Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters, 14290-14293 [2021-05252]
Download as PDF
14290
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules
RIN 2120–AA64
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
14 CFR Part 39
Federal Aviation Administration
Since issuance of the NPRM, the
design approval holder has reviewed its
records and determined that the affected
blade assemblies have been removed
from service. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that AD action is not
required and the NPRM is withdrawn.
Withdrawal of the NPRM constitutes
only such action and does not preclude
the FAA from further rulemaking on
this issue, nor does it commit the FAA
to any course of action in the future.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to comment on the NPRM.
The FAA received comments from one
commenter.
Erickson requested deletions,
corrections, and additions to the NPRM.
The FAA acknowledges the
commenter’s requests. However,
because the FAA is withdrawing the
NPRM, the commenter’s request is no
longer necessary.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration of the
available information, the FAA has
determined that the NPRM is
unnecessary. Accordingly, the NPRM is
withdrawn.
Regulatory Findings
Since this action only withdraws an
NPRM, it is neither a proposed nor a
final rule. This action therefore is not
covered under Executive Order 12866,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking, Docket No. FAA–2007–
0373, Directorate Identifier 2006–SW–
14–AD, which was published in the
Federal Register on December 31, 2007
(72 FR 74210), is withdrawn.
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0145; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–01212–R]
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 817–222–5110. It is also
available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0145.
prevent failure of the tail rotor blade
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
Issued on March 8, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–05219 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and
EC130T2 helicopters. This proposed AD
was prompted by a report of cracks and
geometrical non-conformities of the tail
rotor blades (TRBs); all cracks initiated
in the drain hole area at the blade root
section. This proposed AD would
require cleaning affected parts, visual
and dye penetrant inspections for cracks
of affected parts, a dimensional
inspection to verify conformity of
affected parts, and corrective actions if
necessary, as specified in a European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
AD, which is proposed for incorporation
by reference. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on
these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by April 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for
incorporation by reference (IBR) in this
AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000;
email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet:
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0145; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hal
Jensen, Aerospace Engineer, Operational
Safety Branch, FAA, 950 L’Enfant Plaza
SW, Washington, DC 20024; phone:
202–267–9167; email: hal.jensen@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0145; Project Identifier
MCAI–2020–01212–R’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules
visual and dye penetrant inspections for
cracks of affected parts (the cleaning
and visual and dye penetrant
inspections are one-time or repetitive,
depending on the accumulated hours
time in service on the TRB), a one-time
dimensional inspection to verify
conformity of affected parts, and
corrective actions if necessary.
Corrective actions include replacement
of the affected part with a serviceable
part, and additional repetitive cleaning
and inspections until replacement of the
affected part with a serviceable part.
This material is reasonably available
because the interested parties have
access to it through their normal course
of business or by the means identified
in the ADDRESSES section.
14291
The EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD
2020–0187, dated August 21, 2020
(EASA AD 2020–0187) (also referred to
as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the
MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus Helicopters Model
EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters.
This proposed AD was prompted by
a report of cracks and geometrical nonconformities of the TRBs on an EC130B4
helicopter; all cracks initiated in the
drain hole area at the blade root section.
The same TRBs can be installed on
EC130T2 helicopters. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address
geometrical non-conformities of the
TRBs, which could lead to crack
initiation and consequent blade failure,
and possible loss of control of the
helicopter. See the MCAI for additional
background information.
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI referenced
above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the
relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described
previously is likely to exist or develop
in other products of the same type
design.
process, the FAA initially worked with
Airbus and EASA to develop a process
to use certain EASA ADs as the primary
source of information for compliance
with requirements for corresponding
FAA ADs. The FAA has since
coordinated with other manufacturers
and civil aviation authorities (CAAs) to
use this process. As a result, EASA AD
2020–0187 will be incorporated by
reference in the FAA final rule. This
proposed AD would, therefore, require
compliance with EASA AD 2020–0187
in its entirety, through that
incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same
as the heading of a particular section in
the EASA AD does not mean that
operators need comply only with that
section. For example, where the AD
requirement refers to ‘‘all required
actions and compliance times,’’
compliance with this AD requirement is
not limited to the section titled
‘‘Required Action(s) and Compliance
Time(s)’’ in the EASA AD. Service
information specified in EASA AD
2020–0187 that is required for
compliance with EASA AD 2020–0187
will be available on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0145 after the FAA final
rule is published.
Proposed AD Requirements
Interim Action
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Explanation of Required Compliance
Information
EASA AD 2020–0187 describes
procedures for cleaning affected parts,
In the FAA’s ongoing efforts to
improve the efficiency of the AD
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Hal Jensen, Aerospace
Engineer, Operational Safety Branch,
FAA, 950 L’Enfant Plaza SW,
Washington, DC 20024; phone: 202–
267–9167; email: hal.jensen@faa.gov.
Any commentary that the FAA receives
that is not specifically designated as CBI
will be placed in the public docket for
this rulemaking.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
Discussion
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
EASA AD 2020–0187, described
previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
The FAA considers this proposed AD
interim action. If final action is later
identified, the FAA might consider
further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 264 helicopters of U.S.
registry. The FAA estimates the
following costs to comply with this
proposed AD:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
Cost on U.S.
operators
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ..........................................................................................
$0
$595
$157,080
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
the results of any required actions. The
FAA has no way of determining the
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
number of helicopters that might need
these on-condition actions:
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
14292
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules
ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
4 work-hours × $85 per hour = $340 ......................................................................................................................
$4,641
$4,981
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive:
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2021–
0145; Project Identifier MCAI–2020–
01212–R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by April
29, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters
Model EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters,
certificated in any category, with a tail rotor
blade (TRB), obtained by forging, part
number 350A33–3002–02, 350A33–3002–03,
350A33–3002–04, or 350A33–3002–05
installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC)
Code 6410, Tail rotor blades.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of
cracks and geometrical non-conformities of
the TRBs; all cracks initiated in the drain
hole area at the blade root section. The FAA
is issuing this AD to address geometrical
non-conformities of the TRBs, which could
lead to crack initiation and consequent blade
failure, and possible loss of control of the
helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–0187, dated
August 21, 2020 (EASA AD 2020–0187).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0187
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0187 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2020–0187 does not apply to this AD.
(3) Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0187 specifies
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
to discard certain parts, this AD does not
include that requirement.
(4) Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0187 specifies
to return certain parts, this AD does not
include that requirement.
(5) Where EASA AD 2020–0187 refers to
flight hours (FH), this AD requires using
hours time-in-service.
(6) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0187 specifies
to ‘‘contact customer support,’’ this AD does
not include that requirement.
(7) Where the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0187 specifies
to measure using the Smartphone
application, the PowerPoint method, or
‘‘Contacting customer support with a specific
procedure,’’ those methods of measurement
are not required by this AD.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information
referenced in EASA AD 2020–0187 specifies
to submit certain information to the
manufacturer, this AD does not include that
requirement.
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in
accordance with 14 CFR 21.197 and 21.199
to operate the helicopter to a location where
the helicopter can be modified (if the
operator elects to do so), provided that the
helicopter is operated under visual flight
rules.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the International Validation Branch, send
it to the attention of the person identified in
paragraph (l)(2) of this AD. Information may
be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR-730-AMOC@
faa.gov. Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(l) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020–0187, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000;
email: ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet:
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Proposed Rules
For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 817–222–5110. This
material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0145.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Hal Jensen, Aerospace Engineer,
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 950
L’Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20024;
phone: 202–267–9167; email: hal.jensen@
faa.gov.
Issued on March 9, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–05252 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
0720; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this AD action,
any comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Schwetz, Aerospace Engineer,
Aviation Safety Section, Boston ACO
Branch, FAA, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, MA 01803; phone: 781–
238–7761; email: michael.schwetz@
faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Discussion
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2010–0720; Project
Identifier 2010–SW–050–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky)
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Proposed rule; withdrawal.
AGENCY:
The FAA is withdrawing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
that proposed to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) that would
have applied to certain Sikorsky Model
S–92A helicopters. The NPRM was
prompted by a fatigue analysis
conducted after a helicopter was found
with a severed main gearbox (MGB)
mounting foot pad (foot pad) that failed
due to fatigue. The NPRM would have
required revising the airworthiness
limitations section of the existing
Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICA) for your helicopter
to reduce the life limit of the MGB
housing and replacing any MGB
housing that exceeds the life limit.
Since issuance of the NPRM, the FAA
has determined that the affected MGB
housings are no longer in service.
Accordingly, the NPRM is withdrawn.
DATES: The FAA is withdrawing the
proposed rule published July 21, 2010
(75 FR 42340), as of March 15, 2021.
ADDRESSES:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2010–
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
The FAA has issued an NPRM that
proposed to amend 14 CFR part 39 by
adding an AD that would apply to the
specified products. The NPRM was
published in the Federal Register on
July 21, 2010 (75 FR 42340). The NPRM
was prompted by a fatigue analysis
conducted after a helicopter was found
with a severed foot pad that failed due
to fatigue.
The NPRM proposed to require
revising the existing airworthiness
limitations section of the ICA for your
helicopter to reduce the life limit of the
MGB housing and replacing any MGB
housing that exceeds the life limit. The
proposed actions were intended to
address failure of the foot pad, loss of
the MGB, and subsequent loss of control
of the helicopter.
14293
The FAA acknowledges that, in the
event of publication of a final rule,
Sikorsky Aircraft’s request would have
been valuable in clarifying the language.
However, this NPRM will not be
published as a final rule. The FAA has
determined that the affected MGB
housings are no longer in service, and
that the NPRM is no longer necessary.
FAA’s Conclusions
Upon further consideration, the FAA
has determined that the NPRM is
unnecessary. Accordingly, the NPRM is
withdrawn.
Regulatory Findings
Since this action only withdraws an
NPRM, it is neither a proposed nor a
final rule. This action therefore is not
covered under Executive Order 12866,
the Regulatory Flexibility Act, or DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034, February 26, 1979).
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Withdrawal
Accordingly, the notice of proposed
rulemaking, Docket No. FAA–2010–
0720, which was published in the
Federal Register on July 21, 2010 (75 FR
42340), is withdrawn.
Issued on January 25, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–05194 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since issuance of the NPRM, the FAA
has determined that the affected MGB
housings are no longer in service and
the identified unsafe condition no
longer exists. Therefore, the FAA has
determined that AD action is not
appropriate.
Withdrawal of the NPRM constitutes
only such action and does not preclude
the FAA from further rulemaking on
this issue, nor does it commit the FAA
to any course of action in the future.
Comments
The FAA gave the public the
opportunity to comment on the NPRM.
The following presents the comments
received on the NPRM and the FAA’s
response to each comment.
Request To Clarify Certain Language in
the NPRM
Sikorsky Aircraft requested that the
FAA clarify certain language in the
NPRM.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0086; Airspace
Docket No. 21–AGL–4]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Revocation of V–271 and
Amendment of V–285 in the Vicinity of
Manistee, MI
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
revoke the Very High Frequency
Omnidirectional Range (VOR) Federal
airway V–271 and amend the VOR
Federal airway V–285 in the vicinity of
Manistee, MI. The airway amendments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\15MRP1.SGM
15MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 48 (Monday, March 15, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 14290-14293]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05252]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0145; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-01212-R]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters. This
proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracks and geometrical non-
conformities of the tail rotor blades (TRBs); all cracks initiated in
the drain hole area at the blade root section. This proposed AD would
require cleaning affected parts, visual and dye penetrant inspections
for cracks of affected parts, a dimensional inspection to verify
conformity of affected parts, and corrective actions if necessary, as
specified in a European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD, which
is proposed for incorporation by reference. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 29,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for incorporation by reference (IBR)
in this AD, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email: [email protected]; internet:
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this material on the EASA website at
https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this material at the FAA,
Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability
of this material at the FAA, call 817-222-5110. It is also available in
the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0145.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0145; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Hal Jensen, Aerospace Engineer,
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 950 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC
20024; phone: 202-267-9167; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0145; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-01212-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated
[[Page 14291]]
as private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the
submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be
sent to Hal Jensen, Aerospace Engineer, Operational Safety Branch, FAA,
950 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20024; phone: 202-267-9167;
email: [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives that is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, has issued EASA AD 2020-0187, dated August 21, 2020
(EASA AD 2020-0187) (also referred to as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or the MCAI), to correct an unsafe condition
for all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report of cracks and geometrical
non-conformities of the TRBs on an EC130B4 helicopter; all cracks
initiated in the drain hole area at the blade root section. The same
TRBs can be installed on EC130T2 helicopters. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address geometrical non-conformities of the TRBs, which could
lead to crack initiation and consequent blade failure, and possible
loss of control of the helicopter. See the MCAI for additional
background information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
EASA AD 2020-0187 describes procedures for cleaning affected parts,
visual and dye penetrant inspections for cracks of affected parts (the
cleaning and visual and dye penetrant inspections are one-time or
repetitive, depending on the accumulated hours time in service on the
TRB), a one-time dimensional inspection to verify conformity of
affected parts, and corrective actions if necessary. Corrective actions
include replacement of the affected part with a serviceable part, and
additional repetitive cleaning and inspections until replacement of the
affected part with a serviceable part. This material is reasonably
available because the interested parties have access to it through
their normal course of business or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, the FAA
has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all the relevant information and determined the unsafe
condition described previously is likely to exist or develop in other
products of the same type design.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in EASA AD 2020-0187, described previously, as incorporated by
reference, except for any differences identified as exceptions in the
regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Explanation of Required Compliance Information
In the FAA's ongoing efforts to improve the efficiency of the AD
process, the FAA initially worked with Airbus and EASA to develop a
process to use certain EASA ADs as the primary source of information
for compliance with requirements for corresponding FAA ADs. The FAA has
since coordinated with other manufacturers and civil aviation
authorities (CAAs) to use this process. As a result, EASA AD 2020-0187
will be incorporated by reference in the FAA final rule. This proposed
AD would, therefore, require compliance with EASA AD 2020-0187 in its
entirety, through that incorporation, except for any differences
identified as exceptions in the regulatory text of this proposed AD.
Using common terms that are the same as the heading of a particular
section in the EASA AD does not mean that operators need comply only
with that section. For example, where the AD requirement refers to
``all required actions and compliance times,'' compliance with this AD
requirement is not limited to the section titled ``Required Action(s)
and Compliance Time(s)'' in the EASA AD. Service information specified
in EASA AD 2020-0187 that is required for compliance with EASA AD 2020-
0187 will be available on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0145 after the FAA
final rule is published.
Interim Action
The FAA considers this proposed AD interim action. If final action
is later identified, the FAA might consider further rulemaking then.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 264 helicopters of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per Cost on U.S.
Labor cost Parts cost product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7 work-hours x $85 per hour = $595........................... $0 $595 $157,080
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
helicopters that might need these on-condition actions:
[[Page 14292]]
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
4 work-hours x $85 per hour = $340.... $4,641 $4,981
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive:
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2021-0145; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-01212-R.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by April 29, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and
EC130T2 helicopters, certificated in any category, with a tail rotor
blade (TRB), obtained by forging, part number 350A33-3002-02,
350A33-3002-03, 350A33-3002-04, or 350A33-3002-05 installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft System Component (JASC) Code 6410, Tail rotor
blades.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of cracks and geometrical non-
conformities of the TRBs; all cracks initiated in the drain hole
area at the blade root section. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address geometrical non-conformities of the TRBs, which could lead
to crack initiation and consequent blade failure, and possible loss
of control of the helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this AD: Comply with all
required actions and compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
2020-0187, dated August 21, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0187).
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020-0187
(1) Where EASA AD 2020-0187 refers to its effective date, this
AD requires using the effective date of this AD.
(2) The ``Remarks'' section of EASA AD 2020-0187 does not apply
to this AD.
(3) Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0187 specifies to discard certain parts, this AD does not include
that requirement.
(4) Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0187 specifies to return certain parts, this AD does not include
that requirement.
(5) Where EASA AD 2020-0187 refers to flight hours (FH), this AD
requires using hours time-in-service.
(6) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0187 specifies to ``contact customer support,'' this AD does not
include that requirement.
(7) Where the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-
0187 specifies to measure using the Smartphone application, the
PowerPoint method, or ``Contacting customer support with a specific
procedure,'' those methods of measurement are not required by this
AD.
(i) No Reporting Requirement
Although the service information referenced in EASA AD 2020-0187
specifies to submit certain information to the manufacturer, this AD
does not include that requirement.
(j) Special Flight Permit
Special flight permits may be issued in accordance with 14 CFR
21.197 and 21.199 to operate the helicopter to a location where the
helicopter can be modified (if the operator elects to do so),
provided that the helicopter is operated under visual flight rules.
(k) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, has the
authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the International Validation Branch, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (l)(2) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected]. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
(l) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020-0187, contact the EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-
Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne, Germany; phone: +49 221 8999 000; email:
[email protected]; internet: www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://ad.easa.europa.eu. You may
view this material at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
[[Page 14293]]
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA,
call 817-222-5110. This material may be found in the AD docket on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0145.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Hal Jensen,
Aerospace Engineer, Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 950 L'Enfant
Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20024; phone: 202-267-9167; email:
[email protected].
Issued on March 9, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-05252 Filed 3-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P