Disposition of Fast Critical Assembly Plutonium, 13359-13360 [2021-04707]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Disposition of Fast Critical Assembly
Plutonium
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
AGENCY:
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
Department of Energy (DOE), is
amending its prior decision to
disposition up to 350 kilograms (kg) of
foreign Gap Material Plutonium from
preparation for emplacement in the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to
disposition using an electrolytic
dissolver in H-Canyon, vitrification with
high level radioactive waste (HLW) at
the Defense Waste Processing Facility
(DWPF), and storage at Savannah River
Site (SRS) until a geologic repository is
available. NNSA has determined
through feasibility and process
technology studies that this disposition
path could be performed at a
substantially lower cost than
preparation for disposal at WIPP. NNSA
has prepared a Supplement Analysis
(SA) to inform this amended decision
and has determined that no additional
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) review is necessary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this Amended
Record of Decision (ROD) or the Fast
Critical Assembly (FCA) SA, or to
receive related NEPA documents, please
contact: Ms. Amy Miller, NEPA
Compliance Officer, National Nuclear
Security Administration, Office of
General Counsel, (505) 845–5090; or by
email to amy.miller@nnsa.doe.gov. This
Amended ROD and the FCA SA (DOE/
EIS–0283–S2–SA–02, Supplement
Analysis for the Disposition of Fast
Critical Assembly Plutonium, January
2021) will be available on the internet
at https://energy.gov/nepa. For further
information on FCA disposition, contact
Ms. Lisa McGuire, Office of Material
Management and Minimization,
National Nuclear Security
Administration, (803) 952–6921 or
email at lisa.mcguire@nnsa.srs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
Background
In the Surplus Plutonium Disposition
Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS)
(DOE/EIS–0283–S2, April 2015), NNSA
evaluated disposition options for 13.1
metric tons (MT) of surplus plutonium
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
consisting of 6 MT of non-pit material
and 7.1 MT of pit material. The 6 MT
of surplus non-pit plutonium included
0.9 MT (900 kg) of excess capacity to
allow for the possibility that the NNSA
might identify additional quantities of
surplus plutonium that could be
processed for disposition using the
facilities and capabilities analyzed in
the SPD Supplemental EIS.
NNSA assessed the impacts of
shipment, receipt, treatment, storage,
and disposition of up to 900 kilograms
(kg) of foreign Gap Material Plutonium,
of which the FCA fuel is a subset, in an
Environmental Assessment (EA) for Gap
Material Plutonium—Transport,
Receipt, and Processing (DOE/EA–2024,
December 2015), with a subsequent
Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI). In the 2015 EA, NNSA noted
that up to 375 kg of the Gap Material
Plutonium may require stabilization
prior to disposition. NNSA further
stated that interim storage and
disposition of the Gap Material
Plutonium would be in accordance with
decisions made for disposition of U.S.
surplus plutonium in the SPD
Supplemental EIS.
In a 2016 ROD (81 FR 19588, April 5,
2016), NNSA announced its decision to
implement the preferred alternative, the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP)
(Dilute and Dispose) Alternative, for
disposition of 6 MT of surplus,
weapons-usable, non-pit plutonium. In
the 2016 ROD, NNSA refers specifically
to the 2015 Gap Material Plutonium EA.
In the SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA
evaluated five alternatives for
disposition of 6 MT of plutonium,
which includes the 900 kg of Gap
Material Plutonium, including the HCanyon/HB-Line to DWPF Alternative
and WIPP (Dilute and Dispose)
Alternative.
Based on an international agreement,
the Japan Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA)
is providing funding to NNSA to
disposition the FCA plutonium (FCA
fuel), a subset of the Gap Material
Plutonium. The United States received
the FCA fuel from Japan for
nonproliferation purposes to disposition
it safely and securely, and it is currently
stored at SRS awaiting further
processing for final disposition.
The FCA fuel is different from the rest
of the 6 MT because it is clad in
stainless steel, whereas the majority of
the 6 MT is not clad in stainless steel.
The stainless-steel cladding must be
removed prior to processing the
plutonium. As described in the 2015
Gap Material Plutonium EA, NNSA
intended to separate the FCA fuel from
its stainless-steel cladding and convert
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13359
it to an oxide form 1 for dilution at SRS
to meet the waste acceptance criteria for
disposal at WIPP near Carlsbad, New
Mexico. Because of the high cost to
install and operate a decladding and
oxide conversion process, NNSA
initiated an evaluation of alternative
processing technologies. Based on these
feasibility and process technology
studies, NNSA determined that
electrolytic dissolution could be
performed at SRS at a substantially
lower cost than the mechanical
decladding and oxidation process.
Based on results of studies and
experiments conducted by Savannah
River Nuclear Solutions in 2017 and
2018, NNSA is changing the disposition
path for up to 350 kg of FCA fuel.
Instead of using the WIPP Alternative,
NNSA will employ the H-Canyon/HBLine Alternative, using a dissolver in
H-Canyon, vitrification with HLW at the
Defense Waste Processing Facility
(DWPF), and storage at SRS until a
geologic repository is available, as
described in the SPD Supplemental EIS.
However, NNSA will use an electrolytic
dissolver rather than a chemical
dissolver in H-Canyon to dissolve the
FCA fuel to prepare it for transfer to
DWPF.
Disposition Process
The material will be dissolved using
an electrolytic dissolver in H-Canyon.
The DOE Office of Environmental
Management (DOE/EM) categorically
excluded replacement of a failed
electrolytic dissolution unit in HCanyon with a spare electrolytic
dissolution unit. (OBU–H–2019–0006,
January 14, 2019, available at https://
www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx019585-electrolytic-dissolution-fastcritical-assembly-material).
The FCA fuel will be transported to
H-Canyon where containers of the FCA
fuel will be removed from the shipping
packages and placed in or attached to a
charging device for transport to the
dissolver. After preparing the
electrolytic dissolver with a cold
chemical solution of nitric acid, the
cans will be charged to (placed in) the
dissolver. Electrical power will be
applied to the dissolver resulting in the
dissolution of the FCA cladding and
fuel. The only difference between the HCanyon process used to dissolve the
FCA fuel with an electrolytic dissolver
rather than a chemical dissolver is the
1 The majority of FCA fuel is stainless-steel clad
alloy and requires conversion to an oxide prior to
dilution. A small portion of the FCA fuel is
stainless-steel clad oxide and, therefore, would not
require conversion prior to dilution. This AROD
applies to both the stainless-steel clad alloy and the
stainless-steel clad oxide.
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
13360
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Notices
application of the electrical current.
NNSA estimates that dissolution will be
complete in less than 24 hours per
charge. After each dissolution cycle is
complete, solution samples will be
obtained to ensure complete dissolution
of the FCA fuel. If necessary, a
subsequent heating step will be
performed to complete the dissolution
process. NNSA estimates that 18 batches
would be required to complete
processing of the FCA fuel. After
completion of each batch, the material
will be transferred to an accountability
tank in H-Canyon and then to a canyon
vessel for storage and eventual transfer
to the H-Tank Farm. Immobilization and
storage of the material will occur at
DWPF pending disposal in a geologic
repository. NNSA estimates that
vitrification of the FCA fuel along with
HLW at DWPF will result in three waste
canisters.
The electrolytic dissolution process is
very similar to the chemical dissolution
process as described in Appendix B,
section B.1.3, of the SPD Supplemental
EIS. Dissolved FCA fuel solutions will
be very similar to those resulting from
chemical dissolution, and compatible
with transfer to the H-Area Tank Farm
pending immobilization in DWPF. FCA
dissolution operations would be
scheduled in conjunction with other HCanyon operations and coordinated
with tank farm and DWPF operations.
In the SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA
evaluated disposition of 6 MT of
plutonium using both the H-Canyon/
HB-Line to DWPF Alternative and the
WIPP Alternative. The impact
assessment of both alternatives includes
up to 350 kg of FCA fuel. In the
Supplement Analysis for Disposition of
FCA Plutonium, NNSA compared the
impacts of processing 350 kg of FCA
fuel using both alternatives.
Differences in doses and potential
latent cancer fatalities to workers and
the public between the WIPP
Alternative and the H-Canyon/HB-Line
Alternative are minor. In the case of
electrolytic dissolution, worker dose
would be lower than the H-Canyon/HBLine chemical dissolution and WIPP
alternatives. Both would require
handling and de-cladding of the fuel
prior to processing. In the SPD
Supplemental EIS (Tables 4–3 and 4–4),
NNSA estimated radiation doses and
impacts, in terms of latent cancer
fatalities (LCFs), from operations for the
H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative
(including the material evaluated in the
SA) to workers and the public. Worker
doses were estimated to be less than the
SRS administrative limit of 500
millirem (mrem) per year, resulting in
no LCFs on an annual basis. Over the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:05 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
life of the H-Canyon/HB-Line to DWPF
Alternative (13 years), NNSA estimated
that operations could result in an
estimated 2 LCFs to involved workers
and none to members of the public or
the maximally exposed individual. The
proposed action was included in the
estimates for the H-Canyon/HB-Line
Alternative. No LCFs in addition to
those NNSA previously estimated
would result from implementation of
the proposed action.
Vitrification of the FCA fuel in DWPF
would result in an estimated three HLW
glass canisters. Less CH–TRU waste
would be generated using the
H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative because
WIPP alternative processing results in
TRU waste for disposal at WIPP. Other
differences in waste generation are
minor.
To ensure safe and secure operations,
NNSA, in conjunction with DOE/EM,
which owns the facilities, would review
and revise, as needed, safety basis
documents for all involved facilities at
SRS.
Basis for Decision
To disposition the FCA fuel the
H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative can be
implemented at a substantially lower
cost than the WIPP Alternative. The SRS
H-Canyon has used electrolytic
dissolution in the past. The process is
well known and can be implemented
with little technology maturation. The
impacts from activities related to the
disposition of FCA fuel have been
evaluated in the SPD Supplemental EIS.
There are no substantial differences in
environmental impacts between using
the electrolytic dissolver and the
standard H-Canyon dissolver for this
amount of material (up to 350 kg). All
processes downstream of the dissolver
are the same as those analyzed in the
H-Canyon/HB-Line to DWPF
Alternative. The FCA fuel would be
prepared for disposition and safely
stored at SRS in existing facilities
pending the availability of a geologic
repository.
Amended Decision
NNSA has decided to change the
disposition pathway for up to 350 kg
FCA fuel from the WIPP Disposal
Alternative to the H-Canyon/HB-Line to
DWPF Alternative, as described and
evaluated in the SPD Supplemental EIS.
NNSA will use electrolytic dissolution
instead of chemical dissolution because
the FCA fuel is clad in stainless steel.
FCA fuel comprises less than half of
the 0.9 MT of gap material plutonium
evaluated in DOE/EA–2024, and less
than 6 percent of the 6 MT NNSA
decided to disposition using the WIPP
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Disposal Alternative. NNSA remains
committed to dispositioning 6 MT of
surplus plutonium using the WIPP
Disposal Alternative, as NNSA
previously decided (81 FR 19588, April
5, 2016).
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on March 1, 2021, by
Charles P. Verdon, Acting Under
Secretary for Nuclear Security and
Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 3,
2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021–04707 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket Nos. CP15–554–009; CP15–555–
007]
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, Eastern
Gas Transmission and Storage, Inc.;
Notice of Amendment of Certificates
and Opening of Scoping Period
Take notice that on January 4, 2021,
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP), 120
Tredegar Street, Richmond, VA 23219,
filed its Atlantic Coast Project
Disposition and Restoration Plan, and
on November 20, 2020, Eastern Gas
Transmission and Storage, Inc. (EGTS),1
6603 West Broad Street, Richmond,
Virginia 23230, filed the Supply Header
Project Restoration Plan.2 On July 5,
2020, Dominion Energy Transmission,
1 On November 1, 2020, Dominion Energy sold
certain companies including Dominion Energy
Transmission, Inc., the Supply Header Project
developer, to Berkshire Hathaway Energy Company
and Dominion Energy Transmission, Inc. changed
its name to Eastern Gas Transmission and Storage,
Inc.
2 Both plans were submitted in response to
Commission staff’s October 27, 2020 Data Request.
E:\FR\FM\08MRN1.SGM
08MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 43 (Monday, March 8, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13359-13360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04707]
[[Page 13359]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Disposition of Fast Critical Assembly Plutonium
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-
autonomous agency within the Department of Energy (DOE), is amending
its prior decision to disposition up to 350 kilograms (kg) of foreign
Gap Material Plutonium from preparation for emplacement in the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) to disposition using an electrolytic
dissolver in H-Canyon, vitrification with high level radioactive waste
(HLW) at the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), and storage at
Savannah River Site (SRS) until a geologic repository is available.
NNSA has determined through feasibility and process technology studies
that this disposition path could be performed at a substantially lower
cost than preparation for disposal at WIPP. NNSA has prepared a
Supplement Analysis (SA) to inform this amended decision and has
determined that no additional National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
review is necessary.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this
Amended Record of Decision (ROD) or the Fast Critical Assembly (FCA)
SA, or to receive related NEPA documents, please contact: Ms. Amy
Miller, NEPA Compliance Officer, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Office of General Counsel, (505) 845-5090; or by email
to [email protected]. This Amended ROD and the FCA SA (DOE/EIS-
0283-S2-SA-02, Supplement Analysis for the Disposition of Fast Critical
Assembly Plutonium, January 2021) will be available on the internet at
https://energy.gov/nepa. For further information on FCA disposition,
contact Ms. Lisa McGuire, Office of Material Management and
Minimization, National Nuclear Security Administration, (803) 952-6921
or email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
In the Surplus Plutonium Disposition Supplemental Environmental
Impact Statement (SPD Supplemental EIS) (DOE/EIS-0283-S2, April 2015),
NNSA evaluated disposition options for 13.1 metric tons (MT) of surplus
plutonium consisting of 6 MT of non-pit material and 7.1 MT of pit
material. The 6 MT of surplus non-pit plutonium included 0.9 MT (900
kg) of excess capacity to allow for the possibility that the NNSA might
identify additional quantities of surplus plutonium that could be
processed for disposition using the facilities and capabilities
analyzed in the SPD Supplemental EIS.
NNSA assessed the impacts of shipment, receipt, treatment, storage,
and disposition of up to 900 kilograms (kg) of foreign Gap Material
Plutonium, of which the FCA fuel is a subset, in an Environmental
Assessment (EA) for Gap Material Plutonium--Transport, Receipt, and
Processing (DOE/EA-2024, December 2015), with a subsequent Finding of
No Significant Impact (FONSI). In the 2015 EA, NNSA noted that up to
375 kg of the Gap Material Plutonium may require stabilization prior to
disposition. NNSA further stated that interim storage and disposition
of the Gap Material Plutonium would be in accordance with decisions
made for disposition of U.S. surplus plutonium in the SPD Supplemental
EIS.
In a 2016 ROD (81 FR 19588, April 5, 2016), NNSA announced its
decision to implement the preferred alternative, the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant (WIPP) (Dilute and Dispose) Alternative, for disposition of
6 MT of surplus, weapons-usable, non-pit plutonium. In the 2016 ROD,
NNSA refers specifically to the 2015 Gap Material Plutonium EA. In the
SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA evaluated five alternatives for disposition
of 6 MT of plutonium, which includes the 900 kg of Gap Material
Plutonium, including the H-Canyon/HB-Line to DWPF Alternative and WIPP
(Dilute and Dispose) Alternative.
Based on an international agreement, the Japan Atomic Energy Agency
(JAEA) is providing funding to NNSA to disposition the FCA plutonium
(FCA fuel), a subset of the Gap Material Plutonium. The United States
received the FCA fuel from Japan for nonproliferation purposes to
disposition it safely and securely, and it is currently stored at SRS
awaiting further processing for final disposition.
The FCA fuel is different from the rest of the 6 MT because it is
clad in stainless steel, whereas the majority of the 6 MT is not clad
in stainless steel. The stainless-steel cladding must be removed prior
to processing the plutonium. As described in the 2015 Gap Material
Plutonium EA, NNSA intended to separate the FCA fuel from its
stainless-steel cladding and convert it to an oxide form \1\ for
dilution at SRS to meet the waste acceptance criteria for disposal at
WIPP near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Because of the high cost to install and
operate a decladding and oxide conversion process, NNSA initiated an
evaluation of alternative processing technologies. Based on these
feasibility and process technology studies, NNSA determined that
electrolytic dissolution could be performed at SRS at a substantially
lower cost than the mechanical decladding and oxidation process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The majority of FCA fuel is stainless-steel clad alloy and
requires conversion to an oxide prior to dilution. A small portion
of the FCA fuel is stainless-steel clad oxide and, therefore, would
not require conversion prior to dilution. This AROD applies to both
the stainless-steel clad alloy and the stainless-steel clad oxide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on results of studies and experiments conducted by Savannah
River Nuclear Solutions in 2017 and 2018, NNSA is changing the
disposition path for up to 350 kg of FCA fuel. Instead of using the
WIPP Alternative, NNSA will employ the H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative,
using a dissolver in H-Canyon, vitrification with HLW at the Defense
Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), and storage at SRS until a geologic
repository is available, as described in the SPD Supplemental EIS.
However, NNSA will use an electrolytic dissolver rather than a chemical
dissolver in H-Canyon to dissolve the FCA fuel to prepare it for
transfer to DWPF.
Disposition Process
The material will be dissolved using an electrolytic dissolver in
H-Canyon. The DOE Office of Environmental Management (DOE/EM)
categorically excluded replacement of a failed electrolytic dissolution
unit in H-Canyon with a spare electrolytic dissolution unit. (OBU-H-
2019-0006, January 14, 2019, available at https://www.energy.gov/nepa/downloads/cx-019585-electrolytic-dissolution-fast-critical-assembly-material).
The FCA fuel will be transported to H-Canyon where containers of
the FCA fuel will be removed from the shipping packages and placed in
or attached to a charging device for transport to the dissolver. After
preparing the electrolytic dissolver with a cold chemical solution of
nitric acid, the cans will be charged to (placed in) the dissolver.
Electrical power will be applied to the dissolver resulting in the
dissolution of the FCA cladding and fuel. The only difference between
the H-Canyon process used to dissolve the FCA fuel with an electrolytic
dissolver rather than a chemical dissolver is the
[[Page 13360]]
application of the electrical current. NNSA estimates that dissolution
will be complete in less than 24 hours per charge. After each
dissolution cycle is complete, solution samples will be obtained to
ensure complete dissolution of the FCA fuel. If necessary, a subsequent
heating step will be performed to complete the dissolution process.
NNSA estimates that 18 batches would be required to complete processing
of the FCA fuel. After completion of each batch, the material will be
transferred to an accountability tank in H-Canyon and then to a canyon
vessel for storage and eventual transfer to the H-Tank Farm.
Immobilization and storage of the material will occur at DWPF pending
disposal in a geologic repository. NNSA estimates that vitrification of
the FCA fuel along with HLW at DWPF will result in three waste
canisters.
The electrolytic dissolution process is very similar to the
chemical dissolution process as described in Appendix B, section B.1.3,
of the SPD Supplemental EIS. Dissolved FCA fuel solutions will be very
similar to those resulting from chemical dissolution, and compatible
with transfer to the H-Area Tank Farm pending immobilization in DWPF.
FCA dissolution operations would be scheduled in conjunction with other
H-Canyon operations and coordinated with tank farm and DWPF operations.
In the SPD Supplemental EIS, NNSA evaluated disposition of 6 MT of
plutonium using both the H-Canyon/HB-Line to DWPF Alternative and the
WIPP Alternative. The impact assessment of both alternatives includes
up to 350 kg of FCA fuel. In the Supplement Analysis for Disposition of
FCA Plutonium, NNSA compared the impacts of processing 350 kg of FCA
fuel using both alternatives.
Differences in doses and potential latent cancer fatalities to
workers and the public between the WIPP Alternative and the H-Canyon/
HB-Line Alternative are minor. In the case of electrolytic dissolution,
worker dose would be lower than the H-Canyon/HB-Line chemical
dissolution and WIPP alternatives. Both would require handling and de-
cladding of the fuel prior to processing. In the SPD Supplemental EIS
(Tables 4-3 and 4-4), NNSA estimated radiation doses and impacts, in
terms of latent cancer fatalities (LCFs), from operations for the H-
Canyon/HB-Line Alternative (including the material evaluated in the SA)
to workers and the public. Worker doses were estimated to be less than
the SRS administrative limit of 500 millirem (mrem) per year, resulting
in no LCFs on an annual basis. Over the life of the H-Canyon/HB-Line to
DWPF Alternative (13 years), NNSA estimated that operations could
result in an estimated 2 LCFs to involved workers and none to members
of the public or the maximally exposed individual. The proposed action
was included in the estimates for the H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative. No
LCFs in addition to those NNSA previously estimated would result from
implementation of the proposed action.
Vitrification of the FCA fuel in DWPF would result in an estimated
three HLW glass canisters. Less CH-TRU waste would be generated using
the H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative because WIPP alternative processing
results in TRU waste for disposal at WIPP. Other differences in waste
generation are minor.
To ensure safe and secure operations, NNSA, in conjunction with
DOE/EM, which owns the facilities, would review and revise, as needed,
safety basis documents for all involved facilities at SRS.
Basis for Decision
To disposition the FCA fuel the H-Canyon/HB-Line Alternative can be
implemented at a substantially lower cost than the WIPP Alternative.
The SRS H-Canyon has used electrolytic dissolution in the past. The
process is well known and can be implemented with little technology
maturation. The impacts from activities related to the disposition of
FCA fuel have been evaluated in the SPD Supplemental EIS. There are no
substantial differences in environmental impacts between using the
electrolytic dissolver and the standard H-Canyon dissolver for this
amount of material (up to 350 kg). All processes downstream of the
dissolver are the same as those analyzed in the H-Canyon/HB-Line to
DWPF Alternative. The FCA fuel would be prepared for disposition and
safely stored at SRS in existing facilities pending the availability of
a geologic repository.
Amended Decision
NNSA has decided to change the disposition pathway for up to 350 kg
FCA fuel from the WIPP Disposal Alternative to the H-Canyon/HB-Line to
DWPF Alternative, as described and evaluated in the SPD Supplemental
EIS. NNSA will use electrolytic dissolution instead of chemical
dissolution because the FCA fuel is clad in stainless steel.
FCA fuel comprises less than half of the 0.9 MT of gap material
plutonium evaluated in DOE/EA-2024, and less than 6 percent of the 6 MT
NNSA decided to disposition using the WIPP Disposal Alternative. NNSA
remains committed to dispositioning 6 MT of surplus plutonium using the
WIPP Disposal Alternative, as NNSA previously decided (81 FR 19588,
April 5, 2016).
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on March 1,
2021, by Charles P. Verdon, Acting Under Secretary for Nuclear Security
and Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date
is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on March 3, 2021.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2021-04707 Filed 3-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P