Air Plan Approval; KY; Gasoline Loading Facilities at Existing Bulk Terminals and New Bulk Plants, 6589-6591 [2021-00533]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 13 / Friday, January 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules
5080, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 and to
the (2) Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, Office of
Management and Budget, at
www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Select ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function.
Executive Order 13132
Executive Order 13132 encourages
independent regulatory agencies to
consider the impact of their actions on
state and local interests. In adherence to
fundamental federalism principles, the
NCUA, an independent regulatory
agency as defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(5),
voluntarily complies with the principles
of the executive order. This rulemaking
will not have a substantial direct effect
on the states, on the connection between
the national government and the states,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. The NCUA has
determined that this proposal does not
constitute a policy that has federalism
implications for purposes of the
executive order.
Assessment of Federal Regulations and
Policies on Families
The NCUA has determined that this
proposed rule will not affect family
well-being within the meaning of
section 654 of the Treasury and General
Government Appropriations Act, 1999,
Public Law 105–277, 112 Stat. 2681
(1998).
List of Subjects in 12 CFR Part 748
Security program, report of suspected
crimes, suspicious transactions,
catastrophic acts and Bank Secrecy Act
compliance.
By the National Credit Union
Administration Board on December 17, 2020.
Melane Conyers-Ausbrooks,
Secretary of the Board.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Board proposes to amend
12 CFR part 748, as follows:
PART 748—SECURITY PROGRAM,
REPORT OF SUSPECTED CRIMES,
SUSPICIOUS TRANSACTIONS,
CATASTROPHIC ACTS AND BANK
SECRECY ACT COMPLIANCE
1. The authority citation for part 748
continues to read as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
■
Authority: 12 U.S.C. 1766(a), 1786(q); 15
U.S.C. 6801–6809; 31 U.S.C. 5311 and 5318.
2. Amend § 748.1 by adding new
paragraph (c)(7) to read as follows:
■
§ 748.1
*
*
Filing of reports.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
[FR Doc. 2021–00048 Filed 1–21–21; 8:45 am]
*
16:14 Jan 21, 2021
(c) Suspicious Activity Report. * * *
(7) Exemptions.
(i) The NCUA may exempt any
federally insured credit union from the
requirements of paragraph (c) of this
section. Upon receiving a written
request from a federally insured credit
union, the NCUA will determine
whether the exemption is consistent
with safe and sound practices, and may
consider other appropriate factors. The
NCUA will also seek FinCEN’s
determination whether the exemption is
consistent with the purposes of the
BSA, if applicable. The exemption shall
be applicable only as expressly stated in
the exemption, may be conditional or
unconditional, may apply to particular
persons or to classes of persons, and
may apply to transactions or classes of
transactions. The NCUA will seek
FinCEN’s concurrence with regard to
any exemption request that would also
require an exemption from the
requirements of FinCEN’s SAR
regulations, and may consult with
FinCEN regarding other exemption
requests. The NCUA also may consult
with the other state and federal banking
agencies and consider comments before
granting any exemption.
(ii) The NCUA will provide a written
response to the federally insured credit
union that submitted the exemption
request after considering whether the
exemption is consistent with safe and
sound banking, consulting with the
appropriate agencies, and seeking
concurrence when appropriate. A
federally insured credit union that has
received an exemption under paragraph
(i) of this section may rely on the
exemption for a period of time to be
communicated by the NCUA in its
granting of the exemption, which may
indefinite. The NCUA may extend the
period of time or may revoke an
exemption granted under paragraph (i)
of this section. Exemptions may be
revoked at the sole discretion of the
NCUA. The NCUA will provide written
notice to the federally insured credit
union of the NCUA’s intention to revoke
an exemption. Such notice will include
the basis for the revocation and will
provide an opportunity for the federally
insured credit union to submit a
response to the NCUA. The NCUA will
consider the credit union’s response
prior to deciding whether to revoke an
exemption and will notify the federally
insured credit union of the NCUA’s
decision to revoke an exemption in
writing.
BILLING CODE 7535–01–P
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6589
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2020–0102; FRL–10018–
62–Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Gasoline
Loading Facilities at Existing Bulk
Terminals and New Bulk Plants
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve
revisions to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky State Implementation
Plan (SIP), submitted by the
Commonwealth of Kentucky, through
the Energy and Environment Cabinet
(Cabinet) on September 5, 2019. The
revisions were submitted by the Cabinet
on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air
Pollution Control District (District) and
include amendments related to the
standards for existing gasoline loading
facilities at bulk terminals and new
gasoline loading facilities at bulk plants.
The amendments to these standards
replace a requirement for gasoline tank
trucks to possess a valid Kentucky
pressure vacuum test sticker with a
requirement for specific vapor tightness
testing and recordkeeping procedures,
clarify rule applicability, and remove
language stating that a pressure
measuring device will be supplied by
the District. EPA is proposing to
approve the revisions because they are
consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA
or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R04–
OAR–2020–0102 at
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. EPA will generally
not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
6590
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 13 / Friday, January 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
www2.epa.gov/dockets/commentingepa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sarah LaRocca, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and
Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960.
The telephone number is (404) 562–
8994. Ms. LaRocca can also be reached
via electronic mail at larocca.sarah@
epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. EPA’s Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve changes
to Regulation 6.21, Standard of
Performance for Existing Gasoline
Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals,
and Regulation 7.20, Standard of
Performance for New Gasoline Loading
Facilities at Bulk Plants, of the Jefferson
County portion of the Kentucky SIP,
submitted by the Commonwealth of
Kentucky on September 5, 2019. The
amendments replace the requirement for
tank trucks being loaded at bulk
terminals and plants to possess a valid
Kentucky pressure vacuum sticker with
specific vapor tightness testing and
recordkeeping requirements and make
minor, non-substantive changes as
discussed in section II. The SIP
revisions update the current SIPapproved versions of Regulation 6.21
(Version 2) and Regulation 7.20 (Version
2) to Version 3.
II. EPA’s Analysis of the Revisions
The District’s September 5, 2019, SIP
revision includes changes to Regulation
6.21 and Regulation 7.20 related to
standards for existing gasoline loading
facilities at bulk terminals and
standards for new gasoline loading
facilities at bulk plants, respectively, as
described below. The District notes that
it enacted these regulations to control
volatile organic compound emissions
from gasoline loading facilities and that
Regulations Parts 6 and 7 apply more
stringent standards to a broader crosssection of sources than the federal New
Source Performance Standards (NSPS).1
The District has revised Regulation
6.21 and Regulation 7.20 to discontinue
the practice of requiring gasoline
transport vehicles to display a Kentucky
pressure vacuum sticker. Specifically,
the revisions to Regulation 6.20 and
1 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX is the federal NSPS
containing standards of performance for bulk
gasoline terminals.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
Regulation 7.21 delete the text of
subsection 3.6.4 and subsection 3.11.1,
respectively, which provide that no
owner or operator of a bulk gasoline
terminal or plant subject to these
regulations may allow a tank truck or
trailer to be loaded with gasoline unless
the vehicle has ‘‘a valid Kentucky
pressure-vacuum test sticker as required
by Regulation 6.37 attached and visibly
displayed.’’ 2 This requirement is
replaced with specific procedures for
assuring that tank trucks and their
associated vapor collection systems
have passed the required vapor
tightness test on an annual basis. New
subsection 3.6.4.1 of Regulation 6.21
and subsection 3.11.1.1 of Regulation
7.20 state that no owner or operator of
an existing bulk gasoline terminal or a
new bulk gasoline plant shall allow
loading unless the gasoline tank truck
and its vapor collection system has
demonstrated a pressure change within
specific parameters. The parameters to
be met are a pressure change of no more
than 75 millimeter (mm) water (3 inches
water) in five minutes when pressurized
to 450 mm water (18 inches water) and
when evacuated to 150 mm water (6
inches water) using the test procedure
described in the regulation.
The SIP revision also adds a new
subsection 3.6.4.2 of Regulation 6.21
and a new subsection 3.11.1.2 of
Regulation 7.20 to specify the testing
procedures that must be used to assure
compliance with the new vapor
tightness requirements described above.
As proposed for incorporation into the
SIP, these subsections require that EPA
Method 27, ‘‘Determination of Vapor
Tightness of Gasoline Delivery Tank
Using Pressure Vacuum Test,’’ as
specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, on
July 1, 1991, shall be used to determine
compliance with subsection 3.6.4.1 of
Regulation 6.21 and subsection 3.11.1.1
of Regulation 7.20.3 The new
subsections also require the owner or
operator of a tank truck being loaded at
2 The District has no record of ever having created
‘‘Regulation 6.37’’ (see email from Byron Gary,
Louisville Air Pollution Control District, to Sarah
LaRocca, EPA Region 4, March 23, 2020), and the
Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP does
not contain ‘‘Regulation 6.37.’’ The District’s
September 5, 2019, revisions rectify this
discrepancy by removing the references to the nonexistent ‘‘Regulation 6.37’’ and adding new
provisions (at subsection 3.6.4 for Regulation 6.21
and subsection 3.11.1 for Regulation 7.20)
containing detailed, updated procedures that
explicitly state the vapor tightness and
recordkeeping requirements.
3 EPA is not acting on the phrase ‘‘or an alternate
procedure approved by the District’’ in the District’s
new subsection 3.6.4.2 of Regulation 6.21 and
subsection 3.11.1.2 of Regulation 7.20. The District
intends to withdraw this phrase from the submitted
SIP revision.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
an affected facility to have this vapor
tightness test completed annually and to
maintain all testing records (i.e., test
data, date of testing, identification of
tank truck, type of repair, retest data and
date) for two years after the date of
testing, and to make such records
available upon request by the District.
EPA notes that the District’s revised
tank truck vapor tightness standards,
testing procedures and recordkeeping
requirements as proposed for
incorporation into the SIP are consistent
with the Commonwealth of Kentucky’s
requirements at 401 KAR 63:031, Leaks
from gasoline tank trucks, and also with
EPA’s requirements applicable to
gasoline cargo tanks under 40 CFR part
60, subpart XX, Standards of
Performance for Bulk Gasoline
Terminals (see 40 CFR 60.505(b)) and 40
CFR part 63, subpart BBBBBB, National
Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline
Distribution Bulk Terminals, Bulk
Plants, and Pipeline Facilities (see 40
CFR 63.11092(f)(1) and 63.11094(b)).
The revisions also include minor
changes Regulation 6.21 and Regulation
7.20. A non-substantive change to
Section 1 of Regulation 6.21 clarifies
that the rule applies to each affected
facility that was either existing or had
a construction permit issued on or
before June 13, 1979.4 The nonsubstantive changes to Regulation 7.20
clarify that the rule applies to each
affected facility which commenced
construction, modification, or
reconstruction after June 13, 1979; 5
remove language in subsection 3.11.3
such that a pressure measuring device is
no longer required to be supplied by the
District; and renumber subsections
within Section 3.
Because these rule revisions will not
increase air pollutant emissions, EPA
proposes to determine that, in
accordance with CAA section 110(l),
that they will not interfere with
attainment or maintenance of the
NAAQS, reasonable further progress
toward attainment of the NAAQS, or
any other applicable requirement of the
CAA. EPA has preliminarily determined
that these changes are consistent with
the CAA is therefore proposing to
4 The SIP-approved version of the rule states that
it applies to ‘‘each affected facility which was in
being or had a construction permit issued by the
District before June 13, 1979.’’ ‘‘Affected facility’’ is
defined in Section 2.1 of the rule as ‘‘facilities at
a bulk gasoline terminal for loading gasoline into
tank trucks, trailers, railroad tank cars, or other
mobile, non-marine vessels.’’
5 The SIP-approved version of the rule states that
it applies to ‘‘each new affected facility which is
commenced after the June 13, 1979.’’ ‘‘Affected
facility’’ is defined in Section 2.1 of the rule as ‘‘a
bulk gasoline plant.’’
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 13 / Friday, January 22, 2021 / Proposed Rules
approve these portions of the SIP
revisions.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control
District Regulation 6.21, Standard of
Performance for Existing Gasoline
Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals,
Version 3, and Regulation 7.20,
Standard of Performance for New
Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk
Plants, Version 3, state-effective June
19, 2019, with the exception of the
phrase ‘‘or an alternate procedure
approved by the District’’ in Regulation
6.21, subsection 3.6.4.2 and Regulation
7.20, subsection 3.11.1.2. The changes
to these rules replace a requirement for
gasoline tank trucks to possess valid
pressure vacuum test sticker with a
requirement for specific vapor tightness
testing and recordkeeping procedures,
clarify rule applicability, and remove
language stating that a pressure
measuring device will be supplied by
the District. EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the
revisions to the Jefferson County portion
of the Kentucky SIP (Regulation 6.21,
Standard of Performance for Existing
Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk
Terminals, Version 3, and Regulation
7.20, Standard of Performance for New
Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk
Plants, Version 3), submitted on
September 5, 2019, as discussed above.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. This action merely proposes to
approve state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this proposed action:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:14 Jan 21, 2021
Jkt 253001
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1955 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in the
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the national
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The
SIP is not approved to apply on any
Indian reservation land or any other
area where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications as specified by Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000), nor will it impose substantial
direct costs on tribal governments or
preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
6591
Dated: December 11, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2021–00533 Filed 1–21–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R01–OAR–2020–0327; FRL–10018–
02-Region 1]
Air Plan Approval; Maine;
Infrastructure State Implementation
Plan Requirements for the 2015 Ozone
Standard and Negative Declaration for
the Oil and Gas Industry for the 2008
and 2015 Ozone Standards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision submitted by the State of
Maine. This revision addresses the
infrastructure requirements of the Clean
Air Act (CAA or Act) for the 2015 ozone
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NAAQS). Today’s proposed action
includes all elements of these
infrastructure requirements except for
the ‘‘Good Neighbor’’ or ‘‘transport’’
provisions, which will be addressed in
a future action. The infrastructure
requirements are designed to ensure that
the structural components of each
state’s air quality management program
are adequate to meet the state’s
responsibilities under the CAA.
EPA is also proposing to approve
State of Maine submittals of
amendments to Chapter 110, Ambient
Air Quality Standards, and of statutory
conflict-of-interest provisions in 38
Maine Revised Statutes Annotated
(MRSA) Section 341–A and 341–C.
These two submittals support the state’s
infrastructure submittal for the 2015
ozone NAAQS.
In addition, we are proposing to
convert previous conditional approvals
of the sub-element of section
110(a)(2)(E) that addresses State Board
Requirements in Maine’s infrastructure
SIPs for the 2008 ozone; 2008 lead (Pb);
2010 nitrogen dioxide (NO2); 2010
sulfur dioxide (SO2); 1997, 2006, and
2012 fine particle (PM2.5) NAAQS to full
approvals. We are also proposing to
convert to full approval previous
conditional approvals of section
110(a)(2)(A) (Emission limits and other
control measures) in Maine’s
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22JAP1.SGM
22JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 13 (Friday, January 22, 2021)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 6589-6591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00533]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2020-0102; FRL-10018-62-Region 4]
Air Plan Approval; KY; Gasoline Loading Facilities at Existing
Bulk Terminals and New Bulk Plants
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky,
through the Energy and Environment Cabinet (Cabinet) on September 5,
2019. The revisions were submitted by the Cabinet on behalf of the
Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (District) and include
amendments related to the standards for existing gasoline loading
facilities at bulk terminals and new gasoline loading facilities at
bulk plants. The amendments to these standards replace a requirement
for gasoline tank trucks to possess a valid Kentucky pressure vacuum
test sticker with a requirement for specific vapor tightness testing
and recordkeeping procedures, clarify rule applicability, and remove
language stating that a pressure measuring device will be supplied by
the District. EPA is proposing to approve the revisions because they
are consistent with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act).
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R04-
OAR-2020-0102 at www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. EPA may publish any comment received to
its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full
[[Page 6590]]
EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please
visit www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah LaRocca, Air Regulatory
Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air and
Radiation Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street SW, Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number is
(404) 562-8994. Ms. LaRocca can also be reached via electronic mail at
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. EPA's Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve changes to Regulation 6.21, Standard of
Performance for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals,
and Regulation 7.20, Standard of Performance for New Gasoline Loading
Facilities at Bulk Plants, of the Jefferson County portion of the
Kentucky SIP, submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky on September 5,
2019. The amendments replace the requirement for tank trucks being
loaded at bulk terminals and plants to possess a valid Kentucky
pressure vacuum sticker with specific vapor tightness testing and
recordkeeping requirements and make minor, non-substantive changes as
discussed in section II. The SIP revisions update the current SIP-
approved versions of Regulation 6.21 (Version 2) and Regulation 7.20
(Version 2) to Version 3.
II. EPA's Analysis of the Revisions
The District's September 5, 2019, SIP revision includes changes to
Regulation 6.21 and Regulation 7.20 related to standards for existing
gasoline loading facilities at bulk terminals and standards for new
gasoline loading facilities at bulk plants, respectively, as described
below. The District notes that it enacted these regulations to control
volatile organic compound emissions from gasoline loading facilities
and that Regulations Parts 6 and 7 apply more stringent standards to a
broader cross-section of sources than the federal New Source
Performance Standards (NSPS).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX is the federal NSPS containing
standards of performance for bulk gasoline terminals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The District has revised Regulation 6.21 and Regulation 7.20 to
discontinue the practice of requiring gasoline transport vehicles to
display a Kentucky pressure vacuum sticker. Specifically, the revisions
to Regulation 6.20 and Regulation 7.21 delete the text of subsection
3.6.4 and subsection 3.11.1, respectively, which provide that no owner
or operator of a bulk gasoline terminal or plant subject to these
regulations may allow a tank truck or trailer to be loaded with
gasoline unless the vehicle has ``a valid Kentucky pressure-vacuum test
sticker as required by Regulation 6.37 attached and visibly
displayed.'' \2\ This requirement is replaced with specific procedures
for assuring that tank trucks and their associated vapor collection
systems have passed the required vapor tightness test on an annual
basis. New subsection 3.6.4.1 of Regulation 6.21 and subsection
3.11.1.1 of Regulation 7.20 state that no owner or operator of an
existing bulk gasoline terminal or a new bulk gasoline plant shall
allow loading unless the gasoline tank truck and its vapor collection
system has demonstrated a pressure change within specific parameters.
The parameters to be met are a pressure change of no more than 75
millimeter (mm) water (3 inches water) in five minutes when pressurized
to 450 mm water (18 inches water) and when evacuated to 150 mm water (6
inches water) using the test procedure described in the regulation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The District has no record of ever having created
``Regulation 6.37'' (see email from Byron Gary, Louisville Air
Pollution Control District, to Sarah LaRocca, EPA Region 4, March
23, 2020), and the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP does
not contain ``Regulation 6.37.'' The District's September 5, 2019,
revisions rectify this discrepancy by removing the references to the
non-existent ``Regulation 6.37'' and adding new provisions (at
subsection 3.6.4 for Regulation 6.21 and subsection 3.11.1 for
Regulation 7.20) containing detailed, updated procedures that
explicitly state the vapor tightness and recordkeeping requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The SIP revision also adds a new subsection 3.6.4.2 of Regulation
6.21 and a new subsection 3.11.1.2 of Regulation 7.20 to specify the
testing procedures that must be used to assure compliance with the new
vapor tightness requirements described above. As proposed for
incorporation into the SIP, these subsections require that EPA Method
27, ``Determination of Vapor Tightness of Gasoline Delivery Tank Using
Pressure Vacuum Test,'' as specified in 40 CFR 60, Appendix A, on July
1, 1991, shall be used to determine compliance with subsection 3.6.4.1
of Regulation 6.21 and subsection 3.11.1.1 of Regulation 7.20.\3\ The
new subsections also require the owner or operator of a tank truck
being loaded at an affected facility to have this vapor tightness test
completed annually and to maintain all testing records (i.e., test
data, date of testing, identification of tank truck, type of repair,
retest data and date) for two years after the date of testing, and to
make such records available upon request by the District. EPA notes
that the District's revised tank truck vapor tightness standards,
testing procedures and recordkeeping requirements as proposed for
incorporation into the SIP are consistent with the Commonwealth of
Kentucky's requirements at 401 KAR 63:031, Leaks from gasoline tank
trucks, and also with EPA's requirements applicable to gasoline cargo
tanks under 40 CFR part 60, subpart XX, Standards of Performance for
Bulk Gasoline Terminals (see 40 CFR 60.505(b)) and 40 CFR part 63,
subpart BBBBBB, National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants for Source Category: Gasoline Distribution Bulk Terminals,
Bulk Plants, and Pipeline Facilities (see 40 CFR 63.11092(f)(1) and
63.11094(b)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ EPA is not acting on the phrase ``or an alternate procedure
approved by the District'' in the District's new subsection 3.6.4.2
of Regulation 6.21 and subsection 3.11.1.2 of Regulation 7.20. The
District intends to withdraw this phrase from the submitted SIP
revision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The revisions also include minor changes Regulation 6.21 and
Regulation 7.20. A non-substantive change to Section 1 of Regulation
6.21 clarifies that the rule applies to each affected facility that was
either existing or had a construction permit issued on or before June
13, 1979.\4\ The non-substantive changes to Regulation 7.20 clarify
that the rule applies to each affected facility which commenced
construction, modification, or reconstruction after June 13, 1979; \5\
remove language in subsection 3.11.3 such that a pressure measuring
device is no longer required to be supplied by the District; and
renumber subsections within Section 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The SIP-approved version of the rule states that it applies
to ``each affected facility which was in being or had a construction
permit issued by the District before June 13, 1979.'' ``Affected
facility'' is defined in Section 2.1 of the rule as ``facilities at
a bulk gasoline terminal for loading gasoline into tank trucks,
trailers, railroad tank cars, or other mobile, non-marine vessels.''
\5\ The SIP-approved version of the rule states that it applies
to ``each new affected facility which is commenced after the June
13, 1979.'' ``Affected facility'' is defined in Section 2.1 of the
rule as ``a bulk gasoline plant.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because these rule revisions will not increase air pollutant
emissions, EPA proposes to determine that, in accordance with CAA
section 110(l), that they will not interfere with attainment or
maintenance of the NAAQS, reasonable further progress toward attainment
of the NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement of the CAA. EPA has
preliminarily determined that these changes are consistent with the CAA
is therefore proposing to
[[Page 6591]]
approve these portions of the SIP revisions.
III. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule
regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance
with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by
reference Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District Regulation
6.21, Standard of Performance for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities
at Bulk Terminals, Version 3, and Regulation 7.20, Standard of
Performance for New Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Plants, Version
3, state-effective June 19, 2019, with the exception of the phrase ``or
an alternate procedure approved by the District'' in Regulation 6.21,
subsection 3.6.4.2 and Regulation 7.20, subsection 3.11.1.2. The
changes to these rules replace a requirement for gasoline tank trucks
to possess valid pressure vacuum test sticker with a requirement for
specific vapor tightness testing and recordkeeping procedures, clarify
rule applicability, and remove language stating that a pressure
measuring device will be supplied by the District. EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials generally available through
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 4 office (please contact the
person identified in the For Further Information Contact section of
this preamble for more information).
IV. Proposed Action
EPA is proposing to approve the revisions to the Jefferson County
portion of the Kentucky SIP (Regulation 6.21, Standard of Performance
for Existing Gasoline Loading Facilities at Bulk Terminals, Version 3,
and Regulation 7.20, Standard of Performance for New Gasoline Loading
Facilities at Bulk Plants, Version 3), submitted on September 5, 2019,
as discussed above.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. See 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. This action merely
proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1955 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in the
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
national Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The SIP is not
approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or any other area
where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), nor will it impose substantial direct costs on
tribal governments or preempt tribal law.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 11, 2020.
Mary Walker,
Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2021-00533 Filed 1-21-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P