SBA Supervised Lenders Application Process, 78205-78215 [2020-26307]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
insufficiently transparent to meet the
standard for reproducibility; or
(vi) Derive from or implement
Executive Orders or other Presidential
directives that have been subsequently
rescinded or substantially modified.
DOE concludes that this rulemaking is
consistent with the directives set forth
in these Executive Orders. This final
rule will update and improve efficiency
in DOE’s implementation of NEPA by
appropriately focusing DOE’s NEPA
analysis for natural gas export
applications and eliminating certain
requirements of its existing regulations
that are unnecessary.
M. Congressional Notification
PART 1021—NATIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
IMPLEMENTING PROCEDURES
1. The authority citation for part 1021
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7101 et seq.; 42 U.S.C.
4321 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 2401 et seq.
2. Appendix B to subpart D of part
1021 is amended by:
■ a. Revising section B5.7; and
■ b. Removing and reserving section
B5.8.
The revision reads as follows:
■
Appendix B to Subpart D of Part 1021—
Categorical Exclusions Applicable to
Specific Agency Actions
*
As required by 5 U.S.C. 801, DOE will
submit to Congress a report regarding
the issuance of this final rule prior to
the effective date set forth at the outset
of this rulemaking. The report will state
that it has been determined that the rule
is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 801(2).
Approval of the Office of the Secretary
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
B5. * * *
*
*
B5.7 Export of natural gas and associated
transportation by marine vessel
Approvals or disapprovals of new
authorizations or amendments of existing
authorizations to export natural gas under
section 3 of the Natural Gas Act and any
associated transportation of natural gas by
marine vessel.
The Secretary of Energy has approved
publication of this final rule.
B5.8
[Removed and Reserved]
*
*
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 1021
Appendix C to Subpart D of Part 1021—
Classes of Actions That Normally
Require EAs But Not Necessarily EISs
Environmental impact statements.
Signing Authority
C13
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on November 24,
2020, by William S. Cooper III, General
Counsel, pursuant to delegated
authority from the Secretary of Energy.
That document with the original
signature and date is maintained by
DOE. For administrative purposes only,
and in compliance with requirements of
the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register
Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in
electronic format for publication, as an
official document of the Department of
Energy. This administrative process in
no way alters the legal effect of this
document upon publication in the
Federal Register.
■
Signed in Washington, DC, on November
25, 2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DOE amends part 1021 of
Chapter X of Title 10 of the Code of
Federal Regulations as set forth below:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
*
*
*
[Removed and Reserved]
3. Remove and reserve section C13.
Appendix D to Subpart D of Part 1021—
Classes of Actions That Normally
Require EISs
D8 and D9
[Removed and Reserved]
4. Remove and reserve sections D8
and D9.
■
[FR Doc. 2020–26459 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 120
RIN 3245–AH04
SBA Supervised Lenders Application
Process
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Small Business
Administration (SBA or Agency) is
amending the regulations applicable to
Small Business Lending Companies
(SBLCs) and state-regulated lenders
(Non-Federally Regulated Lenders
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78205
(NFRLs) (collectively referred to as SBA
Supervised Lenders). The key
amendments to the regulations include
a new application and review process
for SBA Supervised Lenders, including
for transactions involving a change of
ownership or control. Other
amendments to the regulations include
updating the minimum capital
maintenance requirements, clarifying
the factors SBA will consider in its
evaluation of an SBA Supervised Lender
application and limiting the 7(a) lending
area for NFRLs.
DATES: This rule is effective January 4,
2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Kirwin, Chief, SBA Supervised Lender
Oversight Team, Office of Credit Risk
Management, Office of Capital Access,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Washington, DC
20416; telephone: (202) 205–7261;
email: paul.kirwin@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
The 7(a) Loan Program is a business
loan program authorized by section 7(a)
of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C.
636(a)) and is governed primarily by the
regulations in part 120 of title 13 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The
core mission of the 7(a) Loan Program
is to provide SBA-guaranteed financial
assistance to small businesses that lack
access to capital on reasonable terms
and conditions to support our nation’s
economy.
Most Lenders participating in the 7(a)
Loan Program are depository
institutions that have a primary Federal
Financial Institution Regulator (as
defined in 13 CFR 120.10) that oversees
the Lender’s lending activities. SBA has
statutory authority under section
7(a)(17) of the Small Business Act to
authorize non-federally regulated
entities to make 7(a) loans, including
entities that have state regulators. Under
this authority, SBA has authorized SBA
Supervised Lenders to make loans in the
7(a) Loan Program. SBA Supervised
Lenders are defined in 13 CFR 120.10 to
include SBLCs and NFRLs, and are
subject to regulation, oversight, and
enforcement by SBA.
SBLCs are non-depository lending
institutions that are authorized only to
make loans pursuant to section 7(a) of
the Small Business Act and loans to
Intermediaries in SBA’s Microloan
program. SBLCs are regulated,
supervised, and examined solely by
SBA, except for the subset of SBLCs
defined as Other Regulated SBLCs in 13
CFR 120.10. SBA imposed a moratorium
on issuing additional SBA lending
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
78206
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
authorities (referred to as SBLC
Licenses) to SBLCs in 1982. Currently,
there are fourteen (14) SBLCs with the
authority to make 7(a) loans up to the
maximum loan amount allowed under
the Small Business Act.1 An entity may
purchase one of the fourteen (14) SBLC
Licenses from an existing SBLC with
SBA’s prior written approval.
NFRLs are business concerns that are
subject to regulation, supervision and
oversight by a state regulator that must
be satisfactory to SBA. By definition, an
NFRL’s lending activities are not
regulated by a Federal Financial
Institution Regulator. NFRLs are
typically organized as state licensed
Business and Industrial Development
Companies (BIDCOs) and may include
other types of state-regulated lending
institutions, such as non-profit
corporations or financial institutions
without Federal deposit insurance or
share insurance protection.2
To become an SBA Supervised
Lender, an applicant must be qualified
as determined by SBA in its sole
discretion. An entity interested in
becoming an SBA Supervised Lender
must submit an application to SBA
containing the information specified in
SBA’s Standard Operating Procedures
50 10, Lender and Development
Company Loan Programs, as amended
from time to time (SOP 50 10).3
1 SBA waived certain regulations for the purpose
of permitting mission-oriented lenders to
participate in SBA’s Community Advantage Pilot
Program (referred to as CA Lenders), a pilot
program within the 7(a) Loan Program. Each CA
Lender is identified as either an SBLC or NFRL,
depending on whether the lender is subject to
regulation by a state. CA Lenders are limited to
making loans in the CA Pilot Program, which
generally requires a CA Lender to make loans to
underserved markets (e.g., low-to-moderate income
communities, rural areas, opportunity zones,
veteran-owned businesses) and in an amount not to
exceed $250,000. The CA Pilot Program is governed
by all regulations applicable to the 7(a) Loan
Program generally and to SBA Supervised Lenders
specifically unless waived or modified in the
Federal Register Notices published in connection
with the CA Pilot Program. As indicated in the
proposed rule, the revisions in this final rule do not
apply to the CA Pilot Program. For more
information about the CA Pilot Program please refer
to the CA Participant Guide, Version 6.0 (June 15,
2020), available at https://www.sba.gov/document/
support-community-advantage-participant-guide.
2 This final rule does not apply to NFRLs
authorized to make Paycheck Protection Program
(PPP) loans under SBA Form 3507. For more
information about PPP please refer to the
information available on SBA’s website at https://
www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/coronavirusrelief-options/paycheck-protection-program.
3 The current version of the SOP is 50 10 6,
effective October 1, 2020. The application
requirements can be found in this SOP in Part 1,
Section A, Chapter 1, Paragraph A.2 with respect
to NFRLs and Part 1, Section A, Chapter 2,
Paragraph B with respect to SBLCs. The SOP is
available at https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-5010-lender-development-company-loan-programs-0.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
On January 13, 2020, SBA published
a proposed rule with a request for
comments in the Federal Register to
amend the regulations related to the
SBA Supervised Lender application and
review process and to mitigate certain
risks inherent in their participation in
the 7(a) Loan Program. 85 FR 1783
(January 13, 2020). The proposed
changes were designed to: Improve
efficiencies related to the SBA
Supervised Lender application and
review process, including for a change
of ownership or control transaction (as
defined in § 120.468); incorporate into
the regulations the factors SBA will
consider in its evaluation of an
application; and mitigate the increased
risk associated with the lending
operations of SBA Supervised Lenders
by updating their minimum capital
maintenance requirements and
establishing a 7(a) lending area for
NFRLs.
II. Summary of Comments
SBA received 19 comments on the
proposed rule. Seven comments were
submitted by or on behalf of SBLCs.
Three comments were submitted by or
on behalf of NFRLs. Three comments
were submitted by or on behalf of state
regulators. SBA also received comments
from two trade associations, two law
firms, and two individuals.
The comments were generally
supportive of the proposed application
and review process with some suggested
changes to shorten the waiting period
for entities seeking to reapply to become
an SBA Supervised Lender.
Commenters generally agreed with
SBA’s proposed definition of qualified
full-time professional management with
minor changes. The commenters were
also generally in favor of the changes to
the minimum capital maintenance
requirements with some proposed
changes. A majority of the commenters
were opposed to SBA limiting the 7(a)
lending area for NFRLs to the state in
which their primary state regulator is
located. Commenters also requested
some technical changes to the proposed
regulation related to SBA’s evaluation of
applications and the requirements for
change of ownership or control
transactions. Finally, there were several
responses to SBA’s request for
comments on whether SBA should
modify the contribution that servicing
rights assets may have on an SBA
Supervised Lender’s capital
maintenance requirement.
SBA appreciates the comments
received and has incorporated many of
the suggested changes into the final
rule. SBA has addressed the comments
to the proposed regulatory changes
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
within the section-by-section analysis
below.
III. Section-by-Section Analysis of
Comments and Changes
A. SBA Supervised Lenders
1. Section 120.460 What are SBA’s
additional requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders?
SBA proposed to add two new
paragraphs to § 120.460. Proposed
paragraph (c) required all SBA
Supervised Lenders to employ qualified
full-time professional management, as is
currently required for SBLCs. This
proposed regulation also clarified the
meaning of full-time professional
management to include, at a minimum,
the employment of a chief executive
officer or equivalent to manage daily
operations, a chief credit/risk officer,
and at least one other full-time
employee qualified by training and
experience to carry out the SBA
Supervised Lender’s business plan. In
addition, proposed paragraph (c)
included a requirement that an SBA
Supervised Lender must sustain a
sufficient level of 7(a) lending activity
in its area of operation.
Overall commenters supported
proposed § 120.460(c). A few
commenters suggested that SBA should
allow SBA Supervised Lenders to fulfill
the full-time professional management
requirement by using shared employees
from affiliate organizations. One
commenter suggested SBA should
eliminate the requirement for a third
full-time employee.
SBA recognizes that SBA Supervised
Lenders may have different staffing
levels depending on the size of their 7(a)
loan portfolios. However, SBA
maintains its policy position that SBA
Supervised Lenders must have a
minimum level of internal oversight to
independently manage their 7(a)
lending operations. SBA considered the
comments received and has revised the
rule to permit SBA Supervised Lenders
to meet the qualified full-time
professional management requirement
by having two full-time senior officers
(i.e., CEO and CCO/CRO), and one parttime employee (which may be a shared
employee of the lender’s affiliates).
Existing SBA Supervised Lenders will
not be required to comply with this
regulatory definition of qualified fulltime professional management unless,
after the effective date of this final rule,
the SBA Supervised Lender makes or
acquires any 7(a) loans or engages in a
transaction that constitutes a change of
ownership or control.
SBA received six comments in
support of the requirement in paragraph
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(c) for each SBA Supervised Lender to
maintain a sufficient level of lending
activity in its area of operation. Most
commenters requested that SBA clarify
in the final rule the meaning of a
‘‘sufficient’’ level of lending activity.
SBA considered these comments and
has determined that a sufficient level of
lending activity for SBA Supervised
Lenders means obtaining at least four
7(a) loan approvals during two
consecutive fiscal years. This is
modeled on the minimum level of loan
activity that SBA currently requires for
Certified Development Companies in
the 504 loan program. See 13 CFR
120.828. Existing SBA Supervised
Lenders will not be required to comply
with the 7(a) lending activity
requirement unless, after the effective
date of this final rule, the SBA
Supervised Lender makes or acquires
any 7(a) loans or engages in a
transaction that constitutes a change of
ownership or control.
Second, proposed new paragraph (d)
limited an NFRL’s 7(a) lending area to
the state in which its primary state
regulator is located. Overall,
commenters were opposed to this part
of the proposed rule. Some commenters
argued that a limitation on the 7(a)
lending area for NFRLs could have an
impact on their business plans. Five
commenters suggested that SBA should
allow NFRLs previously engaged in
nationwide 7(a) lending to continue
such lending activities. One commenter
supported the 7(a) lending area
restriction for NFRLs, but suggested that
SBA provide a 1-year transition period
to allow NFRLs to adjust their future
7(a) lending activities.
As stated in the proposed rule,
approximately 90 percent of all 7(a) loan
approvals obtained by NFRLs during the
last 3 fiscal years were for 7(a) loans to
be made in the state where the NFRL’s
primary state regulator was located.
Additionally, the final rule does not
limit or restrict in any way an NFRL’s
ability to make other types of non-SBA
loans to borrowers on a nationwide
basis. While SBA understands that some
state regulators may not object to
nationwide 7(a) lending for NFRLs, state
regulators do not bear the same financial
risk that SBA assumes as the guarantor
of 7(a) loans.4 Moreover, while state
regulators may generally oversee NFRLs
within their borders for safety and
soundness, SBA bears the responsibility
of ensuring participating lenders
comply with SBA Loan Program
Requirements (as defined in 13 CFR
4 SBA’s guaranty on regular 7(a) loans ranges from
50% to 90% of the loan amount. Under the PPP,
SBA’s guaranty is 100% of the loan amount.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
120.10). When SBA placed a
moratorium on approving additional
SBLCs in 1982, it did so to reduce the
administrative resources needed to
prudently regulate and oversee nondepository lenders with a nationwide
7(a) lending platform. SBA does not
have the administrative resources
needed to oversee NFRLs with a
nationwide 7(a) lending platform in
addition to the 14 SBLCs it currently
regulates. In addition, proposed
§ 120.460(d) is consistent with state
statutes placing geographic limits on
lending activity overseen by state
regulators, as well as a general
understanding that NFRLs are expected
to focus on economic development in
their state and local communities.
SBA carefully considered the
comments received on proposed
§ 120.460(d) and does not agree with the
commenters’ objections. In order to
manage the Agency’s limited
administrative resources and the
increased risk to SBA associated with
NFRLs participating in the 7(a) Loan
Program, the final rule establishes a 7(a)
lending area for NFRLs limited to the
state in which their primary state
regulator is located. SBA will provide
an exception such that an NFRL’s
lending area may include a local trade
area that is contiguous to such state
(e.g., a city or metropolitan statistical
area that is bisected by a state line) with
SBA’s prior written approval. SBA also
is adopting a commenter’s suggestion
that NFRLs that are currently engaged in
7(a) lending outside of the state in
which their primary regulator is located
should not be subject to the 7(a) lending
area limitation until 1 year after the
effective date of the final rule. SBA will
apply this rule immediately, however,
to all new NFRLs and to any NFRL that
engages in and/or is seeking approval of
a change of ownership or control
transaction. The 1-year grace period will
allow the few NFRLs that may be
affected by this rule to adjust their
future 7(a) lending activities. SBA
encourages existing or prospective
NFRLs interested in making 7(a) loans
on a nationwide basis to acquire one of
the fourteen SBLC licenses that become
available from time to time.
For further discussion of the impact of
this provision, see the final regulatory
flexibility analysis (FRFA) below.
2. Section 120.462 What are SBA’s
additional requirements on capital
maintenance for SBA Supervised
Lenders?
SBA proposed to amend the
regulations to require NFRLs to
maintain a baseline minimum amount
of capital necessary for participation in
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78207
the 7(a) Loan Program. The proposed
rule established a minimum amount of
capital equal to the higher of (1) the
minimum amount of capital required by
the NFRL’s state regulator, or (2)
$2,500,000. Commenters were generally
supportive of the proposal. A few
commenters indicated that the $2.5
million capital amount was too high,
and SBA should instead allow the
minimum capital requirement to be
based on the size of the NFRL’s loan
portfolio. Other commenters suggested
that the $2.5 million capital amount was
too low and encouraged SBA to raise the
minimum capital requirement for
NFRLs to be at the same level as SBLCs
(i.e., $5 million).
SBA must ensure that NFRLs have a
minimum level of capital necessary to
manage the credit risk associated with
their 7(a) lending operations. SBA
disagrees with the comments suggesting
that the amount should be increased or
decreased and is moving forward with
the rule as proposed. As SBA proposed,
NFRLs will have 3 years after the
effective date of this final rule to reach
the new minimum capital amount. In
addition, an NFRL that does not meet
the new minimum capital requirement
by the end of the 3-year period may
remain in the 7(a) Loan Program but
will not be permitted to make or acquire
7(a) loans after such date until it
satisfies the minimum capital
requirement. The minimum capital
requirement will also apply
immediately to new NFRLs and in the
event of a change of ownership or
control of an NFRL occurring and/or
approved after the effective date of this
final rule.
3. Section 120.466 SBA Supervised
Lender Application
SBA proposed to add a new § 120.466
to codify a new application and review
process for entities seeking to become
an SBA Supervised Lender. SBA
proposed to evaluate applications
through an initial review and, if
warranted, a final review.
The initial review requires an SBA
Supervised Lender applicant to submit
a written plan (known as a Lender
Assessment Plan (LAP)). The LAP
contains key information that would
enable SBA to reach a preliminary
assessment about the qualifications of
an applicant expeditiously. An LAP
review includes an initial assessment of
the applicant’s business plan,
capitalization, and professional
management team. SBA could also
require an interview with the Office of
Capital Access. If SBA were to notify an
applicant that it may not proceed to the
final review phase, the proposed rule
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
78208
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
provided that the applicant must wait
nine months from the date of such
notification before reapplying by
submitting a new LAP.
Overall commenters were supportive
of the proposed rule. SBA received six
comments suggesting the 9-month
waiting period was too long and should
be shortened to 3 months. SBA
considered these comments and has
agreed to shorten the waiting period
from 9 months to 6 months to address
the commenters’ concerns. SBA believes
that 3 months is too short a period to
allow an applicant to make meaningful
improvements in its circumstances.
The final review, as proposed under
§ 120.466(b), requires an SBA
Supervised Lender applicant to submit
a complete application to SBA. The
complete application updates the
information disclosed in the LAP and
provides SBA with additional
information for review, such as the
applicant’s organizational documents,
operational plan, credit policies,
internal control policies, loan risk rating
system, capital adequacy plan, proposed
credit facilities (if any), organizational
chart, audited financial statements, bank
statements, legal opinions and any other
necessary documentation as further
described in official SBA policies and
procedures.5 After completion of the
final review, SBA issues a final decision
to approve or deny the application. If an
SBA Supervised Lender’s application is
denied, the proposed rule required an
applicant to wait 18 months before it
may submit a new LAP and restart the
application process. The Agency
received a number of comments
requesting that SBA shorten this 18month time period. SBA considered
these comments and has agreed to
shorten the time period from 18 months
to 12 months. SBA believes a 1 year
waiting period will allow the applicant
to address material deficiencies and for
meaningful and sustained improvement
in its application.
Lastly, under proposed § 120.466(c),
an entity seeking to become an NFRL is
required to have at least one year of
current operating and relevant
commercial lending experience (by the
entity itself) before the entity may
submit an application to become an
SBA Supervised Lender. SBA did not
receive comments on this portion of the
proposed rule and will include
paragraph (c) in the final rule, with the
clarification that it is the applicant that
must have the requisite experience.
5 The information required to be submitted in a
complete application is not set forth in SBA’s
regulation but will continue to be in SBA’s official
policies and procedures. See SOP 50 10.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
4. Section 120.467 Evaluation of SBA
Supervised Lender Applicants
SBA proposed to add a new § 120.467
to incorporate into the regulations the
factors SBA will consider in evaluating
an SBA Supervised Lender applicant.
SBA’s evaluation will include a review
of, among other things, the applicant’s
business plan, capitalization,
operational plan, organizational
structure, management qualifications,
the historical performance of the loans
originated by the applicant or
attributable to its management team, the
applicant’s financial projections and
liquidity, and prior history or
involvement of the applicant or its
management team (including key
employees) with any SBA guaranteed
lending program or any other Federal or
state lending program. SBA also reviews
the results of background investigations
(e.g., through SBA Form 1081) and other
information obtained through due
diligence and reference checks. Under
the proposed rule SBA may also
prohibit individuals or entities from
participating as an officer, director,
manager, owner or key employee of an
SBA Supervised Lender applicant.
Commenters were generally in
support of the proposed rule. SBA
received four comments to proposed
paragraph (b)(1) suggesting that it be
revised to reflect that the individuals or
entities that SBA may prohibit from
serving as an officer, director, manager,
owner or key employee of an SBA
Supervised Lender are those that have
‘‘materially’’ failed to comply with SBA
Loan Program Requirements. SBA has
agreed to revise § 120.467(b)(1) by
adding ‘‘materially’’ to this paragraph in
the final rule.
5. Section 120.468 Change of
Ownership or Control Requirements for
SBA Supervised Lenders
SBA proposed to move the regulation
applicable to a change of ownership or
control of an SBLC (§ 120.475) to a new
§ 120.468 with certain modifications.
The purpose of this change is to
incorporate into the regulations the
Agency’s current policy requirement
and practice that all SBA Supervised
Lenders, including NFRLs, must obtain
SBA written approval prior to any
change of ownership or control.
Section 120.468(a) in the proposed
rule clarified that SBA Supervised
Lenders must receive SBA prior written
approval before entering into a
definitive agreement regarding a change
of ownership or control. SBA received
approximately 11 comments on this
proposed rule. The commenters were
opposed to the requirement to obtain
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SBA prior written approval before
entering into a definitive agreement for
a change of ownership or control. Most
commenters requested that SBA either
strike this provision from the rule or
require a change of ownership or control
to be ‘‘conditioned’’ upon receipt of
SBA approval.
SBA disagrees with these comments.
SBA is seeking to eliminate the time and
expense associated with SBA
Supervised Lenders entering into
agreements for a change of ownership or
control only to have SBA deny their
requests months later after conducting a
thorough review of the applications.
Allowing SBA Supervised Lenders to
enter into an agreement upfront
(without prior SBA approval) would
cause unnecessary time and expense to
be expended by the parties in some
cases and could unfairly raise
expectations. The final rule retains the
requirement that any SBA Supervised
Lenders seeking to continue in the 7(a)
Loan Program must obtain SBA’s prior
written approval before entering into an
agreement for a change of ownership or
control. To avoid confusion as to the
meaning of a ‘‘definitive’’ agreement,
SBA has removed the term and is
clarifying that the limitation applies
even if such agreement is conditioned
on SBA approval. However, an SBA
Supervised Lender may enter into a
non-binding letter of intent regarding a
prospective change of ownership or
control, provided that such letter is
reported to SBA within 30 calendar
days. SBA removed the cross reference
to § 120.464(a)(5) in the final rule in
response to comments received.
Section 120.468(b) of the proposed
rule clarified that if the approval of any
state or Federal authority is required for
an SBA Supervised Lender’s change of
ownership or control, such approval is
required in addition to SBA’s prior
written approval. SBA did not receive
any comments on this part of the
proposed rule and will adopt the text in
the final rule as proposed.
Section 120.468(c) of the proposed
rule incorporated SBA’s current policy
that a new application must be
submitted to SBA in connection with a
change of ownership or control of an
SBA Supervised Lender. SBA did not
receive any comments on this part of the
proposed rule and will adopt the text in
the final rule as proposed.
Section 120.468(d) of the proposed
rule provided that SBA Supervised
Lenders would have an opportunity to
voluntarily surrender their SBA lending
authority (i.e., the SBLC License or the
NFRL lending authority) and withdraw
from the 7(a) Loan Program with SBA’s
prior written approval. As proposed, a
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
voluntary surrender requires an SBA
Supervised Lender to (i) transfer its
entire loan portfolio to one or more
Lenders acceptable to SBA, and (ii)
enter into a withdrawal agreement. One
commenter suggested that if a transferee
for an SBA Supervised Lender’s 7(a)
loan portfolio could not be found, the
final rule should be clarified so that
SBA may take over the servicing of the
SBA Supervised Lender’s 7(a) loan
portfolio. SBA agrees with this comment
and has revised the final rule such that
SBA may, in its sole discretion, elect to
take over the servicing of an SBA
Supervised Lender’s 7(a) loan portfolio
upon the voluntary surrender of its SBA
lending authority. If SBA elects to take
over servicing, the SBA Lender must
assign the 7(a) loan documents to SBA
and provide any needed assistance to
allow SBA to take over servicing. SBA
may use contractors to perform these
actions. See 13 CFR 120.535(d).
6. Section 120.471 What are the
minimum capital requirements for
SBLCs?
SBA proposed to amend § 120.471(a)
to increase the minimum capital
requirement for SBLCs. As stated in the
proposed rule, the minimum capital
amount for SBLCs has not been updated
since 1996. SBA believes the current
minimum capital (of at least $1,000,000)
is insufficient to assure an SBLC’s
continued financial viability or to
provide for any necessary growth. As
stated in the proposed rule, the
maximum 7(a) loan amount has
increased from $1,000,000 in 1996 to
$5,000,000 as of the date of the
proposed rule.6 As a result, SBA has
determined that a corresponding change
to increase the minimum capital
requirements for SBLCs is necessary at
this time.
Under the proposed rule, SBLCs must
maintain a minimum amount of capital
equal to unencumbered paid-in capital
and paid-in surplus of at least $5
million, or 10 percent of the aggregate
of the SBLC’s share of all outstanding
loans, whichever is greater. Most of the
14 SBLCs have capital in excess of the
minimum capital proposed under
§ 120.471(a). SBA also included a
provision in the proposed rule
providing SBLCs with 3 years after the
effective date of the final rule to reach
the new minimum capital amount.
However, the proposed minimum
capital amount would apply
immediately in the event of a change of
6 In addition, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and
Economic Security Act (CARES Act) (Pub. L. 116–
136), permits participating lenders to make section
7(a) loans up to a maximum amount of $10 million
under the PPP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
ownership or control of an SBLC
occurring and/or approved after the
effective date of this final rule.
Five commenters supported the
proposed rule and two commenters
were opposed. Commenters also
encouraged SBA to modify the
definition of regulatory capital so that
SBA Supervised Lenders would not
need to maintain capital against the full
amount of the unguaranteed portion of
7(a) loans sold into securitizations.
Three commenters also expressed some
concerns about the proposed increase in
capital for non-profit SBLCs and
suggested that these entities should be
permitted to use ‘‘restricted’’ capital
toward their minimum capital
requirement.
SBA considered the comments and is
moving forward with the proposed rule
as drafted. SBA disagrees that SBLCs
should only be required to maintain
capital against the risk retention portion
of their 7(a) loan securitizations as
opposed to the full amount of the
unguaranteed portion of 7(a) loans sold
into securitizations. SBA requires nondepository institutions (including SBA
Supervised Lenders) that engage in
securitization transactions to maintain
capital in accordance with § 120.425(a).
This regulation applies a capital charge
against all assets of the securitizer
including the balance outstanding on
the unguaranteed portion of the
securitizer’s 7(a) loans, as well as
including those unguaranteed interests
in any securitization pool. SBA did not
propose any revisions to § 120.425(a) in
the proposed rule.
SBA also does not agree with the
suggestion that non-profit SBLCs should
be permitted to include ‘‘restricted’’
capital in their minimum capital
calculation. An SBLC’s capital must be
‘‘unencumbered’’ and available to
absorb potential losses from its lending
activities, including those associated
with its entire 7(a) loan portfolio.
Restricted capital does not meet this
requirement. SBA will not permit nonprofit SBLCs to include restricted
capital towards their minimum capital
calculation.
Finally, SBA will continue to study
whether changes to the definition of
capital under § 120.471(b) should be
modified to account for the valuation of
servicing rights assets. Most of the
comments received suggested that SBA
should allow SBLCs to receive full
credit for the value of their servicing
rights towards their minimum capital
requirement. If SBA determines there is
a need for further changes, SBA will
promulgate regulations or provide
additional guidance on this issue.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78209
B. Technical Changes
1. Section 120.410 Requirements for
All Participating Lenders
SBA proposed a conforming technical
change to § 120.410(a)(1) to reflect the
new minimum capital requirements for
SBA Supervised Lenders. SBA did not
receive any comments on this proposed
technical change and incorporated the
proposed text into the final rule.
2. Section 120.470 What are SBA’s
additional requirements for SBLCs?
SBA proposed a conforming technical
change to remove § 120.470(g)
‘‘Management’’ and redesignate
paragraph (h) as paragraph (g). No
comments were received, and SBA is
adopting the change in this final rule.
The management requirement for SBLCs
is addressed in new § 120.460(c).
3. Section 120.475 Change of
Ownership or Control
SBA proposed a conforming technical
change to remove and reserve § 120.475.
No comments were received, and SBA
is adopting the change in this final rule.
The text of § 120.475 is incorporated
into § 120.468.
Compliance With Executive Orders
12866, 13563, 13771, 12988, and 13132,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612)
Executive Order 12866
This rule finalizes a proposed rule
that the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) determined was not a
‘‘significant’’ regulatory action for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
OMB did not change the non-significant
designation for this final rule, and
therefore, SBA has not prepared a
Regulatory Impact Analysis. This is not
a major rule under the Congressional
Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
Executive Order 13563
This executive order supplements and
reaffirms the principles and
requirements in Executive Order 12866,
including the requirement to provide
the public with an opportunity to
participate in the regulatory process.
SBA Supervised Lenders have been
involved in the 7(a) Loan Program for
over 35 years. Over the years, the
Agency has received feedback from SBA
Supervised Lender applicants and
program participants, including
valuable insight and suggestions for
improvements to the application and
review process. This feedback from SBA
Supervised Lenders, together with the
comments in response to the proposed
rule, has shaped this final rule.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
78210
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Executive Order 13771
This final rule is not subject to
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because the rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable
standards set forth in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden. The action does not have
retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this final
rule will not have substantial, direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. For the
purposes of Executive Order 13132,
SBA has determined that this rule has
no federalism implications warranting
preparation of a federalism assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.,
Ch. 35
SBA has determined that this final
rule imposes a new reporting
requirement under the Paperwork
Reduction Act (PRA). Specifically, the
final rule requires SBA Supervised
Lenders to submit a written Lender
Assessment Plan (LAP) for SBA to
conduct an initial review of the
applicant. In addition, the final rule
codifies a requirement for applicants to
submit a complete application in order
for SBA to determine whether the
applicant has the qualifications
necessary to participate in the 7(a) Loan
Program as an SBA Supervised Lender.
As discussed above, this requirement is
currently described in SBA’s official
policies and procedures. In addition to
these two requirements, the applicant
will submit the same forms as other
Lenders that apply to participate in the
7(a) Loan Program, including the SBA
Form 1081, Statement of Personal
History (OMB Control number 3245–
0080).
The title, summary of the information
collections, description of respondents,
and an estimate of the related reporting
burdens are discussed below.
Additional information related to these
requirements is included in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act discussion in
this rule. SBA did not receive comments
on the new information collections in
the proposed rule.
Title of Collection: SBA Supervised
Lender Application and Review.
OMB Control Number: New
Collection.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
(a) Lender Assessment Plan.
The final rule requires organizations
seeking to become an SBA Supervised
Lender (or seeking SBA approval of a
change of ownership or control) to
submit a LAP to SBA. The LAP includes
the legal name and contact information
of the applicant, a written business
plan, current and projected financial
statements and other important
information about the applicant and its
management team (including key
employees).
Need and Purpose: The LAP is
necessary for SBA to conduct an initial
review of an applicant seeking to
become an SBA Supervised Lender (or
seeking SBA approval of a change of
ownership or control). The LAP
provides SBA with key information that
would enable SBA to reach a
preliminary assessment about the
qualifications of an applicant more
efficiently. This initial review phase
will assist SBA in identifying
incomplete applications and
unqualified applicants much earlier in
the application review process.
Description and Estimated Number of
Respondents: Pursuant to proposed
§ 120.466(a), the information in the LAP
will be collected from each organization
seeking to become an SBA Supervised
Lender (or seeking SBA approval of a
change of ownership or control). SBA
estimates that it will likely receive no
more than four LAPs each year.
Total Estimated Response Time: It is
estimated that each applicant would
need approximately 35 hours to prepare
and submit the LAP for an estimated
total of 140 hours annually.
(b) SBA Supervised Lender
Application.
If an applicant seeking to become an
SBA Supervised Lender (or seeking SBA
approval of a change of ownership or
control) is authorized by SBA to
proceed to the final review phase, the
applicant will be required to submit a
complete application.
Need and Purpose: The information
submitted with this application is
necessary for SBA to reach a final
decision regarding whether the
applicant has the qualifications
necessary to participate in the 7(a) Loan
Program. The complete application
requires an SBA Supervised Lender
applicant to provide additional detail
about the information previously
disclosed to SBA in the LAP and will
include new information about the
applicant’s proposed operation and
lending activities as a participant in the
7(a) Loan Program. As stated above,
these application requirements are not
new since they are currently set out in
SBA’s official policies and procedures.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Under those policies and procedures, an
organization applying to become an
SBA Supervised Lender (or seeking SBA
approval of a change of ownership or
control) is required to, among other
things, submit documentation in
support of its organizational structure,
internal control policies, operational
plan, proposed credit policies, loan risk
rating system, proposed secondary
market activities, capital adequacy plan,
audited financial statements and other
information (e.g., certifications and legal
opinions) necessary for SBA to evaluate
the qualifications of the applicant. See
SOP 50 10. Although SBA estimates that
the requirements will only apply to
approximately four organizations each
year, now that SBA is codifying the
application requirements in this final
rule, under the PRA the requirements
are deemed to impact ten or more
respondents; therefore, SBA has also
requested OMB approval of this
application in compliance with the PRA
procedures.
Description and Estimated Number of
Respondents: The information in the
complete application will be collected
from organizations that are seeking to
become an SBA Supervised Lender and
have successfully reached the final
review phase. Based on current
experience, SBA estimates that it will
likely receive no more than four
complete applications each year.
Total Estimated Response Time: It is
estimated that each applicant would
need approximately 50 hours to prepare
and submit a complete application, for
an estimated total of 200 hours
annually.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–
612
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(RFA), this final rule may have an
impact on a substantial number of small
entities that participate as SBA
Supervised Lenders in the 7(a) Loan
Program. Immediately below, SBA sets
forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) examining the impact
of the final rule in accordance with 5
U.S.C. 603. The FRFA addresses (1) the
reasons, objectives and legal basis for
this rule; (2) a description of the kind
and number of small entities that may
be affected; (3) the projected reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance
requirements; (4) whether there are any
Federal rules that may duplicate,
overlap, or conflict with this rule; and
(5) whether there are any significant
alternatives to this rule.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
1. What are the reasons, objectives and
legal basis for the rule?
The rule is designed to improve
efficiencies and enhance the application
and review process for organizations
seeking to participate in the 7(a) Loan
Program as SBA Supervised Lenders.
The objective is to provide a process for
a more efficient and effective evaluation
of the qualifications of applicants
seeking to become SBA Supervised
Lenders. The new application and
review process will provide greater
clarity and transparency to applicants
and would expedite SBA’s review,
which may potentially reduce costs on
applicants and on SBA’s limited
administrative resources.
The rule also raises the minimum
capital requirement that SBA
Supervised Lenders must maintain to
assure their continued financial
viability and to provide for any
necessary growth. The minimum capital
requirement for SBA Supervised
Lenders has not been updated by SBA
for more than 23 years. The Agency has
determined that the regulations
addressing minimum capital must be
amended to correspond with the more
than 500 percent increase in the
maximum 7(a) loan amount that
Congress has authorized by statute over
the last twenty-three years.
The rule also limits the 7(a) lending
area for NFRLs to the state in which
their primary regulator is located,
except that an NFRL may request SBA’s
prior written approval to make 7(a)
loans in a local trade area that is
contiguous to such state (e.g., a city or
metropolitan statistical area that is
bisected by a state line). Most NFRLs
participating in the 7(a) Loan Program
already limit their lending activities to
the state in which their primary state
regulator is located. In recent years,
some state regulators have permitted
NFRLs to make loans outside of their
state or even nationwide. The expansion
of an NFRL’s 7(a) lending area increases
risk to SBA and the Agency does not
have the additional administrative
resources to adequately supervise,
regulate and examine NFRLs that
operate outside of their state. This part
of the final rule is also consistent with
the general understanding that stateregulated lenders (such as BIDCOs) are
licensed under specific state laws to
focus primarily on economic
development in their respective state
and local communities. Based on the
comments received, SBA has agreed to
provide existing NFRLs that SBA has
approved for 7(a) lending outside of the
state in which their primary regulator is
located with an additional one-year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
grace period to allow them to adjust
their future 7(a) lending activities.
SBA is authorized to supervise the
safety and soundness of SBA
Supervised Lenders and may regulate
their 7(a) lending activities pursuant to
section 23(a) of the Small Business Act.
15 U.S.C. 650(a), see also 15 U.S.C.
634(b)(7). SBA has the authority to
promulgate rules, regulations and
requirements for the 7(a) Loan Program.
15 U.S.C. 634(b)(6).
2. What are SBA’s description and
estimate of the number of small entities
to which the rule will apply?
SBA Supervised Lenders affected by
this rule comprise a unique class of 36
non-depository lenders that may only
participate in the 7(a) Loan Program and
make 7(a) loans if authorized by SBA.
This final rule will be applicable to all
SBA Supervised Lenders (other than
lenders participating as CA Lenders in
the CA Pilot Program and lenders
authorized to make PPP loans under
SBA Form 3507). SBA estimates that
approximately 88 percent of SBA
Supervised Lenders are considered
small entities based on NAICS sector
code 52 (Finance and Insurance) and
industry code 52298 (All Other Nondepository Credit Intermediation) and
have annual receipts of less than $38.5
million. This estimate of 32 small SBA
Supervised Lenders is based in part on
information contained in the quarterly
condition reports and the annual reports
that are required to be submitted to SBA
by such lenders.
3. What are the projected reporting,
recordkeeping, and other compliance
requirements of the rule and an estimate
of the classes of small entities which
will be subject to the requirements?
The final rule imposes a new
reporting requirement for organizations
seeking to become an SBA Supervised
Lender (or seeking SBA approval of a
change of ownership or control). The
final rule codifies an existing
requirement that applicants submit a
complete application for SBA to
determine whether an organization has
the qualifications necessary to
participate in the 7(a) Loan Program as
an SBA Supervised Lender.
The LAP includes key information
about an organization that will allow
SBA to reach a preliminary assessment
about the qualifications of an applicant
more efficiently. SBA estimates it will
receive approximately four LAPs each
year. SBA estimates that it will take
approximately 35 hours for an
organization to prepare an LAP at a cost
of $3,838 per LAP. Based on SBA’s
experience with similar data collections,
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78211
we expect an organization that submits
a LAP will need to employ the services
of a financial manager and an
administrative assistant when preparing
an LAP for submission to SBA.7
If an organization is authorized by
SBA to proceed to the final review
phase, a complete application must be
submitted to SBA. As mentioned above,
the application requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders are not new and are
currently set forth in SBA’s official
policies and procedures. See SOP 50 10
6, Part 1, Section A, Chapter 1,
Paragraph A.2 for NFRLs and Part 1,
Section A, Chapter 2, Paragraph B for
SBLCs. SBA estimates that it will
receive approximately four complete
applications each year. SBA estimates
that it will take approximately 50 hours
for an organization to prepare a
complete application at a cost of $5,207
per application. Based on SBA’s
experience with similar data collections,
an organization applying to become an
SBA Supervised Lender would typically
employ the services of a financial
manager, an accountant, an attorney and
an administrative assistant when
preparing a complete application for
submission to SBA.8 SBA did not
receive comments on whether the
number of hours estimated to prepare a
complete application is appropriate or
on the services they employ to complete
the application.
SBA anticipates that there will be
some costs for SBA Supervised Lenders
related to the new minimum capital
requirement under the rule. This rule
establishes a new minimum capital
requirement for SBLCs and NFRLs of at
least $5 million and $2.5 million,
respectively. Based on information
provided to SBA by SBA Supervised
Lenders in quarterly condition reports,
11 of the 14 SBLCs (i.e., 79 percent)
have at least $3.7 million in capital (and
of those 11 SBLCs, 11 have more than
$5 million in capital). In addition, 19 of
the 22 NFRLs (i.e., 86 percent) have
more than $2.5 million in capital.
7 The cost estimate for the LAP is based on hourly
job position wages published by the U.S.
Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics for
2019 and increased by 100% to account for benefits
and overhead. The cost breakdown is as follows:
Financial Manager (30 hours times an hourly rate
of $124.90) plus Administrative Assistant (5 hours
times an hourly rate of $36.24) equals $3,838.
8 The cost estimate for a complete application is
based on hourly job position wages published by
the U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor
Statistics for 2019 and increased by 100% to
account for benefits and overhead. The cost
breakdown is as follows: Financial Manager (30
hours times an hourly rate of $124.90) plus
Accountant (10 hours times an hourly rate of
$68.80) plus Attorney (5 hours times an hourly rate
of $118.22) plus Administrative Assistant (5 hours
times an hourly rate of $36.24) equals $5,207.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
78212
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
SBA has determined that there are
seven small entities that will be
impacted by the new capital
requirements in the rule. In other words,
7 of the 36 SBA Supervised Lenders that
are considered small entities will need
to increase their capital to reach the new
minimum capital requirement of either
$2.5 million or $5 million (as
applicable). SBA estimates the amount
of capital that would need to be raised
by these small entities currently ranges
between $1,270,000 and $3,580,000.
SBA estimates that this rule may have
a significant economic impact on 6 of
the 36 SBA Supervised Lenders (i.e., 17
percent), each of which is considered a
small entity. As noted above, all existing
SBA Supervised Lenders will have 3
years from the effective date of a final
rulemaking to comply with this part of
the rule (other than for transactions
involving a change of ownership or
control of an SBA Supervised Lender).
SBA estimates that the cost of raising
capital for SBA Supervised Lenders is
approximately 9.8 percent of the
amount of equity capital raised based on
the Capital Asset Pricing Model
(CAPM). The CAPM is one of the most
widely used pricing models by financial
professionals and considered the
preferred method to estimate the cost of
equity capital. See Duff & Phelps 2019
Valuation Handbook—U.S. Industry
Cost of Capital (data through June 30,
2019).9 SBA estimates that the total cost
of raising new equity capital for the
seven SBA Supervised Lenders based on
the requirements of the rule would
range in amount from approximately
$124,000 to $350,000.10 However, the
cost is mitigated by the fact that under
the rule SBA Supervised Lenders will
have 3 years to increase their capital.
Thus, the maximum amount that it
would cost an existing SBA Supervised
Lender to reach the new minimum
capital requirement would be
approximately $117,000 per year for 3
consecutive years.11
9 The 2019 Valuation Handbook—U.S. Industry
Cost of Capital published by Duff & Phelps provides
cost of capital estimates for approximately 170
industries identified by Standard Industrial
Classification codes (SIC). For purposes of
estimating the cost of raising equity capital for SBA
Supervised Lenders, SBA used SIC code 61—nondepository credit institutions, which includes 21
companies that are engaged primarily in extending
credit in the form of loans (but are not engaged in
deposit banking). SBA compared the estimated cost
of raising capital cited above with other sources and
found the data to be similar.
10 The estimated cost to raise $1.27 million or
$3.58 million in equity capital would be as follows:
$1,270,000 times 9.8% equals $124,000; $3.58
million times 9.8% equals $350,000.
11 It should be noted that some existing SBA
Supervised Lenders may decide to increase their
capital by retaining earnings instead of raising new
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
SBA determined that a 3-year time
frame was a sufficient amount of time
for SBA Supervised Lenders to increase
their capital. SBA specifically requested
comments on whether SBA Supervised
Lenders should have 3 years to comply
with the new minimum capital
requirements under the proposed rule or
should be required to comply sooner.
The majority of the commenters were
generally supportive of at least a 3-year
time frame to meet the new minimum
capital requirement.
The rule also limits the 7(a) lending
area for NFRLs to the state in which
their primary state regulator is located,
except that with SBA approval it may
include a local trade area that is
contiguous to such state (such as a city
or metropolitan statistical area bisected
by a state line). There are currently 22
NFRLs participating in the 7(a) Loan
Program. During the last 3 fiscal years,
2 NFRLs (each of which is considered
a small entity) requested loan
authorizations to make the majority of
their 7(a) loans outside of the state in
which their primary state regulator is
located. Except for these two NFRLs,
approximately 90 percent of the lending
within the 7(a) Loan Program during the
last 3 fiscal years was done in the state
where the NFRL’s primary state
regulator is located. Approximately 79
percent of all 7(a) loan approvals
obtained by NFRLs during the last 3
fiscal years were for loans to be made
to small businesses located within their
own state. This part of the rule will not
impact a substantial number of small
entities. It is important to note that this
final rule will not impose any
restrictions regarding an NFRL’s non7(a) lending activities. Therefore, the
final rule will not have any impact on
an NFRL’s ability to generate business
by making other types of non-SBA loans
outside of its own state.
Most commenters did not support the
limitation on 7(a) lending areas for
NFRLs. SBA considered the comments
received and has agreed to allow
existing NFRLs one additional year to
adjust to this portion of the rule.
Therefore, NFRLs currently engaged in
7(a) lending outside of the state in
which their primary regulator is located
may continue to make 7(a) loans on a
nationwide basis (if permitted by their
primary state-regulator) for 1 year from
the effective date of this final rule. This
additional one-year grace period will
not apply to new applications from
NFRLs, including those that have
engaged in and/or are seeking approval
of a change of ownership or control.
equity capital, which would reduce the cost of this
rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
In summary, SBA estimates that the
total cost to a particular SBA Supervised
Lender associated with this rule
(including the costs related to data
collection) will range from zero to
$356,683, substantially all of which
relates to the cost of raising capital and
may be spread over a 3-year time period.
4. What are the relevant Federal rules
which may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the rule?
We are not aware of any Federal rules
that duplicate, overlap or conflict with
this rule. SBA’s SOP 50 10 will have to
be amended to conform to portions of
this rule, which will be done separately.
5. What alternatives will allow the
Agency to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact
on small entities?
The Agency originally considered
imposing the new minimum capital
requirements for SBA Supervised
Lenders immediately due to the risk
associated with their lending
operations. SBA recognized, however,
that providing a 3-year period for SBA
Supervised Lenders to increase their
capital would be less burdensome on
lenders and their operational plans.
SBA took into consideration that some
lenders may need time to plan their
capital raising efforts and negotiate
favorable terms and conditions for
increasing their capital. The 3-year time
period will provide SBA Supervised
Lenders with a sufficient amount of
time to raise new equity capital and an
opportunity to increase capital by
retaining earnings (which will reduce
the estimated overall cost of raising
such capital).
SBA believes many of the changes in
this rule will benefit small entities
interested in becoming an SBA
Supervised Lender by clarifying areas in
the application process where there was
confusion and to make the process more
transparent. This rule will also allow
SBA to evaluate the qualifications of
new applicants (including for change of
ownership or control transactions) more
efficiently and make well-informed
decisions on SBA Supervised Lender
applications. SBA believes this rule
encompasses best practice guidance that
aligns with the Agency’s mission to
increase access to capital for small
businesses and facilitate American job
preservation and creation.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 120
Community development, Equal
employment opportunity, Loan
programs—business, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, SBA is amending 13 CFR part
120 as follows:
PART 120—BUSINESS LOANS
1. The authority for 13 CFR part 120
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b) (6), (b) (7), (b)
(14), (h), and note, 636(a), (h) and (m), and
note, 650, 657t, and note, 657u, and note,
687(f), 696(3) and (7), and note, and 697(a)
and (e), and note.
§ 120.410
[Amended]
2. Amend § 120.410 in paragraph
(a)(1) by removing the phrase ‘‘for
SBLCs, meeting its SBA minimum
capital requirement; and for NFRLs,
meeting its state minimum capital
requirement); and’’, and adding in its
place the phrase, ‘‘and for SBLCs and
NFRLs, meeting their respective
minimum capital requirement); and’’.
■ 3. Amend § 120.460 by adding
paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 120.460 What are SBA’s additional
requirements for SBA Supervised Lenders?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) An SBA Supervised Lender must
have qualified full-time professional
management including, but not limited
to, a chief executive officer or the
equivalent to manage daily operations,
and a chief credit/risk officer. An SBA
Supervised Lender must also have at
least one other part-time professional
employee (which may be a shared
employee of the lender’s affiliates)
qualified by training and experience to
carry out its business plan. An SBA
Supervised Lender is expected to
sustain a sufficient level of lending
activity in its lending area, which means
obtaining at least four 7(a) loan
approvals during two consecutive fiscal
years. This paragraph only applies to
SBA Supervised Lenders that make or
acquire a 7(a) loan after January 4, 2021,
or to any SBA Supervised Lender
approved after such date, including in
the event of a change of ownership or
control of an SBA Supervised Lender.
(d) An NFRL may only make or
acquire 7(a) loans in the state in which
its primary state regulator is located,
except that an NFRL’s lending area may
include a local trade area that is
contiguous to such state (e.g., a city or
metropolitan statistical area that is
bisected by a state line) if the NFRL
receives SBA’s prior written approval.
This paragraph applies to all NFRLs on
or after January 4, 2021, including in the
event of approval of a new NFRL or a
change of ownership or control of an
NFRL; provided however, that if SBA
has approved any NFRL to make 7(a)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
loans out of their state, then this
paragraph will apply on or after January
4, 2022.
■ 4. Amend § 120.462 by:
■ a. Removing the phrase ‘‘by state
regulators’’ wherever it appears and
adding in its place the phrase ‘‘in
§ 120.462(a)(1)’’;
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (a)
through (e) as paragraphs (b) through (f);
and
■ c. Adding a new paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
§ 120.462 What are SBA’s additional
requirements on capital maintenance for
SBA Supervised Lenders?
(a) Minimum capital requirements—
(1) For NFRLs. (i) Beginning on January
4, 2024, each NFRL that makes or
acquires a 7(a) loan must maintain the
minimum capital required by its state
regulator, or $2,500,000, whichever is
greater.
(ii) Any NFRL approved on or after
January 4, 2021, including in the event
of a change of ownership or control,
must maintain the minimum capital
requirement set forth in paragraph
(a)(1)(i) of this section.
(iii) Unless subject to paragraph
(a)(1)(i) or (ii) of this section, an NFRL
must comply with the minimum capital
requirements for NFRLs that were in
effect on January 3, 2021.
(2) For SBLCs. For information on
minimum capital requirements for
SBLCs, see § 120.471.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. Add § 120.466 to read as follows:
§ 120.466 SBA Supervised Lender
application.
An entity seeking to participate as an
SBA Supervised Lender must apply to
SBA. SBA evaluates SBA Supervised
Lender applicants through an initial
review and final review, as follows:
(a) Initial review. SBA Supervised
Lender applicants must submit a written
plan containing information about the
organization and its current and
proposed lending activities (‘‘Lender
Assessment Plan’’). After SBA’s review
of the Lender Assessment Plan, the
Office of Capital Access may require an
interview with the applicant and its
management team. SBA will determine,
in its sole discretion, whether an
applicant may proceed to the final
review. If SBA determines that an
applicant may not proceed to the final
review, the applicant must wait at least
6 months before it may submit a new
Lender Assessment Plan. Each applicant
must demonstrate to SBA’s satisfaction
that it meets the ethical requirements
and the participation criteria set forth in
13 CFR 120.140 and 120.410. The
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78213
Lender Assessment Plan must include
the following items:
(1) The legal name, address, telephone
number and email address of the
applicant;
(2) Business plan, detailing the
applicant’s proposed lending area and
the volume of loan activity projected
over the next 3 years (supported by
current and projected balance sheets,
income statements and statements of
cash flows);
(3) Capitalization (current and
proposed), including the form of
organization and the identification of all
debt and classes of equity capital and
proposed funding amounts, including
any rights or preferences accorded to
such interests (e.g., voting rights,
redemption rights and rights of
convertibility) and any conditions for
the transfer, sale or assignment of such
interests;
(4) A list of all members of the
applicant’s management team, including
the applicant’s officers, directors,
managers and key employees, as well as
the applicant’s owners, Associates (as
defined in § 120.10) and Affiliates (as
defined in § 121.103 of this chapter);
(5) A written summary of the
professional experience (including any
prior experience with any SBA program)
of the applicant’s management team
(including key employees);
(6) In connection with any application
to become an SBLC, the applicant must
include a letter agreement signed by an
authorized official of an existing SBLC
certifying that the SBLC is seeking to
transfer its SBA lending authority to the
applicant; and
(7) If approval of any state or Federal
chartering, licensing or other regulatory
authority is required, copies of any
licenses issued by or documents filed
with such authority.
(b) Final review. Each applicant that
receives notice from SBA in writing that
it may proceed to the final review must
submit a complete application to SBA
within 90 calendar days. The
application requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders are set forth in
official SBA policy and procedures. An
incomplete application submitted to
SBA will not be processed and will be
returned to the applicant. SBA may, in
its sole discretion, approve or deny any
SBA Supervised Lender application.
The decision to approve or deny an SBA
Supervised Lender application is a final
agency decision. If an SBA Supervised
Lender application is denied by SBA or
if a complete application is not timely
submitted, the applicant may not submit
a new Lender Assessment Plan and
restart the application process until 12
months from the date of denial or the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
78214
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
date a complete application was due to
SBA, as applicable.
(c) NFRL operating and lending
experience requirement. For an entity
seeking to become an NFRL, evidence of
at least 1 year of current operating and
relevant commercial lending experience
by the entity must be provided.
■ 6. Add § 120.467 to read as follows:
§ 120.467 Evaluation of SBA Supervised
Lender applicants.
(a) SBA will evaluate an SBA
Supervised Lender applicant based on
information from, among other sources,
the Lender Assessment Plan, an
interview with the applicant’s
management team (if required), the
application and any other
documentation submitted by the
applicant, the results of background
investigations, public record searches
and due diligence conducted by SBA or
other Federal or state agencies. SBA’s
evaluation will consider factors such as
the following:
(1) Professional qualifications of its
management team (including key
employees), including demonstrated
commercial lending experience,
business reputation, adherence to legal
and ethical standards, track record in
making and monitoring business loans,
and prior history, if any, working as an
officer, manager, director or key
employee of a lender involved in any
SBA program or any other Federal or
state lending program.
(2) Historical performance measures
of loans originated by the applicant or
attributable to its management team
(including key employees), including
loan default rates, purchase rates and
loss rates, measured in both percentage
terms and in comparison to appropriate
industry benchmarks, review/
examination assessments and other
performance measures.
(3) The applicant’s capitalization,
organizational structure, business plan
(including any risk factors), projected
financial performance, financial
strength, liquidity, the soundness of its
financial projections and underlying
assumptions, loan underwriting process,
operations plan and the history of
compliance of the applicant and its
management team (including key
employees) with SBA Loan Program
Requirements.
(4) Whether the NFRL’s state regulator
and the state statute or regulations
governing the NFRL’s operations,
including but not limited to those
pertaining to audit, examination,
supervision, enforcement and
information sharing, are satisfactory to
SBA in its sole discretion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
(5) For changes of ownership or
control, in addition to the factors listed
in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this
section, SBA will consider whether the
applicant’s plan for the resolution of
any outstanding monetary liabilities to
SBA, including repairs and denials and
civil monetary penalties, is acceptable
to SBA in its sole discretion.
(b) SBA may prohibit any individual
or entity from participating as an officer,
director, manager, owner or key
employee of the applicant if such
individual or entity:
(1) Has a previous record of failing to
materially comply with SBA Loan
Program Requirements;
(2) Previously participated in a
material way with any past or present
SBA Lender or Intermediary that failed
to maintain satisfactory SBA
performance;
(3) Previously defaulted on any
Federal loan or Federally assisted
financing that resulted in the Federal
Government or any of its agencies or
departments sustaining a loss in any of
its programs; or
(4) Ever failed to pay when due any
debt or obligation, including any
amounts in dispute, to the Federal
Government or guaranteed by the
Federal Government (including but not
limited to taxes or business or student
loans).
■ 7. Add § 120.468 to read as follows:
§ 120.468 Change of ownership or control
requirements for SBA Supervised Lenders.
(a) SBA prior approval required. Any
change of ownership or control of an
SBA Supervised Lender without SBA’s
prior written approval is prohibited.
Prior to entering into any agreement,
other than a non-binding letter of intent,
for a change of ownership or control,
SBA Supervised Lenders must receive
SBA’s prior written approval from the
appropriate SBA official in accordance
with the prevailing Delegations of
Authority. An SBA Supervised Lender
may not register proposed new owners
on its books and records or permit them
to participate in any manner in the
conduct of the SBA Supervised Lender’s
affairs unless approved in writing by
SBA. Any type of non-binding letter of
intent regarding a prospective change of
ownership or control must be reported
to SBA within 30 calendar days. A
change of ownership or control includes
the following:
(1) Any transfer(s) (direct or indirect)
of 10 percent or more of any class of the
SBA Supervised Lender’s stock or
ownership interests (or series of
transfers which, in the aggregate over an
18 month period, equals 10 percent or
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
more), or any agreement providing for
such transfer;
(2) Any transfer(s) (direct or indirect)
that could result in the beneficial
ownership by any person or group of
persons acting in concert of 10 percent
or more of any class of the SBA
Supervised Lender’s stock or ownership
interests, or any agreement providing for
such transfer(s);
(3) Any merger, consolidation, or
reorganization;
(4) Any other transaction or
agreement that transfers control of an
SBA Supervised Lender; or
(5) Any other transaction or event that
results in any change in the possession
(direct or indirect) of the right to
control, or the power to direct or cause
the direction of, the management or
policies of an SBA Supervised Lender,
whether through the ownership of
voting securities, by contract or
otherwise.
(b) Approval required by other
regulatory authorities. If a change of
ownership or control of an SBA
Supervised Lender is subject to the
approval of any state or Federal
chartering, licensing or other regulatory
authority, copies of any documents filed
with such authority must, at the same
time, be transmitted to the appropriate
SBA official in accordance with the
prevailing Delegations of Authority. The
approval of any state or Federal
authority will be required in addition to
SBA’s prior written approval.
(c) Application requirements for
changes of ownership or control. An
applicant must submit a Lender
Assessment Plan and a new application
in accordance with § 120.466 for any
change of ownership or control. If a
proposed change of ownership is for
less than 50 percent of the ownership
interests in an SBA Supervised Lender,
SBA may, in its sole discretion, limit the
requirements of the Lender Assessment
Plan or the complete application as set
forth in official SBA policy and
procedures.
(d) Voluntary surrender of SBA
lending authority. An SBA Supervised
Lender may voluntarily surrender its
SBA lending authority (including its
SBLC license or NFRL lending
authority, as applicable) and withdraw
as a participating Lender with SBA’s
prior written approval. The SBA
Supervised Lender must agree to
transfer its entire 7(a) loan portfolio to
one or more Lenders acceptable to SBA
in accordance with § 120.432(a), and
enter into a withdrawal agreement to
resolve any outstanding issues,
including any outstanding monetary
liabilities, to SBA’s satisfaction. SBA
may, in its sole discretion, take over the
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
servicing of an SBA Supervised
Lender’s 7(a) loan portfolio in
accordance with § 120.535(d) upon the
voluntary surrender of its SBA lending
authority.
§ 120.470
8. Amend § 120.470 by removing
paragraph (g) and redesignating
paragraph (h) as paragraph (g).
9. Amend § 120.471 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (a);
■ b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(3)
through (5) as paragraphs (b)(4) through
(6) respectively; and
■ c. Adding new paragraph (b)(3).
The revision and addition to read as
follows:
§ 120.471 What are the minimum capital
requirements for SBLCs?
(a) Minimum capital requirements. (1)
Beginning on January 4, 2024, each
SBLC that makes or acquires a 7(a) loan
must maintain, at a minimum,
unencumbered paid-in capital and paidin surplus of at least $5,000,000, or 10
percent of the aggregate of its share of
all outstanding loans, whichever is
greater.
(2) Any SBLC approved on or after
January 4, 2021, including in the event
of a change of ownership or control,
must maintain the minimum capital
requirement set forth in paragraph (a)(1)
of this section.
(3) Unless subject to paragraph (a)(1)
or (2) of this section, an SBLC must
comply with the minimum capital
requirements that were in effect on
January 3, 2021.
(b) * * *
(3) Unrestricted net assets (for nonprofit corporations);
*
*
*
*
*
■
10. Remove and reserve § 120.475.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–26307 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:15 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
14 CFR Part 39
RIN 2120–AA64
■
[Removed and Reserved]
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0425; Project
Identifier 2016–NE–13–AD; Amendment 39–
21346; AD 2020–25–04]
[Amended]
■
§ 120.475
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Airworthiness Directives; Rolls-Royce
Deutschland Ltd & Co KG (Type
Certificate Previously Held by RollsRoyce plc) Turbofan Engines
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The FAA is superseding
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2016–24–
08 for all Rolls-Royce Deutschland Ltd.
& Co KG (RRD) RB211–Trent 875–17,
RB211–Trent 877–17, RB211–Trent
884–17, RB211–Trent 884B–17, RB211–
Trent 892–17, RB211–Trent 892B–17,
and RB211–Trent 895–17 model
turbofan engines. AD 2016–24–08
required repetitive inspections of the
engine upper bifurcation nose fairing
assembly and repair or replacement of
any fairing assembly that fails
inspection. This AD retains the
requirements to perform repetitive
inspections of the engine upper
bifurcation nose fairing assembly and
repair or replacement of any fairing
assembly that fails inspection. As a
terminating action to these inspections,
this AD also requires the modification of
the engine upper bifurcation nose
fairing assembly. The FAA is issuing
this AD to address the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD is effective January 8,
2021.
The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
of certain publications listed in this AD
as of January 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: For service information
identified in this final rule, contact
Rolls-Royce plc, Corporate
Communications, P.O. Box 31, Derby,
England, DE24 8BJ; phone: (+44) 1332
242424; fax: (+44) 1332 249936; email:
https://www.rolls-royce.com/contact/
civil_team.jsp; internet: https://
customers.rolls-royce.com/public/
rollsroycecare. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 1200 District
Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call (781) 238–
7759. It is also available at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78215
and locating Docket No. FAA–2019–
0425.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket at
https://www.regulations.gov by
searching for and locating Docket No.
FAA–2019–0425; or in person at Docket
Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this
AD, the mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI), any
comments received, and other
information. The address for Docket
Operations is U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Scott Stevenson, Aviation Safety
Engineer, ECO Branch, FAA, 1200
District Avenue, Burlington, MA 01803;
phone: (781) 238–7132; fax: (781) 238–
7199; email: Scott.M.Stevenson@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR
part 39 to supersede AD 2016–24–08,
Amendment 39–18725 (81 FR 86567,
December 1, 2016) (AD 2016–24–08).
AD 2016–24–08 applied to all RR
RB211–Trent 875–17, RB211–Trent
877–17, RB211–Trent 884–17, RB211–
Trent 884B–17, RB211–Trent 892–17,
RB211–Trent 892B–17, and RB211–
Trent 895–17 model turbofan engines.
The NPRM published in the Federal
Register on June 24, 2019 (84 FR 29423).
The NPRM was prompted by RRD
developing a modification of the engine
upper bifurcation nose fairing assembly
that terminates the need for repetitive
inspections of this part. In the NPRM,
the FAA proposed to retain the
requirements to perform repetitive
inspections of the engine upper
bifurcation nose fairing assembly and
repair or replacement of any fairing
assembly that fails inspection. As a
terminating action, in the NPRM the
FAA also proposed to require
modification of the engine upper
bifurcation nose fairing assembly. The
FAA is issuing this AD to address the
unsafe condition of these products.
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD 2018–
0088, dated April 18, 2018 (referred to
after this as ‘‘the MCAI’’), to address the
unsafe condition on these products. The
MCAI states:
E:\FR\FM\04DER1.SGM
04DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78205-78215]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26307]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
13 CFR Part 120
RIN 3245-AH04
SBA Supervised Lenders Application Process
AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA or Agency) is
amending the regulations applicable to Small Business Lending Companies
(SBLCs) and state-regulated lenders (Non-Federally Regulated Lenders
(NFRLs) (collectively referred to as SBA Supervised Lenders). The key
amendments to the regulations include a new application and review
process for SBA Supervised Lenders, including for transactions
involving a change of ownership or control. Other amendments to the
regulations include updating the minimum capital maintenance
requirements, clarifying the factors SBA will consider in its
evaluation of an SBA Supervised Lender application and limiting the
7(a) lending area for NFRLs.
DATES: This rule is effective January 4, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Kirwin, Chief, SBA Supervised
Lender Oversight Team, Office of Credit Risk Management, Office of
Capital Access, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW,
Washington, DC 20416; telephone: (202) 205-7261; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background Information
The 7(a) Loan Program is a business loan program authorized by
section 7(a) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 636(a)) and is
governed primarily by the regulations in part 120 of title 13 of the
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR). The core mission of the 7(a) Loan
Program is to provide SBA-guaranteed financial assistance to small
businesses that lack access to capital on reasonable terms and
conditions to support our nation's economy.
Most Lenders participating in the 7(a) Loan Program are depository
institutions that have a primary Federal Financial Institution
Regulator (as defined in 13 CFR 120.10) that oversees the Lender's
lending activities. SBA has statutory authority under section 7(a)(17)
of the Small Business Act to authorize non-federally regulated entities
to make 7(a) loans, including entities that have state regulators.
Under this authority, SBA has authorized SBA Supervised Lenders to make
loans in the 7(a) Loan Program. SBA Supervised Lenders are defined in
13 CFR 120.10 to include SBLCs and NFRLs, and are subject to
regulation, oversight, and enforcement by SBA.
SBLCs are non-depository lending institutions that are authorized
only to make loans pursuant to section 7(a) of the Small Business Act
and loans to Intermediaries in SBA's Microloan program. SBLCs are
regulated, supervised, and examined solely by SBA, except for the
subset of SBLCs defined as Other Regulated SBLCs in 13 CFR 120.10. SBA
imposed a moratorium on issuing additional SBA lending
[[Page 78206]]
authorities (referred to as SBLC Licenses) to SBLCs in 1982. Currently,
there are fourteen (14) SBLCs with the authority to make 7(a) loans up
to the maximum loan amount allowed under the Small Business Act.\1\ An
entity may purchase one of the fourteen (14) SBLC Licenses from an
existing SBLC with SBA's prior written approval.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ SBA waived certain regulations for the purpose of permitting
mission-oriented lenders to participate in SBA's Community Advantage
Pilot Program (referred to as CA Lenders), a pilot program within
the 7(a) Loan Program. Each CA Lender is identified as either an
SBLC or NFRL, depending on whether the lender is subject to
regulation by a state. CA Lenders are limited to making loans in the
CA Pilot Program, which generally requires a CA Lender to make loans
to underserved markets (e.g., low-to-moderate income communities,
rural areas, opportunity zones, veteran-owned businesses) and in an
amount not to exceed $250,000. The CA Pilot Program is governed by
all regulations applicable to the 7(a) Loan Program generally and to
SBA Supervised Lenders specifically unless waived or modified in the
Federal Register Notices published in connection with the CA Pilot
Program. As indicated in the proposed rule, the revisions in this
final rule do not apply to the CA Pilot Program. For more
information about the CA Pilot Program please refer to the CA
Participant Guide, Version 6.0 (June 15, 2020), available at https://www.sba.gov/document/support-community-advantage-participant-guide.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NFRLs are business concerns that are subject to regulation,
supervision and oversight by a state regulator that must be
satisfactory to SBA. By definition, an NFRL's lending activities are
not regulated by a Federal Financial Institution Regulator. NFRLs are
typically organized as state licensed Business and Industrial
Development Companies (BIDCOs) and may include other types of state-
regulated lending institutions, such as non-profit corporations or
financial institutions without Federal deposit insurance or share
insurance protection.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ This final rule does not apply to NFRLs authorized to make
Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans under SBA Form 3507. For
more information about PPP please refer to the information available
on SBA's website at https://www.sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/coronavirus-relief-options/paycheck-protection-program.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To become an SBA Supervised Lender, an applicant must be qualified
as determined by SBA in its sole discretion. An entity interested in
becoming an SBA Supervised Lender must submit an application to SBA
containing the information specified in SBA's Standard Operating
Procedures 50 10, Lender and Development Company Loan Programs, as
amended from time to time (SOP 50 10).\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The current version of the SOP is 50 10 6, effective October
1, 2020. The application requirements can be found in this SOP in
Part 1, Section A, Chapter 1, Paragraph A.2 with respect to NFRLs
and Part 1, Section A, Chapter 2, Paragraph B with respect to SBLCs.
The SOP is available at https://www.sba.gov/document/sop-50-10-lender-development-company-loan-programs-0.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On January 13, 2020, SBA published a proposed rule with a request
for comments in the Federal Register to amend the regulations related
to the SBA Supervised Lender application and review process and to
mitigate certain risks inherent in their participation in the 7(a) Loan
Program. 85 FR 1783 (January 13, 2020). The proposed changes were
designed to: Improve efficiencies related to the SBA Supervised Lender
application and review process, including for a change of ownership or
control transaction (as defined in Sec. 120.468); incorporate into the
regulations the factors SBA will consider in its evaluation of an
application; and mitigate the increased risk associated with the
lending operations of SBA Supervised Lenders by updating their minimum
capital maintenance requirements and establishing a 7(a) lending area
for NFRLs.
II. Summary of Comments
SBA received 19 comments on the proposed rule. Seven comments were
submitted by or on behalf of SBLCs. Three comments were submitted by or
on behalf of NFRLs. Three comments were submitted by or on behalf of
state regulators. SBA also received comments from two trade
associations, two law firms, and two individuals.
The comments were generally supportive of the proposed application
and review process with some suggested changes to shorten the waiting
period for entities seeking to reapply to become an SBA Supervised
Lender. Commenters generally agreed with SBA's proposed definition of
qualified full-time professional management with minor changes. The
commenters were also generally in favor of the changes to the minimum
capital maintenance requirements with some proposed changes. A majority
of the commenters were opposed to SBA limiting the 7(a) lending area
for NFRLs to the state in which their primary state regulator is
located. Commenters also requested some technical changes to the
proposed regulation related to SBA's evaluation of applications and the
requirements for change of ownership or control transactions. Finally,
there were several responses to SBA's request for comments on whether
SBA should modify the contribution that servicing rights assets may
have on an SBA Supervised Lender's capital maintenance requirement.
SBA appreciates the comments received and has incorporated many of
the suggested changes into the final rule. SBA has addressed the
comments to the proposed regulatory changes within the section-by-
section analysis below.
III. Section-by-Section Analysis of Comments and Changes
A. SBA Supervised Lenders
1. Section 120.460 What are SBA's additional requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders?
SBA proposed to add two new paragraphs to Sec. 120.460. Proposed
paragraph (c) required all SBA Supervised Lenders to employ qualified
full-time professional management, as is currently required for SBLCs.
This proposed regulation also clarified the meaning of full-time
professional management to include, at a minimum, the employment of a
chief executive officer or equivalent to manage daily operations, a
chief credit/risk officer, and at least one other full-time employee
qualified by training and experience to carry out the SBA Supervised
Lender's business plan. In addition, proposed paragraph (c) included a
requirement that an SBA Supervised Lender must sustain a sufficient
level of 7(a) lending activity in its area of operation.
Overall commenters supported proposed Sec. 120.460(c). A few
commenters suggested that SBA should allow SBA Supervised Lenders to
fulfill the full-time professional management requirement by using
shared employees from affiliate organizations. One commenter suggested
SBA should eliminate the requirement for a third full-time employee.
SBA recognizes that SBA Supervised Lenders may have different
staffing levels depending on the size of their 7(a) loan portfolios.
However, SBA maintains its policy position that SBA Supervised Lenders
must have a minimum level of internal oversight to independently manage
their 7(a) lending operations. SBA considered the comments received and
has revised the rule to permit SBA Supervised Lenders to meet the
qualified full-time professional management requirement by having two
full-time senior officers (i.e., CEO and CCO/CRO), and one part-time
employee (which may be a shared employee of the lender's affiliates).
Existing SBA Supervised Lenders will not be required to comply with
this regulatory definition of qualified full-time professional
management unless, after the effective date of this final rule, the SBA
Supervised Lender makes or acquires any 7(a) loans or engages in a
transaction that constitutes a change of ownership or control.
SBA received six comments in support of the requirement in
paragraph
[[Page 78207]]
(c) for each SBA Supervised Lender to maintain a sufficient level of
lending activity in its area of operation. Most commenters requested
that SBA clarify in the final rule the meaning of a ``sufficient''
level of lending activity. SBA considered these comments and has
determined that a sufficient level of lending activity for SBA
Supervised Lenders means obtaining at least four 7(a) loan approvals
during two consecutive fiscal years. This is modeled on the minimum
level of loan activity that SBA currently requires for Certified
Development Companies in the 504 loan program. See 13 CFR 120.828.
Existing SBA Supervised Lenders will not be required to comply with the
7(a) lending activity requirement unless, after the effective date of
this final rule, the SBA Supervised Lender makes or acquires any 7(a)
loans or engages in a transaction that constitutes a change of
ownership or control.
Second, proposed new paragraph (d) limited an NFRL's 7(a) lending
area to the state in which its primary state regulator is located.
Overall, commenters were opposed to this part of the proposed rule.
Some commenters argued that a limitation on the 7(a) lending area for
NFRLs could have an impact on their business plans. Five commenters
suggested that SBA should allow NFRLs previously engaged in nationwide
7(a) lending to continue such lending activities. One commenter
supported the 7(a) lending area restriction for NFRLs, but suggested
that SBA provide a 1-year transition period to allow NFRLs to adjust
their future 7(a) lending activities.
As stated in the proposed rule, approximately 90 percent of all
7(a) loan approvals obtained by NFRLs during the last 3 fiscal years
were for 7(a) loans to be made in the state where the NFRL's primary
state regulator was located. Additionally, the final rule does not
limit or restrict in any way an NFRL's ability to make other types of
non-SBA loans to borrowers on a nationwide basis. While SBA understands
that some state regulators may not object to nationwide 7(a) lending
for NFRLs, state regulators do not bear the same financial risk that
SBA assumes as the guarantor of 7(a) loans.\4\ Moreover, while state
regulators may generally oversee NFRLs within their borders for safety
and soundness, SBA bears the responsibility of ensuring participating
lenders comply with SBA Loan Program Requirements (as defined in 13 CFR
120.10). When SBA placed a moratorium on approving additional SBLCs in
1982, it did so to reduce the administrative resources needed to
prudently regulate and oversee non-depository lenders with a nationwide
7(a) lending platform. SBA does not have the administrative resources
needed to oversee NFRLs with a nationwide 7(a) lending platform in
addition to the 14 SBLCs it currently regulates. In addition, proposed
Sec. 120.460(d) is consistent with state statutes placing geographic
limits on lending activity overseen by state regulators, as well as a
general understanding that NFRLs are expected to focus on economic
development in their state and local communities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ SBA's guaranty on regular 7(a) loans ranges from 50% to 90%
of the loan amount. Under the PPP, SBA's guaranty is 100% of the
loan amount.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBA carefully considered the comments received on proposed Sec.
120.460(d) and does not agree with the commenters' objections. In order
to manage the Agency's limited administrative resources and the
increased risk to SBA associated with NFRLs participating in the 7(a)
Loan Program, the final rule establishes a 7(a) lending area for NFRLs
limited to the state in which their primary state regulator is located.
SBA will provide an exception such that an NFRL's lending area may
include a local trade area that is contiguous to such state (e.g., a
city or metropolitan statistical area that is bisected by a state line)
with SBA's prior written approval. SBA also is adopting a commenter's
suggestion that NFRLs that are currently engaged in 7(a) lending
outside of the state in which their primary regulator is located should
not be subject to the 7(a) lending area limitation until 1 year after
the effective date of the final rule. SBA will apply this rule
immediately, however, to all new NFRLs and to any NFRL that engages in
and/or is seeking approval of a change of ownership or control
transaction. The 1-year grace period will allow the few NFRLs that may
be affected by this rule to adjust their future 7(a) lending
activities. SBA encourages existing or prospective NFRLs interested in
making 7(a) loans on a nationwide basis to acquire one of the fourteen
SBLC licenses that become available from time to time.
For further discussion of the impact of this provision, see the
final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) below.
2. Section 120.462 What are SBA's additional requirements on capital
maintenance for SBA Supervised Lenders?
SBA proposed to amend the regulations to require NFRLs to maintain
a baseline minimum amount of capital necessary for participation in the
7(a) Loan Program. The proposed rule established a minimum amount of
capital equal to the higher of (1) the minimum amount of capital
required by the NFRL's state regulator, or (2) $2,500,000. Commenters
were generally supportive of the proposal. A few commenters indicated
that the $2.5 million capital amount was too high, and SBA should
instead allow the minimum capital requirement to be based on the size
of the NFRL's loan portfolio. Other commenters suggested that the $2.5
million capital amount was too low and encouraged SBA to raise the
minimum capital requirement for NFRLs to be at the same level as SBLCs
(i.e., $5 million).
SBA must ensure that NFRLs have a minimum level of capital
necessary to manage the credit risk associated with their 7(a) lending
operations. SBA disagrees with the comments suggesting that the amount
should be increased or decreased and is moving forward with the rule as
proposed. As SBA proposed, NFRLs will have 3 years after the effective
date of this final rule to reach the new minimum capital amount. In
addition, an NFRL that does not meet the new minimum capital
requirement by the end of the 3-year period may remain in the 7(a) Loan
Program but will not be permitted to make or acquire 7(a) loans after
such date until it satisfies the minimum capital requirement. The
minimum capital requirement will also apply immediately to new NFRLs
and in the event of a change of ownership or control of an NFRL
occurring and/or approved after the effective date of this final rule.
3. Section 120.466 SBA Supervised Lender Application
SBA proposed to add a new Sec. 120.466 to codify a new application
and review process for entities seeking to become an SBA Supervised
Lender. SBA proposed to evaluate applications through an initial review
and, if warranted, a final review.
The initial review requires an SBA Supervised Lender applicant to
submit a written plan (known as a Lender Assessment Plan (LAP)). The
LAP contains key information that would enable SBA to reach a
preliminary assessment about the qualifications of an applicant
expeditiously. An LAP review includes an initial assessment of the
applicant's business plan, capitalization, and professional management
team. SBA could also require an interview with the Office of Capital
Access. If SBA were to notify an applicant that it may not proceed to
the final review phase, the proposed rule
[[Page 78208]]
provided that the applicant must wait nine months from the date of such
notification before reapplying by submitting a new LAP.
Overall commenters were supportive of the proposed rule. SBA
received six comments suggesting the 9-month waiting period was too
long and should be shortened to 3 months. SBA considered these comments
and has agreed to shorten the waiting period from 9 months to 6 months
to address the commenters' concerns. SBA believes that 3 months is too
short a period to allow an applicant to make meaningful improvements in
its circumstances.
The final review, as proposed under Sec. 120.466(b), requires an
SBA Supervised Lender applicant to submit a complete application to
SBA. The complete application updates the information disclosed in the
LAP and provides SBA with additional information for review, such as
the applicant's organizational documents, operational plan, credit
policies, internal control policies, loan risk rating system, capital
adequacy plan, proposed credit facilities (if any), organizational
chart, audited financial statements, bank statements, legal opinions
and any other necessary documentation as further described in official
SBA policies and procedures.\5\ After completion of the final review,
SBA issues a final decision to approve or deny the application. If an
SBA Supervised Lender's application is denied, the proposed rule
required an applicant to wait 18 months before it may submit a new LAP
and restart the application process. The Agency received a number of
comments requesting that SBA shorten this 18-month time period. SBA
considered these comments and has agreed to shorten the time period
from 18 months to 12 months. SBA believes a 1 year waiting period will
allow the applicant to address material deficiencies and for meaningful
and sustained improvement in its application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The information required to be submitted in a complete
application is not set forth in SBA's regulation but will continue
to be in SBA's official policies and procedures. See SOP 50 10.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lastly, under proposed Sec. 120.466(c), an entity seeking to
become an NFRL is required to have at least one year of current
operating and relevant commercial lending experience (by the entity
itself) before the entity may submit an application to become an SBA
Supervised Lender. SBA did not receive comments on this portion of the
proposed rule and will include paragraph (c) in the final rule, with
the clarification that it is the applicant that must have the requisite
experience.
4. Section 120.467 Evaluation of SBA Supervised Lender Applicants
SBA proposed to add a new Sec. 120.467 to incorporate into the
regulations the factors SBA will consider in evaluating an SBA
Supervised Lender applicant. SBA's evaluation will include a review of,
among other things, the applicant's business plan, capitalization,
operational plan, organizational structure, management qualifications,
the historical performance of the loans originated by the applicant or
attributable to its management team, the applicant's financial
projections and liquidity, and prior history or involvement of the
applicant or its management team (including key employees) with any SBA
guaranteed lending program or any other Federal or state lending
program. SBA also reviews the results of background investigations
(e.g., through SBA Form 1081) and other information obtained through
due diligence and reference checks. Under the proposed rule SBA may
also prohibit individuals or entities from participating as an officer,
director, manager, owner or key employee of an SBA Supervised Lender
applicant.
Commenters were generally in support of the proposed rule. SBA
received four comments to proposed paragraph (b)(1) suggesting that it
be revised to reflect that the individuals or entities that SBA may
prohibit from serving as an officer, director, manager, owner or key
employee of an SBA Supervised Lender are those that have ``materially''
failed to comply with SBA Loan Program Requirements. SBA has agreed to
revise Sec. 120.467(b)(1) by adding ``materially'' to this paragraph
in the final rule.
5. Section 120.468 Change of Ownership or Control Requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders
SBA proposed to move the regulation applicable to a change of
ownership or control of an SBLC (Sec. 120.475) to a new Sec. 120.468
with certain modifications. The purpose of this change is to
incorporate into the regulations the Agency's current policy
requirement and practice that all SBA Supervised Lenders, including
NFRLs, must obtain SBA written approval prior to any change of
ownership or control.
Section 120.468(a) in the proposed rule clarified that SBA
Supervised Lenders must receive SBA prior written approval before
entering into a definitive agreement regarding a change of ownership or
control. SBA received approximately 11 comments on this proposed rule.
The commenters were opposed to the requirement to obtain SBA prior
written approval before entering into a definitive agreement for a
change of ownership or control. Most commenters requested that SBA
either strike this provision from the rule or require a change of
ownership or control to be ``conditioned'' upon receipt of SBA
approval.
SBA disagrees with these comments. SBA is seeking to eliminate the
time and expense associated with SBA Supervised Lenders entering into
agreements for a change of ownership or control only to have SBA deny
their requests months later after conducting a thorough review of the
applications. Allowing SBA Supervised Lenders to enter into an
agreement upfront (without prior SBA approval) would cause unnecessary
time and expense to be expended by the parties in some cases and could
unfairly raise expectations. The final rule retains the requirement
that any SBA Supervised Lenders seeking to continue in the 7(a) Loan
Program must obtain SBA's prior written approval before entering into
an agreement for a change of ownership or control. To avoid confusion
as to the meaning of a ``definitive'' agreement, SBA has removed the
term and is clarifying that the limitation applies even if such
agreement is conditioned on SBA approval. However, an SBA Supervised
Lender may enter into a non-binding letter of intent regarding a
prospective change of ownership or control, provided that such letter
is reported to SBA within 30 calendar days. SBA removed the cross
reference to Sec. 120.464(a)(5) in the final rule in response to
comments received.
Section 120.468(b) of the proposed rule clarified that if the
approval of any state or Federal authority is required for an SBA
Supervised Lender's change of ownership or control, such approval is
required in addition to SBA's prior written approval. SBA did not
receive any comments on this part of the proposed rule and will adopt
the text in the final rule as proposed.
Section 120.468(c) of the proposed rule incorporated SBA's current
policy that a new application must be submitted to SBA in connection
with a change of ownership or control of an SBA Supervised Lender. SBA
did not receive any comments on this part of the proposed rule and will
adopt the text in the final rule as proposed.
Section 120.468(d) of the proposed rule provided that SBA
Supervised Lenders would have an opportunity to voluntarily surrender
their SBA lending authority (i.e., the SBLC License or the NFRL lending
authority) and withdraw from the 7(a) Loan Program with SBA's prior
written approval. As proposed, a
[[Page 78209]]
voluntary surrender requires an SBA Supervised Lender to (i) transfer
its entire loan portfolio to one or more Lenders acceptable to SBA, and
(ii) enter into a withdrawal agreement. One commenter suggested that if
a transferee for an SBA Supervised Lender's 7(a) loan portfolio could
not be found, the final rule should be clarified so that SBA may take
over the servicing of the SBA Supervised Lender's 7(a) loan portfolio.
SBA agrees with this comment and has revised the final rule such that
SBA may, in its sole discretion, elect to take over the servicing of an
SBA Supervised Lender's 7(a) loan portfolio upon the voluntary
surrender of its SBA lending authority. If SBA elects to take over
servicing, the SBA Lender must assign the 7(a) loan documents to SBA
and provide any needed assistance to allow SBA to take over servicing.
SBA may use contractors to perform these actions. See 13 CFR
120.535(d).
6. Section 120.471 What are the minimum capital requirements for SBLCs?
SBA proposed to amend Sec. 120.471(a) to increase the minimum
capital requirement for SBLCs. As stated in the proposed rule, the
minimum capital amount for SBLCs has not been updated since 1996. SBA
believes the current minimum capital (of at least $1,000,000) is
insufficient to assure an SBLC's continued financial viability or to
provide for any necessary growth. As stated in the proposed rule, the
maximum 7(a) loan amount has increased from $1,000,000 in 1996 to
$5,000,000 as of the date of the proposed rule.\6\ As a result, SBA has
determined that a corresponding change to increase the minimum capital
requirements for SBLCs is necessary at this time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ In addition, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (CARES Act) (Pub. L. 116-136), permits participating
lenders to make section 7(a) loans up to a maximum amount of $10
million under the PPP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Under the proposed rule, SBLCs must maintain a minimum amount of
capital equal to unencumbered paid-in capital and paid-in surplus of at
least $5 million, or 10 percent of the aggregate of the SBLC's share of
all outstanding loans, whichever is greater. Most of the 14 SBLCs have
capital in excess of the minimum capital proposed under Sec.
120.471(a). SBA also included a provision in the proposed rule
providing SBLCs with 3 years after the effective date of the final rule
to reach the new minimum capital amount. However, the proposed minimum
capital amount would apply immediately in the event of a change of
ownership or control of an SBLC occurring and/or approved after the
effective date of this final rule.
Five commenters supported the proposed rule and two commenters were
opposed. Commenters also encouraged SBA to modify the definition of
regulatory capital so that SBA Supervised Lenders would not need to
maintain capital against the full amount of the unguaranteed portion of
7(a) loans sold into securitizations. Three commenters also expressed
some concerns about the proposed increase in capital for non-profit
SBLCs and suggested that these entities should be permitted to use
``restricted'' capital toward their minimum capital requirement.
SBA considered the comments and is moving forward with the proposed
rule as drafted. SBA disagrees that SBLCs should only be required to
maintain capital against the risk retention portion of their 7(a) loan
securitizations as opposed to the full amount of the unguaranteed
portion of 7(a) loans sold into securitizations. SBA requires non-
depository institutions (including SBA Supervised Lenders) that engage
in securitization transactions to maintain capital in accordance with
Sec. 120.425(a). This regulation applies a capital charge against all
assets of the securitizer including the balance outstanding on the
unguaranteed portion of the securitizer's 7(a) loans, as well as
including those unguaranteed interests in any securitization pool. SBA
did not propose any revisions to Sec. 120.425(a) in the proposed rule.
SBA also does not agree with the suggestion that non-profit SBLCs
should be permitted to include ``restricted'' capital in their minimum
capital calculation. An SBLC's capital must be ``unencumbered'' and
available to absorb potential losses from its lending activities,
including those associated with its entire 7(a) loan portfolio.
Restricted capital does not meet this requirement. SBA will not permit
non-profit SBLCs to include restricted capital towards their minimum
capital calculation.
Finally, SBA will continue to study whether changes to the
definition of capital under Sec. 120.471(b) should be modified to
account for the valuation of servicing rights assets. Most of the
comments received suggested that SBA should allow SBLCs to receive full
credit for the value of their servicing rights towards their minimum
capital requirement. If SBA determines there is a need for further
changes, SBA will promulgate regulations or provide additional guidance
on this issue.
B. Technical Changes
1. Section 120.410 Requirements for All Participating Lenders
SBA proposed a conforming technical change to Sec. 120.410(a)(1)
to reflect the new minimum capital requirements for SBA Supervised
Lenders. SBA did not receive any comments on this proposed technical
change and incorporated the proposed text into the final rule.
2. Section 120.470 What are SBA's additional requirements for SBLCs?
SBA proposed a conforming technical change to remove Sec.
120.470(g) ``Management'' and redesignate paragraph (h) as paragraph
(g). No comments were received, and SBA is adopting the change in this
final rule. The management requirement for SBLCs is addressed in new
Sec. 120.460(c).
3. Section 120.475 Change of Ownership or Control
SBA proposed a conforming technical change to remove and reserve
Sec. 120.475. No comments were received, and SBA is adopting the
change in this final rule. The text of Sec. 120.475 is incorporated
into Sec. 120.468.
Compliance With Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13771, 12988, and 13132,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C., Ch. 35), and the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612)
Executive Order 12866
This rule finalizes a proposed rule that the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) determined was not a ``significant'' regulatory action
for the purposes of Executive Order 12866. OMB did not change the non-
significant designation for this final rule, and therefore, SBA has not
prepared a Regulatory Impact Analysis. This is not a major rule under
the Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.
Executive Order 13563
This executive order supplements and reaffirms the principles and
requirements in Executive Order 12866, including the requirement to
provide the public with an opportunity to participate in the regulatory
process. SBA Supervised Lenders have been involved in the 7(a) Loan
Program for over 35 years. Over the years, the Agency has received
feedback from SBA Supervised Lender applicants and program
participants, including valuable insight and suggestions for
improvements to the application and review process. This feedback from
SBA Supervised Lenders, together with the comments in response to the
proposed rule, has shaped this final rule.
[[Page 78210]]
Executive Order 13771
This final rule is not subject to Executive Order 13771 regulatory
action because the rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12988
This action meets applicable standards set forth in sections 3(a)
and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. The action does not
have retroactive or preemptive effect.
Executive Order 13132
SBA has determined that this final rule will not have substantial,
direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government. For the
purposes of Executive Order 13132, SBA has determined that this rule
has no federalism implications warranting preparation of a federalism
assessment.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C., Ch. 35
SBA has determined that this final rule imposes a new reporting
requirement under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). Specifically, the
final rule requires SBA Supervised Lenders to submit a written Lender
Assessment Plan (LAP) for SBA to conduct an initial review of the
applicant. In addition, the final rule codifies a requirement for
applicants to submit a complete application in order for SBA to
determine whether the applicant has the qualifications necessary to
participate in the 7(a) Loan Program as an SBA Supervised Lender. As
discussed above, this requirement is currently described in SBA's
official policies and procedures. In addition to these two
requirements, the applicant will submit the same forms as other Lenders
that apply to participate in the 7(a) Loan Program, including the SBA
Form 1081, Statement of Personal History (OMB Control number 3245-
0080).
The title, summary of the information collections, description of
respondents, and an estimate of the related reporting burdens are
discussed below. Additional information related to these requirements
is included in the Regulatory Flexibility Act discussion in this rule.
SBA did not receive comments on the new information collections in the
proposed rule.
Title of Collection: SBA Supervised Lender Application and Review.
OMB Control Number: New Collection.
(a) Lender Assessment Plan.
The final rule requires organizations seeking to become an SBA
Supervised Lender (or seeking SBA approval of a change of ownership or
control) to submit a LAP to SBA. The LAP includes the legal name and
contact information of the applicant, a written business plan, current
and projected financial statements and other important information
about the applicant and its management team (including key employees).
Need and Purpose: The LAP is necessary for SBA to conduct an
initial review of an applicant seeking to become an SBA Supervised
Lender (or seeking SBA approval of a change of ownership or control).
The LAP provides SBA with key information that would enable SBA to
reach a preliminary assessment about the qualifications of an applicant
more efficiently. This initial review phase will assist SBA in
identifying incomplete applications and unqualified applicants much
earlier in the application review process.
Description and Estimated Number of Respondents: Pursuant to
proposed Sec. 120.466(a), the information in the LAP will be collected
from each organization seeking to become an SBA Supervised Lender (or
seeking SBA approval of a change of ownership or control). SBA
estimates that it will likely receive no more than four LAPs each year.
Total Estimated Response Time: It is estimated that each applicant
would need approximately 35 hours to prepare and submit the LAP for an
estimated total of 140 hours annually.
(b) SBA Supervised Lender Application.
If an applicant seeking to become an SBA Supervised Lender (or
seeking SBA approval of a change of ownership or control) is authorized
by SBA to proceed to the final review phase, the applicant will be
required to submit a complete application.
Need and Purpose: The information submitted with this application
is necessary for SBA to reach a final decision regarding whether the
applicant has the qualifications necessary to participate in the 7(a)
Loan Program. The complete application requires an SBA Supervised
Lender applicant to provide additional detail about the information
previously disclosed to SBA in the LAP and will include new information
about the applicant's proposed operation and lending activities as a
participant in the 7(a) Loan Program. As stated above, these
application requirements are not new since they are currently set out
in SBA's official policies and procedures. Under those policies and
procedures, an organization applying to become an SBA Supervised Lender
(or seeking SBA approval of a change of ownership or control) is
required to, among other things, submit documentation in support of its
organizational structure, internal control policies, operational plan,
proposed credit policies, loan risk rating system, proposed secondary
market activities, capital adequacy plan, audited financial statements
and other information (e.g., certifications and legal opinions)
necessary for SBA to evaluate the qualifications of the applicant. See
SOP 50 10. Although SBA estimates that the requirements will only apply
to approximately four organizations each year, now that SBA is
codifying the application requirements in this final rule, under the
PRA the requirements are deemed to impact ten or more respondents;
therefore, SBA has also requested OMB approval of this application in
compliance with the PRA procedures.
Description and Estimated Number of Respondents: The information in
the complete application will be collected from organizations that are
seeking to become an SBA Supervised Lender and have successfully
reached the final review phase. Based on current experience, SBA
estimates that it will likely receive no more than four complete
applications each year.
Total Estimated Response Time: It is estimated that each applicant
would need approximately 50 hours to prepare and submit a complete
application, for an estimated total of 200 hours annually.
Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-612
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA), this final rule may
have an impact on a substantial number of small entities that
participate as SBA Supervised Lenders in the 7(a) Loan Program.
Immediately below, SBA sets forth a final regulatory flexibility
analysis (FRFA) examining the impact of the final rule in accordance
with 5 U.S.C. 603. The FRFA addresses (1) the reasons, objectives and
legal basis for this rule; (2) a description of the kind and number of
small entities that may be affected; (3) the projected reporting,
recordkeeping and other compliance requirements; (4) whether there are
any Federal rules that may duplicate, overlap, or conflict with this
rule; and (5) whether there are any significant alternatives to this
rule.
[[Page 78211]]
1. What are the reasons, objectives and legal basis for the rule?
The rule is designed to improve efficiencies and enhance the
application and review process for organizations seeking to participate
in the 7(a) Loan Program as SBA Supervised Lenders. The objective is to
provide a process for a more efficient and effective evaluation of the
qualifications of applicants seeking to become SBA Supervised Lenders.
The new application and review process will provide greater clarity and
transparency to applicants and would expedite SBA's review, which may
potentially reduce costs on applicants and on SBA's limited
administrative resources.
The rule also raises the minimum capital requirement that SBA
Supervised Lenders must maintain to assure their continued financial
viability and to provide for any necessary growth. The minimum capital
requirement for SBA Supervised Lenders has not been updated by SBA for
more than 23 years. The Agency has determined that the regulations
addressing minimum capital must be amended to correspond with the more
than 500 percent increase in the maximum 7(a) loan amount that Congress
has authorized by statute over the last twenty-three years.
The rule also limits the 7(a) lending area for NFRLs to the state
in which their primary regulator is located, except that an NFRL may
request SBA's prior written approval to make 7(a) loans in a local
trade area that is contiguous to such state (e.g., a city or
metropolitan statistical area that is bisected by a state line). Most
NFRLs participating in the 7(a) Loan Program already limit their
lending activities to the state in which their primary state regulator
is located. In recent years, some state regulators have permitted NFRLs
to make loans outside of their state or even nationwide. The expansion
of an NFRL's 7(a) lending area increases risk to SBA and the Agency
does not have the additional administrative resources to adequately
supervise, regulate and examine NFRLs that operate outside of their
state. This part of the final rule is also consistent with the general
understanding that state-regulated lenders (such as BIDCOs) are
licensed under specific state laws to focus primarily on economic
development in their respective state and local communities. Based on
the comments received, SBA has agreed to provide existing NFRLs that
SBA has approved for 7(a) lending outside of the state in which their
primary regulator is located with an additional one-year grace period
to allow them to adjust their future 7(a) lending activities.
SBA is authorized to supervise the safety and soundness of SBA
Supervised Lenders and may regulate their 7(a) lending activities
pursuant to section 23(a) of the Small Business Act. 15 U.S.C. 650(a),
see also 15 U.S.C. 634(b)(7). SBA has the authority to promulgate
rules, regulations and requirements for the 7(a) Loan Program. 15
U.S.C. 634(b)(6).
2. What are SBA's description and estimate of the number of small
entities to which the rule will apply?
SBA Supervised Lenders affected by this rule comprise a unique
class of 36 non-depository lenders that may only participate in the
7(a) Loan Program and make 7(a) loans if authorized by SBA. This final
rule will be applicable to all SBA Supervised Lenders (other than
lenders participating as CA Lenders in the CA Pilot Program and lenders
authorized to make PPP loans under SBA Form 3507). SBA estimates that
approximately 88 percent of SBA Supervised Lenders are considered small
entities based on NAICS sector code 52 (Finance and Insurance) and
industry code 52298 (All Other Non-depository Credit Intermediation)
and have annual receipts of less than $38.5 million. This estimate of
32 small SBA Supervised Lenders is based in part on information
contained in the quarterly condition reports and the annual reports
that are required to be submitted to SBA by such lenders.
3. What are the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the rule and an estimate of the classes of
small entities which will be subject to the requirements?
The final rule imposes a new reporting requirement for
organizations seeking to become an SBA Supervised Lender (or seeking
SBA approval of a change of ownership or control). The final rule
codifies an existing requirement that applicants submit a complete
application for SBA to determine whether an organization has the
qualifications necessary to participate in the 7(a) Loan Program as an
SBA Supervised Lender.
The LAP includes key information about an organization that will
allow SBA to reach a preliminary assessment about the qualifications of
an applicant more efficiently. SBA estimates it will receive
approximately four LAPs each year. SBA estimates that it will take
approximately 35 hours for an organization to prepare an LAP at a cost
of $3,838 per LAP. Based on SBA's experience with similar data
collections, we expect an organization that submits a LAP will need to
employ the services of a financial manager and an administrative
assistant when preparing an LAP for submission to SBA.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ The cost estimate for the LAP is based on hourly job
position wages published by the U.S. Department of Labor's Bureau of
Labor Statistics for 2019 and increased by 100% to account for
benefits and overhead. The cost breakdown is as follows: Financial
Manager (30 hours times an hourly rate of $124.90) plus
Administrative Assistant (5 hours times an hourly rate of $36.24)
equals $3,838.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an organization is authorized by SBA to proceed to the final
review phase, a complete application must be submitted to SBA. As
mentioned above, the application requirements for SBA Supervised
Lenders are not new and are currently set forth in SBA's official
policies and procedures. See SOP 50 10 6, Part 1, Section A, Chapter 1,
Paragraph A.2 for NFRLs and Part 1, Section A, Chapter 2, Paragraph B
for SBLCs. SBA estimates that it will receive approximately four
complete applications each year. SBA estimates that it will take
approximately 50 hours for an organization to prepare a complete
application at a cost of $5,207 per application. Based on SBA's
experience with similar data collections, an organization applying to
become an SBA Supervised Lender would typically employ the services of
a financial manager, an accountant, an attorney and an administrative
assistant when preparing a complete application for submission to
SBA.\8\ SBA did not receive comments on whether the number of hours
estimated to prepare a complete application is appropriate or on the
services they employ to complete the application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The cost estimate for a complete application is based on
hourly job position wages published by the U.S. Department of
Labor's Bureau of Labor Statistics for 2019 and increased by 100% to
account for benefits and overhead. The cost breakdown is as follows:
Financial Manager (30 hours times an hourly rate of $124.90) plus
Accountant (10 hours times an hourly rate of $68.80) plus Attorney
(5 hours times an hourly rate of $118.22) plus Administrative
Assistant (5 hours times an hourly rate of $36.24) equals $5,207.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBA anticipates that there will be some costs for SBA Supervised
Lenders related to the new minimum capital requirement under the rule.
This rule establishes a new minimum capital requirement for SBLCs and
NFRLs of at least $5 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Based on
information provided to SBA by SBA Supervised Lenders in quarterly
condition reports, 11 of the 14 SBLCs (i.e., 79 percent) have at least
$3.7 million in capital (and of those 11 SBLCs, 11 have more than $5
million in capital). In addition, 19 of the 22 NFRLs (i.e., 86 percent)
have more than $2.5 million in capital.
[[Page 78212]]
SBA has determined that there are seven small entities that will be
impacted by the new capital requirements in the rule. In other words, 7
of the 36 SBA Supervised Lenders that are considered small entities
will need to increase their capital to reach the new minimum capital
requirement of either $2.5 million or $5 million (as applicable). SBA
estimates the amount of capital that would need to be raised by these
small entities currently ranges between $1,270,000 and $3,580,000. SBA
estimates that this rule may have a significant economic impact on 6 of
the 36 SBA Supervised Lenders (i.e., 17 percent), each of which is
considered a small entity. As noted above, all existing SBA Supervised
Lenders will have 3 years from the effective date of a final rulemaking
to comply with this part of the rule (other than for transactions
involving a change of ownership or control of an SBA Supervised
Lender).
SBA estimates that the cost of raising capital for SBA Supervised
Lenders is approximately 9.8 percent of the amount of equity capital
raised based on the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM). The CAPM is one
of the most widely used pricing models by financial professionals and
considered the preferred method to estimate the cost of equity capital.
See Duff & Phelps 2019 Valuation Handbook--U.S. Industry Cost of
Capital (data through June 30, 2019).\9\ SBA estimates that the total
cost of raising new equity capital for the seven SBA Supervised Lenders
based on the requirements of the rule would range in amount from
approximately $124,000 to $350,000.\10\ However, the cost is mitigated
by the fact that under the rule SBA Supervised Lenders will have 3
years to increase their capital. Thus, the maximum amount that it would
cost an existing SBA Supervised Lender to reach the new minimum capital
requirement would be approximately $117,000 per year for 3 consecutive
years.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The 2019 Valuation Handbook--U.S. Industry Cost of Capital
published by Duff & Phelps provides cost of capital estimates for
approximately 170 industries identified by Standard Industrial
Classification codes (SIC). For purposes of estimating the cost of
raising equity capital for SBA Supervised Lenders, SBA used SIC code
61--non-depository credit institutions, which includes 21 companies
that are engaged primarily in extending credit in the form of loans
(but are not engaged in deposit banking). SBA compared the estimated
cost of raising capital cited above with other sources and found the
data to be similar.
\10\ The estimated cost to raise $1.27 million or $3.58 million
in equity capital would be as follows: $1,270,000 times 9.8% equals
$124,000; $3.58 million times 9.8% equals $350,000.
\11\ It should be noted that some existing SBA Supervised
Lenders may decide to increase their capital by retaining earnings
instead of raising new equity capital, which would reduce the cost
of this rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SBA determined that a 3-year time frame was a sufficient amount of
time for SBA Supervised Lenders to increase their capital. SBA
specifically requested comments on whether SBA Supervised Lenders
should have 3 years to comply with the new minimum capital requirements
under the proposed rule or should be required to comply sooner. The
majority of the commenters were generally supportive of at least a 3-
year time frame to meet the new minimum capital requirement.
The rule also limits the 7(a) lending area for NFRLs to the state
in which their primary state regulator is located, except that with SBA
approval it may include a local trade area that is contiguous to such
state (such as a city or metropolitan statistical area bisected by a
state line). There are currently 22 NFRLs participating in the 7(a)
Loan Program. During the last 3 fiscal years, 2 NFRLs (each of which is
considered a small entity) requested loan authorizations to make the
majority of their 7(a) loans outside of the state in which their
primary state regulator is located. Except for these two NFRLs,
approximately 90 percent of the lending within the 7(a) Loan Program
during the last 3 fiscal years was done in the state where the NFRL's
primary state regulator is located. Approximately 79 percent of all
7(a) loan approvals obtained by NFRLs during the last 3 fiscal years
were for loans to be made to small businesses located within their own
state. This part of the rule will not impact a substantial number of
small entities. It is important to note that this final rule will not
impose any restrictions regarding an NFRL's non-7(a) lending
activities. Therefore, the final rule will not have any impact on an
NFRL's ability to generate business by making other types of non-SBA
loans outside of its own state.
Most commenters did not support the limitation on 7(a) lending
areas for NFRLs. SBA considered the comments received and has agreed to
allow existing NFRLs one additional year to adjust to this portion of
the rule. Therefore, NFRLs currently engaged in 7(a) lending outside of
the state in which their primary regulator is located may continue to
make 7(a) loans on a nationwide basis (if permitted by their primary
state-regulator) for 1 year from the effective date of this final rule.
This additional one-year grace period will not apply to new
applications from NFRLs, including those that have engaged in and/or
are seeking approval of a change of ownership or control.
In summary, SBA estimates that the total cost to a particular SBA
Supervised Lender associated with this rule (including the costs
related to data collection) will range from zero to $356,683,
substantially all of which relates to the cost of raising capital and
may be spread over a 3-year time period.
4. What are the relevant Federal rules which may duplicate, overlap, or
conflict with the rule?
We are not aware of any Federal rules that duplicate, overlap or
conflict with this rule. SBA's SOP 50 10 will have to be amended to
conform to portions of this rule, which will be done separately.
5. What alternatives will allow the Agency to accomplish its regulatory
objectives while minimizing the impact on small entities?
The Agency originally considered imposing the new minimum capital
requirements for SBA Supervised Lenders immediately due to the risk
associated with their lending operations. SBA recognized, however, that
providing a 3-year period for SBA Supervised Lenders to increase their
capital would be less burdensome on lenders and their operational
plans. SBA took into consideration that some lenders may need time to
plan their capital raising efforts and negotiate favorable terms and
conditions for increasing their capital. The 3-year time period will
provide SBA Supervised Lenders with a sufficient amount of time to
raise new equity capital and an opportunity to increase capital by
retaining earnings (which will reduce the estimated overall cost of
raising such capital).
SBA believes many of the changes in this rule will benefit small
entities interested in becoming an SBA Supervised Lender by clarifying
areas in the application process where there was confusion and to make
the process more transparent. This rule will also allow SBA to evaluate
the qualifications of new applicants (including for change of ownership
or control transactions) more efficiently and make well-informed
decisions on SBA Supervised Lender applications. SBA believes this rule
encompasses best practice guidance that aligns with the Agency's
mission to increase access to capital for small businesses and
facilitate American job preservation and creation.
List of Subjects in 13 CFR Part 120
Community development, Equal employment opportunity, Loan
programs--business, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Small
businesses.
[[Page 78213]]
For the reasons stated in the preamble, SBA is amending 13 CFR part
120 as follows:
PART 120--BUSINESS LOANS
0
1. The authority for 13 CFR part 120 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 15 U.S.C. 634(b) (6), (b) (7), (b) (14), (h), and
note, 636(a), (h) and (m), and note, 650, 657t, and note, 657u, and
note, 687(f), 696(3) and (7), and note, and 697(a) and (e), and
note.
Sec. 120.410 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 120.410 in paragraph (a)(1) by removing the phrase ``for
SBLCs, meeting its SBA minimum capital requirement; and for NFRLs,
meeting its state minimum capital requirement); and'', and adding in
its place the phrase, ``and for SBLCs and NFRLs, meeting their
respective minimum capital requirement); and''.
0
3. Amend Sec. 120.460 by adding paragraphs (c) and (d) to read as
follows:
Sec. 120.460 What are SBA's additional requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders?
* * * * *
(c) An SBA Supervised Lender must have qualified full-time
professional management including, but not limited to, a chief
executive officer or the equivalent to manage daily operations, and a
chief credit/risk officer. An SBA Supervised Lender must also have at
least one other part-time professional employee (which may be a shared
employee of the lender's affiliates) qualified by training and
experience to carry out its business plan. An SBA Supervised Lender is
expected to sustain a sufficient level of lending activity in its
lending area, which means obtaining at least four 7(a) loan approvals
during two consecutive fiscal years. This paragraph only applies to SBA
Supervised Lenders that make or acquire a 7(a) loan after January 4,
2021, or to any SBA Supervised Lender approved after such date,
including in the event of a change of ownership or control of an SBA
Supervised Lender.
(d) An NFRL may only make or acquire 7(a) loans in the state in
which its primary state regulator is located, except that an NFRL's
lending area may include a local trade area that is contiguous to such
state (e.g., a city or metropolitan statistical area that is bisected
by a state line) if the NFRL receives SBA's prior written approval.
This paragraph applies to all NFRLs on or after January 4, 2021,
including in the event of approval of a new NFRL or a change of
ownership or control of an NFRL; provided however, that if SBA has
approved any NFRL to make 7(a) loans out of their state, then this
paragraph will apply on or after January 4, 2022.
0
4. Amend Sec. 120.462 by:
0
a. Removing the phrase ``by state regulators'' wherever it appears and
adding in its place the phrase ``in Sec. 120.462(a)(1)'';
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (a) through (e) as paragraphs (b) through
(f); and
0
c. Adding a new paragraph (a).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 120.462 What are SBA's additional requirements on capital
maintenance for SBA Supervised Lenders?
(a) Minimum capital requirements--(1) For NFRLs. (i) Beginning on
January 4, 2024, each NFRL that makes or acquires a 7(a) loan must
maintain the minimum capital required by its state regulator, or
$2,500,000, whichever is greater.
(ii) Any NFRL approved on or after January 4, 2021, including in
the event of a change of ownership or control, must maintain the
minimum capital requirement set forth in paragraph (a)(1)(i) of this
section.
(iii) Unless subject to paragraph (a)(1)(i) or (ii) of this
section, an NFRL must comply with the minimum capital requirements for
NFRLs that were in effect on January 3, 2021.
(2) For SBLCs. For information on minimum capital requirements for
SBLCs, see Sec. 120.471.
* * * * *
0
5. Add Sec. 120.466 to read as follows:
Sec. 120.466 SBA Supervised Lender application.
An entity seeking to participate as an SBA Supervised Lender must
apply to SBA. SBA evaluates SBA Supervised Lender applicants through an
initial review and final review, as follows:
(a) Initial review. SBA Supervised Lender applicants must submit a
written plan containing information about the organization and its
current and proposed lending activities (``Lender Assessment Plan'').
After SBA's review of the Lender Assessment Plan, the Office of Capital
Access may require an interview with the applicant and its management
team. SBA will determine, in its sole discretion, whether an applicant
may proceed to the final review. If SBA determines that an applicant
may not proceed to the final review, the applicant must wait at least 6
months before it may submit a new Lender Assessment Plan. Each
applicant must demonstrate to SBA's satisfaction that it meets the
ethical requirements and the participation criteria set forth in 13 CFR
120.140 and 120.410. The Lender Assessment Plan must include the
following items:
(1) The legal name, address, telephone number and email address of
the applicant;
(2) Business plan, detailing the applicant's proposed lending area
and the volume of loan activity projected over the next 3 years
(supported by current and projected balance sheets, income statements
and statements of cash flows);
(3) Capitalization (current and proposed), including the form of
organization and the identification of all debt and classes of equity
capital and proposed funding amounts, including any rights or
preferences accorded to such interests (e.g., voting rights, redemption
rights and rights of convertibility) and any conditions for the
transfer, sale or assignment of such interests;
(4) A list of all members of the applicant's management team,
including the applicant's officers, directors, managers and key
employees, as well as the applicant's owners, Associates (as defined in
Sec. 120.10) and Affiliates (as defined in Sec. 121.103 of this
chapter);
(5) A written summary of the professional experience (including any
prior experience with any SBA program) of the applicant's management
team (including key employees);
(6) In connection with any application to become an SBLC, the
applicant must include a letter agreement signed by an authorized
official of an existing SBLC certifying that the SBLC is seeking to
transfer its SBA lending authority to the applicant; and
(7) If approval of any state or Federal chartering, licensing or
other regulatory authority is required, copies of any licenses issued
by or documents filed with such authority.
(b) Final review. Each applicant that receives notice from SBA in
writing that it may proceed to the final review must submit a complete
application to SBA within 90 calendar days. The application
requirements for SBA Supervised Lenders are set forth in official SBA
policy and procedures. An incomplete application submitted to SBA will
not be processed and will be returned to the applicant. SBA may, in its
sole discretion, approve or deny any SBA Supervised Lender application.
The decision to approve or deny an SBA Supervised Lender application is
a final agency decision. If an SBA Supervised Lender application is
denied by SBA or if a complete application is not timely submitted, the
applicant may not submit a new Lender Assessment Plan and restart the
application process until 12 months from the date of denial or the
[[Page 78214]]
date a complete application was due to SBA, as applicable.
(c) NFRL operating and lending experience requirement. For an
entity seeking to become an NFRL, evidence of at least 1 year of
current operating and relevant commercial lending experience by the
entity must be provided.
0
6. Add Sec. 120.467 to read as follows:
Sec. 120.467 Evaluation of SBA Supervised Lender applicants.
(a) SBA will evaluate an SBA Supervised Lender applicant based on
information from, among other sources, the Lender Assessment Plan, an
interview with the applicant's management team (if required), the
application and any other documentation submitted by the applicant, the
results of background investigations, public record searches and due
diligence conducted by SBA or other Federal or state agencies. SBA's
evaluation will consider factors such as the following:
(1) Professional qualifications of its management team (including
key employees), including demonstrated commercial lending experience,
business reputation, adherence to legal and ethical standards, track
record in making and monitoring business loans, and prior history, if
any, working as an officer, manager, director or key employee of a
lender involved in any SBA program or any other Federal or state
lending program.
(2) Historical performance measures of loans originated by the
applicant or attributable to its management team (including key
employees), including loan default rates, purchase rates and loss
rates, measured in both percentage terms and in comparison to
appropriate industry benchmarks, review/examination assessments and
other performance measures.
(3) The applicant's capitalization, organizational structure,
business plan (including any risk factors), projected financial
performance, financial strength, liquidity, the soundness of its
financial projections and underlying assumptions, loan underwriting
process, operations plan and the history of compliance of the applicant
and its management team (including key employees) with SBA Loan Program
Requirements.
(4) Whether the NFRL's state regulator and the state statute or
regulations governing the NFRL's operations, including but not limited
to those pertaining to audit, examination, supervision, enforcement and
information sharing, are satisfactory to SBA in its sole discretion.
(5) For changes of ownership or control, in addition to the factors
listed in paragraphs (a)(1) through (4) of this section, SBA will
consider whether the applicant's plan for the resolution of any
outstanding monetary liabilities to SBA, including repairs and denials
and civil monetary penalties, is acceptable to SBA in its sole
discretion.
(b) SBA may prohibit any individual or entity from participating as
an officer, director, manager, owner or key employee of the applicant
if such individual or entity:
(1) Has a previous record of failing to materially comply with SBA
Loan Program Requirements;
(2) Previously participated in a material way with any past or
present SBA Lender or Intermediary that failed to maintain satisfactory
SBA performance;
(3) Previously defaulted on any Federal loan or Federally assisted
financing that resulted in the Federal Government or any of its
agencies or departments sustaining a loss in any of its programs; or
(4) Ever failed to pay when due any debt or obligation, including
any amounts in dispute, to the Federal Government or guaranteed by the
Federal Government (including but not limited to taxes or business or
student loans).
0
7. Add Sec. 120.468 to read as follows:
Sec. 120.468 Change of ownership or control requirements for SBA
Supervised Lenders.
(a) SBA prior approval required. Any change of ownership or control
of an SBA Supervised Lender without SBA's prior written approval is
prohibited. Prior to entering into any agreement, other than a non-
binding letter of intent, for a change of ownership or control, SBA
Supervised Lenders must receive SBA's prior written approval from the
appropriate SBA official in accordance with the prevailing Delegations
of Authority. An SBA Supervised Lender may not register proposed new
owners on its books and records or permit them to participate in any
manner in the conduct of the SBA Supervised Lender's affairs unless
approved in writing by SBA. Any type of non-binding letter of intent
regarding a prospective change of ownership or control must be reported
to SBA within 30 calendar days. A change of ownership or control
includes the following:
(1) Any transfer(s) (direct or indirect) of 10 percent or more of
any class of the SBA Supervised Lender's stock or ownership interests
(or series of transfers which, in the aggregate over an 18 month
period, equals 10 percent or more), or any agreement providing for such
transfer;
(2) Any transfer(s) (direct or indirect) that could result in the
beneficial ownership by any person or group of persons acting in
concert of 10 percent or more of any class of the SBA Supervised
Lender's stock or ownership interests, or any agreement providing for
such transfer(s);
(3) Any merger, consolidation, or reorganization;
(4) Any other transaction or agreement that transfers control of an
SBA Supervised Lender; or
(5) Any other transaction or event that results in any change in
the possession (direct or indirect) of the right to control, or the
power to direct or cause the direction of, the management or policies
of an SBA Supervised Lender, whether through the ownership of voting
securities, by contract or otherwise.
(b) Approval required by other regulatory authorities. If a change
of ownership or control of an SBA Supervised Lender is subject to the
approval of any state or Federal chartering, licensing or other
regulatory authority, copies of any documents filed with such authority
must, at the same time, be transmitted to the appropriate SBA official
in accordance with the prevailing Delegations of Authority. The
approval of any state or Federal authority will be required in addition
to SBA's prior written approval.
(c) Application requirements for changes of ownership or control.
An applicant must submit a Lender Assessment Plan and a new application
in accordance with Sec. 120.466 for any change of ownership or
control. If a proposed change of ownership is for less than 50 percent
of the ownership interests in an SBA Supervised Lender, SBA may, in its
sole discretion, limit the requirements of the Lender Assessment Plan
or the complete application as set forth in official SBA policy and
procedures.
(d) Voluntary surrender of SBA lending authority. An SBA Supervised
Lender may voluntarily surrender its SBA lending authority (including
its SBLC license or NFRL lending authority, as applicable) and withdraw
as a participating Lender with SBA's prior written approval. The SBA
Supervised Lender must agree to transfer its entire 7(a) loan portfolio
to one or more Lenders acceptable to SBA in accordance with Sec.
120.432(a), and enter into a withdrawal agreement to resolve any
outstanding issues, including any outstanding monetary liabilities, to
SBA's satisfaction. SBA may, in its sole discretion, take over the
[[Page 78215]]
servicing of an SBA Supervised Lender's 7(a) loan portfolio in
accordance with Sec. 120.535(d) upon the voluntary surrender of its
SBA lending authority.
Sec. 120.470 [Amended]
0
8. Amend Sec. 120.470 by removing paragraph (g) and redesignating
paragraph (h) as paragraph (g).
0
9. Amend Sec. 120.471 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (a);
0
b. Redesignating paragraphs (b)(3) through (5) as paragraphs (b)(4)
through (6) respectively; and
0
c. Adding new paragraph (b)(3).
The revision and addition to read as follows:
Sec. 120.471 What are the minimum capital requirements for SBLCs?
(a) Minimum capital requirements. (1) Beginning on January 4, 2024,
each SBLC that makes or acquires a 7(a) loan must maintain, at a
minimum, unencumbered paid-in capital and paid-in surplus of at least
$5,000,000, or 10 percent of the aggregate of its share of all
outstanding loans, whichever is greater.
(2) Any SBLC approved on or after January 4, 2021, including in the
event of a change of ownership or control, must maintain the minimum
capital requirement set forth in paragraph (a)(1) of this section.
(3) Unless subject to paragraph (a)(1) or (2) of this section, an
SBLC must comply with the minimum capital requirements that were in
effect on January 3, 2021.
(b) * * *
(3) Unrestricted net assets (for non-profit corporations);
* * * * *
Sec. 120.475 [Removed and Reserved]
0
10. Remove and reserve Sec. 120.475.
Jovita Carranza,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020-26307 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P