Request for Information (RFI): Accelerating Innovation in Diagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease, 9075-9077 [2021-02796]
Download as PDF
9075
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices
RECORDKEEPING REQUIREMENTS
Data required to be submitted
Number of
record keepers
Hours per year
432
432
432
* 475
* 475
* 475
* 475
1.05
1.25
1.25
0.37
10.00
10.00
19.55
454
540
540
176
4,750
4,750
9,286
HPSL, LDS, and PCL Program:
Documentation of Cost of Attendance .................................................................................
Promissory Note ...................................................................................................................
Documentation of Entrance Interview ..................................................................................
Documentation of Exit Interview ...........................................................................................
Program Records .................................................................................................................
Student Records ..........................................................................................................................
Repayment Records ....................................................................................................................
Total burden
hours
HPSL/LDS/PCL Subtotal ...............................................................................................
NSL Program:
Documentation of Cost of Attendance .................................................................................
Promissory Note ...................................................................................................................
Documentation of Entrance Interview ..................................................................................
Documentation of Exit Interview ...........................................................................................
Program Records .................................................................................................................
Student Records ...................................................................................................................
Repayment Records .............................................................................................................
475
........................
20,496
304
304
304
* 486
* 486
* 486
* 486
0.25
0.50
0.50
0.14
5.00
1.00
2.51
76
152
152
68
2,430
486
1,220
NSL Subtotal .................................................................................................................
486
........................
4,584
* Includes active and closing schools.
REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Number of
respondents
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
HPSL, LDS, and PCL:
Student Financial Aid Transcript ..................................
Loan Information Disclosure .........................................
Entrance Interview ........................................................
Exit Interview ................................................................
Notification of Repayment ............................................
Notification During Deferment ......................................
Notification of Delinquent Accounts ..............................
Credit Bureau Notification .............................................
Write-off of Uncollectable Loans ..................................
Disability Cancellation ...................................................
Administrative Hearings record retention .....................
Administrative Hearings reporting requirements ..........
Responses
per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Hours per
response
Total burden
hours
4,600
325
325
* 334
* 334
* 333
334
334
520
3
0
0
1
299.5
139.5
113.5
862.5
17
172.5
6
1
1
0
0
4,600
97,338
45,338
37,909
288,075
5,661
57,615
2,004
520
3
0
0
0.25
0.63
0.50
1.00
0.38
0.63
1.25
0.50
3.00
1.00
0.00
0.00
1,150
61,323
22,669
37,909
109,469
3,566
72,019
1,002
1560
3
0
0
HPSL Subtotal .......................................................
NSL:
Student Financial Aid Transcript ..................................
Entrance Interview ........................................................
Exit Interview ................................................................
Notification of Repayment ............................................
Notification During Deferment ......................................
Notification of Delinquent Accounts ..............................
Credit Bureau Notification .............................................
Write-off of Uncollectable Loans ..................................
Disability Cancellation ...................................................
Administrative Hearings ................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
310,670
4,100
282
348
348
348
348
348
23
16
0
1
17.5
9
9
1.5
42.5
709
1
1
0
4,100
4,935
3,132
3,132
522
14,790
246,732
23
16
0
0.25
0.42
0.42
0.27
0.29
0.04
0.06
3.00
1.00
0.00
1,025
2,073
1,315
846
151
592
1,480
69
16
0
NSL Subtotal .........................................................
........................
........................
........................
........................
7,567
HRSA specifically requests comments
on (1) the necessity and utility of the
proposed information collection for the
proper performance of the agency’s
functions, (2) the accuracy of the
estimated burden, (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected, and (4) the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Maria G. Button,
Director, Executive Secretariat.
Request for Information (RFI):
Accelerating Innovation in Diagnostic
Testing for Lyme Disease
[FR Doc. 2021–02807 Filed 2–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4165–15–P
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health (OASH), Office of
the Secretary, Department of Health and
Human Services (HHS).
AGENCY:
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
9076
ACTION:
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices
Request for information.
The Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health (OASH) in the
Department of Health and Human
Services seeks to obtain information
regarding the current state of the science
and technology to accelerate the pace of
innovative solutions for the diagnosis of
Lyme disease. A set of questions is
available in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section below.
DATES: To be considered, comments
must be received electronically at the
email address provided below, no later
than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) March
15, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Individuals are encouraged
to submit responses electronically to Dr.
Kristen Honey, Senior Advisor to the
Assistant Secretary for Health, 200
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20201, LymeInnovation@hhs.gov,
(202) 853–7680. Please indicate ‘‘RFI
RESPONSE’’ in the subject line of your
email. Submissions received after the
deadline will not be reviewed.
Responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
government to form a binding contract
or issue a grant. Respond concisely and
in plain language. You may use any
structure or layout that presents the
information well. You may respond to
some or all of our questions, and you
can suggest other factors or relevant
questions. You may also include links to
online material or interactive
presentations. Clearly mark any
proprietary information, and place it in
its own section or file. Your response
will become government property, and
we may publish some of its nonproprietary content.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The HHS
Lyme Innovation initiative is a patientcentered, data-driven approach to the
threat of Lyme disease and tick-borne
diseases. Lyme disease affects more than
300,000 people in the U.S. each year
and accounts for more than 70% of all
vector-borne diseases in our country.
Lyme and other tick-borne diseases cost
the U.S. economy billions of dollars
annually.
The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative
uses strategic public-private
partnerships to accelerate advancements
in Lyme disease and other tick-borne
diseases. The Lyme Innovation initiative
aims to build commitment to patientcentered innovations, identify ways to
collect and share data while raising
awareness, accelerate the discovery of
next-generation diagnostic tools and
technologies, and lower barriers across
all phases of development, testing, and
implementation. The recommendations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
of the Tick-Borne Disease Working
Group to HHS inform the Lyme
Innovation initiative. The Lyme
Innovation initiative represents one way
that HHS is executing the strategies
described in ‘‘A National Public Health
Framework for the Prevention and
Control of Vector-Borne Diseases in
Humans.’’
HHS has entered into a public-private
partnership with the Steven and
Alexandra Cohen Foundation to form
the LymeX Innovation Accelerator
(LymeX). LymeX will accelerate the
Lyme Innovation initiative’s progress
and strategically advance tick-bornedisease solutions in direct collaboration
with Lyme disease patients, patient
advocates, and diverse stakeholders. A
primary goal of the LymeX partnership
and the Framework is the development
of new diagnostic technologies for Lyme
disease.
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) website (https://
www.cdc.gov/lyme/)
summarizes information about the
stages of Lyme disease, current
diagnostic testing recommendations,
and treatment options. CDC currently
recommends the use of FDA cleared
serologic tests in a two-step testing
process that detects the presence of
antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, the
bacterium responsible for Lyme disease.
Serologic tests for diagnosis of Lyme
disease have technical limitations.
Antibodies may not be produced by the
immune system early enough or in high
enough quantities to meet the detection
limit of these tests (https://
www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/tbdwgreport-to-congress-2018.pdf). As an
antibody response in infected persons
requires time to develop, serologic tests
for Lyme disease may produce false
negative results during early infection.
In areas where Lyme disease is highly
endemic, the infection may be
diagnosed without laboratory testing if
patients develop a diagnostic skin lesion
at the site of the tick bite, which is
known as erythema migrans (EM) or a
‘‘bullseye rash.’’ However, 20% of
patients may not develop this specific
rash, and sometimes the rash is not seen
or recognized. The rash also might not
display the stereotypical presentation.
Therefore, these newly infected patients
may not be diagnosed in the absence of
a sensitive diagnostic test and may not
receive prompt or proper treatment for
a disease with the potential to cause
disabling illness.
Serology tests are also not capable of
determining if there is an active
infection. As antibodies normally
persist for months or even years after
the infection is gone, serologic testing
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
cannot be used to determine a cure.
Additionally, cross-reactions between
serologic tests for Lyme disease and
those for other infectious diseases can
also yield false positive results.
These limitations of serological
testing compound the scientific
challenges in identifying specific
etiologies for Post-Treatment Lyme
Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), which is
characterized by persistence of
symptoms for more than 6 months
following treatment with oral
antibiotics. Improvements in Lyme
disease diagnostics would enable better
clinical management of PTLDS patients
as well.
HHS has identified an area of known
need in developing more advanced
diagnostic tests that diagnose infection
at all stages of Lyme disease. Therefore,
the LymeX partnership is embarking on
a series of initiatives, including prize
challenges to develop new diagnostic
tests for Lyme disease. This RFI is
intended to gather information on the
current state of the science and
development landscape for new
diagnostic tests from the entrepreneurs,
scientists, and physicians who will
develop and use them.
We encourage responders to answer
the following questions:
• What challenges/barriers exist for
the development and validation of
innovative diagnostic tests for Lyme
disease?
• What types of diagnostic
technologies are being developed (or
could be developed or adapted) to
detect Lyme disease, including
technologies and breakthroughs adapted
from COVID–19 diagnostics with
potential applications for Lyme disease
(e.g., highly sensitive nucleic acid
amplification testing [NAAT])?
• What emerging technologies (e.g.,
epigenetic mapping, inflammatory
markers, gene arrays, NAAT, or others)
might be developed or adapted to
characterize different stages of Lyme
disease, including Post-Treatment Lyme
Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), etc.?
• What analyte (e.g., DNA, RNA,
protein, metabolite) does existing or
developing Lyme disease diagnostic
tests detect?
• What is the optimal sample type
(e.g., whole blood, plasma) for the
detection of a test analyte in patients
with Lyme disease? The optimal sample
type can be generally defined as the one
where the analyte can be best detected.
• What challenges exist in the
implementation and use of Lyme
disease diagnostic testing in clinical
practice?
• What role can or should publicprivate partnerships play in accelerating
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
9077
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 27 / Thursday, February 11, 2021 / Notices
development, validation, or appropriate
use of innovative Lyme disease
diagnostic tests, and what factors are
most critical to ensure their success?
This information will inform the
development of the HHS Lyme
Innovation initiative and the LymeX
public-private partnership to create
meaningful incentives to develop or
validate new diagnostic tests for Lyme
disease.
Kristen Honey,
Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for
Health (ASH), Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–02796 Filed 2–10–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–28–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
[Document Identifier OS–0990–xxxx]
Agency Information Collection
Request. 60-Day Public Comment
Request
Office of the Secretary, HHS.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
In compliance with the
requirement of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, the Office of the
Secretary (OS), Department of Health
and Human Services, is publishing the
following summary of a proposed
collection for public comment.
DATES: Comments on the ICR must be
received on or before April 12, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments to
Sherrette.Funn@hhs.gov or by calling
(202) 795–7714.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
When submitting comments or
requesting information, please include
the document identifier 0990-New-60D,
and project title for reference, to
Sherrette Funn, Reports Clearance
Officer, Sherrette.funn@hhs.gov, 202–
795–7714.
SUMMARY:
Interested
persons are invited to send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any
other aspect of this collection of
information, including any of the
following subjects: (1) The necessity and
utility of the proposed information
collection for the proper performance of
the agency’s functions; (2) the accuracy
of the estimated burden; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology to minimize the information
collection burden.
Title of the Collection: Family
Planning Annual Report 2.0.
Type of Collection: New.
Abstract: The Office of Population
Affairs (OPA), within the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Health, seeks
approval for a new encounter level data
collection for the Family Planning
Annual Report (FPAR). Currently
collected in aggregate under OMB No.
0990–0221, this new data collection,
‘‘FPAR 2.0’’, will collect information at
the encounter level and build on the
existing data collection and reporting
system. This annual reporting
requirement is for competitively
awarded grants authorized and funded
by the Title X Family Planning Program.
Need and Proposed Use of the
Information: The Office of Population
Affairs’ (OPA) Title X Family Planning
Program is the only federal grant
program dedicated solely to providing
comprehensive family planning and
related preventive health services.
Annual submission of the FPAR is
required of all Title X family planning
services grantees for purposes of
monitoring and reporting program
performance (45 CFR part 74 and 45
CFR part 92). The FPAR is the only
source of annual, uniform reporting by
all grantees funded under Section 1001
of the Title X Public Health Service Act.
Similar to the previous FPAR, FPAR 2.0
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
will provide consistent, national-level
data on the Title X Family Planning
program and its users. OPA will be able
to assemble and analyze comparable
and relevant program data to answer
questions about the characteristics of
the population served, the provision
and use of services, and the impact of
the program on certain family planning
outcomes. FPAR 2.0 will also collect a
standard set of data elements pertaining
to users and encounters, such as user
demographics, service delivery, family
planning intentions and methods, and
other indicators, which allow for
comparisons over time at all levels of
the program (e.g., national, regional,
state, and grantee). Encounter level data
collected through FPAR 2.0 will
ultimately improve the quality of data
reported to OPA and reduce reporting
burden by grantees. Additionally, the
more granular data collected with FPAR
2.0 will help contribute to a learning
healthcare environment by greatly
expanding the options for data analysis
and reporting—for example, through
interactive data dashboards and
visualizations, customized tabulations
and reports, and application of analytics
and statistical analyses on the
encounter-level data files.
Information from FPAR 2.0 is
important to OPA for many reasons, and
will be used to:
(1) Monitor compliance with statutory
requirements, regulations, and
operational guidance.
(2) Comply with accountability and
federal performance requirements for
Title X family planning funds.
(3) Guide strategic and financial
planning, to monitor performance, to
respond to inquiries from policymakers
and Congress about the program, and to
estimate program impact.
Type of respondent: Annual reporting;
respondents are all grantees that receive
Title X funding from OPA.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOUR TABLE
Average
burden per
response
Respondents
(if necessary)
FPAR 2.0 ..........................................
Grantees ...........................................
74
1
36
2,664
Total ...........................................
...........................................................
........................
1
........................
2,664
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:39 Feb 10, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Number of
respondents
Number of
responses per
respondents
Forms
(if necessary)
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\11FEN1.SGM
11FEN1
Total burden
hours
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 27 (Thursday, February 11, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 9075-9077]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02796]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Request for Information (RFI): Accelerating Innovation in
Diagnostic Testing for Lyme Disease
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), Office of
the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
[[Page 9076]]
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH) in the
Department of Health and Human Services seeks to obtain information
regarding the current state of the science and technology to accelerate
the pace of innovative solutions for the diagnosis of Lyme disease. A
set of questions is available in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
DATES: To be considered, comments must be received electronically at
the email address provided below, no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
(ET) March 15, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Individuals are encouraged to submit responses
electronically to Dr. Kristen Honey, Senior Advisor to the Assistant
Secretary for Health, 200 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20201,
[email protected], (202) 853-7680. Please indicate ``RFI
RESPONSE'' in the subject line of your email. Submissions received
after the deadline will not be reviewed. Responses to this notice are
not offers and cannot be accepted by the government to form a binding
contract or issue a grant. Respond concisely and in plain language. You
may use any structure or layout that presents the information well. You
may respond to some or all of our questions, and you can suggest other
factors or relevant questions. You may also include links to online
material or interactive presentations. Clearly mark any proprietary
information, and place it in its own section or file. Your response
will become government property, and we may publish some of its non-
proprietary content.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative is a
patient-centered, data-driven approach to the threat of Lyme disease
and tick-borne diseases. Lyme disease affects more than 300,000 people
in the U.S. each year and accounts for more than 70% of all vector-
borne diseases in our country. Lyme and other tick-borne diseases cost
the U.S. economy billions of dollars annually.
The HHS Lyme Innovation initiative uses strategic public-private
partnerships to accelerate advancements in Lyme disease and other tick-
borne diseases. The Lyme Innovation initiative aims to build commitment
to patient-centered innovations, identify ways to collect and share
data while raising awareness, accelerate the discovery of next-
generation diagnostic tools and technologies, and lower barriers across
all phases of development, testing, and implementation. The
recommendations of the Tick-Borne Disease Working Group to HHS inform
the Lyme Innovation initiative. The Lyme Innovation initiative
represents one way that HHS is executing the strategies described in
``A National Public Health Framework for the Prevention and Control of
Vector-Borne Diseases in Humans.''
HHS has entered into a public-private partnership with the Steven
and Alexandra Cohen Foundation to form the LymeX Innovation Accelerator
(LymeX). LymeX will accelerate the Lyme Innovation initiative's
progress and strategically advance tick-borne-disease solutions in
direct collaboration with Lyme disease patients, patient advocates, and
diverse stakeholders. A primary goal of the LymeX partnership and the
Framework is the development of new diagnostic technologies for Lyme
disease.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website
(https://www.cdc.gov/lyme/) summarizes information about the
stages of Lyme disease, current diagnostic testing recommendations, and
treatment options. CDC currently recommends the use of FDA cleared
serologic tests in a two-step testing process that detects the presence
of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, the bacterium responsible for
Lyme disease.
Serologic tests for diagnosis of Lyme disease have technical
limitations. Antibodies may not be produced by the immune system early
enough or in high enough quantities to meet the detection limit of
these tests (https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/tbdwg-report-to-congress-2018.pdf). As an antibody response in infected persons
requires time to develop, serologic tests for Lyme disease may produce
false negative results during early infection. In areas where Lyme
disease is highly endemic, the infection may be diagnosed without
laboratory testing if patients develop a diagnostic skin lesion at the
site of the tick bite, which is known as erythema migrans (EM) or a
``bullseye rash.'' However, 20% of patients may not develop this
specific rash, and sometimes the rash is not seen or recognized. The
rash also might not display the stereotypical presentation. Therefore,
these newly infected patients may not be diagnosed in the absence of a
sensitive diagnostic test and may not receive prompt or proper
treatment for a disease with the potential to cause disabling illness.
Serology tests are also not capable of determining if there is an
active infection. As antibodies normally persist for months or even
years after the infection is gone, serologic testing cannot be used to
determine a cure. Additionally, cross-reactions between serologic tests
for Lyme disease and those for other infectious diseases can also yield
false positive results.
These limitations of serological testing compound the scientific
challenges in identifying specific etiologies for Post-Treatment Lyme
Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), which is characterized by persistence of
symptoms for more than 6 months following treatment with oral
antibiotics. Improvements in Lyme disease diagnostics would enable
better clinical management of PTLDS patients as well.
HHS has identified an area of known need in developing more
advanced diagnostic tests that diagnose infection at all stages of Lyme
disease. Therefore, the LymeX partnership is embarking on a series of
initiatives, including prize challenges to develop new diagnostic tests
for Lyme disease. This RFI is intended to gather information on the
current state of the science and development landscape for new
diagnostic tests from the entrepreneurs, scientists, and physicians who
will develop and use them.
We encourage responders to answer the following questions:
What challenges/barriers exist for the development and
validation of innovative diagnostic tests for Lyme disease?
What types of diagnostic technologies are being developed
(or could be developed or adapted) to detect Lyme disease, including
technologies and breakthroughs adapted from COVID-19 diagnostics with
potential applications for Lyme disease (e.g., highly sensitive nucleic
acid amplification testing [NAAT])?
What emerging technologies (e.g., epigenetic mapping,
inflammatory markers, gene arrays, NAAT, or others) might be developed
or adapted to characterize different stages of Lyme disease, including
Post-Treatment Lyme Disease Syndrome (PTLDS), etc.?
What analyte (e.g., DNA, RNA, protein, metabolite) does
existing or developing Lyme disease diagnostic tests detect?
What is the optimal sample type (e.g., whole blood,
plasma) for the detection of a test analyte in patients with Lyme
disease? The optimal sample type can be generally defined as the one
where the analyte can be best detected.
What challenges exist in the implementation and use of
Lyme disease diagnostic testing in clinical practice?
What role can or should public-private partnerships play
in accelerating
[[Page 9077]]
development, validation, or appropriate use of innovative Lyme disease
diagnostic tests, and what factors are most critical to ensure their
success?
This information will inform the development of the HHS Lyme
Innovation initiative and the LymeX public-private partnership to
create meaningful incentives to develop or validate new diagnostic
tests for Lyme disease.
Kristen Honey,
Senior Advisor to the Assistant Secretary for Health (ASH), Office of
the Assistant Secretary for Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human
Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-02796 Filed 2-10-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-28-P