Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, 2496-2526 [2020-28227]
Download as PDF
2496
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND
URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282, and 3285
[Docket No. FR–6149–F–02]
RIN 2502–AJ49
Manufactured Home Construction and
Safety Standards
Office of the Assistant
Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule amends the
Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards (the
Construction and Safety Standards) by
adopting recommendations made to
HUD by the Manufactured Housing
Consensus Committee (MHCC), as
modified by HUD. The National
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (the
Act) requires HUD to publish in the
proposed revised Construction and
Safety Standards submitted by the
MHCC. The MHCC prepared and
submitted to HUD its third group of
recommendations to improve various
aspects of the Construction and Safety
Standards. HUD reviewed those
recommendations and adopted some of
them after making editorial revisions
and some additions. This final rule
further revises the Construction and
Safety Standards based on HUD’s
review and incorporation of certain
public comments.
DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2021.
The incorporation by reference of
certain publications listed in the rule is
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of March 15, 2021. The
incorporation by reference of certain
other publications listed in the rule was
approved by the Director of the Federal
Register as of August 11, 1987.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Teresa B. Payne, Administrator, Office
of Manufactured Housing Programs,
Office of Housing, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451
7th Street SW, Washington DC 20410;
telephone 202–402–5365 (this is not a
toll-free number). Persons with hearing
or speech impairments may access this
number via TTY by calling the Federal
Information Relay Service at 800–877–
8389 (this is a toll-free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
SUMMARY:
I. Background
The National Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401–5426) (the Act)
authorizes HUD to establish and amend
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
the Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards (the
Construction and Safety Standards)
codified in 24 CFR part 3280. The Act
was amended in 2000 by the
Manufactured Housing Improvement
Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–569, approved
December 27, 2000) which established
the Manufactured Housing Consensus
Committee (MHCC), a consensus
committee responsible for providing
HUD recommendations to adopt, revise
and interpret the Construction and
Safety Standards. HUD’s Construction
and Safety Standards apply to the
design, construction, and installation of
new homes. Changes to the collective
standards are not retroactively enforced
by HUD as applicable to previously
designed, built, and installed homes.
As amended, the purposes of the Act
(enumerated at 42 U.S.C. 5401) are: ‘‘(1)
To protect the quality, durability, safety,
and affordability of manufactured
homes; (2) to facilitate the availability of
affordable manufactured homes and to
increase homeownership for all
Americans; (3) to provide for the
establishment of practical, uniform, and,
to the extent possible, performancebased Federal construction standards for
manufactured homes; (4) to encourage
innovative and cost-effective
construction techniques for
manufactured homes; (5) to protect
residents of manufactured homes with
respect to personal injuries and the
amount of insurance costs and property
damages in manufactured housing
consistent with the other purposes of
this section; (6) to establish a balanced
consensus process for the development,
revision, and interpretation of
Construction and Safety standards for
manufactured homes and related
regulations for the enforcement of such
standards; (7) to ensure uniform and
effective enforcement of Construction
and Safety standards for manufactured
homes; and (8) to ensure that the public
interest in, and need for, affordable
manufactured housing is duly
considered in all determinations
relating to the Federal standards and
their enforcement.’’
In addition, the amended Act
generally requires HUD to establish
Construction and Safety Standards that
are reasonable and practical, meet high
standards of protection, are
performance-based, and are objectively
stated. Congress specifically established
the MHCC to develop proposed
revisions to the Construction and Safety
Standards. The Act provides specific
procedures (42 U.S.C. 5403) for the
MHCC process.
The MHCC held its first meeting in
August 2002 and began work on
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
reviewing possible revisions to the
Construction and Safety Standards. As
the MHCC proceeded, proposed
revisions to the Construction and Safety
Standards were divided into sets. The
first set of revisions proposed by the
MHCC was published as a final rule in
the Federal Register on November 30,
2005 (70 FR 72024). The second set of
revisions proposed by the MHCC was
published as a final rule published in
the Federal Register on December 9,
2013 (78 FR 73965). This final rule is
based in part on the third set of MHCC
proposals to revise the Construction and
Safety Standards published as a
proposed rule in the Federal Register on
January 31, 2020 (85 FR 5589). The
proposed rule included a MHCC
proposal to revise the Construction and
Safety Standards to reduce the
regulatory burden by eliminating the
need for manufacturers to obtain special
approvals from HUD for certain
construction features and options. HUD
reviewed the MHCC’s proposals and
made editorial revisions prior to
publishing the January 31, 2020,
proposed rule. HUD also added
proposals that complement the MHCC’s
recommendations.
As explained in the January 31, 2020,
proposed rule, HUD decided not to
include certain MHCC
recommendations due to pending
regulations for improving energy
efficiency in manufactured homes being
prepared by the U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE) under the Energy
Independence and Security Act (Pub. L.
110–140, approved December 19, 2007)
(EISA). DOE published a Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking on June 17, 2016
(81 FR 39756) and, more recently, a
Notice of Data Availability, Request for
Information on August 3, 2018 (83 FR
38073) regarding energy conservation
standards for manufactured housing.
Given this DOE rulemaking, HUD
decided to postpone action on MHCCproposed revisions to §§ 3280.502 and
3280.506(b), except for the mating wall
of attached manufactured homes at
§ 3280.506(b)—an option that is needed
to avoid a more burdensome alternative
approval process (24 CFR 3282.14—
Alternative construction of
manufactured homes). HUD also
decided not to move forward with a new
proposal to add requirements for
draftstopping to the Construction and
Safety Standards. HUD will not include
or move forward with these
recommendations in this final rule.
II. Changes Made at the Final Rule
Stage
In consideration of the public
comments and HUD’s experience
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
implementing the program, HUD has
made certain editorial revisions to
HUD’s proposals made in the January
31, 2020, proposed rule. In general, the
revisions adopt changes to the codified
regulations that reinforce the Act’s
purposes, namely providing benefits to
consumers, homeowners, and the
broader community; promoting and
improving consumer and home safety;
reducing regulatory barriers and
expanding consumer options; and
allowing use of some for the latest
building technologies and materials
while creating more consistency with
State-adopted residential building
codes. HUD declined to adopt some
standards or commenters’ suggested
changes in some instances based on
considerations of the statutorily
prescribed MHCC process, the lack of
authority under the Act for HUD to
regulate design and construction of
certain types of housing, and consumer
safety.
The final rule will revise certain
sections of the Construction and Safety
Standards, as well as the incorporated
reference standards where indicated.
The revisions described below are based
on HUD’s review and consideration of
the public comments on the proposed
rule, HUD’s experience with the
program, the existent Construction and
Standards, and the issues raised in the
proposed rule. The final rule also makes
minor technical edits to the
Construction and Standards.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3280.5
Data Plate
HUD revised § 3280.5 by revising
paragraph (d), pursuant to public
comments, to streamline data entry.
Paragraph (d) now reads, ‘‘(d) This
manufactured home IS designed to
accommodate the additional loads
imposed by the attachment of an
attached accessory building or structure
in accordance with the manufacturer
installation instructions. The additional
loads are in accordance with the design
load(s) identified on this Data Plate; or
This manufactured home IS NOT
designed to accommodate the additional
loads imposed by the attachment of an
attached accessory building or structure
in accordance with the manufacturer
installation instructions.’’ The
appropriate designation may be made
while still setting forth information that
may be used by state and local
authorities that have enforcement
authority for site-built structures that
are not integral to the manufactured
home produced and shipped by the
manufactured home manufacturer. HUD
seeks to preclude a home from being
taken out of compliance when an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
attached accessory building or structure
is built and added on at the home site.
§ 3280.108 Interior Passage
HUD revised paragraph (c) in this
section in accordance with the public
comments by creating an exception to
the requirement for doors to closets,
pantries, and doors to toilet
compartments in single-section homes.
Single-section manufactured homes
have a smaller living space when
compared with a multi-section
manufactured home or a typical sitebuilt home and, thus, closet and pantry
doors should not be subject to the same
clear opening requirements as a multisection manufactured home or a typical
site-built home.
§ 3280.114 Stairways
HUD adjusted the rise and run
dimensions based on public comment.
The changes recommended by public
commenters on the proposed rule will
give manufacturers more flexibility
when trying to balance the smaller formfactor of most homes with consumer
demand for multiple stories. The edits
clarify that the standards do not apply
to exterior stairways that are built at the
home site or stairways to basement areas
that are not designed and built as part
of the manufactured home.
§ 3280.209 Smoke Alarm
Requirements
While HUD did not revise this section
in the proposed rule, a public
commenter recommended that
combination smoke and carbon
monoxide alarms be added as
acceptable devices to parallel the
International Residential Code (IRC).
Furthermore, the changes to this section
are intended to work in conjunction
with the changes to § 3280.211.
§ 3280.211 Carbon Monoxide Detectors
‘‘Alarms’’ and ‘‘detectors’’ are
different items that serve different
purposes. HUD changed references from
‘‘detector’’ to ‘‘alarm’’ in response to
public comment. HUD also revised this
section to include specific locations
where such items must be installed
rather than just referencing the more
general standards, such as the National
Fire Protection Association Standard
720.
§ 3280.212 Factory Constructed or
Site-Built Attached Garages
Public commenters suggested that the
distinction between attached and selfsupported structures be emphasized in
this section. HUD clarified that
paragraph (a) applies only to garages
which are not self-supported and
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2497
revised the fire separation requirements
in paragraph (c), including that the
garage must be separated from the home
with appropriate gypsum wallboard or
equivalent. HUD also added paragraph
(h) as suggested by public comment to
include that a site-built, self-supported
garage is considered an add-on subject
to § 3282.8(j)(1) and state and local
authorities.
§ 3280.213 Factory Constructed or
Site-Built Attached Carports
Similar to the previous section, public
commenters also suggested that the
distinction between attached and selfsupported structures be emphasized in
this section. HUD made several changes
to this section based on public
comment, including adding a provision
in paragraph (b) that the manufacturer
may provide the maximum live and
dead loads, and the applied loading
locations that the home is designed to
resist from the carport, and other design
limitations or restrictions.
§ 3280.504 Condensation Control and
Installation of Vapor Retarders
Based on public comment, HUD
clarified the distinction between mating
walls and fire separation walls in
paragraph (b), stating that the fire
separation wall between each attached
manufactured home must be considered
to be an exterior wall pursuant to
subpart K.
§ 3280.609
Water Distribution Systems
In order to better protect residents,
HUD added relief pipe turndown
requirements to this section based on
public comment, stating that exterior
relief drains shall be directed down and
shall terminate between 6″ and 24″
above finished grade. This is high
enough to prevent backflow, but low
enough to reduce the risk of injury or
accident.
§ 3280.705
Gas Piping Systems
HUD eliminated ‘‘hard pipe’’ in
paragraph (I)(8)(iii), to account for a flex
gas connector rather than a quickdisconnect.
§ 3280.710 Venting, Ventilation, and
Combustion Air
HUD clarified that the placement
restrictions apply to exhausts of fuel
burning appliances and used the
defined term ‘‘habitable rooms’’ in this
section. This provides consistency
across the regulation.
§ 3280.904 Specific Requirements for
Designing the Transportations System
In addition to some language and
grammatical changes, HUD added a
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2498
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
requirement to check weights with the
home in a level position ready for
transport in paragraph (b)(4)(ii), an
explicit reference to the Department of
Transportation’s regulations at 49 CFR
393.52(d) in paragraph (b)(9)(ii)
regarding stopping distance, and textual
changes to paragraph (b)(9)(iii)
regarding electrical brake wiring.
§ 3280.1002
Definitions
In this section, HUD edited the
definition of ‘‘Fire separation wall’’ to
emphasize the separation between
attached manufactured homes.
§ 3280.1003 Attached Manufactured
Home Unit Separation
HUD clarified this section based on
public comment, particularly in
paragraph (a)(1) related to fire
resistance. These edits will help HUD
address minimum fire separation
requirements for common walls of
attached manufactured housing
solutions in the Standards.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
III. The Public Comments
The public comment period for the
January 31, 2020, proposed rule closed
on March 31, 2020. HUD received fortyone (41) public comments in response to
the proposed rule, from various
manufactured home associations, nonprofit organizations, and other
interested parties. This section presents
the significant issues, questions, and
suggestions submitted by public
commenters, and HUD’s responses to
these issues, questions, and suggestions.
Most commenters supported updates
to the Construction and Safety
Standards, and encouraged HUD to
continue working on updates to, and
provided specific recommendations for,
certain sections of the Construction and
Standards. For example, several
commenters supported adding twofamily or two- and three-family
dwelling units to the new Subpart K,
Attached Manufactured Homes and
Special Construction. Some commenters
also suggested deleting or removing
certain changes proposed by HUD. For
example, some commenters opposed or
requested clarification of HUD’s
proposed changes to stair rise and run
requirements, and suggested changes to
create consistency among the Standards’
landing requirements and clarify
whether certain requirements apply to
stairs inside, or inside and outside, the
home.
The following sections summarize the
comments received on the proposed
rule and HUD’s responses:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
General Support
The majority of commenters
expressed general support for the
proposed changes as part of HUD’s
effort to update the Construction and
Safety Standards. These commenters
stated that the proposed changes would
benefit homeowners and the broader
community, promote or improve
consumer and home safety, allow use of
the latest building technologies and
materials, create more consistency with
State-adopted residential building codes
for site-built housing, expand consumer
amenity options (including attached
garages, carports, decks and accessory
buildings), help to include two-story
and multifamily guidelines, and
eliminate regulations that impede broad
access to affordable housing. Several
commenters also urged HUD to move
forward with publishing the next set of
proposed updates to address
outstanding items.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the
commenters that the proposed changes
would provide benefits to consumers,
homeowners, and the broader
community, and help promote the other
purposes and policies of the National
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards Act of 1974.
Comment: Testing requirements
should be included but be accredited to
ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020 by accredited
testing laboratories that are signatories
to the International Laboratory
Accreditation Cooperation Mutual
Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA).
One commenter stated that several
parts of the proposed rule reference
testing, such as American Society for
Testing and Materials, Standard Test
Methods for Fire Tests of Building
Construction and Materials (ASTM E
119), and recommended that these
laboratory tests be conducted by ISO/
IEC 17025 accredited testing
laboratories so as to be assured that the
testing results are generated by an entity
that has been found to be technically
competent by an independent,
accreditation body. Two commenters
supported testing requirements, but
recommended that these laboratory tests
be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020
by accredited testing laboratories that
are signatories to the International
Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation
Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC
MRA), to assure that the testing results
are generated by an entity that has been
found to be technically competent by an
independent accreditation body. One
commenter added that this would allow
HUD to focus resources on program
oversight and/or research for technical
advancements. The commenter
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
provided a link to an example of
effective models whereby government
agencies rely on ISO/IEC 17020
accreditation programs (https://
www1.nyc.gov/site/buildings/industry/
recognized-accrediting-bodies.page).1
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the commenters. HUD’s regulations at
24 CFR 3280.2 require products to be
listed, certified, or labeled by a
nationally recognized testing laboratory,
inspection agency, or other organization
concerned with product evaluation that
maintains periodic inspection of
production of labeled equipment or
materials, and by whose labeling
indicates compliance with nationally
recognized standards or tests to
determine suitable usage in a specified
manner. HUD also believed that this
recommendation should be submitted
for MHCC review and consideration,
that it is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at this final rule
stage, and the commenter should make
the proposal through the MHCC process
through the following website: https://
mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.2
Comment: HUD should adopt
universal design standards.
A commenter who identified as a
person with a disability recommended
that HUD adopt universal design
standards in manufactured home
construction and encourage
communities and housing agencies to
do likewise.
HUD Response: HUD appreciated the
commenter’s perspective that HUD
adopt universal design standards. While
HUD is fully supportive of the need for
affordable and accessible housing, it
noted that universal design can be
accomplished within the minimum
Construction and Safety standards
requirements already codified. Further,
many home manufacturers currently
offer homes designed and constructed to
meet universal design standards without
conflicting with HUD’s current
minimum standards.
General Opposition
Some commenters stated that the
several of the provisions proposed
would increase manufactured home
installers’ liability and responsibility if
the proposed rule is advanced without
significant change. The commenters
stated home installers were not
included in deliberations, and, as such,
1 NYC Buildings, Recognized Accrediting Bodies,
NYC.gov, https://www1.nyc.gov/site/buildings/
industry/recognized-accrediting-bodies.page (last
visited April 20, 2020).
2 Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee,
MHCC Proposed Change Form, https://
mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
HUD should not move forward with this
rule.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the commenter that manufactured home
installers were not included in
deliberations. The MHCC membership
has included and continues to include
representation from at least one
individual with manufactured home
installer interest. The MHCC process is
administered in an open format in
which any member of the public,
including manufactured home
installers, may participate and address
the Committee, as well as propose
changes for MHCC review. All such
meetings are published in the Federal
Register at least 30 days in advance of
meetings.
Comment: Manufacturer
Documentation.
One commenter stated that the
proposed rule’s requirements for the
manufacturer to provide documentation
poses problems, because HUD does not
require inspection agencies to check any
of the documents the manufacturer
provides in the home. The commenter
stated this situation resulted from
HUD’s Interpretative Bulletin H–1–77,3
which the commenter asserted
complicates several proposed changes,
namely those at §§ 3280.212, 3280.213,
3280.612, and 3280.709. The commenter
stated that if the proposed rule becomes
final, HUD should rescind Interpretive
Bulletin H–1–77 to account for the
installation program loophole and the
failure to provide assurance that the
proper documentation would be
shipped with the home. Another
commenter stated a concern with
potential liability for installation work
related to accessory buildings and other
on-site installation, such as certain
appliances the proposed rule states can
be shipped ‘‘loose’’ to the homesite.
According to the commenter, to ensure
that the end buyer or resident of the
home has a home that has been safely
manufactured, transported, and
installed, it is vital that all installation
documentation is shipped with and
remains with the home.
HUD Response: HUD is aware that
standards for some construction features
that are addressed in this rulemaking
affect the installation process and
therefore impact the responsibilities of
home installers. All construction
features included in this final rule were
previously available through the
Alternative Construction process and in
all instances where an Alternative
3 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, PIA Responsibility for Documents
Required to be Provided with the Mobile Home,
HUD.gov, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/
OCHCO/documents/EIB-H-1-77.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
Construction letter had been issued,
HUD required specific documentation to
be provided with each affected
manufactured home, including
installation instructions. The same or
similar documentation would continue
to be required pursuant to the
requirement for manufacturers to
provide installation instructions in
accordance with 24 CFR 3280.306(b)
and 24 CFR 3285.2. Further, the home
manufacturer instructions must provide
minimum installation specifications so
that the home is not taken out of
compliance with the Construction and
Standards and meets the Model
Manufactured Home Installation
Standards. These instructions are
reviewed and approved by HUDapproved Design Approval Primary
Inspection Agencies (DAPIA) and
manufacturers are required to provide
the instructions with each manufactured
home.
HUD also disagreed with the
commenter that requiring the
manufacturer to provide the
instructions, without requiring an
inspection to verify the instructions are
shipped with the home, complicates
matters or otherwise poses risks to
consumer health and safety. The
manufacturers’ installation instructions
and documentation are required to be
reviewed and approved by its DAPIA to
help ensure conformance. Further, it is
the manufacturers’ responsibility to
ensure that each home is provided with
installation instructions and associated
documentation as approved by its
DAPIA. DAPIA-approved quality
assurance manuals typically require
manufacturer verification for the
shipment of the installation
instructions. It is the IPIA’s
responsibility to ensure the
effectiveness of the quality assurance
manuals. HUD may review and
reconsider this matter further should
evidence showing appropriate
installation instructions are not being
shipped with manufactured homes. The
commenter(s) should submit proposed
regulatory text through the MHCC
process at https://
mhcc.homeinnovation.com/ so that the
matter is reviewed by the MHCC.4
Comment: HUD should not use subregulatory guidance to establish
Construction and Safety standards.
A commenter stated that HUD should
repudiate the use of sub-regulatory
‘‘guidance’’ or ‘‘field guidance’’
memoranda and documents to establish
4 Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee,
MHCC Proposed Change Form, https://
mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2499
de-facto manufactured housing
‘‘standards.’’
HUD Response: HUD is currently
implementing Executive Order 13891,
Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance
Documents,5 and this comment is not
applicable to any aspect addressed in
this rulemaking.
Comment: HUD should not provide
competitive advantage to any housing
type.
Another commenter expressed
concern regarding any policy that may
give one housing type an unwarranted
competitive advantage and risks the
occupants’ health and safety. The
commenter stated HUD should refrain
from making any changes that would
result in furthering the divide between
the code requirements for manufactured
homes and those that apply to homes
that are stick-built or built using
engineered building systems. The
commenter urged HUD to maintain this
balance and continue to facilitate
consumer choice by ensuring that
regulatory reform efforts do not favor
manufactured homes over other
residences, leading to consumer
confusion and unfair marketplace
competition.
HUD Response: HUD’s authority to
develop and implement standards is
applicable only to homes meeting the
statutory definition of a manufactured
home. However, this rulemaking brings
the Standards in closer alignment to
standards imposed for other types of
housing.
Comment: HUD has no authority to
establish standards for structures
attached to a manufactured home.
A commenter stated that HUD defined
‘‘manufactured housing’’ narrowly in
§ 3280.2 to mean a structure built on a
permanent chassis and designed to be
used as a dwelling. The commenter
stated that while HUD has authority to
establish requirements applicable to
components within the chassis, it does
not have the authority to establish
standards for items outside or apart
from the chassis. Rather, authority to
regulate these structures rests with state
and local authorities and their building
code requirements and inspection
protocols. ‘‘Add-on or accessory
buildings or structures’’ are not built on
a permanent chassis. Section 3285.903
provides conditions where add-on or
attached accessory buildings or
structures may be installed, but again
fails to designate inspection
responsibilities. The definition for
‘‘Attached accessory building or
structure’’ proposed for addition to
5 84
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
FR 55235 (Oct. 15, 2019).
12JAR2
2500
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§§ 3280.2 and 3285.5 further adds to the
confusion indicating that it includes
such items when they are designed for
attachment and structural support from
the manufactured home.
HUD Response: HUD’s standards
developed and implemented through
this rulemaking are not intended to
apply to the design and construction of
site-built structures, including add-ons
(in other words, the site-built garage, or
the site-built carport). However, the
standards and regulations established
through this rulemaking do apply to the
design and construction of the
manufactured home, when the home is
designed to have an attached accessory
structure, such as the garage, carport, or
similar add-on. The requirements
established are to ensure that the
manufactured home will continue to
comply with the Construction and
Safety Standards and that the residents’
health and safety will be protected
through means such as adequate
structural load design and minimum fire
separation and other requirements when
applicable. The design, construction,
and inspection of the attached accessory
structure (site-built garage, site-built
carport, or other site-built add-on)
remains subject to any applicable state
and or local requirements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Subpart A, General
§ 3280.2 Definitions
One commenter opposed the
definition change to ‘‘attached accessory
building or structure,’’ while another
commenter supported the proposed
changes. Some commenters stated that
proposed definition of ‘‘Attached
accessory building or structure’’ fails to
include stairs, which are needed for
entry in almost every manufactured
home.
One commenter further stated that the
proposed rule would require that the
‘‘basic manufactured home’’ be designed
for the attachment of these structures.
This does not address the need for the
manufacturers to modify their
installation instructions to reflect the
added weight and wind load that added
structures would impose on the home’s
foundation.
Another commenter stated that the
definition appears to open the flood
gates for other additions to a
manufactured home which can affect
egress requirements as well as alter the
electric, heating, plumbing and other
systems. The commenter provided
examples; awnings, porches, and
ramadas typically are identified as a
covered area projecting in front of an
entrance, while cabanas are defined as
a cabin, hut, or shelter, and garages are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
defined as a ‘‘building’’ for housing a
motor vehicle. The commenter stated
that these are totally separate structures
which affect the home differently and
can create safety hazards. The
commenter suggested that the proposal
should be rewritten, and garages should
be addressed separately.
A commenter stated that the term
‘‘basic manufactured home’’ is not
defined and pre-supposing that there is
such a thing as a ‘‘non-basic
manufactured home.’’ If this is the case,
HUD should clearly indicate what they
mean by these terms and how the
construction and safety standards would
apply. The commenter contended that
regardless of HUD’s differentiation in
this case, the manufactured housing
Construction and Safety standards
should be applied consistently and any
manufactured home, whether deemed
‘‘basic’’ or ‘‘non-basic’’ be clearly
marketed as a manufactured home to
avoid customer confusion and an
expectation of the product being
received.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
commenters stating that HUD should
establish requirements for stairs external
to the manufactured home, which are
needed for entry in most manufactured
homes. HUD’s established standards
only govern the design and construction
of the manufactured home, including all
provisions addressed by this
rulemaking. Requirements for external
stairs that are necessary to provide entry
to the homes remain subject to design
and construction requirements of state
and local jurisdictions as they are not
intended to increase the living or
storage area of the manufactured home
and are dependent upon the siting and
installation of each individual home
which may vary by model, lot size,
topography, and other aspects.
HUD agreed with the commenter
stating that the proposed rule would
require that the manufactured home be
designed for the attachment of these
site-built structures. However, HUD
disagreed that the manufacturer would
not be required to provide installation
instructions that reflect the added
weight and wind load that an added
structure would impose on the home’s
foundation. HUD’s standards, set forth
at § 3285.903, require accessory
structures to be structurally
independent unless the attached
accessory building or structure is
otherwise included in the installation
instructions or designed by a registered
professional engineer or registered
architect. Further, the changes to the
Data Plate specifically identify when the
home is designed for an attached
accessory structure, and if so, the loads
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
the home has been designed to
accommodate (see § 3280.5).
HUD disagreed with the comment
suggesting that the definition of
accessory building or structure is too
broad. The Construction and Safety
standards address the design and
construction of the manufactured home
and do not address the design,
construction, placement, or other
standards for the design and
construction of the accessory
structure(s). Further, state and local
authorities may verify that a home has
been designed for an attached accessory
structure by verifying such information
available on the Data Plate. HUD agreed
with the commenter that the term ‘‘basic
manufactured home’’ is not defined;
therefore, ‘‘basic’’ has been removed.
§ 3280.5 Data Plate
One commenter opposed the
proposed rule’s changes to the Data
Plate language and another commenter
supported the proposed changes. Some
commenters agreed, however, that
certain modifications to the Data Plate
definition should be made: The Data
Plate indicates whether the home is
designed to accommodate an add on,
accessory building, and the like, and the
Data Plate and other documentation
should document the weight, size, and
other limits the manufactured home can
support. Failure to require additional
information will lead to confusion and
result in many homes being stressed
beyond their designs limits and
therefore lead to structural failure.
Another commenter stated that the
manufacturer should be required to
identify the maximum loads applied to
the floor system, wall system, roof
system and support system.
Another commenter suggested HUD
delete the first paragraph of the
applicable statement in § 3280.5(d). This
and another commenter recommended
HUD revise the second paragraph to
include a checkbox for ‘‘is’’ or ‘‘is not’’
similar to current language for
§ 3280.5(g) to reduce language and
clutter on home Data Plates. One
commenter explained that this
alternative would still capture the intent
of HUD’s proposal, while preserving
space on the Data Plate for future
statements or other required disclosures.
The commenters proposed significant
changes to HUD’s proposed regulatory
text.
HUD Response: HUD considered all
comments received on the requirements
for the Data Plate and made minor
changes to reflect and accommodate
some of the comments. Through the
language on the Date Plate, HUD is
trying to provide information to the
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
consumers, retailers, installers, and
local authorities about the design and
construction of the home that may help
prevent a home from being taken out of
compliance when an attached accessory
building or structure is built and added
on at the home site. Further, the Data
Plate provides information that may be
used by state and local authorities that
have enforcement authority for site-built
structures that are not integral to the
manufactured home produced and
shipped by the manufactured home
manufacturer.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Subpart B, Planning Considerations
One commenter stated that HUD
proposed to adopt a superseded MHCC
recommendation concerning
ventilation. HUD has proposed to
authorize manufacturers’ compliance
with the 2010 edition of American
Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and
Air-Conditioning Engineers
(‘‘ASHRAE’’) Standard 62.2,
‘‘Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality in Low-Rise Residential
Buildings,’’ as an alternative to the
prescriptive ventilation requirements in
§ 3280.103(b) and (c). The proposed rule
ignores that more than four years ago,
the MHCC updated its recommended
acceptance of ASHRAE Standard 62.2 to
refer to the 2013 version. Adopting the
more recent version of the ASHRAE
standard in this rulemaking would
avoid the need for an additional change
to the regulations later to update the
reference.
HUD Response: HUD understands
that the MHCC continues to provide
recommendations that may be more
recent than those published in proposed
rules, including updates to the
referenced ASHRAE Standard 62.2.
Generally, HUD finalizes
recommendations in the order received
to avoid selective choice, minimize
confusion, and so that full and complete
impact analyses can be conducted
specific to the various groups of
recommendations provide by the
MHCC.
§ 3280.103 Light and Ventilation
One commenter supported the
removal of the maximum 90 cubic feet
per minute fan requirement, which will
allow the commenter to increase the
size of homes built to accommodate
larger families, which commenter stated
will allow more families to live in safe,
affordable homes with the modern
amenities they desire.
Another commenter expressed
concern that using the Standards and
eliminating the alternative construction
(AC) process for manufactured housing
that utilizes design elements of site-built
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
homes could affect the manufactured
housing occupants’ health and safety.
The commenter urged HUD to keep the
AC process in place for design features
that could affect the manufactured
home’s structural integrity and safety,
including attached homes (i.e., zero lot
line), multi-story homes, and attached
carports and garages. The commenter
continued that blurring the line between
what is manufactured housing and what
is site-built housing could mislead
homebuyers, and that manufactured
housing that emulates site-built
elements should be held to the same
inspection and building standards as
site-built homes. The commenter urged
HUD to require attached units to meet
all state and local building codes,
including higher energy standards,
required for conventionally built
housing.
HUD Response: HUD’s minimum
requirements established for attached
homes (i.e., zero lot line) and multistory homes do not change the
definition of a manufactured home or
impact the requirement that every
transportable section of a manufactured
home bear a manufacturer’s certification
label. Through this rulemaking, HUD is
codifying requirements previously set
forth through Alternative Construction
requirements; thereby, accounting for
consumer safety. All regulatory aspects
of the program, including design review
and inspections, remain in place for all
manufactured homes built under this
federal program. HUD believes the
minimum standards established and
enforced for these construction options
provide benefits to all segments of the
industry while protecting consumers’
health and safety. Further updates to the
referenced ASHRAE Standard 62.2 may
be addressed in future rulemaking.
§ 3280.108 Interior Passage
Several commenters agreed that
clarification was needed regarding to
which doors the 27-inch requirement
applies. One commenter stated that
closet doors (including walk-in closets)
and pantry doors are less than 27inches, typically 24-inches or less.
Another commenter stated that it has
several floor plans with closet and
pantry openings less than 27-inches and
uses 24-inches for water heater and
furnace compartments and 16-inches for
linen and coat closets. The commenters
stated that they would need to make
significant changes to floor plan designs
to accommodate HUD’s proposal, and
one commenter explained this would
add costs to the home, drive up
affordable housing costs, and financially
burden the commenter. One commenter
suggested clarifying that the minimum
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2501
clear opening requirement of 27-inches
only apply to passage doors in a
manufactured home.
Some commenters suggested adding
exclusions for closet, pantry, coat closet,
linen closet, and toilet compartment
doors and other spaces where the intent
is to ‘‘reach in’’ and access an item. The
commenters explained that closet and
pantry doors, unlike a bedroom door,
are not considered passage doors.
Further, single-section manufactured
homes have a smaller living space when
compared with a multi-section
manufactured home or a typical sitebuilt home. Given that living space is at
a premium in single-section homes,
closet and pantry doors should not be
subject to the same clear opening
requirements.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the
comments and revised the standard
accordingly.
§ 3280.111
Toilet compartments
Two commenters suggested revising
language in paragraph (b) to clarify the
regulatory intent that the section refers
to bathroom passage doors in singlesection and multi-section homes. For
example, the term ‘‘single-section’’
should modify ‘‘home,’’ not
‘‘bathroom.’’
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the
comments and revised the standard
accordingly.
§ 3280.114
Stairways
Comments: Riser Height, Tread Depth,
and Consistency.
Several commenters opposed HUD’s
proposed changes to stair rise and run
requirements. Some commenters noted
that, as written, the proposal would
conflict with existing state and local
requirements and require manufactured
home communities to replace existing
inventory of prefabricated landings and
stairs. Another commenter stated that
the stair rise and run in HUD’s proposed
rule would not allow stairs to be run
parallel with the width of many homes,
which would eliminate many floor plan
options and adversely penalize
manufactured home builders.
One commenter stated that,
§ 3280.114(a)(2)(i), 7″ risers and 10″
treads would cause stairway openings to
be larger to the point where some floor
plans would no longer accommodate a
stairway. Some commenters suggested
HUD use 8″ or 8.25″ for the maximum
rise and 9″ for the minimum tread,
which are figures that thirteen states
accept.6 One commenter also suggested
6 The states referenced by the commenter were:
IL, IN, KY, ME, MD, MA, MT, NJ, ND, OH, OR, PA,
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
Continued
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
2502
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
HUD change ‘‘%’’ to ‘‘3⁄8 inch’’ in
§ 3280.114(a)(2)(i), and change ‘‘%’’ to
‘‘3⁄4 inch’’ in § 3280.114(a)(2)(ii). This
commenter also suggested changing
‘‘Y2’’ to ‘‘1⁄2 inch’’ in paragraph (a)(5).
According to another commenter, the
maximum riser height and minimum
tread depth should be changed to 81⁄4
inches and 9 inches in § 3280.114
(a)(2)(i). HUD’s proposed requirements
would almost eliminate stairway
designs that run parallel with the width
of a traditional manufactured home.
This commenter’s rationale for the
recommended change included giving
manufacturers more flexibility when
trying to balance the smaller form-factor
of most homes with consumer demand
for multiple stories.
HUD Response: Regarding riser height
and tread depth, HUD reviewed several
state building codes referenced in
public comments and has made changes
to riser height and tread depth
consistent with those requirements
found in many state building codes and
in accordance with the comments
received.
Comments: Interior and Exterior
Stairs.
Several commenters stated that HUD
should clarify whether the requirements
apply to stairs inside, or inside and
outside, the home or commented on
whether the requirements should apply
to these different sets of stairs. One
commenter stated that requirements for
stairways and related design features
should focus only on stairways placed
inside the manufactured home, and the
section title should be changed to
‘‘Stairways Inside the Manufactured
Home.’’ Another commenter stated that
the proposed changes to paragraph (a)(2)
addresses interior stairways and exterior
stairways; the commenter suggested
revising the proposal to address interior
steps only. According to the commenter,
states and local municipalities establish
stair geometry to which first responders
are already accustomed, and to require
smaller riser heights and larger treads
may create a hazard.
Another commenter supported the
addition of language to define
requirements for stairways, landings,
handrails, guards, and stairway
illumination, however, the commenter
suggested the language should detail if
it covers interior stairways, exterior
stairways, or both.
WI and WY. The commenter also referenced a
change to the Indiana Code; see Indiana Department
of Homeland Security, Proposal for Code Change
43, IN.gov (May 9, 2018) (proposals 49 and 50),
https://www.in.gov/dhs/files/IRCC%27s%20
Final%20Approved%20Amendments%20
to%202018%20IRC%20(Part%201)%20%20Accepted%20by%20FPBSC%202-5-19.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
Another commenter suggested
striking paragraph (b)(2) in its entirety
because it partially conflicts with
paragraph (b)(1), or, if HUD disagreed
with striking (b)(2), revising (b)(2) as
follows to streamline and clarify
requirements: ‘‘A landing or floor must
be located on each side of an exterior
doorway and the width of each landing
must not be less than the door it serves.
The maximum threshold height above
the floor or landing must be 11⁄2
inches.’’ Given that paragraph (b)(1)
addresses interior stairways, doors, and
landings (with exception for certain
basement applications), the commenter
assumed that paragraph (b)(2) must be
intended for exterior applications,
which is the basis for the suggested
edits.
Two commenters suggested HUD
delete paragraph (e)(2) entirely, since
exterior stairs are not constructed
within the building facility and more
appropriately fit under the HUD Code’s
Model Manufactured Home Installation
Standards. A commenter explained that
exterior stairs would be subject to state
and local building code and healthsafety requirements. If HUD’s exterior
illumination requirements conflict with
state or local requirements, it would
only cause confusion within the
industry and may put consumers at risk.
Comment: Guard Rails.
Some commenters also suggested, for
§ 3280.114(d)(1), that the proposed load
requirements only apply to guards more
than 42″ above the floor grade below, to
prevent driving up housing costs
without providing significant increased
safety protection. When a manufactured
home includes a porch or similar
feature, once installed, it is usually
between 30 and 42 inches above the
lower floor, and there is no evidence of
increased injury from a fall as a result
of a guard failure that is 42 or fewer
inches from grade. The commenters
provided regulatory text edits, and
stated that a 30-inch guard rail
structural requirement would increase
the cost of each single-section home
with a modest porch by $500, or more
for larger homes, which undermines
HUD’s efforts to preserve manufactured
housing affordability.
The commenters further stated HUD
should remove the language regarding
the horizontal rail restriction in
paragraph (d)(2), which HUD has not
backed with a significant health-safety
concern as justification and which
would restrict designs and add
unnecessary cost. This restriction is not
found in the International Residential
Code (IRC), which only prohibits the
passage of a four-inch sphere and would
result in a restriction for manufactured
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
home builders that does not exist for
site-built home builders. One
commenter stated that IRC Table
R301.1.5 does not require the 200 pound
concentrated load to be applied with
any other loads and, therefore, the word
‘‘not’’ should be added after ‘‘this load’’
in the last sentence of paragraph
(d)(2)(ii). Another commenter agreed
and added that this makes (d)(2)(ii)
consistent with the last sentence in
paragraph (c)(5).
Comment: Lighting.
For § 3280.114(e)(1), one commenter
stated that HUD should delete the
requirement for artificial light to be not
less than one-foot-candle at the center of
treads and landing and require only a
light above stairways and landings
because the commenter was not aware
of a test method. Another commenter
suggested a prescriptive method to
simplify compliance with interior stair
lighting. Lumens required for a 3 feet
wide x 9 feet vertical stair would be 3
feet x 11.67 feet x 1 foot-candle = ∼35
Lumens. One 60-watt incandescent bulb
or 10-Watt A19 LED provides about 840
lumens which is more than adequate.
Another commenter recommended
HUD add a prescriptive lighting
standard as an alternative compliance
option. The proposed illumination
requirement of ‘‘not less than one (1)
foot-candle measured at the center of
treads and landings’’ creates a new test
requirement, but it is unclear who is
responsible for performing the test and
assessing compliance. Without an
explanation of the test parameters and
how the test would be administered, the
commenter was concerned this
provision would be inconsistently
enforced. As an alternative, the
commenter recommended that HUD
introduce a minimum standard for
illumination.
HUD Response: Generally, HUD
agreed with most comments and made
changes to the standards for stairways
including revisions to riser height and
tread depth (§ 3280.114(a)(2),
clarification of interior and exterior
consideration (§§ 3280.114(a) and
3280.114(b)), provisions for landings
(§ 3280.114(b)), and handrails
(§ 3280.114(c)).
HUD also modified the standard in
multiple places so that the text reflects
HUD’s regulatory authority for design
and construction of the home and its
lack of authority to regulate stairways
that are designed by others and built at
the home’s site necessary for access and
egress from the entry and exit points of
the homes. HUD also disagreed with
some commenters, as the requirements
in § 3280.112 only apply to stairways
integral to the manufactured home, such
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
as those necessary for multi-story or
multi-level manufactured home floors or
for stairs that are not inside the home
but may be necessary for multi-level
manufacturer designed and constructed
porches designed and built in the home
building factory as an integral feature of
the manufactured home. Further,
requirements for external or exterior
stairs that provide entry and exit and are
built at the home site are subject to state
and or local authority and any such
reference otherwise has been removed.
HUD modified the standards related
to landings removing duplicative
language, clarifying interior versus
exterior provisions, and threshold
height.
HUD also modified the standard
regarding handrails to be consistent
with requirements for handrails
(removal of ladder effect restriction)
identified in other building codes for
other residential structures. However,
HUD disagreed with comments that
would have changed the load
requirements for guard systems to apply
only to guards above 42 inches above
floor grade.
The changes effected by this rule are
generally consistent with other
residential codes enforced nationwide.
However, the load requirement of 20
pounds per square foot is significantly
less than the load required by many
states for similar guard systems.
After consideration of the public
comments, HUD has not changed the
stairway and landing illumination
requirements from the proposed rule as
commented by multiple commenters.
The requirements, as published, are
consistent with state and local standards
and compliance remains, as with all
other standards, the responsibility of the
home manufacturer. In section I. of the
preamble to this rule, HUD clarified that
all standards in this rule are not
retroactive and apply only to newly
constructed homes that enter the first
phase or stage of production on and
after the effective date of the rule.
Further changes, such as those proposed
by some commenters, should be
proposed for review by the MHCC so
that consensus review of those proposed
changes is made as envisioned by the
Act. It is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at the final rule
stage.
Subpart C, Fire Safety
§ 3280.209 Smoke Alarm
Requirements
One commenter recommended HUD
revise § 3280.209, a section not
addressed in the proposed rule. The
commenter stated that HUD should add
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
combination smoke and carbon
monoxide alarms as acceptable devices
just as they are in IRC sections R314.1.1
and R314.5.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the
commenter and made the corresponding
change.
§ 3280.211 Carbon Monoxide Detectors
Some commenters supported
incorporating carbon monoxide
requirements into the Standards to
protect consumer health and safety. One
commenter noted that the MHCC made
this recommendation in 2009 and HUD
should have adopted it some time ago.
One commenter suggested HUD
should revise § 3280.211 to include
specific location requirements like
smoke alarms, instead of referencing the
National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) Standard 720.
Some commenters stated that the
proposed rule’s coverage of CO alarm
requirements would be insufficient
under the new § 3280.211 in protecting
occupants of manufactured housing
because of its limited coverage. All
manufactured housing should have CO
alarms and not just those with fuel-fired
appliances, designed for installing
attached garages, or designed for
installation over basements. While the
new § 3280.211 would be consistent
with occupancy-related installation
requirements of IRC Section R315, these
requirements provide no direct
protection for occupants of
manufactured homes except where
coincident housing-related factors of
installed fuel-fired appliances, designs
for installing attached garages, or
designs for installation over basements
were relevant. Furthermore, the
proposed § 3280.211 requirements
would not protect occupants where
other sources such as use of portable
heating appliances or from misuse of
charcoal grills indoors (both reflected in
CO incident data) following completion
of manufactured housing installation
and commissioning. Occupants of ‘‘allelectric’’ homes may be particularly
vulnerable during periods of electrical
outage. The comment provided
instances of harm caused by carbon
monoxide.
One commenter commended HUD for
recognizing the importance of requiring
carbon monoxide detectors consistent
with the IRC’s requirements. Through
incorporation into the Construction and
Safety Standards, HUD relieves local
officials from conducting additional
inspections and potential re-work post
installation to comply with local
requirements.
Another commenter stated that HUD’s
proposed carbon monoxide
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2503
requirements should align more closely
with similar requirements in other
building codes, such as the IRC’s.
Specifically, the commenter’s
suggestions include: Specifying the
required locations where carbon
monoxide alarms must be installed (for
example, alarms should be required
outside each separate sleeping area or in
the immediate vicinity of any
bedrooms); requiring interconnectivity
between alarms, because when more
than one alarm is installed in a home,
the actuation of one alarm should
activate all alarms; specifying how each
alarm must be powered, because the
home’s electrical system should be the
primary power source, with batteries as
a secondary, reserve power source; and
clarifying that the Standards would
allow combination carbon monoxide
and smoke alarms to keep pace with
consumer demand. Another commenter
(0023) also supported this change.
According to the commenter, HUD
should clarify that combination alarms
are acceptable to ensure the industry
continues to keep pace with consumer
demand. The commenter also suggested
amending § 3280.209 to ensure the
sections cross-reference each other.
Comment: Alarms versus Detectors.
Some commenters stated that the
word ‘‘detector’’ should not be used and
suggested using ‘‘alarms’’ to be
consistent with other codes and striking
the word ‘‘detector’’ wherever it occurs,
because alarms and detectors are
distinct concepts. Alarms are selfcontained, single, or multi-station
sensing devices that detect a given event
and sound an audible or visual alarm.
Detectors are sensing devices that must
be connected to a separate alarm system,
rather than self-contained systems. One
commenter stated that standards do not
include requirements for transmitting
detection devices to an alarm control
unit as would be necessary with
detector devices. The commenter
recommended removing the standard
versions in specific code sections which
are incorporated by reference in
§ 3280.4, which will allow for
simplified future updates and is a
common practice for incorporating
building code standards into regulations
and laws. The commenter
recommended removing the reference to
ANSI/UL 2034, which may not be
readily available and incorporate
location requirements within this
section.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with
many comments and has modified the
Construction and Safety Standards to
address combination alarms, integration
of specific location requirements, and
removal of references to ‘‘detector.’’
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2504
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
HUD also notes that updating specific
editions of referenced standards may
require notice and comment and as
such, will remain for the time-being.
HUD also disagreed with some
commenters that proposed to require
carbon monoxide alarms in all homes,
regardless of whether the home as fuelburning appliances, an attached garage,
or designed for installation over a
basement. HUD’s standards are
consistent with state and local standards
for residential construction. Should the
commenter wish to pursue requirements
for carbon monoxide alarms in all
homes, the commenter is encouraged to
submit the proposed change to the
MHCC for review and deliberation by
the Committee. It is not appropriate for
HUD to integrate these changes at the
final rule stage.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Subpart C, Fire Safety, Attached
Garages
§ 3280.212 Factory Constructed or
Site-Built Attached Garages
One commenter noted that HUD’s
current policy, to not require the IPIA to
inspect documents shipped with the
manufactured home (under Interpretive
Bulletin H–1–77), conflicts with
proposed paragraph (g)—there is no
assurance that the manufacturer would
be including these additional
instructions.
A commenter stated that the proposed
rule leaves it unclear as to when a
garage is to be added to the home.
Another commenter stated that HUD
should clarify that paragraph (a) applies
only to garages which are not selfsupported. One commenter supported
HUD’s actions to remove the issue of
attached garages and carports from the
costly AC process. The commenter
stated that the proposed standards and
regulations would effectively obviate
previous sub-regulatory HUD
‘‘guidance’’ memoranda which
mandated the approval of attached
garage and ‘‘add-on’’-ready
manufactured homes via the AC process
set forth at § 3282.14.7
Several commenters stated that HUD
should revise the proposed fire
separation requirements. A commenter
stated HUD should require that gypsum
be added on site to meet the fire
separation requirement. Installing
gypsum on the exterior of a home in the
factory would not be a durable enough
7 See,
e.g., June 12, 2014 HUD Guidance
Memorandum (‘‘Construction of On-Site
installation of Add-Ons Such as an Attached
Garage’’); and November 10, 2014 HUD Guidance
Memorandum (‘‘Additional DAPIA Guidance for
Review and Processing of Manufacturers
Alternative Construction Requests for Attached
Garages’’).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
exterior finish for storage and shipping.
Another commenter agreed and stated
that paragraph (c) needs to be clarified
so that fire separation between the
garage and the home may be completed
on-site. Site-installed dormers at the
garage in addition to floor-to-foundation
fire separation will be required to be
completed on-site and it would be
advantageous to run all separation at
that time to ensure proper alignment
with the garage. Paragraph (c)(1) should
also be clarified to allow gypsum
required to meet separation to be either
factory or site installed and allowance
for products equivalent to 1⁄2″ gypsum
should be added.
One commenter stated that in
§ 3280.212(g) the reference to § 3285.201
should be changed to § 3285.301. The
commenter proposed that a new
paragraph (h) be added because a sitebuilt, self-supported garage is
considered an add-on per § 3282.8(j)(1)
and does not affect the ability of the
manufactured home to comply with the
Construction and Standards.
Another commenter stated the
Standards should be consistent with
other building codes, such as the IRC.
Instead of requiring that the fire
separation be continuous from beneath
the floor, through the attic space, to the
underside of the roof sheathing/decking,
the Standards should only state that the
garage must be separated from the home
with appropriate gypsum wallboard or
equivalent. Manufacturers can
determine whether the fire separation
should be continuous from the floor,
through the attic space, to the roof
sheathing or decking or if it is more
appropriate to envelop the structure’s
garage side. Other building codes leave
this to the builder’s discretion and so
should the Standards.
The commenter continued that HUD’s
proposed rule for factory or site
construction of attached garages should
emphasize the distinction between
attached and self-supported structures.
HUD should also revisit the fire
separation requirements for attached
garages. The commenter’s suggested
edits included clarifying that attached
garages are not self-supported. Further,
when a garage would be attached to and
supported by the home, manufacturers
should only be required to comply with
the Standards’ load provisions. They
should not be expected to build homes
that also meet the specific requirements
of the various state and local
jurisdictions, and confirming that a sitebuilt, self-supported garage is
considered an add-on and clarifying that
add-ons do not affect a manufactured
home’s ability to comply with the
Standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
According to one commenter, the
guidance provided in §§ 3280.212,
3280.213, 3282.8(j), and 3285.903(c)
(Attached Garages, Carports and AddOns) appears contradictory and
confusing. Sections 3280.212 and
3280.213 provide guidance on how
manufactured housing should be
prepared for the addition of garages and
carports which is clearly within the
scope of the Federal standards. These
sections, along with § 3282.8, discuss
load paths, providing conflicting
information on where loads should be
transferred. If the intent is to offer
options, then the sections should be
presented with an ‘‘or’’ statement to
indicate they are options, as is included
in the Data Plate requirements of
§ 3280.5. The commenter said who bears
responsibility for approval and
inspection of these attached accessory
buildings and structures should also be
clarified. According to the commenter,
these structures should comply with the
local building code and be inspected to
that code by the local jurisdiction, given
their designation as ‘‘attached buildings
or structures’’ and not the extension of
the manufactured home.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with
most comments and has accepted all
suggested textual changes to the
standards that were submitted by the
public. HUD modified the final
Construction and Safety Standards
accordingly.
HUD disagreed with the commenter
that installation instructions are not
required by this final rule, as it is
specifically addressed through
§ 3280.212(g). Further, upon placing a
label certification on each transportable
section of a manufactured home, the
manufacturer self certifies its
compliance with the Construction and
Safety Standards. Should the
commenter seek additional changes to
either manufacturer or IPIA
requirements, the commenter is
encouraged to submit comments
through the MHCC process for
consensus review and deliberation. It is
not appropriate for HUD to integrate
these changes at the final rule stage.
HUD also notes that the added
information required on the Data Plate
more clearly identifies whether the
home has been designed for an attached
garage.
Subpart C, Fire Safety, Attached
Carports
§ 3280.213 Factory Constructed or
Site-Built Attached Carports
One commenter stated that the
proposed rule should be modified to
include attached patio covers and porch
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
roofs which can easily exceed the size
of a carport. The commenter also stated
that current HUD policy under
Interpretive Bulletin H–1–77 conflicts
with paragraph (f)—there is no
assurance that the manufacturer would
be including these additional
instructions.
Another commenter requested HUD
delete the following: Paragraph (b) about
maximum roof slope for the carport, on
the basis that carports cannot exceed the
height of the home; paragraph (c) on
beam designs, on the basis that beam
designs would be part of the approved
design by the Design Approval Primary
Inspection Agency (DAPIA); and
paragraph (d) on shear wall and uplift
strapping design, on the basis that the
carport design would not be known.
One commenter stated that paragraph
(f)’s reference to § 3285.201 should be
changed to § 3285.301.
Another commenter said § 3280.213
for factory or site-built attached carports
should emphasize the distinction
between attached and self-supported
structures and that striking unnecessary
or superfluous rules would also
streamline the requirements. The
commenter’s suggested edits include:
Deleting the maximum roof slope
requirement from the list of design
characteristics for carports, because
given that the height of the carport
cannot exceed the height of the home,
the carport’s roof slope is never a
relevant factor in home design; adding
a provision that, as an alternative to
specifying the unique design
characteristics of the carport and the
home, manufacturers may provide the
maximum loads that the home is
designed to resist from the carport;
removing the provisions specifying
where splices in the host beam can be
located, because narrowly defining this
provision with such detailed,
prescriptive requirements could have
unanticipated consequences, especially
if there are continued advancements in
anchoring technology. According to the
commenter, specific design
characteristics should remain subject to
review and approval by the
manufacturer’s DAPIA.
The commenter’s recommendations
continued with: Removing the shear
wall requirements for homes designed
for Wind Zone II and III installations in
favor of manufacturers specifying
anchor requirements for uplift forces in
Wind Zones II and III as part of the
home’s DAPIA-approved design,
because if the manufacturer and its
DAPIA specify these requirements at the
design stage, the size of any attached
carport would be limited by the load
capacity of the anchor system installed
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
in the factory. This would limit the
design options available to any third
party responsible for installing an
attached carport at the jobsite; and
removing the ‘‘cone of influence’’
provision, because this requirement is
dependent on the type of anchor, and
should be determined by the installer.
The manufacturer should not be
expected to know this information
without knowing exactly where a
manufactured home would be sited and
how it would be installed; and
confirming that a site-built, selfsupported carport is considered an addon and clarifying that add-ons do not
affect a manufactured home’s ability to
comply with the Construction and
Safety Standards.
Another commenter also supported
deleting paragraph (c)(1), because this
paragraph was covered in paragraphs (a)
and (c), and additional details on the
acceptable engineering load path are not
required. The commenter also suggested
deleting paragraph (d) because the load
path requirements should apply to all
wind zones as specified in paragraphs
(a) and (c). The commenter also stated
that the accepted engineer anchor test
protocol does not test for cone of
influence and it is not defined within
the Construction and Safety Standards.
Therefore, it should be removed from
§ 3280.213(f)(1).
HUD Response: HUD did not add
requirements for patio covers and porch
roofs, as such specific code change text
and supporting information be
submitted to the MHCC for consensus
review and deliberation. It is not
appropriate for HUD to integrate these
changes at the final rule stage. Further,
HUD disagreed with comments that
installation instructions are not required
by the standard, as it is clearly
addressed in §§ 3280.213(b) and (e).
Upon placing a label certification on
each transportable section of a
manufactured home, the manufacturer
self-certifies its compliance with the
Construction and Safety Standards.
HUD notes the added information
required on the Data Plate more clearly
identifies whether the home has been
designed for an attached carport. HUD
agreed with all comments providing
specific textual changes and HUD
modified the standards accordingly.
Subpart D, Body and Frame
Requirements
§ 3280.305 Structural Design
Requirements
One commenter stated that proposed
§ 3280.305(h)(5) expands areas of
construction that could be deferred to
the job site and imposed on the installer
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2505
under ‘‘On-Site Completion
Requirements.’’ The commenter stated
that installers were not included in
deliberations on the proposed changes,
and that since the On-Site Completion
rule is relatively new, and given that
HUD has failed to monitor or measure
compliance, this provision should be
deleted until the success of the ‘‘On Site
Completion’’ process can be evaluated.
Another commenter stated that HUD
should delete the words ‘‘connections
between sections,’’ after ‘‘hinged roof
sections,’’ and before ‘‘sheathing,’’ in
paragraph (h)(5) because connections
between sections is covered as part of
standard installation.
Another commenter stated that
paragraph (h)(5)(iii) requires inspection
at an installation site in stages but does
not clarify who would provide
inspections. The commenter also
suggested that HUD clearly define
‘‘inspection of the work at the
installation site in stages,’’ and stated
that this new requirement would add
costs to the home, drive up the cost of
affordable housing, and would
financially burden the commenter.
Two commenters stated that HUD
strike §§ 3280.305(h)(5) (iii), (iv), and
(v), because these proposals generally
apply to onsite installation and appear
to overstep Subpart D’s bounds. The
commenters believed these
requirements, if necessary, would be
more appropriate under Part 3282,
Subpart M, ‘‘On-site Completion of
Construction of Manufactured Homes.’’
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the commenter that revisions to this
standard expand areas of construction
that can be completed on site. The
changes to this standard were already
implemented with the On-Site
Completion of Construction Rule and
these changes are conforming. Further,
HUD conducted limited monitoring of
procedures and approvals related to On
Site Completion of Construction and has
not concluded any adverse or significant
findings.
HUD modified this section to address
other comments received including
removing any references to installation
activities. HUD also modified the
inspection requirements but has
retained the intent that inspections
occur prior to covering up additional
aspects or otherwise allowing for
inspection panels so that inspection can
take place. This aspect is important to
assure that the work completed on site
conforms to the design standards, so
that the home is completed in
accordance with the Construction and
Safety Standards, and the home is not
taken out of compliance through the
work done at the home site. Further,
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2506
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
these standards are established to work
in concert with the regulations for On
Site Completion of Construction and
will help to ensure that appropriate
designs are provided to address the
work that is expected to happen in the
factory, the work that is expected to
happen at the home site, and the factory
and or inspections at the site necessary
for conformance.
§ 3280.307
Use
Resistance to Elements and
A commenter stated that the
expansion of field installation of
exterior coverings means the
requirement for the manufacturer to
provide all needed materials (siding,
fasteners, channels, etc.) should be
added to this list. Another commenter
agreed and suggested adding ‘‘and the
required materials’’ after ‘‘Complete
installation instructions.’’ A commenter
suggested adding attached garages to the
list of exemptions in paragraph (e),
given the amount of onsite work
required to complete the installation of
an attached garage, and as long as the
manufacturer is complying with HUD’s
list of conditions.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and
generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard accordingly.
Subpart F, Thermal Protection
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3820.504 Condensation Control and
Installation of Vapor Retarders
One commenter stated that the
proposed requirements under
§§ 3820.504(b) and .506(c) are not
needed, and HUD should delete them.
The commenter stated its mating walls
are located in a conditioned area,
gaskets are installed in the factory to
prevent air infiltration, and the
commenter has not witnessed a mating
wall with damage from condensation.
Another commenter stated that
mating walls are interior walls and
should not be treated as exterior walls
which require a vapor barrier.
Furthermore, many homes have single
mating walls, and this section does not
define on which side the vapor barrier
should be applied.
Another commenter stated that HUD
should delete these proposals until
certain issues are evaluated. There will
be a concern if the connection between
floors is not effectively sealed from
allowing cold outside air to enter
between the ceiling of the first floor and
floor system of the upper floor. If cold
air is entering this area, a vapor retarder
should be applied to the ceiling on the
first floor. Another concern would be if
the bottom board is still required to be
placed under the upper floors, this may
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
add to additional condensation between
the floors if the vapor retarder is not
installed on the ceiling on the lower
floor.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the commenters regarding the need for
§§ 3280.504(b) and (c) to be deleted or
amended, and that the affected walls are
interior walls. These commenters may
not understand that the subject
standards apply to the (fire) walls
separating attached manufactured
homes; rather than, mating walls
between two sections of the same
manufactured home. Multi-story
manufactured homes have been
designed and built for more than two
decades prior to the rulemaking and
under Alternative Construction
processes. These homes have been
designed and built, and significantly,
HUD has not received information
indicating these homes, without a
ceiling vapor retarder on the first floor,
are not performing.
§ 3820.506 Heat Loss/Heat Gain
Two commenters suggested revising
paragraph (c) by replacing ‘‘the mating
wall of each’’ with ‘‘the fire separation
wall between each.’’ Mating walls
between two or more sections of a
multi-section home are not the same as
firewalls separating two or more
attached, single-family manufactured
homes. Mating walls are aligned at
installation to create a cohesive singlefamily residence—they are not exterior
walls. However, fire separation walls,
which separate attached single-family
homes, should be classified as exterior
walls because they act as a health-safety
barrier between distinct residential
dwellings. The commenters believed
these edits clarify the distinction
between mating walls and fire
separation walls.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and
generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard to
incorporate the public comment where
those changes have not significantly
altered the intent as proposed.
Subpart G, Plumbing Systems
A commenter suggested clarifying the
definition of ‘‘indirect waste receptor,’’
a new term being introduced to the
Standards. Second, in § 3280.608, strike
‘‘Hangars’’ and replace it with
‘‘Hangers’’ as in the original. Third, by
incorporating additional safety
considerations from the Uniform
Plumbing Code, the commenter saw an
opportunity to protect the general
public from the risk of burn or scald.
The commenter believed a home’s relief
drain, should it terminate outside the
home, must terminate between six and
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
twenty-four inches above the finished
grade and face down at termination;
high enough to prevent backflow, but
low enough to reduce the risk of injury
or accident.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and
generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard to
incorporate the public comment where
those changes have not significantly
altered the intent as proposed.
§ 3280.609 Water Distribution Systems
One commenter stated that the
requirement that installers extend water
heater relief valve piping to beyond the
skirting of the home would very likely
create an imminent safety hazard
because it carries superheated,
pressurized water, so it should be
deleted. Another commenter stated that
if the relief valve is directed to outside
the crawl space, there would be a
possibility of personal injury to those
nearby. The commenter explained that
water heater manufacturers do not allow
additional piping to be installed directly
on the pressure relief valve. They
require ‘‘air gaps’’ when directing into
additional piping. The commenter
concluded that HUD should reject these
changes.
Another commenter stated that HUD
should add discharge pipe turndown
requirements taken from the Uniform
Plumbing Code which adds a higher
level of scald protection. This revision
will increase consumer safety.
Two commenters proposed changes to
HUD’s regulatory text.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and
generally agreed with the comments and
addressed the protections to residents
by accepting comments regarding relief
pipe turndowns. HUD also modified the
standard to incorporate the public
comment where those changes have not
significantly altered the intent as
proposed.
§ 3280.612 Tests and Inspection
One commenter opposed the changes
to this section because they would
reduce the required pressure needed to
perform water supply testing and, as a
result, a revision of the manufacturers’
installation instructions would be
needed along with oversight by the IPIA
agencies to assure that the proper
instructions are provided with the
home. Another commenter
recommended that, in the last sentence,
‘‘potable water source’’ should replace
‘‘potable source of supply.’’
HUD Response: HUD generally agreed
with the comments regarding wording
changes to the standard. HUD modified
the standard to incorporate the public
comment where those changes have not
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
significantly altered the intent as
proposed. HUD disagreed with
opposition to the proposed change as
the changes have been vetted by the
MHCC and are consistent with many
state requirements for testing potable
water supply systems. While this
change may require revisions to
manufacturers’ installation instructions,
the system of design approvals will
ensure the instructions conform to the
revised requirements by the rule’s
effective date.
Subpart H, Heating, Cooling and Fuel
Burning Systems
§ 3280.705
Gas Piping Systems
One commenter suggested HUD
eliminate ‘‘hard pipe’’ in paragraph
(i)(8)(iii), as the industry uses a flex gas
connector and not a quick-disconnect.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and
generally agreed with the commenter
and modified the standard to
incorporate the commenter’s proposed
change.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3280.709
Installation of Appliances
A commenter stated that
§§ 3280.709(a) and 3280.711 require that
manufacturers currently ship two sets of
installation instructions for each
appliance with every home; the MHCC
voted to strike this requirement from
section § 3280.709(a) by letter ballot in
2015 (Log #92).
Some commenters noted the
importance of inspection but stated that
it is unclear who is to perform on-site
inspections and testing related to
paragraph (a)(1)(ii). One commenter
stated that HUD should clarify that the
installation is to comply with the local
building code requirements and be
subject to inspection by state or local
code officials. This commenter noted
that the language in § 3280.709(a)(1)
would allow for the installation of direct
vent space heating appliances on-site
following approved instructions and the
installation and inspection procedures
provided.
A commenter was concerned with
changes to the vent system termination
provisions in paragraph (d) because the
commenter was unaware of any healthsafety risks that would necessitate
expanding the permissible range from 3
to 10 feet. The commenter stated the IRC
has a similar requirement, but it only
applies to the vent system of a fuelburning appliance. Consequently, the
commenter recommended adding the
clarifying phrase ‘‘of fuel-burning
appliances.’’ In addition, the commenter
replacing the phrase ‘‘habitable areas’’
with ‘‘habitable rooms’’ because this
term is defined in the Standards.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
2507
HUD Response: HUD agreed that the
MHCC voted to eliminate the
requirement for the home manufacturer
to provide two sets of appliance
manufacturers’ instructions with each
home. This recommended change is
anticipated to be addressed in a future
rulemaking. HUD also reviewed the
comments concerning the site installed
direct vent appliances and has made
changes to clarify that testing of the
home’s fuel supply and electrical
systems are the responsibility of the
home manufacturer. HUD also reviewed
the comment regarding separation of
intake and exhaust vents and made
changes to address the comment by
clarifying that the placement restrictions
apply to exhausts of fuel burning
appliances and using the defined term,
‘‘habitable rooms.’’
explained that wiring ceiling-mounted
and wall-mounted light fixtures to one
switch has been standard practice for
decades. A commenter stated they were
unaware of any health-safety risk
associated with having multiple
bathroom lights controlled by the same
switch, HUD has not provided any
information to suggest otherwise, and
consumers’ preference and other
building codes or standards support the
commenter’s position.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the comments. The intent of the
requirement for separate switches
allows an occupant to use one or both
lights at their discretion. This allows
potential energy consumption savings
by allowing the occupant to energize
one light rather than both if both are not
necessary.
§ 3280.710 Venting, Ventilation, and
Combustion Air
Subpart J, Transportation Systems
One commenter stated that the new
requirement at paragraph (d) is not
needed and that, to follow the proposed
requirement, the commenter would
have vent pipes above allowable
transport height. The commenter
requested that HUD delete the
requirement because it would be forced
to have vent pipes site installed, revise
vent runs, or eliminate some floor plans
completely, which would drive up the
cost of affordable housing and cause
financial burden. Another commenter
stated that HUD should clarify that
§ 3280.710 applies to fuel-burning
combustion appliances, to be consistent
with the IRC. Two commenters
proposed changes to HUD’s regulatory
text.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the comment that the changes to
separate intake and exhaust vents are
not needed. The proposed standard was
recommended by the MHCC and HUD
refers the commenter to U.S.
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) audit report GAO–13–52, Testing
and Performance Evaluation Could
Better Ensure Safe Indoor Air Quality.
HUD also reviewed the comment
regarding separation of intake and
exhaust vents and has made changes to
address the comment by clarifying that
the placement restrictions apply to
exhausts of fuel burning appliances and
using the defined term, ‘‘habitable
rooms.’’
Subpart I, Electrical Systems
§ 3280.807
Fixtures and Appliances
Some commenters stated that the new
requirement at paragraph (g) has no
safety benefit to the consumer and HUD
should delete it. The commenters
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
§ 3280.902
Definitions
One commenter stated that the
proposed change to the ‘‘Drawbar and
coupling mechanism’’ definition, by
removing ‘‘A frame’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘rigid substructure,’’ is not
justified and should be discarded.
Another commenter suggested deleting
the parenthetical from the ‘‘Drawbar and
coupling mechanism’’ definition for
clarity. The commenter stated the
parenthetical is unnecessary, and
‘‘usually an A frame rigid structure’’
only creates confusion where the
defined term ‘‘Frame’’ also uses the
phrase ‘‘rigid structure’’ in its
definition.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
these comments. The added term is
consistent with the same use in other
definitions and is intended to reflect the
structure to which the coupling
mechanism is mounted.
§ 3280.903 General Requirements for
Designing the Structure To Withstand
Transportation Shock and Vibration
One commenter suggested that HUD
reject the proposed changes to
paragraph (a). The commenter stated
that to remove ‘‘during its intended life’’
is unacceptable. To alter the language to
‘‘function after set-up’’ now establishes
a ‘‘time frame’’ on how long chassis
have to last and many manufactured
homes will no longer be ‘‘transportable’’
which is required under 3280.2. The
commenter did not suggest where HUD
should reinclude the phrase ‘‘during its
intended life’’ if HUD kept its proposed
changes to § 3280.903.
For paragraph (b)(1), commenters
stated that HUD should provide more
guidance on the road test requirements
and clarify what constitutes an effective
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2508
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
road test. One commenter suggested that
HUD clearly define the minimum miles
to travel, the type of roadways to travel,
and what a failure is. Other commenters
supported the requirement for road tests
to be witnessed by experts who are in
the best position to provide such
services—an independent registered
professional engineer or architect, or by
a recognized testing organization. One
commenter recommended that the
testing laboratory be accredited to ISO/
IEC 17025 or 17020. Two commenters
stated that in paragraph (b)(1), the
manufacturer’s Production Inspection
Primary Inspection Agency should be
added to the list of independent third
parties who can witness and certify the
road test, and included regulatory text
changes. These commenters stated that
paragraphs A and B appear to be a
carryover from Interpretive Bulletin J–
1–76 and should be updated to the
applicable (1) and (2) paragraph
numbering format to clarify that the
equation requires the sum of the Dead
Load and Floor Load calculations.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with
the comment that the changed language
alters the intended life of the chassis.
The terminology refers to the structural,
plumbing, mechanical and electrical
systems and requires that those systems
remain operational/functional after
transportation.
HUD reviewed the comments and
proposed changes that would add
several specific requirements within the
road test requirements. These
suggestions should be put forth for
MHCC review and consideration, as it is
not appropriate for HUD to integrate
these changes at the final rule stage.
Upon review of public comment,
HUD added that Primary Inspection
Agencies may also witness and certify
road tests. HUD also reviewed
comments that include specific changes
to the formula included in
§ 3280.903(b)(3) and edited the formula
accordingly.
§ 3280.904 Specific Requirements for
Designing the Transportations System
A commenter suggested that ‘‘to
insure’’ should be replaced with
‘‘ensuring’’ to correct a minor
grammatical error. Some commenters
suggested that in paragraph (b)(4)(i) the
word ‘‘static’’ should be added to ‘‘gross
dead weight,’’ such that the text should
read ‘‘gross static dead weight,’’ to
maintain consistency with the ‘‘static
tongue weight’’ variable.
For paragraph (b)(4)(ii), one
commenter suggested HUD add a
requirement to check weights with the
home in a level position ready for
transport.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
For paragraph (b)(9)(ii), several
commenters stated HUD should
maintain the current 40-foot stopping
distance. One commenter stated HUD
should utilize Interpretive Bulletin J–1–
76. Requiring new brake tests would
pose financial burdens. Another
commenter stated it could not find a
federal Department of Transportation
(DOT) requirement that would reduce
the braking distance to 35 feet from 40
feet. The proposal would eliminate
acceptable brake tests qualified under
the current standards, adding undue
burden and cost, without justification,
to homes with years of satisfactory
braking experience which would need
to be re-tested. Another commenter
believed keeping the stopping distance
at 40 feet is consistent with DOT
regulations.
For the same paragraph (b)(9)(ii), a
commenter stated the parenthetical
should be deleted. The transportation of
manufactured homes more
appropriately falls under Category B(3),
‘‘All other property-carrying vehicles
and combinations of property-carrying
vehicles,’’ of the DOT Vehicle Brake
Performance Table.8 Given that the
weight of a home can easily exceed
25,000 pounds—with some 16-footwide, full-length models approaching
40,000 pounds—home transportation is
more closely related to the movement of
heavy equipment, such as excavators
and dump trucks. While the process of
transporting a home is considered
driveaway-towaway operations under
DOT regulations, the DOT also
recognizes that these homes require
special consideration.9
Two commenters suggested in
paragraph (b)(6)(i), the word
‘‘nationally’’ should be deleted. There
are several reputable programs and
testing agencies that do not yet have
national accreditation, but they have
regional, state, or local approval. These
programs or agencies should not be
excluded, especially when state
standards are often more stringent.
Another commenter recommended that,
for paragraph (b)(6)(i), that the
nationally recognized testing agency be
accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020.
Some commenters suggested in
paragraph (b)(8)(ii), the phrase ‘‘or
equivalent’’ should follow ‘‘tread wear
indicator’’ to ensure consistency with
how the phrase is applied to other
similar provisions throughout the
Standards.
For paragraph (b)(9)(iii), a commenter
stated that HUD’s proposed requirement
is not practical because there is no way
8 See
49 CFR 393.52(d).
e.g., 49 CFR 393.75(h).
9 See,
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to check actual voltage unless the truck
is hooked up to the brakes. The
commenter asked if the intent is to
perform this test on every home that
ships and requested that HUD delete the
requirement as it would drive up the
cost of affordable housing and pose
financial burden on the commenter.
Another commenter suggested
replacing the first two sentences of
paragraph (b)(9)(iii) with the following:
‘‘Brake wiring must be provided for
each brake. The brake wire must not be
less than the value specified in the
brake manufacturer’s instructions.’’
Manufacturers should not be
responsible for evaluating each
transportation company’s tractors and
equipment or for assessing each
company’s quality assurance program.
They should only be responsible for
ensuring that the provided brake wiring
meets or exceeds the minimum required
specifications as provided by the brake
manufacturer.
HUD Response: HUD accepted the
comment regarding changing ‘‘insuring’’
to ‘‘to ensure’’ within § 3280.904(b)(3).
HUD also accepted the comment to add
‘‘static’’ within §§ 3280.904(b)(4) and
3280.904(b)(6). HUD also accepted the
comment to check weights with the
home in a level position (see revised
§ 3280.904(b)(4)(ii)).
HUD disagreed with the comment to
revise the stopping distance from 35 to
40 feet. HUD revised the reference for
the braking performance stopping
distance, aligning HUD’s standards with
DOT (at 49 CFR 393.52(d)) and clarified
the classification of manufactured home
to best align with DOT’s previously
designated classification.
HUD disagreed with the comment to
remove ‘‘nationally’’ from the qualifier
on testing agencies that may accept
recycled axle programs
(§ 3280.904(b)(6)(i)). This terminology
has been in use for decades and its use
is consistent with historical use. HUD
also disagreed with the comment that
suggests adding a specific accreditation
for testing agencies. HUD has found the
work of nationally recognized testing
agencies, having various qualifications,
does not impede health and safety
protection.
HUD also reviewed comments
requesting the addition of equivalent
tread wear indicators but has not
received specific means of determining
equivalence and has therefore decided
not to include such language in the final
rule. These suggestions should be put
forth for MHCC review and
consideration, as it is not appropriate
for HUD to integrate these changes at
the final rule stage.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
HUD reviewed public comment and
specific comments that included textual
changes to § 3280.904(b)(9)(iii)
regarding electrical brake wiring. HUD
accepted these changes.
Subpart K, Attached Manufactured
Homes and Special Construction
Several commenters supported adding
two-family, or two- and three-family,
dwelling units to Subpart K. These
commenters supported duplexes and
triplexes as more practical and
affordable solutions in urban and
suburban applications because of, for
example, zoning restrictions. One
commenter suggested less restrictive fire
separation requirements and amending
§§ 3280.1002 and .1004 and adding a
new § 3280.1003(a). Another
commenter also suggested less
restrictive fire separation requirements
and offered several recommended
changes to regulatory text. These
proposed changes to regulatory text
included separating § 3280.1003 into
two paragraphs—paragraph (a) for ‘‘two
attached manufactured homes’’ and
paragraph (b) for ‘‘three or more
attached manufactured homes.’’ Some
commenters supported reevaluating
Subpart K for a single structure with
two dwellings but did not propose
alternative regulatory text. One
commenter stated that duplexes have
simpler requirements than ‘‘town
homes,’’ and the demand for duplexes
will far outpace any other type of
attached manufactured home.
Another commenter, while expressing
general support for HUD’s proposed
changes, questioned HUD’s focus on
adopting standards for multi-story
manufactured homes and attached
manufactured homes, while MHCC
recommended standards for multifamily manufactured homes are not
included in the proposed rule and have
yet to be proposed for adoption. The
commenter noted the absence of an
explanation in the proposed rule for
HUD’s prioritization of the included
standards for multi-story and ‘‘zero-lotline’’ attached manufactured homes, as
contrasted with broader and potentially
much more economically-significant
and beneficial proposed standards for
multi-unit/multi-family manufactured
homes. The commenter stated that
instead of promoting affordable
manufactured housing for all Americans
as required by law, HUD appears to be
abusing its regulatory authority to
support Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in
order to benefit a narrow industry
segment, while smaller manufacturers
are kept waiting endlessly for proposed
multi-unit/multi-family standard. The
commenter stated that HUD gave no
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
indication in the proposed rule of when
or even if multi-unit/multi-family
manufactured homes will be addressed
by promulgating new standards that are
clearly and uncontrovertibly within the
scope of present federal law. The
commenter concluded that HUD should
include MHCC recommended standards
for multi-unit/multi-family
manufactured homes in any final rule
under the present docket.
Another commenter stated that much
of the proposed language in the new
Subpart K duplicates nearly verbatim
the language contained in IRC sections
R302.2 and R302.4 without observing
and protecting the rights of the ICC as
its copyright holder. The commenter
stated that if HUD wishes to publish any
part of the IRC in its rules or future
rulemaking proceeding, HUD must seek
to comply with OMB Circular A–119
and Incorporation by Reference
procedures.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed
comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those
comments to the maximum extent
deemed necessary to effect the
appropriate changes where those
changes have not significantly altered
the intent as proposed.
HUD decided not to eliminate
structural independence for attached
homes, as each home shall be designed
to be structurally independent and each
home must perform on its own. HUD
accepted changes to wording regarding
fire separation walls but has not
accepted the use of exceptions. The
exceptions should be submitted as
proposed changes to the MHCC, and any
exceptions shall be handled through the
Alternative Construction process. It is
not appropriate for HUD to integrate
these changes at the final rule stage.
Further, this standards change was
not intended to address multi-dwelling
unit manufactured homes (multiple
single-family residences in one
manufactured home structure). The
MHCC recommendations for multi-unit
manufactured homes are contained in
the fourth set of its recommendations
for changes to the Standards. The
attached manufactured homes are each
designed as individual single-family
residential structures by the home
manufacturers and each such attached
home is to comply with the
requirements set forth in 24 CFR 3280
and as such meet all such requirements
to be labeled as manufactured homes to
be installed in accordance with
accompanying installation instructions
that also meet HUD’s Model
Manufactured Home Installation
Standards.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2509
HUD has reviewed the public
comment regarding integration of
requirements that are generally
consistent with provisions of the
International Residential Code (IRC).
HUD has acted on proposed standards
received from the public and as
reviewed, modified and recommended
by the MHCC. While some language
may be consistent between the IRC, state
and local codes, and the requirements
published in this rule, there are
differences that remain and justify
establishment of unique provisions
rather than incorporating the IRC or any
given state or local code in their
entirety. HUD believes the standards
will allow use of some of the latest
building technologies and materials,
creating more consistency with multiple
State-adopted residential building codes
for site-built housing (some of which
may incorporate or amend standards
including, but not limited to, the
International Residential Code), and
expand consumer choice.
Comments: Preemption and
Opportunity Zones.
A commenter asserted that in the
preamble HUD overtly intends to
preempt the authority of state and local
jurisdictions through Subpart K. The
commenter cited reasons as to why such
requirements are within the domain of
state and local authorities. Adjacent and
attached manufactured homes may be
manufactured by different companies
and installed at different times resulting
in potential interactions that have not
been addressed within either
manufactured home, but which could be
within the proposed rule’s
requirements. The proposed rule
provides no requirements that attached
manufactured homes be manufactured
by the same manufacturer or installed at
the same time.
A commenter stated that HUD should
have provided more detail and
justification for the following statement
made in the Proposed Rule, which was
used as a blanket justification for the
new subpart K: ‘‘Subpart K would
enable manufacturers to design and
construct homes similar to townhomes,
which may be useful to address
affordable housing needs in
Opportunity Zones and urban or other
areas.’’
According to the commenter, HUD
makes no attempt to quantify the benefit
against potential costs even though the
qualifier ‘‘may’’ is used to describe the
policy change’s potential benefit. For
instance, HUD did not consider how
many fewer code inspectors might there
be in the country if this policy change
were to allow the manufactured housing
industry to become a dominant force in
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
2510
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
the housing sector. Further, HUD also
failed to provide any evidence that a
consumer market even exists for
townhome-style developments made out
of manufactured homes. Additionally,
HUD also failed to describe any interest
that would validate the above statement
for the type of developments that are
considered by this new provision on the
part of the Opportunity Zone funds, or
their managers, or even those local
officials representing the Opportunity
Zone areas.
The commenter was also concerned
about the number of state and local
authorities that the proposed rule would
preempt, if finalized in its current form.
The commenter stated there are at least
four major preemptions that should be
considered more fully through a
Federalism Consultation, consistent
with Executive Order 13132. The
commenter believed that the authority
granted to manufactured housing
producers under this provision should
have triggered a proper consultation
process, irrespective of the additional
preemptions provided by the proposed
rule for building code-related
authorities affecting stairways, landings,
handrails, guards and stairway
illumination, siting of and installation
standards for carbon monoxide alarms,
and indoor ventilation requirements.
The commenter suggested that prior to
finalizing the rule, HUD should pause to
complete a Federalism Consultation and
more robust cost-benefit analysis,
especially as it relates to disaster
preparedness and recovery.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the
public comment regarding the
justification for this new Subpart. In
response, HUD found that the standards
promulgated in this Final Rule are
within the scope and authority provided
by the Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974, as amended by the
Manufactured Housing Improvement
Act of 2000. Further, HUD believes that
the future design, construction and
installation of attached manufactured
homes may create affordable housing
opportunities and may allow
manufactured homes to be placed in
more urban areas where land and space
restrictions have historically limited the
use of manufactured housing and
because the design and construction of
such homes historically required
specific HUD approvals creating a more
burdensome and costly oversight
process. These areas may include
locations within Opportunity Zones.
HUD is aware of a nationwide trend that
recognizes increased focus on efficient
land use in many areas. HUD’s
Construction and Safety Standards
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
allow for the industry to provide safe,
decent, sanitary, and affordable housing,
as the need develops.
HUD also noted that the aspects of
installation would still be subject to
state and local authority, as is the same
for all other manufactured home
installations, provided manufacturer
installation instructions and state and
local requirements at a minimum
comply with HUD’s Model
Manufactured Home Installation
Standards. However, HUD’s
Construction and Safety Standards as
promulgated through this Final Rule
would preempt state and local
requirements for the same aspects of
construction, the same as for all other
manufactured homes.
§ 3280.1002 Definitions
Two commenters suggested changes
to HUD’s proposed regulatory text.
Another commenter stated that HUD
should reject the proposed changes to
§ 3280.1002. Manufactured homes are
designed to be transportable during the
intended life of the home and allowing
multi-family manufactured homes to be
constructed and installed affects
homeownership and the adjacent home.
Another commenter opposed the
proposed rule due to its unwarranted
intrusion into the modular housing
construction sector. Subpart K would
allow ‘‘(t)wo or more adjacent
manufactured homes that are
structurally independent from
foundation to roof and with open space
on at least two sides. . .’’ (definition of
Attached manufactured home at
§ 3280.1002). In addition to federal
preemption and safety risks associated
with manufactured housing, the
commenter asserted that HUD has not
considered additional factors that make
modular homebuilding preferable to
manufactured housing, including:
Durability, resiliency, long-term value
and resale market, access to
conventional financing without the
limits FHA places on manufactured
home loans, and fewer zoning
restrictions.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed
comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those
comments to the maximum extent
deemed necessary to effect the
appropriate changes. HUD has changed
the definition for ‘‘fire separation wall’’
by removing the language that the walls
be structurally independent as that
requirement is already included in the
definition of ‘‘attached manufactured
home.’’ Further, HUD reviewed the
comments suggesting intrusion into the
modular housing sector and disagreed
with the comments. These standards
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
apply to manufactured housing and
contain many of the same or similar
requirements as other similar structures
or similar design features and
considerations.
§ 3280.1003 Attached Manufactured
Home Unit Separation
Two commenters provided a
significant number of suggested changes
to HUD’s proposed regulatory text. The
commenters suggested several editorial
and substantive changes to the unit
separation requirements and have
suggested exceptions to the
requirements under certain conditions.
Some commentors have also suggested
substantive changes to requirements for
fire separation wall penetrations.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed
comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those
comments to the maximum extent
deemed necessary to effect the
appropriate changes that remain in line
with the MHCC’s recommendations.
The changes made by HUD within this
standard remove reference to ‘‘two
attached manufactured homes’’ and
more generically requires unit
separation between any attached
manufactured homes. HUD has also
modified the requirement that 1 hour
fire-resistive rating be based on testing
in accordance with ASTM E 119–05,
without including language stating
‘‘with exposure from both sides on each
attached manufactured home unit.’’
HUD has not integrated substantive
changes to include new exceptions and
HUD has not accepted substantive
changes to fire separation penetrations.
HUD will consider exceptions through
the Alternative Construction process,
should a manufacturer be unable to
meet the requirements of the standards
and be able to demonstrate an
equivalent level of safety. Further
changes, such as those proposed by
some commenters, should be proposed
for review by the MHCC so that
consensus review of those proposed
changes is made as envisioned by the
Act. It is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at the final rule
stage.
§ 3280.1004
Exterior Walls
Two commenters proposed that in
paragraph (b), ‘‘or separation wall’’
should be added after ‘‘fire separation
wall’’ and before ‘‘on each
manufactured home.’’
HUD Response: HUD reviewed
comments that include specific text
changes and has decided not to
incorporate the change to ensure all
exterior walls contain insulation.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
Comments: Changes to the
Manufactured Home Procedural and
Enforcement Regulations (24 CFR Part
3282).
A commenter stated that high winds
caused by tornadoes and hurricanes
have caused significant damage to
manufactured housing units, as
compared to site-built houses, as
evidenced by the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) in
multiple post-disaster assessment
reports. The commenter explained that
structural add-ons to manufactured
homes present a clear safety risk to life
and property, and the broad authority
given to manufactured housing
manufacturers regarding attachments,
including car ports, garages, awnings,
decks and porches, at the newly
proposed 24 CFR part 3282, as well as
through the proposed subpart K, should
be reconsidered and reevaluated. HUD
should reevaluate the proposed
revisions in consultation with FEMA
and the U.S. Global Change Research
Program.
Another commenter recommended
that HUD keep in mind that, on January
14, 2020, several important amendments
to Subpart M were advanced by the
MHCC’s Regulatory Enforcement
Subcommittee. While the commenter
did not suggest that HUD delay updates
to Subpart M, HUD should be aware that
substantial changes will likely be
approved by the MHCC at its next
meeting. The commenter also looked
forward to the prompt implementation
of the MHCC’s recommended revisions
to Subpart M, which the commenter
believed will streamline the
administrative process.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed these
general comments. HUD is regulating
design of the manufactured home, not
the design and construction of site-built
attachments. These aspects remain
under the purview of the local
authorities having jurisdiction.
Changes to the Model Manufactured
Home Installation Standards (24 CFR
Part 3285)
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
General Comments
A commenter stated the proposed rule
would have a significant impact on the
role of manufactured home installers,
including potential liability for
installation work related to accessory
buildings and other on-site installation,
such as certain appliances the proposal
states can be shipped ‘‘loose’’ to the
homesite. To ensure that the end buyer
or resident of the home has a home that
has been safely manufactured,
transported, and installed, it is vital that
all installation documentation is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
shipped with and remains with the
home.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the
comment and addressed similar
comments in this final rule. Concerns
regarding verification of current
installation documentation
requirements should be put forth for
MHCC review and consideration, as it is
not appropriate for HUD to integrate
changes on these requirements at the
final rule stage.
§ 3285.5
Definitions
One commenter suggested that the
‘‘attached accessory building or
structure’’ definition in § 3285.5 be
updated to ensure it matches how the
term is defined elsewhere in the
Standards. Specifically, the word ‘‘the’’
should be inserted between ‘‘which’’
and ‘‘attachment,’’ to promote
consistency in the Standards for the
new term ‘‘attached accessory building
or structure.’’
HUD Response: HUD reviewed
comments that included specific text
changes and integrated those comments
to the maximum extent deemed
necessary to effect the appropriate
changes.
Continued Updates to the Standards
and MHCC Recommendations Not
Addressed in the Proposed Rule
General Comments
Several commenters supported
regular updates to the Standards and
HUD’s backing of manufactured
housing. Commenters also
recommended that HUD develop and
implement a streamlined process for
Standards updates going forward, so
revisions are introduced on a more
consistent timeline.
Many commenters supported
recommendations and technical changes
made by the national association
representing the industry at the federal
level, the Manufactured Housing
Institute (MHI), that further enhance the
proposed rule. The commenters
believed MHI’s recommendations
should be incorporated into HUD’s final
updates and represent critical progress
in clearing out the backlog of items that
have been approved by the MHCC.
These changes were recommended by
the MHCC but have not yet been
incorporated into the Standards, and the
commenters encouraged HUD to quickly
finalize the proposed rule with MHI’s
recommended changes.
A commenter believed updates are
delayed because the Office of
Manufactured Housing Programs is a
‘‘low priority’’ within HUD’s
organizational hierarchy. HUD has
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2511
repeatedly said it is committed to both
housing innovation and streamlining
the administrative and regulatory
processes that hurt manufactured
housing, and this rulemaking galvanizes
HUD’s commitment to the manufactured
housing industry. Because HUD is the
standard-setting body for the nation’s
manufactured home construction and
safety standards, updates must follow a
distinct administrative path and must be
prioritized separately from unrelated
policy matters. Such an approach was
recommended by the Government
Accountability Office in 2014 and in
2019 by HUD’s own Office of Policy
Development and Research.10
These commenters also urged HUD to
move forward with the subsequent sets
of Standards updates that have been
passed by the MHCC but are still
pending HUD action. Such sets of
updates include several critical industry
recommendations such as roll-in
showers and tankless water heaters
within the Standards. The commenters
also urged HUD to move forward with
subsequent proposals to update the
Federal Construction and Safety
Standards that have been considered
and recommended by the Consensus
Committee—yet have not been acted
upon by the Department. One
commenter stated it is unacceptable that
HUD continues to neglect its obligations
to ensure timely updates to the
Standards. HUD’s delays have realworld consequences for families moving
into manufactured homes and for the
environment and public health. It is
critical that HUD address each of the
revisions already recommended by the
MHCC and act on future MHCC
recommendations within the timeframe
allowed by Congress, ‘‘not later than 12
months after the date on which a
standard is submitted to the Secretary
by the MHCC.’’
Comments: The Department of Energy
and Energy Efficiency.
One commenter stated that one of the
proposed rule’s notable failures is
HUD’s decision ‘‘not to include in this
proposed rule certain MHCC
recommendations due to pending
regulations for improving energy
efficiency in manufactured homes being
prepared by the U.S. Department of
Energy’’ (DOE). DOE in November 2019
agreed to a settlement to take final
action on energy efficiency no later than
February 2022. This offers HUD a
reasonable opportunity to implement
10 U.S. Gov’t Accountability Office, GAO–14–410,
Manufactured Housing: Efforts Needed to Enhance
Program Effectiveness and Ensure Funding Stability
(July 2, 2014). See also HUD’s ‘‘Report to Congress
on the On-Site Completion of Construction for
Manufactured Homes’’ (June 18, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
2512
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
the MHCC’s recommendations in the
current rulemaking and HUD’s delay
further risks the health and financial
well-being of new manufactured home
residents.
Another commenter continued that
HUD states that ‘‘[g]iven this DOE
rulemaking,’’ it ‘‘has decided to
postpone action’’ on certain MHCC
recommendations affecting §§ 3280.502
and 3280.506(b). The proposed rule
cites no legal authority for this
postponement, nor is HUD’s proposed
action one of the three outcomes
permitted by the statutory text: 11 The
adoption, modification, or rejection of
the proposed revisions recommended by
the MHCC. Moreover, the proposed rule
does not fulfill HUD’s obligation to
publish for public comment the
proposed revised standards
recommended by the MHCC. Because
HUD has failed to identify the specific
changes to the Standards that it is
postponing, HUD denies the public an
opportunity to meaningfully comment
on this aspect of the proposed rule.
Even if DOE’s standards for energy
efficiency would ultimately supersede
the MHCC’s approved
recommendations, HUD has ample time
to implement the MHCC’s
recommended energy efficiency
improvements before compliance with
any conflicting DOE standards would be
required.
Another commenter recognized the
valuable role energy efficiency
requirements play in reducing the
energy burden of households
(particularly low-and moderate-income
households) and supporting
affordability across the life cycle of
homeownership and rental. DOE’s delay
does not absolve HUD of its obligation
to provide manufactured homeowners
with energy efficient homes. The
commenter recommended HUD
incorporate provisions of the
International Energy Conservation Code
appropriate for manufactured homes
into the federal standards. HUD should
also work diligently with DOE to assure
the implementation of the requirements
in 42 U.S.C. 17071.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the
comments and intends to move forward
with more recent MHCC
recommendations. HUD will continue to
collaborate and cooperate with other
federal agencies, including DOE, as
needed and necessary.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
The reference standards proposed for
incorporation are approved by the
Director of the Federal Register for
11 See
42 U.S.C. 5403(a)(5).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1
CFR part 51. Copies of these standards
may be obtained from the organization
that developed the standard. As
described in § 3280.4, these standards
are also available for inspection at
HUD’s Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs and the National Archives and
Records Administration.
This final rule incorporates by
reference the following six consensus
standards for Manufactured Housing:
1. ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2–2010,
Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality in Low-Rise Residential
Buildings. This standard defines the
roles of and minimum requirements for
mechanical and natural ventilation
systems and the building envelope
intended to provide acceptable indoor
air quality in low-rise residential
buildings. It is ASHRAE’s Indoor Air
Quality standard for residential
buildings. It applies to spaces intended
for human occupancy within singlefamily houses and multi-family
structures of three stories or fewer above
grade, including manufactured and
modular houses. This standard is
available online for review via readonly, electronic access at https://
ibr.ansi.org/Standards/.
2. ANSI/UL 2034–2016. Standard for
Single and Multiple Station Carbon
Monoxide Alarms. These requirements
cover electrically operated single and
multiple station carbon monoxide (CO)
alarms intended for protection in
ordinary indoor locations of dwelling
units, including recreational vehicles,
mobile homes, and recreational boats
with enclosed accommodation spaces
and cockpit areas. The carbon monoxide
alarms covered by these requirements
are intended to respond to the presence
of carbon monoxide from sources such
as, but not limited to, exhaust from
internal-combustion engines, abnormal
operation of fuel-fired appliances, and
fireplaces. Carbon monoxide alarms are
intended to alarm at carbon monoxide
levels below those that cause a loss of
ability to react to the dangers of carbon
monoxide exposure. Carbon monoxide
alarms covered by this standard are not
intended to alarm when exposed to
long-term, low-level carbon monoxide
exposures or slightly higher short-term
transient carbon monoxide exposures,
possibly caused by air pollution or
properly installed and maintained fuelfired appliances and fireplaces. This
standard is available online for review
via read-only, electronic access at https://
ibr.ansi.org/Standard.
3. ASTM E 119–05. Standard Test
Methods for Fire Tests of Building
Construction and Materials. This
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
standard is used to measure and
describe the response of materials,
products, or assemblies to heat and
flame under controlled conditions, but
does not by itself incorporate all factors
required for fire hazard or fire risk
assessment of the materials, products, or
assemblies under actual fire conditions.
This standard is available online for
review via read-only, electronic access
at https://www.ASTM.org/READING
LIBRARY.
4. NFPA 70–2005. National Electrical
Code, Article 550.17. The provisions of
this article cover the electrical
conductors and equipment installed
within or on mobile and manufactured
homes, the conductors that connect
mobile and manufactured homes to a
supply of electricity, and the
installation of electrical wiring,
luminaires (fixtures), equipment, and
appurtenances related to electrical
installations within a mobile home park
up to the mobile home service-entrance
conductors or, if none, the mobile home
service equipment. More specifically,
Article 550.17 provides that the wiring
of each mobile home be subjected to a
1-minute, 900-volt, dielectric strength
test (with all switches closed) between
live parts (including neutral) and the
mobile home ground. Alternatively, the
standard allows a test to be performed
at 1080 volts for 1 second. This test
shall be performed after branch circuits
are complete and after luminaires
(fixtures) or appliances are installed.
This standard is available online for
review via read-only, electronic access
at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards.
5. NFPA 720. Standard for the
Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Detection and Warning Equipment. This
document does not attempt to cover all
equipment, methods, and requirements
that might be necessary or advantageous
for the protection of lives from carbon
monoxide exposure. The effects of
exposure to carbon monoxide vary
significantly among different people.
Infants, pregnant women, and people
with physical conditions that limit their
bodies’ ability to use oxygen can be
affected by low concentrations of carbon
monoxide. These conditions include,
but are not limited to, emphysema,
asthma, and heart disease, all of which
are usually indicated by a shortness of
breath upon mild exercise. People in
need of warning about low levels of
carbon monoxide should explore the
use of specially calibrated units or other
alternatives. This standard is primarily
concerned with life safety, not with
protection of property. It covers the
selection, design, application,
installation, location, performance,
inspection, testing, and maintenance of
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
carbon monoxide detection and warning
equipment in buildings and structures.
This standard is available online for
review via read-only, electronic access
at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards.
6. UL 217. Single and Multiple Station
Smoke Alarms. This document provides
requirements that cover electrically
operated single and multiple station
smoke alarms intended for open area
protection in indoor locations. This
standard is available online for review
via read-only, electronic access at https://
ibr.ansi.org/Standard.
Standard
Edition
Title
ANSI/UL 2034 ......................
Third ...
Single and Multiple Station Carbon Monoxide Alarms.
§ 3280.211(a)
ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2 .............
2010 ...
§ 3280.103(d)
NFPA No.70 Article 550.17 ..
2005 ...
Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-Rise
Residential Buildings.
National Electrical Code ..............
NFPA 720 .............................
2015 ...
Standard for the Installation Carbon
Monoxide
Detection
Equipment.
§ 3280.211(b)
ASTM E 119 .........................
2005 ...
§ 3280.1003(a)
UL 217 ..................................
Fifth ....
Standard Test Method for Fire
Tests of Building Construction
and Materials.
Single and Multiple Station
Smoke Alarms.
In addition to reviewing these
standards on-line, copies of the
standards may be obtained from the
organization that developed the
standard as follows:
ANSI—American National Standards
Institute, 11 West 42nd Street, New
York, NY 10036, 212–642–4900, fax
212–398–0023, www.ansi.org.
ASHRAE—American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration, and Air
Conditioning Engineers, 1791 Tullie
Circle NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, 404–636–
8400, fax 404–321–5478.
ASTM—ASTM, Int’l, 100 Barr Harbor
Drive, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania 19428, 610–832–9500, fax
610–832–9555, www.astm.org.
NFPA—National Fire Protection
Association, Batterymarch Park, Quincy,
Massachusetts 02269, 617–770–3000,
fax 617–770–0700, www.nfpa.org.
UL—Underwriters Laboratories, 333
Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, Illinois
60062, 847–272–8800, fax 847–509–
6257, www.ul.com.
This final rule also references ASTM
D781–1968 (Reapproved 1973), which
has already been approved for
incorporation by reference. No changes
are being proposed to this IBR.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review—Executive Orders
12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866
(Regulatory Planning and Review), a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 3280.211(a)
Comment
Only required for homes that incorporate a gas
burning appliance and then preempts state and
local requirements already established in 38
states.
Provides an option to ventilation requirements established at § 3280.103(b) and (c).
Provides for a referenced standard to conduct polarity checks as an option to visual polarity
checks.
Only required for homes that incorporate a gas
burning appliance or an attached garage and
then preempts state and local requirements already established in 38 states.
Allows for a manufacturer to design and construct
attached housing that is otherwise only permitted through an AC review and approval.
Provides for a referenced standard for manufacturers to use combination carbon monoxide and
smoke alarms. This standard addresses smoke
alarm operation of the combination alarms.
determination must be made whether a
regulatory action is significant and,
therefore, subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) in
accordance with the requirements of the
order. Executive Order 13563
(Improving Regulations and Regulatory
Review) directs executive agencies to
analyze regulations that are ‘‘outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively
burdensome, and to modify, streamline,
expand, or repeal them in accordance
with what has been learned.’’ Executive
Order 13563 also directs that, where
relevant, feasible, and consistent with
regulatory objectives, and to the extent
permitted by law, agencies are to
identify and consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and
maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public.
This rule was determined to be a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of the Executive
order (although not an economically
significant regulatory action, as
provided under section 3(f)(1) of the
Executive order).
Executive Order 13771
Executive Order 13771, entitled
‘‘Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs,’’ was issued on
January 30, 2017. This rule is expected
to be an Executive Order 13771
regulatory action. Details on the
estimated cost savings of this final rule
PO 00000
Frm 00019
The sections of the Construction and
Safety Standards that would be
amended by each reference modification
and the impact of each reference is
shown in the chart below.
Section
§ 3280.810(b)
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2513
can be found below in the Summary of
Benefits and Costs, and in the rule’s
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
Summary of Benefits and Costs of Rule
As discussed, this final rule would
amend the Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards by
adopting recommendations made to
HUD by the MHCC. In this regard, this
final rule revises various standards that
reflect current construction practices
used by the manufacturing housing
industry and the home construction
industry in general. For example, when
a manufacturer chooses to install a
carbon monoxide alarm, the
manufacturer will use an alarm that has
been listed in accordance with
requirements of ANSI/UL 2034 and the
manufacturer will install the alarm in
accordance with the product’s
installation instructions that meet the
requirements of NFPA 720. Similarly,
standards proposed that are applicable
to interior door widths as well as those
provisions for multi-story and attached
manufactured homes are based on
current construction practices that have
largely been established due to preexisting requirements of state and local
jurisdictions for other housing products
(i.e., site-built or modular). Other
standards recommended by the MHCC
and proposed by HUD, such as those
that would define requirements for
stairways, landings, handrails, guards
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2514
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
and stairway illumination, would free
manufacturers from having to follow
various state and local requirements that
vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction
and bring uniformity to manufactured
home construction nation-wide. The
rule would also incorporate five new
reference standards that are already
standards used in the design, listing,
and evaluation of the respective
materials or components.
In addition, HUD has concluded that
this rule provides manufacturers more
flexibility in the ability to pursue design
options and, more importantly, cost
savings as the result of eliminating the
need to obtain HUD approval through
the Alternative Construction (AC)
process (see § 3282.14). More
specifically, manufacturers need to
engage the AC process to design and
construct manufactured homes that
incorporate innovations that have not
yet been codified in HUD’s Construction
and Safety Standards. For example,
addressing the design and construction
of multi-story homes, attached homes,
or homes that are designed to
accommodate an attached garage or
carport that is not factory constructed
but added to the home during the home
installation process, may create
regulatory confusion between state,
local, and Federal authorities and may
sometimes require HUD approval
through the AC process prior to the
manufacturer being able to incorporate
these design features. After review of an
AC request, HUD establishes specific
terms and conditions for use of the
design through an AC letter. While the
AC process serves a useful purpose,
including encouraging the use of new
technology in the construction of
manufactured homes, HUD believes that
codification of certain design features
that already were reviewed can provide
cost savings for manufacturers and
consumers, and reduce regulatory
confusion when directly addressed
within the code. In fact, HUD’s final
rule is based primarily on the MHCC’s
recommendations and integrates some
aspects of specific AC letters that have
been issued in the past. Specifically,
regulatory costs that are currently borne
by the manufactured home
manufacturer associated with preparing
an AC request and maintaining the AC
approvals include:
1. Manufacturers’ engineers’
preparation of designs, calculations, or
tests for aspects that do not conform
with outdated building standards for
past innovations that have become more
commonplace but have not yet been
incorporated into the Construction and
Safety Standards;
2. DAPIA review and approval of the
designs, calculations, and or tests to be
submitted on behalf of the
manufacturers requesting HUD’s
approval;
3. Preparation of a submission
package for the AC request, including
all designs, calculations, and tests to be
sent to HUD for approval;
4. Lost opportunity costs and actual
manufacturer and DAPIA staff time to
respond to HUD throughout the review
and approval process, which, depending
on the specific AC request, may take as
few as 30 days or as long as 6 months;
5. Time and travel associated with
third-party inspections at each affected
home’s site for manufactured homes
built under an AC that requires a site
inspection be conducted in order to
verify conformance with specific terms
and conditions of the AC approval; and
6. Maintaining and providing copies
of AC-specific production reports,
inspection reports, and other
administrative burdens required to
maintain the AC approval.
This rule would also require that
carbon monoxide detectors be installed
in homes with fuel burning appliances
or designed by the home manufacturer
for an attached garage. These provisions
are intended to be consistent with other
single-family dwelling construction
requirements and are intended to
provide early warning alerts to
occupants of the presence of carbon
monoxide within the living space of the
manufactured home. Specifically, this
rule would require that carbon
monoxide alarms be installed in
accordance with the Standard for the
Installation of Carbon Monoxide
Detection Equipment, NFPA 720–2015,
and be listed and conform to the
requirements of Single and Multiple
Station Carbon Monoxide Alarms,
ANSI/UL 2034–2016 edition.
In sum, the one-time annual costs of
this proposed rule range from $2.19
million to $4.122 million. Total valued
benefits range from $8.515 million to
$12.517 million. Unvalued benefits
include reduced home damage and
injuries from piping water heater relief
valves to outside of the home and from
the avoided delay during the AC review.
The total estimated annual costs and
benefits are described in the chart
below.
3 percent
Estimate: low
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Total Annual Costs (See Figure 3):
Carbon Monoxide Detector Requirement .................................................
Water heater relief valves .........................................................................
Wet-vented drains ....................................................................................
Separate Bathroom Light Switches ..........................................................
7 percent
Estimate: high
Estimate: low
Estimate: high
$258,000
1,352,400
483,000
96,600
$1,032,000
1,932,000
772,800
425,040
$258,000
1,352,400
483,000
96,600
$1,032,000
1,932,000
772,800
425,040
Total ...................................................................................................
Present Value of Benefits
Carbon Monoxide Detector Requirement (See Figure 4):
Value of Injuries Prevented ......................................................................
Value of Deaths Prevented ......................................................................
Wet-vented drains (See Figure 7) ...................................................................
Separate Bathroom Light Switches (See Figure 5) .........................................
Deregulatory (See Figure 6):
Whole-House Ventilation ..........................................................................
2-Story Homes ..........................................................................................
Attached Garages .....................................................................................
2,190,000
4,161,840
2,190,000
4,161,840
166,818
8,908,186
483,000
326,796
166,818
8,908,186
772,800
2,614,366
142,688
7,619,651
483,000
214,929
142,688
7,619,651
772,800
1,719,434
3,540
12,640
38,836
3,540
12,640
38,836
3,540
12,640
38,836
3,540
12,640
38,836
Total ...................................................................................................
9,939,816
12,517,187
8,515,285
10,309,589
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
A fuller discussion of the costs and
benefits of this rule is available in the
rule’s Regulatory Impact Analysis,
which is part of this docket.
Finally, any changes made to the rule
subsequent to its submission to OMB
are identified in the docket file, which
is available for public inspection in the
Regulations Division, Room 10276,
Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 7th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410–0500.
Information collection
Number of
respondents
Manufacturers Records:
§ 3282.14 Alternative Construction Submissions
IPIA Records:
§ 3282.14 Alternative Construction Submission
Concurrence
Records and Reporting ...............
DAPIA Records:
§ 3282.203/361/364
Design Review
Records and Reporting ...............
Total ...............
Burden hours
per response
Annual burden
hours
Hourly cost
per response
Annual cost
0.75
101
2.5
253
$33.57
$8,493.21
12
14
168
2.0
336
33.57
11,279.52
6
28
168
1.0
168
33.57
5,639.76
153
........................
569
........................
757
........................
25,412.49
Environmental Review
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Responses
per annum
Reduction Act, an agency may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless the collection
displays a valid control number.
The burden of information collection
addressed in this final rule is estimated
as follows for those aspects that would
continue to require AC requests and
does not include burdens for past AC
requests related to carport-ready homes,
garage-ready homes, homes that exceed
2,571 square feet (whole house
ventilation), and two-story homes:
135
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538) establishes requirements for
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their regulatory actions on state, local,
and tribal governments, and the private
sector. This rule will not impose any
Federal mandates on any state, local, or
tribal government or the private sector
within the meaning of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
A Finding of No Significant Impact
with respect to the environment has
been made in accordance with HUD
regulations at 24 CFR part 50, which
implement section 102(2)(C) of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The
Finding of No Significant Impact is
available for public inspection between
the hours of 8 a.m. and 5 p.m. weekdays
in the Regulations Division, Office of
General Counsel, Room 10276,
Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 451 Seventh Street SW,
Washington, DC 20410–0500. The
Finding of No Significant Impact will
also be available for review in the
docket for this rule on Regulations.gov.
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
The information collection
requirements contained in this proposed
rule have been approved by the OMB
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520) and
assigned OMB control number 2502–
0253. HUD expects to make changes to
the existing recordkeeping items
consistent with changes in this final
rule and believes that the changes will
result in a decrease of burden. In
accordance with the Paperwork
Frequency of
response
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Paperwork Reduction Act
2515
Jkt 253001
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) generally requires
an agency to conduct a regulatory
flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies
that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. It is HUD’s
position that this proposed rule would
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would
regulate establishments primarily
engaged in making manufactured homes
(NAICS 32991). The U.S. Small
Business Administration’s size
standards define an establishment
primarily engaged in making
manufactured homes as small if it does
not exceed 1,250 employees. Of the 222
firms included under this NAICS
definition, approximately 35 produce
manufactured homes subject to HUD’s
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards. Other entities
covered by this NAICS code build nonHUD Code prefabricated buildings. Of
the 35 manufacturers subject to HUD’s
Manufactured Housing Construction
and Safety Standards, 31 are considered
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
to be small businesses based on the
threshold of 1,250 employees or less.
The final rule applies to all the
manufacturers and thus would affect a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities have the ability and
capability to offer the same type of
housing products with the same or
similar options, features, and appliances
as larger manufacturers. However,
smaller manufacturers have more
difficulty spreading regulatory costs
over the higher production of homes
like that of a large, higher producing
manufacturer. Small manufacturers
would need to bear the costs, reducing
profit margins accordingly or passingthrough the costs over lower production
amounts. This may disproportionally
increase the cost of housing products for
small manufacturers considering the
same or similar options, features, and
appliances. This rule, however, would
provide small manufacturers greater
flexibility to pursue design options and,
more importantly, obtain cost savings
resulting from the elimination of the
need to obtain HUD approval through
the AC process (see § 3282.14). More
specifically, small manufacturers are
more likely to engage engineering
consultants and other non-staff
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2516
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
resources in order to provide data and
information needed for the AC process.
Consequently, small manufacturers
would benefit most from this rule’s
provisions that eliminate the AC process
for design and construction of
manufactured homes that incorporate
innovations that have not yet been
codified in HUD’s Construction and
Safety Standards. Additionally, the
elimination of these current regulatory
costs may provide small manufacturers
the opportunity to pursue design and
construction innovations that absent the
rule would have been too costly to
pursue.
For the reasons stated, a substantial
number of small manufacturers with
fewer than 1,250 employees will be
affected by this rule. Nevertheless, HUD
anticipates that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on them.
Accordingly, the undersigned certifies
that this rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, an
agency from promulgating a regulation
that has federalism implications and
either imposes substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments and is not required by
statute, or preempts state law, unless the
relevant requirements of section 6 of the
Executive order are met. This rule does
not have federalism implications and
does not impose substantial direct
compliance costs on state and local
governments or preempt state law
within the meaning of the Executive
order.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number for Manufactured
Housing Construction and Safety
Standards is 14.171.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 3280
Fire prevention, Housing standards,
Incorporation by reference.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
24 CFR Part 3282
Administrative practice and
procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations,
Investigations, Manufactured homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Warranties.
24 CFR Part 3285
Housing standards, Manufactured
homes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
Accordingly, for the reasons described
in the preamble, HUD amends 24 CFR
parts 3280, 3282, and 3285 to read as
follows:
PART 3280—MANUFACTURED HOME
CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY
STANDARDS
1. The authority citation for part 3280
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2697, 42 U.S.C.
3535(d), 5403, and 5424.
2. In § 3280.2, add in alphabetical
order a definition for ‘‘Attached
accessory building or structure’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 3280.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Attached accessory building or
structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport,
windbreak, garage or porch for which
the attachment of such is designed by
the home manufacturer to be
structurally supported by the
manufactured home.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. Revise § 3280.3 to read as follows:
§ 3280.3 Manufactured home procedural
and enforcement regulations, and
consumer manual requirements.
(a) A manufacturer must comply with
the requirements of this part, part 3282
of this chapter, and 42 U.S.C. 5416.
(b) Consumer manuals must be in
accordance with § 3282.207 of this
chapter.
■ 4. Amend § 3280.4 as follows:
■ a. Revise paragraph (a);
■ b. Add paragraph (m)(2);
■ c. In the introductory text to
paragraph (p), remove the words
‘‘American Society for Testing and
Materials’’ and add, in their place,
‘‘ASTM, International’’;
■ d. Redesignate paragraphs (p)(27)
through (34) as paragraphs (p)(28)
through (35), respectively, and add new
paragraph (p)(27);
■ e. Redesignate paragraphs (aa)(4)(xvi)
through (xix) as paragraphs (aa)(4)(xvii)
through (xx), respectively, and add new
paragraph (aa)(4)(xvi); and
■ f. Add paragraph (aa)(9);
■ g. In paragraph (hh)(9), remove
‘‘§ 3280.208(a)’’ and add, in its place,
‘‘§§ 3280.208(a) and 3280.211(a)’’; and
■ h. Add paragraph (hh)(23).
The revision and additions read as
follows:
§ 3280.4
Incorporation by reference.
(a) The specifications, standards, and
codes of the following organizations are
incorporated by reference in 24 CFR
part 3280 (this Standard) pursuant to 5
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as
though set forth in full. The
incorporation by reference of these
standards has been approved by the
Director of the Federal Register. If a later
edition is to be enforced, the
Department will publish a notification
of change in the Federal Register. These
incorporated standards are available for
purchase from the organization that
developed the standard at the
corresponding addresses noted below.
Incorporated standards are available for
inspection at the Office of Manufactured
Housing Program, Manufactured
Housing and Construction Standards
Division, U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW, Room B–133, Washington,
DC 20410, email mhs@hud.gov. Copies
of incorporated standards that are not
available from their producer
organizations may be obtained from the
Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs. These standards are also
available for inspection at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
email fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(2) ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2–2010,
Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality in Low-Rise Residential
Buildings, copyright 2010 IBR approved
for § 3280.103(d).
*
*
*
*
*
(p) * * *
(27) ASTM E 119–05, Standard Test
Methods for Fire Tests of Building
Construction and Materials, approved
September 15, 2005, IBR approved for
§ 3280.1003(a).
*
*
*
*
*
(aa) * * *
(4) * * *
(xvi) Article 550.17, IBR approved for
§ 3280.810(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(9) NFPA 720, Standard for
Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Detection and Warning Equipment,
2015 Edition, Copyright 2014, IBR
approved for § 3280.211(b).
*
*
*
*
*
(hh) * * *
(23) ANSI/UL 2034–2016, Standard
for Single and Multiple Station Carbon
Monoxide Alarms, Third Edition, dated
February 28, 2008 (including revisions
through May 11, 2016), IBR approved
for § 3280.211(a).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 3280.5, redesignate paragraphs
(d) through (i) as paragraphs (e) through
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(j), respectively, and add new paragraph
(d) to read as follows:
§ 3280.5
Data plate.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The applicable statement:
This manufactured home IS designed
to accommodate the additional loads
imposed by the attachment of an
attached accessory building or structure
in accordance with the manufacturer
installation instructions. The additional
loads are in accordance with the design
load(s) identified on this Data Plate; or
This manufactured home IS NOT
designed to accommodate the additional
loads imposed by the attachment of an
attached accessory building or structure
in accordance with the manufacturer
installation instructions.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 3280.11, revise paragraph (d) to
read as follows:
§ 3280.11
Certification label.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) The label must be located at the
taillight end of each transportable
section of the manufactured home
approximately 1 foot up from the floor
and 1 foot in from the road side, or as
near that location on a permanent part
of the exterior of the manufactured
home section as practicable. The road
side is the right side of the
manufactured home when one views the
manufactured home from the tow bar
end of the manufactured home. If
locating the label on the taillight end of
a transportable section will prevent the
label from being visible after the
manufactured home section is installed
at the installation site, the label must be
installed on a permanent part of the
exterior of the manufactured home
section, in a visible location as specified
in the approved design.
■ 7. In § 3280.103, revise paragraph (b)
introductory text and add paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
§ 3280.103
Light and ventilation.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
*
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 3280.108
Interior passage.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) All interior swinging doors must
have a minimum clear opening of 27
inches except doors to toilet
compartments in single-section homes
(see § 3280.111(b)), and doors to closets
and pantries.
■ 9. Revise § 3280.111 to read as
follows:
§ 3280.111
Toilet compartments.
(a) Each toilet compartment must be
a minimum of 30 inches wide, except,
when the toilet is located adjacent to the
short dimension of the tub, the distance
from the tub, to the center line of the
toilet must not be less than 12 inches.
At least 21 inches of clear space must
be provided in front of each toilet.
(b) All bathroom passage doors in
single-section homes must have a
minimum clear opening width of 23
inches, and bathroom passage doors in
multi-section homes must have a
minimum clear opening width of 27
inches.
■ 10. In § 3280.113, redesignate
paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) as paragraphs
(c), (d), and (e), respectively, and add
paragraph (b) to read as follows:
§ 3280.113
Glass and glazed openings.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Required glazed openings shall be
permitted to face into a roofed porch
where the porch abuts a street, yard, or
court and the longer side of the porch
is at least 65 percent open and
unobstructed and the ceiling height is
not less than 7 feet.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 11. Add § 3280.114 to read as follows:
§ 3280.114
*
*
*
*
(b) Whole-house ventilation. Each
manufactured home must be provided
with whole-house ventilation having a
minimum capacity of 0.035 ft3/min/ft2
of interior floor space or its hourly
average equivalent. This ventilation
capacity must be in addition to any
openable window area. In no case shall
the installed ventilation capacity of the
system be less than 50 cfm. The
following criteria must be adhered to:
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Optional ventilation provisions. As
an option to complying with the
provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
this section, ventilation systems
complying with ANSI/ASHRAE
Standard 62.2 (incorporated by
reference, see § 3280.4) may be used.
■ 8. In § 3280.108, add paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
Stairways.
(a) Stairways—(1) General. These
minimum standards apply to stairways
that are designed and constructed as
part of the factory-completed
transportable section(s) of a
manufactured home, such as interior
stairways for multi-level or multi-story
homes or external stairways for multilevel construction features that are
designed and constructed in the factory
on a transportable section and integral
to the access and egress needs within
the transportable section(s) of a home.
These standards do not apply to exterior
stairways that are built at the home site
or stairways to basement areas that are
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2517
not designed and built as part of a
transportable section of a manufactured
home.
(2) Width. Stairways must not be less
than 36 inches in clear width at all
points above permitted handrail height
and below the required headroom
height. Handrails must not project more
than 41⁄2 inches on either side of the
stairway and the minimum clear width
of the stairway at and below the
handrail height, including treads and
landings, must not be less than 311⁄2
inches where a handrail is installed on
one side and 27 inches where handrails
are provided on both sides.
(3) Stair treads and risers—(i) Riser
height and tread depth. The maximum
riser height must not exceed 81⁄4 inches
and the minimum tread depth must not
be less than 9 inches. The riser height
must be measured vertically between
leading edges of the adjacent treads. The
tread depth must be measured
horizontally between the vertical planes
of the foremost projection of adjacent
treads and at a right angle to the tread’s
leading edge. The walking surface of
treads and landings of a stairway must
be sloped no steeper than one unit
vertical in 48 units horizontal (a 2percent slope). The greatest riser height
within any flight of stairs must not
exceed the smallest by more than 3⁄8
inch. The greatest tread depth within
any flight of stairs must not exceed the
smallest by more than 3⁄8 inch.
(ii) Profile. The radius of curvature at
the leading edge of the tread must not
be greater than 9⁄16 inch. A nosing not
less than 3⁄4 inch but not more than 11⁄4
inches shall be provided on stairways
with solid risers. The greatest nosing
projection must not exceed the smallest
nosing projection by more than 3⁄4 inch
between two stories, including the
nosing at the level of floors and
landings. Beveling of nosing must not
exceed 1⁄2 inch. Risers must be vertical
or sloped from the underside of the
leading edge of the tread above at an
angle not more than 30 degrees from the
vertical. Open risers are permitted,
provided that the opening between
treads does not permit the passage of a
4-inch diameter sphere. A nosing is not
required where the tread depth is a
minimum of 11 inches. The opening
between adjacent treads is not limited
on stairs with a total rise of 30 inches
or less.
(4) Headroom. The minimum
headroom in all parts of the stairway
must not be less than 6 feet 8 inches,
measured vertically from the sloped
plane adjoining the tread nosing or from
the floor surface of the landing or
platform.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
2518
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(5) Winders (winding stairways).
Winders are permitted, provided that
the width of the tread at a point not
more than 12 inches from the side
where the treads are narrower is not less
than 10 inches and the minimum width
of any tread is not less than 6 inches.
Within any flight of stairs, the greatest
winder tread depth at the 12-inch walk
line must not exceed the smallest by
more than 3⁄8 inch. The continuous
handrail required by paragraph (c)(3) of
this section must be located on the side
where the tread is narrower.
(6) Spiral stairways. Spiral stairways
are permitted provided the minimum
width is a minimum 26 inches with
each tread having 71⁄2 inch minimum
tread width at 12 inches from the
narrow edge. All treads must be
identical, and the rise must be no more
than 91⁄2 inches. Minimum headroom of
6 feet, 6 inches must be provided.
(7) Circular stairways. Circular
stairways must have a tread depth at a
point not more than 12 inches from the
side where the treads are narrower of
not less than 11 inches and the
minimum depth of any tread must not
be less than 6 inches. Tread depth at
any walking line, measured a consistent
distance from a side of the stairway,
must be uniform as specified in
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
(b) Landings. Every landing must have
a minimum dimension of 36 inches
measured in the direction of travel.
Landings must be located as follows:
(1) There must be a floor or landing
at the top and bottom of each stairway,
except at the top of an interior flight of
basement stairs, provided a door does
not swing over the stairs.
(2) A landing or floor must be located
on each side of an interior doorway and
exterior doorway, to the extent the
external stairway is designed by the
home manufacturer and constructed in
the factory, and the width of each
landing must not be less than the door
it serves. The maximum threshold
height above the floor or landing must
be 11⁄2-inches.
(c) Handrails—(1) General. A
minimum of one handrail meeting the
requirements of this section must be
installed on all stairways consisting of
four or more risers. Handrails must be
securely attached to structural framing
members. A minimum space of 11⁄2
inches must be provided between the
adjoining wall surface and the handrail.
(2) Handrail height. Handrails must
be installed between 34 inches and 38
inches measured vertically from the
leading edge of the stairway treads
except that handrails installed up to 42
inches high must be permitted if serving
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
as the upper rails of guards required by
paragraph (d) of this section.
(3) Continuity. Required handrails
must be continuous from a point
directly above the leading edge of the
lowest stair tread to a point directly
above the leading edge of the landing or
floor surface at the top of the stairway.
If the handrail is extended at the top of
the stairway flight, the extension must
parallel the floor or landing surface and
must be at the same height as the
handrail above the leading edges of the
treads. If the handrail is extended at the
base of the stair, it must continue to
slope parallel to the stair flight for a
distance of one tread depth, measured
horizontally, before being terminated or
returned or extended horizontally. The
ends of handrails must return into a
wall or terminate in a safety terminal or
newel post.
(4) Graspability. Required handrails
must, if circular in cross section, have
a minimum 11⁄4-inch and a maximum 2inch diameter dimension. Handrails
with a noncircular cross section must
have a perimeter dimension of at least
4 inches and not more than 61⁄4 inches
(with a maximum cross-section
dimension of not more than 21⁄4 inches).
The handgrip portion of the handrail
must have a smooth surface. Edges must
have a minimum 1⁄8-inch radius.
Handrails must be continuously
graspable along their entire length
except that brackets or balusters are not
considered obstructions to graspability
if they do not project horizontally
beyond the sides of the handrail within
11⁄2 inches of the bottom of the handrail.
(5) Required resistance of handrails.
Handrails must be designed to resist a
load of 20 lb./ft applied in any direction
at the top and to transfer this load
through the supports to the structure.
All handrails must be able to resist a
single concentrated load of 200 lbs.,
applied in any direction at any point
along the top, and have attachment
devices and supporting structures to
transfer this loading to appropriate
structural elements of the building. This
load is not required to be assumed to act
concurrently with the loads specified in
this section.
(d) Guards. (1) Porches, balconies, or
raised floor surfaces located more than
30 inches above the floor or grade below
must have guards not less than 36
inches in height. Open sides of stairs
with a total rise of more than 30 inches
above the floor or grade below must
have guards not less than 34 inches in
height measured vertically from the
nosing of the treads. Balconies and
porches on the second floor or higher
must have guards a minimum of 42
inches in height.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(2) Required guards on open sides of
stairways, raised floor areas, balconies,
and porches must have intermediate
rails or ornamental closures that do not
allow passage of a sphere 4 inches in
diameter.
(i) The triangular openings formed by
the riser, tread and bottom rail of a
guard at the open side of the stairway
must be of such a size that a sphere of
6 inches cannot pass through.
(ii) Guard systems must be designed
to resist a load of 20 lb./ft applied in any
direction at the top and to transfer this
load through the supports to the
structure. All guard systems must be
able to resist a single concentrated load
of 200 lb., applied in any direction at
any point along the top and have
attachment devices and supporting
structures to transfer this loading to
appropriate structural elements of the
building. This load is not required to be
assumed to act concurrently with the
loads specified in this section.
(e) Stairway illumination. All interior
and exterior stairways must be provided
with a means to illuminate the
stairways, including the landings and
treads.
(1) Interior stairways must be
provided with an artificial light source
located in the immediate vicinity of
each landing of the stairway. For
interior stairs, the artificial light sources
must be capable of illuminating treads
and landings to levels not less than one
(1) foot-candle measured at the center of
treads and landings. The control and
activation of the required interior
stairway lighting must be accessible at
the top and bottom of each stairway
without traversing any steps.
(2) Exterior stairways designed by the
home manufacturer and constructed in
the factory must be provided with an
artificial light source located in the
immediate vicinity of the top landing of
the stairway. An artificial light source is
not required at the top and bottom
landing, provided an artificial light
source is located directly over each
stairway section. The illumination of
exterior stairways must be controlled
from inside the home.
■ 12. Amend § 3280.209 by
■ a. Revising paragraph (a);
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)
through (f) as paragraphs (c) through (g);
and
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (b).
The addition and revision read as
follows:
§ 3280.209
Smoke Alarm Requirements.
(a) Labeling. Each smoke alarm
required under paragraph (b) of this
section must conform with the
requirements of UL 217 (incorporated
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
by reference, see § 3280.4), or ANSI/UL
268 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 3280.4), and must bear a label to
evidence conformance. Combination
smoke and carbon monoxide alarms
shall be listed and must bear a label to
evidence conformance with UL 217 and
ANSI/UL 2034.
(b) Combination alarms. Combination
smoke and carbon monoxide alarms
shall be permitted to be used in lieu of
smoke alarms. If installed, such alarms
must meet location requirements for
both smoke alarms and carbon
monoxide alarms.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 13. Add § 3280.211 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3280.211 Carbon monoxide alarm
requirements.
(a) Labeling. Carbon monoxide alarms
shall be listed and must bear a label to
evidence conformance with ANSI/UL
2034 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 3280.4). Combination carbon
monoxide and smoke alarms shall be
listed and must bear a label to evidence
conformance with ANSI/UL 2034 and
UL 217 (incorporated by reference, see
§ 3280.4).
(b) Required carbon monoxide alarm
locations. Carbon monoxide alarms
must be installed in each home
containing either a fuel burning
appliance or designed by the home
manufacturer to include an attached
garage. Carbon monoxide alarms must
be installed outside of each separate
sleeping area in the immediate vicinity
of the bedrooms and in accordance with
the alarm manufacturer’s installation
instructions. Where a fuel-burning
appliance is located within a bedroom
or its attached bathroom, a carbon
monoxide alarm must be installed
within the bedroom and in accordance
with the manufacturer’s installation
instructions. Carbon monoxide alarms
must be installed in conformance with
NFPA 720 (incorporated by reference,
see § 3280.4).
(c) Interconnectivity. Where more
than one carbon monoxide alarm is
required to be installed, the alarm
devices shall be interconnected in such
a manner that the actuation of one alarm
will activate all the alarms installed.
(d) Connection to power source. Each
carbon monoxide alarm must be
powered from the electrical system of
the home as the primary power source
and a battery as a secondary power
source.
(e) Combination alarms. Combination
carbon monoxide and smoke alarms
shall be permitted to be used in lieu of
carbon monoxide alarms. When
combination carbon monoxide and
smoke alarms are used, they shall be
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
installed to also comply with
§ 3280.209.
(f) Basement applications. For each
home designed to be placed over a
basement, the manufacturer must
provide a carbon monoxide alarm for
the basement and must install the
electrical junction box for the
installation of this carbon monoxide
alarm for its interconnection with other
alarms required by this section.
(g) Testing. Each required carbon
monoxide alarm installed at the factory
must be operationally tested, after
conducting the dielectric test specified
in § 3280.810(a), in accordance with the
alarm manufacturer’s instructions. A
carbon monoxide alarm that does not
function as designed during the test and
is not satisfactorily repaired so that it
functions properly in the next retest
must be replaced. Any replacement
carbon monoxide alarm must be
successfully tested in accordance with
this section.
■ 14. Add § 3280.212 to read as follows:
§ 3280.212 Factory constructed or sitebuilt attached garages.
(a) When a manufactured home is
designed for factory construction with
an attached garage or is designed for
construction of an attached site-built
garage that is not self-supported, the
manufacturer must design the
manufactured home to accommodate all
appropriate live and dead loads from
the attached garage structure that will be
transferred through the manufactured
home structure to the home’s support
and anchoring systems.
(b) The design must specify the
following home and garage
characteristics including maximum
width, maximum sidewall height,
maximum roof slope, live and dead
loads, and other design limitations or
restrictions using loads provided by this
Code.
(c) When a manufactured home is
factory constructed with an attached
garage or is constructed for the
attachment of a site-built garage,
provisions must be made to provide fire
separation between the garage and the
manufactured home.
(1) The garage must be separated from
the manufactured home and its attic by
not less than 1⁄2-inch gypsum board or
equivalent applied to the garage side of
the manufactured home, separation
shall be from the underside of the floor
to the underside of the roof deck and
may be provided on-site as part of an On
Site Completion of Construction
approval. Garages beneath habitable
rooms must be separated from all
habitable rooms by 5⁄8-inch, Type X
gypsum board or equivalent. Where the
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2519
separation is a floor ceiling assembly,
the structure supporting the separation
must also be protected by not less than
1⁄2-inch gypsum board or equivalent.
The design approval and the
manufacturer’s installation instructions
must also include provision for
equivalent vertical or horizontal
separation between the garage and the
manufactured home as appropriate.
(2) [Reserved]
(d) Openings from a garage directly
into a room designated for sleeping
purposes are not permitted.
(e) Other openings between the garage
and the manufactured home must:
(1) Be equipped with solid wood
doors not less than 13⁄8 inch in
thickness, or solid or honeycomb steel
doors not less than 13⁄8 inch in
thickness, or 20-minute fire-rated doors,
and all doors shall be of the self-closing
type; and
(2) Be in addition to the two exterior
doors required by § 3280.105.
(f) Ducts penetrating the walls or
ceilings separating the manufactured
home from the garage must be
constructed of a minimum No. 26 gauge
steel or other approved material and
must have no openings into the garage.
(g) Installation instructions shall be
provided by the home manufacturer
that, in addition to addressing the fire
separation as required in this section,
shall identify acceptable attachment
locations, indicate design limitations for
the attachment of the garage including
acceptable live and dead loads for
which the home has been designed to
accommodate, and provide support and
anchorage designs as necessary to
transfer all imposed loads to the ground
in accordance with §§ 3285.301 and
3285.401 of this chapter.
(h) A site-built, self-supported garage
is considered an add-on, per
3282.8(j)(1), that does not affect the
ability of the manufactured home to
comply with the Construction and
Safety Standards. The design and
construction of the garage is subject to
state and or local authorities having
jurisdiction.
■ 15. Add § 3280.213 to read as follows:
§ 3280.213 Factory constructed or sitebuilt attached carports.
(a) When a manufactured home is
designed for factory construction with
an attached carport or is designed for
construction of an attached site-built
carport, the manufacturer must design
the manufactured home to
accommodate all appropriate live and
dead loads from the attached carport
structure that will be transferred
through the manufactured home
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
2520
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
structure to the home’s support and
anchoring systems.
(b) The design, including the home’s
installation instructions, must specify
the following home and carport
characteristics including maximum
width, maximum sidewall height, live
and dead loads, and other design
limitations or restrictions.
(1) Alternatively, the manufacturer
may provide, by design and home
installation instructions, the maximum
live and dead loads, and the applied
loading locations, that the home is
designed to resist from the carport, and
other design limitations or restrictions.
(2) [Reserved].
(c) Homes may be designed with a
factory-installed host beam (i.e., ledger
board) or specific roof truss rail for the
attachment of the carport to the exterior
wall of the home. The host beam (i.e.,
ledger board) must be designed to
transmit the appropriate live and dead
loads at the interface between the
carport and the manufactured home. In
cases where the carport is designed to
be supported by the roof truss overhang,
the roof trusses must be designed to
support the additional live and dead
loads from the carport.
(1) Any portion of the host beam (i.e.,
ledger board) and all fasteners exposed
to the weather shall be protected in
accordance with § 3280.307.
(2) [Reserved].
(d) To ensure that the attachment of
the carport does not interfere with roof
or attic ventilation, the manufacturer
must provide specific instructions to
ensure continued compliance with the
manufactured home roof or attic
ventilation requirements in accordance
with § 3280.504(d).
(e) Installation instructions shall be
provided by the home manufacturer that
identify acceptable attachment
locations, indicate design limitations for
the attachment of the carport including
acceptable live and dead loads for
which the home has been designed to
accommodate, and provide support and
anchorage designs as necessary to
transfer all imposed loads to the ground
in accordance with §§ 3285.301 and
3285.401 of this chapter.
(1) The manufacturer must ensure that
any anchoring system designs
incorporating anchorage to resist
combined shear wall and carport uplift
loads are evaluated for adequacy to
resist the combined loads, taking into
consideration the limitations of the
ground anchor test and certification.
(2) [Reserved].
(f) A site-built, self-supported carport
is considered an add-on, as provided by
§ 3282.8(j)(1), that does not affect the
ability of the manufactured home to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
comply with the standards. The design
and construction of the carport is
subject to state and or local authorities
having jurisdiction.
■ 16. In § 3280.305, revise paragraphs
(a), (e)(1), (g)(6), and (h)(5) to read as
follows:
must be tight fitted against all
penetrations.
(h) * * *
(5) Portions of roof assemblies,
including, but not limited to, dormers,
gables, crickets, hinged roof sections,
sheathing, roof coverings,
underlayments, flashings, and eaves and
§ 3280.305 Structural design requirements. overhangs are permitted to be assembled
(a) General. Each manufactured home and installed on site in accordance with
must be designed and constructed as a
24 CFR part 3282, subpart M, provided
completely integrated structure capable
that the requirements in paragraphs
of sustaining the design load
(h)(5)(i) through (v) of this section are
requirements of this part and must be
met.
capable of transmitting these loads to
(i) Approved installation instructions
stabilizing devices without exceeding
must be provided that include
the allowable stresses or deflections.
requirements for the following items:
Roof framing must be securely fastened
(A) Materials, installation, and
to wall framing, walls to floor structure, structural connections complying with
and floor structure to chassis to secure
this section;
and maintain continuity between the
(B) Installation and fastening of
floor and chassis, so as to resist wind
sheathing and roof coverings;
overturning, uplift, and sliding as
(C) Installation of appliance vent
imposed by design loads in this part. In
systems
in accordance with § 3280.710;
multistory construction, each story must
(D)
Installation
of plumbing vents as
be securely fastened to the story above
required by § 3280.611; and
and/or below to provide continuity and
(E) Installation of attic ventilation in
resist design loads in this part.
accordance with § 3280.504(c).
Uncompressed finished flooring greater
(ii) The installation instructions
than 1⁄8 inch in thickness must not
specified in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this
extend beneath load-bearing walls that
section must include drawings, details,
are fastened to the floor structure.
and instructions as necessary to assure
*
*
*
*
*
that the on-site work complies with the
(e) * * *
approved design.
(1) Roof framing must be securely
(iii) The installation instructions
fastened to wall framing, walls to floor
structure, and floor structure to chassis, specified in paragraph (h)(5)(i) of this
section must provide for inspection of
to secure and maintain continuity
the work at the installation site. As
between the floor and chassis in order
necessary to ensure conformance,
to resist wind overturning, uplift, and
inspection panels may be required, or
sliding, and to provide continuous load
inspections may need to occur in stages
paths for these forces to the foundation
that assure inspections are performed
or anchorage system. The number and
before any work is concealed. Such
type of fasteners used must be capable
inspection procedures shall be
of transferring all forces between
addressed in the approved installation
elements being joined. In multistory
instructions.
construction, each story must be
(iv) Temporary weather protection
securely fastened to the story above
must be provided per § 3280.307(e).
and/or below to provide continuity and
resist design loads in this section.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
■ 17. Amend § 3280.307 by adding
(g) * * *
paragraph (e) to read as follows:
(6) Bottom board material (with or
§ 3280.307 Resistance to elements and
without patches) must meet or exceed
the level of 48 inch-pounds of puncture use.
*
*
*
*
*
resistance as tested by the Beach
(e) Multi-section and attached
Puncture Test in accordance with
Standard Test Methods for Puncture and manufactured homes (see subpart K of
Stiffness of Paperboard, and Corrugated this part) are not required to comply
with the factory installation of weatherand Solid Fiberboard, ASTM D781–
resistant exterior finishes for those areas
1968 (Reapproved 1973) (incorporated
by reference, see § 3280.4). The material left open for field connection of the
sections provided the following
must be suitable for patches and the
conditions are satisfied:
patch life must be equivalent to the
material life. Patch installation
(1) Temporary weather protection for
instruction must be included in the
exposed, unprotected construction is
manufactured home manufacturer’s
provided in accordance with methods to
instructions. The bottom board material be included in the approved design.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Methods for on-site completion
and finishing of these elements are
included in the approved design.
(3) Complete installation instructions
and the required materials for finishing
these elements are provided.
■ 18. In § 3280.504, add paragraph (a)(3)
and revise paragraph (b) introductory
text to read as follows:
(a) * * *
(3) In multi-story manufactured
homes, the ceiling vapor retarder is
permitted to be omitted when the story
directly above is part of the same
manufactured home.
(b) Exterior walls. Exterior walls must
be provided with a system or method to
manage moisture and vapor
accumulation with one of the elements
in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this
section. For purposes of the requirement
in this paragraph (b), the fire separation
wall between each attached
manufactured home must be considered
to be an exterior wall. See subpart K of
this part
*
*
*
*
*
■ 19. Amend § 3280.506 as follows:
■ a. Redesignate paragraphs (a), (b), and
(c) as paragraphs (b), (c), and (d),
respectively;
■ b. Designate the introductory text as
paragraph (a);
■ c. In newly designated paragraph (a):
■ i. Remove ‘‘of this subpart;’’
■ ii. Remove ‘‘figure 506’’ and add
‘‘figure 1 to this paragraph (a)’’ in its
place; and
■ iii. Add a heading for the figure.
■ d. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b):
■ i. Remove the heading;
■ ii. Add a comma between
‘‘ventilation’’ and ‘‘and;’’
■ iii. Remove ‘‘below’’ and add ‘‘in the
table to this paragraph (b)’’ in its place;
and
■ iv. Add a heading for the table; and
■ e. Revise newly redesignated
paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions to read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Heat loss/heat gain.
(a) * * *
Figure 1 to Paragraph (a)
(b) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)
*
*
*
*
*
(c) To assure uniform heat
transmission in manufactured homes,
cavities in exterior walls, floors, and
ceilings must be provided with thermal
insulation. For insulation purposes, the
fire separation wall between each single
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 3280.602
Definitions.
*
§ 3280.504 Condensation control and
installation of vapor retarders.
§ 3280.506
family attached manufactured home
shall be considered an exterior wall (see
subpart K of this part).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 20. In § 3280.602, add alphabetically
the definition for ‘‘Indirect waste
receptor’’ to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
Indirect waste receptor means a
receptor that receives a discharge waste
pipe that is not directly connected to a
receptor but maintains a suitable air gap
between the end of the pipe and the top
of the drain.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 21. In § 3280.608, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
§ 3280.608
Hangers and supports.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Piping supports. Piping must be
secured at sufficiently close intervals to
keep the pipe in alignment and carry the
weight of the pipe and contents. Unless
otherwise stated in the standards
incorporated by reference for specific
materials at § 3280.604(a), or unless
specified by the pipe manufacturer,
horizontal plastic drainage piping must
be supported at intervals not to exceed
4 feet and horizontal plastic water
piping must be supported at intervals
not to exceed 3 feet. Vertical drainage
and water piping must be supported at
each story height.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 22. In § 3280.609, revise paragraph
(c)(1)(iii) and add paragraph (c)(1)(iv) to
read as follows:
§ 3280.609
Water distribution systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Relief valves must be provided
with full-sized drains, with cross
sectional areas equivalent to that of the
relief valve outlet. The outlet of a
pressure relief valve, temperature relief
valve, or combination thereof, must not
be directly connected to the drainage
system. The discharge from the relief
valve must be piped full size separately
to the exterior of the manufactured
home, not underneath the home, or to
an indirect waste receptor located inside
the manufactured home. Exterior relief
drains shall be directed down and shall
terminate between 6″ and 24″ above
finished grade. Drain lines must be of a
material listed for hot water distribution
and must drain fully by gravity, must
not be trapped, and must not have their
outlets threaded, and the end of the
drain must be visible for inspection.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2521
(iv) Relief valve piping designed to be
located underneath the manufactured
home is not required to be installed at
the factory provided the manufacturer
designs the system for site assembly and
also provides all materials and
components including piping, fittings,
cement, supports, and instructions for
proper site installation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. In § 3280.610, add headings to
paragraphs (c)(1) and (4) and revise
paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
§ 3280.610
Drainage systems.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * (1) General. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Size Requirement. * * *
(5) Preassembly of drain lines.
Section(s) of the drain system, designed
to be located underneath the
manufactured home or between stories
of the manufactured home, are not
required to be factory installed when the
manufacturer designs the system for site
assembly and also provides all materials
and components, including piping,
fittings, cement, supports, and
instructions necessary for proper site
installation.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 24. Amend § 3280.611 as follows:
■ a. Remove the comma at the end of
paragraph (c)(1)(i) and add a semicolon
in its place; and
■ b. Revise paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
The revisions to read as follows:
§ 3280.611
Vents and venting.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) A 11⁄2-inch diameter (min.)
continuous vent or equivalent,
indirectly connected to the toilet drain
piping within the distance allowed in
paragraph (c)(5) of this section for 3
inch trap arms through a 2-inch wet
vented drain that carries the waste of
not more than one fixture. Sections of
the wet vented drain that are 3 inches
in diameter are permitted to carry the
waste of an unlimited number of
fixtures; or
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. In § 3280.612, amend paragraph
(a) to read as follows:
§ 3280.612
Tests and inspection.
(a) Water system. All water piping in
the water distribution system must be
subjected to a pressure test. The test
must be made by subjecting the system
to air or water at 80 psi + or ¥ 5 psi
for 15 minutes without loss of pressure.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 3280.705
The water used for the test must be
obtained from a potable water source.
*
*
*
*
*
26. Amend § 3280.705 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
■ b. In paragraph (j), removing ‘‘shall’’
and add in its place ‘‘must’’ wherever it
appears;
■ c. Revising paragraphs (k), (l)(7), and
(l)(8)(i); and
■ d. Adding paragraph (l)(8)(iii).
The revisions and addition to read as
follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) All points of crossover beneath the
transportable sections must be readily
accessible from the exterior of the home.
In multi-story manufactured homes, the
interconnections between stories must
be accessible through a panel on the
exterior or interior of the manufactured
home.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Identification of gas supply
connections. Each manufactured home
must have permanently affixed to the
(l) * * *
(7) Hangers and supports. All
horizontal gas piping must be
adequately supported by galvanized or
equivalently protected metal straps or
hangers at intervals of not more than 4
feet, except where adequate support and
protection is provided by structural
members. Vertical gas piping in multistory dwelling units must be supported
at intervals of not more than 6 feet.
Solid iron-pipe connection(s) must be
rigidly anchored to a structural member
within 6 inches of the supply
connection(s).
(8) * * * (i) Before appliances are
connected, piping systems must stand a
pressure of three ± 0.2 psi gauge for a
period of not less than ten minutes
without showing any drop in pressure.
Pressure must be measured with a
mercury manometer or slope gauge
calibrated so as to be read in increments
of not greater than one-tenth pound, or
an equivalent device. The source of
normal operating pressure must be
isolated before the pressure tests are
made. Before a test is begun, the
temperature of the ambient air and of
the piping must be approximately the
same, and constant air temperature must
be maintained throughout the test.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Where gas piping between
transportable sections must be made on
site, the installation instructions must
contain provisions for onsite testing for
leakage consistent with the provisions
in paragraph (l)(8)(i) of this section.
■
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
Gas piping systems.
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
exterior skin at or near each gas supply
connection or the end of the pipe, a tag
of 3 inches by 13⁄4 inches minimum size,
made of etched, metal-stamped or
embossed brass, stainless steel,
anodized or alcalde aluminum not less
than 0.020 inch thick, or other approved
material [e.g., 0.005 inch plastic
laminates], with the information shown
in Figure 1 to this paragraph (k). The
connector capacity indicated on this tag
must be equal to or greater than the total
Btu/hr rating of all intended gas
appliances.
27. In § 3280.708, revise paragraph
(a)(1) introductory text to read as
follows:
■
§ 3280.708 Exhaust duct system and
provisions for the future installation of a
clothes dryer.
(a) * * * (1) All gas and electric
clothes dryers must be exhausted to the
outside by a moisture/lint exhaust duct
and termination fitting. When the
manufacturer supplies the clothes dryer,
the exhaust duct and termination
fittings must be completely installed by
the manufacturer. If the exhaust duct
system is subject to damage during
transportation, or a field connection
between transportable sections is
required, complete factory installation
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
ER12JA21.000
2522
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
§ 3280.802
of the exhaust duct system is not
required when the following apply:
*
*
*
*
*
28. In § 3280.709, revise paragraph (a)
to read as follows:
■
§ 3280.709
Definitions.
*
Installation of appliances.
(a) The installation of each appliance
must conform to the terms of its listing
and the manufacturer’s instructions.
The manufactured home manufacturer
must leave the appliance manufacturer’s
instructions attached to the appliance.
Every appliance must be secured in
place to avoid displacement. For the
purpose of servicing and replacement,
each appliance must be both accessible
and removable.
(1) A direct vent space heating
appliance is permitted to be shipped
loose for on-site installation in a
basement provided the following:
(i) The heating appliance is listed for
the installation.
(ii) Approved installation instructions
are provided that include requirements
for completion of all gas and electrical
connections and provide for the
manufacturer’s inspection and/or testing
of all connections.
(iii) Approved instructions are
provided to assure connection of the
vent and combustion air systems in
accordance with § 3280.710(b), and to
provide for the manufacturer’s
inspection of the systems for
compliance.
(iv) Approved installation and the
manufacturer’s inspection procedures
are provided for the connection of the
site-installed heating appliance to the
factory-installed circulation air system
and return air systems.
(2) The procedures must include
revisions to assure compliance of the
installed systems with § 3280.715.
*
*
*
*
*
29. In § 3280.710, revise paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
■
*
*
*
*
(a) * * *
(4) Attached accessory building or
structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport,
windbreak, garage, or porch for which
the attachment of such is designed by
the home manufacturer to be
structurally supported by the
manufactured home.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) [Reserved]
31. In § 3280.807, add paragraph (g) to
read as follows:
■
§ 3280.807
Fixtures and appliances.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) In bathrooms, ceiling-mounted
lighting fixtures and wall-mounted
lighting fixtures must not be controlled
by the same switch.
32. In § 3280.810, revise paragraph (b)
to read as follows:
■
§ 3280.810
Electrical testing.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Additional testing. Each
manufactured home must be subjected
to the following tests:
(1) An electrical continuity test to
assure that metallic parts are effectively
bonded;
(2) An operational test of all devices
and utilization equipment, except water
heaters, electric ranges, electric
furnaces, dishwashers, clothes washers/
dryers, and portable appliances, to
demonstrate they are connected and in
working order; and
(3) Electrical polarity checks to
determine that connections have been
made in accordance with applicable
provisions of these standards and
Article 550.17 of NFPA 70–2005
(incorporated by reference, see
§ 3280.4). Visual verification is an
acceptable electrical polarity check.
§ 3280.902
[Amended]
33. In § 3280.902(b), remove ‘‘an A
frame’’ and add in its place ‘‘a rigid
substructure.’’
■ 34. Revise § 3280.903 to read as
follows:
■
§ 3280.710 Venting, ventilation, and
combustion air.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Venting systems of fuel-burning
appliances must terminate at least three
feet above any motor-driven air intake
discharging into habitable rooms when
located within ten feet of the air intake.
*
*
*
*
*
30. Amend § 3280.802 by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(4)
through (41) as paragraphs (a)(5)
through (42);
■ b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(4); and
■ c. Adding and reserving paragraph (b).
The additions read as follows:
■
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
§ 3280.903 General requirements for
designing the structure to withstand
transportation shock and vibration.
(a) General. The manufactured home
and its transportation system (as defined
in § 3280.902(f)) must withstand the
effects of highway movement such that
the home is capable of being transported
safely and installed as a habitable
structure. Structural, plumbing,
mechanical, and electrical systems must
be designed to function after set-up. The
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2523
home must remain weather protected
during the transportation sequence to
prevent internal damage.
(b) Testing or analysis requirements.
Suitability of the transportation system
and home structure to withstand the
effects of transportation must be
permitted to be determined by testing,
or engineering analysis, or a
combination of the two as required by
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Road tests. Tests must be
witnessed by an independent registered
professional engineer or architect,
manufacturer’s IPIA or DAPIA, or by a
recognized testing organization. Such
testing procedures must be part of the
manufacturer’s approved design.
(2) Engineering analysis. Engineering
analysis methods based on the
principles of mechanics and/or
structural engineering may be used to
substantiate the adequacy of the
transportation system to withstand intransit loading conditions. As
transportation loadings are typically
critical in the longitudinal direction,
analysis should, in particular, provide
emphasis on design of longitudinal
structural components of the
manufactured home (e.g., main chassis
girder beams, sidewalls, and rim joists,
etc.). Notwithstanding, all structural
elements necessary to the structural
integrity of the manufactured home
during in-transit loading are also to be
evaluated (e.g., transverse chassis
members and floor framing members,
etc.).
(i)(A) The summation of the design
loads in paragraphs (b)(2)(i)(A)(1)
through (3) of this section may be used
to determine the adequacy of the chassis
in conjunction with the manufactured
home structure to resist in-transit
loading:
(1) Dead load, the vertical load due to
the weight of all structural and nonstructural components of the
manufactured home at the time of
shipment.
(2) Floor load, a minimum of 3
pounds per square foot.
(3) Dynamic loading factor,
(0.25)[(b2iA) + (b2iB)].
(B) However, the in-transit design
loading need not exceed twice the dead
load of the manufactured home.
(ii) To determine the adequacy of
individual longitudinal structural
components to resist the in-transit
design loading, a load distribution based
on the relative flexural rigidity and
shear stiffness of each component may
be utilized. For the purpose of loading
distribution, the sidewall may be
considered to be acting as a ‘‘deep
beam’’ in conjunction with other load
carrying elements in determining the
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2524
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
relative stiffness of the integrated
structure. Further, by proper precambering of the chassis assembly,
additional loading may be distributed to
the chassis, and the remaining loading
may be distributed to each of the load
carrying members by the relative
stiffness principle.
(iii) The analysis is also to include
consideration for:
(A) Location of openings in the
sidewall during transport and, when
appropriate,
provisions for reinforcement of the
structure and/or chassis at the opening.
(B) Sidewall component member
sizing and joint-splice analysis (i.e., top
and bottom plates, etc.), and
connections between load carrying
elements.
■ 35. In § 3280.904, revise paragraphs
(a), (b)(1) through (6) and (8) through
(10) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3280.904 Specific requirements for
designing the transportations system.
(a) General. The transportation system
must be designed and constructed as an
integrated unit which is safe and
suitable for its specified use. In
operation, the transportation system
must effectively respond to the control
of the towing vehicle tracking and
braking, while traveling at applicable
highway speeds and in normal highway
traffic conditions.
(b) Specific requirements—(1)
Drawbar. The drawbar must be
constructed of sufficient strength,
rigidity, and durability to safely
withstand those dynamic forces
experienced during highway
transportation. It must be securely
fastened to the manufactured home
substructure.
(2) Coupling mechanism. The
coupling mechanism (which is usually
of the socket type) must be securely
fastened to the drawbar in such a
manner as to assure safe and effective
transfer of the maximum loads,
including dynamic loads, between the
manufactured home structure and the
hitch-assembly of the towing vehicle.
The coupling must be equipped with a
manually operated mechanism so
adapted as to prevent disengagement of
the unit while in operation. The
coupling must be so designed that it can
be disconnected regardless of the angle
of the manufactured home to the towing
vehicle.
(3) Chassis. The chassis, in
conjunction with the manufactured
home structure, must be constructed to
effectively sustain the design loads. The
integrated structure must be capable of
ensuring the integrity of the complete
manufactured home and ensuring
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
against excessive deformation of
structural or finish members.
(4) Running gear assembly—(i) Design
criteria. The design load used to size
running gear components must be the
gross static dead weight minus the static
tongue weight supported by the
drawbar. Running gear must be
designed to accept shock and vibration,
both from the highway and the towing
vehicle and effectively dampen these
forces so as to protect the manufactured
home structure from damage and
fatigue. Its components must be
designed to facilitate routine
maintenance, inspection, and
replacement.
(ii) Location. Location of the running
gear assembly must be determined by
documented engineering analysis,
taking into account the gross weight
(including all contents), total length of
the manufactured home, the necessary
coupling hitch weight, span distance,
and turning radius. Weights shall be
checked with the home in a level
position ready for transport. The
coupling weight must be not less than
12 percent nor more than 25 percent of
the gross weight.
(5) Spring assemblies. Spring
assemblies (springs, hangers, shackles,
bushings, and mounting bolts) must be
capable of supporting the running gear
design loads, without exceeding
maximum allowable stresses for design
spring assembly life as recommended by
the spring assembly manufacturer. The
capacity of the spring system must
ensure that under maximum operating
load conditions, sufficient clearance is
maintained between the tire and
manufactured home’s frame or structure
to permit unimpeded wheel movement
and for changing tires.
(6) Axles. Axles, and their connecting
hardware, must be capable of
supporting the static running gear
design loads, without exceeding
maximum allowable design axle loads
as recommended by the axle
manufacturer. The number and load
capacity necessary to provide a safe tow
must not be less than those required to
support the design load.
(i) Recycled axles. Before reuse, all
axles, including all component parts,
must be reconditioned as required
pursuant to a program accepted by a
nationally recognized testing agency.
The recycling program must be
approved, and the axles must be labeled
by a nationally recognized testing
agency. Recycled axles and their
components must utilize compatible
components and be of the same size and
rating as the original equipment.
(ii) [Reserved].
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
(8) Tires, wheels, and rims. Tires,
wheels, and rims must be selected,
sized, and fitted to axles so that static
dead load supported by the running gear
does not exceed the load capacity of the
tires. Tires must not be loaded beyond
the load rating marked on the sidewall
of the tire or, in the absence of such a
marking, the load rating specified in any
of the publications of any of the
organizations listed in Federal Motor
Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No.
119 in 49 CFR 571.119, S5.1(b). Wheels
and rims must be sized in accordance
with the tire manufacturer’s
recommendations as suitable for use
with the tires selected.
(i) Inflation pressure. The load and
cold inflation pressure imposed on the
rim or wheel must not exceed the rim
and wheel manufacturer’s instructions
even if the tire has been approved for a
higher load or inflation. Tire cold
inflation pressure limitations and the
inflation pressure measurement
correction for heat must be as specified
in 49 CFR 393.75(h).
(ii) Used tires. Whenever the tread
depth is at least 1⁄16 inch as determined
by a tread wear indicator, used tires are
permitted to be sized in accordance
with 49 CFR 571.119. The
determination as to whether a used tire
is acceptable must also include a visual
inspection for thermal and structural
defects (e.g., dry rotting, excessive tire
sidewall splitting, etc.). Used tires with
such structural defects must not be
installed on manufactured homes.
(9) Brake assemblies—(i) Braking
axles. The number, type, size, and
design of brake assemblies required to
assist the towing vehicle in providing
effective control and stopping of the
manufactured home must be determined
and documented by engineering
analysis. Those alternatives listed in
§ 3280.903(c) may be accepted in place
of such an analysis. Unless
substantiated in the design to the
satisfaction of the approval agency by
either engineering analysis in
accordance with § 3280.903(a)(1) or tests
in accordance with paragraph (b)(9)(ii)
of this section, there must be a
minimum of two axles equipped with
brake assemblies on each manufactured
home transportable section.
(ii) Stopping distance. Brakes on the
towing vehicle and the manufactured
home (a drive-away/tow-away) must be
capable of ensuring that the maximum
stopping distance from an initial speed
of 20 miles per hour does not exceed 35
feet in accordance with 49 CFR
393.52(d) for 2 or fewer vehicles in
drive away or tow away operation.
(iii) Electrical brake wiring. Brake
wiring must be provided for each brake.
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
The brake wire must not be less than the
value specified in the brake
manufacturer’s instructions. Aluminum
wire, when used, must be provided with
suitable termination that is protected
against corrosion.
(10) Lamps and associated wiring.
Stop lamps, turn signal/lamps, and
associated wiring must meet the
appropriate sections of FMVSS No. 108
in 49 CFR 571.108, which specify the
performance and location of these lamps
and their wiring. The manufacturer may
meet these requirements by utilizing a
temporary light/wiring harness, which
has components that meet the FMVSS
No. 108. The temporary harness is
permitted to be provided by the
manufactured home transportation
carrier.
■ 36. Add subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K—Attached Manufactured
Homes and Special Construction
Considerations
Sec.
3280.1001 Scope.
3280.1002 Definitions.
3280.1003 Attached manufactured home
unit separation.
3280.1004 Exterior walls.
3280.1005 Electrical service.
3280.1006 Water service.
§ 3280.1001
Scope.
This subpart covers the requirements
for attached manufactured homes and
other related construction associated
with manufactured homes not
addressed elsewhere within this part.
§ 3280.1002
Definitions.
The following definitions are
applicable to this subpart only:
Attached manufactured home. Two or
more adjacent manufactured homes that
are structurally independent from
foundation to roof and with open space
on at least two sides, but which have the
appearance of a physical connection
(i.e., zero lot line).
Fire separation wall. An adjoining
wall of a manufactured home that
separates attached manufactured homes
with a fire separation distance of less
than three feet.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
§ 3280.1003 Attached manufactured home
unit separation.
(a) Separation requirements. (1)
Attached manufactured homes shall be
separated from each other by a fire
separation wall of not less than 1-hour
fire-resistive rating with exposure from
both sides on each attached
manufactured home unit when rated
based on tests in accordance with
ASTM E119–05 (incorporated by
reference, see § 3280.4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
(2) Fire-resistance-rated floor/ceiling
and wall assemblies shall extend to and
be tight against the exterior wall, and
wall assemblies shall extend from the
foundation to the underside of the roof
sheathing.
(b) Fire separation penetrations. (1)
Fire rated fire separation walls must not
contain through penetrations or
openings.
(2) Membrane penetrations for
electrical boxes are permitted on the
living side of the wall under the
following conditions:
(i) Steel electrical boxes not exceeding
16 square inches may be installed
provided that the total area of such
boxes does not exceed 100 square
inches in any 100 square feet wall area.
Steel electrical boxes in adjacent fire
separation walls must be separated by a
horizontal distance of not less than 24
inches.
(ii) Listed 2-hour fire-resistant
nonmetallic electrical boxes are
installed in accordance with the listings.
(iii) No other membrane penetrations
are allowed.
(c) Continuity of walls. The fire
separation walls for single-family
attached dwelling units must be
continuous from the foundation to the
underside of the roof sheathing, deck, or
slab and must extend the full length of
the fire separation walls.
(d) Parapets. (1) Parapets constructed
in accordance with paragraph (d)(2) of
this section must be provided for
attached manufactured homes as an
extension of fire separation walls in
accordance with the following:
(i) Where roof surfaces adjacent to the
fire separation walls are at the same
elevation, the parapet must extend not
less than 30 inches above the roof
surfaces.
(ii) Where roof surfaces adjacent to
the wall or walls are at different
elevations and the higher roof is not
more than 30 inches above the lower
roof surface, the parapet must not
extend less than 30 inches above the
lower roof surface.
(A) Parapets must be provided unless
roofs are of a Class C roof covering and
the roof decking or sheathing is of
noncombustible materials or approved
fire-retardant-treated wood for a
distance of four feet on each side of the
common fire separation walls; or one
layer of 5⁄8 inch Type X gypsum board
or equivalent is installed directly
beneath the roof decking or sheathing
for a distance of four feet on each side
of the fire separation walls.
(B) A parapet must not be required
where roof surfaces adjacent to the
common walls are at different elevations
and the higher roof is more than 30
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 4700
2525
inches above the lower roof. The fire
separation wall construction from the
lower roof to the underside of the higher
roof deck must not have less than a 1hour fire-resistive rating. The wall must
be rated for exposure from both sides.
(2) Parapets must have the same fire
resistance rating as that required for the
supporting wall or walls. On any side
adjacent to a roof surface, the parapet
must have noncombustible faces for the
uppermost 18 inches, to include counter
flashing and coping materials. Where
the roof slopes toward a parapet at
slopes greater than 2⁄12 (16.7 percent
slope), the parapet must extend to the
same height as any portion of the roof
within a distance of three feet, but in no
case will the height be less than 30
inches.
§ 3280.1004
Exterior walls.
(a) The requirements of § 3280.504 for
condensation control and vapor retarder
installation are required to be provided
on each fire separation wall of each
attached manufactured home.
(b) The requirements of § 3280.506 for
heat loss/gain insulation apply to the
fire separation wall on each attached
manufactured home.
§ 3280.1005
Electrical service.
(a) Each attached manufactured home
must be supplied by only one service.
(b) Service conductors supplying one
manufactured home must not pass
through the interior of another
manufactured home.
§ 3280.1006
Water service.
(a) Each manufactured home must
have an individual water supply that
will service only that unit.
(b) Each manufactured home must
have a hot water supply system that will
service only that unit.
PART 3282—MANUFACTURED HOME
PROCEDURAL AND ENFORCEMENT
REGULATIONS
37. The authority citation for part
3282 is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2697, 28 U.S.C. 2461
note, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, and 5424.
38. In § 3282.7, redesignate
paragraphs (d) through (nn) as (e)
through (oo) and add new paragraph (d)
to read as follows:
■
§ 3282.7
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Attached accessory building or
structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport,
windbreak, garage, or porch for which
the attachment of such is designed by
the home manufacturer to be
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
2526
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
structurally supported by the
manufactured home.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 39. In § 3282.8, revise paragraph (j) to
read as follows:
§ 3282.8
Applicability.
*
*
*
*
(j) Add-on. An add-on including an
attached accessory building or structure
added by the retailer or some party
other than the manufacturer (except
where the manufacturer acts as a
retailer) as part of a simultaneous
transaction involving the sale of a new
manufactured home, is not governed by
the standards and is not subject to the
regulations in this part except as
identified in this section and part 3280
of this chapter. The addition of any addon or attached accessory building or
structure must not affect the ability of
the manufactured home to comply with
the standards. If the addition of an addon or attached accessory building or
structure causes the manufactured home
to fail to conform to the standards, then
sale, lease, and offer for sale or lease of
the home are prohibited until the
manufactured home is brought into
conformance with the standards.
(1) With the exception of attached
accessory buildings or structures, addons must be structurally independent
and any attachment between the home
and the add-on must be for
weatherproofing or cosmetic purposes
only.
(2) If an attached accessory building
or structure is not structurally
independent all the following must be
met for attachment to the manufactured
home:
(i) Manufactured home must be
designed and constructed to
accommodate all imposed loads,
including any loads imposed on the
home by the attached accessory building
or structure, in accordance with part
3280 of this chapter.
(ii) Data plate must indicate that home
has been designed to accommodate the
additional loads imposed by the
attachment of the attached accessory
buildings or structures and must
identify the design loads.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES2
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:18 Jan 11, 2021
Jkt 253001
(iii) Installation instructions shall be
provided by the home manufacturer
which identifies acceptable attachment
locations, indicates design limitations
for the attached accessory building or
structure including acceptable live and
dead loads for which the home has been
designed to accommodate and provide
support and anchorage designs as
necessary to transfer all imposed loads
to the ground in accordance with part
3285 of this chapter.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 40. In § 3282.14, revise paragraph (a)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 3282.14 Alternative construction of
manufactured homes.
(a) Policy. In order to promote the
purposes of the Act, the Department
will permit the sale or lease of one or
more manufactured homes not in
compliance with the standards under
circumstances wherein no affirmative
action is needed to protect the public
interest. An add-on, including an
attached accessory building or structure
which does not affect the performance
and ability of the manufactured home to
comply with the standards in
accordance with § 3282.8(j), is not
governed by this section. The
Department encourages innovation and
the use of new technology in
manufactured homes. Accordingly,
HUD will permit manufacturers to
utilize new designs or techniques not in
compliance with the standards in cases:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 41. In § 3282.601, add paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 3282.601
Purpose and applicability.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Exception. An add-on or attached
accessory building or structure which
does not affect the performance and
ability of the manufactured home to
comply with the standards in
accordance with § 3282.8(j) is not
governed by this section.
■ 42. In § 3282.602, revise paragraph
(a)(2) to read as follows:
§ 3282.602 Construction qualifying for onsite completion.
(a) * * *
PO 00000
Frm 00032
(2) Any work required by the home
design that cannot be completed in the
factory, or when the manufacturer
authorizes the retailer to provide an
add-on to the home during installation,
when that work would take the home
out of conformance with the
construction and safety standards and
then bring it back into conformance;
*
*
*
*
*
PART 3285—MODEL MANUFACTURED
HOME INSTALLATION STANDARDS
43. The authority citation for part
3285 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, 5404,
and 5424.
44. In § 3285.5, add alphabetically the
definition for ‘‘Attached accessory
building or structure’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 3285.5
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Attached accessory building or
structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport,
windbreak, garage, or porch for which
the attachment of such is designed by
the home manufacturer to be
structurally supported by the
manufactured home.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 45. In § 3285.903, revise paragraph (c)
to read as follows:
§ 3285.903 Permits, alterations, and onsite structures.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Installation of an add-on or
attached accessory building or structure.
Each attached accessory building or
structure or add-on is designed to
support all of its own live and dead
loads, unless the attached accessory
building or structure is otherwise
included in the installation instructions
or designed by a registered professional
engineer or registered architect in
accordance with this part.
Dana T. Wade,
Assistant Secretary for Housing Federal
Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2020–28227 Filed 1–11–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210–67–P
Fmt 4701
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\12JAR2.SGM
12JAR2
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 7 (Tuesday, January 12, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 2496-2526]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28227]
[[Page 2495]]
Vol. 86
Tuesday,
No. 7
January 12, 2021
Part II
Department of Housing and Urban Development
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282 and 3285
Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards; Final Rule
Federal Register / Vol. 86 , No. 7 / Tuesday, January 12, 2021 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 2496]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
24 CFR Parts 3280, 3282, and 3285
[Docket No. FR-6149-F-02]
RIN 2502-AJ49
Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards
AGENCY: Office of the Assistant Secretary for Housing--Federal Housing
Commissioner, HUD.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule amends the Federal Manufactured Home
Construction and Safety Standards (the Construction and Safety
Standards) by adopting recommendations made to HUD by the Manufactured
Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC), as modified by HUD. The National
Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act of 1974 (the
Act) requires HUD to publish in the proposed revised Construction and
Safety Standards submitted by the MHCC. The MHCC prepared and submitted
to HUD its third group of recommendations to improve various aspects of
the Construction and Safety Standards. HUD reviewed those
recommendations and adopted some of them after making editorial
revisions and some additions. This final rule further revises the
Construction and Safety Standards based on HUD's review and
incorporation of certain public comments.
DATES: Effective Date: March 15, 2021. The incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in the rule is approved by the Director
of the Federal Register as of March 15, 2021. The incorporation by
reference of certain other publications listed in the rule was approved
by the Director of the Federal Register as of August 11, 1987.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Teresa B. Payne, Administrator, Office
of Manufactured Housing Programs, Office of Housing, U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th Street SW, Washington DC 20410;
telephone 202-402-5365 (this is not a toll-free number). Persons with
hearing or speech impairments may access this number via TTY by calling
the Federal Information Relay Service at 800-877-8389 (this is a toll-
free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards
Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5401-5426) (the Act) authorizes HUD to establish
and amend the Federal Manufactured Home Construction and Safety
Standards (the Construction and Safety Standards) codified in 24 CFR
part 3280. The Act was amended in 2000 by the Manufactured Housing
Improvement Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106-569, approved December 27, 2000)
which established the Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee (MHCC),
a consensus committee responsible for providing HUD recommendations to
adopt, revise and interpret the Construction and Safety Standards.
HUD's Construction and Safety Standards apply to the design,
construction, and installation of new homes. Changes to the collective
standards are not retroactively enforced by HUD as applicable to
previously designed, built, and installed homes.
As amended, the purposes of the Act (enumerated at 42 U.S.C. 5401)
are: ``(1) To protect the quality, durability, safety, and
affordability of manufactured homes; (2) to facilitate the availability
of affordable manufactured homes and to increase homeownership for all
Americans; (3) to provide for the establishment of practical, uniform,
and, to the extent possible, performance-based Federal construction
standards for manufactured homes; (4) to encourage innovative and cost-
effective construction techniques for manufactured homes; (5) to
protect residents of manufactured homes with respect to personal
injuries and the amount of insurance costs and property damages in
manufactured housing consistent with the other purposes of this
section; (6) to establish a balanced consensus process for the
development, revision, and interpretation of Construction and Safety
standards for manufactured homes and related regulations for the
enforcement of such standards; (7) to ensure uniform and effective
enforcement of Construction and Safety standards for manufactured
homes; and (8) to ensure that the public interest in, and need for,
affordable manufactured housing is duly considered in all
determinations relating to the Federal standards and their
enforcement.''
In addition, the amended Act generally requires HUD to establish
Construction and Safety Standards that are reasonable and practical,
meet high standards of protection, are performance-based, and are
objectively stated. Congress specifically established the MHCC to
develop proposed revisions to the Construction and Safety Standards.
The Act provides specific procedures (42 U.S.C. 5403) for the MHCC
process.
The MHCC held its first meeting in August 2002 and began work on
reviewing possible revisions to the Construction and Safety Standards.
As the MHCC proceeded, proposed revisions to the Construction and
Safety Standards were divided into sets. The first set of revisions
proposed by the MHCC was published as a final rule in the Federal
Register on November 30, 2005 (70 FR 72024). The second set of
revisions proposed by the MHCC was published as a final rule published
in the Federal Register on December 9, 2013 (78 FR 73965). This final
rule is based in part on the third set of MHCC proposals to revise the
Construction and Safety Standards published as a proposed rule in the
Federal Register on January 31, 2020 (85 FR 5589). The proposed rule
included a MHCC proposal to revise the Construction and Safety
Standards to reduce the regulatory burden by eliminating the need for
manufacturers to obtain special approvals from HUD for certain
construction features and options. HUD reviewed the MHCC's proposals
and made editorial revisions prior to publishing the January 31, 2020,
proposed rule. HUD also added proposals that complement the MHCC's
recommendations.
As explained in the January 31, 2020, proposed rule, HUD decided
not to include certain MHCC recommendations due to pending regulations
for improving energy efficiency in manufactured homes being prepared by
the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under the Energy Independence and
Security Act (Pub. L. 110-140, approved December 19, 2007) (EISA). DOE
published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on June 17, 2016 (81 FR
39756) and, more recently, a Notice of Data Availability, Request for
Information on August 3, 2018 (83 FR 38073) regarding energy
conservation standards for manufactured housing. Given this DOE
rulemaking, HUD decided to postpone action on MHCC-proposed revisions
to Sec. Sec. 3280.502 and 3280.506(b), except for the mating wall of
attached manufactured homes at Sec. 3280.506(b)--an option that is
needed to avoid a more burdensome alternative approval process (24 CFR
3282.14--Alternative construction of manufactured homes). HUD also
decided not to move forward with a new proposal to add requirements for
draftstopping to the Construction and Safety Standards. HUD will not
include or move forward with these recommendations in this final rule.
II. Changes Made at the Final Rule Stage
In consideration of the public comments and HUD's experience
[[Page 2497]]
implementing the program, HUD has made certain editorial revisions to
HUD's proposals made in the January 31, 2020, proposed rule. In
general, the revisions adopt changes to the codified regulations that
reinforce the Act's purposes, namely providing benefits to consumers,
homeowners, and the broader community; promoting and improving consumer
and home safety; reducing regulatory barriers and expanding consumer
options; and allowing use of some for the latest building technologies
and materials while creating more consistency with State-adopted
residential building codes. HUD declined to adopt some standards or
commenters' suggested changes in some instances based on considerations
of the statutorily prescribed MHCC process, the lack of authority under
the Act for HUD to regulate design and construction of certain types of
housing, and consumer safety.
The final rule will revise certain sections of the Construction and
Safety Standards, as well as the incorporated reference standards where
indicated. The revisions described below are based on HUD's review and
consideration of the public comments on the proposed rule, HUD's
experience with the program, the existent Construction and Standards,
and the issues raised in the proposed rule. The final rule also makes
minor technical edits to the Construction and Standards.
Sec. 3280.5 Data Plate
HUD revised Sec. 3280.5 by revising paragraph (d), pursuant to
public comments, to streamline data entry. Paragraph (d) now reads,
``(d) This manufactured home IS designed to accommodate the additional
loads imposed by the attachment of an attached accessory building or
structure in accordance with the manufacturer installation
instructions. The additional loads are in accordance with the design
load(s) identified on this Data Plate; or This manufactured home IS NOT
designed to accommodate the additional loads imposed by the attachment
of an attached accessory building or structure in accordance with the
manufacturer installation instructions.'' The appropriate designation
may be made while still setting forth information that may be used by
state and local authorities that have enforcement authority for site-
built structures that are not integral to the manufactured home
produced and shipped by the manufactured home manufacturer. HUD seeks
to preclude a home from being taken out of compliance when an attached
accessory building or structure is built and added on at the home site.
Sec. 3280.108 Interior Passage
HUD revised paragraph (c) in this section in accordance with the
public comments by creating an exception to the requirement for doors
to closets, pantries, and doors to toilet compartments in single-
section homes. Single-section manufactured homes have a smaller living
space when compared with a multi-section manufactured home or a typical
site-built home and, thus, closet and pantry doors should not be
subject to the same clear opening requirements as a multi-section
manufactured home or a typical site-built home.
Sec. 3280.114 Stairways
HUD adjusted the rise and run dimensions based on public comment.
The changes recommended by public commenters on the proposed rule will
give manufacturers more flexibility when trying to balance the smaller
form-factor of most homes with consumer demand for multiple stories.
The edits clarify that the standards do not apply to exterior stairways
that are built at the home site or stairways to basement areas that are
not designed and built as part of the manufactured home.
Sec. 3280.209 Smoke Alarm Requirements
While HUD did not revise this section in the proposed rule, a
public commenter recommended that combination smoke and carbon monoxide
alarms be added as acceptable devices to parallel the International
Residential Code (IRC). Furthermore, the changes to this section are
intended to work in conjunction with the changes to Sec. 3280.211.
Sec. 3280.211 Carbon Monoxide Detectors
``Alarms'' and ``detectors'' are different items that serve
different purposes. HUD changed references from ``detector'' to
``alarm'' in response to public comment. HUD also revised this section
to include specific locations where such items must be installed rather
than just referencing the more general standards, such as the National
Fire Protection Association Standard 720.
Sec. 3280.212 Factory Constructed or Site-Built Attached Garages
Public commenters suggested that the distinction between attached
and self-supported structures be emphasized in this section. HUD
clarified that paragraph (a) applies only to garages which are not
self-supported and revised the fire separation requirements in
paragraph (c), including that the garage must be separated from the
home with appropriate gypsum wallboard or equivalent. HUD also added
paragraph (h) as suggested by public comment to include that a site-
built, self-supported garage is considered an add-on subject to Sec.
3282.8(j)(1) and state and local authorities.
Sec. 3280.213 Factory Constructed or Site-Built Attached Carports
Similar to the previous section, public commenters also suggested
that the distinction between attached and self-supported structures be
emphasized in this section. HUD made several changes to this section
based on public comment, including adding a provision in paragraph (b)
that the manufacturer may provide the maximum live and dead loads, and
the applied loading locations that the home is designed to resist from
the carport, and other design limitations or restrictions.
Sec. 3280.504 Condensation Control and Installation of Vapor Retarders
Based on public comment, HUD clarified the distinction between
mating walls and fire separation walls in paragraph (b), stating that
the fire separation wall between each attached manufactured home must
be considered to be an exterior wall pursuant to subpart K.
Sec. 3280.609 Water Distribution Systems
In order to better protect residents, HUD added relief pipe
turndown requirements to this section based on public comment, stating
that exterior relief drains shall be directed down and shall terminate
between 6'' and 24'' above finished grade. This is high enough to
prevent backflow, but low enough to reduce the risk of injury or
accident.
Sec. 3280.705 Gas Piping Systems
HUD eliminated ``hard pipe'' in paragraph (I)(8)(iii), to account
for a flex gas connector rather than a quick-disconnect.
Sec. 3280.710 Venting, Ventilation, and Combustion Air
HUD clarified that the placement restrictions apply to exhausts of
fuel burning appliances and used the defined term ``habitable rooms''
in this section. This provides consistency across the regulation.
Sec. 3280.904 Specific Requirements for Designing the Transportations
System
In addition to some language and grammatical changes, HUD added a
[[Page 2498]]
requirement to check weights with the home in a level position ready
for transport in paragraph (b)(4)(ii), an explicit reference to the
Department of Transportation's regulations at 49 CFR 393.52(d) in
paragraph (b)(9)(ii) regarding stopping distance, and textual changes
to paragraph (b)(9)(iii) regarding electrical brake wiring.
Sec. 3280.1002 Definitions
In this section, HUD edited the definition of ``Fire separation
wall'' to emphasize the separation between attached manufactured homes.
Sec. 3280.1003 Attached Manufactured Home Unit Separation
HUD clarified this section based on public comment, particularly in
paragraph (a)(1) related to fire resistance. These edits will help HUD
address minimum fire separation requirements for common walls of
attached manufactured housing solutions in the Standards.
III. The Public Comments
The public comment period for the January 31, 2020, proposed rule
closed on March 31, 2020. HUD received forty-one (41) public comments
in response to the proposed rule, from various manufactured home
associations, non-profit organizations, and other interested parties.
This section presents the significant issues, questions, and
suggestions submitted by public commenters, and HUD's responses to
these issues, questions, and suggestions.
Most commenters supported updates to the Construction and Safety
Standards, and encouraged HUD to continue working on updates to, and
provided specific recommendations for, certain sections of the
Construction and Standards. For example, several commenters supported
adding two-family or two- and three-family dwelling units to the new
Subpart K, Attached Manufactured Homes and Special Construction. Some
commenters also suggested deleting or removing certain changes proposed
by HUD. For example, some commenters opposed or requested clarification
of HUD's proposed changes to stair rise and run requirements, and
suggested changes to create consistency among the Standards' landing
requirements and clarify whether certain requirements apply to stairs
inside, or inside and outside, the home.
The following sections summarize the comments received on the
proposed rule and HUD's responses:
General Support
The majority of commenters expressed general support for the
proposed changes as part of HUD's effort to update the Construction and
Safety Standards. These commenters stated that the proposed changes
would benefit homeowners and the broader community, promote or improve
consumer and home safety, allow use of the latest building technologies
and materials, create more consistency with State-adopted residential
building codes for site-built housing, expand consumer amenity options
(including attached garages, carports, decks and accessory buildings),
help to include two-story and multifamily guidelines, and eliminate
regulations that impede broad access to affordable housing. Several
commenters also urged HUD to move forward with publishing the next set
of proposed updates to address outstanding items.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the commenters that the proposed
changes would provide benefits to consumers, homeowners, and the
broader community, and help promote the other purposes and policies of
the National Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards Act
of 1974.
Comment: Testing requirements should be included but be accredited
to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020 by accredited testing laboratories that are
signatories to the International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation
Mutual Recognition Arrangement (ILAC MRA).
One commenter stated that several parts of the proposed rule
reference testing, such as American Society for Testing and Materials,
Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and
Materials (ASTM E 119), and recommended that these laboratory tests be
conducted by ISO/IEC 17025 accredited testing laboratories so as to be
assured that the testing results are generated by an entity that has
been found to be technically competent by an independent, accreditation
body. Two commenters supported testing requirements, but recommended
that these laboratory tests be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020 by
accredited testing laboratories that are signatories to the
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation Mutual Recognition
Arrangement (ILAC MRA), to assure that the testing results are
generated by an entity that has been found to be technically competent
by an independent accreditation body. One commenter added that this
would allow HUD to focus resources on program oversight and/or research
for technical advancements. The commenter provided a link to an example
of effective models whereby government agencies rely on ISO/IEC 17020
accreditation programs (https://www1.nyc.gov/site/buildings/industry/recognized-accrediting-bodies.page).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NYC Buildings, Recognized Accrediting Bodies, NYC.gov,
https://www1.nyc.gov/site/buildings/industry/recognized-accrediting-bodies.page (last visited April 20, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the commenters. HUD's regulations
at 24 CFR 3280.2 require products to be listed, certified, or labeled
by a nationally recognized testing laboratory, inspection agency, or
other organization concerned with product evaluation that maintains
periodic inspection of production of labeled equipment or materials,
and by whose labeling indicates compliance with nationally recognized
standards or tests to determine suitable usage in a specified manner.
HUD also believed that this recommendation should be submitted for MHCC
review and consideration, that it is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at this final rule stage, and the commenter
should make the proposal through the MHCC process through the following
website: https://mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee, MHCC Proposed
Change Form, https://mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: HUD should adopt universal design standards.
A commenter who identified as a person with a disability
recommended that HUD adopt universal design standards in manufactured
home construction and encourage communities and housing agencies to do
likewise.
HUD Response: HUD appreciated the commenter's perspective that HUD
adopt universal design standards. While HUD is fully supportive of the
need for affordable and accessible housing, it noted that universal
design can be accomplished within the minimum Construction and Safety
standards requirements already codified. Further, many home
manufacturers currently offer homes designed and constructed to meet
universal design standards without conflicting with HUD's current
minimum standards.
General Opposition
Some commenters stated that the several of the provisions proposed
would increase manufactured home installers' liability and
responsibility if the proposed rule is advanced without significant
change. The commenters stated home installers were not included in
deliberations, and, as such,
[[Page 2499]]
HUD should not move forward with this rule.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the commenter that manufactured
home installers were not included in deliberations. The MHCC membership
has included and continues to include representation from at least one
individual with manufactured home installer interest. The MHCC process
is administered in an open format in which any member of the public,
including manufactured home installers, may participate and address the
Committee, as well as propose changes for MHCC review. All such
meetings are published in the Federal Register at least 30 days in
advance of meetings.
Comment: Manufacturer Documentation.
One commenter stated that the proposed rule's requirements for the
manufacturer to provide documentation poses problems, because HUD does
not require inspection agencies to check any of the documents the
manufacturer provides in the home. The commenter stated this situation
resulted from HUD's Interpretative Bulletin H-1-77,\3\ which the
commenter asserted complicates several proposed changes, namely those
at Sec. Sec. 3280.212, 3280.213, 3280.612, and 3280.709. The commenter
stated that if the proposed rule becomes final, HUD should rescind
Interpretive Bulletin H-1-77 to account for the installation program
loophole and the failure to provide assurance that the proper
documentation would be shipped with the home. Another commenter stated
a concern with potential liability for installation work related to
accessory buildings and other on-site installation, such as certain
appliances the proposed rule states can be shipped ``loose'' to the
homesite. According to the commenter, to ensure that the end buyer or
resident of the home has a home that has been safely manufactured,
transported, and installed, it is vital that all installation
documentation is shipped with and remains with the home.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, PIA
Responsibility for Documents Required to be Provided with the Mobile
Home, HUD.gov, https://www.hud.gov/sites/dfiles/OCHCO/documents/EIB-H-1-77.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
HUD Response: HUD is aware that standards for some construction
features that are addressed in this rulemaking affect the installation
process and therefore impact the responsibilities of home installers.
All construction features included in this final rule were previously
available through the Alternative Construction process and in all
instances where an Alternative Construction letter had been issued, HUD
required specific documentation to be provided with each affected
manufactured home, including installation instructions. The same or
similar documentation would continue to be required pursuant to the
requirement for manufacturers to provide installation instructions in
accordance with 24 CFR 3280.306(b) and 24 CFR 3285.2. Further, the home
manufacturer instructions must provide minimum installation
specifications so that the home is not taken out of compliance with the
Construction and Standards and meets the Model Manufactured Home
Installation Standards. These instructions are reviewed and approved by
HUD-approved Design Approval Primary Inspection Agencies (DAPIA) and
manufacturers are required to provide the instructions with each
manufactured home.
HUD also disagreed with the commenter that requiring the
manufacturer to provide the instructions, without requiring an
inspection to verify the instructions are shipped with the home,
complicates matters or otherwise poses risks to consumer health and
safety. The manufacturers' installation instructions and documentation
are required to be reviewed and approved by its DAPIA to help ensure
conformance. Further, it is the manufacturers' responsibility to ensure
that each home is provided with installation instructions and
associated documentation as approved by its DAPIA. DAPIA-approved
quality assurance manuals typically require manufacturer verification
for the shipment of the installation instructions. It is the IPIA's
responsibility to ensure the effectiveness of the quality assurance
manuals. HUD may review and reconsider this matter further should
evidence showing appropriate installation instructions are not being
shipped with manufactured homes. The commenter(s) should submit
proposed regulatory text through the MHCC process at https://mhcc.homeinnovation.com/ so that the matter is reviewed by the MHCC.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Manufactured Housing Consensus Committee, MHCC Proposed
Change Form, https://mhcc.homeinnovation.com/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: HUD should not use sub-regulatory guidance to establish
Construction and Safety standards.
A commenter stated that HUD should repudiate the use of sub-
regulatory ``guidance'' or ``field guidance'' memoranda and documents
to establish de-facto manufactured housing ``standards.''
HUD Response: HUD is currently implementing Executive Order 13891,
Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance
Documents,\5\ and this comment is not applicable to any aspect
addressed in this rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 84 FR 55235 (Oct. 15, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comment: HUD should not provide competitive advantage to any
housing type.
Another commenter expressed concern regarding any policy that may
give one housing type an unwarranted competitive advantage and risks
the occupants' health and safety. The commenter stated HUD should
refrain from making any changes that would result in furthering the
divide between the code requirements for manufactured homes and those
that apply to homes that are stick-built or built using engineered
building systems. The commenter urged HUD to maintain this balance and
continue to facilitate consumer choice by ensuring that regulatory
reform efforts do not favor manufactured homes over other residences,
leading to consumer confusion and unfair marketplace competition.
HUD Response: HUD's authority to develop and implement standards is
applicable only to homes meeting the statutory definition of a
manufactured home. However, this rulemaking brings the Standards in
closer alignment to standards imposed for other types of housing.
Comment: HUD has no authority to establish standards for structures
attached to a manufactured home.
A commenter stated that HUD defined ``manufactured housing''
narrowly in Sec. 3280.2 to mean a structure built on a permanent
chassis and designed to be used as a dwelling. The commenter stated
that while HUD has authority to establish requirements applicable to
components within the chassis, it does not have the authority to
establish standards for items outside or apart from the chassis.
Rather, authority to regulate these structures rests with state and
local authorities and their building code requirements and inspection
protocols. ``Add-on or accessory buildings or structures'' are not
built on a permanent chassis. Section 3285.903 provides conditions
where add-on or attached accessory buildings or structures may be
installed, but again fails to designate inspection responsibilities.
The definition for ``Attached accessory building or structure''
proposed for addition to
[[Page 2500]]
Sec. Sec. 3280.2 and 3285.5 further adds to the confusion indicating
that it includes such items when they are designed for attachment and
structural support from the manufactured home.
HUD Response: HUD's standards developed and implemented through
this rulemaking are not intended to apply to the design and
construction of site-built structures, including add-ons (in other
words, the site-built garage, or the site-built carport). However, the
standards and regulations established through this rulemaking do apply
to the design and construction of the manufactured home, when the home
is designed to have an attached accessory structure, such as the
garage, carport, or similar add-on. The requirements established are to
ensure that the manufactured home will continue to comply with the
Construction and Safety Standards and that the residents' health and
safety will be protected through means such as adequate structural load
design and minimum fire separation and other requirements when
applicable. The design, construction, and inspection of the attached
accessory structure (site-built garage, site-built carport, or other
site-built add-on) remains subject to any applicable state and or local
requirements.
Subpart A, General
Sec. 3280.2 Definitions
One commenter opposed the definition change to ``attached accessory
building or structure,'' while another commenter supported the proposed
changes. Some commenters stated that proposed definition of ``Attached
accessory building or structure'' fails to include stairs, which are
needed for entry in almost every manufactured home.
One commenter further stated that the proposed rule would require
that the ``basic manufactured home'' be designed for the attachment of
these structures. This does not address the need for the manufacturers
to modify their installation instructions to reflect the added weight
and wind load that added structures would impose on the home's
foundation.
Another commenter stated that the definition appears to open the
flood gates for other additions to a manufactured home which can affect
egress requirements as well as alter the electric, heating, plumbing
and other systems. The commenter provided examples; awnings, porches,
and ramadas typically are identified as a covered area projecting in
front of an entrance, while cabanas are defined as a cabin, hut, or
shelter, and garages are defined as a ``building'' for housing a motor
vehicle. The commenter stated that these are totally separate
structures which affect the home differently and can create safety
hazards. The commenter suggested that the proposal should be rewritten,
and garages should be addressed separately.
A commenter stated that the term ``basic manufactured home'' is not
defined and pre-supposing that there is such a thing as a ``non-basic
manufactured home.'' If this is the case, HUD should clearly indicate
what they mean by these terms and how the construction and safety
standards would apply. The commenter contended that regardless of HUD's
differentiation in this case, the manufactured housing Construction and
Safety standards should be applied consistently and any manufactured
home, whether deemed ``basic'' or ``non-basic'' be clearly marketed as
a manufactured home to avoid customer confusion and an expectation of
the product being received.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with commenters stating that HUD should
establish requirements for stairs external to the manufactured home,
which are needed for entry in most manufactured homes. HUD's
established standards only govern the design and construction of the
manufactured home, including all provisions addressed by this
rulemaking. Requirements for external stairs that are necessary to
provide entry to the homes remain subject to design and construction
requirements of state and local jurisdictions as they are not intended
to increase the living or storage area of the manufactured home and are
dependent upon the siting and installation of each individual home
which may vary by model, lot size, topography, and other aspects.
HUD agreed with the commenter stating that the proposed rule would
require that the manufactured home be designed for the attachment of
these site-built structures. However, HUD disagreed that the
manufacturer would not be required to provide installation instructions
that reflect the added weight and wind load that an added structure
would impose on the home's foundation. HUD's standards, set forth at
Sec. 3285.903, require accessory structures to be structurally
independent unless the attached accessory building or structure is
otherwise included in the installation instructions or designed by a
registered professional engineer or registered architect. Further, the
changes to the Data Plate specifically identify when the home is
designed for an attached accessory structure, and if so, the loads the
home has been designed to accommodate (see Sec. 3280.5).
HUD disagreed with the comment suggesting that the definition of
accessory building or structure is too broad. The Construction and
Safety standards address the design and construction of the
manufactured home and do not address the design, construction,
placement, or other standards for the design and construction of the
accessory structure(s). Further, state and local authorities may verify
that a home has been designed for an attached accessory structure by
verifying such information available on the Data Plate. HUD agreed with
the commenter that the term ``basic manufactured home'' is not defined;
therefore, ``basic'' has been removed.
Sec. 3280.5 Data Plate
One commenter opposed the proposed rule's changes to the Data Plate
language and another commenter supported the proposed changes. Some
commenters agreed, however, that certain modifications to the Data
Plate definition should be made: The Data Plate indicates whether the
home is designed to accommodate an add on, accessory building, and the
like, and the Data Plate and other documentation should document the
weight, size, and other limits the manufactured home can support.
Failure to require additional information will lead to confusion and
result in many homes being stressed beyond their designs limits and
therefore lead to structural failure. Another commenter stated that the
manufacturer should be required to identify the maximum loads applied
to the floor system, wall system, roof system and support system.
Another commenter suggested HUD delete the first paragraph of the
applicable statement in Sec. 3280.5(d). This and another commenter
recommended HUD revise the second paragraph to include a checkbox for
``is'' or ``is not'' similar to current language for Sec. 3280.5(g) to
reduce language and clutter on home Data Plates. One commenter
explained that this alternative would still capture the intent of HUD's
proposal, while preserving space on the Data Plate for future
statements or other required disclosures. The commenters proposed
significant changes to HUD's proposed regulatory text.
HUD Response: HUD considered all comments received on the
requirements for the Data Plate and made minor changes to reflect and
accommodate some of the comments. Through the language on the Date
Plate, HUD is trying to provide information to the
[[Page 2501]]
consumers, retailers, installers, and local authorities about the
design and construction of the home that may help prevent a home from
being taken out of compliance when an attached accessory building or
structure is built and added on at the home site. Further, the Data
Plate provides information that may be used by state and local
authorities that have enforcement authority for site-built structures
that are not integral to the manufactured home produced and shipped by
the manufactured home manufacturer.
Subpart B, Planning Considerations
One commenter stated that HUD proposed to adopt a superseded MHCC
recommendation concerning ventilation. HUD has proposed to authorize
manufacturers' compliance with the 2010 edition of American Society of
Heating, Refrigeration, and Air-Conditioning Engineers (``ASHRAE'')
Standard 62.2, ``Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air Quality in Low-
Rise Residential Buildings,'' as an alternative to the prescriptive
ventilation requirements in Sec. 3280.103(b) and (c). The proposed
rule ignores that more than four years ago, the MHCC updated its
recommended acceptance of ASHRAE Standard 62.2 to refer to the 2013
version. Adopting the more recent version of the ASHRAE standard in
this rulemaking would avoid the need for an additional change to the
regulations later to update the reference.
HUD Response: HUD understands that the MHCC continues to provide
recommendations that may be more recent than those published in
proposed rules, including updates to the referenced ASHRAE Standard
62.2. Generally, HUD finalizes recommendations in the order received to
avoid selective choice, minimize confusion, and so that full and
complete impact analyses can be conducted specific to the various
groups of recommendations provide by the MHCC.
Sec. 3280.103 Light and Ventilation
One commenter supported the removal of the maximum 90 cubic feet
per minute fan requirement, which will allow the commenter to increase
the size of homes built to accommodate larger families, which commenter
stated will allow more families to live in safe, affordable homes with
the modern amenities they desire.
Another commenter expressed concern that using the Standards and
eliminating the alternative construction (AC) process for manufactured
housing that utilizes design elements of site-built homes could affect
the manufactured housing occupants' health and safety. The commenter
urged HUD to keep the AC process in place for design features that
could affect the manufactured home's structural integrity and safety,
including attached homes (i.e., zero lot line), multi-story homes, and
attached carports and garages. The commenter continued that blurring
the line between what is manufactured housing and what is site-built
housing could mislead homebuyers, and that manufactured housing that
emulates site-built elements should be held to the same inspection and
building standards as site-built homes. The commenter urged HUD to
require attached units to meet all state and local building codes,
including higher energy standards, required for conventionally built
housing.
HUD Response: HUD's minimum requirements established for attached
homes (i.e., zero lot line) and multi-story homes do not change the
definition of a manufactured home or impact the requirement that every
transportable section of a manufactured home bear a manufacturer's
certification label. Through this rulemaking, HUD is codifying
requirements previously set forth through Alternative Construction
requirements; thereby, accounting for consumer safety. All regulatory
aspects of the program, including design review and inspections, remain
in place for all manufactured homes built under this federal program.
HUD believes the minimum standards established and enforced for these
construction options provide benefits to all segments of the industry
while protecting consumers' health and safety. Further updates to the
referenced ASHRAE Standard 62.2 may be addressed in future rulemaking.
Sec. 3280.108 Interior Passage
Several commenters agreed that clarification was needed regarding
to which doors the 27-inch requirement applies. One commenter stated
that closet doors (including walk-in closets) and pantry doors are less
than 27-inches, typically 24-inches or less. Another commenter stated
that it has several floor plans with closet and pantry openings less
than 27-inches and uses 24-inches for water heater and furnace
compartments and 16-inches for linen and coat closets. The commenters
stated that they would need to make significant changes to floor plan
designs to accommodate HUD's proposal, and one commenter explained this
would add costs to the home, drive up affordable housing costs, and
financially burden the commenter. One commenter suggested clarifying
that the minimum clear opening requirement of 27-inches only apply to
passage doors in a manufactured home.
Some commenters suggested adding exclusions for closet, pantry,
coat closet, linen closet, and toilet compartment doors and other
spaces where the intent is to ``reach in'' and access an item. The
commenters explained that closet and pantry doors, unlike a bedroom
door, are not considered passage doors. Further, single-section
manufactured homes have a smaller living space when compared with a
multi-section manufactured home or a typical site-built home. Given
that living space is at a premium in single-section homes, closet and
pantry doors should not be subject to the same clear opening
requirements.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the comments and revised the standard
accordingly.
Sec. 3280.111 Toilet compartments
Two commenters suggested revising language in paragraph (b) to
clarify the regulatory intent that the section refers to bathroom
passage doors in single-section and multi-section homes. For example,
the term ``single-section'' should modify ``home,'' not ``bathroom.''
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the comments and revised the standard
accordingly.
Sec. 3280.114 Stairways
Comments: Riser Height, Tread Depth, and Consistency.
Several commenters opposed HUD's proposed changes to stair rise and
run requirements. Some commenters noted that, as written, the proposal
would conflict with existing state and local requirements and require
manufactured home communities to replace existing inventory of
prefabricated landings and stairs. Another commenter stated that the
stair rise and run in HUD's proposed rule would not allow stairs to be
run parallel with the width of many homes, which would eliminate many
floor plan options and adversely penalize manufactured home builders.
One commenter stated that, Sec. 3280.114(a)(2)(i), 7
risers and 10 treads would cause stairway openings to be
larger to the point where some floor plans would no longer accommodate
a stairway. Some commenters suggested HUD use 8 or
8.25 for the maximum rise and 9 for the minimum
tread, which are figures that thirteen states accept.\6\ One commenter
also suggested
[[Page 2502]]
HUD change ``%'' to ``\3/8\ inch'' in Sec. 3280.114(a)(2)(i), and
change ``%'' to ``\3/4\ inch'' in Sec. 3280.114(a)(2)(ii). This
commenter also suggested changing ``Y2'' to ``\1/2\ inch'' in paragraph
(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The states referenced by the commenter were: IL, IN, KY, ME,
MD, MA, MT, NJ, ND, OH, OR, PA, WI and WY. The commenter also
referenced a change to the Indiana Code; see Indiana Department of
Homeland Security, Proposal for Code Change 43, IN.gov (May 9, 2018)
(proposals 49 and 50), https://www.in.gov/dhs/files/IRCC%27s%20Final%20Approved%20Amendments%20to%202018%20IRC%20(Part%20
1)%20-%20Accepted%20by%20FPBSC%202-5-19.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
According to another commenter, the maximum riser height and
minimum tread depth should be changed to 8\1/4\ inches and 9 inches in
Sec. 3280.114 (a)(2)(i). HUD's proposed requirements would almost
eliminate stairway designs that run parallel with the width of a
traditional manufactured home. This commenter's rationale for the
recommended change included giving manufacturers more flexibility when
trying to balance the smaller form-factor of most homes with consumer
demand for multiple stories.
HUD Response: Regarding riser height and tread depth, HUD reviewed
several state building codes referenced in public comments and has made
changes to riser height and tread depth consistent with those
requirements found in many state building codes and in accordance with
the comments received.
Comments: Interior and Exterior Stairs.
Several commenters stated that HUD should clarify whether the
requirements apply to stairs inside, or inside and outside, the home or
commented on whether the requirements should apply to these different
sets of stairs. One commenter stated that requirements for stairways
and related design features should focus only on stairways placed
inside the manufactured home, and the section title should be changed
to ``Stairways Inside the Manufactured Home.'' Another commenter stated
that the proposed changes to paragraph (a)(2) addresses interior
stairways and exterior stairways; the commenter suggested revising the
proposal to address interior steps only. According to the commenter,
states and local municipalities establish stair geometry to which first
responders are already accustomed, and to require smaller riser heights
and larger treads may create a hazard.
Another commenter supported the addition of language to define
requirements for stairways, landings, handrails, guards, and stairway
illumination, however, the commenter suggested the language should
detail if it covers interior stairways, exterior stairways, or both.
Another commenter suggested striking paragraph (b)(2) in its
entirety because it partially conflicts with paragraph (b)(1), or, if
HUD disagreed with striking (b)(2), revising (b)(2) as follows to
streamline and clarify requirements: ``A landing or floor must be
located on each side of an exterior doorway and the width of each
landing must not be less than the door it serves. The maximum threshold
height above the floor or landing must be 1\1/2\ inches.'' Given that
paragraph (b)(1) addresses interior stairways, doors, and landings
(with exception for certain basement applications), the commenter
assumed that paragraph (b)(2) must be intended for exterior
applications, which is the basis for the suggested edits.
Two commenters suggested HUD delete paragraph (e)(2) entirely,
since exterior stairs are not constructed within the building facility
and more appropriately fit under the HUD Code's Model Manufactured Home
Installation Standards. A commenter explained that exterior stairs
would be subject to state and local building code and health-safety
requirements. If HUD's exterior illumination requirements conflict with
state or local requirements, it would only cause confusion within the
industry and may put consumers at risk.
Comment: Guard Rails.
Some commenters also suggested, for Sec. 3280.114(d)(1), that the
proposed load requirements only apply to guards more than 42
above the floor grade below, to prevent driving up housing costs
without providing significant increased safety protection. When a
manufactured home includes a porch or similar feature, once installed,
it is usually between 30 and 42 inches above the lower floor, and there
is no evidence of increased injury from a fall as a result of a guard
failure that is 42 or fewer inches from grade. The commenters provided
regulatory text edits, and stated that a 30-inch guard rail structural
requirement would increase the cost of each single-section home with a
modest porch by $500, or more for larger homes, which undermines HUD's
efforts to preserve manufactured housing affordability.
The commenters further stated HUD should remove the language
regarding the horizontal rail restriction in paragraph (d)(2), which
HUD has not backed with a significant health-safety concern as
justification and which would restrict designs and add unnecessary
cost. This restriction is not found in the International Residential
Code (IRC), which only prohibits the passage of a four-inch sphere and
would result in a restriction for manufactured home builders that does
not exist for site-built home builders. One commenter stated that IRC
Table R301.1.5 does not require the 200 pound concentrated load to be
applied with any other loads and, therefore, the word ``not'' should be
added after ``this load'' in the last sentence of paragraph (d)(2)(ii).
Another commenter agreed and added that this makes (d)(2)(ii)
consistent with the last sentence in paragraph (c)(5).
Comment: Lighting.
For Sec. 3280.114(e)(1), one commenter stated that HUD should
delete the requirement for artificial light to be not less than one-
foot-candle at the center of treads and landing and require only a
light above stairways and landings because the commenter was not aware
of a test method. Another commenter suggested a prescriptive method to
simplify compliance with interior stair lighting. Lumens required for a
3 feet wide x 9 feet vertical stair would be 3 feet x 11.67 feet x 1
foot-candle = ~35 Lumens. One 60-watt incandescent bulb or 10-Watt A19
LED provides about 840 lumens which is more than adequate.
Another commenter recommended HUD add a prescriptive lighting
standard as an alternative compliance option. The proposed illumination
requirement of ``not less than one (1) foot-candle measured at the
center of treads and landings'' creates a new test requirement, but it
is unclear who is responsible for performing the test and assessing
compliance. Without an explanation of the test parameters and how the
test would be administered, the commenter was concerned this provision
would be inconsistently enforced. As an alternative, the commenter
recommended that HUD introduce a minimum standard for illumination.
HUD Response: Generally, HUD agreed with most comments and made
changes to the standards for stairways including revisions to riser
height and tread depth (Sec. 3280.114(a)(2), clarification of interior
and exterior consideration (Sec. Sec. 3280.114(a) and 3280.114(b)),
provisions for landings (Sec. 3280.114(b)), and handrails (Sec.
3280.114(c)).
HUD also modified the standard in multiple places so that the text
reflects HUD's regulatory authority for design and construction of the
home and its lack of authority to regulate stairways that are designed
by others and built at the home's site necessary for access and egress
from the entry and exit points of the homes. HUD also disagreed with
some commenters, as the requirements in Sec. 3280.112 only apply to
stairways integral to the manufactured home, such
[[Page 2503]]
as those necessary for multi-story or multi-level manufactured home
floors or for stairs that are not inside the home but may be necessary
for multi-level manufacturer designed and constructed porches designed
and built in the home building factory as an integral feature of the
manufactured home. Further, requirements for external or exterior
stairs that provide entry and exit and are built at the home site are
subject to state and or local authority and any such reference
otherwise has been removed.
HUD modified the standards related to landings removing duplicative
language, clarifying interior versus exterior provisions, and threshold
height.
HUD also modified the standard regarding handrails to be consistent
with requirements for handrails (removal of ladder effect restriction)
identified in other building codes for other residential structures.
However, HUD disagreed with comments that would have changed the load
requirements for guard systems to apply only to guards above 42 inches
above floor grade.
The changes effected by this rule are generally consistent with
other residential codes enforced nationwide. However, the load
requirement of 20 pounds per square foot is significantly less than the
load required by many states for similar guard systems.
After consideration of the public comments, HUD has not changed the
stairway and landing illumination requirements from the proposed rule
as commented by multiple commenters. The requirements, as published,
are consistent with state and local standards and compliance remains,
as with all other standards, the responsibility of the home
manufacturer. In section I. of the preamble to this rule, HUD clarified
that all standards in this rule are not retroactive and apply only to
newly constructed homes that enter the first phase or stage of
production on and after the effective date of the rule. Further
changes, such as those proposed by some commenters, should be proposed
for review by the MHCC so that consensus review of those proposed
changes is made as envisioned by the Act. It is not appropriate for HUD
to integrate these changes at the final rule stage.
Subpart C, Fire Safety
Sec. 3280.209 Smoke Alarm Requirements
One commenter recommended HUD revise Sec. 3280.209, a section not
addressed in the proposed rule. The commenter stated that HUD should
add combination smoke and carbon monoxide alarms as acceptable devices
just as they are in IRC sections R314.1.1 and R314.5.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with the commenter and made the
corresponding change.
Sec. 3280.211 Carbon Monoxide Detectors
Some commenters supported incorporating carbon monoxide
requirements into the Standards to protect consumer health and safety.
One commenter noted that the MHCC made this recommendation in 2009 and
HUD should have adopted it some time ago.
One commenter suggested HUD should revise Sec. 3280.211 to include
specific location requirements like smoke alarms, instead of
referencing the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Standard
720.
Some commenters stated that the proposed rule's coverage of CO
alarm requirements would be insufficient under the new Sec. 3280.211
in protecting occupants of manufactured housing because of its limited
coverage. All manufactured housing should have CO alarms and not just
those with fuel-fired appliances, designed for installing attached
garages, or designed for installation over basements. While the new
Sec. 3280.211 would be consistent with occupancy-related installation
requirements of IRC Section R315, these requirements provide no direct
protection for occupants of manufactured homes except where coincident
housing-related factors of installed fuel-fired appliances, designs for
installing attached garages, or designs for installation over basements
were relevant. Furthermore, the proposed Sec. 3280.211 requirements
would not protect occupants where other sources such as use of portable
heating appliances or from misuse of charcoal grills indoors (both
reflected in CO incident data) following completion of manufactured
housing installation and commissioning. Occupants of ``all-electric''
homes may be particularly vulnerable during periods of electrical
outage. The comment provided instances of harm caused by carbon
monoxide.
One commenter commended HUD for recognizing the importance of
requiring carbon monoxide detectors consistent with the IRC's
requirements. Through incorporation into the Construction and Safety
Standards, HUD relieves local officials from conducting additional
inspections and potential re-work post installation to comply with
local requirements.
Another commenter stated that HUD's proposed carbon monoxide
requirements should align more closely with similar requirements in
other building codes, such as the IRC's. Specifically, the commenter's
suggestions include: Specifying the required locations where carbon
monoxide alarms must be installed (for example, alarms should be
required outside each separate sleeping area or in the immediate
vicinity of any bedrooms); requiring interconnectivity between alarms,
because when more than one alarm is installed in a home, the actuation
of one alarm should activate all alarms; specifying how each alarm must
be powered, because the home's electrical system should be the primary
power source, with batteries as a secondary, reserve power source; and
clarifying that the Standards would allow combination carbon monoxide
and smoke alarms to keep pace with consumer demand. Another commenter
(0023) also supported this change.
According to the commenter, HUD should clarify that combination
alarms are acceptable to ensure the industry continues to keep pace
with consumer demand. The commenter also suggested amending Sec.
3280.209 to ensure the sections cross-reference each other.
Comment: Alarms versus Detectors.
Some commenters stated that the word ``detector'' should not be
used and suggested using ``alarms'' to be consistent with other codes
and striking the word ``detector'' wherever it occurs, because alarms
and detectors are distinct concepts. Alarms are self-contained, single,
or multi-station sensing devices that detect a given event and sound an
audible or visual alarm. Detectors are sensing devices that must be
connected to a separate alarm system, rather than self-contained
systems. One commenter stated that standards do not include
requirements for transmitting detection devices to an alarm control
unit as would be necessary with detector devices. The commenter
recommended removing the standard versions in specific code sections
which are incorporated by reference in Sec. 3280.4, which will allow
for simplified future updates and is a common practice for
incorporating building code standards into regulations and laws. The
commenter recommended removing the reference to ANSI/UL 2034, which may
not be readily available and incorporate location requirements within
this section.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with many comments and has modified the
Construction and Safety Standards to address combination alarms,
integration of specific location requirements, and removal of
references to ``detector.''
[[Page 2504]]
HUD also notes that updating specific editions of referenced standards
may require notice and comment and as such, will remain for the time-
being. HUD also disagreed with some commenters that proposed to require
carbon monoxide alarms in all homes, regardless of whether the home as
fuel-burning appliances, an attached garage, or designed for
installation over a basement. HUD's standards are consistent with state
and local standards for residential construction. Should the commenter
wish to pursue requirements for carbon monoxide alarms in all homes,
the commenter is encouraged to submit the proposed change to the MHCC
for review and deliberation by the Committee. It is not appropriate for
HUD to integrate these changes at the final rule stage.
Subpart C, Fire Safety, Attached Garages
Sec. 3280.212 Factory Constructed or Site-Built Attached Garages
One commenter noted that HUD's current policy, to not require the
IPIA to inspect documents shipped with the manufactured home (under
Interpretive Bulletin H-1-77), conflicts with proposed paragraph (g)--
there is no assurance that the manufacturer would be including these
additional instructions.
A commenter stated that the proposed rule leaves it unclear as to
when a garage is to be added to the home. Another commenter stated that
HUD should clarify that paragraph (a) applies only to garages which are
not self-supported. One commenter supported HUD's actions to remove the
issue of attached garages and carports from the costly AC process. The
commenter stated that the proposed standards and regulations would
effectively obviate previous sub-regulatory HUD ``guidance'' memoranda
which mandated the approval of attached garage and ``add-on''-ready
manufactured homes via the AC process set forth at Sec. 3282.14.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., June 12, 2014 HUD Guidance Memorandum
(``Construction of On-Site installation of Add-Ons Such as an
Attached Garage''); and November 10, 2014 HUD Guidance Memorandum
(``Additional DAPIA Guidance for Review and Processing of
Manufacturers Alternative Construction Requests for Attached
Garages'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Several commenters stated that HUD should revise the proposed fire
separation requirements. A commenter stated HUD should require that
gypsum be added on site to meet the fire separation requirement.
Installing gypsum on the exterior of a home in the factory would not be
a durable enough exterior finish for storage and shipping. Another
commenter agreed and stated that paragraph (c) needs to be clarified so
that fire separation between the garage and the home may be completed
on-site. Site-installed dormers at the garage in addition to floor-to-
foundation fire separation will be required to be completed on-site and
it would be advantageous to run all separation at that time to ensure
proper alignment with the garage. Paragraph (c)(1) should also be
clarified to allow gypsum required to meet separation to be either
factory or site installed and allowance for products equivalent to \1/
2\ gypsum should be added.
One commenter stated that in Sec. 3280.212(g) the reference to
Sec. 3285.201 should be changed to Sec. 3285.301. The commenter
proposed that a new paragraph (h) be added because a site-built, self-
supported garage is considered an add-on per Sec. 3282.8(j)(1) and
does not affect the ability of the manufactured home to comply with the
Construction and Standards.
Another commenter stated the Standards should be consistent with
other building codes, such as the IRC. Instead of requiring that the
fire separation be continuous from beneath the floor, through the attic
space, to the underside of the roof sheathing/decking, the Standards
should only state that the garage must be separated from the home with
appropriate gypsum wallboard or equivalent. Manufacturers can determine
whether the fire separation should be continuous from the floor,
through the attic space, to the roof sheathing or decking or if it is
more appropriate to envelop the structure's garage side. Other building
codes leave this to the builder's discretion and so should the
Standards.
The commenter continued that HUD's proposed rule for factory or
site construction of attached garages should emphasize the distinction
between attached and self-supported structures. HUD should also revisit
the fire separation requirements for attached garages. The commenter's
suggested edits included clarifying that attached garages are not self-
supported. Further, when a garage would be attached to and supported by
the home, manufacturers should only be required to comply with the
Standards' load provisions. They should not be expected to build homes
that also meet the specific requirements of the various state and local
jurisdictions, and confirming that a site-built, self-supported garage
is considered an add-on and clarifying that add-ons do not affect a
manufactured home's ability to comply with the Standards.
According to one commenter, the guidance provided in Sec. Sec.
3280.212, 3280.213, 3282.8(j), and 3285.903(c) (Attached Garages,
Carports and Add-Ons) appears contradictory and confusing. Sections
3280.212 and 3280.213 provide guidance on how manufactured housing
should be prepared for the addition of garages and carports which is
clearly within the scope of the Federal standards. These sections,
along with Sec. 3282.8, discuss load paths, providing conflicting
information on where loads should be transferred. If the intent is to
offer options, then the sections should be presented with an ``or''
statement to indicate they are options, as is included in the Data
Plate requirements of Sec. 3280.5. The commenter said who bears
responsibility for approval and inspection of these attached accessory
buildings and structures should also be clarified. According to the
commenter, these structures should comply with the local building code
and be inspected to that code by the local jurisdiction, given their
designation as ``attached buildings or structures'' and not the
extension of the manufactured home.
HUD Response: HUD agreed with most comments and has accepted all
suggested textual changes to the standards that were submitted by the
public. HUD modified the final Construction and Safety Standards
accordingly.
HUD disagreed with the commenter that installation instructions are
not required by this final rule, as it is specifically addressed
through Sec. 3280.212(g). Further, upon placing a label certification
on each transportable section of a manufactured home, the manufacturer
self certifies its compliance with the Construction and Safety
Standards. Should the commenter seek additional changes to either
manufacturer or IPIA requirements, the commenter is encouraged to
submit comments through the MHCC process for consensus review and
deliberation. It is not appropriate for HUD to integrate these changes
at the final rule stage. HUD also notes that the added information
required on the Data Plate more clearly identifies whether the home has
been designed for an attached garage.
Subpart C, Fire Safety, Attached Carports
Sec. 3280.213 Factory Constructed or Site-Built Attached Carports
One commenter stated that the proposed rule should be modified to
include attached patio covers and porch
[[Page 2505]]
roofs which can easily exceed the size of a carport. The commenter also
stated that current HUD policy under Interpretive Bulletin H-1-77
conflicts with paragraph (f)--there is no assurance that the
manufacturer would be including these additional instructions.
Another commenter requested HUD delete the following: Paragraph (b)
about maximum roof slope for the carport, on the basis that carports
cannot exceed the height of the home; paragraph (c) on beam designs, on
the basis that beam designs would be part of the approved design by the
Design Approval Primary Inspection Agency (DAPIA); and paragraph (d) on
shear wall and uplift strapping design, on the basis that the carport
design would not be known.
One commenter stated that paragraph (f)'s reference to Sec.
3285.201 should be changed to Sec. 3285.301.
Another commenter said Sec. 3280.213 for factory or site-built
attached carports should emphasize the distinction between attached and
self-supported structures and that striking unnecessary or superfluous
rules would also streamline the requirements. The commenter's suggested
edits include: Deleting the maximum roof slope requirement from the
list of design characteristics for carports, because given that the
height of the carport cannot exceed the height of the home, the
carport's roof slope is never a relevant factor in home design; adding
a provision that, as an alternative to specifying the unique design
characteristics of the carport and the home, manufacturers may provide
the maximum loads that the home is designed to resist from the carport;
removing the provisions specifying where splices in the host beam can
be located, because narrowly defining this provision with such
detailed, prescriptive requirements could have unanticipated
consequences, especially if there are continued advancements in
anchoring technology. According to the commenter, specific design
characteristics should remain subject to review and approval by the
manufacturer's DAPIA.
The commenter's recommendations continued with: Removing the shear
wall requirements for homes designed for Wind Zone II and III
installations in favor of manufacturers specifying anchor requirements
for uplift forces in Wind Zones II and III as part of the home's DAPIA-
approved design, because if the manufacturer and its DAPIA specify
these requirements at the design stage, the size of any attached
carport would be limited by the load capacity of the anchor system
installed in the factory. This would limit the design options available
to any third party responsible for installing an attached carport at
the jobsite; and removing the ``cone of influence'' provision, because
this requirement is dependent on the type of anchor, and should be
determined by the installer. The manufacturer should not be expected to
know this information without knowing exactly where a manufactured home
would be sited and how it would be installed; and confirming that a
site-built, self-supported carport is considered an add-on and
clarifying that add-ons do not affect a manufactured home's ability to
comply with the Construction and Safety Standards.
Another commenter also supported deleting paragraph (c)(1), because
this paragraph was covered in paragraphs (a) and (c), and additional
details on the acceptable engineering load path are not required. The
commenter also suggested deleting paragraph (d) because the load path
requirements should apply to all wind zones as specified in paragraphs
(a) and (c). The commenter also stated that the accepted engineer
anchor test protocol does not test for cone of influence and it is not
defined within the Construction and Safety Standards. Therefore, it
should be removed from Sec. 3280.213(f)(1).
HUD Response: HUD did not add requirements for patio covers and
porch roofs, as such specific code change text and supporting
information be submitted to the MHCC for consensus review and
deliberation. It is not appropriate for HUD to integrate these changes
at the final rule stage. Further, HUD disagreed with comments that
installation instructions are not required by the standard, as it is
clearly addressed in Sec. Sec. 3280.213(b) and (e). Upon placing a
label certification on each transportable section of a manufactured
home, the manufacturer self-certifies its compliance with the
Construction and Safety Standards.
HUD notes the added information required on the Data Plate more
clearly identifies whether the home has been designed for an attached
carport. HUD agreed with all comments providing specific textual
changes and HUD modified the standards accordingly.
Subpart D, Body and Frame Requirements
Sec. 3280.305 Structural Design Requirements
One commenter stated that proposed Sec. 3280.305(h)(5) expands
areas of construction that could be deferred to the job site and
imposed on the installer under ``On-Site Completion Requirements.'' The
commenter stated that installers were not included in deliberations on
the proposed changes, and that since the On-Site Completion rule is
relatively new, and given that HUD has failed to monitor or measure
compliance, this provision should be deleted until the success of the
``On Site Completion'' process can be evaluated. Another commenter
stated that HUD should delete the words ``connections between
sections,'' after ``hinged roof sections,'' and before ``sheathing,''
in paragraph (h)(5) because connections between sections is covered as
part of standard installation.
Another commenter stated that paragraph (h)(5)(iii) requires
inspection at an installation site in stages but does not clarify who
would provide inspections. The commenter also suggested that HUD
clearly define ``inspection of the work at the installation site in
stages,'' and stated that this new requirement would add costs to the
home, drive up the cost of affordable housing, and would financially
burden the commenter.
Two commenters stated that HUD strike Sec. Sec. 3280.305(h)(5)
(iii), (iv), and (v), because these proposals generally apply to onsite
installation and appear to overstep Subpart D's bounds. The commenters
believed these requirements, if necessary, would be more appropriate
under Part 3282, Subpart M, ``On-site Completion of Construction of
Manufactured Homes.''
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the commenter that revisions to
this standard expand areas of construction that can be completed on
site. The changes to this standard were already implemented with the
On-Site Completion of Construction Rule and these changes are
conforming. Further, HUD conducted limited monitoring of procedures and
approvals related to On Site Completion of Construction and has not
concluded any adverse or significant findings.
HUD modified this section to address other comments received
including removing any references to installation activities. HUD also
modified the inspection requirements but has retained the intent that
inspections occur prior to covering up additional aspects or otherwise
allowing for inspection panels so that inspection can take place. This
aspect is important to assure that the work completed on site conforms
to the design standards, so that the home is completed in accordance
with the Construction and Safety Standards, and the home is not taken
out of compliance through the work done at the home site. Further,
[[Page 2506]]
these standards are established to work in concert with the regulations
for On Site Completion of Construction and will help to ensure that
appropriate designs are provided to address the work that is expected
to happen in the factory, the work that is expected to happen at the
home site, and the factory and or inspections at the site necessary for
conformance.
Sec. 3280.307 Resistance to Elements and Use
A commenter stated that the expansion of field installation of
exterior coverings means the requirement for the manufacturer to
provide all needed materials (siding, fasteners, channels, etc.) should
be added to this list. Another commenter agreed and suggested adding
``and the required materials'' after ``Complete installation
instructions.'' A commenter suggested adding attached garages to the
list of exemptions in paragraph (e), given the amount of onsite work
required to complete the installation of an attached garage, and as
long as the manufacturer is complying with HUD's list of conditions.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard accordingly.
Subpart F, Thermal Protection
Sec. 3820.504 Condensation Control and Installation of Vapor Retarders
One commenter stated that the proposed requirements under
Sec. Sec. 3820.504(b) and .506(c) are not needed, and HUD should
delete them. The commenter stated its mating walls are located in a
conditioned area, gaskets are installed in the factory to prevent air
infiltration, and the commenter has not witnessed a mating wall with
damage from condensation.
Another commenter stated that mating walls are interior walls and
should not be treated as exterior walls which require a vapor barrier.
Furthermore, many homes have single mating walls, and this section does
not define on which side the vapor barrier should be applied.
Another commenter stated that HUD should delete these proposals
until certain issues are evaluated. There will be a concern if the
connection between floors is not effectively sealed from allowing cold
outside air to enter between the ceiling of the first floor and floor
system of the upper floor. If cold air is entering this area, a vapor
retarder should be applied to the ceiling on the first floor. Another
concern would be if the bottom board is still required to be placed
under the upper floors, this may add to additional condensation between
the floors if the vapor retarder is not installed on the ceiling on the
lower floor.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the commenters regarding the need
for Sec. Sec. 3280.504(b) and (c) to be deleted or amended, and that
the affected walls are interior walls. These commenters may not
understand that the subject standards apply to the (fire) walls
separating attached manufactured homes; rather than, mating walls
between two sections of the same manufactured home. Multi-story
manufactured homes have been designed and built for more than two
decades prior to the rulemaking and under Alternative Construction
processes. These homes have been designed and built, and significantly,
HUD has not received information indicating these homes, without a
ceiling vapor retarder on the first floor, are not performing.
Sec. 3820.506 Heat Loss/Heat Gain
Two commenters suggested revising paragraph (c) by replacing ``the
mating wall of each'' with ``the fire separation wall between each.''
Mating walls between two or more sections of a multi-section home are
not the same as firewalls separating two or more attached, single-
family manufactured homes. Mating walls are aligned at installation to
create a cohesive single-family residence--they are not exterior walls.
However, fire separation walls, which separate attached single-family
homes, should be classified as exterior walls because they act as a
health-safety barrier between distinct residential dwellings. The
commenters believed these edits clarify the distinction between mating
walls and fire separation walls.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard to incorporate the public comment where those
changes have not significantly altered the intent as proposed.
Subpart G, Plumbing Systems
A commenter suggested clarifying the definition of ``indirect waste
receptor,'' a new term being introduced to the Standards. Second, in
Sec. 3280.608, strike ``Hangars'' and replace it with ``Hangers'' as
in the original. Third, by incorporating additional safety
considerations from the Uniform Plumbing Code, the commenter saw an
opportunity to protect the general public from the risk of burn or
scald. The commenter believed a home's relief drain, should it
terminate outside the home, must terminate between six and twenty-four
inches above the finished grade and face down at termination; high
enough to prevent backflow, but low enough to reduce the risk of injury
or accident.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and generally agreed with the comments.
HUD modified the standard to incorporate the public comment where those
changes have not significantly altered the intent as proposed.
Sec. 3280.609 Water Distribution Systems
One commenter stated that the requirement that installers extend
water heater relief valve piping to beyond the skirting of the home
would very likely create an imminent safety hazard because it carries
superheated, pressurized water, so it should be deleted. Another
commenter stated that if the relief valve is directed to outside the
crawl space, there would be a possibility of personal injury to those
nearby. The commenter explained that water heater manufacturers do not
allow additional piping to be installed directly on the pressure relief
valve. They require ``air gaps'' when directing into additional piping.
The commenter concluded that HUD should reject these changes.
Another commenter stated that HUD should add discharge pipe
turndown requirements taken from the Uniform Plumbing Code which adds a
higher level of scald protection. This revision will increase consumer
safety.
Two commenters proposed changes to HUD's regulatory text.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and generally agreed with the comments
and addressed the protections to residents by accepting comments
regarding relief pipe turndowns. HUD also modified the standard to
incorporate the public comment where those changes have not
significantly altered the intent as proposed.
Sec. 3280.612 Tests and Inspection
One commenter opposed the changes to this section because they
would reduce the required pressure needed to perform water supply
testing and, as a result, a revision of the manufacturers' installation
instructions would be needed along with oversight by the IPIA agencies
to assure that the proper instructions are provided with the home.
Another commenter recommended that, in the last sentence, ``potable
water source'' should replace ``potable source of supply.''
HUD Response: HUD generally agreed with the comments regarding
wording changes to the standard. HUD modified the standard to
incorporate the public comment where those changes have not
[[Page 2507]]
significantly altered the intent as proposed. HUD disagreed with
opposition to the proposed change as the changes have been vetted by
the MHCC and are consistent with many state requirements for testing
potable water supply systems. While this change may require revisions
to manufacturers' installation instructions, the system of design
approvals will ensure the instructions conform to the revised
requirements by the rule's effective date.
Subpart H, Heating, Cooling and Fuel Burning Systems
Sec. 3280.705 Gas Piping Systems
One commenter suggested HUD eliminate ``hard pipe'' in paragraph
(i)(8)(iii), as the industry uses a flex gas connector and not a quick-
disconnect.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed and generally agreed with the commenter
and modified the standard to incorporate the commenter's proposed
change.
Sec. 3280.709 Installation of Appliances
A commenter stated that Sec. Sec. 3280.709(a) and 3280.711 require
that manufacturers currently ship two sets of installation instructions
for each appliance with every home; the MHCC voted to strike this
requirement from section Sec. 3280.709(a) by letter ballot in 2015
(Log #92).
Some commenters noted the importance of inspection but stated that
it is unclear who is to perform on-site inspections and testing related
to paragraph (a)(1)(ii). One commenter stated that HUD should clarify
that the installation is to comply with the local building code
requirements and be subject to inspection by state or local code
officials. This commenter noted that the language in Sec.
3280.709(a)(1) would allow for the installation of direct vent space
heating appliances on-site following approved instructions and the
installation and inspection procedures provided.
A commenter was concerned with changes to the vent system
termination provisions in paragraph (d) because the commenter was
unaware of any health-safety risks that would necessitate expanding the
permissible range from 3 to 10 feet. The commenter stated the IRC has a
similar requirement, but it only applies to the vent system of a fuel-
burning appliance. Consequently, the commenter recommended adding the
clarifying phrase ``of fuel-burning appliances.'' In addition, the
commenter replacing the phrase ``habitable areas'' with ``habitable
rooms'' because this term is defined in the Standards.
HUD Response: HUD agreed that the MHCC voted to eliminate the
requirement for the home manufacturer to provide two sets of appliance
manufacturers' instructions with each home. This recommended change is
anticipated to be addressed in a future rulemaking. HUD also reviewed
the comments concerning the site installed direct vent appliances and
has made changes to clarify that testing of the home's fuel supply and
electrical systems are the responsibility of the home manufacturer. HUD
also reviewed the comment regarding separation of intake and exhaust
vents and made changes to address the comment by clarifying that the
placement restrictions apply to exhausts of fuel burning appliances and
using the defined term, ``habitable rooms.''
Sec. 3280.710 Venting, Ventilation, and Combustion Air
One commenter stated that the new requirement at paragraph (d) is
not needed and that, to follow the proposed requirement, the commenter
would have vent pipes above allowable transport height. The commenter
requested that HUD delete the requirement because it would be forced to
have vent pipes site installed, revise vent runs, or eliminate some
floor plans completely, which would drive up the cost of affordable
housing and cause financial burden. Another commenter stated that HUD
should clarify that Sec. 3280.710 applies to fuel-burning combustion
appliances, to be consistent with the IRC. Two commenters proposed
changes to HUD's regulatory text.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the comment that the changes to
separate intake and exhaust vents are not needed. The proposed standard
was recommended by the MHCC and HUD refers the commenter to U.S.
Government Accountability Office (GAO) audit report GAO-13-52, Testing
and Performance Evaluation Could Better Ensure Safe Indoor Air Quality.
HUD also reviewed the comment regarding separation of intake and
exhaust vents and has made changes to address the comment by clarifying
that the placement restrictions apply to exhausts of fuel burning
appliances and using the defined term, ``habitable rooms.''
Subpart I, Electrical Systems
Sec. 3280.807 Fixtures and Appliances
Some commenters stated that the new requirement at paragraph (g)
has no safety benefit to the consumer and HUD should delete it. The
commenters explained that wiring ceiling-mounted and wall-mounted light
fixtures to one switch has been standard practice for decades. A
commenter stated they were unaware of any health-safety risk associated
with having multiple bathroom lights controlled by the same switch, HUD
has not provided any information to suggest otherwise, and consumers'
preference and other building codes or standards support the
commenter's position.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the comments. The intent of the
requirement for separate switches allows an occupant to use one or both
lights at their discretion. This allows potential energy consumption
savings by allowing the occupant to energize one light rather than both
if both are not necessary.
Subpart J, Transportation Systems
Sec. 3280.902 Definitions
One commenter stated that the proposed change to the ``Drawbar and
coupling mechanism'' definition, by removing ``A frame'' and adding in
its place ``rigid substructure,'' is not justified and should be
discarded. Another commenter suggested deleting the parenthetical from
the ``Drawbar and coupling mechanism'' definition for clarity. The
commenter stated the parenthetical is unnecessary, and ``usually an A
frame rigid structure'' only creates confusion where the defined term
``Frame'' also uses the phrase ``rigid structure'' in its definition.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with these comments. The added term is
consistent with the same use in other definitions and is intended to
reflect the structure to which the coupling mechanism is mounted.
Sec. 3280.903 General Requirements for Designing the Structure To
Withstand Transportation Shock and Vibration
One commenter suggested that HUD reject the proposed changes to
paragraph (a). The commenter stated that to remove ``during its
intended life'' is unacceptable. To alter the language to ``function
after set-up'' now establishes a ``time frame'' on how long chassis
have to last and many manufactured homes will no longer be
``transportable'' which is required under 3280.2. The commenter did not
suggest where HUD should reinclude the phrase ``during its intended
life'' if HUD kept its proposed changes to Sec. 3280.903.
For paragraph (b)(1), commenters stated that HUD should provide
more guidance on the road test requirements and clarify what
constitutes an effective
[[Page 2508]]
road test. One commenter suggested that HUD clearly define the minimum
miles to travel, the type of roadways to travel, and what a failure is.
Other commenters supported the requirement for road tests to be
witnessed by experts who are in the best position to provide such
services--an independent registered professional engineer or architect,
or by a recognized testing organization. One commenter recommended that
the testing laboratory be accredited to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020. Two
commenters stated that in paragraph (b)(1), the manufacturer's
Production Inspection Primary Inspection Agency should be added to the
list of independent third parties who can witness and certify the road
test, and included regulatory text changes. These commenters stated
that paragraphs A and B appear to be a carryover from Interpretive
Bulletin J-1-76 and should be updated to the applicable (1) and (2)
paragraph numbering format to clarify that the equation requires the
sum of the Dead Load and Floor Load calculations.
HUD Response: HUD disagreed with the comment that the changed
language alters the intended life of the chassis. The terminology
refers to the structural, plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems
and requires that those systems remain operational/functional after
transportation.
HUD reviewed the comments and proposed changes that would add
several specific requirements within the road test requirements. These
suggestions should be put forth for MHCC review and consideration, as
it is not appropriate for HUD to integrate these changes at the final
rule stage.
Upon review of public comment, HUD added that Primary Inspection
Agencies may also witness and certify road tests. HUD also reviewed
comments that include specific changes to the formula included in Sec.
3280.903(b)(3) and edited the formula accordingly.
Sec. 3280.904 Specific Requirements for Designing the Transportations
System
A commenter suggested that ``to insure'' should be replaced with
``ensuring'' to correct a minor grammatical error. Some commenters
suggested that in paragraph (b)(4)(i) the word ``static'' should be
added to ``gross dead weight,'' such that the text should read ``gross
static dead weight,'' to maintain consistency with the ``static tongue
weight'' variable.
For paragraph (b)(4)(ii), one commenter suggested HUD add a
requirement to check weights with the home in a level position ready
for transport.
For paragraph (b)(9)(ii), several commenters stated HUD should
maintain the current 40-foot stopping distance. One commenter stated
HUD should utilize Interpretive Bulletin J-1-76. Requiring new brake
tests would pose financial burdens. Another commenter stated it could
not find a federal Department of Transportation (DOT) requirement that
would reduce the braking distance to 35 feet from 40 feet. The proposal
would eliminate acceptable brake tests qualified under the current
standards, adding undue burden and cost, without justification, to
homes with years of satisfactory braking experience which would need to
be re-tested. Another commenter believed keeping the stopping distance
at 40 feet is consistent with DOT regulations.
For the same paragraph (b)(9)(ii), a commenter stated the
parenthetical should be deleted. The transportation of manufactured
homes more appropriately falls under Category B(3), ``All other
property-carrying vehicles and combinations of property-carrying
vehicles,'' of the DOT Vehicle Brake Performance Table.\8\ Given that
the weight of a home can easily exceed 25,000 pounds--with some 16-
foot-wide, full-length models approaching 40,000 pounds--home
transportation is more closely related to the movement of heavy
equipment, such as excavators and dump trucks. While the process of
transporting a home is considered driveaway-towaway operations under
DOT regulations, the DOT also recognizes that these homes require
special consideration.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See 49 CFR 393.52(d).
\9\ See, e.g., 49 CFR 393.75(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Two commenters suggested in paragraph (b)(6)(i), the word
``nationally'' should be deleted. There are several reputable programs
and testing agencies that do not yet have national accreditation, but
they have regional, state, or local approval. These programs or
agencies should not be excluded, especially when state standards are
often more stringent. Another commenter recommended that, for paragraph
(b)(6)(i), that the nationally recognized testing agency be accredited
to ISO/IEC 17025 or 17020.
Some commenters suggested in paragraph (b)(8)(ii), the phrase ``or
equivalent'' should follow ``tread wear indicator'' to ensure
consistency with how the phrase is applied to other similar provisions
throughout the Standards.
For paragraph (b)(9)(iii), a commenter stated that HUD's proposed
requirement is not practical because there is no way to check actual
voltage unless the truck is hooked up to the brakes. The commenter
asked if the intent is to perform this test on every home that ships
and requested that HUD delete the requirement as it would drive up the
cost of affordable housing and pose financial burden on the commenter.
Another commenter suggested replacing the first two sentences of
paragraph (b)(9)(iii) with the following: ``Brake wiring must be
provided for each brake. The brake wire must not be less than the value
specified in the brake manufacturer's instructions.'' Manufacturers
should not be responsible for evaluating each transportation company's
tractors and equipment or for assessing each company's quality
assurance program. They should only be responsible for ensuring that
the provided brake wiring meets or exceeds the minimum required
specifications as provided by the brake manufacturer.
HUD Response: HUD accepted the comment regarding changing
``insuring'' to ``to ensure'' within Sec. 3280.904(b)(3). HUD also
accepted the comment to add ``static'' within Sec. Sec. 3280.904(b)(4)
and 3280.904(b)(6). HUD also accepted the comment to check weights with
the home in a level position (see revised Sec. 3280.904(b)(4)(ii)).
HUD disagreed with the comment to revise the stopping distance from
35 to 40 feet. HUD revised the reference for the braking performance
stopping distance, aligning HUD's standards with DOT (at 49 CFR
393.52(d)) and clarified the classification of manufactured home to
best align with DOT's previously designated classification.
HUD disagreed with the comment to remove ``nationally'' from the
qualifier on testing agencies that may accept recycled axle programs
(Sec. 3280.904(b)(6)(i)). This terminology has been in use for decades
and its use is consistent with historical use. HUD also disagreed with
the comment that suggests adding a specific accreditation for testing
agencies. HUD has found the work of nationally recognized testing
agencies, having various qualifications, does not impede health and
safety protection.
HUD also reviewed comments requesting the addition of equivalent
tread wear indicators but has not received specific means of
determining equivalence and has therefore decided not to include such
language in the final rule. These suggestions should be put forth for
MHCC review and consideration, as it is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at the final rule stage.
[[Page 2509]]
HUD reviewed public comment and specific comments that included
textual changes to Sec. 3280.904(b)(9)(iii) regarding electrical brake
wiring. HUD accepted these changes.
Subpart K, Attached Manufactured Homes and Special Construction
Several commenters supported adding two-family, or two- and three-
family, dwelling units to Subpart K. These commenters supported
duplexes and triplexes as more practical and affordable solutions in
urban and suburban applications because of, for example, zoning
restrictions. One commenter suggested less restrictive fire separation
requirements and amending Sec. Sec. 3280.1002 and .1004 and adding a
new Sec. 3280.1003(a). Another commenter also suggested less
restrictive fire separation requirements and offered several
recommended changes to regulatory text. These proposed changes to
regulatory text included separating Sec. 3280.1003 into two
paragraphs--paragraph (a) for ``two attached manufactured homes'' and
paragraph (b) for ``three or more attached manufactured homes.'' Some
commenters supported reevaluating Subpart K for a single structure with
two dwellings but did not propose alternative regulatory text. One
commenter stated that duplexes have simpler requirements than ``town
homes,'' and the demand for duplexes will far outpace any other type of
attached manufactured home.
Another commenter, while expressing general support for HUD's
proposed changes, questioned HUD's focus on adopting standards for
multi-story manufactured homes and attached manufactured homes, while
MHCC recommended standards for multi-family manufactured homes are not
included in the proposed rule and have yet to be proposed for adoption.
The commenter noted the absence of an explanation in the proposed rule
for HUD's prioritization of the included standards for multi-story and
``zero-lot-line'' attached manufactured homes, as contrasted with
broader and potentially much more economically-significant and
beneficial proposed standards for multi-unit/multi-family manufactured
homes. The commenter stated that instead of promoting affordable
manufactured housing for all Americans as required by law, HUD appears
to be abusing its regulatory authority to support Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac in order to benefit a narrow industry segment, while
smaller manufacturers are kept waiting endlessly for proposed multi-
unit/multi-family standard. The commenter stated that HUD gave no
indication in the proposed rule of when or even if multi-unit/multi-
family manufactured homes will be addressed by promulgating new
standards that are clearly and uncontrovertibly within the scope of
present federal law. The commenter concluded that HUD should include
MHCC recommended standards for multi-unit/multi-family manufactured
homes in any final rule under the present docket.
Another commenter stated that much of the proposed language in the
new Subpart K duplicates nearly verbatim the language contained in IRC
sections R302.2 and R302.4 without observing and protecting the rights
of the ICC as its copyright holder. The commenter stated that if HUD
wishes to publish any part of the IRC in its rules or future rulemaking
proceeding, HUD must seek to comply with OMB Circular A-119 and
Incorporation by Reference procedures.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those comments to the maximum extent deemed
necessary to effect the appropriate changes where those changes have
not significantly altered the intent as proposed.
HUD decided not to eliminate structural independence for attached
homes, as each home shall be designed to be structurally independent
and each home must perform on its own. HUD accepted changes to wording
regarding fire separation walls but has not accepted the use of
exceptions. The exceptions should be submitted as proposed changes to
the MHCC, and any exceptions shall be handled through the Alternative
Construction process. It is not appropriate for HUD to integrate these
changes at the final rule stage.
Further, this standards change was not intended to address multi-
dwelling unit manufactured homes (multiple single-family residences in
one manufactured home structure). The MHCC recommendations for multi-
unit manufactured homes are contained in the fourth set of its
recommendations for changes to the Standards. The attached manufactured
homes are each designed as individual single-family residential
structures by the home manufacturers and each such attached home is to
comply with the requirements set forth in 24 CFR 3280 and as such meet
all such requirements to be labeled as manufactured homes to be
installed in accordance with accompanying installation instructions
that also meet HUD's Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards.
HUD has reviewed the public comment regarding integration of
requirements that are generally consistent with provisions of the
International Residential Code (IRC). HUD has acted on proposed
standards received from the public and as reviewed, modified and
recommended by the MHCC. While some language may be consistent between
the IRC, state and local codes, and the requirements published in this
rule, there are differences that remain and justify establishment of
unique provisions rather than incorporating the IRC or any given state
or local code in their entirety. HUD believes the standards will allow
use of some of the latest building technologies and materials, creating
more consistency with multiple State-adopted residential building codes
for site-built housing (some of which may incorporate or amend
standards including, but not limited to, the International Residential
Code), and expand consumer choice.
Comments: Preemption and Opportunity Zones.
A commenter asserted that in the preamble HUD overtly intends to
preempt the authority of state and local jurisdictions through Subpart
K. The commenter cited reasons as to why such requirements are within
the domain of state and local authorities. Adjacent and attached
manufactured homes may be manufactured by different companies and
installed at different times resulting in potential interactions that
have not been addressed within either manufactured home, but which
could be within the proposed rule's requirements. The proposed rule
provides no requirements that attached manufactured homes be
manufactured by the same manufacturer or installed at the same time.
A commenter stated that HUD should have provided more detail and
justification for the following statement made in the Proposed Rule,
which was used as a blanket justification for the new subpart K:
``Subpart K would enable manufacturers to design and construct homes
similar to townhomes, which may be useful to address affordable housing
needs in Opportunity Zones and urban or other areas.''
According to the commenter, HUD makes no attempt to quantify the
benefit against potential costs even though the qualifier ``may'' is
used to describe the policy change's potential benefit. For instance,
HUD did not consider how many fewer code inspectors might there be in
the country if this policy change were to allow the manufactured
housing industry to become a dominant force in
[[Page 2510]]
the housing sector. Further, HUD also failed to provide any evidence
that a consumer market even exists for townhome-style developments made
out of manufactured homes. Additionally, HUD also failed to describe
any interest that would validate the above statement for the type of
developments that are considered by this new provision on the part of
the Opportunity Zone funds, or their managers, or even those local
officials representing the Opportunity Zone areas.
The commenter was also concerned about the number of state and
local authorities that the proposed rule would preempt, if finalized in
its current form. The commenter stated there are at least four major
preemptions that should be considered more fully through a Federalism
Consultation, consistent with Executive Order 13132. The commenter
believed that the authority granted to manufactured housing producers
under this provision should have triggered a proper consultation
process, irrespective of the additional preemptions provided by the
proposed rule for building code-related authorities affecting
stairways, landings, handrails, guards and stairway illumination,
siting of and installation standards for carbon monoxide alarms, and
indoor ventilation requirements. The commenter suggested that prior to
finalizing the rule, HUD should pause to complete a Federalism
Consultation and more robust cost-benefit analysis, especially as it
relates to disaster preparedness and recovery.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the public comment regarding the
justification for this new Subpart. In response, HUD found that the
standards promulgated in this Final Rule are within the scope and
authority provided by the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety
Standards Act of 1974, as amended by the Manufactured Housing
Improvement Act of 2000. Further, HUD believes that the future design,
construction and installation of attached manufactured homes may create
affordable housing opportunities and may allow manufactured homes to be
placed in more urban areas where land and space restrictions have
historically limited the use of manufactured housing and because the
design and construction of such homes historically required specific
HUD approvals creating a more burdensome and costly oversight process.
These areas may include locations within Opportunity Zones. HUD is
aware of a nationwide trend that recognizes increased focus on
efficient land use in many areas. HUD's Construction and Safety
Standards allow for the industry to provide safe, decent, sanitary, and
affordable housing, as the need develops.
HUD also noted that the aspects of installation would still be
subject to state and local authority, as is the same for all other
manufactured home installations, provided manufacturer installation
instructions and state and local requirements at a minimum comply with
HUD's Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards. However, HUD's
Construction and Safety Standards as promulgated through this Final
Rule would preempt state and local requirements for the same aspects of
construction, the same as for all other manufactured homes.
Sec. 3280.1002 Definitions
Two commenters suggested changes to HUD's proposed regulatory text.
Another commenter stated that HUD should reject the proposed changes to
Sec. 3280.1002. Manufactured homes are designed to be transportable
during the intended life of the home and allowing multi-family
manufactured homes to be constructed and installed affects
homeownership and the adjacent home.
Another commenter opposed the proposed rule due to its unwarranted
intrusion into the modular housing construction sector. Subpart K would
allow ``(t)wo or more adjacent manufactured homes that are structurally
independent from foundation to roof and with open space on at least two
sides. . .'' (definition of Attached manufactured home at Sec.
3280.1002). In addition to federal preemption and safety risks
associated with manufactured housing, the commenter asserted that HUD
has not considered additional factors that make modular homebuilding
preferable to manufactured housing, including: Durability, resiliency,
long-term value and resale market, access to conventional financing
without the limits FHA places on manufactured home loans, and fewer
zoning restrictions.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those comments to the maximum extent deemed
necessary to effect the appropriate changes. HUD has changed the
definition for ``fire separation wall'' by removing the language that
the walls be structurally independent as that requirement is already
included in the definition of ``attached manufactured home.'' Further,
HUD reviewed the comments suggesting intrusion into the modular housing
sector and disagreed with the comments. These standards apply to
manufactured housing and contain many of the same or similar
requirements as other similar structures or similar design features and
considerations.
Sec. 3280.1003 Attached Manufactured Home Unit Separation
Two commenters provided a significant number of suggested changes
to HUD's proposed regulatory text. The commenters suggested several
editorial and substantive changes to the unit separation requirements
and have suggested exceptions to the requirements under certain
conditions. Some commentors have also suggested substantive changes to
requirements for fire separation wall penetrations.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed comments that include specific text
changes and has integrated those comments to the maximum extent deemed
necessary to effect the appropriate changes that remain in line with
the MHCC's recommendations. The changes made by HUD within this
standard remove reference to ``two attached manufactured homes'' and
more generically requires unit separation between any attached
manufactured homes. HUD has also modified the requirement that 1 hour
fire-resistive rating be based on testing in accordance with ASTM E
119-05, without including language stating ``with exposure from both
sides on each attached manufactured home unit.'' HUD has not integrated
substantive changes to include new exceptions and HUD has not accepted
substantive changes to fire separation penetrations. HUD will consider
exceptions through the Alternative Construction process, should a
manufacturer be unable to meet the requirements of the standards and be
able to demonstrate an equivalent level of safety. Further changes,
such as those proposed by some commenters, should be proposed for
review by the MHCC so that consensus review of those proposed changes
is made as envisioned by the Act. It is not appropriate for HUD to
integrate these changes at the final rule stage.
Sec. 3280.1004 Exterior Walls
Two commenters proposed that in paragraph (b), ``or separation
wall'' should be added after ``fire separation wall'' and before ``on
each manufactured home.''
HUD Response: HUD reviewed comments that include specific text
changes and has decided not to incorporate the change to ensure all
exterior walls contain insulation.
[[Page 2511]]
Comments: Changes to the Manufactured Home Procedural and
Enforcement Regulations (24 CFR Part 3282).
A commenter stated that high winds caused by tornadoes and
hurricanes have caused significant damage to manufactured housing
units, as compared to site-built houses, as evidenced by the Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) in multiple post-disaster assessment
reports. The commenter explained that structural add-ons to
manufactured homes present a clear safety risk to life and property,
and the broad authority given to manufactured housing manufacturers
regarding attachments, including car ports, garages, awnings, decks and
porches, at the newly proposed 24 CFR part 3282, as well as through the
proposed subpart K, should be reconsidered and reevaluated. HUD should
reevaluate the proposed revisions in consultation with FEMA and the
U.S. Global Change Research Program.
Another commenter recommended that HUD keep in mind that, on
January 14, 2020, several important amendments to Subpart M were
advanced by the MHCC's Regulatory Enforcement Subcommittee. While the
commenter did not suggest that HUD delay updates to Subpart M, HUD
should be aware that substantial changes will likely be approved by the
MHCC at its next meeting. The commenter also looked forward to the
prompt implementation of the MHCC's recommended revisions to Subpart M,
which the commenter believed will streamline the administrative
process.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed these general comments. HUD is
regulating design of the manufactured home, not the design and
construction of site-built attachments. These aspects remain under the
purview of the local authorities having jurisdiction.
Changes to the Model Manufactured Home Installation Standards (24 CFR
Part 3285)
General Comments
A commenter stated the proposed rule would have a significant
impact on the role of manufactured home installers, including potential
liability for installation work related to accessory buildings and
other on-site installation, such as certain appliances the proposal
states can be shipped ``loose'' to the homesite. To ensure that the end
buyer or resident of the home has a home that has been safely
manufactured, transported, and installed, it is vital that all
installation documentation is shipped with and remains with the home.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the comment and addressed similar
comments in this final rule. Concerns regarding verification of current
installation documentation requirements should be put forth for MHCC
review and consideration, as it is not appropriate for HUD to integrate
changes on these requirements at the final rule stage.
Sec. 3285.5 Definitions
One commenter suggested that the ``attached accessory building or
structure'' definition in Sec. 3285.5 be updated to ensure it matches
how the term is defined elsewhere in the Standards. Specifically, the
word ``the'' should be inserted between ``which'' and ``attachment,''
to promote consistency in the Standards for the new term ``attached
accessory building or structure.''
HUD Response: HUD reviewed comments that included specific text
changes and integrated those comments to the maximum extent deemed
necessary to effect the appropriate changes.
Continued Updates to the Standards and MHCC Recommendations Not
Addressed in the Proposed Rule
General Comments
Several commenters supported regular updates to the Standards and
HUD's backing of manufactured housing. Commenters also recommended that
HUD develop and implement a streamlined process for Standards updates
going forward, so revisions are introduced on a more consistent
timeline.
Many commenters supported recommendations and technical changes
made by the national association representing the industry at the
federal level, the Manufactured Housing Institute (MHI), that further
enhance the proposed rule. The commenters believed MHI's
recommendations should be incorporated into HUD's final updates and
represent critical progress in clearing out the backlog of items that
have been approved by the MHCC. These changes were recommended by the
MHCC but have not yet been incorporated into the Standards, and the
commenters encouraged HUD to quickly finalize the proposed rule with
MHI's recommended changes.
A commenter believed updates are delayed because the Office of
Manufactured Housing Programs is a ``low priority'' within HUD's
organizational hierarchy. HUD has repeatedly said it is committed to
both housing innovation and streamlining the administrative and
regulatory processes that hurt manufactured housing, and this
rulemaking galvanizes HUD's commitment to the manufactured housing
industry. Because HUD is the standard-setting body for the nation's
manufactured home construction and safety standards, updates must
follow a distinct administrative path and must be prioritized
separately from unrelated policy matters. Such an approach was
recommended by the Government Accountability Office in 2014 and in 2019
by HUD's own Office of Policy Development and Research.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ U.S. Gov't Accountability Office, GAO-14-410, Manufactured
Housing: Efforts Needed to Enhance Program Effectiveness and Ensure
Funding Stability (July 2, 2014). See also HUD's ``Report to
Congress on the On-Site Completion of Construction for Manufactured
Homes'' (June 18, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
These commenters also urged HUD to move forward with the subsequent
sets of Standards updates that have been passed by the MHCC but are
still pending HUD action. Such sets of updates include several critical
industry recommendations such as roll-in showers and tankless water
heaters within the Standards. The commenters also urged HUD to move
forward with subsequent proposals to update the Federal Construction
and Safety Standards that have been considered and recommended by the
Consensus Committee--yet have not been acted upon by the Department.
One commenter stated it is unacceptable that HUD continues to neglect
its obligations to ensure timely updates to the Standards. HUD's delays
have real-world consequences for families moving into manufactured
homes and for the environment and public health. It is critical that
HUD address each of the revisions already recommended by the MHCC and
act on future MHCC recommendations within the timeframe allowed by
Congress, ``not later than 12 months after the date on which a standard
is submitted to the Secretary by the MHCC.''
Comments: The Department of Energy and Energy Efficiency.
One commenter stated that one of the proposed rule's notable
failures is HUD's decision ``not to include in this proposed rule
certain MHCC recommendations due to pending regulations for improving
energy efficiency in manufactured homes being prepared by the U.S.
Department of Energy'' (DOE). DOE in November 2019 agreed to a
settlement to take final action on energy efficiency no later than
February 2022. This offers HUD a reasonable opportunity to implement
[[Page 2512]]
the MHCC's recommendations in the current rulemaking and HUD's delay
further risks the health and financial well-being of new manufactured
home residents.
Another commenter continued that HUD states that ``[g]iven this DOE
rulemaking,'' it ``has decided to postpone action'' on certain MHCC
recommendations affecting Sec. Sec. 3280.502 and 3280.506(b). The
proposed rule cites no legal authority for this postponement, nor is
HUD's proposed action one of the three outcomes permitted by the
statutory text: \11\ The adoption, modification, or rejection of the
proposed revisions recommended by the MHCC. Moreover, the proposed rule
does not fulfill HUD's obligation to publish for public comment the
proposed revised standards recommended by the MHCC. Because HUD has
failed to identify the specific changes to the Standards that it is
postponing, HUD denies the public an opportunity to meaningfully
comment on this aspect of the proposed rule. Even if DOE's standards
for energy efficiency would ultimately supersede the MHCC's approved
recommendations, HUD has ample time to implement the MHCC's recommended
energy efficiency improvements before compliance with any conflicting
DOE standards would be required.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 42 U.S.C. 5403(a)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Another commenter recognized the valuable role energy efficiency
requirements play in reducing the energy burden of households
(particularly low-and moderate-income households) and supporting
affordability across the life cycle of homeownership and rental. DOE's
delay does not absolve HUD of its obligation to provide manufactured
homeowners with energy efficient homes. The commenter recommended HUD
incorporate provisions of the International Energy Conservation Code
appropriate for manufactured homes into the federal standards. HUD
should also work diligently with DOE to assure the implementation of
the requirements in 42 U.S.C. 17071.
HUD Response: HUD reviewed the comments and intends to move forward
with more recent MHCC recommendations. HUD will continue to collaborate
and cooperate with other federal agencies, including DOE, as needed and
necessary.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
The reference standards proposed for incorporation are approved by
the Director of the Federal Register for incorporation by reference in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. Copies of these
standards may be obtained from the organization that developed the
standard. As described in Sec. 3280.4, these standards are also
available for inspection at HUD's Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs and the National Archives and Records Administration.
This final rule incorporates by reference the following six
consensus standards for Manufactured Housing:
1. ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2-2010, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings. This standard defines the
roles of and minimum requirements for mechanical and natural
ventilation systems and the building envelope intended to provide
acceptable indoor air quality in low-rise residential buildings. It is
ASHRAE's Indoor Air Quality standard for residential buildings. It
applies to spaces intended for human occupancy within single-family
houses and multi-family structures of three stories or fewer above
grade, including manufactured and modular houses. This standard is
available online for review via read-only, electronic access at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards/.
2. ANSI/UL 2034-2016. Standard for Single and Multiple Station
Carbon Monoxide Alarms. These requirements cover electrically operated
single and multiple station carbon monoxide (CO) alarms intended for
protection in ordinary indoor locations of dwelling units, including
recreational vehicles, mobile homes, and recreational boats with
enclosed accommodation spaces and cockpit areas. The carbon monoxide
alarms covered by these requirements are intended to respond to the
presence of carbon monoxide from sources such as, but not limited to,
exhaust from internal-combustion engines, abnormal operation of fuel-
fired appliances, and fireplaces. Carbon monoxide alarms are intended
to alarm at carbon monoxide levels below those that cause a loss of
ability to react to the dangers of carbon monoxide exposure. Carbon
monoxide alarms covered by this standard are not intended to alarm when
exposed to long-term, low-level carbon monoxide exposures or slightly
higher short-term transient carbon monoxide exposures, possibly caused
by air pollution or properly installed and maintained fuel-fired
appliances and fireplaces. This standard is available online for review
via read-only, electronic access at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standard.
3. ASTM E 119-05. Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building
Construction and Materials. This standard is used to measure and
describe the response of materials, products, or assemblies to heat and
flame under controlled conditions, but does not by itself incorporate
all factors required for fire hazard or fire risk assessment of the
materials, products, or assemblies under actual fire conditions. This
standard is available online for review via read-only, electronic
access at https://www.ASTM.org/READINGLIBRARY.
4. NFPA 70-2005. National Electrical Code, Article 550.17. The
provisions of this article cover the electrical conductors and
equipment installed within or on mobile and manufactured homes, the
conductors that connect mobile and manufactured homes to a supply of
electricity, and the installation of electrical wiring, luminaires
(fixtures), equipment, and appurtenances related to electrical
installations within a mobile home park up to the mobile home service-
entrance conductors or, if none, the mobile home service equipment.
More specifically, Article 550.17 provides that the wiring of each
mobile home be subjected to a 1-minute, 900-volt, dielectric strength
test (with all switches closed) between live parts (including neutral)
and the mobile home ground. Alternatively, the standard allows a test
to be performed at 1080 volts for 1 second. This test shall be
performed after branch circuits are complete and after luminaires
(fixtures) or appliances are installed. This standard is available
online for review via read-only, electronic access at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards.
5. NFPA 720. Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Detection and Warning Equipment. This document does not attempt to
cover all equipment, methods, and requirements that might be necessary
or advantageous for the protection of lives from carbon monoxide
exposure. The effects of exposure to carbon monoxide vary significantly
among different people. Infants, pregnant women, and people with
physical conditions that limit their bodies' ability to use oxygen can
be affected by low concentrations of carbon monoxide. These conditions
include, but are not limited to, emphysema, asthma, and heart disease,
all of which are usually indicated by a shortness of breath upon mild
exercise. People in need of warning about low levels of carbon monoxide
should explore the use of specially calibrated units or other
alternatives. This standard is primarily concerned with life safety,
not with protection of property. It covers the selection, design,
application, installation, location, performance, inspection, testing,
and maintenance of
[[Page 2513]]
carbon monoxide detection and warning equipment in buildings and
structures. This standard is available online for review via read-only,
electronic access at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standards.
6. UL 217. Single and Multiple Station Smoke Alarms. This document
provides requirements that cover electrically operated single and
multiple station smoke alarms intended for open area protection in
indoor locations. This standard is available online for review via
read-only, electronic access at https://ibr.ansi.org/Standard.
The sections of the Construction and Safety Standards that would be
amended by each reference modification and the impact of each reference
is shown in the chart below.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standard Edition Title Section Comment
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ANSI/UL 2034............................... Third.............. Single and Multiple Station Sec. Only required for homes that
Carbon Monoxide Alarms. 3280.211(a) incorporate a gas burning appliance
and then preempts state and local
requirements already established in 38
states.
ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2........................... 2010............... Ventilation and Acceptable Sec. Provides an option to ventilation
Indoor Air Quality in Low- 3280.103(d) requirements established at Sec.
Rise Residential Buildings. 3280.103(b) and (c).
NFPA No.70 Article 550.17.................. 2005............... National Electrical Code..... Sec. Provides for a referenced standard to
3280.810(b) conduct polarity checks as an option
to visual polarity checks.
NFPA 720................................... 2015............... Standard for the Installation Sec. Only required for homes that
Carbon Monoxide Detection 3280.211(b) incorporate a gas burning appliance or
Equipment. an attached garage and then preempts
state and local requirements already
established in 38 states.
ASTM E 119................................. 2005............... Standard Test Method for Fire Sec. Allows for a manufacturer to design and
Tests of Building 3280.1003(a) construct attached housing that is
Construction and Materials. otherwise only permitted through an AC
review and approval.
UL 217..................................... Fifth.............. Single and Multiple Station Sec. Provides for a referenced standard for
Smoke Alarms. 3280.211(a) manufacturers to use combination
carbon monoxide and smoke alarms. This
standard addresses smoke alarm
operation of the combination alarms.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition to reviewing these standards on-line, copies of the
standards may be obtained from the organization that developed the
standard as follows:
ANSI--American National Standards Institute, 11 West 42nd Street,
New York, NY 10036, 212-642-4900, fax 212-398-0023, www.ansi.org.
ASHRAE--American Society of Heating, Refrigeration, and Air
Conditioning Engineers, 1791 Tullie Circle NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, 404-
636-8400, fax 404-321-5478.
ASTM--ASTM, Int'l, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, West Conshohocken,
Pennsylvania 19428, 610-832-9500, fax 610-832-9555, www.astm.org.
NFPA_National Fire Protection Association, Batterymarch Park,
Quincy, Massachusetts 02269, 617-770-3000, fax 617-770-0700,
www.nfpa.org.
UL_Underwriters Laboratories, 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook,
Illinois 60062, 847-272-8800, fax 847-509-6257, www.ul.com.
This final rule also references ASTM D781-1968 (Reapproved 1973),
which has already been approved for incorporation by reference. No
changes are being proposed to this IBR.
V. Findings and Certifications
Regulatory Review--Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
Under Executive Order 12866 (Regulatory Planning and Review), a
determination must be made whether a regulatory action is significant
and, therefore, subject to review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in accordance with the requirements of the order.
Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulations and Regulatory Review)
directs executive agencies to analyze regulations that are ``outmoded,
ineffective, insufficient, or excessively burdensome, and to modify,
streamline, expand, or repeal them in accordance with what has been
learned.'' Executive Order 13563 also directs that, where relevant,
feasible, and consistent with regulatory objectives, and to the extent
permitted by law, agencies are to identify and consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public.
This rule was determined to be a ``significant regulatory action''
as defined in section 3(f) of the Executive order (although not an
economically significant regulatory action, as provided under section
3(f)(1) of the Executive order).
Executive Order 13771
Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs,'' was issued on January 30, 2017. This
rule is expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action.
Details on the estimated cost savings of this final rule can be found
below in the Summary of Benefits and Costs, and in the rule's
Regulatory Impact Analysis.
Summary of Benefits and Costs of Rule
As discussed, this final rule would amend the Federal Manufactured
Home Construction and Safety Standards by adopting recommendations made
to HUD by the MHCC. In this regard, this final rule revises various
standards that reflect current construction practices used by the
manufacturing housing industry and the home construction industry in
general. For example, when a manufacturer chooses to install a carbon
monoxide alarm, the manufacturer will use an alarm that has been listed
in accordance with requirements of ANSI/UL 2034 and the manufacturer
will install the alarm in accordance with the product's installation
instructions that meet the requirements of NFPA 720. Similarly,
standards proposed that are applicable to interior door widths as well
as those provisions for multi-story and attached manufactured homes are
based on current construction practices that have largely been
established due to pre-existing requirements of state and local
jurisdictions for other housing products (i.e., site-built or modular).
Other standards recommended by the MHCC and proposed by HUD, such as
those that would define requirements for stairways, landings,
handrails, guards
[[Page 2514]]
and stairway illumination, would free manufacturers from having to
follow various state and local requirements that vary from jurisdiction
to jurisdiction and bring uniformity to manufactured home construction
nation-wide. The rule would also incorporate five new reference
standards that are already standards used in the design, listing, and
evaluation of the respective materials or components.
In addition, HUD has concluded that this rule provides
manufacturers more flexibility in the ability to pursue design options
and, more importantly, cost savings as the result of eliminating the
need to obtain HUD approval through the Alternative Construction (AC)
process (see Sec. 3282.14). More specifically, manufacturers need to
engage the AC process to design and construct manufactured homes that
incorporate innovations that have not yet been codified in HUD's
Construction and Safety Standards. For example, addressing the design
and construction of multi-story homes, attached homes, or homes that
are designed to accommodate an attached garage or carport that is not
factory constructed but added to the home during the home installation
process, may create regulatory confusion between state, local, and
Federal authorities and may sometimes require HUD approval through the
AC process prior to the manufacturer being able to incorporate these
design features. After review of an AC request, HUD establishes
specific terms and conditions for use of the design through an AC
letter. While the AC process serves a useful purpose, including
encouraging the use of new technology in the construction of
manufactured homes, HUD believes that codification of certain design
features that already were reviewed can provide cost savings for
manufacturers and consumers, and reduce regulatory confusion when
directly addressed within the code. In fact, HUD's final rule is based
primarily on the MHCC's recommendations and integrates some aspects of
specific AC letters that have been issued in the past. Specifically,
regulatory costs that are currently borne by the manufactured home
manufacturer associated with preparing an AC request and maintaining
the AC approvals include:
1. Manufacturers' engineers' preparation of designs, calculations,
or tests for aspects that do not conform with outdated building
standards for past innovations that have become more commonplace but
have not yet been incorporated into the Construction and Safety
Standards;
2. DAPIA review and approval of the designs, calculations, and or
tests to be submitted on behalf of the manufacturers requesting HUD's
approval;
3. Preparation of a submission package for the AC request,
including all designs, calculations, and tests to be sent to HUD for
approval;
4. Lost opportunity costs and actual manufacturer and DAPIA staff
time to respond to HUD throughout the review and approval process,
which, depending on the specific AC request, may take as few as 30 days
or as long as 6 months;
5. Time and travel associated with third-party inspections at each
affected home's site for manufactured homes built under an AC that
requires a site inspection be conducted in order to verify conformance
with specific terms and conditions of the AC approval; and
6. Maintaining and providing copies of AC-specific production
reports, inspection reports, and other administrative burdens required
to maintain the AC approval.
This rule would also require that carbon monoxide detectors be
installed in homes with fuel burning appliances or designed by the home
manufacturer for an attached garage. These provisions are intended to
be consistent with other single-family dwelling construction
requirements and are intended to provide early warning alerts to
occupants of the presence of carbon monoxide within the living space of
the manufactured home. Specifically, this rule would require that
carbon monoxide alarms be installed in accordance with the Standard for
the Installation of Carbon Monoxide Detection Equipment, NFPA 720-2015,
and be listed and conform to the requirements of Single and Multiple
Station Carbon Monoxide Alarms, ANSI/UL 2034-2016 edition.
In sum, the one-time annual costs of this proposed rule range from
$2.19 million to $4.122 million. Total valued benefits range from
$8.515 million to $12.517 million. Unvalued benefits include reduced
home damage and injuries from piping water heater relief valves to
outside of the home and from the avoided delay during the AC review.
The total estimated annual costs and benefits are described in the
chart below.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3 percent 7 percent
---------------------------------------------------------------
Estimate: low Estimate: high Estimate: low Estimate: high
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Annual Costs (See Figure 3):
Carbon Monoxide Detector Requirement........ $258,000 $1,032,000 $258,000 $1,032,000
Water heater relief valves.................. 1,352,400 1,932,000 1,352,400 1,932,000
Wet-vented drains........................... 483,000 772,800 483,000 772,800
Separate Bathroom Light Switches............ 96,600 425,040 96,600 425,040
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 2,190,000 4,161,840 2,190,000 4,161,840
Present Value of Benefits
Carbon Monoxide Detector Requirement (See Figure
4):
Value of Injuries Prevented................. 166,818 166,818 142,688 142,688
Value of Deaths Prevented................... 8,908,186 8,908,186 7,619,651 7,619,651
Wet-vented drains (See Figure 7)................ 483,000 772,800 483,000 772,800
Separate Bathroom Light Switches (See Figure 5). 326,796 2,614,366 214,929 1,719,434
Deregulatory (See Figure 6):
Whole-House Ventilation..................... 3,540 3,540 3,540 3,540
2-Story Homes............................... 12,640 12,640 12,640 12,640
Attached Garages............................ 38,836 38,836 38,836 38,836
---------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................... 9,939,816 12,517,187 8,515,285 10,309,589
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 2515]]
A fuller discussion of the costs and benefits of this rule is
available in the rule's Regulatory Impact Analysis, which is part of
this docket.
Finally, any changes made to the rule subsequent to its submission
to OMB are identified in the docket file, which is available for public
inspection in the Regulations Division, Room 10276, Office of General
Counsel, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 7th
Street SW, Washington, DC 20410-0500.
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this proposed
rule have been approved by the OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520) and assigned OMB control number 2502-0253.
HUD expects to make changes to the existing recordkeeping items
consistent with changes in this final rule and believes that the
changes will result in a decrease of burden. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a collection of information
unless the collection displays a valid control number.
The burden of information collection addressed in this final rule
is estimated as follows for those aspects that would continue to
require AC requests and does not include burdens for past AC requests
related to carport-ready homes, garage-ready homes, homes that exceed
2,571 square feet (whole house ventilation), and two-story homes:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Number of Frequency of Responses per Burden hours Annual burden Hourly cost
Information collection respondents response annum per response hours per response Annual cost
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manufacturers Records:
Sec. 3282.14 Alternative 135 0.75 101 2.5 253 $33.57 $8,493.21
Construction Submissions...........
IPIA Records:
Sec. 3282.14 Alternative 12 14 168 2.0 336 33.57 11,279.52
Construction Submission Concurrence
Records and Reporting..............
DAPIA Records:
Sec. 3282.203/361/364 Design 6 28 168 1.0 168 33.57 5,639.76
Review Records and Reporting.......
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total........................... 153 .............. 569 .............. 757 .............. 25,412.49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C.
1531-1538) establishes requirements for Federal agencies to assess the
effects of their regulatory actions on state, local, and tribal
governments, and the private sector. This rule will not impose any
Federal mandates on any state, local, or tribal government or the
private sector within the meaning of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
Environmental Review
A Finding of No Significant Impact with respect to the environment
has been made in accordance with HUD regulations at 24 CFR part 50,
which implement section 102(2)(C) of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4332(2)(C)). The Finding of No Significant
Impact is available for public inspection between the hours of 8 a.m.
and 5 p.m. weekdays in the Regulations Division, Office of General
Counsel, Room 10276, Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451
Seventh Street SW, Washington, DC 20410-0500. The Finding of No
Significant Impact will also be available for review in the docket for
this rule on Regulations.gov.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
generally requires an agency to conduct a regulatory flexibility
analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements, unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
It is HUD's position that this proposed rule would not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would regulate establishments primarily engaged in
making manufactured homes (NAICS 32991). The U.S. Small Business
Administration's size standards define an establishment primarily
engaged in making manufactured homes as small if it does not exceed
1,250 employees. Of the 222 firms included under this NAICS definition,
approximately 35 produce manufactured homes subject to HUD's
Manufactured Housing Construction and Safety Standards. Other entities
covered by this NAICS code build non-HUD Code prefabricated buildings.
Of the 35 manufacturers subject to HUD's Manufactured Housing
Construction and Safety Standards, 31 are considered to be small
businesses based on the threshold of 1,250 employees or less. The final
rule applies to all the manufacturers and thus would affect a
substantial number of small entities.
Small entities have the ability and capability to offer the same
type of housing products with the same or similar options, features,
and appliances as larger manufacturers. However, smaller manufacturers
have more difficulty spreading regulatory costs over the higher
production of homes like that of a large, higher producing
manufacturer. Small manufacturers would need to bear the costs,
reducing profit margins accordingly or passing-through the costs over
lower production amounts. This may disproportionally increase the cost
of housing products for small manufacturers considering the same or
similar options, features, and appliances. This rule, however, would
provide small manufacturers greater flexibility to pursue design
options and, more importantly, obtain cost savings resulting from the
elimination of the need to obtain HUD approval through the AC process
(see Sec. 3282.14). More specifically, small manufacturers are more
likely to engage engineering consultants and other non-staff
[[Page 2516]]
resources in order to provide data and information needed for the AC
process. Consequently, small manufacturers would benefit most from this
rule's provisions that eliminate the AC process for design and
construction of manufactured homes that incorporate innovations that
have not yet been codified in HUD's Construction and Safety Standards.
Additionally, the elimination of these current regulatory costs may
provide small manufacturers the opportunity to pursue design and
construction innovations that absent the rule would have been too
costly to pursue.
For the reasons stated, a substantial number of small manufacturers
with fewer than 1,250 employees will be affected by this rule.
Nevertheless, HUD anticipates that the rule will not have a significant
economic impact on them. Accordingly, the undersigned certifies that
this rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
Executive Order 13132, Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits, to the
extent practicable and permitted by law, an agency from promulgating a
regulation that has federalism implications and either imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on state and local governments and
is not required by statute, or preempts state law, unless the relevant
requirements of section 6 of the Executive order are met. This rule
does not have federalism implications and does not impose substantial
direct compliance costs on state and local governments or preempt state
law within the meaning of the Executive order.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number for Manufactured
Housing Construction and Safety Standards is 14.171.
List of Subjects
24 CFR Part 3280
Fire prevention, Housing standards, Incorporation by reference.
24 CFR Part 3282
Administrative practice and procedure, Consumer protection,
Intergovernmental relations, Investigations, Manufactured homes,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Warranties.
24 CFR Part 3285
Housing standards, Manufactured homes.
Accordingly, for the reasons described in the preamble, HUD amends
24 CFR parts 3280, 3282, and 3285 to read as follows:
PART 3280--MANUFACTURED HOME CONSTRUCTION AND SAFETY STANDARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 3280 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2697, 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, and 5424.
0
2. In Sec. 3280.2, add in alphabetical order a definition for
``Attached accessory building or structure'' to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Attached accessory building or structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, garage or porch for
which the attachment of such is designed by the home manufacturer to be
structurally supported by the manufactured home.
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 3280.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.3 Manufactured home procedural and enforcement regulations,
and consumer manual requirements.
(a) A manufacturer must comply with the requirements of this part,
part 3282 of this chapter, and 42 U.S.C. 5416.
(b) Consumer manuals must be in accordance with Sec. 3282.207 of
this chapter.
0
4. Amend Sec. 3280.4 as follows:
0
a. Revise paragraph (a);
0
b. Add paragraph (m)(2);
0
c. In the introductory text to paragraph (p), remove the words
``American Society for Testing and Materials'' and add, in their place,
``ASTM, International'';
0
d. Redesignate paragraphs (p)(27) through (34) as paragraphs (p)(28)
through (35), respectively, and add new paragraph (p)(27);
0
e. Redesignate paragraphs (aa)(4)(xvi) through (xix) as paragraphs
(aa)(4)(xvii) through (xx), respectively, and add new paragraph
(aa)(4)(xvi); and
0
f. Add paragraph (aa)(9);
0
g. In paragraph (hh)(9), remove ``Sec. 3280.208(a)'' and add, in its
place, ``Sec. Sec. 3280.208(a) and 3280.211(a)''; and
0
h. Add paragraph (hh)(23).
The revision and additions read as follows:
Sec. 3280.4 Incorporation by reference.
(a) The specifications, standards, and codes of the following
organizations are incorporated by reference in 24 CFR part 3280 (this
Standard) pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 as though set
forth in full. The incorporation by reference of these standards has
been approved by the Director of the Federal Register. If a later
edition is to be enforced, the Department will publish a notification
of change in the Federal Register. These incorporated standards are
available for purchase from the organization that developed the
standard at the corresponding addresses noted below. Incorporated
standards are available for inspection at the Office of Manufactured
Housing Program, Manufactured Housing and Construction Standards
Division, U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, 451 Seventh
Street SW, Room B-133, Washington, DC 20410, email [email protected]. Copies
of incorporated standards that are not available from their producer
organizations may be obtained from the Office of Manufactured Housing
Programs. These standards are also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, email [email protected]
or go to www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(2) ANSI/ASHRAE 62.2-2010, Ventilation and Acceptable Indoor Air
Quality in Low-Rise Residential Buildings, copyright 2010 IBR approved
for Sec. 3280.103(d).
* * * * *
(p) * * *
(27) ASTM E 119-05, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of
Building Construction and Materials, approved September 15, 2005, IBR
approved for Sec. 3280.1003(a).
* * * * *
(aa) * * *
(4) * * *
(xvi) Article 550.17, IBR approved for Sec. 3280.810(b).
* * * * *
(9) NFPA 720, Standard for Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Detection and Warning Equipment, 2015 Edition, Copyright 2014, IBR
approved for Sec. 3280.211(b).
* * * * *
(hh) * * *
(23) ANSI/UL 2034-2016, Standard for Single and Multiple Station
Carbon Monoxide Alarms, Third Edition, dated February 28, 2008
(including revisions through May 11, 2016), IBR approved for Sec.
3280.211(a).
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 3280.5, redesignate paragraphs (d) through (i) as
paragraphs (e) through
[[Page 2517]]
(j), respectively, and add new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.5 Data plate.
* * * * *
(d) The applicable statement:
This manufactured home IS designed to accommodate the additional
loads imposed by the attachment of an attached accessory building or
structure in accordance with the manufacturer installation
instructions. The additional loads are in accordance with the design
load(s) identified on this Data Plate; or
This manufactured home IS NOT designed to accommodate the
additional loads imposed by the attachment of an attached accessory
building or structure in accordance with the manufacturer installation
instructions.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 3280.11, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.11 Certification label.
* * * * *
(d) The label must be located at the taillight end of each
transportable section of the manufactured home approximately 1 foot up
from the floor and 1 foot in from the road side, or as near that
location on a permanent part of the exterior of the manufactured home
section as practicable. The road side is the right side of the
manufactured home when one views the manufactured home from the tow bar
end of the manufactured home. If locating the label on the taillight
end of a transportable section will prevent the label from being
visible after the manufactured home section is installed at the
installation site, the label must be installed on a permanent part of
the exterior of the manufactured home section, in a visible location as
specified in the approved design.
0
7. In Sec. 3280.103, revise paragraph (b) introductory text and add
paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.103 Light and ventilation.
* * * * *
(b) Whole-house ventilation. Each manufactured home must be
provided with whole-house ventilation having a minimum capacity of
0.035 ft\3\/min/ft\2\ of interior floor space or its hourly average
equivalent. This ventilation capacity must be in addition to any
openable window area. In no case shall the installed ventilation
capacity of the system be less than 50 cfm. The following criteria must
be adhered to:
* * * * *
(d) Optional ventilation provisions. As an option to complying with
the provisions of paragraphs (b) and (c) of this section, ventilation
systems complying with ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.2 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 3280.4) may be used.
0
8. In Sec. 3280.108, add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.108 Interior passage.
* * * * *
(c) All interior swinging doors must have a minimum clear opening
of 27 inches except doors to toilet compartments in single-section
homes (see Sec. 3280.111(b)), and doors to closets and pantries.
0
9. Revise Sec. 3280.111 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.111 Toilet compartments.
(a) Each toilet compartment must be a minimum of 30 inches wide,
except, when the toilet is located adjacent to the short dimension of
the tub, the distance from the tub, to the center line of the toilet
must not be less than 12 inches. At least 21 inches of clear space must
be provided in front of each toilet.
(b) All bathroom passage doors in single-section homes must have a
minimum clear opening width of 23 inches, and bathroom passage doors in
multi-section homes must have a minimum clear opening width of 27
inches.
0
10. In Sec. 3280.113, redesignate paragraphs (b), (c), and (d) as
paragraphs (c), (d), and (e), respectively, and add paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
Sec. 3280.113 Glass and glazed openings.
* * * * *
(b) Required glazed openings shall be permitted to face into a
roofed porch where the porch abuts a street, yard, or court and the
longer side of the porch is at least 65 percent open and unobstructed
and the ceiling height is not less than 7 feet.
* * * * *
0
11. Add Sec. 3280.114 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.114 Stairways.
(a) Stairways--(1) General. These minimum standards apply to
stairways that are designed and constructed as part of the factory-
completed transportable section(s) of a manufactured home, such as
interior stairways for multi-level or multi-story homes or external
stairways for multi-level construction features that are designed and
constructed in the factory on a transportable section and integral to
the access and egress needs within the transportable section(s) of a
home. These standards do not apply to exterior stairways that are built
at the home site or stairways to basement areas that are not designed
and built as part of a transportable section of a manufactured home.
(2) Width. Stairways must not be less than 36 inches in clear width
at all points above permitted handrail height and below the required
headroom height. Handrails must not project more than 4\1/2\ inches on
either side of the stairway and the minimum clear width of the stairway
at and below the handrail height, including treads and landings, must
not be less than 31\1/2\ inches where a handrail is installed on one
side and 27 inches where handrails are provided on both sides.
(3) Stair treads and risers--(i) Riser height and tread depth. The
maximum riser height must not exceed 8\1/4\ inches and the minimum
tread depth must not be less than 9 inches. The riser height must be
measured vertically between leading edges of the adjacent treads. The
tread depth must be measured horizontally between the vertical planes
of the foremost projection of adjacent treads and at a right angle to
the tread's leading edge. The walking surface of treads and landings of
a stairway must be sloped no steeper than one unit vertical in 48 units
horizontal (a 2-percent slope). The greatest riser height within any
flight of stairs must not exceed the smallest by more than \3/8\ inch.
The greatest tread depth within any flight of stairs must not exceed
the smallest by more than \3/8\ inch.
(ii) Profile. The radius of curvature at the leading edge of the
tread must not be greater than \9/16\ inch. A nosing not less than \3/
4\ inch but not more than 1\1/4\ inches shall be provided on stairways
with solid risers. The greatest nosing projection must not exceed the
smallest nosing projection by more than \3/4\ inch between two stories,
including the nosing at the level of floors and landings. Beveling of
nosing must not exceed \1/2\ inch. Risers must be vertical or sloped
from the underside of the leading edge of the tread above at an angle
not more than 30 degrees from the vertical. Open risers are permitted,
provided that the opening between treads does not permit the passage of
a 4-inch diameter sphere. A nosing is not required where the tread
depth is a minimum of 11 inches. The opening between adjacent treads is
not limited on stairs with a total rise of 30 inches or less.
(4) Headroom. The minimum headroom in all parts of the stairway
must not be less than 6 feet 8 inches, measured vertically from the
sloped plane adjoining the tread nosing or from the floor surface of
the landing or platform.
[[Page 2518]]
(5) Winders (winding stairways). Winders are permitted, provided
that the width of the tread at a point not more than 12 inches from the
side where the treads are narrower is not less than 10 inches and the
minimum width of any tread is not less than 6 inches. Within any flight
of stairs, the greatest winder tread depth at the 12-inch walk line
must not exceed the smallest by more than \3/8\ inch. The continuous
handrail required by paragraph (c)(3) of this section must be located
on the side where the tread is narrower.
(6) Spiral stairways. Spiral stairways are permitted provided the
minimum width is a minimum 26 inches with each tread having 7\1/2\ inch
minimum tread width at 12 inches from the narrow edge. All treads must
be identical, and the rise must be no more than 9\1/2\ inches. Minimum
headroom of 6 feet, 6 inches must be provided.
(7) Circular stairways. Circular stairways must have a tread depth
at a point not more than 12 inches from the side where the treads are
narrower of not less than 11 inches and the minimum depth of any tread
must not be less than 6 inches. Tread depth at any walking line,
measured a consistent distance from a side of the stairway, must be
uniform as specified in paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
(b) Landings. Every landing must have a minimum dimension of 36
inches measured in the direction of travel. Landings must be located as
follows:
(1) There must be a floor or landing at the top and bottom of each
stairway, except at the top of an interior flight of basement stairs,
provided a door does not swing over the stairs.
(2) A landing or floor must be located on each side of an interior
doorway and exterior doorway, to the extent the external stairway is
designed by the home manufacturer and constructed in the factory, and
the width of each landing must not be less than the door it serves. The
maximum threshold height above the floor or landing must be 1\1/2\-
inches.
(c) Handrails--(1) General. A minimum of one handrail meeting the
requirements of this section must be installed on all stairways
consisting of four or more risers. Handrails must be securely attached
to structural framing members. A minimum space of 1\1/2\ inches must be
provided between the adjoining wall surface and the handrail.
(2) Handrail height. Handrails must be installed between 34 inches
and 38 inches measured vertically from the leading edge of the stairway
treads except that handrails installed up to 42 inches high must be
permitted if serving as the upper rails of guards required by paragraph
(d) of this section.
(3) Continuity. Required handrails must be continuous from a point
directly above the leading edge of the lowest stair tread to a point
directly above the leading edge of the landing or floor surface at the
top of the stairway. If the handrail is extended at the top of the
stairway flight, the extension must parallel the floor or landing
surface and must be at the same height as the handrail above the
leading edges of the treads. If the handrail is extended at the base of
the stair, it must continue to slope parallel to the stair flight for a
distance of one tread depth, measured horizontally, before being
terminated or returned or extended horizontally. The ends of handrails
must return into a wall or terminate in a safety terminal or newel
post.
(4) Graspability. Required handrails must, if circular in cross
section, have a minimum 1\1/4\-inch and a maximum 2-inch diameter
dimension. Handrails with a noncircular cross section must have a
perimeter dimension of at least 4 inches and not more than 6\1/4\
inches (with a maximum cross-section dimension of not more than 2\1/4\
inches). The handgrip portion of the handrail must have a smooth
surface. Edges must have a minimum \1/8\-inch radius. Handrails must be
continuously graspable along their entire length except that brackets
or balusters are not considered obstructions to graspability if they do
not project horizontally beyond the sides of the handrail within 1\1/2\
inches of the bottom of the handrail.
(5) Required resistance of handrails. Handrails must be designed to
resist a load of 20 lb./ft applied in any direction at the top and to
transfer this load through the supports to the structure. All handrails
must be able to resist a single concentrated load of 200 lbs., applied
in any direction at any point along the top, and have attachment
devices and supporting structures to transfer this loading to
appropriate structural elements of the building. This load is not
required to be assumed to act concurrently with the loads specified in
this section.
(d) Guards. (1) Porches, balconies, or raised floor surfaces
located more than 30 inches above the floor or grade below must have
guards not less than 36 inches in height. Open sides of stairs with a
total rise of more than 30 inches above the floor or grade below must
have guards not less than 34 inches in height measured vertically from
the nosing of the treads. Balconies and porches on the second floor or
higher must have guards a minimum of 42 inches in height.
(2) Required guards on open sides of stairways, raised floor areas,
balconies, and porches must have intermediate rails or ornamental
closures that do not allow passage of a sphere 4 inches in diameter.
(i) The triangular openings formed by the riser, tread and bottom
rail of a guard at the open side of the stairway must be of such a size
that a sphere of 6 inches cannot pass through.
(ii) Guard systems must be designed to resist a load of 20 lb./ft
applied in any direction at the top and to transfer this load through
the supports to the structure. All guard systems must be able to resist
a single concentrated load of 200 lb., applied in any direction at any
point along the top and have attachment devices and supporting
structures to transfer this loading to appropriate structural elements
of the building. This load is not required to be assumed to act
concurrently with the loads specified in this section.
(e) Stairway illumination. All interior and exterior stairways must
be provided with a means to illuminate the stairways, including the
landings and treads.
(1) Interior stairways must be provided with an artificial light
source located in the immediate vicinity of each landing of the
stairway. For interior stairs, the artificial light sources must be
capable of illuminating treads and landings to levels not less than one
(1) foot-candle measured at the center of treads and landings. The
control and activation of the required interior stairway lighting must
be accessible at the top and bottom of each stairway without traversing
any steps.
(2) Exterior stairways designed by the home manufacturer and
constructed in the factory must be provided with an artificial light
source located in the immediate vicinity of the top landing of the
stairway. An artificial light source is not required at the top and
bottom landing, provided an artificial light source is located directly
over each stairway section. The illumination of exterior stairways must
be controlled from inside the home.
0
12. Amend Sec. 3280.209 by
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b) through (f) as paragraphs (c) through
(g); and
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (b).
The addition and revision read as follows:
Sec. 3280.209 Smoke Alarm Requirements.
(a) Labeling. Each smoke alarm required under paragraph (b) of this
section must conform with the requirements of UL 217 (incorporated
[[Page 2519]]
by reference, see Sec. 3280.4), or ANSI/UL 268 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 3280.4), and must bear a label to evidence
conformance. Combination smoke and carbon monoxide alarms shall be
listed and must bear a label to evidence conformance with UL 217 and
ANSI/UL 2034.
(b) Combination alarms. Combination smoke and carbon monoxide
alarms shall be permitted to be used in lieu of smoke alarms. If
installed, such alarms must meet location requirements for both smoke
alarms and carbon monoxide alarms.
* * * * *
0
13. Add Sec. 3280.211 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.211 Carbon monoxide alarm requirements.
(a) Labeling. Carbon monoxide alarms shall be listed and must bear
a label to evidence conformance with ANSI/UL 2034 (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 3280.4). Combination carbon monoxide and smoke
alarms shall be listed and must bear a label to evidence conformance
with ANSI/UL 2034 and UL 217 (incorporated by reference, see Sec.
3280.4).
(b) Required carbon monoxide alarm locations. Carbon monoxide
alarms must be installed in each home containing either a fuel burning
appliance or designed by the home manufacturer to include an attached
garage. Carbon monoxide alarms must be installed outside of each
separate sleeping area in the immediate vicinity of the bedrooms and in
accordance with the alarm manufacturer's installation instructions.
Where a fuel[hyphen]burning appliance is located within a bedroom or
its attached bathroom, a carbon monoxide alarm must be installed within
the bedroom and in accordance with the manufacturer's installation
instructions. Carbon monoxide alarms must be installed in conformance
with NFPA 720 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 3280.4).
(c) Interconnectivity. Where more than one carbon monoxide alarm is
required to be installed, the alarm devices shall be interconnected in
such a manner that the actuation of one alarm will activate all the
alarms installed.
(d) Connection to power source. Each carbon monoxide alarm must be
powered from the electrical system of the home as the primary power
source and a battery as a secondary power source.
(e) Combination alarms. Combination carbon monoxide and smoke
alarms shall be permitted to be used in lieu of carbon monoxide alarms.
When combination carbon monoxide and smoke alarms are used, they shall
be installed to also comply with Sec. 3280.209.
(f) Basement applications. For each home designed to be placed over
a basement, the manufacturer must provide a carbon monoxide alarm for
the basement and must install the electrical junction box for the
installation of this carbon monoxide alarm for its interconnection with
other alarms required by this section.
(g) Testing. Each required carbon monoxide alarm installed at the
factory must be operationally tested, after conducting the dielectric
test specified in Sec. 3280.810(a), in accordance with the alarm
manufacturer's instructions. A carbon monoxide alarm that does not
function as designed during the test and is not satisfactorily repaired
so that it functions properly in the next retest must be replaced. Any
replacement carbon monoxide alarm must be successfully tested in
accordance with this section.
0
14. Add Sec. 3280.212 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.212 Factory constructed or site-built attached garages.
(a) When a manufactured home is designed for factory construction
with an attached garage or is designed for construction of an attached
site-built garage that is not self[hyphen]supported, the manufacturer
must design the manufactured home to accommodate all appropriate live
and dead loads from the attached garage structure that will be
transferred through the manufactured home structure to the home's
support and anchoring systems.
(b) The design must specify the following home and garage
characteristics including maximum width, maximum sidewall height,
maximum roof slope, live and dead loads, and other design limitations
or restrictions using loads provided by this Code.
(c) When a manufactured home is factory constructed with an
attached garage or is constructed for the attachment of a site-built
garage, provisions must be made to provide fire separation between the
garage and the manufactured home.
(1) The garage must be separated from the manufactured home and its
attic by not less than \1/2\-inch gypsum board or equivalent applied to
the garage side of the manufactured home, separation shall be from the
underside of the floor to the underside of the roof deck and may be
provided on-site as part of an On Site Completion of Construction
approval. Garages beneath habitable rooms must be separated from all
habitable rooms by \5/8\-inch, Type X gypsum board or equivalent. Where
the separation is a floor ceiling assembly, the structure supporting
the separation must also be protected by not less than \1/2\-inch
gypsum board or equivalent. The design approval and the manufacturer's
installation instructions must also include provision for equivalent
vertical or horizontal separation between the garage and the
manufactured home as appropriate.
(2) [Reserved]
(d) Openings from a garage directly into a room designated for
sleeping purposes are not permitted.
(e) Other openings between the garage and the manufactured home
must:
(1) Be equipped with solid wood doors not less than 1\3/8\ inch in
thickness, or solid or honeycomb steel doors not less than 1\3/8\ inch
in thickness, or 20-minute fire-rated doors, and all doors shall be of
the self-closing type; and
(2) Be in addition to the two exterior doors required by Sec.
3280.105.
(f) Ducts penetrating the walls or ceilings separating the
manufactured home from the garage must be constructed of a minimum No.
26 gauge steel or other approved material and must have no openings
into the garage.
(g) Installation instructions shall be provided by the home
manufacturer that, in addition to addressing the fire separation as
required in this section, shall identify acceptable attachment
locations, indicate design limitations for the attachment of the garage
including acceptable live and dead loads for which the home has been
designed to accommodate, and provide support and anchorage designs as
necessary to transfer all imposed loads to the ground in accordance
with Sec. Sec. 3285.301 and 3285.401 of this chapter.
(h) A site[hyphen]built, self[hyphen]supported garage is considered
an add[hyphen]on, per 3282.8(j)(1), that does not affect the ability of
the manufactured home to comply with the Construction and Safety
Standards. The design and construction of the garage is subject to
state and or local authorities having jurisdiction.
0
15. Add Sec. 3280.213 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.213 Factory constructed or site-built attached carports.
(a) When a manufactured home is designed for factory construction
with an attached carport or is designed for construction of an attached
site-built carport, the manufacturer must design the manufactured home
to accommodate all appropriate live and dead loads from the attached
carport structure that will be transferred through the manufactured
home
[[Page 2520]]
structure to the home's support and anchoring systems.
(b) The design, including the home's installation instructions,
must specify the following home and carport characteristics including
maximum width, maximum sidewall height, live and dead loads, and other
design limitations or restrictions.
(1) Alternatively, the manufacturer may provide, by design and home
installation instructions, the maximum live and dead loads, and the
applied loading locations, that the home is designed to resist from the
carport, and other design limitations or restrictions.
(2) [Reserved].
(c) Homes may be designed with a factory-installed host beam (i.e.,
ledger board) or specific roof truss rail for the attachment of the
carport to the exterior wall of the home. The host beam (i.e., ledger
board) must be designed to transmit the appropriate live and dead loads
at the interface between the carport and the manufactured home. In
cases where the carport is designed to be supported by the roof truss
overhang, the roof trusses must be designed to support the additional
live and dead loads from the carport.
(1) Any portion of the host beam (i.e., ledger board) and all
fasteners exposed to the weather shall be protected in accordance with
Sec. 3280.307.
(2) [Reserved].
(d) To ensure that the attachment of the carport does not interfere
with roof or attic ventilation, the manufacturer must provide specific
instructions to ensure continued compliance with the manufactured home
roof or attic ventilation requirements in accordance with Sec.
3280.504(d).
(e) Installation instructions shall be provided by the home
manufacturer that identify acceptable attachment locations, indicate
design limitations for the attachment of the carport including
acceptable live and dead loads for which the home has been designed to
accommodate, and provide support and anchorage designs as necessary to
transfer all imposed loads to the ground in accordance with Sec. Sec.
3285.301 and 3285.401 of this chapter.
(1) The manufacturer must ensure that any anchoring system designs
incorporating anchorage to resist combined shear wall and carport
uplift loads are evaluated for adequacy to resist the combined loads,
taking into consideration the limitations of the ground anchor test and
certification.
(2) [Reserved].
(f) A site[hyphen]built, self[hyphen]supported carport is
considered an add[hyphen]on, as provided by Sec. 3282.8(j)(1), that
does not affect the ability of the manufactured home to comply with the
standards. The design and construction of the carport is subject to
state and or local authorities having jurisdiction.
0
16. In Sec. 3280.305, revise paragraphs (a), (e)(1), (g)(6), and
(h)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.305 Structural design requirements.
(a) General. Each manufactured home must be designed and
constructed as a completely integrated structure capable of sustaining
the design load requirements of this part and must be capable of
transmitting these loads to stabilizing devices without exceeding the
allowable stresses or deflections. Roof framing must be securely
fastened to wall framing, walls to floor structure, and floor structure
to chassis to secure and maintain continuity between the floor and
chassis, so as to resist wind overturning, uplift, and sliding as
imposed by design loads in this part. In multistory construction, each
story must be securely fastened to the story above and/or below to
provide continuity and resist design loads in this part. Uncompressed
finished flooring greater than \1/8\ inch in thickness must not extend
beneath load-bearing walls that are fastened to the floor structure.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Roof framing must be securely fastened to wall framing, walls
to floor structure, and floor structure to chassis, to secure and
maintain continuity between the floor and chassis in order to resist
wind overturning, uplift, and sliding, and to provide continuous load
paths for these forces to the foundation or anchorage system. The
number and type of fasteners used must be capable of transferring all
forces between elements being joined. In multistory construction, each
story must be securely fastened to the story above and/or below to
provide continuity and resist design loads in this section.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(6) Bottom board material (with or without patches) must meet or
exceed the level of 48 inch-pounds of puncture resistance as tested by
the Beach Puncture Test in accordance with Standard Test Methods for
Puncture and Stiffness of Paperboard, and Corrugated and Solid
Fiberboard, ASTM D781-1968 (Reapproved 1973) (incorporated by
reference, see Sec. 3280.4). The material must be suitable for patches
and the patch life must be equivalent to the material life. Patch
installation instruction must be included in the manufactured home
manufacturer's instructions. The bottom board material must be tight
fitted against all penetrations.
(h) * * *
(5) Portions of roof assemblies, including, but not limited to,
dormers, gables, crickets, hinged roof sections, sheathing, roof
coverings, underlayments, flashings, and eaves and overhangs are
permitted to be assembled and installed on site in accordance with 24
CFR part 3282, subpart M, provided that the requirements in paragraphs
(h)(5)(i) through (v) of this section are met.
(i) Approved installation instructions must be provided that
include requirements for the following items:
(A) Materials, installation, and structural connections complying
with this section;
(B) Installation and fastening of sheathing and roof coverings;
(C) Installation of appliance vent systems in accordance with Sec.
3280.710;
(D) Installation of plumbing vents as required by Sec. 3280.611;
and
(E) Installation of attic ventilation in accordance with Sec.
3280.504(c).
(ii) The installation instructions specified in paragraph (h)(5)(i)
of this section must include drawings, details, and instructions as
necessary to assure that the on-site work complies with the approved
design.
(iii) The installation instructions specified in paragraph
(h)(5)(i) of this section must provide for inspection of the work at
the installation site. As necessary to ensure conformance, inspection
panels may be required, or inspections may need to occur in stages that
assure inspections are performed before any work is concealed. Such
inspection procedures shall be addressed in the approved installation
instructions.
(iv) Temporary weather protection must be provided per Sec.
3280.307(e).
* * * * *
0
17. Amend Sec. 3280.307 by adding paragraph (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.307 Resistance to elements and use.
* * * * *
(e) Multi-section and attached manufactured homes (see subpart K of
this part) are not required to comply with the factory installation of
weather-resistant exterior finishes for those areas left open for field
connection of the sections provided the following conditions are
satisfied:
(1) Temporary weather protection for exposed, unprotected
construction is provided in accordance with methods to be included in
the approved design.
[[Page 2521]]
(2) Methods for on-site completion and finishing of these elements
are included in the approved design.
(3) Complete installation instructions and the required materials
for finishing these elements are provided.
0
18. In Sec. 3280.504, add paragraph (a)(3) and revise paragraph (b)
introductory text to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.504 Condensation control and installation of vapor
retarders.
(a) * * *
(3) In multi-story manufactured homes, the ceiling vapor retarder
is permitted to be omitted when the story directly above is part of the
same manufactured home.
(b) Exterior walls. Exterior walls must be provided with a system
or method to manage moisture and vapor accumulation with one of the
elements in paragraphs (b)(1) through (4) of this section. For purposes
of the requirement in this paragraph (b), the fire separation wall
between each attached manufactured home must be considered to be an
exterior wall. See subpart K of this part
* * * * *
0
19. Amend Sec. 3280.506 as follows:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) as paragraphs (b), (c), and
(d), respectively;
0
b. Designate the introductory text as paragraph (a);
0
c. In newly designated paragraph (a):
0
i. Remove ``of this subpart;''
0
ii. Remove ``figure 506'' and add ``figure 1 to this paragraph (a)'' in
its place; and
0
iii. Add a heading for the figure.
0
d. In newly redesignated paragraph (b):
0
i. Remove the heading;
0
ii. Add a comma between ``ventilation'' and ``and;''
0
iii. Remove ``below'' and add ``in the table to this paragraph (b)'' in
its place; and
0
iv. Add a heading for the table; and
0
e. Revise newly redesignated paragraph (c).
The revisions and additions to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.506 Heat loss/heat gain.
(a) * * *
Figure 1 to Paragraph (a)
(b) * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)
* * * * *
(c) To assure uniform heat transmission in manufactured homes,
cavities in exterior walls, floors, and ceilings must be provided with
thermal insulation. For insulation purposes, the fire separation wall
between each single family attached manufactured home shall be
considered an exterior wall (see subpart K of this part).
* * * * *
0
20. In Sec. 3280.602, add alphabetically the definition for ``Indirect
waste receptor'' to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.602 Definitions.
* * * * *
Indirect waste receptor means a receptor that receives a discharge
waste pipe that is not directly connected to a receptor but maintains a
suitable air gap between the end of the pipe and the top of the drain.
* * * * *
0
21. In Sec. 3280.608, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.608 Hangers and supports.
* * * * *
(b) Piping supports. Piping must be secured at sufficiently close
intervals to keep the pipe in alignment and carry the weight of the
pipe and contents. Unless otherwise stated in the standards
incorporated by reference for specific materials at Sec. 3280.604(a),
or unless specified by the pipe manufacturer, horizontal plastic
drainage piping must be supported at intervals not to exceed 4 feet and
horizontal plastic water piping must be supported at intervals not to
exceed 3 feet. Vertical drainage and water piping must be supported at
each story height.
* * * * *
0
22. In Sec. 3280.609, revise paragraph (c)(1)(iii) and add paragraph
(c)(1)(iv) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.609 Water distribution systems.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Relief valves must be provided with full-sized drains, with
cross sectional areas equivalent to that of the relief valve outlet.
The outlet of a pressure relief valve, temperature relief valve, or
combination thereof, must not be directly connected to the drainage
system. The discharge from the relief valve must be piped full size
separately to the exterior of the manufactured home, not underneath the
home, or to an indirect waste receptor located inside the manufactured
home. Exterior relief drains shall be directed down and shall terminate
between 6'' and 24'' above finished grade. Drain lines must be of a
material listed for hot water distribution and must drain fully by
gravity, must not be trapped, and must not have their outlets threaded,
and the end of the drain must be visible for inspection.
(iv) Relief valve piping designed to be located underneath the
manufactured home is not required to be installed at the factory
provided the manufacturer designs the system for site assembly and also
provides all materials and components including piping, fittings,
cement, supports, and instructions for proper site installation.
* * * * *
0
23. In Sec. 3280.610, add headings to paragraphs (c)(1) and (4) and
revise paragraph (c)(5) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.610 Drainage systems.
* * * * *
(c) * * * (1) General. * * *
* * * * *
(4) Size Requirement. * * *
(5) Preassembly of drain lines. Section(s) of the drain system,
designed to be located underneath the manufactured home or between
stories of the manufactured home, are not required to be factory
installed when the manufacturer designs the system for site assembly
and also provides all materials and components, including piping,
fittings, cement, supports, and instructions necessary for proper site
installation.
* * * * *
0
24. Amend Sec. 3280.611 as follows:
0
a. Remove the comma at the end of paragraph (c)(1)(i) and add a
semicolon in its place; and
0
b. Revise paragraph (c)(1)(ii).
The revisions to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.611 Vents and venting.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(ii) A 1\1/2\-inch diameter (min.) continuous vent or equivalent,
indirectly connected to the toilet drain piping within the distance
allowed in paragraph (c)(5) of this section for 3 inch trap arms
through a 2-inch wet vented drain that carries the waste of not more
than one fixture. Sections of the wet vented drain that are 3 inches in
diameter are permitted to carry the waste of an unlimited number of
fixtures; or
* * * * *
0
25. In Sec. 3280.612, amend paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.612 Tests and inspection.
(a) Water system. All water piping in the water distribution system
must be subjected to a pressure test. The test must be made by
subjecting the system to air or water at 80 psi + or - 5 psi for 15
minutes without loss of pressure.
[[Page 2522]]
The water used for the test must be obtained from a potable water
source.
* * * * *
0
26. Amend Sec. 3280.705 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(1);
0
b. In paragraph (j), removing ``shall'' and add in its place ``must''
wherever it appears;
0
c. Revising paragraphs (k), (l)(7), and (l)(8)(i); and
0
d. Adding paragraph (l)(8)(iii).
The revisions and addition to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.705 Gas piping systems.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) All points of crossover beneath the transportable sections must
be readily accessible from the exterior of the home. In multi-story
manufactured homes, the interconnections between stories must be
accessible through a panel on the exterior or interior of the
manufactured home.
* * * * *
(k) Identification of gas supply connections. Each manufactured
home must have permanently affixed to the exterior skin at or near each
gas supply connection or the end of the pipe, a tag of 3 inches by 1\3/
4\ inches minimum size, made of etched, metal-stamped or embossed
brass, stainless steel, anodized or alcalde aluminum not less than
0.020 inch thick, or other approved material [e.g., 0.005 inch plastic
laminates], with the information shown in Figure 1 to this paragraph
(k). The connector capacity indicated on this tag must be equal to or
greater than the total Btu/hr rating of all intended gas appliances.
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TR12JA21.000
(l) * * *
(7) Hangers and supports. All horizontal gas piping must be
adequately supported by galvanized or equivalently protected metal
straps or hangers at intervals of not more than 4 feet, except where
adequate support and protection is provided by structural members.
Vertical gas piping in multi-story dwelling units must be supported at
intervals of not more than 6 feet. Solid iron-pipe connection(s) must
be rigidly anchored to a structural member within 6 inches of the
supply connection(s).
(8) * * * (i) Before appliances are connected, piping systems must
stand a pressure of three 0.2 psi gauge for a period of
not less than ten minutes without showing any drop in pressure.
Pressure must be measured with a mercury manometer or slope gauge
calibrated so as to be read in increments of not greater than one-tenth
pound, or an equivalent device. The source of normal operating pressure
must be isolated before the pressure tests are made. Before a test is
begun, the temperature of the ambient air and of the piping must be
approximately the same, and constant air temperature must be maintained
throughout the test.
* * * * *
(iii) Where gas piping between transportable sections must be made
on site, the installation instructions must contain provisions for
onsite testing for leakage consistent with the provisions in paragraph
(l)(8)(i) of this section.
0
27. In Sec. 3280.708, revise paragraph (a)(1) introductory text to
read as follows:
Sec. 3280.708 Exhaust duct system and provisions for the future
installation of a clothes dryer.
(a) * * * (1) All gas and electric clothes dryers must be exhausted
to the outside by a moisture/lint exhaust duct and termination fitting.
When the manufacturer supplies the clothes dryer, the exhaust duct and
termination fittings must be completely installed by the manufacturer.
If the exhaust duct system is subject to damage during transportation,
or a field connection between transportable sections is required,
complete factory installation
[[Page 2523]]
of the exhaust duct system is not required when the following apply:
* * * * *
0
28. In Sec. 3280.709, revise paragraph (a) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.709 Installation of appliances.
(a) The installation of each appliance must conform to the terms of
its listing and the manufacturer's instructions. The manufactured home
manufacturer must leave the appliance manufacturer's instructions
attached to the appliance. Every appliance must be secured in place to
avoid displacement. For the purpose of servicing and replacement, each
appliance must be both accessible and removable.
(1) A direct vent space heating appliance is permitted to be
shipped loose for on-site installation in a basement provided the
following:
(i) The heating appliance is listed for the installation.
(ii) Approved installation instructions are provided that include
requirements for completion of all gas and electrical connections and
provide for the manufacturer's inspection and/or testing of all
connections.
(iii) Approved instructions are provided to assure connection of
the vent and combustion air systems in accordance with Sec.
3280.710(b), and to provide for the manufacturer's inspection of the
systems for compliance.
(iv) Approved installation and the manufacturer's inspection
procedures are provided for the connection of the site-installed
heating appliance to the factory-installed circulation air system and
return air systems.
(2) The procedures must include revisions to assure compliance of
the installed systems with Sec. 3280.715.
* * * * *
0
29. In Sec. 3280.710, revise paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.710 Venting, ventilation, and combustion air.
* * * * *
(d) Venting systems of fuel-burning appliances must terminate at
least three feet above any motor-driven air intake discharging into
habitable rooms when located within ten feet of the air intake.
* * * * *
0
30. Amend Sec. 3280.802 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (a)(4) through (41) as paragraphs (a)(5)
through (42);
0
b. Adding a new paragraph (a)(4); and
0
c. Adding and reserving paragraph (b).
The additions read as follows:
Sec. 3280.802 Definitions.
* * * * *
(a) * * *
(4) Attached accessory building or structure means any awning,
cabana, deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, garage, or
porch for which the attachment of such is designed by the home
manufacturer to be structurally supported by the manufactured home.
* * * * *
(b) [Reserved]
0
31. In Sec. 3280.807, add paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.807 Fixtures and appliances.
* * * * *
(g) In bathrooms, ceiling-mounted lighting fixtures and wall-
mounted lighting fixtures must not be controlled by the same switch.
0
32. In Sec. 3280.810, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.810 Electrical testing.
* * * * *
(b) Additional testing. Each manufactured home must be subjected to
the following tests:
(1) An electrical continuity test to assure that metallic parts are
effectively bonded;
(2) An operational test of all devices and utilization equipment,
except water heaters, electric ranges, electric furnaces, dishwashers,
clothes washers/dryers, and portable appliances, to demonstrate they
are connected and in working order; and
(3) Electrical polarity checks to determine that connections have
been made in accordance with applicable provisions of these standards
and Article 550.17 of NFPA 70-2005 (incorporated by reference, see
Sec. 3280.4). Visual verification is an acceptable electrical polarity
check.
Sec. 3280.902 [Amended]
0
33. In Sec. 3280.902(b), remove ``an A frame'' and add in its place
``a rigid substructure.''
0
34. Revise Sec. 3280.903 to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.903 General requirements for designing the structure to
withstand transportation shock and vibration.
(a) General. The manufactured home and its transportation system
(as defined in Sec. 3280.902(f)) must withstand the effects of highway
movement such that the home is capable of being transported safely and
installed as a habitable structure. Structural, plumbing, mechanical,
and electrical systems must be designed to function after set-up. The
home must remain weather protected during the transportation sequence
to prevent internal damage.
(b) Testing or analysis requirements. Suitability of the
transportation system and home structure to withstand the effects of
transportation must be permitted to be determined by testing, or
engineering analysis, or a combination of the two as required by
paragraphs (b)(1) and (2) of this section.
(1) Road tests. Tests must be witnessed by an independent
registered professional engineer or architect, manufacturer's IPIA or
DAPIA, or by a recognized testing organization. Such testing procedures
must be part of the manufacturer's approved design.
(2) Engineering analysis. Engineering analysis methods based on the
principles of mechanics and/or structural engineering may be used to
substantiate the adequacy of the transportation system to withstand in-
transit loading conditions. As transportation loadings are typically
critical in the longitudinal direction, analysis should, in particular,
provide emphasis on design of longitudinal structural components of the
manufactured home (e.g., main chassis girder beams, sidewalls, and rim
joists, etc.). Notwithstanding, all structural elements necessary to
the structural integrity of the manufactured home during in-transit
loading are also to be evaluated (e.g., transverse chassis members and
floor framing members, etc.).
(i)(A) The summation of the design loads in paragraphs
(b)(2)(i)(A)(1) through (3) of this section may be used to determine
the adequacy of the chassis in conjunction with the manufactured home
structure to resist in-transit loading:
(1) Dead load, the vertical load due to the weight of all
structural and non-structural components of the manufactured home at
the time of shipment.
(2) Floor load, a minimum of 3 pounds per square foot.
(3) Dynamic loading factor, (0.25)[(b2iA) + (b2iB)].
(B) However, the in-transit design loading need not exceed twice
the dead load of the manufactured home.
(ii) To determine the adequacy of individual longitudinal
structural components to resist the in-transit design loading, a load
distribution based on the relative flexural rigidity and shear
stiffness of each component may be utilized. For the purpose of loading
distribution, the sidewall may be considered to be acting as a ``deep
beam'' in conjunction with other load carrying elements in determining
the
[[Page 2524]]
relative stiffness of the integrated structure. Further, by proper pre-
cambering of the chassis assembly, additional loading may be
distributed to the chassis, and the remaining loading may be
distributed to each of the load carrying members by the relative
stiffness principle.
(iii) The analysis is also to include consideration for:
(A) Location of openings in the sidewall during transport and, when
appropriate,
provisions for reinforcement of the structure and/or chassis at the
opening.
(B) Sidewall component member sizing and joint-splice analysis
(i.e., top and bottom plates, etc.), and connections between load
carrying elements.
0
35. In Sec. 3280.904, revise paragraphs (a), (b)(1) through (6) and
(8) through (10) to read as follows:
Sec. 3280.904 Specific requirements for designing the transportations
system.
(a) General. The transportation system must be designed and
constructed as an integrated unit which is safe and suitable for its
specified use. In operation, the transportation system must effectively
respond to the control of the towing vehicle tracking and braking,
while traveling at applicable highway speeds and in normal highway
traffic conditions.
(b) Specific requirements--(1) Drawbar. The drawbar must be
constructed of sufficient strength, rigidity, and durability to safely
withstand those dynamic forces experienced during highway
transportation. It must be securely fastened to the manufactured home
substructure.
(2) Coupling mechanism. The coupling mechanism (which is usually of
the socket type) must be securely fastened to the drawbar in such a
manner as to assure safe and effective transfer of the maximum loads,
including dynamic loads, between the manufactured home structure and
the hitch-assembly of the towing vehicle. The coupling must be equipped
with a manually operated mechanism so adapted as to prevent
disengagement of the unit while in operation. The coupling must be so
designed that it can be disconnected regardless of the angle of the
manufactured home to the towing vehicle.
(3) Chassis. The chassis, in conjunction with the manufactured home
structure, must be constructed to effectively sustain the design loads.
The integrated structure must be capable of ensuring the integrity of
the complete manufactured home and ensuring against excessive
deformation of structural or finish members.
(4) Running gear assembly--(i) Design criteria. The design load
used to size running gear components must be the gross static dead
weight minus the static tongue weight supported by the drawbar. Running
gear must be designed to accept shock and vibration, both from the
highway and the towing vehicle and effectively dampen these forces so
as to protect the manufactured home structure from damage and fatigue.
Its components must be designed to facilitate routine maintenance,
inspection, and replacement.
(ii) Location. Location of the running gear assembly must be
determined by documented engineering analysis, taking into account the
gross weight (including all contents), total length of the manufactured
home, the necessary coupling hitch weight, span distance, and turning
radius. Weights shall be checked with the home in a level position
ready for transport. The coupling weight must be not less than 12
percent nor more than 25 percent of the gross weight.
(5) Spring assemblies. Spring assemblies (springs, hangers,
shackles, bushings, and mounting bolts) must be capable of supporting
the running gear design loads, without exceeding maximum allowable
stresses for design spring assembly life as recommended by the spring
assembly manufacturer. The capacity of the spring system must ensure
that under maximum operating load conditions, sufficient clearance is
maintained between the tire and manufactured home's frame or structure
to permit unimpeded wheel movement and for changing tires.
(6) Axles. Axles, and their connecting hardware, must be capable of
supporting the static running gear design loads, without exceeding
maximum allowable design axle loads as recommended by the axle
manufacturer. The number and load capacity necessary to provide a safe
tow must not be less than those required to support the design load.
(i) Recycled axles. Before reuse, all axles, including all
component parts, must be reconditioned as required pursuant to a
program accepted by a nationally recognized testing agency. The
recycling program must be approved, and the axles must be labeled by a
nationally recognized testing agency. Recycled axles and their
components must utilize compatible components and be of the same size
and rating as the original equipment.
(ii) [Reserved].
* * * * *
(8) Tires, wheels, and rims. Tires, wheels, and rims must be
selected, sized, and fitted to axles so that static dead load supported
by the running gear does not exceed the load capacity of the tires.
Tires must not be loaded beyond the load rating marked on the sidewall
of the tire or, in the absence of such a marking, the load rating
specified in any of the publications of any of the organizations listed
in Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 119 in 49 CFR
571.119, S5.1(b). Wheels and rims must be sized in accordance with the
tire manufacturer's recommendations as suitable for use with the tires
selected.
(i) Inflation pressure. The load and cold inflation pressure
imposed on the rim or wheel must not exceed the rim and wheel
manufacturer's instructions even if the tire has been approved for a
higher load or inflation. Tire cold inflation pressure limitations and
the inflation pressure measurement correction for heat must be as
specified in 49 CFR 393.75(h).
(ii) Used tires. Whenever the tread depth is at least \1/16\ inch
as determined by a tread wear indicator, used tires are permitted to be
sized in accordance with 49 CFR 571.119. The determination as to
whether a used tire is acceptable must also include a visual inspection
for thermal and structural defects (e.g., dry rotting, excessive tire
sidewall splitting, etc.). Used tires with such structural defects must
not be installed on manufactured homes.
(9) Brake assemblies--(i) Braking axles. The number, type, size,
and design of brake assemblies required to assist the towing vehicle in
providing effective control and stopping of the manufactured home must
be determined and documented by engineering analysis. Those
alternatives listed in Sec. 3280.903(c) may be accepted in place of
such an analysis. Unless substantiated in the design to the
satisfaction of the approval agency by either engineering analysis in
accordance with Sec. 3280.903(a)(1) or tests in accordance with
paragraph (b)(9)(ii) of this section, there must be a minimum of two
axles equipped with brake assemblies on each manufactured home
transportable section.
(ii) Stopping distance. Brakes on the towing vehicle and the
manufactured home (a drive-away/tow-away) must be capable of ensuring
that the maximum stopping distance from an initial speed of 20 miles
per hour does not exceed 35 feet in accordance with 49 CFR 393.52(d)
for 2 or fewer vehicles in drive away or tow away operation.
(iii) Electrical brake wiring. Brake wiring must be provided for
each brake.
[[Page 2525]]
The brake wire must not be less than the value specified in the brake
manufacturer's instructions. Aluminum wire, when used, must be provided
with suitable termination that is protected against corrosion.
(10) Lamps and associated wiring. Stop lamps, turn signal/lamps,
and associated wiring must meet the appropriate sections of FMVSS No.
108 in 49 CFR 571.108, which specify the performance and location of
these lamps and their wiring. The manufacturer may meet these
requirements by utilizing a temporary light/wiring harness, which has
components that meet the FMVSS No. 108. The temporary harness is
permitted to be provided by the manufactured home transportation
carrier.
0
36. Add subpart K to read as follows:
Subpart K--Attached Manufactured Homes and Special Construction
Considerations
Sec.
3280.1001 Scope.
3280.1002 Definitions.
3280.1003 Attached manufactured home unit separation.
3280.1004 Exterior walls.
3280.1005 Electrical service.
3280.1006 Water service.
Sec. 3280.1001 Scope.
This subpart covers the requirements for attached manufactured
homes and other related construction associated with manufactured homes
not addressed elsewhere within this part.
Sec. 3280.1002 Definitions.
The following definitions are applicable to this subpart only:
Attached manufactured home. Two or more adjacent manufactured homes
that are structurally independent from foundation to roof and with open
space on at least two sides, but which have the appearance of a
physical connection (i.e., zero lot line).
Fire separation wall. An adjoining wall of a manufactured home that
separates attached manufactured homes with a fire separation distance
of less than three feet.
Sec. 3280.1003 Attached manufactured home unit separation.
(a) Separation requirements. (1) Attached manufactured homes shall
be separated from each other by a fire separation wall of not less than
1-hour fire-resistive rating with exposure from both sides on each
attached manufactured home unit when rated based on tests in accordance
with ASTM E119-05 (incorporated by reference, see Sec. 3280.4).
(2) Fire-resistance-rated floor/ceiling and wall assemblies shall
extend to and be tight against the exterior wall, and wall assemblies
shall extend from the foundation to the underside of the roof
sheathing.
(b) Fire separation penetrations. (1) Fire rated fire separation
walls must not contain through penetrations or openings.
(2) Membrane penetrations for electrical boxes are permitted on the
living side of the wall under the following conditions:
(i) Steel electrical boxes not exceeding 16 square inches may be
installed provided that the total area of such boxes does not exceed
100 square inches in any 100 square feet wall area. Steel electrical
boxes in adjacent fire separation walls must be separated by a
horizontal distance of not less than 24 inches.
(ii) Listed 2-hour fire-resistant nonmetallic electrical boxes are
installed in accordance with the listings.
(iii) No other membrane penetrations are allowed.
(c) Continuity of walls. The fire separation walls for single-
family attached dwelling units must be continuous from the foundation
to the underside of the roof sheathing, deck, or slab and must extend
the full length of the fire separation walls.
(d) Parapets. (1) Parapets constructed in accordance with paragraph
(d)(2) of this section must be provided for attached manufactured homes
as an extension of fire separation walls in accordance with the
following:
(i) Where roof surfaces adjacent to the fire separation walls are
at the same elevation, the parapet must extend not less than 30 inches
above the roof surfaces.
(ii) Where roof surfaces adjacent to the wall or walls are at
different elevations and the higher roof is not more than 30 inches
above the lower roof surface, the parapet must not extend less than 30
inches above the lower roof surface.
(A) Parapets must be provided unless roofs are of a Class C roof
covering and the roof decking or sheathing is of noncombustible
materials or approved fire-retardant-treated wood for a distance of
four feet on each side of the common fire separation walls; or one
layer of \5/8\ inch Type X gypsum board or equivalent is installed
directly beneath the roof decking or sheathing for a distance of four
feet on each side of the fire separation walls.
(B) A parapet must not be required where roof surfaces adjacent to
the common walls are at different elevations and the higher roof is
more than 30 inches above the lower roof. The fire separation wall
construction from the lower roof to the underside of the higher roof
deck must not have less than a 1-hour fire-resistive rating. The wall
must be rated for exposure from both sides.
(2) Parapets must have the same fire resistance rating as that
required for the supporting wall or walls. On any side adjacent to a
roof surface, the parapet must have noncombustible faces for the
uppermost 18 inches, to include counter flashing and coping materials.
Where the roof slopes toward a parapet at slopes greater than \2/12\
(16.7 percent slope), the parapet must extend to the same height as any
portion of the roof within a distance of three feet, but in no case
will the height be less than 30 inches.
Sec. 3280.1004 Exterior walls.
(a) The requirements of Sec. 3280.504 for condensation control and
vapor retarder installation are required to be provided on each fire
separation wall of each attached manufactured home.
(b) The requirements of Sec. 3280.506 for heat loss/gain
insulation apply to the fire separation wall on each attached
manufactured home.
Sec. 3280.1005 Electrical service.
(a) Each attached manufactured home must be supplied by only one
service.
(b) Service conductors supplying one manufactured home must not
pass through the interior of another manufactured home.
Sec. 3280.1006 Water service.
(a) Each manufactured home must have an individual water supply
that will service only that unit.
(b) Each manufactured home must have a hot water supply system that
will service only that unit.
PART 3282--MANUFACTURED HOME PROCEDURAL AND ENFORCEMENT REGULATIONS
0
37. The authority citation for part 3282 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2697, 28 U.S.C. 2461 note, 42 U.S.C.
3535(d), 5403, and 5424.
0
38. In Sec. 3282.7, redesignate paragraphs (d) through (nn) as (e)
through (oo) and add new paragraph (d) to read as follows:
Sec. 3282.7 Definitions.
* * * * *
(d) Attached accessory building or structure means any awning,
cabana, deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, garage, or
porch for which the attachment of such is designed by the home
manufacturer to be
[[Page 2526]]
structurally supported by the manufactured home.
* * * * *
0
39. In Sec. 3282.8, revise paragraph (j) to read as follows:
Sec. 3282.8 Applicability.
* * * * *
(j) Add-on. An add-on including an attached accessory building or
structure added by the retailer or some party other than the
manufacturer (except where the manufacturer acts as a retailer) as part
of a simultaneous transaction involving the sale of a new manufactured
home, is not governed by the standards and is not subject to the
regulations in this part except as identified in this section and part
3280 of this chapter. The addition of any add-on or attached accessory
building or structure must not affect the ability of the manufactured
home to comply with the standards. If the addition of an add-on or
attached accessory building or structure causes the manufactured home
to fail to conform to the standards, then sale, lease, and offer for
sale or lease of the home are prohibited until the manufactured home is
brought into conformance with the standards.
(1) With the exception of attached accessory buildings or
structures, add-ons must be structurally independent and any attachment
between the home and the add-on must be for weatherproofing or cosmetic
purposes only.
(2) If an attached accessory building or structure is not
structurally independent all the following must be met for attachment
to the manufactured home:
(i) Manufactured home must be designed and constructed to
accommodate all imposed loads, including any loads imposed on the home
by the attached accessory building or structure, in accordance with
part 3280 of this chapter.
(ii) Data plate must indicate that home has been designed to
accommodate the additional loads imposed by the attachment of the
attached accessory buildings or structures and must identify the design
loads.
(iii) Installation instructions shall be provided by the home
manufacturer which identifies acceptable attachment locations,
indicates design limitations for the attached accessory building or
structure including acceptable live and dead loads for which the home
has been designed to accommodate and provide support and anchorage
designs as necessary to transfer all imposed loads to the ground in
accordance with part 3285 of this chapter.
* * * * *
0
40. In Sec. 3282.14, revise paragraph (a) introductory text to read as
follows:
Sec. 3282.14 Alternative construction of manufactured homes.
(a) Policy. In order to promote the purposes of the Act, the
Department will permit the sale or lease of one or more manufactured
homes not in compliance with the standards under circumstances wherein
no affirmative action is needed to protect the public interest. An add-
on, including an attached accessory building or structure which does
not affect the performance and ability of the manufactured home to
comply with the standards in accordance with Sec. 3282.8(j), is not
governed by this section. The Department encourages innovation and the
use of new technology in manufactured homes. Accordingly, HUD will
permit manufacturers to utilize new designs or techniques not in
compliance with the standards in cases:
* * * * *
0
41. In Sec. 3282.601, add paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 3282.601 Purpose and applicability.
* * * * *
(c) Exception. An add-on or attached accessory building or
structure which does not affect the performance and ability of the
manufactured home to comply with the standards in accordance with Sec.
3282.8(j) is not governed by this section.
0
42. In Sec. 3282.602, revise paragraph (a)(2) to read as follows:
Sec. 3282.602 Construction qualifying for on-site completion.
(a) * * *
(2) Any work required by the home design that cannot be completed
in the factory, or when the manufacturer authorizes the retailer to
provide an add-on to the home during installation, when that work would
take the home out of conformance with the construction and safety
standards and then bring it back into conformance;
* * * * *
PART 3285--MODEL MANUFACTURED HOME INSTALLATION STANDARDS
0
43. The authority citation for part 3285 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 3535(d), 5403, 5404, and 5424.
0
44. In Sec. 3285.5, add alphabetically the definition for ``Attached
accessory building or structure'' to read as follows:
Sec. 3285.5 Definitions.
* * * * *
Attached accessory building or structure means any awning, cabana,
deck, ramada, storage cabinet, carport, windbreak, garage, or porch for
which the attachment of such is designed by the home manufacturer to be
structurally supported by the manufactured home.
* * * * *
0
45. In Sec. 3285.903, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 3285.903 Permits, alterations, and on-site structures.
* * * * *
(c) Installation of an add-on or attached accessory building or
structure. Each attached accessory building or structure or add-on is
designed to support all of its own live and dead loads, unless the
attached accessory building or structure is otherwise included in the
installation instructions or designed by a registered professional
engineer or registered architect in accordance with this part.
Dana T. Wade,
Assistant Secretary for Housing Federal Housing Commissioner.
[FR Doc. 2020-28227 Filed 1-11-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4210-67-P