Consolidation of Mentor-Protégé Programs and Other Government Contracting Amendments; Correction, 72916-72917 [2020-25177]

Download as PDF 72916 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 221 / Monday, November 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations production area in the production of such tomatoes. 2. The issuance of this amendatory Order advances the interests of growers Findings and Determinations of tomatoes in the production area (a) Findings and Determinations Upon pursuant to the declared policy of the the Basis of the Rulemaking Record. Act. The findings hereinafter set forth are Order Relative To Handling supplementary to the findings and determinations which were previously It is therefore ordered, that on and made in connection with the issuance of after the effective date hereof, all the Order; and all said previous findings handling of tomatoes grown in Florida and determinations are hereby ratified shall be in conformity to, and in and affirmed, except insofar as such compliance with, the terms and findings and determinations may be in conditions of the said Order as hereby conflict with the findings and proposed to be amended as follows: determinations set forth herein. The provisions amending the Order 1. The Order, as amended, and as contained in the proposed rule issued hereby further amended, and all the by the Administrator on September 23, terms and conditions thereof, will tend 2019, and published in the Federal to effectuate the declared policy of the Register (84 FR 52042) on October 1, Act; 2019, will be and are the terms and 2. The Order, as amended, and as provisions of this order amending the hereby further amended, regulates the Order and are set forth in full herein. handling of tomatoes grown in Florida in the same manner as, and is applicable List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 966 only to, persons in the respective classes Tomatoes, Marketing agreements, of commercial and industrial activity Reporting and recordkeeping specified in the Order; 3. The Order, as amended, and as requirements. hereby further amended, is limited in Bruce Summers, application to the smallest regional Administrator, Agricultural Marketing production area which is practicable, Service. consistent with carrying out the declared policy of the Act, and the For the reasons set forth in the issuance of several orders applicable to preamble, 7 CFR part 966 is amended as subdivisions of the production area follows: would not effectively carry out the PART 966—TOMATOES GROWN IN declared policy of the Act; FLORIDA 4. The Order, as amended, and as hereby further amended, prescribes, ■ 1. The authority citation for 7 CFR insofar as practicable, such different terms applicable to different parts of the part 966 continues to read as follows: production area as are necessary to give Authority: 7 U.S.C. 601–674. due recognition to the differences in the ■ 2. Revise § 966.22(a) to read as production and marketing of onions follows: produced in the production area; and 5. All handling of tomatoes produced § 966.22 Establishment and membership. or packed in the production area as (a) The Florida Tomato Committee, defined in the Order is in the current of consisting of 10 producer members, is interstate or foreign commerce or hereby established. For each member of directly burdens, obstructs, or affects the committee there shall be an alternate such commerce. who shall have the same qualifications (b) Determinations. as the member. It is hereby determined that: 1. The issuance of this amendatory * * * * * Order, amending the aforesaid Order, is ■ 3. Revise § 966.23(a) to read as favored or approved by producers follows: representing at least two-thirds of the volume of tomatoes produced by those § 966.23 Term of office. voting in a referendum on the question (a) The term of office of committee of approval and who, during the period members, and their respective of October 1, 2018, through September alternates, shall be for 2 years and shall 31, 2019, have been engaged within the begin as of August 1 and end as of July 31. 1 This order shall not become effective unless and until the requirements of § 900.14 of the rules of * * * * * jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES Order Amending the Order Regulating the Handling of Tomatoes Grown in Florida 1 practice and procedure governing proceedings to formulate marketing agreements and marketing orders have been met. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:17 Nov 13, 2020 Jkt 253001 4. Revise § 966.32(a) to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 § 966.32 Procedure. (a) Six members of the committee shall be necessary to constitute a quorum and the same number of concurring votes shall be required to pass any motion or approve any committee action. * * * * * [FR Doc. 2020–23590 Filed 11–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION 13 CFR Part 121 RIN 3245–AG94 Consolidation of Mentor-Prote´ge´ Programs and Other Government Contracting Amendments; Correction U.S. Small Business Administration. ACTION: Final rule; correction. AGENCY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is correcting a final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020. This rule merged the 8(a) Business Development (BD) Mentor-Prote´ge´ Program and the All Small Mentor-Prote´ge´ Program to eliminate confusion and remove unnecessary duplication of functions within SBA. This rule also eliminated the requirement that 8(a) Participants seeking to be awarded an 8(a) contract as a joint venture submit the joint venture agreement to SBA for review and approval prior to contract award, revised several 8(a) BD program regulations to reduce unnecessary or excessive burdens on 8(a) Participants, and clarified other related regulatory provisions to eliminate confusion among small businesses and procuring activities. In addition, in response to public comment, the rule required a business concern to recertify its size and/or socioeconomic status for all setaside orders under unrestricted multiple award contracts, unless the contract authorized limited pools of concerns for which size and/or status was required. This document is making three technical corrections to the final rule. DATES: Effective November 16, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hagedorn, U.S. Small Business Administration, Office of General Counsel, 409 Third Street SW, Washington, DC 20416; (202) 205–7625; mark.hagedorn@sba.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020–19428, appearing on page 66146 in the Federal Register of Friday, October 16, 2020, the following corrections are made: SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM 16NOR1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 221 / Monday, November 16, 2020 / Rules and Regulations § 121.103 [Corrected] 1. On page 66180, in the third column, in § 121.103, in paragraph (h)(1)(ii), ‘‘Except for sole source 8(a) awards, the joint venture must meet the requirements of § 124.513(c) and (d), § 125.8(b) and (c), § 125.18(b)(2) and (3), § 126.616(c) and (d), or § 127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate, at the time it submits its initial offer including price. For a sole source 8(a) award, the joint venture must demonstrate that it meets the requirements of § 124.513(c) and (d) prior to the award of the contract.’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘Except for sole source 8(a) awards, the joint venture must meet the requirements of § 124.513(c) and (d), § 125.8(b) and (c), § 125.18(b)(2) and (3), § 126.616(c) and (d), or § 127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate, as of the date of the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final bid for sealed bidding. For a sole source 8(a) award, the joint venture must demonstrate that it meets the requirements of § 124.513(c) and (d) prior to the award of the contract.’’ jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES § 121.404 [Corrected] 18:27 Nov 13, 2020 Francis C. Spampinato, Associate Administrator, Government Contracting and Business Development. [FR Doc. 2020–25177 Filed 11–13–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026–03–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA–2020–0751; Airspace Docket No. 20–ANM–42] RIN 2120–AA66 Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Paris, ID Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: 2. On page 66180, in the third column, in § 121.404, in amendment 4, instruction (a) ‘‘i. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text and (a)(1); and ii. Adding a paragraph heading to paragraph (a)(2);’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘i. Adding a paragraph heading to paragraphs (a) and (a)(2); and ii. Revising paragraph (a)(1);’’. 3. On page 66180, in the third column, in § 121.404, in paragraph (a), ‘‘Time of size—’’ is corrected to read ‘‘Time of size * * *’’. 4. On page 66181, in the third column, in § 121.404, in paragraph (d), ‘‘Nonmanufacturer rule, ostensible subcontractor rule, and joint venture agreements. Size status is determined as of the date of the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final bid for sealed bidding for the following purposes: compliance with the nonmanufacturer rule set forth in § 121.406(b)(1), the ostensible subcontractor rule set forth in § 121.103(h)(4), and the joint venture agreement requirements in § 124.513(c) and (d), § 125.8(b) and (c), § 125.18(b)(2) and (3), § 126.616(c) and (d), or § 127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate.’’ is corrected to read, ‘‘Nonmanufacturer rule, ostensible subcontractor rule, and joint venture agreements. Compliance with the nonmanufacturer rule set forth in § 121.406(b)(1), the ostensible subcontractor rule set forth in VerDate Sep<11>2014 § 121.103(h)(4), and the joint venture agreement requirements in § 124.513(c) and (d), § 125.8(b) and (c), § 125.18(b)(2) and (3), § 126.616(c) and (d), or § 127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate, is determined as of the date of the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final bid for sealed bidding for the following purposes.’’ Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/ ibr-locations.html. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard Roberts, Federal Aviation Administration, Western Service Center, Operations Support Group, 2200 S. 216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198; telephone (206) 231–2245. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority for This Rulemaking The FAA’s authority to issue rules regarding aviation safety is found in Title 49 of the United States Code (U.S.C.). Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs, describes in more detail the scope of the Agency’s authority. This rulemaking is promulgated under the authority described in Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that section, the FAA is charged with prescribing regulations to assign the use of airspace necessary to ensure the safety of aircraft and the efficient use of airspace. This regulation is within the scope of that authority as it modifies the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet AGL at Bear Lake County Airport, Paris, ID in support of IFR operations. History This action modifies the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Bear Lake County Airport, Paris, ID, to accommodate new Area Navigation (RNAV) procedures at the airport. This action will ensure the safety and management of instrument flight rules (IFR) operations within the National Airspace System. DATES: Effective 0901 UTC, February 25, 2021. The Director of the Federal Register approves this incorporation by reference action under Title 1 Code of Federal Regulations part 51, subject to the annual revision of FAA Order 7400.11 and publication of conforming amendments. ADDRESSES: FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, and subsequent amendments can be viewed online at https:// www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/. For further information, you can contact the Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591; telephone: (202) 267–8783. The Order is also available for inspection at the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of FAA Order 7400.11E at NARA, email fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to https:// SUMMARY: 72917 The FAA published a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register (85 FR 53308; August 28, 2020) for Docket No. FAA–2020–0751 to modify the Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the earth at Bear Lake County Airport, Paris, ID, in support of IFR operations. Interested parties were invited to participate in this rulemaking effort by submitting written comments on the proposal to the FAA. No substantive comments were received. Class D and Class E airspace designations are published in paragraph 6005 of FAA Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020 and effective September 15, 2020, which is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1. The Class E airspace designations listed in this document will be published subsequently in the Order. Availability and Summary of Documents for Incorporation by Reference This document amends FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace Designations and Reporting Points, dated July 21, 2020, and effective September 15, 2020. FAA Order 7400.11E is publicly available as listed in the ADDRESSES section of this document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, E:\FR\FM\16NOR1.SGM 16NOR1

Agencies

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 221 (Monday, November 16, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72916-72917]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25177]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

13 CFR Part 121

RIN 3245-AG94


Consolidation of Mentor-Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Programs and Other 
Government Contracting Amendments; Correction

AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Final rule; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The U.S. Small Business Administration (SBA) is correcting a 
final rule that appeared in the Federal Register on October 16, 2020. 
This rule merged the 8(a) Business Development (BD) Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program and the All Small Mentor-
Prot[eacute]g[eacute] Program to eliminate confusion and remove 
unnecessary duplication of functions within SBA. This rule also 
eliminated the requirement that 8(a) Participants seeking to be awarded 
an 8(a) contract as a joint venture submit the joint venture agreement 
to SBA for review and approval prior to contract award, revised several 
8(a) BD program regulations to reduce unnecessary or excessive burdens 
on 8(a) Participants, and clarified other related regulatory provisions 
to eliminate confusion among small businesses and procuring activities. 
In addition, in response to public comment, the rule required a 
business concern to recertify its size and/or socioeconomic status for 
all set-aside orders under unrestricted multiple award contracts, 
unless the contract authorized limited pools of concerns for which size 
and/or status was required. This document is making three technical 
corrections to the final rule.

DATES: Effective November 16, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Hagedorn, U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Office of General Counsel, 409 Third Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20416; (202) 205-7625; [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In FR Doc. 2020-19428, appearing on page 
66146 in the Federal Register of Friday, October 16, 2020, the 
following corrections are made:

[[Page 72917]]

Sec.  121.103 [Corrected]

     1. On page 66180, in the third column, in Sec.  121.103, in 
paragraph (h)(1)(ii), ``Except for sole source 8(a) awards, the joint 
venture must meet the requirements of Sec.  124.513(c) and (d), Sec.  
125.8(b) and (c), Sec.  125.18(b)(2) and (3), Sec.  126.616(c) and (d), 
or Sec.  127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate, at the 
time it submits its initial offer including price. For a sole source 
8(a) award, the joint venture must demonstrate that it meets the 
requirements of Sec.  124.513(c) and (d) prior to the award of the 
contract.'' is corrected to read, ``Except for sole source 8(a) awards, 
the joint venture must meet the requirements of Sec.  124.513(c) and 
(d), Sec.  125.8(b) and (c), Sec.  125.18(b)(2) and (3), Sec.  
126.616(c) and (d), or Sec.  127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as 
appropriate, as of the date of the final proposal revision for 
negotiated acquisitions and final bid for sealed bidding. For a sole 
source 8(a) award, the joint venture must demonstrate that it meets the 
requirements of Sec.  124.513(c) and (d) prior to the award of the 
contract.''

Sec.  121.404 [Corrected]

     2. On page 66180, in the third column, in Sec.  121.404, in 
amendment 4, instruction (a) ``i. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory 
text and (a)(1); and ii. Adding a paragraph heading to paragraph 
(a)(2);'' is corrected to read, ``i. Adding a paragraph heading to 
paragraphs (a) and (a)(2); and ii. Revising paragraph (a)(1);''.
     3. On page 66180, in the third column, in Sec.  121.404, in 
paragraph (a), ``Time of size--'' is corrected to read ``Time of size * 
* *''.
     4. On page 66181, in the third column, in Sec.  121.404, in 
paragraph (d), ``Nonmanufacturer rule, ostensible subcontractor rule, 
and joint venture agreements. Size status is determined as of the date 
of the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final 
bid for sealed bidding for the following purposes: compliance with the 
nonmanufacturer rule set forth in Sec.  121.406(b)(1), the ostensible 
subcontractor rule set forth in Sec.  121.103(h)(4), and the joint 
venture agreement requirements in Sec.  124.513(c) and (d), Sec.  
125.8(b) and (c), Sec.  125.18(b)(2) and (3), Sec.  126.616(c) and (d), 
or Sec.  127.506(c) and (d) of this chapter, as appropriate.'' is 
corrected to read, ``Nonmanufacturer rule, ostensible subcontractor 
rule, and joint venture agreements. Compliance with the nonmanufacturer 
rule set forth in Sec.  121.406(b)(1), the ostensible subcontractor 
rule set forth in Sec.  121.103(h)(4), and the joint venture agreement 
requirements in Sec.  124.513(c) and (d), Sec.  125.8(b) and (c), Sec.  
125.18(b)(2) and (3), Sec.  126.616(c) and (d), or Sec.  127.506(c) and 
(d) of this chapter, as appropriate, is determined as of the date of 
the final proposal revision for negotiated acquisitions and final bid 
for sealed bidding for the following purposes.''

Francis C. Spampinato,
Associate Administrator, Government Contracting and Business 
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020-25177 Filed 11-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-03-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.