Request for Information (RFI): Accelerating Innovation in Diagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease, 9075-9077 [2021-02796]

Download as PDF 9075 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS Data required to be submitted Number of record keepers Hours per year 432 432 432 * 475 * 475 * 475 * 475 1.05 1.25 1.25 0.37 10.00 10.00 19.55 454 540 540 176 4,750 4,750 9,286 HPSL, LDS, and PCL Program: Documentation of Cost of Attendance ................................................................................. Promissory Note ................................................................................................................... Documentation of Entrance Interview .................................................................................. Documentation of Exit Interview ........................................................................................... Program Records ................................................................................................................. Student Records .......................................................................................................................... Repayment Records .................................................................................................................... Total burden hours HPSL/LDS/PCL Subtotal ............................................................................................... NSL Program: Documentation of Cost of Attendance ................................................................................. Promissory Note ................................................................................................................... Documentation of Entrance Interview .................................................................................. Documentation of Exit Interview ........................................................................................... Program Records ................................................................................................................. Student Records ................................................................................................................... Repayment Records ............................................................................................................. 475 ........................ 20,496 304 304 304 * 486 * 486 * 486 * 486 0.25 0.50 0.50 0.14 5.00 1.00 2.51 76 152 152 68 2,430 486 1,220 NSL Subtotal ................................................................................................................. 486 ........................ 4,584 * Includes active and closing schools. REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Number of respondents khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES HPSL, LDS, and PCL: Student Financial Aid Transcript .................................. Loan Information Disclosure ......................................... Entrance Interview ........................................................ Exit Interview ................................................................ Notification of Repayment ............................................ Notification During Deferment ...................................... Notification of Delinquent Accounts .............................. Credit Bureau Notification ............................................. Write-off of Uncollectable Loans .................................. Disability Cancellation ................................................... Administrative Hearings record retention ..................... Administrative Hearings reporting requirements .......... Responses per respondent Total annual responses Hours per response Total burden hours 4,600 325 325 * 334 * 334 * 333 334 334 520 3 0 0 1 299.5 139.5 113.5 862.5 17 172.5 6 1 1 0 0 4,600 97,338 45,338 37,909 288,075 5,661 57,615 2,004 520 3 0 0 0.25 0.63 0.50 1.00 0.38 0.63 1.25 0.50 3.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1,150 61,323 22,669 37,909 109,469 3,566 72,019 1,002 1560 3 0 0 HPSL Subtotal ....................................................... NSL: Student Financial Aid Transcript .................................. Entrance Interview ........................................................ Exit Interview ................................................................ Notification of Repayment ............................................ Notification During Deferment ...................................... Notification of Delinquent Accounts .............................. Credit Bureau Notification ............................................. Write-off of Uncollectable Loans .................................. Disability Cancellation ................................................... Administrative Hearings ................................................ ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 310,670 4,100 282 348 348 348 348 348 23 16 0 1 17.5 9 9 1.5 42.5 709 1 1 0 4,100 4,935 3,132 3,132 522 14,790 246,732 23 16 0 0.25 0.42 0.42 0.27 0.29 0.04 0.06 3.00 1.00 0.00 1,025 2,073 1,315 846 151 592 1,480 69 16 0 NSL Subtotal ......................................................... ........................ ........................ ........................ ........................ 7,567 HRSA specifically requests comments on (1) the necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency’s functions, (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected, and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Feb 10, 2021 Jkt 253001 technology to minimize the information collection burden. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Maria G. Button, Director, Executive Secretariat. Request for Information (RFI): Accelerating Innovation in Diagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease [FR Doc. 2021–02807 Filed 2–10–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165–15–P PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). AGENCY: Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM 11FEN1 9076 ACTION: Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices Request for information. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) in the Department of Health and Human Services seeks to obtain information regarding the current state of the science and technology to accelerate the pace of innovative solutions for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A set of questions is available in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. DATES: To be considered, comments must be received electronically at the email address provided below, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) March 15, 2021. ADDRESSES: Individuals are encouraged to submit responses electronically to Dr. Kristen Honey, Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, LymeInnovation@hhs.gov, (202) 853–7680. Please indicate ‘‘RFI RESPONSE’’ in the subject line of your email. Submissions received after the deadline will not be reviewed. Responses to this notice are not offers and cannot be accepted by the government to form a binding contract or issue a grant. Respond concisely and in plain language. You may use any structure or layout that presents the information well. You may respond to some or all of our questions, and you can suggest other factors or relevant questions. You may also include links to online material or interactive presentations. Clearly mark any proprietary information, and place it in its own section or file. Your response will become government property, and we may publish some of its nonproprietary content. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative is a patientcentered, data-driven approach to the threat of Lyme disease and tick-borne diseases. Lyme disease affects more than 300,000 people in the U.S. each year and accounts for more than 70% of all vector-borne diseases in our country. Lyme and other tick-borne diseases cost the U.S. economy billions of dollars annually. The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative uses strategic public-private partnerships to accelerate advancements in Lyme disease and other tick-borne diseases. The Lyme Innovation initiative aims to build commitment to patientcentered innovations, identify ways to collect and share data while raising awareness, accelerate the discovery of next-generation diagnostic tools and technologies, and lower barriers across all phases of development, testing, and implementation. The recommendations khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Feb 10, 2021 Jkt 253001 of the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group to HHS inform the Lyme Innovation initiative. The Lyme Innovation initiative represents one way that HHS is executing the strategies described in ‘‘A National Public Health Framework for the Prevention and Control of Vector-Borne Diseases in Humans.’’ HHS has entered into a public-private partnership with the Steven and Alexandra Cohen Foundation to form the LymeX Innovation Accelerator (LymeX). LymeX will accelerate the Lyme Innovation initiative’s progress and strategically advance tick-bornedisease solutions in direct collaboration with Lyme disease patients, patient advocates, and diverse stakeholders. A primary goal of the LymeX partnership and the Framework is the development of new diagnostic technologies for Lyme disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website (https:// www.cdc.gov/lyme/) summarizes information about the stages of Lyme disease, current diagnostic testing recommendations, and treatment options. CDC currently recommends the use of FDA cleared serologic tests in a two-step testing process that detects the presence of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for Lyme disease. Serologic tests for diagnosis of Lyme disease have technical limitations. Antibodies may not be produced by the immune system early enough or in high enough quantities to meet the detection limit of these tests (https:// www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/tbdwgreport-to-congress-2018.pdf). As an antibody response in infected persons requires time to develop, serologic tests for Lyme disease may produce false negative results during early infection. In areas where Lyme disease is highly endemic, the infection may be diagnosed without laboratory testing if patients develop a diagnostic skin lesion at the site of the tick bite, which is known as erythema migrans (EM) or a ‘‘bullseye rash.’’ However, 20% of patients may not develop this specific rash, and sometimes the rash is not seen or recognized. The rash also might not display the stereotypical presentation. Therefore, these newly infected patients may not be diagnosed in the absence of a sensitive diagnostic test and may not receive prompt or proper treatment for a disease with the potential to cause disabling illness. Serology tests are also not capable of determining if there is an active infection. As antibodies normally persist for months or even years after the infection is gone, serologic testing PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 cannot be used to determine a cure. Additionally, cross-reactions between serologic tests for Lyme disease and those for other infectious diseases can also yield false positive results. These limitations of serological testing compound the scientific challenges in identifying specific etiologies for Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), which is characterized by persistence of symptoms for more than 6 months following treatment with oral antibiotics. Improvements in Lyme disease diagnostics would enable better clinical management of PTLDS patients as well. HHS has identified an area of known need in developing more advanced diagnostic tests that diagnose infection at all stages of Lyme disease. Therefore, the LymeX partnership is embarking on a series of initiatives, including prize challenges to develop new diagnostic tests for Lyme disease. This RFI is intended to gather information on the current state of the science and development landscape for new diagnostic tests from the entrepreneurs, scientists, and physicians who will develop and use them. We encourage responders to answer the following questions: • What challenges/barriers exist for the development and validation of innovative diagnostic tests for Lyme disease? • What types of diagnostic technologies are being developed (or could be developed or adapted) to detect Lyme disease, including technologies and breakthroughs adapted from COVID–19 diagnostics with potential applications for Lyme disease (e.g., highly sensitive nucleic acid amplification testing [NAAT])? • What emerging technologies (e.g., epigenetic mapping, inflammatory markers, gene arrays, NAAT, or others) might be developed or adapted to characterize different stages of Lyme disease, including Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), etc.? • What analyte (e.g., DNA, RNA, protein, metabolite) does existing or developing Lyme disease diagnostic tests detect? • What is the optimal sample type (e.g., whole blood, plasma) for the detection of a test analyte in patients with Lyme disease? The optimal sample type can be generally defined as the one where the analyte can be best detected. • What challenges exist in the implementation and use of Lyme disease diagnostic testing in clinical practice? • What role can or should publicprivate partnerships play in accelerating E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM 11FEN1 9077 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices development, validation, or appropriate use of innovative Lyme disease diagnostic tests, and what factors are most critical to ensure their success? This information will inform the development of the HHS Lyme Innovation initiative and the LymeX public-private partnership to create meaningful incentives to develop or validate new diagnostic tests for Lyme disease. Kristen Honey, Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Service. [FR Doc. 2021–02796 Filed 2–10–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4150–28–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES [Document Identifier OS–0990–xxxx] Agency Information Collection Request. 60-Day Public Comment Request Office of the Secretary, HHS. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: In compliance with the requirement of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the Secretary (OS), Department of Health and Human Services, is publishing the following summary of a proposed collection for public comment. DATES: Comments on the ICR must be received on or before April 12, 2021. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to Sherrette.Funn@hhs.gov or by calling (202) 795–7714. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: When submitting comments or requesting information, please include the document identifier 0990-New-60D, and project title for reference, to Sherrette Funn, Reports Clearance Officer, Sherrette.funn@hhs.gov, 202– 795–7714. SUMMARY: Interested persons are invited to send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including any of the following subjects: (1) The necessity and utility of the proposed information collection for the proper performance of the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy of the estimated burden; (3) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology to minimize the information collection burden. Title of the Collection: Family Planning Annual Report 2.0. Type of Collection: New. Abstract: The Office of Population Affairs (OPA), within the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health, seeks approval for a new encounter level data collection for the Family Planning Annual Report (FPAR). Currently collected in aggregate under OMB No. 0990–0221, this new data collection, ‘‘FPAR 2.0’’, will collect information at the encounter level and build on the existing data collection and reporting system. This annual reporting requirement is for competitively awarded grants authorized and funded by the Title X Family Planning Program. Need and Proposed Use of the Information: The Office of Population Affairs’ (OPA) Title X Family Planning Program is the only federal grant program dedicated solely to providing comprehensive family planning and related preventive health services. Annual submission of the FPAR is required of all Title X family planning services grantees for purposes of monitoring and reporting program performance (45 CFR part 74 and 45 CFR part 92). The FPAR is the only source of annual, uniform reporting by all grantees funded under Section 1001 of the Title X Public Health Service Act. Similar to the previous FPAR, FPAR 2.0 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: will provide consistent, national-level data on the Title X Family Planning program and its users. OPA will be able to assemble and analyze comparable and relevant program data to answer questions about the characteristics of the population served, the provision and use of services, and the impact of the program on certain family planning outcomes. FPAR 2.0 will also collect a standard set of data elements pertaining to users and encounters, such as user demographics, service delivery, family planning intentions and methods, and other indicators, which allow for comparisons over time at all levels of the program (e.g., national, regional, state, and grantee). Encounter level data collected through FPAR 2.0 will ultimately improve the quality of data reported to OPA and reduce reporting burden by grantees. Additionally, the more granular data collected with FPAR 2.0 will help contribute to a learning healthcare environment by greatly expanding the options for data analysis and reporting—for example, through interactive data dashboards and visualizations, customized tabulations and reports, and application of analytics and statistical analyses on the encounter-level data files. Information from FPAR 2.0 is important to OPA for many reasons, and will be used to: (1) Monitor compliance with statutory requirements, regulations, and operational guidance. (2) Comply with accountability and federal performance requirements for Title X family planning funds. (3) Guide strategic and financial planning, to monitor performance, to respond to inquiries from policymakers and Congress about the program, and to estimate program impact. Type of respondent: Annual reporting; respondents are all grantees that receive Title X funding from OPA. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOUR TABLE Average burden per response Respondents (if necessary) FPAR 2.0 .......................................... Grantees ........................................... 74 1 36 2,664 Total ........................................... ........................................................... ........................ 1 ........................ 2,664 VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:39 Feb 10, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00034 Number of respondents Number of responses per respondents Forms (if necessary) Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM 11FEN1 Total burden hours

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 27 (Thursday, February 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9075-9077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02796]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES


Request for Information (RFI): Accelerating Innovation in 
Diagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), Office of 
the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).

[[Page 9076]]


ACTION: Request for information.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) in the 
Department of Health and Human Services seeks to obtain information 
regarding the current state of the science and technology to accelerate 
the pace of innovative solutions for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A 
set of questions is available in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section 
below.

DATES: To be considered, comments must be received electronically at 
the email address provided below, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time 
(ET) March 15, 2021.

ADDRESSES: Individuals are encouraged to submit responses 
electronically to Dr. Kristen Honey, Senior Advisor to the Assistant 
Secretary for Health, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201, 
[email protected], (202) 853-7680. Please indicate ``RFI 
RESPONSE'' in the subject line of your email. Submissions received 
after the deadline will not be reviewed. Responses to this notice are 
not offers and cannot be accepted by the government to form a binding 
contract or issue a grant. Respond concisely and in plain language. You 
may use any structure or layout that presents the information well. You 
may respond to some or all of our questions, and you can suggest other 
factors or relevant questions. You may also include links to online 
material or interactive presentations. Clearly mark any proprietary 
information, and place it in its own section or file. Your response 
will become government property, and we may publish some of its non-
proprietary content.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative is a 
patient-centered, data-driven approach to the threat of Lyme disease 
and tick-borne diseases. Lyme disease affects more than 300,000 people 
in the U.S. each year and accounts for more than 70% of all vector-
borne diseases in our country. Lyme and other tick-borne diseases cost 
the U.S. economy billions of dollars annually.
    The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative uses strategic public-private 
partnerships to accelerate advancements in Lyme disease and other tick-
borne diseases. The Lyme Innovation initiative aims to build commitment 
to patient-centered innovations, identify ways to collect and share 
data while raising awareness, accelerate the discovery of next-
generation diagnostic tools and technologies, and lower barriers across 
all phases of development, testing, and implementation. The 
recommendations of the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group to HHS inform 
the Lyme Innovation initiative. The Lyme Innovation initiative 
represents one way that HHS is executing the strategies described in 
``A National Public Health Framework for the Prevention and Control of 
Vector-Borne Diseases in Humans.''
    HHS has entered into a public-private partnership with the Steven 
and Alexandra Cohen Foundation to form the LymeX Innovation Accelerator 
(LymeX). LymeX will accelerate the Lyme Innovation initiative's 
progress and strategically advance tick-borne-disease solutions in 
direct collaboration with Lyme disease patients, patient advocates, and 
diverse stakeholders. A primary goal of the LymeX partnership and the 
Framework is the development of new diagnostic technologies for Lyme 
disease.
    The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website 
(https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/) summarizes information about the 
stages of Lyme disease, current diagnostic testing recommendations, and 
treatment options. CDC currently recommends the use of FDA cleared 
serologic tests in a two-step testing process that detects the presence 
of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for 
Lyme disease.
    Serologic tests for diagnosis of Lyme disease have technical 
limitations. Antibodies may not be produced by the immune system early 
enough or in high enough quantities to meet the detection limit of 
these tests (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/tbdwg-report-to-congress-2018.pdf). As an antibody response in infected persons 
requires time to develop, serologic tests for Lyme disease may produce 
false negative results during early infection. In areas where Lyme 
disease is highly endemic, the infection may be diagnosed without 
laboratory testing if patients develop a diagnostic skin lesion at the 
site of the tick bite, which is known as erythema migrans (EM) or a 
``bullseye rash.'' However, 20% of patients may not develop this 
specific rash, and sometimes the rash is not seen or recognized. The 
rash also might not display the stereotypical presentation. Therefore, 
these newly infected patients may not be diagnosed in the absence of a 
sensitive diagnostic test and may not receive prompt or proper 
treatment for a disease with the potential to cause disabling illness.
    Serology tests are also not capable of determining if there is an 
active infection. As antibodies normally persist for months or even 
years after the infection is gone, serologic testing cannot be used to 
determine a cure. Additionally, cross-reactions between serologic tests 
for Lyme disease and those for other infectious diseases can also yield 
false positive results.
    These limitations of serological testing compound the scientific 
challenges in identifying specific etiologies for Post-Treatment Lyme 
Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), which is characterized by persistence of 
symptoms for more than 6 months following treatment with oral 
antibiotics. Improvements in Lyme disease diagnostics would enable 
better clinical management of PTLDS patients as well.
    HHS has identified an area of known need in developing more 
advanced diagnostic tests that diagnose infection at all stages of Lyme 
disease. Therefore, the LymeX partnership is embarking on a series of 
initiatives, including prize challenges to develop new diagnostic tests 
for Lyme disease. This RFI is intended to gather information on the 
current state of the science and development landscape for new 
diagnostic tests from the entrepreneurs, scientists, and physicians who 
will develop and use them.
    We encourage responders to answer the following questions:
     What challenges/barriers exist for the development and 
validation of innovative diagnostic tests for Lyme disease?
     What types of diagnostic technologies are being developed 
(or could be developed or adapted) to detect Lyme disease, including 
technologies and breakthroughs adapted from COVID-19 diagnostics with 
potential applications for Lyme disease (e.g., highly sensitive nucleic 
acid amplification testing [NAAT])?
     What emerging technologies (e.g., epigenetic mapping, 
inflammatory markers, gene arrays, NAAT, or others) might be developed 
or adapted to characterize different stages of Lyme disease, including 
Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), etc.?
     What analyte (e.g., DNA, RNA, protein, metabolite) does 
existing or developing Lyme disease diagnostic tests detect?
     What is the optimal sample type (e.g., whole blood, 
plasma) for the detection of a test analyte in patients with Lyme 
disease? The optimal sample type can be generally defined as the one 
where the analyte can be best detected.
     What challenges exist in the implementation and use of 
Lyme disease diagnostic testing in clinical practice?
     What role can or should public-private partnerships play 
in accelerating

[[Page 9077]]

development, validation, or appropriate use of innovative Lyme disease 
diagnostic tests, and what factors are most critical to ensure their 
success?
    This information will inform the development of the HHS Lyme 
Innovation initiative and the LymeX public-private partnership to 
create meaningful incentives to develop or validate new diagnostic 
tests for Lyme disease.

Kristen Honey,
Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), Office of 
the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human 
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-02796 Filed 2-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-28-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.