Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International Agreements: Amendments, 78813-78814 [2020-26718]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
22 CFR Part 181
RIN 1400–AE98
[Public Notice: 10990]
Publication, Coordination, and
Reporting of International Agreements:
Amendments
*
ASW NM D Farmington, NM [Amended]
Four Corners Regional Airport, NM
(Lat. 36°44′29″ N, long. 108°13′48″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 8,000 feet MSL
within a 4.7-mile radius of the airport, and
within 1.8 miles each side of the 086° bearing
from the airport, extending from the 4.7-mile
radius to 5.6 miles east of Four Corners
Regional Airport. This Class D airspace area
is effective during the specific dates and
times established in advance by a Notice to
Airmen. The effective date and time will
thereafter be continuously published in the
Chart Supplement.
Paragraph 6002 Class E Airspace
Designated as a Surface Area.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
ASW NM E2 Farmington, NM [Amended]
Four Corners Regional Airport, NM
(Lat. 36°44′29″ N, long. 108°13′48″ W)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface within a 4.7-mile radius of the
airport, and within 1.8 miles each side of the
086° bearing from the airport, extending from
the 4.7-mile radius to 5.6 miles east of Four
Corners Regional Airport. This Class E
airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airman. The effective date and time
will thereafter be continuously published in
the Chart Supplement.
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward From 700 Feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is
amended as follows:
■
*
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on
December 1, 2020.
B.G. Chew,
Acting Group Manager, Operations Support
Group, Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020–26818 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am]
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
ASW NM E5 Farmington, NM [Amended]
Four Corners Regional Airport, NM
(Lat. 36°44′29″ N, long. 108°13′48″ W)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.7-mile
radius of the airport, and within 4 miles
north and 8 miles south of the 088° bearing
from the airport, extending from the 6.7-mile
radius of the airport, and extending from 4
miles east of the airport to 22.4 miles east of
the airport, and within 4.2 miles each side of
the 267° bearing from the airport, extending
from the 6.7-mile radius to 12.5 miles west
of Four Corners Regional Airport.
*
17:11 Dec 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
Department of State.
Proposed rule with request for
comment.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Treaties and Other
International Acts Series (TIAS) is the
official treaty series of the United States
and serves as evidence of the treaties,
and international agreements other than
treaties, in all courts of law and equity
of the United States, and in public
offices of the federal government and of
the states, without any need of further
authentication. Certain international
agreements may be exempted from
publication in TIAS, if the Department
of State provides notice in its
regulations. With this proposed rule, the
Department of State is proposing to
update those regulations to clarify the
scope of an existing exemption.
DATES: The Department of State will
consider comments submitted before
February 5, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Email: KottmyerAM@state.gov. You
must include the RIN 1400–AE98 in the
subject line of your message.
• Website: Persons with access to the
internet may also view this notice and
provide comments by going to the
regulations.gov website and searching
Docket DOS–2019–0045 at: https://
www.regulations.gov/.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
78813
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Michael Mattler, Treaty Affairs, Office
of the Legal Adviser, Department of
State, Washington, DC 20520, (202)
647–1345, or at treatyoffice@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant
to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of State
is required to cause to be published
annually a compilation of all treaties
and international agreements to which
the United States is a party that were
signed, proclaimed, or ‘‘with reference
to which any other final formality ha[d]
been executed’’ during the calendar
year.
The Secretary of State, however, may
determine that publication of particular
categories of agreements is not required
if certain criteria are met (See 1 U.S.C.
112a(b)). The criteria are:
(1) Such agreements are not treaties
that have been brought into force for the
United States after having received
Senate advice and consent pursuant to
section 2(2) of Article II of the
Constitution of the United States;
(2) The public interest in such
agreements is insufficient to justify their
publication, because (A) as of the date
of enactment of the Foreign Relations
Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994
and 1995, the agreements are no longer
in force; (B) the agreements do not
create private rights or duties, or
establish standards intended to govern
government action in the treatment of
private individuals; (C) in view of the
limited or specialized nature of the
public interest in such agreements, such
interest can adequately be satisfied by
an alternative means; or (D) the public
disclosure of the text of the agreement
would, in the opinion of the President,
be prejudicial to the national security of
the United States; and
(3) Copies of such agreements (other
than those in paragraph (2)(D)),
including certified copies where
necessary for litigation or similar
purposes, will be made available by the
Department of State upon request.
Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a(c), any such
determination must be published in the
Federal Register. The Department
proposes amending the exemption
contained in 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9) to
clarify its scope. 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9)
exempts from publication ‘‘Agreements
that have been given a national security
classification pursuant to Executive
Order No. 13526, its predecessors or
successors.’’ The Department proposes
amending this subsection to read
‘‘Agreements that have been given a
national security classification pursuant
to Executive Order No. 13526, its
predecessors or successors, or are
otherwise exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.’’
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
78814
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Proposed Rules
In proposing this change, the
Department wishes to clarify that the
scope of the exemption contained in 22
CFR 181.8(a)(9) includes agreements
that have not been given a national
security classification pursuant to
Executive Order No. 13526, its
predecessors or successors, but
nonetheless are exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to U.S. law. The
principal category of agreements for
which this clarification is relevant are
agreements that are exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to 10 U.S.C. 130c,
which authorizes specified national
security officials to withhold from
public disclosure otherwise required by
law sensitive information of foreign
governments and international
organizations.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is issuing this
proposed rule for comment in
accordance with the Administrative
Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive
Order 13272: Small Business
This rulemaking is hereby certified as
not expected to have a significant
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the criteria of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601
et seq.
The Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking does not constitute a
major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804,
for purposes of congressional review of
agency rulemaking.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally
requires agencies to prepare a statement
before proposing any rule that may
result in an annual expenditure of $100
million or more by State, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector.
This rule will not result in any such
expenditure nor would it significantly
or uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132:
Federalism and Executive Order 13175,
Impact on Tribes
This rule will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the
regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Dec 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
of Executive Orders 12372 and 13132.
This rule will not have tribal
implications, will not impose costs on
Indian tribal governments, and will not
pre-empt tribal law. Accordingly, the
requirements of Executive Order 13175
do not apply to this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563:
Regulatory Review
This rule has been drafted in
accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. This
rule has been determined to be a
significant rulemaking under section 3
of Executive Order 12866, but not
economically significant. With respect
to the costs and benefits of this rule, the
Department notes that agreements
addressed by the proposed clarification
are, by definition, already exempt from
public disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.
The proposed rule is intended to
provide greater clarity to the application
of the existing rule rather than to effect
a change in existing practices regarding
the publication of agreements. For this
reason, the Department does not
anticipate any costs to the public from
this rulemaking. Therefore, the
Department believes that the benefits of
this rulemaking outweigh any costs.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice
Reform
This rule has been reviewed in light
of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity,
minimize litigation, establish clear legal
standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is not expected to
be subject to the requirements of
Executive Order 13771 because this
proposed rule is expected to result in no
more than de minimis costs.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from
OMB for each collection of information
they conduct, sponsor, or require
through regulation. This rule contains
no new collection of information
requirements.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181
Treaties.
For the reasons set forth above, 22
CFR part 181 is proposed to be amended
as follows:
PART 181—COORDINATION,
REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF
INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENTS
1. The Authority section for Part 181
continues to read as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22
U.S.C. 2651a.
§ 181.8
[Amended]
2. In § 181.8 revise paragraph (a)(9) to
read as follows:
(a) * * *
*
*
*
*
*
(9) Agreements that have been given
a national security classification
pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526,
its predecessors or successors, or are
otherwise exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.
*
*
*
*
*
■
Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Directives Management,
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2020–26718 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–08–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 54
[WC Docket Nos. 18–143, 10–90, 14–58; FCC
19–95; FRS 17234]
The Uniendo a Puerto Rico Fund and
the Connect USVI Fund, Connect
America Fund, ETC Annual Reports
and Certifications; Correction
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Notification of intent to correct.
AGENCY:
This document announces
that the Commission will correct an
error in the regulatory text of a Federal
Register document that took major steps
to promote the deployment of advanced,
hardened networks in the Territories by
allocating nearly a billion dollars in
Federal universal service support in
Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
once an effective date is established for
the relevant section. The summary was
published in the Federal Register on
November 7, 2019.
DATES: When the Commission publishes
a document in the Federal Register
announcing the effective date of the
sections published 84 FR 59937
(November 7, 2019), it will also correct
this error.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexander Minard, Wireline
Competition Bureau, (202) 418–7400.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
summary contains a correction to the
regulatory text of a Federal Register
document, 84 FR 59937, November 7,
2019. The full text of the Commission’s
Report and Order and Order on
Reconsideration in WC Docket Nos. 18–
143, 10–90, 14–58; FCC 19–95, released
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\07DEP1.SGM
07DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 235 (Monday, December 7, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 78813-78814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26718]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 181
RIN 1400-AE98
[Public Notice: 10990]
Publication, Coordination, and Reporting of International
Agreements: Amendments
AGENCY: Department of State.
ACTION: Proposed rule with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Treaties and Other International Acts Series (TIAS) is the
official treaty series of the United States and serves as evidence of
the treaties, and international agreements other than treaties, in all
courts of law and equity of the United States, and in public offices of
the federal government and of the states, without any need of further
authentication. Certain international agreements may be exempted from
publication in TIAS, if the Department of State provides notice in its
regulations. With this proposed rule, the Department of State is
proposing to update those regulations to clarify the scope of an
existing exemption.
DATES: The Department of State will consider comments submitted before
February 5, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Email: [email protected]. You must include the RIN
1400-AE98 in the subject line of your message.
Website: Persons with access to the internet may also view
this notice and provide comments by going to the regulations.gov
website and searching Docket DOS-2019-0045 at: https://www.regulations.gov/.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Mattler, Treaty Affairs,
Office of the Legal Adviser, Department of State, Washington, DC 20520,
(202) 647-1345, or at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a, the Secretary of
State is required to cause to be published annually a compilation of
all treaties and international agreements to which the United States is
a party that were signed, proclaimed, or ``with reference to which any
other final formality ha[d] been executed'' during the calendar year.
The Secretary of State, however, may determine that publication of
particular categories of agreements is not required if certain criteria
are met (See 1 U.S.C. 112a(b)). The criteria are:
(1) Such agreements are not treaties that have been brought into
force for the United States after having received Senate advice and
consent pursuant to section 2(2) of Article II of the Constitution of
the United States;
(2) The public interest in such agreements is insufficient to
justify their publication, because (A) as of the date of enactment of
the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1994 and 1995,
the agreements are no longer in force; (B) the agreements do not create
private rights or duties, or establish standards intended to govern
government action in the treatment of private individuals; (C) in view
of the limited or specialized nature of the public interest in such
agreements, such interest can adequately be satisfied by an alternative
means; or (D) the public disclosure of the text of the agreement would,
in the opinion of the President, be prejudicial to the national
security of the United States; and
(3) Copies of such agreements (other than those in paragraph
(2)(D)), including certified copies where necessary for litigation or
similar purposes, will be made available by the Department of State
upon request.
Pursuant to 1 U.S.C. 112a(c), any such determination must be
published in the Federal Register. The Department proposes amending the
exemption contained in 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9) to clarify its scope. 22 CFR
181.8(a)(9) exempts from publication ``Agreements that have been given
a national security classification pursuant to Executive Order No.
13526, its predecessors or successors.'' The Department proposes
amending this subsection to read ``Agreements that have been given a
national security classification pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526,
its predecessors or successors, or are otherwise exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.''
[[Page 78814]]
In proposing this change, the Department wishes to clarify that the
scope of the exemption contained in 22 CFR 181.8(a)(9) includes
agreements that have not been given a national security classification
pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526, its predecessors or successors,
but nonetheless are exempt from public disclosure pursuant to U.S. law.
The principal category of agreements for which this clarification is
relevant are agreements that are exempt from public disclosure pursuant
to 10 U.S.C. 130c, which authorizes specified national security
officials to withhold from public disclosure otherwise required by law
sensitive information of foreign governments and international
organizations.
Regulatory Analysis
Administrative Procedure Act
The Department is issuing this proposed rule for comment in
accordance with the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. 553).
Regulatory Flexibility Act/Executive Order 13272: Small Business
This rulemaking is hereby certified as not expected to have a
significant impact on a substantial number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
The Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
This rulemaking does not constitute a major rule, as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804, for purposes of congressional review of agency rulemaking.
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 1532, generally
requires agencies to prepare a statement before proposing any rule that
may result in an annual expenditure of $100 million or more by State,
local, or tribal governments, or by the private sector. This rule will
not result in any such expenditure nor would it significantly or
uniquely affect small governments.
Executive Orders 12372 and 13132: Federalism and Executive Order 13175,
Impact on Tribes
This rule will not have substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various
levels of government. Nor will the regulations have federalism
implications warranting the application of Executive Orders 12372 and
13132. This rule will not have tribal implications, will not impose
costs on Indian tribal governments, and will not pre-empt tribal law.
Accordingly, the requirements of Executive Order 13175 do not apply to
this rulemaking.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563: Regulatory Review
This rule has been drafted in accordance with the principles of
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563. This rule has been determined to be a
significant rulemaking under section 3 of Executive Order 12866, but
not economically significant. With respect to the costs and benefits of
this rule, the Department notes that agreements addressed by the
proposed clarification are, by definition, already exempt from public
disclosure pursuant to U.S. law. The proposed rule is intended to
provide greater clarity to the application of the existing rule rather
than to effect a change in existing practices regarding the publication
of agreements. For this reason, the Department does not anticipate any
costs to the public from this rulemaking. Therefore, the Department
believes that the benefits of this rulemaking outweigh any costs.
Executive Order 12988: Civil Justice Reform
This rule has been reviewed in light of sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988 to eliminate ambiguity, minimize litigation,
establish clear legal standards, and reduce burden.
Executive Order 13771
This proposed rule is not expected to be subject to the
requirements of Executive Order 13771 because this proposed rule is
expected to result in no more than de minimis costs.
The Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.),
Federal agencies must obtain approval from OMB for each collection of
information they conduct, sponsor, or require through regulation. This
rule contains no new collection of information requirements.
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 181
Treaties.
For the reasons set forth above, 22 CFR part 181 is proposed to be
amended as follows:
PART 181--COORDINATION, REPORTING AND PUBLICATION OF INTERNATIONAL
AGREEMENTS
0
1. The Authority section for Part 181 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 1 U.S.C. 112a, 112b; and 22 U.S.C. 2651a.
Sec. 181.8 [Amended]
0
2. In Sec. 181.8 revise paragraph (a)(9) to read as follows:
(a) * * *
* * * * *
(9) Agreements that have been given a national security
classification pursuant to Executive Order No. 13526, its predecessors
or successors, or are otherwise exempt from public disclosure pursuant
to U.S. law.
* * * * *
Zachary A. Parker,
Director, Office of Directives Management, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2020-26718 Filed 12-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-08-P