Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Kansas City, Missouri Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement, 83877-83880 [2020-28119]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules
permitting program. We are proposing
this action because we find that the
2019–20 NSR submittals meet the
applicable requirements under parts C
and D of title I of the CAA, and that our
action is consistent with sections
110(a)(2), 110(l) and 193 of the Act.
We will accept comments from the
public on this proposal until January 22,
2021. If we take final action to approve
the 2019–20 NSR submittals, our final
action will incorporate the identified
rule(s) into the federally enforceable
SIP.
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this rule, the EPA is proposing to
include in a final EPA rule regulatory
text that includes incorporation by
reference. In accordance with
requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
the ADEQ rules described in Table 1 of
this preamble. The EPA has made, and
will continue to make, these materials
available through https://
www.regulations.gov and at the EPA
Region IX Office (please contact the
person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the
EPA’s role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Act. Accordingly, this proposed
action merely proposes to approve state
law as meeting federal requirements and
does not impose additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this proposed
action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide the EPA with the
discretionary authority to address
disproportionate human health or
environmental effects with practical,
appropriate, and legally permissible
methods under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved to
apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where the EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Sulfur dioxide, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: December 8, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2020–27952 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
83877
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R07–OAR–2020–0695; FRL–10018–
78–Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal
of Kansas City, Missouri Reid Vapor
Pressure Requirement
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing approval of
revision to the Missouri State
Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted
by the Missouri Department of Natural
Resources (MoDNR) on September 15,
2020. The proposed revision removes
the Kansas City, Missouri low Reid
Vapor Pressure (RVP) requirement
which required gasoline sold in the
Kansas City, Missouri area to have a
seven pounds per square inch Reid
Vapor Pressure from June 1 to
September 15. The majority of the state
is subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA)
nine pounds per square inch Reid Vapor
Pressure from June 1 to September 15.
If approved the Kansas City, Missouri
area would be subject to the Clean Air
Act Reid Vapor Pressure requirement. In
addition, EPA anticipates issuing a
separate proposal for the Kansas side of
the Kansas City metro area.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R07–
OAR–2020–0695 to https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the Docket ID No. for this
rulemaking. Comments received will be
posted without change to https://
www.regulations.gov/, including any
personal information provided. For
detailed instructions on sending
comments and additional information
on the rulemaking process, see the
‘‘Written Comments’’ heading of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jed
Wolkins, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality
Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219;
telephone number: (913) 551–7588;
email address: wolkins.jed@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
83878
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a
SIP Revision Been Met?
IV. Background
V. What is the EPA’s analysis of Missouri’s
SIP request?
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
VII. Incorporation by Reference
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by
Docket ID No. EPA–R07–OAR–2020–
0695, at https://www.regulations.gov.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from Regulations.gov.
The EPA may publish any comment
received to its public docket. Do not
submit electronically any information
you consider to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
II. What is being addressed in this
document?
The EPA is proposing to approve a
revision to the Missouri SIP, submitted
by the MoDNR on September 15, 2020.
The proposed revision removes the
Kansas City, Missouri; Clay, Jackson,
and Platte Counties; seven pounds per
square inch (psi) Reid Vapor Pressure
(RVP) requirement. The approved SIP,
10 CSR 10–2.330, requires gasoline sold
in the three counties to have an RVP of
seven psi or less from June 1 through
September 15.1 If the SIP revision is
approved, the Kansas City, Missouri
area would be subject to the CAA RVP
requirement of nine psi or less from
June 1 through September 15.2 Missouri
has asked EPA to remove 10 CSR 10–
2.330, Control of Gasoline Reid Vapor
Pressure from the SIP.
1 The Missouri rule allows an additional one psi
for gasoline containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
2 The CAA allows an additional one psi for
gasoline containing up to 15% ethanol.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
III. Have the requirements for approval
of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the
public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR
51.102. The submission also satisfied
the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part
51, appendix V. The State provided
public notice on this SIP revision from
February 18, 2020 to April 2, 2020 and
received three comments. Missouri
adequately responded to the comments
but did not change the removal based on
the comments. In addition, as explained
below, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the
CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. Background
The EPA established a 1-hour ozone
NAAQS in 1971.3 36 FR 8186 (April 30,
1971). On March 3, 1978, the EPA
designated Clay, Platte and Jackson
counties (hereinafter referred to in this
document as the ‘‘Kanas City area’’) in
nonattainment of the 1971 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, as required by the CAA
Amendments of 1977. 43 FR 8962
(March 3, 1978). On February 8, 1979,
the EPA revised the 1-hour ozone
NAAQS, referred to as the 1979 ozone
NAAQS. 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979).
The EPA redesignated the Kansas City
area to attainment of the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard and approved the ozone
maintenance plan on July 23, 1992. 57
FR 27939 (June 23, 1992). Pursuant to
section 175A of the CAA, the first 10year maintenance period for the 1-hour
ozone standard began on July 23, 1992,
the effective date of the redesignation
approval.
In 1995, the Kansas City area violated
the 1979 1-hour ozone standard.
Missouri revised the control strategy
and contingency measures in the
maintenance plan, which was approved
on June 24, 2002. 67 FR 20036 (April 24,
2002). The revised control strategy
included 10 CSR 10–2.330, Control of
Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure.
On January 1, 1997, Missouri adopted
the seven and two tenths (7.2) pounds
per square inch (psi) Reid Vapor
Pressure (RVP) limit from June 1 to
September 15.4 EPA approved this rule
3 The 1-hour ozone NAAQS was originally
promulgated as a photochemical oxidant standard.
See 36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971). In 1979, the EPA
substituted the word ‘‘ozone’’ for ‘‘photochemical
oxidant’’. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). In
doing so, the EPA stated that ‘‘(t)he intent of the
standard (total-oxidant reduction), the control
strategies, and the index of Progress toward
attainment (measured ozone levels) remain
unchanged.’’ Id. at 8203.
4 The Missouri rule allowed an additional one psi
for gasoline containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
into the SIP on April 24, 1998.5 On
April 3, 2001, Missouri revised the rule
to seven (7.0) psi limit from June 1 to
September 15.6 EPA approved this rule
into the SIP on February 13, 2002.7
On April 30, 2004, the EPA published
a final rule in the Federal Register
stating the 1979 ozone NAAQS would
no longer apply (i.e., would be revoked)
for an area one year after the effective
date of the area’s designation for the 8hour ozone NAAQS. 69 FR 23951 (April
30, 2004). The Kansas City Area was
designated as an unclassifiable area for
the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS,
effective June 15, 2004. See id.
However, on May 3, 2005, EPA
published a final rule designating the
Kansas City area as an attainment area
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
based on new monitoring data. See 70
FR 22801 (May 3, 2005). The effective
date of the revocation of the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard for the Kansas City area
was June 15, 2005. See 70 FR 44470
(August 3, 2005). Missouri achieved the
required maintenance of the 1979 1hour ozone standard in 2014.
On September 15, 2020, Missouri
requested that the EPA remove 10 CSR
10–2.330 from the SIP. Section 110(l) of
the CAA prohibits EPA from approving
a SIP revision that interferes with any
applicable requirement concerning
attainment and reasonable further
progress (RFP), or any other applicable
requirement of the CAA.
V. What is the EPA’s analysis of
Missouri’s SIP request?
EPA is making the preliminary
determination that the ozone NAAQS is
the primary focus for the
noninterference demonstration required
by section 110(l) of the CAA because the
RVP requirements result primarily in
emissions benefits for VOCs and NOX.
VOCs and NOX emissions are precursors
for ozone. NOX emissions are precursors
for particulate matter. NO2 is a
component of NOX. There are no
emissions reductions attributable to the
emissions of carbon monoxide (CO),
lead and sulfur dioxide (SO2) from RVP
requirements.
In Missouri’s September 15, 2020
submission the State provided a
technical demonstration to support the
request to remove Missouri’s 7.0 psi
RVP requirement from the active
measures portions of the Missouri SIP.
In that technical demonstration,
Missouri provided Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator (MOVES) results,
5 63
FR 20318.
Missouri rule allows an additional one psi
for gasoline containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
7 67 FR 6658.
6 The
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules
modeling the emissions of VOCs and
NOX associated with changing the high
ozone season RVP requirements from
the state-level requirement of 7.0 psi to
the federal requirement of 9.0 psi. EPA
evaluated the state’s assumptions and
inputs used in MOVES, and EPA finds
the state analysis is appropriate.
Specifically, MDNR compared what the
projected emissions in the year 2020
(the year the program is requested to be
rescinded) would be, assuming a RVP
level of 7.0 psi and 9.0 psi, respectively,
in two separate modeling simulations.
The comparison revealed an increase in
emissions of 0.17 tons for NOX and 0.71
tons for VOC, per ozone season day,
would result from the change to the
federal requirement from June 1 through
September 15. While the modeling
showed a slight increase in NOX and
VOC emissions resulting from the use of
83879
9.0 psi RVP as opposed to 7.0 psi, the
most appropriate analysis is whether
emissions in the future years would
increase and potentially interfere with
maintenance of the NAAQS. The State
compared actual emissions from 2017
using a RVP of 7.0 psi to emissions
modelled for the years 2020 using a RVP
of 9.0 psi. Table 1 below provides the
results of this analysis.
TABLE 1—COMPARATIVE EMISSIONS FOR CHANGE TO RVP
2017 7.0 psi RVP
(tons per ozone
season day)
2020 7.0 psi RVP
(tons per ozone
season day)
2020 9.0 psi RVP
(tons per ozone
season day)
Decrease in 2020 9.0 psi RVP
compared to 2017 7.0 psi RVP
(tons per ozone season day)
57.01
31.25
43.51
28.11
43.68
28.82
13.33
2.43
NOX ......................................................................
VOC .....................................................................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
As Table 1 indicates, NOX and VOC
emissions in the Kansas City Area
would decrease from 2017 to 2020, even
with the increase due to ozone season
fuel RVP of 9.0 psi. The modeling
demonstration shows the slight increase
in emissions is being mitigated areawide by a steady decrease in tailpipe
emissions. This is the result of a cleaner
new vehicle fleet replacing the older
fleet 8 and the decrease in the sulfur
content in gasoline as required by EPA’s
Tier 3 motor vehicle emission and fuel
standards, which were implemented
beginning on January 1, 2017.9
The Kansas City, Missouri area is
designated attainment/unclassifiable or
attainment for the 1979, 1997, 2008, and
2015 ozone standards. While the 1979
maintenance plan is approved into the
SIP, the 1979 NAAQS has been revoked
for the Kansas City area. There are no
other ozone maintenance plans for the
Kansas City area in the SIP. The highest
monitor design value in the Kansas City
area is 68 parts per billion (ppb), which
is below the 2015 ozone NAAQS of 70
ppb.10 Based on the state’s modeling
analysis, along with air quality data,
EPA is making the preliminary
determination that the slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions resulting from
the use of 9.0 psi RVP fuel will not
interfere with the Kansas City area’s
8 As vehicle owners purchase new vehicles, the
older vehicles slowly are removed from the vehicles
on the road. A used vehicle maybe purchased and
driven by several owner, but eventually the older,
more polluting vehicles are removed from the road.
Manufactures’ fleets in 1994 are allowed 0.6 gram/
mile NOX emissions. Manufactures’ fleets in 2004
are allowed 0.07 gram/mile Nox emissions.
Manufactures’ fleets in 2025 will be allowed 0.03
gram/mile NOX emissions.
9 Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles:
Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards
(See 79 FR 23414, April 28, 2014.)
10 Based on the most recent quality assured data
design values (2017–2019).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
ability to maintain the ozone NAAQS,
or any other applicable requirement.
The EPA is making this determination
based on MOVES modeling that
indicates that on-road VOC and NOX
emissions in 2020 with gasoline meeting
the 9.0 psi RVP requirement remain
below the emissions levels in 2017, a
year in which the area’s design value
was also below the 2015 ozone standard
of 70 ppb.
The Kansas City area is designated as
attainment or unclassifiable for the 2006
24-hour PM2.5, 2012 annual PM2.5, 1971
annual NO2, and 2010 1-hour NO2
standards. There are no maintenance
plans for any of these standards. The
highest PM2.5 design value is 75% of the
standard. The highest NO2 design value
is 50% of the standard. As discussed
above the area has a decrease from 2017
to 2020 in NOX and VOC emissions.
Based on this data together with air
quality data, EPA is making the
preliminary determination that the
slight increase in NOX and VOC
emissions in 2020 and the downward
trend in on-road VOC and NOX
emissions resulting from this change
will not interfere with the Area’s ability
to maintain the any PM2.5 or NO2
NAAQS, or any other applicable
requirement.
The Platte and Clay Counties of the
Kansas City area are designated as
attainment or unclassifiable for the SO2
standards. Jackson county is designated
as nonattainment. There are no
maintenance plans for any of these
standards. The most recent (2017–2019)
highest SO2 design value is in Jackson
County and is less than 15% of the
standard. The RVP standard has no
effect on SO2 emissions. Based on this
data together with air quality data, EPA
is making the preliminary determination
that the change will not interfere with
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the Area’s ability to attain or maintain
the SO2 NAAQS, or any other applicable
requirement.
The Kansas City area is designated as
attainment or unclassifiable for the CO
and lead standards. There are no
maintenance plans for any of these
standards. The highest CO design value
is less than 20% of the standard. There
is no lead monitoring in the area. The
RVP standard has no effect on CO or
lead emissions. Based on this data
together with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination
that the change will not interfere with
the area’s ability to maintain the CO or
lead NAAQS, or any other applicable
requirement. EPA is making the
preliminary determination that the
change will not interfere with
reasonable progress towards natural
visibility in Missouri’s Class 1 areas nor
any Class 1 area in another state
Missouri impacts.
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
We are proposing to approve
Missouri’s removal of the state RVP
requirement from the SIP for the Kansas
City, Missouri area. As discussed above
the removal of the RVP requirement will
not affect the area’s ability to attain or
maintain any air quality standard. We
are processing this as a proposed action
because we are soliciting comments on
this proposed action. Final rulemaking
will occur after consideration of any
comments.
VII. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to amend regulatory text that
includes incorporation by reference. As
described in the proposed amendments
to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below, the
EPA is proposing to remove provisions
of the EPA-Approved Missouri
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
83880
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 247 / Wednesday, December 23, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulations from the Missouri State
Implementation Plan, which is
incorporated by reference in accordance
with the requirements of 1 CFR part 51.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the
Administrator is required to approve a
SIP submission that complies with the
provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k);
40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP
submissions, the EPA’s role is to
approve state choices, provided that
they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely
approves state law as meeting Federal
requirements and does not impose
additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason,
this action:
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by the Office of
Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because SIP approvals are
exempted under Executive Order 12866.
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTA) because this
rulemaking does not involve technical
standards; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:43 Dec 22, 2020
Jkt 253001
The SIP is not approved to apply on
any Indian reservation land or in any
other area where EPA or an Indian tribe
has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the rule does not have tribal
implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: December 14, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52—APPROVAL AND
PROMULGATION OF
IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart–AA Missouri
§ 52.1320
[Amended]
2. In § 52.1320, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by removing the entry
‘‘10–2.330’’ under the heading ‘‘Chapter
2-Air Quality Standards and Air
Pollution Control Regulations for the
Kansas City Metropolitan Area’’.
■ 3. In § 52.1323, paragraph (n) is
revised to read as follows:
■
§ 52.1323
Approval status.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Missouri rule 10 CSR 10–2.330
was rescinded on January 22, 2021.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–28119 Filed 12–22–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 174 and 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2020–0053; FRL–10017–71]
Receipt of Several Pesticide Petitions
Filed for Residues of Pesticide
Chemicals in or on Various
Commodities (November 2020)
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of filing of petitions and
request for comment.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This document announces the
Agency’s receipt of several initial filings
of pesticide petitions requesting the
establishment or modification of
regulations for residues of pesticide
chemicals in or on various commodities.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before January 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by the docket identification
(ID) number and the pesticide petition
(PP) of interest as shown in the body of
this document, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Charles Smith, Biopesticides and
Pollution Prevention Division (7511P),
Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001; main telephone number:
(703) 305–7090; email address:
BPPDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\23DEP1.SGM
23DEP1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 247 (Wednesday, December 23, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 83877-83880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28119]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R07-OAR-2020-0695; FRL-10018-78-Region 7]
Air Plan Approval; Missouri; Removal of Kansas City, Missouri
Reid Vapor Pressure Requirement
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing
approval of revision to the Missouri State Implementation Plan (SIP),
submitted by the Missouri Department of Natural Resources (MoDNR) on
September 15, 2020. The proposed revision removes the Kansas City,
Missouri low Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) requirement which required
gasoline sold in the Kansas City, Missouri area to have a seven pounds
per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure from June 1 to September 15. The
majority of the state is subject to the Clean Air Act (CAA) nine pounds
per square inch Reid Vapor Pressure from June 1 to September 15. If
approved the Kansas City, Missouri area would be subject to the Clean
Air Act Reid Vapor Pressure requirement. In addition, EPA anticipates
issuing a separate proposal for the Kansas side of the Kansas City
metro area.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before January 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-
OAR-2020-0695 to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the Docket ID
No. for this rulemaking. Comments received will be posted without
change to https://www.regulations.gov/, including any personal
information provided. For detailed instructions on sending comments and
additional information on the rulemaking process, see the ``Written
Comments'' heading of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jed Wolkins, Environmental Protection
Agency, Region 7 Office, Air Quality Planning Branch, 11201 Renner
Boulevard, Lenexa, Kansas 66219; telephone number: (913) 551-7588;
email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we,'' ``us,'' and
``our'' refer to the EPA.
[[Page 83878]]
Table of Contents
I. Written Comments
II. What is being addressed in this document?
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP Revision Been Met?
IV. Background
V. What is the EPA's analysis of Missouri's SIP request?
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
VII. Incorporation by Reference
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. Written Comments
Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R07-OAR-2020-
0695, at https://www.regulations.gov. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
will generally not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA
public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions,
and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
II. What is being addressed in this document?
The EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the Missouri SIP,
submitted by the MoDNR on September 15, 2020. The proposed revision
removes the Kansas City, Missouri; Clay, Jackson, and Platte Counties;
seven pounds per square inch (psi) Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP)
requirement. The approved SIP, 10 CSR 10-2.330, requires gasoline sold
in the three counties to have an RVP of seven psi or less from June 1
through September 15.\1\ If the SIP revision is approved, the Kansas
City, Missouri area would be subject to the CAA RVP requirement of nine
psi or less from June 1 through September 15.\2\ Missouri has asked EPA
to remove 10 CSR 10-2.330, Control of Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure from
the SIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Missouri rule allows an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
\2\ The CAA allows an additional one psi for gasoline containing
up to 15% ethanol.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Have the requirements for approval of a SIP revision been met?
The State submission has met the public notice requirements for SIP
submissions in accordance with 40 CFR 51.102. The submission also
satisfied the completeness criteria of 40 CFR part 51, appendix V. The
State provided public notice on this SIP revision from February 18,
2020 to April 2, 2020 and received three comments. Missouri adequately
responded to the comments but did not change the removal based on the
comments. In addition, as explained below, the revision meets the
substantive SIP requirements of the CAA, including section 110 and
implementing regulations.
IV. Background
The EPA established a 1-hour ozone NAAQS in 1971.\3\ 36 FR 8186
(April 30, 1971). On March 3, 1978, the EPA designated Clay, Platte and
Jackson counties (hereinafter referred to in this document as the
``Kanas City area'') in nonattainment of the 1971 1-hour ozone NAAQS,
as required by the CAA Amendments of 1977. 43 FR 8962 (March 3, 1978).
On February 8, 1979, the EPA revised the 1-hour ozone NAAQS, referred
to as the 1979 ozone NAAQS. 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The 1-hour ozone NAAQS was originally promulgated as a
photochemical oxidant standard. See 36 FR 8186 (April 30, 1971). In
1979, the EPA substituted the word ``ozone'' for ``photochemical
oxidant''. See 44 FR 8202 (February 8, 1979). In doing so, the EPA
stated that ``(t)he intent of the standard (total-oxidant
reduction), the control strategies, and the index of Progress toward
attainment (measured ozone levels) remain unchanged.'' Id. at 8203.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The EPA redesignated the Kansas City area to attainment of the 1979
1-hour ozone standard and approved the ozone maintenance plan on July
23, 1992. 57 FR 27939 (June 23, 1992). Pursuant to section 175A of the
CAA, the first 10-year maintenance period for the 1-hour ozone standard
began on July 23, 1992, the effective date of the redesignation
approval.
In 1995, the Kansas City area violated the 1979 1-hour ozone
standard. Missouri revised the control strategy and contingency
measures in the maintenance plan, which was approved on June 24, 2002.
67 FR 20036 (April 24, 2002). The revised control strategy included 10
CSR 10-2.330, Control of Gasoline Reid Vapor Pressure.
On January 1, 1997, Missouri adopted the seven and two tenths (7.2)
pounds per square inch (psi) Reid Vapor Pressure (RVP) limit from June
1 to September 15.\4\ EPA approved this rule into the SIP on April 24,
1998.\5\ On April 3, 2001, Missouri revised the rule to seven (7.0) psi
limit from June 1 to September 15.\6\ EPA approved this rule into the
SIP on February 13, 2002.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The Missouri rule allowed an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
\5\ 63 FR 20318.
\6\ The Missouri rule allows an additional one psi for gasoline
containing 9 to 10% ethanol.
\7\ 67 FR 6658.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 30, 2004, the EPA published a final rule in the Federal
Register stating the 1979 ozone NAAQS would no longer apply (i.e.,
would be revoked) for an area one year after the effective date of the
area's designation for the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. 69 FR 23951 (April 30,
2004). The Kansas City Area was designated as an unclassifiable area
for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS, effective June 15, 2004. See id.
However, on May 3, 2005, EPA published a final rule designating the
Kansas City area as an attainment area for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS
based on new monitoring data. See 70 FR 22801 (May 3, 2005). The
effective date of the revocation of the 1979 1-hour ozone standard for
the Kansas City area was June 15, 2005. See 70 FR 44470 (August 3,
2005). Missouri achieved the required maintenance of the 1979 1-hour
ozone standard in 2014.
On September 15, 2020, Missouri requested that the EPA remove 10
CSR 10-2.330 from the SIP. Section 110(l) of the CAA prohibits EPA from
approving a SIP revision that interferes with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further progress
(RFP), or any other applicable requirement of the CAA.
V. What is the EPA's analysis of Missouri's SIP request?
EPA is making the preliminary determination that the ozone NAAQS is
the primary focus for the noninterference demonstration required by
section 110(l) of the CAA because the RVP requirements result primarily
in emissions benefits for VOCs and NOX. VOCs and
NOX emissions are precursors for ozone. NOX
emissions are precursors for particulate matter. NO2 is a
component of NOX. There are no emissions reductions
attributable to the emissions of carbon monoxide (CO), lead and sulfur
dioxide (SO2) from RVP requirements.
In Missouri's September 15, 2020 submission the State provided a
technical demonstration to support the request to remove Missouri's 7.0
psi RVP requirement from the active measures portions of the Missouri
SIP. In that technical demonstration, Missouri provided Motor Vehicle
Emissions Simulator (MOVES) results,
[[Page 83879]]
modeling the emissions of VOCs and NOX associated with
changing the high ozone season RVP requirements from the state-level
requirement of 7.0 psi to the federal requirement of 9.0 psi. EPA
evaluated the state's assumptions and inputs used in MOVES, and EPA
finds the state analysis is appropriate. Specifically, MDNR compared
what the projected emissions in the year 2020 (the year the program is
requested to be rescinded) would be, assuming a RVP level of 7.0 psi
and 9.0 psi, respectively, in two separate modeling simulations. The
comparison revealed an increase in emissions of 0.17 tons for
NOX and 0.71 tons for VOC, per ozone season day, would
result from the change to the federal requirement from June 1 through
September 15. While the modeling showed a slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions resulting from the use of 9.0 psi RVP
as opposed to 7.0 psi, the most appropriate analysis is whether
emissions in the future years would increase and potentially interfere
with maintenance of the NAAQS. The State compared actual emissions from
2017 using a RVP of 7.0 psi to emissions modelled for the years 2020
using a RVP of 9.0 psi. Table 1 below provides the results of this
analysis.
Table 1--Comparative Emissions for Change to RVP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2017 7.0 psi RVP 2020 7.0 psi RVP 2020 9.0 psi RVP Decrease in 2020 9.0 psi RVP
(tons per ozone (tons per ozone (tons per ozone compared to 2017 7.0 psi RVP
season day) season day) season day) (tons per ozone season day)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NOX.............................................................. 57.01 43.51 43.68 13.33
VOC.............................................................. 31.25 28.11 28.82 2.43
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
As Table 1 indicates, NOX and VOC emissions in the
Kansas City Area would decrease from 2017 to 2020, even with the
increase due to ozone season fuel RVP of 9.0 psi. The modeling
demonstration shows the slight increase in emissions is being mitigated
area-wide by a steady decrease in tailpipe emissions. This is the
result of a cleaner new vehicle fleet replacing the older fleet \8\ and
the decrease in the sulfur content in gasoline as required by EPA's
Tier 3 motor vehicle emission and fuel standards, which were
implemented beginning on January 1, 2017.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As vehicle owners purchase new vehicles, the older vehicles
slowly are removed from the vehicles on the road. A used vehicle
maybe purchased and driven by several owner, but eventually the
older, more polluting vehicles are removed from the road.
Manufactures' fleets in 1994 are allowed 0.6 gram/mile
NOX emissions. Manufactures' fleets in 2004 are allowed
0.07 gram/mile Nox emissions. Manufactures' fleets in 2025 will be
allowed 0.03 gram/mile NOX emissions.
\9\ Control of Air Pollution From Motor Vehicles: Tier 3 Motor
Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards (See 79 FR 23414, April 28,
2014.)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Kansas City, Missouri area is designated attainment/
unclassifiable or attainment for the 1979, 1997, 2008, and 2015 ozone
standards. While the 1979 maintenance plan is approved into the SIP,
the 1979 NAAQS has been revoked for the Kansas City area. There are no
other ozone maintenance plans for the Kansas City area in the SIP. The
highest monitor design value in the Kansas City area is 68 parts per
billion (ppb), which is below the 2015 ozone NAAQS of 70 ppb.\10\ Based
on the state's modeling analysis, along with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination that the slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions resulting from the use of 9.0 psi RVP
fuel will not interfere with the Kansas City area's ability to maintain
the ozone NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement. The EPA is making
this determination based on MOVES modeling that indicates that on-road
VOC and NOX emissions in 2020 with gasoline meeting the 9.0
psi RVP requirement remain below the emissions levels in 2017, a year
in which the area's design value was also below the 2015 ozone standard
of 70 ppb.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Based on the most recent quality assured data design values
(2017-2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Kansas City area is designated as attainment or unclassifiable
for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5, 2012 annual PM2.5,
1971 annual NO2, and 2010 1-hour NO2 standards.
There are no maintenance plans for any of these standards. The highest
PM2.5 design value is 75% of the standard. The highest
NO2 design value is 50% of the standard. As discussed above
the area has a decrease from 2017 to 2020 in NOX and VOC
emissions. Based on this data together with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination that the slight increase in
NOX and VOC emissions in 2020 and the downward trend in on-
road VOC and NOX emissions resulting from this change will
not interfere with the Area's ability to maintain the any
PM2.5 or NO2 NAAQS, or any other applicable
requirement.
The Platte and Clay Counties of the Kansas City area are designated
as attainment or unclassifiable for the SO2 standards.
Jackson county is designated as nonattainment. There are no maintenance
plans for any of these standards. The most recent (2017-2019) highest
SO2 design value is in Jackson County and is less than 15%
of the standard. The RVP standard has no effect on SO2
emissions. Based on this data together with air quality data, EPA is
making the preliminary determination that the change will not interfere
with the Area's ability to attain or maintain the SO2 NAAQS,
or any other applicable requirement.
The Kansas City area is designated as attainment or unclassifiable
for the CO and lead standards. There are no maintenance plans for any
of these standards. The highest CO design value is less than 20% of the
standard. There is no lead monitoring in the area. The RVP standard has
no effect on CO or lead emissions. Based on this data together with air
quality data, EPA is making the preliminary determination that the
change will not interfere with the area's ability to maintain the CO or
lead NAAQS, or any other applicable requirement. EPA is making the
preliminary determination that the change will not interfere with
reasonable progress towards natural visibility in Missouri's Class 1
areas nor any Class 1 area in another state Missouri impacts.
VI. What action is the EPA taking?
We are proposing to approve Missouri's removal of the state RVP
requirement from the SIP for the Kansas City, Missouri area. As
discussed above the removal of the RVP requirement will not affect the
area's ability to attain or maintain any air quality standard. We are
processing this as a proposed action because we are soliciting comments
on this proposed action. Final rulemaking will occur after
consideration of any comments.
VII. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to amend regulatory text
that includes incorporation by reference. As described in the proposed
amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below, the EPA is proposing to
remove provisions of the EPA-Approved Missouri
[[Page 83880]]
Regulations from the Missouri State Implementation Plan, which is
incorporated by reference in accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR
part 51.
VIII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the Clean Air Act (CAA), the Administrator is required to
approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act
and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly,
this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements
and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under
Executive Order 12866.
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTA) because this rulemaking does not
involve technical standards; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or
in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: December 14, 2020.
James Gulliford,
Regional Administrator, Region 7.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA proposes to amend
40 CFR part 52 as set forth below:
PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart-AA Missouri
Sec. 52.1320 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 52.1320, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by removing
the entry ``10-2.330'' under the heading ``Chapter 2-Air Quality
Standards and Air Pollution Control Regulations for the Kansas City
Metropolitan Area''.
0
3. In Sec. 52.1323, paragraph (n) is revised to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1323 Approval status.
* * * * *
(n) Missouri rule 10 CSR 10-2.330 was rescinded on January 22,
2021.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-28119 Filed 12-22-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
