Air Plan Approval; California; Consumer Products Regulations; Correcting Amendment, 10016-10018 [2021-02900]
Download as PDF
10016
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by April 19, 2021. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the
Administrator of this final rule does not
affect the finality of this action for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2)).
Dated: February 9, 2021.
Michelle L. Pirzadeh,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 10.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
■
Subpart WW—Washington
2. In § 52.2470, Table 2 in paragraph
(e) is amended by adding an entry for
‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS’’ immediately below the entry
‘‘Interstate Transport for the 2015 Ozone
NAAQS’’ to read as follows:
■
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 40 CFR part 52 is amended as
follows:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.2470
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
TABLE 2—ATTAINMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND OTHER PLANS
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment area
Name of SIP provision
*
*
*
State submittal
date
EPA approval date
*
Explanations
*
*
*
110(a)(2) Infrastructure and Interstate Transport
*
*
Interstate Transport for the 2010 SO2
NAAQS.
*
*
Statewide ...............
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Air Plan Approval; California;
Consumer Products Regulations;
Correcting Amendment
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
On September 16, 2020, the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
issued a final rule titled ‘‘Air Plan
Approval; California; Consumer
Products Regulations.’’ That publication
inadvertently omitted the amendatory
instructions revising the entries that
relate to California’s Tables of
Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR)
Values in the table listing the approved
State rules in the California state
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Jkt 253001
The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0213. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
ADDRESSES:
[EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0213; FRL–10017–
20–Region 9]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
*
*
This
action
addresses
110(a)(2)(D)(i)(I).
*
This rule is effective on February
18, 2021.
40 CFR Part 52
16:43 Feb 17, 2021
*
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
2/18/2021, [Insert
Federal Register
citation].
implementation plan (SIP). This
document corrects this omission and
revises the entries accordingly.
[FR Doc. 2021–03032 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am]
SUMMARY:
*
2/7/2018
Sfmt 4700
*
CAA
*
94105. Phone: (415) 947–4152 or by
email at buss.jeffrey@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
September 16, 2020 (85 FR 57703), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
issued a final rule titled ‘‘Air Plan
Approval; California; Consumer
Products Regulations.’’ That publication
inadvertently omitted the amendatory
instruction revising the entries for
sections 94700 (‘‘MIR Values for
Compounds’’) and 94701 (‘‘MIR Values
for Hydrocarbon Solvents’’) of title 17 of
the California Code of Regulations
(CCR). This action corrects the omission
and revises the entries as intended in
the September 16, 2020 final rule.
The EPA has determined that this
action falls under the ‘‘good cause’’
exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA)
which, upon finding ‘‘good cause,’’
authorizes agencies to dispense with
public participation where public notice
and comment procedures are
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest. Public notice and
comment for this action is unnecessary
because the underlying rule for which
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
this correcting amendment has been
prepared was already subject to a 30-day
comment period, and this action merely
adds amendatory instructions that were
inadvertently omitted in the underlying
rule. Further, this action is consistent
with the purpose and rationale of the
final rule, which is corrected herein.
Because this action does not change the
EPA’s analyses or overall actions, no
purpose would be served by additional
public notice and comment.
Consequently, additional public notice
and comment are unnecessary.
The EPA also finds that there is good
cause under APA section 553(d)(3) for
this correction to become effective on
the date of publication of this action.
Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date of less than 30 days after
publication ‘‘as otherwise provided by
the agency for good cause found and
published with the rule.’’ 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day
waiting period prescribed in APA
section 553(d)(3) is to give affected
parties a reasonable time to adjust their
behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule does not
create any new regulatory requirements
such that affected parties would need
time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. This action merely adds
amendatory instructions that were
inadvertently omitted in a previous
rulemaking. For these reasons, the EPA
finds good cause under APA section
553(d)(3) for this correction to become
effective on the date of publication of
this action.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing
regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In
accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the
incorporation by reference of the
California rules described in the
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth
below. Therefore, these materials have
been approved by the EPA for inclusion
in the SIP, have been incorporated by
reference by the EPA into that plan, are
fully federally enforceable under
sections 110 and 113 of the CAA as of
the effective date of the final rulemaking
of the EPA’s approval, and will be
incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.1 The
EPA has made, and will continue to
make, these documents available
through www.regulations.gov and at the
EPA Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
1 62
FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Feb 17, 2021
Jkt 253001
section of this
preamble for more information).
INFORMATION CONTACT
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to E.O. 13211, ‘‘Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action is not an E.O.
13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017)
regulatory action because this action is
not significant under E.O. 12866.
Because the agency has made a ‘‘good
cause’’ finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. In addition, the SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where the EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000). This rule will not
have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999). This rule also is not subject to
E.O. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically
significant. This action adding missing
amendatory instructions does not
involve technical standards; thus the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by E.O. 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule,
the EPA has taken the necessary steps
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
10017
to eliminate drafting errors and
ambiguity, minimize potential litigation,
and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section
3 of E.O. 12988 (61 FR 4729, February
7, 1996). The EPA has complied with
E.O. 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15,
1998) by examining the takings
implications of the rule in accordance
with the ‘‘Attorney General’s
Supplemental Guidelines for the
Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of
Unanticipated Takings’’ issued under
the executive order. This rule does not
impose an information collection
burden under the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, the EPA
had made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of February
18, 2021. The EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This action adding
missing amendatory instructions is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 5, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of
Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
10018
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
§ 52.220a
*
Subpart F—California
Identification of plan—in part.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
2. In § 52.220a, amend Table 1 to
paragraph (c) by revising the entries for
‘‘94700’’ and ‘‘94701’’ to read as follows:
■
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
TABLE 1—EPA-APPROVED STATUTES AND STATE REGULATIONS 1
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Additional explanation
*
*
*
Title 17 (Public Health), Division 3 (Air Resources), Chapter 1 (Air Resources Board); Subchapter 8.6 (Maximum Incremental
Reactivity); Article 1 (Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) Values)
94700 ................
MIR Values for Compounds .........
1/1/2015
94701 ................
MIR Values for Hydrocarbon Solvents.
10/2/2010
2/18/2021, [Insert citation of publication].
2/18/2021, [Insert citation of publication].
Submitted by CARB on December
1, 2016.
Submitted by CARB on December
1, 2016.
1 Table 1 lists EPA-approved California statutes and regulations incorporated by reference in the applicable SIP. Table 2 of paragraph (c) lists
approved California test procedures, test methods and specifications that are cited in certain regulations listed in table 1. Approved California
statutes that are nonregulatory or quasi-regulatory are listed in paragraph (e).
*
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0195; FRL–10020–
08-Region 3]
Air Plan Approval; West Virginia; 1997
8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air
Quality Standard Second Maintenance
Plan for the West Virginia Portion of
the Steubenville-Weirton, OH-WV Area
Comprising Brooke and Hancock
Counties
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is approving a state
implementation plan (SIP) revision
submitted by the West Virginia
Department of Environmental Protection
(WVDEP) on behalf of the State of West
Virginia. This revision pertains to the
West Virginia’s plan for maintaining the
1997 8-hour ozone national ambient air
quality standard (NAAQS) for the West
Virginia portion of the SteubenvilleWeirton, OH-WV area (Weirton Area),
comprising Brooke and Hancock
Counties. EPA is approving these
revisions to the West Virginia SIP in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA).
DATES: This final rule is effective on
March 22, 2021.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Feb 17, 2021
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
Number EPA–R03–OAR–2020–0195. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., confidential business
information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section for
additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Keila M. Paga´n-Incle, Planning &
Implementation Branch (3AD30), Air &
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region III, 1650
Arch Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
19103. The telephone number is (215)
814–2926. Ms. Paga´n-Incle can also be
reached via electronic mail at paganincle.keila@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
[FR Doc. 2021–02900 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am]
Jkt 253001
I. Background
On June 29, 2020 (85 FR 38820), EPA
published a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) for the State of
West Virginia. In the NPRM, EPA
proposed approval of West Virginia’s
plan for maintaining the 1997 8-hour
ozone NAAQS through June 13, 2027, in
accordance with CAA section 175A. The
formal SIP revision was submitted by
WVDEP on December 10, 2019.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Summary of SIP Revision and EPA
Analysis
On May 14, 2007 (72 FR 27060,
effective June 13, 2007), EPA approved
a redesignation request (and
maintenance plan) from WVDEP for the
Weirton Area. Per CAA section 175A(b),
at the end of the eighth year after the
effective date of the redesignation, the
state must also submit a second
maintenance plan to ensure ongoing
maintenance of the standard for an
additional 10 years, and in South Coast
Air Quality Management District v.
EPA,1 the D.C. Circuit held that this
requirement cannot be waived for areas,
like the Weirton Area, that had been
redesignated to attainment for the 1997
8-hour ozone NAAQS prior to
revocation and that were designated
attainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS.
CAA section 175A sets forth the criteria
for adequate maintenance plans. In
addition, EPA has published
longstanding guidance that provides
further insight on the content of an
approvable maintenance plan,
explaining that a maintenance plan
should address five elements: (1) An
attainment emissions inventory; (2) a
maintenance demonstration; (3) a
commitment for continued air quality
monitoring; (4) a process for verification
of continued attainment; and (5) a
contingency plan.2 WVDEP’s December
10, 2019 SIP submittal fulfills West
1 882
F.3d 1138 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
for Processing Requests to
Redesignate Areas to Attainment,’’ Memorandum
from John Calcagni, Director, Air Quality
Management Division, September 4, 1992 (Calcagni
Memo).
2 ‘‘Procedures
E:\FR\FM\18FER1.SGM
18FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 10016-10018]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02900]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0213; FRL-10017-20-Region 9]
Air Plan Approval; California; Consumer Products Regulations;
Correcting Amendment
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 16, 2020, the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) issued a final rule titled ``Air Plan Approval; California;
Consumer Products Regulations.'' That publication inadvertently omitted
the amendatory instructions revising the entries that relate to
California's Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) Values in
the table listing the approved State rules in the California state
implementation plan (SIP). This document corrects this omission and
revises the entries accordingly.
DATES: This rule is effective on February 18, 2021.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0213. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g.,
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Buss, EPA Region IX, 75
Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105. Phone: (415) 947-4152 or by
email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On September 16, 2020 (85 FR 57703), the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a final rule titled ``Air
Plan Approval; California; Consumer Products Regulations.'' That
publication inadvertently omitted the amendatory instruction revising
the entries for sections 94700 (``MIR Values for Compounds'') and 94701
(``MIR Values for Hydrocarbon Solvents'') of title 17 of the California
Code of Regulations (CCR). This action corrects the omission and
revises the entries as intended in the September 16, 2020 final rule.
The EPA has determined that this action falls under the ``good
cause'' exemption in section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) which, upon finding ``good cause,'' authorizes
agencies to dispense with public participation where public notice and
comment procedures are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the
public interest. Public notice and comment for this action is
unnecessary because the underlying rule for which
[[Page 10017]]
this correcting amendment has been prepared was already subject to a
30-day comment period, and this action merely adds amendatory
instructions that were inadvertently omitted in the underlying rule.
Further, this action is consistent with the purpose and rationale of
the final rule, which is corrected herein. Because this action does not
change the EPA's analyses or overall actions, no purpose would be
served by additional public notice and comment. Consequently,
additional public notice and comment are unnecessary.
The EPA also finds that there is good cause under APA section
553(d)(3) for this correction to become effective on the date of
publication of this action. Section 553(d)(3) of the APA allows an
effective date of less than 30 days after publication ``as otherwise
provided by the agency for good cause found and published with the
rule.'' 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3). The purpose of the 30-day waiting period
prescribed in APA section 553(d)(3) is to give affected parties a
reasonable time to adjust their behavior and prepare before the final
rule takes effect. This rule does not create any new regulatory
requirements such that affected parties would need time to prepare
before the rule takes effect. This action merely adds amendatory
instructions that were inadvertently omitted in a previous rulemaking.
For these reasons, the EPA finds good cause under APA section 553(d)(3)
for this correction to become effective on the date of publication of
this action.
Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the
California rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set
forth below. Therefore, these materials have been approved by the EPA
for inclusion in the SIP, have been incorporated by reference by the
EPA into that plan, are fully federally enforceable under sections 110
and 113 of the CAA as of the effective date of the final rulemaking of
the EPA's approval, and will be incorporated by reference in the next
update to the SIP compilation.\1\ The EPA has made, and will continue
to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at
the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more
information).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 62 FR 27968 (May 22, 1997).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to E.O. 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action is not
an E.O. 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because
this action is not significant under E.O. 12866. Because the agency has
made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not subject to
notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act
or any other statute as indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section above, it is not subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.), or
to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not significantly
or uniquely affect small governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal
law as specified by E.O. 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by E.O. 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999).
This rule also is not subject to E.O. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997), because it is not economically significant. This action adding
missing amendatory instructions does not involve technical standards;
thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply.
The rule also does not involve special consideration of environmental
justice related issues as required by E.O. 12898 (59 FR 7629, February
16, 1994). In issuing this rule, the EPA has taken the necessary steps
to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity, minimize potential
litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of E.O. 12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996). The
EPA has complied with E.O. 12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of the rule in accordance with the
``Attorney General's Supplemental Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated Takings'' issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an information collection burden under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, the EPA had made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of
February 18, 2021. The EPA will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. This action adding
missing amendatory instructions is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: February 5, 2021.
Deborah Jordan,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
[[Page 10018]]
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. In Sec. 52.220a, amend Table 1 to paragraph (c) by revising the
entries for ``94700'' and ``94701'' to read as follows:
Sec. 52.220a Identification of plan--in part.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
Table 1--EPA-Approved Statutes and State Regulations \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State Additional
State citation Title/subject effective date EPA approval date explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Title 17 (Public Health), Division 3 (Air Resources), Chapter 1 (Air Resources Board); Subchapter 8.6 (Maximum
Incremental Reactivity); Article 1 (Tables of Maximum Incremental Reactivity (MIR) Values)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
94700............................ MIR Values for 1/1/2015 2/18/2021, [Insert Submitted by CARB
Compounds. citation of on December 1,
publication]. 2016.
94701............................ MIR Values for 10/2/2010 2/18/2021, [Insert Submitted by CARB
Hydrocarbon citation of on December 1,
Solvents. publication]. 2016.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Table 1 lists EPA-approved California statutes and regulations incorporated by reference in the applicable
SIP. Table 2 of paragraph (c) lists approved California test procedures, test methods and specifications that
are cited in certain regulations listed in table 1. Approved California statutes that are nonregulatory or
quasi-regulatory are listed in paragraph (e).
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2021-02900 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P