Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for Sharpnose Shiner and Smalleye Shiner, 75027-75029 [2020-25918]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R2–ES–2020–N040;
FXES11130200000–201–FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Draft Recovery Plan for
Sharpnose Shiner and Smalleye Shiner
Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request
for comment.
AGENCY:
We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan
for sharpnose shiner and smalleye
shiner, two fish species listed as
endangered under the Endangered
Species Act. The two species are
broadcast-spawning minnows currently
restricted to the upper Brazos River
Basin in north-central Texas. We
provide this notice to seek comments
from the public and Federal, Tribal,
State, and local governments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we
must receive written comments on or
before January 25, 2021. However, we
will accept information about any
species at any time.
ADDRESSES:
Reviewing document: You may obtain
a copy of the draft recovery plan by any
one of the following methods:
• Internet: Download a copy at
https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/
arlingtontexas/.
• U.S. mail: Send a request to U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service, Arlington
Ecological Services Field Office, 2005
NE Green Oaks Blvd., Suite 140,
Arlington, TX 76006–6247.
• Telephone: 817–277–1100.
• U.S. mail: Project Leader, at the
above U.S. mail address;
Submitting comments: Submit your
comments on the draft document in
writing by any one of the following
methods:
• U.S. mail: Project Leader, at the
above U.S. mail address; or
• Email: ARLES@fws.gov.
For additional information about
submitting comments, see Request for
Public Comments and Public
Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Debra Bills, Field Supervisor, at the
above address, via phone at 817–277–
1100, or by email at ARLES@fws.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
announce the availability of our draft
recovery plan for sharpnose shiner
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
(Notropis oxyrhynchus) and smalleye
shiner (Notropis buccula), two fish
species listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act, as amended
(ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We
request review and comment on this
plan from local, State, and Federal
agencies; Tribes; and the public. We
will also accept any new information on
the status of sharpnose shiner and
smalleye shiner throughout their range
to assist in finalizing the recovery plan.
Sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner
are broadcast-spawning minnows
currently restricted to the upper Brazos
River Basin in north-central Texas and
its major tributaries that occur within
following counties in north-central
Texas: Archer, Baylor, Crosby, Dickens,
Fisher, Garza, Haskell, Jones, Kent,
King, Knox, Lubbock, Lynn, Palo Pinto,
Scurry, Stephens, Stonewall,
Throckmorton, and Young. The draft
recovery plan includes specific recovery
objectives and criteria that, when
achieved, will enable us to consider
removing the sharpnose shiner and
smalleye shiner from the Federal List of
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
(List).
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened
animals and plants to the point where
they are again secure, self-sustaining
members of their ecosystems is a
primary goal of our endangered species
program and the ESA. Recovery means
improvement of the status of listed
species to the point at which listing is
no longer appropriate under the criteria
set out in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA. The
ESA requires the development of
recovery plans for listed species, unless
such a plan would not promote the
conservation of a particular species.
We utilized a streamlined approach to
recovery planning and implementation
by first conducting a species status
assessment (SSA) of sharpnose shiner
and smalleye shiner (Service 2018). An
SSA is a comprehensive analysis of the
species’ needs, current condition,
threats, and future viability. The
information in the SSA provides the
biological background, a threats
assessment, and a basis for a strategy for
recovery of sharpnose shiner and
smalleye shiner. We then used this
information to prepare an abbreviated
draft recovery plan for sharpnose shiner
and smalleye shiner that includes
prioritized recovery actions, criteria for
reclassifying the species from
endangered to threatened, criteria for
removing the species from the List, and
the estimated time and cost to recovery.
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75027
Summary of Species Information
We published final rules to list the
sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner as
endangered (79 FR 45273) with critical
habitat under the ESA (79 FR 45241) on
August 4, 2014. The sharpnose shiner
historically occurred in the Brazos
River, Red River, and Colorado River
Basins within Texas, where headwaters
for these basins lie within the semi-arid
High Plains ecoregion. The smalleye
shiner historically occurred only in the
Brazos River Basin. These species are
currently restricted to the upper Brazos
River and its major tributaries, which
represents a greater than 70 percent
reduction in range for the sharpnose
shiner and a greater than 50 percent
range reduction for the smalleye shiner
(Service 2018).
Sharpnose and smalleye shiners
spawn asynchronously from April
through September during periods of no
and low streamflow. Large,
synchronized spawning events occur
during high streamflow events (Durham
2007, p. 24; Durham and Wilde 2008,
entire; Durham and Wilde 2009, p. 26).
Field observations of sharpnose shiner
and smalleye shiner in the upper Brazos
River Basin indicate that successful
survival to the juvenile fish stage does
not occur during periods completely
lacking streamflow (Durham and Wilde
2009, p. 24). The best available science
suggests that the primary needs of
sharpnose and smalleye populations
include a minimum, unobstructed,
wide, flowing river segment length of
greater than 275 kilometers (171 miles)
to support development of their early
life history stages. However, this
information comes from a study (Perkin
and Gido 2011) that focused on similar
species, rather than specifically on the
sharpnose and smalleye shiners. We do
not have information about specific
stream length requirements for
sharpnose and smalleye shiners. As we
implement the recovery plan actions,
we expect to gain valuable new
information from the monitoring of
reintroduced populations and continued
research. This new information will be
specific to these species and will modify
estimates of the minimum stream length
necessary to sustain resilient
populations of these two species. Based
on current life history information,
population dynamics modeling
estimates that a mean summer water
discharge of approximately 92 cubic feet
per second (cfs) is necessary to sustain
sharpnose shiner populations (Durham
2007, p. 110), while a higher mean
discharge of approximately 227 cfs is
necessary for smalleye shiners (Durham
and Wilde 2009, p. 670). The maximum
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
75028
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
life span of both species is less than 3
years (Marks 1999, p. 69). Given both
species’ short lifespans and restricted
range, stressors that persist for two or
more reproductive seasons (such as a
severe drought), severely limit these
species’ viability, placing them at a high
risk of extinction (Service 2018).
The decline of sharpnose and
smalleye shiner throughout much of
their historical range is attributed
primarily to habitat loss and
modification due to fragmentation and
decreased river flow resulting from
major water impoundments, drought,
and groundwater withdrawals. Water
quality degradation, invasive salt cedar,
and other factors may have also
contributed to their decline. As a result,
sharpnose and smalleye shiners’
redundancy, or the ability to withstand
catastrophic events, is limited to a
single population within the historical
range. With a single population of the
sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner
reduced to a fragment of their former
range, these species lack redundancy as
well as the genetic and ecological
representation to adapt to new or
ongoing threats.
Recovery Plan Goals
The objective of a recovery plan is to
provide a framework for the recovery of
a species so that protection under the
ESA is no longer necessary. A recovery
plan includes scientific information
about the species and provides criteria
and actions necessary for us to be able
to reclassify the species to threatened
status or remove it from the List.
Recovery plans help guide our recovery
efforts by describing actions we
consider necessary for the species’
conservation and by estimating time and
costs for implementing needed recovery
measures.
The recovery strategy for the
sharpnose and smalleye shiners
involves stemming any further range
contraction in the upper Brazos River
Basin, improving resiliency of these
species in the upper Brazos River Basin,
and increasing redundancy and
representation of both shiners. Much of
the strategy focuses on habitat
restoration and preservation, predicated
on an increased understanding of the
relationship of the sharpnose and
smalleye shiners’ life history
requirements within the physical,
chemical, and ecological conditions of
their environments. Information on
these species and their habitats (for
example, population dynamics,
predation, river fragmentation,
alterations in stream flow, and
responses to identified threats) is
needed to provide for better future
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
science-based management decisions
and conservation actions.
Implementation of the recovery plan
will necessitate adaptive management
strategies to use the most up-to-date
information as it becomes available.
The recovery of the sharpnose and
smalleye shiner will involve continued
cooperation among Federal, State, and
local agencies; private entities; and
other stakeholders. Therefore, the
success of the recovery strategy will rely
heavily on the implementation of
recovery actions conducted by and
through coordination with our
conservation partners.
Recovery objectives for reclassifying
the species from endangered to
threatened consist of:
• A viable, self-sustaining population
of sharpnose and smalleye shiner
dispersed throughout the upper Brazos
River Basin,
• A captive population sufficient to
protect against a catastrophic loss and
facilitate population augmentation,
• Adequate stream flows to
accommodate all life stages,
• Water quality sufficient to
accommodate all life stages, and
• Restoration and preservation of
natural river morphology.
Recovery objectives for removing the
species from the List include the
objectives for reclassifying the species to
threatened status, in addition to:
• A second viable population of both
the sharpnose and smalleye shiner
within their historical ranges, as defined
by criteria related to population size,
distribution, and extinction risk, and
• The availability of habitat sufficient
to support two populations of both the
sharpnose and smalleye shiner, as
defined by criteria related to adequate
stream flows for all life stages, adequate
water quality for all life stages, and
adequate river morphology.
It is anticipated that implementation
of these objectives would allow
populations to become self-sustaining
with minimal human intervention.
The criteria for removing the species
from the List and the criteria for
reclassification to threatened status
provided in the recovery plan are based
on the following:
• Improving habitat conditions and
maintaining a viable population of both
species in the upper Brazos River Basin,
and
• The reintroduction of a second
viable population of both species within
their historical range with habitat
sufficient to accommodate all of the
species’ life stages.
The above must be sustainable with
minimal human intervention.
Recovery of these species through
implementation of recovery actions is
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
estimated to occur in 2050; total costs
for all partners are estimated at
approximately $71 million over the next
30 years.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires us to
provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and
comment during recovery plan
development. It is also our policy to
request peer review of recovery plans
(July 1, 1994; 59 FR 34270). In an
appendix to the final recovery plan, we
will summarize and respond to the
issues raised by the public and peer
reviewers. Comments may or may not
result in changes to the recovery plan;
comments regarding recovery plan
implementation will be forwarded as
appropriate to Federal or other entities
so that they can be taken into account
during the course of implementing
recovery actions. Responses to
individual commenters will not be
provided, but we will provide a
summary of how we addressed
substantive comments in an appendix to
the approved recovery plan.
We invite written comments on this
draft recovery plan. In particular, we are
interested in additional information
regarding the current threats to the
species, ongoing beneficial management
efforts, and the costs associated with
implementing the recommended
recovery actions.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments received, including
names and addresses, will become part
of the administrative record and will be
available to the public. Before including
your address, phone number, email
address, or other personal identifying
information in your comment, you
should be aware that your entire
comment—including your personal
identifying information—will be
publicly available. If you submit a
hardcopy comment that includes
personal identifying information, you
may request at the top of your document
that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot
guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Comments and materials we receive will
be available, by appointment, for public
inspection during normal business
hours at our office (see ADDRESSES).
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan
and publish this notice under the
authority of section 4(f) of the
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Amy Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–25918 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Indian Affairs
[201A2100DD/AAKC001030/
A0A501010.999900 253G; OMB Control
Number 1076–0131]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Indian Child Welfare
Quarterly and Annual Report
Bureau of Indian Affairs,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of information collection;
request for comment.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we,
the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) is
proposing to renew an information
collection.
SUMMARY:
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before January
25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Send your comments on
this information collection request (ICR)
by mail to Ms. Evangeline Campbell,
Chief, Division of Human Services,
Office of Indian Services, Bureau of
Indian Affairs, 1849 C Street NW, MS–
3641–MIB, Washington, DC 20240; fax:
(202) 208–5113; email:
Evangeline.Campbell@bia.gov. Please
reference OMB Control Number 1076–
0131 in the subject line of your
comments.
DATES:
To
request additional information about
this ICR, contact Ms. Evangeline
Campbell by email at
Evangeline.Campbell@bia.gov, or by
telephone at (202) 513–7621.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995, we provide the
general public and other Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on new, proposed, revised,
and continuing collections of
information. This helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. It also helps the
public understand our information
collection requirements and provide the
requested data in the desired format.
We are soliciting comments on the
proposed ICR that is described below.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
We are especially interested in public
comment addressing the following
issues: (1) Is the collection necessary to
the proper functions of the BIA; (2) will
this information be processed and used
in a timely manner; (3) is the estimate
of burden accurate; (4) how might the
BIA enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (5) how might the BIA
minimize the burden of this collection
on the respondents, including through
the use of information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this ICR. Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Abstract: The BIA is seeking to renew
the information collection conducted
under 25 CFR 23, related to the Indian
Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The BIA
collects information using a
consolidated caseload form, which
Tribal ICWA program directors
complete. The BIA uses the information
to determine the extent of service needs
in local Indian communities, assess
ICWA program effectiveness, and
provide date for the annual program
budget justification. The aggregated
report is not considered confidential.
This form must be completed by
federally recognized Tribes that operate
child protection programs. Submission
of this information by federally
recognized Tribes allows the BIA to
consolidate and review selected data on
Indian child welfare cases. The data is
useful on a local level, to the Tribes and
Tribal entities that collect it, for case
management purposes. The data are
useful on a nationwide basis for
planning and budget purposes.
Title of Collection: Indian Child
Welfare Quarterly and Annual Report.
OMB Control Number: 1076–0131.
Form Number: None.
Type of Review: Extension of a
currently approved collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Federally recognized Tribes or Tribal
entities that are operating programs for
Tribes.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 940 per year, on average.
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75029
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 3,760 per year, on average.
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: Approximately 15 minutes
for Part A—ICWA Data; approximately
15 minutes for Part B—Tribal Child
Abuse and Neglect Data.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 940, per year on average.
Respondent’s Obligation: A response
is required to obtain a benefit.
Frequency of Collection: Four times
per year for the Part A—ICWA Data; if
applicable, four times per year for Part
B—Tribal Child Abuse Neglect Data.
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: $0.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
Elizabeth K. Appel,
Director, Office of Regulatory Affairs and
Collaborative Action—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020–25976 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[DOI–2020–0004; 212D0102DM,
DS64600000, DLSN00000.000000, DX.64601]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Rescindment of a system of
records notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Department of the
Interior (DOI) is issuing a public notice
of its intent to rescind the Privacy Act
system of records, INTERIOR/DOI–79,
Interior Personnel Records, from its
inventory because it is duplicative with
existing system of records notice
requirements. During a review of DOI
system of records notices, it was
determined that personnel records of
current and recently separated DOI
employees maintained by DOI are
covered under the government-wide
system of records notice, OPM/GOVT–
1, General Personnel Records, and the
DOI system of records notice,
INTERIOR/DOI–85, Payroll, Attendance,
Retirement, and Leave Records. This
rescindment will eliminate an
unnecessary duplicate notice and
promote the overall streamlining and
management of DOI Privacy Act systems
of records.
DATES: These changes take effect on
November 24, 2020.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75027-75029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25918]
[[Page 75027]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R2-ES-2020-N040; FXES11130200000-201-FF02ENEH00]
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Draft Recovery
Plan for Sharpnose Shiner and Smalleye Shiner
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability; request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, announce the
availability of our draft recovery plan for sharpnose shiner and
smalleye shiner, two fish species listed as endangered under the
Endangered Species Act. The two species are broadcast-spawning minnows
currently restricted to the upper Brazos River Basin in north-central
Texas. We provide this notice to seek comments from the public and
Federal, Tribal, State, and local governments.
DATES: To ensure consideration, we must receive written comments on or
before January 25, 2021. However, we will accept information about any
species at any time.
ADDRESSES:
Reviewing document: You may obtain a copy of the draft recovery
plan by any one of the following methods:
Internet: Download a copy at https://www.fws.gov/southwest/es/arlingtontexas/.
U.S. mail: Send a request to U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, Arlington Ecological Services Field Office, 2005 NE Green Oaks
Blvd., Suite 140, Arlington, TX 76006-6247.
Telephone: 817-277-1100.
U.S. mail: Project Leader, at the above U.S. mail address;
Submitting comments: Submit your comments on the draft document in
writing by any one of the following methods:
U.S. mail: Project Leader, at the above U.S. mail address;
or
Email: [email protected].
For additional information about submitting comments, see Request
for Public Comments and Public Availability of Comments under
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Bills, Field Supervisor, at the
above address, via phone at 817-277-1100, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
announce the availability of our draft recovery plan for sharpnose
shiner (Notropis oxyrhynchus) and smalleye shiner (Notropis buccula),
two fish species listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act,
as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). We request review and comment
on this plan from local, State, and Federal agencies; Tribes; and the
public. We will also accept any new information on the status of
sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner throughout their range to assist
in finalizing the recovery plan.
Sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner are broadcast-spawning minnows
currently restricted to the upper Brazos River Basin in north-central
Texas and its major tributaries that occur within following counties in
north-central Texas: Archer, Baylor, Crosby, Dickens, Fisher, Garza,
Haskell, Jones, Kent, King, Knox, Lubbock, Lynn, Palo Pinto, Scurry,
Stephens, Stonewall, Throckmorton, and Young. The draft recovery plan
includes specific recovery objectives and criteria that, when achieved,
will enable us to consider removing the sharpnose shiner and smalleye
shiner from the Federal List of Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
(List).
Background
Recovery of endangered or threatened animals and plants to the
point where they are again secure, self-sustaining members of their
ecosystems is a primary goal of our endangered species program and the
ESA. Recovery means improvement of the status of listed species to the
point at which listing is no longer appropriate under the criteria set
out in section 4(a)(1) of the ESA. The ESA requires the development of
recovery plans for listed species, unless such a plan would not promote
the conservation of a particular species.
We utilized a streamlined approach to recovery planning and
implementation by first conducting a species status assessment (SSA) of
sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner (Service 2018). An SSA is a
comprehensive analysis of the species' needs, current condition,
threats, and future viability. The information in the SSA provides the
biological background, a threats assessment, and a basis for a strategy
for recovery of sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner. We then used this
information to prepare an abbreviated draft recovery plan for sharpnose
shiner and smalleye shiner that includes prioritized recovery actions,
criteria for reclassifying the species from endangered to threatened,
criteria for removing the species from the List, and the estimated time
and cost to recovery.
Summary of Species Information
We published final rules to list the sharpnose shiner and smalleye
shiner as endangered (79 FR 45273) with critical habitat under the ESA
(79 FR 45241) on August 4, 2014. The sharpnose shiner historically
occurred in the Brazos River, Red River, and Colorado River Basins
within Texas, where headwaters for these basins lie within the semi-
arid High Plains ecoregion. The smalleye shiner historically occurred
only in the Brazos River Basin. These species are currently restricted
to the upper Brazos River and its major tributaries, which represents a
greater than 70 percent reduction in range for the sharpnose shiner and
a greater than 50 percent range reduction for the smalleye shiner
(Service 2018).
Sharpnose and smalleye shiners spawn asynchronously from April
through September during periods of no and low streamflow. Large,
synchronized spawning events occur during high streamflow events
(Durham 2007, p. 24; Durham and Wilde 2008, entire; Durham and Wilde
2009, p. 26). Field observations of sharpnose shiner and smalleye
shiner in the upper Brazos River Basin indicate that successful
survival to the juvenile fish stage does not occur during periods
completely lacking streamflow (Durham and Wilde 2009, p. 24). The best
available science suggests that the primary needs of sharpnose and
smalleye populations include a minimum, unobstructed, wide, flowing
river segment length of greater than 275 kilometers (171 miles) to
support development of their early life history stages. However, this
information comes from a study (Perkin and Gido 2011) that focused on
similar species, rather than specifically on the sharpnose and smalleye
shiners. We do not have information about specific stream length
requirements for sharpnose and smalleye shiners. As we implement the
recovery plan actions, we expect to gain valuable new information from
the monitoring of reintroduced populations and continued research. This
new information will be specific to these species and will modify
estimates of the minimum stream length necessary to sustain resilient
populations of these two species. Based on current life history
information, population dynamics modeling estimates that a mean summer
water discharge of approximately 92 cubic feet per second (cfs) is
necessary to sustain sharpnose shiner populations (Durham 2007, p.
110), while a higher mean discharge of approximately 227 cfs is
necessary for smalleye shiners (Durham and Wilde 2009, p. 670). The
maximum
[[Page 75028]]
life span of both species is less than 3 years (Marks 1999, p. 69).
Given both species' short lifespans and restricted range, stressors
that persist for two or more reproductive seasons (such as a severe
drought), severely limit these species' viability, placing them at a
high risk of extinction (Service 2018).
The decline of sharpnose and smalleye shiner throughout much of
their historical range is attributed primarily to habitat loss and
modification due to fragmentation and decreased river flow resulting
from major water impoundments, drought, and groundwater withdrawals.
Water quality degradation, invasive salt cedar, and other factors may
have also contributed to their decline. As a result, sharpnose and
smalleye shiners' redundancy, or the ability to withstand catastrophic
events, is limited to a single population within the historical range.
With a single population of the sharpnose shiner and smalleye shiner
reduced to a fragment of their former range, these species lack
redundancy as well as the genetic and ecological representation to
adapt to new or ongoing threats.
Recovery Plan Goals
The objective of a recovery plan is to provide a framework for the
recovery of a species so that protection under the ESA is no longer
necessary. A recovery plan includes scientific information about the
species and provides criteria and actions necessary for us to be able
to reclassify the species to threatened status or remove it from the
List. Recovery plans help guide our recovery efforts by describing
actions we consider necessary for the species' conservation and by
estimating time and costs for implementing needed recovery measures.
The recovery strategy for the sharpnose and smalleye shiners
involves stemming any further range contraction in the upper Brazos
River Basin, improving resiliency of these species in the upper Brazos
River Basin, and increasing redundancy and representation of both
shiners. Much of the strategy focuses on habitat restoration and
preservation, predicated on an increased understanding of the
relationship of the sharpnose and smalleye shiners' life history
requirements within the physical, chemical, and ecological conditions
of their environments. Information on these species and their habitats
(for example, population dynamics, predation, river fragmentation,
alterations in stream flow, and responses to identified threats) is
needed to provide for better future science-based management decisions
and conservation actions. Implementation of the recovery plan will
necessitate adaptive management strategies to use the most up-to-date
information as it becomes available.
The recovery of the sharpnose and smalleye shiner will involve
continued cooperation among Federal, State, and local agencies; private
entities; and other stakeholders. Therefore, the success of the
recovery strategy will rely heavily on the implementation of recovery
actions conducted by and through coordination with our conservation
partners.
Recovery objectives for reclassifying the species from endangered
to threatened consist of:
A viable, self-sustaining population of sharpnose and
smalleye shiner dispersed throughout the upper Brazos River Basin,
A captive population sufficient to protect against a
catastrophic loss and facilitate population augmentation,
Adequate stream flows to accommodate all life stages,
Water quality sufficient to accommodate all life stages,
and
Restoration and preservation of natural river morphology.
Recovery objectives for removing the species from the List include
the objectives for reclassifying the species to threatened status, in
addition to:
A second viable population of both the sharpnose and
smalleye shiner within their historical ranges, as defined by criteria
related to population size, distribution, and extinction risk, and
The availability of habitat sufficient to support two
populations of both the sharpnose and smalleye shiner, as defined by
criteria related to adequate stream flows for all life stages, adequate
water quality for all life stages, and adequate river morphology.
It is anticipated that implementation of these objectives would
allow populations to become self-sustaining with minimal human
intervention.
The criteria for removing the species from the List and the
criteria for reclassification to threatened status provided in the
recovery plan are based on the following:
Improving habitat conditions and maintaining a viable
population of both species in the upper Brazos River Basin, and
The reintroduction of a second viable population of both
species within their historical range with habitat sufficient to
accommodate all of the species' life stages.
The above must be sustainable with minimal human intervention.
Recovery of these species through implementation of recovery
actions is estimated to occur in 2050; total costs for all partners are
estimated at approximately $71 million over the next 30 years.
Request for Public Comments
Section 4(f) of the ESA requires us to provide public notice and an
opportunity for public review and comment during recovery plan
development. It is also our policy to request peer review of recovery
plans (July 1, 1994; 59 FR 34270). In an appendix to the final recovery
plan, we will summarize and respond to the issues raised by the public
and peer reviewers. Comments may or may not result in changes to the
recovery plan; comments regarding recovery plan implementation will be
forwarded as appropriate to Federal or other entities so that they can
be taken into account during the course of implementing recovery
actions. Responses to individual commenters will not be provided, but
we will provide a summary of how we addressed substantive comments in
an appendix to the approved recovery plan.
We invite written comments on this draft recovery plan. In
particular, we are interested in additional information regarding the
current threats to the species, ongoing beneficial management efforts,
and the costs associated with implementing the recommended recovery
actions.
Public Availability of Comments
All comments received, including names and addresses, will become
part of the administrative record and will be available to the public.
Before including your address, phone number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your comment, you should be aware
that your entire comment--including your personal identifying
information--will be publicly available. If you submit a hardcopy
comment that includes personal identifying information, you may request
at the top of your document that we withhold this information from
public review. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do
so. Comments and materials we receive will be available, by
appointment, for public inspection during normal business hours at our
office (see ADDRESSES).
Authority
We developed our draft recovery plan and publish this notice under
the authority of section 4(f) of the
[[Page 75029]]
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.).
Amy Lueders,
Regional Director, Southwest Region, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-25918 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333-15-P