Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes, 13222-13225 [2021-04395]
Download as PDF
13222
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
Comments on the ANPR were
required to be received on or before
February 26, 2021. We are reopening the
comment period on Docket No. APHIS–
2020–0079 for an additional 60 days.
The comment period will now close on
May 7, 2021. This action will allow
interested persons additional time to
prepare and submit comments.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 8301–8317; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.4.
Done in Washington, DC, this 2nd day of
March 2021 .
Heather Pichelman,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary for Marketing
and Regulatory Programs.
Paul Kiecker,
Acting Deputy Under Secretary, Office for
Food Safety.
[FR Doc. 2021–04716 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0857; Project
Identifier MCAI–2020–00707–A]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA is revising a notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2014–25–04, which applies to all Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC–6, PC–
6–H1, PC–6–H2, PC–6/350, PC–6/350–
H1, PC–6/350–H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/A–H1,
PC–6/A–H2, PC–6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–H2,
PC–6/B2–H2, PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2,
and PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes. This action
revises the NPRM by adding an eddy
current inspection of each fuselage wing
fitting if an earlier version of the service
information was accomplished. The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
Since these actions would impose an
additional burden over those in the
NPRM, the FAA is requesting comments
on this SNPRM.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this SNPRM by April 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this SNPRM, contact Pilatus Aircraft
Ltd., Customer Support General
Aviation, CH–6371 Stans, Switzerland;
phone: +41 848 24 7 365; email:
Techsupport@pilatus-aircraft.com;
website: https://www.pilatusaircraft.com/en. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, MO 64106. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0857; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains the NPRM, this
SNPRM, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, General Aviation &
Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room
301, Kansas City, MO 64106; phone:
(816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–4090;
email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2020–0857; Project Identifier
MCAI–2020–00707–A’’ at the beginning
of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend the proposal
because of those comments.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed
AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this SNPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this SNPRM, it is
important that you clearly designate the
submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket
of this SNPRM. Submissions containing
CBI should be sent to Doug Rudolph,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO
64106. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically
designated as CBI will be placed in the
public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued an NPRM to amend
14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD 2014–
25–04, Amendment 39–18045 (79 FR
73803, December 12, 2014) (AD 2014–
25–04). AD 2014–25–04 applies to all
Pilatus Model PC–6, PC–6–H1, PC–6–
H2, PC–6/350, PC–6/350–H1, PC–6/
350–H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/A–H1, PC–6/A–
H2, PC–6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–H2, PC–6/
B2–H2, PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2, and
PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes and resulted
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. AD 2014–25–04 requires
incorporating revised airworthiness
limitations into the aircraft maintenance
manual (AMM) for your FAA-approved
maintenance program.
The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on October 2, 2020 (85 FR
62266). The NPRM was prompted by
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
MCAI issued by the European Union
Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Union. EASA
superseded its previous MCAIs on this
unsafe condition with EASA AD No.
2020–0120, dated May 27, 2020 (EASA
AD 2020–0120). EASA AD 2020–0120
states that revised airworthiness
limitations for the subject airplanes
introduce new data modules that
require non-destructive visual and eddy
current inspections instead of a
previous requirement for the fluorescent
dye-penetrant method. In the NPRM, the
FAA proposed to require incorporating
the new airworthiness limitations
(revision 29) and performing an eddy
current inspection of the fuselage wing
fittings and wing-to-fuselage fittings.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since the FAA issued the NPRM,
EASA superseded EASA AD 2020–0120
and issued EASA AD No. 2020–0278,
dated December 14, 2020 (EASA AD
2020–0278) (also referred to after this as
‘‘the MCAI’’). According to EASA AD
2020–0278, an installation procedure
specified in the service information
identified in the NPRM contained an
error and, therefore, did not adequately
address the identified unsafe condition.
Pilatus has revised the airworthiness
limitations (revision 30) and issued
corrected service information, which
includes installing certain bushes using
grease instead of a bonding agent and an
additional one-time eddy current
inspection of the fuselage wing fittings
and wing-to-fuselage fittings if the last
inspection was performed using an
earlier version of the service
information. You may examine the
MCAI in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–0857.
This SNPRM was prompted by the
FAA’s determination that the revised
airworthiness limitations and new
inspection procedures are necessary, in
addition to the new life limits proposed
in the NPRM. The FAA is proposing this
AD to address reduced airplane
controllability due to possible loss of
structural integrity of certain parts.
Comments
The FAA received a comment from
Pilatus. The following presents the
comment received on the NPRM and the
FAA’s response to that comment.
Request to Reference Latest Service
Information
Pilatus requested that FAA revise the
NPRM to require using Pilatus PC–6
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document
Number 01975, Revision 30, dated
October 30, 2020; and Pilatus PC–6
Airworthiness Limitations Document
Number 02334, Revision 10, dated
October 30, 2020. In support of its
request, Pilatus stated the installation
procedure in the service information
specified in the NPRM is incorrect.
Pilatus also stated that it has added a
note to the airworthiness limitations
section indicating the data module
procedure has been corrected and
specifying a repeat of the action if it was
last done in accordance with the prior
service information.
The FAA agrees. After Pilatus
submitted its comment, EASA issued
the MCAI to require the revised service
information, as described previously. In
this SNPRM, the FAA proposes to
require the latest service information.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Pilatus issued PC–6 Airworthiness
Limitations Document No. 02334,
Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020;
and Section 04–00–00, Airworthiness
Limitations of Chapter 04,
Airworthiness Limitations, of the
Pilatus PC–6 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual Document No. 01975, Revision
30, dated October 30, 2020. This service
information contains airworthiness
limitations for the stabilizer trim
actuator, fuselage wing fittings, and
wing-to-fuselage fittings. These
documents are distinct since they apply
to different airplane models.
Pilatus also issued Section 53–00–01,
Fuselage Wing Fittings—Inspection/
Check, of the Pilatus PC–6 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Document No.
01975, Revision 30, dated October 30,
2020; Section 57–00–03, Wing to
Fuselage Fittings—Inspection/Check, of
the PC–6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 29,
dated February 28, 2020; Appendix K,
Fuselage Wing Fittings—Inspection/
Check, of the PC–6 Airworthiness
Limitations Document No. 02334,
Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020;
and Appendix L, Wing to Fuselage
Fittings—Inspection/Check, of the PC–6
Airworthiness Limitations Document
No. 02334, Revision 9, dated March 6,
2020. This service information specifies
procedures for repetitive eddy current
inspections of the fuselage wing fittings
and wing-to-fuselage fittings and, if
necessary, installing the bush on the
fuselage wing fittings using grease.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13223
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the State
of Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. The FAA
is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all pertinent information and
determined an unsafe condition exists
and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Certain changes described above
expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, it is necessary to reopen the
comment period to provide additional
opportunity for the public to comment
on this SNPRM.
Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM
This proposed AD would retain none
of the requirements of AD 2014–25–04.
This proposed AD would require
revising the airworthiness limitation
section of the existing AMM or
instructions for continued airworthiness
to incorporate new airworthiness
limitations. The revised limitations
include an eddy current inspection of
the fuselage wing fittings and wing-tofuselage fittings. This proposed AD
would also require, within 50 hours
time-in-service (TIS) for certain bushes,
performing an eddy current inspection
of the fuselage wing fittings and wingto-fuselage fittings and replacing the
bush on the fuselage wing fittings using
grease. Lastly, this proposed AD would
require performing the eddy current
inspection of the fuselage wing fittings
and wing-to-fuselage fittings first within
1,100 hours TIS or 12 months
(whichever occurs first), and thereafter
at the intervals specified in the revised
limitations.
This proposed AD would require
revisions to the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of an
operator’s maintenance documents to
include new inspections. Compliance
with the airworthiness limitations
section is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c).
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if
adopted as proposed, would affect 30
airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA
estimates the following costs to comply
with this proposed AD:
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
13224
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
ESTIMATED COSTS
Action
Labor cost
ALS revision .........................................................
1 work-hour × $85 per
hour = $85.
7 work-hours × $85 per
hour = $595.
Eddy current inspection of the fuselage wing fittings and wing-to-fuselage fittings.
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do the inspections and
installation that would be required if an
Cost per
product
Parts cost
$0
$1,860
Cost on U.S.
operators
$85 ...............................
$2,550.
$2,455 per inspection
cycle.
$73,650 per inspection
cycle.
earlier version of the service
information has been accomplished.
The agency has no way of determining
the number of aircraft that might need
these inspections and installation:
ON-CONDITION COSTS
Action
Labor cost
Visual and eddy current inspection and installation for
certain bushes.
7 work-hours × $85 per hour = $595 ...........................
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2014–25–04, Amendment 39–
18045 (79 FR 73803, December 12,
2014); and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
■
Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Docket No. FAA–
2020–0857; Project Identifier MCAI–
2020–00707–A.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this
airworthiness directive (AD) by April 22,
2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
This AD replaces AD 2014–25–04,
Amendment 39–18045 (79 FR 73803,
December 12, 2014) (AD 2014–25–04).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pilatus Aircraft Limited
Model PC–6, PC–6–H1, PC–6–H2, PC–6/350,
PC–6/350–H1, PC–6/350–H2, PC–6/A, PC–6/
A–H1, PC–6/A–H2, PC–6/B–H2, PC–6/B1–
H2, PC–6/B2–H2, PC–6/B2–H4, PC–6/C–H2,
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Parts cost
$1,860
Cost per
product
$2,455
and PC–6/C1–H2 airplanes, all serial
numbers, certificated in any category.
Note 1 to paragraph (c): These airplanes
may also be identified as Fairchild Republic
Company airplanes, Fairchild Industries
airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter airplanes, or
Fairchild-Hiller Corporation airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance
Checks.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination
that new and more restrictive airworthiness
limitations, new life limits, and new
inspection procedures are necessary. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address reduced
airplane controllability due to possible loss
of structural integrity of certain parts.
(f) Airworthiness Limitations Revision
Unless already done, before further flight,
comply with the actions specified in
paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this AD.
(1) For Models PC–6/B2–H2 and PC–6/B2–
H4 airplanes, revise the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of the existing
maintenance manual or instructions for
continued airworthiness (ICA) for your
airplane as follows:
(i) Replace Section 04–00–00 with Section
04–00–00, Airworthiness Limitations, of
Chapter 04, Airworthiness Limitations, of the
Pilatus PC–6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 30, dated
October 30, 2020.
(ii) Add (or replace, if applicable) Section
53–00–01, Fuselage Wing Fittings—
Inspection/Check, of the Pilatus PC–6
Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document No.
01975, Revision 30, dated October 30, 2020.
(iii) Add Section 57–00–03, Wing to
Fuselage Fittings—Inspection/Check, of the
Pilatus PC–6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 29, dated
February 28, 2020.
(2) For all airplanes specified in paragraph
(c) of this AD except Models PC–6/B2–H2
and PC–6/B2–H4 airplanes, revise the ALS of
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 43 / Monday, March 8, 2021 / Proposed Rules
the existing maintenance manual or ICA for
your airplane as follows:
(i) Replace the ALS with the Airworthiness
Limitations Section of Pilatus PC–6
Airworthiness Limitations Document No.
02334, Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020.
(ii) Add (or replace, if applicable)
Appendix K, Fuselage Wing Fittings—
Inspection/Check, of Pilatus PC 6
Airworthiness Limitations Document No.
02334, Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020.
(iii) Add Appendix L, Wing to Fuselage
Fittings—Inspection/Check, of Pilatus PC 6
Airworthiness Limitations Document No.
02334, Revision 9, dated March 6, 2020.
(3) For all airplanes specified in paragraph
(c) of this AD, after revising the ALS as
required by paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this
AD, remove from service each part that has
reached or exceeded its new life limit.
(g) Inspections and Replacement
(1) For airplanes with a bush part number
(P/N) 6100.0020.01 that has been bonded as
specified in Section 53–00–01, Fuselage
Wing Fittings—Inspection/Check, of Pilatus
PC–6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 29, dated
February 28, 2020; or Appendix K, Fuselage
Wing Fittings—Inspection/Check, of Pilatus
PC–6 Airworthiness Limitations Document
No. 02334, Revision 9, dated March 6, 2020:
Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after
the effective date of this AD, perform a visual
and eddy current inspection of each fuselage
wing fitting on fuselage Frame 3, remove
bush P/N 6100.0020.01 from service, and
install a new (zero hours TIS) bush P/N
6100.0020.01 into Frame 3 with grease by
using the procedures specified in paragraph
(f)(1)(ii) or (f)(2)(ii) of this AD, as applicable
to your airplane.
(2) Unless already done, within 1,100
hours TIS after the effective date of this AD
or within 12 months after the effective date
of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform
an eddy current inspection of each fuselage
wing fitting and each wing-to-fuselage fitting
using the procedures specified in paragraphs
(f)(1)(ii) and (iii) of this AD, or paragraphs
(f)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this AD, as applicable to
your airplane. Thereafter, repeat the eddy
current inspection of each fuselage wing
fitting and each wing-to-fuselage fitting at the
intervals specified in the ALS identified in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(2)(i), as applicable to
your airplane.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the ALS has been revised as required
by paragraph (f) of this AD, no alternative
inspection intervals or procedures may be
approved, except as provided in paragraph (i)
of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send your request to the person identified in
Related Information. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspection, the manager of the local Flight
Standards District Office.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:28 Mar 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) European
Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD
No. 2020–0120, dated May 27, 2020, and
EASA AD No. 2020–0278, dated December
14, 2020, for related information. This MCAI
may be found in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA–
2020–0857.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106;
telephone: (816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–
4090; email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
(3) For service information identified in
this AD, contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd.,
Customer Support General Aviation, CH–
6371 Stans, Switzerland; telephone: +41 848
24 7 365; email: Techsupport@
pilatusaircraft.com; internet: https://
www.pilatusaircraft.com/en. You may view
this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO
64106. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (816) 329–4148.
Issued on February 25, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–04395 Filed 3–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0129; Project
Identifier AD–2020–01597–E]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; International
Aero Engines AG Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain International Aero Engines AG
(IAE) V2522–A5, V2524–A5, V2525–D5,
V2527–A5, V2527E–A5, V2527M–A5,
V2528–D5, V2530–A5, V2531–E5, and
V2533–A5 model turbofan engines. This
proposed AD was prompted by an
analysis performed by the manufacturer
after an event involving an uncontained
failure of a high-pressure turbine (HPT)
1st-stage disk that resulted in highenergy debris penetrating the engine
cowling. This proposed AD would
require the performance of an ultrasonic
SUMMARY:
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
inspection (USI) of the HPT 1st-stage
disk and HPT 2nd-stage disk and,
depending on the results of the
inspections, replacement of the HPT 1ststage disk or HPT 2nd-stage disk. The
FAA is proposing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by April 7, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact International Aero
Engines AG, 400 Main Street, East
Hartford, CT 06118; phone: (800) 565–
0140; email: help24@pw.utc.com;
website: https://fleetcare.pw.utc.com.
You may view this service information
at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch,
1200 District Avenue, Burlington, MA
01803. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call (781) 238–7759.
Examining the AD Docket
14 CFR Part 39
PO 00000
13225
Sfmt 4702
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0129; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
NPRM, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicholas Paine, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7742; fax: (781) 238–
7199; email: nicholas.j.paine@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2021–0129; Project Identifier AD–
2020–01597–E’’ at the beginning of your
comments. The most helpful comments
E:\FR\FM\08MRP1.SGM
08MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 43 (Monday, March 8, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13222-13225]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04395]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0857; Project Identifier MCAI-2020-00707-A]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (SNPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is revising a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-25-04, which applies to all
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC-6, PC-6-H1, PC-6-H2, PC-6/350,
PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-
6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes.
This action revises the NPRM by adding an eddy current inspection of
each fuselage wing fitting if an earlier version of the service
information was accomplished. The FAA is proposing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products. Since these actions would
impose an additional burden over those in the NPRM, the FAA is
requesting comments on this SNPRM.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this SNPRM by April 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this SNPRM, contact Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support General Aviation, CH-6371 Stans,
Switzerland; phone: +41 848 24 7 365; email: aircraft.com">[email protected]aircraft.com; website: https://www.pilatus-aircraft.com/en. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106.
For information on the availability of this material at the FAA, call
(816) 329-4148.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0857; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
the NPRM, this SNPRM, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106; phone:
(816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-4090; email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0857; Project Identifier
MCAI-2020-00707-A'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
the proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this SNPRM contain
commercial or financial information that is customarily treated as
private, that you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this SNPRM, it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked
submissions as confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed
in the public docket of this SNPRM. Submissions containing CBI should
be sent to Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International Validation Branch, 901
Locust, Room 301, Kansas City, MO 64106. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Background
The FAA issued an NPRM to amend 14 CFR part 39 to supersede AD
2014-25-04, Amendment 39-18045 (79 FR 73803, December 12, 2014) (AD
2014-25-04). AD 2014-25-04 applies to all Pilatus Model PC-6, PC-6-H1,
PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-6/A-
H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2, and PC-6/
C1-H2 airplanes and resulted from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by an aviation authority of another country
to identify and correct an unsafe condition on an aviation product. AD
2014-25-04 requires incorporating revised airworthiness limitations
into the aircraft maintenance manual (AMM) for your FAA-approved
maintenance program.
The NPRM published in the Federal Register on October 2, 2020 (85
FR 62266). The NPRM was prompted by
[[Page 13223]]
MCAI issued by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA), which
is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the European Union.
EASA superseded its previous MCAIs on this unsafe condition with EASA
AD No. 2020-0120, dated May 27, 2020 (EASA AD 2020-0120). EASA AD 2020-
0120 states that revised airworthiness limitations for the subject
airplanes introduce new data modules that require non-destructive
visual and eddy current inspections instead of a previous requirement
for the fluorescent dye-penetrant method. In the NPRM, the FAA proposed
to require incorporating the new airworthiness limitations (revision
29) and performing an eddy current inspection of the fuselage wing
fittings and wing-to-fuselage fittings.
Actions Since the NPRM Was Issued
Since the FAA issued the NPRM, EASA superseded EASA AD 2020-0120
and issued EASA AD No. 2020-0278, dated December 14, 2020 (EASA AD
2020-0278) (also referred to after this as ``the MCAI''). According to
EASA AD 2020-0278, an installation procedure specified in the service
information identified in the NPRM contained an error and, therefore,
did not adequately address the identified unsafe condition. Pilatus has
revised the airworthiness limitations (revision 30) and issued
corrected service information, which includes installing certain bushes
using grease instead of a bonding agent and an additional one-time eddy
current inspection of the fuselage wing fittings and wing-to-fuselage
fittings if the last inspection was performed using an earlier version
of the service information. You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket
on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0857.
This SNPRM was prompted by the FAA's determination that the revised
airworthiness limitations and new inspection procedures are necessary,
in addition to the new life limits proposed in the NPRM. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address reduced airplane controllability due to
possible loss of structural integrity of certain parts.
Comments
The FAA received a comment from Pilatus. The following presents the
comment received on the NPRM and the FAA's response to that comment.
Request to Reference Latest Service Information
Pilatus requested that FAA revise the NPRM to require using Pilatus
PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document Number 01975, Revision 30,
dated October 30, 2020; and Pilatus PC-6 Airworthiness Limitations
Document Number 02334, Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020. In support
of its request, Pilatus stated the installation procedure in the
service information specified in the NPRM is incorrect. Pilatus also
stated that it has added a note to the airworthiness limitations
section indicating the data module procedure has been corrected and
specifying a repeat of the action if it was last done in accordance
with the prior service information.
The FAA agrees. After Pilatus submitted its comment, EASA issued
the MCAI to require the revised service information, as described
previously. In this SNPRM, the FAA proposes to require the latest
service information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Pilatus issued PC-6 Airworthiness Limitations Document No. 02334,
Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020; and Section 04-00-00,
Airworthiness Limitations of Chapter 04, Airworthiness Limitations, of
the Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document No. 01975,
Revision 30, dated October 30, 2020. This service information contains
airworthiness limitations for the stabilizer trim actuator, fuselage
wing fittings, and wing-to-fuselage fittings. These documents are
distinct since they apply to different airplane models.
Pilatus also issued Section 53-00-01, Fuselage Wing Fittings--
Inspection/Check, of the Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 30, dated October 30, 2020; Section 57-00-
03, Wing to Fuselage Fittings--Inspection/Check, of the PC-6 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Document No. 01975, Revision 29, dated February 28,
2020; Appendix K, Fuselage Wing Fittings--Inspection/Check, of the PC-6
Airworthiness Limitations Document No. 02334, Revision 10, dated
October 30, 2020; and Appendix L, Wing to Fuselage Fittings--
Inspection/Check, of the PC-6 Airworthiness Limitations Document No.
02334, Revision 9, dated March 6, 2020. This service information
specifies procedures for repetitive eddy current inspections of the
fuselage wing fittings and wing-to-fuselage fittings and, if necessary,
installing the bush on the fuselage wing fittings using grease.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all pertinent information and determined an
unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other
products of the same type design.
Certain changes described above expand the scope of the NPRM. As a
result, it is necessary to reopen the comment period to provide
additional opportunity for the public to comment on this SNPRM.
Proposed Requirements of This SNPRM
This proposed AD would retain none of the requirements of AD 2014-
25-04. This proposed AD would require revising the airworthiness
limitation section of the existing AMM or instructions for continued
airworthiness to incorporate new airworthiness limitations. The revised
limitations include an eddy current inspection of the fuselage wing
fittings and wing-to-fuselage fittings. This proposed AD would also
require, within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) for certain bushes,
performing an eddy current inspection of the fuselage wing fittings and
wing-to-fuselage fittings and replacing the bush on the fuselage wing
fittings using grease. Lastly, this proposed AD would require
performing the eddy current inspection of the fuselage wing fittings
and wing-to-fuselage fittings first within 1,100 hours TIS or 12 months
(whichever occurs first), and thereafter at the intervals specified in
the revised limitations.
This proposed AD would require revisions to the airworthiness
limitations section (ALS) of an operator's maintenance documents to
include new inspections. Compliance with the airworthiness limitations
section is required by 14 CFR 91.403(c).
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD, if adopted as proposed, would
affect 30 airplanes of U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following
costs to comply with this proposed AD:
[[Page 13224]]
Estimated Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost on U.S.
Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ALS revision..................... 1 work-hour x $85 $0 $85................ $2,550.
per hour = $85.
Eddy current inspection of the 7 work-hours x $85 $1,860 $2,455 per $73,650 per
fuselage wing fittings and per hour = $595. inspection cycle. inspection cycle.
wing[dash]to[dash]fuselage
fittings.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do the inspections and
installation that would be required if an earlier version of the
service information has been accomplished. The agency has no way of
determining the number of aircraft that might need these inspections
and installation:
On-Condition Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Action Labor cost Parts cost product
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Visual and eddy current inspection and 7 work-hours x $85 per hour = $1,860 $2,455
installation for certain bushes. $595.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2014-25-04, Amendment 39-18045
(79 FR 73803, December 12, 2014); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Pilatus Aircraft Limited: Docket No. FAA-2020-0857; Project
Identifier MCAI-2020-00707-A.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments on this airworthiness directive
(AD) by April 22, 2021.
(b) Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
This AD replaces AD 2014-25-04, Amendment 39-18045 (79 FR 73803,
December 12, 2014) (AD 2014-25-04).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Pilatus Aircraft Limited Model PC-6, PC-6-H1,
PC-6-H2, PC-6/350, PC-6/350-H1, PC-6/350-H2, PC-6/A, PC-6/A-H1, PC-
6/A-H2, PC-6/B-H2, PC-6/B1-H2, PC-6/B2-H2, PC-6/B2-H4, PC-6/C-H2,
and PC-6/C1-H2 airplanes, all serial numbers, certificated in any
category.
Note 1 to paragraph (c): These airplanes may also be identified
as Fairchild Republic Company airplanes, Fairchild Industries
airplanes, Fairchild Heli Porter airplanes, or Fairchild-Hiller
Corporation airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 05, Time Limits/
Maintenance Checks.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a determination that new and more
restrictive airworthiness limitations, new life limits, and new
inspection procedures are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address reduced airplane controllability due to possible loss of
structural integrity of certain parts.
(f) Airworthiness Limitations Revision
Unless already done, before further flight, comply with the
actions specified in paragraphs (f)(1) through (3) of this AD.
(1) For Models PC-6/B2-H2 and PC-6/B2-H4 airplanes, revise the
airworthiness limitations section (ALS) of the existing maintenance
manual or instructions for continued airworthiness (ICA) for your
airplane as follows:
(i) Replace Section 04-00-00 with Section 04-00-00,
Airworthiness Limitations, of Chapter 04, Airworthiness Limitations,
of the Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual Document No. 01975,
Revision 30, dated October 30, 2020.
(ii) Add (or replace, if applicable) Section 53-00-01, Fuselage
Wing Fittings--Inspection/Check, of the Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft
Maintenance Manual Document No. 01975, Revision 30, dated October
30, 2020.
(iii) Add Section 57-00-03, Wing to Fuselage Fittings--
Inspection/Check, of the Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance Manual
Document No. 01975, Revision 29, dated February 28, 2020.
(2) For all airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD
except Models PC-6/B2-H2 and PC-6/B2-H4 airplanes, revise the ALS of
[[Page 13225]]
the existing maintenance manual or ICA for your airplane as follows:
(i) Replace the ALS with the Airworthiness Limitations Section
of Pilatus PC-6 Airworthiness Limitations Document No. 02334,
Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020.
(ii) Add (or replace, if applicable) Appendix K, Fuselage Wing
Fittings--Inspection/Check, of Pilatus PC 6 Airworthiness
Limitations Document No. 02334, Revision 10, dated October 30, 2020.
(iii) Add Appendix L, Wing to Fuselage Fittings--Inspection/
Check, of Pilatus PC 6 Airworthiness Limitations Document No. 02334,
Revision 9, dated March 6, 2020.
(3) For all airplanes specified in paragraph (c) of this AD,
after revising the ALS as required by paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of
this AD, remove from service each part that has reached or exceeded
its new life limit.
(g) Inspections and Replacement
(1) For airplanes with a bush part number (P/N) 6100.0020.01
that has been bonded as specified in Section 53-00-01, Fuselage Wing
Fittings--Inspection/Check, of Pilatus PC-6 Aircraft Maintenance
Manual Document No. 01975, Revision 29, dated February 28, 2020; or
Appendix K, Fuselage Wing Fittings--Inspection/Check, of Pilatus PC-
6 Airworthiness Limitations Document No. 02334, Revision 9, dated
March 6, 2020: Within 50 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the
effective date of this AD, perform a visual and eddy current
inspection of each fuselage wing fitting on fuselage Frame 3, remove
bush P/N 6100.0020.01 from service, and install a new (zero hours
TIS) bush P/N 6100.0020.01 into Frame 3 with grease by using the
procedures specified in paragraph (f)(1)(ii) or (f)(2)(ii) of this
AD, as applicable to your airplane.
(2) Unless already done, within 1,100 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD or within 12 months after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs first, perform an eddy current
inspection of each fuselage wing fitting and each wing-to-fuselage
fitting using the procedures specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(ii) and
(iii) of this AD, or paragraphs (f)(2)(ii) and (iii) of this AD, as
applicable to your airplane. Thereafter, repeat the eddy current
inspection of each fuselage wing fitting and each wing-to-fuselage
fitting at the intervals specified in the ALS identified in
paragraph (f)(1)(i) or (f)(2)(i), as applicable to your airplane.
(h) No Alternative Actions or Intervals
After the ALS has been revised as required by paragraph (f) of
this AD, no alternative inspection intervals or procedures may be
approved, except as provided in paragraph (i) of this AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Validation Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send your request to the person identified in Related
Information. Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspection, the manager
of the local Flight Standards District Office.
(j) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2020-
0120, dated May 27, 2020, and EASA AD No. 2020-0278, dated December
14, 2020, for related information. This MCAI may be found in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching
for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0857.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Doug Rudolph,
Aviation Safety Engineer, FAA, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, MO 64106; telephone: (816) 329-4059; fax: (816) 329-
4090; email: [email protected].
(3) For service information identified in this AD, contact
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., Customer Support General Aviation, CH-6371
Stans, Switzerland; telephone: +41 848 24 7 365; email:
[email protected]; internet: https://www.pilatusaircraft.com/en. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
901 Locust, Kansas City, MO 64106. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call (816) 329-4148.
Issued on February 25, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-04395 Filed 3-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P