Foreign Futures and Options Transactions, 74872-74875 [2020-24658]
Download as PDF
74872
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
and BSE rules that form the basis upon
which this exemption from certain
provisions of the Act and regulations
thereunder is granted.
As set forth in the Commission’s
September 11, 1997 Order delegating to
NFA certain responsibilities, the written
representations set forth in paragraph
(2) shall be filed with NFA.9 Each firm
seeking relief hereunder has an ongoing
obligation to notify NFA should there be
a material change to any of the
representations required in the firm’s
application for relief.
This Order will become effective as to
any designated BSE firm the later of the
date of publication of the Order in the
Federal Register or the filing of the
consents set forth in paragraphs (2)(a)–
(f). Upon filing of the notice required
under paragraph (1)(b) as to any such
firm, the relief granted by this Order
may be suspended immediately as to
that firm. That suspension will remain
in effect pending further notice by the
Commission, or the Commission’s
designee, to the firm and BSE.
This Order is issued pursuant to
Regulation 30.10 based on the
representations made and supporting
material provided to the Commission
and the recommendation of the staff,
and is made effective as to any firm
granted relief hereunder based upon the
filings and representations of such firms
required hereunder. Any material
changes or omissions in the facts and
circumstances pursuant to which this
Order is granted might require the
Commission to reconsider its finding
that the exemption is not otherwise
contrary to the public interest or to the
purposes of the provision from which
exemption is sought. Further, if
experience demonstrates that the
continued effectiveness of this Order in
general, or with respect to a particular
firm, would be contrary to the public
interest, or that the systems in place for
the exchange of information or other
circumstances do not warrant
continuation of the exemptive relief
granted herein, the Commission may,
after appropriate notice and opportunity
to respond, condition, modify, suspend,
terminate, withhold as to a specific firm,
or otherwise restrict the exemptive relief
granted in this Order, as appropriate
and as permitted by law, on its own
motion. The process by which the
9 62 FR 47792, 47793 (Sept. 11, 1997). Among
other duties, the Commission authorized NFA to
receive requests for confirmation of Regulation
30.10 relief on behalf of particular firms, to verify
such firms’ fitness and compliance with the
conditions of the appropriate Regulation 30.10
Order and to grant exemptive relief from
registration to qualifying firms.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
Commission may terminate relief is set
forth in § 30.10(c).10
The Commission will continue to
monitor the implementation of its
program to exempt firms located in
jurisdictions generally deemed to have a
comparable regulatory program from the
application of certain of the foreign
futures and option regulations and will
make necessary adjustments if
appropriate.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2020, by the Commission.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendix will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendix to Foreign Futures and
Options Transactions—Commission
Voting Summary
On this matter, Chairman Tarbert and
Commissioners Quintenz, Behnam, Stump,
and Berkovitz voted in the affirmative. No
Commissioner voted in the negative.
[FR Doc. 2020–24662 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING
COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 30
Foreign Futures and Options
Transactions
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission.
ACTION: Order.
AGENCY:
By this Order, the Commodity
Futures Trading Commission
(Commission) is amending and
consolidating prior relief issued in
orders pursuant to Commission
regulation 30.10 regarding the offer and
sale of foreign futures and options
contracts to customers located in the
U.S. by firms designated by the
Montreal Exchange (MX) to reflect
changes to the local laws and
regulations applicable to the segregation
of customer funds.
DATES: This Order is effective November
24, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andrew V. Chapin, Associate Chief
Counsel, (202) 418–5465, achapin@
cftc.gov, Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight, Commodity
Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st
Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission has issued the following
Order:
SUMMARY:
10 17 CFR 30.10(c). See 85 FR 15359 (Mar. 18,
2020).
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order Amending and Consolidating the
Terms and Conditions Set Forth in
Prior Orders Issued Pursuant to
Commission Regulation 30.10
Exempting Firms Designated by the
Montreal Exchange From the
Application of Certain of the Foreign
Futures and Option Regulations
Part 30 of the Commission’s
regulations governs the offer and sale of
futures and option contracts traded on
or subject to the regulations of a foreign
board of trade (foreign futures and
options) to customers located in the
U.S.1 These regulations set forth
requirements for foreign firms acting in
the capacity of a futures commission
merchant (FCM), introducing broker,
commodity pool operator and
commodity trading adviser with respect
to the offer and sale of foreign futures
and options to U.S. customers and are
designed to ensure that such products
offered and sold in the U.S. are subject
to regulatory safeguards comparable to
those applicable to transactions entered
into on designated contract markets.
Pursuant to § 30.10(a), persons located
outside the U.S. and subject to a
comparable regulatory structure in the
jurisdiction in which they are located
may seek an exemption from certain of
the requirements under Part 30 of the
Commission’s regulations based upon
compliance with the regulatory
requirements of the person’s
jurisdiction.2 If the Commission
determines that relief pursuant to
§ 30.10(a) is not otherwise contrary to
the public interest or to the purposes of
the provisions from which exemption is
sought, the Commission issues an Order
to the petitioner—typically a foreign
regulator or self-regulatory organization
(SRO)—that sets forth conditions
governing such relief. Persons subject to
regulatory oversight by the foreign
regulator or SRO granted an exemption,
as appropriate, and located and doing
business outside the U.S. may solicit or
accept orders directly from U.S.
customers for foreign futures or options
transactions and, in the case of a person
acting in the capacity of an FCM, accept
customer money or other property,
without registering under the
1 17 CFR part 30. The Commission promulgated
part 30 of its regulations in 1987. See Foreign
Futures and Foreign Options Transactions, 52 FR
28980 (Aug. 5, 1987). Appendix A also specifically
states that in considering an exemption request, the
Commission will take into account the extent to
which United States persons or contracts regulated
by the Commission are permitted to engage in
futures-related activities or be offered in the country
from which an exemption is sought. 17 CFR part 30,
Appendix A.
2 17 CFR 30.10(a).
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Commodity Exchange Act (CEA or Act)
in the appropriate capacity.3
In 1989, the Commission issued an
order to MX pursuant to § 30.10(a)
permitting designated members of MX
to intermediate on behalf of customers
located in the U.S. foreign futures and
options transactions executed on MX
without having to register as FCMs with
the Commission.4 In 1997, the
Commission issued another order
expanding the exemptive relief for
designated members to include foreign
futures and options transactions on
foreign boards of trade other than MX,
as permitted by local law and
regulation.5 At the time that these
orders were published, the local laws
and regulations applicable to MX
members did not require the segregation
of customer funds consistent with those
requirements applicable to FCMs set
forth in Section 4d(f) of the CEA and
those regulations promulgated
thereunder, including § 30.7.6 As a
result, the Commission imposed a
condition on each designated member of
MX seeking confirmation of relief to
comply with the secured amount
requirement set forth in § 30.7.
Specifically, among other
representations, the 1989 Order stated
that each MX member agrees to
maintain, on behalf of customers located
in the United States, funds equivalent to
the ‘‘secured amount’’ described in
Commission Rule 1.3(rr), 17 CFR 1.3(rr)
(1988), in a separate account as set forth
in Commission Rule 30.7, 17 CFR 30.7
(1988), and to treat those funds in the
manner described by that rule.7
On July 15, 2019, MX petitioned the
Commission on behalf of its member
firms to amend the conditions for relief
set forth in the 1989 and 1997 Orders.
In particular, MX requested that the
Commission remove the condition set
forth in subparagraph (f) of the 1989
Order requiring MX members to comply
with the secured amount requirement
set forth in § 30.7. In support of its
request, MX provided supplementary
materials demonstrating that the
relevant laws and regulations governing
MX members require the segregation of
customer funds consistent with § 30.7’s
3 The term ‘‘futures commission merchant’’ is
defined in § 1.3, 17 CFR 1.3.
4 54 FR 11179 (Mar. 17, 1989) (1989 Order).
5 62 FR 8875 (Feb. 27, 1997) (1997 Order). The
expanded § 30.10 relief provided under the 1997
Order was contingent on the continued compliance
by MX and its designated members with the 1989
Order along with certain additional conditions. See
62 FR at 8876–7.
6 7 U.S.C. 6d(f); 17 CFR 30.7.
7 54 FR at 11182. In the time since the 1989 Order
was issued, the Commission has amended § 30.7.
See, e.g., 78 FR 68648, (Nov. 14, 2013), as amended
at 79 FR 44126, (July 30, 2014).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
secured amount requirement applicable
to registered FCMs.
Based upon a review of the petition
and supplementary materials filed by
MX, the Commission has concluded that
MX has demonstrated to the
Commission’s satisfaction that the
exemption for relief pursuant to
§ 30.10(a) is not otherwise contrary to
the public interest or to the purposes of
the provisions from which exemption is
sought. Accordingly, the Commission
has determined that compliance with
applicable Que´bec law and MX rules
may be substituted for compliance with
those sections of the Act and regulations
regarding the separate account
requirement set forth in § 30.7.
By this Order, the Commission hereby
exempts, subject to specified conditions,
those firms identified to the
Commission by MX as eligible for the
relief granted herein from:
• Registration with the Commission
for firms and for firm representatives;
• The requirement in Commission
Regulation 30.6(a) and (d), 17 CFR
30.6(a) and (d), that firms provide
customers located in the U.S. with the
risk disclosure statements in
Commission Regulation 1.55(b), 17 CFR
1.55(b), and Commission Regulation
33.7, 17 CFR 33.7, or as otherwise
approved under Commission Regulation
1.55(c), 17 CFR 1.55(c);
• The separate account requirement
contained in Commission Regulation
30.7, 17 CFR 30.7;
• Those sections of Part 1 of the
Commission’s regulations that apply to
foreign futures and options sold in the
U.S. as set forth in Part 30; and
• Those sections of Part 1 of the
Commission’s regulations relating to
books and records which apply to
transactions subject to Part 30,
based upon substituted compliance by
such persons with the applicable
statutes and regulations in effect in
Que´bec, Canada.
This determination to permit
substituted compliance is based on,
among other things, the Commission’s
previous finding and the finding today
that the regulatory framework governing
persons in Que´bec who would be
exempted hereunder provides:
(1) A system of qualification or
authorization of firms who deal in
transactions subject to regulation under
Part 30 that includes, for example,
criteria and procedures for granting,
monitoring, suspending and revoking
licenses, and provisions for requiring
and obtaining access to information
about authorized firms and persons who
act on behalf of such firms;
(2) Financial requirements for firms
including, without limitation, a
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74873
requirement for a minimum level of
working capital and daily mark-tomarket settlement and/or accounting
procedures;
(3) A system for the protection of
customer assets that is designed to
preclude the use of customer assets to
satisfy house obligations and requires
separate accounting for such assets;
(4) Recordkeeping and reporting
requirements pertaining to financial and
trade information;
(5) Sales practice standards for
authorized firms and persons acting on
their behalf that include, for example,
required disclosures to prospective
customers and prohibitions on improper
trading advice;
(6) Procedures to audit for compliance
with, and to redress violations of, the
customer protection and sales practice
requirements referred to above,
including, without limitation, an
affirmative surveillance program
designed to detect trading activities that
take advantage of customers, and the
existence of broad powers of
investigation relating to sales practice
abuses; and
(7) Mechanisms for sharing of
information between the Commission,
MX and the Que´bec regulatory
authorities on an ‘‘as needed’’ basis
including, without limitation,
confirmation data, data necessary to
trace funds related to trading futures
products subject to regulation in
Que´bec, position data, and data on
firms’ standing to do business and
financial condition.
The relief set forth in this Order
permits designated MX members to
solicit and accept orders from U.S.
customers for otherwise permitted
transactions 8 on all non-U.S. exchanges
where such members are authorized
under local law and regulation to
transact in futures and options. The
relief does not extend to regulations
relating to trading, directly or indirectly,
on U.S. exchanges, and does not pertain
to any transaction in swaps, as defined
in Section 1a(47) of the Act. This Order
does not provide an exemption from any
provision of the Act or regulations
thereunder not specified herein, such as
the antifraud provision in § 30.9. For
example, a MX member trading in U.S.
markets for its own account would be
subject to the Commission’s large trader
reporting requirements.9 Similarly, if
such a firm were carrying positions on
a U.S. exchange on behalf of foreign
clients and submitted such transactions
for clearing on an omnibus basis
through a firm registered as an FCM
8 See,
9 See,
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
e.g., Sections 2(a)(1)(C) and (D) of the Act.
e.g., 17 CFR part 18.
24NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
74874
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
under the Act, it would be subject to the
reporting requirements applicable to
foreign brokers.10 The relief herein is
inapplicable where the firm solicits or
accepts orders from customers located
in the U.S. for transactions on U.S.
markets. In that case, the firm must
comply with all applicable U.S. laws
and regulations, including the
requirement to register in the
appropriate capacity.
The eligibility of any firm to seek
relief under this exemptive Order is
subject to the following conditions:
(1) MX, as the SRO responsible for
monitoring the compliance of such
firms with the regulatory requirements
described in the § 30.10 petition, must
represent in writing to the Commission
that:
(a) Each firm for which relief is sought
is registered, licensed or authorized, as
appropriate, and is otherwise in good
standing under the standards in place in
Que´bec; such firm is engaged in
business with customers located in
Que´bec as well as in the U.S.; and such
firm and its principals and employees
who engage in activities subject to Part
30 would not be statutorily disqualified
from registration under Section 8a(2) of
the Act, 7 U.S.C. 12a(2);
(b) It will monitor firms to which
relief is granted for compliance with the
regulatory requirements for which
substituted compliance is accepted and
will promptly notify the Commission or
NFA of any change in status of a firm
that would affect its continued
eligibility for the exemption granted
hereunder, including the termination of
its activities in the U.S.;
(c) It will carry out its compliance,
surveillance, and rule enforcement
activities with respect to any
transactions on any non-MX exchange
to the same extent it carries out such
activities with respect to MX business;
(d) All transactions with respect to
customers located in the U.S. will be
made subject to the regulations of MX,
and the Commission will receive
prompt notice of all material changes to
the relevant laws in Que´bec, any rules
promulgated thereunder and MX rules;
(e) Customers located in the U.S. will
be provided no less stringent regulatory
protection than customers in Que´bec
under all relevant provisions of Que´bec
law;
(f) It will cooperate with the
Commission with respect to any
inquiries concerning any activity subject
to regulation under the Part 30
Regulations, including sharing the
information specified in Appendix A on
an ‘‘as needed’’ basis and will use its
10 See,
e.g., 17 CFR parts 17 and 21.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
best efforts to notify the Commission if
it becomes aware of any information
that in its judgment affects the financial
or operational viability of a member
firm doing business in the U.S. under
the exemption granted by this Order.
(2) Each firm seeking relief hereunder
must represent in writing that it:
(a) Is located outside the U.S., its
territories and possessions and, where
applicable, has subsidiaries or affiliates
domiciled in the U.S. with a related
business (e.g., banks and broker/dealer
affiliates) along with a brief description
of each subsidiary’s or affiliate’s identity
and principal business in the U.S.;
(b) Consents to jurisdiction in the U.S.
under the Act by filing a valid and
binding appointment of an agent in the
U.S. for service of process in accordance
with the requirements set forth in § 30.5;
(c) Agrees to provide access to its
books and records related to
transactions under Part 30, including
those transactions undertaken on any
non-U.S. exchange, required to be
maintained under the applicable
statutes and regulations in effect in
Que´bec upon the request of any
representative of the Commission or
U.S. Department of Justice at the place
in the U.S. designated by such
representative, within 72 hours, or such
lesser period of time as specified by that
representative as may be reasonable
under the circumstances after notice of
the request;
(d) Has no principal or employee who
solicits or accepts orders from
customers located in the U.S. who
would be disqualified under Section
8a(2) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 12a(2), from
doing business in the U.S.;
(e) Consents to participate in any NFA
arbitration program that offers a
procedure for resolving customer
disputes on the papers where such
disputes involve representations or
activities with respect to transactions
under Part 30, and consents to notify
customers located in the U.S. of the
availability of such a program;
(f) Undertakes to comply with the
applicable provisions of Canadian laws
and MX rules that form the basis upon
which this exemption from certain
provisions of the Act and regulations
thereunder is granted; and
(g) Notwithstanding provisions of the
Que´bec regulatory program, consents
not to commingle the foreign futures
and options funds or property of any
customer located in the U.S. with funds
of any account holders unrelated to
trading foreign futures or foreign
options; and refuse to any customer
located in the U.S. the option of not
segregating customer funds.
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
As set forth in the Commission’s
September 11, 1997 Order delegating to
NFA certain responsibilities, the written
representations set forth in paragraph
(2) shall be filed with NFA.11 Each firm
seeking relief hereunder has an ongoing
obligation to notify NFA should there be
a material change to any of the
representations required in the firm’s
application for relief.
This Order will become effective
immediately as to any designated MX
firm which currently operates under the
1989 and 1997 Orders, who will be
deemed to have consented to the
amended conditions by effecting
transactions pursuant to this Order.
With respect to any other designated
MX firms, the relief will be become
effective the later of the date of
publication of the Order in the Federal
Register or the filing of the consents set
forth in paragraphs (2)(a)–(g). Upon
filing of the notice required under
paragraph (1)(b) as to any such firm, the
relief granted by this Order may be
suspended immediately as to that firm.
That suspension will remain in effect
pending further notice by the
Commission, or the Commission’s
designee, to the firm and MX.
This Order is issued pursuant to
Regulation 30.10 based on the
representations made and supporting
material provided to the Commission
and the recommendation of the staff,
and is made effective as to any firm
granted relief hereunder based upon the
filings and representations of such firms
required hereunder. Any material
changes or omissions in the facts and
circumstances pursuant to which this
Order is granted might require the
Commission to reconsider its finding
that the exemption is not otherwise
contrary to the public interest or to the
purposes of the provision from which
exemption is sought. Further, if
experience demonstrates that the
continued effectiveness of this Order in
general, or with respect to a particular
firm, would be contrary to public policy
or to the purposes of the provision from
which exemption is sought, or that the
systems in place for the exchange of
information or other circumstances do
not warrant continuation of the
exemptive relief granted herein, the
Commission may, after appropriate
notice and opportunity to respond,
condition, modify, suspend, terminate,
11 62 FR 47792, 47793 (Sept. 11, 1997). Among
other duties, the Commission authorized NFA to
receive requests for confirmation of Regulation
30.10 relief on behalf of particular firms, to verify
such firms’ fitness and compliance with the
conditions of the appropriate § 30.10 Order and to
grant exemptive relief from registration to
qualifying firms.
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
withhold as to a specific firm, or
otherwise restrict the exemptive relief
granted in this Order, as appropriate
and as permitted by law, on its own
motion. The process by which the
Commission may terminate relief is set
forth in § 30.10(c).12
The Commission will continue to
monitor the implementation of its
program to exempt firms located in
jurisdictions generally deemed to have a
comparable regulatory program from the
application of certain of the foreign
futures and option regulations and will
make necessary adjustments if
appropriate.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2,
2020, by the Commission.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendix will not
appear in the Code of Federal Regulations.
Appendix to Foreign Futures and
Options Transactions—Commission
Voting Summary
On this matter, Chairman Tarbert and
Commissioners Quintenz, Behnam, Stump,
and Berkovitz voted in the affirmative. No
Commissioner voted in the negative.
[FR Doc. 2020–24658 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
22 CFR Part 41
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[Public Notice: 11218]
Megan Herndon, Senior Regulatory
Coordinator, Visa Services Directorate,
Bureau of Consular Affairs, Department
of State; telephone (202) 485–7586,
VisaRegs@state.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
RIN 1400–AE99
Visas: Visa Bond Pilot Program
Department of State.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
This temporary final rule
provides for a U.S. Department of State
(Department) visa bond pilot program
(Pilot Program) with specified
parameters. The purpose of the Pilot
Program is to assess the operational
feasibility of posting, processing, and
discharging visa bonds, in coordination
with the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), to help assess the
burden on government agencies and
identify any practical challenges related
to visa bonds. The Pilot Program does
not aim to assess whether issuing visa
bonds will be effective in reducing the
number of aliens who overstay their
temporary business visitor/tourist (B–1/
B–2) visa. Visa applicants potentially
subject to the Pilot Program include
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
12 17 CFR 30.10(c). See 85 FR 15359 (Mar. 18,
2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Nov 23, 2020
aliens who: Are applying for visas as
temporary visitors for business or
pleasure (B–1/B–2); are from countries
with high visa overstay rates; and
already have been approved by DHS for
an inadmissibility waiver. Because this
is a visa bond program, aliens traveling
under the Visa Waiver Program fall
outside the scope of the Pilot Program,
as those travelers do not apply for visas.
The Pilot Program is designed to apply
to nationals of specified countries with
high overstay rates to serve as a
diplomatic tool to encourage foreign
governments to take all appropriate
actions to ensure their nationals timely
depart the United States after making
temporary visits. The Pilot Program will
run for six months. During that period,
consular officers may require
nonimmigrant visa applicants falling
within the scope of the Pilot Program to
post a bond in the amount of $5,000,
$10,000, or $15,000 as a condition of
visa issuance. The amount of the bond,
should a bond be appropriate, will be
determined by the consular officer
based on the circumstances of the visa
applicant.
DATES:
Effective Date: This temporary final
rule is effective from December 24, 2020
through June 24, 2021.
Pilot Program Dates: The Pilot
Program will run for six months, from
December 24, 2020 through June 24,
2021.
Jkt 253001
I. Executive Summary of Pilot Program
This temporary final rule establishes
a Pilot Program under section 221(g)(3)
of the Immigration and Nationality Act,
as amended (INA) (8 U.S.C. 1201(g)(3)),
which authorizes consular officers to
require the posting of a Maintenance of
Status and Departure Bond (visa bond)
by an alien applying for, and otherwise
eligible to receive, a business visitor/
tourist (B–1/B–2) visa, when a visa bond
is required ‘‘to insure that at the
expiration of the time for which such
alien has been admitted . . . or upon
failure to maintain the status under
which [the alien] was admitted, or to
maintain any status subsequently
acquired under section 1258 of this title
(INA section 248), such alien will depart
from the United States.’’ The Pilot
Program will begin on December 24,
2020, and end on June 24, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
74875
Historically, Department guidance
generally discouraged consular officers
from exercising their authority to
require visa bonds under INA section
221(g)(3), as reflected in guidance
published in Volume 9 of the Foreign
Affairs Manual (9 FAM), section 403.9–
8(A) Bonds Should Rarely Be Used,1
which states, ‘‘[t]he mechanics of
posting, processing and discharging a
bond are cumbersome,’’ and notes
possible misperception of a bond
requirement by the public. The Pilot
Program will help the Department
assess the operational feasibility of
posting, processing, and discharging
visa bonds, in coordination with DHS,
to inform any future decision
concerning the possible use of visa
bonds to address overstays. The Pilot
Program responds to the President’s
initiative to lower visa overstay rates, as
reflected in the April 22, 2019,
Presidential Memorandum on
Combating High Nonimmigrant
Overstay Rates 2 (the Presidential
Memorandum), the threat to U.S.
interests described in the Presidential
Memorandum; and the high
nonimmigrant overstay rates for
nationals of certain countries.
Under the Pilot Program, visa bonds
may be required from certain applicants
for B–1/B–2 visas who are nationals of
listed countries that have overstay rates
of ten percent or higher in the combined
B–1/B–2 nonimmigrant visa category, as
reported in the DHS Fiscal Year 2019
Entry/Exit Overstay Report (DHS FY
2019 Overstay Report), and who have
been approved for a waiver of
ineligibility by DHS under INA section
212(d)(3)(A) (8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(3)(A)).
Visa bonds will be posted with U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
(ICE) via ICE Form I–352, Immigration
Bond. DHS regulations at 8 CFR 103.6
currently provide for the posting,
processing, and cancellation of such
visa bonds. DHS/ICE will collect all
bonds and retain all fees in the instance
that a bond is breached.
II. Purpose of This Rule
The Department is publishing this
temporary final rule (TFR) to establish
the Pilot Program, including: (1) The
criteria for identifying visa applicants
who will be required to post visa bonds;
(2) three levels for the amount of the
bond, with the level to be selected by
the consular officer based on an
applicant’s individual circumstances;
and (3) the duration of the Pilot
1 https://fam.state.gov/FAM/09FAM/
09FAM040309.html.
2 https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidentialactions/presidential-memorandum-combating-highnonimmigrant-overstay-rates/.
E:\FR\FM\24NOR1.SGM
24NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 74872-74875]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24658]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION
17 CFR Part 30
Foreign Futures and Options Transactions
AGENCY: Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
ACTION: Order.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: By this Order, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
(Commission) is amending and consolidating prior relief issued in
orders pursuant to Commission regulation 30.10 regarding the offer and
sale of foreign futures and options contracts to customers located in
the U.S. by firms designated by the Montreal Exchange (MX) to reflect
changes to the local laws and regulations applicable to the segregation
of customer funds.
DATES: This Order is effective November 24, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Andrew V. Chapin, Associate Chief
Counsel, (202) 418-5465, [email protected], Division of Swap Dealer and
Intermediary Oversight, Commodity Futures Trading Commission, 1155 21st
Street NW, Washington, DC 20581.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission has issued the following
Order:
Order Amending and Consolidating the Terms and Conditions Set Forth in
Prior Orders Issued Pursuant to Commission Regulation 30.10 Exempting
Firms Designated by the Montreal Exchange From the Application of
Certain of the Foreign Futures and Option Regulations
Part 30 of the Commission's regulations governs the offer and sale
of futures and option contracts traded on or subject to the regulations
of a foreign board of trade (foreign futures and options) to customers
located in the U.S.\1\ These regulations set forth requirements for
foreign firms acting in the capacity of a futures commission merchant
(FCM), introducing broker, commodity pool operator and commodity
trading adviser with respect to the offer and sale of foreign futures
and options to U.S. customers and are designed to ensure that such
products offered and sold in the U.S. are subject to regulatory
safeguards comparable to those applicable to transactions entered into
on designated contract markets. Pursuant to Sec. 30.10(a), persons
located outside the U.S. and subject to a comparable regulatory
structure in the jurisdiction in which they are located may seek an
exemption from certain of the requirements under Part 30 of the
Commission's regulations based upon compliance with the regulatory
requirements of the person's jurisdiction.\2\ If the Commission
determines that relief pursuant to Sec. 30.10(a) is not otherwise
contrary to the public interest or to the purposes of the provisions
from which exemption is sought, the Commission issues an Order to the
petitioner--typically a foreign regulator or self-regulatory
organization (SRO)--that sets forth conditions governing such relief.
Persons subject to regulatory oversight by the foreign regulator or SRO
granted an exemption, as appropriate, and located and doing business
outside the U.S. may solicit or accept orders directly from U.S.
customers for foreign futures or options transactions and, in the case
of a person acting in the capacity of an FCM, accept customer money or
other property, without registering under the
[[Page 74873]]
Commodity Exchange Act (CEA or Act) in the appropriate capacity.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 CFR part 30. The Commission promulgated part 30 of its
regulations in 1987. See Foreign Futures and Foreign Options
Transactions, 52 FR 28980 (Aug. 5, 1987). Appendix A also
specifically states that in considering an exemption request, the
Commission will take into account the extent to which United States
persons or contracts regulated by the Commission are permitted to
engage in futures-related activities or be offered in the country
from which an exemption is sought. 17 CFR part 30, Appendix A.
\2\ 17 CFR 30.10(a).
\3\ The term ``futures commission merchant'' is defined in Sec.
1.3, 17 CFR 1.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 1989, the Commission issued an order to MX pursuant to Sec.
30.10(a) permitting designated members of MX to intermediate on behalf
of customers located in the U.S. foreign futures and options
transactions executed on MX without having to register as FCMs with the
Commission.\4\ In 1997, the Commission issued another order expanding
the exemptive relief for designated members to include foreign futures
and options transactions on foreign boards of trade other than MX, as
permitted by local law and regulation.\5\ At the time that these orders
were published, the local laws and regulations applicable to MX members
did not require the segregation of customer funds consistent with those
requirements applicable to FCMs set forth in Section 4d(f) of the CEA
and those regulations promulgated thereunder, including Sec. 30.7.\6\
As a result, the Commission imposed a condition on each designated
member of MX seeking confirmation of relief to comply with the secured
amount requirement set forth in Sec. 30.7. Specifically, among other
representations, the 1989 Order stated that each MX member agrees to
maintain, on behalf of customers located in the United States, funds
equivalent to the ``secured amount'' described in Commission Rule
1.3(rr), 17 CFR 1.3(rr) (1988), in a separate account as set forth in
Commission Rule 30.7, 17 CFR 30.7 (1988), and to treat those funds in
the manner described by that rule.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 54 FR 11179 (Mar. 17, 1989) (1989 Order).
\5\ 62 FR 8875 (Feb. 27, 1997) (1997 Order). The expanded Sec.
30.10 relief provided under the 1997 Order was contingent on the
continued compliance by MX and its designated members with the 1989
Order along with certain additional conditions. See 62 FR at 8876-7.
\6\ 7 U.S.C. 6d(f); 17 CFR 30.7.
\7\ 54 FR at 11182. In the time since the 1989 Order was issued,
the Commission has amended Sec. 30.7. See, e.g., 78 FR 68648, (Nov.
14, 2013), as amended at 79 FR 44126, (July 30, 2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 15, 2019, MX petitioned the Commission on behalf of its
member firms to amend the conditions for relief set forth in the 1989
and 1997 Orders. In particular, MX requested that the Commission remove
the condition set forth in subparagraph (f) of the 1989 Order requiring
MX members to comply with the secured amount requirement set forth in
Sec. 30.7. In support of its request, MX provided supplementary
materials demonstrating that the relevant laws and regulations
governing MX members require the segregation of customer funds
consistent with Sec. 30.7's secured amount requirement applicable to
registered FCMs.
Based upon a review of the petition and supplementary materials
filed by MX, the Commission has concluded that MX has demonstrated to
the Commission's satisfaction that the exemption for relief pursuant to
Sec. 30.10(a) is not otherwise contrary to the public interest or to
the purposes of the provisions from which exemption is sought.
Accordingly, the Commission has determined that compliance with
applicable Qu[eacute]bec law and MX rules may be substituted for
compliance with those sections of the Act and regulations regarding the
separate account requirement set forth in Sec. 30.7.
By this Order, the Commission hereby exempts, subject to specified
conditions, those firms identified to the Commission by MX as eligible
for the relief granted herein from:
Registration with the Commission for firms and for firm
representatives;
The requirement in Commission Regulation 30.6(a) and (d),
17 CFR 30.6(a) and (d), that firms provide customers located in the
U.S. with the risk disclosure statements in Commission Regulation
1.55(b), 17 CFR 1.55(b), and Commission Regulation 33.7, 17 CFR 33.7,
or as otherwise approved under Commission Regulation 1.55(c), 17 CFR
1.55(c);
The separate account requirement contained in Commission
Regulation 30.7, 17 CFR 30.7;
Those sections of Part 1 of the Commission's regulations
that apply to foreign futures and options sold in the U.S. as set forth
in Part 30; and
Those sections of Part 1 of the Commission's regulations
relating to books and records which apply to transactions subject to
Part 30,
based upon substituted compliance by such persons with the applicable
statutes and regulations in effect in Qu[eacute]bec, Canada.
This determination to permit substituted compliance is based on,
among other things, the Commission's previous finding and the finding
today that the regulatory framework governing persons in Qu[eacute]bec
who would be exempted hereunder provides:
(1) A system of qualification or authorization of firms who deal in
transactions subject to regulation under Part 30 that includes, for
example, criteria and procedures for granting, monitoring, suspending
and revoking licenses, and provisions for requiring and obtaining
access to information about authorized firms and persons who act on
behalf of such firms;
(2) Financial requirements for firms including, without limitation,
a requirement for a minimum level of working capital and daily mark-to-
market settlement and/or accounting procedures;
(3) A system for the protection of customer assets that is designed
to preclude the use of customer assets to satisfy house obligations and
requires separate accounting for such assets;
(4) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements pertaining to
financial and trade information;
(5) Sales practice standards for authorized firms and persons
acting on their behalf that include, for example, required disclosures
to prospective customers and prohibitions on improper trading advice;
(6) Procedures to audit for compliance with, and to redress
violations of, the customer protection and sales practice requirements
referred to above, including, without limitation, an affirmative
surveillance program designed to detect trading activities that take
advantage of customers, and the existence of broad powers of
investigation relating to sales practice abuses; and
(7) Mechanisms for sharing of information between the Commission,
MX and the Qu[eacute]bec regulatory authorities on an ``as needed''
basis including, without limitation, confirmation data, data necessary
to trace funds related to trading futures products subject to
regulation in Qu[eacute]bec, position data, and data on firms' standing
to do business and financial condition.
The relief set forth in this Order permits designated MX members to
solicit and accept orders from U.S. customers for otherwise permitted
transactions \8\ on all non-U.S. exchanges where such members are
authorized under local law and regulation to transact in futures and
options. The relief does not extend to regulations relating to trading,
directly or indirectly, on U.S. exchanges, and does not pertain to any
transaction in swaps, as defined in Section 1a(47) of the Act. This
Order does not provide an exemption from any provision of the Act or
regulations thereunder not specified herein, such as the antifraud
provision in Sec. 30.9. For example, a MX member trading in U.S.
markets for its own account would be subject to the Commission's large
trader reporting requirements.\9\ Similarly, if such a firm were
carrying positions on a U.S. exchange on behalf of foreign clients and
submitted such transactions for clearing on an omnibus basis through a
firm registered as an FCM
[[Page 74874]]
under the Act, it would be subject to the reporting requirements
applicable to foreign brokers.\10\ The relief herein is inapplicable
where the firm solicits or accepts orders from customers located in the
U.S. for transactions on U.S. markets. In that case, the firm must
comply with all applicable U.S. laws and regulations, including the
requirement to register in the appropriate capacity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See, e.g., Sections 2(a)(1)(C) and (D) of the Act.
\9\ See, e.g., 17 CFR part 18.
\10\ See, e.g., 17 CFR parts 17 and 21.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The eligibility of any firm to seek relief under this exemptive
Order is subject to the following conditions:
(1) MX, as the SRO responsible for monitoring the compliance of
such firms with the regulatory requirements described in the Sec.
30.10 petition, must represent in writing to the Commission that:
(a) Each firm for which relief is sought is registered, licensed or
authorized, as appropriate, and is otherwise in good standing under the
standards in place in Qu[eacute]bec; such firm is engaged in business
with customers located in Qu[eacute]bec as well as in the U.S.; and
such firm and its principals and employees who engage in activities
subject to Part 30 would not be statutorily disqualified from
registration under Section 8a(2) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 12a(2);
(b) It will monitor firms to which relief is granted for compliance
with the regulatory requirements for which substituted compliance is
accepted and will promptly notify the Commission or NFA of any change
in status of a firm that would affect its continued eligibility for the
exemption granted hereunder, including the termination of its
activities in the U.S.;
(c) It will carry out its compliance, surveillance, and rule
enforcement activities with respect to any transactions on any non-MX
exchange to the same extent it carries out such activities with respect
to MX business;
(d) All transactions with respect to customers located in the U.S.
will be made subject to the regulations of MX, and the Commission will
receive prompt notice of all material changes to the relevant laws in
Qu[eacute]bec, any rules promulgated thereunder and MX rules;
(e) Customers located in the U.S. will be provided no less
stringent regulatory protection than customers in Qu[eacute]bec under
all relevant provisions of Qu[eacute]bec law;
(f) It will cooperate with the Commission with respect to any
inquiries concerning any activity subject to regulation under the Part
30 Regulations, including sharing the information specified in Appendix
A on an ``as needed'' basis and will use its best efforts to notify the
Commission if it becomes aware of any information that in its judgment
affects the financial or operational viability of a member firm doing
business in the U.S. under the exemption granted by this Order.
(2) Each firm seeking relief hereunder must represent in writing
that it:
(a) Is located outside the U.S., its territories and possessions
and, where applicable, has subsidiaries or affiliates domiciled in the
U.S. with a related business (e.g., banks and broker/dealer affiliates)
along with a brief description of each subsidiary's or affiliate's
identity and principal business in the U.S.;
(b) Consents to jurisdiction in the U.S. under the Act by filing a
valid and binding appointment of an agent in the U.S. for service of
process in accordance with the requirements set forth in Sec. 30.5;
(c) Agrees to provide access to its books and records related to
transactions under Part 30, including those transactions undertaken on
any non-U.S. exchange, required to be maintained under the applicable
statutes and regulations in effect in Qu[eacute]bec upon the request of
any representative of the Commission or U.S. Department of Justice at
the place in the U.S. designated by such representative, within 72
hours, or such lesser period of time as specified by that
representative as may be reasonable under the circumstances after
notice of the request;
(d) Has no principal or employee who solicits or accepts orders
from customers located in the U.S. who would be disqualified under
Section 8a(2) of the Act, 7 U.S.C. 12a(2), from doing business in the
U.S.;
(e) Consents to participate in any NFA arbitration program that
offers a procedure for resolving customer disputes on the papers where
such disputes involve representations or activities with respect to
transactions under Part 30, and consents to notify customers located in
the U.S. of the availability of such a program;
(f) Undertakes to comply with the applicable provisions of Canadian
laws and MX rules that form the basis upon which this exemption from
certain provisions of the Act and regulations thereunder is granted;
and
(g) Notwithstanding provisions of the Qu[eacute]bec regulatory
program, consents not to commingle the foreign futures and options
funds or property of any customer located in the U.S. with funds of any
account holders unrelated to trading foreign futures or foreign
options; and refuse to any customer located in the U.S. the option of
not segregating customer funds.
As set forth in the Commission's September 11, 1997 Order
delegating to NFA certain responsibilities, the written representations
set forth in paragraph (2) shall be filed with NFA.\11\ Each firm
seeking relief hereunder has an ongoing obligation to notify NFA should
there be a material change to any of the representations required in
the firm's application for relief.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 62 FR 47792, 47793 (Sept. 11, 1997). Among other duties,
the Commission authorized NFA to receive requests for confirmation
of Regulation 30.10 relief on behalf of particular firms, to verify
such firms' fitness and compliance with the conditions of the
appropriate Sec. 30.10 Order and to grant exemptive relief from
registration to qualifying firms.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Order will become effective immediately as to any designated
MX firm which currently operates under the 1989 and 1997 Orders, who
will be deemed to have consented to the amended conditions by effecting
transactions pursuant to this Order. With respect to any other
designated MX firms, the relief will be become effective the later of
the date of publication of the Order in the Federal Register or the
filing of the consents set forth in paragraphs (2)(a)-(g). Upon filing
of the notice required under paragraph (1)(b) as to any such firm, the
relief granted by this Order may be suspended immediately as to that
firm. That suspension will remain in effect pending further notice by
the Commission, or the Commission's designee, to the firm and MX.
This Order is issued pursuant to Regulation 30.10 based on the
representations made and supporting material provided to the Commission
and the recommendation of the staff, and is made effective as to any
firm granted relief hereunder based upon the filings and
representations of such firms required hereunder. Any material changes
or omissions in the facts and circumstances pursuant to which this
Order is granted might require the Commission to reconsider its finding
that the exemption is not otherwise contrary to the public interest or
to the purposes of the provision from which exemption is sought.
Further, if experience demonstrates that the continued effectiveness of
this Order in general, or with respect to a particular firm, would be
contrary to public policy or to the purposes of the provision from
which exemption is sought, or that the systems in place for the
exchange of information or other circumstances do not warrant
continuation of the exemptive relief granted herein, the Commission
may, after appropriate notice and opportunity to respond, condition,
modify, suspend, terminate,
[[Page 74875]]
withhold as to a specific firm, or otherwise restrict the exemptive
relief granted in this Order, as appropriate and as permitted by law,
on its own motion. The process by which the Commission may terminate
relief is set forth in Sec. 30.10(c).\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 30.10(c). See 85 FR 15359 (Mar. 18, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission will continue to monitor the implementation of its
program to exempt firms located in jurisdictions generally deemed to
have a comparable regulatory program from the application of certain of
the foreign futures and option regulations and will make necessary
adjustments if appropriate.
Issued in Washington, DC, on November 2, 2020, by the
Commission.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
Note: The following appendix will not appear in the Code of
Federal Regulations.
Appendix to Foreign Futures and Options Transactions--Commission Voting
Summary
On this matter, Chairman Tarbert and Commissioners Quintenz,
Behnam, Stump, and Berkovitz voted in the affirmative. No
Commissioner voted in the negative.
[FR Doc. 2020-24658 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P