Non-Substantive Amendments to Adjudicatory Proceeding Requirements, 70507-70508 [2020-24152]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
own procedures for claims of
administrative error on its part.
(c) The agency, Clerk of the House of
Representatives, or Secretary of the
Senate, as appropriate, shall determine
if administrative error on its part caused
an increase in interest due on the
deposit amount. OPM shall determine if
administrative error on its part caused
an increase in interest due on the
deposit amount.
(d) OPM’s final determination
regarding a claim of administrative error
on its part is not subject to the due
process procedures described in 5
U.S.C. 8461(e).
[FR Doc. 2020–24034 Filed 11–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
confirming receipt, then contact us at
301–415–1677.
• Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, ATTN:
Rulemaking and Adjudications Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining
information and submitting comments,
see ‘‘Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments’’ in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of
this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian
Irvin, Office of the General Counsel,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; telephone:
301–287–9193; email: 2020_Part_2_
Rulemaking@usnrc.onmicrosoft.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting
Comments
II. Rulemaking Procedure
III. Background
IV. Plain Writing
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
10 CFR Part 2
[NRC–2020–0033]
RIN 3150–AK46
I. Obtaining Information and
Submitting Comments
Non-Substantive Amendments to
Adjudicatory Proceeding
Requirements
Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its regulations to revise and
clarify the agency’s rules of practice and
procedure to reflect current Atomic
Safety and Licensing Board Panel
practice, Commission case law, and a
decision of the Supreme Court of the
United States and to enhance
consistency within the NRC’s
regulations.
SUMMARY:
Submit comments by December
7, 2020. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical
to do so, but the NRC is able to ensure
consideration only for comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0033. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn
Forder; telephone: 301–415–3407;
email: Dawn.Forder@nrc.gov. For
technical questions contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
document.
• Email comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive an automatic email reply
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
DATES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC–2020–
0033 when contacting the NRC about
the availability of information for this
action. You may obtain publicly
available information related to this
action by any of the following methods:
• Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRC–2020–0033.
• NRC’s Agencywide Documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly
available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. To begin the search, select
‘‘Begin Web-based ADAMS Search.’’ For
problems with ADAMS, please contact
the NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR)
reference staff at 1–800–397–4209, at
301–415–4737, or by email to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov. The ADAMS
accession number for each document
referenced (if it is available in ADAMS)
is provided the first time that it is
mentioned in this document.
• Attention: The PDR, where you may
examine and order copies of public
documents is currently closed. You may
submit your request to the PDR via
email at PDR.Resource@nrc.gov or call
1–800–397–4209 between 8:00 a.m. and
4:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic
comment submission through the
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
70507
Federal Rulemaking website (https://
www.regulations.gov). Please include
Docket ID NRC–2020–0033 in your
comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include
identifying or contact information that
you do not want to be publicly
disclosed in your comment submission.
The NRC will post all comment
submissions at https://
www.regulations.gov as well as enter the
comment submissions into ADAMS.
The NRC does not routinely edit
comment submissions to remove
identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating
comments from other persons for
submission to the NRC, then you should
inform those persons not to include
identifying or contact information that
they do not want to be publicly
disclosed in their comment submission.
Your request should state that the NRC
does not routinely edit comment
submissions to remove such information
before making the comment
submissions available to the public or
entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Rulemaking Procedure
Because the NRC considers this action
to be non-controversial, the NRC is
publishing this proposed rule
concurrently with a direct final rule in
the Rules and Regulations section of this
issue of the Federal Register. The direct
final rule will become effective on
January 19, 2021. However, if the NRC
receives any significant adverse
comments by December 7, 2020, then
the NRC will publish a document that
withdraws the direct final rule. If the
direct final rule is withdrawn, the NRC
will address the comments in a
subsequent final rule. Absent significant
modifications to the proposed revisions
requiring republication, the NRC will
not initiate a second comment period on
this action in the event the direct final
rule is withdrawn.
A significant adverse comment is a
comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be
inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule’s underlying premise or
approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A
comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and
provides a reason sufficient to require a
substantive response in a notice-andcomment process. For example, a
substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC to
reevaluate (or reconsider) its position or
conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue
serious enough to warrant a substantive
E:\FR\FM\05NOP1.SGM
05NOP1
70508
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 215 / Thursday, November 5, 2020 / Proposed Rules
response to clarify or complete the
record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant
issue that was not previously addressed
or considered by the NRC.
(2) The comment proposes a change
or an addition to the rule, and it is
apparent that the rule would be
ineffective or unacceptable without
incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC to
make a change (other than editorial) to
the rule.
For a more detailed discussion of the
proposed rule changes and associated
analyses, see the direct final rule
published in the Rules and Regulations
section of this issue of the Federal
Register.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
III. Background
The NRC’s regulations governing the
conduct of adjudicatory proceedings
before the agency are contained in part
2 of title 10 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR), ‘‘Agency Rules of
Practice and Procedure.’’ Periodically,
the NRC has amended these rules,
including adopting changes in 2004 to
enhance efficiency; in 2012 to promote
fairness, efficiency, and openness; and
in 2016 to reflect technological
advances and current agency practice.
Since the last update to the agency’s
rules of practice and procedure, the
NRC has identified various provisions
that should be updated to reflect
technological advances and current
agency practice. This proposed rule
would make those updates and also
clarify that any administrative law judge
designated to preside over an NRC
adjudication must be appointed by the
Commission consistent with the
Supreme Court decision in Lucia v.
Securities and Exchange Commission
(138 S. Ct. 2044 (2018)).
IV. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub.
L. 111–274) requires Federal agencies to
write documents in a clear, concise,
well-organized manner. The NRC has
written this document to be consistent
with the Plain Writing Act as well as the
Presidential Memorandum, ‘‘Plain
Language in Government Writing,’’
published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883).
The NRC requests comment on the
proposed rule with respect to clarity
and effectiveness of the language used.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain
a collection of information as defined in
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and, therefore,
is not subject to the requirements of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:49 Nov 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information unless the
document requesting or requiring the
collection displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Dated October 21, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Margaret M. Doane,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–24152 Filed 11–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 430
[EERE–2020–BT–TP–0029]
RIN 1904–AF03
Energy Conservation Program: Test
Procedures for Consumer Products;
Early Assessment Review: Portable Air
Conditioners
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Request for information.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Department of
Energy (‘‘DOE’’) is undertaking an early
assessment review to determine whether
to proceed with a rulemaking to amend
the test procedure for portable air
conditioners (‘‘AC’’). Specifically,
through this request for information
(‘‘RFI’’), DOE seeks data and
information that could enable the
agency to determine whether DOE
should propose not to amend the
existing DOE test procedure because an
amended test procedure would not more
accurately or fully comply with the
statutory requirement that the test
procedure produces results that measure
energy use during a representative
average use cycle or period of use for
the product, and not be unduly
burdensome to conduct. DOE also seeks
comment on the availability of
consensus-based test procedures for
measuring the energy use of portable
ACs that more accurately or fully
comply with this statutory requirement.
DATES: Written comments and
information are requested and will be
accepted on or before January 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
encouraged to submit comments using
the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
Alternatively, interested persons may
submit comments, identified by docket
number EERE–2020–BT–TP–0029 and/
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
or RIN 1904–AF03, by any of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
2. Email: to PortableAC2020TP0029@
ee.doe.gov. Include docket number
EERE–2020–BT–TP–0029 and/or RIN
1904–AF03 in the subject line of the
message.
3. Postal Mail: Appliance and
Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, Mailstop EE–5B,
1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585–0121. If
possible, please submit all items on a
compact disc (‘‘CD’’), in which case it is
not necessary to include printed copies.
4. Hand Delivery/Courier: Appliance
and Equipment Standards Program, U.S.
Department of Energy, Building
Technologies Office, 950 L’Enfant Plaza
SW, Suite 600, Washington, DC 20024.
Telephone: (202) 287–1445. If possible,
please submit all items on a CD, in
which case it is not necessary to include
printed copies.
No telefacsimilies (‘‘faxes’’) will be
accepted. For detailed instructions on
submitting comments and additional
information on this process, see section
III of this document (Submission of
Comments).
Docket: The docket for this activity,
which includes Federal Register
notices, comments, and other
supporting documents/materials, is
available for review at https://
www.regulations.gov. All documents in
the docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov index. However,
some documents listed in the index,
such as those containing information
that is exempt from public disclosure,
may not be publicly available.
The docket web page can be found at:
https://www.regulations.gov/
docket?D=EERE-2020-BT-TP-0029. The
docket web page contains instructions
on how to access all documents,
including public comments, in the
docket. See section III of this document
for information on how to submit
comments through https://
www.regulations.gov.
Mr.
Bryan Berringer, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Building
Technologies Office, EE–5B, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585–0121. Telephone: (202) 586–
0371. Email:
ApplianceStandardsQuestions@
ee.doe.gov.
Mr. Matthew Ring, U.S. Department of
Energy, Office of the General Counsel,
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
E:\FR\FM\05NOP1.SGM
05NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 215 (Thursday, November 5, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 70507-70508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24152]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 2
[NRC-2020-0033]
RIN 3150-AK46
Non-Substantive Amendments to Adjudicatory Proceeding
Requirements
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its regulations to revise and clarify the agency's rules of
practice and procedure to reflect current Atomic Safety and Licensing
Board Panel practice, Commission case law, and a decision of the
Supreme Court of the United States and to enhance consistency within
the NRC's regulations.
DATES: Submit comments by December 7, 2020. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the NRC
is able to ensure consideration only for comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any of the following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0033. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Dawn Forder; telephone: 301-415-3407;
email: [email protected]. For technical questions contact the
individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this document.
Email comments to: [email protected]. If you do
not receive an automatic email reply confirming receipt, then contact
us at 301-415-1677.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, ATTN: Rulemaking and
Adjudications Staff.
For additional direction on obtaining information and submitting
comments, see ``Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments'' in the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Irvin, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001;
telephone: 301-287-9193; email:
[email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
II. Rulemaking Procedure
III. Background
IV. Plain Writing
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
I. Obtaining Information and Submitting Comments
A. Obtaining Information
Please refer to Docket ID NRC-2020-0033 when contacting the NRC
about the availability of information for this action. You may obtain
publicly available information related to this action by any of the
following methods:
Federal Rulemaking Website: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and search for Docket ID NRC-2020-0033.
NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System
(ADAMS): You may obtain publicly available documents online in the
ADAMS Public Documents collection at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. To begin the search, select ``Begin Web-based ADAMS
Search.'' For problems with ADAMS, please contact the NRC's Public
Document Room (PDR) reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, at 301-415-4737,
or by email to [email protected]. The ADAMS accession number for
each document referenced (if it is available in ADAMS) is provided the
first time that it is mentioned in this document.
Attention: The PDR, where you may examine and order copies
of public documents is currently closed. You may submit your request to
the PDR via email at [email protected] or call 1-800-397-4209
between 8:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. (EST), Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
B. Submitting Comments
The NRC encourages electronic comment submission through the
Federal Rulemaking website (https://www.regulations.gov). Please
include Docket ID NRC-2020-0033 in your comment submission.
The NRC cautions you not to include identifying or contact
information that you do not want to be publicly disclosed in your
comment submission. The NRC will post all comment submissions at
https://www.regulations.gov as well as enter the comment submissions
into ADAMS. The NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove identifying or contact information.
If you are requesting or aggregating comments from other persons
for submission to the NRC, then you should inform those persons not to
include identifying or contact information that they do not want to be
publicly disclosed in their comment submission. Your request should
state that the NRC does not routinely edit comment submissions to
remove such information before making the comment submissions available
to the public or entering the comment into ADAMS.
II. Rulemaking Procedure
Because the NRC considers this action to be non-controversial, the
NRC is publishing this proposed rule concurrently with a direct final
rule in the Rules and Regulations section of this issue of the Federal
Register. The direct final rule will become effective on January 19,
2021. However, if the NRC receives any significant adverse comments by
December 7, 2020, then the NRC will publish a document that withdraws
the direct final rule. If the direct final rule is withdrawn, the NRC
will address the comments in a subsequent final rule. Absent
significant modifications to the proposed revisions requiring
republication, the NRC will not initiate a second comment period on
this action in the event the direct final rule is withdrawn.
A significant adverse comment is a comment where the commenter
explains why the rule would be inappropriate, including challenges to
the rule's underlying premise or approach, or would be ineffective or
unacceptable without a change. A comment is adverse and significant if:
(1) The comment opposes the rule and provides a reason sufficient
to require a substantive response in a notice-and-comment process. For
example, a substantive response is required when:
(a) The comment causes the NRC to reevaluate (or reconsider) its
position or conduct additional analysis;
(b) The comment raises an issue serious enough to warrant a
substantive
[[Page 70508]]
response to clarify or complete the record; or
(c) The comment raises a relevant issue that was not previously
addressed or considered by the NRC.
(2) The comment proposes a change or an addition to the rule, and
it is apparent that the rule would be ineffective or unacceptable
without incorporation of the change or addition.
(3) The comment causes the NRC to make a change (other than
editorial) to the rule.
For a more detailed discussion of the proposed rule changes and
associated analyses, see the direct final rule published in the Rules
and Regulations section of this issue of the Federal Register.
III. Background
The NRC's regulations governing the conduct of adjudicatory
proceedings before the agency are contained in part 2 of title 10 of
the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), ``Agency Rules of Practice
and Procedure.'' Periodically, the NRC has amended these rules,
including adopting changes in 2004 to enhance efficiency; in 2012 to
promote fairness, efficiency, and openness; and in 2016 to reflect
technological advances and current agency practice. Since the last
update to the agency's rules of practice and procedure, the NRC has
identified various provisions that should be updated to reflect
technological advances and current agency practice. This proposed rule
would make those updates and also clarify that any administrative law
judge designated to preside over an NRC adjudication must be appointed
by the Commission consistent with the Supreme Court decision in Lucia
v. Securities and Exchange Commission (138 S. Ct. 2044 (2018)).
IV. Plain Writing
The Plain Writing Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-274) requires Federal
agencies to write documents in a clear, concise, well-organized manner.
The NRC has written this document to be consistent with the Plain
Writing Act as well as the Presidential Memorandum, ``Plain Language in
Government Writing,'' published June 10, 1998 (63 FR 31883). The NRC
requests comment on the proposed rule with respect to clarity and
effectiveness of the language used.
V. Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule does not contain a collection of information as
defined in the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.)
and, therefore, is not subject to the requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information unless the document requesting
or requiring the collection displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Dated October 21, 2020.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Margaret M. Doane,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020-24152 Filed 11-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P