Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands, 78038-78045 [2020-26593]
Download as PDF
78038
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
demonstrates its behavioral flexibility to
variable environmental conditions.
Additionally, regulatory mechanisms
such as the California Endangered
Species Act (CESA) and local
ordinances are currently acting to
ameliorate the severity of some existing
threats, such as the take of individuals,
degradation of tributary streams, and
loss of wetland habitat surrounding
Clear Lake. Furthermore, the SSA
presented three plausible future
scenarios, which included various states
of potential future conditions for the
species. Our analysis of these scenarios
indicates that the Clear Lake hitch will
maintain its current resiliency,
representation, or redundancy, or
undergo only a slight decrease in
condition into the foreseeable future.
Even under a projection of a slight
decrease in future condition, the Clear
Lake hitch was not projected to be in
danger of extinction in the next 50
years.
Therefore, we find that listing the
Clear Lake hitch as an endangered or
threatened species under the Act is not
warranted at this time. A detailed
discussion of the basis for this finding
can be found in the Clear Lake hitch
species assessment form and other
supporting documents (see ADDRESSES,
above).
New Information
We request that you submit any new
information concerning the taxonomy
of, biology of, ecology of, status of, or
stressors to the Doll’s daisy, Puget
Oregonian, Rocky Mountain
monkeyflower, southern white-tailed
ptarmigan, tidewater amphipod, tufted
puffin, Hamlin Valley pyrg, longitudinal
gland pyrg, sub-globose snake pyrg, the
Johnson Springs Wetland Complex
population of relict dace, or Clear Lake
hitch to the appropriate person, as
specified under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT, whenever it
becomes available. New information
will help us monitor these species and
make appropriate decisions about their
conservation and status. We encourage
local agencies and stakeholders to
continue cooperative monitoring and
conservation efforts.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
References Cited
A list of the references cited in this
petition finding is available on the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov
in the appropriate docket provided
above in ADDRESSES and upon request
from the appropriate person, as
specified under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
Authors
The primary authors of this document
are the staff members of the Species
Assessment Team, Ecological Services
Program.
Authority
The authority for this action is section
4 of the Endangered Species Act of
1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.).
Aurelia Skipwith,
Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–26139 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 201125–0321]
RIN 0648–BJ59
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic
Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod in the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
National Marine Fisheries
Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule modifies
Federal permit conditions and imposes
participation requirements for certain
federally permitted vessels when fishing
for Pacific cod in state waters adjacent
to the exclusive economic zone of the
Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands during
the State of Alaska’s parallel Pacific cod
fishery. This action is necessary to
enhance Federal conservation,
management, and catch accounting
measures previously adopted by the
North Pacific Fishery Management
Council (Council) regarding license
limitation, sector allocations, and catch
reporting. This action is intended to
promote the goals and objectives of the
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery
Conservation and Management Act, the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands Management Area, and
other applicable law.
DATES: Effective January 4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the
Categorical Exclusion and the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR)
prepared for this action (referred to as
the ‘‘Analysis’’) are available from
https://www.regulations.gov or from the
NMFS Alaska Region website at https://
www/fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kurt
Iverson, 907–586–7210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish
fisheries in the U.S. exclusive economic
zone (EEZ) of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands (BSAI) under the
Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the BSAI Management
Area (FMP). The Council prepared, and
NMFS approved, the FMP under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens
Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Regulations governing U.S. fisheries and
implementing the FMP appear at 50
CFR part 679. General regulations that
pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at
subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.
NMFS published the proposed rule
for these regulatory amendments in the
Federal Register on September 18, 2020
(85 FR 58322). A summary of comments
on the proposed rule and NMFS’
responses are provided in the
Comments and Responses section of this
preamble.
Summary of This Action
In this rule, NMFS modifies Federal
permit conditions and imposes
participation requirements for certain
federally permitted vessels when fishing
for Pacific cod in State of Alaska waters
(state waters) adjacent to the Exclusive
Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Bering Sea
and Aleutian Islands (BSAI). The state
waters portion of the Pacific cod fishery
that runs concurrent with the Federal
Pacific cod fishery is commonly known
as the State’s parallel fishery.
Throughout this preamble, ‘‘state
waters’’ refers to the maritime waters
from 0 to 3 nautical miles off Alaska,
and ‘‘EEZ’’ and ‘‘Federal waters’’ are
used interchangeably and refer to the
maritime waters from 3 to 200 nautical
miles off Alaska. In addition, ‘‘parallel
fisheries’’ in this preamble refers to the
state waters Pacific cod parallel fisheries
in the State of Alaska Bering SeaAleutian Islands Area, which presently
is in the Dutch Harbor Subdistrict of the
Bering Sea and within the Aleutian
Islands Subdistrict of the Aleutian
Islands, respectively.
This rule prohibits (1) a hook-andline, pot, or trawl gear vessel named on
a Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP) or
License Limitation Program (LLP)
license from being used to catch and
retain BSAI Pacific cod in State of
Alaska (State) waters adjacent to the
BSAI during the State’s parallel Pacific
cod fishery unless the vessel is named
on an FFP and LLP license that have the
required endorsements; (2) a hook-and-
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
line, pot, or trawl gear vessel named on
an FFP or LLP license from catching and
retaining Pacific cod in state waters
adjacent to the BSAI EEZ during the
State’s parallel fishery when NMFS has
closed the EEZ to directed fishing for
Pacific cod by the sector to which the
vessel belongs; (3) the holder of an FFP
with certain endorsements from
modifying those endorsements during
the effective period of the FFP; and (4)
the reissuance of a surrendered FFP
with certain endorsements for the
remainder of the three-year term, or
cycle, of FFPs.
Summary of Management of the Fishery
This section briefly describes the
Federal BSAI Pacific cod fishery,
including the Pacific cod fisheries that
occur in BSAI state waters. More
detailed descriptions, including a
review of this rule and the rationale for
the regulations, are provided in the
preamble to the proposed rule (85 FR
58322, September 18, 2020) and in the
Analysis (see ADDRESSES).
Vessels that harvest Pacific cod in the
BSAI use both trawl and non-trawl gear.
Non-trawl gear includes hook-and-line,
jig, and pot gear. Additionally, BSAI
Pacific cod vessels operate as catcher
vessels that harvest and deliver the fish
for processing, or as catcher processors
that harvest and process the catch on
board. The amount of BSAI Pacific cod
available for commercial harvest is
determined through an annual harvest
specifications process (e.g., 83 FR
13553, March 9, 2020). This process
accounts for Pacific cod harvested in
guideline harvest level (GHL) fisheries
that occur only within state waters and
are managed by the State of Alaska.
After deducting for harvests in the GHL
fisheries, Pacific cod Total Allowable
Catches (TACs) are set for the Federal
fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands subareas.
Once the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands TACs are established,
regulations at § 679.20(a)(7)(i) allocate
10.7 percent of the Bering Sea Pacific
cod TAC and 10.7 percent of the
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod TAC to the
Community Development Quota (CDQ)
Program for exclusive harvest by
Western Alaska CDQ groups. Section
305(i) of the MSA specifies the methods
for allocating these harvest privileges.
Once allocated, CDQ groups must
ensure that they do not exceed their
allocations.
78039
The portion that remains after
subtraction of the CDQ allocation from
each TAC is the initial TAC (ITAC) for
the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands.
NMFS combines the Bering Sea ITAC
and the Aleutian Islands ITAC into one,
BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC. This
combined BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod
TAC is then allocated among, and
available for harvest by, nine non-CDQ
fishery sectors. Regulations at
§ 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A) define the nine nonCDQ fishery sectors and specify the
percentage of the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific
cod TAC allocated to each. The nonCDQ fishery sectors are defined by a
combination of gear type (e.g., trawl,
hook-and-line), operation type (i.e.,
catcher vessel or catcher/processor), and
vessel size categories (e.g., vessels
greater than or equal to 60 feet (ft) in
length overall or less than 60 ft in length
overall). Through the annual harvest
specifications process, NMFS allocates
an amount of the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific
cod TAC to each of the nine non-CDQ
fishery sectors. The nine non-CDQ
fishery sectors and the percentage of the
BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC
allocated to each sector are shown in
Table 1 below.
TABLE 1—ALLOCATIONS OF THE BSAI NON-CDQ PACIFIC COD TAC TO THE NON-CDQ FISHERY SECTORS
Percentage
allocation of
the BSAI
non-CDQ TAC
Non-CDQ fishery sector
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Hook-and-line catcher vessels greater than or equal to 60 ft length overall (LOA) ...........................................................................
Jig gear ................................................................................................................................................................................................
Pot catcher/processors ........................................................................................................................................................................
Hook-and-line and pot catcher vessels less than 60 ft LOA ..............................................................................................................
American Fisheries Act (AFA) trawl catcher/processors .....................................................................................................................
Pot catcher vessels greater than or equal to 60 ft LOA .....................................................................................................................
Non-AFA trawl catcher/processors (Amendment 80 catcher/processors) ..........................................................................................
Trawl catcher vessels ..........................................................................................................................................................................
Hook-and-line catcher processors .......................................................................................................................................................
NMFS manages each of the fishery
sectors to ensure harvest of Pacific cod
does not exceed the sector’s annual
allocation. NMFS monitors harvests that
occur by vessels being used to conduct
directed fishing for Pacific cod (that is,
participants who are specifically
targeting and retaining Pacific cod above
specific threshold levels) and harvests
that occur by vessels being used to
conduct directed fishing for other
species and incidentally catching
Pacific cod (e.g., the incidental catch of
Pacific cod in the directed pollock
fishery). Section 679.2 provides the
regulatory definition of ‘‘directed
fishing.’’ For the non-AFA trawl
catcher/processor sector, also known as
the Amendment 80 sector, NMFS
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
allocates exclusive harvest privileges to
participants within that sector that
cannot be exceeded. For the other nonCDQ fishery sectors, NMFS carefully
tracks both directed and incidental
catch of Pacific cod. An allocation to a
non-CDQ fishery sector may be
harvested in either the Bering Sea or the
Aleutian Islands, subject to the Pacific
cod ITAC specified for the Bering Sea or
the Aleutian Islands. NMFS takes
appropriate management measures,
such as closing directed fishing for a
fishery sector, to ensure that total
directed fishing and incidental fishing
harvests do not exceed that sector’s
allocation. Section 2.7 of the Analysis
describes NMFS’ management of the
non-CDQ fishery sectors.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
0.2
1.4
1.5
2.0
2.3
8.4
13.4
22.1
48.7
Allocations of Pacific cod to the CDQ
Program and to the non-CDQ fishery
sectors are further apportioned by
season dates established at
§ 679.23(e)(5). In general, regulations
apportion CDQ and non-CDQ fishery
sector allocations among three seasons
that correspond to the early (A-season),
middle (B-season), and late (C-season)
portions of the year. The specific season
dates established for the CDQ Program
and each of the non-CDQ fishery sectors
were provided in the final 2020 and
2021 harvest specifications for
groundfish of the BSAI (83 FR 13553,
March 9, 2020). Depending on the
specific CDQ Program or non-CDQ
fishery sector allocation, between 40
percent and 70 percent of the Pacific
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
78040
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
cod allocations are apportioned to the
A-season, historically the most lucrative
fishing season due to the presence of
valuable roe in the fish and the good
quality of the flesh during that time of
year.
The allocation of Pacific cod among
the CDQ Program and the nine non-CDQ
fishery sectors, as well as the seasonal
apportionment of those allocations,
create a large number of distinct sector
and season allocations. The regulations
allow NMFS to reallocate (rollover) any
unused portion of a seasonal
apportionment from any non-CDQ
fishery sector (except the jig sector) to
that sector’s next season during the
current fishing year, unless the Regional
Administrator determines a non-CDQ
fishery sector will not be able to harvest
its allocation (see § 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B)).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Permits and Licenses
To monitor compliance with harvest
catch limits, prohibited species (nonretained) catch limits, and sideboard
regulations that limit participation in
other fisheries, NMFS requires various
permits that authorize or restrict access
to the groundfish fisheries in the
Federal waters of the BSAI. The two
most relevant permits associated with
this final rule are FFPs and LLP
licenses.
1. Federal Fisheries Permit
All vessels that retain BSAI Pacific
cod in the EEZ are required to have an
FFP on board the vessel at all times
(§ 679.4(b)(1)). An FFP authorizes a
vessel owner to deploy a vessel to
conduct fishing operations in the EEZ of
the BSAI in accordance with the
endorsements on the FFP. An FFP
includes many endorsements, such as
type of gear (e.g., pot, hook-and-line,
and trawl), vessel operation category
(catcher vessel, catcher/processor,
mothership, tender vessel, or support
vessel), and regulatory area of operation
(e.g., BSAI) in which a permitted vessel
is eligible to fish. In some fisheries, a
species endorsement is also required.
For example, the owners and operators
of harvesting vessels that participate in
the directed BSAI Pacific cod fisheries,
except vessels using jig gear, are
required to have an FFP endorsement
for Pacific cod, along with
endorsements for the gear type used to
fish for Pacific cod, the vessel operation
type, and the regulatory area(s) in which
the fishery is prosecuted. All CDQ
vessels and all non-jig vessels listed in
Table 1 are required to have an FFP
onboard that is endorsed for Pacific cod.
A vessel may not be operated in a
category other than what is specified on
the FFP.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
The operators of harvesting vessels
that possess an FFP are required to
comply with NMFS observer coverage
requirements (§ 679.50(a)). In addition,
FFP holders participating in a pollock,
Atka mackerel, or Pacific cod fishery in
the BSAI are required to have on board
the vessel a transmitting vessel
monitoring system (VMS)
(§ 679.28(f)(6)). A VMS consists of a
NMFS-approved transmitter that
automatically determines a vessel’s
position and transmits that information
to NMFS. While Pacific cod directed
fisheries are open, all harvesting vessels
with an FFP endorsed with a hook-andline, pot, or trawl Pacific cod
endorsement are required to have an
operational VMS, regardless of where
the vessel is fishing at the time or what
the vessel is targeting. Thus, a VMS is
required of all vessels with an FFP
endorsed for Pacific cod hook-and-line,
pot, or trawl gear while fishing in state
waters (0 to 3 nm) adjacent to the BSAI.
However, because these Federal
requirements apply as a condition of
being issued an FFP, operators of
vessels that have not been issued an FFP
and that fish exclusively in state waters
are not required to possess an FFP or
have an FFP on board the vessel, and
such vessels are not subject to Federal
observer, VMS, or recordkeeping and
reporting requirements unless specified
by the State.
FFPs are valid for three years and,
unless revoked, suspended, or
surrendered, are in effect from the date
of issuance through the end of the threeyear cycle. The current cycle of FFPs
issued for vessels that operate in Alaska
waters is January 1, 2018, through
December 31, 2020. A vessel operator
with an FFP can surrender the permit at
any time and have NMFS reissue the
FFP any number of times within the
three-year cycle.
While any vessel owner can apply for
an FFP with any combination of vessel
operation, area, gear, or species
endorsements, an FFP, by itself, does
not necessarily authorize the FFP holder
or the vessel named on the FFP to
participate in the Federal Pacific cod
fisheries. Most of the vessels that are
used to participate in the Federal Pacific
cod fisheries in the BSAI are also are
required to have a groundfish LLP
license.
2. License Limitation Program (LLP)
License
A groundfish LLP license authorizes a
vessel to be used in a directed fishery
for groundfish in the BSAI in
accordance with the specific area and
species endorsements, the vessel and
gear designations, the maximum length
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
overall (MLOA) specified on the license,
and any exemption from the MLOA
specified on the license. Most vessel
operators fishing for groundfish in the
BSAI must have an LLP license on
board at all times when the vessel is
engaged in fishing activities (§ 679.4(k)).
LLP licenses are issued by NMFS to
qualified persons. Exemptions to the
LLP license requirement in the BSAI are
listed at § 679.4(k)(2), including an
exemption for any vessel that does not
exceed 32 ft (9.8 m) length overall
(LOA), and an exemption for jig vessels
less than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA
that use a maximum of 5 jig machines,
one line per jig machine, and a
maximum of 15 hooks per line.
In order to participate in the BSAI
Pacific cod fisheries, several
endorsements are required to be
specified on an LLP license, such as
vessel operation type, area, gear
designation, and maximum length
overall (MLOA). The endorsements for
operation type on LLP licenses are
either catcher vessel or catcher/
processor. A catcher vessel endorsement
allows a vessel to harvest but not
process fish on board. A catcher/
processor endorsement allows both
harvesting and onboard processing, and
also allows a vessel to deliver the catch
to a separate processor. Area
endorsements on BSAI groundfish LLP
licenses authorize a vessel to fish in
either the Bering Sea, the Aleutian
Islands, or both areas. Gear
endorsements for BSAI groundfish LLP
licenses are either for trawl, non-trawl,
or both gear types. For groundfish
vessels with non-trawl endorsed
licenses, NMFS implemented
regulations in 2002 that require a Pacific
cod endorsement for hook-and-line and
pot gear LLP licenses on catcher/
processor vessels and catcher vessels
that are 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA or greater
and that are used to participate in the
BSAI Pacific cod fisheries (67 FR 18130,
April 15, 2002). Catcher vessels less
than 60 ft (18.3 m) are exempt from the
required Pacific cod endorsement on
their LLP license.
Groundfish LLP licenses also identify
whether the license is associated with
the Amendment 80, American Fisheries
Act, or Gulf of Alaska Rockfish license
limitation programs. BSAI groundfish
LLP licenses further specify whether the
license is restricted by regulatory
sideboards from being used in other
fisheries.
In general, a vessel is authorized to
use only the gear that is designated on
the LLP license. Unlike the FFP, the
endorsements on an LLP license are not
generally severable and an LLP license,
with its associated endorsements, can be
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
reassigned to a different vessel only
once per year. Like FFPs, operators of
vessels that have not been issued an LLP
license and that fish exclusively in state
waters fisheries are not required to
comply with Federal requirements for
LLP licenses.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
BSAI State Waters Pacific Cod Fisheries
As mentioned above, catch limits for
the Federal Pacific cod fisheries include
the sum of harvests that come from
BSAI Federal waters and from the
concurrent state parallel Pacific cod
fisheries. Under the authority of Alaska
statutes and regulations, the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G)
manages two parallel Pacific cod
fisheries and three GHL fisheries in the
state waters adjacent to the BSAI EEZ.
Two of the GHL fisheries are held in the
State’s Dutch Harbor Subdistrict of the
Bering Sea; the third is within the
Aleutian Islands Subdistrict of the
Aleutian Islands.
Parallel Pacific Cod Fisheries
During the Federal BSAI Pacific cod
fisheries in the EEZ, the State creates
concurrent, or parallel, Pacific cod
fisheries in state waters by generally
adopting NMFS management actions for
state waters. The initial Federal BSAI
Pacific cod season (‘‘A-Season’’) opens
January 1 for vessels using hook-andline, pot, and jig gear, and January 20 for
vessels using trawl gear. Unless
specifically prohibited by State
regulation, (e.g., nonpelagic trawl gear is
prohibited in state waters by 5 AAC
39.164 (4)), the State authorizes the
same gear types, seasons, and bycatch
limits that apply in the adjacent Federal
BSAI Pacific cod season during a
parallel fishery. In addition, during
these State parallel Pacific cod fisheries,
vessels using longline gear may not
exceed 58 feet in overall length (OAL)
(5 AAC 28.690(c)). Except for vessels
using mechanical jigging machines,
State regulations require all vessels that
participate in a parallel Pacific cod
fishery to have an activated VMS (5
AAC 28.087(c)).
Although the State adopts many of the
management measures applicable to
vessels participating in the Federal
BSAI Pacific cod fisheries in the EEZ,
the State does not require vessels that
participate in the State’s parallel Pacific
cod fisheries to possess an FFP or an
LLP license. Effective January 1, 2012,
NMFS implemented regulations at
§ 679.7 that prohibit federally permitted
catcher/processor pot and catcher/
processor hook-and-line vessels from
being used to catch and retain Pacific
cod in state waters during the State’s
parallel fisheries unless the vessel is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
designated on an FFP and an LLP
license that have the required
endorsements (76 FR 73513, November
29, 2011). Additionally, regulations at
§ 679.7 require Federal permit holders
who operate vessels in these two
catcher/processor sectors to adhere to
the Federal BSAI Pacific cod opening
and closing periods when they
participate in the State’s parallel
fisheries. At this time, vessels in other
non-CDQ fishery sectors may participate
in the State’s Pacific cod parallel
fisheries without having an FFP, an LLP
license, and endorsements necessary to
participate in the Federal fishery.
As mentioned above, Pacific cod
harvested during the State’s parallel
fisheries accrue toward the Federal
Pacific cod TAC. The State closes a
parallel Pacific cod fishery by gear
sector when NMFS determines the TAC
for a Federal fishery sector using that
gear type has been reached or when
incidental species allowances are met.
Section 2.7 of the Analysis and the
preamble to the proposed rule provide
specific details on the number of vessels
that have participated in the State’s
BSAI Pacific cod parallel fisheries, by
vessel sector, over the 2010–2019
period. For all sectors combined, the
total number of participating vessels in
the BSAI Pacific cod parallel fisheries
has ranged from 13 to 39 vessels per
year. The proportion of Pacific cod that
those vessels have caught in state waters
during the concurrent BSAI Federal
waters and State parallel fisheries varies
by sector, but for all sectors combined
has ranged from 2 percent to 5 percent
of their total BSAI Pacific cod catch over
the 2010–2019 period.
GHL Fisheries
State GHL fisheries for Pacific cod are
also prosecuted in state waters, but
occur when fishing by specific Pacific
cod sectors in the Federal and parallel
fisheries is closed. The State currently
manages GHL fisheries adjacent to both
the BSAI subareas. The GHL fisheries
may re-open and close as needed to
coordinate with Federal fishery
openings.
The Alaska Board of Fisheries (BOF)
established the Dutch Harbor
Subdistrict (DHS) state waters Pacific
cod GHL fishery in 2013 (5 AAC
28.648). Pot and jig gear are the only
legal gear types. In the Aleutian Islands
Subdistrict GHL fishery (5 AAC 28.647),
state regulations allow trawl, longline,
pot, and jig gear vessels. More
information on the GHL fisheries in the
Dutch Harbor and Aleutian Islands
Subdistricts can be found in section 2.6
of the Analysis and in the preamble to
the proposed rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78041
Need for this Action
This final rule prohibits some
federally permitted vessels from fishing
for Pacific cod in the State of Alaska’s
parallel fisheries in the BSAI. Under
current regulations, Federal FFPs and
LLP licenses are only required for
fishing activity in the EEZ. As a result,
some vessels without an FFP or LLP
license, and other vessels that have an
FFP but with an LLP license that is not
endorsed for Pacific cod fishing in the
adjacent BSAI Federal waters, have
participated in the State’s parallel
fisheries. Additionally, the State is
legally constrained from allocating
resources within a single fishery, and as
a result does not recognize sector
allocations based on operation types,
such as catcher vessel versus catcher/
processor designations. This
circumstance has inadvertently allowed
fishing in the State parallel fisheries by
catcher vessels even when the Federal
fishery sector for those vessels has fully
achieved its Federal Pacific cod
allocation. This has been most common
among hook-and-line vessels. The
Council determined, and NMFS agrees,
that this fishing activity has negative
effects on the Federal management
regime for BSAI Pacific cod and must be
curtailed to maintain the conservation
and management benefits intended by
the Council and implemented by NMFS.
For example, the Federal Pacific cod
seasons for the hook-and-line catcher/
processor sector typically remain open
to directed fishing for much of the year,
whereas the seasons for hook-and-line
catcher vessel sectors, which fish under
much smaller allocations, normally
close earlier in the year. Because the
State does not recognize sector
allocations based on operation types,
the State parallel Pacific cod fishery
remains open for much of the year, so
long as the Federal catcher/processor
hook-and-line season is open. Therefore,
when the catcher vessel hook-and-line
allocation has been achieved, and
NMFS closes that sector’s season in
Federal waters, some of those vessels
have continued to fish for Pacific cod in
state waters. When this has occurred,
NMFS has been obligated to reallocate
Pacific cod from other sectors to prevent
overharvest of the area TAC. The
Council determined that this
complicates Federal conservation and
management measures that are intended
to hold sectors to their allocations and
it also undermines the intent of
previous Council decisions regarding
license limitation, sector allocations,
and catch reporting.
When evaluating these issues, the
Council also considered the terms under
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
78042
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
which FFPs are issued. Under current
regulations, an FFP is issued in a threeyear cycle, but within that period, a
vessel operator can surrender the FFP at
any time, then reapply for a reissuance
of the permit any number of times
within the three-year cycle. This would
provide an opportunity for vessel
operators to avoid the prohibitions in
this rule. Lengthening the amount of
time that must pass between the period
when a person surrenders an FFP and
later reapplies for a new FFP will create
a disincentive for vessel owners to
circumvent Federal regulations by
temporarily surrendering the FFP.
Similar concerns apply to FFP
amendments.
This final rule addresses these issues.
The regulations in this final rule are
similar to regulations implemented by
NMFS in 2011 as part of Amendment 83
to the Fishery Management Plan for
Groundfish of the Gulf of Alaska (76 FR
74670, December 1, 2011), and are also
similar to regulations that apply to pot
and hook-and-line catcher/processors in
the BSAI (76 FR 73513, November 29,
2011).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Description of the Final Rule and
Effects
FFP Requirements and LLP License
This rule prohibits a trawl, hook-andline, or pot gear vessel that is named on
an FFP or LLP license to catch and
retain BSAI Pacific cod in state waters
during the State’s parallel Pacific cod
fisheries unless the vessel is named on
an FFP and LLP license that have the
required endorsements. In addition, this
rule prohibits a federally permitted
hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear vessel
from catching and retaining BSAI
Pacific cod in state waters during the
State’s parallel fisheries when NMFS
has closed the corresponding sector to
directed Pacific cod fishing in the EEZ.
Through this permit condition, federally
permitted vessels will be required to
adhere to Federal seasonal Pacific cod
closures and other management
measures for their fishery sector when
participating in the State’s parallel
fisheries.
Additionally, the regulations
implemented by this final rule limit the
number of times in which a vessel
owner may relinquish an FFP and then
reapply for a new FFP. Specifically, if
an FFP is issued to a pot or hook-andline catcher vessel with a Bering Sea or
Aleutian Islands Pacific cod
endorsement, or to a trawl vessel with
a Bering Sea or Aleutian Islands
endorsement, and if the FFP for the
vessel is surrendered, then the vessel
will not be eligible to receive a new FFP
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
until after the expiration date of the
surrendered FFP.
As noted above, the Council’s intent
for the regulatory amendments in this
rule is to expand upon rules already in
place for BSAI catcher/processor vessels
that fish for Pacific cod with pot or
hook-and-line gear. Federal regulations
currently require these two catcher/
processor sectors to have an FFP and
LLP license with correct Federal Pacific
cod endorsements in order to fish in the
parallel fisheries (76 FR 73513,
November 29, 2011). The two Pacific
cod catcher/processor sectors are also
subject to the FFP relinquish and
reapply rules mentioned above.
The regulations in this final rule
reflect the Council’s intent and do not
modify the regulatory requirements for
vessels using jig gear in the BSAI.
Additionally, this rule does not limit
participation in the state waters GHL
fisheries.
Section 2.7.6 of the Analysis and the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) below provide details on the
number and type of vessels that may
potentially be affected by the
regulations in this rule.
Amending, Surrendering, and Reissuing
an FFP
The regulations established in this
rule also prohibit amendment of an FFP
during its effective period and create a
disincentive for a vessel operator to
surrender, or relinquish, their FFP
during its effective period. Under
current regulations, an FFP holder could
avoid vessel observer coverage, catch
reporting, and FFP and LLP
requirements by amending or
surrendering their FFP to fish in the
State’s Pacific cod parallel fishery, and
then requesting that NMFS amend or
reissue the FFP so that the vessel can be
used to resume fishing in the EEZ.
Amending or surrendering an FFP in
this fashion may degrade the quality of
information available to NMFS to
manage the Pacific cod fishery and
provide an opportunity to undermine
the intent of this rule. As noted above,
FFPs are currently issued on a threeyear cycle; however, a vessel operator
with an FFP can amend or surrender the
permit at any time and have the FFP
reissued any number of times within the
three-year cycle. Prohibiting an
amendment of an issued FFP during the
three-year cycle and lengthening the
amount of time that must pass before a
person can reapply for a surrendered
FFP makes it more difficult for FFP
holders to circumvent the regulations by
temporarily amending or surrendering
the FFP. The regulatory provisions in
this final rule for FFPs will address
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
situations where a vessel owner could
choose to amend or surrender the FFP
before fishing in the State parallel or
GHL fisheries to avoid NMFS observer
coverage or recordkeeping and reporting
requirements, and then seek to amend
or reissue the FFP for the opening of the
Federal waters fishery.
Final Regulations
This final rule amends paragraphs
(b)(3)(ii)(B) and (b)(3)(iii)(B) in 50 CFR
679.4 by expanding the scope of the
applicable FFP vessel operation types to
include both catcher/processors and
catcher vessels. The revisions also
specify that the applicable FFP gear
types include trawl, pot, and hook-andline gears. Note this final rule explicitly
excludes vessels using jig gear from
these regulatory actions.
This final rule amends paragraphs
(c)(3) and (4) in 50 CFR 679.7 to expand
the scope of vessels that are prohibited
from participating in the BSAI parallel
fisheries without properly endorsed LLP
licenses. The former regulations that
restrict fishing in the Pacific cod
parallel fisheries applied only to
catcher/processor vessels fishing pot or
hook-and-line gear in the parallel waters
of the BSAI. This action changes the
regulations to identify both catcher/
processor and catcher vessel operation
types, and to include vessels using
trawl, pot, and hook-and-line gear types
in the regulations.
Modifying the regulations currently at
§ 679.7(c)(4)(i) to include trawl, pot, and
hook-and-line gear types provides an
opportunity to simplify the regulations
by deleting paragraph (c)(4)(ii) in
§ 679.7.
Lastly, this final rule amends
paragraph (b)(3)(i) in 50 CFR 679.4 to
specifically reference the three-year
cycle NMFS uses for issuing FFPs.
Regulations at § 679.4(b) govern
issuance of FFPs, and for many years
specifically referenced the three-year
cycle followed by NMFS for issuing
FFPs. NMFS proposed to maintain the
three-year cycle when it published a
proposed rule to modify recordkeeping
and reporting regulations in 2007 (72 FR
35747; June 29, 2007). However, the
specific reference to the three-year cycle
was inadvertently omitted in the
supplemental proposed rule (73 FR
55368; September 24, 2008) and not
included in the final rule for that action
(73 FR 76136; December 15, 2008).
NMFS has continued to use a three-year
cycle for issuing FFPs and this final rule
will reinsert the specific reference to
this cycle.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Changes From Proposed to Final Rule
NMFS did not make any substantive
changes to the regulatory text in this
final rule from the regulatory text in the
proposed rule.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
Comments and Responses
NMFS received and considered four
unique, relevant comment letters on the
proposed rule. All public comment
letters submitted during the comment
period may be obtained from
www.regulations.gov. Three of the
letters expressed support for the
proposed regulations, and one letter did
not support the proposed rule. None of
the individual commenters identified
themselves as direct participants in the
BSAI Pacific cod fisheries. All three
letters that supported the proposed rule
were submitted anonymously, and
NMFS cannot determine whether they
were submitted by separate individuals.
The letters and comments are grouped,
summarized, and responded to below.
Comment 1: The three comment
letters that supported the proposed
regulations each expressed the
importance of avoiding overfishing. The
letters mentioned the conservation and
management benefits of enhancing
proper catch accounting in the fisheries.
Two of the comment letters recognized
that Pacific cod in the BSAI are not
overfished.
Response: NMFS acknowledges these
comments, and reiterates the benefits of
this rule, which are to enhance the
management of the Pacific cod fisheries
and to reflect the intent of the Council
regarding license limitation, vessel
sector allocations of Pacific cod, and
proper catch reporting. NMFS agrees
that Pacific cod in the BSAI are
currently not overfished.
Comment 2: Two of the three
supporting letters suggested the new
regulations would assist NMFS by
making it easier to discipline or punish
persons who exceed the Pacific cod
TAC.
Response: NMFS agrees that keeping
harvests within TAC limits is an
essential element of effective
management; however, the record that
supports this final rule does not reflect
concerns with the agency’s current
enforcement of overharvest limits or
deterrence of regulatory violations.
Comment 3: One comment did not
support the proposed rule, and briefly
expressed it would not be beneficial to
American citizens or to the fish.
Response: NMFS has determined that
the final rule is consistent with the
BSAI FMP, the MSA, and other
applicable law and disagrees with the
premise of the comment. Regulations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
similar to those adopted under this final
rule have been in place since 2011 for
the parallel Pacific cod fisheries in the
Gulf of Alaska and for catcher/processor
vessels that harvest Pacific cod in the
BSAI. In each of these cases, the
regulations have proven to be effective
by enhancing the management of the
fisheries. The regulations in this rule
reflect the Council’s and NMFS’s intent
to adopt similar regulations for Pacific
cod catcher vessel operations in the
BSAI.
Classification
Pursuant to Section 304(b)(3) of the
MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this
final rule is consistent with the BSAI
FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and
other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to
be not significant for purposes of
Executive Order 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive
Order 13771 regulatory action because
this rule is not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Impact Review
An RIR was prepared to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives. A copy of this analysis is
available from NMFS (see ADDRESSES).
NMFS has adopted the action
alternative over the former status quo,
and makes regulatory revisions in this
final rule based on those measures that
maximized net benefits to the Nation.
Specific aspects of the economic
analysis are discussed below in the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA) section. More information is
provided in the Analysis, as well as in
the preamble to this rule and in the
preamble to the proposed rule.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
(FRFA)
A final regulatory flexibility analysis
(FRFA) was prepared in this final rule.
This FRFA incorporates the initial
regulatory flexibility analysis (IRFA).
Section 604 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 604)
requires that, when an agency
promulgates a final rule under section
553 of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, after
being required by that section or any
other law to publish a general notice of
proposed rulemaking, the agency shall
prepare a FRFA. Section 604 describes
the required contents of a FRFA: (1) A
statement of the need for and objectives
of the rule; (2) a statement of the
significant issues raised by the public
comments in response to the IRFA, a
statement of the assessment of the
agency of such issues, and a statement
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78043
of any changes made to the proposed
rule as a result of such comments; (3)
the response of the agency to any
comments filed by the Chief Counsel for
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration (SBA) in response to the
proposed rule, and a detailed statement
of any change made to the proposed rule
in the final rule as a result of the
comments; (4) a description of and an
estimate of the number of small entities
to which the rule will apply or an
explanation of why no such estimate is
available; (5) a description of the
projected reporting, recordkeeping, and
other compliance requirements of the
rule, including an estimate of the classes
of small entities that will be subject to
the requirement and the type of
professional skills necessary for
preparation of the report or record; and
(6) a description of the steps the agency
has taken to minimize the significant
economic impact on small entities
consistent with the stated objectives of
applicable statutes including a
statement of the factual, policy, and
legal reasons for selecting the alternative
adopted in this final rule and why each
one of the other significant alternatives
to the rule considered by the agency
which affect the impact on small
entities was rejected.
A description of this rule, along with
the need for and objectives of the rule,
are contained in the preamble herein
and in the preamble to the proposed
rule (85 FR 58322, September 18, 2020),
and are not repeated here.
Public and Chief Counsel for Advocacy
Comments on the IRFA
NMFS published the proposed rule on
September 18, 2020 (85 FR 58322). An
IRFA was prepared and included in the
Classification section of the preamble to
the proposed rule. The comment period
on the proposed rule ended on October
19, 2020. None of the comments from
the public directly or indirectly
referenced the IRFA. The Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA did not file any
comments on the proposed rule.
Number and Description of Small
Entities Regulated by This Final Rule
For RFA purposes only, NMFS has
established a small business size
standard for businesses, including their
affiliates, whose primary industry is
commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2).
A business primarily engaged in
commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411)
is classified as a small business if it is
independently owned and operated, is
not dominant in its field of operation
(including its affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
78044
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
of $11 million for all its affiliated
operations worldwide.
This final rule directly regulates
individuals and entities that participate,
or would seek to participate, in the
BSAI Pacific cod parallel fisheries with
federally permitted vessels using trawl,
hook-and-line, or pot gear. The Analysis
indicates that 192 vessels have a history
of participation in the BSAI targeted
Pacific cod fisheries over the 2010–2019
period. Based upon the estimated exvessel earnings of these vessels, the
Analysis also indicates that 71 of these
vessels are considered small entities. Of
the 30 vessels that are expected to be
directly impacted by the regulations in
this rule, 29 are considered small
entities, based on SBA criteria.
This rule, which prohibits certain
federally permitted vessels from
catching and retaining Pacific cod in the
State’s parallel fishery unless the vessel
has the required permits, licenses, and
endorsements, is intended to reflect the
intent of previous recommendations by
the Council regarding license limitation,
vessel sector allocations of Pacific cod,
and catch reporting. Additionally, this
rule is expected to enhance the
conservation and management of the
fisheries by holding vessel sectors to
their allocations and to promote the
goals and objectives of the BSAI FMP
for the Federal Pacific cod fishery. In
2011, NMFS implemented provisions
similar to this final rule as part of
Amendment 83 to the Fishery
Management Plan for Groundfish of the
Gulf of Alaska. Regulations established
by this final rule are also very similar to
current regulations that control the
participation of catcher/processor hookand-line and pot gear vessels in the
BSAI; the regulations in this rule
effectively add BSAI hook-and-line
catcher vessels, pot catcher vessels, and
trawl gear vessels to the existing body
of BSAI fishing regulations.
The majority of the 30 vessel owners
who are directly impacted by this rule
currently have LLP licenses that allow
them to participate in the parallel
fisheries. Five of the 30 vessels
currently do not have FFPs, which
prevents them from fishing in Federal
waters. Under this final rule, these
vessels could continue to fish as they do
now, solely in state waters. However, if
the vessel owners choose to obtain an
FFP, their vessels would have the
flexibility to fish in both state and
Federal waters during the directed
Federal Pacific cod fishery for their
sector. Also among the 30 directly
impacted vessels, 15 other vessels are
currently associated with FFPs and are
linked to LLP licenses that allow them
to continue to fish for Pacific cod in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
both Federal and state waters during the
concurrent Federal and parallel
fisheries; however, in previous years, an
incremental portion of their
participation has occurred in the
parallel fishery when their sector was
closed to fishing in Federal waters.
Under this final rule, these vessels will
no longer be able to circumvent seasonal
closures for their sector by participating
in the parallel fishery after their Federal
sector has been closed. This ensures that
their Pacific cod harvests will be
attributed to the appropriate sector, as
designated on their LLP license.
Vessel owners most likely to be
impacted by this final rule are those
whose vessels have an FFP and
participate in the parallel fishery, but
who do not have the appropriate LLP
license to fish for Pacific cod in the
BSAI Federal waters. These vessels
could either exit the parallel fishery and
therefore the BSAI Pacific cod fishery
entirely, or they could forfeit their FFP
(and therefore fish solely in state waters,
but also forfeit Federal fishing
opportunities associated with their
FFP), or they could obtain a valid LLP
license that would allow them the
flexibility to participate in both the
Federal and parallel Pacific cod
fisheries. Because LLP licenses are a
transferable and marketable asset, the
owners’ decisions will likely be
influenced by the cost and availability
of an LLP license.
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and other
Compliance Requirements
Under this final rule, recordkeeping
and reporting will not change for
federally permitted catcher vessels that
participate in the directed BSAI nonCDQ Pacific cod fisheries. The scope of
this final rule modifies the conditions of
Federal permits and imposes
participation requirements for certain
federally permitted vessels when fishing
for Pacific cod in the parallel fisheries.
This action also modifies the conditions
under which existing permits may be
used. Those specific requirements and
the permit conditions are described in
the preambles to this rule and to the
proposed rule, and are not repeated
here.
Duplicate, Overlapping, or Conflicting
Federal Rules
No duplication, overlap, or conflict
between this final rule and existing
Federal rules has been identified.
Description of Significant Alternatives
Considered to the Final Action That
Minimize Adverse Impacts on Small
Entities
The Council and NMFS considered
two alternatives. Among the two
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
alternatives, Alternative 2 (the
preferred, action alternative) promotes
conservation, management, and catch
accounting measures that were
previously adopted by the North Pacific
Fishery Management Council (Council)
regarding license limitation, sector
allocations, and catch reporting. As
noted in the preamble to this rule, the
Council’s intent for the regulatory
amendments of Alternative 2 is to
expand upon rules already in place for
BSAI catcher/processor vessels that fish
for Pacific cod with pot or hook-andline gear. Federal regulations currently
require these two catcher/processor
sectors to have an FFP and LLP license
with correct Federal Pacific cod
endorsements in order to fish in the
parallel fisheries (76 FR 73513,
November 29, 2011). These two Pacific
cod catcher/processor sectors are also
subject to the FFP relinquish and
reapply rules implemented by this rule.
Alternative 1 was the no action
alternative. Under the status quo, the
regulations inadvertently allow fishing
in the State parallel fisheries by catcher
vessels even when the Federal fishery
sector for those vessels has fully
achieved its Federal Pacific cod
allocation, which is contrary to the
Council’s intent.
The regulations in this final rule do
not modify the regulatory requirements
for vessels using jig gear in the BSAI.
Additionally, this rule does not limit
participation in the state waters GHL
fisheries.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 states that, for each rule or group
of related rules for which an agency is
required to prepare a final regulatory
flexibility analysis, the agency shall
publish one or more guides to assist
small entities in complying with the
rule, and shall designate such
publications as ‘‘small entity
compliance guides.’’ The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is
required to take to comply with a rule
or group of rules. NMFS will publish on
its website a summary of this
rulemaking including compliance
requirements that will serve as the small
entity compliance guide. Copies of the
proposed rule and this final rule are
available from the NMFS website at
https://fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This final rule does not contain a
change to a collection of information
requirement for purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The
existing collection of information
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
requirements would continue to apply
under the following OMB Control
Numbers: 0648–0206, Alaska Region
Permit Family of Forms (FFP), and
0648–0334, Alaska License Limitation
Program for Groundfish, Crab, and
Scallops.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 25, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch, III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for
Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
679 as follows:
PART 679—FISHERIES OF THE
EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF
ALASKA
1. The authority citation for part 679
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et
seq.; 3631 et seq.; Pub. L. 108–447; Pub. L.
111–281.
§ 679.7
2. In § 679.4, revise paragraphs
(b)(3)(i), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and (b)(3)(iii)(B) to
read as follows:
Permits.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(3) * * * (i) Length of permit
effectiveness. NMFS issues FFPs on a
three-year cycle and an FFP is in effect
from the effective date through the
expiration date, as indicated on the FFP,
unless the FFP is revoked, suspended,
surrendered in accordance with
paragraph (a)(9) of this section, or
modified under § 600.735 or § 600.740
of this chapter.
(ii) * * *
(B) For the BSAI, NMFS will not
reissue a surrendered FFP to the owner
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
Prohibitions.
*
■
§ 679.4
or authorized representative of a vessel
named on an FFP that has been issued
with endorsements for catcher/
processor or catcher vessel operation
type; trawl, pot, and/or hook-and-line
gear type; and the BSAI area, until after
the expiration date of the surrendered
FFP as initially issued.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) * * *
(B) In the BSAI, NMFS will not
approve an application to amend an FFP
to remove a catcher/processor or catcher
vessel operation type endorsement,
trawl gear type endorsement, pot gear
type endorsement, hook-and-line gear
type endorsement, or BSAI area
endorsement from an FFP that has been
issued with endorsements for catcher/
processor or catcher vessel operation
type, trawl, pot, or hook-and-line gear
type, and the BSAI area.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In § 679.7, revise paragraphs (c)(3)
and (4) to read as follows:
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) Parallel Pacific cod fisheries—
participation requirements. Use a vessel
named or required to be named on an
FFP to catch and retain Pacific cod from
State of Alaska waters adjacent to the
BSAI, when Pacific cod caught by that
vessel is deducted from the Federal TAC
specified under § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2)
through (9), unless:
(i) That non-trawl vessel is designated
on both:
(A) An LLP license issued under
§ 679.4(k), unless that vessel is using jig
gear and exempt from the LLP license
requirement under § 679.4(k)(2)(iii).
Each vessel required to have an LLP
license must be designated with the
following endorsements:
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
78045
(1) The BSAI area endorsement for the
BSAI area adjacent to the parallel
fishery where the harvest occurred; and
(2) A BSAI catcher/processor Pacific
cod hook-and-line endorsement, a BSAI
catcher/processor Pacific cod pot
endorsement, or a BSAI Pacific cod
catcher vessel endorsement if that
catcher vessel is 60 feet or greater length
overall; and
(B) An FFP issued under § 679.4(b)
with the following endorsements:
(1) A catcher/processor or catcher
vessel operation type endorsement;
(2) A BSAI area endorsement; and
(3) A pot or hook-and-line gear type
endorsement.
(ii) Or, that trawl vessel is designated
on both:
(A) An LLP license issued under
§ 679.4(k) endorsed for trawl gear with
the BSAI area endorsement for the BSAI
area adjacent to the parallel fishery
where the harvest occurred; and
(B) An FFP issued under § 679.4(b)
with the following endorsements:
(1) The BSAI area endorsement;
(2) An operational type endorsement;
(3) A trawl gear type endorsement;
and
(4) A Pacific cod gear type
endorsement.
(4) Parallel Pacific cod fisheries—
closures. Use a vessel named or required
to be named on an FFP to catch and
retain Pacific cod with trawl, pot, or
hook-and-line gear from State of Alaska
waters adjacent to the BSAI when
Pacific cod caught by that vessel is
deducted from the Federal TAC
specified under § 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A) for
trawl, pot, or hook-and-line gear, if
directed fishing for Pacific cod is not
open for the sector to which the vessel
belongs in Federal waters.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–26593 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78038-78045]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26593]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 679
[Docket No. 201125-0321]
RIN 0648-BJ59
Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic Zone Off Alaska; Pacific Cod
in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule modifies Federal permit conditions and imposes
participation requirements for certain federally permitted vessels when
fishing for Pacific cod in state waters adjacent to the exclusive
economic zone of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands during the State
of Alaska's parallel Pacific cod fishery. This action is necessary to
enhance Federal conservation, management, and catch accounting measures
previously adopted by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) regarding license limitation, sector allocations, and catch
reporting. This action is intended to promote the goals and objectives
of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, the
Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands Management Area, and other applicable law.
DATES: Effective January 4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Electronic copies of the Categorical Exclusion and the
Regulatory Impact Review (RIR) prepared for this action (referred to as
the ``Analysis'') are available from https://www.regulations.gov or from
the NMFS Alaska Region website at https://www/fisheries.noaa.gov/
region/alaska.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kurt Iverson, 907-586-7210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for Action
NMFS manages the groundfish fisheries in the U.S. exclusive
economic zone (EEZ) of the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands (BSAI) under
the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the BSAI Management Area
(FMP). The Council prepared, and NMFS approved, the FMP under the
authority of the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management
Act (MSA), 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq. Regulations governing U.S. fisheries
and implementing the FMP appear at 50 CFR part 679. General regulations
that pertain to U.S. fisheries appear at subpart H of 50 CFR part 600.
NMFS published the proposed rule for these regulatory amendments in
the Federal Register on September 18, 2020 (85 FR 58322). A summary of
comments on the proposed rule and NMFS' responses are provided in the
Comments and Responses section of this preamble.
Summary of This Action
In this rule, NMFS modifies Federal permit conditions and imposes
participation requirements for certain federally permitted vessels when
fishing for Pacific cod in State of Alaska waters (state waters)
adjacent to the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the Bering Sea and
Aleutian Islands (BSAI). The state waters portion of the Pacific cod
fishery that runs concurrent with the Federal Pacific cod fishery is
commonly known as the State's parallel fishery.
Throughout this preamble, ``state waters'' refers to the maritime
waters from 0 to 3 nautical miles off Alaska, and ``EEZ'' and ``Federal
waters'' are used interchangeably and refer to the maritime waters from
3 to 200 nautical miles off Alaska. In addition, ``parallel fisheries''
in this preamble refers to the state waters Pacific cod parallel
fisheries in the State of Alaska Bering Sea-Aleutian Islands Area,
which presently is in the Dutch Harbor Subdistrict of the Bering Sea
and within the Aleutian Islands Subdistrict of the Aleutian Islands,
respectively.
This rule prohibits (1) a hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear vessel
named on a Federal Fisheries Permit (FFP) or License Limitation Program
(LLP) license from being used to catch and retain BSAI Pacific cod in
State of Alaska (State) waters adjacent to the BSAI during the State's
parallel Pacific cod fishery unless the vessel is named on an FFP and
LLP license that have the required endorsements; (2) a hook-and-
[[Page 78039]]
line, pot, or trawl gear vessel named on an FFP or LLP license from
catching and retaining Pacific cod in state waters adjacent to the BSAI
EEZ during the State's parallel fishery when NMFS has closed the EEZ to
directed fishing for Pacific cod by the sector to which the vessel
belongs; (3) the holder of an FFP with certain endorsements from
modifying those endorsements during the effective period of the FFP;
and (4) the reissuance of a surrendered FFP with certain endorsements
for the remainder of the three-year term, or cycle, of FFPs.
Summary of Management of the Fishery
This section briefly describes the Federal BSAI Pacific cod
fishery, including the Pacific cod fisheries that occur in BSAI state
waters. More detailed descriptions, including a review of this rule and
the rationale for the regulations, are provided in the preamble to the
proposed rule (85 FR 58322, September 18, 2020) and in the Analysis
(see ADDRESSES).
Vessels that harvest Pacific cod in the BSAI use both trawl and
non-trawl gear. Non-trawl gear includes hook-and-line, jig, and pot
gear. Additionally, BSAI Pacific cod vessels operate as catcher vessels
that harvest and deliver the fish for processing, or as catcher
processors that harvest and process the catch on board. The amount of
BSAI Pacific cod available for commercial harvest is determined through
an annual harvest specifications process (e.g., 83 FR 13553, March 9,
2020). This process accounts for Pacific cod harvested in guideline
harvest level (GHL) fisheries that occur only within state waters and
are managed by the State of Alaska. After deducting for harvests in the
GHL fisheries, Pacific cod Total Allowable Catches (TACs) are set for
the Federal fisheries in the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands subareas.
Once the Bering Sea and Aleutian Islands TACs are established,
regulations at Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(i) allocate 10.7 percent of the
Bering Sea Pacific cod TAC and 10.7 percent of the Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod TAC to the Community Development Quota (CDQ) Program for
exclusive harvest by Western Alaska CDQ groups. Section 305(i) of the
MSA specifies the methods for allocating these harvest privileges. Once
allocated, CDQ groups must ensure that they do not exceed their
allocations.
The portion that remains after subtraction of the CDQ allocation
from each TAC is the initial TAC (ITAC) for the Bering Sea and Aleutian
Islands. NMFS combines the Bering Sea ITAC and the Aleutian Islands
ITAC into one, BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC. This combined BSAI non-CDQ
Pacific cod TAC is then allocated among, and available for harvest by,
nine non-CDQ fishery sectors. Regulations at Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A)
define the nine non-CDQ fishery sectors and specify the percentage of
the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC allocated to each. The non-CDQ fishery
sectors are defined by a combination of gear type (e.g., trawl, hook-
and-line), operation type (i.e., catcher vessel or catcher/processor),
and vessel size categories (e.g., vessels greater than or equal to 60
feet (ft) in length overall or less than 60 ft in length overall).
Through the annual harvest specifications process, NMFS allocates an
amount of the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC to each of the nine non-CDQ
fishery sectors. The nine non-CDQ fishery sectors and the percentage of
the BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod TAC allocated to each sector are shown in
Table 1 below.
Table 1--Allocations of the BSAI Non-CDQ Pacific Cod TAC to the Non-CDQ
Fishery Sectors
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Percentage
allocation of
Non-CDQ fishery sector the BSAI non-
CDQ TAC
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hook-and-line catcher vessels greater than or equal to 0.2
60 ft length overall (LOA).............................
Jig gear................................................ 1.4
Pot catcher/processors.................................. 1.5
Hook-and-line and pot catcher vessels less than 60 ft 2.0
LOA....................................................
American Fisheries Act (AFA) trawl catcher/processors... 2.3
Pot catcher vessels greater than or equal to 60 ft LOA.. 8.4
Non-AFA trawl catcher/processors (Amendment 80 catcher/ 13.4
processors)............................................
Trawl catcher vessels................................... 22.1
Hook-and-line catcher processors........................ 48.7
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NMFS manages each of the fishery sectors to ensure harvest of
Pacific cod does not exceed the sector's annual allocation. NMFS
monitors harvests that occur by vessels being used to conduct directed
fishing for Pacific cod (that is, participants who are specifically
targeting and retaining Pacific cod above specific threshold levels)
and harvests that occur by vessels being used to conduct directed
fishing for other species and incidentally catching Pacific cod (e.g.,
the incidental catch of Pacific cod in the directed pollock fishery).
Section 679.2 provides the regulatory definition of ``directed
fishing.'' For the non-AFA trawl catcher/processor sector, also known
as the Amendment 80 sector, NMFS allocates exclusive harvest privileges
to participants within that sector that cannot be exceeded. For the
other non-CDQ fishery sectors, NMFS carefully tracks both directed and
incidental catch of Pacific cod. An allocation to a non-CDQ fishery
sector may be harvested in either the Bering Sea or the Aleutian
Islands, subject to the Pacific cod ITAC specified for the Bering Sea
or the Aleutian Islands. NMFS takes appropriate management measures,
such as closing directed fishing for a fishery sector, to ensure that
total directed fishing and incidental fishing harvests do not exceed
that sector's allocation. Section 2.7 of the Analysis describes NMFS'
management of the non-CDQ fishery sectors.
Allocations of Pacific cod to the CDQ Program and to the non-CDQ
fishery sectors are further apportioned by season dates established at
Sec. 679.23(e)(5). In general, regulations apportion CDQ and non-CDQ
fishery sector allocations among three seasons that correspond to the
early (A-season), middle (B-season), and late (C-season) portions of
the year. The specific season dates established for the CDQ Program and
each of the non-CDQ fishery sectors were provided in the final 2020 and
2021 harvest specifications for groundfish of the BSAI (83 FR 13553,
March 9, 2020). Depending on the specific CDQ Program or non-CDQ
fishery sector allocation, between 40 percent and 70 percent of the
Pacific
[[Page 78040]]
cod allocations are apportioned to the A-season, historically the most
lucrative fishing season due to the presence of valuable roe in the
fish and the good quality of the flesh during that time of year.
The allocation of Pacific cod among the CDQ Program and the nine
non-CDQ fishery sectors, as well as the seasonal apportionment of those
allocations, create a large number of distinct sector and season
allocations. The regulations allow NMFS to reallocate (rollover) any
unused portion of a seasonal apportionment from any non-CDQ fishery
sector (except the jig sector) to that sector's next season during the
current fishing year, unless the Regional Administrator determines a
non-CDQ fishery sector will not be able to harvest its allocation (see
Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(iv)(B)).
Permits and Licenses
To monitor compliance with harvest catch limits, prohibited species
(non-retained) catch limits, and sideboard regulations that limit
participation in other fisheries, NMFS requires various permits that
authorize or restrict access to the groundfish fisheries in the Federal
waters of the BSAI. The two most relevant permits associated with this
final rule are FFPs and LLP licenses.
1. Federal Fisheries Permit
All vessels that retain BSAI Pacific cod in the EEZ are required to
have an FFP on board the vessel at all times (Sec. 679.4(b)(1)). An
FFP authorizes a vessel owner to deploy a vessel to conduct fishing
operations in the EEZ of the BSAI in accordance with the endorsements
on the FFP. An FFP includes many endorsements, such as type of gear
(e.g., pot, hook-and-line, and trawl), vessel operation category
(catcher vessel, catcher/processor, mothership, tender vessel, or
support vessel), and regulatory area of operation (e.g., BSAI) in which
a permitted vessel is eligible to fish. In some fisheries, a species
endorsement is also required. For example, the owners and operators of
harvesting vessels that participate in the directed BSAI Pacific cod
fisheries, except vessels using jig gear, are required to have an FFP
endorsement for Pacific cod, along with endorsements for the gear type
used to fish for Pacific cod, the vessel operation type, and the
regulatory area(s) in which the fishery is prosecuted. All CDQ vessels
and all non-jig vessels listed in Table 1 are required to have an FFP
onboard that is endorsed for Pacific cod. A vessel may not be operated
in a category other than what is specified on the FFP.
The operators of harvesting vessels that possess an FFP are
required to comply with NMFS observer coverage requirements (Sec.
679.50(a)). In addition, FFP holders participating in a pollock, Atka
mackerel, or Pacific cod fishery in the BSAI are required to have on
board the vessel a transmitting vessel monitoring system (VMS) (Sec.
679.28(f)(6)). A VMS consists of a NMFS-approved transmitter that
automatically determines a vessel's position and transmits that
information to NMFS. While Pacific cod directed fisheries are open, all
harvesting vessels with an FFP endorsed with a hook-and-line, pot, or
trawl Pacific cod endorsement are required to have an operational VMS,
regardless of where the vessel is fishing at the time or what the
vessel is targeting. Thus, a VMS is required of all vessels with an FFP
endorsed for Pacific cod hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear while
fishing in state waters (0 to 3 nm) adjacent to the BSAI. However,
because these Federal requirements apply as a condition of being issued
an FFP, operators of vessels that have not been issued an FFP and that
fish exclusively in state waters are not required to possess an FFP or
have an FFP on board the vessel, and such vessels are not subject to
Federal observer, VMS, or recordkeeping and reporting requirements
unless specified by the State.
FFPs are valid for three years and, unless revoked, suspended, or
surrendered, are in effect from the date of issuance through the end of
the three-year cycle. The current cycle of FFPs issued for vessels that
operate in Alaska waters is January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2020.
A vessel operator with an FFP can surrender the permit at any time and
have NMFS reissue the FFP any number of times within the three-year
cycle.
While any vessel owner can apply for an FFP with any combination of
vessel operation, area, gear, or species endorsements, an FFP, by
itself, does not necessarily authorize the FFP holder or the vessel
named on the FFP to participate in the Federal Pacific cod fisheries.
Most of the vessels that are used to participate in the Federal Pacific
cod fisheries in the BSAI are also are required to have a groundfish
LLP license.
2. License Limitation Program (LLP) License
A groundfish LLP license authorizes a vessel to be used in a
directed fishery for groundfish in the BSAI in accordance with the
specific area and species endorsements, the vessel and gear
designations, the maximum length overall (MLOA) specified on the
license, and any exemption from the MLOA specified on the license. Most
vessel operators fishing for groundfish in the BSAI must have an LLP
license on board at all times when the vessel is engaged in fishing
activities (Sec. 679.4(k)). LLP licenses are issued by NMFS to
qualified persons. Exemptions to the LLP license requirement in the
BSAI are listed at Sec. 679.4(k)(2), including an exemption for any
vessel that does not exceed 32 ft (9.8 m) length overall (LOA), and an
exemption for jig vessels less than or equal to 60 ft (18.3 m) LOA that
use a maximum of 5 jig machines, one line per jig machine, and a
maximum of 15 hooks per line.
In order to participate in the BSAI Pacific cod fisheries, several
endorsements are required to be specified on an LLP license, such as
vessel operation type, area, gear designation, and maximum length
overall (MLOA). The endorsements for operation type on LLP licenses are
either catcher vessel or catcher/processor. A catcher vessel
endorsement allows a vessel to harvest but not process fish on board. A
catcher/processor endorsement allows both harvesting and onboard
processing, and also allows a vessel to deliver the catch to a separate
processor. Area endorsements on BSAI groundfish LLP licenses authorize
a vessel to fish in either the Bering Sea, the Aleutian Islands, or
both areas. Gear endorsements for BSAI groundfish LLP licenses are
either for trawl, non-trawl, or both gear types. For groundfish vessels
with non-trawl endorsed licenses, NMFS implemented regulations in 2002
that require a Pacific cod endorsement for hook-and-line and pot gear
LLP licenses on catcher/processor vessels and catcher vessels that are
60 ft (18.3 m) LOA or greater and that are used to participate in the
BSAI Pacific cod fisheries (67 FR 18130, April 15, 2002). Catcher
vessels less than 60 ft (18.3 m) are exempt from the required Pacific
cod endorsement on their LLP license.
Groundfish LLP licenses also identify whether the license is
associated with the Amendment 80, American Fisheries Act, or Gulf of
Alaska Rockfish license limitation programs. BSAI groundfish LLP
licenses further specify whether the license is restricted by
regulatory sideboards from being used in other fisheries.
In general, a vessel is authorized to use only the gear that is
designated on the LLP license. Unlike the FFP, the endorsements on an
LLP license are not generally severable and an LLP license, with its
associated endorsements, can be
[[Page 78041]]
reassigned to a different vessel only once per year. Like FFPs,
operators of vessels that have not been issued an LLP license and that
fish exclusively in state waters fisheries are not required to comply
with Federal requirements for LLP licenses.
BSAI State Waters Pacific Cod Fisheries
As mentioned above, catch limits for the Federal Pacific cod
fisheries include the sum of harvests that come from BSAI Federal
waters and from the concurrent state parallel Pacific cod fisheries.
Under the authority of Alaska statutes and regulations, the Alaska
Department of Fish and Game (ADF&G) manages two parallel Pacific cod
fisheries and three GHL fisheries in the state waters adjacent to the
BSAI EEZ. Two of the GHL fisheries are held in the State's Dutch Harbor
Subdistrict of the Bering Sea; the third is within the Aleutian Islands
Subdistrict of the Aleutian Islands.
Parallel Pacific Cod Fisheries
During the Federal BSAI Pacific cod fisheries in the EEZ, the State
creates concurrent, or parallel, Pacific cod fisheries in state waters
by generally adopting NMFS management actions for state waters. The
initial Federal BSAI Pacific cod season (``A-Season'') opens January 1
for vessels using hook-and-line, pot, and jig gear, and January 20 for
vessels using trawl gear. Unless specifically prohibited by State
regulation, (e.g., nonpelagic trawl gear is prohibited in state waters
by 5 AAC 39.164 (4)), the State authorizes the same gear types,
seasons, and bycatch limits that apply in the adjacent Federal BSAI
Pacific cod season during a parallel fishery. In addition, during these
State parallel Pacific cod fisheries, vessels using longline gear may
not exceed 58 feet in overall length (OAL) (5 AAC 28.690(c)). Except
for vessels using mechanical jigging machines, State regulations
require all vessels that participate in a parallel Pacific cod fishery
to have an activated VMS (5 AAC 28.087(c)).
Although the State adopts many of the management measures
applicable to vessels participating in the Federal BSAI Pacific cod
fisheries in the EEZ, the State does not require vessels that
participate in the State's parallel Pacific cod fisheries to possess an
FFP or an LLP license. Effective January 1, 2012, NMFS implemented
regulations at Sec. 679.7 that prohibit federally permitted catcher/
processor pot and catcher/processor hook-and-line vessels from being
used to catch and retain Pacific cod in state waters during the State's
parallel fisheries unless the vessel is designated on an FFP and an LLP
license that have the required endorsements (76 FR 73513, November 29,
2011). Additionally, regulations at Sec. 679.7 require Federal permit
holders who operate vessels in these two catcher/processor sectors to
adhere to the Federal BSAI Pacific cod opening and closing periods when
they participate in the State's parallel fisheries. At this time,
vessels in other non-CDQ fishery sectors may participate in the State's
Pacific cod parallel fisheries without having an FFP, an LLP license,
and endorsements necessary to participate in the Federal fishery.
As mentioned above, Pacific cod harvested during the State's
parallel fisheries accrue toward the Federal Pacific cod TAC. The State
closes a parallel Pacific cod fishery by gear sector when NMFS
determines the TAC for a Federal fishery sector using that gear type
has been reached or when incidental species allowances are met.
Section 2.7 of the Analysis and the preamble to the proposed rule
provide specific details on the number of vessels that have
participated in the State's BSAI Pacific cod parallel fisheries, by
vessel sector, over the 2010-2019 period. For all sectors combined, the
total number of participating vessels in the BSAI Pacific cod parallel
fisheries has ranged from 13 to 39 vessels per year. The proportion of
Pacific cod that those vessels have caught in state waters during the
concurrent BSAI Federal waters and State parallel fisheries varies by
sector, but for all sectors combined has ranged from 2 percent to 5
percent of their total BSAI Pacific cod catch over the 2010-2019
period.
GHL Fisheries
State GHL fisheries for Pacific cod are also prosecuted in state
waters, but occur when fishing by specific Pacific cod sectors in the
Federal and parallel fisheries is closed. The State currently manages
GHL fisheries adjacent to both the BSAI subareas. The GHL fisheries may
re-open and close as needed to coordinate with Federal fishery
openings.
The Alaska Board of Fisheries (BOF) established the Dutch Harbor
Subdistrict (DHS) state waters Pacific cod GHL fishery in 2013 (5 AAC
28.648). Pot and jig gear are the only legal gear types. In the
Aleutian Islands Subdistrict GHL fishery (5 AAC 28.647), state
regulations allow trawl, longline, pot, and jig gear vessels. More
information on the GHL fisheries in the Dutch Harbor and Aleutian
Islands Subdistricts can be found in section 2.6 of the Analysis and in
the preamble to the proposed rule.
Need for this Action
This final rule prohibits some federally permitted vessels from
fishing for Pacific cod in the State of Alaska's parallel fisheries in
the BSAI. Under current regulations, Federal FFPs and LLP licenses are
only required for fishing activity in the EEZ. As a result, some
vessels without an FFP or LLP license, and other vessels that have an
FFP but with an LLP license that is not endorsed for Pacific cod
fishing in the adjacent BSAI Federal waters, have participated in the
State's parallel fisheries. Additionally, the State is legally
constrained from allocating resources within a single fishery, and as a
result does not recognize sector allocations based on operation types,
such as catcher vessel versus catcher/processor designations. This
circumstance has inadvertently allowed fishing in the State parallel
fisheries by catcher vessels even when the Federal fishery sector for
those vessels has fully achieved its Federal Pacific cod allocation.
This has been most common among hook-and-line vessels. The Council
determined, and NMFS agrees, that this fishing activity has negative
effects on the Federal management regime for BSAI Pacific cod and must
be curtailed to maintain the conservation and management benefits
intended by the Council and implemented by NMFS.
For example, the Federal Pacific cod seasons for the hook-and-line
catcher/processor sector typically remain open to directed fishing for
much of the year, whereas the seasons for hook-and-line catcher vessel
sectors, which fish under much smaller allocations, normally close
earlier in the year. Because the State does not recognize sector
allocations based on operation types, the State parallel Pacific cod
fishery remains open for much of the year, so long as the Federal
catcher/processor hook-and-line season is open. Therefore, when the
catcher vessel hook-and-line allocation has been achieved, and NMFS
closes that sector's season in Federal waters, some of those vessels
have continued to fish for Pacific cod in state waters. When this has
occurred, NMFS has been obligated to reallocate Pacific cod from other
sectors to prevent overharvest of the area TAC. The Council determined
that this complicates Federal conservation and management measures that
are intended to hold sectors to their allocations and it also
undermines the intent of previous Council decisions regarding license
limitation, sector allocations, and catch reporting.
When evaluating these issues, the Council also considered the terms
under
[[Page 78042]]
which FFPs are issued. Under current regulations, an FFP is issued in a
three-year cycle, but within that period, a vessel operator can
surrender the FFP at any time, then reapply for a reissuance of the
permit any number of times within the three-year cycle. This would
provide an opportunity for vessel operators to avoid the prohibitions
in this rule. Lengthening the amount of time that must pass between the
period when a person surrenders an FFP and later reapplies for a new
FFP will create a disincentive for vessel owners to circumvent Federal
regulations by temporarily surrendering the FFP. Similar concerns apply
to FFP amendments.
This final rule addresses these issues. The regulations in this
final rule are similar to regulations implemented by NMFS in 2011 as
part of Amendment 83 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of
the Gulf of Alaska (76 FR 74670, December 1, 2011), and are also
similar to regulations that apply to pot and hook-and-line catcher/
processors in the BSAI (76 FR 73513, November 29, 2011).
Description of the Final Rule and Effects
FFP Requirements and LLP License
This rule prohibits a trawl, hook-and-line, or pot gear vessel that
is named on an FFP or LLP license to catch and retain BSAI Pacific cod
in state waters during the State's parallel Pacific cod fisheries
unless the vessel is named on an FFP and LLP license that have the
required endorsements. In addition, this rule prohibits a federally
permitted hook-and-line, pot, or trawl gear vessel from catching and
retaining BSAI Pacific cod in state waters during the State's parallel
fisheries when NMFS has closed the corresponding sector to directed
Pacific cod fishing in the EEZ. Through this permit condition,
federally permitted vessels will be required to adhere to Federal
seasonal Pacific cod closures and other management measures for their
fishery sector when participating in the State's parallel fisheries.
Additionally, the regulations implemented by this final rule limit
the number of times in which a vessel owner may relinquish an FFP and
then reapply for a new FFP. Specifically, if an FFP is issued to a pot
or hook-and-line catcher vessel with a Bering Sea or Aleutian Islands
Pacific cod endorsement, or to a trawl vessel with a Bering Sea or
Aleutian Islands endorsement, and if the FFP for the vessel is
surrendered, then the vessel will not be eligible to receive a new FFP
until after the expiration date of the surrendered FFP.
As noted above, the Council's intent for the regulatory amendments
in this rule is to expand upon rules already in place for BSAI catcher/
processor vessels that fish for Pacific cod with pot or hook-and-line
gear. Federal regulations currently require these two catcher/processor
sectors to have an FFP and LLP license with correct Federal Pacific cod
endorsements in order to fish in the parallel fisheries (76 FR 73513,
November 29, 2011). The two Pacific cod catcher/processor sectors are
also subject to the FFP relinquish and reapply rules mentioned above.
The regulations in this final rule reflect the Council's intent and
do not modify the regulatory requirements for vessels using jig gear in
the BSAI. Additionally, this rule does not limit participation in the
state waters GHL fisheries.
Section 2.7.6 of the Analysis and the Final Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (FRFA) below provide details on the number and type of vessels
that may potentially be affected by the regulations in this rule.
Amending, Surrendering, and Reissuing an FFP
The regulations established in this rule also prohibit amendment of
an FFP during its effective period and create a disincentive for a
vessel operator to surrender, or relinquish, their FFP during its
effective period. Under current regulations, an FFP holder could avoid
vessel observer coverage, catch reporting, and FFP and LLP requirements
by amending or surrendering their FFP to fish in the State's Pacific
cod parallel fishery, and then requesting that NMFS amend or reissue
the FFP so that the vessel can be used to resume fishing in the EEZ.
Amending or surrendering an FFP in this fashion may degrade the quality
of information available to NMFS to manage the Pacific cod fishery and
provide an opportunity to undermine the intent of this rule. As noted
above, FFPs are currently issued on a three-year cycle; however, a
vessel operator with an FFP can amend or surrender the permit at any
time and have the FFP reissued any number of times within the three-
year cycle. Prohibiting an amendment of an issued FFP during the three-
year cycle and lengthening the amount of time that must pass before a
person can reapply for a surrendered FFP makes it more difficult for
FFP holders to circumvent the regulations by temporarily amending or
surrendering the FFP. The regulatory provisions in this final rule for
FFPs will address situations where a vessel owner could choose to amend
or surrender the FFP before fishing in the State parallel or GHL
fisheries to avoid NMFS observer coverage or recordkeeping and
reporting requirements, and then seek to amend or reissue the FFP for
the opening of the Federal waters fishery.
Final Regulations
This final rule amends paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(B) and (b)(3)(iii)(B)
in 50 CFR 679.4 by expanding the scope of the applicable FFP vessel
operation types to include both catcher/processors and catcher vessels.
The revisions also specify that the applicable FFP gear types include
trawl, pot, and hook-and-line gears. Note this final rule explicitly
excludes vessels using jig gear from these regulatory actions.
This final rule amends paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) in 50 CFR 679.7 to
expand the scope of vessels that are prohibited from participating in
the BSAI parallel fisheries without properly endorsed LLP licenses. The
former regulations that restrict fishing in the Pacific cod parallel
fisheries applied only to catcher/processor vessels fishing pot or
hook-and-line gear in the parallel waters of the BSAI. This action
changes the regulations to identify both catcher/processor and catcher
vessel operation types, and to include vessels using trawl, pot, and
hook-and-line gear types in the regulations.
Modifying the regulations currently at Sec. 679.7(c)(4)(i) to
include trawl, pot, and hook-and-line gear types provides an
opportunity to simplify the regulations by deleting paragraph
(c)(4)(ii) in Sec. 679.7.
Lastly, this final rule amends paragraph (b)(3)(i) in 50 CFR 679.4
to specifically reference the three-year cycle NMFS uses for issuing
FFPs. Regulations at Sec. 679.4(b) govern issuance of FFPs, and for
many years specifically referenced the three-year cycle followed by
NMFS for issuing FFPs. NMFS proposed to maintain the three-year cycle
when it published a proposed rule to modify recordkeeping and reporting
regulations in 2007 (72 FR 35747; June 29, 2007). However, the specific
reference to the three-year cycle was inadvertently omitted in the
supplemental proposed rule (73 FR 55368; September 24, 2008) and not
included in the final rule for that action (73 FR 76136; December 15,
2008). NMFS has continued to use a three-year cycle for issuing FFPs
and this final rule will reinsert the specific reference to this cycle.
[[Page 78043]]
Changes From Proposed to Final Rule
NMFS did not make any substantive changes to the regulatory text in
this final rule from the regulatory text in the proposed rule.
Comments and Responses
NMFS received and considered four unique, relevant comment letters
on the proposed rule. All public comment letters submitted during the
comment period may be obtained from www.regulations.gov. Three of the
letters expressed support for the proposed regulations, and one letter
did not support the proposed rule. None of the individual commenters
identified themselves as direct participants in the BSAI Pacific cod
fisheries. All three letters that supported the proposed rule were
submitted anonymously, and NMFS cannot determine whether they were
submitted by separate individuals. The letters and comments are
grouped, summarized, and responded to below.
Comment 1: The three comment letters that supported the proposed
regulations each expressed the importance of avoiding overfishing. The
letters mentioned the conservation and management benefits of enhancing
proper catch accounting in the fisheries. Two of the comment letters
recognized that Pacific cod in the BSAI are not overfished.
Response: NMFS acknowledges these comments, and reiterates the
benefits of this rule, which are to enhance the management of the
Pacific cod fisheries and to reflect the intent of the Council
regarding license limitation, vessel sector allocations of Pacific cod,
and proper catch reporting. NMFS agrees that Pacific cod in the BSAI
are currently not overfished.
Comment 2: Two of the three supporting letters suggested the new
regulations would assist NMFS by making it easier to discipline or
punish persons who exceed the Pacific cod TAC.
Response: NMFS agrees that keeping harvests within TAC limits is an
essential element of effective management; however, the record that
supports this final rule does not reflect concerns with the agency's
current enforcement of overharvest limits or deterrence of regulatory
violations.
Comment 3: One comment did not support the proposed rule, and
briefly expressed it would not be beneficial to American citizens or to
the fish.
Response: NMFS has determined that the final rule is consistent
with the BSAI FMP, the MSA, and other applicable law and disagrees with
the premise of the comment. Regulations similar to those adopted under
this final rule have been in place since 2011 for the parallel Pacific
cod fisheries in the Gulf of Alaska and for catcher/processor vessels
that harvest Pacific cod in the BSAI. In each of these cases, the
regulations have proven to be effective by enhancing the management of
the fisheries. The regulations in this rule reflect the Council's and
NMFS's intent to adopt similar regulations for Pacific cod catcher
vessel operations in the BSAI.
Classification
Pursuant to Section 304(b)(3) of the MSA, the NMFS Assistant
Administrator has determined that this final rule is consistent with
the BSAI FMP, other provisions of the MSA, and other applicable law.
This final rule has been determined to be not significant for
purposes of Executive Order 12866.
This final rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
Regulatory Impact Review
An RIR was prepared to assess the costs and benefits of available
regulatory alternatives. A copy of this analysis is available from NMFS
(see ADDRESSES). NMFS has adopted the action alternative over the
former status quo, and makes regulatory revisions in this final rule
based on those measures that maximized net benefits to the Nation.
Specific aspects of the economic analysis are discussed below in the
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA) section. More information
is provided in the Analysis, as well as in the preamble to this rule
and in the preamble to the proposed rule.
Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (FRFA)
A final regulatory flexibility analysis (FRFA) was prepared in this
final rule. This FRFA incorporates the initial regulatory flexibility
analysis (IRFA).
Section 604 of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 604)
requires that, when an agency promulgates a final rule under section
553 of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, after being required by that section
or any other law to publish a general notice of proposed rulemaking,
the agency shall prepare a FRFA. Section 604 describes the required
contents of a FRFA: (1) A statement of the need for and objectives of
the rule; (2) a statement of the significant issues raised by the
public comments in response to the IRFA, a statement of the assessment
of the agency of such issues, and a statement of any changes made to
the proposed rule as a result of such comments; (3) the response of the
agency to any comments filed by the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the
Small Business Administration (SBA) in response to the proposed rule,
and a detailed statement of any change made to the proposed rule in the
final rule as a result of the comments; (4) a description of and an
estimate of the number of small entities to which the rule will apply
or an explanation of why no such estimate is available; (5) a
description of the projected reporting, recordkeeping, and other
compliance requirements of the rule, including an estimate of the
classes of small entities that will be subject to the requirement and
the type of professional skills necessary for preparation of the report
or record; and (6) a description of the steps the agency has taken to
minimize the significant economic impact on small entities consistent
with the stated objectives of applicable statutes including a statement
of the factual, policy, and legal reasons for selecting the alternative
adopted in this final rule and why each one of the other significant
alternatives to the rule considered by the agency which affect the
impact on small entities was rejected.
A description of this rule, along with the need for and objectives
of the rule, are contained in the preamble herein and in the preamble
to the proposed rule (85 FR 58322, September 18, 2020), and are not
repeated here.
Public and Chief Counsel for Advocacy Comments on the IRFA
NMFS published the proposed rule on September 18, 2020 (85 FR
58322). An IRFA was prepared and included in the Classification section
of the preamble to the proposed rule. The comment period on the
proposed rule ended on October 19, 2020. None of the comments from the
public directly or indirectly referenced the IRFA. The Chief Counsel
for Advocacy of the SBA did not file any comments on the proposed rule.
Number and Description of Small Entities Regulated by This Final Rule
For RFA purposes only, NMFS has established a small business size
standard for businesses, including their affiliates, whose primary
industry is commercial fishing (see 50 CFR 200.2). A business primarily
engaged in commercial fishing (NAICS code 11411) is classified as a
small business if it is independently owned and operated, is not
dominant in its field of operation (including its affiliates), and has
combined annual receipts not in excess
[[Page 78044]]
of $11 million for all its affiliated operations worldwide.
This final rule directly regulates individuals and entities that
participate, or would seek to participate, in the BSAI Pacific cod
parallel fisheries with federally permitted vessels using trawl, hook-
and-line, or pot gear. The Analysis indicates that 192 vessels have a
history of participation in the BSAI targeted Pacific cod fisheries
over the 2010-2019 period. Based upon the estimated ex-vessel earnings
of these vessels, the Analysis also indicates that 71 of these vessels
are considered small entities. Of the 30 vessels that are expected to
be directly impacted by the regulations in this rule, 29 are considered
small entities, based on SBA criteria.
This rule, which prohibits certain federally permitted vessels from
catching and retaining Pacific cod in the State's parallel fishery
unless the vessel has the required permits, licenses, and endorsements,
is intended to reflect the intent of previous recommendations by the
Council regarding license limitation, vessel sector allocations of
Pacific cod, and catch reporting. Additionally, this rule is expected
to enhance the conservation and management of the fisheries by holding
vessel sectors to their allocations and to promote the goals and
objectives of the BSAI FMP for the Federal Pacific cod fishery. In
2011, NMFS implemented provisions similar to this final rule as part of
Amendment 83 to the Fishery Management Plan for Groundfish of the Gulf
of Alaska. Regulations established by this final rule are also very
similar to current regulations that control the participation of
catcher/processor hook-and-line and pot gear vessels in the BSAI; the
regulations in this rule effectively add BSAI hook-and-line catcher
vessels, pot catcher vessels, and trawl gear vessels to the existing
body of BSAI fishing regulations.
The majority of the 30 vessel owners who are directly impacted by
this rule currently have LLP licenses that allow them to participate in
the parallel fisheries. Five of the 30 vessels currently do not have
FFPs, which prevents them from fishing in Federal waters. Under this
final rule, these vessels could continue to fish as they do now, solely
in state waters. However, if the vessel owners choose to obtain an FFP,
their vessels would have the flexibility to fish in both state and
Federal waters during the directed Federal Pacific cod fishery for
their sector. Also among the 30 directly impacted vessels, 15 other
vessels are currently associated with FFPs and are linked to LLP
licenses that allow them to continue to fish for Pacific cod in both
Federal and state waters during the concurrent Federal and parallel
fisheries; however, in previous years, an incremental portion of their
participation has occurred in the parallel fishery when their sector
was closed to fishing in Federal waters. Under this final rule, these
vessels will no longer be able to circumvent seasonal closures for
their sector by participating in the parallel fishery after their
Federal sector has been closed. This ensures that their Pacific cod
harvests will be attributed to the appropriate sector, as designated on
their LLP license.
Vessel owners most likely to be impacted by this final rule are
those whose vessels have an FFP and participate in the parallel
fishery, but who do not have the appropriate LLP license to fish for
Pacific cod in the BSAI Federal waters. These vessels could either exit
the parallel fishery and therefore the BSAI Pacific cod fishery
entirely, or they could forfeit their FFP (and therefore fish solely in
state waters, but also forfeit Federal fishing opportunities associated
with their FFP), or they could obtain a valid LLP license that would
allow them the flexibility to participate in both the Federal and
parallel Pacific cod fisheries. Because LLP licenses are a transferable
and marketable asset, the owners' decisions will likely be influenced
by the cost and availability of an LLP license.
Recordkeeping, Reporting, and other Compliance Requirements
Under this final rule, recordkeeping and reporting will not change
for federally permitted catcher vessels that participate in the
directed BSAI non-CDQ Pacific cod fisheries. The scope of this final
rule modifies the conditions of Federal permits and imposes
participation requirements for certain federally permitted vessels when
fishing for Pacific cod in the parallel fisheries. This action also
modifies the conditions under which existing permits may be used. Those
specific requirements and the permit conditions are described in the
preambles to this rule and to the proposed rule, and are not repeated
here.
Duplicate, Overlapping, or Conflicting Federal Rules
No duplication, overlap, or conflict between this final rule and
existing Federal rules has been identified.
Description of Significant Alternatives Considered to the Final
Action That Minimize Adverse Impacts on Small Entities
The Council and NMFS considered two alternatives. Among the two
alternatives, Alternative 2 (the preferred, action alternative)
promotes conservation, management, and catch accounting measures that
were previously adopted by the North Pacific Fishery Management Council
(Council) regarding license limitation, sector allocations, and catch
reporting. As noted in the preamble to this rule, the Council's intent
for the regulatory amendments of Alternative 2 is to expand upon rules
already in place for BSAI catcher/processor vessels that fish for
Pacific cod with pot or hook-and-line gear. Federal regulations
currently require these two catcher/processor sectors to have an FFP
and LLP license with correct Federal Pacific cod endorsements in order
to fish in the parallel fisheries (76 FR 73513, November 29, 2011).
These two Pacific cod catcher/processor sectors are also subject to the
FFP relinquish and reapply rules implemented by this rule.
Alternative 1 was the no action alternative. Under the status quo,
the regulations inadvertently allow fishing in the State parallel
fisheries by catcher vessels even when the Federal fishery sector for
those vessels has fully achieved its Federal Pacific cod allocation,
which is contrary to the Council's intent.
The regulations in this final rule do not modify the regulatory
requirements for vessels using jig gear in the BSAI. Additionally, this
rule does not limit participation in the state waters GHL fisheries.
Small Entity Compliance Guide
Section 212 of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness
Act of 1996 states that, for each rule or group of related rules for
which an agency is required to prepare a final regulatory flexibility
analysis, the agency shall publish one or more guides to assist small
entities in complying with the rule, and shall designate such
publications as ``small entity compliance guides.'' The agency shall
explain the actions a small entity is required to take to comply with a
rule or group of rules. NMFS will publish on its website a summary of
this rulemaking including compliance requirements that will serve as
the small entity compliance guide. Copies of the proposed rule and this
final rule are available from the NMFS website at https://
fisheries.noaa.gov/region/alaska.
Collection-of-Information Requirements
This final rule does not contain a change to a collection of
information requirement for purposes of the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995. The existing collection of information
[[Page 78045]]
requirements would continue to apply under the following OMB Control
Numbers: 0648-0206, Alaska Region Permit Family of Forms (FFP), and
0648-0334, Alaska License Limitation Program for Groundfish, Crab, and
Scallops.
List of Subjects in 50 CFR Part 679
Alaska, Fisheries, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 25, 2020.
Samuel D. Rauch, III
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, NMFS amends 50 CFR part
679 as follows:
PART 679--FISHERIES OF THE EXCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ZONE OFF ALASKA
0
1. The authority citation for part 679 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 773 et seq.; 1801 et seq.; 3631 et seq.;
Pub. L. 108-447; Pub. L. 111-281.
0
2. In Sec. 679.4, revise paragraphs (b)(3)(i), (b)(3)(ii)(B), and
(b)(3)(iii)(B) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.4 Permits.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(3) * * * (i) Length of permit effectiveness. NMFS issues FFPs on a
three-year cycle and an FFP is in effect from the effective date
through the expiration date, as indicated on the FFP, unless the FFP is
revoked, suspended, surrendered in accordance with paragraph (a)(9) of
this section, or modified under Sec. 600.735 or Sec. 600.740 of this
chapter.
(ii) * * *
(B) For the BSAI, NMFS will not reissue a surrendered FFP to the
owner or authorized representative of a vessel named on an FFP that has
been issued with endorsements for catcher/processor or catcher vessel
operation type; trawl, pot, and/or hook-and-line gear type; and the
BSAI area, until after the expiration date of the surrendered FFP as
initially issued.
* * * * *
(iii) * * *
(B) In the BSAI, NMFS will not approve an application to amend an
FFP to remove a catcher/processor or catcher vessel operation type
endorsement, trawl gear type endorsement, pot gear type endorsement,
hook-and-line gear type endorsement, or BSAI area endorsement from an
FFP that has been issued with endorsements for catcher/processor or
catcher vessel operation type, trawl, pot, or hook-and-line gear type,
and the BSAI area.
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 679.7, revise paragraphs (c)(3) and (4) to read as follows:
Sec. 679.7 Prohibitions.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) Parallel Pacific cod fisheries--participation requirements. Use
a vessel named or required to be named on an FFP to catch and retain
Pacific cod from State of Alaska waters adjacent to the BSAI, when
Pacific cod caught by that vessel is deducted from the Federal TAC
specified under Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A)(2) through (9), unless:
(i) That non-trawl vessel is designated on both:
(A) An LLP license issued under Sec. 679.4(k), unless that vessel
is using jig gear and exempt from the LLP license requirement under
Sec. 679.4(k)(2)(iii). Each vessel required to have an LLP license
must be designated with the following endorsements:
(1) The BSAI area endorsement for the BSAI area adjacent to the
parallel fishery where the harvest occurred; and
(2) A BSAI catcher/processor Pacific cod hook-and-line endorsement,
a BSAI catcher/processor Pacific cod pot endorsement, or a BSAI Pacific
cod catcher vessel endorsement if that catcher vessel is 60 feet or
greater length overall; and
(B) An FFP issued under Sec. 679.4(b) with the following
endorsements:
(1) A catcher/processor or catcher vessel operation type
endorsement;
(2) A BSAI area endorsement; and
(3) A pot or hook-and-line gear type endorsement.
(ii) Or, that trawl vessel is designated on both:
(A) An LLP license issued under Sec. 679.4(k) endorsed for trawl
gear with the BSAI area endorsement for the BSAI area adjacent to the
parallel fishery where the harvest occurred; and
(B) An FFP issued under Sec. 679.4(b) with the following
endorsements:
(1) The BSAI area endorsement;
(2) An operational type endorsement;
(3) A trawl gear type endorsement; and
(4) A Pacific cod gear type endorsement.
(4) Parallel Pacific cod fisheries--closures. Use a vessel named or
required to be named on an FFP to catch and retain Pacific cod with
trawl, pot, or hook-and-line gear from State of Alaska waters adjacent
to the BSAI when Pacific cod caught by that vessel is deducted from the
Federal TAC specified under Sec. 679.20(a)(7)(ii)(A) for trawl, pot,
or hook-and-line gear, if directed fishing for Pacific cod is not open
for the sector to which the vessel belongs in Federal waters.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-26593 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P