Notice of Revision of Section 301 Action: Enforcement of U.S. WTO Rights in Large Civil Aircraft Dispute, 674-691 [2020-29225]
Download as PDF
674
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020–29257 Filed 1–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36453]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SRC Railway LLC—Lease and
Operation Exemption—Strasburg Rail
Road Company
SRC Railway LLC (Railway LLC), a
noncarrier, has filed a verified notice of
exemption pursuant to 49 CFR 1150.31
to lease from Strasburg Rail Road
Company (SRC) and operate
approximately 4.25 miles of rail line
known as the Strasburg Line in
Lancaster County, Pa. (the Line). The
Line extends from approximately
quarter-milepost 20 at Leaman Place
(immediately north of the underpass at
U.S. Highway 30 and west of the
interchange connection with Norfolk
Southern Railway Company and the
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
(NRPC milepost 56.8)), southwesterly to
quarter-milepost 3 at East Strasburg.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in Strasburg Rail Road
Company—Continuance in Control
Exemption—SRC Railway LLC, Docket
No. FD 36454, in which SRC seeks to
continue in control of Railway LLC
upon Railway LLC’s becoming a Class
III rail carrier.
Railway LLC states that it will shortly
execute agreements with SRC pursuant
to which it will lease the Line from SRC.
According to Railway LLC, the proposed
agreements do not contain any
provision that would limit future
interchange on the Line with a thirdparty connecting carrier.
Further, Railway LLC certifies that its
projected annual revenue will not
exceed $5 million and will not result in
Railway LLC becoming a Class I or II rail
carrier.
The earliest this transaction may be
consummated is January 20, 2021, the
effective date of the exemption (30 days
after the verified notice was filed).
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than January 12, 2021.
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36453, should be filed with the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
Surface Transportation Board via efiling on the Board’s website. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Railway LLC’s
representative, Bradon J. Smith, Fletcher
& Sippel LLC, 29 North Wacker Drive,
Suite 800, Chicago, IL 60606–3208.
According to Railway LLC, this action
is categorically excluded from
environmental review under 49 CFR
1105.6(c) and from historic preservation
reporting requirements under 49 CFR
1105.8(b).
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: December 31, 2020.
By the Board, Scott M. Zimmerman, Acting
Director, Office of Proceedings.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020–29256 Filed 1–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket Number USTR–2020–0042]
Notice of Revision of Section 301
Action: Enforcement of U.S. WTO
Rights in Large Civil Aircraft Dispute
Office of the United States
Trade Representative (USTR).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Trade
Representative has determined to revise
the action being taken in this Section
301 investigation to mirror the approach
taken by the European Union (EU) in
exercising its World Trade Organization
(WTO) authorization in the Boeing
dispute. In implementing this approach,
the U.S. Trade Representative has
determined to revise the action by
adding certain products of certain EU
member States to the list of products
subject to additional duties.
DATES: The revisions in Annex I are
applicable with respect to products that
are entered for consumption, or
withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m.
eastern standard time on January 12,
2021.
SUMMARY:
For
questions about the investigation and
revisions announced in this notice,
contact Associate General Counsel
Megan Grimball, at (202) 395–5725, or
Director for Europe Michael Rogers, at
(202) 395–3320. For questions on
customs procedures or the classification
of products identified in the annexes,
contact Traderemedy@cbp.dhs.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
PO 00000
Frm 00175
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
A. Proceedings in the Investigation
On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Trade
Representative announced the initiation
of an investigation to enforce U.S. rights
in the WTO dispute against the EU and
certain EU member States addressed to
subsidies on large civil aircraft. See 84
FR 15028 (April 12 notice). The April 12
notice contains background information
on the investigation and the dispute
settlement proceedings.
The April 12 notice solicited
comments on a proposed determination
that, inter alia, the EU and certain
member States have denied U.S. rights
under the WTO Agreement, and in
particular, under Articles 5 and 6.3 of
the Agreement on Subsidies and
Countervailing Measures and the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
1994, and have failed to comply with
the WTO Dispute Settlement Body
(DSB) recommendations to bring the
WTO-inconsistent subsidies into
compliance with WTO obligations. The
April 12 notice invited public
comments on a proposed action in the
form of an additional ad valorem duty
of up to 100 percent on products of EU
member States to be drawn from a list
of 317 tariff subheadings and 9
statistical reporting numbers of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) included in the
annex to that notice.
On July 5, 2019, USTR published a
notice inviting public comments on a
second list of products also being
considered for an additional ad valorem
duty of up to 100 percent. See 84 FR
32248.
On October 2, 2019, the WTO
Arbitrator issued a report concluding
that the appropriate level of
countermeasures in response to the
WTO-inconsistent launch aid provided
by the EU or certain member States to
their large civil aircraft domestic
industry is approximately $7.5 billion
annually.
On October 9, 2019, the U.S. Trade
Representative published a
determination that the EU and certain
member States have denied U.S. rights
under the WTO Agreement and have
failed to implement DSB
recommendations concerning certain
subsidies to the EU large civil aircraft
industry. The U.S. Trade Representative
determined to take action in the form of
additional duties on products of certain
current or former member States of the
EU, at levels of 10 or 25 percent ad
valorem, effective October 18, 2019. See
84 FR 54245 (October 9, 2019) and 84
FR 55998 (October 18, 2019).
On December 12, 2019, the U.S. Trade
Representative announced a review of
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
the action and invited public comments
regarding potential revisions. See 84 FR
67992. As part of that review, on
February 14, 2020, the U.S. Trade
Representative announced a
determination to revise the list of nonaircraft products subject to 25 percent
additional duties and to increase
additional duties on certain large civil
aircraft from 10 to 15 percent, effective
March 5 and March 18. See 85 FR 10204
(February 21, 2020) and 85 FR 14517
(March 12, 2020). The U.S. Trade
Representative also determined that
‘‘going forward, the action may be
revised as appropriate immediately
upon any EU imposition of additional
duties on U.S. products in connection
with the Large Civil Aircraft dispute or
with the EU’s WTO challenge to the
alleged subsidization of U.S. large civil
aircraft.’’
On June 26, 2020, the U.S. Trade
Representative published a notice
announcing another review of the action
and establishing a docket to receive
public comments. See 85 FR 38488
(June 26 notice). The June 26 notice
included a proposal to impose
additional duties of up to 100 percent
on a new list of products of France,
Germany, Spain and the United
Kingdom, covered by an additional 30
tariff subheadings with an approximate
annual trade value of $3.1 billion in
terms of estimated import trade value
for calendar year 2018. See June 26
notice, as amended by 85 FR 39661 (July
1, 2020).
On August 12, 2020, the U.S. Trade
Representative announced certain
revisions to the action. See 85 FR 50866
(August 18, 2020). The notice reiterated
the U.S. Trade Representative’s prior
determination that ‘‘the action may be
revised as appropriate immediately
upon any EU imposition of additional
duties on U.S. products.’’
On November 9, 2020, the EU
announced that it would impose
additional duties on goods of the United
States, effective November 10, 2020.
Specifically, the EU determined to
impose additional duties of 15 percent
on imports of certain large civil aircraft
of the United States, and additional
duties of 25 percent on other U.S. goods.
The EU stated that its action has an
annual trade value of $4 billion. The
EU’s action followed a decision by the
WTO arbitrator in United States—
Measure Affecting Trade in Large Civil
Aircraft (DS353), and a corresponding
WTO authorization for the EU to
suspend WTO concessions to the United
States.
The EU has represented that its
retaliatory action mirrors the action
taken by the United States in this
investigation, but that is not accurate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
Specifically, the EU’s action does not
mirror the U.S. action because the
methodology used by the EU to exercise
its $4 billion authorization relies on a
benchmark reference period affected by
the economic downturn caused by the
COVID pandemic. Under this
methodology, the EU was able to cover
a greater volume of imports than if, like
the United States, it had used data from
a period when trade was not affected by
the pandemic.
In addition, up to and until the exit
of the United Kingdom from EU
customs territory is finalized, goods of
the United States are subject to
additional EU duties when entering the
United Kingdom. However, the EU’s
trade action valuation does not account
for U.S. exports to the United Kingdom.
Therefore, the value of U.S. exports
subject to tariffs is greater than the trade
value the EU ascribes to the various
covered tariff lines.
The United States has expressed its
concerns to the EU and has given the EU
an opportunity to address these issues.
The EU has declined to do so.
B. Revision of Action
In light of these developments, the
U.S. Trade Representative determined to
make a further revision of the action in
this investigation as part of the ongoing
efforts toward a satisfactory resolution
of the dispute. The revision takes
account of public comments received in
the investigation, advice of advisory
committees, and advice of the
interagency Section 301 Committee.
In particular, the U.S. Trade
Representative has determined to mirror
the EU approach to exercising its DSB
authorization by adjusting the reference
period used for the U.S. trade action to
mirror the August 2019 to July 2020
reference period used by the EU. In
adopting this approach, the United
States has made appropriate
adjustments to ensure that the trade data
from the revised reference period does
not reflect reductions in trade resulting
from the October 2019 trade action in
the investigation. Using the estimated
trade values from this reference period,
the value of the U.S. trade action as last
revised on August 12, 2020, is well
below the $7.5 billion level authorized
by the DSB.
In order to exercise the DSB
authorization to the United States, the
U.S. Trade Representative has
determined to add products to the list
of products currently subject to
additional duties, while otherwise
maintaining the trade action as last
revised on August 12, 2020. In
considering actions most likely to result
in the EU’s implementation of DSB
recommendations or a mutually
PO 00000
Frm 00176
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
675
satisfactory resolution of the dispute,
the U.S. Trade Representative has
determined that the additional products
should be goods of France and
Germany, as these countries have
provided the greatest level of WTOinconsistent large civil aircraft
subsidies.
As specified in the annexes to this
notice, additional goods of France and
Germany are subject to additional
duties. These goods were drawn from
the proposed lists in the April 12, 2019
notice.
In accordance with section
306(b)(2)(F) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2416(b)(2)(F)), the action includes
reciprocal goods of the affected
industry. The annual trade value of the
tariff subheadings subject to additional
duties under the revised action remains
at approximately $7.5 billion, which is
consistent with the WTO Arbitrator’s
finding on the appropriate level of
countermeasures in the United States’
dispute against the EU involving large
civil aircraft.
Annex I to this notice identifies the
products affected by the revised action,
the rate of duty to be assessed, and the
current or former EU member States
affected. Annex II, section 1, contains
the unofficial descriptive list of the
revisions made by this Notice. Annex II,
section 2, contains an unofficial,
consolidated description of the action,
reflecting the changes in annex I.
In order to implement this
determination, effective January 12,
2021, subchapter III of chapter 99 of the
HTSUS is modified by annex I to this
notice. The additional duties provided
for in the HTSUS subheadings
established by annex I apply in addition
to all other applicable duties, fees,
exactions and charges.
Any product listed in annex I to this
notice, except any product that is
eligible for admission under ‘domestic
status’ as defined in 19 CFR 146.43,
which is subject to the additional duty
imposed by this determination, and is
admitted into a U.S. foreign trade zone
on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern standard
time on January 12, 2021, only may be
admitted as ‘privileged foreign status’ as
defined in 19 CFR 146.41. Such
products will be subject upon entry for
consumption to any ad valorem rates of
duty or quantitative limitations related
to the classification under the
applicable HTSUS subheading.
The U.S. Trade Representative will
continue to consider the action taken in
this investigation.
Joseph Barloon,
General Counsel, Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00177
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.010
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
676
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00178
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
677
EN06JA21.011
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00179
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.012
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
678
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
679
EN06JA21.013
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.014
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
680
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
681
EN06JA21.015
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00183
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.016
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
682
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00184
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
683
EN06JA21.017
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00185
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.018
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
684
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00186
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
685
EN06JA21.019
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00187
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.020
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
686
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00188
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
687
EN06JA21.021
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00189
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.022
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
688
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00190
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4725
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
689
EN06JA21.023
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00191
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
EN06JA21.024
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
690
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 3 / Wednesday, January 6, 2021 / Notices
[FR Doc. 2020–29225 Filed 1–5–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F0–P
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Determination of Trade Surplus in
Certain Sugar and Syrup Goods and
Sugar-Containing Products of Chile,
Morocco, Costa Rica, the Dominican
Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru, Colombia,
and Panama
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS), the Office of the
United States Trade Representative
(USTR) is providing notice of its
determination of the trade surplus in
certain sugar and syrup goods and
sugar-containing products of Chile,
Morocco, Costa Rica, the Dominican
Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala,
Honduras, Nicaragua, Peru, Colombia
and Panama. The level of a country’s
trade surplus in these goods relates to
the quantity of sugar and syrup goods
and sugar-containing products for
which the United States grants
preferential tariff treatment under (i) the
United States-Chile Free Trade
Agreement (Chile FTA); (ii) the United
States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement
(Morocco FTA); (iii) the Dominican
Republic-Central America-United States
Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA–DR);
(iv) the United States-Peru Trade
Promotion Agreement (Peru TPA); (v)
the United States-Colombia Trade
Promotion Agreement (Colombia TPA);
and (vi) the United States-Panama Trade
Promotion Agreement (Panama TPA).
DATES: This notice is applicable on
January 1, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
H. Nicholson, Office of Agricultural
Affairs, (202) 395–9419 or
Erin.H.Nicholson@ustr.eop.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
I. Chile FTA
Pursuant to section 201 of the United
States-Chile Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 108–77; 19
U.S.C. 3805 note), Presidential
Proclamation No. 7746 of December 30,
2003 (68 FR 75789) implemented the
Chile FTA on behalf of the United States
and modified the HTSUS to reflect the
tariff treatment provided for in the Chile
FTA.
Note 12(a) to subchapter XI of HTSUS
chapter 99 requires USTR annually to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:08 Jan 05, 2021
Jkt 253001
publish a determination of the amount
of Chile’s trade surplus, by volume,
with all sources for goods in HTSUS
subheadings 1701.11, 1701.12, 1701.91,
1701.99, 1702.20, 1702.30, 1702.40,
1702.60, 1702.90, 1806.10, 2101.12,
2101.20, and 2106.90, except that
Chile’s imports of goods classified
under HTSUS subheadings 1702.40 and
1702.60 that qualify for preferential
tariff treatment under the Chile FTA are
not included in the calculation of
Chile’s trade surplus. Proclamation 8771
of December 29, 2011 (77 FR 413)
reclassified HTSUS subheading 1701.11
as 1701.13 and 1701.14.
Note 12(b) to subchapter XI of HTSUS
chapter 99 provides duty-free treatment
for certain sugar and syrup goods and
sugar-containing products of Chile
entered under subheading 9911.17.05 in
any calendar year (CY) (beginning in
CY2015) is the quantity of goods equal
to the amount of Chile’s trade surplus in
subdivision (a) of the note. During
CY2019, the most recent year for which
data is available, Chile’s imports of the
sugar and syrup goods and sugarcontaining products described above
exceeded its exports of those goods by
633,441 metric tons according to data
published by its customs authority, the
Servicio Nacional de Aduana. Based on
this data, USTR has determined that
Chile’s trade surplus is negative.
Therefore, in accordance with U.S. Note
12(b) to subchapter XI of HTSUS
chapter 99, goods of Chile are not
eligible to enter the United States dutyfree under subheading 9911.17.05 in
CY2021.
II. Morocco FTA
Pursuant to section 201 of the United
States-Morocco Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 108–302;
19 U.S.C. 3805 note), Presidential
Proclamation No. 7971 of December 22,
2005 (70 FR 76651) implemented the
Morocco FTA on behalf of the United
States and modified the HTSUS to
reflect the tariff treatment provided for
in the Morocco FTA.
Note 12(a) to subchapter XII of
HTSUS chapter 99 requires USTR
annually to publish a determination of
the amount of Morocco’s trade surplus,
by volume, with all sources for goods in
HTSUS subheadings 1701.11, 1701.12,
1701.91, 1701.99, 1702.40, and 1702.60,
except that Morocco’s imports of U.S.
goods classified under HTSUS
subheadings 1702.40 and 1702.60 that
qualify for preferential tariff treatment
under the Morocco FTA are not
included in the calculation of Morocco’s
trade surplus. Proclamation 8771 of
December 29, 2011 (77 FR 413)
PO 00000
Frm 00192
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
691
reclassified HTSUS subheading 1701.11
as 1701.13 and 1701.14.
Note 12(b) to subchapter XII of
HTSUS chapter 99 provides duty-free
treatment for certain sugar and syrup
goods and sugar-containing products of
Morocco entered under subheading
9912.17.05 in an amount equal to the
lesser of Morocco’s trade surplus or the
specific quantity set out in that note for
that calendar year.
Note 12(c) to subchapter XII of
HTSUS chapter 99 provides preferential
tariff treatment for certain sugar and
syrup goods and sugar-containing
products of Morocco entered under
subheading 9912.17.10 through
9912.17.85 in an amount equal to the
amount by which Morocco’s trade
surplus exceeds the specific quantity set
out in that note for that calendar year.
During CY2019, the most recent year
for which data is available, Morocco’s
imports of the sugar and syrup goods
and sugar-containing products
described above exceeded its exports of
those goods by 694,075 metric tons
according to data published by its
customs authority, the Office des
Changes. Based on this data, USTR has
determined that Morocco’s trade surplus
is negative. Therefore, in accordance
with U.S. Note 12(b) and U.S. Note 12(c)
to subchapter XII of HTSUS chapter 99,
goods of Morocco are not eligible to
enter the United States duty-free under
subheading 9912.17.05 or at preferential
tariff rates under subheading 9912.17.10
through 9912.17.85 in CY2021.
II. CAFTA–DR
Pursuant to section 201 of the
Dominican Republic-Central AmericaUnited States Free Trade Agreement
Implementation Act (Pub. L. 109–53; 19
U.S.C. 4031), Presidential Proclamation
No. 7987 of February 28, 2006 (71 FR
10827), Presidential Proclamation No.
7991 of March 24, 2006 (71 FR 16009),
Presidential Proclamation No. 7996 of
March 31, 2006 (71 FR 16971),
Presidential Proclamation No. 8034 of
June 30, 2006 (71 FR 38509),
Presidential Proclamation No. 8111 of
February 28, 2007 (72 FR 10025),
Presidential Proclamation No. 8331 of
December 23, 2008 (73 FR 79585), and
Presidential Proclamation No. 8536 of
June 12, 2010 (75 FR 34311),
implemented the CAFTA–DR on behalf
of the United States and modified the
HTSUS to reflect the tariff treatment
provided for in the CAFTA–DR.
Note 25(b)(i) to subchapter XXII of
HTSUS chapter 98 requires USTR
annually to publish a determination of
the amount of each CAFTA–DR
country’s trade surplus, by volume, with
all sources for goods in HTSUS
E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM
06JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 3 (Wednesday, January 6, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 674-691]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-29225]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket Number USTR-2020-0042]
Notice of Revision of Section 301 Action: Enforcement of U.S. WTO
Rights in Large Civil Aircraft Dispute
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR).
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Trade Representative has determined to revise the
action being taken in this Section 301 investigation to mirror the
approach taken by the European Union (EU) in exercising its World Trade
Organization (WTO) authorization in the Boeing dispute. In implementing
this approach, the U.S. Trade Representative has determined to revise
the action by adding certain products of certain EU member States to
the list of products subject to additional duties.
DATES: The revisions in Annex I are applicable with respect to products
that are entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for
consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on January
12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For questions about the investigation
and revisions announced in this notice, contact Associate General
Counsel Megan Grimball, at (202) 395-5725, or Director for Europe
Michael Rogers, at (202) 395-3320. For questions on customs procedures
or the classification of products identified in the annexes, contact
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
A. Proceedings in the Investigation
On April 12, 2019, the U.S. Trade Representative announced the
initiation of an investigation to enforce U.S. rights in the WTO
dispute against the EU and certain EU member States addressed to
subsidies on large civil aircraft. See 84 FR 15028 (April 12 notice).
The April 12 notice contains background information on the
investigation and the dispute settlement proceedings.
The April 12 notice solicited comments on a proposed determination
that, inter alia, the EU and certain member States have denied U.S.
rights under the WTO Agreement, and in particular, under Articles 5 and
6.3 of the Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures and the
General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994, and have failed to comply
with the WTO Dispute Settlement Body (DSB) recommendations to bring the
WTO-inconsistent subsidies into compliance with WTO obligations. The
April 12 notice invited public comments on a proposed action in the
form of an additional ad valorem duty of up to 100 percent on products
of EU member States to be drawn from a list of 317 tariff subheadings
and 9 statistical reporting numbers of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) included in the annex to that notice.
On July 5, 2019, USTR published a notice inviting public comments
on a second list of products also being considered for an additional ad
valorem duty of up to 100 percent. See 84 FR 32248.
On October 2, 2019, the WTO Arbitrator issued a report concluding
that the appropriate level of countermeasures in response to the WTO-
inconsistent launch aid provided by the EU or certain member States to
their large civil aircraft domestic industry is approximately $7.5
billion annually.
On October 9, 2019, the U.S. Trade Representative published a
determination that the EU and certain member States have denied U.S.
rights under the WTO Agreement and have failed to implement DSB
recommendations concerning certain subsidies to the EU large civil
aircraft industry. The U.S. Trade Representative determined to take
action in the form of additional duties on products of certain current
or former member States of the EU, at levels of 10 or 25 percent ad
valorem, effective October 18, 2019. See 84 FR 54245 (October 9, 2019)
and 84 FR 55998 (October 18, 2019).
On December 12, 2019, the U.S. Trade Representative announced a
review of
[[Page 675]]
the action and invited public comments regarding potential revisions.
See 84 FR 67992. As part of that review, on February 14, 2020, the U.S.
Trade Representative announced a determination to revise the list of
non-aircraft products subject to 25 percent additional duties and to
increase additional duties on certain large civil aircraft from 10 to
15 percent, effective March 5 and March 18. See 85 FR 10204 (February
21, 2020) and 85 FR 14517 (March 12, 2020). The U.S. Trade
Representative also determined that ``going forward, the action may be
revised as appropriate immediately upon any EU imposition of additional
duties on U.S. products in connection with the Large Civil Aircraft
dispute or with the EU's WTO challenge to the alleged subsidization of
U.S. large civil aircraft.''
On June 26, 2020, the U.S. Trade Representative published a notice
announcing another review of the action and establishing a docket to
receive public comments. See 85 FR 38488 (June 26 notice). The June 26
notice included a proposal to impose additional duties of up to 100
percent on a new list of products of France, Germany, Spain and the
United Kingdom, covered by an additional 30 tariff subheadings with an
approximate annual trade value of $3.1 billion in terms of estimated
import trade value for calendar year 2018. See June 26 notice, as
amended by 85 FR 39661 (July 1, 2020).
On August 12, 2020, the U.S. Trade Representative announced certain
revisions to the action. See 85 FR 50866 (August 18, 2020). The notice
reiterated the U.S. Trade Representative's prior determination that
``the action may be revised as appropriate immediately upon any EU
imposition of additional duties on U.S. products.''
On November 9, 2020, the EU announced that it would impose
additional duties on goods of the United States, effective November 10,
2020. Specifically, the EU determined to impose additional duties of 15
percent on imports of certain large civil aircraft of the United
States, and additional duties of 25 percent on other U.S. goods. The EU
stated that its action has an annual trade value of $4 billion. The
EU's action followed a decision by the WTO arbitrator in United
States--Measure Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft (DS353), and a
corresponding WTO authorization for the EU to suspend WTO concessions
to the United States.
The EU has represented that its retaliatory action mirrors the
action taken by the United States in this investigation, but that is
not accurate. Specifically, the EU's action does not mirror the U.S.
action because the methodology used by the EU to exercise its $4
billion authorization relies on a benchmark reference period affected
by the economic downturn caused by the COVID pandemic. Under this
methodology, the EU was able to cover a greater volume of imports than
if, like the United States, it had used data from a period when trade
was not affected by the pandemic.
In addition, up to and until the exit of the United Kingdom from EU
customs territory is finalized, goods of the United States are subject
to additional EU duties when entering the United Kingdom. However, the
EU's trade action valuation does not account for U.S. exports to the
United Kingdom. Therefore, the value of U.S. exports subject to tariffs
is greater than the trade value the EU ascribes to the various covered
tariff lines.
The United States has expressed its concerns to the EU and has
given the EU an opportunity to address these issues. The EU has
declined to do so.
B. Revision of Action
In light of these developments, the U.S. Trade Representative
determined to make a further revision of the action in this
investigation as part of the ongoing efforts toward a satisfactory
resolution of the dispute. The revision takes account of public
comments received in the investigation, advice of advisory committees,
and advice of the interagency Section 301 Committee.
In particular, the U.S. Trade Representative has determined to
mirror the EU approach to exercising its DSB authorization by adjusting
the reference period used for the U.S. trade action to mirror the
August 2019 to July 2020 reference period used by the EU. In adopting
this approach, the United States has made appropriate adjustments to
ensure that the trade data from the revised reference period does not
reflect reductions in trade resulting from the October 2019 trade
action in the investigation. Using the estimated trade values from this
reference period, the value of the U.S. trade action as last revised on
August 12, 2020, is well below the $7.5 billion level authorized by the
DSB.
In order to exercise the DSB authorization to the United States,
the U.S. Trade Representative has determined to add products to the
list of products currently subject to additional duties, while
otherwise maintaining the trade action as last revised on August 12,
2020. In considering actions most likely to result in the EU's
implementation of DSB recommendations or a mutually satisfactory
resolution of the dispute, the U.S. Trade Representative has determined
that the additional products should be goods of France and Germany, as
these countries have provided the greatest level of WTO-inconsistent
large civil aircraft subsidies.
As specified in the annexes to this notice, additional goods of
France and Germany are subject to additional duties. These goods were
drawn from the proposed lists in the April 12, 2019 notice.
In accordance with section 306(b)(2)(F) of the Trade Act (19 U.S.C.
2416(b)(2)(F)), the action includes reciprocal goods of the affected
industry. The annual trade value of the tariff subheadings subject to
additional duties under the revised action remains at approximately
$7.5 billion, which is consistent with the WTO Arbitrator's finding on
the appropriate level of countermeasures in the United States' dispute
against the EU involving large civil aircraft.
Annex I to this notice identifies the products affected by the
revised action, the rate of duty to be assessed, and the current or
former EU member States affected. Annex II, section 1, contains the
unofficial descriptive list of the revisions made by this Notice. Annex
II, section 2, contains an unofficial, consolidated description of the
action, reflecting the changes in annex I.
In order to implement this determination, effective January 12,
2021, subchapter III of chapter 99 of the HTSUS is modified by annex I
to this notice. The additional duties provided for in the HTSUS
subheadings established by annex I apply in addition to all other
applicable duties, fees, exactions and charges.
Any product listed in annex I to this notice, except any product
that is eligible for admission under `domestic status' as defined in 19
CFR 146.43, which is subject to the additional duty imposed by this
determination, and is admitted into a U.S. foreign trade zone on or
after 12:01 a.m. eastern standard time on January 12, 2021, only may be
admitted as `privileged foreign status' as defined in 19 CFR 146.41.
Such products will be subject upon entry for consumption to any ad
valorem rates of duty or quantitative limitations related to the
classification under the applicable HTSUS subheading.
The U.S. Trade Representative will continue to consider the action
taken in this investigation.
Joseph Barloon,
General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative.
[[Page 676]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.010
[[Page 677]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.011
[[Page 678]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.012
[[Page 679]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.013
[[Page 680]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.014
[[Page 681]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.015
[[Page 682]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.016
[[Page 683]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.017
[[Page 684]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.018
[[Page 685]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.019
[[Page 686]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.020
[[Page 687]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.021
[[Page 688]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.022
[[Page 689]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.023
[[Page 690]]
[GRAPHIC] [TIFF OMITTED] TN06JA21.024
[[Page 691]]
[FR Doc. 2020-29225 Filed 1-5-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F0-P