Publication of Standards, Criteria and Recommendations, 8926-8928 [2021-02695]

Download as PDF 8926 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices The OMB will consider all written comments that agency receives on or before March 12, 2021. ADDRESSES: Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information collection should be sent within 30 days of publication of this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/ PRAMain. Find this particular information collection by selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or by using the search function. Comments are invited on: (1) Whether the collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the Department, including whether the information will have practical utility; (2) if the information will be processed and used in a timely manner; (3) the accuracy of the agency’s estimates of the burden and cost of the collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; (4) ways to enhance the quality, utility and clarity of the information collection; and (5) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Crystal Rennie by telephone at 202– 693–0456, or by email at DOL_PRA_ PUBLIC@dol.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The standard requires employers to develop a written fire safety plan and written statements or policies that contain information about fire watches and fire response duties and responsibilities. For additional substantive information about this ICR, see the related notice published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2020 (85 FR 71949). This information collection is subject to the PRA. A Federal agency generally cannot conduct or sponsor a collection of information, and the public is generally not required to respond to an information collection, unless the OMB approves it and displays a currently valid OMB Control Number. In addition, notwithstanding any other provisions of law, no person shall generally be subject to penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information that does not display a valid OMB Control Number. See 5 CFR 1320.5(a) and 1320.6. DOL seeks PRA authorization for this information collection for three (3) years. OMB authorization for an ICR cannot be for more than three (3) years without renewal. The DOL notes that information collection requirements submitted to the OMB for existing ICRs DATES: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Feb 09, 2021 Jkt 253001 receive a month-to-month extension while they undergo review. Agency: DOL–OSHA. Title of Collection: Fire Protection in Shipyard Employment Standard. OMB Control Number: 1218–0248. Affected Public: Private Sector, Businesses or other for-profits. Total Estimated Number of Respondents: 253. Total Estimated Number of Responses: 184,921. Total Estimated Annual Time Burden: 16,251 hours. Total Estimated Annual Other Costs Burden: $0. (Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3507(a)(1)(D)) Crystal Rennie, Senior PRA Analyst. [FR Doc. 2021–02696 Filed 2–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4510–26–P OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET [Notice–PBS–2019–06; Docket No. 2019– 0002; Sequence No. 15] Publication of Standards, Criteria and Recommendations Office of Management and Budget ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The notice provides the list of Office of Management and Budget (OMB) recommended Federal real property for consideration by the Public Buildings Reform Board (PBRB) for disposal, consolidation, or co-location and the standards and criteria used to assess the property. ADDRESSES: Recommendations on Federal real property to be disposed may be submitted online at http:www.gsa.gov/fasta. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. Contact Bill Hamele by phone at (202) 395–7583 and by email at whamele@ omb.eop.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Background: As required in Section 11(d)(2) of Public Law 114–287, the standards, criteria, and recommendations developed pursuant to subsection (b) shall be published in the Federal Register. OMB asked landholding agencies to submit projects for consideration through an agency recommendation template developed in coordination with the General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service (PBS). II. Standards & Criteria: The agency recommendation template allows SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00045 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 agencies to provide a business-case justification for the inclusion of the following project types: Disposal (by sale as authorized by the Act) and consolidation (which could include colocation, reconfiguration, and redevelopment). The recommendation template required agencies to provide the following information for each project submitted: Agency priority, ownership, marketability, agency mission impacts, financial return (including costs associated with project implementation), and utilization rate information. OMB and GSA then evaluated these submissions based on real estate fundamentals, financial information, schedule certainty, and other factors as required by Public Law 112–287 Section 11(b)(3). In addition, GSA and OMB established a ranking scheme of high, medium, and low priority to assign relative priority to the projects submitted by the agencies. As OMB and GSA are working to mature the FASTA process, the OMB list was limited to less complex property disposals with the understanding that the Board has access to multiple other sources of information to determine its next set of disposal recommendations. More complex options such as consolidations and land swaps were not included in this list because there are other factors, including proposed legislative reforms that may impact those types of disposal options. This approach is intended to build on OMB’s recent approval of the PBRB’s highvalue list and the lessons learned from actions taken to sell those properties. OMB looks forward to continuing to refine this process over subsequent rounds provided in the statute by developing increasingly complex transactions, potentially to include consolidations or other actions. Agency submissions were evaluated by review teams from PBS and OMB with priority given to projects with strong real estate fundamentals, favorable financial data, limited complexity, availability of information for the public on effected buildings, and high schedule certainty. A combination of the evaluation of submitted data, assessment of the evaluation factors required by Public Law 112–287 Section 11(b)(3), and dialogue with agencies resulted in the final high, medium, low rankings. Only projects ranked High or Medium were recommended to the PBRB. Project in the Low category did not provide sufficient financial benefit to the government or had high risk and high cost, generally associated with environmental cleanup. E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 8927 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices It is important to note that while OMB, with GSA’s assistance, did conduct this evaluation of the agencyidentified properties and is providing a list of properties for consideration of the PBRB, it is ultimately the responsibility of the PBRB to fully vet each property, as the PBRB, working with GSA, is charged with carrying out the disposals and consolidations. Like the High Value Asset process, OMB will expect that the PBRB provide the necessary financial information to weigh the likelihood of project by project success. Further, the availability of appropriations including appropriations of proceeds from the High Value Round disposals will be a critical determination of what is possible to execute, and that is currently unknown. III. Standard Utilization Rates: In 2017–2018, GSA and OMB researched existing utilization rate standards that could potentially be used to evaluate Agency Recommendations, in accordance with Public Law 114–287, Section 11(c), ‘‘Special Rule for Utilization Rates.’’ Specifically FASTA required that standards developed by the Director of OMB pursuant to subsection (b) ‘‘shall incorporate and apply clear standard utilization rates to the extent that such standard rates increase efficiency and provide performance data. The utilization rates shall be consistent throughout each applicable category of space and with non-government space utilization rates.’’ This research was conducted by GSA with input from OMB. For each Federal Real Property Profile (FRPP) predominant building use type, potential utilization rate approaches were identified and evaluated based on the criteria established in this section, including the ability to identify efficiency opportunities, provide performance data, and be consistent throughout each applicable category of space. A. Office Buildings The results of the study revealed that only the FRPP building type ‘‘office’’ lends itself to a standard utilization metric. Utilization rates for office space are used by the private sector and a majority of federal agencies to manage their space and assess its efficient use. OMB and GSA recommends to PBRB that buildings reported to the FRPP with a building use code of ‘‘office’’ should utilize the following utilization rate calculation: Total Administrative Office Space (useable square feet) divided by Total Headcount = administrative Office Utilization Rate (usable square feet per person). This Administrative Office Utilization Rate formula focuses solely on that space which is commonly found in a commercial office setting: Workstations, private offices, collaboration areas, meeting spaces, and other standard support spaces, and associated internal circulation. Any space that is unique to the agency and does not have a commercial office equivalent (termed ‘‘special space’’) is removed from the calculation. This special space is instead evaluated based on its efficiency relative to achieving the agency’s programmatic goals and established design criteria. B. Non-Office Buildings For all other FRPP building types other than ‘‘office’’, the study revealed that a clear and reliable utilization rate is not in common use within the government or the private sector, and that it is currently not feasible to create such rates without extensive and close collaboration among the government and the private sector. In some building types, there exist significant variations in programmatic purpose that prevent reliable comparisons between them. Creating a standard utilization rate for non-office building types would often provide a misleading and inaccurate efficiency measurements, particularly if comparison was made among agencies. Based on this, GSA recommends that non-office buildings identified in Agency Recommendations be evaluated individually by real estate professionals, based on the building’s unique ability to meet mission requirements of the agency at that specific location, to assess how efficiently the building is being utilized. IV. Agency Recommendations: In accordance with 11(d)(2) of Public Law 114–287, the list of recommendations was submitted by OMB and GSA and has been provided to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate; the Government Accountability Office; and the Public Buildings Reform Board. OMB believes that to fully utilize the authority provided by FASTA, the next round of PBRB recommendations should include 100 or more properties and that projects already identified by the agencies as priorities are likely to be strong candidates for that list. Deidre A. Harrison, Deputy Controller (Acting). Total improvements Annual O&M costs Total square footage Agency Agency Property name City State Priority VA .................... VHA ................. Menlo Park ...... CA ...... Medium ...... $4,302 1 15,200 2.24 Agriculture ........ Energy ............. ARS ................. ANL ................. Glen Dale ........ Argonne ........... MD ..... IL ........ Medium ...... Medium ...... 2,500,000 .................... 24 0 31,242 0 70 8.4 EPA .................. EPA ................. Grosee Ile ....... MI ....... Medium ...... 239,196 4 35,547 3.1 Labor ................ Job Corps ........ Morgansfield .... KY ...... Medium ...... .................... 0 0 600 VA .................... VA .................... VHA ................. VHA ................. Sepulveda ....... Manchester ..... CA ...... NH ...... Medium ...... Medium ...... .................... 33,661 18 1 35,316 2,776 3.53 2.8 VA .................... VHA ................. Walla Walla ..... WA ..... Medium ...... .................... 0 0 13 VA .................... VHA ................. Tomah ............. WI ...... Medium ...... 12,401 3 30,823 2 Labor ................ Job Corps ........ Menlo Park VA Medical Center—NW Parcel. Portion of ARS Glen Dale Argonne National Lab— Vacant Land/2 Parking Structures. Lakes & Rivers Forecasting Research Station. Earle C Clements Job Corps Center—Vacant Land. Sepulveda North Parcel Portion of Manchester VA Medical Center. Portion of VA Campus— Baseball Fields. Tomah Quarters Buildings. Portion of Atterbury Job Corps Center. Edinburgh ........ IN ....... Medium ...... .................... 8 62,840.00 93.00 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Feb 09, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00046 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1 Total acres 8928 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices Agency Agency Labor ................ Job Corps ........ VA .................... VA .................... VHA ................. VHA ................. Property name Gary Job Corps Center Staff Housing. Portion of FDR Campus Portion of VA New Jersey HCS. [FR Doc. 2021–02695 Filed 2–9–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3110–01–P NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION [NRC–2021–0038] Safety-Related Steel Structures and Steel-Plate Composite Walls for Other Than Reactor Vessels and Containments Nuclear Regulatory Commission. ACTION: Draft regulatory guide; request for comment. AGENCY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing for public comment a draft regulatory guide (DG), DG–1304, ‘‘Safety-Related Steel Structures and Steel-Plate Composite Walls for other than Reactor Vessels and Containments.’’ DG–1304 is a new guide that proposes guidance to meet regulatory requirements for safetyrelated steel structures and steel-plate composite walls for other than reactor vessels. DG–1304 endorses, with exceptions and clarifications, the 2018 edition of American National Standards Institute/American Nuclear Society (ANSI/AISC) N690, ‘‘Specification for Safety-Related Steel Structures for Nuclear Facilities.’’ DATES: Submit comments by March 29, 2021. Comments received after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before this date. Although a time limit is given, comments and suggestions in connection with items for inclusion in guides currently being developed or improvements in all published guides are encouraged at any time. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods, however, the NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the Federal Rulemaking website: • Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2021–0038. Address questions about Docket IDs in SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:53 Feb 09, 2021 Jkt 253001 Total square footage State Priority San Marcos ..... TX ...... Medium ...... 558,677 59 142,622.00 60.00 Montrose ......... Lyons ............... NY ...... NJ ...... Medium ...... Medium ...... .................... .................... 0 0 0 0 5.10 0.10 3,348,237 118 356,366 863.27 Regulations.gov to Stacy Schumann; telephone: 301–415–0624; email: Stacy.Schumann@nrc.gov. For technical questions, contact the individuals listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this document. • Mail comments to: Office of Administration, Mail Stop: TWFN–7– A60M, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555– 0001, ATTN: Program Management, Announcements, and Editing Staff. For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting comments, see ‘‘Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments’’ in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Edward O’Donnell, telephone: 301–415– 3317, email: Edward.ODonnell@nrc.gov and Marcos Rolon Acevedo, telephone: 301–415–2208, email: Marcos.Rolon@ nrc.gov. Both are staff of the Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555–0001. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments A. Obtaining Information Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2021– 0038 when contacting the NRC about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain publicly available information related to this action by any of the following methods: • Federal Rulemaking website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC–2021–0038. • NRC’s Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/ adams.html. To begin the search, select ‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at 301–415–4737, or by email to pdr.resource@nrc.gov. DG–1304, ‘‘Safety-Related Steel Structures and Steel-Plate Composite Walls for other than Reactor Vessels and Containments’’ PO 00000 Total improvements Annual O&M costs City Frm 00047 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Total acres is available in ADAMS under Accession No. ML20339A558. • Attention: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies of public documents, is currently closed. You may submit your request to the PDR via email at pdr.resource@nrc.gov or call 1– 800–397–4209 or 301–415–4737, between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. B. Submitting Comments The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the Federal Rulemaking website (https:// www.regulations.gov). Please include Docket ID NRC–2021–0038 in your comment submission. The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at https:// www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove identifying or contact information. If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to remove such information before making the comment submissions available to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS. II. Additional Information The NRC is issuing for public comment a DG in the NRC’s ‘‘Regulatory Guide’’ series. This series was developed to describe and make available to the public information regarding methods that are acceptable to the NRC staff for implementing specific parts of the NRC’s regulations, techniques that the staff uses in evaluating specific issues or postulated events, and data that the staff needs in its review of applications for permits and licenses. E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM 10FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8926-8928]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02695]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET

[Notice-PBS-2019-06; Docket No. 2019-0002; Sequence No. 15]


Publication of Standards, Criteria and Recommendations

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The notice provides the list of Office of Management and 
Budget (OMB) recommended Federal real property for consideration by the 
Public Buildings Reform Board (PBRB) for disposal, consolidation, or 
co-location and the standards and criteria used to assess the property.

ADDRESSES: Recommendations on Federal real property to be disposed may 
be submitted online at http:www.gsa.gov/fasta.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: U.S. Office of Management and Budget, 
725 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20503. Contact Bill Hamele by phone 
at (202) 395-7583 and by email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    I. Background: As required in Section 11(d)(2) of Public Law 114-
287, the standards, criteria, and recommendations developed pursuant to 
subsection (b) shall be published in the Federal Register. OMB asked 
landholding agencies to submit projects for consideration through an 
agency recommendation template developed in coordination with the 
General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service (PBS).
    II. Standards & Criteria: The agency recommendation template allows 
agencies to provide a business-case justification for the inclusion of 
the following project types: Disposal (by sale as authorized by the 
Act) and consolidation (which could include colocation, 
reconfiguration, and redevelopment). The recommendation template 
required agencies to provide the following information for each project 
submitted: Agency priority, ownership, marketability, agency mission 
impacts, financial return (including costs associated with project 
implementation), and utilization rate information. OMB and GSA then 
evaluated these submissions based on real estate fundamentals, 
financial information, schedule certainty, and other factors as 
required by Public Law 112-287 Section 11(b)(3). In addition, GSA and 
OMB established a ranking scheme of high, medium, and low priority to 
assign relative priority to the projects submitted by the agencies. As 
OMB and GSA are working to mature the FASTA process, the OMB list was 
limited to less complex property disposals with the understanding that 
the Board has access to multiple other sources of information to 
determine its next set of disposal recommendations. More complex 
options such as consolidations and land swaps were not included in this 
list because there are other factors, including proposed legislative 
reforms that may impact those types of disposal options. This approach 
is intended to build on OMB's recent approval of the PBRB's high-value 
list and the lessons learned from actions taken to sell those 
properties. OMB looks forward to continuing to refine this process over 
subsequent rounds provided in the statute by developing increasingly 
complex transactions, potentially to include consolidations or other 
actions. Agency submissions were evaluated by review teams from PBS and 
OMB with priority given to projects with strong real estate 
fundamentals, favorable financial data, limited complexity, 
availability of information for the public on effected buildings, and 
high schedule certainty. A combination of the evaluation of submitted 
data, assessment of the evaluation factors required by Public Law 112-
287 Section 11(b)(3), and dialogue with agencies resulted in the final 
high, medium, low rankings. Only projects ranked High or Medium were 
recommended to the PBRB. Project in the Low category did not provide 
sufficient financial benefit to the government or had high risk and 
high cost, generally associated with environmental cleanup.

[[Page 8927]]

    It is important to note that while OMB, with GSA's assistance, did 
conduct this evaluation of the agency-identified properties and is 
providing a list of properties for consideration of the PBRB, it is 
ultimately the responsibility of the PBRB to fully vet each property, 
as the PBRB, working with GSA, is charged with carrying out the 
disposals and consolidations. Like the High Value Asset process, OMB 
will expect that the PBRB provide the necessary financial information 
to weigh the likelihood of project by project success. Further, the 
availability of appropriations including appropriations of proceeds 
from the High Value Round disposals will be a critical determination of 
what is possible to execute, and that is currently unknown.
    III. Standard Utilization Rates: In 2017-2018, GSA and OMB 
researched existing utilization rate standards that could potentially 
be used to evaluate Agency Recommendations, in accordance with Public 
Law 114-287, Section 11(c), ``Special Rule for Utilization Rates.'' 
Specifically FASTA required that standards developed by the Director of 
OMB pursuant to subsection (b) ``shall incorporate and apply clear 
standard utilization rates to the extent that such standard rates 
increase efficiency and provide performance data. The utilization rates 
shall be consistent throughout each applicable category of space and 
with non-government space utilization rates.''
    This research was conducted by GSA with input from OMB. For each 
Federal Real Property Profile (FRPP) predominant building use type, 
potential utilization rate approaches were identified and evaluated 
based on the criteria established in this section, including the 
ability to identify efficiency opportunities, provide performance data, 
and be consistent throughout each applicable category of space.

A. Office Buildings

    The results of the study revealed that only the FRPP building type 
``office'' lends itself to a standard utilization metric. Utilization 
rates for office space are used by the private sector and a majority of 
federal agencies to manage their space and assess its efficient use. 
OMB and GSA recommends to PBRB that buildings reported to the FRPP with 
a building use code of ``office'' should utilize the following 
utilization rate calculation: Total Administrative Office Space 
(useable square feet) divided by Total Headcount = administrative 
Office Utilization Rate (usable square feet per person). This 
Administrative Office Utilization Rate formula focuses solely on that 
space which is commonly found in a commercial office setting: 
Workstations, private offices, collaboration areas, meeting spaces, and 
other standard support spaces, and associated internal circulation. Any 
space that is unique to the agency and does not have a commercial 
office equivalent (termed ``special space'') is removed from the 
calculation. This special space is instead evaluated based on its 
efficiency relative to achieving the agency's programmatic goals and 
established design criteria.

B. Non-Office Buildings

    For all other FRPP building types other than ``office'', the study 
revealed that a clear and reliable utilization rate is not in common 
use within the government or the private sector, and that it is 
currently not feasible to create such rates without extensive and close 
collaboration among the government and the private sector. In some 
building types, there exist significant variations in programmatic 
purpose that prevent reliable comparisons between them. Creating a 
standard utilization rate for non-office building types would often 
provide a misleading and inaccurate efficiency measurements, 
particularly if comparison was made among agencies. Based on this, GSA 
recommends that non-office buildings identified in Agency 
Recommendations be evaluated individually by real estate professionals, 
based on the building's unique ability to meet mission requirements of 
the agency at that specific location, to assess how efficiently the 
building is being utilized.
    IV. Agency Recommendations: In accordance with 11(d)(2) of Public 
Law 114-287, the list of recommendations was submitted by OMB and GSA 
and has been provided to the Committee on Transportation and 
Infrastructure of the House of Representatives; the Committee on 
Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives; the 
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; 
the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate; and the 
Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the 
Senate; the Government Accountability Office; and the Public Buildings 
Reform Board. OMB believes that to fully utilize the authority provided 
by FASTA, the next round of PBRB recommendations should include 100 or 
more properties and that projects already identified by the agencies as 
priorities are likely to be strong candidates for that list.

Deidre A. Harrison,
Deputy Controller (Acting).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                   Total
      Agency             Agency         Property name          City          State       Priority     Annual O&M      Total        square    Total acres
                                                                                                        costs     improvements    footage
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
VA...............  VHA..............  Menlo Park VA     Menlo Park.......  CA.......  Medium.......       $4,302             1       15,200         2.24
                                       Medical Center--
                                       NW Parcel.
Agriculture......  ARS..............  Portion of ARS    Glen Dale........  MD.......  Medium.......    2,500,000            24       31,242           70
                                       Glen Dale.
Energy...........  ANL..............  Argonne National  Argonne..........  IL.......  Medium.......  ...........             0            0          8.4
                                       Lab--Vacant
                                       Land/2 Parking
                                       Structures.
EPA..............  EPA..............  Lakes & Rivers    Grosee Ile.......  MI.......  Medium.......      239,196             4       35,547          3.1
                                       Forecasting
                                       Research
                                       Station.
Labor............  Job Corps........  Earle C Clements  Morgansfield.....  KY.......  Medium.......  ...........             0            0          600
                                       Job Corps
                                       Center--Vacant
                                       Land.
VA...............  VHA..............  Sepulveda North   Sepulveda........  CA.......  Medium.......  ...........            18       35,316         3.53
                                       Parcel.
VA...............  VHA..............  Portion of        Manchester.......  NH.......  Medium.......       33,661             1        2,776          2.8
                                       Manchester VA
                                       Medical Center.
VA...............  VHA..............  Portion of VA     Walla Walla......  WA.......  Medium.......  ...........             0            0           13
                                       Campus--Basebal
                                       l Fields.
VA...............  VHA..............  Tomah Quarters    Tomah............  WI.......  Medium.......       12,401             3       30,823            2
                                       Buildings.
Labor............  Job Corps........  Portion of        Edinburgh........  IN.......  Medium.......  ...........             8    62,840.00        93.00
                                       Atterbury Job
                                       Corps Center.

[[Page 8928]]

 
Labor............  Job Corps........  Gary Job Corps    San Marcos.......  TX.......  Medium.......      558,677            59   142,622.00        60.00
                                       Center Staff
                                       Housing.
VA...............  VHA..............  Portion of FDR    Montrose.........  NY.......  Medium.......  ...........             0            0         5.10
                                       Campus.
VA...............  VHA..............  Portion of VA     Lyons............  NJ.......  Medium.......  ...........             0            0         0.10
                                       New Jersey HCS.
                                                                                                    ----------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                       3,348,237           118      356,366       863.27
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[FR Doc. 2021-02695 Filed 2-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P