Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Proceedings, 71296 [2020-24731]

Download as PDF 71296 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules Wisconsin’s submittal includes revisions to its SIP to incorporate these changes. Wisconsin’s rules are consistent with the January 6, 2004 definition of ‘‘Replacement Unit’’ and clarification of calculations for PAL (November 7, 2003, 68 FR 63021). II. What action is EPA taking? EPA is proposing to approve updates and revisions to Wisconsin’s air quality SIP. Specifically, EPA is proposing to approve updates to the definition of ‘‘Replacement Unit’’ under NR 405.02(12)(b), NR405.02(25k), and NR 408.02(29s), and is approving a revision to a component of the emission calculation used to determine emissions under a PAL under NR 405.18(6)(e) and NR 408.11(6)(e). III. Incorporation by Reference In this rule, EPA is proposing to include in a final EPA rule regulatory text that includes incorporation by reference. In accordance with requirements of 1 CFR 51.5, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference Wisconsin Administrative Code provisions NR 405.02(12)(b), 405.18(6)(e), NR 405.02(25k), NR 408.02(29s) and NR 408.11(6)(e), as published in the Wisconsin Register, July, 2008, No. 631 and state effective August 1, 2008. EPA has made, and will continue to make, these documents generally available through www.regulations.gov and at the EPA Region 5 Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the Clean Air Act, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Clean Air Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action: • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:13 Nov 06, 2020 Jkt 253001 action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations. Dated: November 3, 2020. Kurt Thiede, Regional Administrator, Region 5. PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4702 47 CFR Parts 5, 25, 97 [IB Docket No. 18–313; Report No. 3158; FRS 17196] Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Proceedings Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration. AGENCY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in the Commission’s proceeding by David Goldman, on behalf of Space Exploration Technologies Corp.; Audrey L. Allison, on behalf of The Boeing Company; Jennifer A. Manner, on behalf of EchoStar Satellite Services, LLC and Hughes Network Services, LLC; Mike Safyan, on behalf of Planet Labs Inc.; Ananda Martin, on behalf of Spire Global, Inc.; Elisabeth Neasmith, on behalf of Telesat Canada; and Julie Zoller, et al., on behalf of Kuiper Systems, Inc. DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before November 24, 2020. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before December 4, 2020. ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merissa Velez, International Bureau, Satellite Division, (202) 418–0751. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission’s document, Report No. 3158, released October 6, 2020. Petitions may be accessed online via the Commission’s Electronic Comment Filing System at: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will not send a Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), because no rules are being adopted by the Commission. Subject: Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age, FCC 20–54, published 85 FR 52422, August 25, 2020, in IB Docket No. 18–313. This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g). Number of Petitions Filed: 3. SUMMARY: Federal Communications Commission. Cecilia Sigmund, Federal Register Liaison. [FR Doc. 2020–24776 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION [FR Doc. 2020–24731 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6712–01–P Sfmt 4702 E:\FR\FM\09NOP1.SGM 09NOP1

Agencies

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 217 (Monday, November 9, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 71296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24731]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

47 CFR Parts 5, 25, 97

[IB Docket No. 18-313; Report No. 3158; FRS 17196]


Petitions for Reconsideration of Action in Proceedings

AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.

ACTION: Petitions for reconsideration.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Petitions for Reconsideration (Petitions) have been filed in 
the Commission's proceeding by David Goldman, on behalf of Space 
Exploration Technologies Corp.; Audrey L. Allison, on behalf of The 
Boeing Company; Jennifer A. Manner, on behalf of EchoStar Satellite 
Services, LLC and Hughes Network Services, LLC; Mike Safyan, on behalf 
of Planet Labs Inc.; Ananda Martin, on behalf of Spire Global, Inc.; 
Elisabeth Neasmith, on behalf of Telesat Canada; and Julie Zoller, et 
al., on behalf of Kuiper Systems, Inc.

DATES: Oppositions to the Petitions must be filed on or before November 
24, 2020. Replies to an opposition must be filed on or before December 
4, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Federal Communications Commission, 445 12th Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20554.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Merissa Velez, International Bureau, 
Satellite Division, (202) 418-0751.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's 
document, Report No. 3158, released October 6, 2020. Petitions may be 
accessed online via the Commission's Electronic Comment Filing System 
at: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/. The Commission will not send a 
Congressional Review Act (CRA) submission to Congress or the Government 
Accountability Office pursuant to the CRA, 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A), 
because no rules are being adopted by the Commission.
    Subject: Mitigation of Orbital Debris in the New Space Age, FCC 20-
54, published 85 FR 52422, August 25, 2020, in IB Docket No. 18-313. 
This document is being published pursuant to 47 CFR 1.429(e). See also 
47 CFR 1.4(b)(1) and 1.429(f), (g).
    Number of Petitions Filed: 3.

Federal Communications Commission.
Cecilia Sigmund,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2020-24731 Filed 11-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.