Proposed Settlement Agreement; Biological Evaluations, 81205-81206 [2020-27541]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 15, 2020 / Notices
If you are interested in information
that is not included in these tables, you
may contact EPA’s technical
information contact or general
information contact as described under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT to
access additional non-CBI information
that may be available.
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq.
Dated: November 12, 2020.
Pamela Myrick,
Director, Information Management Division,
Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2020–27540 Filed 12–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OGC–2020–0612; FRL 10017–99–
OGC]
Proposed Settlement Agreement;
Biological Evaluations
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement
agreement; request for public comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator’s October 16, 2017,
Directive Promoting Transparency and
Public Participation in Consent Decrees
and Settlement Agreements, notice is
hereby given of a proposed settlement
agreement in the five consolidated
petitions for review in Center for
Biological Diversity, et al. v. EPA (D.C.
Cir. Nos. 15–1054, 15–1176, 15–1389,
15–1462 and 16–1351) in the United
States Court of Appeals for the District
of Columbia. In 2015 and 2016, the
Center for Biological Diversity and other
Petitioners (collectively, ‘‘Petitioners’’)
filed five petitions for review of
registrations containing five active
ingredients: flupyradifurone,
bicyclopyrone, benzovindiflupyr,
cuprous iodide, and haluaxifen-methyl.
The five petitions for review alleged that
EPA violated the Endangered Species
Act (‘‘ESA’’) by failing to consult on the
effects to listed species when registering
products containing the five new active
ingredients. The Court consolidated the
cases on June 20, 2018. The registrants
for each active ingredient other than
cuprous iodide sought and were granted
intervention.
EPA, the Petitioners and the
Defendant-Intervenors (collectively,
‘‘the Parties’’) are proposing to enter
into an out-of-court settlement
agreement, which, among other things,
calls for the Parties to file a Joint Motion
for Order on Consent requesting that the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Dec 14, 2020
Jkt 253001
Court order EPA to: complete a final
effects determination for any use of
cuprous iodide that is approved for sale
and distribution by August 13, 2021;
complete final Biological Evaluations
for two of the other active ingredients by
September 30, 2025 and the remaining
two active ingredients by September 30,
2027; and initiate consultation with the
National Marine Fisheries Service and/
or the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Services) as appropriate based on the
outcome of the Biological Evaluations.
DATES: Written comments on the
proposed settlement agreement must be
received by January 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OGC–2020- 0612 online at
www.regulations.gov (EPA’s preferred
method). For comments submitted at
www.regulations.gov, follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA generally
will not consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin
S. Koch, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances Law Office (2333A), Office
of General Counsel, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460;
telephone: (202) 564–1718; email
address: koch.erin@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the
Proposed Settlement Agreement
In 2015 and 2016, Petitioners filed
five petitions for review in the Court of
Appeals for the D.C. Circuit as EPA
issued registrations for five new active
ingredients, namely flupyradifurone,
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81205
bicyclopyrone, benzovindiflupyr,
cuprous iodide, and halauxifen-methyl.
The petitions for review alleged that
EPA violated Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA
by failing to consult on the effects to
listed species of the five new active
ingredients. The Court consolidated the
cases on June 20, 2018. The registrants
for each active ingredient other than
cuprous iodide sought and were granted
intervention.
The Parties have been engaged in
settlement negotiations to reach an
agreement in this case. The proposed
settlement agreement between the
Parties calls for, among other things, the
Parties to file a Joint Motion for Order
on Consent requesting that the Court
order EPA to: (1) Complete a final
effects determination for any use of
cuprous iodide that is approved for sale
and distribution by August 13, 2021; (2)
complete final Biological Evaluations
(BEs) for two of the other active
ingredients by September 30, 2025 and
the remaining two active ingredients by
September 30, 2027; and (3) initiate
consultation as appropriate based on the
outcome of the BEs.
Similar to the settlement agreement in
CBD, et al. v. EPA, et al. (Case No. CV–
11–0293–JCS (N.D. Cal.)), this proposed
settlement agreement provides for the
possibility of extending these dates if
specific events occur, such as an
extension of a comment period.
In addition to the commitments
above, the settlement agreement
provides that within three months of
issuance of draft BEs or no later than
December of 2024 and 2026, the Parties
will meet and discuss potential interim
measures. The settlement agreement
also provides that EPA will maintain a
web page that includes the settlement
agreement, associated court orders, and
a link to an independent 3rd-party web
page hosted, maintained, and funded by
Defendant-Intervenors.
For a period of thirty (30) days
following the date of publication of this
notice, the Agency will accept written
comments relating to the proposed
settlement agreement from persons who
are not named as parties to the litigation
in question. EPA may withdraw or
withhold consent to the proposed
settlement if the comments disclose
facts or considerations that indicate that
such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent
with the requirements of the ESA or the
Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and
Rodenticide Act. Unless EPA
determines that consent should be
withdrawn, the terms of the proposed
settlement agreement will be affirmed.
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
81206
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 241 / Tuesday, December 15, 2020 / Notices
II. Additional Information About
Commenting on the Proposed
Settlement Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed
settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this
action (identified by EPA–HQ–OGC–
2020–0612) contains a copy of the
proposed settlement agreement and
proposed order that will be filed with
the Joint Motion for Order on Consent.
The EPA is temporarily suspending its
Docket Center and Reading Room for
public visitors, with limited exceptions,
to reduce the risk of transmitting
COVID–19. Our Docket Center staff will
continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform.
We encourage the public to submit
comments via https://
www.regulations.gov/ as there may be a
delay in processing mail and faxes.
Hand deliveries or couriers will be
received by scheduled appointment
only. For further information and
updates on EPA Docket Center services,
please visit us online at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
The EPA continues to carefully and
continuously monitor information from
the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC), local area health
departments, and our Federal partners
so that we can respond rapidly as
conditions change regarding COVID–19.
The electronic version of the public
docket for this action contains a copy of
the proposed settlement agreement and
proposed order that will be filed with
the Joint Motion for Order on Consent,
and is available through https://
www.regulations.gov. You may use
www.regulations.gov to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official
public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are
available electronically. Once in the
system, key in the appropriate docket
identification number then select
‘‘search.’’ It is important to note that
EPA’s policy is that public comments,
whether submitted electronically or in
paper, will be made available for public
viewing online at www.regulations.gov
without change, unless the comment
contains copyrighted material, CBI, or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute
is not included in the official public
docket or in the electronic public
docket.
EPA’s policy is that copyrighted
material, including copyrighted material
contained in a public comment, will not
be placed in EPA’s electronic public
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:35 Dec 14, 2020
Jkt 253001
docket but will be available only in
printed, paper form in the official public
docket. Please refer to the information
above about the current status of the
EPA Docket Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit
comments?
You may submit comments as
provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are
submitted within the specified comment
period.
If you submit an electronic comment,
EPA recommends that you include your
name, mailing address, and an email
address or other contact information in
the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD ROM you submit. This
ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows
EPA to contact you in case EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical
difficulties or needs further information
on the substance of your comment. Any
identifying or contact information
provided in the body of a comment will
be included as part of the comment that
is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA’s electronic
public docket. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov
website to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA’s preferred method
for receiving comments. The electronic
public docket system is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, which means EPA will
not know your identity, email address,
or other contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA’s electronic public
docket, EPA’s electronic mail (email)
system is not an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system. If you send an email comment
directly to the Docket without going
through www.regulations.gov, your
email address is automatically captured
and included as part of the comment
that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA’s
electronic public docket.
[FR Doc. 2020–27541 Filed 12–14–20; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Notice of Request for Comment on the
Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2020 and
Three-Year Plan
Federal Accounting Standards
Advisory Board.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Ms.
Monica R. Valentine, Executive
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155,
Washington, DC 20548, or call (202)
512–7350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 31 U.S.C. 3511(d), the Federal
Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5
U.S.C. App.), and the FASAB Rules Of
Procedure, as amended in October 2010,
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Accounting Standards Advisory Board
(FASAB) has issued its Annual Report
for Fiscal Year 2020 and Three-Year
Plan.
The Annual Report for Fiscal Year
2020 and Three-Year Plan is available
on the FASAB website at https://
www.fasab.gov/our-annual-reports/.
Copies can be obtained by contacting
FASAB at (202) 512–7350.
Respondents are encouraged to
comment on the content of the annual
report, FASAB’s project priorities for
the next three years, and the potential
projects the Board will consider moving
forward. Written comments are
requested by January 21, 2021, and
should be sent to fasab@fasab.gov or
Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive
Director, Federal Accounting Standards
Advisory Board, 441 G Street NW, Suite
1155, Washington, DC 20548.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority: Federal Advisory Committee
Act (5 U.S.C. App.), 31 U.S.C. 3511(d).
Dated: December 8, 2020.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2020–27566 Filed 12–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610–02–P
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION
Sunshine Act Meetings
10:00 a.m. on Tuesday,
December 15, 2020.
PLACE: The meeting is open to the
public. Out of an abundance of caution
related to current and potential
coronavirus developments, the public’s
means to observe this Board meeting
will be via a Webcast live on the
internet and subsequently made
available on-demand approximately one
TIME AND DATE:
Joseph E. Cole,
Associate General Counsel.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
ADVISORY BOARD
E:\FR\FM\15DEN1.SGM
15DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 241 (Tuesday, December 15, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81205-81206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27541]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-HQ-OGC-2020-0612; FRL 10017-99-OGC]
Proposed Settlement Agreement; Biological Evaluations
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement agreement; request for public
comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator's October 16, 2017, Directive Promoting Transparency and
Public Participation in Consent Decrees and Settlement Agreements,
notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement in the five
consolidated petitions for review in Center for Biological Diversity,
et al. v. EPA (D.C. Cir. Nos. 15-1054, 15-1176, 15-1389, 15-1462 and
16-1351) in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia. In 2015 and 2016, the Center for Biological Diversity and
other Petitioners (collectively, ``Petitioners'') filed five petitions
for review of registrations containing five active ingredients:
flupyradifurone, bicyclopyrone, benzovindiflupyr, cuprous iodide, and
haluaxifen-methyl. The five petitions for review alleged that EPA
violated the Endangered Species Act (``ESA'') by failing to consult on
the effects to listed species when registering products containing the
five new active ingredients. The Court consolidated the cases on June
20, 2018. The registrants for each active ingredient other than cuprous
iodide sought and were granted intervention.
EPA, the Petitioners and the Defendant-Intervenors (collectively,
``the Parties'') are proposing to enter into an out-of-court settlement
agreement, which, among other things, calls for the Parties to file a
Joint Motion for Order on Consent requesting that the Court order EPA
to: complete a final effects determination for any use of cuprous
iodide that is approved for sale and distribution by August 13, 2021;
complete final Biological Evaluations for two of the other active
ingredients by September 30, 2025 and the remaining two active
ingredients by September 30, 2027; and initiate consultation with the
National Marine Fisheries Service and/or the Fish and Wildlife Service
(Services) as appropriate based on the outcome of the Biological
Evaluations.
DATES: Written comments on the proposed settlement agreement must be
received by January 14, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID number EPA-HQ-
OGC-2020- 0612 online at www.regulations.gov (EPA's preferred method).
For comments submitted at www.regulations.gov, follow the online
instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot
be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a
written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment
and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA
generally will not consider comments or comment contents located
outside of the primary submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or other
file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or
multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective
comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Erin S. Koch, Pesticides and Toxic
Substances Law Office (2333A), Office of General Counsel, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington,
DC 20460; telephone: (202) 564-1718; email address: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Additional Information About the Proposed Settlement Agreement
In 2015 and 2016, Petitioners filed five petitions for review in
the Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit as EPA issued registrations
for five new active ingredients, namely flupyradifurone, bicyclopyrone,
benzovindiflupyr, cuprous iodide, and halauxifen-methyl. The petitions
for review alleged that EPA violated Section 7(a)(2) of the ESA by
failing to consult on the effects to listed species of the five new
active ingredients. The Court consolidated the cases on June 20, 2018.
The registrants for each active ingredient other than cuprous iodide
sought and were granted intervention.
The Parties have been engaged in settlement negotiations to reach
an agreement in this case. The proposed settlement agreement between
the Parties calls for, among other things, the Parties to file a Joint
Motion for Order on Consent requesting that the Court order EPA to: (1)
Complete a final effects determination for any use of cuprous iodide
that is approved for sale and distribution by August 13, 2021; (2)
complete final Biological Evaluations (BEs) for two of the other active
ingredients by September 30, 2025 and the remaining two active
ingredients by September 30, 2027; and (3) initiate consultation as
appropriate based on the outcome of the BEs.
Similar to the settlement agreement in CBD, et al. v. EPA, et al.
(Case No. CV-11-0293-JCS (N.D. Cal.)), this proposed settlement
agreement provides for the possibility of extending these dates if
specific events occur, such as an extension of a comment period.
In addition to the commitments above, the settlement agreement
provides that within three months of issuance of draft BEs or no later
than December of 2024 and 2026, the Parties will meet and discuss
potential interim measures. The settlement agreement also provides that
EPA will maintain a web page that includes the settlement agreement,
associated court orders, and a link to an independent 3rd-party web
page hosted, maintained, and funded by Defendant-Intervenors.
For a period of thirty (30) days following the date of publication
of this notice, the Agency will accept written comments relating to the
proposed settlement agreement from persons who are not named as parties
to the litigation in question. EPA may withdraw or withhold consent to
the proposed settlement if the comments disclose facts or
considerations that indicate that such consent is inappropriate,
improper, inadequate, or inconsistent with the requirements of the ESA
or the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act. Unless EPA
determines that consent should be withdrawn, the terms of the proposed
settlement agreement will be affirmed.
[[Page 81206]]
II. Additional Information About Commenting on the Proposed Settlement
Agreement
A. How can I get a copy of the proposed settlement agreement?
The official public docket for this action (identified by EPA-HQ-
OGC-2020-0612) contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement and
proposed order that will be filed with the Joint Motion for Order on
Consent. The EPA is temporarily suspending its Docket Center and
Reading Room for public visitors, with limited exceptions, to reduce
the risk of transmitting COVID-19. Our Docket Center staff will
continue to provide remote customer service via email, phone, and
webform. We encourage the public to submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov/ as there may be a delay in processing mail and
faxes. Hand deliveries or couriers will be received by scheduled
appointment only. For further information and updates on EPA Docket
Center services, please visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
The EPA continues to carefully and continuously monitor information
from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), local area
health departments, and our Federal partners so that we can respond
rapidly as conditions change regarding COVID-19.
The electronic version of the public docket for this action
contains a copy of the proposed settlement agreement and proposed order
that will be filed with the Joint Motion for Order on Consent, and is
available through https://www.regulations.gov. You may use
www.regulations.gov to submit or view public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the official public docket, and access those
documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once
in the system, key in the appropriate docket identification number then
select ``search.'' It is important to note that EPA's policy is that
public comments, whether submitted electronically or in paper, will be
made available for public viewing online at www.regulations.gov without
change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information
claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute is not included in the official public docket or in the
electronic public docket.
EPA's policy is that copyrighted material, including copyrighted
material contained in a public comment, will not be placed in EPA's
electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper
form in the official public docket. Please refer to the information
above about the current status of the EPA Docket Center.
B. How and to whom do I submit comments?
You may submit comments as provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified
comment period.
If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name, mailing address, and an email address or other
contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD
ROM you submit. This ensures that you can be identified as the
submitter of the comment and allows EPA to contact you in case EPA
cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties or needs further
information on the substance of your comment. Any identifying or
contact information provided in the body of a comment will be included
as part of the comment that is placed in the official public docket,
and made available in EPA's electronic public docket. If EPA cannot
read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you
for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment.
Use of the www.regulations.gov website to submit comments to EPA
electronically is EPA's preferred method for receiving comments. The
electronic public docket system is an ``anonymous access'' system,
which means EPA will not know your identity, email address, or other
contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment.
In contrast to EPA's electronic public docket, EPA's electronic mail
(email) system is not an ``anonymous access'' system. If you send an
email comment directly to the Docket without going through
www.regulations.gov, your email address is automatically captured and
included as part of the comment that is placed in the official public
docket, and made available in EPA's electronic public docket.
Joseph E. Cole,
Associate General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020-27541 Filed 12-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P