Mefenoxam; Pesticide Tolerances, 72571-72574 [2020-23423]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 220 / Friday, November 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
technical issue, or an interpretation of a
statute or regulation. A guidance
document does not include the
following:
(1) Rules promulgated pursuant to
notice and comment under section 553
of title 5, United States Code, or similar
statutory provisions;
(2) Rules exempt from rulemaking
requirements under section 553(a) of
title 5, United States Code;
(3) Rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice;
(4) Decisions of agency adjudications
under section 554 of title 5, United
States Code, or similar statutory
provisions;
(5) Internal guidance directed to the
issuing agency or other agencies that is
not intended to have substantial future
effect on the behavior of regulated
parties; or
(6) Internal executive branch legal
advice or legal opinions addressed to
executive branch officials.
Significant guidance document means
a guidance document that the
Administrator of the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
determines is reasonably anticipated to:
(1) Lead to an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
of Executive Order 12866.
VA means the Department of Veterans
Affairs.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 5.15 Procedures for issuing guidance
documents.
(a) General. (1) Each guidance
document must clearly and prominently
state that it does not bind the public,
except as authorized by law or as
incorporated into a contract. Guidance
documents may include the following or
similar disclaimer language: The
contents of this document do not have
the force and effect of law and are not
meant to bind the public in any way.
This document is intended only to
provide clarity to the public regarding
existing requirements under the law or
agency policies.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 12, 2020
Jkt 253001
(2) Each guidance document must
include the following information in the
published guidance document:
(i) The term guidance;
(ii) The agency or office issuing the
document;
(iii) To what and to whom the
document applies;
(iv) The date of issuance;
(v) The title and unique identification
number of the document;
(vi) Citation to statutory or regulatory
authority that the guidance document
interprets or applies;
(vii) A short summary of the subject
matter covered at the beginning of the
guidance document;
(viii) The statement required under
paragraph (a)(1) of this section; and
(ix) As applicable, the guidance
document being revised or replaced.
(b) Significant guidance documents.
We will refer to the Administrator of the
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs (OIRA) within the Office of
Management and Budget, or the
Administrator’s designee, the question
of whether a guidance document is
significant. Significant guidance
documents must follow the
requirements provided in paragraph
5.15(a). Additionally, unless the
Administrator of OIRA, pursuant to
review under E.O. 12866, and VA agree
that exigency, safety, health, or other
compelling cause warrants an
exemption, the following additional
procedures apply:
(1) VA will provide for a period of
public notice and comment of at least 30
days before issuance of such significant
guidance document and will provide a
public response to major concerns
raised in comments, except when VA
for good cause finds (and incorporates
such finding and a brief statement of
reasons therefor into the guidance
document) that notice and public
comment thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.
(2) The Secretary or a VA component
head appointed by the President (with
or without confirmation by the Senate),
or by an official who is serving in an
acting capacity as either of the
foregoing, must approve any significant
guidance document prior to issuance;
pursuant to section 4(a)(iii)(B) of
Executive Order 13891, this approval
authority is not delegable.
(3) Significant guidance documents
must be submitted to OIRA for review
under Executive Order 12866 prior to
issuance.
(4) Significant guidance documents
must comply with the applicable
requirements for regulations or rules set
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72571
forth in Executive Orders 12866, 13563,
13609, 13771, and 13777.
§ 5.20 Procedures for petition for the
withdrawal or modification of a guidance
document.
Petitions for withdrawal or
modification of a guidance document.
The following procedures apply for the
public to petition for withdrawal or
modification of a guidance document.
(a) A member of the public wishing to
petition for withdrawal or modification
of a guidance document may submit
such petition via email to: OEIDMO@
va.gov. Petitions may also be mailed to
the following address: Office of Policy
and Interagency Collaboration, Office of
Enterprise Integration, 810 Vermont
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20420.
(b) A petition for withdrawal or
modification of a guidance document
must contain the following information:
(1) The petitioner’s name and address;
(2) Information identifying the
guidance document to which the
petition pertains;
(3) A statement of the reasons the
petitioner believes the document should
be withdrawn or modified.
(c) VA will provide a response to a
petition within 90 days of receipt of the
request.
§ 5.25
Guidance website.
VA has a guidance website that
contains, or links to, guidance
documents that are currently in effect.
VA will not cite, use, or rely on any
guidance document that is not posted
on the website existing under Executive
Order 13891, except to establish
historical facts. The website can be
found at the following address:
www.VA.gov/guidance.
[FR Doc. 2020–25121 Filed 11–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0346; FRL–10012–87]
Mefenoxam; Pesticide Tolerances
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of mefenoxam in
or on the tree nut, crop group 14–12 and
almond, hulls. Syngenta Crop Protection
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
72572
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 220 / Friday, November 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
This regulation is effective
November 13, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received
on or before January 12, 2021, and must
be filed in accordance with the
instructions provided in 40 CFR part
178 (see also Unit I.C. of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
DATES:
The docket for this action,
identified by docket identification (ID)
number EPA–HQ–OPP–2019–0346, is
available at https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Office of Pesticide Programs
Regulatory Public Docket (OPP Docket)
in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William
Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460–0001. The Public Reading Room
is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744,
and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305–5805.
Due to the public health concerns
related to COVID–19, the EPA Docket
Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is
closed to visitors with limited
exceptions. The staff continues to
provide remote customer service via
email, phone, and webform. For the
latest status information on EPA/DC
services and docket access, visit https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide
Programs, Environmental Protection
Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460–0001; main
telephone number: (703) 305–7090;
email address: RDFRNotices@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. The following
list of North American Industrial
Classification System (NAICS) codes is
not intended to be exhaustive, but rather
provides a guide to help readers
determine whether this document
applies to them. Potentially affected
entities may include:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 12, 2020
Jkt 253001
B. How can I get electronic access to
other related information?
You may access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Publishing Office’s eCFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/
text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/
Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing
request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2019–0346 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
objections and requests for a hearing
must be in writing, and must be
received by the Hearing Clerk on or
before January 12, 2021. Addresses for
mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40
CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing (excluding
any Confidential Business Information
(CBI)) for inclusion in the public docket.
Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be
disclosed publicly by EPA without prior
notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your
objection or hearing request, identified
by docket ID number EPA–HQ–OPP–
2019–0346, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be CBI or
other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute.
• Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/
DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave.
NW, Washington, DC 20460–0001.
• Hand Delivery: To make special
arrangements for hand delivery or
delivery of boxed information, please
follow the instructions at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on
commenting or visiting the docket,
along with more information about
dockets generally, is available at https://
www.epa.gov/dockets.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Summary of Petitioned-For
Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 24,
2020 (85 FR 37806) (FRL–10010–82),
EPA issued a document pursuant to
FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 9F8759) by
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, P.O. Box
18300, Greensboro, NC 27419. The
petition requested that 40 CFR 180.546
be amended by establishing a tolerance
for residues of mefenoxam, (methyl N(2,6-dimethylphenyl)-N(methoxyacetyl)-DL-alaninate) including
its metabolites and degradate, in or on
tree nuts crop group 14–12 at 0.3 parts
per million (ppm). Syngenta’s petition
was intended to cover residues of
mefenoxam in or on nut commodities
from domestic use of the pesticide,
although EPA erroneously stated in the
Notice of Filing that Syngenta had
requested a tolerance to cover residues
of mefenoxam on imported nut
commodities. EPA hereby clarifies that
error and has evaluated the request as
submitted by the petition. The error did
not substantially impact the way EPA
evaluated the petition. In addition,
although not mentioned in EPA’s
document, Syngenta’s petition also
requested that currently established
tolerances for residues of metalaxyl in/
on almond and walnut at 0.5 ppm be
removed from 40 CFR 180.408, under
the premise these commodities would
be adequately covered by the proposed
tree nut, crop group 14–12 tolerance for
mefenoxam, which is the single
enantiomer of the racemic mixture
metalaxyl. A summary document of the
petition prepared by Syngenta Crop
Protection, the registrant, is available in
the docket, https://www.regulations.gov.
One comment was received in response
to the notice of filing, although it was
not germane to the petition for
mefenoxam tolerances.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and
Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA
allows EPA to establish a tolerance (the
legal limit for a pesticide chemical
residue in or on a food) only if EPA
determines that the tolerance is ‘‘safe.’’
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA
defines ‘‘safe’’ to mean that ‘‘there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result from aggregate exposure to the
pesticide chemical residue, including
all anticipated dietary exposures and all
other exposures for which there is
reliable information.’’ This includes
exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include
occupational exposure. Section
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 220 / Friday, November 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to
give special consideration to exposure
of infants and children to the pesticide
chemical residue in establishing a
tolerance and to ‘‘ensure that there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide
chemical residue. . . .’’
Consistent with FFDCA section
408(b)(2)(D), and the factors specified in
FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has
reviewed the available scientific data
and other relevant information in
support of this action. EPA has
sufficient data to assess the hazards of
and to make a determination on
aggregate exposure for mefenoxam
including exposure resulting from the
tolerance established by this action.
EPA’s assessment of exposures and risks
associated with mefenoxam follows.
On December 21, 2018, EPA
published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues
of mefenoxam in or on several
commodities based on the Agency’s
conclusion that aggregate exposure to
mefenoxam is safe for the general
population, including infants and
children. See 83 FR 65541 (FRL–9985–
52). Because the Agency’s position
concerning several sections of that
document have not changed, EPA is
incorporating them by reference here—
the toxicological profile and points of
departure, description of the
assumptions for assessing exposure
from residues in or on food, in drinking
water, and residential exposures, the
Agency’s conclusion about cumulative
risk, and Agency’s determination
regarding the children’s safety factor.
Further information about EPA’s risk
assessment and determination of safety
supporting the tolerances established in
the December 21, 2018 Federal Register
action, as well as the new mefenoxam
tolerance can be found at https://
www.regulations.gov in the document
titled ‘‘Mefenoxam (Metalaxyl-M).
Human Health Risk Assessment for the
Establishment of Permanent Tolerances
and New Uses in/on Wasabi, Cacao, and
Crop Group Expansion from Kiwifruit to
Fruit, Small, Vine Climbing, Except
Grape, Crop Subgroup 13–07E.’’ dated
June 5, 2018, in docket ID EPA–HQ–
OPP–2017–0562 and the document
titled, ‘‘Mefenoxam (Metalaxyl-M).
Human Health Risk Assessment for the
Proposed New Use in/on Tree Nuts,
Crop Group 14–12 and the
Establishment of a Permanent
Tolerance.’’ in docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2019–0346.
EPA’s exposure assessments have
been updated to include the additional
exposure from use of mefenoxam on tree
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 12, 2020
Jkt 253001
nut, crop group 14–12. EPA’s aggregate
exposure assessment incorporated this
additional dietary exposure, as well as
exposures from drinking water and
residential sources, although those latter
exposures are not impacted by the new
uses on the tree nut, crop group 14–12
and thus have not changed since the last
assessment.
Acute dietary risks are below the
Agency’s level of concern: 52% of the
acute population adjusted dose (aPAD)
for children 1 to 2 years old, the
population group of concern. Due to the
lack of a chronic endpoint, a chronic
dietary risk is not expected. As required
by the FFDCA, EPA considered
aggregate exposures to mefenoxam, i.e.,
exposures from food, drinking water,
and residential uses, in its risk
assessment. There are no residential
uses expected to result in acute,
intermediate-term, or chronic
exposures; therefore, aggregate risks for
those exposure durations are equal to
the dietary risks for those exposure
durations and not of concern.
Based on the absence of increased
hazard from repeated exposures to
mefenoxam, short-term aggregate risk
assessments are protective of potential
effects from longer-term exposures.
Additionally, residential exposures are
not expected to occur beyond the shortterm time interval.
Using the exposure assumptions
described for short-term exposures, EPA
has concluded the combined short-term
food, water, and residential exposures
result in aggregate margins of exposures
above the level of concern of 100 for all
scenarios assessed and are not of
concern.
Therefore, based on the risk
assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to
infants and children from aggregate
exposure to mefenoxam residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
There are adequate residue analytical
methods for enforcing tolerances for
mefenoxam residues of concern in/on
the registered plant and livestock
commodities. These several methods
include gas chromatography equipped
with an alkali flame ionization detector
(GC/AFID), gas chromatography
equipped with a nitrogen/phosphorus
detector (GC/NPD), the multiresidue
method in PAM, Vol. I Section 302
(Protocol D) in the nitrogen-specific
mode, and gas-liquid chromatography/
mass spectrometry in the chemical
ionization mode with selected ion
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
72573
monitoring (SIM) of the M+1 ion at m/
z 268 for determining residues in/on nut
crops and livestock.
The methods may be requested from:
Chief, Analytical Chemistry Branch,
Environmental Science Center, 701
Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD 20755–5350;
telephone number: (410) 305–2905;
email address: residuemethods@
epa.gov.
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA
seeks to harmonize U.S. tolerances with
international standards whenever
possible, consistent with U.S. food
safety standards and agricultural
practices. EPA considers the
international maximum residue limits
(MRLs) established by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as
required by FFDCA section 408(b)(4).
The Codex Alimentarius is a joint
United Nations Food and Agriculture
Organization/World Health
Organization food standards program,
and it is recognized as an international
food safety standards-setting
organization in trade agreements to
which the United States is a party. EPA
may establish a tolerance that is
different from a Codex MRL; however,
FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that
EPA explain the reasons for departing
from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established an
MRL for mefenoxam or metalaxyl in or
on the tree nut, crop group 14–12.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For
Tolerances
There are no revisions to the
requested tolerance petition of
mefenoxam. The petition requested that
upon establishment of tolerances in or
on tree nuts crop group 14–12 at 0.3
ppm, the currently established
tolerances for residues of metalaxyl in
or on almond and walnuts at 0.5 ppm
be removed from 40 CFR 180.408,
because residues in or on these
commodities were anticipated to be
adequately covered by the new tree nut
crop group 14–12 tolerance. EPA has
decided not to remove the existing
tolerances for metalaxyl on almond and
walnut. Existing registrations permit use
of metalaxyl on almond and walnut, and
those uses would result in residues of
metalaxyl on those commodities that
would not be covered by the new
mefenoxam tolerances. Therefore,
removal of such tolerances would result
in adulterated commodities.
Although a tolerance on almond hulls
was not requested, available processing
data demonstrates that residues from
treated almonds concentrate on hulls
during processing; therefore, a separate
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
72574
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 220 / Friday, November 13, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
tolerance is needed to cover those
residues. Based on application rates for
mefenoxam and extrapolating from the
available data concerning concentration
during processing for metalaxyl, EPA
concludes a tolerance level of 5 ppm for
residues of mefenoxam in or on almond
hulls is appropriate. EPA is establishing
that tolerance here. The FFDCA
anticipates that residues of pesticides
applied to raw agricultural commodities
may pass through to processed
commodities and allows tolerances on
raw agricultural commodities to cover
processed forms of those commodities
as long as residues remain within
tolerance levels. 21 U.S.C. 346a(a)(2).
Where residues concentrate in the
processed food, a separate tolerance is
necessary. Given the potential to passthrough, EPA examines whether
tolerances on the raw agricultural
commodities will cover residues on the
processed food, and if not, establishes
them. EPA believes it is reasonable to
expect that a tolerance may need to be
established in processed forms of
commodities for which tolerances on
the raw agricultural commodities are
requested.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established
for residues of mefenoxam, including its
metabolites and degradates in or on the
tree nut, crop group 14–12 at 0.3 ppm
and almond hulls at 5 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
This action establishes tolerances
under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the
Agency. The Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has exempted these types
of actions from review under Executive
Order 12866, entitled ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’ (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993). Because this action
has been exempted from review under
Executive Order 12866, this action is
not subject to Executive Order 13211,
entitled ‘‘Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect
Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use’’ (66
FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive
Order 13045, entitled ‘‘Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks’’ (62 FR 19885,
April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order
13771, entitled ‘‘Reducing Regulations
and Controlling Regulatory Costs’’ (82
FR 9339, February 3, 2017). This action
does not contain any information
collections subject to OMB approval
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), nor does
it require any special considerations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:03 Nov 12, 2020
Jkt 253001
under Executive Order 12898, entitled
‘‘Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority
Populations and Low-Income
Populations’’ (59 FR 7629, February 16,
1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that
are established on the basis of a petition
under FFDCA section 408(d), such as
the tolerance in this final rule, do not
require the issuance of a proposed rule,
the requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers,
food processors, food handlers, and food
retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does
this action alter the relationships or
distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress
in the preemption provisions of FFDCA
section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency
has determined that this action will not
have a substantial direct effect on States
or Tribal Governments, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States or Tribal
Governments, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian
Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132,
entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999) and Executive Order
13175, entitled ‘‘Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments’’ (65 FR 67249, November
9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In
addition, this action does not impose
any enforceable duty or contain any
unfunded mandate as described under
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act (UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et
seq.).
This action does not involve any
technical standards that would require
Agency consideration of voluntary
consensus standards pursuant to section
12(d) of the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act
(NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), EPA will
submit a report containing this rule and
other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller
General of the United States prior to
publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ‘‘major
rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
and pests, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
Dated: October 9, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office
of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the
preamble, EPA is amending 40 CFR
chapter I as follows:
PART 180—TOLERANCES AND
EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE
CHEMICAL RESIDUES IN FOOD
1. The authority citation for part 180
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
2. In § 180.546 amend paragraph (a)
by designating the table as Table 1 to
paragraph (a) and adding in alphabetical
order to newly designated Table 1 to
paragraph (a) entries for ‘‘Almond,
hulls’’ and ‘‘Tree nut, crop group 14–
12’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 180.546 Mefenoxam; tolerances for
residues.
*
*
*
*
*
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (a)
Parts per
million
Commodity
*
*
*
*
Almond hulls .............................
*
*
*
*
*
Tree nut, crop group 14–12 .....
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
5
0.3
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–23423 Filed 11–12–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION
46 CFR Parts 502, 503, 520, 530, 535,
540, 550, 555, and 560
[Docket No. 20–18]
RIN 3072–AC83
Update of Existing User Fees
Federal Maritime Commission
Direct final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Federal Maritime
Commission (Commission) is updating
its current user fees and amending the
relevant regulations to reflect these
updates. The Commission is also
correcting an internal citation and
clarifying the applicability of a fee in an
existing regulation.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13NOR1.SGM
13NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 220 (Friday, November 13, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 72571-72574]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23423]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0346; FRL-10012-87]
Mefenoxam; Pesticide Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes tolerances for residues of
mefenoxam in or on the tree nut, crop group 14-12 and almond, hulls.
Syngenta Crop Protection requested these tolerances under the Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA).
[[Page 72572]]
DATES: This regulation is effective November 13, 2020. Objections and
requests for hearings must be received on or before January 12, 2021,
and must be filed in accordance with the instructions provided in 40
CFR part 178 (see also Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: The docket for this action, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0346, is available at https://www.regulations.gov or at the Office of Pesticide Programs Regulatory
Public Docket (OPP Docket) in the Environmental Protection Agency
Docket Center (EPA/DC), West William Jefferson Clinton Bldg., Rm. 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-0001. The Public
Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone number for the OPP
Docket is (703) 305-5805.
Due to the public health concerns related to COVID-19, the EPA
Docket Center (EPA/DC) and Reading Room is closed to visitors with
limited exceptions. The staff continues to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For the latest status
information on EPA/DC services and docket access, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Marietta Echeverria, Registration
Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460-
0001; main telephone number: (703) 305-7090; email address:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an
agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer.
The following list of North American Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a
guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them.
Potentially affected entities may include:
Crop production (NAICS code 111).
Animal production (NAICS code 112).
Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311).
Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532).
B. How can I get electronic access to other related information?
You may access a frequently updated electronic version of EPA's
tolerance regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through the Government
Publishing Office's e-CFR site at https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?&c=ecfr&tpl=/ecfrbrowse/Title40/40tab_02.tpl.
C. How can I file an objection or hearing request?
Under FFDCA section 408(g), 21 U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation and may also request a
hearing on those objections. You must file your objection or request a
hearing on this regulation in accordance with the instructions provided
in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, you must identify
docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0346 in the subject line on the first
page of your submission. All objections and requests for a hearing must
be in writing, and must be received by the Hearing Clerk on or before
January 12, 2021. Addresses for mail and hand delivery of objections
and hearing requests are provided in 40 CFR 178.25(b).
In addition to filing an objection or hearing request with the
Hearing Clerk as described in 40 CFR part 178, please submit a copy of
the filing (excluding any Confidential Business Information (CBI)) for
inclusion in the public docket. Information not marked confidential
pursuant to 40 CFR part 2 may be disclosed publicly by EPA without
prior notice. Submit the non-CBI copy of your objection or hearing
request, identified by docket ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0346, by one of
the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit
electronically any information you consider to be CBI or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket
Center (EPA/DC), (28221T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20460-0001.
Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand
delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the
instructions at https://www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html.
Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along
with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/dockets.
II. Summary of Petitioned-For Tolerance
In the Federal Register of June 24, 2020 (85 FR 37806) (FRL-10010-
82), EPA issued a document pursuant to FFDCA section 408(d)(3), 21
U.S.C. 346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a pesticide petition (PP
9F8759) by Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, P.O. Box 18300, Greensboro, NC
27419. The petition requested that 40 CFR 180.546 be amended by
establishing a tolerance for residues of mefenoxam, (methyl N-(2,6-
dimethylphenyl)-N-(methoxyacetyl)-DL-alaninate) including its
metabolites and degradate, in or on tree nuts crop group 14-12 at 0.3
parts per million (ppm). Syngenta's petition was intended to cover
residues of mefenoxam in or on nut commodities from domestic use of the
pesticide, although EPA erroneously stated in the Notice of Filing that
Syngenta had requested a tolerance to cover residues of mefenoxam on
imported nut commodities. EPA hereby clarifies that error and has
evaluated the request as submitted by the petition. The error did not
substantially impact the way EPA evaluated the petition. In addition,
although not mentioned in EPA's document, Syngenta's petition also
requested that currently established tolerances for residues of
metalaxyl in/on almond and walnut at 0.5 ppm be removed from 40 CFR
180.408, under the premise these commodities would be adequately
covered by the proposed tree nut, crop group 14-12 tolerance for
mefenoxam, which is the single enantiomer of the racemic mixture
metalaxyl. A summary document of the petition prepared by Syngenta Crop
Protection, the registrant, is available in the docket, https://www.regulations.gov. One comment was received in response to the notice
of filing, although it was not germane to the petition for mefenoxam
tolerances.
III. Aggregate Risk Assessment and Determination of Safety
Section 408(b)(2)(A)(i) of FFDCA allows EPA to establish a
tolerance (the legal limit for a pesticide chemical residue in or on a
food) only if EPA determines that the tolerance is ``safe.'' Section
408(b)(2)(A)(ii) of FFDCA defines ``safe'' to mean that ``there is a
reasonable certainty that no harm will result from aggregate exposure
to the pesticide chemical residue, including all anticipated dietary
exposures and all other exposures for which there is reliable
information.'' This includes exposure through drinking water and in
residential settings but does not include occupational exposure.
Section
[[Page 72573]]
408(b)(2)(C) of FFDCA requires EPA to give special consideration to
exposure of infants and children to the pesticide chemical residue in
establishing a tolerance and to ``ensure that there is a reasonable
certainty that no harm will result to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to the pesticide chemical residue. . . .''
Consistent with FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), and the factors
specified in FFDCA section 408(b)(2)(D), EPA has reviewed the available
scientific data and other relevant information in support of this
action. EPA has sufficient data to assess the hazards of and to make a
determination on aggregate exposure for mefenoxam including exposure
resulting from the tolerance established by this action. EPA's
assessment of exposures and risks associated with mefenoxam follows.
On December 21, 2018, EPA published in the Federal Register a final
rule establishing tolerances for residues of mefenoxam in or on several
commodities based on the Agency's conclusion that aggregate exposure to
mefenoxam is safe for the general population, including infants and
children. See 83 FR 65541 (FRL-9985-52). Because the Agency's position
concerning several sections of that document have not changed, EPA is
incorporating them by reference here--the toxicological profile and
points of departure, description of the assumptions for assessing
exposure from residues in or on food, in drinking water, and
residential exposures, the Agency's conclusion about cumulative risk,
and Agency's determination regarding the children's safety factor.
Further information about EPA's risk assessment and determination of
safety supporting the tolerances established in the December 21, 2018
Federal Register action, as well as the new mefenoxam tolerance can be
found at https://www.regulations.gov in the document titled ``Mefenoxam
(Metalaxyl-M). Human Health Risk Assessment for the Establishment of
Permanent Tolerances and New Uses in/on Wasabi, Cacao, and Crop Group
Expansion from Kiwifruit to Fruit, Small, Vine Climbing, Except Grape,
Crop Subgroup 13-07E.'' dated June 5, 2018, in docket ID EPA-HQ-OPP-
2017-0562 and the document titled, ``Mefenoxam (Metalaxyl-M). Human
Health Risk Assessment for the Proposed New Use in/on Tree Nuts, Crop
Group 14-12 and the Establishment of a Permanent Tolerance.'' in docket
ID number EPA-HQ-OPP-2019-0346.
EPA's exposure assessments have been updated to include the
additional exposure from use of mefenoxam on tree nut, crop group 14-
12. EPA's aggregate exposure assessment incorporated this additional
dietary exposure, as well as exposures from drinking water and
residential sources, although those latter exposures are not impacted
by the new uses on the tree nut, crop group 14-12 and thus have not
changed since the last assessment.
Acute dietary risks are below the Agency's level of concern: 52% of
the acute population adjusted dose (aPAD) for children 1 to 2 years
old, the population group of concern. Due to the lack of a chronic
endpoint, a chronic dietary risk is not expected. As required by the
FFDCA, EPA considered aggregate exposures to mefenoxam, i.e., exposures
from food, drinking water, and residential uses, in its risk
assessment. There are no residential uses expected to result in acute,
intermediate-term, or chronic exposures; therefore, aggregate risks for
those exposure durations are equal to the dietary risks for those
exposure durations and not of concern.
Based on the absence of increased hazard from repeated exposures to
mefenoxam, short-term aggregate risk assessments are protective of
potential effects from longer-term exposures. Additionally, residential
exposures are not expected to occur beyond the short-term time
interval.
Using the exposure assumptions described for short-term exposures,
EPA has concluded the combined short-term food, water, and residential
exposures result in aggregate margins of exposures above the level of
concern of 100 for all scenarios assessed and are not of concern.
Therefore, based on the risk assessments and information described
above, EPA concludes there is a reasonable certainty that no harm will
result to the general population, or to infants and children from
aggregate exposure to mefenoxam residues.
IV. Other Considerations
A. Analytical Enforcement Methodology
There are adequate residue analytical methods for enforcing
tolerances for mefenoxam residues of concern in/on the registered plant
and livestock commodities. These several methods include gas
chromatography equipped with an alkali flame ionization detector (GC/
AFID), gas chromatography equipped with a nitrogen/phosphorus detector
(GC/NPD), the multiresidue method in PAM, Vol. I Section 302 (Protocol
D) in the nitrogen-specific mode, and gas-liquid chromatography/mass
spectrometry in the chemical ionization mode with selected ion
monitoring (SIM) of the M+1 ion at m/z 268 for determining residues in/
on nut crops and livestock.
The methods may be requested from: Chief, Analytical Chemistry
Branch, Environmental Science Center, 701 Mapes Rd., Ft. Meade, MD
20755-5350; telephone number: (410) 305-2905; email address:
[email protected].
B. International Residue Limits
In making its tolerance decisions, EPA seeks to harmonize U.S.
tolerances with international standards whenever possible, consistent
with U.S. food safety standards and agricultural practices. EPA
considers the international maximum residue limits (MRLs) established
by the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), as required by FFDCA
section 408(b)(4). The Codex Alimentarius is a joint United Nations
Food and Agriculture Organization/World Health Organization food
standards program, and it is recognized as an international food safety
standards-setting organization in trade agreements to which the United
States is a party. EPA may establish a tolerance that is different from
a Codex MRL; however, FFDCA section 408(b)(4) requires that EPA explain
the reasons for departing from the Codex level.
The Codex has not established an MRL for mefenoxam or metalaxyl in
or on the tree nut, crop group 14-12.
C. Revisions to Petitioned-For Tolerances
There are no revisions to the requested tolerance petition of
mefenoxam. The petition requested that upon establishment of tolerances
in or on tree nuts crop group 14-12 at 0.3 ppm, the currently
established tolerances for residues of metalaxyl in or on almond and
walnuts at 0.5 ppm be removed from 40 CFR 180.408, because residues in
or on these commodities were anticipated to be adequately covered by
the new tree nut crop group 14-12 tolerance. EPA has decided not to
remove the existing tolerances for metalaxyl on almond and walnut.
Existing registrations permit use of metalaxyl on almond and walnut,
and those uses would result in residues of metalaxyl on those
commodities that would not be covered by the new mefenoxam tolerances.
Therefore, removal of such tolerances would result in adulterated
commodities.
Although a tolerance on almond hulls was not requested, available
processing data demonstrates that residues from treated almonds
concentrate on hulls during processing; therefore, a separate
[[Page 72574]]
tolerance is needed to cover those residues. Based on application rates
for mefenoxam and extrapolating from the available data concerning
concentration during processing for metalaxyl, EPA concludes a
tolerance level of 5 ppm for residues of mefenoxam in or on almond
hulls is appropriate. EPA is establishing that tolerance here. The
FFDCA anticipates that residues of pesticides applied to raw
agricultural commodities may pass through to processed commodities and
allows tolerances on raw agricultural commodities to cover processed
forms of those commodities as long as residues remain within tolerance
levels. 21 U.S.C. 346a(a)(2). Where residues concentrate in the
processed food, a separate tolerance is necessary. Given the potential
to pass-through, EPA examines whether tolerances on the raw
agricultural commodities will cover residues on the processed food, and
if not, establishes them. EPA believes it is reasonable to expect that
a tolerance may need to be established in processed forms of
commodities for which tolerances on the raw agricultural commodities
are requested.
V. Conclusion
Therefore, tolerances are established for residues of mefenoxam,
including its metabolites and degradates in or on the tree nut, crop
group 14-12 at 0.3 ppm and almond hulls at 5 ppm.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
This action establishes tolerances under FFDCA section 408(d) in
response to a petition submitted to the Agency. The Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) has exempted these types of actions from
review under Executive Order 12866, entitled ``Regulatory Planning and
Review'' (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993). Because this action has been
exempted from review under Executive Order 12866, this action is not
subject to Executive Order 13211, entitled ``Actions Concerning
Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or
Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) or Executive Order 13045, entitled
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), nor is it considered a
regulatory action under Executive Order 13771, entitled ``Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory Costs'' (82 FR 9339, February 3,
2017). This action does not contain any information collections subject
to OMB approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.), nor does it require any special considerations under
Executive Order 12898, entitled ``Federal Actions to Address
Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income
Populations'' (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
Since tolerances and exemptions that are established on the basis
of a petition under FFDCA section 408(d), such as the tolerance in this
final rule, do not require the issuance of a proposed rule, the
requirements of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) (5 U.S.C. 601 et
seq.), do not apply.
This action directly regulates growers, food processors, food
handlers, and food retailers, not States or Tribes, nor does this
action alter the relationships or distribution of power and
responsibilities established by Congress in the preemption provisions
of FFDCA section 408(n)(4). As such, the Agency has determined that
this action will not have a substantial direct effect on States or
Tribal Governments, on the relationship between the National Government
and the States or Tribal Governments, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government or between
the Federal Government and Indian Tribes. Thus, the Agency has
determined that Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR
43255, August 10, 1999) and Executive Order 13175, entitled
``Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments'' (65 FR
67249, November 9, 2000) do not apply to this action. In addition, this
action does not impose any enforceable duty or contain any unfunded
mandate as described under Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA) (2 U.S.C. 1501 et seq.).
This action does not involve any technical standards that would
require Agency consideration of voluntary consensus standards pursuant
to section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note).
VII. Congressional Review Act
Pursuant to the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.),
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 180
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Agricultural commodities, Pesticides and pests, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Dated: October 9, 2020.
Marietta Echeverria,
Acting Director, Registration Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
Therefore, for the reasons stated in the preamble, EPA is amending
40 CFR chapter I as follows:
PART 180--TOLERANCES AND EXEMPTIONS FOR PESTICIDE CHEMICAL RESIDUES
IN FOOD
0
1. The authority citation for part 180 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 321(q), 346a and 371.
0
2. In Sec. 180.546 amend paragraph (a) by designating the table as
Table 1 to paragraph (a) and adding in alphabetical order to newly
designated Table 1 to paragraph (a) entries for ``Almond, hulls'' and
``Tree nut, crop group 14-12'' to read as follows:
Sec. 180.546 Mefenoxam; tolerances for residues.
* * * * *
Table 1 to Paragraph (a)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parts per
Commodity million
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
Almond hulls............................................... 5
* * * * *
Tree nut, crop group 14-12................................. 0.3
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-23423 Filed 11-12-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P