Wisconsin & Southern Railroad, L.L.C.-Acquisition and Operation Exemption-Soo Line Railroad Company, 84093-84094 [2020-28395]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Notices
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions for stay must
be filed no later than December 31, 2020
(at least seven days before the
exemption becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36456, should be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board via efiling on the Board’s website. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on DUSR’s representative,
Robert A. Wimbish, Fletcher & Sippel
LLC, 29 North Wacker Drive, Suite 800,
Chicago, IL 60606–3208.
According to DUSR, this action is
categorically excluded from
environmental review under 49 CFR
1105.6(c) and from historic reporting
requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b).
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: December 17, 2020.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director,
Office of Proceedings.
Kenyatta Clay,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020–28274 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36452]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Wisconsin & Southern Railroad,
L.L.C.—Acquisition and Operation
Exemption—Soo Line Railroad
Company
On November 17, 2020, Wisconsin &
Southern Railroad, L.L.C. (WSOR), a
Class II rail carrier, filed a petition
under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for an exemption
from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 10902 to acquire and operate
over approximately 4.79 miles of rail
line owned by Soo Line Railroad
Company (Soo Line). The rail line
extends from milepost 93.20 (at
Hampton Avenue) to milepost 88.41
(south of State Street) in the City of
Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, Wis.
(the Line). WSOR concurrently filed a
petition for waiver of the 60-day
advance notice requirement of 49 CFR
1121.4(h). For the reasons discussed
below, the Board will grant the petition
for exemption and the petition for
waiver.
Background
In 2007, WSOR received Board
authority to lease and operate over the
Line. Wis. & S. R.R.—Lease & Operation
Exemption—Soo Line R.R. (Lease
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:21 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
Decision), FD 35012, slip op. at 1, 3
(STB served July 17, 2007).1 According
to WSOR, it has continued to lease,
maintain, dispatch, and operate over the
Line since 2007, but now seeks to
purchase the Line from Soo Line.2 (Pet.
for Exemption 1–2.) WSOR states that,
through ownership of the Line, it ‘‘will
be able to exercise more complete
control over investment decisions, and
will be better positioned to offer
responsive and efficient rail service into
the future.’’ (Id. at 3.) WSOR states that
the parties hope to close on their
transaction before the end of the year
and asks the Board, at Soo Line’s
request, for expedited consideration of
its petition for exemption. (Id. at 2.)
WSOR also petitions the Board for a
waiver of the 60-day notice requirement
under 49 CFR 1121.4(h). Unless waived,
section 1121.4(h) would require WSOR,
at least 60 days before the exemption
becomes effective, to post a notice of its
intent to undertake the proposed
transaction setting forth certain
information at the workplace of the
employees on the affected lines, serve a
copy of the notice on the national
offices of the labor unions with
employees on the affected lines, and
certify to the Board that it has done so.
WSOR argues that the notice
requirement would serve no useful
purpose under the circumstances,
pointing out that no Soo Line employees
have worked on the Line for more than
13 years and that, because WSOR has
operated the Line during that time, there
is no new carrier. (Pet. for Waiver 3.)
WSOR states that it ‘‘has no plans to
modify its operation of the Line once its
leasehold interest is converted to
ownership,’’ and, therefore, no
employees would be adversely affected
by the proposed acquisition. (Id. at 2.)
No opposition to either the petition
for exemption or the petition for waiver
has been filed.
Discussion and Conclusions
Exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10902.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10902, the acquisition
of a rail line by a Class II rail carrier
requires the prior approval of the Board.
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the
1 The petition for exemption notes that the Lease
Decision listed the Line’s southern limit as milepost
88.4, whereas the Asset Purchase Agreement
governing the sale of the Line here lists it as
milepost 88.41. WSOR states that this ‘‘minimal
difference in mileposts—less than 53 feet—is
believed to be a rounding error, and was not
intended to signify a different point on the Line.’’
(Pet. for Exemption 1 n.1.)
2 WSOR states that its proposed transaction with
Soo Line also includes the transfer of a portion of
Soo Line’s Glendale Yard known as the ‘‘B’’ yard.
(Pet. for Exemption 1.) The 2007 transaction also
included the ‘‘B’’ yard. Lease Decision, FD 35012,
slip op. at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00211
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
84093
Board must exempt a transaction or
service from regulation when it finds
that: (1) Regulation is not necessary to
carry out the rail transportation policy
(RTP) of 49 U.S.C. 10101; and (2) either
(a) the transaction or service is of
limited scope, or (b) regulation is not
needed to protect shippers from the
abuse of market power.
In this case, an exemption from the
prior approval requirements of section
10902 is consistent with section
10502(a). Detailed scrutiny of the
proposed transaction under section
10902 is not necessary to carry out the
RTP. An exemption from the
application process would minimize the
need for federal regulatory control,
reduce regulatory barriers to entry, and
result in the expeditious handling of
this proceeding. See 49 U.S.C. 10101(2),
(7), (15). Other aspects of the RTP would
not be adversely affected by use of the
exemption process.
Moreover, regulation of the proposed
transaction under section 10902 is not
needed to protect shippers from the
abuse of market power.3 There would be
no loss of rail competition and no
adverse change in the competitive
balance in the transportation market, as
WSOR has been the carrier providing
service over the Line since 2007. Nor
would there be a change in the level of
service to any shippers because ‘‘WSOR
does not intend as a result of the
proposed transaction to change
materially its existing operations over
the Line.’’ (Pet. for Exemption 3.)
Waiver of 49 CFR 1121.4(h). As noted,
WSOR has petitioned for waiver of the
60-day notification requirement under
49 CFR 1121.4(h). The purpose of that
requirement is to ensure that rail labor
unions and employees who would be
affected by the transfer of a line are
given sufficient notice of the transaction
before consummation. The Board takes
seriously the requirements of the
regulation, but it does not appear that
the purpose behind the notice
requirement would be thwarted if the
requested waiver is granted in this case.
The record indicates that no railroad
employees would be adversely affected
by waiver of the requirement here. As
WSOR explains, ‘‘[n]o Soo [Line]
employees have worked on any portion
of the Line in more than 13 years, and
they (and the unions representing them)
were advised of the transition to WSOR
operation of the Line in connection with
the Lease Decision transaction as of May
24, 2007.’’ (Pet. for Waiver 3.) WSOR
3 Because the Board concludes that regulation is
not needed to protect shippers from the abuse of
market power, it is unnecessary to determine
whether the proposed transaction is limited in
scope. See 49 U.S.C. 10502(a).
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
84094
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Notices
also states that ‘‘[n]o Soo [Line]
employees will be displaced[,]’’ and that
WSOR ‘‘will continue in [its] capacity’’
as the operator of the Line following the
proposed transaction. (Id.) Because no
employees would be adversely affected
by the requested waiver of the 60-day
notice period, the Board will grant the
waiver. See, e.g., Wis. & S. R.R.—
Acquis. & Operation Exemption—City of
Fitchburg, Wis., FD 35838, slip op. at 4
(STB served Nov. 18, 2014).
Employee Protection. Under 49 U.S.C.
10502(g), the Board may not use its
exemption authority to relieve a carrier
of its statutory obligation to protect the
interests of its employees. Section
10902(d) provides for labor protection
in line acquisitions by Class II rail
carriers. As a condition to this
exemption, any employees affected by
the acquisition will be protected as
required by 49 U.S.C. 10902(d), subject
to the standards and procedures
established in Wisconsin Central Ltd.—
Acquisition Exemption—Lines of Union
Pacific Railroad, 2 S.T.B. 218 (1997),
aff’d in relevant part sub nom.
Association of American Railroads v.
STB, 162 F.3d 101 (DC Cir. 1998).
Environmental and Historic Review.
Under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(1), this action,
which will not result in significant
changes in carrier operations, is
categorically excluded from
environmental review. Similarly, under
49 CFR 1105.8(b)(1), no historic report
is required because the subject
transaction is for continued rail service,
WSOR has indicated no plans to alter
railroad properties 50 years old or older,
and any abandonment would be subject
to Board jurisdiction.
Effective Date. WSOR requests
authority to acquire and operate the
Line by December 28, 2020, so that the
parties may close the transaction before
the end of the year. The exemption will
take effect on December 28, 2020, unless
it is stayed.
It is ordered:
1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board
exempts from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902
WSOR’s acquisition of and operation
over the Line, subject to the employee
protective conditions implementing 49
U.S.C. 10902(d) as provided in this
decision.
2. Notice of the exemption will be
published in the Federal Register.
3. WSOR’s request for a waiver of the
advance notice requirement under 49
CFR 1121.4(h) is granted.
4. This exemption will become
effective on December 28, 2020.
5. Petitions to stay must be filed by
December 22, 2020. Petitions to reopen
must be filed by January 4, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:21 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
Decided: December 14, 2020.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman,
Fuchs, and Oberman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020–28395 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36462]
Patriot Rail Transportation Company,
LLC, Patriot Rail Company LLC, SRTV
Holdings LLC, SteelRiver Transport
Ventures LLC, Global Diversified
Infrastructure Fund (North America)
LP, First State Infrastructure Managers
(International) Limited, and Mitsubishi
UFJ Financial Group, Inc.—Control
Exemption—Salt Lake Garfield and
Western Railway Company
Patriot Rail Transportation Company,
LLC (Patriot), Patriot Rail Company LLC
(PRC), SRTV Holdings LLC, SteelRiver
Transport Ventures LLC, Global
Diversified Infrastructure Fund (North
America) LP, First State Infrastructure
Managers (International) Limited, and
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.
(collectively, Applicants), all
noncarriers, have filed a verified notice
of exemption under 49 CFR 1180.2(d)(2)
to acquire control of Salt Lake Garfield
and Western Railway Company (SLGW),
a Class III rail carrier operating in Utah.
According to the verified notice, PRC,
on behalf of its subsidiary, Patriot, has
entered into a Purchase and Sale
Agreement with SLGW, Caballero,
L.L.C., and Caballero 2 LLC.1 Applicants
state that Patriot will acquire a 100%
controlling interest in SLGW. The
verified notice states that Patriot
currently controls 14 class III railroads.2
The verified notice indicates that: (1)
SLGW will not connect with any of the
Subsidiary Railroads; (2) the acquisition
of control is not part of a series of
anticipated transactions that would
1 A redacted version of the agreement was filed
with the verified notice of exemption. Applicants
simultaneously filed a motion for protective order
under 49 CFR 1104.14(b). That motion will be
addressed in a separate decision.
2 The verified notice lists the railroads as follows:
(1) The Tennessee Southern Railroad Company,
LLC; (2) Rarus Railway, LLC, d/b/a Butte, Anaconda
& Pacific Railway Co.; (3) Utah Central Railway
Company, LLC; (4) Sacramento Valley Railroad,
LLC; (5) The Louisiana and North West Railroad
Company LLC; (6) Temple & Central Texas Railway,
LLC; (7) the Columbia & Cowlitz Railway, LLC; (8)
the DeQueen and Eastern Railroad, LLC; (9) the
Golden Triangle Railroad, LLC; (10) the Patriot
Woods Railroad, LLC; (11) the Texas, Oklahoma &
Eastern Railroad, LLC; (12) Georgia Northeastern
Railroad Company, LLC; (13) the Kingman Terminal
Railroad, LLC; and (14) West Belt Railway LLC
(collectively, the Subsidiary Railroads).
PO 00000
Frm 00212
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
connect SLGW or any of the Subsidiary
Railroads with each other; and (3) the
proposed transaction does not involve a
Class I carrier. Therefore, the transaction
is exempt from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323. See 49
CFR 1180.2(d)(2).
The verified notice states that
Applicants intend to control SLGW on
or before December 15, 2020. However,
the earliest this transaction may be
consummated is January 9, 2021, the
effective date of the exemption (30 days
after the verified notice was filed).3
Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board
may not use its exemption authority to
relieve a rail carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its
employees. However, 49 U.S.C. 11326(c)
does not provide for labor protection for
transactions under 49 U.S.C. 11324 and
11325 that involve only Class III rail
carriers. Because this transaction
involves Class III rail carriers only, the
Board, under the statute, may not
impose labor protective conditions for
this transaction.
If the verified notice contains false or
misleading information, the exemption
is void ab initio. Petitions to revoke the
exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d)
may be filed at any time. The filing of
a petition to revoke will not
automatically stay the effectiveness of
the exemption. Petitions to stay must be
filed no later than December 31, 2020 (at
least seven days before the exemption
becomes effective).
All pleadings, referring to Docket No.
FD 36462, should be filed with the
Surface Transportation Board via efiling on the Board’s website. In
addition, a copy of each pleading must
be served on Applicants’ representative,
Louis E. Gitomer, Law Offices of Louis
E. Gitomer, LLC, 600 Baltimore Ave.,
Suite 301, Towson, MD 21204.
According to the verified notice, this
action is categorically excluded from
environmental review under 49 CFR
1105.6(c) and from historic preservation
reporting requirements under 49 CFR
1105.8(b).
Board decisions and notices are
available at www.stb.gov.
Decided: December 17, 2020.
By the Board, Allison C. Davis, Director,
Office of Proceedings.
Tammy Lowery,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020–28286 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915–01–P
3 The verified notice was initially submitted on
November 17, 2020. Applicants filed supplements
on November 18, December 1, and December 10,
2020. December 10, 2020, therefore, is deemed the
filing date of the verified notice.
E:\FR\FM\23DEN1.SGM
23DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 84093-84094]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28395]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
[Docket No. FD 36452]
Wisconsin & Southern Railroad, L.L.C.--Acquisition and Operation
Exemption--Soo Line Railroad Company
On November 17, 2020, Wisconsin & Southern Railroad, L.L.C. (WSOR),
a Class II rail carrier, filed a petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for an
exemption from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902 to
acquire and operate over approximately 4.79 miles of rail line owned by
Soo Line Railroad Company (Soo Line). The rail line extends from
milepost 93.20 (at Hampton Avenue) to milepost 88.41 (south of State
Street) in the City of Milwaukee, Milwaukee County, Wis. (the Line).
WSOR concurrently filed a petition for waiver of the 60-day advance
notice requirement of 49 CFR 1121.4(h). For the reasons discussed
below, the Board will grant the petition for exemption and the petition
for waiver.
Background
In 2007, WSOR received Board authority to lease and operate over
the Line. Wis. & S. R.R.--Lease & Operation Exemption--Soo Line R.R.
(Lease Decision), FD 35012, slip op. at 1, 3 (STB served July 17,
2007).\1\ According to WSOR, it has continued to lease, maintain,
dispatch, and operate over the Line since 2007, but now seeks to
purchase the Line from Soo Line.\2\ (Pet. for Exemption 1-2.) WSOR
states that, through ownership of the Line, it ``will be able to
exercise more complete control over investment decisions, and will be
better positioned to offer responsive and efficient rail service into
the future.'' (Id. at 3.) WSOR states that the parties hope to close on
their transaction before the end of the year and asks the Board, at Soo
Line's request, for expedited consideration of its petition for
exemption. (Id. at 2.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petition for exemption notes that the Lease Decision
listed the Line's southern limit as milepost 88.4, whereas the Asset
Purchase Agreement governing the sale of the Line here lists it as
milepost 88.41. WSOR states that this ``minimal difference in
mileposts--less than 53 feet--is believed to be a rounding error,
and was not intended to signify a different point on the Line.''
(Pet. for Exemption 1 n.1.)
\2\ WSOR states that its proposed transaction with Soo Line also
includes the transfer of a portion of Soo Line's Glendale Yard known
as the ``B'' yard. (Pet. for Exemption 1.) The 2007 transaction also
included the ``B'' yard. Lease Decision, FD 35012, slip op. at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
WSOR also petitions the Board for a waiver of the 60-day notice
requirement under 49 CFR 1121.4(h). Unless waived, section 1121.4(h)
would require WSOR, at least 60 days before the exemption becomes
effective, to post a notice of its intent to undertake the proposed
transaction setting forth certain information at the workplace of the
employees on the affected lines, serve a copy of the notice on the
national offices of the labor unions with employees on the affected
lines, and certify to the Board that it has done so. WSOR argues that
the notice requirement would serve no useful purpose under the
circumstances, pointing out that no Soo Line employees have worked on
the Line for more than 13 years and that, because WSOR has operated the
Line during that time, there is no new carrier. (Pet. for Waiver 3.)
WSOR states that it ``has no plans to modify its operation of the Line
once its leasehold interest is converted to ownership,'' and,
therefore, no employees would be adversely affected by the proposed
acquisition. (Id. at 2.)
No opposition to either the petition for exemption or the petition
for waiver has been filed.
Discussion and Conclusions
Exemption from 49 U.S.C. 10902. Under 49 U.S.C. 10902, the
acquisition of a rail line by a Class II rail carrier requires the
prior approval of the Board. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the
Board must exempt a transaction or service from regulation when it
finds that: (1) Regulation is not necessary to carry out the rail
transportation policy (RTP) of 49 U.S.C. 10101; and (2) either (a) the
transaction or service is of limited scope, or (b) regulation is not
needed to protect shippers from the abuse of market power.
In this case, an exemption from the prior approval requirements of
section 10902 is consistent with section 10502(a). Detailed scrutiny of
the proposed transaction under section 10902 is not necessary to carry
out the RTP. An exemption from the application process would minimize
the need for federal regulatory control, reduce regulatory barriers to
entry, and result in the expeditious handling of this proceeding. See
49 U.S.C. 10101(2), (7), (15). Other aspects of the RTP would not be
adversely affected by use of the exemption process.
Moreover, regulation of the proposed transaction under section
10902 is not needed to protect shippers from the abuse of market
power.\3\ There would be no loss of rail competition and no adverse
change in the competitive balance in the transportation market, as WSOR
has been the carrier providing service over the Line since 2007. Nor
would there be a change in the level of service to any shippers because
``WSOR does not intend as a result of the proposed transaction to
change materially its existing operations over the Line.'' (Pet. for
Exemption 3.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Because the Board concludes that regulation is not needed to
protect shippers from the abuse of market power, it is unnecessary
to determine whether the proposed transaction is limited in scope.
See 49 U.S.C. 10502(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Waiver of 49 CFR 1121.4(h). As noted, WSOR has petitioned for
waiver of the 60-day notification requirement under 49 CFR 1121.4(h).
The purpose of that requirement is to ensure that rail labor unions and
employees who would be affected by the transfer of a line are given
sufficient notice of the transaction before consummation. The Board
takes seriously the requirements of the regulation, but it does not
appear that the purpose behind the notice requirement would be thwarted
if the requested waiver is granted in this case.
The record indicates that no railroad employees would be adversely
affected by waiver of the requirement here. As WSOR explains, ``[n]o
Soo [Line] employees have worked on any portion of the Line in more
than 13 years, and they (and the unions representing them) were advised
of the transition to WSOR operation of the Line in connection with the
Lease Decision transaction as of May 24, 2007.'' (Pet. for Waiver 3.)
WSOR
[[Page 84094]]
also states that ``[n]o Soo [Line] employees will be displaced[,]'' and
that WSOR ``will continue in [its] capacity'' as the operator of the
Line following the proposed transaction. (Id.) Because no employees
would be adversely affected by the requested waiver of the 60-day
notice period, the Board will grant the waiver. See, e.g., Wis. & S.
R.R.--Acquis. & Operation Exemption--City of Fitchburg, Wis., FD 35838,
slip op. at 4 (STB served Nov. 18, 2014).
Employee Protection. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not
use its exemption authority to relieve a carrier of its statutory
obligation to protect the interests of its employees. Section 10902(d)
provides for labor protection in line acquisitions by Class II rail
carriers. As a condition to this exemption, any employees affected by
the acquisition will be protected as required by 49 U.S.C. 10902(d),
subject to the standards and procedures established in Wisconsin
Central Ltd.--Acquisition Exemption--Lines of Union Pacific Railroad, 2
S.T.B. 218 (1997), aff'd in relevant part sub nom. Association of
American Railroads v. STB, 162 F.3d 101 (DC Cir. 1998).
Environmental and Historic Review. Under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(1), this
action, which will not result in significant changes in carrier
operations, is categorically excluded from environmental review.
Similarly, under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(1), no historic report is required
because the subject transaction is for continued rail service, WSOR has
indicated no plans to alter railroad properties 50 years old or older,
and any abandonment would be subject to Board jurisdiction.
Effective Date. WSOR requests authority to acquire and operate the
Line by December 28, 2020, so that the parties may close the
transaction before the end of the year. The exemption will take effect
on December 28, 2020, unless it is stayed.
It is ordered:
1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts from the prior approval
requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10902 WSOR's acquisition of and operation
over the Line, subject to the employee protective conditions
implementing 49 U.S.C. 10902(d) as provided in this decision.
2. Notice of the exemption will be published in the Federal
Register.
3. WSOR's request for a waiver of the advance notice requirement
under 49 CFR 1121.4(h) is granted.
4. This exemption will become effective on December 28, 2020.
5. Petitions to stay must be filed by December 22, 2020. Petitions
to reopen must be filed by January 4, 2021.
Decided: December 14, 2020.
By the Board, Board Members Begeman, Fuchs, and Oberman.
Jeffrey Herzig,
Clearance Clerk.
[FR Doc. 2020-28395 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4915-01-P