Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA); Amendment to the Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 10178-10180 [2021-03362]
Download as PDF
10178
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 180
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0146; FRL–10018–54]
I. General Information
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids
(CPPA); Amendment to the Exemption
From the Requirement of a Tolerance
A. Does this action apply to me?
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation amends the
existing tolerance exemption for
residues of Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA) in or on all
food commodities as a plant growth
regulator to add use as a nematicide in
pesticide formulations. FBSciences, Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) requesting this amendment.
This regulation adds use as a nematicide
to the existing tolerance exemption of
CPPA under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective
February 19, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before April 20, 2021, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0146, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Smith, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Publishing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://
www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/textidx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/
40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2020–0146 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before April
20, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand
delivery of objections and hearing
requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2020–0146, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting
or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is
available at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of May 05,
2020 (85 FR 26684) (FRL–10008–46),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide tolerance petition (PP 0F8822)
by FBSciences, Inc., 153 N. Main Street,
Ste. 100, Collierville, TN 38017–2691.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.1321 be amended by the addition of
use as a nematicide to the already
established exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance for residues
of Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy
Acids (CPPA). That document
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared by the petitioner FBSciences,
Inc., which is available in the docket for
this action at https://
www.regulations.gov. Although
comments were received on the notice
of filing, none were relevant to this
tolerance rulemaking.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in making a
determination to establish or maintain
in effect an exemption from the
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requirement of a tolerance, EPA must
take into account the factors set forth in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which
require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and
children to the pesticide chemical
residue in establishing a tolerance to
‘‘ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. . . .’’ Additionally, FFDCA
section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the
Agency consider ‘‘available information
concerning the cumulative effects of
such residues and other substances that
have a common mechanism of
toxicity. . . .’’
EPA performs a number of analyses to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide residues. First,
EPA determines the toxicity of
pesticides. Second, EPA examines
exposure to the pesticide through food,
drinking water, and through other
exposures that occur as a result of
pesticide use in residential settings.
II. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other
relevant information in support of this
action and considered its risk. EPA has
also considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES
A. Overview of Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acids
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy
Acids (CPPA) is a complex mixture of
naturally occurring organic substances
found in dead plant materials. The
components of CPPA are widespread in
nature, being found in soils and fresh
and saltwater environments as a result
of decaying plant materials and are used
to condition agricultural soils. Its major
components are humic acid, fulvic acid,
and tannins, and their relative
concentrations in soil and water systems
are influenced by environmental
conditions, such as climate, soil types,
vegetation, and hydrology. CPPA is
made by concentrating the organic
substances from water leached through
forest soil using a proprietary
manufacturing process.
B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology
Data Requirements
All applicable mammalian toxicology
data requirements supporting the
existing tolerance exemption for
residues of CPPA in or on all food
commodities as a plant growth regulator
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
have been fulfilled. The mammalian
toxicology data requirements supporting
the addition of nematicide use to the
existing tolerance exemption have also
been fulfilled as EPA has relied upon
the same mammalian toxicology data
that supported the existing tolerance
exemption for CPPA. No acute,
subchronic, or chronic toxicity
endpoints were identified in guideline
studies or in data obtained from open
technical literature. Moreover, CPPA is
not a mutagen, and is not a
developmental toxicant. There are no
known effects on endocrine systems via
oral, dermal, or inhalation exposure. A
more in-depth synopsis of the data upon
which EPA relied and its human health
risk assessment based on that data can
be found in the document
‘‘Biopesticides Registration Action
Document, Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA),’’ which is
available in Docket Number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0917–0011, as well as the
docket for this action, via
www.regulations.gov as described under
ADDRESSES.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure,
FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information
concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other nonoccupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or
surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or
buildings (residential and other indoor
uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
The proposed use pattern may result
in dietary exposure with possible
residues in or on agricultural
commodities. No significant exposure
via drinking water is expected beyond
what is already present, when CPPA is
used according to the product label
directions, because the active ingredient
biodegrades rapidly (half-life = 25.7
days) in the environment, is applied at
low application rates, and is not directly
applied to water. Should exposure
occur, however, minimal to no risk is
expected for the general population,
including infants and children, due to
low toxicity of CPPA and its
components as demonstrated in the data
submitted and evaluated by the Agency.
In addition, the lack of reported
incidents in spite of the exposure from
use in commercial agriculture for years
to condition soils and its abundance in
nature support a conclusion that
minimal to no risk is expected.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10179
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Non-occupational exposure is not
expected because CPPA will be applied
as a plant growth regulator and
nematicide for agricultural purposes
only and there are no residential uses.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances
With a Common Mechanism of Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA
requires that, in establishing a tolerance
or tolerance exemption for a pesticide
chemical residue, the Agency consider
‘‘available information concerning the
cumulative effects of such residues and
other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity. . . .’’ EPA has
determined CPPA to have a non-toxic
mode of action; therefore,
408(b)(2)(D)(v) does not apply.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S.
Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides
that, in establishing a tolerance or
tolerance exemption for a pesticide
chemical residue, EPA shall assess the
available information about
consumption patterns among infants
and children, special susceptibility of
infants and children to pesticide
chemical residues, and the cumulative
effects on infants and children of the
residues and other substances with a
common mechanism of toxicity. In
addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C)
provides that EPA shall apply an
additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety
for infants and children in the case of
threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the
completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure, unless EPA determines
that a different margin of safety will be
safe for infants and children. This
additional margin of safety is commonly
referred to as the Food Quality
Protection Act Safety Factor. In
applying this provision, EPA either
retains the default value of 10X, or uses
a different additional safety factor when
reliable data are available to support the
choice of a different safety factor. As
part of its qualitative assessment, EPA
evaluated the available toxicity and
exposure data on CPPA and considered
its validity, completeness, and
reliability, as well as the relationship of
this information to human risk. EPA
considers the toxicity database to be
complete and has identified no residual
uncertainty with regard to prenatal and
postnatal toxicity or exposure. No
hazard was identified based on the
available studies. Based upon its
evaluation, EPA concludes that there are
no threshold effects of concern to
infants, children, or adults when CPPA
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
10180
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 32 / Friday, February 19, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
is applied as a plant growth regulator or
nematicide and used in accordance with
label directions and good agricultural
practices. As a result, EPA concludes
that no additional margin of exposure
(safety) is necessary.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy
Acids (CPPA) because EPA is amending
an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance without any numerical
limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
Codex is a joint United Nations Food
and Agriculture Organization/World
Health Organization food standards
program, and it is recognized as an
international food safety standardssetting organization in trade agreements
to which the United States is a party.
EPA may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level. The Codex has not
established an MRL for CPPA.
tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with RULES
VIII. Conclusion
EPA concludes that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the U.S. population, including
infants and children, from aggregate
exposure to residues of CPPA.
Therefore, EPA is establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of CPPA in or on
all food commodities when applied as a
nematicide and used in accordance with
good agricultural practices.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance
exemption under FFDCA section 408(d)
in response to a petition submitted to
the Agency. The Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) has exempted these
types of actions from review under
Executive Order 12866, entitled
‘‘Regulatory Planning and Review’’ (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because
this action has been exempted from
review under Executive Order 12866,
this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ‘‘Actions
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:57 Feb 18, 2021
Jkt 253001
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045,
entitled ‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
nor is it considered a regulatory action
under Executive Order 13771, entitled
‘‘Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs’’ (82 FR 9339, February
3, 2017). This action does not contain
any information collections subject to
OMB approval under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501 et
seq., nor does it require any special
considerations under Executive Order
12898, entitled ‘‘Federal Actions to
Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance exemption in this final
rule, do not require the issuance of a
proposed rule, the requirements of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or tribal governments, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States or tribal
governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
tribes. Thus, the Agency has determined
that Executive Order 13132, entitled
‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999) and Executive Order 13175,
entitled ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments’’ (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply
to this action. In addition, this action
does not impose any enforceable duty or
contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C.
1501 et seq.). This action does not
involve any technical standards that
would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
X. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: February 16, 2021.
Charles Smith,
Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution
Prevention Division, Office of Pesticide
Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is
amended as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. Revise § 180.1321 to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.1321 Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acids; exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance.
(a) An exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
for the residues of complex polymeric
polyhydroxy acids in or on all food
commodities when applied as a plant
growth regulator and used in
accordance with good agricultural
practices.
(b) An exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
for the residues of complex polymeric
polyhydroxy acids in or on all food
commodities when applied as a
nematicide and used in accordance with
good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2021–03362 Filed 2–18–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\19FER1.SGM
19FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 32 (Friday, February 19, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10178-10180]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03362]
[[Page 10178]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0146; FRL-10018-54]
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA); Amendment to the
Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation amends the existing tolerance exemption for
residues of Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA) in or on all
food commodities as a plant growth regulator to add use as a nematicide
in pesticide formulations. FBSciences, Inc. submitted a petition to EPA
under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) requesting this
amendment. This regulation adds use as a nematicide to the existing
tolerance exemption of CPPA under FFDCA.
DATES: This regulation is effective February 19, 2021. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before April 20, 2021, and
must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40 CFR
part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0146, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Charles Smith, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460-0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0146 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
April 20, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2020-0146, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional
instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more
information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Background
In the Federal Register of May 05, 2020 (85 FR 26684) (FRL-10008-
46), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide tolerance
petition (PP 0F8822) by FBSciences, Inc., 153 N. Main Street, Ste. 100,
Collierville, TN 38017-2691. The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.1321 be amended by the addition of use as a nematicide to the
already established exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA). That document
referenced a summary of the petition prepared by the petitioner
FBSciences, Inc., which is available in the docket for this action at
https://www.regulations.gov. Although comments were received on the
notice of filing, none were relevant to this tolerance rulemaking.
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines
``safe'' to mean that ``there is reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue,
including all anticipated dietary exposures and all other exposures for
which there is reliable information.'' This includes exposure through
drinking water and in residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Pursuant to FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), in
making a determination to establish or maintain in effect an exemption
from the
[[Page 10179]]
requirement of a tolerance, EPA must take into account the factors set
forth in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C), which require EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a tolerance to ``ensure that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and children
from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .''
Additionally, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D) requires that the Agency
consider ``available information concerning the cumulative effects of
such residues and other substances that have a common mechanism of
toxicity. . . .''
EPA performs a number of analyses to determine the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide residues. First, EPA determines the
toxicity of pesticides. Second, EPA examines exposure to the pesticide
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings.
II. Toxicological Profile
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the
available scientific data and other relevant information in support of
this action and considered its risk. EPA has also considered available
information concerning the variability of the sensitivities of major
identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and children.
A. Overview of Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids
Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA) is a complex mixture of
naturally occurring organic substances found in dead plant materials.
The components of CPPA are widespread in nature, being found in soils
and fresh and saltwater environments as a result of decaying plant
materials and are used to condition agricultural soils. Its major
components are humic acid, fulvic acid, and tannins, and their relative
concentrations in soil and water systems are influenced by
environmental conditions, such as climate, soil types, vegetation, and
hydrology. CPPA is made by concentrating the organic substances from
water leached through forest soil using a proprietary manufacturing
process.
B. Biochemical Pesticide Toxicology Data Requirements
All applicable mammalian toxicology data requirements supporting
the existing tolerance exemption for residues of CPPA in or on all food
commodities as a plant growth regulator have been fulfilled. The
mammalian toxicology data requirements supporting the addition of
nematicide use to the existing tolerance exemption have also been
fulfilled as EPA has relied upon the same mammalian toxicology data
that supported the existing tolerance exemption for CPPA. No acute,
subchronic, or chronic toxicity endpoints were identified in guideline
studies or in data obtained from open technical literature. Moreover,
CPPA is not a mutagen, and is not a developmental toxicant. There are
no known effects on endocrine systems via oral, dermal, or inhalation
exposure. A more in-depth synopsis of the data upon which EPA relied
and its human health risk assessment based on that data can be found in
the document ``Biopesticides Registration Action Document, Complex
Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA),'' which is available in Docket
Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2009-0917-0011, as well as the docket for this
action, via www.regulations.gov as described under ADDRESSES.
IV. Aggregate Exposures
In examining aggregate exposure, FFDCA section 408 directs EPA to
consider available information concerning exposures from the pesticide
residue in food and all other non-occupational exposures, including
drinking water from ground water or surface water and exposure through
pesticide use in gardens, lawns, or buildings (residential and other
indoor uses).
A. Dietary Exposure
The proposed use pattern may result in dietary exposure with
possible residues in or on agricultural commodities. No significant
exposure via drinking water is expected beyond what is already present,
when CPPA is used according to the product label directions, because
the active ingredient biodegrades rapidly (half-life = 25.7 days) in
the environment, is applied at low application rates, and is not
directly applied to water. Should exposure occur, however, minimal to
no risk is expected for the general population, including infants and
children, due to low toxicity of CPPA and its components as
demonstrated in the data submitted and evaluated by the Agency. In
addition, the lack of reported incidents in spite of the exposure from
use in commercial agriculture for years to condition soils and its
abundance in nature support a conclusion that minimal to no risk is
expected.
B. Other Non-Occupational Exposure
Non-occupational exposure is not expected because CPPA will be
applied as a plant growth regulator and nematicide for agricultural
purposes only and there are no residential uses.
V. Cumulative Effects From Substances With a Common Mechanism of
Toxicity
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of FFDCA requires that, in establishing a
tolerance or tolerance exemption for a pesticide chemical residue, the
Agency consider ``available information concerning the cumulative
effects of such residues and other substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity. . . .'' EPA has determined CPPA to have a non-
toxic mode of action; therefore, 408(b)(2)(D)(v) does not apply.
VI. Determination of Safety for U.S. Population, Infants and Children
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that, in establishing a
tolerance or tolerance exemption for a pesticide chemical residue, EPA
shall assess the available information about consumption patterns among
infants and children, special susceptibility of infants and children to
pesticide chemical residues, and the cumulative effects on infants and
children of the residues and other substances with a common mechanism
of toxicity. In addition, FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(C) provides that EPA
shall apply an additional tenfold (10X) margin of safety for infants
and children in the case of threshold effects to account for prenatal
and postnatal toxicity and the completeness of the database on toxicity
and exposure, unless EPA determines that a different margin of safety
will be safe for infants and children. This additional margin of safety
is commonly referred to as the Food Quality Protection Act Safety
Factor. In applying this provision, EPA either retains the default
value of 10X, or uses a different additional safety factor when
reliable data are available to support the choice of a different safety
factor. As part of its qualitative assessment, EPA evaluated the
available toxicity and exposure data on CPPA and considered its
validity, completeness, and reliability, as well as the relationship of
this information to human risk. EPA considers the toxicity database to
be complete and has identified no residual uncertainty with regard to
prenatal and postnatal toxicity or exposure. No hazard was identified
based on the available studies. Based upon its evaluation, EPA
concludes that there are no threshold effects of concern to infants,
children, or adults when CPPA
[[Page 10180]]
is applied as a plant growth regulator or nematicide and used in
accordance with label directions and good agricultural practices. As a
result, EPA concludes that no additional margin of exposure (safety) is
necessary.
VII. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for Complex Polymeric
Polyhydroxy Acids (CPPA) because EPA is amending an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance without any numerical limitation.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). Codex is a joint United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health Organization food standards program, and it
is recognized as an international food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to which the United States is a party.
EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from a Codex MRL;
however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain the reasons
for departing from the Codex level. The Codex has not established an
MRL for CPPA.
VIII. Conclusion
EPA concludes that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm
will result to the U.S. population, including infants and children,
from aggregate exposure to residues of CPPA. Therefore, EPA is
establishing an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for
residues of CPPA in or on all food commodities when applied as a
nematicide and used in accordance with good agricultural practices.
IX. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes a tolerance exemption under FFDCA section
408(d) in response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA), 44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq., nor does it require any special considerations under Executive
Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR
7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance
exemption in this final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed
rule, the requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
tribal governments, on the relationship between the national government
and the States or tribal governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.). This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require Agency consideration of
voluntary consensus standards pursuant to section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
X. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: February 16, 2021.
Charles Smith,
Acting Director, Biopesticides and Pollution Prevention Division,
Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, 40 CFR chapter I is amended as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. Revise Sec. 180.1321 to read as follows:
Sec. 180.1321 Complex Polymeric Polyhydroxy Acids; exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance.
(a) An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established
for the residues of complex polymeric polyhydroxy acids in or on all
food commodities when applied as a plant growth regulator and used in
accordance with good agricultural practices.
(b) An exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is established
for the residues of complex polymeric polyhydroxy acids in or on all
food commodities when applied as a nematicide and used in accordance
with good agricultural practices.
[FR Doc. 2021-03362 Filed 2-18-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P