30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528-New, 12198-12199 [2021-04253]

Download as PDF 12198 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting. The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. Name of Committee: National Institute on Aging Special Emphasis Panel; Artificial Intelligence, Technology, and Aging. Date: March 12, 2021. Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications. Place: National Institute on Aging, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Video Meeting). Contact Person: Kimberly Firth, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Gateway Building, 7201 Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 2W200, Bethesda, MD 20892, 301–402–7702, firthkm@ mail.nih.gov. This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.866, Aging Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS) Dated: February 24, 2021. Miguelina Perez, Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. BILLING CODE 4140–01–P National Institutes of Health jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES [FR Doc. 2021–04230 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4140–01–P DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: National Library of Medicine; Notice of Meeting Pursuant to section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Literature Selection Technical Review Committee. The meeting is devoted to the review and evaluation of journals for potential indexing by the National Library of Medicine and will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in section 552b(c)(9)(B), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. Premature disclosure of the titles of the journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of Medicine, the discussions, and the Jkt 253001 Dated: February 24, 2021. Ronald J. Livingston, Jr., Program Analyst,Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy. 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528–New DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 17:11 Mar 01, 2021 Name of Committee: Literature Selection Technical Review Committee. Date: June 24–25, 2021. Time: 9:30 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Agenda: To review and evaluate journals as potential titles to be indexed by the National Library of Medicine. Place: Virtual Meeting. Contact Person: Dianne Babski, Associate Director, Division of Library Operations, National Library of Medicine, 8600 Rockville Pike, Building 38, Room 2W04A, Bethesda, MD 20894, 301–827–4729, babskid@ mail.nih.gov. Any member of the public may submit written comments no later than 15 days after the meeting. Any interested person may file written comments with the committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional affiliation of the interested person. (Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program No. 93.879, Medical Library Assistance, National Institutes of Health, HHS). [Docket No. FR–7034–N–11] [FR Doc. 2021–04227 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am] VerDate Sep<11>2014 presence of individuals associated with these publications could significantly frustrate the review and evaluation of individual journals. HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment. SUMMARY: DATES: Comments Due Date: April 1, 2021. Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding this proposal. Comments should refer to ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00030 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 the proposal by name and/or OMB Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 20503; fax:202–395–5806, Email: OIRA Submission@omb.eop.gov FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at Anna.P.Guido@hud.gov or telephone 202–402–5535. This is not a toll-free number. Person with hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877–8339. Copies of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in Section A. The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the information collection for a period of 60 days was published on June 9, 2020 at 85 FR 35328. A. Overview of Information Collection Title of Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation. OMB Approval Number: 2528-New. Type of Request: New collection. Form Number: NA Description of the need for the information and proposed use: The Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R), at the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is proposing the collection of information for the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation. RAD was established under the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2012 to preserve affordable housing units over the long term by enabling public housing authorities (PHAs) to apply to HUD to convert at-risk public housing properties to two different forms of project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments contracts—projectbased voucher (PBV) or project-based rental assistance (PBRA). Doing so gives PHAs more flexibility to access private and public funding sources to meet with short-term capital needs, reduce their reliance on limited appropriations, and stabilize their financial and physical condition. Choice mobility, an E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1 12199 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices additional feature of RAD, allows residents of RAD properties to request a Housing Choice Voucher that they can use to move to a housing unit in the private market. Congress requested an evaluation of RAD to assess the impact of the demonstration on the preservation and improvement of public housing, the amount of private sector leveraging, and the effect on tenants. HUD contracted a two-phase evaluation to address these research areas. The Phase I results were published in 2016 and the Phase II results in 2019. The OMB Approval Number for that evaluation was 2528– 0304 and expired on January 31st, 2020. The Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations Act provided funds to conduct a followInformation collection Responses per annum study is the impact of RAD on the longterm preservation and financial viability of converted affordable housing properties. The third is the adequacy of asset management for PBV and PBRA conversions. The fourth study will examine the organizational and operational changes at PHAs that participated in RAD. For the first three studies, the evaluation includes webbased survey of all RAD PHAs, RAD property owners/operators, and former RAD residents who have exercised the choice mobility option; and a sample survey of RAD residents who have not elected the choice mobility option. For the fourth study, we plan to conduct qualitative interviews with senior staff at 25 RAD PHAs. Burden ?hour per response Annual burden hours Hourly cost per response Number of respondents Frequency of response Annual cost 400 1 400 0.75 300.00 $34.46 $10,338.00 Census of RAD PHA ............................... Survey of RAD non-PHA Property Owners ......................................................... Survey of choice mobility residents ......... Survey of non-choice mobility residents .. Interview of PHA staff on organizational changes ................................................ 228 708 231 1 1 1 228 708 231 0.33 0.33 0.33 75.24 233.64 76.23 34.46 28.62 28.62 2,592.77 6,686.78 2,181.70 250 1 250 1.5 375.00 34.46 12,922.50 Total .................................................. 1,817 N/A 1,817 N/A 1,060.11 N/A 34,721.75 Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 44 U.S.C. Chapter 35. B. Solicitation of Public Comment jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES up evaluation of the RAD program, including its implementation and outcomes, the choice mobility option, the impact on tenants and related protections, and the long-term preservation of housing affordability. This Federal Register Notice provides an opportunity to comment on the information collection for this new phase of the RAD evaluation titled RAD Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation. The current information collection is designed to support four studies included in the evaluation. One is the study of the implementation of the RAD choice mobility option and its effects on property outcomes, tenant outcomes, and the voucher program. The second This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and affected parties concerning the collection of information described in Section A on the following: (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) The accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. (5) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to these questions. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:11 Mar 01, 2021 Jkt 253001 Anna P. Guido, Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2021–04253 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4210–67–P DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fish and Wildlife Service [Docket No. FWS–HQ–IA–2021–0008; FXIA16710900000–FF09A10000–212] Conference of the Parties to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES); Nineteenth Regular Meeting: Species Proposals for Consideration and Request for Information and Recommendations on Resolutions, Decisions, and Agenda Items for Consideration Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: To implement the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES or the Convention), the Parties to the Convention meet periodically to review what species in international trade SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 should be regulated and other aspects of CITES implementation. The nineteenth regular meeting of the Conference of the Parties (CoP19) is tentatively scheduled to be held in Costa Rica, March 3–14, 2022. With this notice we are soliciting recommendations for amending Appendices I and II of CITES at CoP19 as well as recommendations for resolutions, decisions, and agenda items for discussion at CoP19. We invite you to provide us with information and recommendations on animal and plant species for which the United States should consider submitting proposals to amend Appendices I and II of CITES at CoP19. Such proposals may concern the addition of species to Appendix I or II, the transfer of species from one Appendix to another, or the removal of species from Appendices. We also invite you to provide us with information and recommendations on resolutions, decisions, and agenda items that the United States might consider submitting for discussion at CoP19. Finally, with this notice, we also describe the U.S. approach to preparations for CoP19. We will consider all information and comments we receive on or before May 3, 2021. DATES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods: ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM 02MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12198-12199]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04253]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT

[Docket No. FR-7034-N-11]


30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Rental 
Assistance Demonstration (RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term 
Affordability Evaluation OMB Control No. 2528-New

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Information Officer, HUD.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: HUD is seeking approval from the Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) for the information collection described below. In 
accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act, HUD is requesting comment 
from all interested parties on the proposed collection of information. 
The purpose of this notice is to allow for 30 days of public comment.

DATES: Comments Due Date: April 1, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments regarding 
this proposal. Comments should refer to the proposal by name and/or OMB 
Control Number and should be sent to: HUD Desk Officer, Office of 
Management and Budget, New Executive Office Building, Washington, DC 
20503; fax:202-395-5806, Email: OIRA [email protected]

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anna P. Guido, Reports Management 
Officer, QMAC, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th 
Street, SW, Washington, DC 20410; email her at [email protected] or 
telephone 202-402-5535. This is not a toll-free number. Person with 
hearing or speech impairments may access this number through TTY by 
calling the toll-free Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Copies 
of available documents submitted to OMB may be obtained from Ms. Guido.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice informs the public that HUD is 
seeking approval from OMB for the information collection described in 
Section A.
    The Federal Register notice that solicited public comment on the 
information collection for a period of 60 days was published on June 9, 
2020 at 85 FR 35328.

A. Overview of Information Collection

    Title of Information Collection: Rental Assistance Demonstration 
(RAD) Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation.
    OMB Approval Number: 2528-New.
    Type of Request: New collection.
    Form Number: NA
    Description of the need for the information and proposed use:
    The Office of Policy Development and Research (PD&R), at the U.S. 
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), is proposing the 
collection of information for the Rental Assistance Demonstration (RAD) 
Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation.
    RAD was established under the Consolidated and Further Continuing 
Appropriations Act of 2012 to preserve affordable housing units over 
the long term by enabling public housing authorities (PHAs) to apply to 
HUD to convert at-risk public housing properties to two different forms 
of project-based Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments contracts--
project-based voucher (PBV) or project-based rental assistance (PBRA). 
Doing so gives PHAs more flexibility to access private and public 
funding sources to meet with short-term capital needs, reduce their 
reliance on limited appropriations, and stabilize their financial and 
physical condition. Choice mobility, an

[[Page 12199]]

additional feature of RAD, allows residents of RAD properties to 
request a Housing Choice Voucher that they can use to move to a housing 
unit in the private market.
    Congress requested an evaluation of RAD to assess the impact of the 
demonstration on the preservation and improvement of public housing, 
the amount of private sector leveraging, and the effect on tenants. HUD 
contracted a two-phase evaluation to address these research areas. The 
Phase I results were published in 2016 and the Phase II results in 
2019. The OMB Approval Number for that evaluation was 2528-0304 and 
expired on January 31st, 2020. The Fiscal Year 2018 Appropriations Act 
provided funds to conduct a follow-up evaluation of the RAD program, 
including its implementation and outcomes, the choice mobility option, 
the impact on tenants and related protections, and the long-term 
preservation of housing affordability.
    This Federal Register Notice provides an opportunity to comment on 
the information collection for this new phase of the RAD evaluation 
titled RAD Choice Mobility and Long-Term Affordability Evaluation. The 
current information collection is designed to support four studies 
included in the evaluation. One is the study of the implementation of 
the RAD choice mobility option and its effects on property outcomes, 
tenant outcomes, and the voucher program. The second study is the 
impact of RAD on the long-term preservation and financial viability of 
converted affordable housing properties. The third is the adequacy of 
asset management for PBV and PBRA conversions. The fourth study will 
examine the organizational and operational changes at PHAs that 
participated in RAD. For the first three studies, the evaluation 
includes web-based survey of all RAD PHAs, RAD property owners/
operators, and former RAD residents who have exercised the choice 
mobility option; and a sample survey of RAD residents who have not 
elected the choice mobility option. For the fourth study, we plan to 
conduct qualitative interviews with senior staff at 25 RAD PHAs.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                         Burden       Annual       Hourly
                    Information collection                      Number of    Frequency    Responses    ?hour per      burden      cost per   Annual cost
                                                               respondents  of response   per annum     response      hours       response
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Census of RAD PHA............................................          400            1          400         0.75       300.00       $34.46   $10,338.00
Survey of RAD non-PHA Property Owners........................          228            1          228         0.33        75.24        34.46     2,592.77
Survey of choice mobility residents..........................          708            1          708         0.33       233.64        28.62     6,686.78
Survey of non-choice mobility residents......................          231            1          231         0.33        76.23        28.62     2,181.70
Interview of PHA staff on organizational changes.............          250            1          250          1.5       375.00        34.46    12,922.50
                                                              ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Total....................................................        1,817          N/A        1,817          N/A     1,060.11          N/A    34,721.75
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Solicitation of Public Comment

    This notice is soliciting comments from members of the public and 
affected parties concerning the collection of information described in 
Section A on the following:
    (1) Whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for 
the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including 
whether the information will have practical utility;
    (2) The accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden of the 
proposed collection of information;
    (3) Ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the 
information to be collected; and
    (4) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond; including through the use of appropriate 
automated collection techniques or other forms of information 
technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses.
    (5) Ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on 
those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection 
techniques or other forms of information technology.
    HUD encourages interested parties to submit comment in response to 
these questions.

    Authority: Section 3507 of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, 
44 U.S.C. Chapter 35.

Anna P. Guido,
Department Reports Management Officer, Office of the Chief Information 
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021-04253 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.