List of Fisheries for 2021, 3028-3053 [2021-00570]
Download as PDF
3028
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)—Continued
Adjusted
penalty
amount 2020
U.S. code citation
Civil monetary penalty description
49 U.S.C. 14901(d)(2) .................
Minimum penalty for each instance of transportation of household
goods if broker provides estimate without carrier agreement.
Minimum penalty for each instance of transportation of household
goods without being registered.
Minimum penalty for each violation of a transportation rule ............
Minimum penalty for each additional violation ..................................
Maximum penalty for undercharge or overcharge of tariff rate, for
each violation.
For first violation, rebates at less than the rate in effect ..................
For all subsequent violations ............................................................
Maximum penalty for first violation for undercharges by freight forwarders.
Maximum penalty for subsequent violations .....................................
Maximum penalty for other first violations under § 13702 ................
Maximum penalty for subsequent violations .....................................
Maximum penalty for each knowing violation of § 14103(a), and
knowingly authorizing, consenting to, or permitting a violation of
§ 14103(a) or (b).
Minimum penalty for first attempt to evade regulation .....................
Minimum amount for each subsequent attempt to evade regulation
Maximum penalty for recordkeeping/reporting violations .................
Maximum penalty for violation of § 14908(a)(1) ...............................
When another civil penalty is not specified under this part, for each
violation, for each day.
Minimum penalty for holding a household goods shipment hostage, for each day.
Maximum penalty for each knowing violation under § 14916(a) for
unlawful brokerage activities.
49 U.S.C. 14901(d)(3) .................
49 U.S.C. 14901(e) ......................
49 U.S.C. 14901(e) ......................
49 U.S.C. 14903(a) ......................
49 U.S.C. 14904(a) ......................
49 U.S.C. 14904(a) ......................
49 U.S.C. 14904(b)(1) .................
49
49
49
49
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
14904(b)(1) .................
14904(b)(2) .................
14904(b)(2) .................
14905(a) ......................
49
49
49
49
49
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
14906 ..........................
14906 ..........................
14907 ..........................
14908(a)(2) .................
14910 ..........................
49 U.S.C. 14915(a)(1)–(2) ...........
49 U.S.C. 14916(c)(1) ..................
Adjusted
penalty
amount 2021
16,258
16,450
40,640
41,120
3,251
8,128
162,568
3,289
8,224
164,490
325
407
813
329
412
823
3,251
813
3,251
16,258
3,289
823
3,289
16,450
2,226
5,562
8,128
3,251
813
2,252
5,628
8,224
3,289
823
12,919
13,072
11,125
11,257
8,128
813
162
162
1,625
8,224
823
164
164
1,644
Pipeline Carrier Civil Penalties
49
49
49
49
49
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
U.S.C.
16101(a) ......................
16101(b)(1), (4) ...........
16101(b)(2), (4) ...........
16101(b)(3)–(4) ...........
16103(a) ......................
Maximum penalty for violation of this part, for each day .................
For each recordkeeping violation under § 15722, each day ............
For each inspection violation liable under § 15722, each day .........
For each reporting violation under § 15723, each day .....................
Maximum penalty for improper disclosure of information .................
[FR Doc. 2021–00755 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 210108–0005]
RIN 0648–BJ72
List of Fisheries for 2021
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
AGENCY:
The National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2021, as
required by the Marine Mammal
Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for
2021 reflects new information on
interactions between commercial
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery
on the LOF into one of three categories
under the MMPA based upon the level
of mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals that occurs incidental to each
fishery. The classification of a fishery on
the LOF determines whether
participants in that fishery are subject to
certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan (TRP) requirements.
DATES: The effective date of this final
rule is February 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and
Sea Turtle Conservation Division, Office
of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315
East-West Highway, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jaclyn Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, 301–427–8402; Allison
Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978–
281–9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast
Region, 727–824–5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 206–526–4740;
Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907–
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
586–7240; Diana Kramer, Pacific Islands
Region, 808–725–5167. Individuals who
use a telecommunications device for the
hearing impaired may call the Federal
Information Relay Service at 1–800–
877–8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m.
Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires
NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories
based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals occurring in each fishery (16
U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of
a fishery on the LOF determines
whether participants in that fishery may
be required to comply with certain
provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take
reduction plan requirements. NMFS
must reexamine the LOF annually,
considering new information in the
Marine Mammal Stock Assessment
Reports (SARs) and other relevant
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
sources, and publish in the Federal
Register any necessary changes to the
LOF after notice and opportunity for
public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which
category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery
classification criteria can be found in
the implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2). The
criteria are also summarized here.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria
consist of a two-tiered, stock-specific
approach that first addresses the total
impact of all fisheries on each marine
mammal stock and then addresses the
impact of individual fisheries on each
stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of
animals per year, of incidental
mortalities and serious injuries of
marine mammals due to commercial
fishing operations relative to the
potential biological removal (PBR) level
for each marine mammal stock. The
MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1362 (20)) defines the
PBR level as the maximum number of
animals, not including natural
mortalities, that may be removed from a
marine mammal stock while allowing
that stock to reach or maintain its
optimum sustainable population (OSP).
This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section
118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the
cumulative fishery mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock. If the total
annual mortality and serious injury of a
marine mammal stock, across all
fisheries, is less than or equal to 10
percent of the PBR level of the stock, all
fisheries interacting with the stock will
be placed in Category III (unless those
fisheries interact with other stock(s) for
which total annual mortality and
serious injury is greater than 10 percent
of PBR). Otherwise, these fisheries are
subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of
analysis to determine their
classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fisheryspecific mortality and serious injury for
a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the PBR level (i.e., frequent
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is greater than 1 percent and less
than 50 percent of the PBR level (i.e.,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
occasional incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and
serious injury of a stock in a given
fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent
of the PBR level (i.e., a remote
likelihood of or no known incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Additional details regarding how the
categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final
rule implementing section 118 of the
MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a
per-stock basis, a fishery may qualify as
one category for one marine mammal
stock and another category for a
different marine mammal stock. A
fishery is typically classified on the LOF
at its highest level of classification (e.g.,
a fishery qualifying for Category III for
one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal
stock will be listed under Category II).
Stocks driving a fishery’s classification
are denoted with a superscript ‘‘1’’ in
Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum
amount of data, and NMFS does not
have sufficient data to perform a tier
analysis on certain fisheries. Therefore,
NMFS has classified certain fisheries by
analogy to other fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, or according
to factors discussed in the final LOF for
1996 (60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995)
and listed in the regulatory definition of
a Category II fishery. In the absence of
reliable information indicating the
frequency of incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals by a
commercial fishery, NMFS will
determine whether the incidental
mortality or serious injury is
‘‘occasional’’ by evaluating other factors
such as fishing techniques, gear used,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area, or at the
discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries
not specifically identified on the LOF
are deemed to be Category II fisheries
until the next LOF is published (50 CFR
229.2).
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3029
How does NMFS determine which
species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a
fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each
commercial fishery. The list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured includes ‘‘serious’’ and ‘‘nonserious’’ documented injuries as
described later in the List of Species
and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or
Injured in the Pacific Ocean and List of
Species and/or Stocks Incidentally
Killed or Injured in the Atlantic Ocean,
Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean sections.
To determine which species or stocks
are included as incidentally killed or
injured in a fishery, NMFS annually
reviews the information presented in
the current SARs and injury
determination reports. SARs are brief
reports summarizing the status of each
stock of marine mammals occurring in
waters under U.S. jurisdiction,
including information on the identity
and geographic range of the stock,
population statistics related to
abundance, trend, and annual
productivity, notable habitat concerns,
and estimates of human-caused
mortality and serious injury (M/SI) by
source. The SARs are based upon the
best available scientific information and
provide the most current and inclusive
information on each stock’s PBR level
and level of interaction with
commercial fishing operations. The best
available scientific information used in
the SARs and reviewed for the 2021
LOF generally summarizes data from
2013–2017. NMFS also reviews other
sources of new information, including
injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal
reports from that time period. In some
cases, more recent information may be
available and used in the LOF.
For fisheries with observer coverage,
species or stocks are generally removed
from the list of marine mammal species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured if no interactions are
documented in the 5-year timeframe
summarized in that year’s LOF. For
fisheries with no observer coverage and
for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has low observer coverage and
stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that
cannot be attributed to a specific
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3030
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
How do I find out if a specific fishery
is in Category I, II, or III?
fishery) species and stocks may be
retained for longer than 5 years. For
these fisheries, NMFS will review the
other sources of information listed
above and use its discretion to decide
when it is appropriate to remove a
species or stock.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Where does NMFS obtain information
on the level of observer coverage in a
fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the
level of observer coverage and the
spatial and temporal distribution of
observed marine mammal interactions is
presented in the SARs. Data obtained
from the observer program and observer
coverage levels are important tools in
estimating the level of marine mammal
mortality and serious injury in
commercial fishing operations. Starting
with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with
detailed descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF, including the
observer coverage in those fisheries. For
Atlantic fisheries, this information can
be found in the LOF Fishery Fact
Sheets. The SARs do not provide
detailed information on observer
coverage in Category III fisheries
because, under the MMPA, Category III
fisheries are not required to
accommodate observers aboard vessels
due to the remote likelihood of
mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals. Fishery information
presented in the SARs’ appendices and
other resources referenced during the
tier analysis may include: Level of
observer coverage; target species; levels
of fishing effort; spatial and temporal
distribution of fishing effort;
characteristics of fishing gear and
operations; management and
regulations; and interactions with
marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources website at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessment-reportsregion. Information on observer
coverage levels in Category I, II, and III
fisheries can be found in the fishery fact
sheets on the NMFS Office of Protected
Resources’ website: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/listfisheries-summary-tables. Additional
information on observer programs in
commercial fisheries can be found on
the NMFS National Observer Program’s
website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/fisheries-observers/nationalobserver-program.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
The LOF includes three tables that list
all U.S. commercial fisheries by
Category. Table 1 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists
all of the commercial fisheries in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S.
authorized commercial fisheries on the
high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists
all commercial fisheries managed under
applicable TRPs or take reduction teams
(TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the
LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS
includes high seas fisheries in Table 3
of the LOF, along with the number of
valid High Seas Fishing Compliance Act
(HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of
2004, NMFS issues HSFCA permits only
for high seas fisheries analyzed in
accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and
the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The
authorized high seas fisheries are broad
in scope and encompass multiple
specific fisheries identified by gear type.
For the purposes of the LOF, the high
seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse
seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to provide more
detail on composition of effort within
these fisheries. Many fisheries operate
in both U.S. waters and on the high
seas, creating some overlap between the
fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2 and
those in Table 3. In these cases, the high
seas component of the fishery is not
considered a separate fishery, but an
extension of a fishery operating within
U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2).
NMFS designates those fisheries in
Tables 1, 2, and 3 with an asterisk (*)
after the fishery’s name. The number of
HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the
high seas components of these fisheries
operating in U.S. waters does not
necessarily represent additional effort
that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels/participants holding
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S.
waters and are included in the number
of vessels and participants operating
within those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years,
during which time Fishery Management
Plans (FMPs) can change. Therefore,
some vessels/participants may possess
valid HSFCA permits without the ability
to fish under the permit because it was
issued for a gear type that is no longer
authorized under the most current FMP.
For this reason, the number of HSFCA
permits displayed in Table 3 is likely
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
higher than the actual U.S. fishing effort
on the high seas. For more information
on how NMFS classifies high seas
fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble
text in the final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032;
December 1, 2008). Additional
information about HSFCA permits can
be found at https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/highseas-fishing-permits.
Where can I find specific information
on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS
developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I
and II fishery on the LOF. These fishery
fact sheets provide the full history of
each Category I and II fishery, including:
When the fishery was added to the LOF;
the basis for the fishery’s initial
classification; classification changes to
the fishery; changes to the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the fishery; fishery gear and
methods used; observer coverage levels;
fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These
fishery fact sheets are updated after each
final LOF and can be found under ‘‘How
Do I Find Out if a Specific Fishery is in
Category I, II, or III?’’ on the NMFS
Office of Protected Resources’ website:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/marine-mammal-protection/
marine-mammal-protection-act-listfisheries, linked to the ‘‘List of Fisheries
Summary’’ table. NMFS is developing
similar fishery fact sheets for each
Category III fishery on the LOF.
However, due to the large number of
Category III fisheries on the LOF and the
lack of accessible and detailed
information on many of these fisheries,
the development of these fishery fact
sheets is taking significant time to
complete. NMFS began posting Category
III fishery fact sheets online with the
LOF for 2016.
Am I required to register under the
MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in
a Category I or II fishery are required
under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)),
as described in 50 CFR 229.4, to register
with NMFS and obtain a marine
mammal authorization to lawfully take
non-endangered and non-threatened
marine mammals incidental to
commercial fishing operations. Owners
of vessels or gear engaged in a Category
III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal
authorization.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
How do I register, renew and receive
my Marine Mammal Authorization
Program authorization certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA
registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal
Authorization Program (MMAP), with
existing state and Federal fishery
license, registration, or permit systems
for Category I and II fisheries on the
LOF. Participants in these fisheries are
automatically registered under the
MMAP and are not required to submit
registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and
Alaska regions, NMFS will issue vessel
or gear owners an authorization
certificate via U.S. mail or with their
state or Federal license or permit at the
time of issuance or renewal. In the
Greater Atlantic and Southeast Regions,
NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners
an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
automatically at the beginning of each
calendar year.
Vessel or gear owners who participate
in fisheries in these regions and have
not received authorization certificates
by the beginning of the calendar year, or
with renewed fishing licenses, must
contact the appropriate NMFS Regional
Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION).
Authorization certificates may also be
obtained by visiting the MMAP website
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/
national/marine-mammal-protection/
marine-mammal-authorizationprogram#obtaining-a-marine-mammalauthorization-certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a
copy, must be on board the vessel while
it is operating in a Category I or II
fishery, or for non-vessel fisheries, in
the possession of the person in charge
of the fishing operation (50 CFR
229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to
limit the issuance of authorization
certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or
II fisheries, not all state and Federal
license or permit systems distinguish
between fisheries as classified by the
LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear
owners in Category III fisheries may
receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for
Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and
II fisheries for which no state or Federal
license or permit is required must
register with NMFS by contacting their
appropriate Regional Office (see
ADDRESSES).
In recognition of logistical challenges
with certificate issuance related to the
ongoing COVID–19 pandemic, the
MMAP certificate issued in 2020
remains in effect, valid through
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
December 31, 2021, for vessel or gear
owners participating in all Category I
and II fisheries as of the final 2021 LOF.
2020 certificates may be retained or
replacements downloaded from https://
go.usa.gov/xArUW. Vessel or gear
owners participating in previous
Category III fisheries reclassified as a
Category II fishery in this final 2021
LOF can obtain their MMAP certificate
on our website https://go.usa.gov/
xArUW.
Am I required to submit reports when
I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing
operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16
U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6, any
vessel owner or operator, or gear owner
or operator (in the case of non-vessel
fisheries), participating in a fishery
listed on the LOF must report to NMFS
all incidental mortalities and injuries of
marine mammals that occur during
commercial fishing operations,
regardless of the category in which the
fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or,
in the case of non-vessel fisheries,
fishing activity. ‘‘Injury’’ is defined in
50 CFR 229.2 as a wound or other
physical harm. In addition, any animal
that ingests fishing gear or any animal
that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any
part of the body is considered injured,
regardless of the presence of any wound
or other evidence of injury, and must be
reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and
instructions for submitting forms to
NMFS can be found at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-authorizationprogram#reporting-a-death-or-injury-ofa-marine-mammal-during-commercialfishing-operations or by contacting the
appropriate regional office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION). Forms may be
submitted via any of the following
means: (1) Online using the electronic
form; (2) emailed as an attachment to
nmfs.mireport@noaa.gov; (3) faxed to
the NMFS Office of Protected Resources
at 301–713–0376; or (4) mailed to the
NMFS Office of Protected Resources
(mailing address is provided on the
postage-paid form that can be printed
from the web address listed above).
Reporting requirements and procedures
are found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I required to take an observer
aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a
Category I or II fishery are required to
accommodate an observer aboard their
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3031
vessel(s) upon request from NMFS.
MMPA section 118 states that the
Secretary is not required to place an
observer on a vessel if the facilities for
quartering an observer or performing
observer functions are so inadequate or
unsafe that the health or safety of the
observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby
authorizing the exemption of vessels too
small to safely accommodate an
observer from this requirement.
However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline vessels operating in
special areas designated by the Pelagic
Longline Take Reduction Plan
implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.36(d)) will not be exempted from
observer requirements, regardless of
their size. Observer requirements are
found in 50 CFR 229.7.
Am I required to comply with any
marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries
affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations are found at 50 CFR 229.30
through 229.37. A description of each
TRT and copies of each TRP can be
found at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-take-reduction-plans-andteams. It is the responsibility of fishery
participants to comply with applicable
take reduction regulations.
Where can I find more information
about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and
the MMAP, including registration
procedures and forms; current and past
LOFs; descriptions of each Category I
and II fishery and some Category III
fisheries; observer requirements; and
marine mammal mortality/injury
reporting forms and submittal
procedures; may be obtained at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-protection-act-list-fisheries, or
from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional
Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930–2298,
Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th
Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL 33701,
Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long
Beach Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd., Suite
4200, Long Beach, CA 90802–4213,
Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected
Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn:
Suzie Teerlink; or
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3032
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
below; comments on actions not related
to the LOF are not included.
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional
Office, Protected Resources Division,
1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176,
Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn: Diana
Kramer.
Sources of Information Reviewed for
the 2021 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal
incidental mortality and serious injury
information presented in the SARs for
all fisheries to determine whether
changes in fishery classification are
warranted. The SARs are based on the
best scientific information available at
the time of preparation, including the
level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental
to commercial fishery operations and
the PBR levels of marine mammal
stocks. The information contained in the
SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific
Review Groups (SRGs) representing
Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii),
and the U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean. The SRGs were
established by the MMPA to review the
science that informs the SARs, and to
advise NMFS on marine mammal
population status, trends, and stock
structure, uncertainties in the science,
research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of
new information, including marine
mammal stranding and entanglement
data, observer program data, fishermen
self-reports, reports to the SRGs,
conference papers, FMPs, and ESA
documents.
The LOF for 2021 was based on,
among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs,
primarily the 2019 SARs, which are
based on data from 2013–2017. The
SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2016 (82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017), 2018
(84 FR 28489; June 19, 2019), and 2019
(84 FR 65353; November 27, 2019). The
SARs are available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/
marine-mammal-protection/marinemammal-stock-assessment-reportsregion.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
NMFS received nine comment letters
on the proposed LOF for 2021 (85 FR
59258; September 21, 2020). Comments
were received from members of the
public, Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen’s
Association (AOLA), Freezer Longline
Coalition (FLC), Hawaii Longline
Association (HLA), Maine Lobstermen’s
Association (MLA), Massachusetts
Division of Marine Fisheries (MA DMF),
Marine Mammal Commission
(Commission) and Whale Safe USA.
Responses to substantive comments are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
General Comments
Comment 1: A commenter
recommends that NMFS require
Category III fisheries to accommodate
observers aboard vessels in order to
expand data collection on marine
mammal bycatch in fisheries.
Response: MMPA section 118 requires
individuals participating in a Category I
or II fishery to accommodate an observer
aboard their vessel(s) upon request from
NMFS. In addition, MMPA section
118(d)(7) provides NMFS, with the
consent by the vessel owner, the ability
to place an observer on board a vessel
participating in Category III fisheries (50
CFR 229.7(d)). The MMPA and
implementing regulations (50 CFR
229.6) also include a marine mammal
mortality and injury reporting
requirement for all Category I, II and III
fisheries. Any vessel owner or operator
participating in a fishery listed on the
LOF must report to NMFS all incidental
mortalities and injuries of marine
mammals that occur during commercial
fishing operations within 48 hours of
the end of the fishing trip.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean
Comment 2: FLC recommends NMFS
reclassify the AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands (BSAI) Pacific cod longline
fishery from a Category II to Category III.
They note that the following marine
mammal stocks are included on the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery: Killer whale (Eastern North
Pacific AK resident); killer whale (Gulf
of Alaska, BSAI transient); Northern fur
seal (Eastern Pacific); spotted seal (AK)
and Steller sea lion (Western U.S). FLC
provides evidence that from 2013
through 2017 the only marine mammal
stock incidentally killed or injured in
the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery
was the Western U.S. stock of Steller sea
lions and these did not result in annual
M/SI greater than 1 percent of the
stock’s PBR level.
FLC also states that the BSAI Pacific
cod longline fishery is currently
classified as a Category II based on a
killer whale M/SI in 2012. They note
that this M/SI is assigned to both the
resident and transient stocks of killer
whales and is outside the 5 year
timeframe (2013–2017) of the 2021 LOF.
Therefore, FLC recommends that the
BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery be
reclassified as a Category III fishery.
Response: NMFS reviewed the
information provided and agrees with
FLC. One killer whale (Gulf of Alaska,
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
BSAI transient stock) M/SI was driving
the Category II classification of the BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery. This killer
whale M/SI occurred in 2012, and no
additional M/SI have been observed or
reported for the 2013–2017 data analysis
timeframe for this fishery. Therefore,
NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI Pacific
cod longline fishery from a Category II
to a Category III fishery in this final rule.
NMFS also removes both the Eastern
North Pacific AK resident stock and
Gulf of Alaska, BSAI transient stock of
killer whales from the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery.
Comment 3: FLC recommends NMFS
re-evaluate how a single marine
mammal M/SI is assigned to multiple
stocks when stock ranges overlap. They
state that the M/SI should be distributed
between stocks based on the relative
proportion of the population of the two
stocks combined.
As noted in the 2016 SAR (Muto et
al., 2017), the 2012 killer whale M/SI in
the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery
was assigned to both the resident and
transient stocks of killer whale, given no
genetic samples were collected and the
overlap in the range of the two stocks in
Alaska waters. FLC further states that
NMFS attributes the single M/SI to both
stocks equally. However, the probability
of encountering either stock is not 100
percent, but proportional to the relative
population of the stocks throughout the
range. The commenter notes that
revising the single M/SI between both
killer whale stocks (based on probability
of encounter) would distribute the
single 2012 M/SI in the BSAI Pacific
cod longline fishery from 100 percent
for both stocks to 80 percent to the
resident stock and 20 percent to the
transient stock.
Response: The SARs are drafted
according to NMFS’ ‘‘Guidelines for
Preparing Stock Assessment Reports
Pursuant to the 1994 Amendments to
the MMPA’’ (NMFS 2016, 02–204–01).
This provides directives for consistently
assigning M/SI to stocks, including
times when the M/SI is documented in
an area of overlapping stocks. Because
there were no data to indicate specific
stock or reliable data that could be used
to partition the 2012 killer whale M/SI,
the M/SI was assigned to both stocks as
prescribed by NMFS’ ‘‘Guidelines for
Preparing Stock Assessment Reports
Pursuant to the 1994 Amendments to
the MMPA’’.
Comment 4: FLC requests that NMFS
update the LOF fishery fact sheet for the
Category II BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery. The LOF fishery fact sheet for
the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
has an incorrect description for the
observer coverage in both the catcher
processor and catcher vessel longline
sectors. The description of observer
coverage included in the LOF fishery
fact sheet is outdated and does not
reflect the Observer Program structuring
for catcher processor and catcher vessels
sectors since 2012.
Response: NMFS thanks FLC for
bringing to our attention that the
observer coverage information in the AK
BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery fact
sheet on NMFS’ website needs
updating. The fishery fact sheets
summarize LOF classification
information for the public and we will
review and correct this error.
Comment 5: The Commission restates
a previous comment and recommends
NMFS reclassify both the Category II SE
Alaska salmon drift gillnet and Yakutat
salmon set gillnet fisheries as Category
I fisheries. The Commission previously
noted that the 2016 SAR for the
Southeast Alaska stock of harbor
porpoise reported a population-size
estimate of 975 and an estimated
minimum population size (Nmin) of
896, which produced a PBR of 8.9
animals. That 2016 SAR also reported a
total annual M/SI estimate of 34 animals
for the two fisheries combined. The
Commission states that the estimated
annual M/SI has not changed, and
although the stock’s PBR increased to 12
in the 2019 SAR, fishery-related M/SI
still exceed PBR by nearly threefold.
The Commission states that the
clearer case can be made for
reclassifying the Category II SE Alaska
salmon drift gillnet fishery as a Category
I fishery. They note that the estimated
annual harbor porpoise M/SI in the SE
Alaska salmon drift gillnet fishery
included the 2019 SAR is 12 animals
which equals PBR for the stock and
exceeds the Category I classification
threshold of 50 percent of PBR. The
Commission continues to state that this
M/SI estimate is based on data collected
in salmon management areas 6–8 in
2012 and 2013, and is a conservative
estimate since salmon management
areas 6–8 comprise only a small portion
of the total area surveyed.
The Commission notes that is more
difficult to address the harbor porpoise
M/SI in Category II Yakutat salmon set
gillnet because there is a geographical
disconnect between where observer data
was collected and the population
surveys were conducted. Thus, the
comparison of the estimated annual M/
SI does not provide a meaningful basis
for classifying this fishery, given the
likely population structure found in the
Southeast Alaska (SEAK) harbor
porpoise stock, as described in the 2019
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
SAR. Therefore, the Commission
reiterates its recommendation that
NMFS reclassify the SE Alaska salmon
drift gillnet as a Category I fishery.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 85 FR 21079,
April 16, 2020). The PBR level for the
SEAK harbor porpoise stock was
estimated based on a survey that
covered only a portion of the currentlyrecognized distribution of this stock,
and it included commercial fishery M/
SI that occurred far north of the
surveyed areas. Over the last year,
NMFS has made substantial progress in
analyzing genetic data to resolve stock
structure of harbor porpoise in
Southeast Alaska. Once finalized, the
analysis of these data will be helpful in
addressing management concerns
related to SEAK harbor porpoise and
effects from commercial fishing. NMFS
continues to pursue options for
additional observer coverage to collect
more recent and more geographically
comprehensive data on mortality in
Alaska’s state fisheries, and we will
prioritize observation of the Southeast
Alaska drift gillnet fishery. For the 2021
LOF, NMFS retains the Category II
classification for the Yakutat salmon set
gillnet and SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet fisheries until more data are
available.
Comment 6: HLA restates a previous
comment recommending NMFS remove
the Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI)
insular and Northwestern Hawaiian
Islands (NWHI) stocks of false killer
whales from the list of species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery. HLA notes that (a) the False
Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan
(FKWTRP) closed the deep-set longline
fishery for almost the entire range of the
MHI insular stock, (b) since this change
was made in 2013 there have been no
false killer whale interactions in the
fishery, and (c) there has never been a
deep-set longline fishery interaction in
the very small area of the stocks’ range
where the fishery operates. The
commenter also states that no
information has been presented to the
False Killer Whale TRT or the Pacific
Scientific Review Group suggesting any
false killer whale interactions in the
deep-set fishery can reliably be
attributed to the Insular or NWHI stocks
of false killer whales. HLA requests that
NMFS remove the MHI insular and
NWHI stocks of false killer whales from
the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I Hawaii deep-set longline
fishery.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 84 FR 22051,
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3033
May 16, 2019; 85 FR 21079, April 16,
2020). The MHI insular stock of false
killer whales have been documented via
telemetry to move far enough offshore to
reach longline fishing areas (Bradford et
al., 2015). The MHI insular, Hawaii
pelagic, and NWHI stocks have partially
overlapping ranges. MHI insular false
killer whales have been satellite tracked
as far as 115 km from the MHI, while
pelagic stock animals have been tracked
to within 11 kilometers (km) of the MHI
and throughout the NWHI. Thus, M/SI
of false killer whales of unknown stock
within the stock overlap zones must be
prorated to MHI insular, pelagic, or
NWHI stocks. Annual bycatch estimates
are prorated using a process outlined in
detail in the SARs, which account for
M/SI that occur within the MHI-pelagic
or NWHI-pelagic overlap zones.
For observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has evidence of fisheries
interactions that cannot be attributed to
a specific fishery, and stranding
network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be
attributed to a specific fishery), stocks
may be retained on the LOF for longer
than 5 years. For these fisheries, NMFS
will review the other sources of relevant
information to determine when it is
appropriate to remove a species or stock
from the LOF. As described in the 2019
LOF (84 FR 22051, May 16, 2019), six
false killer whale M/SI incidental to the
deep-set longline fishery were observed
inside the exclusive economic zone
(EEZ) around Hawaii, including three
that occurred close to the outer
boundary of the Main Hawaiian Islands
Longline Fishing Prohibited Area, in
close proximity to the outer boundary of
the MHI Insular false killer whale
stocks’ range. Also, MHI Insular false
killer whale range overlaps with areas
that are open to deep-set longline
fishing and MHI Insular false killer
whales have been documented with
injuries consistent with fisheries
interactions that have not been
attributed to a specific fishery (Baird et
al., 2014). Additionally, in August 2020,
NMFS reopened the Southern Exclusion
Zone to Hawaii deep-set longline fishing
(85 FR 50959, August 19, 2020).
In addition to the SARs, NMFS also
reviews other sources of new
information for the LOF, including
injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, and observer data. In
some cases, more recent information
may be available and used in the LOF.
In January 2019, there was an observed
mortality of a false killer whale
incidental to the Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery that occurred within the
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3034
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
range of the NWHI stock. Therefore,
NMFS retains both the MHI insular and
NWHI false killer whale stocks on the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category I
Hawaii deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 7: HLA restates a previous
comment opposing the inclusion of the
Hawaii stocks of Kogia species (pygmy
or dwarf sperm whales) on the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category I HI deep-set
longline fishery. HLA requests that
NMFS remove Kogia species from the
list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the deep-set longline
fishery because SARs for the two stock
does not include M/SI in the deep-set
fishery.
Response: This comment has been
addressed previously (see 84 FR 22051,
May 16, 2019). The 2021 LOF generally
summarizes data from 2013–2017, and
in addition to the SARs, the LOF also
reviews other sources of information,
including injury determination reports
and observer data. In February 2014,
there was an observed interaction with
a pygmy sperm whale (Kogia breviceps)
in the Category I HI deep-set longline
fishery. Therefore, NMFS retains Kogia
on the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I HI deep-set longline fishery.
Comment 8: HLA recommends NMFS
remove the Central North Pacific
humpback whale stock from the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II HI shallowset longline fishery. HLA states that the
proposed 2021 LOF includes the Central
North Pacific stock of humpback whales
on the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured from the
Category II HI shallow-set longline
fishery, but the most recent SAR does
not identify M/SI in the shallow-set
fishery. The HI shallow-set longline
fishery has 100 percent observer
coverage and therefore, the Central
North Pacific stock of humpback whale
stock should be removed the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category II HI shallowset longline fishery.
Response: In addition to the M/SI
included in the SARs, the LOF
references data from injury
determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data,
logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports, and anecdotal
reports. In March 2015, there was an
observed humpback whale, Central
North Pacific stock, injury in the
Category II Hawaii shallow-set longline
fishery. The injury was determined to be
non-serious. Due to the observed injury,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
the Central North Pacific stock of
humpback whale is retained on the list
of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II HI
shallow-set longline fishery.
Comment 9: The Commission
recommends that NMFS reclassify the
Category III Hawaii troll fishery as a
Category II fishery. The Commission
states that NMFS proposed to reclassify
the Category III Hawaii charter vessel
fishery, which is primarily a troll
fishery, and the HI trolling, rod and reel
fisheries as Category II fisheries in the
2012 LOF (76 FR 37716, June 28, 2011).
In the proposed rule, NMFS based the
proposed change on reports of hooking
spotted dolphins, and information on
the prevalence of vessels from these
fisheries targeting Pantropical spotted
dolphin pods. NMFS estimated that M/
SI would be, at a minimum,
approximately 2 percent of PBR,
justifying the Category II classifications
for both fisheries. The Commission
notes the final 2012 LOF (76 FR 73912,
November 29, 2011) did not finalize the
fishery proposed reclassifications.
The Commission states that
implementing regulations allow for
NMFS, in the absence of reliable
estimates of the M/SI, to determine
whether M/SI occurs ‘not at all or with
a remote likelihood’ (Category III),
‘occasionally’ (Category II), or
‘frequently’ based on analogy to similar
fisheries. This is the approach NMFS
took this approach in 2012 proposed
LOF.
The Commission also notes that the
case for reclassifying the troll fisheries
as Category II fisheries has strengthened
since serious injuries due to hooking or
entanglement in fishing line have been
documented, and reliable estimates of
rates of troll vessels fishing in and
through spotted dolphin groups have
been published (Baird and Webster,
2020). In addition, the spotted dolphin
stock considered in 2011, was later split
into four stocks (three insular and one
pelagic) in the 2013 SAR, and each of
the insular stocks is likely to have a
smaller PBR than the estimates used in
2012 proposed LOF. Given NMFS’s
assessment in 2012 proposed LOF that
interactions were likely ‘occasional’,
combined with more recent information,
the Commission recommends that
NMFS reclassify the Category III Hawaii
troll fishery as a Category II fishery.
Response: As noted by the
Commission, there are four stocks of
pantropical spotted dolphins in the
Hawaii Islands region: Oahu stock, 4Islands stock, Hawaii Island stock, and
Hawaii pelagic stock. In 2014, one
pantropical spotted dolphin from the
Hawaii Island stock was observed
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
hooked above the jaw and trailing 8–10
feet of fishing line (Bradford and
Lyman, 2018). In 2017, a spotted
dolphin from the 4-Islands stock was
observed with a band of debris around
its rostrum preventing it from opening
its mouth (Bradford and Lyman, 2019).
Both of these injuries are considered
serious injuries and the responsible
fishery is not known for either case. In
addition, of the four pantropical spotted
dolphin stocks, only the Hawaii pelagic
stock has a minimum population
estimate and resulting PBR.
Without known M/SI attributed to the
HI troll fishery, and a minimum
population estimate and PBR for only
one of the four stocks, we evaluated
classification of the fishery by analogy.
However, in reviewing available data,
there are no documented mortalities or
injuries of pantropical spotted dolphins
in similar fisheries. There are no current
data on interactions with pantropical
dolphins (or other dolphin species) in
any other Pacific Ocean commercial
troll fisheries. In other stocks of
pantropical dolphins, the only
documented fishery-related M/SI in the
Northern Gulf of Mexico stock of
pantropical are incidental to the pelagic
longline fishery (2015 SAR). The
Western North Atlantic stock of
pantropical spotted dolphins’ total
annual estimated fishery-related M/SI is
presumed to be zero, as there were no
reports of mortalities or serious injuries
(2019 SAR). There are no documented
interactions with pantropical spotted
dolphins in commercial troll fisheries
on the high seas (2020 LOF). Therefore,
the HI troll fishery cannot be classified
by analogy to other fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques that are
known to cause mortality or serious
injury of pantropical spotted dolphins.
The mentioned study, (Baird and
Webster, 2020) presented findings on
the magnitude and nature of
associations between fishing vessels and
pantropical spotted dolphin stocks. The
study did not estimate mortality or
injury rates incidental to fisheries.
Results of the study indicated that there
is a high frequency of associations
between troll and rod and reel fishing,
and pantropical spotted dolphins, and
in particular with the Hawaii Island
stock. This information suggests
hookings and/or entanglements may
occur, and the fishing technique of
trolling through groups and
repositioning presents a heightened risk
of hooking or entanglement to
pantropical spotted dolphins. However,
this information alone does not provide
sufficient evidence with which to
conclude that spotted dolphins are
being seriously injured or killed on an
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
‘‘occasional basis’’ as necessary for a
Category II fishery classification.
Therefore, NMFS is retaining the
Category III classification of the Hawaii
troll fishery.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in
the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Comment 10: MLA states that NMFS
has the flexibility to consider a variety
of criteria, such as differences in gear
and fishing techniques, and the
distribution of endangered stocks
relative to individual fisheries when
classifying fisheries on the LOF. The
commenter notes that the Maine state
waters lobster fishery is managed and
enforced by the state of Maine. While
the Federal waters portion of the Maine
lobster fishery is managed through the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries
Commission as part of Lobster
Management Area 1, it is also subject to
further regulation and enforcement by
the state of Maine through the Lobster
Management Policy Councils. In
addition, Maine’s state and Federal
waters lobstermen must declare a
lobster zone and are required to fish the
majority of gear in their home zone,
limiting the spatial footprint of where
individual lobstermen can set gear.
MLA states that this requirement
differentiates the Maine lobster fishery
from all other lobster fisheries
throughout the Northeast and midAtlantic.
Response: NMFS agrees that the
Agency has the flexibility to separate
out individual fisheries where it is
appropriate; however, the commenter
has not presented adequate information
to substantiate any difference in risk
that Maine state and Federal lobster
fisheries pose to North Atlantic right
whales, or other large whale species,
that would warrant a current change in
classification for these fisheries. As
stated in the 2020 Final LOF (85 FR
21079, April 16, 2020), fisheries are
classified based on the gear types used,
how the gear is fished, and the behavior
of the fishery related to the risk to
marine mammals. Multiple states
participate in the Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery, using a wide variety of gear and
gear configurations throughout a large
portion of coastal waters. While we
recognize this variety within the fishery
at large, there are not clear boundaries
to divide gear use across the wider area
as suggested by this comment.
Importantly, the state of Maine does not
use unique gear configurations from
other states and gear configurations
within Maine’s waters are not uniform
or divided across the geographic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
boundaries (i.e., exemption lines) that
MLA has identified. Further, gear
marking and right whale monitoring
efforts throughout Maine waters are
insufficient to determine that the gear or
area presents a different risk to large
whales. Below we provide further detail
as to why the information presented by
the MLA is insufficient for the requested
changes. At this time, we do not have
enough information to suggest Maine’s
fisheries should be split from the
Northeast/mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery, because the gear
used in Maine waters is not unique from
other states.
While NMFS appreciates the state of
Maine’s efforts to manage the footprint
of where individual lobstermen may set
their gear, NMFS must look at the risk
that the gear itself poses to large whales,
particularly North Atlantic right whales.
Current Maine state lobster management
does not represent unique gear
characteristics (e.g., the use of weak
rope exclusively or exclusion of vertical
lines). In non-exempted waters, risk
reduction can be calculated based on
implemented changes to gear
configurations, and if that risk reduction
is substantial enough, NMFS could
revisit the fishery classification in a
future LOF.
Comment 11: MLA states that the
NMFS Category I Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery does not accurately capture
marine mammal interactions and risk.
MLA recommends NMFS classify
Maine’s state and Federal water’s lobster
fisheries as unique fisheries, separate
from the Category I Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery.
The commenter notes that in the
absence of sufficient data to properly
classify all fisheries, the MMPA
provides that NMFS may evaluate other
factors such as fishing techniques, gear
used, methods used to deter marine
mammals, target species, seasons and
areas fished, qualitative data from
logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding
data, and the species and distribution of
marine mammals in the area, or at the
discretion of the Assistant
Administrator for Fisheries. MLA
further states that there are several
factors with disparity among the
Northeast and mid-Atlantic lobster
fisheries, as well as significant
differences in potential overlap with
North Atlantic right whales. These
differences among the lobster fisheries
include: Fishing techniques, gear used,
seasons and areas fished, fishermen’s
observations of right whales and
distribution of marine mammals. MLA
alleges that based on these factors, the
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3035
lobster fishery prosecuted close to shore
in Maine is significantly different than
lobster fisheries which occur in offshore
Lobster Management Area 3 or off of
New Jersey.
MLA also alleges that Maine’s state
and Federal lobster fisheries do not
meet the criteria of a Category I fishery
under the MMPA. MLA recommends
NMFS reclassify the Maine state waters
lobster fishery as Category III fishery
since there are no documented serious
injuries or mortalities with this fishery,
and NMFS determined that regulating
the waters exempt from the Atlantic
Large Whale Take Reduction Plan
(ALWTRP) would have no significant
benefit to large whales. MLA also
recommends NMFS reclassify the Maine
Federal waters lobster fishery as
Category II fishery. MLA alleges there
are no documented M/SI in the Maine
Federal lobster fishery, but the Category
II classification may be warranted under
an abundance of precaution that a future
interaction could occur due to the
offshore migration of North Atlantic
right whales.
MLA states that according to the 2019
North Atlantic right whale SAR, PBR is
0.8, and M/SI for commercial fisheries
is 5.55. MLA’s further analysis shows
zero M/SI attributed to the Maine
lobster fishery over this most recent 5
year period, while there were six
documented cases in Canadian trap/pot
fisheries. In addition, MLA alleges,
there has been only one right whale
entangled in Maine lobster gear in April
2002, and the entanglement was
determined to be a non-serious injury.
Maine gear was involved in a second
case in 2004, but it was not the primary
entangling gear in this case. The
commenter states that there are four
additional trap/pot entanglement cases
that resulted in right whale M/SI for
which a fishery was not determined
and, therefore, for which the Maine
lobster fishery cannot be completely
ruled out. However, a close look at these
cases reveals that the entangling gear is
no longer fished, efforts to trace
registration numbers to U.S. fishery
were unsuccessful, or a Maine fishery
was explicitly ruled out.
Response: NMFS uses the
classification criteria described in the
preamble to classify fisheries as
Category I, Category II, or Category III.
As noted, a fishery is classified under
Category I if the annual M/SI of a stock
in a given fishery is greater than or
equal to 50 percent of the stock’s PBR
level. Additional details regarding
categorization of fisheries is provided in
the preamble to the final rule
implementing section 118 of the MMPA
(60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3036
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
As noted in the section of this rule
and the LOF proposed rule describing
how NMFS determines which species or
stocks are included as incidentally
killed or injured in a fishery, for
fisheries with no observer coverage and
for observed fisheries with evidence
indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
fishery has evidence of fisheries
interactions that cannot be attributed to
a specific fishery, and stranding
network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be
attributed to a specific fishery), stocks
may be retained on the LOF for longer
than 5 years. For these fisheries, NMFS
will review the other sources of relevant
information to determine when it is
appropriate to remove a species or stock
from the LOF.
At this time, we consider it
appropriate to retain North Atlantic
right whales as a species listed as
driving the classification of the
Northeast/mid-Atlantic lobster trap/pot
fishery given that PBR is 0.8 and the
further detail provided below, which
reiterates responses provided in the
2020 Final LOF (85 FR 21079, April 16,
2020).
The commenter cites four cases of
unknown entanglements they believe
explicitly rule out Maine lobster
fisheries from the origin of
entanglement. However, the evidence
presented is not sufficient to draw these
conclusions. In one of the commenter’s
cited cases (E43–12/RW 4193), red
tracers were identified in the recovered
gear. Red tracers are indicative of the
gear marking scheme required for the
ALWTRP Northern Inshore Trap/Pot
fishery management area, a management
area that overlaps Maine, New
Hampshire, and Massachusetts state
waters. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out
that the entanglement may have
occurred off the coast of Maine in nonexempt waters. An additional case from
2011, previously noted in our 2020
Final LOF response to comments (85 FR
21079, April 16, 2020) but not
mentioned in MLA’s comment, also
included recovered gear with these red
tracers, though the location of that
entanglement remains unknown (E11–
11/RW 4040). Therefore, Maine lobster
trap/pot fisheries cannot be ruled out as
the potential origin for entanglements
with undetermined origins.
We also note that two additional
entanglements have been identified as
Massachusetts lobster trap/pot
entanglements (E36–16/RW 3623 and
E25–09). This is relevant to the
discussion since Maine state and
Federal lobster fisheries are functionally
equivalent to gear found in these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
entanglements; and, therefore, gear
fished in Maine presents similar risks.
While floating groundline is
prohibited in ALWTRP non-exempt
management areas, there are waters
along the east coast (including off the
coast of Maine) that are exempted from
this ALWTRP requirement. Therefore,
the recovery of floating groundline from
an entanglement does not explicitly rule
out Maine lobster fisheries. For
example, in case E25–10/RW 3911, the
gear analysis found ‘‘wire mesh is likely
the remains of wire traps that parted off
from themselves. This wire mesh, along
with the 7/16 inch poly and associated
gangions, is consistent with gear used in
trap/pot fisheries conducted along the
east coast of the U.S. and Canada’’
(NMFS 2010 Large Whale Entanglement
Report), which is consistent with some
gear fished in exempted waters.
Additionally, unless a rope diameter is
explicitly prohibited in an area, rope
diameter does not rule out the potential
for an entanglement to have occurred in
Maine waters, even if it does not
represent the majority’s normal fishing
practices. Therefore, the 9/16 inch float
rope that was recovered from E01–09/
RW 3311, again, does not explicitly rule
out Maine lobster fisheries.
With this request, the commenter is
also not taking into consideration the
high percentage of unidentified
entanglements that are both first sighted
in the U.S. and in Canada. Over the past
5 years, there have been 4.15 M/SI
entanglements documented annually
where the origin of the entanglement is
unknown (Hayes et al., 2020).
The sample size of recovered gear
from entanglements is small and much
of the retrieved gear is unmarked and
cannot be attributed to a particular
location. Currently, the state of Maine
does not require gear marking in
ALWTRP exempted areas. The lack of
marks on retrieved gear may indicate
the current marking scheme is
inadequate, or that entanglements are
occurring in areas where gear is not
currently marked, such as international
waters or current exempted areas. The
state is currently pursuing a gear
marking regime in these exempted
waters that may provide additional data
about entanglement risk in these areas
in the future.
The commenter alleges ‘‘There are
zero instances of Maine lobster gear
associated with a right whale serious
injury or mortality in any data set, and
only one known entanglement where
Maine lobster was the primary
entangling gear in 2002 resulting in nonserious injury determination.’’ We
recognize that there has only been one
confirmed mortality (in 2012) in
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
identified U.S. trap/pot gear in the past
decade. Those cases where we could
identify lobster gear from right whale
entanglements during the past 10 years
were determined to result in nonserious injuries. However, there have
been a number of life-threatening
entanglements since 2010 that have
resulted in a non-serious injury due to
disentanglement intervention. (Henry et
al., 2019). According to NMFS’ ‘‘Process
for Distinguishing Serious from NonSerious Injury of Marine Mammals
(NMFS 2015, 02–238–01),’’ cases that
would have been serious injuries prior
to disentanglement are not counted
against PBR in the SAR, but they are
included in the recorded takes for the
LOF and associated management
measures. Aerial surveys, whale
watching boats, the presence of other
fisheries, and the presence and
associated outreach by a
disentanglement team contribute to the
higher reporting of entanglement
sightings in certain areas (i.e.,
Massachusetts) than in Maine state and
offshore waters; we cannot conclude
that risk is nonexistent in other areas
where entanglements are not observed.
With 85 percent of all observed right
whales exhibiting entanglement scars, it
is likely that entanglements are indeed
occurring in areas where entanglements
have not yet been observed and/or
reported.
NMFS will continue to annually
evaluate marine mammal interactions
and risk posed by a variety of gear types
and fisheries through the LOF process.
As stated previously, should
information suggest that unique gear
characteristics have lowered the risk of
interaction in a particular
geographically unique portion of a
fishery, NMFS will evaluate to
determine if the risk reduction is
sufficient for separating the fishery out
from the broader, current, classification
of the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery.
As stated above, we find that there is
insufficient information to suggest that
Maine’s fisheries should be split from
the Northeast/mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery because the gear
used in Maine waters and the manner in
which the gear is used are not unique
from other states. Further, we maintain
that entanglement data indicate that the
gear used across this fishery remains a
risk to right whales. Should Maine
fisheries make significant changes to
their gear configurations that
differentiate these fisheries from other
state and Federal lobster trap/pot
fisheries, such as eliminating vertical
lines, NMFS will reconsider this
decision.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Comment 12: AOLA expresses
concern that data used in the LOF do
not represent the current conditions of
the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery nor
marine mammal stocks. The commenter
notes that the primary information used
in the 2021 LOF comes from 2019 SARs,
which are based on data from 2013–
2017. Yet since 2013, the northwest
Atlantic has undergone considerable
climatic changes that have influenced
the distributions of marine mammals
and their prey. AOLA further states that
the 2014 ALWTRP regulations as well as
the American lobster fishery
management plan regulations, reduced
vertical lines and enhanced gear
marking in the fishery. AOLA requests
NMFS incorporate more timely data and
recent information into the 2021 LOF.
Response: NMFS agrees that the best
available scientific information is
important for assessing the risk fisheries
pose to marine mammal stocks. NMFS
uses the best available scientific
information to prepare the annual LOF.
This includes relying on the SARs,
which are peer reviewed by the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
Scientific Review Group. The MMPA
established this SRG, along with two
others, to review the science that
informs the SARs, and to advise NMFS
on marine mammal population status,
trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research
needs, and other issues. We recognize
that this peer review process takes
additional time to ensure that the best
available are used to inform the LOF.
However, the SARs generally provide
the most current and inclusive
information on each stock’s PBR level
and level of interaction with
commercial fishing operations; there
may also be more recent reports that
include bycatch estimates.
Comment 13: AOLA expresses
concern with how NMFS assigns M/SI
when the origin of entanglement is
unknown. AOLA states to that
according to the 2019 North Atlantic
right whale SAR the 5-year mean
estimated M/SI from entanglements is
5.55. Of those, 0.2 were attributed to
U.S. fisheries, 1.2 to Canadian fisheries,
and the remaining 4.15 were
undetermined. The commenter notes
that NMFS splits undetermined North
Atlantic right whale M/SI evenly
between the two countries. However, 86
percent of known entanglements were
in Canadian gear. AOLA recommends
NMFS split undetermined North
Atlantic right whale M/SI between the
two countries based on the percentage
of known entanglements from each
country and this prorated distribution of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
M/SI should be used when classifying
fisheries on the LOF.
Response: For determining a fishery’s
classification on the LOF, NMFS must
assess the M/SI with respect to a stock’s
PBR. See response to comment #11
above about M/SI of right whales that is
attributed to the Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery.
With respect to the current unknown
North Atlantic right whale M/SI being
assumed to be divided between both
Canada and U.S. equally, this was a
scenario that NMFS generated to
support ALWTRT deliberations and is
not used for classifying fisheries on the
MMPA LOF. Given the additional
regulatory requirements for Category I
and II fisheries, NMFS uses known M/
SI that can be attributed to a specific
fishery for LOF analysis.
Comment 14: AOLA expresses
concern over the perceived lack of
parity when assessing the impacts of
fisheries on marine mammals. AOLA
understands that with limited observer
coverage and data gaps there is a level
of subjectivity into the LOF
classification process; however, the
process should be equal among
fisheries. The commenter notes that the
Northeast/mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery is classified as a
Category I fishery for North Atlantic
right whales, yet there has been only
one confirmed mortality in American
lobster trap/pot gear in the past decade
(2012) and no documented serious
injuries (as stated in the 2020 LOF final
rule). In the 2020 LOF final rule, NMFS
cites all U.S. undetermined M/SI,
potential M/SI prevented by
intervention, and North Atlantic right
whale entanglement scarring rates as
data used for the Category I
classification of the Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery. AOLA recommends NMFS take
a more equitable approach when
assessing entanglement risk across
fisheries, countries, and non-fishery
sources, and also notes this would assist
in assuring fishermen are treated fairly.
Response: The LOF is the annual
process NMFS conducts to place all U.S.
commercial fisheries into one of three
categories based on the level of
incidental mortality and serious injury
of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery. See response to comment #11
above about how cases that would have
been serious injuries prior to
disentanglement are not counted against
PBR in the SAR, but are included in the
LOF classification process.
For fisheries with no observer
coverage and for observed fisheries with
evidence indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g.,
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3037
fishery has low observer coverage and
stranding network data include
evidence of fisheries interactions that
cannot be attributed to a specific
fishery), NMFS uses the best available
data to inform the LOF; thus, data older
than 5 years may be used to retain a
fishery classification or the list of
species and stocks killed/injured
incidental to a fishery. For these
fisheries, NMFS will review the other
sources of information listed above and
use its discretion to decide when it is
appropriate to remove a species or
stock.
The assessment of large whale M/SI in
fisheries with limited observer coverage
remains a considerable challenge
compared to other gear types that
interact with pinniped or small
cetaceans. In fisheries with sufficient
observer coverage, NMFS extrapolates
annual M/SI estimates for bycaught
species. However, large whale fishery
interaction assessments are dependent
on direct counts of entangled whales,
not the fishery per se. This observed
count of entanglements is not
representative of total fishery-related M/
SI that goes undetected or unattributed
to a particular cause, and therefore
represents the minimum M/SI. A
method to assign cause to these
unknown, as well as undetected
mortalities, while addressing country
entanglement of origin, is currently
under development (Hayes et al., 2020).
When these estimations become
available, NMFS will solicit public
comment through the SAR publication
process.
Comment 15: MA DMF recommends
NMFS reclassify the Massachusetts state
waters lobster trap/pot fishery as its
own non-Category I fishery, separate
from the Category I Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery based on the gear restrictions
and large whale conservation programs
that are unique to Massachusetts. They
note that the state of Massachusetts has
a number of actions currently in place,
as well as a number of additional
actions that will be in place for the 2021
fishing season, that distinguish the
Massachusetts state lobster trap/pot
fishery as unique from the rest of the
Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery. MA
DMF states that they are the only state
lobster trap/trap fishery implementing
the following actions either currently or
in the future: (1) Lobster trap/pot fishery
closure from February 1st to April 30th
(currently in place for the Massachusetts
Bay Restricted Area, proposed closure of
all state waters beginning February 1,
2021); (2) dynamic extension of the
lobster trap/pot fishery closure to ensure
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
3038
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
safe passage of right whales from our
waters prior to fixed gear being set
(currently in place for the Massachusetts
Bay Restricted Area, proposed for all
state waters beginning February 1,
2021); (3) ban use of vertical buoy lines
greater than 3⁄8 inch diameter (proposed
to begin February 1, 2021); (4) ban
fishing single traps by the majority of its
active fleet (proposed to begin January
1, 2022); (5) universal requirement of
1,700 pound breaking strength line or
equivalent contrivance (proposed to
begin February 1, 2021); (6) permitting
and regulatory scheme designed to
reduce participation and effort over time
(currently in place); and (7)
demonstrated substantial decline in the
number of participants and the number
of buoy lines deployed (currently in
place). Based on these mitigation efforts,
MA DMF recommends NMFS reclassify
the Massachusetts state waters lobster
trap/pot fishery as its own non-Category
I fishery.
Response: NMFS appreciates the
actions the state of Massachusetts has
taken, and continues to take, to help
conserve and protect North Atlantic
right whales. However, the current
implemented measures are not enough
to suggest Massachusetts’s state waters
lobster trap/pot fishery should be split
from the Category I Northeast/midAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery. At this time, NMFS retains the
Category I classification for the
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery, which includes
the state waters of Massachusetts.
Additional detail on how gear would be
considered unique to differentiate it
from other state lobster and trap/pot
fisheries is included in response to
Comment #11. NMFS looks forward to
seeing what measures the state of
Massachusetts will finalize and
implement for the state lobster trap/pot
fishery in the future. Should major
changes to lobster gear and fishing
practices be required and implemented
for all Massachusetts state lobster
fishing gear, making this gear unique
and easily identified from other state
and Federal gear, NMFS will re-evaluate
the status of this fishery and consider it
in a future proposed LOF.
Comment 16: Whale Safe USA
requests NMFS maintain the Category I
classifications for Northeast/MidAtlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery and Northeast sink gillnet
fishery.
Response: As stated above in response
to Comments #11 and 15, NMFS retains
the Category I classification of the
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery. Additionally,
no data is currently available to suggest
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
state fisheries should be separated from
the Category I Northeast sink gillnet
fishery, therefore NMFS retains the
Category I classification for the
Northeast sink gillnet fishery.
Summary of Changes From the
Proposed Rule
NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery from a
Category II to Category III fishery. NMFS
also removes both the Eastern North
Pacific AK resident stock and Gulf of
Alaska, BSAI transient stock of killer
whales from the list of species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery.
NMFS updates the MMAP certificate
process for calendar year 2021. MMAP
certificates issued in 2020 remain in
effect, valid through December 31, 2021,
for vessel or gear owners participating
in all Category I and II fisheries as of the
final 2021 LOF.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for
2021
The following summarizes changes to
the LOF for 2021, including the
classification of fisheries, fisheries
listed, the estimated number of vessels/
persons in a particular fishery, and the
species and/or stocks that are
incidentally killed or injured in a
particular fishery. NMFS re-classifies
two fisheries in the LOF for 2021. NMFS
also makes changes to the estimated
number of vessels/persons and list of
species and/or stocks killed or injured
in certain fisheries. The classifications
and definitions of U.S. commercial
fisheries for 2021 are identical to those
provided in the LOF for 2020 with the
changes discussed below. State and
regional abbreviations used in the
following paragraphs include: AK
(Alaska), CA (California), HI (Hawaii),
OR (Oregon), WA (Washington), and
WNA (Western North Atlantic).
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific
Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS reclassifies the AK Bering Sea,
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot fishery
from a Category III to a Category II
fishery.
NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery from at
Category II to Category III fishery.
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
CA/OR/WA stock of minke whale
indicating it is driving the Category II
classification of the CA thresher shark/
swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh)
fishery.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Pacific Ocean
(Table 1) as follows:
Category I
• HI deep-set longline fishery from
145 to 143 vessels/persons;
Category II
• HI shallow-set longline fishery from
18 to 11 vessels/persons;
• American Samoa longline fishery
from 15 to 13 vessels/persons; and
Category III
• American Samoa bottomfish
handline fishery from fewer than 30 to
fewer than 20 vessels/persons.
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Aleutian Islands stock
of harbor seal to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands rockfish trawl fishery.
NMFS adds three stocks to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II AK Bering
Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot
fishery: (1) Bristol Bay stock of harbor
seal, (2) Western North Pacific stock of
humpback whale, and (3) Central North
Pacific stock of humpback whale.
NMFS adds both the Eastern North
Pacific Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian Islands,
and Bering Sea Transient stock, and
West Coast Transient stock, of killer
whales to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II CA Dungeness crab pot
fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category III CA squid
purse seine fishery: (1) CA/OR/WA
stock of Risso’s dolphin and (2) U.S.
stock of California sea lion.
NMFS adds the Cook Inlet stock of
harbor seal to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III AK Gulf of Alaska halibut
longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Aleutian Islands stock
of harbor seal to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands Atka mackerel trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the U.S. stock of
California sea lion to the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III WA/OR/CA shrimp
trawl fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category III WA/OR/CA
groundfish trawl fishery: (1) California
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
breeding stock of northern elephant seal
and (2) CA/OR/WA stock of northern
right whale dolphin.
NMFS adds to the Western North
Pacific stock of humpback whale to the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category III AK/WA/
OR/CA commercial passenger fishing
vessel fishery. NMFS removes three
stocks from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands pollock trawl fishery: (1) Alaska
stock of ringed seal, (2) Central North
Pacific stock of humpback whale and (3)
Western North Pacific stock of
humpback whale.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of
ringed seal from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands Pacific cod longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Western U.S.
stock of Steller sea lion from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in the Category II AK Gulf of
Alaska sablefish longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of
ringed seal from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III AK Bering Sea, Aleutian
Islands Pacific cod trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of
harbor seal from the list of species/
stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category III AK Gulf of Alaska
flatfish trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery Name and Organizational
Changes and Clarification
NMFS adds a superscript ‘‘1’’ to the
following four stocks to indicate they
are driving the Category II classification
of the Northeast trawl fishery: (1)
Western North Atlantic stock of Risso’s
dolphin, (2) Western North Atlantic
stock of long-finned pilot whale, (3)
Western North Atlantic offshore stock of
bottlenose dolphin, and (4) Western
North Atlantic stock of gray seal.
NMFS clarifies the fishery description
of the Category II Southeastern U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery. NMFS clarifies that this fishery
targets shrimp species with various gear
types, but mainly utilizes skimmer or
otter trawls. These gear types likely
entangle marine mammals, particularly
bottlenose dolphins, in very similar
ways. The common entangling
mechanism of these gear types are the
‘‘lazy’’ or ‘‘easy’’ line.
NMFS clarifies the fishery description
of the Category I Atlantic Ocean,
Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline fishery. NMFS clarifies that the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
fishery does not target bluefin tuna,
shortfin mako sharks and other shark
species.
As discussed in the proposed rule,
NMFS clarifies its response to Comment
#14 in the 2020 Final LOF (85 FR 21079;
April 16, 2020). In Comment #14, MLA
notes ‘‘there has been only one right
whale entangled in Maine gear in April
2002, and the entanglement was
determined to be a non-serious injury.
There are two additional non-serious
injury entanglement cases that involved
Maine lobster gear. However, Maine
lobster gear was not the primary
entangling gear in these cases.’’ In the
2020 Final LOF, NMFS’ response in part
to this comment stated: ‘‘We recognize
that there has only been one confirmed
mortality (in 2012) in American lobster
gear in the past decade. All other
documented lobster interactions were
determined to result in non-serious
injuries. However, there have been a
number of entanglements for which
interventions occurred because these
entanglements were determined to be
resulting in serious injuries (Henry et
al., 2019).’’
NMFS clarifies part of the response to
Comment #14 to state: We recognize
there has been only one confirmed
mortality (in 2012) in the past decade in
U.S. Northern inshore/nearshore trap/
pot gear which could be gear from the
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery or the Atlantic
mixed species trap/pot fishery. All other
documented lobster interactions were
determined to result in non-serious
injuries. However, there have been a
number of entanglements for which
interventions occurred because these
entanglements were determined to be
resulting in serious injuries (Henry et
al., 2019).
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of vessels/persons in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
(Table 2) as follows:
Category I
• Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery from
3,950 to 4,020 vessels/person;
• Northeast sink gillnet fishery from
3,163 to 4,072 vessels/persons;
Category II
• Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet
fishery from 248 to 265 vessels/persons;
• Northeast bottom trawl fishery from
2,238 to 968 vessels/persons;
• Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery from 4,950
to 10,824 vessels/persons;
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
3039
• Atlantic mixed species trap/pot
fishery from 3,332 to 3,493 vessels/
persons;
• Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine
fishery from 19 to 17 vessels/persons;
• Virginia pound net fishery from 26
to 20 vessels/persons;
Category III
• Caribbean gillnet fishery from >991
to 127 vessels/persons;
• Caribbean mixed species trap/pot
fishery from >501 to 154 vessels/
persons;
• Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot
fishery from >197 to 40 vessels/persons;
and
• Caribbean haul/beach seine fishery
from 15 to 38 vessels/person.
NMFS notes there is variability in the
estimated number of vessels/persons in
the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of
Mexico shrimp trawl fishery. This
variability is due to multiple permitting
agencies, differences in fishery
management, and artifacts with
available data sets. A complete
explanation of the variability is
available in the Environmental Impact
Statement to Reduce the Incidental
Bycatch and Mortality of Sea Turtles in
the Southeastern U.S. Shrimp Fisheries
(November 4, 2019).
List of Species and/or Stocks
Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
NMFS adds the Mobile Bay,
Bonsecour Bay stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II Gulf of Mexico gillnet
fishery.
NMFS adds the Western North
Atlantic offshore stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II mid-Atlantic mid-water
trawl (including pair trawl) fishery.
NMFS adds the Puerto Rico and U.S.
Virgin Islands stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in
Category III Caribbean mixed species
trap/pot fishery.
Following consultation with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, NMFS adds
the Antillean subspecies (Puerto Rico
stock) of West Indian manatee to the list
of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in Category III Caribbean haul/
beach seine fishery.
NMFS removes the Western North
Atlantic offshore stock of bottlenose
dolphin from the list of species/stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III Gulf of Maine, U.S. mid-
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3040
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hookand line/harpoon fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number
of HSFCA permits for high seas fisheries
(Table 3) as follows:
Category I
• Atlantic highly migratory species
longline fishery from 53 to 45 HSFCA
permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI
deep-set component) fishery from 145 to
143 HSFCA permits;
Category II
• South Pacific tuna purse seine
fishery from 33 to 26 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific tuna longline fishery
from 2 to 3 HSFCA permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI
shallow-set component) fishery from 18
to 11 HSFCA permits;
• Atlantic highly migratory species
handline/pole and line fishery from 2 to
1 HSFCA permits;
• Pacific highly migratory species
handline/pole and line fishery from 41
to 43 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific albacore troll
handline/pole and line fishery from 11
to 10 HSFCA permits;
• South Pacific albacore troll fishery
from 17 to 18 HSFCA permits;
• Western Pacific pelagic troll fishery
from 5 to 4 HSFCA permits;
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Category III
• Northwest Atlantic bottom longline
fishery from 3 to 2 HSFCA permits;
• Pacific highly migratory species
longline fishery from 108 to 105 HSFCA
permits; and
• Pacific highly migratory species
troll fishery from 119 to 111 HSFCA
permits.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list
of U.S. commercial fisheries according
to their classification under section 118
of the MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial
fisheries in the Pacific Ocean (including
Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial
fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of
Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists
commercial fisheries on the high seas,
and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated
number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating
within U.S. waters is expressed in terms
of the number of active participants in
the fishery, when possible. If this
information is not available, the
estimated number of vessels or persons
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
licensed for a particular fishery is
provided. If no recent information is
available on the number of participants,
vessels, or persons licensed in a fishery,
then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of
vessels or persons in the fishery. NMFS
acknowledges that, in some cases, these
estimates may be inflations of actual
effort. For example, the State of Hawaii
does not issue fishery-specific licenses,
and the number of participants reported
in the LOF represents the number of
commercial marine license holders who
reported using a particular fishing gear
type/method at least once in a given
year, without considering how many
times the gear was used. For these
fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the
fisherman used the gear only once or
every day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New
England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each
fishery, given the multiple gear types for
which several state permits may allow.
Changes made to Mid-Atlantic and New
England fishery participants will not
affect observer coverage or bycatch
estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel
trip reports and landings data. Tables 1
and 2 serve to provide a description of
the fishery’s potential effort (state and
Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types
used by state permit holders in the
future, the numbers will be updated to
reflect this change. For additional
information on fishing effort in fisheries
found on Table 1 or 2, contact the
relevant regional office (contact
information included above in Where
can I find more information about the
LOF and the MMAP? section).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists
the number of valid HSFCA permits
currently held. Although this likely
overestimates the number of active
participants in many of these fisheries,
the number of valid HSFCA permits is
the most reliable data on the potential
effort in high seas fisheries at this time.
As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in
Table 3 for the high seas components of
fisheries that also operate within U.S.
waters does not necessarily represent
additional effort that is not accounted
for in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels
holding HSFCA permits also fish within
U.S. waters and are included in the
number of vessels and participants
operating within those fisheries in
Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine
mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured (seriously
or non-seriously) in each fishery based
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
on SARs, injury determination reports,
bycatch estimation reports, observer
data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data,
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best
available scientific information
included in these reports is based on
data through 2017. This list includes all
species and/or stocks known to be killed
or injured in a given fishery, but also
includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a
mortality or injury. Additionally,
species identified by logbook entries,
stranding data, or fishermen self-reports
(i.e., MMAP reports) may not be
verified. In Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has
designated those species/stocks driving
a fishery’s classification (i.e., the fishery
is classified based on mortalities and
serious injuries of a marine mammal
stock that are greater than or equal to 50
percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent
(Category II), of a stock’s PBR) by a ‘‘1’’
after the stock’s name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several
fisheries classified as Category II that
have no recent documented mortalities
or serious injuries of marine mammals,
or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater
than 1 percent of a stock’s PBR level
based on known interactions. NMFS has
classified these fisheries by analogy to
other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that
are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of marine mammals, as discussed
in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995), and according to
factors listed in the definition of a
‘‘Category II fishery’’ in 50 CFR 229.2
(i.e., fishing techniques, gear types,
methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or
fishermen reports, stranding data, and
the species and distribution of marine
mammals in the area). NMFS has
designated those fisheries listed by
analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by adding a
‘‘2’’ after the fishery’s name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1,
2, and 3 in which a portion of the
fishing vessels cross the EEZ boundary
and therefore operate both within U.S.
waters and on the high seas. These
fisheries, though listed separately on
Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are considered
the same fisheries on either side of the
EEZ boundary. NMFS has designated
those fisheries in each table with an
asterisk (*) after the fishery’s name.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3041
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Category I
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
HI deep-set longline * ∧ ........................................................
143
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic 1.
False killer whale, MHI Insular 1.
False killer whale, NWHI.
Humpback whale. Central North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
Category II
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Gillnet Fisheries:
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh) * ....
14
CA halibut/white seabass and other species set gillnet
(>3.5 in mesh).
37
CA yellowtail, barracuda, and white seabass drift gillnet
(mesh size ≥3.5 in and <14 in) 2.
22
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift gillnet 2 .....................................
1,862
AK Bristol Bay salmon set gillnet 2 ......................................
979
AK Kodiak salmon set gillnet ...............................................
188
AK Cook Inlet salmon set gillnet .........................................
736
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift gillnet ........................................
569
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Minke whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-finned pilot whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Sperm Whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
California sea lion, U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Sea otter, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
California sea lion, U.S.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Sea otter, Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Beluga whale, Cook Inlet.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3042
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon drift gillnet 2 ............
162
AK Peninsula/Aleutian Islands salmon set gillnet 2 .............
113
AK Prince William Sound salmon drift gillnet ......................
537
AK Southeast salmon drift gillnet ........................................
474
AK Yakutat salmon set gillnet 2 ...........................................
168
WA Puget Sound Region salmon drift gillnet (includes all
inland waters south of US-Canada border and eastward
of the Bonilla-Tatoosh line-Treaty Indian fishing is excluded).
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands flatfish trawl .....................
154
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands pollock trawl ....................
102
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl ...................
17
Pot, Ring Net, and Trap Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod pot ................
59
CA coonstripe shrimp pot ....................................................
14
CA spiny lobster ..................................................................
186
CA spot prawn pot ...............................................................
23
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00090
32
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Northern sea otter, Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA 1.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, Southeast AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific 1.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor Porpoise, Southeastern AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Harbor porpoise, inland WA 1.
Harbor seal, WA inland.
Bearded seal, AK.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Harbor seal, Bering Sea.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific 1.
Killer whale, AK resident 1.
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient 1.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1.
Walrus, AK.
Bearded Seal, AK.
Beluga whale, Bristol Bay.
Beluga whale, Eastern Bering Sea.
Beluga whale, Eastern Chukchi Sea.
Harbor seal, AK.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.1.
Harbor seal, Aleutian Islands.
Killer whale, ENP AK resident 1.
Killer whale, GOA, AI, BS transient 1.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Harbor seal, Bristol Bay.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Southern sea otter.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3043
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery description
CA Dungeness crab pot ......................................................
501
OR Dungeness crab pot ......................................................
342
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot .....................................................
WA coastal Dungeness crab pot .........................................
155
197
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline ...................................
295
HI shallow-set
longline * ∧
....................................................
11
American Samoa longline 2 ..................................................
13
HI shortline 2 .........................................................................
9
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Blue whale, Eastern North Pacific 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Killer whale, Eastern North Pacific GOA, BSAI transient.
Killer whale, West Coast transient.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA 1.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic 1.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
False killer whale, American Samoa.
Rough-toothed dolphin, American Samoa.
Short-finned pilot whale, unknown.
None documented.
Category III
Gillnet Fisheries:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton Sound, Kotzebue salmon
gillnet.
AK Prince William Sound salmon set gillnet .......................
1,778
29
AK roe herring and food/bait herring gillnet ........................
CA set gillnet (mesh size <3.5 in) .......................................
HI inshore gillnet ..................................................................
920
296
36
WA Grays Harbor salmon drift gillnet (excluding treaty
Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia River eulachon gillnet ............
WA/OR lower Columbia River (includes tributaries) drift
gillnet.
WA Willapa Bay drift gillnet .................................................
24
15
110
82
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Miscellaneous Net Fisheries:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse seine ......................................
AK Kodiak salmon purse seine ...........................................
83
376
AK Southeast salmon purse seine ......................................
AK roe herring and food/bait herring beach seine ..............
AK roe herring and food/bait herring purse seine ...............
AK salmon beach seine .......................................................
AK salmon purse seine (Prince William Sound, Chignik,
Alaska Peninsula).
WA/OR sardine purse seine ................................................
CA anchovy, mackerel, sardine purse seine .......................
315
10
356
31
936
CA squid purse seine ..........................................................
80
CA tuna purse seine * ..........................................................
WA/OR Lower Columbia River salmon seine .....................
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid purse seine or lampara ........
WA salmon purse seine ......................................................
WA salmon reef net .............................................................
10
10
130
75
11
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00091
42
65
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Harbor porpoise, Bering Sea.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Sea otter, South central AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI.
Spinner dolphin, HI.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Harbor seal, Prince William Sound.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, CA.
California sea lion, U.S.
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3044
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery description
HI lift net ..............................................................................
HI inshore purse seine ........................................................
HI throw net, cast net ..........................................................
HI seine net .........................................................................
Dip Net Fisheries:
CA squid dip net ..................................................................
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
CA marine shellfish aquaculture ..........................................
CA salmon enhancement rearing pen .................................
CA white seabass enhancement net pens ..........................
HI offshore pen culture ........................................................
WA salmon net pens ...........................................................
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
WA/OR shellfish aquaculture ...............................................
Troll Fisheries:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface hook and line/troll .................
CA halibut hook and line/handline .......................................
CA white seabass hook and line/handline ..........................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish hand troll and dinglebar troll
AK salmon troll ....................................................................
17
<3
23
24
115
unknown
>1
13
2
14
23
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut longline .......................................
855
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod longline ................................
AK octopus/squid longline ...................................................
AK state-managed waters longline/setline (including sablefish, rockfish, lingcod, and miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, bottomfish longline/set line ............
92
3
464
WA/OR Pacific halibut longline ............................................
CA pelagic longline ..............................................................
HI kaka line ..........................................................................
HI vertical line ......................................................................
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl ........
350
1
15
3
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl ..............
72
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl ............................................
36
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod trawl .....................................
55
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock trawl ...........................................
67
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish trawl ..........................................
AK Kodiak food/bait herring otter trawl ...............................
AK shrimp otter trawl and beam trawl .................................
43
4
38
Frm 00092
None documented.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland waters.
None documented.
None documented.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, HI.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
22
127
PO 00000
None documented.
unknown
1,908
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish longline ............
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands halibut longline ................
Jkt 253001
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
None
None
None
None
13
4,300
2,117
322
40
432
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
None
None
None
None
705
unknown
unknown
unknown
American Samoa tuna troll ..................................................
CA/OR/WA salmon troll .......................................................
HI troll ..................................................................................
HI rod and reel .....................................................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands tuna troll
Guam tuna troll ....................................................................
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Greenland turbot longline
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline .........
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
4
45
367
13
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
Killer whale, AK resident.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Sperm whale, North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Cook Inlet.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, CA/OR/WA offshore.
California sea lion, U.S.
Northern elephant seal, California breeding.
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
None documented.
None documented in the most recent 5 years of data.
None documented.
None documented.
Bearded seal, AK.
Harbor seal, Aleutian Islands.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Bearded seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Harbor seal, AK.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, AK.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
Northern elephant seal, North Pacific.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3045
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
AK state-managed waters of Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl .......................................................
47
CA sea cucumber trawl .......................................................
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl ......................................................
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl ................................................
16
300
160–180
Pot, Ring Net, and Trap Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands sablefish pot ....................
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands crab pot ...........................
6
540
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot ..................................................
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific cod pot .......................................
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish pot ...........................................
AK Southeast Alaska crab pot ............................................
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp pot .........................................
AK shrimp pot, except Southeast ........................................
AK octopus/squid pot ...........................................................
CA rock crab pot ..................................................................
271
116
248
375
99
141
15
124
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot ........................................................
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap .......................................................
WA Puget Sound Dungeness crab pot/trap ........................
HI crab trap ..........................................................................
HI fish trap ...........................................................................
HI lobster trap ......................................................................
HI shrimp trap ......................................................................
HI crab net ...........................................................................
HI Kona crab loop net .........................................................
Hook and Line, Handline, and Jig Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands groundfish jig ..................
AK Gulf of Alaska groundfish jig .........................................
AK halibut jig ........................................................................
American Samoa bottomfish ...............................................
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish .................................................................
HI aku boat, pole, and line ..................................................
HI bottomfish handline .........................................................
HI inshore handline ..............................................................
HI pelagic handline ..............................................................
WA groundfish, bottomfish jig ..............................................
Western Pacific squid jig .....................................................
Harpoon Fisheries:
CA swordfish harpoon .........................................................
Pound Net/Weir Fisheries:
AK herring spawn on kelp pound net ..................................
AK Southeast herring roe/food/bait pound net ....................
HI bullpen trap .....................................................................
Bait Pens:
WA/OR/CA bait pens ...........................................................
Dredge Fissheries:
AK scallop dredge ...............................................................
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection Fisheries:
AK clam ...............................................................................
AK Dungeness crab .............................................................
AK herring spawn on kelp ...................................................
AK miscellaneous invertebrates handpick ...........................
HI black coral diving ............................................................
HI fish pond .........................................................................
54
254
249
5
9
<3
10
4
33
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00093
2
2
214
71
fewer than 20
28
>300
<3
578
357
534
679
0
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
Harbor porpoise, unknown.
Harbor seal, unknown.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Steller sea lion, unknown.
None documented.
California sea lion, U.S.
California sea lion, U.S.
Dall’s porpoise, CA/OR/WA.
Harbor seal, OR/WA coast.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Northern fur seal, Eastern Pacific.
Northern right whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
None documented.
Bowhead whale, Western Arctic.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
None documented.
Harbor seal, GOA.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific (Southeast AK).
None documented.
None documented.
Gray whale, Eastern North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
None documented.
None documented in recent years.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
Fin whale, Northeast Pacific.
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
documented.
documented.
documented in recent years.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
6
None documented.
291
2
3
None documented.
None documented.
None documented.
13
108 (5 AK)
130
2
266
214
<3
5
Fmt 4700
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Sfmt 4700
California sea lion, U.S.
None documented.
None
None
None
None
None
None
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3046
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE PACIFIC OCEAN—Continued
Estimated # of
vessels/persons
Fishery description
HI handpick ..........................................................................
HI lobster diving ...................................................................
HI spearfishing .....................................................................
WA/CA kelp .........................................................................
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea cucumber hand, dive, or mechanical collection.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel (Charter Boat) Fisheries:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing vessel .........
46
19
163
4
201
10
>7,000 (1,006
AK)
Live Finfish/Shellfish Fisheries:
CA nearshore finfish live trap/hook-and-line .......................
HI aquarium collecting .........................................................
93
90
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
None
None
None
None
None
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
None documented.
Humpback whale, Western North Pacific.
Killer whale, unknown.
Steller sea lion, Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion, Western U.S.
None documented.
None documented.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AI—Aleutian Islands; AK—Alaska; BS—Bering Sea; CA—California; ENP—Eastern North
Pacific; GOA—Gulf of Alaska; HI—Hawaii; MHI—Main Hawaiian Islands; OR—Oregon; WA—Washington;
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR.
2 Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3; and
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species and/or stocks killed or injured
in high seas component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the high seas. The species and/
or stocks are found, and the fishery remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the EEZ components of these fisheries
pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components operating on the high seas.
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN
Estimated
number
of vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Category I
Gillnet Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet ................................................................
4,020
Northeast sink gillnet ...........................................................
4,072
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot ................
8,485
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics
longline *.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00094
201
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Hooded seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Fin whale, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.1
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.1
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern GMX.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3047
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number
of vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA.
False killer whale, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME, BF.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian East coast.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, Northern GMX.
Pygmy sperm whale, GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, Northern GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
Rough-toothed dolphin, Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale, Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.1
Sperm whale, Northern GMX.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Category II
Gillnet Fisheries:
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet 2 ........................................
265
Gulf of Mexico gillnet 2 .........................................................
248
NC inshore gillnet ................................................................
2,676
Northeast anchored float gillnet 2 .........................................
852
Northeast drift gillnet 2 ..........................................................
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 2 ...................................................
1,036
273
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet ..............................
21
Trawl Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ...............
320
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl .....................................................
633
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl) ..................
542
Northeast bottom trawl ........................................................
968
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl ....
10,824
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00095
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Northern migratory coastal or
Southern migratory coastal).
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, and estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.1
Harbor seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Central FL, Northern FL, SC/GA
coastal, or Southern migratory coastal).
North Atlantic right whale, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.1
Common dolphin, WNA.1
Gray seal, WNA.1
Harbor seal, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.1
White-sided dolphin, WNA.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.1
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.1
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.1
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.1
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.1
White-sided dolphin, WNA.1
Atlantic spotted dolphin, Northern Gulf of Mexico.
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.1
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3048
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number
of vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/
pot 2.
1,101
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot 2 ..........................................
3,493
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot ....................................................
6,679
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden purse seine ...............................
40–42
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine 2 ..................................
17
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine ..............................................
359
NC long haul seine ..............................................................
22
Stop Net Fisheries:
NC roe mullet stop net ........................................................
1
Pound Net Fisheries:
VA pound net .......................................................................
20
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal.1
SC/GA coastal.1
Southern migratory coastal.
Western GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine (FL west
coast portion).
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Sarasota Bay, Little Sarasota Bay.
Fin whale, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central GA estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Charleston estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern GA estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.
West Indian manatee, FL.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi River Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.1
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
Bottlenose
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
dolphin,
Northern Migratory coastal.1
Northern NC estuarine system.1
Southern Migratory coastal.1
Northern NC estuarine system.1
Southern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, unknown (Southern migratory coastal or
Southern NC estuarine system).
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern Migratory coastal.1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Category III
Gillnet Fisheries:
Caribbean gillnet ..................................................................
DE River inshore gillnet .......................................................
Long Island Sound inshore gillnet .......................................
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy Island), and NY Bight (Raritan and Lower NY Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore gillnet ........................................
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic shellfish bottom trawl ..............................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00096
127
unknown
unknown
unknown
None
None
None
None
unknown
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern SC estuarine system.
>58
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented
documented
documented
documented
in
in
in
in
the
the
the
the
most
most
most
most
None documented.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
recent
recent
recent
recent
5
5
5
5
years
years
years
years
of
of
of
of
data.
data.
data.
data.
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3049
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number
of vessels/
persons
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Gulf of Mexico butterfish trawl .............................................
2
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trawl .....................................
GA cannonball jellyfish trawl ...............................................
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
Finfish aquaculture ..............................................................
Shellfish aquaculture ...........................................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic herring purse seine ..........................
Gulf of Maine menhaden purse seine .................................
FL West Coast sardine purse seine ....................................
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse seine * ...........................................
Longline/Hook and Line Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic bottom longline/hook-and-line .........
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish
hook-and-line/harpoon.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
snapper-grouper and other reef fish bottom longline/
hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shark bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
pelagic hook-and-line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico trotline ...................................
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot .......................................
20
1
48
unknown
>7
>2
10
5
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Harbor seal, WNA.
None documented.
Harbor seal, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
None documented in most recent 5 years of data.
>1,207
2,846
None documented.
Humpback whale, Gulf of Maine.
>5,000
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX continental shelf.
39
680
unknown
None documented.
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot .........................................
FL spiny lobster trap/pot ......................................................
40
1,268
Gulf of Mexico blue crab trap/pot ........................................
4,113
Gulf of Mexico mixed species trap/pot ................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico golden crab
trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/pot ...............................................
Stop Seine/Weir/Pound Net/Floating Trap/Fyke Net Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine herring and Atlantic mackerel stop seine/
weir.
unknown
10
Bottlenose dolphin, Puerto Rico and United States Virgin Islands.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine. Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Keys.
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
West Indian manatee, FL.
None documented.
None documented.
unknown
None documented.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop seine/weir ................................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed species stop seine/weir/pound net
(except the NC roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap .....................................................................
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic fyke net ....................................
Dredge Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin dredge .........................................
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge ..............................................
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid-Atlantic sea scallop dredge ..........
Mid-Atlantic blue crab dredge ..............................................
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell clam dredge .....................................
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge ...................................................
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of Mexico oyster dredge ..................
New England and Mid-Atlantic offshore surf clam/quahog
dredge.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:42 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00097
154
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX continental shelf.
None documented.
>1
2,600
unknown
Harbor porpoise, GME/BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian east coast.
Atlantic white-sided dolphin, WNA.
None documented.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine system.
9
unknown
None documented.
None documented.
unknown
unknown
>403
unknown
unknown
unknown
7,000
unknown
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
None
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
documented.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3050
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES IN THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, GULF OF MEXICO, AND CARIBBEAN—
Continued
Estimated
number
of vessels/
persons
Fishery description
Caribbean haul/beach seine ................................................
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach seine .........................................
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic haul/beach seine ......................
Dive, Hand/Mechanical Collection Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean shellfish dive,
hand/mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, hand/mechanical collection .......
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, and Caribbean cast net.
Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel (Charter Boat) Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean commercial
passenger fishing vessel.
38
unknown
25
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
West Indian manatee, Puerto Rico.
None documented.
None documented.
20,000
None documented.
unknown
unknown
None documented.
None documented.
4,000
Bottlenose dolphin, Barataria Bay estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Biscayne Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Choctawhatchee Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Indian River Lagoon estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Jacksonville estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GA/Southern SC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern NC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern migratory coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Southern NC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, Western GMX coastal.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2:
DE—Delaware; FL—Florida; GA—Georgia; GME/BF—Gulf of Maine/Bay of Fundy; GMX—Gulf of Mexico; MA—Massachusetts; NC—North
Carolina; NY—New York; RI—Rhode Island; SC—South Carolina; VA—Virginia; WNA—Western North Atlantic;
1 Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or greater
than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the stock’s PBR;
2 Fishery classified by analogy; and
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS
Number of
HSFCA permits
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Category I
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species * ......................................
45
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Deep-set component) * ∧ .........
143
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Atlantic spotted dolphin, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier’s beaked whale, WNA.
False killer whale, WNA.
Killer whale, GMX oceanic.
Kogia spp. whale (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), WNA.
Long-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian East coast.
Pantropical spotted dolphin, WNA.
Risso’s dolphin, GMX.
Risso’s dolphin, WNA.
Short-finned pilot whale, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or dwarf sperm whale), HI.
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3051
TABLE 3—LIST OF FISHERIES—COMMERCIAL FISHERIES ON THE HIGH SEAS—Continued
Number of
HSFCA permits
Fishery description
Marine mammal species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
Category II
Drift Gillnet Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species* ∧ .....................................
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ** ....................................
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ...............................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
Longline Fisheries:
CCAMLR ..............................................................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI Shallow-set component) * ∧ .....
Handline/Pole and Line Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
Troll Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory Species ........................................
South Pacific Albacore Troll ................................................
South Pacific Tuna Fisheries ** ...........................................
Western Pacific Pelagic .......................................................
5
Long-beaked common dolphin, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/WA.
Northern right-whale dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso’s dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
1
0
No information.
Antarctic fur seal.
26
1
No information.
No information.
0
6
3
11
None documented.
No information.
No information.
Blainville’s beaked whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI Pelagic.
Fin whale, HI.
Guadalupe fur seal.
Humpback whale, Central North Pacific.
Mesoplodon sp., unknown.
Northern elephant seal, CA breeding.
Risso’s dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin, HI.
Short-beaked common dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Striped dolphin, HI.
1
43
10
5
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
0
18
1
4
No
No
No
No
information.
information.
information.
information.
Category III
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Longline Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom Longline ....................................
Pacific Highly Migratory Species .........................................
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * ∧ .....................................
Trawl Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic ................................................................
Troll Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory Species * .......................................
2
105
None documented.
None documented in the most recent 5 years of data.
5
None documented.
4
None documented.
111
None documented.
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
CA—California; GMX—Gulf of Mexico; HI—Hawaii; OR—Oregon; WA—Washington; WNA—Western North Atlantic;
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits listed in
Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high seas component of the fishery;
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004), the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna
Treaty license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear types, it
does not represent effort. In order to land fish species, fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for unauthorized gear
types expire, the permit-holder will be required to obtain a permit for an authorized gear type; and
∧ The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal species and/or
stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively in coastal
waters, because the marine mammal species and/or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the same on both sides of
the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as the components of these
fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
3052
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 4—FISHERIES AFFECTED BY TAKE REDUCTION TEAMS AND PLANS
Take reduction plans
Affected fisheries
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan (ALWTRP)—50 CFR
229.32.
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Plan (BDTRP)—50 CFR
229.35.
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP)—50 CFR
229.37.
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan (HPTRP)—50 CFR 229.33
(New England) and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic).
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan (PLTRP)—50 CFR 229.36
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Reduction Plan (POCTRP)—50
CFR 229.31.
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Team (ATGTRT) .....................
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot.
Northeast anchored float gillnet.
Northeast drift gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet.*
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot. ∧
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery.
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach seine.
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine.
NC inshore gillnet.
NC long haul seine.
NC roe mullet stop net.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic shark gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl.∧
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico stone crab trap/pot.∧
VA pound net.
Category I
HI deep-set longline.
Category II
HI shallow-set longline.
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category I
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline.
Category II
CA thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet (≥14 in mesh).
Category II
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl.
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl).
Northeast bottom trawl.
Northeast mid-water trawl (including pair trawl).
List of Symbols Used in Table 4:
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S. waters; and
∧ Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in the Atlantic Ocean.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of
the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. No comments were received on
that certification, and no new
information has been discovered to
change that conclusion. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
This rule contains existing collectionof-information (COI) requirements
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
and would not impose additional or
new COI requirements. The COI for the
registration of individuals under the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
MMPA has been approved by the OMB
under OMB Control Number 0648–0293
(0.15 hours per report for new
registrants). The requirement for
reporting marine mammal mortalities or
injuries has been approved by OMB
under OMB Control Number 0648–0292
(0.15 hours per report). These estimates
include the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data
sources, gathering and maintaining the
data needed, and completing and
reviewing the COI. Send comments
regarding these reporting burden
estimates or any other aspect of the COI,
including suggestions for reducing
burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision
of law, no person is required to respond
to, nor shall a person be subject to a
penalty for failure to comply with a COI,
PO 00000
Frm 00100
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act, unless that
COI displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
This rule has been determined to be
not significant for the purposes of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
This rule is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with the Companion
Manual for NOAA Administrative Order
(NAO) 216–6A, NMFS determined that
publishing this LOF qualifies to be
categorically excluded from further
NEPA review, consistent with categories
of activities identified in Categorical
Exclusion G7 (‘‘Preparation of policy
directives, rules, regulations, and
guidelines of an administrative,
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 9 / Thursday, January 14, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
financial, legal, technical, or procedural
nature, or for which the environmental
effects are too broad, speculative or
conjectural to lend themselves to
meaningful analysis and will be subject
later to the NEPA process, either
collectively or on a case-by-case basis’’)
of the Companion Manual and we have
not identified any extraordinary
circumstances listed in Chapter 4 of the
Companion Manual for NAO 216–6A
that would preclude application of this
categorical exclusion. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would first prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement or
Environmental Assessment, as required
under NEPA, specific to that action.
This rule would not affect species
listed as threatened or endangered
under the ESA or their associated
critical habitat. The impacts of
numerous fisheries have been analyzed
in various biological opinions, and this
rule will not affect the conclusions of
those opinions. The classification of
fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would
adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a
management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP,
NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse
impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine
mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries
interacting with marine mammals
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:22 Jan 13, 2021
Jkt 253001
through information collected from
observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or
water uses or natural resources of the
coastal zone, as specified under section
307 of the Coastal Zone Management
Act.
References
Baird, R.W., and D.L. Webster. 2020. Using
dolphins to catch tuna: Assessment of
associations between pantropical spotted
dolphins and yellowfin tuna hook and
line fisheries in Hawai‘i. Fisheries
Research. 230. (2020):105652.
Baird, R.W., S.D. Mahaffy, A.M. Gorgone, T.
Cullins, D.J. McSweeney, E.M. Oelson,
A.L. Bradford, J. Barlow, D.L. Webster.
False Killer Whales and Fisheries
Interaction in Hawaiian Waters:
Evidence for Sex Bias and Variation
Among Populations and Social Groups.
2014. Marine Mammal Science 31(2):
579–590.
Bradford A.L. and E.G. Lyman. 2019. Injury
determinations for humpback whales
and other cetaceans reported to NOAA
response networks in the Hawaiian
Islands during 2017. U.S. Dept. of
Commerce, NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS–PIFSC–81, 18 p.
Bradford A.L. and E. Lyman. 2018. Injury
determinations for humpback whales
and other cetaceans reported to the
Hawaiian Islands Disentanglement and
Pacific Islands Marine Mammal
Response Networks during 2013–2016.
NOAA Technical Memorandum. NMFS–
PIFSC–75. 24 pp.
Bradford, A.L., E.M. Oleson, R.W. Baird, C.H.
Boggs, K.A. Forney, and N.C. Young.
2015. Revised stock boundaries for false
killer whales (Pseudorca crassidens) in
Hawaiian waters. U.S. Department.
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
3053
Commerce, NOAA Technical
Memorandum. NOAA–NMFS–PIFSC–47,
29 p.
Hayes, S.A., Josephson, E., Maze-Foley, K.,
Rosel, P.E., 2020. US Atlantic and Gulf
of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments 2019. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NMFS–NE–264, 479 p.
Henry A, Garron M, Reid A, Morin D,
Ledwell W, Cole TVN. 2019. Serious
injury and mortality determinations for
baleen whale stocks along the Gulf of
Mexico, United States East Coast, and
Atlantic Canadian Provinces, 2012–2016.
US Department of Commerce, Northeast
Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc. 19–13; 54 p.
Muto, M.M, V.T. Helker, R.P. Angliss, B.A.
Allen, P.L. Boveng, J.M. Breiwick, M.F.
Cameron, P.J. Clapham, S.P. Dahle, M.E.
Dahlheim, B.S. Fadely, M.C. Ferguson,
L.W. Fritz, R.C. Hobbs, Y.V.
Ivashchenko, A.S. Kennedy, J.M.
London, S.A. Mizroch, R.R. Ream, E.L.
Richmond, K.E.W. Shelden, R.G. Towell,
P.R. Wade, J.M. Waite, and A.N. Zerbini.
2017. Alaska Marine Mammal Stock
Assessments, 2016. NOAA Technical
Memorandum NOAA–TM–NMFS–
AFSC–355. 367 p.
National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016.
Guidelines for Preparing Stock
Assessment Reports Pursuant to the 1994
Amendments to the MMPA. 02–204–01.
25 p. (Available at: https://
www.fisheries.noaa.gov/webdam/
download/64690366)
Authority: MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: January 8, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–00570 Filed 1–13–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\14JAR1.SGM
14JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 9 (Thursday, January 14, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 3028-3053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-00570]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 229
[Docket No. 210108-0005]
RIN 0648-BJ72
List of Fisheries for 2021
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) publishes its
final List of Fisheries (LOF) for 2021, as required by the Marine
Mammal Protection Act (MMPA). The LOF for 2021 reflects new information
on interactions between commercial fisheries and marine mammals. NMFS
must classify each commercial fishery on the LOF into one of three
categories under the MMPA based upon the level of mortality and serious
injury of marine mammals that occurs incidental to each fishery. The
classification of a fishery on the LOF determines whether participants
in that fishery are subject to certain provisions of the MMPA, such as
registration, observer coverage, and take reduction plan (TRP)
requirements.
DATES: The effective date of this final rule is February 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Chief, Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Conservation Division,
Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, 1315 East-West Highway, Silver
Spring, MD 20910.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jaclyn Taylor, Office of Protected
Resources, 301-427-8402; Allison Rosner, Greater Atlantic Region, 978-
281-9328; Jessica Powell, Southeast Region, 727-824-5312; Dan Lawson,
West Coast Region, 206-526-4740; Suzie Teerlink, Alaska Region, 907-
586-7240; Diana Kramer, Pacific Islands Region, 808-725-5167.
Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the hearing
impaired may call the Federal Information Relay Service at 1-800-877-
8339 between 8 a.m. and 4 p.m. Eastern time, Monday through Friday,
excluding Federal holidays.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
What is the List of Fisheries?
Section 118 of the MMPA requires NMFS to place all U.S. commercial
fisheries into one of three categories based on the level of incidental
mortality and serious injury of marine mammals occurring in each
fishery (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(1)). The classification of a fishery on the
LOF determines whether participants in that fishery may be required to
comply with certain provisions of the MMPA, such as registration,
observer coverage, and take reduction plan requirements. NMFS must
reexamine the LOF annually, considering new information in the Marine
Mammal Stock Assessment Reports (SARs) and other relevant
[[Page 3029]]
sources, and publish in the Federal Register any necessary changes to
the LOF after notice and opportunity for public comment (16 U.S.C. 1387
(c)(1)(C)).
How does NMFS determine in which category a fishery is placed?
The definitions for the fishery classification criteria can be
found in the implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50
CFR 229.2). The criteria are also summarized here.
Fishery Classification Criteria
The fishery classification criteria consist of a two-tiered, stock-
specific approach that first addresses the total impact of all
fisheries on each marine mammal stock and then addresses the impact of
individual fisheries on each stock. This approach is based on
consideration of the rate, in numbers of animals per year, of
incidental mortalities and serious injuries of marine mammals due to
commercial fishing operations relative to the potential biological
removal (PBR) level for each marine mammal stock. The MMPA (16 U.S.C.
1362 (20)) defines the PBR level as the maximum number of animals, not
including natural mortalities, that may be removed from a marine mammal
stock while allowing that stock to reach or maintain its optimum
sustainable population (OSP). This definition can also be found in the
implementing regulations for section 118 of the MMPA (50 CFR 229.2).
Tier 1: Tier 1 considers the cumulative fishery mortality and
serious injury for a particular stock. If the total annual mortality
and serious injury of a marine mammal stock, across all fisheries, is
less than or equal to 10 percent of the PBR level of the stock, all
fisheries interacting with the stock will be placed in Category III
(unless those fisheries interact with other stock(s) for which total
annual mortality and serious injury is greater than 10 percent of PBR).
Otherwise, these fisheries are subject to the next tier (Tier 2) of
analysis to determine their classification.
Tier 2: Tier 2 considers fishery-specific mortality and serious
injury for a particular stock.
Category I: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than or equal to 50 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., frequent incidental mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals).
Category II: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent of the
PBR level (i.e., occasional incidental mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals).
Category III: Annual mortality and serious injury of a stock in a
given fishery is less than or equal to 1 percent of the PBR level
(i.e., a remote likelihood of or no known incidental mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals).
Additional details regarding how the categories were determined are
provided in the preamble to the final rule implementing section 118 of
the MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30, 1995).
Because fisheries are classified on a per-stock basis, a fishery
may qualify as one category for one marine mammal stock and another
category for a different marine mammal stock. A fishery is typically
classified on the LOF at its highest level of classification (e.g., a
fishery qualifying for Category III for one marine mammal stock and for
Category II for another marine mammal stock will be listed under
Category II). Stocks driving a fishery's classification are denoted
with a superscript ``1'' in Tables 1 and 2.
Other Criteria That May Be Considered
The tier analysis requires a minimum amount of data, and NMFS does
not have sufficient data to perform a tier analysis on certain
fisheries. Therefore, NMFS has classified certain fisheries by analogy
to other fisheries that use similar fishing techniques or gear that are
known to cause mortality or serious injury of marine mammals, or
according to factors discussed in the final LOF for 1996 (60 FR 67063;
December 28, 1995) and listed in the regulatory definition of a
Category II fishery. In the absence of reliable information indicating
the frequency of incidental mortality and serious injury of marine
mammals by a commercial fishery, NMFS will determine whether the
incidental mortality or serious injury is ``occasional'' by evaluating
other factors such as fishing techniques, gear used, methods used to
deter marine mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data,
and the species and distribution of marine mammals in the area, or at
the discretion of the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries (50 CFR
229.2).
Further, eligible commercial fisheries not specifically identified
on the LOF are deemed to be Category II fisheries until the next LOF is
published (50 CFR 229.2).
How does NMFS determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery?
The LOF includes a list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in each commercial fishery. The list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured includes
``serious'' and ``non-serious'' documented injuries as described later
in the List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in
the Pacific Ocean and List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed
or Injured in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
sections. To determine which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery, NMFS annually reviews the
information presented in the current SARs and injury determination
reports. SARs are brief reports summarizing the status of each stock of
marine mammals occurring in waters under U.S. jurisdiction, including
information on the identity and geographic range of the stock,
population statistics related to abundance, trend, and annual
productivity, notable habitat concerns, and estimates of human-caused
mortality and serious injury (M/SI) by source. The SARs are based upon
the best available scientific information and provide the most current
and inclusive information on each stock's PBR level and level of
interaction with commercial fishing operations. The best available
scientific information used in the SARs and reviewed for the 2021 LOF
generally summarizes data from 2013-2017. NMFS also reviews other
sources of new information, including injury determination reports,
bycatch estimation reports, observer data, logbook data, stranding
data, disentanglement network data, fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMPA
mortality/injury reports), and anecdotal reports from that time period.
In some cases, more recent information may be available and used in the
LOF.
For fisheries with observer coverage, species or stocks are
generally removed from the list of marine mammal species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured if no interactions are documented in the
5-year timeframe summarized in that year's LOF. For fisheries with no
observer coverage and for observed fisheries with evidence indicating
that undocumented interactions may be occurring (e.g., fishery has low
observer coverage and stranding network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a specific
[[Page 3030]]
fishery) species and stocks may be retained for longer than 5 years.
For these fisheries, NMFS will review the other sources of information
listed above and use its discretion to decide when it is appropriate to
remove a species or stock.
Where does NMFS obtain information on the level of observer coverage in
a fishery on the LOF?
The best available information on the level of observer coverage
and the spatial and temporal distribution of observed marine mammal
interactions is presented in the SARs. Data obtained from the observer
program and observer coverage levels are important tools in estimating
the level of marine mammal mortality and serious injury in commercial
fishing operations. Starting with the 2005 SARs, each Pacific and
Alaska SAR includes an appendix with detailed descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery on the LOF, including the observer coverage
in those fisheries. For Atlantic fisheries, this information can be
found in the LOF Fishery Fact Sheets. The SARs do not provide detailed
information on observer coverage in Category III fisheries because,
under the MMPA, Category III fisheries are not required to accommodate
observers aboard vessels due to the remote likelihood of mortality and
serious injury of marine mammals. Fishery information presented in the
SARs' appendices and other resources referenced during the tier
analysis may include: Level of observer coverage; target species;
levels of fishing effort; spatial and temporal distribution of fishing
effort; characteristics of fishing gear and operations; management and
regulations; and interactions with marine mammals. Copies of the SARs
are available on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources website at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-region. Information on observer
coverage levels in Category I, II, and III fisheries can be found in
the fishery fact sheets on the NMFS Office of Protected Resources'
website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/list-fisheries-summary-tables. Additional information on
observer programs in commercial fisheries can be found on the NMFS
National Observer Program's website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/fisheries-observers/national-observer-program.
How do I find out if a specific fishery is in Category I, II, or III?
The LOF includes three tables that list all U.S. commercial
fisheries by Category. Table 1 lists all of the commercial fisheries in
the Pacific Ocean (including Alaska); Table 2 lists all of the
commercial fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean; and Table 3 lists all U.S. authorized commercial fisheries
on the high seas. A fourth table, Table 4, lists all commercial
fisheries managed under applicable TRPs or take reduction teams (TRT).
Are high seas fisheries included on the LOF?
Beginning with the 2009 LOF, NMFS includes high seas fisheries in
Table 3 of the LOF, along with the number of valid High Seas Fishing
Compliance Act (HSFCA) permits in each fishery. As of 2004, NMFS issues
HSFCA permits only for high seas fisheries analyzed in accordance with
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and the Endangered Species
Act (ESA). The authorized high seas fisheries are broad in scope and
encompass multiple specific fisheries identified by gear type. For the
purposes of the LOF, the high seas fisheries are subdivided based on
gear type (e.g., trawl, longline, purse seine, gillnet, troll, etc.) to
provide more detail on composition of effort within these fisheries.
Many fisheries operate in both U.S. waters and on the high seas,
creating some overlap between the fisheries listed in Tables 1 and 2
and those in Table 3. In these cases, the high seas component of the
fishery is not considered a separate fishery, but an extension of a
fishery operating within U.S. waters (listed in Table 1 or 2). NMFS
designates those fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 with an asterisk (*)
after the fishery's name. The number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3
for the high seas components of these fisheries operating in U.S.
waters does not necessarily represent additional effort that is not
accounted for in Tables 1 and 2. Many vessels/participants holding
HSFCA permits also fish within U.S. waters and are included in the
number of vessels and participants operating within those fisheries in
Tables 1 and 2.
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, during which time Fishery
Management Plans (FMPs) can change. Therefore, some vessels/
participants may possess valid HSFCA permits without the ability to
fish under the permit because it was issued for a gear type that is no
longer authorized under the most current FMP. For this reason, the
number of HSFCA permits displayed in Table 3 is likely higher than the
actual U.S. fishing effort on the high seas. For more information on
how NMFS classifies high seas fisheries on the LOF, see the preamble
text in the final 2009 LOF (73 FR 73032; December 1, 2008). Additional
information about HSFCA permits can be found at https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/high-seas-fishing-permits.
Where can I find specific information on fisheries listed on the LOF?
Starting with the 2010 LOF, NMFS developed summary documents, or
fishery fact sheets, for each Category I and II fishery on the LOF.
These fishery fact sheets provide the full history of each Category I
and II fishery, including: When the fishery was added to the LOF; the
basis for the fishery's initial classification; classification changes
to the fishery; changes to the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the fishery; fishery gear and methods
used; observer coverage levels; fishery management and regulation; and
applicable TRPs or TRTs, if any. These fishery fact sheets are updated
after each final LOF and can be found under ``How Do I Find Out if a
Specific Fishery is in Category I, II, or III?'' on the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources' website: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-protection-act-list-fisheries,
linked to the ``List of Fisheries Summary'' table. NMFS is developing
similar fishery fact sheets for each Category III fishery on the LOF.
However, due to the large number of Category III fisheries on the LOF
and the lack of accessible and detailed information on many of these
fisheries, the development of these fishery fact sheets is taking
significant time to complete. NMFS began posting Category III fishery
fact sheets online with the LOF for 2016.
Am I required to register under the MMPA?
Owners of vessels or gear engaging in a Category I or II fishery
are required under the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(c)(2)), as described in 50
CFR 229.4, to register with NMFS and obtain a marine mammal
authorization to lawfully take non-endangered and non-threatened marine
mammals incidental to commercial fishing operations. Owners of vessels
or gear engaged in a Category III fishery are not required to register
with NMFS or obtain a marine mammal authorization.
[[Page 3031]]
How do I register, renew and receive my Marine Mammal Authorization
Program authorization certificate?
NMFS has integrated the MMPA registration process, implemented
through the Marine Mammal Authorization Program (MMAP), with existing
state and Federal fishery license, registration, or permit systems for
Category I and II fisheries on the LOF. Participants in these fisheries
are automatically registered under the MMAP and are not required to
submit registration or renewal materials.
In the Pacific Islands, West Coast, and Alaska regions, NMFS will
issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via U.S. mail
or with their state or Federal license or permit at the time of
issuance or renewal. In the Greater Atlantic and Southeast Regions,
NMFS will issue vessel or gear owners an authorization certificate via
U.S. mail automatically at the beginning of each calendar year.
Vessel or gear owners who participate in fisheries in these regions
and have not received authorization certificates by the beginning of
the calendar year, or with renewed fishing licenses, must contact the
appropriate NMFS Regional Office (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION).
Authorization certificates may also be obtained by visiting the MMAP
website https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-authorization-program#obtaining-a-marine-mammal-authorization-certificate.
The authorization certificate, or a copy, must be on board the
vessel while it is operating in a Category I or II fishery, or for non-
vessel fisheries, in the possession of the person in charge of the
fishing operation (50 CFR 229.4(e)). Although efforts are made to limit
the issuance of authorization certificates to only those vessel or gear
owners that participate in Category I or II fisheries, not all state
and Federal license or permit systems distinguish between fisheries as
classified by the LOF. Therefore, some vessel or gear owners in
Category III fisheries may receive authorization certificates even
though they are not required for Category III fisheries.
Individuals fishing in Category I and II fisheries for which no
state or Federal license or permit is required must register with NMFS
by contacting their appropriate Regional Office (see ADDRESSES).
In recognition of logistical challenges with certificate issuance
related to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the MMAP certificate issued
in 2020 remains in effect, valid through December 31, 2021, for vessel
or gear owners participating in all Category I and II fisheries as of
the final 2021 LOF. 2020 certificates may be retained or replacements
downloaded from https://go.usa.gov/xArUW. Vessel or gear owners
participating in previous Category III fisheries reclassified as a
Category II fishery in this final 2021 LOF can obtain their MMAP
certificate on our website https://go.usa.gov/xArUW.
Am I required to submit reports when I kill or injure a marine mammal
during the course of commercial fishing operations?
In accordance with the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1387(e)) and 50 CFR 229.6,
any vessel owner or operator, or gear owner or operator (in the case of
non-vessel fisheries), participating in a fishery listed on the LOF
must report to NMFS all incidental mortalities and injuries of marine
mammals that occur during commercial fishing operations, regardless of
the category in which the fishery is placed (I, II, or III) within 48
hours of the end of the fishing trip or, in the case of non-vessel
fisheries, fishing activity. ``Injury'' is defined in 50 CFR 229.2 as a
wound or other physical harm. In addition, any animal that ingests
fishing gear or any animal that is released with fishing gear
entangling, trailing, or perforating any part of the body is considered
injured, regardless of the presence of any wound or other evidence of
injury, and must be reported.
Mortality/injury reporting forms and instructions for submitting
forms to NMFS can be found at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-authorization-program#reporting-a-death-or-injury-of-a-marine-mammal-during-commercial-fishing-operations or by contacting the appropriate regional office (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION). Forms may be submitted via any of the following
means: (1) Online using the electronic form; (2) emailed as an
attachment to [email protected]; (3) faxed to the NMFS Office of
Protected Resources at 301-713-0376; or (4) mailed to the NMFS Office
of Protected Resources (mailing address is provided on the postage-paid
form that can be printed from the web address listed above). Reporting
requirements and procedures are found in 50 CFR 229.6.
Am I required to take an observer aboard my vessel?
Individuals participating in a Category I or II fishery are
required to accommodate an observer aboard their vessel(s) upon request
from NMFS. MMPA section 118 states that the Secretary is not required
to place an observer on a vessel if the facilities for quartering an
observer or performing observer functions are so inadequate or unsafe
that the health or safety of the observer or the safe operation of the
vessel would be jeopardized; thereby authorizing the exemption of
vessels too small to safely accommodate an observer from this
requirement. However, U.S. Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, or Gulf of Mexico
large pelagics longline vessels operating in special areas designated
by the Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Plan implementing regulations
(50 CFR 229.36(d)) will not be exempted from observer requirements,
regardless of their size. Observer requirements are found in 50 CFR
229.7.
Am I required to comply with any marine mammal TRP regulations?
Table 4 provides a list of fisheries affected by TRPs and TRTs. TRP
regulations are found at 50 CFR 229.30 through 229.37. A description of
each TRT and copies of each TRP can be found at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-take-reduction-plans-and-teams. It is the responsibility of fishery
participants to comply with applicable take reduction regulations.
Where can I find more information about the LOF and the MMAP?
Information regarding the LOF and the MMAP, including registration
procedures and forms; current and past LOFs; descriptions of each
Category I and II fishery and some Category III fisheries; observer
requirements; and marine mammal mortality/injury reporting forms and
submittal procedures; may be obtained at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-protection-act-list-fisheries, or from any NMFS Regional Office at the
addresses listed below:
NMFS, Greater Atlantic Regional Fisheries Office, 55 Great Republic
Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930-2298, Attn: Allison Rosner;
NMFS, Southeast Region, 263 13th Avenue South, St. Petersburg, FL
33701, Attn: Jessica Powell;
NMFS, West Coast Region, Long Beach Office, 501 W. Ocean Blvd.,
Suite 4200, Long Beach, CA 90802-4213, Attn: Dan Lawson;
NMFS, Alaska Region, Protected Resources, P.O. Box 22668, 709 West
9th Street, Juneau, AK 99802, Attn: Suzie Teerlink; or
[[Page 3032]]
NMFS, Pacific Islands Regional Office, Protected Resources
Division, 1845 Wasp Blvd., Building 176, Honolulu, HI 96818, Attn:
Diana Kramer.
Sources of Information Reviewed for the 2021 LOF
NMFS reviewed the marine mammal incidental mortality and serious
injury information presented in the SARs for all fisheries to determine
whether changes in fishery classification are warranted. The SARs are
based on the best scientific information available at the time of
preparation, including the level of mortality and serious injury of
marine mammals that occurs incidental to commercial fishery operations
and the PBR levels of marine mammal stocks. The information contained
in the SARs is reviewed by regional Scientific Review Groups (SRGs)
representing Alaska, the Pacific (including Hawaii), and the U.S.
Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean. The SRGs were established by
the MMPA to review the science that informs the SARs, and to advise
NMFS on marine mammal population status, trends, and stock structure,
uncertainties in the science, research needs, and other issues.
NMFS also reviewed other sources of new information, including
marine mammal stranding and entanglement data, observer program data,
fishermen self-reports, reports to the SRGs, conference papers, FMPs,
and ESA documents.
The LOF for 2021 was based on, among other things, stranding data;
fishermen self-reports; and SARs, primarily the 2019 SARs, which are
based on data from 2013-2017. The SARs referenced in this LOF include:
2016 (82 FR 29039; June 27, 2017), 2018 (84 FR 28489; June 19, 2019),
and 2019 (84 FR 65353; November 27, 2019). The SARs are available at:
https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/marine-mammal-protection/marine-mammal-stock-assessment-reports-region.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received nine comment letters on the proposed LOF for 2021 (85
FR 59258; September 21, 2020). Comments were received from members of
the public, Atlantic Offshore Lobstermen's Association (AOLA), Freezer
Longline Coalition (FLC), Hawaii Longline Association (HLA), Maine
Lobstermen's Association (MLA), Massachusetts Division of Marine
Fisheries (MA DMF), Marine Mammal Commission (Commission) and Whale
Safe USA. Responses to substantive comments are below; comments on
actions not related to the LOF are not included.
General Comments
Comment 1: A commenter recommends that NMFS require Category III
fisheries to accommodate observers aboard vessels in order to expand
data collection on marine mammal bycatch in fisheries.
Response: MMPA section 118 requires individuals participating in a
Category I or II fishery to accommodate an observer aboard their
vessel(s) upon request from NMFS. In addition, MMPA section 118(d)(7)
provides NMFS, with the consent by the vessel owner, the ability to
place an observer on board a vessel participating in Category III
fisheries (50 CFR 229.7(d)). The MMPA and implementing regulations (50
CFR 229.6) also include a marine mammal mortality and injury reporting
requirement for all Category I, II and III fisheries. Any vessel owner
or operator participating in a fishery listed on the LOF must report to
NMFS all incidental mortalities and injuries of marine mammals that
occur during commercial fishing operations within 48 hours of the end
of the fishing trip.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Comment 2: FLC recommends NMFS reclassify the AK Bering Sea,
Aleutian Islands (BSAI) Pacific cod longline fishery from a Category II
to Category III. They note that the following marine mammal stocks are
included on the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured
in the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery: Killer whale (Eastern North
Pacific AK resident); killer whale (Gulf of Alaska, BSAI transient);
Northern fur seal (Eastern Pacific); spotted seal (AK) and Steller sea
lion (Western U.S). FLC provides evidence that from 2013 through 2017
the only marine mammal stock incidentally killed or injured in the BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery was the Western U.S. stock of Steller sea
lions and these did not result in annual M/SI greater than 1 percent of
the stock's PBR level.
FLC also states that the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery is
currently classified as a Category II based on a killer whale M/SI in
2012. They note that this M/SI is assigned to both the resident and
transient stocks of killer whales and is outside the 5 year timeframe
(2013-2017) of the 2021 LOF. Therefore, FLC recommends that the BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery be reclassified as a Category III fishery.
Response: NMFS reviewed the information provided and agrees with
FLC. One killer whale (Gulf of Alaska, BSAI transient stock) M/SI was
driving the Category II classification of the BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery. This killer whale M/SI occurred in 2012, and no additional M/
SI have been observed or reported for the 2013-2017 data analysis
timeframe for this fishery. Therefore, NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI
Pacific cod longline fishery from a Category II to a Category III
fishery in this final rule. NMFS also removes both the Eastern North
Pacific AK resident stock and Gulf of Alaska, BSAI transient stock of
killer whales from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery.
Comment 3: FLC recommends NMFS re-evaluate how a single marine
mammal M/SI is assigned to multiple stocks when stock ranges overlap.
They state that the M/SI should be distributed between stocks based on
the relative proportion of the population of the two stocks combined.
As noted in the 2016 SAR (Muto et al., 2017), the 2012 killer whale
M/SI in the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery was assigned to both the
resident and transient stocks of killer whale, given no genetic samples
were collected and the overlap in the range of the two stocks in Alaska
waters. FLC further states that NMFS attributes the single M/SI to both
stocks equally. However, the probability of encountering either stock
is not 100 percent, but proportional to the relative population of the
stocks throughout the range. The commenter notes that revising the
single M/SI between both killer whale stocks (based on probability of
encounter) would distribute the single 2012 M/SI in the BSAI Pacific
cod longline fishery from 100 percent for both stocks to 80 percent to
the resident stock and 20 percent to the transient stock.
Response: The SARs are drafted according to NMFS' ``Guidelines for
Preparing Stock Assessment Reports Pursuant to the 1994 Amendments to
the MMPA'' (NMFS 2016, 02-204-01). This provides directives for
consistently assigning M/SI to stocks, including times when the M/SI is
documented in an area of overlapping stocks. Because there were no data
to indicate specific stock or reliable data that could be used to
partition the 2012 killer whale M/SI, the M/SI was assigned to both
stocks as prescribed by NMFS' ``Guidelines for Preparing Stock
Assessment Reports Pursuant to the 1994 Amendments to the MMPA''.
Comment 4: FLC requests that NMFS update the LOF fishery fact sheet
for the Category II BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery. The LOF fishery
fact sheet for the BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery
[[Page 3033]]
has an incorrect description for the observer coverage in both the
catcher processor and catcher vessel longline sectors. The description
of observer coverage included in the LOF fishery fact sheet is outdated
and does not reflect the Observer Program structuring for catcher
processor and catcher vessels sectors since 2012.
Response: NMFS thanks FLC for bringing to our attention that the
observer coverage information in the AK BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery fact sheet on NMFS' website needs updating. The fishery fact
sheets summarize LOF classification information for the public and we
will review and correct this error.
Comment 5: The Commission restates a previous comment and
recommends NMFS reclassify both the Category II SE Alaska salmon drift
gillnet and Yakutat salmon set gillnet fisheries as Category I
fisheries. The Commission previously noted that the 2016 SAR for the
Southeast Alaska stock of harbor porpoise reported a population-size
estimate of 975 and an estimated minimum population size (Nmin) of 896,
which produced a PBR of 8.9 animals. That 2016 SAR also reported a
total annual M/SI estimate of 34 animals for the two fisheries
combined. The Commission states that the estimated annual M/SI has not
changed, and although the stock's PBR increased to 12 in the 2019 SAR,
fishery-related M/SI still exceed PBR by nearly threefold.
The Commission states that the clearer case can be made for
reclassifying the Category II SE Alaska salmon drift gillnet fishery as
a Category I fishery. They note that the estimated annual harbor
porpoise M/SI in the SE Alaska salmon drift gillnet fishery included
the 2019 SAR is 12 animals which equals PBR for the stock and exceeds
the Category I classification threshold of 50 percent of PBR. The
Commission continues to state that this M/SI estimate is based on data
collected in salmon management areas 6-8 in 2012 and 2013, and is a
conservative estimate since salmon management areas 6-8 comprise only a
small portion of the total area surveyed.
The Commission notes that is more difficult to address the harbor
porpoise M/SI in Category II Yakutat salmon set gillnet because there
is a geographical disconnect between where observer data was collected
and the population surveys were conducted. Thus, the comparison of the
estimated annual M/SI does not provide a meaningful basis for
classifying this fishery, given the likely population structure found
in the Southeast Alaska (SEAK) harbor porpoise stock, as described in
the 2019 SAR. Therefore, the Commission reiterates its recommendation
that NMFS reclassify the SE Alaska salmon drift gillnet as a Category I
fishery.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 85 FR
21079, April 16, 2020). The PBR level for the SEAK harbor porpoise
stock was estimated based on a survey that covered only a portion of
the currently-recognized distribution of this stock, and it included
commercial fishery M/SI that occurred far north of the surveyed areas.
Over the last year, NMFS has made substantial progress in analyzing
genetic data to resolve stock structure of harbor porpoise in Southeast
Alaska. Once finalized, the analysis of these data will be helpful in
addressing management concerns related to SEAK harbor porpoise and
effects from commercial fishing. NMFS continues to pursue options for
additional observer coverage to collect more recent and more
geographically comprehensive data on mortality in Alaska's state
fisheries, and we will prioritize observation of the Southeast Alaska
drift gillnet fishery. For the 2021 LOF, NMFS retains the Category II
classification for the Yakutat salmon set gillnet and SE Alaska salmon
drift gillnet fisheries until more data are available.
Comment 6: HLA restates a previous comment recommending NMFS remove
the Main Hawaiian Islands (MHI) insular and Northwestern Hawaiian
Islands (NWHI) stocks of false killer whales from the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery. HLA notes that (a) the False Killer Whale
Take Reduction Plan (FKWTRP) closed the deep-set longline fishery for
almost the entire range of the MHI insular stock, (b) since this change
was made in 2013 there have been no false killer whale interactions in
the fishery, and (c) there has never been a deep-set longline fishery
interaction in the very small area of the stocks' range where the
fishery operates. The commenter also states that no information has
been presented to the False Killer Whale TRT or the Pacific Scientific
Review Group suggesting any false killer whale interactions in the
deep-set fishery can reliably be attributed to the Insular or NWHI
stocks of false killer whales. HLA requests that NMFS remove the MHI
insular and NWHI stocks of false killer whales from the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii
deep-set longline fishery.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 84 FR
22051, May 16, 2019; 85 FR 21079, April 16, 2020). The MHI insular
stock of false killer whales have been documented via telemetry to move
far enough offshore to reach longline fishing areas (Bradford et al.,
2015). The MHI insular, Hawaii pelagic, and NWHI stocks have partially
overlapping ranges. MHI insular false killer whales have been satellite
tracked as far as 115 km from the MHI, while pelagic stock animals have
been tracked to within 11 kilometers (km) of the MHI and throughout the
NWHI. Thus, M/SI of false killer whales of unknown stock within the
stock overlap zones must be prorated to MHI insular, pelagic, or NWHI
stocks. Annual bycatch estimates are prorated using a process outlined
in detail in the SARs, which account for M/SI that occur within the
MHI-pelagic or NWHI-pelagic overlap zones.
For observed fisheries with evidence indicating that undocumented
interactions may be occurring (e.g., fishery has evidence of fisheries
interactions that cannot be attributed to a specific fishery, and
stranding network data include evidence of fisheries interactions that
cannot be attributed to a specific fishery), stocks may be retained on
the LOF for longer than 5 years. For these fisheries, NMFS will review
the other sources of relevant information to determine when it is
appropriate to remove a species or stock from the LOF. As described in
the 2019 LOF (84 FR 22051, May 16, 2019), six false killer whale M/SI
incidental to the deep-set longline fishery were observed inside the
exclusive economic zone (EEZ) around Hawaii, including three that
occurred close to the outer boundary of the Main Hawaiian Islands
Longline Fishing Prohibited Area, in close proximity to the outer
boundary of the MHI Insular false killer whale stocks' range. Also, MHI
Insular false killer whale range overlaps with areas that are open to
deep-set longline fishing and MHI Insular false killer whales have been
documented with injuries consistent with fisheries interactions that
have not been attributed to a specific fishery (Baird et al., 2014).
Additionally, in August 2020, NMFS reopened the Southern Exclusion Zone
to Hawaii deep-set longline fishing (85 FR 50959, August 19, 2020).
In addition to the SARs, NMFS also reviews other sources of new
information for the LOF, including injury determination reports,
bycatch estimation reports, and observer data. In some cases, more
recent information may be available and used in the LOF. In January
2019, there was an observed mortality of a false killer whale
incidental to the Hawaii deep-set longline fishery that occurred within
the
[[Page 3034]]
range of the NWHI stock. Therefore, NMFS retains both the MHI insular
and NWHI false killer whale stocks on the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category I Hawaii deep-set
longline fishery.
Comment 7: HLA restates a previous comment opposing the inclusion
of the Hawaii stocks of Kogia species (pygmy or dwarf sperm whales) on
the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category I HI deep-set longline fishery. HLA requests that NMFS remove
Kogia species from the list of species and/or stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the deep-set longline fishery because SARs for the
two stock does not include M/SI in the deep-set fishery.
Response: This comment has been addressed previously (see 84 FR
22051, May 16, 2019). The 2021 LOF generally summarizes data from 2013-
2017, and in addition to the SARs, the LOF also reviews other sources
of information, including injury determination reports and observer
data. In February 2014, there was an observed interaction with a pygmy
sperm whale (Kogia breviceps) in the Category I HI deep-set longline
fishery. Therefore, NMFS retains Kogia on the list of species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category I HI deep-set
longline fishery.
Comment 8: HLA recommends NMFS remove the Central North Pacific
humpback whale stock from the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the Category II HI shallow-set
longline fishery. HLA states that the proposed 2021 LOF includes the
Central North Pacific stock of humpback whales on the list of species
and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured from the Category II HI
shallow-set longline fishery, but the most recent SAR does not identify
M/SI in the shallow-set fishery. The HI shallow-set longline fishery
has 100 percent observer coverage and therefore, the Central North
Pacific stock of humpback whale stock should be removed the list of
species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II
HI shallow-set longline fishery.
Response: In addition to the M/SI included in the SARs, the LOF
references data from injury determination reports, bycatch estimation
reports, observer data, logbook data, stranding data, disentanglement
network data, fishermen self-reports, and anecdotal reports. In March
2015, there was an observed humpback whale, Central North Pacific
stock, injury in the Category II Hawaii shallow-set longline fishery.
The injury was determined to be non-serious. Due to the observed
injury, the Central North Pacific stock of humpback whale is retained
on the list of species and/or stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II HI shallow-set longline fishery.
Comment 9: The Commission recommends that NMFS reclassify the
Category III Hawaii troll fishery as a Category II fishery. The
Commission states that NMFS proposed to reclassify the Category III
Hawaii charter vessel fishery, which is primarily a troll fishery, and
the HI trolling, rod and reel fisheries as Category II fisheries in the
2012 LOF (76 FR 37716, June 28, 2011). In the proposed rule, NMFS based
the proposed change on reports of hooking spotted dolphins, and
information on the prevalence of vessels from these fisheries targeting
Pantropical spotted dolphin pods. NMFS estimated that M/SI would be, at
a minimum, approximately 2 percent of PBR, justifying the Category II
classifications for both fisheries. The Commission notes the final 2012
LOF (76 FR 73912, November 29, 2011) did not finalize the fishery
proposed reclassifications.
The Commission states that implementing regulations allow for NMFS,
in the absence of reliable estimates of the M/SI, to determine whether
M/SI occurs `not at all or with a remote likelihood' (Category III),
`occasionally' (Category II), or `frequently' based on analogy to
similar fisheries. This is the approach NMFS took this approach in 2012
proposed LOF.
The Commission also notes that the case for reclassifying the troll
fisheries as Category II fisheries has strengthened since serious
injuries due to hooking or entanglement in fishing line have been
documented, and reliable estimates of rates of troll vessels fishing in
and through spotted dolphin groups have been published (Baird and
Webster, 2020). In addition, the spotted dolphin stock considered in
2011, was later split into four stocks (three insular and one pelagic)
in the 2013 SAR, and each of the insular stocks is likely to have a
smaller PBR than the estimates used in 2012 proposed LOF. Given NMFS's
assessment in 2012 proposed LOF that interactions were likely
`occasional', combined with more recent information, the Commission
recommends that NMFS reclassify the Category III Hawaii troll fishery
as a Category II fishery.
Response: As noted by the Commission, there are four stocks of
pantropical spotted dolphins in the Hawaii Islands region: Oahu stock,
4-Islands stock, Hawaii Island stock, and Hawaii pelagic stock. In
2014, one pantropical spotted dolphin from the Hawaii Island stock was
observed hooked above the jaw and trailing 8-10 feet of fishing line
(Bradford and Lyman, 2018). In 2017, a spotted dolphin from the 4-
Islands stock was observed with a band of debris around its rostrum
preventing it from opening its mouth (Bradford and Lyman, 2019). Both
of these injuries are considered serious injuries and the responsible
fishery is not known for either case. In addition, of the four
pantropical spotted dolphin stocks, only the Hawaii pelagic stock has a
minimum population estimate and resulting PBR.
Without known M/SI attributed to the HI troll fishery, and a
minimum population estimate and PBR for only one of the four stocks, we
evaluated classification of the fishery by analogy. However, in
reviewing available data, there are no documented mortalities or
injuries of pantropical spotted dolphins in similar fisheries. There
are no current data on interactions with pantropical dolphins (or other
dolphin species) in any other Pacific Ocean commercial troll fisheries.
In other stocks of pantropical dolphins, the only documented fishery-
related M/SI in the Northern Gulf of Mexico stock of pantropical are
incidental to the pelagic longline fishery (2015 SAR). The Western
North Atlantic stock of pantropical spotted dolphins' total annual
estimated fishery-related M/SI is presumed to be zero, as there were no
reports of mortalities or serious injuries (2019 SAR). There are no
documented interactions with pantropical spotted dolphins in commercial
troll fisheries on the high seas (2020 LOF). Therefore, the HI troll
fishery cannot be classified by analogy to other fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques that are known to cause mortality or serious
injury of pantropical spotted dolphins.
The mentioned study, (Baird and Webster, 2020) presented findings
on the magnitude and nature of associations between fishing vessels and
pantropical spotted dolphin stocks. The study did not estimate
mortality or injury rates incidental to fisheries. Results of the study
indicated that there is a high frequency of associations between troll
and rod and reel fishing, and pantropical spotted dolphins, and in
particular with the Hawaii Island stock. This information suggests
hookings and/or entanglements may occur, and the fishing technique of
trolling through groups and repositioning presents a heightened risk of
hooking or entanglement to pantropical spotted dolphins. However, this
information alone does not provide sufficient evidence with which to
conclude that spotted dolphins are being seriously injured or killed on
an
[[Page 3035]]
``occasional basis'' as necessary for a Category II fishery
classification. Therefore, NMFS is retaining the Category III
classification of the Hawaii troll fishery.
Comments on Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico,
and Caribbean
Comment 10: MLA states that NMFS has the flexibility to consider a
variety of criteria, such as differences in gear and fishing
techniques, and the distribution of endangered stocks relative to
individual fisheries when classifying fisheries on the LOF. The
commenter notes that the Maine state waters lobster fishery is managed
and enforced by the state of Maine. While the Federal waters portion of
the Maine lobster fishery is managed through the Atlantic States Marine
Fisheries Commission as part of Lobster Management Area 1, it is also
subject to further regulation and enforcement by the state of Maine
through the Lobster Management Policy Councils. In addition, Maine's
state and Federal waters lobstermen must declare a lobster zone and are
required to fish the majority of gear in their home zone, limiting the
spatial footprint of where individual lobstermen can set gear. MLA
states that this requirement differentiates the Maine lobster fishery
from all other lobster fisheries throughout the Northeast and mid-
Atlantic.
Response: NMFS agrees that the Agency has the flexibility to
separate out individual fisheries where it is appropriate; however, the
commenter has not presented adequate information to substantiate any
difference in risk that Maine state and Federal lobster fisheries pose
to North Atlantic right whales, or other large whale species, that
would warrant a current change in classification for these fisheries.
As stated in the 2020 Final LOF (85 FR 21079, April 16, 2020),
fisheries are classified based on the gear types used, how the gear is
fished, and the behavior of the fishery related to the risk to marine
mammals. Multiple states participate in the Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery, using a wide variety of gear and
gear configurations throughout a large portion of coastal waters. While
we recognize this variety within the fishery at large, there are not
clear boundaries to divide gear use across the wider area as suggested
by this comment. Importantly, the state of Maine does not use unique
gear configurations from other states and gear configurations within
Maine's waters are not uniform or divided across the geographic
boundaries (i.e., exemption lines) that MLA has identified. Further,
gear marking and right whale monitoring efforts throughout Maine waters
are insufficient to determine that the gear or area presents a
different risk to large whales. Below we provide further detail as to
why the information presented by the MLA is insufficient for the
requested changes. At this time, we do not have enough information to
suggest Maine's fisheries should be split from the Northeast/mid-
Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery, because the gear used in
Maine waters is not unique from other states.
While NMFS appreciates the state of Maine's efforts to manage the
footprint of where individual lobstermen may set their gear, NMFS must
look at the risk that the gear itself poses to large whales,
particularly North Atlantic right whales. Current Maine state lobster
management does not represent unique gear characteristics (e.g., the
use of weak rope exclusively or exclusion of vertical lines). In non-
exempted waters, risk reduction can be calculated based on implemented
changes to gear configurations, and if that risk reduction is
substantial enough, NMFS could revisit the fishery classification in a
future LOF.
Comment 11: MLA states that the NMFS Category I Northeast/mid-
Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery does not accurately capture
marine mammal interactions and risk. MLA recommends NMFS classify
Maine's state and Federal water's lobster fisheries as unique
fisheries, separate from the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery.
The commenter notes that in the absence of sufficient data to
properly classify all fisheries, the MMPA provides that NMFS may
evaluate other factors such as fishing techniques, gear used, methods
used to deter marine mammals, target species, seasons and areas fished,
qualitative data from logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data,
and the species and distribution of marine mammals in the area, or at
the discretion of the Assistant Administrator for Fisheries. MLA
further states that there are several factors with disparity among the
Northeast and mid-Atlantic lobster fisheries, as well as significant
differences in potential overlap with North Atlantic right whales.
These differences among the lobster fisheries include: Fishing
techniques, gear used, seasons and areas fished, fishermen's
observations of right whales and distribution of marine mammals. MLA
alleges that based on these factors, the lobster fishery prosecuted
close to shore in Maine is significantly different than lobster
fisheries which occur in offshore Lobster Management Area 3 or off of
New Jersey.
MLA also alleges that Maine's state and Federal lobster fisheries
do not meet the criteria of a Category I fishery under the MMPA. MLA
recommends NMFS reclassify the Maine state waters lobster fishery as
Category III fishery since there are no documented serious injuries or
mortalities with this fishery, and NMFS determined that regulating the
waters exempt from the Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Plan
(ALWTRP) would have no significant benefit to large whales. MLA also
recommends NMFS reclassify the Maine Federal waters lobster fishery as
Category II fishery. MLA alleges there are no documented M/SI in the
Maine Federal lobster fishery, but the Category II classification may
be warranted under an abundance of precaution that a future interaction
could occur due to the offshore migration of North Atlantic right
whales.
MLA states that according to the 2019 North Atlantic right whale
SAR, PBR is 0.8, and M/SI for commercial fisheries is 5.55. MLA's
further analysis shows zero M/SI attributed to the Maine lobster
fishery over this most recent 5 year period, while there were six
documented cases in Canadian trap/pot fisheries. In addition, MLA
alleges, there has been only one right whale entangled in Maine lobster
gear in April 2002, and the entanglement was determined to be a non-
serious injury. Maine gear was involved in a second case in 2004, but
it was not the primary entangling gear in this case. The commenter
states that there are four additional trap/pot entanglement cases that
resulted in right whale M/SI for which a fishery was not determined
and, therefore, for which the Maine lobster fishery cannot be
completely ruled out. However, a close look at these cases reveals that
the entangling gear is no longer fished, efforts to trace registration
numbers to U.S. fishery were unsuccessful, or a Maine fishery was
explicitly ruled out.
Response: NMFS uses the classification criteria described in the
preamble to classify fisheries as Category I, Category II, or Category
III. As noted, a fishery is classified under Category I if the annual
M/SI of a stock in a given fishery is greater than or equal to 50
percent of the stock's PBR level. Additional details regarding
categorization of fisheries is provided in the preamble to the final
rule implementing section 118 of the MMPA (60 FR 45086; August 30,
1995).
[[Page 3036]]
As noted in the section of this rule and the LOF proposed rule
describing how NMFS determines which species or stocks are included as
incidentally killed or injured in a fishery, for fisheries with no
observer coverage and for observed fisheries with evidence indicating
that undocumented interactions may be occurring (e.g., fishery has
evidence of fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a
specific fishery, and stranding network data include evidence of
fisheries interactions that cannot be attributed to a specific
fishery), stocks may be retained on the LOF for longer than 5 years.
For these fisheries, NMFS will review the other sources of relevant
information to determine when it is appropriate to remove a species or
stock from the LOF.
At this time, we consider it appropriate to retain North Atlantic
right whales as a species listed as driving the classification of the
Northeast/mid-Atlantic lobster trap/pot fishery given that PBR is 0.8
and the further detail provided below, which reiterates responses
provided in the 2020 Final LOF (85 FR 21079, April 16, 2020).
The commenter cites four cases of unknown entanglements they
believe explicitly rule out Maine lobster fisheries from the origin of
entanglement. However, the evidence presented is not sufficient to draw
these conclusions. In one of the commenter's cited cases (E43-12/RW
4193), red tracers were identified in the recovered gear. Red tracers
are indicative of the gear marking scheme required for the ALWTRP
Northern Inshore Trap/Pot fishery management area, a management area
that overlaps Maine, New Hampshire, and Massachusetts state waters.
Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that the entanglement may have
occurred off the coast of Maine in non-exempt waters. An additional
case from 2011, previously noted in our 2020 Final LOF response to
comments (85 FR 21079, April 16, 2020) but not mentioned in MLA's
comment, also included recovered gear with these red tracers, though
the location of that entanglement remains unknown (E11-11/RW 4040).
Therefore, Maine lobster trap/pot fisheries cannot be ruled out as the
potential origin for entanglements with undetermined origins.
We also note that two additional entanglements have been identified
as Massachusetts lobster trap/pot entanglements (E36-16/RW 3623 and
E25-09). This is relevant to the discussion since Maine state and
Federal lobster fisheries are functionally equivalent to gear found in
these entanglements; and, therefore, gear fished in Maine presents
similar risks.
While floating groundline is prohibited in ALWTRP non-exempt
management areas, there are waters along the east coast (including off
the coast of Maine) that are exempted from this ALWTRP requirement.
Therefore, the recovery of floating groundline from an entanglement
does not explicitly rule out Maine lobster fisheries. For example, in
case E25-10/RW 3911, the gear analysis found ``wire mesh is likely the
remains of wire traps that parted off from themselves. This wire mesh,
along with the 7/16 inch poly and associated gangions, is consistent
with gear used in trap/pot fisheries conducted along the east coast of
the U.S. and Canada'' (NMFS 2010 Large Whale Entanglement Report),
which is consistent with some gear fished in exempted waters.
Additionally, unless a rope diameter is explicitly prohibited in an
area, rope diameter does not rule out the potential for an entanglement
to have occurred in Maine waters, even if it does not represent the
majority's normal fishing practices. Therefore, the 9/16 inch float
rope that was recovered from E01-09/RW 3311, again, does not explicitly
rule out Maine lobster fisheries.
With this request, the commenter is also not taking into
consideration the high percentage of unidentified entanglements that
are both first sighted in the U.S. and in Canada. Over the past 5
years, there have been 4.15 M/SI entanglements documented annually
where the origin of the entanglement is unknown (Hayes et al., 2020).
The sample size of recovered gear from entanglements is small and
much of the retrieved gear is unmarked and cannot be attributed to a
particular location. Currently, the state of Maine does not require
gear marking in ALWTRP exempted areas. The lack of marks on retrieved
gear may indicate the current marking scheme is inadequate, or that
entanglements are occurring in areas where gear is not currently
marked, such as international waters or current exempted areas. The
state is currently pursuing a gear marking regime in these exempted
waters that may provide additional data about entanglement risk in
these areas in the future.
The commenter alleges ``There are zero instances of Maine lobster
gear associated with a right whale serious injury or mortality in any
data set, and only one known entanglement where Maine lobster was the
primary entangling gear in 2002 resulting in non-serious injury
determination.'' We recognize that there has only been one confirmed
mortality (in 2012) in identified U.S. trap/pot gear in the past
decade. Those cases where we could identify lobster gear from right
whale entanglements during the past 10 years were determined to result
in non-serious injuries. However, there have been a number of life-
threatening entanglements since 2010 that have resulted in a non-
serious injury due to disentanglement intervention. (Henry et al.,
2019). According to NMFS' ``Process for Distinguishing Serious from
Non-Serious Injury of Marine Mammals (NMFS 2015, 02-238-01),'' cases
that would have been serious injuries prior to disentanglement are not
counted against PBR in the SAR, but they are included in the recorded
takes for the LOF and associated management measures. Aerial surveys,
whale watching boats, the presence of other fisheries, and the presence
and associated outreach by a disentanglement team contribute to the
higher reporting of entanglement sightings in certain areas (i.e.,
Massachusetts) than in Maine state and offshore waters; we cannot
conclude that risk is nonexistent in other areas where entanglements
are not observed. With 85 percent of all observed right whales
exhibiting entanglement scars, it is likely that entanglements are
indeed occurring in areas where entanglements have not yet been
observed and/or reported.
NMFS will continue to annually evaluate marine mammal interactions
and risk posed by a variety of gear types and fisheries through the LOF
process. As stated previously, should information suggest that unique
gear characteristics have lowered the risk of interaction in a
particular geographically unique portion of a fishery, NMFS will
evaluate to determine if the risk reduction is sufficient for
separating the fishery out from the broader, current, classification of
the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery.
As stated above, we find that there is insufficient information to
suggest that Maine's fisheries should be split from the Northeast/mid-
Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery because the gear used in
Maine waters and the manner in which the gear is used are not unique
from other states. Further, we maintain that entanglement data indicate
that the gear used across this fishery remains a risk to right whales.
Should Maine fisheries make significant changes to their gear
configurations that differentiate these fisheries from other state and
Federal lobster trap/pot fisheries, such as eliminating vertical lines,
NMFS will reconsider this decision.
[[Page 3037]]
Comment 12: AOLA expresses concern that data used in the LOF do not
represent the current conditions of the Category I Northeast/mid-
Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery nor marine mammal stocks.
The commenter notes that the primary information used in the 2021 LOF
comes from 2019 SARs, which are based on data from 2013-2017. Yet since
2013, the northwest Atlantic has undergone considerable climatic
changes that have influenced the distributions of marine mammals and
their prey. AOLA further states that the 2014 ALWTRP regulations as
well as the American lobster fishery management plan regulations,
reduced vertical lines and enhanced gear marking in the fishery. AOLA
requests NMFS incorporate more timely data and recent information into
the 2021 LOF.
Response: NMFS agrees that the best available scientific
information is important for assessing the risk fisheries pose to
marine mammal stocks. NMFS uses the best available scientific
information to prepare the annual LOF. This includes relying on the
SARs, which are peer reviewed by the U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean Scientific Review Group. The MMPA established this SRG, along
with two others, to review the science that informs the SARs, and to
advise NMFS on marine mammal population status, trends, and stock
structure, uncertainties in the science, research needs, and other
issues. We recognize that this peer review process takes additional
time to ensure that the best available are used to inform the LOF.
However, the SARs generally provide the most current and inclusive
information on each stock's PBR level and level of interaction with
commercial fishing operations; there may also be more recent reports
that include bycatch estimates.
Comment 13: AOLA expresses concern with how NMFS assigns M/SI when
the origin of entanglement is unknown. AOLA states to that according to
the 2019 North Atlantic right whale SAR the 5-year mean estimated M/SI
from entanglements is 5.55. Of those, 0.2 were attributed to U.S.
fisheries, 1.2 to Canadian fisheries, and the remaining 4.15 were
undetermined. The commenter notes that NMFS splits undetermined North
Atlantic right whale M/SI evenly between the two countries. However, 86
percent of known entanglements were in Canadian gear. AOLA recommends
NMFS split undetermined North Atlantic right whale M/SI between the two
countries based on the percentage of known entanglements from each
country and this prorated distribution of M/SI should be used when
classifying fisheries on the LOF.
Response: For determining a fishery's classification on the LOF,
NMFS must assess the M/SI with respect to a stock's PBR. See response
to comment #11 above about M/SI of right whales that is attributed to
the Northeast/mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery.
With respect to the current unknown North Atlantic right whale M/SI
being assumed to be divided between both Canada and U.S. equally, this
was a scenario that NMFS generated to support ALWTRT deliberations and
is not used for classifying fisheries on the MMPA LOF. Given the
additional regulatory requirements for Category I and II fisheries,
NMFS uses known M/SI that can be attributed to a specific fishery for
LOF analysis.
Comment 14: AOLA expresses concern over the perceived lack of
parity when assessing the impacts of fisheries on marine mammals. AOLA
understands that with limited observer coverage and data gaps there is
a level of subjectivity into the LOF classification process; however,
the process should be equal among fisheries. The commenter notes that
the Northeast/mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery is
classified as a Category I fishery for North Atlantic right whales, yet
there has been only one confirmed mortality in American lobster trap/
pot gear in the past decade (2012) and no documented serious injuries
(as stated in the 2020 LOF final rule). In the 2020 LOF final rule,
NMFS cites all U.S. undetermined M/SI, potential M/SI prevented by
intervention, and North Atlantic right whale entanglement scarring
rates as data used for the Category I classification of the Northeast/
mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery. AOLA recommends NMFS
take a more equitable approach when assessing entanglement risk across
fisheries, countries, and non-fishery sources, and also notes this
would assist in assuring fishermen are treated fairly.
Response: The LOF is the annual process NMFS conducts to place all
U.S. commercial fisheries into one of three categories based on the
level of incidental mortality and serious injury of marine mammals
occurring in each fishery. See response to comment #11 above about how
cases that would have been serious injuries prior to disentanglement
are not counted against PBR in the SAR, but are included in the LOF
classification process.
For fisheries with no observer coverage and for observed fisheries
with evidence indicating that undocumented interactions may be
occurring (e.g., fishery has low observer coverage and stranding
network data include evidence of fisheries interactions that cannot be
attributed to a specific fishery), NMFS uses the best available data to
inform the LOF; thus, data older than 5 years may be used to retain a
fishery classification or the list of species and stocks killed/injured
incidental to a fishery. For these fisheries, NMFS will review the
other sources of information listed above and use its discretion to
decide when it is appropriate to remove a species or stock.
The assessment of large whale M/SI in fisheries with limited
observer coverage remains a considerable challenge compared to other
gear types that interact with pinniped or small cetaceans. In fisheries
with sufficient observer coverage, NMFS extrapolates annual M/SI
estimates for bycaught species. However, large whale fishery
interaction assessments are dependent on direct counts of entangled
whales, not the fishery per se. This observed count of entanglements is
not representative of total fishery-related M/SI that goes undetected
or unattributed to a particular cause, and therefore represents the
minimum M/SI. A method to assign cause to these unknown, as well as
undetected mortalities, while addressing country entanglement of
origin, is currently under development (Hayes et al., 2020). When these
estimations become available, NMFS will solicit public comment through
the SAR publication process.
Comment 15: MA DMF recommends NMFS reclassify the Massachusetts
state waters lobster trap/pot fishery as its own non-Category I
fishery, separate from the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery based on the gear restrictions and large whale
conservation programs that are unique to Massachusetts. They note that
the state of Massachusetts has a number of actions currently in place,
as well as a number of additional actions that will be in place for the
2021 fishing season, that distinguish the Massachusetts state lobster
trap/pot fishery as unique from the rest of the Category I Northeast/
mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot fishery. MA DMF states that they
are the only state lobster trap/trap fishery implementing the following
actions either currently or in the future: (1) Lobster trap/pot fishery
closure from February 1st to April 30th (currently in place for the
Massachusetts Bay Restricted Area, proposed closure of all state waters
beginning February 1, 2021); (2) dynamic extension of the lobster trap/
pot fishery closure to ensure
[[Page 3038]]
safe passage of right whales from our waters prior to fixed gear being
set (currently in place for the Massachusetts Bay Restricted Area,
proposed for all state waters beginning February 1, 2021); (3) ban use
of vertical buoy lines greater than \3/8\ inch diameter (proposed to
begin February 1, 2021); (4) ban fishing single traps by the majority
of its active fleet (proposed to begin January 1, 2022); (5) universal
requirement of 1,700 pound breaking strength line or equivalent
contrivance (proposed to begin February 1, 2021); (6) permitting and
regulatory scheme designed to reduce participation and effort over time
(currently in place); and (7) demonstrated substantial decline in the
number of participants and the number of buoy lines deployed (currently
in place). Based on these mitigation efforts, MA DMF recommends NMFS
reclassify the Massachusetts state waters lobster trap/pot fishery as
its own non-Category I fishery.
Response: NMFS appreciates the actions the state of Massachusetts
has taken, and continues to take, to help conserve and protect North
Atlantic right whales. However, the current implemented measures are
not enough to suggest Massachusetts's state waters lobster trap/pot
fishery should be split from the Category I Northeast/mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery. At this time, NMFS retains the
Category I classification for the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American
lobster trap/pot fishery, which includes the state waters of
Massachusetts. Additional detail on how gear would be considered unique
to differentiate it from other state lobster and trap/pot fisheries is
included in response to Comment #11. NMFS looks forward to seeing what
measures the state of Massachusetts will finalize and implement for the
state lobster trap/pot fishery in the future. Should major changes to
lobster gear and fishing practices be required and implemented for all
Massachusetts state lobster fishing gear, making this gear unique and
easily identified from other state and Federal gear, NMFS will re-
evaluate the status of this fishery and consider it in a future
proposed LOF.
Comment 16: Whale Safe USA requests NMFS maintain the Category I
classifications for Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery and Northeast sink gillnet fishery.
Response: As stated above in response to Comments #11 and 15, NMFS
retains the Category I classification of the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot fishery. Additionally, no data is currently
available to suggest state fisheries should be separated from the
Category I Northeast sink gillnet fishery, therefore NMFS retains the
Category I classification for the Northeast sink gillnet fishery.
Summary of Changes From the Proposed Rule
NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery from a
Category II to Category III fishery. NMFS also removes both the Eastern
North Pacific AK resident stock and Gulf of Alaska, BSAI transient
stock of killer whales from the list of species and/or stocks
incidentally killed or injured in the BSAI Pacific cod longline
fishery.
NMFS updates the MMAP certificate process for calendar year 2021.
MMAP certificates issued in 2020 remain in effect, valid through
December 31, 2021, for vessel or gear owners participating in all
Category I and II fisheries as of the final 2021 LOF.
Summary of Changes to the LOF for 2021
The following summarizes changes to the LOF for 2021, including the
classification of fisheries, fisheries listed, the estimated number of
vessels/persons in a particular fishery, and the species and/or stocks
that are incidentally killed or injured in a particular fishery. NMFS
re-classifies two fisheries in the LOF for 2021. NMFS also makes
changes to the estimated number of vessels/persons and list of species
and/or stocks killed or injured in certain fisheries. The
classifications and definitions of U.S. commercial fisheries for 2021
are identical to those provided in the LOF for 2020 with the changes
discussed below. State and regional abbreviations used in the following
paragraphs include: AK (Alaska), CA (California), HI (Hawaii), OR
(Oregon), WA (Washington), and WNA (Western North Atlantic).
Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
Classification of Fisheries
NMFS reclassifies the AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
pot fishery from a Category III to a Category II fishery.
NMFS reclassifies the AK BSAI Pacific cod longline fishery from at
Category II to Category III fishery.
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the CA/OR/WA stock of minke whale
indicating it is driving the Category II classification of the CA
thresher shark/swordfish drift gillnet ([gteqt]14 in mesh) fishery.
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the Pacific
Ocean (Table 1) as follows:
Category I
HI deep-set longline fishery from 145 to 143 vessels/
persons;
Category II
HI shallow-set longline fishery from 18 to 11 vessels/
persons;
American Samoa longline fishery from 15 to 13 vessels/
persons; and
Category III
American Samoa bottomfish handline fishery from fewer than
30 to fewer than 20 vessels/persons.
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Pacific Ocean
NMFS adds the Aleutian Islands stock of harbor seal to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands rockfish trawl fishery.
NMFS adds three stocks to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod pot fishery: (1) Bristol Bay stock of harbor seal, (2)
Western North Pacific stock of humpback whale, and (3) Central North
Pacific stock of humpback whale.
NMFS adds both the Eastern North Pacific Gulf of Alaska, Aleutian
Islands, and Bering Sea Transient stock, and West Coast Transient
stock, of killer whales to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II CA Dungeness crab pot fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category III CA squid purse seine fishery: (1)
CA/OR/WA stock of Risso's dolphin and (2) U.S. stock of California sea
lion.
NMFS adds the Cook Inlet stock of harbor seal to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Gulf of Alaska halibut longline fishery.
NMFS adds the Aleutian Islands stock of harbor seal to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Atka mackerel trawl fishery.
NMFS adds the U.S. stock of California sea lion to the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III WA/
OR/CA shrimp trawl fishery.
NMFS adds two stocks to the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category III WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl
fishery: (1) California
[[Page 3039]]
breeding stock of northern elephant seal and (2) CA/OR/WA stock of
northern right whale dolphin.
NMFS adds to the Western North Pacific stock of humpback whale to
the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category III AK/WA/OR/CA commercial passenger fishing vessel fishery.
NMFS removes three stocks from the list of species/stocks incidentally
killed or injured in the Category II AK Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands
pollock trawl fishery: (1) Alaska stock of ringed seal, (2) Central
North Pacific stock of humpback whale and (3) Western North Pacific
stock of humpback whale.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of ringed seal from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category II AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Western U.S. stock of Steller sea lion from the
list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category
II AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish longline fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of ringed seal from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Bering Sea, Aleutian Islands Pacific cod trawl fishery.
NMFS removes the Alaska stock of harbor seal from the list of
species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the Category III AK
Gulf of Alaska flatfish trawl fishery.
Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean
Fishery Name and Organizational Changes and Clarification
NMFS adds a superscript ``1'' to the following four stocks to
indicate they are driving the Category II classification of the
Northeast trawl fishery: (1) Western North Atlantic stock of Risso's
dolphin, (2) Western North Atlantic stock of long-finned pilot whale,
(3) Western North Atlantic offshore stock of bottlenose dolphin, and
(4) Western North Atlantic stock of gray seal.
NMFS clarifies the fishery description of the Category II
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl fishery. NMFS
clarifies that this fishery targets shrimp species with various gear
types, but mainly utilizes skimmer or otter trawls. These gear types
likely entangle marine mammals, particularly bottlenose dolphins, in
very similar ways. The common entangling mechanism of these gear types
are the ``lazy'' or ``easy'' line.
NMFS clarifies the fishery description of the Category I Atlantic
Ocean, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico large pelagics longline fishery. NMFS
clarifies that the fishery does not target bluefin tuna, shortfin mako
sharks and other shark species.
As discussed in the proposed rule, NMFS clarifies its response to
Comment #14 in the 2020 Final LOF (85 FR 21079; April 16, 2020). In
Comment #14, MLA notes ``there has been only one right whale entangled
in Maine gear in April 2002, and the entanglement was determined to be
a non-serious injury. There are two additional non-serious injury
entanglement cases that involved Maine lobster gear. However, Maine
lobster gear was not the primary entangling gear in these cases.'' In
the 2020 Final LOF, NMFS' response in part to this comment stated: ``We
recognize that there has only been one confirmed mortality (in 2012) in
American lobster gear in the past decade. All other documented lobster
interactions were determined to result in non-serious injuries.
However, there have been a number of entanglements for which
interventions occurred because these entanglements were determined to
be resulting in serious injuries (Henry et al., 2019).''
NMFS clarifies part of the response to Comment #14 to state: We
recognize there has been only one confirmed mortality (in 2012) in the
past decade in U.S. Northern inshore/nearshore trap/pot gear which
could be gear from the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic American lobster trap/pot
fishery or the Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery. All other
documented lobster interactions were determined to result in non-
serious injuries. However, there have been a number of entanglements
for which interventions occurred because these entanglements were
determined to be resulting in serious injuries (Henry et al., 2019).
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of vessels/persons in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean (Table 2) as follows:
Category I
Mid-Atlantic gillnet fishery from 3,950 to 4,020 vessels/
person;
Northeast sink gillnet fishery from 3,163 to 4,072
vessels/persons;
Category II
Chesapeake Bay inshore gillnet fishery from 248 to 265
vessels/persons;
Northeast bottom trawl fishery from 2,238 to 968 vessels/
persons;
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery from 4,950 to 10,824 vessels/persons;
Atlantic mixed species trap/pot fishery from 3,332 to
3,493 vessels/persons;
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse seine fishery from 19 to 17
vessels/persons;
Virginia pound net fishery from 26 to 20 vessels/persons;
Category III
Caribbean gillnet fishery from >991 to 127 vessels/
persons;
Caribbean mixed species trap/pot fishery from >501 to 154
vessels/persons;
Caribbean spiny lobster trap/pot fishery from >197 to 40
vessels/persons; and
Caribbean haul/beach seine fishery from 15 to 38 vessels/
person.
NMFS notes there is variability in the estimated number of vessels/
persons in the Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of Mexico shrimp trawl
fishery. This variability is due to multiple permitting agencies,
differences in fishery management, and artifacts with available data
sets. A complete explanation of the variability is available in the
Environmental Impact Statement to Reduce the Incidental Bycatch and
Mortality of Sea Turtles in the Southeastern U.S. Shrimp Fisheries
(November 4, 2019).
List of Species and/or Stocks Incidentally Killed or Injured in the
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
NMFS adds the Mobile Bay, Bonsecour Bay stock of bottlenose dolphin
to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in the
Category II Gulf of Mexico gillnet fishery.
NMFS adds the Western North Atlantic offshore stock of bottlenose
dolphin to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in
the Category II mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl (including pair trawl)
fishery.
NMFS adds the Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands stock of
bottlenose dolphin to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or
injured in Category III Caribbean mixed species trap/pot fishery.
Following consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
NMFS adds the Antillean subspecies (Puerto Rico stock) of West Indian
manatee to the list of species/stocks incidentally killed or injured in
Category III Caribbean haul/beach seine fishery.
NMFS removes the Western North Atlantic offshore stock of
bottlenose dolphin from the list of species/stocks incidentally killed
or injured in the Category III Gulf of Maine, U.S. mid-
[[Page 3040]]
Atlantic tuna, shark, swordfish hook-and line/harpoon fishery.
Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
Number of Vessels/Persons
NMFS updates the estimated number of HSFCA permits for high seas
fisheries (Table 3) as follows:
Category I
Atlantic highly migratory species longline fishery from 53
to 45 HSFCA permits;
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI deep-set component)
fishery from 145 to 143 HSFCA permits;
Category II
South Pacific tuna purse seine fishery from 33 to 26 HSFCA
permits;
South Pacific tuna longline fishery from 2 to 3 HSFCA
permits;
Western Pacific pelagic longline (HI shallow-set
component) fishery from 18 to 11 HSFCA permits;
Atlantic highly migratory species handline/pole and line
fishery from 2 to 1 HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species handline/pole and line
fishery from 41 to 43 HSFCA permits;
South Pacific albacore troll handline/pole and line
fishery from 11 to 10 HSFCA permits;
South Pacific albacore troll fishery from 17 to 18 HSFCA
permits;
Western Pacific pelagic troll fishery from 5 to 4 HSFCA
permits;
Category III
Northwest Atlantic bottom longline fishery from 3 to 2
HSFCA permits;
Pacific highly migratory species longline fishery from 108
to 105 HSFCA permits; and
Pacific highly migratory species troll fishery from 119 to
111 HSFCA permits.
List of Fisheries
The following tables set forth the list of U.S. commercial
fisheries according to their classification under section 118 of the
MMPA. Table 1 lists commercial fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
(including Alaska), Table 2 lists commercial fisheries in the Atlantic
Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean, Table 3 lists commercial
fisheries on the high seas, and Table 4 lists fisheries affected by
TRPs or TRTs.
In Tables 1 and 2, the estimated number of vessels or persons
participating in fisheries operating within U.S. waters is expressed in
terms of the number of active participants in the fishery, when
possible. If this information is not available, the estimated number of
vessels or persons licensed for a particular fishery is provided. If no
recent information is available on the number of participants, vessels,
or persons licensed in a fishery, then the number from the most recent
LOF is used for the estimated number of vessels or persons in the
fishery. NMFS acknowledges that, in some cases, these estimates may be
inflations of actual effort. For example, the State of Hawaii does not
issue fishery-specific licenses, and the number of participants
reported in the LOF represents the number of commercial marine license
holders who reported using a particular fishing gear type/method at
least once in a given year, without considering how many times the gear
was used. For these fisheries, effort by a single participant is
counted the same whether the fisherman used the gear only once or every
day. In the Mid-Atlantic and New England fisheries, the numbers
represent the potential effort for each fishery, given the multiple
gear types for which several state permits may allow. Changes made to
Mid-Atlantic and New England fishery participants will not affect
observer coverage or bycatch estimates, as observer coverage and
bycatch estimates are based on vessel trip reports and landings data.
Tables 1 and 2 serve to provide a description of the fishery's
potential effort (state and Federal). If NMFS is able to extract more
accurate information on the gear types used by state permit holders in
the future, the numbers will be updated to reflect this change. For
additional information on fishing effort in fisheries found on Table 1
or 2, contact the relevant regional office (contact information
included above in Where can I find more information about the LOF and
the MMAP? section).
For high seas fisheries, Table 3 lists the number of valid HSFCA
permits currently held. Although this likely overestimates the number
of active participants in many of these fisheries, the number of valid
HSFCA permits is the most reliable data on the potential effort in high
seas fisheries at this time. As noted previously in this LOF, the
number of HSFCA permits listed in Table 3 for the high seas components
of fisheries that also operate within U.S. waters does not necessarily
represent additional effort that is not accounted for in Tables 1 and
2. Many vessels holding HSFCA permits also fish within U.S. waters and
are included in the number of vessels and participants operating within
those fisheries in Tables 1 and 2.
Tables 1, 2, and 3 also list the marine mammal species and/or
stocks incidentally killed or injured (seriously or non-seriously) in
each fishery based on SARs, injury determination reports, bycatch
estimation reports, observer data, logbook data, stranding data,
disentanglement network data, fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP
reports), and anecdotal reports. The best available scientific
information included in these reports is based on data through 2017.
This list includes all species and/or stocks known to be killed or
injured in a given fishery, but also includes species and/or stocks for
which there are anecdotal records of a mortality or injury.
Additionally, species identified by logbook entries, stranding data, or
fishermen self-reports (i.e., MMAP reports) may not be verified. In
Tables 1 and 2, NMFS has designated those species/stocks driving a
fishery's classification (i.e., the fishery is classified based on
mortalities and serious injuries of a marine mammal stock that are
greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I), or greater than 1
percent and less than 50 percent (Category II), of a stock's PBR) by a
``1'' after the stock's name.
In Tables 1 and 2, there are several fisheries classified as
Category II that have no recent documented mortalities or serious
injuries of marine mammals, or fisheries that did not result in a
mortality or serious injury rate greater than 1 percent of a stock's
PBR level based on known interactions. NMFS has classified these
fisheries by analogy to other Category I or II fisheries that use
similar fishing techniques or gear that are known to cause mortality or
serious injury of marine mammals, as discussed in the final LOF for
1996 (60 FR 67063; December 28, 1995), and according to factors listed
in the definition of a ``Category II fishery'' in 50 CFR 229.2 (i.e.,
fishing techniques, gear types, methods used to deter marine mammals,
target species, seasons and areas fished, qualitative data from
logbooks or fishermen reports, stranding data, and the species and
distribution of marine mammals in the area). NMFS has designated those
fisheries listed by analogy in Tables 1 and 2 by adding a ``2'' after
the fishery's name.
There are several fisheries in Tables 1, 2, and 3 in which a
portion of the fishing vessels cross the EEZ boundary and therefore
operate both within U.S. waters and on the high seas. These fisheries,
though listed separately on Table 1 or 2 and Table 3, are considered
the same fisheries on either side of the EEZ boundary. NMFS has
designated those fisheries in each table with an asterisk (*) after the
fishery's name.
[[Page 3041]]
Table 1--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Pacific Ocean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Estimated # of and/or stocks
Fishery description vessels/ incidentally killed or
persons injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
HI deep-set longline * 143 Bottlenose dolphin, HI
[supcaret]. Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic \1\.
False killer whale, MHI
Insular \1\.
False killer whale,
NWHI.
Humpback whale. Central
North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or
dwarf sperm whale),
HI.
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
HI.
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
CA thresher shark/swordfish 14 Bottlenose dolphin, CA/
drift gillnet (>=14 in OR/WA offshore.
mesh) *. California sea lion,
U.S.
Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/
WA.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA.
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA.
Minke whale, CA/OR/WA
\1\.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Northern right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/
WA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Short-finned pilot
whale, CA/OR/WA \1\.
Sperm Whale, CA/OR/WA
\1\.
CA halibut/white seabass 37 California sea lion,
and other species set U.S.
gillnet (>3.5 in mesh). Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Sea otter, CA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
CA yellowtail, barracuda, 22 California sea lion,
and white seabass drift U.S.
gillnet (mesh size >=3.5 Long-beaked common
in and <14 in) \ 2\. dolphin, CA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
AK Bristol Bay salmon drift 1,862 Beluga whale, Bristol
gillnet \2\. Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Bristol Bay salmon set 979 Beluga whale, Bristol
gillnet \2\. Bay.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Spotted seal, AK.
AK Kodiak salmon set 188 Harbor porpoise, GOA
gillnet. \1\.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western
North Pacific.
Sea otter, Southwest
AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon set 736 Beluga whale, Cook
gillnet. Inlet.
Dall's porpoise, AK.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific \1\.
Sea otter, South
central AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Cook Inlet salmon drift 569 Beluga whale, Cook
gillnet. Inlet.
Dall's porpoise, AK.
[[Page 3042]]
Harbor porpoise, GOA
\1\.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 162 Dall's porpoise, AK.
Islands salmon drift
gillnet \2\.
Harbor porpoise, GOA.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
AK Peninsula/Aleutian 113 Harbor porpoise, Bering
Islands salmon set gillnet Sea.
\2\.
Northern sea otter,
Southwest AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Prince William Sound 537 Dall's porpoise, AK.
salmon drift gillnet.
Harbor porpoise, GOA
\1\.
Harbor seal, GOA.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific.
Sea otter, South
central AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.\1\
AK Southeast salmon drift 474 Dall's porpoise, AK.
gillnet.
Harbor porpoise,
Southeast AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast
AK.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific \1\.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, North
Pacific.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
AK Yakutat salmon set 168 Gray whale, Eastern
gillnet \2\. North Pacific.
Harbor Porpoise,
Southeastern AK.
Harbor seal, Southeast
AK.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific
(Southeast AK).
WA Puget Sound Region 154 Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/
salmon drift gillnet WA.
(includes all inland Harbor porpoise, inland
waters south of US-Canada WA \1\.
border and eastward of the Harbor seal, WA inland.
Bonilla-Tatoosh line-
Treaty Indian fishing is
excluded).
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 32 Bearded seal, AK.
Islands flatfish trawl.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor porpoise, Bering
Sea.
Harbor seal, Bering
Sea.
Humpback whale, Western
North Pacific \1\.
Killer whale, AK
resident \1\.
Killer whale, GOA, AI,
BS transient \1\.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Ringed seal, AK.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.\1\.
Walrus, AK.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 102 Bearded Seal, AK.
Islands pollock trawl.
Beluga whale, Bristol
Bay.
Beluga whale, Eastern
Bering Sea.
Beluga whale, Eastern
Chukchi Sea.
Harbor seal, AK.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.\1\.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 17 Harbor seal, Aleutian
Islands rockfish trawl. Islands.
Killer whale, ENP AK
resident \1\.
Killer whale, GOA, AI,
BS transient \1\.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Pot, Ring Net, and Trap
Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 59 Harbor seal, Bristol
Islands Pacific cod pot. Bay.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western
North Pacific.
CA coonstripe shrimp pot... 14 Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA.
CA spiny lobster........... 186 Bottlenose dolphin, CA/
OR/WA offshore.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Southern sea otter.
CA spot prawn pot.......... 23 Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
[[Page 3043]]
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA.
CA Dungeness crab pot...... 501 Blue whale, Eastern
North Pacific \1\.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
Killer whale, Eastern
North Pacific GOA,
BSAI transient.
Killer whale, West
Coast transient.
OR Dungeness crab pot...... 342 Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
WA/OR/CA sablefish pot..... 155 Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
WA coastal Dungeness crab 197 Gray whale, Eastern
pot. North Pacific.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA \1\.
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish 295 Sperm whale, North
longline. Pacific.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
HI shallow-set longline * 11 Blainville's beaked
[supcaret]. whale, HI.
Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic \1\.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
American Samoa longline \2\ 13 False killer whale,
American Samoa.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
American Samoa.
Short-finned pilot
whale, unknown.
HI shortline \2\........... 9 None documented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
AK Kuskokwim, Yukon, Norton 1,778 Harbor porpoise, Bering
Sound, Kotzebue salmon Sea.
gillnet.
AK Prince William Sound 29 Harbor seal, GOA.
salmon set gillnet.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Sea otter, South
central AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK roe herring and food/ 920 None documented.
bait herring gillnet.
CA set gillnet (mesh size 296 None documented.
<3.5 in).
HI inshore gillnet......... 36 Bottlenose dolphin, HI.
Spinner dolphin, HI.
WA Grays Harbor salmon 24 Harbor seal, OR/WA
drift gillnet (excluding coast.
treaty Tribal fishing).
WA/OR Mainstem Columbia 15 None documented.
River eulachon gillnet.
WA/OR lower Columbia River 110 California sea lion,
(includes tributaries) U.S.
drift gillnet. Harbor seal, OR/WA
coast.
WA Willapa Bay drift 82 Harbor seal, OR/WA
gillnet. coast.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Miscellaneous Net Fisheries:
AK Cook Inlet salmon purse 83 Humpback whale, Central
seine. North Pacific.
AK Kodiak salmon purse 376 Dall's porpoise, AK.
seine.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Humpback whale, Western
North Pacific.
AK Southeast salmon purse 315 Humpback whale, Central
seine. North Pacific.
AK roe herring and food/ 10 None documented.
bait herring beach seine.
AK roe herring and food/ 356 None documented.
bait herring purse seine.
AK salmon beach seine...... 31 None documented.
AK salmon purse seine 936 Harbor seal, GOA.
(Prince William Sound, Harbor seal, Prince
Chignik, Alaska Peninsula). William Sound.
WA/OR sardine purse seine.. 42 None documented.
CA anchovy, mackerel, 65 California sea lion,
sardine purse seine. U.S.
Harbor seal, CA.
CA squid purse seine....... 80 California sea lion,
U.S.
Long-beaked common
dolphin, CA.
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/
WA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
CA tuna purse seine *...... 10 None documented.
WA/OR Lower Columbia River 10 None documented.
salmon seine.
WA/OR herring, smelt, squid 130 None documented.
purse seine or lampara.
WA salmon purse seine...... 75 None documented.
WA salmon reef net......... 11 None documented.
[[Page 3044]]
HI lift net................ 17 None documented.
HI inshore purse seine..... <3 None documented.
HI throw net, cast net..... 23 None documented.
HI seine net............... 24 None documented.
Dip Net Fisheries:
CA squid dip net........... 115 None documented.
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
CA marine shellfish unknown None documented.
aquaculture.
CA salmon enhancement >1 None documented.
rearing pen.
CA white seabass 13 California sea lion,
enhancement net pens. U.S.
HI offshore pen culture.... 2 None documented.
WA salmon net pens......... 14 California sea lion,
U.S.
Harbor seal, WA inland
waters.
WA/OR shellfish aquaculture 23 None documented.
Troll Fisheries:
WA/OR/CA albacore surface 705 None documented.
hook and line/troll.
CA halibut hook and line/ unknown None documented.
handline.
CA white seabass hook and unknown None documented.
line/handline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian unknown None documented.
Islands groundfish hand
troll and dinglebar troll.
AK Gulf of Alaska unknown None documented.
groundfish hand troll and
dinglebar troll.
AK salmon troll............ 1,908 Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
American Samoa tuna troll.. 13 None documented.
CA/OR/WA salmon troll...... 4,300 None documented.
HI troll................... 2,117 Pantropical spotted
dolphin, HI.
HI rod and reel............ 322 None documented.
Commonwealth of the 40 None documented.
Northern Mariana Islands
tuna troll.
Guam tuna troll............ 432 None documented.
Longline/Set Line Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 4 Killer whale, AK
Islands Greenland turbot resident.
longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 45 Northern fur seal,
Islands Pacific cod Eastern Pacific.
longline.
Spotted seal, AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 22 None documented.
Islands sablefish longline.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 127 Northern fur seal,
Islands halibut longline. Eastern Pacific.
Sperm whale, North
Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska halibut 855 Harbor seal, Cook
longline. Inlet.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 92 Steller sea lion,
cod longline. Western U.S.
AK octopus/squid longline.. 3 None documented.
AK state-managed waters 464 None documented.
longline/setline
(including sablefish,
rockfish, lingcod, and
miscellaneous finfish).
WA/OR/CA groundfish, 367 Bottlenose dolphin, CA/
bottomfish longline/set OR/WA offshore.
line. California sea lion,
U.S.
Northern elephant seal,
California breeding.
Sperm whale, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
WA/OR Pacific halibut 350 None documented.
longline.
CA pelagic longline........ 1 None documented in the
most recent 5 years of
data.
HI kaka line............... 15 None documented.
HI vertical line........... 3 None documented.
Trawl Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 13 Bearded seal, AK.
Islands Atka mackerel
trawl.
Harbor seal, Aleutian
Islands.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 72 Bearded seal, AK.
Islands Pacific cod trawl.
Ribbon seal, AK.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska flatfish 36 Northern elephant seal,
trawl. North Pacific.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 55 Harbor seal, AK.
cod trawl.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska pollock 67 Dall's porpoise, AK.
trawl.
Fin whale, Northeast
Pacific.
Northern elephant seal,
North Pacific.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
AK Gulf of Alaska rockfish 43 Steller sea lion,
trawl. Western U.S.
AK Kodiak food/bait herring 4 None documented.
otter trawl.
AK shrimp otter trawl and 38 None documented.
beam trawl.
[[Page 3045]]
AK state-managed waters of 2 None documented.
Prince William Sound
groundfish trawl.
CA halibut bottom trawl.... 47 California sea lion,
U.S.
Harbor porpoise,
unknown.
Harbor seal, unknown.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Steller sea lion,
unknown.
CA sea cucumber trawl...... 16 None documented.
WA/OR/CA shrimp trawl...... 300 California sea lion,
U.S.
WA/OR/CA groundfish trawl.. 160-180 California sea lion,
U.S.
Dall's porpoise, CA/OR/
WA.
Harbor seal, OR/WA
coast.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Northern fur seal,
Eastern Pacific.
Northern right whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
Pot, Ring Net, and Trap
Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 6 None documented.
Islands sablefish pot.
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 540 Bowhead whale, Western
Islands crab pot. Arctic.
Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
AK Gulf of Alaska crab pot. 271 None documented.
AK Gulf of Alaska Pacific 116 Harbor seal, GOA.
cod pot.
AK Gulf of Alaska sablefish 248 None documented.
pot.
AK Southeast Alaska crab 375 Humpback whale, Central
pot. North Pacific
(Southeast AK).
AK Southeast Alaska shrimp 99 Humpback whale, Central
pot. North Pacific
(Southeast AK).
AK shrimp pot, except 141 None documented.
Southeast.
AK octopus/squid pot....... 15 None documented.
CA rock crab pot........... 124 Gray whale, Eastern
North Pacific.
Harbor seal, CA.
WA/OR/CA hagfish pot....... 54 None documented.
WA/OR shrimp pot/trap...... 254 None documented.
WA Puget Sound Dungeness 249 None documented.
crab pot/trap.
HI crab trap............... 5 Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
HI fish trap............... 9 None documented.
HI lobster trap............ <3 None documented in
recent years.
HI shrimp trap............. 10 None documented.
HI crab net................ 4 None documented.
HI Kona crab loop net...... 33 None documented.
Hook and Line, Handline, and
Jig Fisheries:
AK Bering Sea, Aleutian 2 None documented.
Islands groundfish jig.
AK Gulf of Alaska 214 Fin whale, Northeast
groundfish jig. Pacific.
AK halibut jig............. 71 None documented.
American Samoa bottomfish.. fewer than 20 None documented.
Commonwealth of the 28 None documented.
Northern Mariana Islands
bottomfish.
Guam bottomfish............ >300 None documented.
HI aku boat, pole, and line <3 None documented.
HI bottomfish handline..... 578 None documented in
recent years.
HI inshore handline........ 357 None documented.
HI pelagic handline........ 534 None documented.
WA groundfish, bottomfish 679 None documented.
jig.
Western Pacific squid jig.. 0 None documented.
Harpoon Fisheries:
CA swordfish harpoon....... 6 None documented.
Pound Net/Weir Fisheries:
AK herring spawn on kelp 291 None documented.
pound net.
AK Southeast herring roe/ 2 None documented.
food/bait pound net.
HI bullpen trap............ 3 None documented.
Bait Pens:
WA/OR/CA bait pens......... 13 California sea lion,
U.S.
Dredge Fissheries:
AK scallop dredge.......... 108 (5 AK) None documented.
Dive, Hand/Mechanical
Collection Fisheries:
AK clam.................... 130 None documented.
AK Dungeness crab.......... 2 None documented.
AK herring spawn on kelp... 266 None documented.
AK miscellaneous 214 None documented.
invertebrates handpick.
HI black coral diving...... <3 None documented.
HI fish pond............... 5 None documented.
[[Page 3046]]
HI handpick................ 46 None documented.
HI lobster diving.......... 19 None documented.
HI spearfishing............ 163 None documented.
WA/CA kelp................. 4 None documented.
WA/OR bait shrimp, clam 201 None documented.
hand, dive, or mechanical
collection.
OR/CA sea urchin, sea 10 None documented.
cucumber hand, dive, or
mechanical collection.
Commercial Passenger Fishing
Vessel (Charter Boat)
Fisheries:
AK/WA/OR/CA commercial >7,000 (1,006 Humpback whale, Western
passenger fishing vessel. AK) North Pacific.
Killer whale, unknown.
Steller sea lion,
Eastern U.S.
Steller sea lion,
Western U.S.
Live Finfish/Shellfish
Fisheries:
CA nearshore finfish live 93 None documented.
trap/hook-and-line.
HI aquarium collecting..... 90 None documented.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 1: AI--Aleutian Islands;
AK--Alaska; BS--Bering Sea; CA--California; ENP--Eastern North
Pacific; GOA--Gulf of Alaska; HI--Hawaii; MHI--Main Hawaiian Islands;
OR--Oregon; WA--Washington;
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this
stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or
greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the
stock's PBR.
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy.
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3; and
[supcaret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or
injured in this fishery is identical to the list of species and/or
stocks killed or injured in high seas component of the fishery, minus
species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges exclusively on the
high seas. The species and/or stocks are found, and the fishery
remains the same, on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the
EEZ components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals
as the components operating on the high seas.
Table 2--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries in the Atlantic Ocean,
Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated Marine mammal species
number of and/or stocks
Fishery description vessels/ incidentally killed or
persons injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic gillnet....... 4,020 Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Hooded seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of
Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast.
Northeast sink gillnet..... 4,072 Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Fin whale, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.\1\
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Humpback whale, Gulf of
Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast.
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
White-sided dolphin,
WNA.
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic 8,485 Humpback whale, Gulf of
American lobster trap/pot. Maine.
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast.
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA.\1\
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean, 201 Atlantic spotted
Gulf of Mexico large dolphin, Northern GMX.
pelagics longline *. Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA
[[Page 3047]]
Cuvier's beaked whale,
WNA.
False killer whale, WNA
Harbor porpoise, GME,
BF.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or
dwarf sperm whale),
WNA.
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked
whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian
East coast.
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, Northern GMX.
Pygmy sperm whale, GMX.
Risso's dolphin,
Northern GMX.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot
whale, Northern GMX.
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA.\1\
Sperm whale, Northern
GMX.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Chesapeake Bay inshore 265 Bottlenose dolphin,
gillnet \2\. unknown (Northern
migratory coastal or
Southern migratory
coastal).
Gulf of Mexico gillnet \2\. 248 Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound, and
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mobile Bay, Bonsecour
Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal.
NC inshore gillnet......... 2,676 Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Northeast anchored float 852 Harbor seal, WNA.
gillnet \2\.
Humpback whale, Gulf of
Maine.
White-sided dolphin,
WNA.
Northeast drift gillnet \2\ 1,036 None documented.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet 273 Bottlenose dolphin,
\2\. Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/
GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory
coastal.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic 21 Bottlenose dolphin,
shark gillnet. unknown (Central FL,
Northern FL, SC/GA
coastal, or Southern
migratory coastal).
North Atlantic right
whale, WNA.
Trawl Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic mid-water 320 Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
trawl (including pair offshore.
trawl). Harbor seal, WNA.
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl.. 633 Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.\1\
Common dolphin, WNA.\1\
Gray seal, WNA.\1\
Harbor seal, WNA.
Risso's dolphin,
WNA.\1\
White-sided dolphin,
WNA.
Northeast mid-water trawl 542 Common dolphin, WNA.
(including pair trawl).
Gray seal, WNA.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA.\1\
Northeast bottom trawl..... 968 Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.\1\
Common dolphin, WNA.
Gray seal, WNA.\1\
Harbor porpoise, GME/
BF.
Harbor seal, WNA.
Harp seal, WNA.
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA.\1\
Risso's dolphin,
WNA.\1\
White-sided dolphin,
WNA.\1\
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, 10,824 Atlantic spotted
Gulf of Mexico shrimp dolphin, Northern Gulf
trawl. of Mexico.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Charleston estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound,
estuarine.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
continental shelf.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi River
Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mobile Bay, Bonsecour
Bay.
[[Page 3048]]
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/
GA coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX
coastal.\1\
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, 1,101 Bottlenose dolphin,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab Biscayne Bay
trap/pot \2\. estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL
Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound, estuarine
(FL west coast
portion).
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Sarasota Bay, Little
Sarasota Bay.
Atlantic mixed species trap/ 3,493 Fin whale, WNA.
pot \2\.
Humpback whale, Gulf of
Maine.
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot 6,679 Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central GA estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Charleston estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GA/Southern
SC estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern Migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern SC estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/
GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern GA estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC estuarine
system.
West Indian manatee,
FL.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Mexico menhaden 40-42 Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
purse seine. bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi River
Delta.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX
coastal.\1\
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse 17 Bottlenose dolphin,
seine \2\. Northern Migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach 359 Bottlenose dolphin,
seine. Northern Migratory
coastal.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal.\1\
NC long haul seine......... 22 Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.\1\
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC estuarine
system.
Stop Net Fisheries:
NC roe mullet stop net..... 1 Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
unknown (Southern
migratory coastal or
Southern NC estuarine
system).
Pound Net Fisheries:
VA pound net............... 20 Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern Migratory
coastal.\1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gillnet Fisheries:
Caribbean gillnet.......... 127 None documented in the
most recent 5 years of
data.
DE River inshore gillnet... unknown None documented in the
most recent 5 years of
data.
Long Island Sound inshore unknown None documented in the
gillnet. most recent 5 years of
data.
RI, southern MA (to Monomoy unknown None documented in the
Island), and NY Bight most recent 5 years of
(Raritan and Lower NY data.
Bays) inshore gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic inshore unknown Bottlenose dolphin,
gillnet. Northern SC estuarine
system.
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic shellfish bottom >58 None documented.
trawl.
[[Page 3049]]
Gulf of Mexico butterfish 2 Bottlenose dolphin,
trawl. Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX
continental shelf.
Gulf of Mexico mixed 20 None documented.
species trawl.
GA cannonball jellyfish 1 Bottlenose dolphin, SC/
trawl. GA coastal.
Marine Aquaculture Fisheries:
Finfish aquaculture........ 48 Harbor seal, WNA.
Shellfish aquaculture...... unknown None documented.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine Atlantic >7 Harbor seal, WNA.
herring purse seine.
Gulf of Maine menhaden >2 None documented.
purse seine.
FL West Coast sardine purse 10 Bottlenose dolphin,
seine. Eastern GMX coastal.
U.S. Atlantic tuna purse 5 None documented in most
seine *. recent 5 years of
data.
Longline/Hook and Line
Fisheries:
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic >1,207 None documented.
bottom longline/hook-and-
line.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- 2,846 Humpback whale, Gulf of
Atlantic tuna, shark, Maine.
swordfish hook-and-line/
harpoon.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, >5,000 Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
Gulf of Mexico, and continental shelf.
Caribbean snapper-grouper
and other reef fish bottom
longline/hook-and-line.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, 39 Bottlenose dolphin,
Gulf of Mexico shark Eastern GMX coastal.
bottom longline/hook-and- Bottlenose dolphin,
line. Northern GMX
continental shelf.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, 680 None documented.
Gulf of Mexico, and
Caribbean pelagic hook-and-
line/harpoon.
U.S. Atlantic, Gulf of unknown None documented.
Mexico trotline.
Trap/Pot Fisheries:
Caribbean mixed species 154 Bottlenose dolphin,
trap/pot. Puerto Rico and United
States Virgin Islands.
Caribbean spiny lobster 40 None documented.
trap/pot.
FL spiny lobster trap/pot.. 1,268 Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine. Bottlenose
dolphin, Central FL
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL
Bay estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL
Keys.
Gulf of Mexico blue crab 4,113 Bottlenose dolphin,
trap/pot. Barataria Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mobile Bay, Bonsecour
Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal.
West Indian manatee,
FL.
Gulf of Mexico mixed unknown None documented.
species trap/pot.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic, 10 None documented.
Gulf of Mexico golden crab
trap/pot.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic eel trap/ unknown None documented.
pot.
Stop Seine/Weir/Pound Net/
Floating Trap/Fyke Net
Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine herring and >1 Harbor porpoise, GME/
Atlantic mackerel stop .............. BF.
seine/weir. Harbor seal, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian
east coast.
Atlantic white-sided
dolphin, WNA.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic crab stop 2,600 None documented.
seine/weir.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic mixed unknown Bottlenose dolphin,
species stop seine/weir/ Northern NC estuarine
pound net (except the NC system.
roe mullet stop net).
RI floating trap........... 9 None documented.
Northeast and Mid-Atlantic unknown None documented.
fyke net.
Dredge Fisheries:
Gulf of Maine sea urchin unknown None documented.
dredge.
Gulf of Maine mussel dredge unknown None documented.
Gulf of Maine, U.S. Mid- >403 None documented.
Atlantic sea scallop
dredge.
Mid-Atlantic blue crab unknown None documented.
dredge.
Mid-Atlantic soft-shell unknown None documented.
clam dredge.
Mid-Atlantic whelk dredge.. unknown None documented.
U.S. Mid-Atlantic/Gulf of 7,000 None documented.
Mexico oyster dredge.
New England and Mid- unknown None documented.
Atlantic offshore surf
clam/quahog dredge.
Haul/Beach Seine Fisheries:
[[Page 3050]]
Caribbean haul/beach seine. 38 West Indian manatee,
Puerto Rico.
Gulf of Mexico haul/beach unknown None documented.
seine.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic 25 None documented.
haul/beach seine.
Dive, Hand/Mechanical
Collection Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 20,000 None documented.
Mexico, Caribbean
shellfish dive, hand/
mechanical collection.
Gulf of Maine urchin dive, unknown None documented.
hand/mechanical collection.
Gulf of Mexico, Southeast unknown None documented.
Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic,
and Caribbean cast net.
Commercial Passenger Fishing
Vessel (Charter Boat)
Fisheries:
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of 4,000 Bottlenose dolphin,
Mexico, Caribbean .............. Barataria Bay
commercial passenger estuarine system.
fishing vessel. Bottlenose dolphin,
Biscayne Bay
estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Central FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Choctawhatchee Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Eastern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin, FL
Bay.
Bottlenose dolphin, GMX
bay, sound, estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Indian River Lagoon
estuarine system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Jacksonville estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Mississippi Sound,
Lake Borgne, Bay
Boudreau.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern FL coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GA/Southern
SC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern NC estuarine.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern migratory
coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Southern NC estuarine
system.
Bottlenose dolphin, SC/
GA coastal.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Western GMX coastal.
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Abbreviations and Symbols Used in Table 2:
DE--Delaware; FL--Florida; GA--Georgia; GME/BF--Gulf of Maine/Bay of
Fundy; GMX--Gulf of Mexico; MA--Massachusetts; NC--North Carolina; NY--
New York; RI--Rhode Island; SC--South Carolina; VA--Virginia; WNA--
Western North Atlantic;
\1\ Fishery classified based on mortalities and serious injuries of this
stock, which are greater than or equal to 50 percent (Category I) or
greater than 1 percent and less than 50 percent (Category II) of the
stock's PBR;
\2\ Fishery classified by analogy; and
* Fishery has an associated high seas component listed in Table 3.
Table 3--List of Fisheries--Commercial Fisheries on the High Seas
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marine mammal species
Number of and/or stocks
Fishery description HSFCA permits incidentally killed or
injured
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category I
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 45 Atlantic spotted
Species *. dolphin, WNA.
Bottlenose dolphin,
Northern GMX oceanic.
Bottlenose dolphin, WNA
offshore.
Common dolphin, WNA.
Cuvier's beaked whale,
WNA.
False killer whale,
WNA.
Killer whale, GMX
oceanic.
Kogia spp. whale (Pygmy
or dwarf sperm whale),
WNA.
Long-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
Mesoplodon beaked
whale, WNA.
Minke whale, Canadian
East coast.
Pantropical spotted
dolphin, WNA.
Risso's dolphin, GMX.
Risso's dolphin, WNA.
Short-finned pilot
whale, WNA.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 143 Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Deep-set component) * Pelagic.
[supcaret]. False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Kogia spp. (Pygmy or
dwarf sperm whale),
HI.
[[Page 3051]]
Pygmy killer whale, HI.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Short-finned pilot
whale, HI.
Striped dolphin, HI.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category II
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Drift Gillnet Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 5 Long-beaked common
Species* [supcaret]. dolphin, CA.
Humpback whale, CA/OR/
WA.
Northern right-whale
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Pacific white-sided
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Risso's dolphin, CA/OR/
WA.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Trawl Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 1 No information.
Species **.
CCAMLR..................... 0 Antarctic fur seal.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
South Pacific Tuna 26 No information.
Fisheries.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 1 No information.
Longline Fisheries:
CCAMLR..................... 0 None documented.
South Pacific Albacore 6 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 3 No information.
Fisheries **.
Western Pacific Pelagic (HI 11 Blainville's beaked
Shallow-set component) * whale, HI.
[supcaret]. Bottlenose dolphin, HI
Pelagic.
False killer whale, HI
Pelagic.
Fin whale, HI.
Guadalupe fur seal.
Humpback whale, Central
North Pacific.
Mesoplodon sp.,
unknown.
Northern elephant seal,
CA breeding.
Risso's dolphin, HI.
Rough-toothed dolphin,
HI.
Short-beaked common
dolphin, CA/OR/WA.
Striped dolphin, HI.
Handline/Pole and Line
Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 1 No information.
Species.
Pacific Highly Migratory 43 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 10 No information.
Troll.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 5 No information.
Troll Fisheries:
Atlantic Highly Migratory 0 No information.
Species.
South Pacific Albacore 18 No information.
Troll.
South Pacific Tuna 1 No information.
Fisheries **.
Western Pacific Pelagic.... 4 No information.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category III
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Longline Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic Bottom 2 None documented.
Longline.
Pacific Highly Migratory 105 None documented in the
Species. most recent 5 years of
data.
Purse Seine Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 5 None documented.
Species * [supcaret].
Trawl Fisheries:
Northwest Atlantic......... 4 None documented.
Troll Fisheries:
Pacific Highly Migratory 111 None documented.
Species *.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Terms, Abbreviations, and Symbols Used in Table 3:
CA--California; GMX--Gulf of Mexico; HI--Hawaii; OR--Oregon; WA--
Washington; WNA--Western North Atlantic;
* Fishery is an extension/component of an existing fishery operating
within U.S. waters listed in Table 1 or 2. The number of permits
listed in Table 3 represents only the number of permits for the high
seas component of the fishery;
** These gear types are not authorized under the Pacific HMS FMP (2004),
the Atlantic HMS FMP (2006), or without a South Pacific Tuna Treaty
license (in the case of the South Pacific Tuna fisheries). Because
HSFCA permits are valid for 5 years, permits obtained in past years
exist in the HSFCA permit database for gear types that are now
unauthorized. Therefore, while HSFCA permits exist for these gear
types, it does not represent effort. In order to land fish species,
fishers must be using an authorized gear type. Once these permits for
unauthorized gear types expire, the permit-holder will be required to
obtain a permit for an authorized gear type; and
[supcaret] The list of marine mammal species and/or stocks killed or
injured in this fishery is identical to the list of marine mammal
species and/or stocks killed or injured in U.S. waters component of
the fishery, minus species and/or stocks that have geographic ranges
exclusively in coastal waters, because the marine mammal species and/
or stocks are also found on the high seas and the fishery remains the
same on both sides of the EEZ boundary. Therefore, the high seas
components of these fisheries pose the same risk to marine mammals as
the components of these fisheries operating in U.S. waters.
[[Page 3052]]
Table 4--Fisheries Affected by Take Reduction Teams and Plans
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take reduction plans Affected fisheries
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Atlantic Large Whale Take Reduction Category I
Plan (ALWTRP)--50 CFR 229.32. Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Northeast/Mid-Atlantic
American lobster trap/pot.
Northeast sink gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Atlantic mixed species trap/
pot.
Northeast anchored float
gillnet.
Northeast drift gillnet.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet.*
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot. [supcaret]
Bottlenose Dolphin Take Reduction Category I
Plan (BDTRP)--50 CFR 229.35. Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
Category II
Atlantic blue crab trap/pot.
Chesapeake Bay inshore
gillnet fishery.
Mid-Atlantic haul/beach
seine.
Mid-Atlantic menhaden purse
seine.
NC inshore gillnet.
NC long haul seine.
NC roe mullet stop net.
Southeast Atlantic gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic
shark gillnet.
Southeastern U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico shrimp
trawl.[supcaret]
Southeastern, U.S. Atlantic,
Gulf of Mexico stone crab
trap/pot.[supcaret]
VA pound net.
False Killer Whale Take Reduction Category I
Plan (FKWTRP)--50 CFR 229.37. HI deep-set longline.
Category II
HI shallow-set longline.
Harbor Porpoise Take Reduction Plan Category I
(HPTRP)--50 CFR 229.33 (New Mid-Atlantic gillnet.
England) and 229.34 (Mid-Atlantic).
Northeast sink gillnet.
Pelagic Longline Take Reduction Category I
Plan (PLTRP)--50 CFR 229.36.
Atlantic Ocean, Caribbean,
Gulf of Mexico large
pelagics longline.
Pacific Offshore Cetacean Take Category II
Reduction Plan (POCTRP)--50 CFR CA thresher shark/swordfish
229.31. drift gillnet (>=14 in mesh).
Atlantic Trawl Gear Take Reduction Category II
Team (ATGTRT).
Mid-Atlantic bottom trawl.
Mid-Atlantic mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl).
Northeast bottom trawl.
Northeast mid-water trawl
(including pair trawl).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Symbols Used in Table 4:
* Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in U.S.
waters; and
[supcaret] Only applicable to the portion of the fishery operating in
the Atlantic Ocean.
Classification
The Chief Counsel for Regulation of the Department of Commerce has
certified to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) that this rule would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. No comments
were received on that certification, and no new information has been
discovered to change that conclusion. Accordingly, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required, and none has been prepared.
This rule contains existing collection-of-information (COI)
requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act and would not
impose additional or new COI requirements. The COI for the registration
of individuals under the MMPA has been approved by the OMB under OMB
Control Number 0648-0293 (0.15 hours per report for new registrants).
The requirement for reporting marine mammal mortalities or injuries has
been approved by OMB under OMB Control Number 0648-0292 (0.15 hours per
report). These estimates include the time for reviewing instructions,
searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data
needed, and completing and reviewing the COI. Send comments regarding
these reporting burden estimates or any other aspect of the COI,
including suggestions for reducing burden, to NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor shall a person be subject to a penalty for failure
to comply with a COI, subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act, unless that COI displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
This rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Orders 12866 and 13563.
This rule is not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because this rule is not significant under Executive Order
12866.
In accordance with the Companion Manual for NOAA Administrative
Order (NAO) 216-6A, NMFS determined that publishing this LOF qualifies
to be categorically excluded from further NEPA review, consistent with
categories of activities identified in Categorical Exclusion G7
(``Preparation of policy directives, rules, regulations, and guidelines
of an administrative,
[[Page 3053]]
financial, legal, technical, or procedural nature, or for which the
environmental effects are too broad, speculative or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis and will be subject later to the NEPA
process, either collectively or on a case-by-case basis'') of the
Companion Manual and we have not identified any extraordinary
circumstances listed in Chapter 4 of the Companion Manual for NAO 216-
6A that would preclude application of this categorical exclusion. If
NMFS takes a management action, for example, through the development of
a TRP, NMFS would first prepare an Environmental Impact Statement or
Environmental Assessment, as required under NEPA, specific to that
action.
This rule would not affect species listed as threatened or
endangered under the ESA or their associated critical habitat. The
impacts of numerous fisheries have been analyzed in various biological
opinions, and this rule will not affect the conclusions of those
opinions. The classification of fisheries on the LOF is not considered
to be a management action that would adversely affect threatened or
endangered species. If NMFS takes a management action, for example,
through the development of a TRP, NMFS would consult under ESA section
7 on that action.
This rule would have no adverse impacts on marine mammals and may
have a positive impact on marine mammals by improving knowledge of
marine mammals and the fisheries interacting with marine mammals
through information collected from observer programs, stranding and
sighting data, or take reduction teams.
This rule would not affect the land or water uses or natural
resources of the coastal zone, as specified under section 307 of the
Coastal Zone Management Act.
References
Baird, R.W., and D.L. Webster. 2020. Using dolphins to catch tuna:
Assessment of associations between pantropical spotted dolphins and
yellowfin tuna hook and line fisheries in Hawai`i. Fisheries
Research. 230. (2020):105652.
Baird, R.W., S.D. Mahaffy, A.M. Gorgone, T. Cullins, D.J. McSweeney,
E.M. Oelson, A.L. Bradford, J. Barlow, D.L. Webster. False Killer
Whales and Fisheries Interaction in Hawaiian Waters: Evidence for
Sex Bias and Variation Among Populations and Social Groups. 2014.
Marine Mammal Science 31(2): 579-590.
Bradford A.L. and E.G. Lyman. 2019. Injury determinations for
humpback whales and other cetaceans reported to NOAA response
networks in the Hawaiian Islands during 2017. U.S. Dept. of
Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-PIFSC-81, 18 p.
Bradford A.L. and E. Lyman. 2018. Injury determinations for humpback
whales and other cetaceans reported to the Hawaiian Islands
Disentanglement and Pacific Islands Marine Mammal Response Networks
during 2013-2016. NOAA Technical Memorandum. NMFS-PIFSC-75. 24 pp.
Bradford, A.L., E.M. Oleson, R.W. Baird, C.H. Boggs, K.A. Forney,
and N.C. Young. 2015. Revised stock boundaries for false killer
whales (Pseudorca crassidens) in Hawaiian waters. U.S. Department.
Commerce, NOAA Technical Memorandum. NOAA-NMFS-PIFSC-47, 29 p.
Hayes, S.A., Josephson, E., Maze-Foley, K., Rosel, P.E., 2020. US
Atlantic and Gulf of Mexico Marine Mammal Stock Assessments 2019.
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-NE-264, 479 p.
Henry A, Garron M, Reid A, Morin D, Ledwell W, Cole TVN. 2019.
Serious injury and mortality determinations for baleen whale stocks
along the Gulf of Mexico, United States East Coast, and Atlantic
Canadian Provinces, 2012-2016. US Department of Commerce, Northeast
Fish Sci Cent Ref Doc. 19-13; 54 p.
Muto, M.M, V.T. Helker, R.P. Angliss, B.A. Allen, P.L. Boveng, J.M.
Breiwick, M.F. Cameron, P.J. Clapham, S.P. Dahle, M.E. Dahlheim,
B.S. Fadely, M.C. Ferguson, L.W. Fritz, R.C. Hobbs, Y.V.
Ivashchenko, A.S. Kennedy, J.M. London, S.A. Mizroch, R.R. Ream,
E.L. Richmond, K.E.W. Shelden, R.G. Towell, P.R. Wade, J.M. Waite,
and A.N. Zerbini. 2017. Alaska Marine Mammal Stock Assessments,
2016. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOAA-TM-NMFS-AFSC-355. 367 p.
National Marine Fisheries Service. 2016. Guidelines for Preparing
Stock Assessment Reports Pursuant to the 1994 Amendments to the
MMPA. 02-204-01. 25 p. (Available at: https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/webdam/download/64690366)
Authority: MMPA, 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.
Dated: January 8, 2021.
Samuel D. Rauch III,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-00570 Filed 1-13-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P