Adipic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance, 78002-78005 [2020-26005]
Download as PDF
78002
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: November 5, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.412, amend paragraph (a)
by designating the table and adding in
alphabetical order in newly designated
Table 1 to paragraph (a) the entries
‘‘Basil, dried leaves’’ and ‘‘Basil, fresh
leaves’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 180.412 Sethoxydim; tolerances for
residues.
(a) * * *
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
*
Basil, dried leaves ......................
Basil, fresh leaves ......................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
20
8
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–26014 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
40 CFR Part 180
Adipic Acid; Exemption From the
Requirement of a Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
I. General Information
DATES:
This regulation is effective
December 3, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before February 1, 2020, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of 40 CFR part 180
through the Government Publishing
Office’s e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.
gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/
ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0569, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0569 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing and must be received
by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 1, 2020. Addresses for mail
and hand delivery of objections and
hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR
178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2019–0569, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0569; FRL–10015–57]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of Adipic acid
when used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils at an end-use
concentration not to exceed 100 parts
per million (ppm). Ecolab, Inc.
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA) requesting establishment of an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for adipic acid. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of adipic acid when used in
accordance with this exemption.
SUMMARY:
Jkt 253001
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of May 29,
2020 (85 FR 32338) (FRL–10009–84),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C. 346a,
announcing the filing of a pesticide
petition (PP IN–11317) by Ecolab, Inc.,
655 Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, MN 55121.
The petition requested that 40 CFR
180.940(a) be amended by establishing
an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of adipic acid
when used as an inert ingredient at an
upper limit of 100 ppm in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, and foodprocessing equipment and utensils. That
document referenced a summary of the
petition prepared by Ecolab, Inc., the
petitioner, which is available in the
docket, https://www.regulations.gov. One
comment was received on the notice of
filing. EPA’s response to this comment
is discussed in Unit V.B.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients
that are not active ingredients as defined
in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are
not limited to, the following types of
ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own):
Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as
polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and
diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose;
wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol
dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ‘‘inert’’ is not
intended to imply nontoxicity; the
ingredient may or may not be
chemically active. Generally, EPA has
exempted inert ingredients from the
requirement of a tolerance based on the
low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA
allows EPA to establish an exemption
from the requirement for a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the exemption is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that EPA has
determined that ‘‘there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue, including all
anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but it does not
include occupational exposure. Section
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an
exemption and to ‘‘ensure that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue.’’
EPA establishes exemptions from the
requirement of a tolerance only in those
cases where it can be clearly
demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide
chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no
harm to human health. In order to
determine the risks from aggregate
exposure to pesticide inert ingredients,
the Agency considers the toxicity of the
inert in conjunction with possible
exposure to residues of the inert
ingredient through food, drinking water,
and through other exposures that occur
as a result of pesticide use in residential
settings. If EPA is able to determine that
a tolerance is not necessary to ensure
that there is a reasonable certainty that
no harm will result from aggregate
exposure to the inert ingredient, an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(c)(2)(A), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure to adipic acid,
including exposure resulting from the
exemption established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with adipic acid follows.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
78003
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available
toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as
well as the relationship of the results of
the studies to human risk. EPA has also
considered available information
concerning the variability of the
sensitivities of major identifiable
subgroups of consumers, including
infants and children. Specific
information on the studies received and
the nature of the adverse effects caused
by adipic acid in these toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit.
Available acute toxicity studies on
adipic acid include various oral, dermal,
and inhalation studies which showed
low toxicity. Multiple dermal and eye
irritation studies, and a dermal
sensitization study, indicated that
adipic acid is not a dermal irritant and
does not cause skin sensitization.
Adipic acid is an eye irritant. In
available repeat dose studies, which
were up to two years in duration, no
adverse effects of treatment were seen
below the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/
day. In addition, there was no evidence
of carcinogenicity or neuropathological
changes or effects reported in any of the
studies. Adipic acid was not found to be
genotoxic in various in vitro and in vivo
studies.
All studies showed low acute and
repeat dose toxicity, and no
reproductive/developmental toxicity
was seen in any of the species tested.
The primary systemic health effect
associated with adipic acid is irritation
of the intestinal mucosa and decreased
body weight after exposures to
concentrations >2,000 mg/kg/day.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/
Levels of Concern
No toxicological endpoint of concern
for adipic acid has been identified in the
database.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food, feed
uses, and drinking water. In evaluating
dietary exposure to adipic acid, EPA
considered exposure under the current
and proposed use patterns. Dietary
exposure to adipic acid may occur from
eating foods containing adipic acid
(found naturally or as a food additive)
or eating food that comes in contact
with surfaces treated with pesticide
formulations containing this inert
ingredient. In addition, exposure
through drinking water is also possible.
However, no toxicological endpoint of
concern was identified for adipic acid
below the limit dose and therefore a
quantitative assessment of dietary
exposure is not necessary.
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
78004
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
2. Non-dietary exposure. The term
‘‘residential exposure’’ is used in this
document to refer to non-occupational,
non-dietary exposure (e.g., textiles
(clothing and diapers), carpets,
swimming pools, and hard surface
disinfection on walls, floors, and tables).
Residential exposure to adipic acid may
occur based on its use as an inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations
registered for residential uses.
Additional non-dietary exposure may
occur from the use of adipic acid in
pharmaceutical products and cosmetics.
However, no toxicological endpoint of
concern was identified below the limit
dose for adipic acid and therefore a
quantitative residential exposure
assessment for adipic acid was not
conducted.
3. Cumulative effects from substances
with a common mechanism of toxicity.
Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA
requires that, when considering whether
to establish, modify, or revoke an
exemption, the Agency consider
‘‘available information’’ concerning the
cumulative effects of a particular
pesticide’s residues and ‘‘other
substances that have a common
mechanism of toxicity.’’
EPA has not found adipic acid to
share a common mechanism of toxicity
with any other substances, and adipic
acid does not appear to produce a toxic
metabolite produced by other
substances. For the purposes of this
action, therefore, EPA has assumed that
adipic acid does not have a common
mechanism of toxicity with other
substances. For information regarding
EPA’s efforts to determine which
chemicals have a common mechanism
of toxicity and to evaluate the
cumulative effects of such chemicals,
see EPA’s website at https://
www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
D. Safety Factor for Infants and
Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA
requires EPA to apply an additional
tenfold margin of safety in the case of
threshold effects to ensure that there is
a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. As noted in Unit
IV.B., there is no indication of threshold
effects being caused by adipic acid.
Therefore, this requirement does not
apply to the present analysis. Moreover,
due to the lack of any toxicological
endpoints of concern, EPA conducted a
qualitative assessment of adipic acid,
which does not use safety factors for
assessing risk.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of
Safety
Taking into consideration all available
information on adipic acid, EPA has
determined that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm to the general
population or any population subgroup,
including infants and children, will
result from aggregate exposure to adipic
acid residues. Therefore, the
establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR
180.940(a) for residues of adipic acid
when used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils at a maximum
end-use concentration of 100 ppm, is
safe under FFDCA section 408.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required
for enforcement purposes since the
Agency is not establishing a numerical
tolerance for residues of adipic acid in
or on any food commodities. EPA is
establishing a limitation on the amount
of adipic acid that may be used in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils. This limitation
will be enforced through the pesticide
registration process under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide
Act (‘‘FIFRA’’), 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq. EPA
will not register any antimicrobial
pesticide formulation applied to foodcontact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, and foodprocessing equipment and utensils
pesticide formulation that exceeds an
end-use concentration of adipic acid of
100 ppm.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in
response to the notice of filing
associated with this action; however,
the comment was unrelated to adipic
acid and is not relevant to this action.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance is established
under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for residues of
adipic acid (CAS Reg. No. 124–04–9)
when used as an inert ingredient in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations
applied to food-contact surfaces in
public eating places, dairy-processing
equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils at an end-use
concentration not to exceed 100 ppm.
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes an exemption
from the requirement of a tolerance
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the exemption in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
78005
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 233 / Thursday, December 3, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
PART 180— TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Dated: November 6, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR chapter
I as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.940 amend the table in
paragraph (a) by adding alphabetically
the entry ‘‘Adipic acid’’ to read as
follows:
■
§ 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active
and inert ingredients for use in
antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact
surface sanitizing solutions).
*
*
*
(a) * * *
*
*
Pesticide chemical
CAS Reg. No.
Limits
*
*
*
Adipic acid ..........................................................................
*
*
*
124–04–9 ...........................................................................
*
When ready for use, the
end-use concentration
is not to exceed 100
ppm.
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–26005 Filed 12–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[WT Docket No. 19–250, RM–11849; FCC
20–153; FRS 17230]
Accelerating Wireless and Wireline
Deployment by Streamlining Local
Approval of Wireless Infrastructure
Modifications
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the Federal
Communications Commission revises
portions of the Spectrum Act of 2012 to
provide for streamlined state and local
government review of modifications to
existing wireless infrastructure that
involve limited ground excavation or
deployment of transmission equipment.
The Report and Order promotes
accelerated deployment of 5G and other
advanced wireless services by
facilitating the collocation of antennas
and associated equipment on existing
infrastructure while preserving the
SUMMARY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with RULES
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:55 Dec 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
*
*
ability of state and local governments to
manage and protect local land-use
interests.
DATES: Effective January 4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Federal Communications
Commission, 45 L Street NE,
Washington, DC 20554.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Georgios Leris, Georgios.Leris@fcc.gov
or Belinda Nixon, Belinda.Nixon@
fcc.gov, Competition & Infrastructure
Policy Division, Wireless
Telecommunications Bureau.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s Report
and Order in WT Docket No. 19–250,
RM–11849; FCC 20–153, adopted on
October 27, 2020, and released on
November 3, 2020. The full text of this
document is available for public
inspection online at https://
www.fcc.gov/edocs. Documents will be
available electronically in ASCII,
Microsoft Word, and/or Adobe Acrobat.
Alternative formats are available for
people with disabilities (Braille, large
print, electronic files, audio format,
etc.), and reasonable accommodations
(accessible format documents, sign
language interpreters, CART, etc.) may
be requested by sending an email to
FCC504@fcc.gov or call the Consumer &
Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202–
418–0530 (voice), 202–418–0432 (TTY).
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
Synopsis
1. In this Report and Order, the
Commission revises its rule to provide
for streamlined state and local review of
modifications that involve limited
ground excavation or deployment while
preserving the ability of state and local
governments to manage and protect
local land-use interests. To facilitate the
collocation of antennas and associated
ground equipment, while recognizing
the role of state and local governments
in land use decisions, the Commission
revises section 6409(a) rules to provide
that excavation or deployment in a
limited area beyond site boundaries
would not disqualify the modification of
an existing tower from streamlined state
and local review on that basis.
2. This change is consistent with the
recent amendment to the Nationwide
Programmatic Agreement (NPA) for the
Collocation of Wireless Antennas
(Collocation NPA), which now provides
that, in certain circumstances,
excavation or deployment within the
same limited area beyond a site
boundary does not warrant federal
historic preservation review of a
collocation. In addition, we revise the
definition of ‘‘site’’ in section 6409(a)
rules in a manner that will ensure that
the site boundaries from which limited
expansion is measured appropriately
E:\FR\FM\03DER1.SGM
03DER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 233 (Thursday, December 3, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 78002-78005]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26005]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0569; FRL-10015-57]
Adipic Acid; Exemption From the Requirement of a Tolerance
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an exemption from the requirement
of a tolerance for residues of Adipic acid when used as an inert
ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide formulations applied to food-
contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy-processing equipment,
and food-processing equipment and utensils at an end-use concentration
not to exceed 100 parts per million (ppm). Ecolab, Inc. submitted a
petition to EPA under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA)
requesting establishment of an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for adipic acid. This regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level for residues of adipic acid when
used in accordance with this exemption.
DATES: This regulation is effective December 3, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before February 1, 2020,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0569, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of 40 CFR
part 180 through the Government Publishing Office's e-CFR site at
https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a(g), any person may file
an objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0569 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
February 1, 2020. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0569, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
[[Page 78003]]
Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Petition for Exemption
In the Federal Register of May 29, 2020 (85 FR 32338) (FRL-10009-
84), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408, 21 U.S.C.
346a, announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP IN-11317) by
Ecolab, Inc., 655 Lone Oak Drive, Eagan, MN 55121. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.940(a) be amended by establishing an
exemption from the requirement of a tolerance for residues of adipic
acid when used as an inert ingredient at an upper limit of 100 ppm in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces
in public eating places, dairy-processing equipment, and food-
processing equipment and utensils. That document referenced a summary
of the petition prepared by Ecolab, Inc., the petitioner, which is
available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. One comment was
received on the notice of filing. EPA's response to this comment is
discussed in Unit V.B.
III. Inert Ingredient Definition
Inert ingredients are all ingredients that are not active
ingredients as defined in 40 CFR 153.125 and include, but are not
limited to, the following types of ingredients (except when they have a
pesticidal efficacy of their own): Solvents such as alcohols and
hydrocarbons; surfactants such as polyoxyethylene polymers and fatty
acids; carriers such as clay and diatomaceous earth; thickeners such as
carrageenan and modified cellulose; wetting, spreading, and dispersing
agents; propellants in aerosol dispensers; microencapsulating agents;
and emulsifiers. The term ``inert'' is not intended to imply
nontoxicity; the ingredient may or may not be chemically active.
Generally, EPA has exempted inert ingredients from the requirement of a
tolerance based on the low toxicity of the individual inert
ingredients.
IV. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(c)(2)(A)(i) of the FFDCA allows EPA to establish an
exemption from the requirement for a tolerance (the legal limit for a
pesticide chemical residue in or on a food) only if EPA determines that
the exemption is ``safe.'' Section 408(c)(2)(A)(ii) of the FFDCA
defines ``safe'' to mean that EPA has determined that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings, but it does not include occupational exposure.
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special
consideration to exposure of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing an exemption and to ``ensure that
there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to infants and
children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue.''
EPA establishes exemptions from the requirement of a tolerance only
in those cases where it can be clearly demonstrated that the risks from
aggregate exposure to pesticide chemical residues under reasonably
foreseeable circumstances will pose no harm to human health. In order
to determine the risks from aggregate exposure to pesticide inert
ingredients, the Agency considers the toxicity of the inert in
conjunction with possible exposure to residues of the inert ingredient
through food, drinking water, and through other exposures that occur as
a result of pesticide use in residential settings. If EPA is able to
determine that a tolerance is not necessary to ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the inert ingredient, an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance may be established.
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(A), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(c)(2)(B), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure to adipic acid, including exposure
resulting from the exemption established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with adipic acid follows.
A. Toxicological Profile
EPA has evaluated the available toxicity data and considered their
validity, completeness, and reliability as well as the relationship of
the results of the studies to human risk. EPA has also considered
available information concerning the variability of the sensitivities
of major identifiable subgroups of consumers, including infants and
children. Specific information on the studies received and the nature
of the adverse effects caused by adipic acid in these toxicity studies
are discussed in this unit.
Available acute toxicity studies on adipic acid include various
oral, dermal, and inhalation studies which showed low toxicity.
Multiple dermal and eye irritation studies, and a dermal sensitization
study, indicated that adipic acid is not a dermal irritant and does not
cause skin sensitization. Adipic acid is an eye irritant. In available
repeat dose studies, which were up to two years in duration, no adverse
effects of treatment were seen below the limit dose of 1,000 mg/kg/day.
In addition, there was no evidence of carcinogenicity or
neuropathological changes or effects reported in any of the studies.
Adipic acid was not found to be genotoxic in various in vitro and in
vivo studies.
All studies showed low acute and repeat dose toxicity, and no
reproductive/developmental toxicity was seen in any of the species
tested. The primary systemic health effect associated with adipic acid
is irritation of the intestinal mucosa and decreased body weight after
exposures to concentrations >2,000 mg/kg/day.
B. Toxicological Points of Departure/Levels of Concern
No toxicological endpoint of concern for adipic acid has been
identified in the database.
C. Exposure Assessment
1. Dietary exposure from food, feed uses, and drinking water. In
evaluating dietary exposure to adipic acid, EPA considered exposure
under the current and proposed use patterns. Dietary exposure to adipic
acid may occur from eating foods containing adipic acid (found
naturally or as a food additive) or eating food that comes in contact
with surfaces treated with pesticide formulations containing this inert
ingredient. In addition, exposure through drinking water is also
possible. However, no toxicological endpoint of concern was identified
for adipic acid below the limit dose and therefore a quantitative
assessment of dietary exposure is not necessary.
[[Page 78004]]
2. Non-dietary exposure. The term ``residential exposure'' is used
in this document to refer to non-occupational, non-dietary exposure
(e.g., textiles (clothing and diapers), carpets, swimming pools, and
hard surface disinfection on walls, floors, and tables). Residential
exposure to adipic acid may occur based on its use as an inert
ingredient in pesticide formulations registered for residential uses.
Additional non-dietary exposure may occur from the use of adipic acid
in pharmaceutical products and cosmetics. However, no toxicological
endpoint of concern was identified below the limit dose for adipic acid
and therefore a quantitative residential exposure assessment for adipic
acid was not conducted.
3. Cumulative effects from substances with a common mechanism of
toxicity. Section 408(b)(2)(D)(v) of the FFDCA requires that, when
considering whether to establish, modify, or revoke an exemption, the
Agency consider ``available information'' concerning the cumulative
effects of a particular pesticide's residues and ``other substances
that have a common mechanism of toxicity.''
EPA has not found adipic acid to share a common mechanism of
toxicity with any other substances, and adipic acid does not appear to
produce a toxic metabolite produced by other substances. For the
purposes of this action, therefore, EPA has assumed that adipic acid
does not have a common mechanism of toxicity with other substances. For
information regarding EPA's efforts to determine which chemicals have a
common mechanism of toxicity and to evaluate the cumulative effects of
such chemicals, see EPA's website at https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/cumulative.
D. Safety Factor for Infants and Children
Section 408(b)(2)(C) of the FFDCA requires EPA to apply an
additional tenfold margin of safety in the case of threshold effects to
ensure that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will result to
infants and children from aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical
residue. As noted in Unit IV.B., there is no indication of threshold
effects being caused by adipic acid. Therefore, this requirement does
not apply to the present analysis. Moreover, due to the lack of any
toxicological endpoints of concern, EPA conducted a qualitative
assessment of adipic acid, which does not use safety factors for
assessing risk.
E. Aggregate Risks and Determination of Safety
Taking into consideration all available information on adipic acid,
EPA has determined that there is a reasonable certainty that no harm to
the general population or any population subgroup, including infants
and children, will result from aggregate exposure to adipic acid
residues. Therefore, the establishment of an exemption from the
requirement of a tolerance under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for residues of
adipic acid when used as an inert ingredient in antimicrobial pesticide
formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public eating places,
dairy-processing equipment, and food-processing equipment and utensils
at a maximum end-use concentration of 100 ppm, is safe under FFDCA
section 408.
V. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
An analytical method is not required for enforcement purposes since
the Agency is not establishing a numerical tolerance for residues of
adipic acid in or on any food commodities. EPA is establishing a
limitation on the amount of adipic acid that may be used in
antimicrobial pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces
in public eating places, dairy-processing equipment, and food-
processing equipment and utensils. This limitation will be enforced
through the pesticide registration process under the Federal
Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (``FIFRA''), 7 U.S.C. 136
et seq. EPA will not register any antimicrobial pesticide formulation
applied to food-contact surfaces in public eating places, dairy-
processing equipment, and food-processing equipment and utensils
pesticide formulation that exceeds an end-use concentration of adipic
acid of 100 ppm.
B. Response to Comments
One comment was received in response to the notice of filing
associated with this action; however, the comment was unrelated to
adipic acid and is not relevant to this action.
VI. Conclusions
Therefore, an exemption from the requirement of a tolerance is
established under 40 CFR 180.940(a) for residues of adipic acid (CAS
Reg. No. 124-04-9) when used as an inert ingredient in antimicrobial
pesticide formulations applied to food-contact surfaces in public
eating places, dairy-processing equipment, and food-processing
equipment and utensils at an end-use concentration not to exceed 100
ppm.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes an exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance under FFDCA section 408(d) in response to a petition
submitted to the Agency. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has
exempted these types of actions from review under Executive Order
12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and Review'' (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action has been exempted from review
under Executive Order 12866, this action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled ``Protection of
Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks'' (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a regulatory action under
Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action does not
contain any information collections subject to OMB approval under the
Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does it
require any special considerations under Executive Order 12898,
entitled ``Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the exemption in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and
[[Page 78005]]
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this action does not
impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded mandate as
described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) (2
U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VIII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: November 6, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA amends 40
CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180-- TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL
RESIDUES IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.940 amend the table in paragraph (a) by adding
alphabetically the entry ``Adipic acid'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.940 Tolerance exemptions for active and inert ingredients
for use in antimicrobial formulations (Food-contact surface sanitizing
solutions).
* * * * *
(a) * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pesticide chemical CAS Reg. No. Limits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Adipic acid............................. 124-04-9................... When ready for use, the end-use
concentration is not to exceed 100 ppm.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-26005 Filed 12-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P