Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters, 12857-12862 [2021-03954]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
than the 2021 General QM
Amendments. For transactions subject
to § 1026.19(e), (f), or (g), creditors
determine the date the creditor received
the consumer’s application, for
purposes of this comment, in
accordance with § 1026.2(a)(3)(ii). For
transactions that are not subject to
§ 1026.19(e), (f), or (g), creditors can
determine the date the creditor received
the consumer’s application, for
purposes of this comment, in
accordance with either § 1026.2(a)(3)(i)
or (ii).
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
43(e)(2) Qualified Mortgage Defined—
General
1. General QM Amendments Effective
on March 1, 2021. Comment 43–2
provides that, for a transaction for
which a creditor received an application
on or after March 1, 2021 but prior to
October 1, 2022, a person has the option
of complying either: With 12 CFR part
1026 as it is in effect; or with 12 CFR
part 1026 as it was in effect on February
26, 2021, together with any amendments
to 12 CFR part 1026 that become
effective after February 26, 2021, other
than the revisions to Regulation Z
contained in Qualified Mortgage
Definition Under the Truth in Lending
Act (Regulation Z): General QM Loan
Definition published on December 29,
2020 (2021 General QM Amendments).
Prior to the effective date of the 2021
General QM Amendments,
§ 1026.43(e)(2) provided a qualified
mortgage definition that, among other
things, required that the ratio of the
consumer’s total monthly debt to total
monthly income at the time of
consummation not exceed 43 percent.
The 2021 General QM Amendments
removed that requirement and replaced
it with the annual percentage rate
thresholds in § 1026.43(e)(2)(vi), among
other revisions. Both the qualified
mortgage definition in § 1026.43(e)(2)
that was in effect prior to the 2021
General QM Amendments and the
qualified mortgage definition in
§ 1026.43(e)(2) as amended by the 2021
General QM Amendments are available
to creditors for transactions for which a
creditor received an application on or
after March 1, 2021 but prior to October
1, 2022. See comment 43–2 for an
explanation of how creditors determine
the date the creditor received the
consumer’s application for purposes of
that comment.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
43(e)(4) Qualified Mortgage Defined—
Other Agencies
1. General. The Department of
Housing and Urban Development,
Department of Veterans Affairs, and the
Department of Agriculture have
promulgated definitions for qualified
mortgages under mortgage programs
they insure, guarantee, or provide under
applicable law. Cross-references to those
definitions are listed in § 1026.43(e)(4)
to acknowledge the covered transactions
covered by those definitions are
qualified mortgages for purposes of this
section.
2. Mortgages for which the creditor
received the consumer’s application
prior to October 1, 2022. Covered
transactions that met the requirements
of § 1026.43(e)(2)(i) thorough (iii), were
eligible for purchase or guarantee by the
Federal National Mortgage Association
(Fannie Mae) or the Federal Home Loan
Mortgage Corporation (Freddie Mac) (or
any limited-life regulatory entity
succeeding the charter of either)
operating under the conservatorship or
receivership of the Federal Housing
Finance Agency pursuant to section
1367 of the Federal Housing Enterprises
Financial Safety and Soundness Act of
1992 (12 U.S.C. 4617), and for which the
creditor received the consumer’s
application prior to the mandatory
compliance date of October 1, 2022
continue to be qualified mortgages for
the purposes of this section, including
those covered transactions that were
consummated on or after October 1,
2022.
3. Mortgages for which the creditor
received the consumer’s application on
or after March 1, 2021 and prior to
October 1, 2022. For a discussion of the
optional early compliance period for the
2021 General QM Amendments, please
see comment 43–2.
4. [Reserved].
5. [Reserved].
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 2, 2021.
David Uejio,
Acting Director, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021–04698 Filed 3–3–21; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
PO 00000
12857
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–1182; Product
Identifier 2018–SW–036–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to
supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2016–08–20 for certain Airbus
Helicopters (previously Eurocopter
France) EC130B4 and EC130T2
helicopters. AD 2016–08–20 requires
repetitively inspecting the tail boom to
Fenestron junction frame (junction
frame) for a crack. Since the FAA issued
AD 2016–08–20, additional cracks have
been reported and a design change that
modifies the junction frame has become
available. This proposed AD would
continue to require inspecting the
junction frame with the horizontal
stabilizer removed, and would propose
to expand the applicability, revise the
compliance time and the inspection
procedures for inspecting the junction
frame, add inspection procedures for
certain helicopters, allow repair of the
junction frame, and would require
modifying and then repetitively
inspecting the junction frame and
reporting certain information. The
actions of this proposed AD are
intended to address an unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by April 5, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Send comments to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M–30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200
New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to the
‘‘Mail’’ address between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
SUMMARY:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
12858
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
1182; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this proposed
AD, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation
Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
For service information identified in
this proposed rule, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
972–641–0000 or 800–232–0323; fax
972–641–3775; or at https://
www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/
technical-support.html. You may view
the referenced service information at the
FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood
Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX
76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kristi Bradley, Aviation Safety Engineer,
General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone 817–222–5110; email
kristin.bradley@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include Docket No.
FAA–2020–1182; Product Identifier
2018–SW–036–AD at the beginning of
your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Kristi Bradley,
Aviation Safety Engineer, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone 817–222–5110; email
kristin.bradley@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2016–08–20,
Amendment 39–18497 (81 FR 26103,
May 2, 2016) (2016–08–20), for Airbus
Helicopters Model EC130B4 and
EC130T2 helicopters with a junction
frame that has 690 or more hours timein-service (TIS) installed. AD 2016–08–
20 requires dye penetrant and borescope
inspecting around the circumference of
the junction frame for a crack and
replacing any cracked junction frame.
AD 2016–08–20 was prompted by EASA
AD 2015–0033–E, dated February 24,
2015 (EASA AD 2015–0033–E), issued
by EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, to supersede an existing EASA
AD. EASA had determined that it was
necessary to define an inspection
interval in sling cycles in addition to the
existing flight hour inspection interval.
EASA also acknowledged an alternative
method to inspect from the outside of
the tail boom.
Actions Since AD 2016–08–20 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2016–08–
20, EASA has issued a series of ADs, the
most recent being EASA AD 2018–0104,
dated May 4, 2018 (EASA AD 2018–
0104), to correct an unsafe condition for
Airbus Helicopters (formerly
Eurocopter, Eurocopter France) Model
EC 130 B4 and EC 130 T2 helicopters,
all serial numbers, except those with
Airbus modification (MOD) 074775
installed. EASA’s initial AD was
prompted by two incidents of crack
propagation through the junction frame
that initiated in the lower right-hand
side between the web and the flange
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
where the lower spar of the tail boom is
joined. EASA states the cracks were of
a significant length and not visible from
the outside of the helicopter. EASA
advised that this condition, if not
detected, could lead to structural
failure, possibly resulting in Fenestron
detachment and consequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
Following EASA AD 2015–0033–E,
EASA revised its AD to EASA AD 2015–
0033R1, dated May 3, 2016 (EASA AD
2015–0033R1), which was prompted by
the determination that it was not
necessary to inspect junction frames
that had accumulated less than 1,200
flight hours. Accordingly, EASA AD
2015–0033R1 extended the inspection
threshold from 700 flight hours to 1,200
flight hours. Thereafter, EASA issued
EASA AD 2016–0240, dated December
2, 2016 (EASA AD 2016–0240) to
supersede EASA AD 2015–0033R1.
EASA AD 2016–0240 was prompted by
a third incident of cracking in the same
area of the junction frame as the first
two incidents. Investigation determined
that detection of the crack was delayed
because of insufficient cleaning of the
inspection area inside the junction
frame. For that reason, EASA AD 2016–
0240 retained the requirements of EASA
AD 2015–0033R1 and added additional
cleaning requirements before inspecting.
After EASA AD 2016–0240 was issued,
a fourth incident of cracking in the same
area of the junction frame as the first
three incidents was reported. This
fourth incident prompted EASA to issue
EASA AD 2017–0066–E, dated April 21,
2017 (EASA AD 2017–0066–E) to
supersede EASA AD 2016–0240. This
fourth incident occurred on a junction
frame that had accumulated
significantly less flight hours than the
first three incidents. In light of this,
EASA AD 2017–0066–E retained the
requirements of EASA AD 2016–0240
and reduced the inspection threshold.
Shortly after, EASA issued EASA AD
2017–0080, dated May 5, 2017 (EASA
AD 2017–0080) to supersede EASA AD
2017–0066–E. EASA AD 2017–0080 was
prompted by the determination that
improved procedures to remove the
horizontal stabilizer before cleaning and
inspecting were necessary for certain
helicopters. Accordingly, EASA AD
2017–0080 retained the requirements of
EASA AD 2017–0066–E and added the
improved procedures. Since EASA
issued EASA AD 2017–0080, Airbus
Helicopters developed MOD 074775,
which consists of the installation of four
carbon patches at the junction frame.
Installation of MOD 074775, either in
production or by retrofit, constitutes
terminating action for the repetitive
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
inspections. Based on the latest
information, EASA determined that
continued inspections may not
adequately address the long-term risk
and requires modifying the affected
helicopters, which also terminates the
repetitive inspections of the premodified configuration. Accordingly,
EASA issued EASA AD 2018–0104 to
supersede EASA AD 2017–0080 to
require installation of MOD 074775.
Also since the FAA issued AD 2016–
08–20, it has been determined that the
dye penetrant inspections required by
AD 2016–08–20 are unnecessary
because visual inspections are adequate
to inspect for cracks in the affected area
instead.
As a result of the EASA-issued ADs
and the further incidents of cracked
junction frames, this proposed AD
proposes to expand the applicability to
include all Airbus Helicopters Model
EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters with
a junction frame, regardless of how
many hours TIS have accumulated on
the junction frame; revise the
compliance time to inspect the junction
frame with the horizontal stabilizer
removed to depend on the hours TIS
accumulated on the junction frame;
change the inspection of the junction
frame with the horizontal stabilizer
removed from the dye-penetrant
inspection required by AD 2016–08–20
to a visual inspection; add inspection
procedures for helicopters with a skin
cut-out at the junction frame; allow
repairing a junction frame in accordance
with an FAA approved repair
procedure; require the installation of
MOD 074775 or the four carbon patches
reinforcements; and require repetitive
inspections of a modified junction
frame.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the
European Union, EASA has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all of the information
provided by EASA and determining the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other helicopters of
these same type designs.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Airbus Helicopters has issued
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05A017, Revision 7, dated March 21,
2018, for Model EC130 B4 and T2
helicopters without MOD 074775
installed. This service information
specifies procedures for cleaning inside
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
the junction frame, inspecting the
junction frame from the inside of the tail
boom with the horizontal stabilizer both
removed and installed for a crack, and
inspecting the junction frame from the
outside of the tail boom for a crack.
Airbus Helicopters has issued Service
Bulletin No. EC130–53–036, Revision 4,
dated April, 28, 2020, for Model EC130
B4 and T2 helicopters without MOD
074609 or 074775 installed and on
which the skin of the junction frame
area has not been repaired. This service
information specifies procedures to
reinforce the junction frame (MOD
074775) by replacing the two lateral
splices which join the skins with four
carbon patches (left-hand side, righthand side, and lower sides).
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
Airbus Helicopters has issued Service
Bulletin No. EC130–53–029, Revision 1,
dated January 27, 2016. This service
information specifies procedures to
make a cut-out of the splice and skin at
the junction frame (MOD 350A087421).
Airbus has issued EC 130 B4 Chapter
4, Airworthiness Limitations Section,
Revision 11, dated January 19, 2019 and
EC 130 T2 Chapter 4, Airworthiness
Limitations Section, Revision 9, dated
September 9, 2019, which specify
visually checking the junction frame for
cracks at an interval of 600 flight hours
with a margin of 60 flight hours.
Airbus Helicopters has also issued
Section 55–11–00, 6–4—Horizontal
Stabilizer—Inspection/Check, of
Aircraft Maintenance Manual EC130,
dated November 9, 2017, which
specifies procedures for cleaning inside
the junction frame and inspecting the
junction frame from the inside of the tail
boom with the horizontal stabilizer
removed.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
• For helicopters without MOD
074775, or MOD AH 350A087421 or SB
EC130–53–029 installed, at a
compliance time based on the hours TIS
accumulated on the junction frame,
removing the horizontal stabilizer,
cleaning the junction frame, and
visually inspecting the junction frame
area for a crack, paying particular
attention to the area around the 4 spars.
Æ Following the initial visual
inspection, within 25 hours TIS or 390
sling cycles, whichever comes first, and
thereafter at intervals not exceeding 25
hours TIS or 390 sling cycles, whichever
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
12859
comes first, either repeating the initial
visual inspection, or, if the surface area
is clean, borescope inspecting the
junction frame area for a crack, paying
particular attention to the area around
the 4 spars.
Æ Also following the initial visual
inspection, within 150 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150
hours TIS, repeating the initial visual
inspection.
• For helicopters without MOD
074775 installed, but with MOD AH
350A087421 or SB EC130–53–029
installed, before the junction frame
accumulates 350 hours TIS or within 10
hours TIS, whichever occurs later,
visually inspecting for a crack on the
junction frame area in each skin cut-out
area.
Æ Following the initial visual
inspection, within 10 hours TIS or 250
sling cycles, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals not exceeding 10
hours TIS or 250 sling cycles, whichever
occurs first, repeating the initial visual
inspection.
Æ Also following the initial visual
inspection, within 660 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 660
hours TIS, removing the horizontal
stabilizer, cleaning the junction frame,
and dye-penetrant inspecting the
junction frame area for a crack, paying
particular attention to the area around
the 4 spars.
• If there is a crack, replacing or
repairing the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved
repair procedure before further flight.
Repairing the junction frame would not
constitute terminating action for the
requirements of this proposed AD.
• For helicopters without MOD
074775 installed, with or without MOD
AH 350A087421 or SB EC130–53–029
installed, without MOD 074609 or SB
53–024 installed, and on which the skin
of the junction frame area has never
been repaired, installing MOD 074775
within 24 months as of the effective date
of this AD and reporting certain
information to Airbus Helicopters
within 30 days after installing MOD
074775.
• For helicopters without MOD
074775 installed, with MOD 074609 or
SB 53–024 installed, or on which the
skin of the junction frame area has been
previously repaired at any time,
reinforcing the junction frame by
replacing the two lateral splices which
join the skins with four carbon patches
(left-hand side, right-hand side, and
lower sides) within 24 months as of the
effective date of this AD.
• For helicopters with MOD 074775
installed or with the four carbon patches
reinforcements installed, but without
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
12860
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
MOD 074581 for Model EC130T2
helicopters, within 600 hours TIS after
the installation of MOD 074775 or the
reinforcement, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 600 hours TIS,
visually inspect the junction frame area
for a crack. If there is a crack, replacing
or repairing the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved
repair procedure before further flight.
Repairing the junction frame would not
constitute terminating action for the
requirements of this proposed AD.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Differences Between This Proposed AD
and the EASA AD
EASA AD 2018–0104 does not apply
to helicopters with MOD 074775,
whereas this proposed AD does. EASA
AD 2018–0104 requires performing a
local non-destructive inspection if in
doubt about if there is a crack, whereas
this proposed AD does not. EASA AD
2018–0104 allows the pilot to visually
inspect the junction frame from outside
the tail boom for a crack, whereas this
proposed AD does not. EASA AD 2018–
0104 requires contacting Airbus
Helicopters if any crack is detected,
whereas this proposed AD would
require replacing or repairing the
junction frame in accordance with an
FAA approved repair procedure instead.
This proposed AD would require a
repetitive inspection for helicopters
with MOD 074775 installed, whereas
the EASA AD does not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 263 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor costs are estimated at
$85 per work-hours. Based on these
numbers, the FAA estimates that
operators may incur the following costs
in order to comply with this proposed
AD.
Cleaning and inspecting the junction
frame area with the horizontal stabilizer
removed would take about 1 work-hour
for an estimated cost of $85 per
helicopter and $22,355 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle.
Internally borescope inspecting the
junction frame area with the horizontal
stabilizer installed would take about 0.5
work hour for an estimated cost of $43
per helicopter and $11,309 for the U.S.
fleet, per inspection cycle.
If applicable, cleaning and inspecting
the junction frame area in each skin cutout area would take about 1.25 workhour for an estimated cost of $106 per
helicopter and $27,878 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle.
Modifying the junction frame skin
reinforcements would take about 90
work-hours and parts cost about $10,000
for an estimated cost of $17,650 per
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
helicopter and $4,641,950 for the U.S.
fleet. Reporting certain information
would take about 1 work-hour for an
estimated cost of $85 per helicopter and
$22,355 for the U.S. fleet. Inspecting the
modified junction frame area would
take about 1 work-hour for an estimated
cost of $85 per helicopter and $22,355
for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle.
If required, repairing or replacing the
junction frame would take up to 50
work-hours and parts would cost about
$60,000 for an estimated cost of $64,250
per helicopter.
According to Airbus Helicopters’
service information, some of the costs of
this proposed AD may be covered under
warranty, thereby reducing the cost
impact on affected individuals. The
FAA does not control warranty coverage
by Airbus Helicopters. Accordingly, the
FAA has included all costs in this cost
estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject
to penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid
OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information
collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of
information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response,
including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the collection of information.
All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send
comments regarding this burden
estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to:
Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Federal Aviation
Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177–1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in
Alaska, and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
■ a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
(AD) 2016–08–20, Amendment 39–
18497 (81 FR 26103, May 2, 2016); and
■ b. Adding the following new AD:
■
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA–2020–
1182; Product Identifier 2018–SW–036–
AD.
(a) Applicability
This airworthiness directive (AD) applies
to Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and
EC130T2 helicopters, certificated in any
category, with a tail boom to Fenestron
junction frame (junction frame).
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a
crack in the junction frame. This condition
could result in failure of the junction frame,
which could result in loss of the Fenestron
and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
(i) Remove the horizontal stabilizer; using
a clean, lint-free, white cloth soaked with
liquid Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK), clean the
inside of the junction frame (a) as shown in
Figure 1 of Airbus Helicopters Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017, Revision
7, dated March 21, 2018 (EASB 05A017, Rev
7); and visually inspect for cracking around
the circumference of the junction frame, in
the web of the junction frame (a) and in the
radius between the web and the flange of the
tail boom side as shown in Figure 1 EASB
05A017, Rev 7. Pay particular attention to the
area around the 4 spars (b) as shown in
Figure 1 of EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Examples
of cracks are shown in Figure 3 of EASB
05A017, Rev 7. If there is a crack, before
further flight, replace or repair the junction
frame in accordance with an FAA approved
repair procedure. Repairing or replacing the
junction frame does not constitute
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
(ii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(1)(i)
of this AD, within 25 hours TIS or 390 sling
cycles for helicopters that perform external
load carrying operations, whichever occurs
first, and thereafter at intervals not exceeding
25 hours TIS or 390 sling cycles, whichever
occurs first, either perform the actions of
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD or, if the surface
of the junction frame area is clean, use a
borescope through the horizontal stabilizer
opening to borescope inspect for a crack
around the circumference of the junction
frame, and in the web of the junction frame
(a) and in the radius between the web and
the flange on the tail boom side as shown in
Figure 2 EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Pay particular
attention to the area around the 4 spars (b)
of Figure 2 of EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Examples
of cracks are shown in Figure 3 of EASB
05A017, Rev 7. For purposes of this AD, a
sling cycle is defined as one landing with or
without stopping the rotor or one external
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2016–08–20,
Amendment 39–18497 (81 FR 26103, May 2,
2016).
specified compliance time unless it has
already been accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each
action required by this AD within the
(1) For helicopters without modification
(MOD) 074775, or MOD AH 350A087421 or
SB EC130–53–029 installed, at the
compliance time specified by the hours timein-service (TIS) accumulated on the junction
frame in Figure 1 to this paragraph, do the
following:
load-carrying operation; an external loadcarrying operation occurs each time a
helicopter picks up an external load and
drops it off. If there is a crack, before further
flight, replace or repair the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved repair
procedure. Repairing or replacing the
junction frame does not constitute
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
(iii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(1)(i)
of this AD, within 150 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150 hours
TIS, accomplish the actions required by
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD.
Accomplishment of this paragraph
constitutes compliance for an instance of
paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(2) For helicopters without MOD 074775
installed, but with MOD AH 350A087421 or
SB EC130–53–029 installed, before the
junction frame accumulates 350 hours TIS or
within 10 hours TIS, whichever occurs later:
(i) Visually inspect for cracking on the
junction frame (a) in the upper and lower
right-hand side and upper and lower lefthand side areas of the skin cut-out as shown
in Detail A, Figure 4 of EASB 05A017, Rev
7. If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace or repair the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved repair
procedure. Repairing or replacing the
junction frame does not constitute
terminating action for the requirements of
this AD.
(ii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(2)(i)
of this AD, within 10 hours TIS or 250 sling
cycles for helicopters that perform external
load carrying operations, whichever occurs
first, and thereafter at intervals not exceeding
10 hours TIS or 250 sling cycles, whichever
occurs first, accomplish the actions required
by paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD.
(iii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(2)(i)
of this AD, within 660 hours TIS and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 660 hours
TIS, accomplish the actions required by
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD.
Accomplishment of this paragraph
constitutes compliance for an instance of
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(3) For helicopters without MOD 074775
installed, with or without MOD AH
350A087421 or SB EC130–53–029 installed,
without MOD 074609 or SB 53–024 installed,
and on which the skin of the junction frame
area has never been repaired, within 24
months as of the effective date of this AD,
install MOD 074775 by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs
3.B.2.a. through g., of Airbus Helicopters
Service Bulletin No. EC130–53–036, Revision
4, dated April, 28, 2020 (ASB EC130–53–036,
Rev 4), except where ASB EC130–53–036,
Rev. 4 specifies to certain discard parts, you
are required to remove those parts from
service instead and where ASB EC130–53–
036, Rev 4. specifies contacting Airbus
Helicopters for corrective action, the
corrective action must be accomplished using
a method approved by the FAA. Where ASB
EC130–53–036, Rev 4, specifies completing
the table in Appendix 4.H. under paragraph
3.B.2.g., complete and return the table to
Airbus Helicopters within 30 days after
installing MOD 074775. Installation of MOD
074775 constitutes terminating action for the
inspections required by paragraphs (f)(1) and
(2) of this AD.
(4) For helicopters without MOD 074775
installed, with MOD 074609 or SB 53–024
installed, or on which the skin of the
junction frame area has been previously
repaired at any time, within 24 months as of
the effective date of this AD, reinforce the
junction frame by replacing the two lateral
splices which join the skins with four carbon
patches (left-hand side, right-hand side, and
lower sides) in accordance with an FAA
approved corrective procedure. Installation
(d) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by April
5, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
EP05MR21.008
(b) Unsafe Condition
12861
12862
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 42 / Friday, March 5, 2021 / Proposed Rules
of this reinforcement constitutes terminating
action for the inspections required by
paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(5) For Model EC130B4 helicopters with
MOD 074775 installed or with the
reinforcement that is required by paragraph
(f)(4) of this AD; and for Model EC130T2
helicopters with MOD 074775 installed or
with the reinforcement that is required by
paragraph (f)(4) of this AD, but without MOD
074581 installed:
(i) Within 600 hours TIS after the
installation of MOD 074775 or the
reinforcement that is required by paragraph
(f)(4) of this AD, and thereafter at intervals
not exceeding 600 hours TIS, perform the
actions of paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD.
(ii) If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace or repair the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved repair
procedure. Repairing the junction frame does
not constitute terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
(g) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(i) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Service Bulletin No.
EC130–53–029, Revision 1, dated January 27,
2016, Airbus EC 130 B4 Chapter 4,
Airworthiness Limitations Section, Revision
11, dated January 19, 2019, Airbus EC 130 T2
Chapter 4, Airworthiness Limitations
Section, Revision 9, dated September 9, 2019,
and Section 55–11–00, 6–4–Horizontal
Stabilizer—Inspection/Check, of Aircraft
Maintenance Manual EC130, dated
November 9, 2017, which are not
incorporated by reference, contain additional
information about the subject of this AD. For
service information identified in this AD,
contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum
Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
972–641–0000 or 800–232–0323; fax 972–
641–3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/
helicopters/services/technical-support.html.
You may view a copy of the service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321, Fort Worth,
TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) 2018–0104, dated May 4, 2018. You
may view the EASA AD on the internet at
19:49 Mar 04, 2021
Jkt 253001
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 5302, Rotorcraft Tail Boom.
Issued on February 19, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–03954 Filed 3–4–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–1183; Project
Identifier 2019–SW–008–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation
Branch, FAA, may approve AMOCs for this
AD. Send your proposal to: Kristi Bradley,
Aviation Safety Engineer, General Aviation &
Rotorcraft Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817–222–5110;
email kristin.bradley@faa.gov.
(2) For operations conducted under a 14
CFR part 119 operating certificate or under
14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or
lacking a principal inspector, the manager of
the local flight standards district office or
certificate holding district office, before
operating any aircraft complying with this
AD through an AMOC.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating it in Docket No. FAA–2020–
1182.
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain Airbus Helicopters Model EC
155B, EC155B1, SA–365N, SA–365N1,
AS–365N2, and AS 365 N3 helicopters,
as identified in a European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union
Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD.
This proposed AD was prompted by a
report of an in-flight loss of engine and
main gearbox (MGB) cowlings. This
proposed AD would require inspecting
the MGB fixed cowling front fitting
(MGB front fitting), and depending on
findings, corrective action. This
proposed AD would also require a new
modification, which would constitute a
terminating action for the inspection.
These proposed AD requirements are as
specified in an EASA AD, which is
proposed for incorporation by reference
(IBR). The FAA is proposing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by April 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
M–30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For material that is proposed for IBR
in this AD, contact the EASA, KonradAdenauer-Ufer 3, 50668 Cologne,
Germany; telephone +49 221 8999 000;
email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
material on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu. You may view this
material at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 817–222–5110. It is also
available in the AD docket on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2020–1183.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
1183; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Blaine Williams, Aerospace Engineer,
Los Angles ACO Branch, Compliance &
Airworthiness Division, 3960
Paramount Blvd., Lakewood, California
90712; telephone 562–627–5371; email
blaine.williams@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2020–1183; Project Identifier
2019–SW–008–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of
the proposal, explain the reason for any
recommended change, and include
supporting data. The FAA will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this proposal
because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
E:\FR\FM\05MRP1.SGM
05MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 42 (Friday, March 5, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 12857-12862]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03954]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-1182; Product Identifier 2018-SW-036-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to supersede Airworthiness Directive (AD)
2016-08-20 for certain Airbus Helicopters (previously Eurocopter
France) EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters. AD 2016-08-20 requires
repetitively inspecting the tail boom to Fenestron junction frame
(junction frame) for a crack. Since the FAA issued AD 2016-08-20,
additional cracks have been reported and a design change that modifies
the junction frame has become available. This proposed AD would
continue to require inspecting the junction frame with the horizontal
stabilizer removed, and would propose to expand the applicability,
revise the compliance time and the inspection procedures for inspecting
the junction frame, add inspection procedures for certain helicopters,
allow repair of the junction frame, and would require modifying and
then repetitively inspecting the junction frame and reporting certain
information. The actions of this proposed AD are intended to address an
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by April 5,
2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Docket: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: Send comments to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor,
Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to the ``Mail'' address between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://
[[Page 12858]]
www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
1182; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this proposed AD, the European Aviation Safety Agency (now European
Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for Docket Operations is listed
above. Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
For service information identified in this proposed rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone 972-641-0000 or 800-232-0323; fax 972-641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may
view the referenced service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kristi Bradley, Aviation Safety
Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone 817-222-5110; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under ADDRESSES. Include Docket No. FAA-2020-1182; Product Identifier
2018-SW-036-AD at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposal.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Kristi Bradley, Aviation Safety Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Discussion
The FAA issued AD 2016-08-20, Amendment 39-18497 (81 FR 26103, May
2, 2016) (2016-08-20), for Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and EC130T2
helicopters with a junction frame that has 690 or more hours time-in-
service (TIS) installed. AD 2016-08-20 requires dye penetrant and
borescope inspecting around the circumference of the junction frame for
a crack and replacing any cracked junction frame. AD 2016-08-20 was
prompted by EASA AD 2015-0033-E, dated February 24, 2015 (EASA AD 2015-
0033-E), issued by EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member
States of the European Union, to supersede an existing EASA AD. EASA
had determined that it was necessary to define an inspection interval
in sling cycles in addition to the existing flight hour inspection
interval. EASA also acknowledged an alternative method to inspect from
the outside of the tail boom.
Actions Since AD 2016-08-20 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2016-08-20, EASA has issued a series of
ADs, the most recent being EASA AD 2018-0104, dated May 4, 2018 (EASA
AD 2018-0104), to correct an unsafe condition for Airbus Helicopters
(formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter France) Model EC 130 B4 and EC 130 T2
helicopters, all serial numbers, except those with Airbus modification
(MOD) 074775 installed. EASA's initial AD was prompted by two incidents
of crack propagation through the junction frame that initiated in the
lower right-hand side between the web and the flange where the lower
spar of the tail boom is joined. EASA states the cracks were of a
significant length and not visible from the outside of the helicopter.
EASA advised that this condition, if not detected, could lead to
structural failure, possibly resulting in Fenestron detachment and
consequent loss of control of the helicopter.
Following EASA AD 2015-0033-E, EASA revised its AD to EASA AD 2015-
0033R1, dated May 3, 2016 (EASA AD 2015-0033R1), which was prompted by
the determination that it was not necessary to inspect junction frames
that had accumulated less than 1,200 flight hours. Accordingly, EASA AD
2015-0033R1 extended the inspection threshold from 700 flight hours to
1,200 flight hours. Thereafter, EASA issued EASA AD 2016-0240, dated
December 2, 2016 (EASA AD 2016-0240) to supersede EASA AD 2015-0033R1.
EASA AD 2016-0240 was prompted by a third incident of cracking in the
same area of the junction frame as the first two incidents.
Investigation determined that detection of the crack was delayed
because of insufficient cleaning of the inspection area inside the
junction frame. For that reason, EASA AD 2016-0240 retained the
requirements of EASA AD 2015-0033R1 and added additional cleaning
requirements before inspecting. After EASA AD 2016-0240 was issued, a
fourth incident of cracking in the same area of the junction frame as
the first three incidents was reported. This fourth incident prompted
EASA to issue EASA AD 2017-0066-E, dated April 21, 2017 (EASA AD 2017-
0066-E) to supersede EASA AD 2016-0240. This fourth incident occurred
on a junction frame that had accumulated significantly less flight
hours than the first three incidents. In light of this, EASA AD 2017-
0066-E retained the requirements of EASA AD 2016-0240 and reduced the
inspection threshold. Shortly after, EASA issued EASA AD 2017-0080,
dated May 5, 2017 (EASA AD 2017-0080) to supersede EASA AD 2017-0066-E.
EASA AD 2017-0080 was prompted by the determination that improved
procedures to remove the horizontal stabilizer before cleaning and
inspecting were necessary for certain helicopters. Accordingly, EASA AD
2017-0080 retained the requirements of EASA AD 2017-0066-E and added
the improved procedures. Since EASA issued EASA AD 2017-0080, Airbus
Helicopters developed MOD 074775, which consists of the installation of
four carbon patches at the junction frame. Installation of MOD 074775,
either in production or by retrofit, constitutes terminating action for
the repetitive
[[Page 12859]]
inspections. Based on the latest information, EASA determined that
continued inspections may not adequately address the long-term risk and
requires modifying the affected helicopters, which also terminates the
repetitive inspections of the pre-modified configuration. Accordingly,
EASA issued EASA AD 2018-0104 to supersede EASA AD 2017-0080 to require
installation of MOD 074775.
Also since the FAA issued AD 2016-08-20, it has been determined
that the dye penetrant inspections required by AD 2016-08-20 are
unnecessary because visual inspections are adequate to inspect for
cracks in the affected area instead.
As a result of the EASA-issued ADs and the further incidents of
cracked junction frames, this proposed AD proposes to expand the
applicability to include all Airbus Helicopters Model EC130B4 and
EC130T2 helicopters with a junction frame, regardless of how many hours
TIS have accumulated on the junction frame; revise the compliance time
to inspect the junction frame with the horizontal stabilizer removed to
depend on the hours TIS accumulated on the junction frame; change the
inspection of the junction frame with the horizontal stabilizer removed
from the dye-penetrant inspection required by AD 2016-08-20 to a visual
inspection; add inspection procedures for helicopters with a skin cut-
out at the junction frame; allow repairing a junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved repair procedure; require the
installation of MOD 074775 or the four carbon patches reinforcements;
and require repetitive inspections of a modified junction frame.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA of the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all of the information provided by EASA and
determining the unsafe condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of these same type designs.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
Airbus Helicopters has issued Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05A017, Revision 7, dated March 21, 2018, for Model EC130 B4 and T2
helicopters without MOD 074775 installed. This service information
specifies procedures for cleaning inside the junction frame, inspecting
the junction frame from the inside of the tail boom with the horizontal
stabilizer both removed and installed for a crack, and inspecting the
junction frame from the outside of the tail boom for a crack.
Airbus Helicopters has issued Service Bulletin No. EC130-53-036,
Revision 4, dated April, 28, 2020, for Model EC130 B4 and T2
helicopters without MOD 074609 or 074775 installed and on which the
skin of the junction frame area has not been repaired. This service
information specifies procedures to reinforce the junction frame (MOD
074775) by replacing the two lateral splices which join the skins with
four carbon patches (left-hand side, right-hand side, and lower sides).
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
Other Related Service Information
Airbus Helicopters has issued Service Bulletin No. EC130-53-029,
Revision 1, dated January 27, 2016. This service information specifies
procedures to make a cut-out of the splice and skin at the junction
frame (MOD 350A087421).
Airbus has issued EC 130 B4 Chapter 4, Airworthiness Limitations
Section, Revision 11, dated January 19, 2019 and EC 130 T2 Chapter 4,
Airworthiness Limitations Section, Revision 9, dated September 9, 2019,
which specify visually checking the junction frame for cracks at an
interval of 600 flight hours with a margin of 60 flight hours.
Airbus Helicopters has also issued Section 55-11-00, 6-4--
Horizontal Stabilizer--Inspection/Check, of Aircraft Maintenance Manual
EC130, dated November 9, 2017, which specifies procedures for cleaning
inside the junction frame and inspecting the junction frame from the
inside of the tail boom with the horizontal stabilizer removed.
Proposed AD Requirements
This proposed AD would require:
For helicopters without MOD 074775, or MOD AH 350A087421
or SB EC130-53-029 installed, at a compliance time based on the hours
TIS accumulated on the junction frame, removing the horizontal
stabilizer, cleaning the junction frame, and visually inspecting the
junction frame area for a crack, paying particular attention to the
area around the 4 spars.
[cir] Following the initial visual inspection, within 25 hours TIS
or 390 sling cycles, whichever comes first, and thereafter at intervals
not exceeding 25 hours TIS or 390 sling cycles, whichever comes first,
either repeating the initial visual inspection, or, if the surface area
is clean, borescope inspecting the junction frame area for a crack,
paying particular attention to the area around the 4 spars.
[cir] Also following the initial visual inspection, within 150
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150 hours TIS,
repeating the initial visual inspection.
For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, but with MOD
AH 350A087421 or SB EC130-53-029 installed, before the junction frame
accumulates 350 hours TIS or within 10 hours TIS, whichever occurs
later, visually inspecting for a crack on the junction frame area in
each skin cut-out area.
[cir] Following the initial visual inspection, within 10 hours TIS
or 250 sling cycles, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 10 hours TIS or 250 sling cycles, whichever
occurs first, repeating the initial visual inspection.
[cir] Also following the initial visual inspection, within 660
hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 660 hours TIS,
removing the horizontal stabilizer, cleaning the junction frame, and
dye-penetrant inspecting the junction frame area for a crack, paying
particular attention to the area around the 4 spars.
If there is a crack, replacing or repairing the junction
frame in accordance with an FAA approved repair procedure before
further flight. Repairing the junction frame would not constitute
terminating action for the requirements of this proposed AD.
For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, with or
without MOD AH 350A087421 or SB EC130-53-029 installed, without MOD
074609 or SB 53-024 installed, and on which the skin of the junction
frame area has never been repaired, installing MOD 074775 within 24
months as of the effective date of this AD and reporting certain
information to Airbus Helicopters within 30 days after installing MOD
074775.
For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, with MOD
074609 or SB 53-024 installed, or on which the skin of the junction
frame area has been previously repaired at any time, reinforcing the
junction frame by replacing the two lateral splices which join the
skins with four carbon patches (left-hand side, right-hand side, and
lower sides) within 24 months as of the effective date of this AD.
For helicopters with MOD 074775 installed or with the four
carbon patches reinforcements installed, but without
[[Page 12860]]
MOD 074581 for Model EC130T2 helicopters, within 600 hours TIS after
the installation of MOD 074775 or the reinforcement, and thereafter at
intervals not exceeding 600 hours TIS, visually inspect the junction
frame area for a crack. If there is a crack, replacing or repairing the
junction frame in accordance with an FAA approved repair procedure
before further flight. Repairing the junction frame would not
constitute terminating action for the requirements of this proposed AD.
Differences Between This Proposed AD and the EASA AD
EASA AD 2018-0104 does not apply to helicopters with MOD 074775,
whereas this proposed AD does. EASA AD 2018-0104 requires performing a
local non-destructive inspection if in doubt about if there is a crack,
whereas this proposed AD does not. EASA AD 2018-0104 allows the pilot
to visually inspect the junction frame from outside the tail boom for a
crack, whereas this proposed AD does not. EASA AD 2018-0104 requires
contacting Airbus Helicopters if any crack is detected, whereas this
proposed AD would require replacing or repairing the junction frame in
accordance with an FAA approved repair procedure instead. This proposed
AD would require a repetitive inspection for helicopters with MOD
074775 installed, whereas the EASA AD does not.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 263 helicopters of
U.S. Registry. Labor costs are estimated at $85 per work-hours. Based
on these numbers, the FAA estimates that operators may incur the
following costs in order to comply with this proposed AD.
Cleaning and inspecting the junction frame area with the horizontal
stabilizer removed would take about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost
of $85 per helicopter and $22,355 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection
cycle.
Internally borescope inspecting the junction frame area with the
horizontal stabilizer installed would take about 0.5 work hour for an
estimated cost of $43 per helicopter and $11,309 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle.
If applicable, cleaning and inspecting the junction frame area in
each skin cut-out area would take about 1.25 work-hour for an estimated
cost of $106 per helicopter and $27,878 for the U.S. fleet, per
inspection cycle.
Modifying the junction frame skin reinforcements would take about
90 work-hours and parts cost about $10,000 for an estimated cost of
$17,650 per helicopter and $4,641,950 for the U.S. fleet. Reporting
certain information would take about 1 work-hour for an estimated cost
of $85 per helicopter and $22,355 for the U.S. fleet. Inspecting the
modified junction frame area would take about 1 work-hour for an
estimated cost of $85 per helicopter and $22,355 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle.
If required, repairing or replacing the junction frame would take
up to 50 work-hours and parts would cost about $60,000 for an estimated
cost of $64,250 per helicopter.
According to Airbus Helicopters' service information, some of the
costs of this proposed AD may be covered under warranty, thereby
reducing the cost impact on affected individuals. The FAA does not
control warranty coverage by Airbus Helicopters. Accordingly, the FAA
has included all costs in this cost estimate.
Paperwork Reduction Act
A federal agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to penalty for
failure to comply with a collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act unless that collection of
information displays a current valid OMB Control Number. The OMB
Control Number for this information collection is 2120-0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is estimated to be
approximately 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and
maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the
collection of information. All responses to this collection of
information are mandatory. Send comments regarding this burden estimate
or any other aspect of this collection of information, including
suggestions for reducing this burden, to: Information Collection
Clearance Officer, Federal Aviation Administration, 10101 Hillwood
Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177-1524.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866,
2. Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016-08-20, Amendment 39-18497
(81 FR 26103, May 2, 2016); and
0
b. Adding the following new AD:
Airbus Helicopters: Docket No. FAA-2020-1182; Product Identifier
2018-SW-036-AD.
(a) Applicability
This airworthiness directive (AD) applies to Airbus Helicopters
Model EC130B4 and EC130T2 helicopters, certificated in any category,
with a tail boom to Fenestron junction frame (junction frame).
[[Page 12861]]
(b) Unsafe Condition
This AD defines the unsafe condition as a crack in the junction
frame. This condition could result in failure of the junction frame,
which could result in loss of the Fenestron and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter.
(c) Affected ADs
This AD supersedes AD 2016-08-20, Amendment 39-18497 (81 FR
26103, May 2, 2016).
(d) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by April 5, 2021.
(e) Compliance
You are responsible for performing each action required by this
AD within the specified compliance time unless it has already been
accomplished prior to that time.
(f) Required Actions
(1) For helicopters without modification (MOD) 074775, or MOD AH
350A087421 or SB EC130-53-029 installed, at the compliance time
specified by the hours time-in-service (TIS) accumulated on the
junction frame in Figure 1 to this paragraph, do the following:
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TP05MR21.008
(i) Remove the horizontal stabilizer; using a clean, lint-free,
white cloth soaked with liquid Methyl Ethyl Ketone (MEK), clean the
inside of the junction frame (a) as shown in Figure 1 of Airbus
Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No. 05A017, Revision 7,
dated March 21, 2018 (EASB 05A017, Rev 7); and visually inspect for
cracking around the circumference of the junction frame, in the web
of the junction frame (a) and in the radius between the web and the
flange of the tail boom side as shown in Figure 1 EASB 05A017, Rev
7. Pay particular attention to the area around the 4 spars (b) as
shown in Figure 1 of EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Examples of cracks are
shown in Figure 3 of EASB 05A017, Rev 7. If there is a crack, before
further flight, replace or repair the junction frame in accordance
with an FAA approved repair procedure. Repairing or replacing the
junction frame does not constitute terminating action for the
requirements of this AD.
(ii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD, within
25 hours TIS or 390 sling cycles for helicopters that perform
external load carrying operations, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals not exceeding 25 hours TIS or 390 sling
cycles, whichever occurs first, either perform the actions of
paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD or, if the surface of the junction
frame area is clean, use a borescope through the horizontal
stabilizer opening to borescope inspect for a crack around the
circumference of the junction frame, and in the web of the junction
frame (a) and in the radius between the web and the flange on the
tail boom side as shown in Figure 2 EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Pay
particular attention to the area around the 4 spars (b) of Figure 2
of EASB 05A017, Rev 7. Examples of cracks are shown in Figure 3 of
EASB 05A017, Rev 7. For purposes of this AD, a sling cycle is
defined as one landing with or without stopping the rotor or one
external load-carrying operation; an external load-carrying
operation occurs each time a helicopter picks up an external load
and drops it off. If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace or repair the junction frame in accordance with an FAA
approved repair procedure. Repairing or replacing the junction frame
does not constitute terminating action for the requirements of this
AD.
(iii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD,
within 150 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 150
hours TIS, accomplish the actions required by paragraph (f)(1)(i) of
this AD. Accomplishment of this paragraph constitutes compliance for
an instance of paragraph (f)(1)(ii) of this AD.
(2) For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, but with MOD
AH 350A087421 or SB EC130-53-029 installed, before the junction
frame accumulates 350 hours TIS or within 10 hours TIS, whichever
occurs later:
(i) Visually inspect for cracking on the junction frame (a) in
the upper and lower right-hand side and upper and lower left-hand
side areas of the skin cut-out as shown in Detail A, Figure 4 of
EASB 05A017, Rev 7. If there is a crack, before further flight,
replace or repair the junction frame in accordance with an FAA
approved repair procedure. Repairing or replacing the junction frame
does not constitute terminating action for the requirements of this
AD.
(ii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD, within
10 hours TIS or 250 sling cycles for helicopters that perform
external load carrying operations, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals not exceeding 10 hours TIS or 250 sling
cycles, whichever occurs first, accomplish the actions required by
paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD.
(iii) Thereafter following paragraph (f)(2)(i) of this AD,
within 660 hours TIS and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 660
hours TIS, accomplish the actions required by paragraph (f)(1)(i) of
this AD. Accomplishment of this paragraph constitutes compliance for
an instance of paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this AD.
(3) For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, with or
without MOD AH 350A087421 or SB EC130-53-029 installed, without MOD
074609 or SB 53-024 installed, and on which the skin of the junction
frame area has never been repaired, within 24 months as of the
effective date of this AD, install MOD 074775 by following the
Accomplishment Instructions, paragraphs 3.B.2.a. through g., of
Airbus Helicopters Service Bulletin No. EC130-53-036, Revision 4,
dated April, 28, 2020 (ASB EC130-53-036, Rev 4), except where ASB
EC130-53-036, Rev. 4 specifies to certain discard parts, you are
required to remove those parts from service instead and where ASB
EC130-53-036, Rev 4. specifies contacting Airbus Helicopters for
corrective action, the corrective action must be accomplished using
a method approved by the FAA. Where ASB EC130-53-036, Rev 4,
specifies completing the table in Appendix 4.H. under paragraph
3.B.2.g., complete and return the table to Airbus Helicopters within
30 days after installing MOD 074775. Installation of MOD 074775
constitutes terminating action for the inspections required by
paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(4) For helicopters without MOD 074775 installed, with MOD
074609 or SB 53-024 installed, or on which the skin of the junction
frame area has been previously repaired at any time, within 24
months as of the effective date of this AD, reinforce the junction
frame by replacing the two lateral splices which join the skins with
four carbon patches (left-hand side, right-hand side, and lower
sides) in accordance with an FAA approved corrective procedure.
Installation
[[Page 12862]]
of this reinforcement constitutes terminating action for the
inspections required by paragraphs (f)(1) and (2) of this AD.
(5) For Model EC130B4 helicopters with MOD 074775 installed or
with the reinforcement that is required by paragraph (f)(4) of this
AD; and for Model EC130T2 helicopters with MOD 074775 installed or
with the reinforcement that is required by paragraph (f)(4) of this
AD, but without MOD 074581 installed:
(i) Within 600 hours TIS after the installation of MOD 074775 or
the reinforcement that is required by paragraph (f)(4) of this AD,
and thereafter at intervals not exceeding 600 hours TIS, perform the
actions of paragraph (f)(1)(i) of this AD.
(ii) If there is a crack, before further flight, replace or
repair the junction frame in accordance with an FAA approved repair
procedure. Repairing the junction frame does not constitute
terminating action for the requirements of this AD.
(g) Special Flight Permits
Special flight permits are prohibited.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, International Validation Branch, FAA, may
approve AMOCs for this AD. Send your proposal to: Kristi Bradley,
Aviation Safety Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone 817-222-5110; email
[email protected].
(2) For operations conducted under a 14 CFR part 119 operating
certificate or under 14 CFR part 91, subpart K, the FAA suggests
that you notify your principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight standards district office
or certificate holding district office, before operating any
aircraft complying with this AD through an AMOC.
(i) Additional Information
(1) Airbus Helicopters Service Bulletin No. EC130-53-029,
Revision 1, dated January 27, 2016, Airbus EC 130 B4 Chapter 4,
Airworthiness Limitations Section, Revision 11, dated January 19,
2019, Airbus EC 130 T2 Chapter 4, Airworthiness Limitations Section,
Revision 9, dated September 9, 2019, and Section 55-11-00, 6-4-
Horizontal Stabilizer--Inspection/Check, of Aircraft Maintenance
Manual EC130, dated November 9, 2017, which are not incorporated by
reference, contain additional information about the subject of this
AD. For service information identified in this AD, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N. Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone
972-641-0000 or 800-232-0323; fax 972-641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may
view a copy of the service information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-
321, Fort Worth, TX 76177.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA)
2018-0104, dated May 4, 2018. You may view the EASA AD on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating it in Docket No. FAA-2020-1182.
(j) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 5302, Rotorcraft
Tail Boom.
Issued on February 19, 2021.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-03954 Filed 3-4-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P