Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance: Member Married to Member, 75857-75860 [2020-25585]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
individual’s records in this system of
records.
Dated: November 13, 2020.
Washington, DC.
By direction of the Board.
Roxanne L. Rothschild,
Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations
Board.
[FR Doc. 2020–25468 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7545–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 100
[Docket No. USCG–2020–0552]
Special Local Regulation: Palm Beach
Holiday Boat Parade
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
Dated: November 17, 2020.
J.F. Burdian,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Miami.
The Coast Guard will enforce
a special local regulation on December
5, 2020 to provide for the safety and
security of certain navigable waters
along the Intracoastal Waterway during
the Palm Beach Holiday Boat Parade.
During the enforcement period, all nonparticipant persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering, transiting,
anchoring in, or remaining within the
regulated area unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Miami or a
designated representative. The operator
of any vessel in the regulated area must
comply with instructions from the Coast
Guard or designated representative.
DATES: The regulation in 33 CFR
100.702, Table to § 100.702, Line 9, will
be enforced on December 5, 2020 from
5:30 p.m. through 8:30 p.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions about this notice of
enforcement, call or email Mr. Omar
Beceiro, Sector Miami Waterways
Management Division, U.S. Coast
Guard: Telephone: 305–535–4317,
Email: Omar.Beceiro@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Coast
Guard will enforce a special local
regulation for the Palm Beach Holiday
Boat Parade published in 33 CFR
100.702, Table to § 100.702, Line 9, on
December 5, 2020 from 5:30 p.m.
through 8:30 p.m. This action is being
taken to provide for the safety and
security of certain navigable waters
along the Intracoastal Waterway during
this one-day event. Our regulation for
marine events within the Seventh Coast
Guard District, § 100.702, specifies the
[FR Doc. 2020–25751 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am]
AGENCY:
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
location of the special local regulation
for the Palm Beach Holiday Boat Parade,
which encompasses a moving buffer
zone of 50 yards around the parade as
it travels north along the Intracoastal
Waterway in Palm Beach, FL. Only
event sponsor designated participants
and official patrol vessels will be
allowed to enter the regulated area.
Spectators may contact the Coast Guard
Patrol Commander to request
permission to pass through the
regulated area. If permission is granted,
spectators must pass directly through
the regulated area at a safe speed
without loitering.
In addition to this notice of
enforcement in the Federal Register, the
Coast Guard will inform the public
through Local Notice to Mariners and
marine information broadcasts at least
24 hours in advance of the enforcement
of the special local regulation.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Nov 25, 2020
Jkt 253001
75857
final rulemaking will implement the
mandates of Executive Order 13891,
Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance Documents.
Correction
In FR Doc. 2020–25121, appearing on
column 3 of page 72570, in the Federal
Register of 85 FR 72570, the following
correction is made:
■ 1. On page 72570, column 3, the
Signing Authority paragraph should
read as follows:
‘‘The Secretary of Veterans Affairs
approved this document on November
6, 2020, for publication and authorized
the undersigned to sign and submit the
document to the Office of the Federal
Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department
of Veterans Affairs.’’
Jeffrey M. Martin,
Assistant Director, Office of Regulation Policy
& Management, Office of the Secretary,
Department of Veterans Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020–25474 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900–AQ37
38 CFR Part 5
RIN 2900–AQ92
Administrative Procedures: Guidance
Documents; Correction
Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance—Family Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance: Member Married
to Member
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
AGENCY:
ACTION:
ACTION:
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule; correction.
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is correcting a final rule
that published on November 13, 2020,
establishing in regulation its processes
and procedures for issuing guidance
documents. This final rulemaking will
implement the mandates of Executive
Order 13891, Promoting the Rule of Law
Through Improved Agency Guidance
Documents.
SUMMARY:
This correction is effective
December 14, 2020.
DATES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Murphy, Office of Policy and
Interagency Collaboration, Office of
Enterprise Integration, 810 Vermont
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420,
(202) 714–8507. (This is not a toll-free
telephone number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 13, 2020, at 85 FR 72569, VA
published a rulemaking establishing in
regulation its processes and procedures
for issuing guidance documents. This
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Department of Veterans
Affairs (VA) is amending its regulations
governing Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance (SGLI) and Family
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
(FSGLI) to allow a SGLI-covered
member (member) who marries another
SGLI-eligible member (member spouse)
after January 1, 2013, or a member
whose spouse becomes a member
spouse after January 1, 2013, to receive
FSGLI coverage on a member spouse at
the maximum statutory amount or a
lesser amount, or to increase existing
FSGLI coverage on a member spouse. A
member married to a member may elect
or increase FSGLI coverage for a
member spouse, without a requirement
to show good health, within 240 days of:
The member’s marriage to another
member, the member’s spouse entering
service, or the member’s spouse
separating from service. If a member
does not elect or increase FSGLI
coverage within this 240-day ‘‘no
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
75858
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
health’’ period, then the member can
still receive or increase FSGLI coverage
by applying for such coverage and
submitting proof of the member
spouse’s good health. The final
rulemaking also states that FSGLI
coverage that is in force at the time a
spouse or child enters service will
continue and the member is not
required to elect or reapply for such
coverage. Additionally, VA is making a
technical amendment to the amendatory
language.
DATES: This rule is effective December
28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul
Weaver, Department of Veterans Affairs
Insurance Service (310/290B), 5000
Wissahickon Avenue, Philadelphia, PA
19144, (215) 842–2000, ext. 4263. (This
is not a toll-free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On February 11, 2020, VA published
in the Federal Register (85 FR 7683) a
proposed rule to amend its regulations
governing the application process for
FSGLI coverage for member spouses of
SGLI-covered members. Interested
persons were invited to submit written
comments on or before April 13, 2020.
VA received one comment concerning
the submission of proof of good health
for former member spouses. The
commenter recommended that VA
revise the rulemaking to allow a
member to elect FSGLI coverage on a
member spouse without submitting
proof of good health for 120 days
following a marriage or a former
member spouse’s separation from
service. The commenter suggested that
this grace period would minimize
adverse selection and bring parity to
FSGLI eligibility requirements for
civilian and member spouses and is
consistent with Congressional intent to
avoid creating FSGLI debts for members
who do not want FSGLI coverage on
member spouses. Based on internal
agency reconsideration of the proposed
regulation and the comment received,
VA is making the following revisions.
I. FSGLI Coverage for Member Spouses
Section 1969(g)(2)(B) of title 38,
U.S.C., requires VA to manage FSGLI
according to sound actuarial principles,
and VA explained in the proposed
rulemaking that this requires limiting
the risk of adverse selection of FSGLI
applicants. VA has determined that
removing the proposed requirement for
members to submit proof of their
member spouse’s good health for 240
days following a member’s marriage to
another member or a member’s spouse
entering service is consistent with
sound actuarial principles. If a member
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Nov 25, 2020
Jkt 253001
does not elect or increase coverage on a
member spouse within the 240-day
period, then the member will have the
opportunity to receive FSGLI coverage
by applying for such coverage and
submitting proof of their member
spouse’s good health. Although the
commenter recommended a 120-day
‘‘no health’’ period for a member to elect
FSGLI without submitting proof of their
member spouse’s good health, VA has
determined that a 240-day ‘‘no health’’
period is more appropriate since it
would allow for greater participation in
FSGLI and would remain consistent
with sound actuarial principles. This
change is reflected in new § 9.24(a).
II. FSGLI Coverage for Former Member
Spouses
VA is also amending our proposed
rulemaking to allow a member, upon
election, to initiate FSGLI coverage at
the maximum statutory amount or a
lesser amount, or to increase existing
FSGLI coverage, on a former member
spouse. A member will only be required
to submit proof of good health when
more than 240 days have passed
following the former member spouse’s
separation from service. If a member
does not elect FSGLI at the maximum
statutory amount or a lesser amount, or
increase existing FSGLI coverage,
within 240 days following their former
member spouse’s separation from
service, then the member will have the
opportunity to apply for FSGLI or to
increase existing FSGLI coverage by
submitting proof of their former member
spouse’s good health. Although the
commenter recommended a 120-day
‘‘no health’’ period for a member to elect
or increase FSGLI without submitting
proof of their former member spouse’s
good health, VA has determined that a
240-day ‘‘no health’’ period is more
appropriate because it would allow for
greater participation in FSGLI and
would remain consistent with sound
actuarial principles. We also note that
the 240-day period is consistent with 38
CFR 9.2(c), which allows a former
member to apply for Veterans’ Group
Life Insurance within 240 days after
separating from service without
submitting proof of good health. This
change is reflected in new § 9.24(c).
III. Technical Amendments to 38 CFR
Part 9
VA is making two technical
amendments to the amendatory
language in this final rule. In the
proposed rulemaking, we proposed to
create a new paragraph (f) in current 38
CFR 9.2 and to create a new 38 CFR 9.3.
In this final rule, we are creating a new
paragraph (g) because paragraph (f) was
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
recently added by 85 FR 35562,
Extension of Veterans’ Group Life
Insurance (VGLI) Application Period in
Response to the COVID–19 Public
Health Emergency (June 11, 2020)
(interim final rule). We are clarifying
that paragraph (g) applies to member
spouses eligible for coverage under 38
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) as well as (C)(ii).
We are also clarifying that § 9.2(g)(2)
refers to a member-spouse covered
under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i) and
who was also eligible for coverage under
38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but
who was not so insured or was insured
at a reduced amount by reason of the
member’s election pursuant to 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(2)(B) or (a)(3)(B). We are also
moving proposed § 9.3 to new 38 CFR
9.24 for purposes of minimizing
disruption to the other regulations in
part 9. We are clarifying that this section
applies to member spouses eligible for
coverage under 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) as well as (C)(ii). New
§ 9.2(g) and new § 9.24 reflect the
changes discussed above.
For the reasons discussed above, VA
is adopting the proposed rule as a final
rule with the above-noted changes.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and
13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 13563 (Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review)
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits,
reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and
promoting flexibility. The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
VA’s impact analysis can be found as
a supporting document at https://
www.regulations.gov, usually within 48
hours after the rulemaking document is
published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are
available on VA’s website at https://
www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the
link for ‘‘VA Regulations Published
From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to
Date.’’
This rule is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
rule is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. There are no
small entities involved with processing
and/or determining eligibility for SGLI
and FSGLI. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do
not apply.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
designated this rule as not a major rule,
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
PART 9—SERVICEMEMBERS’ GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS’
GROUP LIFE INSURANCE
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9
Life insurance, Military personnel,
Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or
designee, approved this document and
authorized the undersigned to sign and
submit the document to the Office of the
Federal Register for publication
electronically as an official document of
the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Brooks D. Tucker, Assistant Secretary
for Congressional and Legislative
Affairs, Performing the Delegable Duties
of the Chief of Staff, Department of
Veterans Affairs, approved this
Jkt 253001
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965–1980A,
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 9.2 is amended by adding
paragraph (g) to read as follows:
■
§ 9.2
Effective date; applications.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Except as provided in § 9.24, the
effective date of enrollment, reenrollment, or an increase in coverage
under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1) shall be the
date the uniformed service receives an
application and proof of the insurable
spouse’s good health:
(1) For an insurable spouse who was
eligible for coverage under 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but was not so
insured or was insured at a reduced rate
and who became a member; and
(2) For a member-spouse covered
under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i) and
who was also eligible for coverage under
38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but
who was not so insured or was insured
at a reduced amount by reason of an
election made by a member.
■ 3. Add § 9.24 to read as follows:
§ 9.24 Insurable dependents who become
eligible members, and eligible members
who marry eligible members.
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is
64.103, Life Insurance for Veterans.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, VA proposes to amend 38
CFR part 9 as set forth below:
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
one year. This final rule will have no
such effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
16:10 Nov 25, 2020
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office
of Regulation Policy & Management, Office
of the Secretary, Department of Veterans
Affairs.
■
Unfunded Mandates
VerDate Sep<11>2014
document on November 16, 2020, for
publication.
(a) A Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance-covered member (member)
who marries another Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance eligible member
(member spouse) after January 1, 2013,
or is married to a person who becomes
a Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
eligible member after January 1, 2013,
shall receive Family Servicemembers’
Group Life Insurance spousal coverage
at the statutory maximum amount or a
lesser amount, or receive increased
existing spousal coverage on their
member spouse, upon an election of
such coverage if made within 240 days
following the member’s marriage to
another member, or the member’s
spouse entering service, without having
to provide proof of the member spouse’s
good health. If a member does not elect
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
75859
coverage for a member spouse within
240 days following the member’s
marriage to another member, or the
member’s spouse entering service, then
the member may still receive spousal
coverage at the statutory maximum
amount or a lesser amount, or increase
existing spousal coverage, by applying
and submitting proof of the member
spouse’s good health.
(b) A spouse shall remain eligible to
be covered by any existing Family
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
spousal coverage without the member
electing such coverage or applying for
such coverage with proof of the member
spouse’s good health in a case where the
spouse is enrolled in coverage under 38
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) prior to
becoming a member married to another
member.
(c) A member’s spouse who was
insured under the member’s Family
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
at the time the spouse separates from
service will continue to be covered
under the spousal Family
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance
carried while in service, and the
member will not need to elect such
coverage. If a member seeks to enroll a
former member spouse who did not
have such spousal insurance coverage
when the former member spouse
separates from service, or seeks to
increase existing spousal coverage on
their former member spouse, the
member shall receive such spousal
coverage on their former member
spouse, upon an election of such
coverage if made within 240 days
following the former member spouse’s
separation from service, without having
to provide proof of the former member
spouse’s good health. If a member does
not elect coverage for a former member
spouse within 240 days following the
former member spouse’s separation
from service, then the member may still
receive spousal coverage at the statutory
maximum amount or a lesser amount, or
increase existing spousal coverage, by
applying and submitting proof of the
former member spouse’s good health.
(d) After January 1, 2013, an insurable
child who is a member at the time a
parent’s Servicemembers’ Group Life
Insurance coverage commences is not
eligible for automatic dependent
coverage under 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii). Dependent
coverage in effect for an insurable child
prior to becoming a member shall
remain in effect so long as the child
remains an insurable dependent. If an
insurable child was not covered prior to
becoming a member, the child cannot be
covered under 38 U.S.C.
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
75860
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 229 / Friday, November 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) after the child
becomes a member.
[FR Doc. 2020–25585 Filed 11–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0463; FRL–10015–
75–Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Utah;
Regional Haze State and Federal
Implementation Plans
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is finalizing approval of
State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revisions submitted by the State of Utah
on July 3, 2019, as supplemented on
December 3, 2019, to satisfy certain
regional haze requirements for the
regional haze program’s first
implementation period (Utah SIP
revisions). The EPA is approving the
Utah SIP revision that provides an
alternative to best available retrofit
technology (BART) controls for nitrogen
oxides (NOX) at the PacifiCorp Hunter
and Huntington power plants. The EPA
finds that the NOX BART Alternative for
Hunter and Huntington achieves greater
reasonable progress toward natural
visibility conditions than BART, in
accordance with the requirements of the
Clean Air Act (CAA) and the EPA’s
Regional Haze Rule. In conjunction with
this approval, we are withdrawing the
Federal Implementation Plan (FIP) that
addresses NOX BART for the Hunter and
Huntington power plants that EPA
promulgated in 2016. The EPA is also
approving Utah’s December 3, 2019 SIP
supplement that requires reporting of all
deviations from compliance with the
applicable requirements under
particulate matter (PM) BART and the
NOX BART Alternative, including the
emission limits for Hunter and
Huntington. The EPA is taking these
actions pursuant to sections 110 and
169A of the CAA.
DATES: This rule is effective on
December 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–R08–OAR–2015–0463. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the https://www.regulations.gov
website. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Nov 25, 2020
Jkt 253001
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the website and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available through https://
www.regulations.gov, or please call or
email the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
for additional availability information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Aaron Worstell, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–IO, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129, (303)
312–6073, worstell.aaron@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. Proposed Action and the EPA’s Conclusion
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
A. Legal Issues
B. BART Alternative Requirements
C. BART Alternative ‘‘Greater Reasonable
Progress’’ Determination
III. The EPA’s Final Action
A. 2019 Utah Regional Haze SIP Revisions
B. FIP Withdrawal
C. Clean Air Act Section 110(l)
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions
To Address Environmental Justice in
Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations
L. Determination Under Section Clean Air
Act Section 307(d)
M. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
N. Judicial Review
I. Proposed Action and the EPA’s
Conclusion
On July 5, 2016, the EPA promulgated
a final rule titled ‘‘Approval,
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Disapproval, and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Partial
Approval and Partial Disapproval of Air
Quality Implementation Plans and
Federal Implementation Plan; Utah;
Revisions to Regional Haze State
Implementation Plan; Federal
Implementation Plan for Regional
Haze,’’ which approved, in part, a
regional haze SIP revision submitted by
the State of Utah on June 4, 2015.1 In
the July 2016 final rule, the EPA also
disapproved, in part, the Utah regional
haze SIP submission, including the NOX
BART Alternative (also ‘‘BART
Alternative’’ or ‘‘Alternative’’) for
Hunter Units 1 and 2 and Huntington
Units 1 and 2, which are BART units as
explained in more detail below. The
BART Alternative relied on sulfur
dioxide (SO2), NOX, and PM emission
reductions from the 2015 closure of
PacifiCorp’s Carbon power plant, as
well as NOX reductions achieved
through combustion control upgrades at
Hunter Units 1, 2 and 3 and Huntington
Units 1 and 2, which were installed in
2006–2014 (Hunter Unit 3 is not a BART
unit). The combustion control upgrades
for Hunter Units 1 and 2 and
Huntington Units 1 and 2 include an
Alstom TSF 2000TM low-NOX firing
system and two elevations of separated
overfire air (SOFA). The combustion
upgrades for Hunter Unit 3 include
upgraded low-NOX burners (LNB) and
overfire air (OFA). Concurrent with
disapproving the NOX BART
Alternative, EPA promulgated a FIP in
the July 2016 final rule that imposed a
NOX BART emission limit of 0.07 lb/
MMBtu (30-day rolling average) for each
of the four BART units based on the
emission reductions achievable through
the installation and operation of
selective-catalytic reduction (SCR) plus
upgraded combustion controls.
On July 3, 2019, Utah submitted a
revised SIP that, based on new technical
information and a different regulatory
test, seeks to demonstrate that the
previously submitted NOX BART
Alternative achieves greater reasonable
progress than BART. The SIP revision
also includes amendments to Utah’s SO2
milestone reporting requirements under
the SO2 Backstop Trading Program
pursuant to 40 CFR 51.309 such that
SO2 emission reductions resulting from
the closure of the Carbon plant are not
counted under both the SO2 Backstop
Trading Program and the NOX BART
Alternative. On January 22, 2020, the
EPA proposed to approve the State’s
July 3, 2019 SIP revision based on this
new information.2 Specifically, we
1 81
2 85
FR 43894 (July 5, 2016).
FR 3558 (Jan. 22, 2020).
E:\FR\FM\27NOR1.SGM
27NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 229 (Friday, November 27, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 75857-75860]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25585]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 9
RIN 2900-AQ37
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance--Family Servicemembers'
Group Life Insurance: Member Married to Member
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is amending its
regulations governing Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (SGLI) and
Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) to allow a SGLI-
covered member (member) who marries another SGLI-eligible member
(member spouse) after January 1, 2013, or a member whose spouse becomes
a member spouse after January 1, 2013, to receive FSGLI coverage on a
member spouse at the maximum statutory amount or a lesser amount, or to
increase existing FSGLI coverage on a member spouse. A member married
to a member may elect or increase FSGLI coverage for a member spouse,
without a requirement to show good health, within 240 days of: The
member's marriage to another member, the member's spouse entering
service, or the member's spouse separating from service. If a member
does not elect or increase FSGLI coverage within this 240-day ``no
[[Page 75858]]
health'' period, then the member can still receive or increase FSGLI
coverage by applying for such coverage and submitting proof of the
member spouse's good health. The final rulemaking also states that
FSGLI coverage that is in force at the time a spouse or child enters
service will continue and the member is not required to elect or
reapply for such coverage. Additionally, VA is making a technical
amendment to the amendatory language.
DATES: This rule is effective December 28, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul Weaver, Department of Veterans
Affairs Insurance Service (310/290B), 5000 Wissahickon Avenue,
Philadelphia, PA 19144, (215) 842-2000, ext. 4263. (This is not a toll-
free number.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
On February 11, 2020, VA published in the Federal Register (85 FR
7683) a proposed rule to amend its regulations governing the
application process for FSGLI coverage for member spouses of SGLI-
covered members. Interested persons were invited to submit written
comments on or before April 13, 2020. VA received one comment
concerning the submission of proof of good health for former member
spouses. The commenter recommended that VA revise the rulemaking to
allow a member to elect FSGLI coverage on a member spouse without
submitting proof of good health for 120 days following a marriage or a
former member spouse's separation from service. The commenter suggested
that this grace period would minimize adverse selection and bring
parity to FSGLI eligibility requirements for civilian and member
spouses and is consistent with Congressional intent to avoid creating
FSGLI debts for members who do not want FSGLI coverage on member
spouses. Based on internal agency reconsideration of the proposed
regulation and the comment received, VA is making the following
revisions.
I. FSGLI Coverage for Member Spouses
Section 1969(g)(2)(B) of title 38, U.S.C., requires VA to manage
FSGLI according to sound actuarial principles, and VA explained in the
proposed rulemaking that this requires limiting the risk of adverse
selection of FSGLI applicants. VA has determined that removing the
proposed requirement for members to submit proof of their member
spouse's good health for 240 days following a member's marriage to
another member or a member's spouse entering service is consistent with
sound actuarial principles. If a member does not elect or increase
coverage on a member spouse within the 240-day period, then the member
will have the opportunity to receive FSGLI coverage by applying for
such coverage and submitting proof of their member spouse's good
health. Although the commenter recommended a 120-day ``no health''
period for a member to elect FSGLI without submitting proof of their
member spouse's good health, VA has determined that a 240-day ``no
health'' period is more appropriate since it would allow for greater
participation in FSGLI and would remain consistent with sound actuarial
principles. This change is reflected in new Sec. 9.24(a).
II. FSGLI Coverage for Former Member Spouses
VA is also amending our proposed rulemaking to allow a member, upon
election, to initiate FSGLI coverage at the maximum statutory amount or
a lesser amount, or to increase existing FSGLI coverage, on a former
member spouse. A member will only be required to submit proof of good
health when more than 240 days have passed following the former member
spouse's separation from service. If a member does not elect FSGLI at
the maximum statutory amount or a lesser amount, or increase existing
FSGLI coverage, within 240 days following their former member spouse's
separation from service, then the member will have the opportunity to
apply for FSGLI or to increase existing FSGLI coverage by submitting
proof of their former member spouse's good health. Although the
commenter recommended a 120-day ``no health'' period for a member to
elect or increase FSGLI without submitting proof of their former member
spouse's good health, VA has determined that a 240-day ``no health''
period is more appropriate because it would allow for greater
participation in FSGLI and would remain consistent with sound actuarial
principles. We also note that the 240-day period is consistent with 38
CFR 9.2(c), which allows a former member to apply for Veterans' Group
Life Insurance within 240 days after separating from service without
submitting proof of good health. This change is reflected in new Sec.
9.24(c).
III. Technical Amendments to 38 CFR Part 9
VA is making two technical amendments to the amendatory language in
this final rule. In the proposed rulemaking, we proposed to create a
new paragraph (f) in current 38 CFR 9.2 and to create a new 38 CFR 9.3.
In this final rule, we are creating a new paragraph (g) because
paragraph (f) was recently added by 85 FR 35562, Extension of Veterans'
Group Life Insurance (VGLI) Application Period in Response to the
COVID-19 Public Health Emergency (June 11, 2020) (interim final rule).
We are clarifying that paragraph (g) applies to member spouses eligible
for coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) as well as (C)(ii). We
are also clarifying that Sec. 9.2(g)(2) refers to a member-spouse
covered under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i) and who was also eligible for
coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but who was not
so insured or was insured at a reduced amount by reason of the member's
election pursuant to 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(2)(B) or (a)(3)(B). We are also
moving proposed Sec. 9.3 to new 38 CFR 9.24 for purposes of minimizing
disruption to the other regulations in part 9. We are clarifying that
this section applies to member spouses eligible for coverage under 38
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) as well as (C)(ii). New Sec. 9.2(g) and new
Sec. 9.24 reflect the changes discussed above.
For the reasons discussed above, VA is adopting the proposed rule
as a final rule with the above-noted changes.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563 and 13771
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, and other advantages; distributive impacts;
and equity). Executive Order 13563 (Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review) emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, reducing costs, harmonizing rules, and promoting flexibility.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
VA's impact analysis can be found as a supporting document at
https://www.regulations.gov, usually within 48 hours after the
rulemaking document is published. Additionally, a copy of the
rulemaking and its impact analysis are available on VA's website at
https://www.va.gov/orpm/, by following the link for ``VA Regulations
Published From FY 2004 Through Fiscal Year to Date.''
This rule is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
[[Page 75859]]
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. There are no small entities involved with processing and/or
determining eligibility for SGLI and FSGLI. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604 do not apply.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by
State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for
inflation) in any one year. This final rule will have no such effect on
State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs designated this rule
as not a major rule, as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Paperwork Reduction Act
This final rule contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-
3521).
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number and title for the
program affected by this document is 64.103, Life Insurance for
Veterans.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 9
Life insurance, Military personnel, Veterans.
Signing Authority
The Secretary of Veterans Affairs, or designee, approved this
document and authorized the undersigned to sign and submit the document
to the Office of the Federal Register for publication electronically as
an official document of the Department of Veterans Affairs. Brooks D.
Tucker, Assistant Secretary for Congressional and Legislative Affairs,
Performing the Delegable Duties of the Chief of Staff, Department of
Veterans Affairs, approved this document on November 16, 2020, for
publication.
Luvenia Potts,
Regulation Development Coordinator, Office of Regulation Policy &
Management, Office of the Secretary, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, VA proposes to amend 38 CFR
part 9 as set forth below:
PART 9--SERVICEMEMBERS' GROUP LIFE INSURANCE AND VETERANS' GROUP
LIFE INSURANCE
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1965-1980A, unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 9.2 is amended by adding paragraph (g) to read as follows:
Sec. 9.2 Effective date; applications.
* * * * *
(g) Except as provided in Sec. 9.24, the effective date of
enrollment, re-enrollment, or an increase in coverage under 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(1) shall be the date the uniformed service receives an
application and proof of the insurable spouse's good health:
(1) For an insurable spouse who was eligible for coverage under 38
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but was not so insured or was
insured at a reduced rate and who became a member; and
(2) For a member-spouse covered under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(i)
and who was also eligible for coverage under 38 U.S.C.
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) but who was not so insured or was insured
at a reduced amount by reason of an election made by a member.
0
3. Add Sec. 9.24 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.24 Insurable dependents who become eligible members, and
eligible members who marry eligible members.
(a) A Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance-covered member (member)
who marries another Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible
member (member spouse) after January 1, 2013, or is married to a person
who becomes a Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance eligible member
after January 1, 2013, shall receive Family Servicemembers' Group Life
Insurance spousal coverage at the statutory maximum amount or a lesser
amount, or receive increased existing spousal coverage on their member
spouse, upon an election of such coverage if made within 240 days
following the member's marriage to another member, or the member's
spouse entering service, without having to provide proof of the member
spouse's good health. If a member does not elect coverage for a member
spouse within 240 days following the member's marriage to another
member, or the member's spouse entering service, then the member may
still receive spousal coverage at the statutory maximum amount or a
lesser amount, or increase existing spousal coverage, by applying and
submitting proof of the member spouse's good health.
(b) A spouse shall remain eligible to be covered by any existing
Family Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance spousal coverage without
the member electing such coverage or applying for such coverage with
proof of the member spouse's good health in a case where the spouse is
enrolled in coverage under 38 U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) prior
to becoming a member married to another member.
(c) A member's spouse who was insured under the member's Family
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance at the time the spouse separates
from service will continue to be covered under the spousal Family
Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance carried while in service, and the
member will not need to elect such coverage. If a member seeks to
enroll a former member spouse who did not have such spousal insurance
coverage when the former member spouse separates from service, or seeks
to increase existing spousal coverage on their former member spouse,
the member shall receive such spousal coverage on their former member
spouse, upon an election of such coverage if made within 240 days
following the former member spouse's separation from service, without
having to provide proof of the former member spouse's good health. If a
member does not elect coverage for a former member spouse within 240
days following the former member spouse's separation from service, then
the member may still receive spousal coverage at the statutory maximum
amount or a lesser amount, or increase existing spousal coverage, by
applying and submitting proof of the former member spouse's good
health.
(d) After January 1, 2013, an insurable child who is a member at
the time a parent's Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance coverage
commences is not eligible for automatic dependent coverage under 38
U.S.C. 1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii). Dependent coverage in effect for
an insurable child prior to becoming a member shall remain in effect so
long as the child remains an insurable dependent. If an insurable child
was not covered prior to becoming a member, the child cannot be covered
under 38 U.S.C.
[[Page 75860]]
1967(a)(1)(A)(ii) or (C)(ii) after the child becomes a member.
[FR Doc. 2020-25585 Filed 11-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P