30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528-New, 12198-12199 [2021-04253]
Download as PDF
12198
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices
amended, notice is hereby given of the
following meeting.
The meeting will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in sections
552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C.,
as amended. The grant applications and
the discussions could disclose
confidential trade secrets or commercial
property such as patentable material,
and personal information concerning
individuals associated with the grant
applications, the disclosure of which
would constitute a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy.
Name of Committee: National Institute on
Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Artificial
Intelligence, Technology, and Aging.
Date: March 12, 2021.
Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate grant
applications.
Place: National Institute on Aging,
Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue,
Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting).
Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D.,
Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review
Branch, National Institute on Aging, National
Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201
Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2W200, Bethesda,
MD 20892, 301–402–7702, firthkm@
mail.nih.gov.
This notice is being published less than 15
days prior to the meeting due to the timing
limitations imposed by the review and
funding cycle.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research,
National Institutes of Health, HHS)
Dated: February 24, 2021.
Miguelina Perez,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
National Institutes of Health
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
[FR Doc. 2021–04230 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Office of the Chief Information
Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
National Library of Medicine; Notice of
Meeting
Pursuant to section 10(d) of the
Federal Advisory Committee Act, as
amended, notice is hereby given of a
meeting of the Literature Selection
Technical Review Committee. The
meeting is devoted to the review and
evaluation of journals for potential
indexing by the National Library of
Medicine and will be closed to the
public in accordance with the
provisions set forth in section
552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as
amended. Premature disclosure of the
titles of the journals as potential titles to
be indexed by the National Library of
Medicine, the discussions, and the
Jkt 253001
Dated: February 24, 2021.
Ronald J. Livingston, Jr.,
Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory
Committee Policy.
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Rental Assistance
Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility
and Long-Term Affordability
Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528–New
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
17:11 Mar 01, 2021
Name of Committee: Literature Selection
Technical Review Committee.
Date: June 24–25, 2021.
Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Agenda: To review and evaluate journals
as potential titles to be indexed by the
National Library of Medicine.
Place: Virtual Meeting.
Contact Person: Dianne Babski, Associate
Director, Division of Library Operations,
National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville
Pike, Building 38, Room 2W04A, Bethesda,
MD 20894, 301–827–4729, babskid@
mail.nih.gov.
Any member of the public may submit
written comments no later than 15 days after
the meeting. Any interested person may file
written comments with the committee by
forwarding the statement to the Contact
Person listed on this notice. The statement
should include the name, address, telephone
number and when applicable, the business or
professional affiliation of the interested
person.
(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program No. 93.879, Medical Library
Assistance, National Institutes of Health,
HHS).
[Docket No. FR–7034–N–11]
[FR Doc. 2021–04227 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
presence of individuals associated with
these publications could significantly
frustrate the review and evaluation of
individual journals.
HUD is seeking approval from
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for the information collection
described below. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is
requesting comment from all interested
parties on the proposed collection of
information. The purpose of this notice
is to allow for 30 days of public
comment.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Comments Due Date: April 1,
2021.
Interested persons are
invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to:
HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New
Executive Office Building, Washington,
DC 20503; fax:202–395–5806, Email:
OIRA Submission@omb.eop.gov
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 7th Street,
SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at
Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or telephone
202–402–5535. This is not a toll-free
number. Person with hearing or speech
impairments may access this number
through TTY by calling the toll-free
Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339.
Copies of available documents
submitted to OMB may be obtained
from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the
information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that
solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60
days was published on June 9, 2020 at
85 FR 35328.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Rental
Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice
Mobility and Long-Term Affordability
Evaluation.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request: New collection.
Form Number: NA
Description of the need for the
information and proposed use:
The Office of Policy Development and
Research (PD&R), at the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD), is proposing the
collection of information for the Rental
Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice
Mobility and Long-Term Affordability
Evaluation.
RAD was established under the
Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act of 2012 to preserve
affordable housing units over the long
term by enabling public housing
authorities (PHAs) to apply to HUD to
convert at-risk public housing
properties to two different forms of
project-based Section 8 Housing
Assistance Payments contracts—projectbased voucher (PBV) or project-based
rental assistance (PBRA). Doing so gives
PHAs more flexibility to access private
and public funding sources to meet with
short-term capital needs, reduce their
reliance on limited appropriations, and
stabilize their financial and physical
condition. Choice mobility, an
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
12199
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices
additional feature of RAD, allows
residents of RAD properties to request a
Housing Choice Voucher that they can
use to move to a housing unit in the
private market.
Congress requested an evaluation of
RAD to assess the impact of the
demonstration on the preservation and
improvement of public housing, the
amount of private sector leveraging, and
the effect on tenants. HUD contracted a
two-phase evaluation to address these
research areas. The Phase I results were
published in 2016 and the Phase II
results in 2019. The OMB Approval
Number for that evaluation was 2528–
0304 and expired on January 31st, 2020.
The Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations
Act provided funds to conduct a followInformation collection
Responses
per annum
study is the impact of RAD on the longterm preservation and financial viability
of converted affordable housing
properties. The third is the adequacy of
asset management for PBV and PBRA
conversions. The fourth study will
examine the organizational and
operational changes at PHAs that
participated in RAD. For the first three
studies, the evaluation includes webbased survey of all RAD PHAs, RAD
property owners/operators, and former
RAD residents who have exercised the
choice mobility option; and a sample
survey of RAD residents who have not
elected the choice mobility option. For
the fourth study, we plan to conduct
qualitative interviews with senior staff
at 25 RAD PHAs.
Burden
?hour per
response
Annual
burden
hours
Hourly
cost per
response
Number of
respondents
Frequency
of response
Annual
cost
400
1
400
0.75
300.00
$34.46
$10,338.00
Census of RAD PHA ...............................
Survey of RAD non-PHA Property Owners .........................................................
Survey of choice mobility residents .........
Survey of non-choice mobility residents ..
Interview of PHA staff on organizational
changes ................................................
228
708
231
1
1
1
228
708
231
0.33
0.33
0.33
75.24
233.64
76.23
34.46
28.62
28.62
2,592.77
6,686.78
2,181.70
250
1
250
1.5
375.00
34.46
12,922.50
Total ..................................................
1,817
N/A
1,817
N/A
1,060.11
N/A
34,721.75
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
up evaluation of the RAD program,
including its implementation and
outcomes, the choice mobility option,
the impact on tenants and related
protections, and the long-term
preservation of housing affordability.
This Federal Register Notice provides
an opportunity to comment on the
information collection for this new
phase of the RAD evaluation titled RAD
Choice Mobility and Long-Term
Affordability Evaluation. The current
information collection is designed to
support four studies included in the
evaluation. One is the study of the
implementation of the RAD choice
mobility option and its effects on
property outcomes, tenant outcomes,
and the voucher program. The second
This notice is soliciting comments
from members of the public and affected
parties concerning the collection of
information described in Section A on
the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the
proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond; including through
the use of appropriate automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses.
(5) Ways to minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, including the use
of automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
HUD encourages interested parties to
submit comment in response to these
questions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 01, 2021
Jkt 253001
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer,
Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–04253 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[Docket No. FWS–HQ–IA–2021–0008;
FXIA16710900000–FF09A10000–212]
Conference of the Parties to the
Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna
and Flora (CITES); Nineteenth Regular
Meeting: Species Proposals for
Consideration and Request for
Information and Recommendations on
Resolutions, Decisions, and Agenda
Items for Consideration
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
To implement the Convention
on International Trade in Endangered
Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES
or the Convention), the Parties to the
Convention meet periodically to review
what species in international trade
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
should be regulated and other aspects of
CITES implementation. The nineteenth
regular meeting of the Conference of the
Parties (CoP19) is tentatively scheduled
to be held in Costa Rica, March 3–14,
2022. With this notice we are soliciting
recommendations for amending
Appendices I and II of CITES at CoP19
as well as recommendations for
resolutions, decisions, and agenda items
for discussion at CoP19. We invite you
to provide us with information and
recommendations on animal and plant
species for which the United States
should consider submitting proposals to
amend Appendices I and II of CITES at
CoP19. Such proposals may concern the
addition of species to Appendix I or II,
the transfer of species from one
Appendix to another, or the removal of
species from Appendices. We also invite
you to provide us with information and
recommendations on resolutions,
decisions, and agenda items that the
United States might consider submitting
for discussion at CoP19. Finally, with
this notice, we also describe the U.S.
approach to preparations for CoP19.
We will consider all information
and comments we receive on or before
May 3, 2021.
DATES:
You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
ADDRESSES:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12198-12199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04253]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
[Docket No. FR-7034-N-11]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rental
Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term
Affordability Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528-New
AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information.
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment.
DATES: Comments Due Date: April 1, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC
20503; fax:202-395-5806, Email: OIRA [email protected]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at [email protected] or
telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free number. Person with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Copies
of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in
Section A.
The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the
information collection for a period of 60 days was published on June 9,
2020 at 85 FR 35328.
A. Overview of Information Collection
Title of Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration
(RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation.
OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
Type of Request: New collection.
Form Number: NA
Description of the need for the information and proposed use:
The Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R), at the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is proposing the
collection of information for the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD)
Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation.
RAD was established under the Consolidated and Further Continuing
Appropriations Act of 2012 to preserve affordable housing units over
the long term by enabling public housing authorities (PHAs) to apply to
HUD to convert at-risk public housing properties to two different forms
of project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments contracts--
project-based voucher (PBV) or project-based rental assistance (PBRA).
Doing so gives PHAs more flexibility to access private and public
funding sources to meet with short-term capital needs, reduce their
reliance on limited appropriations, and stabilize their financial and
physical condition. Choice mobility, an
[[Page 12199]]
additional feature of RAD, allows residents of RAD properties to
request a Housing Choice Voucher that they can use to move to a housing
unit in the private market.
Congress requested an evaluation of RAD to assess the impact of the
demonstration on the preservation and improvement of public housing,
the amount of private sector leveraging, and the effect on tenants. HUD
contracted a two-phase evaluation to address these research areas. The
Phase I results were published in 2016 and the Phase II results in
2019. The OMB Approval Number for that evaluation was 2528-0304 and
expired on January 31st, 2020. The Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations Act
provided funds to conduct a follow-up evaluation of the RAD program,
including its implementation and outcomes, the choice mobility option,
the impact on tenants and related protections, and the long-term
preservation of housing affordability.
This Federal Register Notice provides an opportunity to comment on
the information collection for this new phase of the RAD evaluation
titled RAD Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation. The
current information collection is designed to support four studies
included in the evaluation. One is the study of the implementation of
the RAD choice mobility option and its effects on property outcomes,
tenant outcomes, and the voucher program. The second study is the
impact of RAD on the long-term preservation and financial viability of
converted affordable housing properties. The third is the adequacy of
asset management for PBV and PBRA conversions. The fourth study will
examine the organizational and operational changes at PHAs that
participated in RAD. For the first three studies, the evaluation
includes web-based survey of all RAD PHAs, RAD property owners/
operators, and former RAD residents who have exercised the choice
mobility option; and a sample survey of RAD residents who have not
elected the choice mobility option. For the fourth study, we plan to
conduct qualitative interviews with senior staff at 25 RAD PHAs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Burden Annual Hourly
Information collection Number of Frequency Responses ?hour per burden cost per Annual cost
respondents of response per annum response hours response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Census of RAD PHA............................................ 400 1 400 0.75 300.00 $34.46 $10,338.00
Survey of RAD non-PHA Property Owners........................ 228 1 228 0.33 75.24 34.46 2,592.77
Survey of choice mobility residents.......................... 708 1 708 0.33 233.64 28.62 6,686.78
Survey of non-choice mobility residents...................... 231 1 231 0.33 76.23 28.62 2,181.70
Interview of PHA staff on organizational changes............. 250 1 250 1.5 375.00 34.46 12,922.50
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total.................................................... 1,817 N/A 1,817 N/A 1,060.11 N/A 34,721.75
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Solicitation of Public Comment
This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in
Section A on the following:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and
(4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
(5) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to
these questions.
Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.
Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-04253 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P