Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances, 11133-11139 [2021-03624]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
2018 Opinion, affirm that the State
revised the title V program provisions
for judicial review as codified in NDAC
section 33.1–15–14–6.8, effective as
amended January 1, 2019. Therefore,
North Dakota timely submitted revisions
to address the deficiencies identified in
our interim approval action within six
months prior to the interim approval’s
expiration. Accordingly, the EPA finds
that the North Dakota title V program
fulfills all criteria for full final approval
of the transfer. The EPA is now acting
to fully approve the North Dakota title
V program under 40 CFR part 70 and
CAA section 502.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a state title V
program submittal that complies with
the provisions of the Act and applicable
federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7661a(d);
40 CFR 70.1(c), 70.4(i). Thus, in
reviewing title V program submittals,
the EPA’s role is to approve state
choices, provided they meet the criteria
of the CAA and the criteria, standards
and procedures defined in 40 CFR part
70. Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because Operating Permits
Program approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Public Law 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this action is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by April 26, 2021.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this action for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 70
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Title V.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11133
Dated: February 11, 2021.
Debra Thomas,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8.
40 CFR part 70 is amended as follows:
PART 70—STATE OPERATING PERMIT
PROGRAMS
1. The authority citation for part 70
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et seq.
2. In appendix A to part 70 the entry
for ‘‘North Dakota’’ is amended by
revising paragraph (d) to read as
follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 70—Approval
Status of State and Local Operating
Permits Programs
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
North Dakota
*
*
*
(d) The State of North Dakota submitted on
August 6, 2018, operating permit program
revisions and a request to transfer authority
to implement and enforce the operating
permit program from the North Dakota
Department of Health to the North Dakota
Department of Environmental Quality. The
recodified North Dakota title V operating
permits program is codified in N.D. Admin.
Code sections 33.1–15–14–06, 33.1–15–23–
04, and 33.1–15–21. North Dakota also
submitted on August 16, 2018 the, ‘‘Attorney
General’s Opinion Operating Permits
Program,’’ which was supplemented on
December 12, 2018, with an ‘‘Addendum to
August 16, 2018 Attorney General’s Opinion
Operating Permits Program,’’ stating that the
laws of the State provide adequate legal
authority to carry out all aspects of the
program. North Dakota also submitted
revisions to state law effective January 1,
2019; full approval effective on April 26,
2021.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2021–03267 Filed 2–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0233; FRL–10005–77]
Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of tetraniliprole
in or on multiple commodities that are
identified and discussed later in this
document. Bayer CropScience requested
these tolerances under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 24, 2021. Objections and
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
11134
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 26, 2021, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0233, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0233 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before April 26, 2021. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2017–0233, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of December
15, 2017 (82 FR 59604) (FRL–9970–50),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 7F8558) by Bayer
CropScience, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive,
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. The
petition requested that 40 CFR part 180
be amended by establishing tolerances
for residues of the insecticide,
tetraniliprole in or on tuberous and
corm vegetables, crop group 1C at 0.015
parts per million (ppm); potato, wet peel
at 0.02 ppm; leafy vegetables, crop
group 4–16 at 20 ppm; Brassica head
and stem vegetables, crop group 5–16 at
1.5 ppm; fruiting vegetables, crop group
8–10 at 0.40 ppm; tomato paste at 1.5
ppm; citrus fruit, orange subgroup 10–
10A at 0.50 ppm; citrus fruit, lemon/
lime subgroup 10–10B at 0.80 ppm;
citrus fruit, grapefruit subgroup 10–10C
at 0.50 ppm; citrus oil at 4.0 ppm; pome
fruit, crop group 11–10 at 0.40 ppm;
stone fruit, crop group 12–12 at 1.0
ppm; plum, dried (prune) at 2.0 ppm;
small fruit, vine climbing subgroup,
except fuzzy kiwi, crop subgroup 13–
07F at 1.5 ppm; tree nuts, crop group
14–12 at 0.03 ppm; almond hulls at 4.0
ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.015 ppm;
corn, field, forage at 4.0 ppm; corn,
field, stover at 15 ppm; corn, pop, grain
at 0.015 ppm; corn, pop, stover at 15
ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cobs with
husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn,
sweet, forage at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet,
stover at 20 ppm; cottonseed, crop
group 20C at 0.40 ppm; cotton, gin
byproducts at 30 ppm; soybean seed at
0.20 ppm; soybean hulls at 0.60 ppm;
aspirated grain fractions at 45 ppm;
soybean forage at 0.07 ppm; soybean
hay at 0.20 ppm; alfalfa, forage and hay
at 0.06 ppm; forage, fodder and straw of
cereal grains, crop group 16, except
field, pop and sweet corn at 0.10 ppm;
foliage of legume vegetables, crop group
7, except soybeans at 0.03 ppm; milk at
0.06 ppm; fat of cattle, horses, sheep
and goats at 0.30 ppm; muscle of cattle,
horses, sheep and goats at 0.03 ppm;
meat by-products of cattle, horses, sheep
and goats at 0.30 ppm. That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by Bayer CropScience, the
registrant, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
Comments were received on the notice
of filing. EPA’s response to these
comments is discussed in Unit IV.C.
Based upon review of the data
supporting the petition, EPA has
modified the levels at which tolerances
are being established as well as some of
the commodity definitions used. The
reasons for these changes are explained
in Unit IV.D.
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for tetraniliprole
including exposure resulting from the
tolerances established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with tetraniliprole follows.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered its validity,
completeness, and reliability as well as
the relationship of the results of the
studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
The submitted animal toxicity studies
on tetraniliprole demonstrate low
toxicity, which is expected based on
two factors. Tetraniliprole is an
anthranilimide insecticide that targets
the activation of insect ryanodine
receptors, which leads to insect
paralysis and death. In contrast,
mammalian ryanodine receptors are
substantially less sensitive (i.e., 350 to
>2,500 times less sensitive) to the effects
of anthranilic diamides than insect
ryanodine receptors. Moreover,
available data indicate that
tetraniliprole has limited absorption at
the higher dose levels (>20 mg/kg),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
which may contribute to the low
toxicity seen in the animal testing.
In subchronic toxicity studies (28-day
and 90-day) in rats and mice, no adverse
effects were seen at dose levels ranging
from approximately 600 to 1,228 mg/kg/
day. In the subchronic studies (28-day
and 90-day) in dogs, an increase in the
incidence and frequency of salivation
was found, but this finding did not
show a dose related-response, was a
common occurrence in dogs, and was
not considered to be adverse.
No systemic or dermal toxicity was
seen in a 28-day dermal toxicity study
at 1,000 mg/kg/day; this finding was
consistent with rather low dermal
absorption as the DAF for humans was
estimated to be approximately 9%
(upper limit).
No adverse maternal or
developmental effects were found at the
limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day) in the
developmental toxicity studies in rats
and rabbits. In the reproduction study,
the offspring effect, slight decrease in
pup weight near and above the limit
dose, was found in the absence of any
adverse parental effect. Because the
potential increase in susceptibility
occurred at the limit dose and on
postnatal days (PND) 14 to 21 at which
time the pups were exposed to the test
material through both milk and food
resulting in a higher compound intake,
the Agency’s concern for the potential
risk to infants and children is low.
Tetraniliprole did not cause any effects
on reproductive parameters.
The combined chronic/
carcinogenicity study in rats showed a
decrease in body weights, increased
incidence of squamous cell hyperplasia
in the cervix and vagina, and corpora
lutea depletion in the ovary at the limit
dose. In addition, a slight increase in the
incidence of uterine tumor was
observed at a dose slightly above the
limit dose. No genotoxic potential was
detected in the battery of genotoxicity
studies. There were no treatment-related
tumors seen in mice and no adverse
effects were observed in male rats. The
only adverse effects observed in female
rats occurred at the limit dose, which
was the only dose where pre-neoplastic
or neoplastic lesions were observed.
Furthermore, there is no concern for
mutagenicity and none of the identified
structurally-related compounds induced
tumors in rats or mice. Based on the
available data that indicates that the
increased incidence of uterine tumor
was seen in only one species (rat), one
sex (female), and is only slightly outside
of the historical control range, EPA has
classified tetraniliprole as having
‘‘suggestive evidence of carcinogenic
potential.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11135
Typically, for chemicals so classified,
EPA recommends that a non-linear or
RfD approach be used because the RfD
would be protective for all toxicity,
including carcinogenicity. However, in
the case of tetraniliprole, EPA
determined that the existing data do not
support establishing toxicity endpoints
and that a qualitative assessment is
more appropriate for assessing
tetraniliprole. This analysis is discussed
more fully in Unit III.B. below.
Similarly, because of the suggestive
nature of the carcinogenicity effects and
the fact that the only tumor effects are
seen at doses above the limit dose, EPA
has determined that a qualitative risk
assessment would be appropriate in this
case to account for all toxicity including
carcinogenicity.
No acute and subchronic
neurotoxicity studies were submitted for
tetraniliprole because this requirement
was waived. However, no evidence of
neurotoxicity was seen in any of the
other studies in the tetraniliprole
database.
Specific information on the studies
received and the nature of the adverse
effects caused by tetraniliprole as well
as the no-observed-adverse-effect-level
(NOAEL) and the lowest-observedadverse-effect-level (LOAEL) from the
toxicity studies can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in the document
titled ‘‘Tetraniliprole: New Active
Ingredient, First Food Use. Human
Health Risk Assessment for the
Establishment of Permanent Tolerances
on Brassica Head and Stem Vegetables,
Corn (Field, Pop and Sweet), Citrus
Fruit, Fruiting Vegetables, Leafy
Vegetables, Pome Fruit, Small Fruit
Vine Growing (except Fuzzy Kiwifruit)
including Grape, Soybean, Stone Fruit,
Tree Nuts, and Tuberous and Corm
Vegetables, Plus Registration for Seed
Treatment Uses on Corn (Field, Pop and
Sweet), Use on Tobacco, and Use on
Golf Course Turf, Sport Fields, and Sod
Farms’’ on pages 33–69 in docket ID
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2017–0233.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide’s toxicological
profile is determined, EPA identifies
toxicological points of departure (POD)
and levels of concern to use in
evaluating the risk posed by human
exposure to the pesticide. For hazards
that have a threshold below which there
is no appreciable risk, the toxicological
POD is used as the basis for derivation
of reference values for risk assessment.
PODs are developed based on a careful
analysis of the doses in each
toxicological study to determine the
dose at which no adverse effects are
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
11136
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest
dose at which adverse effects of concern
are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/
safety factors are used in conjunction
with the POD to calculate a safe
exposure level—generally referred to as
a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
reference dose (RfD)—and a safe margin
of exposure (MOE). For non-threshold
risks, the Agency assumes that any
amount of exposure will lead to some
degree of risk. Thus, the Agency
estimates risk in terms of the probability
of an occurrence of the adverse effect
expected in a lifetime. For more
information on the general principles
EPA uses in risk characterization and a
complete description of the risk
assessment process, see https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/assessinghuman-health-risk-pesticides.
Based on a thorough analysis of the
toxicology database of tetraniliprole, the
Agency has determined that a
qualitative risk assessment is more
appropriate for tetraniliprole based on
the following reasons:
• All the adverse effects (decrease in
pup body weights and non-neoplastic
uterine lesions, characterized by
prolapsed vagina, squamous cell
hyperplasia in the cervix) in rats were
found at or slightly above the limit dose.
Although informative for hazard
characterization for purposes of risk
assessment, a toxicity test dose at or
above the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day
represents an exposure that is not
expected to occur either daily or over an
extended period of time and therefore is
not relevant to exposure levels expected
from the use of tetraniliprole.
• EPA determined that the body
weight reduction effects seen in the 90day and 1-year oral studies with the
dog, (approximately 500 mg/kg/day)
were not robust enough to be employed
as a toxicity endpoint for risk
assessment, due to the marginal nature
of those effects and the fact that the rat
(for which effects were seen at the 1,000
mg/kg/day, limit dose) was more
sensitive, based on a human equivalent
dose analysis.
• Available data indicate no potential
inhalation risk of concern.
• Available data indicate no adverse
systemic effects at the limit dose (1,000
mg/kg/day) for dermal exposure.
• Potential offspring susceptibility
was not of concern as the decrease in
pup weight seen in the reproduction
study was marginal and occurred at or
above the limit dose (890/1,032 mg/kg/
day (males/females)). In addition, the
decrease occurred on postnatal days
(PND) 14 to 21, at which time the pups
were likely to be exposed to the test
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
material through both milk and feed
resulting in a much higher compound
intake.
• Finally, taking into account
expected exposures, EPA does not
anticipate dietary exposure levels to
occur daily, or over an extended period
of time that would reach levels
anywhere near that of the limit dose
(1,000 mg/kg/day). An unrefined
chronic dietary (food only) exposure
estimate of tetraniliprole was calculated
using tolerance-level residues for all
crops and assuming 100% crop treated,
as well as default processing factors.
The screening estimate indicated that
the highest exposure group is children
1 to 2 years old, with an estimated
exposure of 0.027 mg/kg/day. To reach
a dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day, an
individual of this subpopulation would
need to ingest 37,000 times the
estimated dietary exposure. Further, the
highest current application rate is
approximately 0.18 lb ai/acre; and in
order to yield residues that would lead
to dietary exposures of 1,000 mg/kg/day,
the application rate would have to be
greater than 6,000 lb ai/acre.
Consequently, EPA does not believe that
an effect at or about the limit dose is
relevant to human health risk
assessment for tetraniliprole.
Taking all the foregoing into
consideration, EPA has concluded that
a qualitative analysis of tetraniliprole is
appropriate.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and
feed uses. There is potential for
exposure to tetraniliprole via food and
feed based on the proposed uses.
However, no adverse effects were
observed in the submitted toxicological
studies for tetraniliprole regardless of
the route of exposure. Thus, no
quantitative dietary exposure
assessments are needed for EPA to
conclude with reasonable certainty that
dietary exposures to tetraniliprole do
not pose a significant human health
risk.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking
water. There are no residues of
toxicological concern expected in
drinking water from the use of
tetraniliprole. Thus, no drinking water
exposure assessments are needed for the
Agency to conclude with reasonable
certainty that drinking water exposures
to tetraniliprole do not pose a
significant human health risk.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The
term ‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in
this document to refer to nonoccupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., for lawn and garden pest control,
PO 00000
Frm 00046
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
indoor pest control, termiticides, and
flea and tick control on pets).
Based upon the proposed labels, EPA
does not anticipate residential handler
exposures. Tetraniliprole is being
proposed for registration as a liquid
formulation for use on golf course turf
and sports fields that could result in
residential post-application exposures.
However, no adverse effects were
observed in the submitted toxicological
studies for tetraniliprole regardless of
the route of exposure; therefore, a
quantitative residential post-application
exposure assessment was not
conducted. Thus, no residential
exposure assessments are needed for the
Agency to conclude with reasonable
certainty that residential exposures to
tetraniliprole do not pose a significant
human health risk.
4. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke a
tolerance, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found tetraniliprole to
share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and
tetraniliprole does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by
other substances. For the purposes of
this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has
assumed that tetraniliprole does not
have a common mechanism of toxicity
with other substances. For information
regarding EPA’s efforts to determine
which chemicals have a common
mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate
the cumulative effects of such
chemicals, see EPA’s website at https://
www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-andassessing-pesticide-risks/cumulativeassessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires the
application of an additional tenfold
margin of safety to account for potential
risks to infants and children, in the case
of threshold effects. For tetraniliprole,
EPA has not identified any toxicological
endpoints of concern associated with
any threshold effects and is conducting
a qualitative assessment. That
qualitative assessment does not use
safety factors for assessing risk, and no
additional safety factor is needed for
assessing risk to infants and children.
EPA has also evaluated the available
data and concluded that there are no
residual uncertainties concerning the
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
potential risks to infants and children
that would impact its conclusions about
threshold effects.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
EPA determines whether acute and
chronic dietary pesticide exposures are
safe by comparing aggregate exposure
estimates to the acute PAD (aPAD) and
chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer
risks, EPA calculates the lifetime
probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-,
intermediate-, and chronic-term risks
are evaluated by comparing the
estimated aggregate food, water, and
residential exposure to the appropriate
PODs to ensure that an adequate MOE
exists.
No adverse effects were observed in
the submitted toxicological studies at
doses relevant to human health
pesticide risk assessment for
tetraniliprole regardless of the route of
exposure. Effects observed in the data
base (e.g., decreased body weight) were
both marginal, and only seen at doses
not expected to occur daily or over an
extended period. Based on a lack of
toxicity at exposure levels expected
from approved application rates and an
expectation that aggregate exposures to
residues of tetraniliprole will not reach
the levels required to cause any adverse
effects, EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to tetraniliprole residues.
IV. Other Considerations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate analytical method
(01414) which uses high-performance
liquid chromatography with tandem
mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) to
quantitate residues of tetraniliprole in
various crops is available for
enforcement. An adequate HPLC/MS/
MS method, Method FV–002–A16–01,
is proposed as the enforcement method
for determination of residues of
tetraniliprole in livestock matrices. The
methods may be requested from: Chief,
Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established any MRLs for tetraniliprole.
C. Response to Comments
Five comments were received to the
notice of filing. Four of the comments
were not related specifically to
tetraniliprole or pesticides in general,
dealing instead with ‘‘antienvironmental morons’’, electric cars,
and wind farms and their impact on
birds and bats. The fifth comment was
submitted on behalf of the Center for
Biological Diversity that was primarily
concerned about EPA’s consideration of
the impacts of tetraniliprole on the
environment, pollinators, and
endangered species. None of these
comments are relevant to the Agency’s
evaluation of safety of the tetraniliprole
tolerances under section 408 of the
FFDCA, which requires the Agency to
evaluate the potential harms to human
health, not effects on the environment.
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
The Agency is establishing tolerances
based on the Organization for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD)
rounding class practice and to reflect
the preferred commodity definitions
currently used by the Agency, which
results in some variations between
established tolerances and the
tolerances the petitioner requested.
For field corn and popcorn, the
available data support a tolerance of
0.01 ppm, slightly lower than the
petitioned-for tolerance (0.015 ppm).
The petitioner requested tolerances on
dried fruit (prune) and potato wet peel.
The available data indicates that
residues on those commodities do not
concentrate so the new tolerances on
stone fruit group 12–12 (1.0 ppm) and
vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup
1C (0.015 ppm), respectively, are
adequate to cover residues in these
commodities.
For citrus fruits (subgroups 10–10A,
10B, and 10C), the Agency used the
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
11137
OECD statistical calculation procedures
to determine the appropriate tolerance
value based on the available field trial
residue data, which resulted in a higher
tolerance value for each of these
subgroups than what the petitioner
requested.
Based on the highest average field
trial (HAFT) (0.767 ppm) for lime and
using a processing factor of 8.6, the
Agency calculated that a tolerance of 7
ppm is necessary to cover residues in
citrus oil. Similarly, based on the HAFT
(0.136 ppm) for soybean seed and using
a processing factor of 2.6, the Agency
determined that a tolerance of 0.4 ppm
is appropriate for soybean hulls.
Although the petitioner did not
expressly identify certain tolerances as
intended to cover indirect or
inadvertent residues in rotational crops,
because certain crops are only approved
as crops that may be rotated into treated
fields on the label, EPA is establishing
tolerances for indirect or inadvertent
residues for those commodities: alfalfa,
forage at 0.015 ppm; alfalfa, hay at 0.06
ppm; cottonseed subgroup 20C at 0.4
ppm; cotton, gin byproducts at 30 ppm;
grain, cereal, forage, fodder, and straw,
group 16, except field corn, popcorn,
and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm; and
vegetable, foliage of legume, except
soybean, subgroup 7A.
All the proposed tolerances for
livestock commodities were revised
based on calculation of the dietary
burden.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of tetraniliprole, including
its metabolites and degradates.
Compliance with the tolerance levels is
to be determined by measuring only
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide,
in or on almond, hulls at 4 ppm; cattle,
fat at 0.04 ppm; cattle, meat at 0.02
ppm; cattle, meat byproducts at 0.3
ppm; corn, field, forage at 4 ppm; corn,
field, grain at 0.01 ppm; corn, field,
stover at 15 ppm; corn, pop, grain at
0.01 ppm; corn, pop, stover at 15 ppm;
corn, sweet, forage at 6 ppm; corn,
sweet, kernel plus cob with husks
removed at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet,
stover at 20 ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10–
10, oil at 7 ppm; fruit, pome, group 11–
10 at 0.5 ppm; fruit, small vine
climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit,
subgroup 13–07F at 1.5 ppm; fruit,
stone, group 12–12 at 1 ppm; goat, fat
at 0.04 ppm; goat, meat at 0.02 ppm;
goat, meat byproducts at 0.3 ppm; grain,
aspirated fractions at 50 ppm; grapefruit
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
11138
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
subgroup 10–10C at 0.9 ppm; horse, fat
at 0.04 ppm; horse, meat at 0.02 ppm;
horse, meat byproducts at 0.3 ppm;
lemon/lime subgroup 10–10B at 1.5
ppm; milk at 0.05 ppm; nut, tree, group
14–12 at 0.03 ppm; orange subgroup 10–
10A at 1 ppm; sheep, fat at 0.04 ppm;
sheep, meat at 0.02 ppm; sheep, meat
byproducts at 0.3 ppm; soybean, forage
0.07 ppm; soybean, hay at 0.2 ppm;
soybean, hulls at 0.4 ppm; soybean, seed
at 0.2 ppm; tomato, paste at 1.5 ppm;
vegetable, brassica, head and stem,
group 5–16 at 1.5 ppm; vegetable,
fruiting, group 8–10 at 0.4 ppm;
vegetable, leafy, group 4–16 at 20 ppm;
and vegetable, tuberous and corm,
subgroup 1C at 0.015 ppm.
Additionally, tolerances are
established for inadvertent residues of
tetraniliprole, including its metabolites
and degradates. Compliance with the
tolerance levels is to be determined by
measuring only tetraniliprole 1-(3chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2methyl-6[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide
in or on alfalfa, forage at 0.015 ppm;
alfalfa, hay at 0.06 ppm; cotton, gin
byproducts at 30 ppm; cottonseed
subgroup 20C at 0.4 ppm; grain, cereal,
forage, fodder and straw, group 16,
except field corn, popcorn, and sweet
corn at 0.1 ppm; and vegetable, foliage
of legume, except soybean, subgroup 7A
at 0.03 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: January 19, 2021.
Edward Messina,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
■
2. Add § 180.709 to read as follows:
§ 180.709 Tetraniliprole; tolerances for
residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are
established for residues of tetraniliprole,
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
table 1 in this paragraph (a). Compliance
with the tolerance levels specified in
table 1 in this paragraph (a) is to be
determined by measuring only
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Parts per
million
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Commodity
Almond, hulls .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Cattle, fat .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Cattle, meat .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Cattle, meat byproducts .......................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, field, forage ................................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, field, grain ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, field, stover ................................................................................................................................................................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
4
0.04
0.02
0.3
4
0.01
15
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 35 / Wednesday, February 24, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
11139
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)—Continued
Parts per
million
Commodity
Corn, pop, grain ...................................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, pop, stover .................................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, sweet, forage .............................................................................................................................................................................
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed .............................................................................................................................
Corn, sweet, stover ..............................................................................................................................................................................
Fruit, citrus, group 10–10, oil ...............................................................................................................................................................
Fruit, pome, group 11–10 ....................................................................................................................................................................
Fruit, small vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, subgroup 13–07F ...................................................................................................
Fruit, stone, group 12–12 ....................................................................................................................................................................
Goat, fat ...............................................................................................................................................................................................
Goat, meat ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Goat, meat byproducts ........................................................................................................................................................................
Grain, aspirated fractions ....................................................................................................................................................................
Grapefruit subgroup 10–10C ...............................................................................................................................................................
Horse, fat .............................................................................................................................................................................................
Horse, meat .........................................................................................................................................................................................
Horse, meat byproducts ......................................................................................................................................................................
Lemon/lime subgroup 10–10B .............................................................................................................................................................
Milk .......................................................................................................................................................................................................
Nut, tree, group 14–12 ........................................................................................................................................................................
Orange subgroup 10–10A ...................................................................................................................................................................
Sheep, fat ............................................................................................................................................................................................
Sheep, meat ........................................................................................................................................................................................
Sheep, meat byproducts ......................................................................................................................................................................
Soybean, forage ..................................................................................................................................................................................
Soybean, hay .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Soybean, hulls .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Soybean, seed .....................................................................................................................................................................................
Tomato, paste ......................................................................................................................................................................................
Vegetable, brassica, head and stem, group 5–16 ..............................................................................................................................
Vegetable, fruiting, group 8–10 ...........................................................................................................................................................
Vegetable, leafy, group 4–16 ..............................................................................................................................................................
Vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C .....................................................................................................................................
(b)–(c) [Reserved]
(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues.
Tolerances are established for indirect
or inadvertent residues of tetraniliprole,
including its metabolites and
degradates, in or on the commodities in
table 2 in this paragraph (d).
Compliance with the tolerance levels
specified in table 2 in this paragraph (d)
is to be determined by measuring only
0.01
15
6
0.01
20
7
0.5
1.5
1
0.04
0.02
0.3
50
0.9
0.04
0.02
0.3
1.5
0.05
0.03
1
0.04
0.02
0.3
0.07
0.2
0.4
0.2
1.5
1.5
0.4
20
0.015
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide.
TABLE 2 TO PARAGRAPH (d)
Parts per
million
Commodity
Alfalfa, forage .......................................................................................................................................................................................
Alfalfa, hay ...........................................................................................................................................................................................
Cotton, gin byproducts .........................................................................................................................................................................
Cottonseed subgroup 20C ...................................................................................................................................................................
Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn ........................................................
Vegetable, foliage of legume, except soybean, subgroup 7A ............................................................................................................
[FR Doc. 2021–03624 Filed 2–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Enforcement Discretion Regarding
Online or Web-Based Scheduling
Applications for the Scheduling of
Individual Appointments for COVID–19
Vaccination During the COVID–19
Nationwide Public Health Emergency
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Feb 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Frm 00049
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Notification of Enforcement
Discretion.
ACTION:
This Notification is to inform
the public that the Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) is exercising
its discretion in how it applies the
Privacy, Security, and Breach
Notification Rules promulgated under
the Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 and the
Health Information Technology for
Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH)
Act (‘‘HIPAA Rules’’). As a matter of
SUMMARY:
45 CFR Parts 160 and 164
0.015
0.06
30
0.4
0.1
0.03
E:\FR\FM\24FER1.SGM
24FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 35 (Wednesday, February 24, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 11133-11139]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03624]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0233; FRL-10005-77]
Tetraniliprole; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
tetraniliprole in or on multiple commodities that are identified and
discussed later in this document. Bayer CropScience requested these
tolerances under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective February 24, 2021. Objections and
[[Page 11134]]
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 26, 2021, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0233, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0233 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
April 26, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0233, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of December 15, 2017 (82 FR 59604) (FRL-
9970-50), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
7F8558) by Bayer CropScience, 2 T.W. Alexander Drive, Research Triangle
Park, NC 27709. The petition requested that 40 CFR part 180 be amended
by establishing tolerances for residues of the insecticide,
tetraniliprole in or on tuberous and corm vegetables, crop group 1C at
0.015 parts per million (ppm); potato, wet peel at 0.02 ppm; leafy
vegetables, crop group 4-16 at 20 ppm; Brassica head and stem
vegetables, crop group 5-16 at 1.5 ppm; fruiting vegetables, crop group
8-10 at 0.40 ppm; tomato paste at 1.5 ppm; citrus fruit, orange
subgroup 10-10A at 0.50 ppm; citrus fruit, lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B
at 0.80 ppm; citrus fruit, grapefruit subgroup 10-10C at 0.50 ppm;
citrus oil at 4.0 ppm; pome fruit, crop group 11-10 at 0.40 ppm; stone
fruit, crop group 12-12 at 1.0 ppm; plum, dried (prune) at 2.0 ppm;
small fruit, vine climbing subgroup, except fuzzy kiwi, crop subgroup
13-07F at 1.5 ppm; tree nuts, crop group 14-12 at 0.03 ppm; almond
hulls at 4.0 ppm; corn, field, grain at 0.015 ppm; corn, field, forage
at 4.0 ppm; corn, field, stover at 15 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.015
ppm; corn, pop, stover at 15 ppm; corn, sweet, kernel plus cobs with
husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 6.0 ppm; corn, sweet,
stover at 20 ppm; cottonseed, crop group 20C at 0.40 ppm; cotton, gin
byproducts at 30 ppm; soybean seed at 0.20 ppm; soybean hulls at 0.60
ppm; aspirated grain fractions at 45 ppm; soybean forage at 0.07 ppm;
soybean hay at 0.20 ppm; alfalfa, forage and hay at 0.06 ppm; forage,
fodder and straw of cereal grains, crop group 16, except field, pop and
sweet corn at 0.10 ppm; foliage of legume vegetables, crop group 7,
except soybeans at 0.03 ppm; milk at 0.06 ppm; fat of cattle, horses,
sheep and goats at 0.30 ppm; muscle of cattle, horses, sheep and goats
at 0.03 ppm; meat by-products of cattle, horses, sheep and goats at
0.30 ppm. That document referenced a summary of the petition prepared
by Bayer CropScience, the registrant, which is available in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. Comments were received on the notice of
filing. EPA's response to these comments is discussed in Unit IV.C.
Based upon review of the data supporting the petition, EPA has
modified the levels at which tolerances are being established as well
as some of the commodity definitions used. The reasons for these
changes are explained in Unit IV.D.
[[Page 11135]]
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there
is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . .
.''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for tetraniliprole including
exposure resulting from the tolerances established by this action.
EPA's assessment of exposures and risks associated with tetraniliprole
follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children.
The submitted animal toxicity studies on tetraniliprole demonstrate
low toxicity, which is expected based on two factors. Tetraniliprole is
an anthranilimide insecticide that targets the activation of insect
ryanodine receptors, which leads to insect paralysis and death. In
contrast, mammalian ryanodine receptors are substantially less
sensitive (i.e., 350 to >2,500 times less sensitive) to the effects of
anthranilic diamides than insect ryanodine receptors. Moreover,
available data indicate that tetraniliprole has limited absorption at
the higher dose levels (>20 mg/kg), which may contribute to the low
toxicity seen in the animal testing.
In subchronic toxicity studies (28-day and 90-day) in rats and
mice, no adverse effects were seen at dose levels ranging from
approximately 600 to 1,228 mg/kg/day. In the subchronic studies (28-day
and 90-day) in dogs, an increase in the incidence and frequency of
salivation was found, but this finding did not show a dose related-
response, was a common occurrence in dogs, and was not considered to be
adverse.
No systemic or dermal toxicity was seen in a 28-day dermal toxicity
study at 1,000 mg/kg/day; this finding was consistent with rather low
dermal absorption as the DAF for humans was estimated to be
approximately 9% (upper limit).
No adverse maternal or developmental effects were found at the
limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day) in the developmental toxicity studies in
rats and rabbits. In the reproduction study, the offspring effect,
slight decrease in pup weight near and above the limit dose, was found
in the absence of any adverse parental effect. Because the potential
increase in susceptibility occurred at the limit dose and on postnatal
days (PND) 14 to 21 at which time the pups were exposed to the test
material through both milk and food resulting in a higher compound
intake, the Agency's concern for the potential risk to infants and
children is low. Tetraniliprole did not cause any effects on
reproductive parameters.
The combined chronic/carcinogenicity study in rats showed a
decrease in body weights, increased incidence of squamous cell
hyperplasia in the cervix and vagina, and corpora lutea depletion in
the ovary at the limit dose. In addition, a slight increase in the
incidence of uterine tumor was observed at a dose slightly above the
limit dose. No genotoxic potential was detected in the battery of
genotoxicity studies. There were no treatment-related tumors seen in
mice and no adverse effects were observed in male rats. The only
adverse effects observed in female rats occurred at the limit dose,
which was the only dose where pre-neoplastic or neoplastic lesions were
observed. Furthermore, there is no concern for mutagenicity and none of
the identified structurally-related compounds induced tumors in rats or
mice. Based on the available data that indicates that the increased
incidence of uterine tumor was seen in only one species (rat), one sex
(female), and is only slightly outside of the historical control range,
EPA has classified tetraniliprole as having ``suggestive evidence of
carcinogenic potential.''
Typically, for chemicals so classified, EPA recommends that a non-
linear or RfD approach be used because the RfD would be protective for
all toxicity, including carcinogenicity. However, in the case of
tetraniliprole, EPA determined that the existing data do not support
establishing toxicity endpoints and that a qualitative assessment is
more appropriate for assessing tetraniliprole. This analysis is
discussed more fully in Unit III.B. below. Similarly, because of the
suggestive nature of the carcinogenicity effects and the fact that the
only tumor effects are seen at doses above the limit dose, EPA has
determined that a qualitative risk assessment would be appropriate in
this case to account for all toxicity including carcinogenicity.
No acute and subchronic neurotoxicity studies were submitted for
tetraniliprole because this requirement was waived. However, no
evidence of neurotoxicity was seen in any of the other studies in the
tetraniliprole database.
Specific information on the studies received and the nature of the
adverse effects caused by tetraniliprole as well as the no-observed-
adverse-effect-level (NOAEL) and the lowest-observed-adverse-effect-
level (LOAEL) from the toxicity studies can be found at https://www.regulations.gov in the document titled ``Tetraniliprole: New Active
Ingredient, First Food Use. Human Health Risk Assessment for the
Establishment of Permanent Tolerances on Brassica Head and Stem
Vegetables, Corn (Field, Pop and Sweet), Citrus Fruit, Fruiting
Vegetables, Leafy Vegetables, Pome Fruit, Small Fruit Vine Growing
(except Fuzzy Kiwifruit) including Grape, Soybean, Stone Fruit, Tree
Nuts, and Tuberous and Corm Vegetables, Plus Registration for Seed
Treatment Uses on Corn (Field, Pop and Sweet), Use on Tobacco, and Use
on Golf Course Turf, Sport Fields, and Sod Farms'' on pages 33-69 in
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2017-0233.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
Once a pesticide's toxicological profile is determined, EPA
identifies toxicological points of departure (POD) and levels of
concern to use in evaluating the risk posed by human exposure to the
pesticide. For hazards that have a threshold below which there is no
appreciable risk, the toxicological POD is used as the basis for
derivation of reference values for risk assessment. PODs are developed
based on a careful analysis of the doses in each toxicological study to
determine the dose at which no adverse effects are
[[Page 11136]]
observed (the NOAEL) and the lowest dose at which adverse effects of
concern are identified (the LOAEL). Uncertainty/safety factors are used
in conjunction with the POD to calculate a safe exposure level--
generally referred to as a population-adjusted dose (PAD) or a
reference dose (RfD)--and a safe margin of exposure (MOE). For non-
threshold risks, the Agency assumes that any amount of exposure will
lead to some degree of risk. Thus, the Agency estimates risk in terms
of the probability of an occurrence of the adverse effect expected in a
lifetime. For more information on the general principles EPA uses in
risk characterization and a complete description of the risk assessment
process, see https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/assessing-human-health-risk-pesticides.
Based on a thorough analysis of the toxicology database of
tetraniliprole, the Agency has determined that a qualitative risk
assessment is more appropriate for tetraniliprole based on the
following reasons:
All the adverse effects (decrease in pup body weights and
non-neoplastic uterine lesions, characterized by prolapsed vagina,
squamous cell hyperplasia in the cervix) in rats were found at or
slightly above the limit dose. Although informative for hazard
characterization for purposes of risk assessment, a toxicity test dose
at or above the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day represents an exposure
that is not expected to occur either daily or over an extended period
of time and therefore is not relevant to exposure levels expected from
the use of tetraniliprole.
EPA determined that the body weight reduction effects seen
in the 90-day and 1-year oral studies with the dog, (approximately 500
mg/kg/day) were not robust enough to be employed as a toxicity endpoint
for risk assessment, due to the marginal nature of those effects and
the fact that the rat (for which effects were seen at the 1,000 mg/kg/
day, limit dose) was more sensitive, based on a human equivalent dose
analysis.
Available data indicate no potential inhalation risk of
concern.
Available data indicate no adverse systemic effects at the
limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day) for dermal exposure.
Potential offspring susceptibility was not of concern as
the decrease in pup weight seen in the reproduction study was marginal
and occurred at or above the limit dose (890/1,032 mg/kg/day (males/
females)). In addition, the decrease occurred on postnatal days (PND)
14 to 21, at which time the pups were likely to be exposed to the test
material through both milk and feed resulting in a much higher compound
intake.
Finally, taking into account expected exposures, EPA does
not anticipate dietary exposure levels to occur daily, or over an
extended period of time that would reach levels anywhere near that of
the limit dose (1,000 mg/kg/day). An unrefined chronic dietary (food
only) exposure estimate of tetraniliprole was calculated using
tolerance-level residues for all crops and assuming 100% crop treated,
as well as default processing factors. The screening estimate indicated
that the highest exposure group is children 1 to 2 years old, with an
estimated exposure of 0.027 mg/kg/day. To reach a dose of 1,000 mg/kg/
day, an individual of this subpopulation would need to ingest 37,000
times the estimated dietary exposure. Further, the highest current
application rate is approximately 0.18 lb ai/acre; and in order to
yield residues that would lead to dietary exposures of 1,000 mg/kg/day,
the application rate would have to be greater than 6,000 lb ai/acre.
Consequently, EPA does not believe that an effect at or about the limit
dose is relevant to human health risk assessment for tetraniliprole.
Taking all the foregoing into consideration, EPA has concluded that
a qualitative analysis of tetraniliprole is appropriate.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food and feed uses. There is potential for
exposure to tetraniliprole via food and feed based on the proposed
uses. However, no adverse effects were observed in the submitted
toxicological studies for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of
exposure. Thus, no quantitative dietary exposure assessments are needed
for EPA to conclude with reasonable certainty that dietary exposures to
tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human health risk.
2. Dietary exposure from drinking water. There are no residues of
toxicological concern expected in drinking water from the use of
tetraniliprole. Thus, no drinking water exposure assessments are needed
for the Agency to conclude with reasonable certainty that drinking
water exposures to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human
health risk.
3. From non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is
used in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary
exposure (e.g., for lawn and garden pest control, indoor pest control,
termiticides, and flea and tick control on pets).
Based upon the proposed labels, EPA does not anticipate residential
handler exposures. Tetraniliprole is being proposed for registration as
a liquid formulation for use on golf course turf and sports fields that
could result in residential post-application exposures. However, no
adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological studies
for tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure; therefore, a
quantitative residential post-application exposure assessment was not
conducted. Thus, no residential exposure assessments are needed for the
Agency to conclude with reasonable certainty that residential exposures
to tetraniliprole do not pose a significant human health risk.
4. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke a tolerance, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found tetraniliprole to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and tetraniliprole does not appear
to produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this tolerance action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
tetraniliprole does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www2.epa.gov/pesticide-science-and-assessing-pesticide-risks/cumulative-assessment-risk-pesticides.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) requires the application of an additional
tenfold margin of safety to account for potential risks to infants and
children, in the case of threshold effects. For tetraniliprole, EPA has
not identified any toxicological endpoints of concern associated with
any threshold effects and is conducting a qualitative assessment. That
qualitative assessment does not use safety factors for assessing risk,
and no additional safety factor is needed for assessing risk to infants
and children. EPA has also evaluated the available data and concluded
that there are no residual uncertainties concerning the
[[Page 11137]]
potential risks to infants and children that would impact its
conclusions about threshold effects.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
EPA determines whether acute and chronic dietary pesticide
exposures are safe by comparing aggregate exposure estimates to the
acute PAD (aPAD) and chronic PAD (cPAD). For linear cancer risks, EPA
calculates the lifetime probability of acquiring cancer given the
estimated aggregate exposure. Short-, intermediate-, and chronic-term
risks are evaluated by comparing the estimated aggregate food, water,
and residential exposure to the appropriate PODs to ensure that an
adequate MOE exists.
No adverse effects were observed in the submitted toxicological
studies at doses relevant to human health pesticide risk assessment for
tetraniliprole regardless of the route of exposure. Effects observed in
the data base (e.g., decreased body weight) were both marginal, and
only seen at doses not expected to occur daily or over an extended
period. Based on a lack of toxicity at exposure levels expected from
approved application rates and an expectation that aggregate exposures
to residues of tetraniliprole will not reach the levels required to
cause any adverse effects, EPA concludes that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to tetraniliprole
residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An adequate analytical method (01414) which uses high-performance
liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC/MS/MS) to
quantitate residues of tetraniliprole in various crops is available for
enforcement. An adequate HPLC/MS/MS method, Method FV-002-A16-01, is
proposed as the enforcement method for determination of residues of
tetraniliprole in livestock matrices. The methods may be requested
from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch, Environmental Science Center,
701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-
2905; email address: [email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established any MRLs for tetraniliprole.
C. Response to Comments
Five comments were received to the notice of filing. Four of the
comments were not related specifically to tetraniliprole or pesticides
in general, dealing instead with ``anti-environmental morons'',
electric cars, and wind farms and their impact on birds and bats. The
fifth comment was submitted on behalf of the Center for Biological
Diversity that was primarily concerned about EPA's consideration of the
impacts of tetraniliprole on the environment, pollinators, and
endangered species. None of these comments are relevant to the Agency's
evaluation of safety of the tetraniliprole tolerances under section 408
of the FFDCA, which requires the Agency to evaluate the potential harms
to human health, not effects on the environment.
D. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
The Agency is establishing tolerances based on the Organization for
Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) rounding class practice and
to reflect the preferred commodity definitions currently used by the
Agency, which results in some variations between established tolerances
and the tolerances the petitioner requested.
For field corn and popcorn, the available data support a tolerance
of 0.01 ppm, slightly lower than the petitioned-for tolerance (0.015
ppm).
The petitioner requested tolerances on dried fruit (prune) and
potato wet peel. The available data indicates that residues on those
commodities do not concentrate so the new tolerances on stone fruit
group 12-12 (1.0 ppm) and vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C
(0.015 ppm), respectively, are adequate to cover residues in these
commodities.
For citrus fruits (subgroups 10-10A, 10B, and 10C), the Agency used
the OECD statistical calculation procedures to determine the
appropriate tolerance value based on the available field trial residue
data, which resulted in a higher tolerance value for each of these
subgroups than what the petitioner requested.
Based on the highest average field trial (HAFT) (0.767 ppm) for
lime and using a processing factor of 8.6, the Agency calculated that a
tolerance of 7 ppm is necessary to cover residues in citrus oil.
Similarly, based on the HAFT (0.136 ppm) for soybean seed and using a
processing factor of 2.6, the Agency determined that a tolerance of 0.4
ppm is appropriate for soybean hulls.
Although the petitioner did not expressly identify certain
tolerances as intended to cover indirect or inadvertent residues in
rotational crops, because certain crops are only approved as crops that
may be rotated into treated fields on the label, EPA is establishing
tolerances for indirect or inadvertent residues for those commodities:
alfalfa, forage at 0.015 ppm; alfalfa, hay at 0.06 ppm; cottonseed
subgroup 20C at 0.4 ppm; cotton, gin byproducts at 30 ppm; grain,
cereal, forage, fodder, and straw, group 16, except field corn,
popcorn, and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm; and vegetable, foliage of legume,
except soybean, subgroup 7A.
All the proposed tolerances for livestock commodities were revised
based on calculation of the dietary burden.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of
tetraniliprole, including its metabolites and degradates. Compliance
with the tolerance levels is to be determined by measuring only
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2-
yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide, in or on almond, hulls at 4 ppm;
cattle, fat at 0.04 ppm; cattle, meat at 0.02 ppm; cattle, meat
byproducts at 0.3 ppm; corn, field, forage at 4 ppm; corn, field, grain
at 0.01 ppm; corn, field, stover at 15 ppm; corn, pop, grain at 0.01
ppm; corn, pop, stover at 15 ppm; corn, sweet, forage at 6 ppm; corn,
sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed at 0.01 ppm; corn, sweet,
stover at 20 ppm; fruit, citrus, group 10-10, oil at 7 ppm; fruit,
pome, group 11-10 at 0.5 ppm; fruit, small vine climbing, except fuzzy
kiwifruit, subgroup 13-07F at 1.5 ppm; fruit, stone, group 12-12 at 1
ppm; goat, fat at 0.04 ppm; goat, meat at 0.02 ppm; goat, meat
byproducts at 0.3 ppm; grain, aspirated fractions at 50 ppm; grapefruit
[[Page 11138]]
subgroup 10-10C at 0.9 ppm; horse, fat at 0.04 ppm; horse, meat at 0.02
ppm; horse, meat byproducts at 0.3 ppm; lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B at
1.5 ppm; milk at 0.05 ppm; nut, tree, group 14-12 at 0.03 ppm; orange
subgroup 10-10A at 1 ppm; sheep, fat at 0.04 ppm; sheep, meat at 0.02
ppm; sheep, meat byproducts at 0.3 ppm; soybean, forage 0.07 ppm;
soybean, hay at 0.2 ppm; soybean, hulls at 0.4 ppm; soybean, seed at
0.2 ppm; tomato, paste at 1.5 ppm; vegetable, brassica, head and stem,
group 5-16 at 1.5 ppm; vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10 at 0.4 ppm;
vegetable, leafy, group 4-16 at 20 ppm; and vegetable, tuberous and
corm, subgroup 1C at 0.015 ppm.
Additionally, tolerances are established for inadvertent residues
of tetraniliprole, including its metabolites and degradates. Compliance
with the tolerance levels is to be determined by measuring only
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2-
yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide in or on alfalfa, forage at 0.015
ppm; alfalfa, hay at 0.06 ppm; cotton, gin byproducts at 30 ppm;
cottonseed subgroup 20C at 0.4 ppm; grain, cereal, forage, fodder and
straw, group 16, except field corn, popcorn, and sweet corn at 0.1 ppm;
and vegetable, foliage of legume, except soybean, subgroup 7A at 0.03
ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: January 19, 2021.
Edward Messina,
Acting Director, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Add Sec. 180.709 to read as follows:
Sec. 180.709 Tetraniliprole; tolerances for residues.
(a) General. Tolerances are established for residues of
tetraniliprole, including its metabolites and degradates, in or on the
commodities in table 1 in this paragraph (a). Compliance with the
tolerance levels specified in table 1 in this paragraph (a) is to be
determined by measuring only tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-
[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5-
(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2-yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide.
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Almond, hulls........................................... 4
Cattle, fat............................................. 0.04
Cattle, meat............................................ 0.02
Cattle, meat byproducts................................. 0.3
Corn, field, forage..................................... 4
Corn, field, grain...................................... 0.01
Corn, field, stover..................................... 15
[[Page 11139]]
Corn, pop, grain........................................ 0.01
Corn, pop, stover....................................... 15
Corn, sweet, forage..................................... 6
Corn, sweet, kernel plus cob with husks removed......... 0.01
Corn, sweet, stover..................................... 20
Fruit, citrus, group 10-10, oil......................... 7
Fruit, pome, group 11-10................................ 0.5
Fruit, small vine climbing, except fuzzy kiwifruit, 1.5
subgroup 13-07F........................................
Fruit, stone, group 12-12............................... 1
Goat, fat............................................... 0.04
Goat, meat.............................................. 0.02
Goat, meat byproducts................................... 0.3
Grain, aspirated fractions.............................. 50
Grapefruit subgroup 10-10C.............................. 0.9
Horse, fat.............................................. 0.04
Horse, meat............................................. 0.02
Horse, meat byproducts.................................. 0.3
Lemon/lime subgroup 10-10B.............................. 1.5
Milk.................................................... 0.05
Nut, tree, group 14-12.................................. 0.03
Orange subgroup 10-10A.................................. 1
Sheep, fat.............................................. 0.04
Sheep, meat............................................. 0.02
Sheep, meat byproducts.................................. 0.3
Soybean, forage......................................... 0.07
Soybean, hay............................................ 0.2
Soybean, hulls.......................................... 0.4
Soybean, seed........................................... 0.2
Tomato, paste........................................... 1.5
Vegetable, brassica, head and stem, group 5-16.......... 1.5
Vegetable, fruiting, group 8-10......................... 0.4
Vegetable, leafy, group 4-16............................ 20
Vegetable, tuberous and corm, subgroup 1C............... 0.015
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(b)-(c) [Reserved]
(d) Indirect or inadvertent residues. Tolerances are established
for indirect or inadvertent residues of tetraniliprole, including its
metabolites and degradates, in or on the commodities in table 2 in this
paragraph (d). Compliance with the tolerance levels specified in table
2 in this paragraph (d) is to be determined by measuring only
tetraniliprole 1-(3-chloro-2-pyridinyl)-N-[4-cyano-2-methyl-6-
[(methylamino)carbonyl]phenyl]-3-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2H-tetrazol-2-
yl]methyl]-1H-pyrazole-5-carboxamide.
Table 2 to Paragraph (d)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alfalfa, forage......................................... 0.015
Alfalfa, hay............................................ 0.06
Cotton, gin byproducts.................................. 30
Cottonseed subgroup 20C................................. 0.4
Grain, cereal, forage, fodder and straw, group 16, 0.1
except field corn, popcorn and sweet corn..............
Vegetable, foliage of legume, except soybean, subgroup 0.03
7A.....................................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 2021-03624 Filed 2-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P