Air Plan Approval; California; Butte County; El Dorado County; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; San Diego County; Ventura County, 71846-71848 [2020-23551]

Download as PDF 71846 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 219 / Thursday, November 12, 2020 / Rules and Regulations the health care professions listed under 38 U.S.C. 7402(b); (C) Is an employee otherwise authorized by the Secretary to provide health care services; or (D) Is under the clinical supervision of a health care professional that meets the requirements of subsection (a)(2)(iii)(A)–(C) of this section and is either: (i) A health professions trainee appointed under 38 U.S.C. 7405 or 7406 participating in clinical or research training under supervision to satisfy program or degree requirements; or (ii) A health care employee, appointed under title 5 of the U.S. Code, 38 U.S.C. 7401(1) or (3), or 38 U.S.C. 7405 for any category of personnel described in 38 U.S.C. 7401(1) or (3) who must obtain an active, current, full and unrestricted licensure, registration, certification, or meet the qualification standards as defined by the Secretary within the specified time frame. (3) State. The term State means a State as defined in 38 U.S.C. 101(20), or a political subdivision of such a State. (b) Health care professional’s practice. (1) When a State law or license, registration, certification, or other requirement prevents or unduly interferes with a health care professional’s practice within the scope of their VA employment, the health care professional is required to abide by their Federal duties, which includes, but is not limited to, the following situations: (i) A health care professional may practice their VA health care profession in any State irrespective of the State where they hold a valid license, registration, certification, or other State qualification; or (ii) A health care professional may practice their VA health care profession within the scope of the VA national standard of practice as determined by VA. (2) VA health care professional’s practice is subject to the limitations imposed by the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. 801 et seq. and implementing regulations at 21 CFR 1300 et seq., on the authority to prescribe or administer controlled substances, as well as any other limitations on the provision of VA care set forth in applicable Federal law and policy. (c) Preemption of State law. Pursuant to the Supremacy Clause, U.S. Const. art. IV, cl. 2, and in order to achieve important Federal interests, including, but not limited to, the ability to provide the same complete health care and hospital service to beneficiaries in all States as required by 38 U.S.C. 7301, conflicting State laws, rules, regulations or requirements pursuant to such laws are without any force or effect, and State governments have no legal authority to enforce them in relation to actions by health care professionals within the scope of their VA employment. The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0122. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available through https:// www.regulations.gov, or please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for additional availability information. If you need assistance in a language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972–2304 or by email at Lazarus.arnold@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. ADDRESSES: [FR Doc. 2020–24817 Filed 11–10–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8320–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0122; FRL–10014– 19–Region 9] Air Plan Approval; California; Butte County; El Dorado County; Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; San Diego County; Ventura County Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: Table of Contents The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final action to approve revisions to the Butte County Air Quality Management District (BCAQMD), El Dorado County Air Quality Management District (EDCAQMD), Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD), San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and Ventura County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern rules that include definitions for certain terms that are necessary for the implementation of local rules that regulate sources of air pollution. We are approving the definitions rules under the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). DATES: This rule will be effective on December 14, 2020. SUMMARY: I. Proposed Action II. Public Comments and EPA Responses III. EPA Action IV. Incorporation by Reference V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. Proposed Action On July 6, 2020 (85 FR 40156), the EPA proposed to approve the five amended rules listed in Table 1 as revisions to the California SIP. With respect to BCAQMD Rule 102, we determined that the State had not provided sufficient public process documentation to provide the basis for a rescission of the rule from the applicable SIP, but we recognized that, because the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102 had been moved to BCAQMD Rule 101 and because we are approving BCAQMD Rule 101, there is no reason to retain BCAQMD Rule 102 in the applicable SIP. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES Local agency BCAQMD ........................ BCAQMD ........................ EDCAQMD ..................... MDAQMD ....................... VerDate Sep<11>2014 Rule title Rescinded Amended/ revised Definitions ............................................................ Definitions ............................................................ General Provisions and Definitions ..................... Definition of Terms .............................................. ........................ 2 12/14/2017 ........................ ........................ 12/14/2017 ........................ 6/20/2017 1/28/2019 Rule No. 15:52 Nov 10, 2020 101 102 101 102 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 Submitted 1 5/23/2018 3 5/23/2018 8/9/2017 4 8/19/2019 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 219 / Thursday, November 12, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 71847 TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES—Continued Local agency Rule No. SDCAPCD ...................... VCAPCD ........................ 2 2 Rule title Rescinded Definitions ............................................................ Definitions ............................................................ ........................ ........................ We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action and related technical support documents (TSDs) contain more information on the rules and our evaluation. II. Public Comments and EPA Responses The EPA’s proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. During this period, we received a comment letter from a member of the public who expressed support for the proposed rulemaking. III. EPA Action jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules into the California SIP. Our final action includes regulatory text in 40 CFR 52.220 that incorporates by reference the amended rules listed in Table 1 above, and identifies the previously approved rules that are being superseded in the California SIP by the approval of the amended rules. We are also including regulatory text that specifically identifies the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102 (‘‘Definitions’’) that were superseded by our approval in 2015 of BCAQMD Rule 300 (‘‘Open Burning Requirements, Prohibitions and Exemptions’’) 6 and the remaining definitions that are being superseded by today’s approval of amended BCAQMD Rule 101. 1 CARB submitted the amendment to BCAQMD Rule 101 electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB’s submittal letter is dated May 18, 2018. 2 The BCAQMD amended Rule 101 on this date but took no action on Rule 102. The date is from Enclosure A to CARB Executive Order S–18–004, May 18, 2018, which is included in CARB’s May 23, 2018 SIP submittal. 3 CARB submitted the rescission of BCAQMD Rule 102 electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB’s submittal letter is dated May 18, 2018. 4 CARB submitted the amendment to MDAQMD Rule 102 electronically on August 19, 2019. CARB’s submittal letter is dated August 16, 2019. 5 CARB submitted the amendment to VCAPCD Rule 2 electronically on August 19, 2019. CARB’s submittal letter is dated August 16, 2019. 6 We approved BCAQMD Rule 300 at 80 FR 38966 (July 8, 2015). VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Nov 10, 2020 Jkt 253001 IV. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the BCAQMD’s, the EDAQMD’s, the MDAQMD’s, the SDCAPCD’s and the VCAPCD’s rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); PO 00000 Frm 00033 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Amended/ revised 7/11/2017 4/9/2019 Submitted 11/13/2017 5 8/19/2019 • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1 71848 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 219 / Thursday, November 12, 2020 / Rules and Regulations States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 11, 2021. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).) List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Dated: October 16, 2020. John Busterud, Regional Administrator, Region IX. For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends, part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Subpart F—California 2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(168)(i)(A)(11) and (12), (c)(280)(i)(B)(3), (c)(404)(i)(C)(3), (c)(457)(i)(C)(7), (c)(488)(i)(A)(5), (c)(503)(i)(C), (c)(516)(i)(B), (c)(518)(i)(B), (c)(520)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(542) to read as follows: ■ § 52.220 Identification of plan-in part. jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES * * * * * (c) * * * (168) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (11) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph (c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(423)(i)(G)(1), Rule 102 ‘‘Definitions’’: the definitions for ‘‘approved ignition devices,’’ ‘‘open out-door fire’’, ‘‘permissive burn day’’ and ‘‘range improvement burning.’’ (12) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph (c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 102 ‘‘Definitions’’: VerDate Sep<11>2014 15:52 Nov 10, 2020 Jkt 253001 the definitions for ‘‘submerged fill pipe’’ and ‘‘vapor recovery system’’. * * * * * (280) * * * (i) * * * (B) * * * (3) Previously approved on October 10, 2001 in paragraph (c)(280)(i)(B)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(503)(i)(C)(1), Rule 101, adopted on February 15, 2000. * * * * * (404) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * (3) Previously approved on December 7, 2012 in paragraph (c)(404)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(542)(i)(B)(1), Rule 2, ‘‘Definitions,’’ revised on October 22, 1968, as revised through April 12, 2011. * * * * * (457) * * * (i) * * * (C) * * * (7) Previously approved on June 11, 2015 in paragraph (c)(457)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 101, ‘‘Definitions,’’ amended on April 24, 2014. * * * * * (488) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (5) Previously approved on June 21, 2017 in paragraph (c)(488)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in (c)(516)(i)(B)(1), Regulation 1, Rule 2, ‘‘Definitions,’’ Rev. Adopted and Effective on June 30, 1999, Table 1—Exempt Compounds: Rev. and Effective on June 14, 2016. * * * * * (503) * * * (i) * * * (C) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District. (1) Rule 101, ‘‘General Provisions and Definitions,’’ amended on June 20, 2017. (2) [Reserved] * * * * * (516) * * * (i) * * * (B) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 2, ‘‘Definitions,’’ amended on July 11, 2017. (2) [Reserved] * * * * * (518) * * * (i) * * * (B) Butte County Air Quality Management District. PO 00000 Frm 00034 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 (1) Rule 101, ‘‘Definitions,’’ amended on December 14, 2017. (2) [Reserved] * * * * * (520) * * * (i) * * * (A) * * * (2) Previously approved on July 2, 2019 in paragraph (c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in paragraph (c)(542)(i)(A)(1), Rule 102, ‘‘Definition of Terms,’’ amended on April 23, 2018. * * * * * (542) New regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on August 19, 2019 by the Governor’s designee as an attachment to a letter dated August 16, 2019. (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District. (1) Rule 102, ‘‘Definition of Terms,’’ amended on January 28, 2019. (2) [Reserved] (B) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District. (1) Rule 2, ‘‘Definitions,’’ as amended through April 9, 2019. (2) [Reserved] (ii) [Reserved] [FR Doc. 2020–23551 Filed 11–10–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 76 [MB Docket Nos. 19–347, 17–105, 10–71; FCC 20–135; FRS 17141] Cable Service Change Notifications; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative; Retransmission Consent Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: In this document, the Commission revises the regulations governing the notices that cable operators must provide subscribers and local franchise authorities (LFAs) regarding rate and service changes. Specifically, document amends the rules to clarify that when service changes occur due to retransmission consent or program carriage negotiations that fail within the last 30 days of a contract, cable operators must provide notice to subscribers ‘‘as soon as possible,’’ rather than 30 days in advance. The document also eliminates the requirement that cable operators not subject to rate regulation provide 30 days’ advance notice to LFAs of rate or SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\12NOR1.SGM 12NOR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 219 (Thursday, November 12, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71846-71848]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23551]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0122; FRL-10014-19-Region 9]


Air Plan Approval; California; Butte County; El Dorado County; 
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District; San Diego County; 
Ventura County

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking final 
action to approve revisions to the Butte County Air Quality Management 
District (BCAQMD), El Dorado County Air Quality Management District 
(EDCAQMD), Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District (MDAQMD), San 
Diego County Air Pollution Control District (SDCAPCD) and Ventura 
County Air Pollution Control District (VCAPCD) portions of the 
California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern 
rules that include definitions for certain terms that are necessary for 
the implementation of local rules that regulate sources of air 
pollution. We are approving the definitions rules under the Clean Air 
Act (CAA or the Act).

DATES: This rule will be effective on December 14, 2020.

ADDRESSES: The EPA has established a docket for this action under 
Docket ID No. EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0122. All documents in the docket are 
listed on the https://www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., 
Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure 
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted 
material, is not placed on the internet and will be publicly available 
only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are 
available through https://www.regulations.gov, or please contact the 
person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section for 
additional availability information. If you need assistance in a 
language other than English or if you are a person with disabilities 
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Arnold Lazarus, EPA Region IX, 75 
Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105. By phone: (415) 972-2304 or by 
email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

Table of Contents

I. Proposed Action
II. Public Comments and EPA Responses
III. EPA Action
IV. Incorporation by Reference
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. Proposed Action

    On July 6, 2020 (85 FR 40156), the EPA proposed to approve the five 
amended rules listed in Table 1 as revisions to the California SIP. 
With respect to BCAQMD Rule 102, we determined that the State had not 
provided sufficient public process documentation to provide the basis 
for a rescission of the rule from the applicable SIP, but we recognized 
that, because the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102 had been 
moved to BCAQMD Rule 101 and because we are approving BCAQMD Rule 101, 
there is no reason to retain BCAQMD Rule 102 in the applicable SIP.

                                            Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                     Amended/
          Local agency              Rule No.        Rule title       Rescinded        revised        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BCAQMD.........................             101  Definitions....  ..............      12/14/2017   \1\ 5/23/2018
BCAQMD.........................             102  Definitions....  \2\ 12/14/2017  ..............   \3\ 5/23/2018
EDCAQMD........................             101  General          ..............       6/20/2017        8/9/2017
                                                  Provisions and
                                                  Definitions.
MDAQMD.........................             102  Definition of    ..............       1/28/2019   \4\ 8/19/2019
                                                  Terms.

[[Page 71847]]

 
SDCAPCD........................               2  Definitions....  ..............       7/11/2017      11/13/2017
VCAPCD.........................               2  Definitions....  ..............        4/9/2019   \5\ 8/19/2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We proposed to approve these rules because we determined that they 
comply with the relevant CAA requirements. Our proposed action and 
related technical support documents (TSDs) contain more information on 
the rules and our evaluation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ CARB submitted the amendment to BCAQMD Rule 101 
electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB's submittal letter is dated May 
18, 2018.
    \2\ The BCAQMD amended Rule 101 on this date but took no action 
on Rule 102. The date is from Enclosure A to CARB Executive Order S-
18-004, May 18, 2018, which is included in CARB's May 23, 2018 SIP 
submittal.
    \3\ CARB submitted the rescission of BCAQMD Rule 102 
electronically on May 23, 2018. CARB's submittal letter is dated May 
18, 2018.
    \4\ CARB submitted the amendment to MDAQMD Rule 102 
electronically on August 19, 2019. CARB's submittal letter is dated 
August 16, 2019.
    \5\ CARB submitted the amendment to VCAPCD Rule 2 electronically 
on August 19, 2019. CARB's submittal letter is dated August 16, 
2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Public Comments and EPA Responses

    The EPA's proposed action provided a 30-day public comment period. 
During this period, we received a comment letter from a member of the 
public who expressed support for the proposed rulemaking.

III. EPA Action

    No comments were submitted that change our assessment of the rules 
as described in our proposed action. Therefore, as authorized in 
section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA is fully approving these rules 
into the California SIP. Our final action includes regulatory text in 
40 CFR 52.220 that incorporates by reference the amended rules listed 
in Table 1 above, and identifies the previously approved rules that are 
being superseded in the California SIP by the approval of the amended 
rules. We are also including regulatory text that specifically 
identifies the remaining definitions in BCAQMD Rule 102 
(``Definitions'') that were superseded by our approval in 2015 of 
BCAQMD Rule 300 (``Open Burning Requirements, Prohibitions and 
Exemptions'') \6\ and the remaining definitions that are being 
superseded by today's approval of amended BCAQMD Rule 101.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ We approved BCAQMD Rule 300 at 80 FR 38966 (July 8, 2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this rule, the EPA is finalizing regulatory text that includes 
incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 
51.5, the EPA is finalizing the incorporation by reference of the 
BCAQMD's, the EDAQMD's, the MDAQMD's, the SDCAPCD's and the VCAPCD's 
rules described in the amendments to 40 CFR part 52 set forth below. 
The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents available 
through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region IX Office (please 
contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT 
section of this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a 
SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and 
applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state 
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review 
by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 
FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or 
environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible 
methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).
    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. The EPA will submit a report containing this action and 
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).
    Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for 
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United

[[Page 71848]]

States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by January 11, 
2021. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of 
this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the 
purposes of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a 
petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the 
effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged 
later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 
307(b)(2).)

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, 
Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile 
organic compounds.

    Dated: October 16, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
    For the reasons stated in the preamble, the EPA amends, part 52, 
Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows:

PART 52--APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF IMPLEMENTATION PLANS

0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

Subpart F--California

0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(168)(i)(A)(11) 
and (12), (c)(280)(i)(B)(3), (c)(404)(i)(C)(3), (c)(457)(i)(C)(7), 
(c)(488)(i)(A)(5), (c)(503)(i)(C), (c)(516)(i)(B), (c)(518)(i)(B), 
(c)(520)(i)(A)(2) and (c)(542) to read as follows:


Sec.  52.220  Identification of plan-in part.

* * * * *
    (c) * * *
    (168) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (11) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph 
(c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(423)(i)(G)(1), Rule 102 ``Definitions'': the definitions 
for ``approved ignition devices,'' ``open out-door fire'', ``permissive 
burn day'' and ``range improvement burning.''
    (12) Previously approved on February 3, 1987 in paragraph 
(c)(168)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 102 ``Definitions'': the definitions 
for ``submerged fill pipe'' and ``vapor recovery system''.
* * * * *
    (280) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on October 10, 2001 in paragraph 
(c)(280)(i)(B)(2) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(503)(i)(C)(1), Rule 101, adopted on February 15, 2000.
* * * * *
    (404) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (3) Previously approved on December 7, 2012 in paragraph 
(c)(404)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(542)(i)(B)(1), Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' revised on 
October 22, 1968, as revised through April 12, 2011.
* * * * *
    (457) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) * * *
    (7) Previously approved on June 11, 2015 in paragraph 
(c)(457)(i)(C)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(518)(i)(B)(1), Rule 101, ``Definitions,'' amended on 
April 24, 2014.
* * * * *
    (488) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (5) Previously approved on June 21, 2017 in paragraph 
(c)(488)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
(c)(516)(i)(B)(1), Regulation 1, Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' Rev. Adopted 
and Effective on June 30, 1999, Table 1--Exempt Compounds: Rev. and 
Effective on June 14, 2016.
* * * * *
    (503) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (C) El Dorado County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 101, ``General Provisions and Definitions,'' amended on 
June 20, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (516) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) San Diego County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' amended on July 11, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (518) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (B) Butte County Air Quality Management District.
    (1) Rule 101, ``Definitions,'' amended on December 14, 2017.
    (2) [Reserved]
* * * * *
    (520) * * *
    (i) * * *
    (A) * * *
    (2) Previously approved on July 2, 2019 in paragraph 
(c)(520)(i)(A)(1) of this section and now deleted with replacement in 
paragraph (c)(542)(i)(A)(1), Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' amended 
on April 23, 2018.
* * * * *
    (542) New regulations for the following APCDs were submitted on 
August 19, 2019 by the Governor's designee as an attachment to a letter 
dated August 16, 2019.
    (i) Incorporation by reference. (A) Mojave Desert Air Quality 
Management District.
    (1) Rule 102, ``Definition of Terms,'' amended on January 28, 2019.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (B) Ventura County Air Pollution Control District.
    (1) Rule 2, ``Definitions,'' as amended through April 9, 2019.
    (2) [Reserved]
    (ii) [Reserved]

[FR Doc. 2020-23551 Filed 11-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.