Trade Regulation Rule Relating to Power Output Claims for Amplifiers Utilized in Home Entertainment Products, 82391-82393 [2020-27569]
Download as PDF
82391
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 244
Friday, December 18, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 26
[Docket No. PRM–26–6; NRC–2010–0310]
Erik Erb—Minimum Day Off
Requirement for Security Officers
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Petition for rulemaking;
withdrawal by petitioner.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is announcing the
withdrawal, without prejudice to a
future filing, of a petition for rulemaking
(PRM), PRM–26–6, ‘‘Minimum Day Off
Requirement for Security Officers,’’
submitted to the NRC by Erik Erb and
91 co-signers (the petitioners) on August
17, 2010. The petitioners requested that
the NRC amend its regulations to
decrease the minimum days off
requirement for security officers
working 12-hour shifts from an average
of 3 days per week to 2.5 or 2 days per
week. The petitioner withdrew PRM–
26–6 by email dated December 10, 2019.
DATES: PRM–26–6 was withdrawn on
December 10, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Please refer to Docket ID
NRC–2010–0310 when contacting the
NRC about the availability of
information for this action. You may
obtain publicly available information
related to this action by any of the
following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2010–0310. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn
Forder; telephone: 301–415–3407;
email: Dawn.Forder@nrc.gov. For
technical questions, contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publiclyavailable documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Dec 17, 2020
Jkt 253001
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by email to
PDR.Resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section.
• Attention: The PDR, where you may
examine and order copies of public
documents, is currently closed. You
may submit your request to the PDR via
email at PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call
1–800–397–4209 between 8:00 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Yanely Malave, Office of Nuclear
Material Safety and Safeguards, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–415–1519, email: Yanely.MalaveVelez@nrc.gov.
On August
17, 2010, the petitioner submitted PRM–
26–6 to the NRC requesting that it
amend its fitness-for-duty regulations to
decrease the minimum days off
requirement from an average of 3 days
per week to 2.5 or 2 days per week for
security officers working 12-hour shifts
(ADAMS Accession No. ML102630127).
On November 23, 2010, the NRC
published a notice of receipt of, and
request for public comment on PRM–
26–6 in the Federal Register (75 FR
71368). The NRC received 5 comment
letters from corporations, professional
organizations, and private citizens. The
NRC initially determined that the issues
raised in PRM–26–6 would be
considered in the ‘‘Quality Control/
Quality Verification’’ rulemaking
(Docket ID: NRC–2009–0090) and
published a Federal Register notice (76
FR 28191) on May 16, 2011, to this
effect. On December 9, 2015, the NRC
published a notice in the Federal
Register discontinuing the QC/QV
rulemaking (80 FR 76394). By email
dated December 10, 2019, the petitioner
withdrew PRM–26–6 (ADAMS
Accession No. ML20006D919).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated December 3, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
John R. Tappert,
Director, Division of Rulemaking,
Environmental, and Financial Support, Office
of Nuclear Materials Safety and Safeguards.
[FR Doc. 2020–27124 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 432
Trade Regulation Rule Relating to
Power Output Claims for Amplifiers
Utilized in Home Entertainment
Products
Federal Trade Commission.
Advance notice of proposed
rulemaking; request for public
comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
As part of the Commission’s
systematic review of all current FTC
rules and guides, the Federal Trade
Commission (‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
requests public comment on the overall
costs, benefits, necessity, and regulatory
and economic impact of the FTC’s Trade
Regulation Rule Relating to Power
Output Claims for Amplifiers Utilized
in Home Entertainment Products (the
‘‘Amplifier Rule’’ or ‘‘Rule’’).
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before February 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a
comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the
Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below. Write ‘‘Amplifier Rule Review,
16 CFR part 432, Project No. P974222’’
on your comment, and file your
comment online through https://
www.regulations.gov. If you prefer to
file your comment on paper, mail your
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex A),
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610 (Annex
A), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jock
Chung (202–326–2984), Attorney,
Division of Enforcement, Bureau of
Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20580.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
82392
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
I. Background
In response to misleading or
confusing power, distortion, and other
performance claims, the Commission
issued the Amplifier Rule in 1974 to
standardize the measurement and
disclosure of various amplifier
performance characteristics. 39 FR
15387 (May 3, 1974). The Rule
establishes uniform test standards and
disclosures so consumers can easily
compare amplifier characteristics.
Prior to enactment of the Amplifier
Rule, manufacturers used at least seven
different systems to measure amplifier
output, including two incompatible
measurement systems with broad
industry support, the EIA Standard
Methods of Measurement and the IHF
Standard.1 At that time, the same
amplifier might have been advertised
with different power ratings when
incorporated into different products.2
Moreover, prior to enactment of the
Rule, some manufacturers advertised
the maximum power output of a single
channel of a stereo amplifier. The
Commission found that this practice
deceptively indicated a stereo amplifier
powered both stereo channels at that
level simultaneously, which was not
necessarily true.3 Manufacturers also
measured power outputs over short
periods of time, which did not account
for heat buildup that prevented the
amplifiers from being used at the
measured output power for longer
periods. Additionally, some
manufacturers inflated power outputs
by measuring amplifier outputs over
limited frequency ranges or with
excessive distortion, with unrealistic
speaker loads, or when operating on
battery power.4
To address these issues, the Rule
requires uniform measurements and
1 The Electronics Industries Association, an
industry group with approximately 240 member
companies in 1974, created the EIA Standard
Methods of Measurement. The IHF, an industry
group with 37 member companies, created the IHF
Standard. 39 FR at 15388.
2 The Commission found that one amplifier was
reported as advertised with 3 power ratings based
on continuous power output and 1 percent
distortion when included in a component system,
and with a peak power rating with 5 percent
distortion when included in a console system.
3 The Commission found that ‘‘a stereo having, for
example, 20-watts per channel, both channels
driven, will give less total power output than a
single channel 40-watt amplifier.’’ 39 FR at 15390.
4 Amplifiers running on batteries might have less
distortion than the same amplifier running on
power from an electric outlet, so tests driving the
amplifier to a rated distortion level under battery
power might measure a higher power output than
measurements for the same amplifier driven to the
same distortion level under outlet power. 39 FR at
15393.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Dec 17, 2020
Jkt 253001
disclosures for home entertainment
amplifiers. Specifically, it requires
manufacturers to fully drive all
associated channels when measuring
the power output of sound amplification
equipment designed to amplify two or
more channels simultaneously. The
Rule further sets requirements for
measuring and disclosing frequency
ranges, distortion levels, and speaker
loads; requires manufacturers to
conduct measurements in still air at a
specified temperature to prevent the use
of fans or cooling equipment; and
requires manufacturers to use outlet
power to test amplifiers that can run on
either batteries or outlet power.
In 2000, in response to improvements
in amplifier design that enabled
manufacturers to make inexpensive
amplifiers with inaudible levels of
harmonic distortion, the Commission
exempted certain advertising from the
Rule’s Total Harmonic Distortion (THD)
disclosure requirement. 65 FR 81232
(Dec. 22, 2000). Additionally, to address
the development of self-powered
subwoofer-satellite combination speaker
systems, the Commission clarified the
manner in which the Rule’s testing
procedures apply to those systems.
II. Regulatory Review Program
The Commission reviews its rules and
guides periodically to seek information
about their costs and benefits, regulatory
and economic impact, and general
effectiveness in protecting consumers
and helping industry avoid deceptive
claims or unfair practices. These
reviews assist the Commission in
identifying rules and guides that
warrant modification or rescission.
With the present document, the
Commission initiates a review of its
Amplifier Rule. The Commission
solicits comments on, among other
things, the economic impact of, and the
continuing need for, the Rule; the Rule’s
benefits to consumers; and the burdens
it places on industry members subject to
the requirements, including small
businesses.
III. Issues for Comments
To aid commenters in submitting
information, the Commission has
prepared the following questions related
to the Amplifier Rule. The Commission
seeks comments on these and any other
issues related to the Rule’s current
requirements. In their replies,
commenters should provide any
available evidence, including empirical
analysis, that supports their position.
(1) Need: Is there a continuing need
for the Rule? Why or why not?
(2) Benefits and Costs to Consumers:
What benefits has the Rule provided to
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
consumers, and does the Rule impose
any significant costs on consumers?
Please quantify these benefits and costs
wherever possible.
(3) Benefits and Costs to Industry
Members: What benefits, if any, has the
Rule provided to businesses, and does
the Rule impose any significant costs,
including costs of compliance, on
businesses, including small businesses?
Please quantify these benefits and costs
wherever possible.
(4) Recommended Changes: What
modifications, if any, should the
Commission make to the Rule to
increase its benefits or reduce its costs?
How would these modifications affect
the costs and benefits of the Rule for
consumers? How would these
modifications affect the costs and
benefits of the Rule for businesses,
particularly small businesses?
(5) Impact on Information: What
impact has the Rule had on the flow of
truthful information to consumers and
on the flow of deceptive information to
consumers?
(6) Compliance: Provide any evidence
concerning the degree of industry
compliance with the Rule. Does this
evidence indicate that the Rule should
be modified? If so, why, and how? If
not, why not?
(7) Unnecessary Provisions: Provide
any evidence concerning whether any of
the Rule’s provisions are no longer
necessary. Explain why these provisions
are unnecessary.
(8) Additional Unfair or Deceptive
Practices: What potentially unfair or
deceptive practices, not covered by the
Rule, related to amplifiers utilized in
home entertainment products are
occurring in the marketplace? Are such
practices prevalent in the market? If so,
please describe such practices,
including their impact on consumers.
Provide any evidence, such as empirical
data, consumer perception studies, or
consumer complaints, that demonstrates
the extent of such practices. Provide any
evidence that demonstrates whether
such practices cause consumer injury,
and quantify or estimate that injury if
possible. With reference to such
practices, should the Rule be modified?
If so, why, and how? If not, why not?
(9) Product Coverage: Should the
Commission broaden the Rule to
include products not currently covered?
Provide any evidence that supports your
position. What potentially unfair or
deceptive practices related to products
not covered by the Rule are occurring in
the marketplace? Are such practices
prevalent in the market? If so, please
describe such practices, including their
impact on consumers. Provide any
evidence, such as empirical data,
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
consumer perception studies, or
consumer complaints, that demonstrates
the extent of such practices. Provide any
evidence that demonstrates whether
such practices cause consumer injury,
and quantify or estimate that injury if
possible.
(10) Technological or Economic
Changes: What modifications, if any,
should be made to the Rule to account
for current or impending changes in
technology or economic conditions?
How would these modifications affect
the costs and benefits of the Rule for
consumers and businesses, particularly
small businesses?
(11) Conflicts With Other
Requirements: Does the Rule overlap or
conflict with other federal, state, or local
laws or regulations? If so, how? Provide
any evidence that supports your
position. With reference to the asserted
conflicts, should the Rule be modified?
If so, why, and how? If not, why not?
Are there any Rule changes necessary to
help state law enforcement agencies
combat deceptive practices in the
market for amplifiers utilized in home
entertainment products? Provide any
evidence concerning whether the Rule
has assisted in promoting national
consistency with respect to the
advertising of amplifiers utilized in
home entertainment products.
IV. Comment Submissions
You can file a comment online or on
paper. For the Commission to consider
your comment, we must receive it on or
before February 16, 2021. Include
‘‘Amplifier Rule Review, 16 CFR part
432, Project No. P974222’’ on your
comment. Your comment, including
your name and your state, will be
placed on the public record of this
proceeding, including, to the extent
practicable, on the https://
www.regulations.gov website.
Because of the public health
emergency in response to the COVID–19
outbreak and the agency’s heightened
security screening, postal mail
addressed to the Commission will be
subject to delay. We strongly encourage
you to submit your comment online
through the https://www.regulations.gov
website. To ensure the Commission
considers your online comment, please
follow the instructions on the webbased form.
If you file your comment on paper,
write ‘‘Amplifier Rule Review, 16 CFR
part 432, Project No. P974222’’ on your
comment and on the envelope, and mail
your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue
NW, Suite CC–5610 (Annex A),
Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:58 Dec 17, 2020
Jkt 253001
comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th
Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610,
Washington, DC 20024. If possible,
please submit your paper comment to
the Commission by courier or overnight
service.
Because your comment will be placed
on the publicly accessible website,
https://www.regulations.gov, you are
solely responsible for making sure that
your comment does not include any
sensitive or confidential information. In
particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal
information such as your or anyone’s
Social Security number, date of birth,
driver’s license number or other state
identification number or foreign country
equivalent, passport number, financial
account number, or credit or debit card
number. You are also solely responsible
for making sure that your comment does
not include any sensitive health
information, such as medical records or
other individually identifiable health
information. In addition, your comment
should not include any ‘‘[t]rade secret or
any commercial or financial information
which . . . is privileged or
confidential’’—as provided in section
6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and
FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)—
including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs,
sales statistics, inventories, formulas,
patterns, devices, manufacturing
processes, or customer names.
Comments containing material for
which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form,
must be clearly labeled ‘‘Confidential,’’
and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c).
In particular, the written request for
confidential treatment that accompanies
the comment must include the factual
and legal basis for the request, and must
identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public
record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your
comment will be kept confidential only
if the General Counsel grants your
request in accordance with the law and
the public interest. Once your comment
has been posted publicly at
www.regulations.gov—as legally
required by FTC Rule 4.9(b)—we cannot
redact or remove your comment, unless
you submit a confidentiality request that
meets the requirements for such
treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and
the General Counsel grants that request.
Visit the FTC website to read this
request for comment and the news
release describing it. The FTC Act and
other laws that the Commission
administers permit the collection of
public comments to consider and use in
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
82393
this proceeding as appropriate. The
Commission will consider all timely
and responsive public comments that it
receives on or before February 16, 2021.
For information on the Commission’s
privacy policy, including routine uses
permitted by the Privacy Act, see
https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/
privacy-policy.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–27569 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 1
[Docket No. FDA–2014–N–0053]
RIN 0910–AI44
Requirements for Additional
Traceability Records for Certain
Foods; Extension of Comment Period;
Reopening of the Comment Period
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Proposed rule; extension of
comment period; reopening of the
comment period.
ACTION:
The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA, the Agency, or
we) is extending the comment period for
the proposed rule and reopening the
comment period for the information
collection related to the proposed rule
entitled ‘‘Requirements for Additional
Traceability Records for Certain Foods’’
that appeared in the Federal Register of
September 23, 2020. We are taking this
action in response to a request from
stakeholders to extend the comment
period to allow additional time for
interested persons to submit comments
on the proposed rule. We also are taking
this action to keep the comment period
for the information collection provisions
associated with the rule consistent with
the comment period for the proposed
rule.
SUMMARY:
FDA is extending the comment
period on the proposed rule published
September 23, 2020 (85 FR 59984).
Submit either electronic or written
comments on the proposed rule by
February 22, 2021. Submit comments on
information collection issues under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA)
by February 22, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
as follows. Please note that late,
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\18DEP1.SGM
18DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 82391-82393]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27569]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
16 CFR Part 432
Trade Regulation Rule Relating to Power Output Claims for
Amplifiers Utilized in Home Entertainment Products
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission.
ACTION: Advance notice of proposed rulemaking; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: As part of the Commission's systematic review of all current
FTC rules and guides, the Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or
``Commission'') requests public comment on the overall costs, benefits,
necessity, and regulatory and economic impact of the FTC's Trade
Regulation Rule Relating to Power Output Claims for Amplifiers Utilized
in Home Entertainment Products (the ``Amplifier Rule'' or ``Rule'').
DATES: Comments must be received on or before February 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties may file a comment online or on paper, by
following the instructions in the Request for Comment part of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below. Write ``Amplifier Rule Review,
16 CFR part 432, Project No. P974222'' on your comment, and file your
comment online through https://www.regulations.gov. If you prefer to
file your comment on paper, mail your comment to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania
Avenue NW, Suite CC-5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver
your comment to the following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office
of the Secretary, Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor,
Suite 5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 20024.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jock Chung (202-326-2984), Attorney,
Division of Enforcement, Bureau of Consumer Protection, Federal Trade
Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20580.
[[Page 82392]]
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In response to misleading or confusing power, distortion, and other
performance claims, the Commission issued the Amplifier Rule in 1974 to
standardize the measurement and disclosure of various amplifier
performance characteristics. 39 FR 15387 (May 3, 1974). The Rule
establishes uniform test standards and disclosures so consumers can
easily compare amplifier characteristics.
Prior to enactment of the Amplifier Rule, manufacturers used at
least seven different systems to measure amplifier output, including
two incompatible measurement systems with broad industry support, the
EIA Standard Methods of Measurement and the IHF Standard.\1\ At that
time, the same amplifier might have been advertised with different
power ratings when incorporated into different products.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The Electronics Industries Association, an industry group
with approximately 240 member companies in 1974, created the EIA
Standard Methods of Measurement. The IHF, an industry group with 37
member companies, created the IHF Standard. 39 FR at 15388.
\2\ The Commission found that one amplifier was reported as
advertised with 3 power ratings based on continuous power output and
1 percent distortion when included in a component system, and with a
peak power rating with 5 percent distortion when included in a
console system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Moreover, prior to enactment of the Rule, some manufacturers
advertised the maximum power output of a single channel of a stereo
amplifier. The Commission found that this practice deceptively
indicated a stereo amplifier powered both stereo channels at that level
simultaneously, which was not necessarily true.\3\ Manufacturers also
measured power outputs over short periods of time, which did not
account for heat buildup that prevented the amplifiers from being used
at the measured output power for longer periods. Additionally, some
manufacturers inflated power outputs by measuring amplifier outputs
over limited frequency ranges or with excessive distortion, with
unrealistic speaker loads, or when operating on battery power.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The Commission found that ``a stereo having, for example,
20-watts per channel, both channels driven, will give less total
power output than a single channel 40-watt amplifier.'' 39 FR at
15390.
\4\ Amplifiers running on batteries might have less distortion
than the same amplifier running on power from an electric outlet, so
tests driving the amplifier to a rated distortion level under
battery power might measure a higher power output than measurements
for the same amplifier driven to the same distortion level under
outlet power. 39 FR at 15393.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To address these issues, the Rule requires uniform measurements and
disclosures for home entertainment amplifiers. Specifically, it
requires manufacturers to fully drive all associated channels when
measuring the power output of sound amplification equipment designed to
amplify two or more channels simultaneously. The Rule further sets
requirements for measuring and disclosing frequency ranges, distortion
levels, and speaker loads; requires manufacturers to conduct
measurements in still air at a specified temperature to prevent the use
of fans or cooling equipment; and requires manufacturers to use outlet
power to test amplifiers that can run on either batteries or outlet
power.
In 2000, in response to improvements in amplifier design that
enabled manufacturers to make inexpensive amplifiers with inaudible
levels of harmonic distortion, the Commission exempted certain
advertising from the Rule's Total Harmonic Distortion (THD) disclosure
requirement. 65 FR 81232 (Dec. 22, 2000). Additionally, to address the
development of self-powered subwoofer-satellite combination speaker
systems, the Commission clarified the manner in which the Rule's
testing procedures apply to those systems.
II. Regulatory Review Program
The Commission reviews its rules and guides periodically to seek
information about their costs and benefits, regulatory and economic
impact, and general effectiveness in protecting consumers and helping
industry avoid deceptive claims or unfair practices. These reviews
assist the Commission in identifying rules and guides that warrant
modification or rescission.
With the present document, the Commission initiates a review of its
Amplifier Rule. The Commission solicits comments on, among other
things, the economic impact of, and the continuing need for, the Rule;
the Rule's benefits to consumers; and the burdens it places on industry
members subject to the requirements, including small businesses.
III. Issues for Comments
To aid commenters in submitting information, the Commission has
prepared the following questions related to the Amplifier Rule. The
Commission seeks comments on these and any other issues related to the
Rule's current requirements. In their replies, commenters should
provide any available evidence, including empirical analysis, that
supports their position.
(1) Need: Is there a continuing need for the Rule? Why or why not?
(2) Benefits and Costs to Consumers: What benefits has the Rule
provided to consumers, and does the Rule impose any significant costs
on consumers? Please quantify these benefits and costs wherever
possible.
(3) Benefits and Costs to Industry Members: What benefits, if any,
has the Rule provided to businesses, and does the Rule impose any
significant costs, including costs of compliance, on businesses,
including small businesses? Please quantify these benefits and costs
wherever possible.
(4) Recommended Changes: What modifications, if any, should the
Commission make to the Rule to increase its benefits or reduce its
costs? How would these modifications affect the costs and benefits of
the Rule for consumers? How would these modifications affect the costs
and benefits of the Rule for businesses, particularly small businesses?
(5) Impact on Information: What impact has the Rule had on the flow
of truthful information to consumers and on the flow of deceptive
information to consumers?
(6) Compliance: Provide any evidence concerning the degree of
industry compliance with the Rule. Does this evidence indicate that the
Rule should be modified? If so, why, and how? If not, why not?
(7) Unnecessary Provisions: Provide any evidence concerning whether
any of the Rule's provisions are no longer necessary. Explain why these
provisions are unnecessary.
(8) Additional Unfair or Deceptive Practices: What potentially
unfair or deceptive practices, not covered by the Rule, related to
amplifiers utilized in home entertainment products are occurring in the
marketplace? Are such practices prevalent in the market? If so, please
describe such practices, including their impact on consumers. Provide
any evidence, such as empirical data, consumer perception studies, or
consumer complaints, that demonstrates the extent of such practices.
Provide any evidence that demonstrates whether such practices cause
consumer injury, and quantify or estimate that injury if possible. With
reference to such practices, should the Rule be modified? If so, why,
and how? If not, why not?
(9) Product Coverage: Should the Commission broaden the Rule to
include products not currently covered? Provide any evidence that
supports your position. What potentially unfair or deceptive practices
related to products not covered by the Rule are occurring in the
marketplace? Are such practices prevalent in the market? If so, please
describe such practices, including their impact on consumers. Provide
any evidence, such as empirical data,
[[Page 82393]]
consumer perception studies, or consumer complaints, that demonstrates
the extent of such practices. Provide any evidence that demonstrates
whether such practices cause consumer injury, and quantify or estimate
that injury if possible.
(10) Technological or Economic Changes: What modifications, if any,
should be made to the Rule to account for current or impending changes
in technology or economic conditions? How would these modifications
affect the costs and benefits of the Rule for consumers and businesses,
particularly small businesses?
(11) Conflicts With Other Requirements: Does the Rule overlap or
conflict with other federal, state, or local laws or regulations? If
so, how? Provide any evidence that supports your position. With
reference to the asserted conflicts, should the Rule be modified? If
so, why, and how? If not, why not? Are there any Rule changes necessary
to help state law enforcement agencies combat deceptive practices in
the market for amplifiers utilized in home entertainment products?
Provide any evidence concerning whether the Rule has assisted in
promoting national consistency with respect to the advertising of
amplifiers utilized in home entertainment products.
IV. Comment Submissions
You can file a comment online or on paper. For the Commission to
consider your comment, we must receive it on or before February 16,
2021. Include ``Amplifier Rule Review, 16 CFR part 432, Project No.
P974222'' on your comment. Your comment, including your name and your
state, will be placed on the public record of this proceeding,
including, to the extent practicable, on the https://www.regulations.gov website.
Because of the public health emergency in response to the COVID-19
outbreak and the agency's heightened security screening, postal mail
addressed to the Commission will be subject to delay. We strongly
encourage you to submit your comment online through the https://www.regulations.gov website. To ensure the Commission considers your
online comment, please follow the instructions on the web-based form.
If you file your comment on paper, write ``Amplifier Rule Review,
16 CFR part 432, Project No. P974222'' on your comment and on the
envelope, and mail your comment to the following address: Federal Trade
Commission, Office of the Secretary, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite
CC-5610 (Annex A), Washington, DC 20580, or deliver your comment to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Constitution Center, 400 7th Street SW, 5th Floor, Suite 5610,
Washington, DC 20024. If possible, please submit your paper comment to
the Commission by courier or overnight service.
Because your comment will be placed on the publicly accessible
website, https://www.regulations.gov, you are solely responsible for
making sure that your comment does not include any sensitive or
confidential information. In particular, your comment should not
include any sensitive personal information such as your or anyone's
Social Security number, date of birth, driver's license number or other
state identification number or foreign country equivalent, passport
number, financial account number, or credit or debit card number. You
are also solely responsible for making sure that your comment does not
include any sensitive health information, such as medical records or
other individually identifiable health information. In addition, your
comment should not include any ``[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which . . . is privileged or confidential''--as
provided in section 6(f) of the FTC Act, 15 U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule
4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2)--including in particular competitively
sensitive information such as costs, sales statistics, inventories,
formulas, patterns, devices, manufacturing processes, or customer
names.
Comments containing material for which confidential treatment is
requested must be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled
``Confidential,'' and must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c). In particular,
the written request for confidential treatment that accompanies the
comment must include the factual and legal basis for the request, and
must identify the specific portions of the comment to be withheld from
the public record. See FTC Rule 4.9(c). Your comment will be kept
confidential only if the General Counsel grants your request in
accordance with the law and the public interest. Once your comment has
been posted publicly at www.regulations.gov--as legally required by FTC
Rule 4.9(b)--we cannot redact or remove your comment, unless you submit
a confidentiality request that meets the requirements for such
treatment under FTC Rule 4.9(c), and the General Counsel grants that
request.
Visit the FTC website to read this request for comment and the news
release describing it. The FTC Act and other laws that the Commission
administers permit the collection of public comments to consider and
use in this proceeding as appropriate. The Commission will consider all
timely and responsive public comments that it receives on or before
February 16, 2021. For information on the Commission's privacy policy,
including routine uses permitted by the Privacy Act, see https://www.ftc.gov/site-information/privacy-policy.
By direction of the Commission.
April J. Tabor,
Acting Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-27569 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6750-01-P