Security Zone; Fleet Week Demonstration Area, San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 71545-71546 [2020-24863]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
participants, must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the designated
representative.
(3) The COTP will provide notice of
the regulated areas through advanced
notice via Broadcast Notice to Mariners
and by on-scene designated
representatives.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. through
1 p.m. on Wednesday, November 11,
2020.
Dated: November 3, 2020.
T.J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2020–24860 Filed 11–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG–2020–0655]
RIN 1625–AA87
Security Zone; Fleet Week
Demonstration Area, San Diego Bay,
San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, Homeland
Security Department (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary 900-foot radius
security zone on the navigable waters of
the U.S. off of Broadway Pier in San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of
Fleet Week San Diego on November 11,
2020. This action is necessary to
provide for the safety and security of
U.S. Coast Guard surface and aerial
assets, crews and support personnel
who will be performing mission search
and rescue demonstrations. This
rulemaking prohibits persons and
vessels from entering, transiting, or
anchoring in the security zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
San Diego or his designated
representative.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective from 10
a.m. through 2 p.m. on November 11,
2020.
DATES:
To view documents
mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://
www.regulations.gov, type USCG–2020–
0655 in the ‘‘SEARCH’’ box and click
‘‘SEARCH.’’ Click on Open Docket
Folder on the line associated with this
rule.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Nov 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
If
you have questions on this rule, call or
email Lieutenant John Santorum,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone
(619) 278–7656, email
MarineEventsSD@uscg.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
§ Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and
Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment pursuant to
authority under section 4(a) of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is
impracticable. The Coast Guard did not
receive final details for this event until
October 21, 2020. The Coast Guard must
establish this security zone by
November 11, 2020 and lacks sufficient
time to provide a reasonable comment
period and consider those comments
before issuing the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying implementation of
this rulemaking is contrary to public
interest and is needed to ensure the
safety and security of military personnel
and assets on November 11, 2020.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule
under authority in 46 U.S.C. 70034
(previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The
Captain of the Port San Diego (COTP)
has determined that potential hazards
associated with military demonstrations
on November 11, 2020 will be a security
concern for military assets in the
vicinity of the Broadway pier in San
Diego Bay, San Diego, CA. This rule is
needed to protect military personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment on
the navigable waters within the security
zone during the San Diego Fleet Week
event.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
71545
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary
security zone from 10 a.m. until 2 p.m.
on November 11, 2020. The security
zone will encompass the waters within
a 900-foot radius centered at position:
32°42′56″ N, 117°10′46″ W off the
Broadway Pier in the San Diego Bay.
The purpose of the security zone is to
protect the U.S. Coast Guard surface and
aerial assets, crews, and support
personnel who will be performing
search and rescue demonstrations in
San Diego, CA. No vessel or person will
be permitted to enter the security zone
without obtaining permission from the
COTP or his designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and
Executive orders, and we discuss First
Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563
direct agencies to assess the costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits.
Executive Order 13771 directs agencies
to control regulatory costs through a
budgeting process. This rule has not
been designated a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ under Executive
Order 12866. Accordingly, this rule has
not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and
pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination
is based on the size, location, duration,
and time-of-day of the security zone.
Vessel traffic will be able to safely
transit around this safety zone which
will impact a small designated area of
the San Diego Bay. The Coast Guard will
issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via
VHF–FM marine channel 16 about the
zone, and the rule will allow vessels to
seek permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
small entities during rulemaking. The
term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small
businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and
operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions
with populations of less than 50,000.
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
71546
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 10, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C.
605(b) that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
While some owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit the security
zone may be small entities, for the
reasons stated in section V.A above, this
rule will not have a significant
economic impact on any vessel owner
or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this rule. If the rule
would affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new
collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal
Governments
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on the States, on the relationship
between the National Government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government. We have
analyzed this rule under that order and
have determined that it is consistent
with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements
described in Executive Order 13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:20 Nov 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes. If you
believe this rule has implications for
federalism or Indian tribes, please call
or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section
above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 (adjusted for inflation) or
more in any one year. Though this rule
will not result in such an expenditure,
we do discuss the effects of this rule
elsewhere in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023–01 and Environmental
Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a
category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a
security zone lasting only 5 days that
will prohibit entry within a 900-foot feet
radius of a designated coordinate west
of Broadway Pier in San Diego Bay. It
is categorically excluded from further
review under paragraph L60(a) in Table
3–1 of U.S. Coast Guard Environmental
Planning Implementing Procedures. A
Record of Environmental Consideration
supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First
Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to
coordinate protest activities so that your
message can be received without
jeopardizing the safety or security of
people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR
1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add § 165.T11–042 to read as
follows:
■
§165.T11–042 Security Zone; San Diego
Bay; San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a
security zone, including all navigable
waters of San Diego Bay, from surface to
sea floor, within a 900-foot radius
centered at the following coordinate:
32°42′56″ N, 117°10′46″ W.
(b) Definition. The term ‘‘designated
representative’’ means a Coast Guard
Patrol Commander, including a Coast
Guard coxswain, petty officer, and other
officer operating a Coast Guard vessel,
or a Federal, State, or local officer
designated by or assisting the Captain of
the Port San Diego in the enforcement
of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
security zone regulations in subpart D of
this part, all persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering, transiting
through, anchoring in, or remaining
within the security zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port
Sector San Diego (COTP) or his
designated representative.
(2) The security zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the security zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative to obtain
permission to do so. Vessel operators
given permission to enter or operate in
the security zone must comply with all
lawful orders or directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the security zone on VHF channel 16 or
through the 24-hour Command Center at
telephone (619) 278–7033.
(d) Enforcement period. This section
will be enforced from 10 a.m. through
2 p.m. on November 11, 2020.
Dated: November 3, 2020.
T. J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2020–24863 Filed 11–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110–04–P
E:\FR\FM\10NOR1.SGM
10NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 10, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 71545-71546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24863]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket Number USCG-2020-0655]
RIN 1625-AA87
Security Zone; Fleet Week Demonstration Area, San Diego Bay, San
Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, Homeland Security Department (DHS).
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary 900-foot radius
security zone on the navigable waters of the U.S. off of Broadway Pier
in San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, in support of Fleet Week San Diego on
November 11, 2020. This action is necessary to provide for the safety
and security of U.S. Coast Guard surface and aerial assets, crews and
support personnel who will be performing mission search and rescue
demonstrations. This rulemaking prohibits persons and vessels from
entering, transiting, or anchoring in the security zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port San Diego or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. through 2 p.m. on November
11, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To view documents mentioned in this preamble as being
available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov, type USCG-
2020-0655 in the ``SEARCH'' box and click ``SEARCH.'' Click on Open
Docket Folder on the line associated with this rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this rule,
call or email Lieutenant John Santorum, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone (619) 278-7656, email
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Table of Abbreviations
CFR Code of Federal Regulations
DHS Department of Homeland Security
FR Federal Register
NPRM Notice of proposed rulemaking
Sec. Section
U.S.C. United States Code
II. Background Information and Regulatory History
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary rule without prior notice
and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of
the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because it is impracticable. The Coast Guard
did not receive final details for this event until October 21, 2020.
The Coast Guard must establish this security zone by November 11, 2020
and lacks sufficient time to provide a reasonable comment period and
consider those comments before issuing the rule.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Delaying implementation of this
rulemaking is contrary to public interest and is needed to ensure the
safety and security of military personnel and assets on November 11,
2020.
III. Legal Authority and Need for Rule
The Coast Guard is issuing this rule under authority in 46 U.S.C.
70034 (previously 33 U.S.C. 1231). The Captain of the Port San Diego
(COTP) has determined that potential hazards associated with military
demonstrations on November 11, 2020 will be a security concern for
military assets in the vicinity of the Broadway pier in San Diego Bay,
San Diego, CA. This rule is needed to protect military personnel,
vessels, and the marine environment on the navigable waters within the
security zone during the San Diego Fleet Week event.
IV. Discussion of the Rule
This rule establishes a temporary security zone from 10 a.m. until
2 p.m. on November 11, 2020. The security zone will encompass the
waters within a 900-foot radius centered at position: 32[deg]42'56'' N,
117[deg]10'46'' W off the Broadway Pier in the San Diego Bay. The
purpose of the security zone is to protect the U.S. Coast Guard surface
and aerial assets, crews, and support personnel who will be performing
search and rescue demonstrations in San Diego, CA. No vessel or person
will be permitted to enter the security zone without obtaining
permission from the COTP or his designated representative.
V. Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
Executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on a number of these statutes and Executive orders, and we
discuss First Amendment rights of protestors.
A. Regulatory Planning and Review
Executive Orders 12866 and 13563 direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits. Executive Order 13771 directs agencies to control
regulatory costs through a budgeting process. This rule has not been
designated a ``significant regulatory action,'' under Executive Order
12866. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB), and pursuant to OMB guidance it is exempt
from the requirements of Executive Order 13771.
This regulatory action determination is based on the size,
location, duration, and time-of-day of the security zone. Vessel
traffic will be able to safely transit around this safety zone which
will impact a small designated area of the San Diego Bay. The Coast
Guard will issue a Broadcast Notice to Mariners via VHF-FM marine
channel 16 about the zone, and the rule will allow vessels to seek
permission to enter the zone.
B. Impact on Small Entities
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities during rulemaking. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
[[Page 71546]]
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not
have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
While some owners or operators of vessels intending to transit the
security zone may be small entities, for the reasons stated in section
V.A above, this rule will not have a significant economic impact on any
vessel owner or operator.
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this rule. If the rule would affect your
small business, organization, or governmental jurisdiction and you have
questions concerning its provisions or options for compliance, please
call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
section.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
C. Collection of Information
This rule will not call for a new collection of information under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
D. Federalism and Indian Tribal Governments
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on the States, on the
relationship between the National Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
government. We have analyzed this rule under that order and have
determined that it is consistent with the fundamental federalism
principles and preemption requirements described in Executive Order
13132.
Also, this rule does not have tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. If
you believe this rule has implications for federalism or Indian tribes,
please call or email the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section above.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 (adjusted for
inflation) or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in
such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
F. Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Directive 023-01 and Environmental Planning COMDTINST 5090.1 (series),
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have
determined that this action is one of a category of actions that do not
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human
environment. This rule involves a security zone lasting only 5 days
that will prohibit entry within a 900-foot feet radius of a designated
coordinate west of Broadway Pier in San Diego Bay. It is categorically
excluded from further review under paragraph L60(a) in Table 3-1 of
U.S. Coast Guard Environmental Planning Implementing Procedures. A
Record of Environmental Consideration supporting this determination is
available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
G. Protest Activities
The Coast Guard respects the First Amendment rights of protesters.
Protesters are asked to call or email the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to coordinate protest activities so
that your message can be received without jeopardizing the safety or
security of people, places or vessels.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends
33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 46 U.S.C. 70034, 70051; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-
6, and 160.5; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add Sec. 165.T11-042 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-042 Security Zone; San Diego Bay; San Diego, CA.
(a) Location. The following area is a security zone, including all
navigable waters of San Diego Bay, from surface to sea floor, within a
900-foot radius centered at the following coordinate: 32[deg]42'56'' N,
117[deg]10'46'' W.
(b) Definition. The term ``designated representative'' means a
Coast Guard Patrol Commander, including a Coast Guard coxswain, petty
officer, and other officer operating a Coast Guard vessel, or a
Federal, State, or local officer designated by or assisting the Captain
of the Port San Diego in the enforcement of the regulated area.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general security zone regulations in
subpart D of this part, all persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering, transiting through, anchoring in, or remaining within the
security zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port Sector San
Diego (COTP) or his designated representative.
(2) The security zone is closed to all vessel traffic, except as
may be permitted by the COTP or the COTP's designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter or operate within the
security zone must contact the COTP or the COTP's designated
representative to obtain permission to do so. Vessel operators given
permission to enter or operate in the security zone must comply with
all lawful orders or directions given to them by the COTP or the COTP's
designated representative. Persons and vessels may request permission
to enter the security zone on VHF channel 16 or through the 24-hour
Command Center at telephone (619) 278-7033.
(d) Enforcement period. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m.
through 2 p.m. on November 11, 2020.
Dated: November 3, 2020.
T. J. Barelli,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. 2020-24863 Filed 11-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-04-P