Amended Record of Decision for the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement, 70598-70601 [2020-24516]
Download as PDF
70598
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Notices
Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before January
4, 2021.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2020–SCC–0166. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the PRA Coordinator of the
Strategic Collections and Clearance
Governance and Strategy Division, U.S.
Department of Education, 400 Maryland
Ave. SW, LBJ, Room 6W208D,
Washington, DC 20202–8240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Beth
Grebeldinger, 202–377–4018.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Third Party
Authorization Form.
OMB Control Number: 1845–NEW.
Type of Review: A new information
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public:
Individuals and Households.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 100,000.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 25,000.
Abstract: This is a request for a new
information collection for a third-party
authorization form to be used by federal
student loan borrowers to designate or
revoke a designation of an individual or
organization to represent the borrower
in matters related to their federally held
student loans. This form will
standardize the way that borrowers
provide privacy act releases and
authorization for a third party to take
action on borrowers’ federal student
loan accounts held by various servicers.
This will standardize processes and
help borrowers and their third-party
representatives when loans transfer
between servicers. This information
collection stems from the Privacy Act of
1974 and the common law legal
principles of agency, which is not
reflected in the Department’s statute or
regulations, but with which the
Department must comply or which the
Department supports.
Dated: October 30, 2020.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance, Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–24493 Filed 11–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Amended Record of Decision for the
Complex Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
AGENCY:
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is
announcing this amendment to the
December 19, 2008, Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Complex Transformation
Supplemental Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement—
Operations Involving Plutonium,
Uranium, and the Assembly and
Disassembly of Nuclear Weapons
(Complex Transformation SPEIS—2008
Programmatic ROD). In this Amended
ROD, NNSA announces its
programmatic decision to implement
elements of a Modified Distributed
Centers of Excellence (DCE) Alternative
whereby NNSA would produce a
minimum of 50 war reserve pits per year
at a repurposed Mixed-Oxide Fuel
Fabrication Facility (MFFF) at the
Savannah River Site (SRS) during 2030
for the national pit production mission
and implement surge efforts to exceed
80 pits per year up to the analyzed limit
as necessary beginning during 2030 for
the nuclear weapons stockpile. This
decision is supported at a programmatic
level by the analysis in a Supplement
Analysis (SA) to the Complex
Transformation SPEIS (2019 SPEIS SA)
(DOE/EIS–0236–SA–02), which NNSA
prepared in 2019. After preparing and
considering the 2019 SPEIS SA, NNSA
has determined that no further NEPA
analysis is needed at a programmatic
level prior to issuing this Amended
ROD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this Amended
ROD, contact: Mr. James R. Sanderson,
Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance,
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0119; phone: (202) 586–1402;
or email to: Jim.Sanderson@hq.doe.gov.
This Amended ROD, the 2019 SPEIS
SA, and related NEPA documents are
available on the NNSA NEPA Reading
Room website at https://
www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepareading-room.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NNSA has a statutory mission to
maintain and enhance the safety,
reliability, and performance of the U.S.
nuclear weapons stockpile, including
the ability to design, produce, and test,
in order to meet national security
requirements. In the Complex
Transformation SPEIS, NNSA
considered how to configure facilities
that hold Category I and Category II
quantities of Special Nuclear Material
(SNM) across the nuclear weapons
complex (Complex), including the three
functional areas of plutonium, uranium
operations, and assembly/disassembly/
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
high explosives in various ways. These
alternatives were broadly categorized
into a DCE Alternative, a Consolidated
Centers of Excellence (CCE) Alternative,
and Capability-Based Alternative. The
Complex Transformation SPEIS also
analyzed a No Action Alternative. Pit
production levels of up to 200 pits per
year at a single site were analyzed in the
DCE and CCE Alternatives, and nominal
pit production levels of up to 50 pits per
year were analyzed under the
Capability-Based Alternative. With
respect to plutonium operations and pit
production, the 2008 Programmatic
ROD continued NNSA’s prior decision
to produce 20 pits per year at the Los
Alamos National Laboratory (LANL)
until completion of a future Nuclear
Posture Review (NPR).
Both Federal law and national
security policy now require pit
production rates of not less than 80 pits
per year nationally beginning during
2030 (50 U.S.C. 2538a, as amended). On
September 2, 2020, NNSA published an
Amended ROD for its programmatic
decision to implement elements of a
Modified DCE Alternative from the
Complex Transformation SPEIS
whereby LANL will produce a
minimum of 30 war reserve pits per year
for the national pit production mission
during 2026 and implement surge
efforts to exceed 30 pits per year as
needed (85 FR 54550). That decision is
unchanged by this Amended ROD.
Because operations involving SNM are
complex, implementing changes in
operations such as pit production takes
several years. NNSA is now issuing this
Amended ROD on those aspects of the
national pit production mission at SRS
that have been analyzed at both the
programmatic and site-specific level by
final environmental impact statements.
The scope of this Amended ROD is
limited to plutonium operations related
to pit production to sustain NNSA’s pit
production capability and fulfill
NNSA’s requirements under Federal law
and national policy. All other activities
conducted pursuant to decisions
announced in the 2008 Programmatic
ROD are outside the scope of this
decision.
Synopsis of the Programmatic EIS and
the Supplemental Programmatic EIS
Related to Plutonium Operations and
the Associated Records of Decision
During the Cold War, the U.S.
maintained a pit production capacity of
approximately 2,000 pits per year
(actual production numbers are
classified) but lost this large-scale
production capability in the late 1980s.
In 1996, the environmental effects of a
production rate of up to 80 pits per year
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
at SRS and LANL were analyzed in the
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement for Stockpile Stewardship
and Management (DOE/EIS–0236) (SSM
PEIS). In December 1996, NNSA issued
a ROD announcing a decision setting pit
production at LANL at 20 pits per year
(61 FR 68014; December 26, 1996).
Tiering from the SSM PEIS, the 1999
Site-Wide Environmental Impact
Statement for the Continued Operation
of Los Alamos National Laboratory
(DOE/EIS–0283) (1999 LANL SWEIS)
provided site-specific analysis for pit
production levels at LANL of up to 80
pits per year. In the 1999 LANL ROD,
NNSA confirmed its decision for pit
production at LANL at 20 pits per year.
Various supplements to and reevaluations of the SSM PEIS were
completed over the next several years.
In 2008, NNSA prepared the Complex
Transformation SPEIS, which analyzes
the potential environmental impacts of
alternatives for transforming the
Complex in a manner consistent with
national policy. Acknowledging the
shifting needs of national security
policy, the Complex Transformation
SPEIS was prepared to provide NNSA
with a flexible programmatic EIS that
could be tiered from when the United
States faced the need to implement
changes to operations such as pit
production. As it relates to plutonium
operations, the Complex Transformation
SPEIS evaluates the potential impacts of
alternatives for structuring the Complex
including the DCE Alternative, CCE
Alternative, and Capability-Based
Alternative, and each of these
alternatives have several subalternatives. The 2008 LANL SWEIS
again provided site-specific analysis for
pit production levels at LANL of up to
80 pits per year. In the 2008 LANL
SWEIS ROD and subsequent RODs,
NNSA selected a No Action Alternative
(continuation of existing operations)
with some elements of an Expanded
Operations Alternative, which
maintained NNSA’s decision for pit
production levels of 20 pits per year at
LANL. In September 2020, NNSA
finalized its first site-specific analysis
for pit production at SRS, the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Plutonium Pit Production at the
Savannah River Site (SRS) in South
Carolina (DOE/EIS–0541).
The Complex Transformation SPEIS
considered a wide range of alternatives
to provide NNSA with sufficient
flexibility in the continued
transformation of the Complex. Some of
the specific elements of different
alternatives and sub-alternatives in the
Complex Transformation SPEIS include
an analysis of the impacts associated
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
70599
with construction of a new pit
production facility to produce 125 pits
per year, with surge capacity to produce
200 pits per year. Sites that the Complex
Transformation SPEIS evaluates for this
level of pit production include LANL,
SRS, the Pantex Plant (Pantex) in Texas,
the Y–12 National Security Complex
(Y–12) in Tennessee, and the Nevada
National Security Site in Nevada. At
LANL, the Complex Transformation
SPEIS also includes an analysis of two
distinct upgrades to existing facilities,
rather than construction of a new
facilities, including one to support
production of 125 pits per year (with
surge capacity to produce 200 pits per
year) and one to support production of
50–80 pits per year. At SRS, the
Complex Transformation SPEIS
evaluated a pit production facility that
would use the planned MFFF and Pit
Disassembly and Conversion Facility
infrastructure. The alternative selected
in the 2008 Programmatic ROD was a
combination of the DCE Alternative and
a Capability-Based Alternative in which,
with respect to plutonium operations,
NNSA did not make any new decisions
related to pit production capacity
beyond 20 pits per year at LANL.
Changes Since Issuance of the Complex
Transformation 2008 Programmatic
ROD
The United States has emphasized the
need to eventually produce 80 pits per
year and while the drivers and the
requirement for pit production have
remained relatively unchanged there
have been specific changes in the law
and national policy regarding pit
production since issuance of the
Complex Transformation SPEIS. Since
2014, Federal law has required the
nuclear security enterprise to produce
not less than 30 war reserve plutonium
pits during 2026. Federal law now
requires that the nuclear security
enterprise produces not less than 80 war
reserve plutonium pits during 2030 (50
U.S.C. 2538a, as amended).
In addition, on January 27, 2017, the
President directed the Department of
Defense (DoD) to conduct an NPR which
was issued in 2018. The 2018 NPR
echoed the need for pit production and
articulated a national policy that is
consistent with Congressional and
Presidential direction, stating that the
United States will pursue initiatives to
ensure the necessary capability,
capacity, and responsiveness of the
nuclear weapons infrastructure and the
needed skill of the workforce, including
providing the enduring capability and
capacity to produce plutonium pits at a
rate of no fewer than 80 pits per year
during 2030. The 2018 NPR also details
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
70600
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Notices
the evolving and uncertain nuclear
threat environment facing the United
States. Concurrent with the 2018 NPR,
DOE conducted an Analysis of
Alternatives (AoA) to identify and
assess alternatives across DOE sites that
could deliver the infrastructure to meet
the sustained plutonium pit
requirements of 80 pits per year. To
achieve the required annual pit
production rate, the AoA report
considered the construction of new
facilities and the refurbishment of
existing facilities and identifies SRS and
LANL as the two preferred alternatives
to meet pit production requirements.
In 2018, Congress and the President
also directed that LANL will produce a
minimum of 30 pits per year for the
national pit production mission and
directed it be capable of surge efforts to
exceed 30 pits per year to meet NPR and
national policy (Pub. L. 115–232,
Section 3120). To these ends, the DoD
Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment and the
NNSA Administrator issued a Joint
Statement on May 10, 2018, describing
NNSA’s recommended alternative to
pursue a two-site approach—50 pits per
year produced at SRS and a minimum
of 30 pits per year produced at LANL.
In addition to improving the resiliency,
flexibility, and redundancy of our
nuclear security enterprise by reducing
reliance on a single production site, this
approach enables the capability to allow
for enhanced warhead safety and
security to meet DoD and NNSA
requirements; deliberate, methodical
replacement of older existing plutonium
pits with newly manufactured pits as
risk mitigation against plutonium aging;
and response to changes in deterrent
requirements driven by renewed great
power competition.
Finally, since issuance of the 2008
Programmatic ROD, a significant portion
of the MFFF at SRS has been
constructed. At the time that the
Complex Transformation SPEIS was
being completed, construction of the
MFFF had just begun. The MFFF was
built to produce mixed oxide fuel from
surplus plutonium for use in
commercial nuclear reactors. For a
variety of reasons NNSA issued a Notice
of Termination to the MFFF
construction contractor on October 10,
2018, cancelling the contract for the
facility. The constructed portion of
MFFF was built to current safety and
security standards and contains three
floors and more than 400,000 square feet
of available space. The potential
availability of this facility is, in part,
why NNSA has reevaluated a single pit
production site at the programmatic
level and has recently completed a site-
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
specific NEPA analysis for pit
production at SRS.
NEPA Process for Amending the ROD
NNSA prepared this Amended ROD
pursuant to the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality
(CEQ) for implementing NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508) and DOE’s NEPA
implementing procedures (10 CFR part
1021). This Amended ROD is based on
information and analysis in the
Complex Transformation SPEIS (DOE/
EIS–0236–S4) issued on October 24,
2008 (73 FR 63460) and public
comments received; the 2019 SPEIS SA
(DOE/EIS–0236–SA–02) and public
comments received; other NEPA
analysis and public comments as noted
in the 2019 SPEIS SA; and other factors
including Federal law and NNSA’s
mission.
The Draft Complex Transformation
SPEIS included a robust public
participation process. NNSA received
comments from Federal agencies; state,
local, and tribal governments; public
and private organizations; and
individuals. In addition, during the 20
public meetings that NNSA held on the
Draft Complex Transformation SPEIS,
more than 600 speakers made oral
comments. NNSA reviewed and
considered all comments received on
the Draft Complex Transformation
SPEIS before issuing the 2008
Programmatic ROD.
NNSA prepared the 2019 SPEIS SA to
determine whether, prior to proceeding
with the effort to produce plutonium
pits at a rate of not less than 80 pits per
year beginning during 2030, the existing
Complex Transformation SPEIS should
be supplemented, a new environmental
impact statement be prepared, or that no
further NEPA analysis is required.
Although pertinent regulations do not
require public comment on an SA,
NNSA decided, in its discretion, that
public comment in this instance would
be helpful. NNSA issued the Draft 2019
SPEIS SA for public review on June 28,
2019 (84 FR 31055). NNSA considered
all comments received during the public
comment period. NNSA also reviewed
all comment documents received during
the public scoping process for the sitespecific SRS Pit Production EIS for
relevance to the 2019 SPEIS SA. NNSA
included a comment response document
as Appendix A to the Final 2019 SPEIS
SA. The Final 2019 SPEIS SA was
announced on January 8, 2020 (85 FR
887). Since announcing the availability
of the Final 2019 SPEIS SA, NNSA has
received additional comments related to
the need for a programmatic EIS. NNSA
considered those comments during the
preparation of this Amended ROD.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Summary of Impacts
In Section 2.3 of the 2019 SPEIS SA,
NNSA discusses environmental changes
at SRS and LANL that have occurred
since publication of the Complex
Transformation SPEIS and that are
relevant to the analysis in the 2019
SPEIS SA. The 2019 SPEIS SA analyzes
the potential impacts of the Proposed
Action on land resources, visual
resources, noise, air quality, water
resources, geology and soils, ecological
resources, cultural resources,
socioeconomics, environmental justice,
infrastructure, health and safety for
normal operations, accidents and
intentional destructive acts, waste
management, and transportation and
traffic. Section 3.2 of the 2019 SPEIS SA
provides (1) a summary of the potential
environmental impacts from the
Complex Transformation SPEIS, (2) the
estimate of potential impacts specific to
the Proposed Action, and (3) a more
detailed analysis of potential impacts
for those NEPA resource areas where
NNSA determined that there might be
potentially significant new
circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns. Tables 3–1 and
3–2 of the 2019 SPEIS SA present
information in a comparative fashion for
each resource area. Table 3–3 addresses
the combined impacts, to the extent that
they are known at this time, from pit
production at both SRS and LANL.
Table 3–4 addresses Complex-wide
transportation impacts. Section 4.0 of
the 2019 SPEIS SA analyzes cumulative
impacts at both a programmatic level
and site-specific level. NNSA’s
conclusion based on the Final 2019
SPEIS SA is that complex-wide impacts
of adopting a Modified DCE Alternative
for plutonium operations for all
resource areas would not be different, or
would not be significantly different,
than impacts in existing NEPA analyses.
NNSA has determined that that the
proposed action does not constitute a
substantial change from actions
analyzed previously and there are no
significant new circumstances or
information relevant to environmental
concerns. Thus, consistent with 10 CFR
1021.315(e), the existing 2008
Programmatic ROD for the Complex
Transformation SPEIS can be amended
at this time to document NNSA’s
decision to implement the two-site
approach for pit production at SRS and
LANL. In addition, NNSA is separately
issuing a ROD for the site-specific SRS
Pit Production EIS.
Environmentally Preferable Alternative
The analyses in the Complex
Transformation SPEIS of the
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Notices
environmental impacts associated with
the programmatic alternatives indicated
that the No Net Production/Capability
Based Alternative is environmentally
preferable. Under this alternative NNSA
would maintain capabilities to continue
surveillance of the weapons stockpile,
produce limited life components, and
dismantle weapons, but would not add
new types or increased numbers of
weapons to the stockpile. This
alternative would result in the
minimum infrastructure demands,
produce the least amount of wastes,
reduce worker radiation doses, and
require the fewest employees. Almost
all of these reductions in potential
impacts result from the reduced
production levels assumed for this
alternative. The environmentally
preferable alternative for programmatic
alternatives accounts for actions across
the complex at multiple sites. This
determination may not apply to sitespecific determinations where other
factors are considered in the analysis.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Amended Decision
NNSA has decided at a programmatic
level to implement aspects of a
Modified DCE Alternative from the
Complex Transformation SPEIS to
produce a minimum of 50 pits per year
at a repurposed MFFF at SRS, with
additional surge capacity, if needed, to
meet the requirements of producing not
less than 80 pits per year beginning
during 2030 for the nuclear weapons
stockpile. This decision continues the
transformation of the Complex
following the end of the Cold War and
the cessation of nuclear weapons
testing, particularly decisions
announced in the 1996 ROD for the
SSM PEIS (DOE/EIS–0236) (61 FR
68014; Dec. 26, 1996) and the 2008
Programmatic Alternatives ROD for the
Complex Transformation SPEIS. This
Amended ROD modifies only the
plutonium operations aspects of the
2008 Programmatic ROD. NNSA has
made no proposals to, and there are no
changes to, NNSA’s decisions on other
aspects of the 2008 Programmatic ROD
or to the September 2020 Amended
ROD to produce a minimum of 30 war
reserve pits per year at LANL for the
national pit production mission during
2026 and implement surge efforts to
exceed 30 pits per year as needed.
Basis for Decision
In making this decision, NNSA
considered the 2019 SPEIS SA, the
Complex Transformation SPEIS, other
referenced NEPA analyses, and its
statutory responsibilities to support the
nuclear weapons stockpile. Federal law
and national security policies continue
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:36 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
to require NNSA to maintain a safe,
secure, and reliable nuclear weapons
stockpile and create a responsive
nuclear weapons infrastructure that are
cost-effective and have adequate
capacity to meet reasonably foreseeable
national security requirements. This
Amended ROD will enable NNSA to
continue meeting Federal law and
national security requirements.
As described in the Complex
Transformation SPEIS and the 2008
Programmatic ROD, NNSA operates in
compliance with environmental laws,
regulations, and policies within a
framework of contractual requirements;
many of these requirements mandate
actions to control and mitigate potential
adverse environmental effects.
Examples of mitigation measures
include site security and threat
protection plans, emergency plans,
Integrated Safety Management Systems,
pollution prevention and waste
minimization programs, cultural
resource and protected species
programs, and energy and water
conservation programs. Any additional
site-specific mitigation actions would be
identified in site-specific NEPA
documents.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of
Energy was signed on October 30, 2020,
by Lisa E. Gordon-Hagerty, Under
Secretary for Nuclear Security and
Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to
delegated authority from the Secretary
of Energy. That document with the
original signature and date is
maintained by DOE. For administrative
purposes only, and in compliance with
requirements of the Office of the Federal
Register, the undersigned DOE Federal
Register Liaison Officer has been
authorized to sign and submit the
document in electronic format for
publication, as an official document of
the Department of Energy. This
administrative process in no way alters
the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 30,
2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S.
Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2020–24516 Filed 11–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security
Administration
Record of Decision for the Final
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
for Plutonium Pit Production at the
Savannah River Site (SRS) in South
Carolina (DOE/EIS–0541)
National Nuclear Security
Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Record of decision.
AGENCY:
Mitigation Measures
PO 00000
70601
Sfmt 4703
The National Nuclear
Security Administration (NNSA), a
semi-autonomous agency within the
U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is
announcing this Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for Plutonium
Pit Production at the Savannah River
Site (SRS) in South Carolina (SRS Pit
Production EIS) (DOE/EIS–0541). In this
ROD, NNSA announces its decision to
implement the Proposed Action to
repurpose the Mixed-Oxide Fuel
Fabrication Facility (MFFF) to produce
a minimum of 50 war reserve pits per
year at SRS and to develop the ability
to implement a short-term surge
capacity to enable NNSA to meet the
requirements of producing pits at a rate
of not less than 80 war reserve pits per
year up to the analyzed limit as
necessary beginning during 2030 for the
nuclear weapons stockpile. NNSA has
previously evaluated this action at the
programmatic level in the 2008
Complex Transformation Supplemental
Programmatic EIS (Complex
Transformation SPEIS), and recently in
a separate Complex Transformation
SPEIS Supplement Analysis (2019
SPEIS SA).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
further information on this ROD or the
SRS Pit Production EIS, contact:
Jennifer Nelson, NEPA Document
Manager, National Nuclear Security
Administration, Savannah River Field
Office, P.O. Box A, Aiken, SC 29802;
phone: (803) 557–6372 or (803) 557–
NEPA; or via email at NEPA-SRS@
srs.gov. This ROD, the SRS Pit
Production EIS, and related NEPA
documents are available at https://
www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepareading-room.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Background
NNSA has a statutory mission to
maintain and enhance the safety,
reliability, and performance of the U.S.
nuclear weapons stockpile including the
ability to design, produce, and test, in
order to meet national security
E:\FR\FM\05NON1.SGM
05NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 215 (Thursday, November 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 70598-70601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24516]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
National Nuclear Security Administration
Amended Record of Decision for the Complex Transformation
Supplemental Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement
AGENCY: National Nuclear Security Administration, Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended record of decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), a semi-
autonomous agency within the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), is
announcing this amendment to the December 19, 2008, Record of Decision
(ROD) for the Complex Transformation Supplemental Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement--Operations Involving Plutonium,
Uranium, and the Assembly and Disassembly of Nuclear Weapons (Complex
Transformation SPEIS--2008 Programmatic ROD). In this Amended ROD, NNSA
announces its programmatic decision to implement elements of a Modified
Distributed Centers of Excellence (DCE) Alternative whereby NNSA would
produce a minimum of 50 war reserve pits per year at a repurposed
Mixed-Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility (MFFF) at the Savannah River Site
(SRS) during 2030 for the national pit production mission and implement
surge efforts to exceed 80 pits per year up to the analyzed limit as
necessary beginning during 2030 for the nuclear weapons stockpile. This
decision is supported at a programmatic level by the analysis in a
Supplement Analysis (SA) to the Complex Transformation SPEIS (2019
SPEIS SA) (DOE/EIS-0236-SA-02), which NNSA prepared in 2019. After
preparing and considering the 2019 SPEIS SA, NNSA has determined that
no further NEPA analysis is needed at a programmatic level prior to
issuing this Amended ROD.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information on this
Amended ROD, contact: Mr. James R. Sanderson, Office of NEPA Policy and
Compliance, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585-0119; phone: (202) 586-1402; or email to:
[email protected]. This Amended ROD, the 2019 SPEIS SA, and
related NEPA documents are available on the NNSA NEPA Reading Room
website at https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/nnsa-nepa-reading-room.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NNSA has a statutory mission to maintain and enhance the safety,
reliability, and performance of the U.S. nuclear weapons stockpile,
including the ability to design, produce, and test, in order to meet
national security requirements. In the Complex Transformation SPEIS,
NNSA considered how to configure facilities that hold Category I and
Category II quantities of Special Nuclear Material (SNM) across the
nuclear weapons complex (Complex), including the three functional areas
of plutonium, uranium operations, and assembly/disassembly/
[[Page 70599]]
high explosives in various ways. These alternatives were broadly
categorized into a DCE Alternative, a Consolidated Centers of
Excellence (CCE) Alternative, and Capability-Based Alternative. The
Complex Transformation SPEIS also analyzed a No Action Alternative. Pit
production levels of up to 200 pits per year at a single site were
analyzed in the DCE and CCE Alternatives, and nominal pit production
levels of up to 50 pits per year were analyzed under the Capability-
Based Alternative. With respect to plutonium operations and pit
production, the 2008 Programmatic ROD continued NNSA's prior decision
to produce 20 pits per year at the Los Alamos National Laboratory
(LANL) until completion of a future Nuclear Posture Review (NPR).
Both Federal law and national security policy now require pit
production rates of not less than 80 pits per year nationally beginning
during 2030 (50 U.S.C. 2538a, as amended). On September 2, 2020, NNSA
published an Amended ROD for its programmatic decision to implement
elements of a Modified DCE Alternative from the Complex Transformation
SPEIS whereby LANL will produce a minimum of 30 war reserve pits per
year for the national pit production mission during 2026 and implement
surge efforts to exceed 30 pits per year as needed (85 FR 54550). That
decision is unchanged by this Amended ROD. Because operations involving
SNM are complex, implementing changes in operations such as pit
production takes several years. NNSA is now issuing this Amended ROD on
those aspects of the national pit production mission at SRS that have
been analyzed at both the programmatic and site-specific level by final
environmental impact statements. The scope of this Amended ROD is
limited to plutonium operations related to pit production to sustain
NNSA's pit production capability and fulfill NNSA's requirements under
Federal law and national policy. All other activities conducted
pursuant to decisions announced in the 2008 Programmatic ROD are
outside the scope of this decision.
Synopsis of the Programmatic EIS and the Supplemental Programmatic EIS
Related to Plutonium Operations and the Associated Records of Decision
During the Cold War, the U.S. maintained a pit production capacity
of approximately 2,000 pits per year (actual production numbers are
classified) but lost this large-scale production capability in the late
1980s. In 1996, the environmental effects of a production rate of up to
80 pits per year at SRS and LANL were analyzed in the Programmatic
Environmental Impact Statement for Stockpile Stewardship and Management
(DOE/EIS-0236) (SSM PEIS). In December 1996, NNSA issued a ROD
announcing a decision setting pit production at LANL at 20 pits per
year (61 FR 68014; December 26, 1996). Tiering from the SSM PEIS, the
1999 Site-Wide Environmental Impact Statement for the Continued
Operation of Los Alamos National Laboratory (DOE/EIS-0283) (1999 LANL
SWEIS) provided site-specific analysis for pit production levels at
LANL of up to 80 pits per year. In the 1999 LANL ROD, NNSA confirmed
its decision for pit production at LANL at 20 pits per year. Various
supplements to and re-evaluations of the SSM PEIS were completed over
the next several years.
In 2008, NNSA prepared the Complex Transformation SPEIS, which
analyzes the potential environmental impacts of alternatives for
transforming the Complex in a manner consistent with national policy.
Acknowledging the shifting needs of national security policy, the
Complex Transformation SPEIS was prepared to provide NNSA with a
flexible programmatic EIS that could be tiered from when the United
States faced the need to implement changes to operations such as pit
production. As it relates to plutonium operations, the Complex
Transformation SPEIS evaluates the potential impacts of alternatives
for structuring the Complex including the DCE Alternative, CCE
Alternative, and Capability-Based Alternative, and each of these
alternatives have several sub-alternatives. The 2008 LANL SWEIS again
provided site-specific analysis for pit production levels at LANL of up
to 80 pits per year. In the 2008 LANL SWEIS ROD and subsequent RODs,
NNSA selected a No Action Alternative (continuation of existing
operations) with some elements of an Expanded Operations Alternative,
which maintained NNSA's decision for pit production levels of 20 pits
per year at LANL. In September 2020, NNSA finalized its first site-
specific analysis for pit production at SRS, the Final Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) for Plutonium Pit Production at the Savannah
River Site (SRS) in South Carolina (DOE/EIS-0541).
The Complex Transformation SPEIS considered a wide range of
alternatives to provide NNSA with sufficient flexibility in the
continued transformation of the Complex. Some of the specific elements
of different alternatives and sub-alternatives in the Complex
Transformation SPEIS include an analysis of the impacts associated with
construction of a new pit production facility to produce 125 pits per
year, with surge capacity to produce 200 pits per year. Sites that the
Complex Transformation SPEIS evaluates for this level of pit production
include LANL, SRS, the Pantex Plant (Pantex) in Texas, the Y-12
National Security Complex (Y-12) in Tennessee, and the Nevada National
Security Site in Nevada. At LANL, the Complex Transformation SPEIS also
includes an analysis of two distinct upgrades to existing facilities,
rather than construction of a new facilities, including one to support
production of 125 pits per year (with surge capacity to produce 200
pits per year) and one to support production of 50-80 pits per year. At
SRS, the Complex Transformation SPEIS evaluated a pit production
facility that would use the planned MFFF and Pit Disassembly and
Conversion Facility infrastructure. The alternative selected in the
2008 Programmatic ROD was a combination of the DCE Alternative and a
Capability-Based Alternative in which, with respect to plutonium
operations, NNSA did not make any new decisions related to pit
production capacity beyond 20 pits per year at LANL.
Changes Since Issuance of the Complex Transformation 2008 Programmatic
ROD
The United States has emphasized the need to eventually produce 80
pits per year and while the drivers and the requirement for pit
production have remained relatively unchanged there have been specific
changes in the law and national policy regarding pit production since
issuance of the Complex Transformation SPEIS. Since 2014, Federal law
has required the nuclear security enterprise to produce not less than
30 war reserve plutonium pits during 2026. Federal law now requires
that the nuclear security enterprise produces not less than 80 war
reserve plutonium pits during 2030 (50 U.S.C. 2538a, as amended).
In addition, on January 27, 2017, the President directed the
Department of Defense (DoD) to conduct an NPR which was issued in 2018.
The 2018 NPR echoed the need for pit production and articulated a
national policy that is consistent with Congressional and Presidential
direction, stating that the United States will pursue initiatives to
ensure the necessary capability, capacity, and responsiveness of the
nuclear weapons infrastructure and the needed skill of the workforce,
including providing the enduring capability and capacity to produce
plutonium pits at a rate of no fewer than 80 pits per year during 2030.
The 2018 NPR also details
[[Page 70600]]
the evolving and uncertain nuclear threat environment facing the United
States. Concurrent with the 2018 NPR, DOE conducted an Analysis of
Alternatives (AoA) to identify and assess alternatives across DOE sites
that could deliver the infrastructure to meet the sustained plutonium
pit requirements of 80 pits per year. To achieve the required annual
pit production rate, the AoA report considered the construction of new
facilities and the refurbishment of existing facilities and identifies
SRS and LANL as the two preferred alternatives to meet pit production
requirements.
In 2018, Congress and the President also directed that LANL will
produce a minimum of 30 pits per year for the national pit production
mission and directed it be capable of surge efforts to exceed 30 pits
per year to meet NPR and national policy (Pub. L. 115-232, Section
3120). To these ends, the DoD Under Secretary of Defense for
Acquisition and Sustainment and the NNSA Administrator issued a Joint
Statement on May 10, 2018, describing NNSA's recommended alternative to
pursue a two-site approach--50 pits per year produced at SRS and a
minimum of 30 pits per year produced at LANL. In addition to improving
the resiliency, flexibility, and redundancy of our nuclear security
enterprise by reducing reliance on a single production site, this
approach enables the capability to allow for enhanced warhead safety
and security to meet DoD and NNSA requirements; deliberate, methodical
replacement of older existing plutonium pits with newly manufactured
pits as risk mitigation against plutonium aging; and response to
changes in deterrent requirements driven by renewed great power
competition.
Finally, since issuance of the 2008 Programmatic ROD, a significant
portion of the MFFF at SRS has been constructed. At the time that the
Complex Transformation SPEIS was being completed, construction of the
MFFF had just begun. The MFFF was built to produce mixed oxide fuel
from surplus plutonium for use in commercial nuclear reactors. For a
variety of reasons NNSA issued a Notice of Termination to the MFFF
construction contractor on October 10, 2018, cancelling the contract
for the facility. The constructed portion of MFFF was built to current
safety and security standards and contains three floors and more than
400,000 square feet of available space. The potential availability of
this facility is, in part, why NNSA has reevaluated a single pit
production site at the programmatic level and has recently completed a
site-specific NEPA analysis for pit production at SRS.
NEPA Process for Amending the ROD
NNSA prepared this Amended ROD pursuant to the regulations of the
Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) for implementing NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500-1508) and DOE's NEPA implementing procedures (10 CFR part
1021). This Amended ROD is based on information and analysis in the
Complex Transformation SPEIS (DOE/EIS-0236-S4) issued on October 24,
2008 (73 FR 63460) and public comments received; the 2019 SPEIS SA
(DOE/EIS-0236-SA-02) and public comments received; other NEPA analysis
and public comments as noted in the 2019 SPEIS SA; and other factors
including Federal law and NNSA's mission.
The Draft Complex Transformation SPEIS included a robust public
participation process. NNSA received comments from Federal agencies;
state, local, and tribal governments; public and private organizations;
and individuals. In addition, during the 20 public meetings that NNSA
held on the Draft Complex Transformation SPEIS, more than 600 speakers
made oral comments. NNSA reviewed and considered all comments received
on the Draft Complex Transformation SPEIS before issuing the 2008
Programmatic ROD.
NNSA prepared the 2019 SPEIS SA to determine whether, prior to
proceeding with the effort to produce plutonium pits at a rate of not
less than 80 pits per year beginning during 2030, the existing Complex
Transformation SPEIS should be supplemented, a new environmental impact
statement be prepared, or that no further NEPA analysis is required.
Although pertinent regulations do not require public comment on an SA,
NNSA decided, in its discretion, that public comment in this instance
would be helpful. NNSA issued the Draft 2019 SPEIS SA for public review
on June 28, 2019 (84 FR 31055). NNSA considered all comments received
during the public comment period. NNSA also reviewed all comment
documents received during the public scoping process for the site-
specific SRS Pit Production EIS for relevance to the 2019 SPEIS SA.
NNSA included a comment response document as Appendix A to the Final
2019 SPEIS SA. The Final 2019 SPEIS SA was announced on January 8, 2020
(85 FR 887). Since announcing the availability of the Final 2019 SPEIS
SA, NNSA has received additional comments related to the need for a
programmatic EIS. NNSA considered those comments during the preparation
of this Amended ROD.
Summary of Impacts
In Section 2.3 of the 2019 SPEIS SA, NNSA discusses environmental
changes at SRS and LANL that have occurred since publication of the
Complex Transformation SPEIS and that are relevant to the analysis in
the 2019 SPEIS SA. The 2019 SPEIS SA analyzes the potential impacts of
the Proposed Action on land resources, visual resources, noise, air
quality, water resources, geology and soils, ecological resources,
cultural resources, socioeconomics, environmental justice,
infrastructure, health and safety for normal operations, accidents and
intentional destructive acts, waste management, and transportation and
traffic. Section 3.2 of the 2019 SPEIS SA provides (1) a summary of the
potential environmental impacts from the Complex Transformation SPEIS,
(2) the estimate of potential impacts specific to the Proposed Action,
and (3) a more detailed analysis of potential impacts for those NEPA
resource areas where NNSA determined that there might be potentially
significant new circumstances or information relevant to environmental
concerns. Tables 3-1 and 3-2 of the 2019 SPEIS SA present information
in a comparative fashion for each resource area. Table 3-3 addresses
the combined impacts, to the extent that they are known at this time,
from pit production at both SRS and LANL. Table 3-4 addresses Complex-
wide transportation impacts. Section 4.0 of the 2019 SPEIS SA analyzes
cumulative impacts at both a programmatic level and site-specific
level. NNSA's conclusion based on the Final 2019 SPEIS SA is that
complex-wide impacts of adopting a Modified DCE Alternative for
plutonium operations for all resource areas would not be different, or
would not be significantly different, than impacts in existing NEPA
analyses. NNSA has determined that that the proposed action does not
constitute a substantial change from actions analyzed previously and
there are no significant new circumstances or information relevant to
environmental concerns. Thus, consistent with 10 CFR 1021.315(e), the
existing 2008 Programmatic ROD for the Complex Transformation SPEIS can
be amended at this time to document NNSA's decision to implement the
two-site approach for pit production at SRS and LANL. In addition, NNSA
is separately issuing a ROD for the site-specific SRS Pit Production
EIS.
Environmentally Preferable Alternative
The analyses in the Complex Transformation SPEIS of the
[[Page 70601]]
environmental impacts associated with the programmatic alternatives
indicated that the No Net Production/Capability Based Alternative is
environmentally preferable. Under this alternative NNSA would maintain
capabilities to continue surveillance of the weapons stockpile, produce
limited life components, and dismantle weapons, but would not add new
types or increased numbers of weapons to the stockpile. This
alternative would result in the minimum infrastructure demands, produce
the least amount of wastes, reduce worker radiation doses, and require
the fewest employees. Almost all of these reductions in potential
impacts result from the reduced production levels assumed for this
alternative. The environmentally preferable alternative for
programmatic alternatives accounts for actions across the complex at
multiple sites. This determination may not apply to site-specific
determinations where other factors are considered in the analysis.
Amended Decision
NNSA has decided at a programmatic level to implement aspects of a
Modified DCE Alternative from the Complex Transformation SPEIS to
produce a minimum of 50 pits per year at a repurposed MFFF at SRS, with
additional surge capacity, if needed, to meet the requirements of
producing not less than 80 pits per year beginning during 2030 for the
nuclear weapons stockpile. This decision continues the transformation
of the Complex following the end of the Cold War and the cessation of
nuclear weapons testing, particularly decisions announced in the 1996
ROD for the SSM PEIS (DOE/EIS-0236) (61 FR 68014; Dec. 26, 1996) and
the 2008 Programmatic Alternatives ROD for the Complex Transformation
SPEIS. This Amended ROD modifies only the plutonium operations aspects
of the 2008 Programmatic ROD. NNSA has made no proposals to, and there
are no changes to, NNSA's decisions on other aspects of the 2008
Programmatic ROD or to the September 2020 Amended ROD to produce a
minimum of 30 war reserve pits per year at LANL for the national pit
production mission during 2026 and implement surge efforts to exceed 30
pits per year as needed.
Basis for Decision
In making this decision, NNSA considered the 2019 SPEIS SA, the
Complex Transformation SPEIS, other referenced NEPA analyses, and its
statutory responsibilities to support the nuclear weapons stockpile.
Federal law and national security policies continue to require NNSA to
maintain a safe, secure, and reliable nuclear weapons stockpile and
create a responsive nuclear weapons infrastructure that are cost-
effective and have adequate capacity to meet reasonably foreseeable
national security requirements. This Amended ROD will enable NNSA to
continue meeting Federal law and national security requirements.
Mitigation Measures
As described in the Complex Transformation SPEIS and the 2008
Programmatic ROD, NNSA operates in compliance with environmental laws,
regulations, and policies within a framework of contractual
requirements; many of these requirements mandate actions to control and
mitigate potential adverse environmental effects. Examples of
mitigation measures include site security and threat protection plans,
emergency plans, Integrated Safety Management Systems, pollution
prevention and waste minimization programs, cultural resource and
protected species programs, and energy and water conservation programs.
Any additional site-specific mitigation actions would be identified in
site-specific NEPA documents.
Signing Authority
This document of the Department of Energy was signed on October 30,
2020, by Lisa E. Gordon-Hagerty, Under Secretary for Nuclear Security
and Administrator, NNSA, pursuant to delegated authority from the
Secretary of Energy. That document with the original signature and date
is maintained by DOE. For administrative purposes only, and in
compliance with requirements of the Office of the Federal Register, the
undersigned DOE Federal Register Liaison Officer has been authorized to
sign and submit the document in electronic format for publication, as
an official document of the Department of Energy. This administrative
process in no way alters the legal effect of this document upon
publication in the Federal Register.
Signed in Washington, DC, on October 30, 2020.
Treena V. Garrett,
Federal Register Liaison Officer, U.S. Department of Energy.
[FR Doc. 2020-24516 Filed 11-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P