Request for Information on Potential Concepts and Approaches for a National Strategic Computing Reserve (NSCR), 83627-83628 [2020-28142]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 22, 2020 / Notices
MREFC account, established in FY
1995, is a separate budget line item that
provides an agency-wide mechanism,
permitting directorates to undertake
large facility projects that exceed 10% of
the Directorate’s annual budget; or
roughly $70M or greater. Smaller
projects continue to be supported from
the R&RA Account. Facilities are
defined as shared-use infrastructure,
instrumentation and equipment that are
accessible to a broad community of
researchers and/or educators. Facilities
may be centralized or may consist of
distributed installations. They may
incorporate large-scale networking or
computational infrastructure, multi-user
instruments or networks of such
instruments, or other infrastructure,
instrumentation and equipment having
a major impact on a broad segment of
a scientific or engineering discipline.
Historically, awards have been made for
such diverse projects as accelerators,
telescopes, research vessels and aircraft,
and geographically distributed but
networked sensors and instrumentation.
The growth and diversification of
large facility projects require that NSF
remain attentive to the ever-changing
issues and challenges inherent in their
planning, construction, operation,
management and oversight. Most
importantly, dedicated, competent NSF
and awardee staff are needed to manage
and oversee these projects; giving the
attention and oversight that good
practice dictates and that proper
accountability to taxpayers and
Congress demands. To this end, there is
also a need for consistent, documented
requirements and procedures to be
understood and used by NSF program
managers and awardees for all such
major projects.
Use of the Information: Facilities are
an essential part of the science and
engineering enterprise and supporting
them is one major responsibility of the
National Science Foundation (NSF).
NSF makes awards to external entities—
primarily universities, consortia of
universities or non-profit
organizations—to undertake
construction, management and
operation of facilities. Such awards
frequently take the form of cooperative
agreements. NSF does not directly
construct or operate the facilities it
supports. However, NSF retains
responsibility for overseeing their
development, management and
successful performance. Business
Systems Reviews (BSR) of the National
Science Foundation’s (NSF) Major
Facilities are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the business
systems (people, processes, and
technologies) of NSF Recipients are
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 21, 2020
Jkt 253001
effective in meeting administrative
responsibilities and satisfying Federal
regulatory requirements, including
those listed in NSF’s Proposal & Award
Policies & Procedures Guide (PAPPG).
These reviews are not considered
audits but are intended to be assistive in
nature; aiding the Recipient in following
good practices where appropriate and
bringing them into compliance, if
needed. A team of BSR Participants is
assembled to assess the Recipient’s
policies, procedures, and practices to
determine whether, taken collectively,
these administrative business systems
used in managing the Facility meet NSF
award expectations and comply with
Federal regulations.
The BSR Guide is designed for use by
both our customer community and NSF
staff for guidance in leading these
reviews. The BSR Guide defines the
overall framework and structure and
summarizes the details outlined in the
internal operating guidelines and
procedures used by BSR Participants to
execute the review process.
Management principles and practices
are specified for seven core functional
areas (CFA) and are used by BSR
Participants in performing these
evaluations. Roles and responsibilities
of the NSF stakeholders involved in the
process are outlined in the BSR Guide
as well as the expectations of the
Recipient.
This version of the Business Systems
Guide aligns with the Uniform
Guidance and the NSF Major Facilities
Guide.
This Guide will be updated
periodically to reflect changes in
requirements, policies and/or
procedures. Award Recipients are
expected to monitor and adopt the
requirements and best practices
included in the Guide.
The submission of Award Recipient
and Project administrative business
process and procedural documentation
used in support of operations of the
Major Facilities is part of the collection
of information. This information is used
to help NSF fulfill this responsibility in
supporting merit-based research and
education projects in all the scientific
and engineering disciplines. The
Foundation also has a continuing
commitment to provide oversight on
facilities design and construction which
must be balanced against monitoring its
information collection so as to identify
and address any excessive review and
reporting burdens.
NSF has approximately twenty-four
(24) Major Facilities in various stages of
design, construction, operations and
divestment. The need for a BSR and
review scope is based on NSF’s internal
PO 00000
Frm 00118
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
83627
annual Major Facility Portfolio Risk
Assessment and the assessment of
various risks factors.
Burden to the Public: The Foundation
estimates that approximately one and
half (1.5) Full Time Equivalents (FTEs)
are necessary for each major facility
project to respond to a BSR
requirements on an annual basis; or
2,824 hours per year. With an average of
four (4) conducted a year, this equates
to roughly 5 FTEs or 11,296 public
burden hours annually.
Dated: December 17, 2020.
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2020–28220 Filed 12–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information on Potential
Concepts and Approaches for a
National Strategic Computing Reserve
(NSCR)
Office of Science and
Technology Policy (OSTP), Networking
and Information Technology Research
and Development (NITRD) National
Coordination Office (NCO), National
Science Foundation.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
OSTP and the National
Science and Technology Council’s
(NSTC) Subcommittees on the Future
Advanced Computing Ecosystem
(FACE) and Networking and
Information Technology Research and
Development (NITRD) request input
from interested parties on the goals,
value, and necessary approaches for
establishing a National Strategic
Computing Reserve (NSCR). The NSCR
may be envisioned as a coalition of
experts and resource providers that
could be mobilized quickly to provide
critical computational resources
(including compute, software, data, and
technical expertise) in times of urgent
need. This Request for Information will
help inform potential attributes of a
NSCR.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before 11:59
p.m. (ET) on January 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in
response to this notice may be sent by
any of the following methods:
• Email: nscr-rfi@nitrd.gov. Email
submissions should be machinereadable and not be copy-protected.
Submissions should include ‘‘RFI
Response: National Strategic Computing
Reserve’’ in the subject line of the
message.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
83628
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 246 / Tuesday, December 22, 2020 / Notices
• Fax: (202) 459–9673, Attn: Ji Lee.
• Mail: Attn: Ji Lee, NCO, 2415
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, USA.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is
voluntary. Each individual or institution
is requested to submit only one
response. Submissions must not exceed
10 pages in 12 point or larger font, with
a page number provided on each page.
Responses should include the name of
the person(s) or organization(s) filing
the comment. Responses to this RFI may
be posted online at https://
www.nitrd.gov. Therefore, no business
proprietary information, copyrighted
information, or personally identifiable
information should be submitted in
response to this RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3),
responses to this notice are not offers
and cannot be accepted by the
Government to form a binding contract.
Responders are solely responsible for all
expenses associated with responding to
this RFI.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ji
Lee at nscr-rfi@nitrd.gov, 202–459–9674,
or by post mailing to 2415 Eisenhower
Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
Individuals who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time,
Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
prompt, successful, and nimble
deployment of computational resources
(including expertise) via the COVID–19
High-Performance Computing (HPC)
Consortium has demonstrated its
essential role in the Nation’s response to
emergencies. This backdrop has led to
the conceptualization of a National
Strategic Computing Reserve (NSCR),
comprising a coalition of experts and
resource providers that could be
mobilized quickly to provide critical
computational resources (including
compute, software, data, and technical
expertise) in times of urgent need.
Background Information: The
COVID–19 HPC Consortium (https://
covid19-hpc-consortium.org) was
formed in March 2020 and offers an
example of how the consortium rapidly
delivered scientific insights. The
Consortium brought together the Federal
Government, industry, and academic
leaders to provide access to the world’s
most powerful computational resources
in support of COVID–19 research.
Within its first week of existence, the
Consortium instantiated an operational
framework for providing computational
resources for rapid crisis response. The
Consortium effectively:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:30 Dec 21, 2020
Jkt 253001
• Worked together across institutional
and organizational boundaries within
government, industry, and academia to
create a common portal to access
computational resources and to coalesce
ad hoc efforts in smaller ‘‘consortia’’
around the country;
• Ramped up quickly to meet urgent
computational resource requirements
not easily available through other
means; this ramp-up included the
development and adaptation of review,
matching and on-boarding processes for
accessing these resources;
• Set up a communications and user
engagement framework for a worldwide
community; and
• Accelerated explorations in basic
understanding of the SARS–CoV2 virus,
its host interactions, strategies to
mitigate its spread, and early-stage drug
development.
With this RFI, we seek to aggregate
the lessons learned from the COVID–19
HPC Consortium with other broader
community input towards the potential
design of a NSCR effort.
Information Requested: Responders
are asked to answer one or more of the
following questions in the responses to
the RFI:
1. Deployment Scenarios: What are
envisioned scenarios under which it
would be beneficial to make NSCR
computational resources available for
use? What are relevant characteristics to
consider regarding the design of triggers
for activating and deactivating the
NSCR? What approaches might the
NSCR utilize to test readiness for such
scenarios? Are there other barriers to
activating NSCR that would need to be
addressed?
2. Computational Resources: By what
means will the NSCR computational
resources be recruited, vetted, and
sustained for use when needed? What
are appropriate incentives and
mechanisms for compensation? What
principles might be employed in
assessing the suitability of resources for
inclusion in the NSCR? What types of
research (e.g., fundamental research,
Controlled Unclassified Information
research, proprietary research) should
the NSCR be provisioned to support?
3. NSCR Providers: How should the
resource providers’ contributions to
NSCR be determined? What approaches
should guide the selection and
allocation of the NSCR computational
resources to users, and what roles do
resource providers have in determining
these approaches? By what means can
the NSCR computational resource
providers opt in or opt out on
computational resource allocations?
4. NSCR Users: By what means and
with what principles should allocations
PO 00000
Frm 00119
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for NSCR computational resources be
considered? What should constitute
eligibility to apply for computational
resources? What kind of eligibility
restrictions/selection criteria would be
appropriate for users and the use cases
of applications of NSCR?
5. Community Formation: What types
of community outreach and
communications will help enhance the
likelihood of connecting the NSCR
computational resources to the relevant
computational, scientific, and
emergency-response communities? With
what organizations and services should
the NSCR coordinate to enhance its
effectiveness?
6. Partnership Agreements: What are
key aspects of partnership agreements
(e.g., access to results, intellectual
property rights) that can help sustain
the NSCR over time?
7. Relationship to Other Strategic
Reserves: Are there other strategic
reserves that are relevant to NSCR? How
can NSCR connect or interface with
those reserves? What lessons can be
learned from other strategic reserves
that might inform the process of
standing up a NSCR?
Submitted by the National Science
Foundation in support of the Office of
Science and Technology Policy and the
Networking and Information
Technology Research and Development
National Coordination Office on
December 16, 2020.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1861.)
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science
Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2020–28142 Filed 12–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555–01–P
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION
SAFETY BOARD
Sunshine Act Meeting
9:30 a.m., Tuesday,
January 12, 2021.
PLACE: Virtual.
STATUS: The one item may be viewed by
the public through webcast only.
MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:
64964—Pipeline Investigation Report—
Atmos Energy Corporation Natural
Gas-Fueled Explosion, Dallas,
Texas, February 23, 2018
CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Candi Bing at (202) 590–8384 or by
email at bingc@ntsb.gov.
Media Information Contact: Keith
Holloway by email at keith.holloway@
ntsb.gov or at (202) 314–6100.
This meeting will take place virtually.
The public may view it through a live
TIME AND DATE:
E:\FR\FM\22DEN1.SGM
22DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 246 (Tuesday, December 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83627-83628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28142]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Request for Information on Potential Concepts and Approaches for
a National Strategic Computing Reserve (NSCR)
AGENCY: Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP), Networking and
Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD) National
Coordination Office (NCO), National Science Foundation.
ACTION: Request for information.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: OSTP and the National Science and Technology Council's (NSTC)
Subcommittees on the Future Advanced Computing Ecosystem (FACE) and
Networking and Information Technology Research and Development (NITRD)
request input from interested parties on the goals, value, and
necessary approaches for establishing a National Strategic Computing
Reserve (NSCR). The NSCR may be envisioned as a coalition of experts
and resource providers that could be mobilized quickly to provide
critical computational resources (including compute, software, data,
and technical expertise) in times of urgent need. This Request for
Information will help inform potential attributes of a NSCR.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to submit comments on or before
11:59 p.m. (ET) on January 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Comments submitted in response to this notice may be sent by
any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. Email submissions should be
machine-readable and not be copy-protected. Submissions should include
``RFI Response: National Strategic Computing Reserve'' in the subject
line of the message.
[[Page 83628]]
Fax: (202) 459-9673, Attn: Ji Lee.
Mail: Attn: Ji Lee, NCO, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue,
Alexandria, VA 22314, USA.
Instructions: Response to this RFI is voluntary. Each individual or
institution is requested to submit only one response. Submissions must
not exceed 10 pages in 12 point or larger font, with a page number
provided on each page. Responses should include the name of the
person(s) or organization(s) filing the comment. Responses to this RFI
may be posted online at https://www.nitrd.gov. Therefore, no business
proprietary information, copyrighted information, or personally
identifiable information should be submitted in response to this RFI.
In accordance with FAR 15.202(3), responses to this notice are not
offers and cannot be accepted by the Government to form a binding
contract. Responders are solely responsible for all expenses associated
with responding to this RFI.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ji Lee at [email protected], 202-459-
9674, or by post mailing to 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA
22314, USA. Individuals who use a telecommunications device for the
deaf (TDD) may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-
800-877-8339 between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern time, Monday through
Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The prompt, successful, and nimble
deployment of computational resources (including expertise) via the
COVID-19 High-Performance Computing (HPC) Consortium has demonstrated
its essential role in the Nation's response to emergencies. This
backdrop has led to the conceptualization of a National Strategic
Computing Reserve (NSCR), comprising a coalition of experts and
resource providers that could be mobilized quickly to provide critical
computational resources (including compute, software, data, and
technical expertise) in times of urgent need.
Background Information: The COVID-19 HPC Consortium (https://covid19-hpc-consortium.org) was formed in March 2020 and offers an
example of how the consortium rapidly delivered scientific insights.
The Consortium brought together the Federal Government, industry, and
academic leaders to provide access to the world's most powerful
computational resources in support of COVID-19 research. Within its
first week of existence, the Consortium instantiated an operational
framework for providing computational resources for rapid crisis
response. The Consortium effectively:
Worked together across institutional and organizational
boundaries within government, industry, and academia to create a common
portal to access computational resources and to coalesce ad hoc efforts
in smaller ``consortia'' around the country;
Ramped up quickly to meet urgent computational resource
requirements not easily available through other means; this ramp-up
included the development and adaptation of review, matching and on-
boarding processes for accessing these resources;
Set up a communications and user engagement framework for
a worldwide community; and
Accelerated explorations in basic understanding of the
SARS-CoV2 virus, its host interactions, strategies to mitigate its
spread, and early-stage drug development.
With this RFI, we seek to aggregate the lessons learned from the
COVID-19 HPC Consortium with other broader community input towards the
potential design of a NSCR effort.
Information Requested: Responders are asked to answer one or more
of the following questions in the responses to the RFI:
1. Deployment Scenarios: What are envisioned scenarios under which
it would be beneficial to make NSCR computational resources available
for use? What are relevant characteristics to consider regarding the
design of triggers for activating and deactivating the NSCR? What
approaches might the NSCR utilize to test readiness for such scenarios?
Are there other barriers to activating NSCR that would need to be
addressed?
2. Computational Resources: By what means will the NSCR
computational resources be recruited, vetted, and sustained for use
when needed? What are appropriate incentives and mechanisms for
compensation? What principles might be employed in assessing the
suitability of resources for inclusion in the NSCR? What types of
research (e.g., fundamental research, Controlled Unclassified
Information research, proprietary research) should the NSCR be
provisioned to support?
3. NSCR Providers: How should the resource providers' contributions
to NSCR be determined? What approaches should guide the selection and
allocation of the NSCR computational resources to users, and what roles
do resource providers have in determining these approaches? By what
means can the NSCR computational resource providers opt in or opt out
on computational resource allocations?
4. NSCR Users: By what means and with what principles should
allocations for NSCR computational resources be considered? What should
constitute eligibility to apply for computational resources? What kind
of eligibility restrictions/selection criteria would be appropriate for
users and the use cases of applications of NSCR?
5. Community Formation: What types of community outreach and
communications will help enhance the likelihood of connecting the NSCR
computational resources to the relevant computational, scientific, and
emergency-response communities? With what organizations and services
should the NSCR coordinate to enhance its effectiveness?
6. Partnership Agreements: What are key aspects of partnership
agreements (e.g., access to results, intellectual property rights) that
can help sustain the NSCR over time?
7. Relationship to Other Strategic Reserves: Are there other
strategic reserves that are relevant to NSCR? How can NSCR connect or
interface with those reserves? What lessons can be learned from other
strategic reserves that might inform the process of standing up a NSCR?
Submitted by the National Science Foundation in support of the
Office of Science and Technology Policy and the Networking and
Information Technology Research and Development National Coordination
Office on December 16, 2020.
(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 1861.)
Suzanne H. Plimpton,
Reports Clearance Officer, National Science Foundation.
[FR Doc. 2020-28142 Filed 12-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P