Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters, 9269-9272 [2021-03056]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
matters requiring board attention, documents
of resolution, and supervisory
recommendations) a supervised financial
institution for, and the Bureau will not issue
an enforcement action on the basis of, a
‘‘violation’’ of or ‘‘non-compliance’’ with
supervisory guidance. In some situations,
examiners may reference (including in
writing) supervisory guidance to provide
examples of appropriate consumer protection
and risk management practices and other
actions for addressing compliance with laws
or regulations.
• Supervisory criticisms should continue
to be specific as to practices, operations or
other matters that could cause consumer
harm or could cause violations of laws,
regulations, final agency orders, or other
legally enforceable conditions.
• The Bureau may decide to seek public
comment on supervisory guidance. Seeking
public comment on supervisory guidance
does not mean that the guidance is intended
to be a regulation or have the force and effect
of law. The comment process helps the
Bureau to improve its understanding of an
issue, to gather information on institutions’
risk management practices, or to seek ways
to achieve a supervisory objective most
effectively and with the least burden on
institutions.
• The Bureau will aim to reduce the
issuance of multiple supervisory guidance
documents on the same topic and will
generally limit such multiple issuances going
forward.
• The Bureau will continue efforts to make
the role of supervisory guidance clear in
communications to examiners and to
supervised financial institutions and
encourages supervised institutions with
questions about this statement or any
applicable supervisory guidance to discuss
the questions with their appropriate agency
contact.
Dated: January 19, 2021.
Grace Feola,
Federal Register Liaison, Bureau of Consumer
Financial Protection.
[FR Doc. 2021–01524 Filed 2–11–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–AM–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0027; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–00048–R; Amendment
39–21425; AD 2021–04–04]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus
Helicopters
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
Examining the AD Docket
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020–19–
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Feb 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
02, which applied to certain Airbus
Helicopters (previously Eurocopter
France) Model SA330J helicopters. AD
2020–19–02 required repetitively
inspecting affected tail rotor (T/R)
blades and depending on the inspection
results, repairing or replacing the T/R
blade. AD 2020–19–02 also prohibited
installing an affected T/R blade unless
it passed the inspections. This AD
retains the requirements of AD 2020–
19–02 and also clarifies the
applicability, clarifies the affected T/R
blades in the required actions, reduces
a compliance time, and corrects the
prohibition requirement. This AD was
prompted by the determination that
these corrections are necessary. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective
March 1, 2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain document listed in this AD
as of October 7, 2020 (85 FR 59416,
September 22, 2020).
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by March 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this final rule, contact Airbus
Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; telephone 972–641–
0000 or 800–232–0323; fax 972–641–
3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/
helicopters/services/technicalsupport.html. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N–321,
Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information
on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call (817) 222–5110. It is also
available at https://www.regulations.gov
by searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0027.
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9269
FAA–2021–0027; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
final rule, the European Aviation Safety
Agency (now European Union Aviation
Safety Agency) (EASA) AD, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Matt
Fuller, AD Program Manager, General
Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177;
telephone (817) 222–5110; email
matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020–19–02,
Amendment 39–21243 (85 FR 59416,
September 22, 2020) (AD 2020–19–02),
for certain Airbus Helicopters
(previously Eurocopter France) Model
SA330J helicopters. AD 2020–19–02
required, for each T/R blade part
number (P/N) 330A12–0005–(all dash
numbers) and 330A12–0006–(all dash
numbers), repetitively accomplishing a
visual and in-depth inspection for
debonding and eddy current inspecting
for a crack. If there was debonding
within allowable limits, AD 2020–19–02
required repairing or replacing the T/R
blade. If there was debonding that
exceeded allowable limits or a crack,
AD 2020–19–02 required replacing the
T/R blade. AD 2020–19–02 also
prohibited installing an affected T/R
blade unless it passed the inspections.
AD 2020–19–02 was prompted by EASA
AD No. 2016–0059–E, dated March 22,
2016 (EASA AD 2016–0059–E), issued
by the EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the
European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for Airbus Helicopters
(formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter
France, Aerospatiale) Model SA 330 J
helicopters. EASA AD 2016–0059–E
retains the requirements of Direction
Ge´ne´rale de l’Aviation Civile (DGAC)
France AD 87–032–052(B)R3, dated
January 23, 1991, which it supersedes,
and also mandates improved service
instructions. EASA advises of two
reports of cracked metal T/R blade skin,
which subsequently led to rotor blade
vibrations and forced landing of the
helicopter. According to EASA, this
condition, if not addressed, could result
in additional occurrences of T/R blade
structural damage, possibly resulting in
significant vibrations and reduced
control of the helicopter.
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
9270
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Actions Since AD 2020–19–02 Was
Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–19–
02, it was identified that the compliance
time for the initial visual inspection of
T/R blade P/N 330A12–0006–(all dash
numbers) (with a de-icing system) was
inadvertently stated as within 30 hours
time-in-service (TIS). This final rule
corrects this compliance time to within
15 hours TIS.
Since the FAA issued AD 2020–19–
02, it was also identified that the parts
prohibition requirement could cause
confusion about when the inspections
must be accomplished prior to
installation. This final rule clarifies this.
Additionally, this final rule clarifies
the applicability by identifying that T/
R blade P/N 330A12–0005–(all dash
numbers) is without a de-icing system
installed and that T/R blade P/N
330A12–0006–(all dash numbers) is
with a de-icing system installed. This
final rule also clarifies the required
actions by adding the P/Ns.
FAA’s Determination
These helicopters have been approved
by EASA and are approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the
European Union, EASA has notified the
FAA about the unsafe condition
described in its AD. The FAA is
proposing this AD after evaluating all
known relevant information and
determining that the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other helicopters of the same
type design.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters
Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21,
2016, for Model SA330J helicopters
with certain T/R blades with and
without a de-icing system installed.
This service information specifies
procedures for a visual and in-depth
inspection of the T/R blades for skin
debonding and an eddy current
inspection of the T/R blades for a crack
using various crack detectors.
This service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
AD Requirements
This AD requires, for T/R blade P/N
330A12–0006–(all dash numbers) (with
a de-icing system), within 15 hours TIS
after the effective date of this AD or
within 15 hours TIS after last inspecting
the T/R blade as required by paragraph
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Feb 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
(f)(1) of AD 2020–19–02, whichever
occurs first, and thereafter at intervals
not to exceed 15 hours TIS; and for T/
R blade P/N 330A12–0005–(all dash
numbers) (without a de-icing system),
within 30 hours TIS after the effective
date of this AD, or within 30 hours TIS
after last inspecting the T/R blade as
required by paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020–
19–02, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 30
hours TIS:
• Accomplishing a visual and indepth inspection of each T/R blade for
debonding. If there is debonding within
allowable limits, this AD requires
repairing or replacing the T/R blade. If
there is debonding that exceeds
allowable limits, this AD requires
replacing the T/R blade.
• Eddy current inspecting each T/R
blade for a crack. If there is a crack, this
AD requires replacing the T/R blade.
This AD also prohibits installing an
affected T/R blade on any helicopter
unless it passes the inspections required
by this AD.
Differences Between This AD and the
EASA AD
The EASA AD requires returning a T/
R blade with a discrepancy to Airbus
Helicopters; whereas this AD requires
repairing or replacing the T/R blade if
there is debonding within allowable
limits and replacing the T/R blade if
there is debonding that exceeds
allowable limits or a crack instead.
Justification for Immediate Adoption
and Determination of the Effective Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies
to dispense with notice and comment
procedures for rules when the agency,
for ‘‘good cause,’’ finds that those
procedures are ‘‘impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ Under this section, an agency,
upon finding good cause, may issue a
final rule without providing notice and
seeking comment prior to issuance.
Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules
effective in less than thirty days, upon
a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that
requires the immediate adoption of this
AD without providing an opportunity
for public comments prior to adoption.
The FAA has found that the risk to the
flying public justifies foregoing notice
and comment prior to adoption of this
rule because the initial instance of the
repetitive inspections must be
completed within 15 or 30 hours TIS, a
time period of up to approximately two
months based on the average flight-hour
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
utilization rates of these helicopters.
Accordingly, notice and opportunity for
prior public comment are impracticable
and contrary to the public interest
pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good
cause exists pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(d)
for making this amendment effective in
less than 30 days, for the same reasons
the FAA found good cause to forego
notice and comment.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written data, views, or arguments about
this final rule. Send your comments to
an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2021–0027;
Project Identifier MCAI–2021–00048–R’’
at the beginning of your comments. The
most helpful comments reference a
specific portion of the final rule, explain
the reason for any recommended
change, and include supporting data.
The FAA will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend this final rule because of those
comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this AD contain
commercial or financial information
that is customarily treated as private,
that you actually treat as private, and
that is relevant or responsive to this AD,
it is important that you clearly designate
the submitted comments as CBI. Please
mark each page of your submission
containing CBI as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA
will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they
will not be placed in the public docket
of this AD. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Matt Fuller, AD
Program Manager, General Aviation &
Rotorcraft Unit, Airworthiness Products
Section, Operational Safety Branch,
FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort
Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
Any commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) do not apply when
an agency finds good cause pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt a rule without
prior notice and comment. Because the
FAA has determined that it has good
cause to adopt this rule without prior
notice and comment, RFA analysis is
not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD
affects 17 helicopters of U.S. Registry.
Labor rates are estimated at $85 per
work-hour. Based on these numbers, the
FAA estimates the following costs to
comply with this AD.
Inspecting the T/R blades for
debonding takes about 0.75 work-hour
for an estimated cost of $64 per
helicopter and $1,088 for the U.S. fleet,
per inspection cycle. Eddy current
inspecting the T/R blades for a crack
takes about 1.75 work-hours for an
estimated cost of $149 per helicopter
and $2,533 for the U.S. fleet, per
inspection cycle.
If required, replacing a T/R blade
takes about 4 work-hours and parts cost
about $19,000, for an estimated cost of
$19,340.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:41 Feb 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify
that this AD:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as
follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by:
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive
2020–19–02, Amendment 39–21243 (85
FR 59416, September 22, 2020); and
■ b. Adding the following new
airworthiness directive:
■
■
2021–04–04 Airbus Helicopters:
Amendment 39–21425; Docket No.
FAA–2021–0027; Project Identifier
MCAI–2021–00048–R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is
effective March 1, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020–19–02,
Amendment 39–21243 (85 FR 59416,
September 22, 2020) (AD 2020–19–02).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters
Model SA330J helicopters, certificated in any
category, with a tail rotor (T/R) blade part
number (P/N) 330A12–0005–(all dash
numbers) (without a de-icing system) or
330A12–0006–(all dash numbers) (with a deicing system), installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC)
Code: 6410, Tail Rotor Blades.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by two reports of
cracked metal T/R blade skin. The FAA is
issuing this AD to address fatigue cracking of
a T/R blade. The unsafe condition, if not
addressed, could result in failure of a T/R
blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
9271
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Required Actions
(1) For T/R blade P/N 330A12–0006–(all
dash numbers) (with a de-icing system),
within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS) after
the effective date of this AD or within 15
hours TIS after last inspecting the T/R blade
as required by paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020–
19–02, whichever occurs first, and thereafter
at intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS; and
for T/R blade P/N 330A12–0005–(all dash
numbers) (without a de-icing system), within
30 hours TIS after the effective date of this
AD, or within 30 hours TIS after last
inspecting the T/R blade as required by
paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020–19–02,
whichever occurs first, and thereafter at
intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS:
(i) Inspect each T/R blade for debonding by
following the visual and in-depth inspection
procedures in the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2., of Airbus
Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin
No. 05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016
(EASB 05.101). If there is debonding within
allowable limits, before further flight, repair
or replace the T/R blade. If there is
debonding that exceeds allowable limits,
before further flight, replace the T/R blade.
(ii) Eddy current inspect each T/R blade for
a crack by following the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.B.3.a. of EASB
05.101, then either paragraph 3.B.3.b.1. or
3.B.3.b.2. of EASB 05.101 depending on your
crack detector, and paragraph 3.B.3.c. of
EASB 05.101 except the ‘‘if there are no
cracks’’ and ‘‘if there are one or several
cracks’’ steps. Instead of the ‘‘if there are no
cracks’’ and ‘‘if there are one or several
cracks’’ steps, if there is a crack, before
further flight, replace the T/R blade.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, do
not install a T/R blade identified in
paragraph (c) of this AD on any helicopter
unless the actions of paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and
(ii) of this AD have been accomplished.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Strategic Policy
Rotorcraft Section, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-ASW-FTWAMOC-Requests@faa.gov.
(2) Before using any approved AMOC,
notify your appropriate principal inspector,
or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/
certificate holding district office.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD,
contact Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager,
General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit,
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
9272
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 28 / Friday, February 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222–
5110; email matthew.fuller@faa.gov.
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in
European Aviation Safety Agency (now
European Union Aviation Safety Agency)
(EASA) AD No. 2016–0059–E, dated March
22, 2016. You may view the EASA AD on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov in
Docket No. FAA–2021–0027.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on October 7, 2020 (85 FR
59416, September 22, 2020).
(i) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert
Service Bulletin No. 05.101, Revision 0,
dated March 21, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) For Airbus Helicopters service
information identified in this AD, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive,
Grand Prairie, TX 75052; telephone 972–641–
0000 or 800–232–0323; fax 972–641–3775; or
at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/
services/technical-support.html.
(5) You may view this service information
at the FAA, Office of the Regional Counsel,
Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy.,
Room 6N–321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (817) 222–5110.
(6) You may view this service information
that is incorporated by reference at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA,
email: fedreg.legal@nara.gov, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
Issued on February 3, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives,
Compliance & Airworthiness Division,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–03056 Filed 2–10–21; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2021–0049; Project
Identifier MCAI–2021–00033–A; Amendment
39–21427; AD 2021–04–06]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Pilatus
Aircraft Ltd. Airplanes
16:41 Feb 11, 2021
The FAA is adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
Pilatus Aircraft Ltd. (Pilatus) Model PC–
7 airplanes. This AD results from
mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the
aviation authority of another country to
identify and correct an unsafe condition
on an aviation product. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as a
missing release bar retaining screw on a
Harley-type buckle assembly installed
on a harness shoulder strap. This
condition, if not corrected, could lead to
loss of pilot restraint and consequently
loss of airplane control or injuries to the
crew. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address the unsafe condition on these
products.
SUMMARY:
This AD is effective February 12,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of a certain publication listed in this AD
as of February 12, 2021.
The FAA must receive comments on
this AD by March 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For IrvinGQ Limited service
information identified in this final rule,
contact Pilatus Aircraft Ltd., CH–6371,
Stans, Switzerland; phone: +41 848 24
7 365; email: techsupport.ch@pilatusaircraft.com; website: https://
www.pilatus-aircraft.com/. You may
view this service information at the
FAA, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 901 Locust,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (816) 329–
4148. It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0049.
DATES:
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Final rule; request for
comments.
ACTION:
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2021–0049; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
final rule, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Rudolph, Aviation Safety
Engineer, General Aviation & Rotorcraft
Section, International Validation
Branch, FAA, 901 Locust, Room 301,
Kansas City, Missouri 64106; phone:
(816) 329–4059; fax: (816) 329–4090;
email: doug.rudolph@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Federal Office of Civil Aviation
(FOCA), which is the aviation authority
for Switzerland, has issued FOCA AD
HB–2021–001–E, dated January 8, 2021
(referred to after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to
address the unsafe condition on Pilatus
Model PC–7 airplanes. The MCAI states:
An occurrence was reported where in an in
service event a missing release bar retaining
screw on a Harley-type buckle assembly
installed on a harness shoulder strap on an
ejection seat was detected.
This condition, if not corrected, could lead
to loss of pilot restraint and consequently
loss of aeroplane control or injuries to the
crew.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
Pilatus and IrvinGQ issued the [service
bulletins] SBs to provide inspection
instructions.
For the reason described above, this
[FOCA] AD requires the inspection of the
Harley-type buckle assemblies on the seat
harnesses of the front and rear seats, as
defined in this AD, and prohibits (re-)
installation of affected parts.
FOCA advises that the release bar
retaining screws on the affected Harleytype buckle assemblies were incorrectly
peened during manufacture. This
inadequate peening of the retaining
screws has led to loose screws that can
potentially be removed by hand or the
actual screw falling out of the
assemblies. You may examine the MCAI
in the AD docket at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2021–
0049.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country and is approved for operation in
the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, it has notified the
FAA of the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI and service information
referenced above. The FAA is issuing
this AD because the agency has
E:\FR\FM\12FER1.SGM
12FER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 28 (Friday, February 12, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 9269-9272]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03056]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2021-0027; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00048-R;
Amendment 39-21425; AD 2021-04-04]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Airbus Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA is superseding Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2020-19-
02, which applied to certain Airbus Helicopters (previously Eurocopter
France) Model SA330J helicopters. AD 2020-19-02 required repetitively
inspecting affected tail rotor (T/R) blades and depending on the
inspection results, repairing or replacing the T/R blade. AD 2020-19-02
also prohibited installing an affected T/R blade unless it passed the
inspections. This AD retains the requirements of AD 2020-19-02 and also
clarifies the applicability, clarifies the affected T/R blades in the
required actions, reduces a compliance time, and corrects the
prohibition requirement. This AD was prompted by the determination that
these corrections are necessary. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
the unsafe condition on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective March 1, 2021.
The Director of the Federal Register approved the incorporation by
reference of a certain document listed in this AD as of October 7, 2020
(85 FR 59416, September 22, 2020).
The FAA must receive comments on this AD by March 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this final rule, contact
Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand Prairie, TX 75052;
telephone 972-641-0000 or 800-232-0323; fax 972-641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html. You may
view this service information at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room 6N-321, Fort
Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of this material
at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110. It is also available at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-
0027.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2021-0027; or in person at
Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this final rule, the
European Aviation Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety
Agency) (EASA) AD, any comments received, and other information. The
street address for Docket Operations is listed above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Fuller, AD Program Manager,
General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit, Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX
76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued AD 2020-19-02, Amendment 39-21243 (85 FR 59416,
September 22, 2020) (AD 2020-19-02), for certain Airbus Helicopters
(previously Eurocopter France) Model SA330J helicopters. AD 2020-19-02
required, for each T/R blade part number (P/N) 330A12-0005-(all dash
numbers) and 330A12-0006-(all dash numbers), repetitively accomplishing
a visual and in-depth inspection for debonding and eddy current
inspecting for a crack. If there was debonding within allowable limits,
AD 2020-19-02 required repairing or replacing the T/R blade. If there
was debonding that exceeded allowable limits or a crack, AD 2020-19-02
required replacing the T/R blade. AD 2020-19-02 also prohibited
installing an affected T/R blade unless it passed the inspections. AD
2020-19-02 was prompted by EASA AD No. 2016-0059-E, dated March 22,
2016 (EASA AD 2016-0059-E), issued by the EASA, which is the Technical
Agent for the Member States of the European Union, to correct an unsafe
condition for Airbus Helicopters (formerly Eurocopter, Eurocopter
France, Aerospatiale) Model SA 330 J helicopters. EASA AD 2016-0059-E
retains the requirements of Direction G[eacute]n[eacute]rale de
l'Aviation Civile (DGAC) France AD 87-032-052(B)R3, dated January 23,
1991, which it supersedes, and also mandates improved service
instructions. EASA advises of two reports of cracked metal T/R blade
skin, which subsequently led to rotor blade vibrations and forced
landing of the helicopter. According to EASA, this condition, if not
addressed, could result in additional occurrences of T/R blade
structural damage, possibly resulting in significant vibrations and
reduced control of the helicopter.
[[Page 9270]]
Actions Since AD 2020-19-02 Was Issued
Since the FAA issued AD 2020-19-02, it was identified that the
compliance time for the initial visual inspection of T/R blade P/N
330A12-0006-(all dash numbers) (with a de-icing system) was
inadvertently stated as within 30 hours time-in-service (TIS). This
final rule corrects this compliance time to within 15 hours TIS.
Since the FAA issued AD 2020-19-02, it was also identified that the
parts prohibition requirement could cause confusion about when the
inspections must be accomplished prior to installation. This final rule
clarifies this.
Additionally, this final rule clarifies the applicability by
identifying that T/R blade P/N 330A12-0005-(all dash numbers) is
without a de-icing system installed and that T/R blade P/N 330A12-0006-
(all dash numbers) is with a de-icing system installed. This final rule
also clarifies the required actions by adding the P/Ns.
FAA's Determination
These helicopters have been approved by EASA and are approved for
operation in the United States. Pursuant to the FAA's bilateral
agreement with the European Union, EASA has notified the FAA about the
unsafe condition described in its AD. The FAA is proposing this AD
after evaluating all known relevant information and determining that
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other helicopters of the same type design.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
The FAA reviewed Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service
Bulletin No. 05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016, for Model SA330J
helicopters with certain T/R blades with and without a de-icing system
installed. This service information specifies procedures for a visual
and in-depth inspection of the T/R blades for skin debonding and an
eddy current inspection of the T/R blades for a crack using various
crack detectors.
This service information is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it through their normal course of
business or by the means identified in the ADDRESSES section.
AD Requirements
This AD requires, for T/R blade P/N 330A12-0006-(all dash numbers)
(with a de-icing system), within 15 hours TIS after the effective date
of this AD or within 15 hours TIS after last inspecting the T/R blade
as required by paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020-19-02, whichever occurs
first, and thereafter at intervals not to exceed 15 hours TIS; and for
T/R blade P/N 330A12-0005-(all dash numbers) (without a de-icing
system), within 30 hours TIS after the effective date of this AD, or
within 30 hours TIS after last inspecting the T/R blade as required by
paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020-19-02, whichever occurs first, and
thereafter at intervals not to exceed 30 hours TIS:
Accomplishing a visual and in-depth inspection of each T/R
blade for debonding. If there is debonding within allowable limits,
this AD requires repairing or replacing the T/R blade. If there is
debonding that exceeds allowable limits, this AD requires replacing the
T/R blade.
Eddy current inspecting each T/R blade for a crack. If
there is a crack, this AD requires replacing the T/R blade.
This AD also prohibits installing an affected T/R blade on any
helicopter unless it passes the inspections required by this AD.
Differences Between This AD and the EASA AD
The EASA AD requires returning a T/R blade with a discrepancy to
Airbus Helicopters; whereas this AD requires repairing or replacing the
T/R blade if there is debonding within allowable limits and replacing
the T/R blade if there is debonding that exceeds allowable limits or a
crack instead.
Justification for Immediate Adoption and Determination of the Effective
Date
Section 553(b)(3)(B) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.) authorizes agencies to dispense with notice and
comment procedures for rules when the agency, for ``good cause,'' finds
that those procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to
the public interest.'' Under this section, an agency, upon finding good
cause, may issue a final rule without providing notice and seeking
comment prior to issuance. Further, section 553(d) of the APA
authorizes agencies to make rules effective in less than thirty days,
upon a finding of good cause.
An unsafe condition exists that requires the immediate adoption of
this AD without providing an opportunity for public comments prior to
adoption. The FAA has found that the risk to the flying public
justifies foregoing notice and comment prior to adoption of this rule
because the initial instance of the repetitive inspections must be
completed within 15 or 30 hours TIS, a time period of up to
approximately two months based on the average flight-hour utilization
rates of these helicopters. Accordingly, notice and opportunity for
prior public comment are impracticable and contrary to the public
interest pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(3)(B).
In addition, the FAA finds that good cause exists pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 553(d) for making this amendment effective in less than 30 days,
for the same reasons the FAA found good cause to forego notice and
comment.
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written data, views, or arguments
about this final rule. Send your comments to an address listed under
ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2021-0027; Project Identifier MCAI-
2021-00048-R'' at the beginning of your comments. The most helpful
comments reference a specific portion of the final rule, explain the
reason for any recommended change, and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this final rule because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this final rule.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this AD contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this AD, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this AD. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to Matt
Fuller, AD Program Manager, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, FAA, 10101
Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5110; email
[email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA receives which is
not specifically designated as
[[Page 9271]]
CBI will be placed in the public docket for this rulemaking.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) do not
apply when an agency finds good cause pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 553 to adopt
a rule without prior notice and comment. Because the FAA has determined
that it has good cause to adopt this rule without prior notice and
comment, RFA analysis is not required.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this AD affects 17 helicopters of U.S.
Registry. Labor rates are estimated at $85 per work-hour. Based on
these numbers, the FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this AD.
Inspecting the T/R blades for debonding takes about 0.75 work-hour
for an estimated cost of $64 per helicopter and $1,088 for the U.S.
fleet, per inspection cycle. Eddy current inspecting the T/R blades for
a crack takes about 1.75 work-hours for an estimated cost of $149 per
helicopter and $2,533 for the U.S. fleet, per inspection cycle.
If required, replacing a T/R blade takes about 4 work-hours and
parts cost about $19,000, for an estimated cost of $19,340.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
This AD will not have federalism implications under Executive Order
13132. This AD will not have a substantial direct effect on the States,
on the relationship between the national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed, I certify that this AD:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866, and
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA amends 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by:
0
a. Removing Airworthiness Directive 2020-19-02, Amendment 39-21243 (85
FR 59416, September 22, 2020); and
0
b. Adding the following new airworthiness directive:
2021-04-04 Airbus Helicopters: Amendment 39-21425; Docket No. FAA-
2021-0027; Project Identifier MCAI-2021-00048-R.
(a) Effective Date
This airworthiness directive (AD) is effective March 1, 2021.
(b) Affected ADs
This AD replaces AD 2020-19-02, Amendment 39-21243 (85 FR 59416,
September 22, 2020) (AD 2020-19-02).
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to Airbus Helicopters Model SA330J helicopters,
certificated in any category, with a tail rotor (T/R) blade part
number (P/N) 330A12-0005-(all dash numbers) (without a de-icing
system) or 330A12-0006-(all dash numbers) (with a de-icing system),
installed.
(d) Subject
Joint Aircraft Service Component (JASC) Code: 6410, Tail Rotor
Blades.
(e) Unsafe Condition
This AD was prompted by two reports of cracked metal T/R blade
skin. The FAA is issuing this AD to address fatigue cracking of a T/
R blade. The unsafe condition, if not addressed, could result in
failure of a T/R blade and subsequent loss of control of the
helicopter.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
(g) Required Actions
(1) For T/R blade P/N 330A12-0006-(all dash numbers) (with a de-
icing system), within 15 hours time-in-service (TIS) after the
effective date of this AD or within 15 hours TIS after last
inspecting the T/R blade as required by paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020-
19-02, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 15 hours TIS; and for T/R blade P/N 330A12-0005-(all dash
numbers) (without a de-icing system), within 30 hours TIS after the
effective date of this AD, or within 30 hours TIS after last
inspecting the T/R blade as required by paragraph (f)(1) of AD 2020-
19-02, whichever occurs first, and thereafter at intervals not to
exceed 30 hours TIS:
(i) Inspect each T/R blade for debonding by following the visual
and in-depth inspection procedures in the Accomplishment
Instructions, paragraph 3.B.2., of Airbus Helicopters Emergency
Alert Service Bulletin No. 05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016
(EASB 05.101). If there is debonding within allowable limits, before
further flight, repair or replace the T/R blade. If there is
debonding that exceeds allowable limits, before further flight,
replace the T/R blade.
(ii) Eddy current inspect each T/R blade for a crack by
following the Accomplishment Instructions, paragraph 3.B.3.a. of
EASB 05.101, then either paragraph 3.B.3.b.1. or 3.B.3.b.2. of EASB
05.101 depending on your crack detector, and paragraph 3.B.3.c. of
EASB 05.101 except the ``if there are no cracks'' and ``if there are
one or several cracks'' steps. Instead of the ``if there are no
cracks'' and ``if there are one or several cracks'' steps, if there
is a crack, before further flight, replace the T/R blade.
(2) As of the effective date of this AD, do not install a T/R
blade identified in paragraph (c) of this AD on any helicopter
unless the actions of paragraphs (g)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD have
been accomplished.
(h) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(1) The Manager, Strategic Policy Rotorcraft Section, FAA, has
the authority to approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19,
send your request to your principal inspector or local Flight
Standards District Office, as appropriate. If sending information
directly to the manager of the certification office, send it to the
attention of the person identified in paragraph (i)(1) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: [email protected].
(2) Before using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager
of the local flight standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(i) Related Information
(1) For more information about this AD, contact Matt Fuller, AD
Program Manager, General Aviation & Rotorcraft Unit,
[[Page 9272]]
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, FAA,
10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-
5110; email [email protected].
(2) The subject of this AD is addressed in European Aviation
Safety Agency (now European Union Aviation Safety Agency) (EASA) AD
No. 2016-0059-E, dated March 22, 2016. You may view the EASA AD on
the internet at https://www.regulations.gov in Docket No. FAA-2021-
0027.
(j) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register approved the
incorporation by reference (IBR) of the service information listed
in this paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51.
(2) You must use this service information as applicable to do
the actions required by this AD, unless the AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was approved for IBR on
October 7, 2020 (85 FR 59416, September 22, 2020).
(i) Airbus Helicopters Emergency Alert Service Bulletin No.
05.101, Revision 0, dated March 21, 2016.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) For Airbus Helicopters service information identified in
this AD, contact Airbus Helicopters, 2701 N Forum Drive, Grand
Prairie, TX 75052; telephone 972-641-0000 or 800-232-0323; fax 972-
641-3775; or at https://www.airbus.com/helicopters/services/technical-support.html.
(5) You may view this service information at the FAA, Office of
the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 10101 Hillwood Pkwy., Room
6N-321, Fort Worth, TX 76177. For information on the availability of
this material at the FAA, call (817) 222-5110.
(6) You may view this service information that is incorporated
by reference at the National Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability of this material at
NARA, email: [email protected], or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on February 3, 2021.
Gaetano A. Sciortino,
Deputy Director for Strategic Initiatives, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-03056 Filed 2-10-21; 2:00 pm]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P