Proposed Deletion From the National Priorities List, 86525-86527 [2020-28839]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Proposed Rules
and agreeing that the patent or any
patent granted on the application for
which the disclaimer is filed shall be
enforceable only for and during such
period that the patent or any patent
granted on the application for which the
terminal disclaimer is filed and the
reference patent or any patent granted
on the reference application are not
separately enforced.
(2) A terminal disclaimer may be filed
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section if
the requirements of paragraph (d)(2)(i)
or (ii), as applicable, have been met.
(i) For applications or patents subject
to 35 U.S.C. 102 in effect on March 16,
2013.
(A) The applicant or patent owner
provides, or has provided, a statement
to the effect that the subject matter of
the reference patent or application was
developed and the claimed invention
was made by or on behalf of one or more
parties to a joint research agreement,
within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 100(h)
and § 1.9(e), that was in effect on or
before the effective filing date of the
claimed invention, and the claimed
invention was made as a result of
activities undertaken within the scope
of the joint research agreement; and
(B) The application for patent, or the
patent, for the claimed invention
discloses or is amended to disclose the
names of the parties to the joint research
agreement in accordance with § 1.71(g).
(ii) For applications or patents subject
to 35 U.S.C. 102 in effect prior to March
16, 2013.
(A) The applicant or patent owner
provides, or has provided, a statement
to the effect that the subject matter of
the reference patent or application and
the claimed invention were made by or
on behalf of the parties to a joint
research agreement, within the meaning
of 35 U.S.C. 100(h) and § 1.9(e), that was
in effect on or before the date the
claimed invention was made, and that
the claimed invention was made as a
result of activities undertaken within
the scope of the joint research
agreement; and
(B) The application for patent, or the
patent, for the claimed invention
discloses or is amended to disclose the
names of the parties to the joint research
agreement in accordance with § 1.71(g).
(e) Submission of a disclaimer during
an interference under subpart E of part
41 or a proceeding under part 42. A
disclaimer of a complete claim or
claims, or a disclaimer of the entire term
or terminal part of the term (terminal
disclaimer) under this section, of a
patent involved in an interference under
subpart E of part 41 of this chapter or
a proceeding under part 42 of this
chapter may not be entered into the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Dec 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
official file or considered, or if
inadvertently entered, will be expunged
unless a motion requesting to file the
disclaimer under §§ 41.121(a)(2),
41.121(a)(3), or 42.20 of this chapter has
been granted.
Andrei Iancu,
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual
Property and Director of the United States
Patent and Trademark Office.
[FR Doc. 2020–27676 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–16–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008; FRL–10018–
19–OLEM]
Proposed Deletion From the National
Priorities List
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is issuing a Notice of
Intent to partially delete the North
Penn—Area 6 site from the National
Priorities List (NPL) and requests public
comments on this proposed action. The
NPL, promulgated pursuant to the
Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation, and Liability
Act (CERCLA) of 1980, as amended, is
an appendix of the National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution
Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and
the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania,
through its designated state agency,
have determined that all appropriate
response actions under CERCLA, other
than operations and maintenance,
monitoring and five-year reviews, where
applicable, have been completed.
However, this proposed deletion would
not preclude future actions under
Superfund.
DATES: Comments regarding this
proposed listing must be submitted on
or before January 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under the Docket
Identification number included in Table
1 in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section of this document. Submit your
comments, identified by the appropriate
Docket ID number, by one of the
following methods:
• https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow on-line instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be edited or removed
from Regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86525
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
• Email: Table 2 in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document provides an email
address to submit public comments for
the proposed deletion action.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
the Docket Identification number
included in Table 1 in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. EPA’s policy is that all
comments received will be included in
the public docket without change and
may be made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through https://
www.regulations.gov or email. The
https://www.regulations.gov website is
an ‘‘anonymous access’’ system, which
means EPA will not know your identity
or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
If you send an email comment directly
to EPA without going through https://
www.regulations.gov, your email
address will be automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the public docket and
made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA
recommends that you include your
name and other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA
cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact
you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Electronic files should avoid the use of
special characters, any form of
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
86526
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Proposed Rules
encryption, and be free of any defects or
viruses.
Docket: EPA has established a docket
for this action under the Docket
Identification included in Table 1 in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. All documents in the
docket are listed on the https://
www.regulations.gov website. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically through https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the corresponding Regional Records
Center. Location, address, and phone
number of the Regional Records Center
follows.
Regional Records Center:
• Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA,
WV), U.S. EPA Records Center, 1650
Arch Street, Mail code 3SD2,
Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/814–3024.
The EPA is temporarily suspending
Regional Records Centers for public
visitors to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID–19. Information in
these repositories, including the
deletion docket, has not been updated
with hardcopy or electronic media. For
further information and updates on EPA
Docket Center services, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
The EPA continues to carefully and
continuously monitor information from
the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), local area health
departments, and our Federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as
conditions change regarding COVID.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
• Huu Ngo, U.S. EPA Region 3 (DE,
DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), ngo.huu@
epa.gov, 215/814–3187.
• Chuck Sands, U.S. EPA
Headquarters, sands.charles@epa.gov,
703/603–8857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA is issuing a Notice of Intent to
partially delete one site from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and
requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL constitutes
Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300 which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Dec 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
is the NCP, which EPA created under
section 105 of the CERCLA statute of
1980, as amended. EPA maintains the
NPL as those sites that appear to present
a significant risk to public health,
welfare, or the environment. Sites on
the NPL may be the subject of remedial
actions financed by the Hazardous
Substance Superfund (Fund). This
partial deletion is proposed in
accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and
is consistent with the Notice of Policy
Change: Partial Deletion of Sites Listed
on the National Priorities List. 60 FR
55466, November 1, 1995. As described
in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of
a site deleted from the NPL remains
eligible for Fund-financed remedial
action if future conditions warrant such
actions.
EPA will accept comments on the
proposal to partially delete this site for
thirty (30) days after publication of this
document in the Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains
the criteria for deleting sites from the
NPL. Section III of this document
discusses procedures that EPA is using
for this action. Section IV of this
document discusses the portion of the
site proposed for deletion and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion
criteria, including reference documents
with the rationale and data principally
relied upon by the EPA to determine
that the Superfund response is
complete.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that
EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL.
In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e),
sites may be deleted from the NPL
where no further response is
appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR
300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any
of the following criteria have been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons
have implemented all appropriate
response actions required;
ii. all appropriate Fund-financed
response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response
action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. the remedial investigation has
shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the
environment and, therefore, the taking
of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c)
and the NCP, EPA conducts five-year
reviews to ensure the continued
protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants,
or contaminants remain at a site above
levels that allow for unlimited use and
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
unrestricted exposure. EPA conducts
such five-year reviews even if a site is
deleted from the NPL. EPA may initiate
further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new
information becomes available that
indicates it is appropriate. Whenever
there is a significant release from a site
deleted from the NPL, the deleted site
may be restored to the NPL without
application of the hazard ranking
system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the
partial deletion of the site in this
proposed rule:
(1) EPA consulted with the respective
state before developing this Notice of
Intent for partial deletion.
(2) EPA has provided the state 30
working days for review of this
proposed action prior to publication of
it today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria
discussed above, EPA has determined
that no further response is appropriate.
(4) The state, through their designated
state agency, has concurred with the
proposed partial deletion action.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication
of this Notice of Intent for partial
deletion in the Federal Register, a
notice is being published in a major
local newspaper of general circulation
near the site. The newspaper announces
the 30-day public comment period
concerning the Notice of Intent for
partial deletion.
(6) The EPA placed copies of
documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket,
made these items available for public
inspection, and copying at the Regional
Records Center identified above.
If comments are received within the
30-day comment period on this
document, EPA will evaluate and
respond accordingly to the comments
before making a final decision to
partially delete the site. If necessary,
EPA will prepare a Responsiveness
Summary to address any significant
public comments received. After the
public comment period, if EPA
determines it is still appropriate to
partially delete the site, the EPA will
publish a final Notice of Partial Deletion
in the Federal Register. Public notices,
public submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared,
will be made available to interested
parties and included in the site
information repositories listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the
NPL does not itself create, alter, or
revoke any individual’s rights or
obligations. Deletion of a portion of a
site from the NPL does not in any way
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Proposed Rules
alter EPA’s right to take enforcement
actions, as appropriate. The NPL is
designed primarily for informational
purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of
the NCP states that the deletion of a site
from the NPL does not preclude
eligibility for future response actions,
should future conditions warrant such
actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The site to be partially deleted from
the NPL, the location of the site, and
docket number with information
including reference documents with the
rationale and data principally relied
upon by the EPA to determine that the
Superfund response is complete are
specified in Table 1. The NCP permits
activities to occur at a deleted site or
86527
that media or parcel of a partially
deleted site, including operation and
maintenance of the remedy, monitoring,
and five-year reviews. These activities
for the site are entered in Table 1, if
applicable, under Footnote such that;
1 = site has continued operation and
maintenance of the remedy, 2 = site
receives continued monitoring, and 3 =
site five-year reviews are conducted.
TABLE 1
Site name
City/county, state
Type
Docket No.
North Penn—Area 6 ......................
Lansdale, PA ................................
Partial ................
EPA–HQ–SFUND–1989–0008 .....
Table 2 includes a description of the
area, media or Operable Units (OUs) of
the NPL site proposed for partial
deletion from the NPL, and an email
address to which public comments may
be submitted if the commenter does not
Footnote
1, 2, 3
comment using https://
www.regulations.gov.
TABLE 2
Email address for
public comments
Site name
Media/parcels for partial deletion
North Penn—Area 6 .............................
1.66-acres soil and groundwater of the Second Administrative Parcel, 135
East Hancock Street.
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of
sites that appear to present a significant
risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Deletion from the NPL
does not preclude further remedial
action. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL,
the deleted site may be restored to the
NPL without application of the hazard
ranking system. Deletion of a site from
the NPL does not affect responsible
party liability in the unlikely event that
future conditions warrant further
actions.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Chemicals, Hazardous
substances, Hazardous waste,
Intergovernmental relations, Natural
resources, Oil pollution, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Superfund, Water
pollution control, Water supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
9601–9657; E.O. 13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR,
2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR 54757,
3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52
FR 2923, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 18, 2020.
Dana Stalcup,
Acting Office Director, Office of Superfund
Remediation and Technology Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2020–28839 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:59 Dec 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 73
[MB Docket No. 20–428; RM–11870; DA 20–
1487; FRS 17346]
Television Broadcasting Services:
Columbia, Missouri
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Commission has before it
a petition for rulemaking filed by The
Curators of the University of Missouri
(the University), licensee of KOMU–TV,
channel 8, Columbia, Missouri,
requesting the substitution of channel
27 for channel 8 at Columbia in the DTV
Table of Allotments. The University
states that the Commission has
recognized that VHF channels have
certain propagation characteristics
which may cause reception issues for
some viewers. The University states that
since the end of the DTV transition in
2009, the station regularly receives
complaints from viewers who report
being able to receive all other signals in
the market, including a low power
television station operating on a UHF
channel, but not KOMU–TV. While
KOMU–TV’s proposed channel 27
facility would result in a slight
reduction of service to existing viewers,
the University demonstrates that only
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Ngo.huu@epa.gov.
401 people are predicted to live in
portions of the loss area, and that all but
seven of those persons will continue to
be served by at least five full power
television stations. The Commission has
found that population loss of less than
500 persons is de minimus and the
predicted population loss as presented
by the University is only 401 persons
and virtually all of them will continue
to be well-served by five other full
power television stations.
DATES: Comments must be filed on or
before January 29, 2021 and reply
comments on or before February 16,
2021.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 45
L Street NE, Washington, DC 20554. In
addition to filing comments with the
FCC, interested parties should serve
counsel for petitioner as follows: Lauren
Lynch Flick, Esq., Pillsbury Winthrop
Shaw Pittman LLP, 1200 Seventeenth
Street NW, Washington, DC 20036.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Joyce Bernstein, Media Bureau, at (202)
418–1647; or Joyce Bernstein, Media
Bureau, at Joyce.Bernstein@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
synopsis of the Commission’s Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, MB Docket No.
20–428; RM–11870; DA 20–1487,
adopted December 16, 2020, and
released December 16, 2020. The full
text of this document is available for
download at https://www.fcc.gov/edocs.
E:\FR\FM\30DEP1.SGM
30DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 30, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86525-86527]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28839]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 300
[EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0008; FRL-10018-19-OLEM]
Proposed Deletion From the National Priorities List
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule; notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is issuing a Notice
of Intent to partially delete the North Penn--Area 6 site from the
National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL, promulgated pursuant to the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) of
1980, as amended, is an appendix of the National Oil and Hazardous
Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). The EPA and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, through its designated state agency, have
determined that all appropriate response actions under CERCLA, other
than operations and maintenance, monitoring and five-year reviews,
where applicable, have been completed. However, this proposed deletion
would not preclude future actions under Superfund.
DATES: Comments regarding this proposed listing must be submitted on or
before January 29, 2021.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under the
Docket Identification number included in Table 1 in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document. Submit your comments, identified
by the appropriate Docket ID number, by one of the following methods:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow on-line instructions
for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or
removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received
to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Email: Table 2 in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document provides an email address to submit public comments for
the proposed deletion action.
Instructions: Direct your comments to the Docket Identification
number included in Table 1 in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be
included in the public docket without change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal
information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed
to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information
that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through https://www.regulations.gov or email. The https://www.regulations.gov website
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an email comment directly to EPA without
going through https://www.regulations.gov, your email address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of
[[Page 86526]]
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: EPA has established a docket for this action under the
Docket Identification included in Table 1 in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section of this document. All documents in the docket are
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e.,
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are
available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or
in hard copy at the corresponding Regional Records Center. Location,
address, and phone number of the Regional Records Center follows.
Regional Records Center:
Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV), U.S. EPA Records
Center, 1650 Arch Street, Mail code 3SD2, Philadelphia, PA 19103; 215/
814-3024.
The EPA is temporarily suspending Regional Records Centers for
public visitors to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-19.
Information in these repositories, including the deletion docket, has
not been updated with hardcopy or electronic media. For further
information and updates on EPA Docket Center services, please visit us
online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Huu Ngo, U.S. EPA Region 3 (DE, DC, MD, PA, VA, WV),
[email protected], 215/814-3187.
Chuck Sands, U.S. EPA Headquarters, [email protected],
703/603-8857.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
III. Deletion Procedures
IV. Basis for Intended Partial Site Deletion
I. Introduction
EPA is issuing a Notice of Intent to partially delete one site from
the National Priorities List (NPL) and requests public comments on this
proposed action. The NPL constitutes Appendix B of 40 CFR part 300
which is the NCP, which EPA created under section 105 of the CERCLA
statute of 1980, as amended. EPA maintains the NPL as those sites that
appear to present a significant risk to public health, welfare, or the
environment. Sites on the NPL may be the subject of remedial actions
financed by the Hazardous Substance Superfund (Fund). This partial
deletion is proposed in accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e) and is
consistent with the Notice of Policy Change: Partial Deletion of Sites
Listed on the National Priorities List. 60 FR 55466, November 1, 1995.
As described in 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP, a portion of a site deleted
from the NPL remains eligible for Fund-financed remedial action if
future conditions warrant such actions.
EPA will accept comments on the proposal to partially delete this
site for thirty (30) days after publication of this document in the
Federal Register.
Section II of this document explains the criteria for deleting
sites from the NPL. Section III of this document discusses procedures
that EPA is using for this action. Section IV of this document
discusses the portion of the site proposed for deletion and
demonstrates how it meets the deletion criteria, including reference
documents with the rationale and data principally relied upon by the
EPA to determine that the Superfund response is complete.
II. NPL Deletion Criteria
The NCP establishes the criteria that EPA uses to delete sites from
the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425(e), sites may be deleted
from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. In making such a
determination pursuant to 40 CFR 300.425(e), EPA will consider, in
consultation with the state, whether any of the following criteria have
been met:
i. Responsible parties or other persons have implemented all
appropriate response actions required;
ii. all appropriate Fund-financed response under CERCLA has been
implemented, and no further response action by responsible parties is
appropriate; or
iii. the remedial investigation has shown that the release poses no
significant threat to public health or the environment and, therefore,
the taking of remedial measures is not appropriate.
Pursuant to CERCLA section 121(c) and the NCP, EPA conducts five-
year reviews to ensure the continued protectiveness of remedial actions
where hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants remain at a
site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted
exposure. EPA conducts such five-year reviews even if a site is deleted
from the NPL. EPA may initiate further action to ensure continued
protectiveness at a deleted site if new information becomes available
that indicates it is appropriate. Whenever there is a significant
release from a site deleted from the NPL, the deleted site may be
restored to the NPL without application of the hazard ranking system.
III. Deletion Procedures
The following procedures apply to the partial deletion of the site
in this proposed rule:
(1) EPA consulted with the respective state before developing this
Notice of Intent for partial deletion.
(2) EPA has provided the state 30 working days for review of this
proposed action prior to publication of it today.
(3) In accordance with the criteria discussed above, EPA has
determined that no further response is appropriate.
(4) The state, through their designated state agency, has concurred
with the proposed partial deletion action.
(5) Concurrently, with the publication of this Notice of Intent for
partial deletion in the Federal Register, a notice is being published
in a major local newspaper of general circulation near the site. The
newspaper announces the 30-day public comment period concerning the
Notice of Intent for partial deletion.
(6) The EPA placed copies of documents supporting the proposed
partial deletion in the deletion docket, made these items available for
public inspection, and copying at the Regional Records Center
identified above.
If comments are received within the 30-day comment period on this
document, EPA will evaluate and respond accordingly to the comments
before making a final decision to partially delete the site. If
necessary, EPA will prepare a Responsiveness Summary to address any
significant public comments received. After the public comment period,
if EPA determines it is still appropriate to partially delete the site,
the EPA will publish a final Notice of Partial Deletion in the Federal
Register. Public notices, public submissions and copies of the
Responsiveness Summary, if prepared, will be made available to
interested parties and included in the site information repositories
listed above.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not itself
create, alter, or revoke any individual's rights or obligations.
Deletion of a portion of a site from the NPL does not in any way
[[Page 86527]]
alter EPA's right to take enforcement actions, as appropriate. The NPL
is designed primarily for informational purposes and to assist EPA
management. Section 300.425(e)(3) of the NCP states that the deletion
of a site from the NPL does not preclude eligibility for future
response actions, should future conditions warrant such actions.
IV. Basis for Partial Site Deletion
The site to be partially deleted from the NPL, the location of the
site, and docket number with information including reference documents
with the rationale and data principally relied upon by the EPA to
determine that the Superfund response is complete are specified in
Table 1. The NCP permits activities to occur at a deleted site or that
media or parcel of a partially deleted site, including operation and
maintenance of the remedy, monitoring, and five-year reviews. These
activities for the site are entered in Table 1, if applicable, under
Footnote such that; 1 = site has continued operation and maintenance of
the remedy, 2 = site receives continued monitoring, and 3 = site five-
year reviews are conducted.
Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Site name City/county, state Type Docket No. Footnote
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
North Penn--Area 6............... Lansdale, PA....... Partial............ EPA-HQ-SFUND-1989-0 1, 2, 3
008.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Table 2 includes a description of the area, media or Operable Units
(OUs) of the NPL site proposed for partial deletion from the NPL, and
an email address to which public comments may be submitted if the
commenter does not comment using https://www.regulations.gov.
Table 2
________________________________________________________
Media/parcels for partial
Site name deletion Email address for public comments
________________________________________________________
North Penn_Area 6...................... 1.66-acres soil and groundwater [email protected]
of the Second Administrative
Parcel, 135 East Hancock
Street.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA maintains the NPL as the list of sites that appear to present a
significant risk to public health, welfare, or the environment.
Deletion from the NPL does not preclude further remedial action.
Whenever there is a significant release from a site deleted from the
NPL, the deleted site may be restored to the NPL without application of
the hazard ranking system. Deletion of a site from the NPL does not
affect responsible party liability in the unlikely event that future
conditions warrant further actions.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 300
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Chemicals,
Hazardous substances, Hazardous waste, Intergovernmental relations,
Natural resources, Oil pollution, Penalties, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Superfund, Water pollution control, Water
supply.
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.; 42 U.S.C. 9601-9657; E.O.
13626, 77 FR 56749, 3 CFR, 2013 Comp., p. 306; E.O. 12777, 56 FR
54757, 3 CFR, 1991 Comp., p. 351; E.O. 12580, 52 FR 2923, 3 CFR,
1987 Comp., p. 193.
Dated: December 18, 2020.
Dana Stalcup,
Acting Office Director, Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology
Innovation.
[FR Doc. 2020-28839 Filed 12-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P