Security Zone; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 13649-13650 [2021-05079]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Need for Correction
As published the final regulations (TD
9936) that contain errors that need to be
corrected.
Correction of Publication
Accordingly, the final regulations (TD
9936) that are the subject of FR Doc.
2020–27009, which published on
January 15, 2021 (86 FR 4516), are
corrected as follows:
1. On page 4532, the third column,
the ninth line from the bottom of the
last partial paragraph, the language
‘‘claims’’ is corrected to read ‘‘claims,’’.
2. On page 4534, the third column,
the tenth line from the bottom of the
first partial paragraph, the language
‘‘1000’’ is corrected to read ‘‘1,000’’.
3. On page 4541, the third column,
the last line of the third paragraph by
removing the language ‘‘Id.’’.
4. On page 4553, the second column,
the last line of the first full paragraph,
the language ‘‘[X]’’ is corrected to read
‘‘1545–1002’’.
Crystal Pemberton,
Senior Federal Register Liaison, Legal
Processing Division, Associate Chief Counsel
(Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2021–04790 Filed 3–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2021–0133]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; San Diego Bay, San
Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary security zone
for all navigable waters within a 200yard radius of the U.S. Coast Guard
Cutter (USCGC) BERTHOLF while
berthed at 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal in San Diego, CA. The security
zone is needed to protect the military
vessel, personnel in and around the
military vessel, navigable waterways,
and waterfront facilities. Entry of
vessels or persons into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Diego.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30
a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on March 10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2021–
0133 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant John Santorum,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone
619–278–7656, email MarineEventsSD@
uscg.mil.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it
would be impracticable based on the
unpredictable nature of vessel
operations and the fact that details of
the port call were not finalized until
March 3, 2021. This security zone is
required to protect the military vessel,
personnel in and around the military
vessel, navigable waterways, and
waterfront facilities while the vessel is
docked at the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal. It is impracticable to publish
an NPRM because we must establish
this security zone by March 10, 2021.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable
because the security zone is needed on
March 10, 2021 to provide for the
security of the military vessel, personnel
in and around the military vessel,
navigable waterways, and waterfront
facilities while the vessel is docked at
the 10th Avenue Marine Terminal.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
13649
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034. The
Captain of the Port Sector San Diego
(COTP) has determined that the
presence of the military vessel at this
location presents a potential target for
terrorist attack, sabotage, or other
subversive acts, accidents, or other
causes of similar nature. This rule is
needed to protect the military vessel,
personnel in and around the military
vessel, navigable waterways, and
waterfront facilities while the vessel is
docked at the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone
from 8:30 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on
March 10, 2021. The security zone will
cover all navigable waters within a 200yard radius around the USCGC
BERTHOLF while berthed at 10th
Avenue Marine Terminal in San Diego,
CA. The duration of the zone is
intended to protect the military vessel,
personnel in and around the military
vessel, navigable waterways, and
waterfront facilities while the vessel is
docked at the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal. No vessel or person will be
permitted to enter the security zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or a designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
This rule has not been designated a
‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ under
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly,
this rule has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, and
limited duration of the security zone.
This zone impacts a small designated
area of the San Diego Bay for a very
limited period. Furthermore, vessel
traffic can safely transit around the
security zone.
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
13650
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 10, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A. above,
this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:13 Mar 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01, Rev. 1, associated
implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST
5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves
establishment of a security zone lasting
only 2 hours on the navigable waters of
San Diego Bay. It is categorically
excluded from further review under
paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table
1 of DHS Instruction Manual 023–01–
001–01, Rev. 1. A Record of
Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket. For instructions
on locating the docket, see the
ADDRESSES section of this preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–050 to read as
follows:
■
§ 165.T11–050 Security Zone; San Diego
Bay; San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone: All waters of San Diego
Bay, from surface to bottom, within a
200-yard radius of the U.S. Coast Guard
Cutter BERTHOLF while berthed at 10th
Avenue Marine Terminal in San Diego,
CA.
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port Sector San Diego (COTP) in the
enforcement of the security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, you may not enter the security
zone described in paragraph (a) of this
section unless authorized by the COTP
or the COTP’s designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter,
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative by VHF Channel 16.
Those in the security zone must comply
with all lawful orders or directions
given to them by the COTP or the
COTP’s designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 8:30 a.m. until
10:30 a.m. on March 10, 2021.
Dated: March 5, 2021.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2021–05079 Filed 3–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\10MRR1.SGM
10MRR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 10, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 13649-13650]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05079]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2021-0133]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone for
all navigable waters within a 200-yard radius of the U.S. Coast Guard
Cutter (USCGC) BERTHOLF while berthed at 10th Avenue Marine Terminal in
San Diego, CA. The security zone is needed to protect the military
vessel, personnel in and around the military vessel, navigable
waterways, and waterfront facilities. Entry of vessels or persons into
this zone is prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain
of the Port San Diego.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8:30 a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on March
10, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2021-0133 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant John Santorum, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone 619-278-7656, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it would be impracticable based on
the unpredictable nature of vessel operations and the fact that details
of the port call were not finalized until March 3, 2021. This security
zone is required to protect the military vessel, personnel in and
around the military vessel, navigable waterways, and waterfront
facilities while the vessel is docked at the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal. It is impracticable to publish an NPRM because we must
establish this security zone by March 10, 2021.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying the effective date of
this rule would be impracticable because the security zone is needed on
March 10, 2021 to provide for the security of the military vessel,
personnel in and around the military vessel, navigable waterways, and
waterfront facilities while the vessel is docked at the 10th Avenue
Marine Terminal.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034. The Captain of the Port Sector San Diego (COTP) has determined
that the presence of the military vessel at this location presents a
potential target for terrorist attack, sabotage, or other subversive
acts, accidents, or other causes of similar nature. This rule is needed
to protect the military vessel, personnel in and around the military
vessel, navigable waterways, and waterfront facilities while the vessel
is docked at the 10th Avenue Marine Terminal.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a security zone from 8:30 a.m. until 10:30
a.m. on March 10, 2021. The security zone will cover all navigable
waters within a 200-yard radius around the USCGC BERTHOLF while berthed
at 10th Avenue Marine Terminal in San Diego, CA. The duration of the
zone is intended to protect the military vessel, personnel in and
around the military vessel, navigable waterways, and waterfront
facilities while the vessel is docked at the 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal. No vessel or person will be permitted to enter the security
zone without obtaining permission from the COTP or a designated
representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. This rule has not been designated a ``significant
regulatory action,'' under Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, this
rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB).
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, and limited duration of the security zone. This zone impacts
a small designated area of the San Diego Bay for a very limited period.
Furthermore, vessel traffic can safely transit around the security
zone.
[[Page 13650]]
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule
will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of
small entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A. above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on
any vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01, Rev. 1, associated implementing instructions, and
Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series), which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have determined that this action is one of
a category of actions that do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. This rule involves
establishment of a security zone lasting only 2 hours on the navigable
waters of San Diego Bay. It is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) of Appendix A, Table 1 of DHS Instruction
Manual 023-01-001-01, Rev. 1. A Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is available in the docket. For
instructions on locating the docket, see the ADDRESSES section of this
preamble.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places, or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-050 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-050 Security Zone; San Diego Bay; San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone: All waters of
San Diego Bay, from surface to bottom, within a 200-yard radius of the
U.S. Coast Guard Cutter BERTHOLF while berthed at 10th Avenue Marine
Terminal in San Diego, CA.
(b) Definitions. As used in this section, designated representative
means a Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain,
petty officer, or other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel and a
Federal, State, and local officer designated by or assisting the
Captain of the Port Sector San Diego (COTP) in the enforcement of the
security zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, you may not enter the security zone described
in paragraph (a) of this section unless authorized by the COTP or the
COTP's designated representative.
(2) To seek permission to enter, contact the COTP or the COTP's
representative by VHF Channel 16. Those in the security zone must
comply with all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP
or the COTP's designated representative.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 8:30
a.m. until 10:30 a.m. on March 10, 2021.
Dated: March 5, 2021.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Sector San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2021-05079 Filed 3-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P