Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes, 69276-69279 [2020-24040]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(j) Retained Restrictions on Alternative
Actions and Intervals With a New Exception
This paragraph restates the requirements of
paragraph (j) of AD 2019–13–04, with a new
exception. Except as required by paragraph
(k) of this AD, after the existing maintenance
or inspection program has been revised as
required by paragraph (g) of this AD, no
alternative actions (e.g., inspections) and
intervals may be used unless the actions and
intervals are approved as an alternative
method of compliance (AMOC) in
accordance with the procedures specified in
paragraph (n)(1) of this AD.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(k) New Maintenance or Inspection Program
Revision
Except as specified in paragraph (l) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, European Union Aviation
Safety Agency (EASA) AD 2020–0173, dated
August 5, 2020 (‘‘EASA AD 2020–0173’’).
Accomplishing the maintenance or
inspection program revision required by this
paragraph terminates the requirements of
paragraph (g) of this AD.
(l) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0173
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0173 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) The requirements specified in
paragraphs (1) and (3) of EASA AD 2020–
0173 do not apply to this AD.
(3) Paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2020–0173
specifies revising ‘‘the approved AMP’’
within 12 months after its effective date, but
this AD requires revising the existing
maintenance or inspection program, as
applicable, to incorporate the ‘‘limitations,
tasks and associated thresholds and
intervals’’ specified in paragraph (4) of EASA
AD 2020–0173 within 90 days after the
effective date of this AD.
(4) Except as provided by paragraph (2) of
EASA AD 2020–0173, the initial compliance
time for doing the tasks specified in
paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2020–0173 is at
the applicable ‘‘associated thresholds’’
specified in paragraph (4) of EASA AD 2020–
0173, or within 90 days after the effective
date of this AD, whichever occurs later.
(5) Where table 1 of EASA AD 2020–0173
specifies a compliance time of ‘‘without
exceeding the previous threshold and
interval as specified in TLD Revision 16’’ for
this AD use ‘‘without exceeding the
compliance times specified in paragraph (g)
of this AD.’’
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:16 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
(6) The provisions specified in paragraphs
(5) and (6) of EASA AD 2020–0173 do not
apply to this AD.
(7) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2020–0173 does not apply to this AD.
(m) New Provisions for Alternative Actions
and Intervals
After the maintenance or inspection
program has been revised as required by
paragraph (k) of this AD, no alternative
actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals, are
allowed unless they are approved as
specified in the provisions of the ‘‘Ref.
Publications’’ section of EASA AD 2020–
0173.
(n) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or local Flight Standards
District Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (o)(4) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the local flight
standards district office/certificate holding
district office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or ATR—GIE Avions de Transport
Re´gional’s EASA Design Organization
Approval (DOA). If approved by the DOA,
the approval must include the DOAauthorized signature.
(o) Related Information
(1) For EASA AD 2020–0173, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2) For the ATR service information
identified in this AD contact ATR—GIE
Avions de Transport Re´gional, 1 Alle´e Pierre
Nadot, 31712 Blagnac Cedex, France;
telephone +33 (0) 5 62 21 62 21; fax +33 (0)
5 62 21 67 18; email
continued.airworthiness@atr-aircraft.com;
internet https://www.atr-aircraft.com.
(3) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195. This material may be found
in the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0972.
(4) For more information about this AD,
contact Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3220; email
shahram.daneshmandi@faa.gov.
Issued on October 23, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–23933 Filed 10–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0975; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–061–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type
Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
The FAA proposes to adopt a
new airworthiness directive (AD) for
certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited Model DHC–8–400, –401, and
–402 airplanes. This proposed AD was
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
EP02NO20.001
69276
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
prompted by a report of main landing
gear (MLG) retractions after striking an
obstacle or severe wheel imbalance after
a tire failure. This proposed AD would
require inspections for correct height of
the lock link over-center stop pin and
for correct gaps of the left-hand and
right-hand MLG downlock proximity
sensors, replacement of the shim if
necessary, and corrective actions, and
installation of a new improved
proximity sensor electronic unit (PSEU)
with software changes. The FAA is
proposing this AD to address the unsafe
condition on these products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments
on this proposed AD by December 17,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited, Q-Series
Technical Help Desk, 123 Garratt
Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5,
Canada; telephone 416–375–4000; fax
416–375–4539; email thd@
dehavilland.com; internet https://
dehavilland.com. You may view this
service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section,
Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0975; or in person at Docket Operations
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
The AD docket contains this NPRM, any
comments received, and other
information. The street address for
Docket Operations is listed above.
Comments will be available in the AD
docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:16 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite
410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7323; fax 516–794–5531; email
9-avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any
written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send
your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include
‘‘Docket No. FAA–2020–0975; Product
Identifier 2020–NM–061–AD’’ at the
beginning of your comments. The most
helpful comments reference a specific
portion of the proposal, explain the
reason for any recommended change,
and include supporting data. The FAA
will consider all comments received by
the closing date and may amend the
proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business
Information (CBI) as described in the
following paragraph, and other
information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments
received, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. The
agency will also post a report
summarizing each substantive verbal
contact received about this proposed
AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial
information that is both customarily and
actually treated as private by its owner.
Under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt
from public disclosure. If your
comments responsive to this NPRM
contain commercial or financial
information that is customarily treated
as private, that you actually treat as
private, and that is relevant or
responsive to this NPRM, it is important
that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each
page of your submission containing CBI
as ‘‘PROPIN.’’ The FAA will treat such
marked submissions as confidential
under the FOIA, and they will not be
placed in the public docket of this
NPRM. Submissions containing CBI
should be sent to Darren Gassetto,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical
Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch,
1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–
228–7323; fax 516–794–5531; email 9avs-nyaco-cos@faa.gov. Any
commentary that the FAA receives
which is not specifically designated as
CBI will be placed in the public docket
for this rulemaking.
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69277
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA), which is the aviation authority
for Canada, has issued Canadian AD
CF–2016–31R1, dated March 24, 2017
(referred to after this as the Mandatory
Continuing Airworthiness Information,
or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain De Havilland
Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC–
8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes. You
may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–
0975.
This proposed AD was prompted by
a report of MLG retractions after striking
an obstacle or severe wheel imbalance
after a tire failure. The FAA is proposing
this AD to address loss of MLG
downlock signal caused by the
vibrations from those events, which
leads to de-energizing the MLG solenoid
sequence valve (SSV) and subsequent
removal of hydraulic pressure from the
MLG downlock actuator. Loss of the
hydraulic pressure in the downlock
actuator, combined with the vibrations,
can cause the stabilizer brace to unlock
and the MLG to subsequently retract.
See the MCAI for additional background
information.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited has issued Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84–32–140, Revision B, dated
January 30, 2018. This service
information describes set-up procedures
for proper configuration of the MLG
prior to performing subsequent
procedures for inspections for correct
height of the lock link over-center stop
pin and for correct gaps of the left-hand
and right-hand MLG downlock
proximity sensors, and replacement of
the shim.
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited has also issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–32–143, Revision B,
dated November 16, 2016, which
describes procedures for installation of
a new, improved PSEU, PSEU 30145–
0601, with software changes.
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited has also issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–32–149, dated
November 16, 2016, which describes
procedures for installation of a new,
improved PSEU, PSEU 30145–0602,
with software changes.
These documents are distinct since
they apply to different airplane
configurations. This service information
is reasonably available because the
interested parties have access to it
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
69278
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
through their normal course of business
or by the means identified in the
ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to the
FAA’s bilateral agreement with the State
of Design Authority, the FAA has been
notified of the unsafe condition
described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. The FAA
is proposing this AD because the FAA
evaluated all the relevant information
and determined the unsafe condition
described previously is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require
accomplishing the actions specified in
the service information described
previously.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed
AD affects 57 airplanes of U.S. registry.
The FAA estimates the following costs
to comply with this proposed AD:
ESTIMATED COSTS FOR REQUIRED ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per product
Up to 12 work-hours × $85 per hour = Up to $1,020 ........................................
Up to $4,750 ..........
Up to $5,770 ..........
The FAA estimates the following
costs to do any necessary on-condition
actions that would be required based on
the results of any required actions. The
FAA has no way of determining the
Cost on U.S.
operators
Up to $328,890.
number of aircraft that might need these
on-condition actions:
ESTIMATED COSTS OF ON-CONDITION ACTIONS
Labor cost
Parts cost
Cost per
product
1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ..........................................................................................................................
$374
$459
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section
44701: General requirements. Under
that section, Congress charges the FAA
with promoting safe flight of civil
aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and
procedures the Administrator finds
necessary for safety in air commerce.
This regulation is within the scope of
that authority because it addresses an
unsafe condition that is likely to exist or
develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Regulatory Findings
20:16 Oct 30, 2020
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
The FAA determined that this
proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order
13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the
States, on the relationship between the
national Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
(1) Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation
in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Jkt 253001
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
■
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited
(Type Certificate Previously Held by
Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA–
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
2020–0975; Product Identifier 2020–
NM–061–AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by
December 17, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft
of Canada Limited (type certificate
previously held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model
DHC–8–400, –401, and –402 airplanes,
certificated in any category, having serial
number 4001, and 4003 through 4534
inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of main
landing gear (MLG) retractions after striking
an obstacle or severe wheel imbalance after
a tire failure. The FAA is issuing this AD to
address loss of MLG downlock signal caused
by the vibrations from those events, which
leads to de-energizing the MLG solenoid
sequence valve and subsequent removal of
hydraulic pressure from the MLG downlock
actuator. Loss of the hydraulic pressure in
the downlock actuator, combined with the
vibrations, can cause the stabilizer brace to
unlock and the MLG to subsequently retract.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(g) Downlock Sensor Rigging and Reduced
Lock Link Over-Center
Within 9 months after the effective date of
this AD: Verify both the height of the lock
link over-center stop pin and the gap of the
left-hand and right-hand MLG downlock
proximity sensors, and perform corrective
actions as required, in accordance with
paragraphs 3.A. and 3.B. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–32–140, Revision B,
dated January 30, 2018. Do all applicable
corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Installation of Proximity Sensor
Electronic Unit (PSEU) 30145–0601
Within 18 months after the effective date
of this AD, install PSEU 30145–0601 in
accordance with paragraphs 3.A. and 3.B. of
the Accomplishment Instructions of
Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–143,
Revision B, dated November 16, 2016.
(i) Installation of PSEU 30145–0602
Installing PSEU 30145–0602 in accordance
with paragraphs 3.A. and 3.B. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84–32–149, dated November
16, 2016, also accomplishes the requirements
of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraph (g) of this AD,
if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service
information as specified in paragraphs
(j)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–140,
dated August 5, 2016.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–
140, Revision A, dated June 12, 2017.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for
actions required by paragraphs (g) and (h) of
this AD, if PSEU 30145–0601 was installed
before the effective date of this AD using the
service information as specified in
paragraphs (j)(2)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–143,
dated June 30, 2016.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84–32–
143, Revision A, dated August 5, 2016.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the
procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your
request to your principal inspector or local
Flight Standards District Office, as
appropriate. If sending information directly
to the manager of the certification office,
send it to ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New
York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue,
Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone
516–228–7300; fax 516–794–5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your
appropriate principal inspector, or lacking a
principal inspector, the manager of the local
flight standards district office/certificate
holding district office.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:16 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, New York ACO Branch,
FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation
(TCCA); or De Havilland Aircraft of Canada
Limited’s TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO,
the approval must include the DAOauthorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information (MCAI) Canadian
AD CF–2016–31R1, dated March 24, 2017,
for related information. This MCAI may be
found in the AD docket on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0975.
(2) For more information about this AD,
contact Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative
Services Section, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–
7323; fax 516–794–5531; email 9-avs-nyacocos@faa.gov.
(3) For information about AMOCs, contact
ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing
Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO
Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516–228–
7300; fax 516–794–5531.
(4) For service information identified in
this AD, contact De Havilland Aircraft of
Canada Limited, Q-Series Technical Help
Desk, 123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto,
Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416–
375–4000; fax 416–375–4539; email thd@
dehavilland.com; internet https://
dehavilland.com. You may view this service
information at the FAA, Airworthiness
Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Issued on October 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–24040 Filed 10–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2020–0924; Airspace
Docket No. 20–ANE–1]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Revocation of Class E
Airspace; Newburyport, MA
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
remove Class E airspace at
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
69279
Newburyport, MA, as Plum Island
Airport no longer has instrument
approaches, and controlled airspace is
no longer required. This action would
enhance the safety and management of
controlled airspace within the national
airspace system.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before December 17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this rule
to: U.S. Department of Transportation,
Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, Washington, DC
20590–0001; Telephone: (800) 647–
5527, or (202) 366–9826. You must
identify the Docket No. FAA–2020–
0924; Airspace Docket No. 20–ANE–1,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points, and
subsequent amendments can be viewed
online at https://www.faa.gov/air_
traffic/publications/. For further
information, you can contact the
Airspace Policy Group, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC, 20591;
Telephone: 202–267–8783. The Order is
also available for inspection at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For
information on the availability of FAA
Order 7400.11E at NARA, email
fedreg.legal@nara.gov or go to https://
www.archives.gov/federal-register/cfr/
ibr-locations.html.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
Fornito, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Federal Aviation
Administration, 1701 Columbia Ave.,
College Park, GA 30337; telephone (404)
305–6364.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority for This Rulemaking
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This proposed
rulemaking is promulgated under the
authority described in Subtitle VII, part
A, Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would
remove Class E airspace extending
upward from 700 feet above the surface
at Plum Island Airport, Newburyport,
E:\FR\FM\02NOP1.SGM
02NOP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 212 (Monday, November 2, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 69276-69279]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24040]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2020-0975; Product Identifier 2020-NM-061-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited
(Type Certificate Previously Held by Bombardier, Inc.) Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FAA proposes to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD)
for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model DHC-8-400, -
401, and -402 airplanes. This proposed AD was
[[Page 69277]]
prompted by a report of main landing gear (MLG) retractions after
striking an obstacle or severe wheel imbalance after a tire failure.
This proposed AD would require inspections for correct height of the
lock link over-center stop pin and for correct gaps of the left-hand
and right-hand MLG downlock proximity sensors, replacement of the shim
if necessary, and corrective actions, and installation of a new
improved proximity sensor electronic unit (PSEU) with software changes.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: The FAA must receive comments on this proposed AD by December
17, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments, using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this NPRM, contact De
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, Q-Series Technical Help Desk, 123
Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone 416-375-
4000; fax 416-375-4539; email [email protected]; internet https://dehavilland.com. You may view this service information at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch, 2200 South
216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-
0975; or in person at Docket Operations between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains
this NPRM, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for Docket Operations is listed above. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer,
Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York
ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590;
telephone 516-228-7323; fax 516-794-5531; email [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
The FAA invites you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposal. Send your comments to an address listed
under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2020-0975;
Product Identifier 2020-NM-061-AD'' at the beginning of your comments.
The most helpful comments reference a specific portion of the proposal,
explain the reason for any recommended change, and include supporting
data. The FAA will consider all comments received by the closing date
and may amend the proposal because of those comments.
Except for Confidential Business Information (CBI) as described in
the following paragraph, and other information as described in 14 CFR
11.35, the FAA will post all comments received, without change, to
https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you
provide. The agency will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact received about this proposed AD.
Confidential Business Information
CBI is commercial or financial information that is both customarily
and actually treated as private by its owner. Under the Freedom of
Information Act (FOIA) (5 U.S.C. 552), CBI is exempt from public
disclosure. If your comments responsive to this NPRM contain commercial
or financial information that is customarily treated as private, that
you actually treat as private, and that is relevant or responsive to
this NPRM, it is important that you clearly designate the submitted
comments as CBI. Please mark each page of your submission containing
CBI as ``PROPIN.'' The FAA will treat such marked submissions as
confidential under the FOIA, and they will not be placed in the public
docket of this NPRM. Submissions containing CBI should be sent to
Darren Gassetto, Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and
Administrative Services Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7323; fax 516-
794-5531; email [email protected]. Any commentary that the FAA
receives which is not specifically designated as CBI will be placed in
the public docket for this rulemaking.
Discussion
Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA), which is the aviation
authority for Canada, has issued Canadian AD CF-2016-31R1, dated March
24, 2017 (referred to after this as the Mandatory Continuing
Airworthiness Information, or ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for certain De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited Model
DHC-8-400, -401, and -402 airplanes. You may examine the MCAI in the AD
docket on the internet at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA-2020-0975.
This proposed AD was prompted by a report of MLG retractions after
striking an obstacle or severe wheel imbalance after a tire failure.
The FAA is proposing this AD to address loss of MLG downlock signal
caused by the vibrations from those events, which leads to de-
energizing the MLG solenoid sequence valve (SSV) and subsequent removal
of hydraulic pressure from the MLG downlock actuator. Loss of the
hydraulic pressure in the downlock actuator, combined with the
vibrations, can cause the stabilizer brace to unlock and the MLG to
subsequently retract. See the MCAI for additional background
information.
Related Service Information Under 1 CFR Part 51
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited has issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-140, Revision B, dated January 30, 2018. This
service information describes set-up procedures for proper
configuration of the MLG prior to performing subsequent procedures for
inspections for correct height of the lock link over-center stop pin
and for correct gaps of the left-hand and right-hand MLG downlock
proximity sensors, and replacement of the shim.
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited has also issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-143, Revision B, dated November 16, 2016, which
describes procedures for installation of a new, improved PSEU, PSEU
30145-0601, with software changes.
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited has also issued Bombardier
Service Bulletin 84-32-149, dated November 16, 2016, which describes
procedures for installation of a new, improved PSEU, PSEU 30145-0602,
with software changes.
These documents are distinct since they apply to different airplane
configurations. This service information is reasonably available
because the interested parties have access to it
[[Page 69278]]
through their normal course of business or by the means identified in
the ADDRESSES section.
FAA's Determination
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to the FAA's bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority,
the FAA has been notified of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced above. The FAA is proposing this AD
because the FAA evaluated all the relevant information and determined
the unsafe condition described previously is likely to exist or develop
on other products of the same type design.
Proposed Requirements of This NPRM
This proposed AD would require accomplishing the actions specified
in the service information described previously.
Costs of Compliance
The FAA estimates that this proposed AD affects 57 airplanes of
U.S. registry. The FAA estimates the following costs to comply with
this proposed AD:
Estimated Costs for Required Actions
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Labor cost Parts cost Cost per product Cost on U.S. operators
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Up to 12 work-hours x $85 per Up to $4,750.............. Up to $5,770............. Up to $328,890.
hour = Up to $1,020.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The FAA estimates the following costs to do any necessary on-
condition actions that would be required based on the results of any
required actions. The FAA has no way of determining the number of
aircraft that might need these on-condition actions:
Estimated Costs of On-Condition Actions
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cost per
Labor cost Parts cost product
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 work-hour x $85 per hour = $85...... $374 $459
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII: Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
The FAA is issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General requirements.
Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with promoting safe flight
of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing regulations for
practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator finds necessary
for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within the scope of that
authority because it addresses an unsafe condition that is likely to
exist or develop on products identified in this rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
The FAA determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
(1) Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866,
(2) Will not affect intrastate aviation in Alaska, and
(3) Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new airworthiness
directive (AD):
De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (Type Certificate Previously
Held by Bombardier, Inc.): Docket No. FAA-2020-0975; Product
Identifier 2020-NM-061-AD.
(a) Comments Due Date
The FAA must receive comments by December 17, 2020.
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to De Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited (type
certificate previously held by Bombardier, Inc.) Model DHC-8-400, -
401, and -402 airplanes, certificated in any category, having serial
number 4001, and 4003 through 4534 inclusive.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 32, Landing
Gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by a report of main landing gear (MLG)
retractions after striking an obstacle or severe wheel imbalance
after a tire failure. The FAA is issuing this AD to address loss of
MLG downlock signal caused by the vibrations from those events,
which leads to de-energizing the MLG solenoid sequence valve and
subsequent removal of hydraulic pressure from the MLG downlock
actuator. Loss of the hydraulic pressure in the downlock actuator,
combined with the vibrations, can cause the stabilizer brace to
unlock and the MLG to subsequently retract.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the compliance times specified,
unless already done.
[[Page 69279]]
(g) Downlock Sensor Rigging and Reduced Lock Link Over-Center
Within 9 months after the effective date of this AD: Verify both
the height of the lock link over-center stop pin and the gap of the
left-hand and right-hand MLG downlock proximity sensors, and perform
corrective actions as required, in accordance with paragraphs 3.A.
and 3.B. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-32-140, Revision B, dated January 30, 2018. Do all
applicable corrective actions before further flight.
(h) Installation of Proximity Sensor Electronic Unit (PSEU) 30145-0601
Within 18 months after the effective date of this AD, install
PSEU 30145-0601 in accordance with paragraphs 3.A. and 3.B. of the
Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-
143, Revision B, dated November 16, 2016.
(i) Installation of PSEU 30145-0602
Installing PSEU 30145-0602 in accordance with paragraphs 3.A.
and 3.B. of the Accomplishment Instructions of Bombardier Service
Bulletin 84-32-149, dated November 16, 2016, also accomplishes the
requirements of paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD.
(j) Credit for Previous Actions
(1) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraph (g) of this AD, if those actions were performed before the
effective date of this AD using the service information as specified
in paragraphs (j)(1)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-140, dated August 5, 2016.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-140, Revision A, dated
June 12, 2017.
(2) This paragraph provides credit for actions required by
paragraphs (g) and (h) of this AD, if PSEU 30145-0601 was installed
before the effective date of this AD using the service information
as specified in paragraphs (j)(2)(i) and (ii) of this AD.
(i) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-143, dated June 30, 2016.
(ii) Bombardier Service Bulletin 84-32-143, Revision A, dated
August 5, 2016.
(k) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager, New
York ACO Branch, FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs for this
AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. In
accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your principal
inspector or local Flight Standards District Office, as appropriate.
If sending information directly to the manager of the certification
office, send it to ATTN: Program Manager, Continuing Operational
Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7300; fax 516-794-5531. Before
using any approved AMOC, notify your appropriate principal
inspector, or lacking a principal inspector, the manager of the
local flight standards district office/certificate holding district
office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any requirement in this AD
to obtain instructions from a manufacturer, the instructions must be
accomplished using a method approved by the Manager, New York ACO
Branch, FAA; or Transport Canada Civil Aviation (TCCA); or De
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited's TCCA Design Approval
Organization (DAO). If approved by the DAO, the approval must
include the DAO-authorized signature.
(l) Related Information
(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness Information
(MCAI) Canadian AD CF-2016-31R1, dated March 24, 2017, for related
information. This MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the internet
at https://www.regulations.gov by searching for and locating Docket
No. FAA-2020-0975.
(2) For more information about this AD, contact Darren Gassetto,
Aerospace Engineer, Mechanical Systems and Administrative Services
Section, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600 Stewart Avenue, Suite 410,
Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-7323; fax 516-794-5531; email
[email protected].
(3) For information about AMOCs, contact ATTN: Program Manager,
Continuing Operational Safety, FAA, New York ACO Branch, 1600
Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY 11590; telephone 516-228-
7300; fax 516-794-5531.
(4) For service information identified in this AD, contact De
Havilland Aircraft of Canada Limited, Q-Series Technical Help Desk,
123 Garratt Boulevard, Toronto, Ontario M3K 1Y5, Canada; telephone
416-375-4000; fax 416-375-4539; email [email protected]; internet
https://dehavilland.com. You may view this service information at
the FAA, Airworthiness Products Section, Operational Safety Branch,
2200 South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call 206-231-3195.
Issued on October 26, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness Division, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-24040 Filed 10-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P