Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels, 11913 [2021-04011]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 38 / Monday, March 1, 2021 / Proposed Rules a. Revising the introductory text; and b. Adding a period at the end of paragraph (f). The revision and addition read as follows: benefits of expanding other existing regulations, as detailed in question 6, differ from the costs and benefits of requiring SMSs for all passenger vessels?’’ § 213.39 Dated: February 19, 2021. M.T. Cunningham, Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard. ■ ■ Exceptions to mandatory transfer. USAID is not required to transfer a debt to the Financial Management Service (FMS) of the U.S. Department of the Treasury pursuant to § 214.37(b) during such period of time that the debt: * * * * * Kent Kuyumjian, Deputy Chief Financial Officer. [FR Doc. 2021–04011 Filed 2–26–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [FR Doc. 2021–03385 Filed 2–26–21; 8:45 am] 40 CFR Part 52 BILLING CODE 6116–01–P [EPA–R06–OAR–2020–0343; FRL–10016– 31–Region 6] DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Air Plan Approval; Texas; Clean Air Act Requirements for Enhanced Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance and Nonattainment New Source Review Coast Guard 33 CFR Part 96 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: 46 CFR Parts 71, 115, and 176 [Docket No. USCG–2020–0123] RIN 1625–AC65 Pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve portions of two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Texas for the 2008 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS). The SIP revisions proposed for approval describe how CAA requirements for vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M) and Nonattainment New Source Review (NNSR) are met in the Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) and Houston-Galveston-Brazoria (HGB) serious ozone nonattainment areas. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before March 31, 2021. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket No. EPA–R06– OAR–2020–0343, at https:// www.regulations.gov or via email to paige.carrie@epa.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to SUMMARY: Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels Coast Guard, DHS. Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction. AGENCY: ACTION: The Coast Guard is correcting an advance notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register of January 15, 2021, seeking public comment on the potential use of Safety Management Systems (SMSs) to improve safety and reduce marine casualties on board U.S.flagged passenger vessels. The ANPRM contained an incorrect internal crossreference in the list of questions for the public. DATES: March 1, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document, call or email Lieutenant Kimberly Gates, Vessel and Facility Operating Standards Division (CG–OES–2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202–372–1455, email kimberly.m.gates@uscg.mil. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2021–01058, beginning on page 3899 in the issue of January 15, 2021, make the following correction in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section: On page 3902 in the third column, in the paragraph for Question 19, replace the text ‘‘question 4’’ with the text ‘‘question 6.’’ The corrected Question 19 reads as follows: ‘‘How would the costs and SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:16 Feb 26, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 11913 make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact Carrie Paige, 214–665–6521, paige.carrie@epa.gov. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https:// www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epadockets. Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available electronically at www.regulations.gov. While all documents in the docket are listed in the index, some information may not be publicly available due to docket file size restrictions or content (e.g., CBI). Ms. Carrie Paige, EPA Region 6 Office, Infrastructure and Ozone Section, 214– 665–6521, paige.carrie@epa.gov. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our staff, the EPA Region 6 office may be closed to the public to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID– 19. We encourage the public to submit comments via https:// www.regulations.gov, as there will be a delay in processing mail and no courier or hand deliveries will be accepted. Please call or email the contact listed above if you need alternative access to material indexed but not provided in the docket. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background On March 12, 2008, the EPA revised both the primary and secondary NAAQS for ozone to a level of 0.075 parts per million (ppm) to provide increased protection of public health and the environment (73 FR 16436, March 27, 2008).1 The 2008 ozone NAAQS retains the same general form and averaging time as the 0.08 ppm NAAQS set in 1997 but is set at a more protective level. Specifically, the 2008 ozone NAAQS is attained when the 3-year average of the annual fourth-highest daily maximum 8-hour average ambient air quality ozone concentrations is less 1 For a history of the ozone NAAQS, please visit https://www.epa.gov/ground-level-ozone-pollution/ table-historical-ozone-national-ambient-air-qualitystandards-naaqs. For information on EPA’s periodic review of the ozone NAAQS, please visit https:// www.epa.gov/naaqs/ozone-o3-air-qualitystandards. E:\FR\FM\01MRP1.SGM 01MRP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 38 (Monday, March 1, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 11913]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04011]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 96

46 CFR Parts 71, 115, and 176

[Docket No. USCG-2020-0123]
RIN 1625-AC65


Safety Management Systems for Domestic Passenger Vessels

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is correcting an advance notice of proposed 
rulemaking (ANPRM) published in the Federal Register of January 15, 
2021, seeking public comment on the potential use of Safety Management 
Systems (SMSs) to improve safety and reduce marine casualties on board 
U.S.-flagged passenger vessels. The ANPRM contained an incorrect 
internal cross-reference in the list of questions for the public.

DATES: March 1, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information about this document, 
call or email Lieutenant Kimberly Gates, Vessel and Facility Operating 
Standards Division (CG-OES-2), U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 202-372-
1455, email [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2021-01058, beginning on page 
3899 in the issue of January 15, 2021, make the following correction in 
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section:
    On page 3902 in the third column, in the paragraph for Question 19, 
replace the text ``question 4'' with the text ``question 6.''
    The corrected Question 19 reads as follows: ``How would the costs 
and benefits of expanding other existing regulations, as detailed in 
question 6, differ from the costs and benefits of requiring SMSs for 
all passenger vessels?''

    Dated: February 19, 2021.
M.T. Cunningham,
Chief, Office of Regulations and Administrative Law, U.S. Coast Guard.
[FR Doc. 2021-04011 Filed 2-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.