Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations, 462-464 [2020-29273]
Download as PDF
462
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
3. This rule does not contain policies
associated with Federalism as that term
is defined under Executive Order 13132.
4. Pursuant to section 1762 of ECRA
(see 50 U.S.C. 4821), this action is
exempt from the Administrative
Procedure Act requirements (under 5
U.S.C. 553) for notice of proposed
rulemaking, opportunity for public
participation, and delay in effective
date. This rule only updates
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774 to the
EAR by extending the date of the period
of validity of 0D521 software in
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774 for one
year. This revision is merely technical
and in accordance with established
0Y521 ECCN series procedure and
purpose, which was proposed to the
public and subject of comment. This
rule clarifies information, which serves
to avoid confusing readers about the
0D521 item’s status. It does not alter any
right, obligation or prohibition that
applies to any person under the EAR.
5. Because a notice of proposed
rulemaking and an opportunity for
public comment are not required to be
given for this rule by 5 U.S.C. 553, or
by any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., are
not applicable. Accordingly, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required, and none has been prepared.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Accordingly, part 774 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730 through 774) is amended as
follows:
1. The authority citation for part 774
continues to read as follows:
■
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Authority: 50 U.S.C. 4801–4852; 50 U.S.C.
4601 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C.
8720; 10 U.S.C. 8730(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22
U.S.C. 3201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6004; 42 U.S.C.
2139a; 15 U.S.C. 1824; 50 U.S.C. 4305; 22
U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783.
[Amended]
2. In Supplement No. 5 to part 774,
amend the table, under the heading
‘‘0D521. Software’’ entry No 1, by
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
Matthew S. Borman,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020–28776 Filed 1–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. FDA–2000–N–0011]
Uniform Compliance Date for Food
Labeling Regulations
Food and Drug Administration,
Department of Helath and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA or we) is
establishing January 1, 2024, as the
uniform compliance date for food
labeling regulations that are published
on or after January 1, 2021, and on or
before December 31, 2022. We
periodically announce uniform
compliance dates for new food labeling
requirements to minimize the economic
impact of labeling changes.
DATES: This rule is effective January 6,
2021. Submit either electronic or
written comments on the final rule by
March 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Submissions
PART 774—THE COMMERCE
CONTROL LIST
Supplement No. 5 to Part 774
revising the date in the third column to
read: ‘‘January 6, 2022’’.
Submit electronic comments in the
following way:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Comments submitted electronically,
including attachments, to https://
www.regulations.gov will be posted to
the docket unchanged. Because your
comment will be made public, you are
solely responsible for ensuring that your
comment does not include any
confidential information that you or a
third party may not wish to be posted,
such as medical information, your or
anyone else’s Social Security number, or
confidential business information, such
as a manufacturing process. Please note
that if you include your name, contact
information, or other information that
identifies you in the body of your
comments, that information will be
posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• If you want to submit a comment
with confidential information that you
do not wish to be made available to the
public, submit the comment as a
written/paper submission and in the
manner detailed (see ‘‘Written/Paper
Submissions’’ and ‘‘Instructions’’).
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as
follows:
• Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for
written/paper submissions): Dockets
Management Staff (HFA–305), Food and
Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers
Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
• For written/paper comments
submitted to the Dockets Management
Staff, FDA will post your comment, as
well as any attachments, except for
information submitted, marked and
identified, as confidential, if submitted
as detailed in ‘‘Instructions.’’
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket No. FDA–
2000–N–0011 for ‘‘Uniform Compliance
Date for Food Labeling Regulations.’’
Received comments, those filed in a
timely manner, will be placed in the
docket and, except for those submitted
as ‘‘Confidential Submissions,’’ publicly
viewable at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff
between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, 240–402–7500.
• Confidential Submissions—To
submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be
made publicly available, submit your
comments only as a written/paper
submission. You should submit two
copies total. One copy will include the
information you claim to be confidential
with a heading or cover note that states
‘‘THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.’’ We
will review this copy, including the
claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second
copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/
blacked out, will be available for public
viewing and posted on https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff.
If you do not wish your name and
contact information to be made publicly
available, you can provide this
information on the cover sheet and not
in the body of your comments, and you
must identify this information as
‘‘confidential.’’ Any information marked
as ‘‘confidential’’ will not be disclosed
except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20
and other applicable disclosure law. For
more information about FDA’s posting
of comments to public dockets, see 80
FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access
the information at: https://
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201509-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or the
electronic and written/paper comments
received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov and insert the
docket number, found in brackets in the
heading of this document, into the
‘‘Search’’ box and follow the prompts
and/or go to the Dockets Management
Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852, 240–402–7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Carrol Bascus, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS–24), Food
and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus
Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240–402–
3835.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We
periodically issue regulations requiring
changes in the labeling of food. If the
compliance dates of these labeling
changes were not coordinated, the
cumulative economic impact on the
food industry of having to respond
separately to each change would be
substantial. Therefore, we periodically
have announced uniform compliance
dates for new food labeling
requirements (see e.g., the Federal
Register of October 19, 1984 (49 FR
41019); December 24, 1996 (61 FR
67710); December 27, 1996 (61 FR
68145); December 23, 1998 (63 FR
71015); November 20, 2000 (65 FR
69666); December 31, 2002 (67 FR
79851); December 21, 2006 (71 FR
76599); December 8, 2008 (73 FR
74349); December 15, 2010 (75 FR
78155); November 28, 2012 (77 FR
70885); December 10, 2014 (79 FR
73201); November 25, 2016 (81 FR
85156); and December 20, 2018 (83 FR
65294)). Use of a uniform compliance
date provides for an orderly and
economical industry adjustment to new
labeling requirements by allowing
sufficient lead time to plan for the use
of existing label inventories and the
development of new labeling materials.
We have determined under 21 CFR
25.30(k) that this action is of a type that
does not individually or cumulatively
have a significant effect on the human
environment. Therefore, neither an
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required.
This final rule contains no collections
of information. Therefore, clearance by
the Office of Management and Budget
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 is not required.
We have examined the impacts of the
final rule under Executive Order 12866,
Executive Order 13563, Executive Order
13771, the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
U.S.C. 601–612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L.
104–4). Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 direct us to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity). Executive Order
13771 requires that the costs associated
with significant new regulations ‘‘shall,
to the extent permitted by law, be offset
by the elimination of existing costs
associated with at least two prior
regulations.’’ We believe that this final
rule is not a significant regulatory action
as defined by Executive Order 12866.
The establishment of a uniform
compliance date does not in itself lead
to costs or benefits. We will assess the
costs and benefits of the uniform
compliance date in the regulatory
impact analyses of the labeling rules
that take effect at that date.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act
requires us to analyze regulatory options
that would minimize any significant
impact of a rule on small entities.
Because the final rule does not impose
compliance costs on small entities, we
certify that the final rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires us to
prepare a written statement, which
includes an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits, before issuing ‘‘any
rule that includes any Federal mandate
that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted
annually for inflation) in any one year.’’
The current threshold after adjustment
for inflation is $156 million, using the
most current (2019) Implicit Price
Deflator for the Gross Domestic Product.
This final rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or
exceeds this amount.
We have analyzed this final rule in
accordance with the principles set forth
in Executive Order 13132. We have
determined that the rule does not
contain policies that have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Accordingly, we
have concluded that the rule does not
contain policies that have federalism
implications as defined in the Executive
Order and, consequently, a federalism
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
463
summary impact statement is not
required.
This action is not intended to change
existing requirements for compliance
dates contained in final rules published
before January 1, 2021. Therefore, all
final rules published by FDA in the
Federal Register before January 1, 2021,
will still go into effect on the date stated
in the respective final rule. We generally
encourage industry to comply with new
labeling regulations as quickly as
feasible, however. Thus, when industry
members voluntarily change their
labels, it is appropriate that they
incorporate any new requirements that
have been published as final regulations
up to that time.
In rulemaking that began with
publication of a proposed rule on April
15, 1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with
a final rule on December 24, 1996 (61
FR 67710) (together ‘‘the 1996
rulemaking’’), we provided notice and
an opportunity for comment on the
practice of establishing uniform
compliance dates by issuance of a final
rule announcing the date. We received
no comments objecting to this practice
during the 1996 rulemaking, nor have
we received comments objecting to this
practice since we published a uniform
compliance date final rule on December
20, 2018. Therefore, we find good cause
to dispense with issuance of a proposed
rule inviting comment on the practice of
establishing the uniform compliance
date because such prior notice and
comment are unnecessary. Interested
parties will have an opportunity to
comment on the compliance date for
each individual food labeling regulation
as part of the rulemaking process for
that regulation. Consequently, FDA
finds any further advance notice and
opportunity for comment unnecessary
for establishment of the uniform
compliance date. Nonetheless, under 21
CFR 10.40(e)(1), we are providing an
opportunity for comment on whether
the uniform compliance date
established by this final rule should be
modified or revoked.
In addition, we find good cause for
this final rule to become effective on the
date of publication of this action. A
delayed effective date is unnecessary in
this case because the establishment of a
uniform compliance date does not
impose any new regulatory
requirements on affected parties.
Instead, this final rule provides affected
parties with notice of our policy to
identify January 1, 2024, as the
compliance date for final food labeling
regulations that require changes in the
labeling of food products and that
publish on or after January 1, 2021, and
on or before December 31, 2022, unless
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
464
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Rules and Regulations
special circumstances justify a different
compliance date. Thus, affected parties
do not need time to prepare before the
rule takes effect. Therefore, we find
good cause for this final rule to become
effective on the date of publication of
this action.
The new uniform compliance date
will apply only to final FDA food
labeling regulations that require changes
in the labeling of food products and that
publish on or after January 1, 2021, and
on or before December 31, 2022. Those
regulations will specifically identify
January 1, 2024, as their compliance
date. All food products subject to the
January 1, 2024, compliance date must
comply with the appropriate regulations
when initially introduced into interstate
commerce on or after January 1, 2024.
If any food labeling regulation involves
special circumstances that justify a
compliance date other than January 1,
2024, we will determine for that
regulation an appropriate compliance
date, which will be specified when the
final regulation is published.
Dated: December 29, 2020.
Stephen M. Hahn,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
Dated: December 30, 2020.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human
Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–29273 Filed 12–31–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4164–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9937]
RIN 1545–BP46
Rollover Rules for Qualified Plan Loan
Offset Amounts
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document sets forth final
regulations relating to amendments
made to section 402(c) of the Internal
Revenue Code (Code) by section 13613
of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).
Section 13613 of TCJA provides an
extended rollover period for a qualified
plan loan offset, which is a type of plan
loan offset. These regulations affect
participants, beneficiaries, sponsors,
and administrators of qualified
employer plans.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are
effective on January 6, 2021.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:19 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
Applicability Date: For date of
applicability, see § 1.402(c)–3(b)(2).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Naomi Lehr at (202) 317–4102, Vernon
Carter at (202) 317–6799, or Pamela
Kinard at (202) 317–6000 (not toll-free
numbers).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This document amends 26 CFR part 1,
by adding § 1.402(c)–3 to the Income
Tax Regulations to reflect changes to
section 402(c) of the Code, as amended
by section 13613 of TCJA (Pub. L. 115–
97 (131 Stat. 2054)).
1. Plan Loans, Eligible Rollover
Distributions, and Plan Loan Offset
Amounts
Section 72(p)(1) of the Code provides
that if, during any taxable year, a
participant or beneficiary receives
(directly or indirectly) any amount as a
loan from a qualified employer plan (as
defined in section 72(p)(4)(A)),1 that
amount shall be treated as having been
received by the individual as a
distribution from the plan. For certain
plan loans, section 72(p)(2) provides an
exception to the general treatment of
loans as distributions under section
72(p)(1).
For the exception under section
72(p)(2) to apply so that a plan loan is
not treated as a distribution under
section 72(p)(1) for the taxable year in
which the loan is received, the loan
generally must satisfy three
requirements:
(1) The loan, by its terms, must satisfy
the limits on loan amounts, as described
in section 72(p)(2)(A);
(2) The loan, by its terms, generally
must be repayable within 5 years, as
described in section 72(p)(2)(B); and
(3) The loan must require
substantially level amortization over the
term of the loan, as described in section
72(p)(2)(C).
Section 401(a)(31) requires that a plan
qualified under section 401(a) provide
for the direct transfer of eligible rollover
distributions. A similar rule applies to
section 403(a) annuity plans, section
403(b) tax-sheltered annuities, and
section 457 eligible governmental plans.
See generally sections 403(a)(1),
403(b)(10), and 457(d)(1)(C).
Sections 402(c)(3) and 408(d)(3)
provide that any amount distributed
from a qualified plan or individual
retirement account or annuity (IRA) will
be excluded from income if it is
1 Under section 72(p)(4), a qualified employer
plan means a qualified plan, a section 403(a)
annuity plan, a section 403(b) plan, and any
governmental plan.
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
transferred to an eligible retirement plan
no later than the 60th day following the
day the distribution is received. A
similar rule applies to section 403(a)
annuity plans, section 403(b) taxsheltered annuities, and section 457
eligible governmental plans. See
generally sections 403(a)(4)(B),
403(b)(8)(B), and 457(e)(16)(B).
Sections 402(c)(3)(B) and 408(d)(3)(I)
provide that the Secretary may waive
the 60-day rollover requirement ‘‘where
the failure to waive such requirement
would be against equity or good
conscience, including casualty, disaster,
or other events beyond the reasonable
control of the individual subject to such
requirement.’’ See generally Rev. Proc.
2020–46, 2020–45 I.R.B. 995, which sets
forth a self-certification procedure that
taxpayers may use in certain
circumstances to claim a waiver of the
60-day deadline for completing a
rollover under section 402(c)(3)(B) or
408(d)(3)(I), and Rev. Proc. 2020–4,
2020–1 I.R.B. 148, which sets forth
procedures that taxpayers may use to
request a waiver of the 60-day rollover
deadline by submitting a request for a
private letter ruling.2
Section 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–3(a),
provides that, unless specifically
excluded, an eligible rollover
distribution means any distribution to
an employee (or to a spousal distributee
described in § 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–12(a)) of
all or any portion of the balance to the
credit of the employee in a qualified
plan. Section 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–3(b),
provides that certain distributions (for
example, required minimum
distributions under section 401(a)(9))
are not eligible rollover distributions.
Section 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–9(a),
provides that a distribution of a plan
loan offset amount (as defined in
§ 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–9(b)) is an eligible
rollover distribution if it satisfies
§ 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–3. Thus, an amount
not exceeding the plan loan offset
amount may be rolled over by the
employee (or spousal distributee) to an
eligible retirement plan within the 60day period described in section
402(c)(3), unless the plan loan offset
amount fails to be an eligible rollover
distribution for another reason.
Section 1.402(c)–2, Q&A–9(b),
provides that a distribution of a plan
loan offset amount is a distribution that
occurs when, under the plan terms
governing the loan, the employee’s
2 Note that the 60-day rollover deadline can also
be extended to provide temporary relief during a
disaster or an emergency response. For example, in
response to the COVID–19 pandemic, Notice 2020–
23, 2020–18 I.R.B. 742, extended the 60-day
rollover deadline to July 15, 2020, for distributions
made between April 1, 2020, and July 14, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\06JAR1.SGM
06JAR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 462-464]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29273]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 101
[Docket No. FDA-2000-N-0011]
Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling Regulations
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Helath and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is establishing
January 1, 2024, as the uniform compliance date for food labeling
regulations that are published on or after January 1, 2021, and on or
before December 31, 2022. We periodically announce uniform compliance
dates for new food labeling requirements to minimize the economic
impact of labeling changes.
DATES: This rule is effective January 6, 2021. Submit either electronic
or written comments on the final rule by March 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted
electronically, including attachments, to https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be
made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment
does not include any confidential information that you or a third party
may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone
else's Social Security number, or confidential business information,
such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your
name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in
the body of your comments, that information will be posted on https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential
information that you do not wish to be made available to the public,
submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner
detailed (see ``Written/Paper Submissions'' and ``Instructions'').
Written/Paper Submissions
Submit written/paper submissions as follows:
Mail/Hand Delivery/Courier (for written/paper
submissions): Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets
Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any
attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified,
as confidential, if submitted as detailed in ``Instructions.''
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket No.
FDA-2000-N-0011 for ``Uniform Compliance Date for Food Labeling
Regulations.'' Received comments, those filed in a timely manner, will
be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as
``Confidential Submissions,'' publicly viewable at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m.
and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions--To submit a comment with
confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly
available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You
should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information
you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states
``THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.'' We will review
this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in our
consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed
confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for
public viewing and posted on https://www.regulations.gov. Submit both
copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name
and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide
this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your
comments, and you must identify this information as ``confidential.''
Any information marked as ``confidential'' will not be disclosed except
in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law.
For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets,
see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://
[[Page 463]]
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background documents or
the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov and insert the docket number, found in brackets in
the heading of this document, into the ``Search'' box and follow the
prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane,
Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carrol Bascus, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition (HFS-24), Food and Drug Administration, 5001
Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-3835.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We periodically issue regulations requiring
changes in the labeling of food. If the compliance dates of these
labeling changes were not coordinated, the cumulative economic impact
on the food industry of having to respond separately to each change
would be substantial. Therefore, we periodically have announced uniform
compliance dates for new food labeling requirements (see e.g., the
Federal Register of October 19, 1984 (49 FR 41019); December 24, 1996
(61 FR 67710); December 27, 1996 (61 FR 68145); December 23, 1998 (63
FR 71015); November 20, 2000 (65 FR 69666); December 31, 2002 (67 FR
79851); December 21, 2006 (71 FR 76599); December 8, 2008 (73 FR
74349); December 15, 2010 (75 FR 78155); November 28, 2012 (77 FR
70885); December 10, 2014 (79 FR 73201); November 25, 2016 (81 FR
85156); and December 20, 2018 (83 FR 65294)). Use of a uniform
compliance date provides for an orderly and economical industry
adjustment to new labeling requirements by allowing sufficient lead
time to plan for the use of existing label inventories and the
development of new labeling materials.
We have determined under 21 CFR 25.30(k) that this action is of a
type that does not individually or cumulatively have a significant
effect on the human environment. Therefore, neither an environmental
assessment nor an environmental impact statement is required.
This final rule contains no collections of information. Therefore,
clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.
We have examined the impacts of the final rule under Executive
Order 12866, Executive Order 13563, Executive Order 13771, the
Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), and the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4). Executive Orders 12866 and
13563 direct us to assess all costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive Order 13771
requires that the costs associated with significant new regulations
``shall, to the extent permitted by law, be offset by the elimination
of existing costs associated with at least two prior regulations.'' We
believe that this final rule is not a significant regulatory action as
defined by Executive Order 12866.
The establishment of a uniform compliance date does not in itself
lead to costs or benefits. We will assess the costs and benefits of the
uniform compliance date in the regulatory impact analyses of the
labeling rules that take effect at that date.
The Regulatory Flexibility Act requires us to analyze regulatory
options that would minimize any significant impact of a rule on small
entities. Because the final rule does not impose compliance costs on
small entities, we certify that the final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (section 202(a)) requires
us to prepare a written statement, which includes an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits, before issuing ``any rule that includes
any Federal mandate that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100,000,000 or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any one
year.'' The current threshold after adjustment for inflation is $156
million, using the most current (2019) Implicit Price Deflator for the
Gross Domestic Product. This final rule would not result in an
expenditure in any year that meets or exceeds this amount.
We have analyzed this final rule in accordance with the principles
set forth in Executive Order 13132. We have determined that the rule
does not contain policies that have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. Accordingly, we have concluded that the
rule does not contain policies that have federalism implications as
defined in the Executive Order and, consequently, a federalism summary
impact statement is not required.
This action is not intended to change existing requirements for
compliance dates contained in final rules published before January 1,
2021. Therefore, all final rules published by FDA in the Federal
Register before January 1, 2021, will still go into effect on the date
stated in the respective final rule. We generally encourage industry to
comply with new labeling regulations as quickly as feasible, however.
Thus, when industry members voluntarily change their labels, it is
appropriate that they incorporate any new requirements that have been
published as final regulations up to that time.
In rulemaking that began with publication of a proposed rule on
April 15, 1996 (61 FR 16422), and ended with a final rule on December
24, 1996 (61 FR 67710) (together ``the 1996 rulemaking''), we provided
notice and an opportunity for comment on the practice of establishing
uniform compliance dates by issuance of a final rule announcing the
date. We received no comments objecting to this practice during the
1996 rulemaking, nor have we received comments objecting to this
practice since we published a uniform compliance date final rule on
December 20, 2018. Therefore, we find good cause to dispense with
issuance of a proposed rule inviting comment on the practice of
establishing the uniform compliance date because such prior notice and
comment are unnecessary. Interested parties will have an opportunity to
comment on the compliance date for each individual food labeling
regulation as part of the rulemaking process for that regulation.
Consequently, FDA finds any further advance notice and opportunity for
comment unnecessary for establishment of the uniform compliance date.
Nonetheless, under 21 CFR 10.40(e)(1), we are providing an opportunity
for comment on whether the uniform compliance date established by this
final rule should be modified or revoked.
In addition, we find good cause for this final rule to become
effective on the date of publication of this action. A delayed
effective date is unnecessary in this case because the establishment of
a uniform compliance date does not impose any new regulatory
requirements on affected parties. Instead, this final rule provides
affected parties with notice of our policy to identify January 1, 2024,
as the compliance date for final food labeling regulations that require
changes in the labeling of food products and that publish on or after
January 1, 2021, and on or before December 31, 2022, unless
[[Page 464]]
special circumstances justify a different compliance date. Thus,
affected parties do not need time to prepare before the rule takes
effect. Therefore, we find good cause for this final rule to become
effective on the date of publication of this action.
The new uniform compliance date will apply only to final FDA food
labeling regulations that require changes in the labeling of food
products and that publish on or after January 1, 2021, and on or before
December 31, 2022. Those regulations will specifically identify January
1, 2024, as their compliance date. All food products subject to the
January 1, 2024, compliance date must comply with the appropriate
regulations when initially introduced into interstate commerce on or
after January 1, 2024. If any food labeling regulation involves special
circumstances that justify a compliance date other than January 1,
2024, we will determine for that regulation an appropriate compliance
date, which will be specified when the final regulation is published.
Dated: December 29, 2020.
Stephen M. Hahn,
Commissioner of Food and Drugs.
Dated: December 30, 2020.
Alex M. Azar II,
Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.
[FR Doc. 2020-29273 Filed 12-31-20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4164-01-P