NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule-Phase 2 Extension, 69189-69206 [2020-21446]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and
503
[EPA–HQ–OECA–2019–0408; FRL–10015–
08–OECA]
RIN 2020–AA52
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule—
Phase 2 Extension
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is publishing this final
rule to postpone the compliance
deadlines for implementation of Phase 2
of the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Electronic
Reporting Rule (‘‘NPDES eRule’’). The
NPDES eRule requires EPA and states to
modernize Clean Water Act (CWA)
reporting. This final rule also provides
states with additional flexibility to
request additional time as needed.
Further, this final rule promulgates
clarifying changes to the NPDES eRule
and eliminates some duplicative or
outdated reporting requirements. Taken
together, these changes are designed to
save the NPDES authorized programs
considerable resources, make reporting
easier for NPDES-regulated entities,
streamline permit renewals, ensure full
exchange of NPDES program data
between states and EPA, enhance public
transparency, improve environmental
decision-making, and protect human
health and the environment.
SUMMARY:
DC 20460; telephone number: 202–566–
1014; or email: johnston.carey@epa.gov
(preferred). Also see the following
website for additional information
regarding the rulemaking: https://
www.epa.gov/compliance/npdesereporting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How is this document organized?
The outline of this document follows
the following format:
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Postponement of Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient
Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
VI. Assistance To States to Implement Phase
2
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this
action include all NPDES-permitted
facilities, whether covered by an
individual permit or general permit,
industrial users located in cities without
approved local pretreatment programs,
facilities subject to EPA’s biosolids
regulations, and governmental entities
that have received NPDES program
authorization or are implementing
portions of the NPDES program in a
cooperative agreement with EPA. These
entities include:
Category
Examples of regulated entities
Facilities seeking coverage under
an individual NPDES permits,
general permit, or subject to a
NPDES inspection.
Industrial users located in cities
without
approved
local
pretreatment programs.
POTWs and other facilities subject
to EPA’s biosolids regulations.
State and territorial governments ...
Publicly-owned treatment works (POTW) facilities, treatment works treating domestic sewage (TWTDS),
municipalities, counties, stormwater management districts, state-operated facilities, Federally-operated
facilities, industrial facilities, construction sites, and concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs).
Tribal governments .........................
Federal government ........................
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
The final rule is effective on
January 4, 2021. In accordance with 40
CFR part 23, this regulation shall be
considered issued for purposes of
judicial review at 1 p.m. Eastern time on
November 16, 2020. The start dates for
electronic reporting are provided in 40
CFR 127.16.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OECA–2019–0408. All
documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., confidential business information
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Out of an abundance of caution
for members of the public and our staff,
the EPA Docket Center and Reading
Room was closed to public visitors on
March 31, 2020, to reduce the risk of
transmitting COVID–19. Our Docket
Center staff will continue to provide
remote customer service via email,
phone, and webform. For further
information on EPA Docket Center
services and the current status, please
visit us online at https://www.epa.gov/
dockets. The telephone number for the
Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
additional information, please contact
Mr. Carey A. Johnston, Office of
Compliance (mail code 2222A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington,
DATES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
69189
Industrial facilities discharging to POTWs and for which the designated pretreatment Control Authority is
EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or territory rather than an approved local pretreatment program.
Class I sludge management facilities (as defined in 40 CFR 503.9(c)), POTWs with a design flow rate
equal to or greater than one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more.
States and territories that have received NPDES program authorization from EPA, that are implementing
portions of the NPDES program in a cooperative agreement with EPA, or that operate NPDES-permitted
facilities.
Tribes that have received NPDES program authorization from EPA, that are implementing portions of the
NPDES program in a cooperative agreement with EPA, or that operate NPDES-permitted facilities.
Federal facilities with a NPDES permit and EPA Regional Offices acting for those states, tribes, and territories that do not have NPDES program authorization or that do not have program authorization for a
particular NPDES subprogram (e.g., biosolids or pretreatment).
This table is not intended to be an
exhaustive list, but rather provides some
examples of the types of entities
potentially regulated by this action.
Other types of entities not listed in this
table may also be regulated. If you have
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
questions regarding the applicability of
this final action to a particular entity,
consult the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. What action is the agency taking?
EPA published the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Electronic Reporting Rule (‘‘NPDES
eRule’’) on October 22, 2015. The 2015
rule required EPA and states to
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69190
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
modernize Clean Water Act (CWA)
reporting for municipalities, industries
and other facilities. The rule divided
implementation into two ‘‘Phases.’’ The
deadline for Phase 1 implementation
passed on December 21, 2016. The
deadline for Phase 2 was initially
scheduled for December 21, 2020. Some
state authorized NPDES programs
provided feedback to EPA on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the
NPDES eRule and, in particular, have
recommended changes to the schedule
for Phase 2 implementation to allow
both EPA and states sufficient time to
develop and implement the information
technology solutions necessary for
electronic reporting of the Phase 2 data
(see DCN 0001 to 0009). EPA published
a proposed rule to solicit comment on
postponing the compliance deadlines
for Phase 2 implementation as well as
other changes to the NPDES eRule to
allow for a smoother transition from
paper to electronic reporting for the
NPDES program (see February 28, 2020;
85 FR 11909). EPA received comments
from seven states, one state association,
and one anonymous commenter. The
final rule addresses these comments and
postpones the compliance deadlines for
Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES
eRule. This final rule also provides
states with additional flexibility to
request additional time as needed.
Further, this final rule promulgates
clarifying changes to the NPDES eRule
and eliminates some duplicative or
outdated reporting requirements.
C. What is the agency’s authority for
taking this action?
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act
(CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule, which
added a new part to title 40 (40 CFR part
127) and made changes to existing
NPDES regulations. The EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule under
authority of the CWA sections 101(f),
304(i), 308, 402, and 501. EPA is using
the same authority to finalize changes to
the NPDES eRule. EPA notes that the
Congressional Declaration of Goals and
Policy of the CWA specifies in section
101(f) that ‘‘It is the national policy that
to the maximum extent possible the
procedures utilized for implementing
this chapter shall encourage the drastic
minimization of paperwork and
interagency decision procedures, and
the best use of available manpower and
funds, so as to prevent needless
duplication and unnecessary delays at
all levels of government.’’
Harnessing information technology
that is now a common part of daily life
is an important step toward reaching the
goals of the CWA. EPA is promulgating
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
this rule under the authority of CWA
section 304(i), which authorizes EPA to
establish minimum procedural and
other elements of state programs under
section 402, including reporting
requirements and procedures to make
information available to the public. In
addition, EPA is promulgating this rule
under section 308 of the CWA. Section
308 of the CWA authorizes EPA to
require access to information necessary
to carry out the objectives of the Act,
including sections 301, 305, 306, 307,
311, 402, 404, 405, and 504. Section 402
of the CWA establishes the NPDES
permit program for the control of the
discharge of pollutants into the nation’s
waters. Specifically, CWA sections
402(b) and (c) require each authorized
state, tribe, or territory to ensure that
permits meet certain substantive
requirements, and provide EPA
information from point sources,
industrial users, and authorized
programs in order to ensure proper
oversight. Finally, EPA is promulgating
this rule under the authority of section
501, which authorizes EPA to prescribe
such regulations as are necessary to
carry out provisions of the Act.
D. What are the incremental costs and
benefits of this action?
EPA identified only minimal
incremental costs of this final rule as the
overall impact of these changes allow
states to more efficiently implement the
NPDES eRule. EPA is postponing the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation by five years and
providing states with additional
flexibility to request an extension if
more time is necessary but with no
extension allowed beyond December 21,
2028 (see Section IV of this preamble).
This rule also finalizes changes to the
NPDES eRule that clarify existing
requirements and eliminate some
duplicative or outdated reporting
requirements. For example, this rule
eliminates three data elements from the
minimum set of NPDES program data
(Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127):
Reportable Noncompliance Tracking,
Reportable Noncompliance Tracking
Start Date, and Applicable Categorical
Standards. These changes will reduce
the costs to authorized NPDES programs
in collecting, managing, and sharing
these data. EPA also anticipates that the
clarifications contained in this final rule
will help states avoid unnecessary
implementation costs. For example, the
final rule makes clear that the electronic
reporting requirement for Notices of
Termination (NOTs) applies only to
general permit covered facilities (see
Table 1 to Appendix A, 40 CFR part
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
127) and not to individually permitted
facilities.
II. Background
EPA published the NPDES eRule on
22 October 2015. The 2015 rule required
EPA and states to modernize Clean
Water Act (CWA) reporting for
municipalities, industries and other
facilities. The rule replaced most paperbased NPDES reporting requirements
with electronic reporting. The rule
converted the following paper reports to
electronic: (1) Discharge Monitoring
Reports (DMRs); (2) general permit
reports (e.g., Notices of Intent to
discharge in compliance with a general
permit); and (3) other specified program
reports. The NPDES eRule included a
phased implementation schedule (40
CFR 127.26). Most states and permittees
have successfully implemented Phase 1
of the NPDES eRule, which includes
electronic submission of DMRs and the
Federal Biosolids Annual Report where
EPA is the Regulatory Authority.
The NPDES eRule requires EPA to
calculate electronic reporting
participation rates for each authorized
NPDES program six months after the
deadline for conversion from paper to
electronic submissions and annually
thereafter [see 40 CFR 127.26(j)]. The
compliance deadlines for Phase 1 of the
NPDES eRule were 21 December 2016
and included NPDES Data Groups No. 3
(Discharge Monitoring Reports or
‘‘DMRs’’) and No. 4 [Sewage Sludge/
Biosolids Annual Program Reports,
where EPA implements the biosolids
program (40 CFR part 503)]. EPA’s first
three assessments have shown
considerable progress in Phase 1
implementation (see DCN 0012—0014),
although more work needs to be done to
achieve the full benefits of Phase 1.
Current tracking of Phase 1
implementation is available through the
‘‘NPDES eRule Readiness Dashboard.’’
See: https://echo.epa.gov/trends/npdeserule-dashboard-public. EPA recognizes
that there are a number of states who
have not fully implemented Phase 1.
Given that EPA is today postponing the
Phase 2 deadlines, EPA is committed to
focusing additional attention to ensure
that it is receiving all Phase 1 data.
There are a number of mechanisms that
EPA can use to ensure it receives all
Phase 1 data. EPA has been working
with states, providing in-kind technical
assistance and Exchange Network grant
funding (see https://www.epa.gov/
exchangenetwork/exchange-networkgrant-program). In addition, EPA could
use the initial recipient procedure to
expedite the conversion to electronic
reporting for DMRs (see 40 CFR 127.27).
The initial recipient procedure allows
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
EPA to direct NPDES permittees to use
EPA’s electronic reporting tools for one
or more NPDES data groups if the
authorized NPDES program cannot fully
meet the requirements to be an initial
recipient.
Electronic submission of all other
reports and notices covered by the
NPDES eRule are part of Phase 2
implementation. See Table 1 to 40 CFR
127.16. The online ‘‘NPDES eRule Phase
2 Implementation Dashboard’’ provides
an inventory of all general permits and
program reports covered by the NPDES
eRule. See: https://edap.epa.gov/public/
extensions/eRule_Phase2/eRule_
Phase2.html. This dashboard also
provides an updated view of EPA’s
progress in gathering information and
deploying NPDES electronic reporting
tools for Phase 2 general permits and
program reports (see DCN 0015).
EPA and states are now focusing on
implementing Phase 2 of the NPDES
eRule and continuing their work on
implementing Phase 1. EPA and states
are now gathering information and
deploying NPDES electronic reporting
tools for Phase 2 reports. EPA and states
are collaborating and sharing
information through multiple
workgroups. EPA used these
workgroups to provide states with more
information on Phase 2 implementation.
See: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/
data-entry-guidance-and-technicalpapers. The EPA-state General Permit
and Program Report Technical
Workgroup meets monthly and focuses
on the EPA Regional and state general
permits and program reports that will
use EPA’s NPDES Electronic Reporting
Tool (NeT) for Phase 2 data. The EPAstate NPDES Noncompliance Report
(NNCR) workgroup is discussing how to
identify, categorize, sort, and display
violations on the NNCR. This
workgroup is discussing how best to
implement the new NNCR regulations
in 40 CFR 123.45.
EPA received letters from authorized
NPDES programs on how to improve
Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES
eRule. The letters recommended
changes to the schedule for Phase 2
implementation to allow both EPA and
states sufficient time to develop and
implement the information technology
solutions necessary for electronic
reporting of the Phase 2 data (see DCN
0001 to 0009).
In response to the feedback from the
states in the letters and oral
communications, EPA proposed
changes to the NPDES eRule to allow for
a smoother transition from paper to
electronic reporting for the NPDES
program (see February 28, 2020; 85 FR
11909). EPA received comments on the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
proposal from seven states, one state
association, and one anonymous
commenter. The final rule addresses
these comments and postpones the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation period of the NPDES
eRule. This final rule also provides
states with additional flexibility to
request additional time as needed.
Further, this final rule promulgates
clarifying changes to the NPDES eRule
and eliminates some duplicative or
outdated reporting requirements.
Finally, in a separate rulemaking, EPA
has finalized updates to the minimum
set of NPDES program data (Appendix
A to 40 CFR part 127) for the municipal
separate storm sewer systems (MS4s)
sector. See April 15, 2020; 85 FR 20873.
These changes to the NPDES eRule
correct obsolete citations and previous
inconsistencies with the newly
modified MS4 Phase II regulations. See
December 8, 2016; 81 FR 89320. These
updates do not change the burden
associated with complying with the
NPDES eRule but, rather, these changes
assist permitting authorities and MS4
permittees in implementing NPDES
electronic reporting.
III. Postponement of Phase 2
Compliance Deadlines
A. Phase 2 Implementation Deadline
This final rule postpones the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation of the NPDES eRule
from December 21, 2020, to December
21, 2025 (see Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16).
EPA received comments from seven
authorized NPDES programs and one
state association on how to improve
Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES
eRule (see Document Nos: EPA–HQ–
OECA–2019–0408–0022 through 0029;
available at https://
www.regulations.gov).
The comments were generally
supportive of the proposed rule and
requested more time for Phase 2
implementation than the three-year
extension in the proposed rule. The
Association of Clean Water
Administrators (ACWA) and other states
requested that, ‘‘EPA should invest the
necessary resources to complete the
ICIS–NPDES updates and to meet all
NeT/NetDMR commitment obligations
to allow states and EPA to meet the new
deadlines . . . States are also very
interested in engaging with EPA to
identify and prioritize important areas
for updating/enhancing ICIS–NPDES.’’
ACWA and other states noted their
appreciation for EPA’s financial support
through the Exchange Network Grant
Program. They also requested that EPA
make additional dedicated grant
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69191
funding available to States for NPDES
eRule implementation. ACWA also
expressed appreciation for the
continuing opportunities to participate
on workgroups associated with NPDES
eRule implementation.
ACWA and state commenters
recommended that EPA extend the
Phase 2 compliance deadlines for Phase
2 implementation by five years instead
of the proposed three years. ACWA
noted that it does not believe that three
years will be adequate time to complete
all the necessary work, especially with
the current COVID–19 crisis
undermining the efficiency of some of
this work over the next six to twelve
months. Iowa noted that the
postponement of the compliance
deadline will allow states and tribes to
explore more cost-effective options for
electronic reporting. ACWA also
suggested an alternative proposal that
would set the Phase 2 compliance
deadline to be three years after EPA
completes the necessary upgrades to its
national NPDES data system to enable
receipt of Phase 2 data.
The final rule provides EPA and states
with five additional years to implement
Phase 2. This timeframe responds to
state comments for more time and
addresses concerns about the potential
delays due to the COVID–19 pandemic
response. In addition, extending the
Phase 2 compliance deadline by two
additional years will provide EPA and
authorized NPDES programs with
additional time to complete the
development of electronic tools.
Maintaining a fixed date rather than
tying the deadline to completion of
certain electronic reporting solutions
can help prioritize resources and focus
attention on the tasks necessary for the
conversion to electronic reporting.
In addition to postponing the Phase 2
compliance deadlines to December 21,
2025, EPA is adding a reference to the
alternative Phase 2 compliance
deadlines provisions at 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f). This is discussed in
more detail below. Other than the
changes to the Phase 2 compliance
deadlines and the addition of the
reference to the alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines provisions, EPA
is not making any other changes to the
requirements in these sections.
B. Deadline for Public Release of NNCR
EPA proposed to delay the public
release date of the NNCR by one year,
to December 21, 2022. EPA noted in the
preamble to the proposed rule that this
date will allow EPA and states to use
the new NNCR as EPA is making
decisions on its next round of National
Compliance Initiatives. See: https://
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
69192
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
www.epa.gov/enforcement/nationalcompliance-initiatives. EPA further
explained that it would only be able to
provide Phase 1 data in the NNCR
initially and would need to modify the
NNCR as Phase 2 data becomes
available.
ACWA on behalf of several states
recommended that public release of the
NNCR (both Phase 1 and Phase 2) be
delayed until known data quality issues
are resolved.
In response, EPA has added
regulatory language that explicitly
creates separate deadlines for the public
release of the NNCR using Phase 1 data
(December 2022) and Phase 2 data (one
year after the draft report is made
available to states but no later than
December 2026). The NNCR public
release dates for Phase 2 data would be
phased in over time to give states at
least one year to review and provide
comments on draft versions of the
NNCR that incorporates Phase 2 data
before EPA releases a new version to the
public. EPA will provide states with an
informal notice whenever a new draft
version of the NNCR using Phase 2 data
is ready for their review and comment.
This will help EPA and states identify
and fix data quality and data sharing
issues. The deadline for issuance of the
version of the NNCR that incorporates
all Phase 2 data will be December 2026,
i.e., one year after revised deadline for
implementation of Phase 2 (similar to
the approach in the 2015 NPDES eRule).
Phase 1 data are already provided to
the public through ECHO, so even if
data quality issues exist, the public
already has access to Phase 1 data,
which includes noncompliance data.
EPA does not think it is necessary to
delay public release of the NNCR for
Phase 1 beyond December 2022. As
previously noted, EPA and states have
made significant progress in
implementing Phase 1 and EPA has held
frequent meetings with states on how to
develop the NNCR and improve data
sharing between EPA and authorized
NPDES programs. EPA will continue to
help states improve their compliance
with the data sharing requirements in
the NPDES eRule for Phase 1 data. In
particular, EPA has provided technical
support to authorized states to resolve
data sharing problems and has
developed a series of online dashboards
to identify missing or inaccurate Phase
1 data and track improvements in Phase
1 data sharing. The benefit of this
approach will be to give EPA, states,
and the public a complete inventory of
facilities with violations based on the
most currently available set of NPDES
program data. This will help EPA and
states identify noncompliance issues
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
that might impact human health or the
environment.
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines
In addition to postponing the Phase 2
compliance deadlines, EPA is adding
two regulatory provisions that create
additional flexibility for Phase 2
compliance. These two new provisions
respond to the requests from ACWA and
from authorized NPDES programs for
more time to develop and implement
the information technology solutions
necessary for electronic reporting of the
Phase 2 data.
The first regulatory provision [40 CFR
127.24(e)] allows authorized NPDES
programs to request additional time
beyond December 21, 2025 to
implement Phase 2 of the NPDES eRule.
Under this provision, an authorized
NPDES program must send a request to
EPA for review and approval. This
request must identify the facilities,
general permits, program reports, or
data elements for which the authorized
NPDES program needs additional time
beyond December 21, 2025. For
example, a state may seek approval from
EPA to postpone implementation of
electronic reporting for a NPDES general
permit until an agreed-upon time after
December 21, 2025, but no later than
December 21, 2028. EPA estimates that
no authorized state will need more time
than that fixed date, which is thirteen
years after the effective date of the 2015
NPDES eRule. This waiver might be
helpful if a state has a permit or
program report that is a lower priority
for electronic reporting (e.g., a general
permit that provides coverage for 10 or
fewer NPDES-regulated entities) and for
which electronic reporting tool
development is delayed.
While states may make multiple
requests for compliance deadline
extensions beyond December 21, 2025,
EPA will not grant extensions beyond
December 21, 2028. Under today’s rule,
each alternative Phase 2 compliance
deadline request must:
• Be submitted to EPA by the
Director, as defined in 40 CFR 122.2;
• Identify each general permit,
program report, and related data
elements covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance
deadline(s);
• Identify each facility covered by the
request and the corresponding
alternative compliance deadline(s)
(Note: This only applies if the request
covers some but not all facilities
covered by the relevant general permit
or program report requirement);
• Be submitted at least 120 days prior
to the then-applicable compliance
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
deadline(s) in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16
or a previously EPA approved
alternative compliance deadline; and
• Provide a rationale for the delay
and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for the
general permit, program report, and
related data elements covered by the
request.
EPA will review each alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request to
determine if it provides enough detail to
accurately assess if the state has a
reasonable plan to deploy electronic
reporting by the requested alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline. EPA will
return alternative Phase 2 compliance
deadline requests with insufficient
detail back to the Director within 30
days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA intends to
approve or deny each complete
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
request within 120 days of receipt of a
sufficiently detailed request. EPA will
provide notice to the authorized NPDES
program of EPA’s approval or denial.
The authorized NPDES program may reapply if the initial request is denied by
EPA.
EPA may elect to deny an alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline request
and then continue to follow the
procedure in the existing rule for
determining the initial recipient of
electronic NPDES information (see 40
CFR 127.27). EPA must become the
initial recipient of electronic NPDES
information from NPDES-regulated
facilities if the state, tribe, or territory
does not consistently maintain
electronic data transfers in compliance
with the NPDES eRule [see 40 CFR
127.27(d)(2)]. EPA will update its
website with each alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request and the
corresponding Agency approval or
denial notice. EPA will provide updated
information at: https://www.epa.gov/
compliance/npdes-ereporting. EPA will
also update its website and online
‘‘NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation
Dashboard’’ to clearly identify the
approved alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines for each facility,
general permit report, program report,
and related data elements by authorized
NPDES program.
The second regulatory provision [40
CFR 127.24(f)] authorizes EPA to, on its
own initiative, allow for additional time
for one or more authorized NPDES
programs (states and EPA Regions) to
implement NPDES electronic reporting
beyond December 21, 2025. Under this
provision, EPA may establish an
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
for electronic reporting and data sharing
for one or more facilities, general permit
reports, program reports, and related
data elements (see Table 2 to Appendix
A to 40 CFR part 127). Use of this
provision may be necessary if EPA has
not yet deployed the required electronic
reporting tool (when EPA is responsible
for building the tool) or if EPA has not
yet deployed the protocols and systems
for authorized NPDES programs to share
one or more data elements with EPA
(when the state is responsible for
building the tool or generating the data).
Under the provision, EPA may set an
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
for up to three years but not beyond
December 21, 2028. EPA will update its
website and online ‘‘NPDES eRule
Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard’’ to
clearly identify the alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines for each facility,
general permit report, program report,
and related data elements by authorized
NPDES program.
Separately, EPA will provide notice to
the one or more authorized NPDES
programs covered by each alternative
Phase 2 compliance deadline through an
email or letter. This EPA notice will
detail how EPA will implement
electronic reporting (when EPA is
responsible for deploying one or more
electronic reporting tools) or how EPA
will receive data from authorized
NPDES programs (when the state is
responsible for deploying one or more
electronic reporting tools). This section
of the rule does not change the process
for designating the initial recipient of
electronic NPDES information from
NPDES-regulated facilities (see 40 CFR
127.27). This additional flexibility will
also allow more time for EPA and
authorized NPDES programs to resolve
any issues related to the sharing of
Phase 2 data.
ACWA and most states requested that
EPA remove the prohibition against
further extensions beyond the fixed 3year date. States cited the uncertainties
ahead with the COVID–19 pandemic
response, as well as concerns that there
could be further slippage in EPA’s
schedule for updating the ICIS–NPDES
data system and developing data
collection tools under EPA’s NPDES
electronic reporting Tool (‘‘NeT’’),
whether related to the pandemic or for
other reasons.
The final rule retains the proposed
option for a fixed date that is three years
beyond the revised Phase 2 Compliance
Deadlines. This means that EPA can
approve extensions up to, but not
beyond, December 21, 2028. As
previously noted, EPA estimates that no
authorized state will need more time
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
than that fixed date, which is thirteen
years after the effective date of the 2015
NPDES eRule. This approach will help
focus EPA and state efforts on NPDES
electronic reporting and help expedite
the benefits of electronic reporting to
NPDES-regulated entities.
Finally, the Iowa Department of
Natural Resources (Iowa DNR)
commented that the language of the
proposed 40 CFR 127.24(f) could be
read to authorize EPA to delay
electronic reporting and establish an
implementation schedule for a state
without that state’s consent. Iowa
recommended in a meeting with EPA
that EPA modify the language to make
clear that EPA cannot dictate to states
how electronic reporting will be
implemented if the state is meeting the
implementation schedule in the rule
(see Table 1, 40 CFR 127.16, and 40 CFR
127.23). See DCN 0027. In response,
EPA clarifies that this new provision
does not alter the approach taken in the
2015 NPDES eRule that gives states the
option to build and deploy one or more
electronic reporting tools. EPA does not
dictate to states how electronic
reporting will be implemented if the
state is meeting its obligations under the
rule (e.g., implementation schedule,
data collection and sharing
requirements) and complying with
EPA’s Cross-media Electronic Reporting
Rule (40 CFR part 3). EPA modified the
language in 40 CFR 127.24(f) to make
clear that this provision does not make
any changes to the initial recipient
designation process, which is
documented at 40 CFR 127.27.
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient
Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
EPA solicited comment on several
clarifying edits to the 2015 NPDES
eRule (see February 28, 2020; 85 FR
11913). These proposed changes are
intended to clarify and streamline
NPDES eRule implementation. EPA
received two comments on these
changes.
ACWA noted its support for the
‘‘minor refinements to the NPDES
eReporting Rule to reflect lessons
learned over the last five years, to
streamline NPDES eRule
implementation, and to clarify several
Appendix A data elements/descriptions,
which include a number of suggestions
provided directly by states.’’ ACWA also
stated that it, ‘‘does not currently have
any further specific recommendations
for these provisions/sections but expects
individual states may provide such.
Where appropriate, ACWA can help
EPA identify whether such
recommendations are supported by a
PO 00000
Frm 00075
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69193
majority of the states.’’ EPA thanks
ACWA for the comment and its offer of
help in implementing NPDES electronic
reporting.
An anonymous commenter noted that,
‘‘The proposed rule asks for both the
SIC code and NAICS code to be
submitted. Requiring both seems like an
undue burden on the regulated
community, given the regulatory
benefit. Since SIC codes are outdated,
only NAICS codes should be required
and SIC codes should be optional.’’ EPA
notes that the comment on the
collection of SIC code data as an ‘‘undue
burden on the regulated community’’ is
outside the scope of this rulemaking as
the data sharing requirements in this
final rule are imposed on the authorized
NPDES programs and not on the
regulated community. EPA established
the data sharing requirements on the
regulated community in the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Final Rule (see 12 February
2019; 84 FR 3324). Authorized NPDES
programs must update their NPDES
permit applications to collect four-digit
Standard Industrial Classification (SIC)
codes and the six-digit NAICS codes
(see 84 FR 3327).
EPA used the NPDES Electronic
Reporting Rule—Phase 2 Extension
proposed rule to solicit comment on
updates to the minimum set of NPDES
data that authorized NPDES program
must share with EPA (see 28 February
2020; 85 FR 11923). EPA proposed that
states share these data for both
individual and general permit covered
facilities. This would ensure that there
is consistent and complete reporting
nationwide of industrial classification
data, which are useful for regulatory
decisions and program oversight. EPA
proposed to require states to share these
NAICS code data with EPA when they
approve NPDES permit coverage as this
will help lower the implementation
costs to states. Additionally, EPA does
not see the continued sharing of these
SIC code data with EPA as undue
burden on states. EPA did not receive
any negative comments regarding the
burden of these revised data sharing
requirements on authorized NPDES
programs.
Additionally, for reason set forth in
the proposed rule and in this preamble
to the final rule, EPA is amending the
NPDES eRule to incorporate clarifying
changes. The changes adopted in the
final rule:
• Correct the title for 40 CFR 123.45
• Provide greater clarity and specificity
for the NNCR Category I
noncompliance definitions
• Correct Appendix A deficiency
descriptions
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
69194
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
• Correct data element name,
description, and reference for
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge—Land
Application or Surface Disposal
Deficiencies
• Correct the title of the ‘‘Sewer
Overflow/Bypass Event Report’’
• Delete the following two data
elements: Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking and
Reportable Noncompliance
Tracking Start Date
• Provide greater clarity for the
‘‘Facility Concentrated Aquatic
Animal Production (CAAP) Status’’
data element name and description
• Provide greater clarity on the ‘Permit
Component’ data element with
respect to unpermitted facilities
• Provide greater clarity on the Notice
of Termination (NOT) electronic
reporting requirements
• Provide greater clarity on the
‘‘Applicable Effluent Limitations
Guidelines’’ data element and
delete the duplicative data element,
‘‘Applicable Categorical Standards’’
• Provide greater clarity on the
‘‘Receiving Waterbody Name for
Permitted Feature’’ data element
name and description
• Require NAICS Code Data to match
the 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Final Rule
• Add Variance Data Elements to
Appendix A to match the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Final Rule
• Make two editorial changes to the
NNCR language as noted below
Specifically, Arkansas provided
suggestions in comments on the
proposed rule to clarify the
noncompliance reporting language at
Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45 (see EPA–
HQ–OECA–2019–0408–0027). These
comments noted that the criteria for
monthly average permit limit violations
for determining Category I
noncompliance should be clarified as
lower thresholds. These comments
suggested the following clarifying
changes to Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45
(underlined text below are the suggested
additions).
• Violations of monthly average
permit effluent limits which exceed or
equal the product of the Technical
Review Criteria (TRC) times the permit
effluent limit and occur in any two or
more months in a six-month period.
• Violations of monthly average
permit effluent limits which are
exceeded in any four or more months in
a six-month period.
EPA incorporated these changes into
Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45, as they
provide greater clarity on how these
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
criteria currently work as lower
thresholds for triggering Category I
noncompliance and represent the
Agency’s long-standing interpretation
and implementation of these criteria
(see Enforcement Management System:
National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (Clean Water Act),
Chapter VII, DCN 0028).
VI. Assistance to States To Implement
Phase 2
EPA will continue to provide
technical assistance and support to
authorized NPDES programs during the
transition to electronic reporting. This
includes building electronic reporting
tools for authorized NPDES programs
that elect to use these tools and to
support the development of new data
transfer protocols. EPA will also provide
states with the data sharing protocols for
Phase 2 data prior to December 21,
2025. EPA will give states enough
guidance and training ahead of this
deadline so that states have an orderly
means to share these data with EPA.
Authorized NPDES programs can
request EPA’s assistance for electronic
reporting by submitting a request to
NPDESeReporting@epa.gov.
EPA offers authorized programs
financial assistance through the
Exchange Network Grant Program. This
program provides funding to states,
territories, and federally recognized
Indian tribes to support the
development of the National
Environmental Information Exchange
Network. The primary outcome
expected from Exchange Network
assistance agreements is improved
access to, and exchange of, high-quality
environmental data from public and
private sector sources. More information
on this program is available at: https://
www.epa.gov/exchangenetwork/
exchange-network-grant-program.
EPA will continue to work with
authorized NPDES programs to
implement NPDES electronic reporting.
This includes the use of workgroups to
help authorized NPDES programs share
data with EPA and to provide
recommendations on how EPA should
build the NNCR. Authorized NPDES
programs can contact the person listed
in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to learn how to join
these workgroups.
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
VII. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and
Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant
regulatory action and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not an Executive Order
13771 regulatory action because this
action is not significant under Executive
Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection activities
in this rule have been submitted for
approval to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) under the PRA. The
Information Collection Request (ICR)
document that the EPA prepared has
been assigned EPA ICR number 2617.02.
You can find a copy of the ICR in the
docket for this rule, and it is briefly
summarized here. The information
collection requirements are not
enforceable until OMB approves them.
EPA has primary responsibility for
ensuring the CWA’s NPDES program is
effectively and consistently
implemented nationwide, thus ensuring
that public health and environmental
protection goals of the CWA are met.
EPA is taking this action pursuant to
CWA sections 101(f), 304(i), 308, 402,
and 501. The accurate, complete, and
timely information collected under this
ICR will help EPA and states more
efficiently implement the 2015 NPDES
eRule. The improved information
sharing would increase transparency
and accountability and help EPA and
authorized NPDES programs collaborate
and measure progress in implementing
the 2015 NPDES eRule. This
information collection would provide
EPA with more timely, consistent, and
accurate inventory of all general permits
and program reports, the number of
facilities that must electronically submit
reports, and the online location of state
electronic reporting tools [see 40 CFR
123.43(d)].
Receiving current high-level data on
general permits and program reports is
critical to EPA’s ability to oversee and
manage authorized NPDES programs.
Authorizing the burden under this ICR
will allow EPA to provide timely
assistance to authorized NPDES
programs as they implement the NPDES
eRule. The general permits and program
reports inventory will help promote
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
efficiencies in NPDES eRule
implementation as states will be able to
use this information to identify other
states that have already developed
electronic reporting tools and may be
able to provide helpful information or
advice.
Respondents/affected entities: This
ICR covers the 47 states and one U.S.
Territory authorized to implement the
NPDES program.
Respondent’s obligation to respond:
Mandatory (40 CFR 123.43(d) and
127.24(e)).
Estimated number of respondents: 48.
Frequency of response: EPA estimates
that twelve authorized NPDES programs
will provide updated information on
general permits and program reports
and the related electronic reporting
tools each month. Additionally, all 48
authorized NPDES programs will
conduct an annual review and update of
EPA’s inventory. Finally, EPA estimates
that approximately 15 authorized
NPDES programs will prepare and
submit an alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request during the
three-year period covered by the ICR.
Total estimated burden: 416 hours
(per year). Burden is defined at 5 CFR
1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $25,418 (per
year), includes $0 annualized capital or
operation & maintenance costs.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number. The OMB control
numbers for the EPA’s regulations in 40
CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. In
addition, the EPA is amending the table
in 40 CFR part 9 to list the regulatory
citations for the information collection
activities contained in this final rule.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the RFA. This action will not
impose any requirements on small
entities. This action does not affect
small entities as the changes in this
action only directly covers states, tribes,
and territories that have NPDES
program authorization. The RFA defines
‘‘small governmental jurisdiction’’ as
the government of a city, county, town,
township, village, school district, or
special district with a population of less
than 50,000 (5 U.S.C. 601(5)). For the
purposes of the RFA, States and tribal
governments are not considered small
governments. The final rule indirectly
affects NPDES permittees as it
postpones the compliance dates for
Phase 2 implementation. Any costs
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
associated with this postponement are
expected to be minimal for each
regulatory entity.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
(UMRA)
This action does not contain an
unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C.
1531–1538, and does not significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. The
changes in this action help streamline
the implementation of the NPDES eRule
and provide states with more flexibility.
EPA estimates that the additional time
and flexibility afforded by the changes
will help lower the implementation
costs.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the states, on the
relationship between the national
government and the states, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments
This action does not have tribal
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13175. This action does not affect
small entities as the changes in this
action only cover states, tribes, and
territories that have NPDES program
authorization. Currently there are no
tribal governments that are authorized
for the NPDES program. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this
action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13045 because it is not
economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the
EPA does not believe the environmental
health or safety risks addressed by this
action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The changes in this action
only cover states, tribes, and territories
that have NPDES program authorization.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211, because it is not a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69195
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve
technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does
not have disproportionately high and
adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority populations, lowincome populations and/or indigenous
peoples, as specified in Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
The changes in this action only cover
states, tribes, and territories that have
NPDES program authorization.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and
the EPA will submit a rule report to
each House of the Congress and to the
Comptroller General of the United
States. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 9
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water
pollution control.
40 CFR Part 123
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information,
Hazardous substances, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 127
Environmental protection,
Administrative practice and procedure,
Automatic data processing, Electronic
data processing, Hazardous substances,
Intergovernmental relations, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal, Waste treatment and
disposal, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 403
Environmental protection,
Confidential business information,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Waste treatment and
disposal, Water pollution control.
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69196
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
40 CFR Part 503
Environmental protection, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal.
Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts 9,
122, 123, 127, 403, and 503 as follows:
PART 9—OMB APPROVALS UNDER
THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136–136y;
15 U.S.C. 2001, 2003, 2005, 2006, 2601–2671;
21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 31 U.S.C. 9701; 33
U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1318,
1321, 1326, 1330, 1342, 1344, 1345 (d) and
(e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR,
1971–1975 Comp. p. 973; 42 U.S.C. 241,
242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g, 300g–1, 300g–2,
300g–3, 300g–4, 300g–5, 300g–6, 300j–1,
300j–2, 300j–3, 300j–4, 300j–9, 1857 et seq.,
6901–6992k, 7401–7671q, 7542, 9601–9657,
11023, 11048.
2. In § 9.1, add an entry for ‘‘127.24’’
in numerical order under the
undesignated center heading ‘‘NPDES
Electronic Reporting’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork
Reduction Act.
*
*
*
*
*
40 CFR citation
*
*
OMB control No.
*
*
*
NPDES Electronic Reporting
*
*
*
*
127.24
*
*
*
*
2020–0037
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
PART 122—EPA ADMINISTERED
PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL
POLLUTANT DISCHARGE
ELIMINATION SYSTEM
3. The authority citation for part 122
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.
4. In § 122.26, revise paragraphs
(b)(15)(i)(C) and (g)(1)(iii) to read as
follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
■
§ 122.26 Storm water discharges
(applicable to State NPDES programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
*
VerDate Sep<11>2014
*
*
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
(b) * * *
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all certifications
submitted in compliance with
paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(A) and (B) of this
section must be submitted electronically
by the owner or operator to the Director
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
CFR part 127, owners or operators may
be required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Submit the signed certification to
the NPDES permitting authority once
every five years. As of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
certifications submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner or operator
to the Director or initial recipient, as
defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in
compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, owners or operators may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 5. In § 122.28, revise paragraph
(b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
§ 122.28 General permits (applicable to
State NPDES programs, see § 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Except as provided in paragraphs
(b)(2)(v) and (vi) of this section,
dischargers (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) seeking coverage
under a general permit shall submit to
the Director a notice of intent to be
covered by the general permit. A
discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) who fails to submit a
notice of intent in accordance with the
terms of the permit is not authorized to
discharge, (or in the case of sludge
disposal permit, to engage in a sludge
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
use or disposal practice), under the
terms of the general permit unless the
general permit, in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(v), contains a provision
that a notice of intent is not required or
the Director notifies a discharger (or
treatment works treating domestic
sewage) that it is covered by a general
permit in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2)(vi). A complete and timely, notice
of intent (NOI), to be covered in
accordance with general permit
requirements, fulfills the requirements
for permit applications for purposes of
§§ 122.6, 122.21, and 122.26. As of
December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all notices of intent submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
discharger (or treatment works treating
domestic sewage) to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
CFR part 127, discharger (or treatment
works treating domestic sewage) may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 6. In § 122.34, revise paragraph (d)(3)
introductory text to read as follows:
§ 122.34 Permit requirements for regulated
small MS4 permits.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(3) Reporting. Unless the permittee is
relying on another entity to satisfy its
NPDES permit obligations under
§ 122.35(a), the permittee must submit
annual reports to the NPDES permitting
authority for its first permit term. For
subsequent permit terms, the permittee
must submit reports in year two and
four unless the NPDES permitting
authority requires more frequent
reports. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the small
MS4 to the NPDES permitting authority
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), § 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127
is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting.
Prior to this date, and independent of 40
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
CFR part 127, the owner, operator, or
the duly authorized representative of
the small MS4 may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state
law. The report must include:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 7. In § 122.41, revise paragraphs
(l)(6)(i), (l)(7), and (m)(3)(i) and (ii) to
read as follows:
§ 122.41 Conditions applicable to all
permits (applicable to State programs, see
§ 123.25).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(l) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) The permittee shall report any
noncompliance which may endanger
health or the environment. Any
information shall be provided orally
within 24 hours from the time the
permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. A report shall also be
provided within 5 days of the time the
permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. The report shall contain
a description of the noncompliance and
its cause; the period of noncompliance,
including exact dates and times), and if
the noncompliance has not been
corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken or
planned to reduce, eliminate, and
prevent reoccurrence of the
noncompliance. For noncompliance
events related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events, these reports must
include the data described above (with
the exception of time of discovery) as
well as the type of event (combined
sewer overflows, sanitary sewer
overflows, or bypass events), type of
sewer overflow structure (e.g., manhole,
combine sewer overflow outfall),
discharge volumes untreated by the
treatment works treating domestic
sewage, types of human health and
environmental impacts of the sewer
overflow event, and whether the
noncompliance was related to wet
weather. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, permittees may be required to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
electronically submit reports related to
combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) Other noncompliance. The
permittee shall report all instances of
noncompliance not reported under
paragraphs (l)(4), (5), and (6) of this
section, at the time monitoring reports
are submitted. The reports shall contain
the information listed in paragraph
(l)(6). For noncompliance events related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events, these
reports shall contain the information
described in paragraph (l)(6) and the
applicable required data in appendix A
to 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the
Director or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127,
permittees may be required to
electronically submit reports related to
combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related
to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events under
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(m) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Anticipated bypass. If the
permittee knows in advance of the need
for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice,
if possible, at least ten days before the
date of the bypass. As of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
notices submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the
Director or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
PO 00000
Frm 00079
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69197
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127,
permittees may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state
law.
(ii) Unanticipated bypass. The
permittee shall submit notice of an
unanticipated bypass as required in
paragraph (l)(6) of this section (24-hour
notice). As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all notices
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, permittees may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 8. In § 122.42, revise paragraphs (c)
and (e)(4) introductory text to read as
follows:
§ 122.42 Additional conditions applicable
to specified categories of NPDES permits
(applicable to State NPDES programs, see
§ 123.25).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer
systems. The operator of a large or
medium municipal separate storm
sewer system or a municipal separate
storm sewer that has been designated by
the Director under § 122.26(a)(1)(v) must
submit an annual report by the
anniversary of the date of the issuance
of the permit for such system. As of
December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or
the duly authorized representative of
the MS4 to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the MS4
may be required to report electronically
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69198
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
if specified by a particular permit or if
required to do so by state law. The
report shall include:
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(4) Annual reporting requirements for
CAFOs. The permittee must submit an
annual report to the Director. As of
December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all annual reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), § 122.22, and 40
CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the permittee may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law. The annual report must
include:
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. In § 122.64, revise paragraph (c) to
read as follows:
§ 122.64 Termination of permits
(applicable to State programs, see § 123.25).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Permittees that wish to terminate
their permit must submit a Notice of
Termination (NOT) to their permitting
authority. If requesting expedited permit
termination procedures, a permittee
must certify in the NOT that it is not
subject to any pending State or Federal
enforcement actions including citizen
suits brought under State or Federal
law. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40
CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all NOTs
submitted by general permit covered
facilities in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D), § 122.22, and 40 CFR part
127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to
undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date,
and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by State
law.
PART 123—STATE PROGRAM
REQUIREMENTS
10. The authority citation for part 123
continues to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:40 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.
11. In § 123.45, revise the section
heading, the introductory text,
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv), and
appendix A to § 123.45 to read as
follows:
■
§ 123.45 Noncompliance and program
reporting.
As of December 21, 2022, EPA must
prepare and publish online public
(quarterly and annual) reports using
data from Discharge Monitoring Reports
[40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)], Biosolids Annual
Program Reports [40 CFR part 503]
(when the Regional Administrator is the
Director), and information that is
required to be submitted by the State
Director (see Appendix A, 40 CFR part
127). As of December 21, 2026, EPA
must prepare and publish online public
(quarterly and annual) reports using
information that is required to be
submitted by NPDES-regulated facilities
and the State Director (see Appendix A,
40 CFR part 127). EPA will provide
authorized NPDES programs with at
least one year to review and provide
comments on draft versions of the
NNCR prior to their public release.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Enforcement order violations.
These include violations of any
requirement or condition in
administrative or judicial enforcement
orders, other than compliance
construction violations and reporting
violations.
(ii) Compliance construction
violations. These include failure to start
construction, complete construction, or
achieve final compliance within 90 days
after the date established in a permit,
administrative or judicial order, or
regulation.
(iii) Permit effluent limit violations.
These include violations of permit
effluent limits that exceed the ‘‘Criteria
for Category I Permit Effluent Limit
Violations’’ in appendix A to § 123.45.
(iv) Reporting violations. These
include failure to submit a required
report within 30 days after the date
established in a permit, administrative
or judicial order, or regulation. These
reports only include final compliance
schedule progress reports, Discharge
Monitoring Reports (see 40 CFR
122.41(l)(4)(i)), and program reports (see
40 CFR 127.2(f)). In addition, these
violations also include any failure to
comply with the reporting requirements
at 40 CFR 122.41(l)(6).
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Appendix A to § 123.45—Criteria for
Category I Permit Effluent Limit
Violations
This appendix describes the criteria for
reporting Category I violations of NPDES
permit effluent limits in the NPDES
noncompliance report (NNCR) as specified
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section.
Any violation of a NPDES permit is a
violation of the Clean Water Act (CWA) for
which the permittee is liable. As specified in
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, there are two
categories of noncompliance, and the table
below indicates the thresholds for violations
in Category I. An agency’s decision as to
what enforcement action, if any, should be
taken in such cases, shall be based on an
analysis of facts, legal requirements, policy,
and guidance.
Violations of Permit Effluent Limits
The categorization of permit effluent limit
violations depends upon the magnitude and/
or frequency of the violation. Effluent
violations shall be evaluated on a parameterby-parameter and outfall-by-outfall basis. The
criteria for Category I permit effluent limit
violations apply to all Group I and Group II
pollutants and are as follows:
a. Criteria for Category I Violations of
Monthly Average Permit Effluent Limits—
Magnitude and Frequency
Violations of monthly average permit
effluent limits which exceed or equal the
product of the Technical Review Criteria
(TRC) times the permit effluent limit and
occur in any two or more months in a sixmonth period. The TRCs for the two groups
of pollutants are as follows:
• Group I Pollutants (TRC) = 1.4
• Group II Pollutants (TRC) = 1.2
The following is a listing of the Group I
and Group II pollutants.
Group I Pollutants
Oxygen Demand
• Biochemical Oxygen Demand
• Chemical Oxygen Demand
• Total Oxygen Demands
• Total Organic Carbon
• Other
Solids
• Total Suspended Solids (Residues)
• Total Dissolved Solids (Residues)
• Other
Nutrients
• Inorganic Phosphorus Compounds
• Inorganic Nitrogen Compounds
• Other
Detergents and Oils
• MBAS
• NTA
• Oil and Grease
• Other detergents or algicides
Minerals
• Calcium
• Chloride
• Fluoride
• Magnesium
• Sodium
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
•
•
•
•
•
•
Inorganic
Potassium
Sulfur
Sulfate
Total Alkalinity
Total Hardness
Other Minerals
PART 127—NPDES ELECTRONIC
REPORTING
• Cyanide
• Total Residual Chlorine
• All organics are Group II except those
specifically listed under Group I.
Group II Pollutants
Metals (all forms)
• Other metals not specifically listed under
Group I
12. The authority citation for part 127
continues to read as follows:
■
Organics
Metals
• Aluminum
• Cobalt
• Iron
• Vanadium
69199
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
b. Criteria for Category I Violations of
Monthly Average Permit Effluent Limits—
Chronic
■
Violations of monthly average permit
effluent limits which are exceeded in any
four or more months in a six-month period.
§ 127.16 Implementation of electronic
reporting requirements for NPDES
permittees, facilities, and entities subject to
this part [see § 127.1(a)].
13. In § 127.16, revise the table in
paragraph (a) to read as follows:
(a) * * *
TABLE 1 TO § 127.16(a)—COMPLIANCE DEADLINES FOR ELECTRONIC SUBMISSIONS OF NPDES INFORMATION
Compliance deadlines for electronic
submissions 1
NPDES information
General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent to discharge (NOIs); Notices of Termination (NOTs); No Exposure Certifications (NOEs); Low Erosivity Waivers (LEWs) and other Waivers] [40 CFR 122.26(b)(15),
122.28, and 122.64].
Discharge Monitoring Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)] ........................................................................................
Biosolids Annual Program Reports [40 CFR part 503] .....................................................................................
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) Annual Program Reports [40 CFR 122.42(e)(4)] ...............
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Program Reports [40 CFR 122.34(d)(3) and 122.42(c)] .....
POTW Pretreatment Program Annual Reports [40 CFR 403.12(i)] ..................................................................
Significant Industrial User Compliance Reports in Municipalities Without Approved Pretreatment Programs
[40 CFR 403.12(e) and (h)].
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and 122.41(m)(3)] ..............................
CWA 316(b) Annual Reports [40 CFR part 125 subparts I, J, and N] ..............................................................
1 EPA
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2016.
December 21, 2016 (when the Regional Administrator is the Director). 2
December 21, 2025 (when the
state, tribe or territory is the authorized NPDES program). 2
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2025.
December 21, 2025.
may approve an alternative compliance deadline for general permit reports and program reports in accordance with § 127.24(e) and (f).
Director is defined in 40 CFR 122.2.
2 Note:
■
14. In § 127.21, revise paragraph (b) to
read as follows:
§ 127.24 Responsibilities regarding review
of waiver requests from NPDES permittees,
facilities, and entities subject to this part
[see § 127.1(a)] and alternative compliance
deadlines.
§ 127.21 Data to be reported electronically
to EPA by states, tribes, and territories.
*
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) States, tribes, and territories that
have received authorization from EPA to
implement the NPDES program must
electronically transfer these data, listed
in § 127.21(a), to EPA within 40 days of
the completed activity or within 40 days
of the receipt of a report from a NPDES
permittee, facility, or entity subject to
this part (see § 127.1(a)). EPA may set an
alternative compliance deadline for data
sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports,
and related data elements (see 40 CFR
127.24) provided this alternative
compliance date does not extend
beyond December 21, 2028.
15. In § 127.24, revise the section
heading and add paragraphs (e) and (f)
to read as follows:
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
*
*
*
*
(e) A state, tribe, or territory that is
designated by EPA as the initial
recipient (see §§ 127.2(b) and 127.27) for
a NPDES data group [as defined in
§ 127.2(c)] may submit a request to EPA
to establish an alternative compliance
deadline for electronic reporting of one
or more general permit reports, program
reports, and related data elements (see
Table 2 to appendix A). A State may
request to establish an alternative
compliance deadline for up to three
years beyond the currently applicable
date but not beyond December 21, 2028.
It is the duty of the authorized NPDES
program to apply for a new alternative
compliance deadline.
(1) The alternative compliance
deadline request shall:
(i) Be submitted to EPA by the
Director, as defined in 40 CFR 122.2;
(ii) Identify each general permit,
program report, and related data
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
elements covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance
deadline(s);
(iii) Identify each facility covered by
the request and the corresponding
alternative compliance deadline(s)
(Note: This only applies if the request
covers some but not all facilities subject
to the general permit or program report
requirement);
(iv) Be submitted at least 120 days
prior to the applicable compliance
deadline in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or
an alternative compliance deadline
previously approved by EPA; and
(v) Provide a rationale for the delay
and enough details (e.g., tasks,
milestones, roles and responsibilities,
necessary resources) to clearly describe
how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for
general permit, program report, and
related data elements covered by the
request.
(2) EPA will review each alternative
compliance deadline request to see if it
provides enough detail to accurately
assess if the state has a reasonable plan
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69200
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
to deploy electronic reporting by the
requested alternative compliance
deadline. EPA will return alternative
compliance deadline requests with
insufficient detail back to the Director
within 30 days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA intends to
approve or deny each complete
alternative compliance deadline request
within 120 days of receipt. EPA will
provide notice to the authorized NPDES
program of EPA’s approval or denial.
The authorized NPDES program may reapply if the initial request is denied by
EPA.
(3) EPA will update its website after
it approves a request to clearly identify
the approved alternative compliance
deadlines for each facility, general
permit report, program report, and
related data elements by authorized
NPDES program. EPA will also post
each alternative compliance deadline
request and the corresponding Agency
approval or denial notice after each
determination. EPA will provide
updated information on its website.
(f) EPA may, as it deems appropriate,
establish an alternative compliance
deadline for electronic reporting and
data sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports,
and related data elements (see Table 2
to appendix A) in one or more
authorized NPDES programs. EPA may
establish an alternative compliance
deadline up to three years beyond the
currently applicable date, but in no
event beyond December 21, 2028.
Separately, EPA will provide notice to
each authorized NPDES program
covered by each alternative compliance
deadline. This notice will detail how
EPA will implement electronic
reporting (when EPA is responsible for
deploying one or more electronic
reporting tools) or how it will receive
data from authorized NPDES programs
(when the authorized NPDES program is
responsible for deploying one or more
electronic reporting tools). EPA will
update its website to clearly identify the
alternative compliance deadlines for
each facility, general permit report,
program report, and related data
elements by authorized NPDES
program. This paragraph does not
change the process for designating the
initial recipient of electronic NPDES
information from NPDES-regulated
facilities. See § 127.27.
■ 16. In appendix A to part 127:
■ a. In table 1, revise the entry for ‘‘9’’;
and
■ b. In table 2:
■ i. Under the center heading ‘‘Basic
Permit Information’’, revise the entries
‘‘Permit Component’’, ‘‘Applicable
Effluent Limitations Guidelines’’,
‘‘NAICS Code’’, and ‘‘NAICS Code
Primary Indicator’’;
■ ii. Under the center heading ‘‘Basic
Permit Information’’, remove the entries
for ‘‘Reportable Noncompliance
Tracking’’ and ‘‘Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date’’;
■ iii. Under the center heading
‘‘Permitted Feature Information’’,
remove the entry for ‘‘Receiving
Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature’’
and add in its place ‘‘Waterbody Name
for Permitted Feature’’;
■ iv. Remove the center heading
‘‘Animal Feeding Operation Information
on NPDES Permit Application or Notice
of Intent’’ and add in its place ‘‘Animal
Feeding Operation Information’’;
■ v. Under the newly revised center
heading ‘‘Animal Feeding Operation
Information’’, remove the entry for
‘‘Facility CAAP Designation’’ and add in
its place ‘‘Facility CAAP Status’’;
■ vi. Under the center heading
‘‘Pretreatment Information on NPDES
Permit Application or Notice of Intent
(this includes permit application data
required for all new and existing
POTWs (40 CFR 122.21(j)(6))’’, remove
the entry for ‘‘Applicable Categorical
Standards’’;
■ vii. Under the center heading
‘‘Cooling Water Intake Information on
NPDES Permit Application or Notice of
Intent’’, revise the entry for ‘‘Source
Water for Cooling Purposes’’;
viii. Remove the center heading
‘‘CWA section 316(a) Thermal Variance
Information on NPDES Permit
Application or Notice of Intent’’ and
add in its place ‘‘NPDES Variance
Information’’;
■ ix. Under the newly revised center
heading ‘‘NPDES Variance
Information’’, remove the entry
‘‘Thermal Variance Request Type’’ and
add in its place ‘‘Variance Type’’ and
remove the entry ‘‘Thermal Variance
Granted Date’’ and add in its place
‘‘Variance Action Date’’;
■ x. Under the newly revised center
heading ‘‘NPDES Variance
Information’’, add entries for ‘‘Variance
Request Version’’, ‘‘Variance Status’’,
and ‘‘Variance Submission Date’’ after
the entry for ‘‘Variance Type’’;
■ xi. Under the center heading
‘‘Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Program Data Generated
from Authorized NPDES Programs and
EPA)’’, revise the entries for
‘‘Deficiencies Identified Through the
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance
Monitoring’’, ‘‘Deficiencies Identified
Through the MS4 Compliance
Monitoring’’, ‘‘Deficiencies Identified
Through the Pretreatment Compliance
Monitoring’’, and ‘‘Deficiencies
Identified Through the Sewer Overflow/
Bypass Compliance Monitoring’’; and
■ xii. Under the center heading
‘‘Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Data Elements Specific to
Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual
Program Reports)’’, remove the entry
‘‘Biosolids or Sewage Sludge—Land
Application or Surface Disposal
Deficiencies’’ and add in its place
‘‘Biosolids or Sewage SludgeViolations’’.
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
■
Appendix A to Part 127—Minimum Set
of NPDES Data
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
TABLE 1—DATA SOURCES AND REGULATORY CITATIONS 1
NPDES data
group No.2
NPDES data group
Program area
Data provider
Minimum frequency 3
*
9 .........................................
*
*
Sewer Overflow/Bypass
Event Reports [40 CFR
122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and
122.41(m)(3)].
*
Sewer Overflows and
Bypass
Events.
*
NPDES Permittee ..
*
*
Within 5 days of the time the permittee becomes aware of the sewer overflow event
(health or environment endangerment);
Monitoring report frequency specific in permit (all other sewer overflow and bypass
events); At least 10-days before the date of
the anticipated bypass; and Within 5-days
of the time the permittee becomes aware of
the unanticipated bypass.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69201
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 1—DATA SOURCES AND REGULATORY CITATIONS 1—Continued
NPDES data
group No.2
*
NPDES data group
*
Program area
*
Minimum frequency 3
Data provider
*
*
*
*
1 Entities
regulated by a NPDES permit will comply with all reporting requirements in their respective NPDES permit.
the ‘‘NPDES Data Group Number’’ in this table and the ‘‘NPDES Data Group Number’’ column in Table 2 of this appendix to identify the
source of the required data entry. EPA notes that electronic systems may use additional data to facilitate electronic reporting as well as management and reporting of electronic data. For example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter their NPDES permit number (‘‘NPDES ID’’—
NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) into the applicable electronic reporting system in order to identify their permit and submit a Discharge Monitoring
Report (DMR—NPDES Data Group 3). Additionally, NPDES regulated entities may be required to enter and submit data to update or correct erroneous data. For example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter new data regarding the Facility Individual First Name and Last Name
(NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) with their DMR submission when there is a facility personnel change.
3 The applicable reporting frequency is specified in the NPDES permit or control mechanism, which may be more frequent than the minimum
frequency specified in this table.
2 Use
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA
Data name
Data description
*
*
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or other citation
*
*
*
*
*
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Basic Permit Information
*
Permit Component ...............
*
*
*
This will identify one or more applicable NPDES subprograms (e.g., pretreatment, CAFO, CSO, POTW,
biosolids/sewage sludge, stormwater) for the permit
record. This field is only required when the permit includes one or more NPDES subprograms. This data
element is also required for unpermitted facilities
when the authorized NPDES programs is required to
share facility, inspection, violation, or enforcement action data regarding these facilities with EPA’s national
NPDES data system.
*
*
*
122.2, 122.21, 122.21(j)(6), 122.21(q), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 1, 2.
123.26, 123.41(a), 123.43(d), 403.10, and 501.19.
*
Applicable Effluent Limitations Guidelines.
*
*
*
This data element will identify the one or more applicable effluent limitations guidelines and new source performance standards for the facility by the corresponding 40 CFR part number (e.g., part 414—Organic chemicals, plastics, and synthetic fibers point
source category, part 433—Metal Finishing point
source category). For Categorical Industrial Users
(CIUs) this data element will track the one or more
applicable categorical standards even when the CIU
is subject to one or more local limits that are more
stringent than the applicable categorical standards.
This data element will also identify if there are no applicable effluent limitations guidelines, new source
performance standards, or categorical standards for
the facility (including Significant Industrial Users
(SIUs)). This data element can be updated by the
Control Authority for SIUs and CIUs through submission of the Pretreatment Program Reports [40 CFR
403.12(i)]. Additionally, the authorized NPDES program can automate the creation of these data
through submission of the Notices of Intent to discharge (NOI) [40 CFR 122.28(b)(2)(ii)].
*
*
*
122.21, 122.21(j)(6), 122.21(q), 122.44, 122.44(j), 1, 2, and 7.
122.28(b)(2)(ii), 403.10(e), 403.10(f), 403.12(i).
*
NAICS Code ........................
*
*
*
The one or more six-digit North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes/descriptions that
represents the economic activity of the facility. This
field is required to be shared with the U.S. EPA when
authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after
the effective date of the 2019 NPDES Applications
and Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019;
84 FR 3324.
*
*
*
40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA SIC/NAICS 1, 2, and 7.
Data Standard, Standard No. EX000022.2, 6 January
2006, Office of Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President, Final Decision on North
American Industry Classification System (62 FR
17288), 403.10(f).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69202
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
Data name
NAICS Code Primary Indicator.
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
Data description
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or other citation
This data element will identify the primary economic activity, NAICS code, of the facility. This data element is
required for electronic data transfer between state
and EPA systems. This field is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021
(i.e., two years after the effective date of the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA SIC/NAICS
Data Standard, Standard No. EX000022.2, 6 January
2006, Office of Management and Budget, Executive
Office of the President, Final Decision on North
American Industry Classification System (62 FR
17288), 403.10(f).
*
*
*
*
*
*
1, 2, and 7.
*
Permitted Feature Information
*
Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature.
*
*
*
The name of the waterbody that is or will likely receive
the discharge from each permitted feature. If the permitted feature is a cooling water intake structure, this
data element is the name of the source water. Authorized NPDES programs can also use this data element to identify the name of the source water for
other intake structures that are permitted features.
*
*
*
*
*
*
122.21, 122.21(f)(9), 122.28(b)(2)(ii) ............................... 1,2.
*
*
*
*
Animal Feeding Operation Information
Facility CAAP Status ............
The unique code/description to indicate whether the facility includes Concentrated Aquatic Animal Production (CAAP) and the CAAP identification method
[e.g., ‘‘Yes (Based on Facility Production Data)’’,
‘‘Yes (Authorized NPDES Program Designation)’’].
This field also applies when an authorized NPDES
program has conducted an on-site inspection of an
aquatic animal production facility and determined that
the facility should not be regulated under the NPDES
permit program [e.g., ‘‘No (Authorized NPDES Program Determination)’’]. This data element only applies to aquatic animal production facilities. This data
element can be automatically generated from production data that is provided by aquatic animal production facilities.
*
*
*
122.21(i)(2), 122.24, 122.25, 122.28(b)(2)(ii) ..................
*
*
*
1,2.
*
Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
*
Source Water for Cooling
Purposes.
*
*
*
The unique code/description that describes the one or
more source water for cooling purpose for each cooling water intake structure [e.g., 1 = Ocean, 2 = Estuary, 3 = Great Lake, 4 = Fresh River, 5 = Lake/Reservoir, 6 = contract or arrangement with an independent supplier (or multiple suppliers)]. Each cooling
water intake structure will have its own ‘‘Permitted
Feature ID’’
*
*
*
*
*
*
122.21(f)(9), 122.21(r), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 125.86, 125.95, 1, 2.
125.136, 401.14 and CWA section 316(b).
*
*
*
*
NPDES Variance Information
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Variance Type ......................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describes the
type for each variance request submitted by the
NPDES-regulated entity [e.g., fundamentally different
factors (CWA Section 301(n)), non-conventional pollutants (CWA Section 301(c) and (g)), water quality
related effluent limitations (CWA Section 302(b)(2)),
thermal discharges (CWA Section 316(a)), discharges
to marine waters (CWA Section 301(h))]. This field is
required to be shared with the U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after
the effective date of the 2019 NPDES Applications
and Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019;
84 FR 3324.
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4700
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41,
subpart H of 125 and CWA section 316(a).
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
1.
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
69203
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
Data name
Data description
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or other citation
Variance Request Version ...
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describe whether
each variance request from the NPDES-regulated entity is a new request, renewal, or a continuance for
variances that do not expire. This field is required to
be shared with the U.S. EPA when authorized
NPDES programs approve NPDES permit coverage
after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two years after the effective
date of the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
The unique code(s)/description(s) that describes the
status for each the variance request submitted by the
NPDES-regulated entity (e.g., pending, approved, denied, withdrawn by NPDES-regulated entity, terminated). This field is required to be shared with the
U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021
(i.e., two years after the effective date of the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
This is the date for each variance request submitted by
the NPDES-regulated entity to the NPDES permitting
authority. The date must be provided in YYYY–MM–
DD format where YYYY is the year, MM is the month,
and DD is the day. This field is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021
(i.e., two years after the effective date of the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program Updates Rule).
See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
This is the date for each variance request when the
NPDES permitting authority approves (grants, renews), denies, or terminates a variance request as
well as the date when the NPDES-regulated entity
withdraws the variance request. For variances that do
not expire, this is the original action date. The date
must be provided in YYYY–MM–DD format where
YYYY is the year, MM is the month, and DD is the
day. This field is required to be shared with the U.S.
EPA when authorized NPDES programs approve
NPDES permit coverage after June 12, 2021 (i.e.,
two years after the effective date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41,
subpart H of 125 and CWA section 316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41,
subpart H of 125 and CWA section 316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41,
subpart H of 125 and CWA section 316(a).
1.
122.21(f)(10), 122.21(j)(1)(ix), 122.28(b)(2)(ii), 123.41,
subpart H of 125 and CWA section 316(a).
1.
Variance Status ....................
Variance Submission Date ..
Variance Action Date ...........
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Program Data Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and EPA)
Deficiencies Identified
Through the Biosolids/
Sewage Sludge Compliance Monitoring.
Deficiencies Identified
Through the MS4 Compliance Monitoring.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Deficiencies Identified
Through the Pretreatment
Compliance Monitoring.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
This is the unique code/description that that identifies
each deficiency in the facility’s biosolids and sewage
sludge program (40 CFR part 503) for each compliance monitoring activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by
the regulatory authority. This data element includes
unique codes to identify when the facility failed to
comply with any applicable permit requirements or
enforcement actions.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies
each deficiency in the MS4’s program to control
stormwater pollution for each compliance monitoring
activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by the regulatory
authority. This data element includes unique codes to
identify when the MS4 failed to comply with any applicable permit requirements or enforcement actions.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies
each deficiency in the POTW’s authorized
pretreatment program for each pretreatment compliance monitoring activity (e.g., inspections, audits) by
the regulatory authority. These unique codes include:
(1) Failure to enforce against pass through and/or interference; (2) failure to submit required reports within
30 days; (3) failure to meet compliance schedule
milestones within 90 days; (4) failure to issue/reissue
control mechanisms to 90% of SIUs within 6 months;
(5) failure to inspect or sample 80% of SIUs within
the past 12 months; and (6) failure to enforce standards and reporting requirements.
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4700
123.26, 123.41(a), and CWA section 308 .......................
1.
123.26, 123.41(a), and CWA section 308 .......................
1.
123.26, 123.41(a), 403.10, and CWA section 308 .........
1.
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69204
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
TABLE 2—REQUIRED NPDES PROGRAM DATA—Continued
NPDES data
group No.
(see Table 1)
Data name
Data description
CWA, regulatory (40 CFR), or other citation
Deficiencies Identified
Through the Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance
Monitoring.
This is the unique code/description that that identifies
each deficiency in the POTW’s control of combined
sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass
events for each compliance monitoring activity (e.g.,
inspections, audits) by the regulatory authority. This
data element includes unique codes to identify when
a POTW has failed to provide 24-hour notification to
the NPDES permitting authority or failed to submit the
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Report within the required 5-day period. This data element also includes
unique codes to identify when the POTW failed to
comply with any applicable long-term CSO control
plan, permit requirements, or enforcement actions.
122.41(h), 122.41(l)(6) and (7), 122.43, 123.26,
123.41(a), and CWA sections 308 and 402(q)(1).
*
*
*
*
*
*
1.
*
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program Reports)
*
Biosolids or Sewage
Sludge—Violations.
*
*
*
This data element is applicable to facilities that use land
application, active surface disposal site (e.g.,
monofills, surface impoundments, lagoons, waste
piles, dedicated disposal sites, and dedicated beneficial use sites), and/or incineration. This data element uses one or more unique codes/descriptions to
identify all violations. This includes violations of additional or more stringent requirements (40 CFR 503.5),
sampling and analysis requirements (40 CFR 503.8),
land application requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart
B), surface disposal requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart C), pathogen and vector attraction reduction requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart D), and incineration requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart E).
*
*
*
*
*
*
503.18, 503.28, 503.48 ................................................... 4.
*
*
*
*
Notes:
(1) The NPDES program authority may pre-populate these data elements and other data elements (e.g., Federal Registry System ID) in the NPDES electronic reporting systems in order to create efficiencies and standardization. For example, the NPDES program authority may configure their electronic reporting system to
automatically generate NPDES IDs for control mechanisms for new facilities reported on a Pretreatment Program Report [40 CFR 403.12(i)]. Additionally, the NPDES
program authority may decide whether to allow NPDES regulated entities to override these pre-populated data.
(2) The data elements in this table conform to the EPA’s policy regarding the application requirements for renewal or reissuance of NPDES permits for discharges
from Phase I municipal separate storm sewer systems (published in the FEDERAL REGISTER on August 6, 1996).
(3) The data elements in this table are also supported by the Office Management and Budget approved permit applications and forms for the NPDES program.
(4) These data will allow EPA and the NPDES program authority to link facilities, compliance monitoring activities, compliance determinations, and enforcement actions. For example, these data will provide several ways to make the following linkages: linking violations to enforcement actions and final orders; linking single event
violations and compliance monitoring activities; linking program reports to DMRs; linking program reports to compliance monitoring activities; and linking enforcement
activities and compliance monitoring activities.
PART 403—GENERAL
PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR
EXISTING AND NEW SOURCES OF
POLLUTION
17. The authority citation for part 403
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
18. In § 403.12, revise paragraphs
(e)(1), (h), and (i) to read as follows:
■
§ 403.12 Reporting requirements for
POTW’s and industrial users.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Any Industrial User subject to a
categorical Pretreatment Standard
(except a Non-Significant Categorical
User as defined in § 403.3(v)(2)), after
the compliance date of such
Pretreatment Standard, or, in the case of
a New Source, after commencement of
the discharge into the POTW, shall
submit to the Control Authority during
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
the months of June and December,
unless required more frequently in the
Pretreatment Standard or by the Control
Authority or the Approval Authority, a
report indicating the nature and
concentration of pollutants in the
effluent which are limited by such
categorical Pretreatment Standards. In
addition, this report shall include a
record of measured or estimated average
and maximum daily flows for the
reporting period for the Discharge
reported in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section except that the Control
Authority may require more detailed
reporting of flows. In cases where the
Pretreatment Standard requires
compliance with a Best Management
Practice (or pollution prevention
alternative), the User shall submit
documentation required by the Control
Authority or the Pretreatment Standard
necessary to determine the compliance
status of the User. At the discretion of
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Control Authority and in
consideration of such factors as local
high or low flow rates, holidays, budget
cycles, etc., the Control Authority may
modify the months during which the
above reports are to be submitted. For
Industrial Users for which EPA or the
authorized state, tribe, or territory is the
Control Authority, as of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted
electronically by the industrial user to
the Control Authority or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b),
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and
40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the Industrial Users for which EPA
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
or the authorized state, tribe, or territory
is the Control Authority may be
required to report electronically if
specified by a particular control
mechanism or if required to do so by
state law.
*
*
*
*
*
(h) Reporting requirements for
Industrial Users not subject to
categorical Pretreatment Standards. The
Control Authority must require
appropriate reporting from those
Industrial Users with Discharges that are
not subject to categorical Pretreatment
Standards. Significant Non-categorical
Industrial Users must submit to the
Control Authority at least once every six
months (on dates specified by the
Control Authority) a description of the
nature, concentration, and flow of the
pollutants required to be reported by the
Control Authority. In cases where a
local limit requires compliance with a
Best Management Practice or pollution
prevention alternative, the User must
submit documentation required by the
Control Authority to determine the
compliance status of the User. These
reports must be based on sampling and
analysis performed in the period
covered by the report, and in
accordance with the techniques
described in 40 CFR part 136 of this
chapter and amendments thereto. This
sampling and analysis may be
performed by the Control Authority in
lieu of the significant non-categorical
Industrial User. For Industrial Users for
which EPA or the authorized state, tribe,
or territory is the Control Authority, as
of December 21, 2025 or an EPAapproved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the
industrial user to the Control Authority
or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR
part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the
Industrial Users for which EPA or the
authorized state, tribe, or territory is the
Control Authority may be required to
report electronically if specified by a
particular control mechanism or if
required to do so by state law.
(i) Annual POTW reports. POTWs
with approved Pretreatment Programs
shall provide the Approval Authority
with a report that briefly describes the
POTW’s program activities, including
activities of all participating agencies, if
more than one jurisdiction is involved
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
in the local program. The report
required by this section shall be
submitted no later than one year after
approval of the POTW’s Pretreatment
Program, and at least annually
thereafter, and must include, at a
minimum, the applicable required data
in appendix A to 40 CFR part 127. The
report required by this section must also
include a summary of changes to the
POTW’s pretreatment program that have
not been previously reported to the
Approval Authority and any other
relevant information requested by the
Approval Authority. As of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
annual reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically by the POTW
Pretreatment Program to the Approval
Authority or initial recipient, as defined
in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40
CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR
part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part
127, the Approval Authority may also
require POTW Pretreatment Programs to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if specified by a
particular permit or if required to do so
by state law.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 503—STANDARDS FOR THE
USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE
SLUDGE
19. The authority citation for part 503
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Sections 405 (d) and (e) of the
Clean Water Act, as amended by Pub. L. 95–
217, sec. 54(d), 91 Stat. 1591 (33 U.S.C. 1345
(d) and (e)); and Pub. L. 100–4, title IV, sec.
406 (a), (b), 101 Stat., 71, 72 (33 U.S.C. 1251
et seq.).
■
20. Revise § 503.18 to read as follows:
§ 503.18
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in § 501.2 of this
chapter) with a design flow rate equal to
or greater than one million gallons per
day, and POTWs that serve 10,000
people or more shall submit a report on
February 19 of each year. As of
December 21, 2016, all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the operator to EPA when the
Regional Administrator is the Director
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and
40 CFR part 127. Otherwise, as of
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
69205
December 21, 2025, or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance
with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in
all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3),
40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40
CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see
Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director
may also require operators to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if required to do so
by State law.
(a) The information in § 503.17(a),
except the information in
§ 503.17(a)(3)(ii), (a)(4)(ii) and in
(a)(5)(ii), for the appropriate
requirements on February 19 of each
year.
(b) The information in
§ 503.17(a)(5)(ii)(A) through (G) on
February 19th of each year when 90
percent or more of any of the
cumulative pollutant loading rates in
Table 2 of § 503.13 is reached at a land
application site.
■
21. Revise § 503.28 to read as follows:
§ 503.28
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in 40 CFR 501.2)
with a design flow rate equal to or
greater than one million gallons per day,
and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or
more shall submit a report on February
19 of each year. As of December 21,
2016, all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the operator
to EPA when the Regional
Administrator is the Director in
compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. Otherwise,
as of December 21, 2025, or an EPAapproved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically in compliance
with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40
CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR
part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements
for electronic reporting. Prior to the
compliance deadlines for electronic
reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR
127.16), the Director may also require
operators to electronically submit
annual reports under this section if
required to do so by state law.
■
22. Revise § 503.48 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
69206
§ 503.48
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 212 / Monday, November 2, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities,
POTWs (as defined in § 501.2 of this
chapter) with a design flow rate equal to
or greater than one million gallons per
day, and POTWs that serve a population
of 10,000 people or greater shall submit
a report on February 19 of each year. As
of December 21, 2016, all reports
submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically
by the operator to EPA when the
Regional Administrator is the Director
in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases,
subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. Otherwise,
as of December 21, 2025, or an EPAapproved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all reports submitted in
compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically in compliance
with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic
reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see
Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the Director
may also require operators to
electronically submit annual reports
under this section if required to do so
by state law.
[FR Doc. 2020–21446 Filed 10–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Bureau of Land Management
43 CFR Part 8340
[LLWO430000.L12200000.XM0000.20x 24
1A]
RIN 1004–AE72
Increasing Recreational Opportunities
Through the Use of Electric Bikes
Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Bureau of Land
Management (BLM) is amending its offroad vehicle (ORV) regulations to add a
definition for electric bikes (e-bikes)
and, where certain criteria are met and
an authorized officer expressly
determines through a formal decision
that e-bikes should be treated the same
as non-motorized bicycles, expressly
exempt those e-bikes from the definition
of ORV. The regulatory change
effectuated by this rule has the potential
to facilitate increased recreational
opportunities for all Americans,
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:00 Oct 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
especially those with physical
limitations, and could encourage
additional enjoyment of lands and
waters managed by the BLM.
DATES: This final rule is effective on
December 2, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Britta Nelson, National Conservation
Lands and Community Partnerships,
303–236–0539. Persons who use a
telecommunications device for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339, 24
hours a day, 7 days a week, to leave a
message or question with the previously
mentioned point of contact. You will
receive a reply during normal business
hours.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
(SO) 3376 to address regulatory
uncertainty regarding how agencies
within the Department of the Interior
(DOI) manage e-bikes. Specifically, SO
3376 sets forth the general policy of the
DOI that e-bikes should be allowed
where non-motorized types of bicycles
are allowed and not allowed where nonmotorized types of bicycles are
prohibited. SO 3376 directs the BLM to
revise its ORV regulations at 43 CFR
8340.0–5 to be consistent with SO 3376.
The Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service, and National Park
Service are also revising their
regulations for consistency with SO
3376.
I. Background
II. Discussion of the Final Rule and
Comments on the Proposed Rule
III. Procedural Matters
The BLM published a proposed rule
on April 10, 2020 (85 FR 20229),
soliciting public comments for 60 days.
During the comment period, the BLM
received almost 24,000 submissions
from members of the public, including
senior citizens, avid cyclists, hikers,
equestrians and equestrian associations,
and cycling organizations and
manufacturers, as well as state and local
governments. Each public comment was
considered in the development of the
final rule. Many comments were
supportive of the proposed rule, with
some expressing support for increased
opportunities for people to ride e-bikes
on public lands and for e-bikes to be
treated similarly to traditional, nonmotorized bikes by land managers. The
BLM also received comments that were
critical of the proposed rule. Some of
these comments expressed concern over
potential user conflicts or resource
damage that may result from allowing ebikes on roads and trails that are
currently closed to ORVs. Meanwhile,
some comments expressed a desire for
consistency in the management of ebikes across different agencies.
In the proposed rule, the BLM
requested information from the public
on the potential social and physical
impacts of e-bike use on public lands.
Studies and reports were provided in
conjunction with many of the comments
and cover a variety of topics, such as
safety, hazards, health benefits, user
conflict, attitudes and perceptions, elk
behavior, soil displacement, speed
comparisons, impacts to grizzly bears,
snowmobiles, impacts to wildlife,
impacts of roads, strategic planning,
crash likelihood, and battery
flammability. While some studies and
reports address e-bikes specifically,
others do not. Many studies extrapolate
their findings to e-bike use,
management, and effects. The BLM
I. Background
The Federal Land Policy and
Management Act (FLPMA) directs the
BLM to manage public lands for
multiple use and sustained yield (unless
otherwise provided by law) and to
provide for outdoor recreation (43
U.S.C. 1702). Many visitors ride bicycles
on BLM-managed public lands.
Improvements in bicycle technology
have made bicycling an option for more
people and have made public lands
more accessible to cyclists. One bicycle
design modification growing in
popularity is the addition of a small
electric motor that provides power
assistance to the rider and reduces the
physical exertion required. Electric
bicycles (also known as e-bikes) are
available in an ever-expanding range of
design types (urban commuter, full
suspension mountain, fat-tire, gear
hauler bikes, etc.) and electric assist
capabilities (limited by speed, wattage,
output algorithms, etc.). E-bikes are
commonly used in different capacities,
such as transportation and recreation.
By reducing the physical demand
associated with bicycling, e-bikes
expand recreational opportunities for
the public, including for people with
limitations stemming from age, illness,
disability, or fitness, and in more
challenging environments, such as high
altitudes or mountainous terrain. The
presence of a small electric motor on ebikes, however, has created uncertainty
about whether e-bikes should be treated
in the same manner as other types of
non-motorized bicycles or as ORVs
subject to the BLM’s regulations at 43
CFR part 8340.
On August 29, 2019, the Secretary of
the Interior issued Secretary’s Order
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
II. Discussion of the Final Rule and
Comments on the Proposed Rule
E:\FR\FM\02NOR1.SGM
02NOR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 212 (Monday, November 2, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 69189-69206]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21446]
[[Page 69189]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Parts 9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and 503
[EPA-HQ-OECA-2019-0408; FRL-10015-08-OECA]
RIN 2020-AA52
NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule--Phase 2 Extension
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is publishing this
final rule to postpone the compliance deadlines for implementation of
Phase 2 of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)
Electronic Reporting Rule (``NPDES eRule''). The NPDES eRule requires
EPA and states to modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting. This final
rule also provides states with additional flexibility to request
additional time as needed. Further, this final rule promulgates
clarifying changes to the NPDES eRule and eliminates some duplicative
or outdated reporting requirements. Taken together, these changes are
designed to save the NPDES authorized programs considerable resources,
make reporting easier for NPDES-regulated entities, streamline permit
renewals, ensure full exchange of NPDES program data between states and
EPA, enhance public transparency, improve environmental decision-
making, and protect human health and the environment.
DATES: The final rule is effective on January 4, 2021. In accordance
with 40 CFR part 23, this regulation shall be considered issued for
purposes of judicial review at 1 p.m. Eastern time on November 16,
2020. The start dates for electronic reporting are provided in 40 CFR
127.16.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID
No. EPA-HQ-OECA-2019-0408. All documents in the docket are listed on
the www.regulations.gov website. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business
information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by
statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not
placed on the internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy
form. Out of an abundance of caution for members of the public and our
staff, the EPA Docket Center and Reading Room was closed to public
visitors on March 31, 2020, to reduce the risk of transmitting COVID-
19. Our Docket Center staff will continue to provide remote customer
service via email, phone, and webform. For further information on EPA
Docket Center services and the current status, please visit us online
at https://www.epa.gov/dockets. The telephone number for the Public
Reading Room is (202) 566-1744.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For additional information, please
contact Mr. Carey A. Johnston, Office of Compliance (mail code 2222A),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue NW,
Washington, DC 20460; telephone number: 202-566-1014; or email:
[email protected] (preferred). Also see the following website for
additional information regarding the rulemaking: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/npdes-ereporting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
How is this document organized?
The outline of this document follows the following format:
I. General Information
II. Background
III. Postponement of Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
VI. Assistance To States to Implement Phase 2
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. General Information
A. Does this action apply to me?
Entities potentially affected by this action include all NPDES-
permitted facilities, whether covered by an individual permit or
general permit, industrial users located in cities without approved
local pretreatment programs, facilities subject to EPA's biosolids
regulations, and governmental entities that have received NPDES program
authorization or are implementing portions of the NPDES program in a
cooperative agreement with EPA. These entities include:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Category Examples of regulated entities
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facilities seeking coverage under Publicly-owned treatment works
an individual NPDES permits, (POTW) facilities, treatment works
general permit, or subject to a treating domestic sewage (TWTDS),
NPDES inspection. municipalities, counties,
stormwater management districts,
state-operated facilities,
Federally-operated facilities,
industrial facilities, construction
sites, and concentrated animal
feeding operations (CAFOs).
Industrial users located in cities Industrial facilities discharging to
without approved local POTWs and for which the designated
pretreatment programs. pretreatment Control Authority is
EPA or the authorized state, tribe,
or territory rather than an
approved local pretreatment
program.
POTWs and other facilities subject Class I sludge management facilities
to EPA's biosolids regulations. (as defined in 40 CFR 503.9(c)),
POTWs with a design flow rate equal
to or greater than one million
gallons per day, and POTWs that
serve 10,000 people or more.
State and territorial governments. States and territories that have
received NPDES program
authorization from EPA, that are
implementing portions of the NPDES
program in a cooperative agreement
with EPA, or that operate NPDES-
permitted facilities.
Tribal governments................ Tribes that have received NPDES
program authorization from EPA,
that are implementing portions of
the NPDES program in a cooperative
agreement with EPA, or that operate
NPDES-permitted facilities.
Federal government................ Federal facilities with a NPDES
permit and EPA Regional Offices
acting for those states, tribes,
and territories that do not have
NPDES program authorization or that
do not have program authorization
for a particular NPDES subprogram
(e.g., biosolids or pretreatment).
------------------------------------------------------------------------
This table is not intended to be an exhaustive list, but rather
provides some examples of the types of entities potentially regulated
by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this table may
also be regulated. If you have questions regarding the applicability of
this final action to a particular entity, consult the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
B. What action is the agency taking?
EPA published the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDES) Electronic Reporting Rule (``NPDES eRule'') on October 22,
2015. The 2015 rule required EPA and states to
[[Page 69190]]
modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting for municipalities,
industries and other facilities. The rule divided implementation into
two ``Phases.'' The deadline for Phase 1 implementation passed on
December 21, 2016. The deadline for Phase 2 was initially scheduled for
December 21, 2020. Some state authorized NPDES programs provided
feedback to EPA on how to improve Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES
eRule and, in particular, have recommended changes to the schedule for
Phase 2 implementation to allow both EPA and states sufficient time to
develop and implement the information technology solutions necessary
for electronic reporting of the Phase 2 data (see DCN 0001 to 0009).
EPA published a proposed rule to solicit comment on postponing the
compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation as well as other
changes to the NPDES eRule to allow for a smoother transition from
paper to electronic reporting for the NPDES program (see February 28,
2020; 85 FR 11909). EPA received comments from seven states, one state
association, and one anonymous commenter. The final rule addresses
these comments and postpones the compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation of the NPDES eRule. This final rule also provides states
with additional flexibility to request additional time as needed.
Further, this final rule promulgates clarifying changes to the NPDES
eRule and eliminates some duplicative or outdated reporting
requirements.
C. What is the agency's authority for taking this action?
Pursuant to the Clean Water Act (CWA), 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule, which added a new part to title 40 (40 CFR
part 127) and made changes to existing NPDES regulations. The EPA
promulgated the NPDES eRule under authority of the CWA sections 101(f),
304(i), 308, 402, and 501. EPA is using the same authority to finalize
changes to the NPDES eRule. EPA notes that the Congressional
Declaration of Goals and Policy of the CWA specifies in section 101(f)
that ``It is the national policy that to the maximum extent possible
the procedures utilized for implementing this chapter shall encourage
the drastic minimization of paperwork and interagency decision
procedures, and the best use of available manpower and funds, so as to
prevent needless duplication and unnecessary delays at all levels of
government.''
Harnessing information technology that is now a common part of
daily life is an important step toward reaching the goals of the CWA.
EPA is promulgating this rule under the authority of CWA section
304(i), which authorizes EPA to establish minimum procedural and other
elements of state programs under section 402, including reporting
requirements and procedures to make information available to the
public. In addition, EPA is promulgating this rule under section 308 of
the CWA. Section 308 of the CWA authorizes EPA to require access to
information necessary to carry out the objectives of the Act, including
sections 301, 305, 306, 307, 311, 402, 404, 405, and 504. Section 402
of the CWA establishes the NPDES permit program for the control of the
discharge of pollutants into the nation's waters. Specifically, CWA
sections 402(b) and (c) require each authorized state, tribe, or
territory to ensure that permits meet certain substantive requirements,
and provide EPA information from point sources, industrial users, and
authorized programs in order to ensure proper oversight. Finally, EPA
is promulgating this rule under the authority of section 501, which
authorizes EPA to prescribe such regulations as are necessary to carry
out provisions of the Act.
D. What are the incremental costs and benefits of this action?
EPA identified only minimal incremental costs of this final rule as
the overall impact of these changes allow states to more efficiently
implement the NPDES eRule. EPA is postponing the compliance deadlines
for Phase 2 implementation by five years and providing states with
additional flexibility to request an extension if more time is
necessary but with no extension allowed beyond December 21, 2028 (see
Section IV of this preamble).
This rule also finalizes changes to the NPDES eRule that clarify
existing requirements and eliminate some duplicative or outdated
reporting requirements. For example, this rule eliminates three data
elements from the minimum set of NPDES program data (Appendix A to 40
CFR part 127): Reportable Noncompliance Tracking, Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date, and Applicable Categorical
Standards. These changes will reduce the costs to authorized NPDES
programs in collecting, managing, and sharing these data. EPA also
anticipates that the clarifications contained in this final rule will
help states avoid unnecessary implementation costs. For example, the
final rule makes clear that the electronic reporting requirement for
Notices of Termination (NOTs) applies only to general permit covered
facilities (see Table 1 to Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127) and not to
individually permitted facilities.
II. Background
EPA published the NPDES eRule on 22 October 2015. The 2015 rule
required EPA and states to modernize Clean Water Act (CWA) reporting
for municipalities, industries and other facilities. The rule replaced
most paper-based NPDES reporting requirements with electronic
reporting. The rule converted the following paper reports to
electronic: (1) Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs); (2) general permit
reports (e.g., Notices of Intent to discharge in compliance with a
general permit); and (3) other specified program reports. The NPDES
eRule included a phased implementation schedule (40 CFR 127.26). Most
states and permittees have successfully implemented Phase 1 of the
NPDES eRule, which includes electronic submission of DMRs and the
Federal Biosolids Annual Report where EPA is the Regulatory Authority.
The NPDES eRule requires EPA to calculate electronic reporting
participation rates for each authorized NPDES program six months after
the deadline for conversion from paper to electronic submissions and
annually thereafter [see 40 CFR 127.26(j)]. The compliance deadlines
for Phase 1 of the NPDES eRule were 21 December 2016 and included NPDES
Data Groups No. 3 (Discharge Monitoring Reports or ``DMRs'') and No. 4
[Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program Reports, where EPA implements
the biosolids program (40 CFR part 503)]. EPA's first three assessments
have shown considerable progress in Phase 1 implementation (see DCN
0012--0014), although more work needs to be done to achieve the full
benefits of Phase 1. Current tracking of Phase 1 implementation is
available through the ``NPDES eRule Readiness Dashboard.'' See: https://echo.epa.gov/trends/npdes-erule-dashboard-public. EPA recognizes that
there are a number of states who have not fully implemented Phase 1.
Given that EPA is today postponing the Phase 2 deadlines, EPA is
committed to focusing additional attention to ensure that it is
receiving all Phase 1 data. There are a number of mechanisms that EPA
can use to ensure it receives all Phase 1 data. EPA has been working
with states, providing in-kind technical assistance and Exchange
Network grant funding (see https://www.epa.gov/exchangenetwork/exchange-network-grant-program). In addition, EPA could use the initial
recipient procedure to expedite the conversion to electronic reporting
for DMRs (see 40 CFR 127.27). The initial recipient procedure allows
[[Page 69191]]
EPA to direct NPDES permittees to use EPA's electronic reporting tools
for one or more NPDES data groups if the authorized NPDES program
cannot fully meet the requirements to be an initial recipient.
Electronic submission of all other reports and notices covered by
the NPDES eRule are part of Phase 2 implementation. See Table 1 to 40
CFR 127.16. The online ``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard''
provides an inventory of all general permits and program reports
covered by the NPDES eRule. See: https://edap.epa.gov/public/extensions/eRule_Phase2/eRule_Phase2.html. This dashboard also provides
an updated view of EPA's progress in gathering information and
deploying NPDES electronic reporting tools for Phase 2 general permits
and program reports (see DCN 0015).
EPA and states are now focusing on implementing Phase 2 of the
NPDES eRule and continuing their work on implementing Phase 1. EPA and
states are now gathering information and deploying NPDES electronic
reporting tools for Phase 2 reports. EPA and states are collaborating
and sharing information through multiple workgroups. EPA used these
workgroups to provide states with more information on Phase 2
implementation. See: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/data-entry-guidance-and-technical-papers. The EPA-state General Permit and Program
Report Technical Workgroup meets monthly and focuses on the EPA
Regional and state general permits and program reports that will use
EPA's NPDES Electronic Reporting Tool (NeT) for Phase 2 data. The EPA-
state NPDES Noncompliance Report (NNCR) workgroup is discussing how to
identify, categorize, sort, and display violations on the NNCR. This
workgroup is discussing how best to implement the new NNCR regulations
in 40 CFR 123.45.
EPA received letters from authorized NPDES programs on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES eRule. The letters
recommended changes to the schedule for Phase 2 implementation to allow
both EPA and states sufficient time to develop and implement the
information technology solutions necessary for electronic reporting of
the Phase 2 data (see DCN 0001 to 0009).
In response to the feedback from the states in the letters and oral
communications, EPA proposed changes to the NPDES eRule to allow for a
smoother transition from paper to electronic reporting for the NPDES
program (see February 28, 2020; 85 FR 11909). EPA received comments on
the proposal from seven states, one state association, and one
anonymous commenter. The final rule addresses these comments and
postpones the compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation period of
the NPDES eRule. This final rule also provides states with additional
flexibility to request additional time as needed. Further, this final
rule promulgates clarifying changes to the NPDES eRule and eliminates
some duplicative or outdated reporting requirements.
Finally, in a separate rulemaking, EPA has finalized updates to the
minimum set of NPDES program data (Appendix A to 40 CFR part 127) for
the municipal separate storm sewer systems (MS4s) sector. See April 15,
2020; 85 FR 20873. These changes to the NPDES eRule correct obsolete
citations and previous inconsistencies with the newly modified MS4
Phase II regulations. See December 8, 2016; 81 FR 89320. These updates
do not change the burden associated with complying with the NPDES eRule
but, rather, these changes assist permitting authorities and MS4
permittees in implementing NPDES electronic reporting.
III. Postponement of Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
A. Phase 2 Implementation Deadline
This final rule postpones the compliance deadlines for Phase 2
implementation of the NPDES eRule from December 21, 2020, to December
21, 2025 (see Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16). EPA received comments from
seven authorized NPDES programs and one state association on how to
improve Phase 2 implementation of the NPDES eRule (see Document Nos:
EPA-HQ-OECA-2019-0408-0022 through 0029; available at https://www.regulations.gov).
The comments were generally supportive of the proposed rule and
requested more time for Phase 2 implementation than the three-year
extension in the proposed rule. The Association of Clean Water
Administrators (ACWA) and other states requested that, ``EPA should
invest the necessary resources to complete the ICIS-NPDES updates and
to meet all NeT/NetDMR commitment obligations to allow states and EPA
to meet the new deadlines . . . States are also very interested in
engaging with EPA to identify and prioritize important areas for
updating/enhancing ICIS-NPDES.'' ACWA and other states noted their
appreciation for EPA's financial support through the Exchange Network
Grant Program. They also requested that EPA make additional dedicated
grant funding available to States for NPDES eRule implementation. ACWA
also expressed appreciation for the continuing opportunities to
participate on workgroups associated with NPDES eRule implementation.
ACWA and state commenters recommended that EPA extend the Phase 2
compliance deadlines for Phase 2 implementation by five years instead
of the proposed three years. ACWA noted that it does not believe that
three years will be adequate time to complete all the necessary work,
especially with the current COVID-19 crisis undermining the efficiency
of some of this work over the next six to twelve months. Iowa noted
that the postponement of the compliance deadline will allow states and
tribes to explore more cost-effective options for electronic reporting.
ACWA also suggested an alternative proposal that would set the Phase 2
compliance deadline to be three years after EPA completes the necessary
upgrades to its national NPDES data system to enable receipt of Phase 2
data.
The final rule provides EPA and states with five additional years
to implement Phase 2. This timeframe responds to state comments for
more time and addresses concerns about the potential delays due to the
COVID-19 pandemic response. In addition, extending the Phase 2
compliance deadline by two additional years will provide EPA and
authorized NPDES programs with additional time to complete the
development of electronic tools. Maintaining a fixed date rather than
tying the deadline to completion of certain electronic reporting
solutions can help prioritize resources and focus attention on the
tasks necessary for the conversion to electronic reporting.
In addition to postponing the Phase 2 compliance deadlines to
December 21, 2025, EPA is adding a reference to the alternative Phase 2
compliance deadlines provisions at 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f). This is
discussed in more detail below. Other than the changes to the Phase 2
compliance deadlines and the addition of the reference to the
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadlines provisions, EPA is not making
any other changes to the requirements in these sections.
B. Deadline for Public Release of NNCR
EPA proposed to delay the public release date of the NNCR by one
year, to December 21, 2022. EPA noted in the preamble to the proposed
rule that this date will allow EPA and states to use the new NNCR as
EPA is making decisions on its next round of National Compliance
Initiatives. See: https://
[[Page 69192]]
www.epa.gov/enforcement/national-compliance-initiatives. EPA further
explained that it would only be able to provide Phase 1 data in the
NNCR initially and would need to modify the NNCR as Phase 2 data
becomes available.
ACWA on behalf of several states recommended that public release of
the NNCR (both Phase 1 and Phase 2) be delayed until known data quality
issues are resolved.
In response, EPA has added regulatory language that explicitly
creates separate deadlines for the public release of the NNCR using
Phase 1 data (December 2022) and Phase 2 data (one year after the draft
report is made available to states but no later than December 2026).
The NNCR public release dates for Phase 2 data would be phased in over
time to give states at least one year to review and provide comments on
draft versions of the NNCR that incorporates Phase 2 data before EPA
releases a new version to the public. EPA will provide states with an
informal notice whenever a new draft version of the NNCR using Phase 2
data is ready for their review and comment. This will help EPA and
states identify and fix data quality and data sharing issues. The
deadline for issuance of the version of the NNCR that incorporates all
Phase 2 data will be December 2026, i.e., one year after revised
deadline for implementation of Phase 2 (similar to the approach in the
2015 NPDES eRule).
Phase 1 data are already provided to the public through ECHO, so
even if data quality issues exist, the public already has access to
Phase 1 data, which includes noncompliance data. EPA does not think it
is necessary to delay public release of the NNCR for Phase 1 beyond
December 2022. As previously noted, EPA and states have made
significant progress in implementing Phase 1 and EPA has held frequent
meetings with states on how to develop the NNCR and improve data
sharing between EPA and authorized NPDES programs. EPA will continue to
help states improve their compliance with the data sharing requirements
in the NPDES eRule for Phase 1 data. In particular, EPA has provided
technical support to authorized states to resolve data sharing problems
and has developed a series of online dashboards to identify missing or
inaccurate Phase 1 data and track improvements in Phase 1 data sharing.
The benefit of this approach will be to give EPA, states, and the
public a complete inventory of facilities with violations based on the
most currently available set of NPDES program data. This will help EPA
and states identify noncompliance issues that might impact human health
or the environment.
IV. Alternative Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines
In addition to postponing the Phase 2 compliance deadlines, EPA is
adding two regulatory provisions that create additional flexibility for
Phase 2 compliance. These two new provisions respond to the requests
from ACWA and from authorized NPDES programs for more time to develop
and implement the information technology solutions necessary for
electronic reporting of the Phase 2 data.
The first regulatory provision [40 CFR 127.24(e)] allows authorized
NPDES programs to request additional time beyond December 21, 2025 to
implement Phase 2 of the NPDES eRule. Under this provision, an
authorized NPDES program must send a request to EPA for review and
approval. This request must identify the facilities, general permits,
program reports, or data elements for which the authorized NPDES
program needs additional time beyond December 21, 2025. For example, a
state may seek approval from EPA to postpone implementation of
electronic reporting for a NPDES general permit until an agreed-upon
time after December 21, 2025, but no later than December 21, 2028. EPA
estimates that no authorized state will need more time than that fixed
date, which is thirteen years after the effective date of the 2015
NPDES eRule. This waiver might be helpful if a state has a permit or
program report that is a lower priority for electronic reporting (e.g.,
a general permit that provides coverage for 10 or fewer NPDES-regulated
entities) and for which electronic reporting tool development is
delayed.
While states may make multiple requests for compliance deadline
extensions beyond December 21, 2025, EPA will not grant extensions
beyond December 21, 2028. Under today's rule, each alternative Phase 2
compliance deadline request must:
Be submitted to EPA by the Director, as defined in 40 CFR
122.2;
Identify each general permit, program report, and related
data elements covered by the request and the corresponding alternative
compliance deadline(s);
Identify each facility covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance deadline(s) (Note: This only
applies if the request covers some but not all facilities covered by
the relevant general permit or program report requirement);
Be submitted at least 120 days prior to the then-
applicable compliance deadline(s) in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or a
previously EPA approved alternative compliance deadline; and
Provide a rationale for the delay and enough details
(e.g., tasks, milestones, roles and responsibilities, necessary
resources) to clearly describe how the program will successfully
implement electronic reporting for the general permit, program report,
and related data elements covered by the request.
EPA will review each alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
request to determine if it provides enough detail to accurately assess
if the state has a reasonable plan to deploy electronic reporting by
the requested alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline. EPA will return
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline requests with insufficient
detail back to the Director within 30 days of receipt and provide
recommendations. EPA intends to approve or deny each complete
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline request within 120 days of
receipt of a sufficiently detailed request. EPA will provide notice to
the authorized NPDES program of EPA's approval or denial. The
authorized NPDES program may re-apply if the initial request is denied
by EPA.
EPA may elect to deny an alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
request and then continue to follow the procedure in the existing rule
for determining the initial recipient of electronic NPDES information
(see 40 CFR 127.27). EPA must become the initial recipient of
electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities if the
state, tribe, or territory does not consistently maintain electronic
data transfers in compliance with the NPDES eRule [see 40 CFR
127.27(d)(2)]. EPA will update its website with each alternative Phase
2 compliance deadline request and the corresponding Agency approval or
denial notice. EPA will provide updated information at: https://www.epa.gov/compliance/npdes-ereporting. EPA will also update its
website and online ``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard'' to
clearly identify the approved alternative Phase 2 compliance deadlines
for each facility, general permit report, program report, and related
data elements by authorized NPDES program.
The second regulatory provision [40 CFR 127.24(f)] authorizes EPA
to, on its own initiative, allow for additional time for one or more
authorized NPDES programs (states and EPA Regions) to implement NPDES
electronic reporting beyond December 21, 2025. Under this provision,
EPA may establish an
[[Page 69193]]
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline for electronic reporting and
data sharing for one or more facilities, general permit reports,
program reports, and related data elements (see Table 2 to Appendix A
to 40 CFR part 127). Use of this provision may be necessary if EPA has
not yet deployed the required electronic reporting tool (when EPA is
responsible for building the tool) or if EPA has not yet deployed the
protocols and systems for authorized NPDES programs to share one or
more data elements with EPA (when the state is responsible for building
the tool or generating the data). Under the provision, EPA may set an
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline for up to three years but not
beyond December 21, 2028. EPA will update its website and online
``NPDES eRule Phase 2 Implementation Dashboard'' to clearly identify
the alternative Phase 2 compliance deadlines for each facility, general
permit report, program report, and related data elements by authorized
NPDES program.
Separately, EPA will provide notice to the one or more authorized
NPDES programs covered by each alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline
through an email or letter. This EPA notice will detail how EPA will
implement electronic reporting (when EPA is responsible for deploying
one or more electronic reporting tools) or how EPA will receive data
from authorized NPDES programs (when the state is responsible for
deploying one or more electronic reporting tools). This section of the
rule does not change the process for designating the initial recipient
of electronic NPDES information from NPDES-regulated facilities (see 40
CFR 127.27). This additional flexibility will also allow more time for
EPA and authorized NPDES programs to resolve any issues related to the
sharing of Phase 2 data.
ACWA and most states requested that EPA remove the prohibition
against further extensions beyond the fixed 3-year date. States cited
the uncertainties ahead with the COVID-19 pandemic response, as well as
concerns that there could be further slippage in EPA's schedule for
updating the ICIS-NPDES data system and developing data collection
tools under EPA's NPDES electronic reporting Tool (``NeT''), whether
related to the pandemic or for other reasons.
The final rule retains the proposed option for a fixed date that is
three years beyond the revised Phase 2 Compliance Deadlines. This means
that EPA can approve extensions up to, but not beyond, December 21,
2028. As previously noted, EPA estimates that no authorized state will
need more time than that fixed date, which is thirteen years after the
effective date of the 2015 NPDES eRule. This approach will help focus
EPA and state efforts on NPDES electronic reporting and help expedite
the benefits of electronic reporting to NPDES-regulated entities.
Finally, the Iowa Department of Natural Resources (Iowa DNR)
commented that the language of the proposed 40 CFR 127.24(f) could be
read to authorize EPA to delay electronic reporting and establish an
implementation schedule for a state without that state's consent. Iowa
recommended in a meeting with EPA that EPA modify the language to make
clear that EPA cannot dictate to states how electronic reporting will
be implemented if the state is meeting the implementation schedule in
the rule (see Table 1, 40 CFR 127.16, and 40 CFR 127.23). See DCN 0027.
In response, EPA clarifies that this new provision does not alter the
approach taken in the 2015 NPDES eRule that gives states the option to
build and deploy one or more electronic reporting tools. EPA does not
dictate to states how electronic reporting will be implemented if the
state is meeting its obligations under the rule (e.g., implementation
schedule, data collection and sharing requirements) and complying with
EPA's Cross-media Electronic Reporting Rule (40 CFR part 3). EPA
modified the language in 40 CFR 127.24(f) to make clear that this
provision does not make any changes to the initial recipient
designation process, which is documented at 40 CFR 127.27.
V. Clarifying Edits for More Efficient Implementation and 2019 NPDES
Updates Rule Changes
EPA solicited comment on several clarifying edits to the 2015 NPDES
eRule (see February 28, 2020; 85 FR 11913). These proposed changes are
intended to clarify and streamline NPDES eRule implementation. EPA
received two comments on these changes.
ACWA noted its support for the ``minor refinements to the NPDES
eReporting Rule to reflect lessons learned over the last five years, to
streamline NPDES eRule implementation, and to clarify several Appendix
A data elements/descriptions, which include a number of suggestions
provided directly by states.'' ACWA also stated that it, ``does not
currently have any further specific recommendations for these
provisions/sections but expects individual states may provide such.
Where appropriate, ACWA can help EPA identify whether such
recommendations are supported by a majority of the states.'' EPA thanks
ACWA for the comment and its offer of help in implementing NPDES
electronic reporting.
An anonymous commenter noted that, ``The proposed rule asks for
both the SIC code and NAICS code to be submitted. Requiring both seems
like an undue burden on the regulated community, given the regulatory
benefit. Since SIC codes are outdated, only NAICS codes should be
required and SIC codes should be optional.'' EPA notes that the comment
on the collection of SIC code data as an ``undue burden on the
regulated community'' is outside the scope of this rulemaking as the
data sharing requirements in this final rule are imposed on the
authorized NPDES programs and not on the regulated community. EPA
established the data sharing requirements on the regulated community in
the 2019 NPDES Applications and Program Updates Final Rule (see 12
February 2019; 84 FR 3324). Authorized NPDES programs must update their
NPDES permit applications to collect four-digit Standard Industrial
Classification (SIC) codes and the six-digit NAICS codes (see 84 FR
3327).
EPA used the NPDES Electronic Reporting Rule--Phase 2 Extension
proposed rule to solicit comment on updates to the minimum set of NPDES
data that authorized NPDES program must share with EPA (see 28 February
2020; 85 FR 11923). EPA proposed that states share these data for both
individual and general permit covered facilities. This would ensure
that there is consistent and complete reporting nationwide of
industrial classification data, which are useful for regulatory
decisions and program oversight. EPA proposed to require states to
share these NAICS code data with EPA when they approve NPDES permit
coverage as this will help lower the implementation costs to states.
Additionally, EPA does not see the continued sharing of these SIC code
data with EPA as undue burden on states. EPA did not receive any
negative comments regarding the burden of these revised data sharing
requirements on authorized NPDES programs.
Additionally, for reason set forth in the proposed rule and in this
preamble to the final rule, EPA is amending the NPDES eRule to
incorporate clarifying changes. The changes adopted in the final rule:
Correct the title for 40 CFR 123.45
Provide greater clarity and specificity for the NNCR Category
I noncompliance definitions
Correct Appendix A deficiency descriptions
[[Page 69194]]
Correct data element name, description, and reference for
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land Application or Surface Disposal
Deficiencies
Correct the title of the ``Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event
Report''
Delete the following two data elements: Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking and Reportable Noncompliance Tracking Start Date
Provide greater clarity for the ``Facility Concentrated
Aquatic Animal Production (CAAP) Status'' data element name and
description
Provide greater clarity on the `Permit Component' data element
with respect to unpermitted facilities
Provide greater clarity on the Notice of Termination (NOT)
electronic reporting requirements
Provide greater clarity on the ``Applicable Effluent
Limitations Guidelines'' data element and delete the duplicative data
element, ``Applicable Categorical Standards''
Provide greater clarity on the ``Receiving Waterbody Name for
Permitted Feature'' data element name and description
Require NAICS Code Data to match the 2019 NPDES Applications
and Program Updates Final Rule
Add Variance Data Elements to Appendix A to match the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program Updates Final Rule
Make two editorial changes to the NNCR language as noted below
Specifically, Arkansas provided suggestions in comments on the
proposed rule to clarify the noncompliance reporting language at
Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45 (see EPA-HQ-OECA-2019-0408-0027). These
comments noted that the criteria for monthly average permit limit
violations for determining Category I noncompliance should be clarified
as lower thresholds. These comments suggested the following clarifying
changes to Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45 (underlined text below are the
suggested additions).
Violations of monthly average permit effluent limits which
exceed or equal the product of the Technical Review Criteria (TRC)
times the permit effluent limit and occur in any two or more months in
a six-month period.
Violations of monthly average permit effluent limits which
are exceeded in any four or more months in a six-month period.
EPA incorporated these changes into Appendix A, 40 CFR 123.45, as they
provide greater clarity on how these criteria currently work as lower
thresholds for triggering Category I noncompliance and represent the
Agency's long-standing interpretation and implementation of these
criteria (see Enforcement Management System: National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (Clean Water Act), Chapter VII, DCN 0028).
VI. Assistance to States To Implement Phase 2
EPA will continue to provide technical assistance and support to
authorized NPDES programs during the transition to electronic
reporting. This includes building electronic reporting tools for
authorized NPDES programs that elect to use these tools and to support
the development of new data transfer protocols. EPA will also provide
states with the data sharing protocols for Phase 2 data prior to
December 21, 2025. EPA will give states enough guidance and training
ahead of this deadline so that states have an orderly means to share
these data with EPA. Authorized NPDES programs can request EPA's
assistance for electronic reporting by submitting a request to
[email protected].
EPA offers authorized programs financial assistance through the
Exchange Network Grant Program. This program provides funding to
states, territories, and federally recognized Indian tribes to support
the development of the National Environmental Information Exchange
Network. The primary outcome expected from Exchange Network assistance
agreements is improved access to, and exchange of, high-quality
environmental data from public and private sector sources. More
information on this program is available at: https://www.epa.gov/exchangenetwork/exchange-network-grant-program.
EPA will continue to work with authorized NPDES programs to
implement NPDES electronic reporting. This includes the use of
workgroups to help authorized NPDES programs share data with EPA and to
provide recommendations on how EPA should build the NNCR. Authorized
NPDES programs can contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to learn how to join these workgroups.
VII. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive
Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review
This action is not a significant regulatory action and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this action is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection activities in this rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
under the PRA. The Information Collection Request (ICR) document that
the EPA prepared has been assigned EPA ICR number 2617.02. You can find
a copy of the ICR in the docket for this rule, and it is briefly
summarized here. The information collection requirements are not
enforceable until OMB approves them.
EPA has primary responsibility for ensuring the CWA's NPDES program
is effectively and consistently implemented nationwide, thus ensuring
that public health and environmental protection goals of the CWA are
met. EPA is taking this action pursuant to CWA sections 101(f), 304(i),
308, 402, and 501. The accurate, complete, and timely information
collected under this ICR will help EPA and states more efficiently
implement the 2015 NPDES eRule. The improved information sharing would
increase transparency and accountability and help EPA and authorized
NPDES programs collaborate and measure progress in implementing the
2015 NPDES eRule. This information collection would provide EPA with
more timely, consistent, and accurate inventory of all general permits
and program reports, the number of facilities that must electronically
submit reports, and the online location of state electronic reporting
tools [see 40 CFR 123.43(d)].
Receiving current high-level data on general permits and program
reports is critical to EPA's ability to oversee and manage authorized
NPDES programs. Authorizing the burden under this ICR will allow EPA to
provide timely assistance to authorized NPDES programs as they
implement the NPDES eRule. The general permits and program reports
inventory will help promote
[[Page 69195]]
efficiencies in NPDES eRule implementation as states will be able to
use this information to identify other states that have already
developed electronic reporting tools and may be able to provide helpful
information or advice.
Respondents/affected entities: This ICR covers the 47 states and
one U.S. Territory authorized to implement the NPDES program.
Respondent's obligation to respond: Mandatory (40 CFR 123.43(d) and
127.24(e)).
Estimated number of respondents: 48.
Frequency of response: EPA estimates that twelve authorized NPDES
programs will provide updated information on general permits and
program reports and the related electronic reporting tools each month.
Additionally, all 48 authorized NPDES programs will conduct an annual
review and update of EPA's inventory. Finally, EPA estimates that
approximately 15 authorized NPDES programs will prepare and submit an
alternative Phase 2 compliance deadline request during the three-year
period covered by the ICR.
Total estimated burden: 416 hours (per year). Burden is defined at
5 CFR 1320.3(b).
Total estimated cost: $25,418 (per year), includes $0 annualized
capital or operation & maintenance costs.
An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for the
EPA's regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. In addition,
the EPA is amending the table in 40 CFR part 9 to list the regulatory
citations for the information collection activities contained in this
final rule.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)
I certify that this action will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities under the RFA. This
action will not impose any requirements on small entities. This action
does not affect small entities as the changes in this action only
directly covers states, tribes, and territories that have NPDES program
authorization. The RFA defines ``small governmental jurisdiction'' as
the government of a city, county, town, township, village, school
district, or special district with a population of less than 50,000 (5
U.S.C. 601(5)). For the purposes of the RFA, States and tribal
governments are not considered small governments. The final rule
indirectly affects NPDES permittees as it postpones the compliance
dates for Phase 2 implementation. Any costs associated with this
postponement are expected to be minimal for each regulatory entity.
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)
This action does not contain an unfunded mandate of $100 million or
more as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538, and does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The changes in this
action help streamline the implementation of the NPDES eRule and
provide states with more flexibility. EPA estimates that the additional
time and flexibility afforded by the changes will help lower the
implementation costs.
F. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
G. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments
This action does not have tribal implications as specified in
Executive Order 13175. This action does not affect small entities as
the changes in this action only cover states, tribes, and territories
that have NPDES program authorization. Currently there are no tribal
governments that are authorized for the NPDES program. Thus, Executive
Order 13175 does not apply to this action.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it is
not economically significant as defined in Executive Order 12866, and
because the EPA does not believe the environmental health or safety
risks addressed by this action present a disproportionate risk to
children. The changes in this action only cover states, tribes, and
territories that have NPDES program authorization.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is
not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)
This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that this action does not have disproportionately
high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority
populations, low-income populations and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). The
changes in this action only cover states, tribes, and territories that
have NPDES program authorization.
L. Congressional Review Act (CRA)
This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule
report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of
the United States. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 9
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
40 CFR Part 122
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous substances, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 123
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Confidential business information, Hazardous substances, Indians-lands,
Intergovernmental relations, Penalties, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control.
40 CFR Part 127
Environmental protection, Administrative practice and procedure,
Automatic data processing, Electronic data processing, Hazardous
substances, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sewage disposal, Waste treatment and disposal, Water
pollution control.
40 CFR Part 403
Environmental protection, Confidential business information,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Waste treatment and disposal,
Water pollution control.
[[Page 69196]]
40 CFR Part 503
Environmental protection, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Sewage disposal.
Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, EPA amends 40 CFR parts
9, 122, 123, 127, 403, and 503 as follows:
PART 9--OMB APPROVALS UNDER THE PAPERWORK REDUCTION ACT
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 135 et seq., 136-136y; 15 U.S.C. 2001,
2003, 2005, 2006, 2601-2671; 21 U.S.C. 331j, 346a, 31 U.S.C. 9701;
33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., 1311, 1313d, 1314, 1318, 1321, 1326, 1330,
1342, 1344, 1345 (d) and (e), 1361; E.O. 11735, 38 FR 21243, 3 CFR,
1971-1975 Comp. p. 973; 42 U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f, 300g,
300g-1, 300g-2, 300g-3, 300g-4, 300g-5, 300g-6, 300j-1, 300j-2,
300j-3, 300j-4, 300j-9, 1857 et seq., 6901-6992k, 7401-7671q, 7542,
9601-9657, 11023, 11048.
0
2. In Sec. 9.1, add an entry for ``127.24'' in numerical order under
the undesignated center heading ``NPDES Electronic Reporting'' to read
as follows:
Sec. 9.1 OMB approvals under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
40 CFR citation OMB control No.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPDES Electronic Reporting
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
127.24 2020-0037
* * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 122--EPA ADMINISTERED PERMIT PROGRAMS: THE NATIONAL POLLUTANT
DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM
0
3. The authority citation for part 122 continues to read as follows:
Authority: The Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
4. In Sec. 122.26, revise paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(C) and (g)(1)(iii) to
read as follows:
Sec. 122.26 Storm water discharges (applicable to State NPDES
programs, see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(15) * * *
(i) * * *
(C) As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved alternative date
(see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all certifications submitted in
compliance with paragraphs (b)(15)(i)(A) and (B) of this section must
be submitted electronically by the owner or operator to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, owners or operators
may be required to report electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(1) * * *
(iii) Submit the signed certification to the NPDES permitting
authority once every five years. As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-
approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
certifications submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the owner or operator to the Director or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, owners or operators
may be required to report electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
5. In Sec. 122.28, revise paragraph (b)(2)(i) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.28 General permits (applicable to State NPDES programs, see
Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(2)(v) and (vi) of this
section, dischargers (or treatment works treating domestic sewage)
seeking coverage under a general permit shall submit to the Director a
notice of intent to be covered by the general permit. A discharger (or
treatment works treating domestic sewage) who fails to submit a notice
of intent in accordance with the terms of the permit is not authorized
to discharge, (or in the case of sludge disposal permit, to engage in a
sludge use or disposal practice), under the terms of the general permit
unless the general permit, in accordance with paragraph (b)(2)(v),
contains a provision that a notice of intent is not required or the
Director notifies a discharger (or treatment works treating domestic
sewage) that it is covered by a general permit in accordance with
paragraph (b)(2)(vi). A complete and timely, notice of intent (NOI), to
be covered in accordance with general permit requirements, fulfills the
requirements for permit applications for purposes of Sec. Sec. 122.6,
122.21, and 122.26. As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all notices of intent
submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the discharger (or treatment works treating domestic
sewage) to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including,
in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR
part 127, discharger (or treatment works treating domestic sewage) may
be required to report electronically if specified by a particular
permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
6. In Sec. 122.34, revise paragraph (d)(3) introductory text to read
as follows:
Sec. 122.34 Permit requirements for regulated small MS4 permits.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(3) Reporting. Unless the permittee is relying on another entity to
satisfy its NPDES permit obligations under Sec. 122.35(a), the
permittee must submit annual reports to the NPDES permitting authority
for its first permit term. For subsequent permit terms, the permittee
must submit reports in year two and four unless the NPDES permitting
authority requires more frequent reports. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or the duly authorized
representative of the small MS4 to the NPDES permitting authority or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40
[[Page 69197]]
CFR part 127, the owner, operator, or the duly authorized
representative of the small MS4 may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law. The report must include:
* * * * *
0
7. In Sec. 122.41, revise paragraphs (l)(6)(i), (l)(7), and (m)(3)(i)
and (ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.41 Conditions applicable to all permits (applicable to State
programs, see Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(l) * * *
(6) * * *
(i) The permittee shall report any noncompliance which may endanger
health or the environment. Any information shall be provided orally
within 24 hours from the time the permittee becomes aware of the
circumstances. A report shall also be provided within 5 days of the
time the permittee becomes aware of the circumstances. The report shall
contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the period of
noncompliance, including exact dates and times), and if the
noncompliance has not been corrected, the anticipated time it is
expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate,
and prevent reoccurrence of the noncompliance. For noncompliance events
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events, these reports must include the data described above
(with the exception of time of discovery) as well as the type of event
(combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events),
type of sewer overflow structure (e.g., manhole, combine sewer overflow
outfall), discharge volumes untreated by the treatment works treating
domestic sewage, types of human health and environmental impacts of the
sewer overflow event, and whether the noncompliance was related to wet
weather. As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved alternative date
(see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports related to combined sewer
overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events submitted in
compliance with this section must be submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including,
in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR
part 127, permittees may be required to electronically submit reports
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events under this section by a particular permit or if required
to do so by state law. The Director may also require permittees to
electronically submit reports not related to combined sewer overflows,
sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events under this section.
* * * * *
(7) Other noncompliance. The permittee shall report all instances
of noncompliance not reported under paragraphs (l)(4), (5), and (6) of
this section, at the time monitoring reports are submitted. The reports
shall contain the information listed in paragraph (l)(6). For
noncompliance events related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary
sewer overflows, or bypass events, these reports shall contain the
information described in paragraph (l)(6) and the applicable required
data in appendix A to 40 CFR part 127. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows,
or bypass events submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part
3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended
to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this
date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, permittees may be required to
electronically submit reports related to combined sewer overflows,
sanitary sewer overflows, or bypass events under this section by a
particular permit or if required to do so by state law. The Director
may also require permittees to electronically submit reports not
related to combined sewer overflows, sanitary sewer overflows, or
bypass events under this section.
* * * * *
(m) * * *
(3) * * *
(i) Anticipated bypass. If the permittee knows in advance of the
need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice, if possible, at least
ten days before the date of the bypass. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
notices submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial recipient,
as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, permittees may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law.
(ii) Unanticipated bypass. The permittee shall submit notice of an
unanticipated bypass as required in paragraph (l)(6) of this section
(24-hour notice). As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved
alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all notices submitted
in compliance with this section must be submitted electronically by the
permittee to the Director or initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR
127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including,
in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127.
40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing requirements for
electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and independent of 40 CFR
part 127, permittees may be required to report electronically if
specified by a particular permit or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
0
8. In Sec. 122.42, revise paragraphs (c) and (e)(4) introductory text
to read as follows:
Sec. 122.42 Additional conditions applicable to specified categories
of NPDES permits (applicable to State NPDES programs, see Sec.
123.25).
* * * * *
(c) Municipal separate storm sewer systems. The operator of a large
or medium municipal separate storm sewer system or a municipal separate
storm sewer that has been designated by the Director under Sec.
122.26(a)(1)(v) must submit an annual report by the anniversary of the
date of the issuance of the permit for such system. As of December 21,
2025 or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)),
all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the owner, operator, or the duly authorized
representative of the MS4 to the Director or initial recipient, as
defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR
part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec. 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the owner, operator, or the duly
authorized representative of the MS4 may be required to report
electronically
[[Page 69198]]
if specified by a particular permit or if required to do so by state
law. The report shall include:
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(4) Annual reporting requirements for CAFOs. The permittee must
submit an annual report to the Director. As of December 21, 2025 or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all annual
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial recipient,
as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by state law. The annual report must include:
* * * * *
0
9. In Sec. 122.64, revise paragraph (c) to read as follows:
Sec. 122.64 Termination of permits (applicable to State programs, see
Sec. 123.25).
* * * * *
(c) Permittees that wish to terminate their permit must submit a
Notice of Termination (NOT) to their permitting authority. If
requesting expedited permit termination procedures, a permittee must
certify in the NOT that it is not subject to any pending State or
Federal enforcement actions including citizen suits brought under State
or Federal law. As of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved alternative
date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all NOTs submitted by general
permit covered facilities in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the permittee to the Director or initial
recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D), Sec.
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo
existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the permittee may be required to report
electronically if specified by a particular permit or if required to do
so by State law.
PART 123--STATE PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS
0
10. The authority citation for part 123 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
11. In Sec. 123.45, revise the section heading, the introductory text,
paragraphs (a)(2)(i) through (iv), and appendix A to Sec. 123.45 to
read as follows:
Sec. 123.45 Noncompliance and program reporting.
As of December 21, 2022, EPA must prepare and publish online public
(quarterly and annual) reports using data from Discharge Monitoring
Reports [40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)], Biosolids Annual Program Reports [40 CFR
part 503] (when the Regional Administrator is the Director), and
information that is required to be submitted by the State Director (see
Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127). As of December 21, 2026, EPA must prepare
and publish online public (quarterly and annual) reports using
information that is required to be submitted by NPDES-regulated
facilities and the State Director (see Appendix A, 40 CFR part 127).
EPA will provide authorized NPDES programs with at least one year to
review and provide comments on draft versions of the NNCR prior to
their public release.
(a) * * *
(2) * * *
(i) Enforcement order violations. These include violations of any
requirement or condition in administrative or judicial enforcement
orders, other than compliance construction violations and reporting
violations.
(ii) Compliance construction violations. These include failure to
start construction, complete construction, or achieve final compliance
within 90 days after the date established in a permit, administrative
or judicial order, or regulation.
(iii) Permit effluent limit violations. These include violations of
permit effluent limits that exceed the ``Criteria for Category I Permit
Effluent Limit Violations'' in appendix A to Sec. 123.45.
(iv) Reporting violations. These include failure to submit a
required report within 30 days after the date established in a permit,
administrative or judicial order, or regulation. These reports only
include final compliance schedule progress reports, Discharge
Monitoring Reports (see 40 CFR 122.41(l)(4)(i)), and program reports
(see 40 CFR 127.2(f)). In addition, these violations also include any
failure to comply with the reporting requirements at 40 CFR
122.41(l)(6).
* * * * *
Appendix A to Sec. 123.45--Criteria for Category I Permit Effluent
Limit Violations
This appendix describes the criteria for reporting Category I
violations of NPDES permit effluent limits in the NPDES
noncompliance report (NNCR) as specified under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)
of this section. Any violation of a NPDES permit is a violation of
the Clean Water Act (CWA) for which the permittee is liable. As
specified in paragraph (a)(2) of this section, there are two
categories of noncompliance, and the table below indicates the
thresholds for violations in Category I. An agency's decision as to
what enforcement action, if any, should be taken in such cases,
shall be based on an analysis of facts, legal requirements, policy,
and guidance.
Violations of Permit Effluent Limits
The categorization of permit effluent limit violations depends
upon the magnitude and/or frequency of the violation. Effluent
violations shall be evaluated on a parameter-by-parameter and
outfall-by-outfall basis. The criteria for Category I permit
effluent limit violations apply to all Group I and Group II
pollutants and are as follows:
a. Criteria for Category I Violations of Monthly Average Permit
Effluent Limits--Magnitude and Frequency
Violations of monthly average permit effluent limits which
exceed or equal the product of the Technical Review Criteria (TRC)
times the permit effluent limit and occur in any two or more months
in a six-month period. The TRCs for the two groups of pollutants are
as follows:
Group I Pollutants (TRC) = 1.4
Group II Pollutants (TRC) = 1.2
The following is a listing of the Group I and Group II
pollutants.
Group I Pollutants
Oxygen Demand
Biochemical Oxygen Demand
Chemical Oxygen Demand
Total Oxygen Demands
Total Organic Carbon
Other
Solids
Total Suspended Solids (Residues)
Total Dissolved Solids (Residues)
Other
Nutrients
Inorganic Phosphorus Compounds
Inorganic Nitrogen Compounds
Other
Detergents and Oils
MBAS
NTA
Oil and Grease
Other detergents or algicides
Minerals
Calcium
Chloride
Fluoride
Magnesium
Sodium
[[Page 69199]]
Potassium
Sulfur
Sulfate
Total Alkalinity
Total Hardness
Other Minerals
Metals
Aluminum
Cobalt
Iron
Vanadium
Group II Pollutants
Metals (all forms)
Other metals not specifically listed under Group I
Inorganic
Cyanide
Total Residual Chlorine
Organics
All organics are Group II except those specifically listed
under Group I.
b. Criteria for Category I Violations of Monthly Average Permit
Effluent Limits--Chronic
Violations of monthly average permit effluent limits which are
exceeded in any four or more months in a six-month period.
PART 127--NPDES ELECTRONIC REPORTING
0
12. The authority citation for part 127 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
13. In Sec. 127.16, revise the table in paragraph (a) to read as
follows:
Sec. 127.16 Implementation of electronic reporting requirements for
NPDES permittees, facilities, and entities subject to this part [see
Sec. 127.1(a)].
(a) * * *
Table 1 to Sec. 127.16(a)--Compliance Deadlines for Electronic
Submissions of NPDES Information
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance deadlines for
NPDES information electronic submissions \1\
------------------------------------------------------------------------
General Permit Reports [Notices of Intent December 21, 2025.
to discharge (NOIs); Notices of
Termination (NOTs); No Exposure
Certifications (NOEs); Low Erosivity
Waivers (LEWs) and other Waivers] [40 CFR
122.26(b)(15), 122.28, and 122.64].
Discharge Monitoring Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2016.
122.41(l)(4)].
Biosolids Annual Program Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2016 (when the
part 503]. Regional Administrator is
the Director). \ 2\
December 21, 2025 (when the
state, tribe or territory
is the authorized NPDES
program). \ 2\
Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation December 21, 2025.
(CAFO) Annual Program Reports [40 CFR
122.42(e)(4)].
Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) December 21, 2025.
Program Reports [40 CFR 122.34(d)(3) and
122.42(c)].
POTW Pretreatment Program Annual Reports December 21, 2025.
[40 CFR 403.12(i)].
Significant Industrial User Compliance December 21, 2025.
Reports in Municipalities Without Approved
Pretreatment Programs [40 CFR 403.12(e)
and (h)].
Sewer Overflow/Bypass Event Reports [40 CFR December 21, 2025.
122.41(l)(4), (6), (7), and 122.41(m)(3)].
CWA 316(b) Annual Reports [40 CFR part 125 December 21, 2025.
subparts I, J, and N].
------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ EPA may approve an alternative compliance deadline for general
permit reports and program reports in accordance with Sec. 127.24(e)
and (f).
\2\ Note: Director is defined in 40 CFR 122.2.
* * * * *
0
14. In Sec. 127.21, revise paragraph (b) to read as follows:
Sec. 127.21 Data to be reported electronically to EPA by states,
tribes, and territories.
* * * * *
(b) States, tribes, and territories that have received
authorization from EPA to implement the NPDES program must
electronically transfer these data, listed in Sec. 127.21(a), to EPA
within 40 days of the completed activity or within 40 days of the
receipt of a report from a NPDES permittee, facility, or entity subject
to this part (see Sec. 127.1(a)). EPA may set an alternative
compliance deadline for data sharing for one or more facilities,
general permit reports, program reports, and related data elements (see
40 CFR 127.24) provided this alternative compliance date does not
extend beyond December 21, 2028.
0
15. In Sec. 127.24, revise the section heading and add paragraphs (e)
and (f) to read as follows:
Sec. 127.24 Responsibilities regarding review of waiver requests from
NPDES permittees, facilities, and entities subject to this part [see
Sec. 127.1(a)] and alternative compliance deadlines.
* * * * *
(e) A state, tribe, or territory that is designated by EPA as the
initial recipient (see Sec. Sec. 127.2(b) and 127.27) for a NPDES data
group [as defined in Sec. 127.2(c)] may submit a request to EPA to
establish an alternative compliance deadline for electronic reporting
of one or more general permit reports, program reports, and related
data elements (see Table 2 to appendix A). A State may request to
establish an alternative compliance deadline for up to three years
beyond the currently applicable date but not beyond December 21, 2028.
It is the duty of the authorized NPDES program to apply for a new
alternative compliance deadline.
(1) The alternative compliance deadline request shall:
(i) Be submitted to EPA by the Director, as defined in 40 CFR
122.2;
(ii) Identify each general permit, program report, and related data
elements covered by the request and the corresponding alternative
compliance deadline(s);
(iii) Identify each facility covered by the request and the
corresponding alternative compliance deadline(s) (Note: This only
applies if the request covers some but not all facilities subject to
the general permit or program report requirement);
(iv) Be submitted at least 120 days prior to the applicable
compliance deadline in Table 1 to 40 CFR 127.16 or an alternative
compliance deadline previously approved by EPA; and
(v) Provide a rationale for the delay and enough details (e.g.,
tasks, milestones, roles and responsibilities, necessary resources) to
clearly describe how the program will successfully implement electronic
reporting for general permit, program report, and related data elements
covered by the request.
(2) EPA will review each alternative compliance deadline request to
see if it provides enough detail to accurately assess if the state has
a reasonable plan
[[Page 69200]]
to deploy electronic reporting by the requested alternative compliance
deadline. EPA will return alternative compliance deadline requests with
insufficient detail back to the Director within 30 days of receipt and
provide recommendations. EPA intends to approve or deny each complete
alternative compliance deadline request within 120 days of receipt. EPA
will provide notice to the authorized NPDES program of EPA's approval
or denial. The authorized NPDES program may re-apply if the initial
request is denied by EPA.
(3) EPA will update its website after it approves a request to
clearly identify the approved alternative compliance deadlines for each
facility, general permit report, program report, and related data
elements by authorized NPDES program. EPA will also post each
alternative compliance deadline request and the corresponding Agency
approval or denial notice after each determination. EPA will provide
updated information on its website.
(f) EPA may, as it deems appropriate, establish an alternative
compliance deadline for electronic reporting and data sharing for one
or more facilities, general permit reports, program reports, and
related data elements (see Table 2 to appendix A) in one or more
authorized NPDES programs. EPA may establish an alternative compliance
deadline up to three years beyond the currently applicable date, but in
no event beyond December 21, 2028. Separately, EPA will provide notice
to each authorized NPDES program covered by each alternative compliance
deadline. This notice will detail how EPA will implement electronic
reporting (when EPA is responsible for deploying one or more electronic
reporting tools) or how it will receive data from authorized NPDES
programs (when the authorized NPDES program is responsible for
deploying one or more electronic reporting tools). EPA will update its
website to clearly identify the alternative compliance deadlines for
each facility, general permit report, program report, and related data
elements by authorized NPDES program. This paragraph does not change
the process for designating the initial recipient of electronic NPDES
information from NPDES-regulated facilities. See Sec. 127.27.
0
16. In appendix A to part 127:
0
a. In table 1, revise the entry for ``9''; and
0
b. In table 2:
0
i. Under the center heading ``Basic Permit Information'', revise the
entries ``Permit Component'', ``Applicable Effluent Limitations
Guidelines'', ``NAICS Code'', and ``NAICS Code Primary Indicator'';
0
ii. Under the center heading ``Basic Permit Information'', remove the
entries for ``Reportable Noncompliance Tracking'' and ``Reportable
Noncompliance Tracking Start Date'';
0
iii. Under the center heading ``Permitted Feature Information'', remove
the entry for ``Receiving Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature'' and
add in its place ``Waterbody Name for Permitted Feature'';
0
iv. Remove the center heading ``Animal Feeding Operation Information on
NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent'' and add in its place
``Animal Feeding Operation Information'';
0
v. Under the newly revised center heading ``Animal Feeding Operation
Information'', remove the entry for ``Facility CAAP Designation'' and
add in its place ``Facility CAAP Status'';
0
vi. Under the center heading ``Pretreatment Information on NPDES Permit
Application or Notice of Intent (this includes permit application data
required for all new and existing POTWs (40 CFR 122.21(j)(6))'', remove
the entry for ``Applicable Categorical Standards'';
0
vii. Under the center heading ``Cooling Water Intake Information on
NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent'', revise the entry for
``Source Water for Cooling Purposes'';
0
viii. Remove the center heading ``CWA section 316(a) Thermal Variance
Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent'' and add
in its place ``NPDES Variance Information'';
0
ix. Under the newly revised center heading ``NPDES Variance
Information'', remove the entry ``Thermal Variance Request Type'' and
add in its place ``Variance Type'' and remove the entry ``Thermal
Variance Granted Date'' and add in its place ``Variance Action Date'';
0
x. Under the newly revised center heading ``NPDES Variance
Information'', add entries for ``Variance Request Version'', ``Variance
Status'', and ``Variance Submission Date'' after the entry for
``Variance Type'';
0
xi. Under the center heading ``Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Program Data Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and
EPA)'', revise the entries for ``Deficiencies Identified Through the
Biosolids/Sewage Sludge Compliance Monitoring'', ``Deficiencies
Identified Through the MS4 Compliance Monitoring'', ``Deficiencies
Identified Through the Pretreatment Compliance Monitoring'', and
``Deficiencies Identified Through the Sewer Overflow/Bypass Compliance
Monitoring''; and
0
xii. Under the center heading ``Compliance Monitoring Activity
Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual
Program Reports)'', remove the entry ``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge--Land
Application or Surface Disposal Deficiencies'' and add in its place
``Biosolids or Sewage Sludge-Violations''.
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Appendix A to Part 127--Minimum Set of NPDES Data
* * * * *
Table 1--Data Sources and Regulatory Citations \1\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Minimum frequency
NPDES data group No.\2\ NPDES data group Program area Data provider \3\
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
9............................ Sewer Overflow/ Sewer Overflows NPDES Permittee......... Within 5 days of the
Bypass Event and Bypass time the permittee
Reports [40 CFR Events. becomes aware of
122.41(l)(4), the sewer overflow
(6), (7), and event (health or
122.41(m)(3)]. environment
endangerment);
Monitoring report
frequency specific
in permit (all
other sewer
overflow and bypass
events); At least
10-days before the
date of the
anticipated bypass;
and Within 5-days
of the time the
permittee becomes
aware of the
unanticipated
bypass.
[[Page 69201]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Entities regulated by a NPDES permit will comply with all reporting requirements in their respective NPDES
permit.
\2\ Use the ``NPDES Data Group Number'' in this table and the ``NPDES Data Group Number'' column in Table 2 of
this appendix to identify the source of the required data entry. EPA notes that electronic systems may use
additional data to facilitate electronic reporting as well as management and reporting of electronic data. For
example, NPDES permittees may be required to enter their NPDES permit number (``NPDES ID''--NPDES Data Group 1
and 2) into the applicable electronic reporting system in order to identify their permit and submit a
Discharge Monitoring Report (DMR--NPDES Data Group 3). Additionally, NPDES regulated entities may be required
to enter and submit data to update or correct erroneous data. For example, NPDES permittees may be required to
enter new data regarding the Facility Individual First Name and Last Name (NPDES Data Group 1 and 2) with
their DMR submission when there is a facility personnel change.
\3\ The applicable reporting frequency is specified in the NPDES permit or control mechanism, which may be more
frequent than the minimum frequency specified in this table.
Table 2--Required NPDES Program Data
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CWA, regulatory (40
Data name Data description CFR), or other NPDES data group
citation No. (see Table 1)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Basic Permit Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Permit Component.............. This will identify one or more 122.2, 122.21, 1, 2.
applicable NPDES subprograms 122.21(j)(6),
(e.g., pretreatment, CAFO, CSO, 122.21(q),
POTW, biosolids/sewage sludge, 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
stormwater) for the permit record. 123.26, 123.41(a),
This field is only required when 123.43(d), 403.10,
the permit includes one or more and 501.19.
NPDES subprograms. This data
element is also required for
unpermitted facilities when the
authorized NPDES programs is
required to share facility,
inspection, violation, or
enforcement action data regarding
these facilities with EPA's
national NPDES data system.
* * * * * * *
Applicable Effluent This data element will identify the 122.21, 122.21(j)(6), 1, 2, and 7.
Limitations Guidelines. one or more applicable effluent 122.21(q), 122.44,
limitations guidelines and new 122.44(j),
source performance standards for 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
the facility by the corresponding 403.10(e), 403.10(f),
40 CFR part number (e.g., part 403.12(i).
414--Organic chemicals, plastics,
and synthetic fibers point source
category, part 433--Metal
Finishing point source category).
For Categorical Industrial Users
(CIUs) this data element will
track the one or more applicable
categorical standards even when
the CIU is subject to one or more
local limits that are more
stringent than the applicable
categorical standards. This data
element will also identify if
there are no applicable effluent
limitations guidelines, new source
performance standards, or
categorical standards for the
facility (including Significant
Industrial Users (SIUs)). This
data element can be updated by the
Control Authority for SIUs and
CIUs through submission of the
Pretreatment Program Reports [40
CFR 403.12(i)]. Additionally, the
authorized NPDES program can
automate the creation of these
data through submission of the
Notices of Intent to discharge
(NOI) [40 CFR 122.28(b)(2)(ii)].
* * * * * * *
NAICS Code.................... The one or more six-digit North 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 1, 2, and 7.
American Industry Classification 122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA
System (NAICS) codes/descriptions SIC/NAICS Data
that represents the economic Standard, Standard
activity of the facility. This No. EX000022.2, 6
field is required to be shared January 2006, Office
with the U.S. EPA when authorized of Management and
NPDES programs approve NPDES Budget, Executive
permit coverage after June 12, Office of the
2021 (i.e., two years after the President, Final
effective date of the 2019 NPDES Decision on North
Applications and Program Updates American Industry
Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 Classification System
FR 3324. (62 FR 17288),
403.10(f).
[[Page 69202]]
NAICS Code Primary Indicator.. This data element will identify the 40 CFR 122.21(f)(3), 1, 2, and 7.
primary economic activity, NAICS 122.28(b)(2)(ii), EPA
code, of the facility. This data SIC/NAICS Data
element is required for electronic Standard, Standard
data transfer between state and No. EX000022.2, 6
EPA systems. This field is January 2006, Office
required to be shared with the of Management and
U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES Budget, Executive
programs approve NPDES permit Office of the
coverage after June 12, 2021 President, Final
(i.e., two years after the Decision on North
effective date of the 2019 NPDES American Industry
Applications and Program Updates Classification System
Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84 (62 FR 17288),
FR 3324. 403.10(f).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Permitted Feature Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Waterbody Name for Permitted The name of the waterbody that is 122.21, 122.21(f)(9), 1,2.
Feature. or will likely receive the 122.28(b)(2)(ii).
discharge from each permitted
feature. If the permitted feature
is a cooling water intake
structure, this data element is
the name of the source water.
Authorized NPDES programs can also
use this data element to identify
the name of the source water for
other intake structures that are
permitted features.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Animal Feeding Operation Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facility CAAP Status.......... The unique code/description to 122.21(i)(2), 122.24, 1,2.
indicate whether the facility 122.25,
includes Concentrated Aquatic 122.28(b)(2)(ii).
Animal Production (CAAP) and the
CAAP identification method [e.g.,
``Yes (Based on Facility
Production Data)'', ``Yes
(Authorized NPDES Program
Designation)'']. This field also
applies when an authorized NPDES
program has conducted an on-site
inspection of an aquatic animal
production facility and determined
that the facility should not be
regulated under the NPDES permit
program [e.g., ``No (Authorized
NPDES Program Determination)''].
This data element only applies to
aquatic animal production
facilities. This data element can
be automatically generated from
production data that is provided
by aquatic animal production
facilities.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cooling Water Intake Information on NPDES Permit Application or Notice of Intent
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Source Water for Cooling The unique code/description that 122.21(f)(9), 1, 2.
Purposes. describes the one or more source 122.21(r),
water for cooling purpose for each 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
cooling water intake structure 125.86, 125.95,
[e.g., 1 = Ocean, 2 = Estuary, 3 = 125.136, 401.14 and
Great Lake, 4 = Fresh River, 5 = CWA section 316(b).
Lake/Reservoir, 6 = contract or
arrangement with an independent
supplier (or multiple suppliers)].
Each cooling water intake
structure will have its own
``Permitted Feature ID''
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NPDES Variance Information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Variance Type................. The unique code(s)/description(s) 122.21(f)(10), 1.
that describes the type for each 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
variance request submitted by the 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
NPDES-regulated entity [e.g., 123.41, subpart H of
fundamentally different factors 125 and CWA section
(CWA Section 301(n)), non- 316(a).
conventional pollutants (CWA
Section 301(c) and (g)), water
quality related effluent
limitations (CWA Section
302(b)(2)), thermal discharges
(CWA Section 316(a)), discharges
to marine waters (CWA Section
301(h))]. This field is required
to be shared with the U.S. EPA
when authorized NPDES programs
approve NPDES permit coverage
after June 12, 2021 (i.e., two
years after the effective date of
the 2019 NPDES Applications and
Program Updates Rule). See
February 12, 2019; 84 FR 3324.
[[Page 69203]]
Variance Request Version...... The unique code(s)/description(s) 122.21(f)(10), 1.
that describe whether each 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
variance request from the NPDES- 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
regulated entity is a new request, 123.41, subpart H of
renewal, or a continuance for 125 and CWA section
variances that do not expire. This 316(a).
field is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when authorized
NPDES programs approve NPDES
permit coverage after June 12,
2021 (i.e., two years after the
effective date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates
Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84
FR 3324.
Variance Status............... The unique code(s)/description(s) 122.21(f)(10), 1.
that describes the status for each 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
the variance request submitted by 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
the NPDES-regulated entity (e.g., 123.41, subpart H of
pending, approved, denied, 125 and CWA section
withdrawn by NPDES-regulated 316(a).
entity, terminated). This field is
required to be shared with the
U.S. EPA when authorized NPDES
programs approve NPDES permit
coverage after June 12, 2021
(i.e., two years after the
effective date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates
Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84
FR 3324.
Variance Submission Date...... This is the date for each variance 122.21(f)(10), 1.
request submitted by the NPDES- 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
regulated entity to the NPDES 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
permitting authority. The date 123.41, subpart H of
must be provided in YYYY-MM-DD 125 and CWA section
format where YYYY is the year, MM 316(a).
is the month, and DD is the day.
This field is required to be
shared with the U.S. EPA when
authorized NPDES programs approve
NPDES permit coverage after June
12, 2021 (i.e., two years after
the effective date of the 2019
NPDES Applications and Program
Updates Rule). See February 12,
2019; 84 FR 3324.
Variance Action Date.......... This is the date for each variance 122.21(f)(10), 1.
request when the NPDES permitting 122.21(j)(1)(ix),
authority approves (grants, 122.28(b)(2)(ii),
renews), denies, or terminates a 123.41, subpart H of
variance request as well as the 125 and CWA section
date when the NPDES-regulated 316(a).
entity withdraws the variance
request. For variances that do not
expire, this is the original
action date. The date must be
provided in YYYY-MM-DD format
where YYYY is the year, MM is the
month, and DD is the day. This
field is required to be shared
with the U.S. EPA when authorized
NPDES programs approve NPDES
permit coverage after June 12,
2021 (i.e., two years after the
effective date of the 2019 NPDES
Applications and Program Updates
Rule). See February 12, 2019; 84
FR 3324.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Program Data Generated from Authorized NPDES Programs and EPA)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deficiencies Identified This is the unique code/description 123.26, 123.41(a), and 1.
Through the Biosolids/Sewage that that identifies each CWA section 308.
Sludge Compliance Monitoring. deficiency in the facility's
biosolids and sewage sludge
program (40 CFR part 503) for each
compliance monitoring activity
(e.g., inspections, audits) by the
regulatory authority. This data
element includes unique codes to
identify when the facility failed
to comply with any applicable
permit requirements or enforcement
actions.
Deficiencies Identified This is the unique code/description 123.26, 123.41(a), and 1.
Through the MS4 Compliance that that identifies each CWA section 308.
Monitoring. deficiency in the MS4's program to
control stormwater pollution for
each compliance monitoring
activity (e.g., inspections,
audits) by the regulatory
authority. This data element
includes unique codes to identify
when the MS4 failed to comply with
any applicable permit requirements
or enforcement actions.
Deficiencies Identified This is the unique code/description 123.26, 123.41(a), 1.
Through the Pretreatment that that identifies each 403.10, and CWA
Compliance Monitoring. deficiency in the POTW's section 308.
authorized pretreatment program
for each pretreatment compliance
monitoring activity (e.g.,
inspections, audits) by the
regulatory authority. These unique
codes include: (1) Failure to
enforce against pass through and/
or interference; (2) failure to
submit required reports within 30
days; (3) failure to meet
compliance schedule milestones
within 90 days; (4) failure to
issue/reissue control mechanisms
to 90% of SIUs within 6 months;
(5) failure to inspect or sample
80% of SIUs within the past 12
months; and (6) failure to enforce
standards and reporting
requirements.
[[Page 69204]]
Deficiencies Identified This is the unique code/description 122.41(h), 1.
Through the Sewer Overflow/ that that identifies each 122.41(l)(6) and (7),
Bypass Compliance Monitoring. deficiency in the POTW's control 122.43, 123.26,
of combined sewer overflows, 123.41(a), and CWA
sanitary sewer overflows, or sections 308 and
bypass events for each compliance 402(q)(1).
monitoring activity (e.g.,
inspections, audits) by the
regulatory authority. This data
element includes unique codes to
identify when a POTW has failed to
provide 24-hour notification to
the NPDES permitting authority or
failed to submit the Sewer
Overflow/Bypass Event Report
within the required 5-day period.
This data element also includes
unique codes to identify when the
POTW failed to comply with any
applicable long-term CSO control
plan, permit requirements, or
enforcement actions.
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance Monitoring Activity Information (Data Elements Specific to Sewage Sludge/Biosolids Annual Program
Reports)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Biosolids or Sewage Sludge-- This data element is applicable to 503.18, 503.28, 503.48 4.
Violations. facilities that use land
application, active surface
disposal site (e.g., monofills,
surface impoundments, lagoons,
waste piles, dedicated disposal
sites, and dedicated beneficial
use sites), and/or incineration.
This data element uses one or more
unique codes/descriptions to
identify all violations. This
includes violations of additional
or more stringent requirements (40
CFR 503.5), sampling and analysis
requirements (40 CFR 503.8), land
application requirements (40 CFR
503, Subpart B), surface disposal
requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart
C), pathogen and vector attraction
reduction requirements (40 CFR
503, Subpart D), and incineration
requirements (40 CFR 503, Subpart
E).
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
(1) The NPDES program authority may pre-populate these data elements and other data elements (e.g., Federal
Registry System ID) in the NPDES electronic reporting systems in order to create efficiencies and
standardization. For example, the NPDES program authority may configure their electronic reporting system to
automatically generate NPDES IDs for control mechanisms for new facilities reported on a Pretreatment Program
Report [40 CFR 403.12(i)]. Additionally, the NPDES program authority may decide whether to allow NPDES
regulated entities to override these pre-populated data.
(2) The data elements in this table conform to the EPA's policy regarding the application requirements for
renewal or reissuance of NPDES permits for discharges from Phase I municipal separate storm sewer systems
(published in the Federal Register on August 6, 1996).
(3) The data elements in this table are also supported by the Office Management and Budget approved permit
applications and forms for the NPDES program.
(4) These data will allow EPA and the NPDES program authority to link facilities, compliance monitoring
activities, compliance determinations, and enforcement actions. For example, these data will provide several
ways to make the following linkages: linking violations to enforcement actions and final orders; linking
single event violations and compliance monitoring activities; linking program reports to DMRs; linking program
reports to compliance monitoring activities; and linking enforcement activities and compliance monitoring
activities.
PART 403--GENERAL PRETREATMENT REGULATIONS FOR EXISTING AND NEW
SOURCES OF POLLUTION
0
17. The authority citation for part 403 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.
0
18. In Sec. 403.12, revise paragraphs (e)(1), (h), and (i) to read as
follows:
Sec. 403.12 Reporting requirements for POTW's and industrial users.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
(1) Any Industrial User subject to a categorical Pretreatment
Standard (except a Non-Significant Categorical User as defined in Sec.
403.3(v)(2)), after the compliance date of such Pretreatment Standard,
or, in the case of a New Source, after commencement of the discharge
into the POTW, shall submit to the Control Authority during the months
of June and December, unless required more frequently in the
Pretreatment Standard or by the Control Authority or the Approval
Authority, a report indicating the nature and concentration of
pollutants in the effluent which are limited by such categorical
Pretreatment Standards. In addition, this report shall include a record
of measured or estimated average and maximum daily flows for the
reporting period for the Discharge reported in paragraph (b)(4) of this
section except that the Control Authority may require more detailed
reporting of flows. In cases where the Pretreatment Standard requires
compliance with a Best Management Practice (or pollution prevention
alternative), the User shall submit documentation required by the
Control Authority or the Pretreatment Standard necessary to determine
the compliance status of the User. At the discretion of the Control
Authority and in consideration of such factors as local high or low
flow rates, holidays, budget cycles, etc., the Control Authority may
modify the months during which the above reports are to be submitted.
For Industrial Users for which EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or
territory is the Control Authority, as of December 21, 2025 or an EPA-
approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports
submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the industrial user to the Control Authority or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the Industrial Users
for which EPA
[[Page 69205]]
or the authorized state, tribe, or territory is the Control Authority
may be required to report electronically if specified by a particular
control mechanism or if required to do so by state law.
* * * * *
(h) Reporting requirements for Industrial Users not subject to
categorical Pretreatment Standards. The Control Authority must require
appropriate reporting from those Industrial Users with Discharges that
are not subject to categorical Pretreatment Standards. Significant Non-
categorical Industrial Users must submit to the Control Authority at
least once every six months (on dates specified by the Control
Authority) a description of the nature, concentration, and flow of the
pollutants required to be reported by the Control Authority. In cases
where a local limit requires compliance with a Best Management Practice
or pollution prevention alternative, the User must submit documentation
required by the Control Authority to determine the compliance status of
the User. These reports must be based on sampling and analysis
performed in the period covered by the report, and in accordance with
the techniques described in 40 CFR part 136 of this chapter and
amendments thereto. This sampling and analysis may be performed by the
Control Authority in lieu of the significant non-categorical Industrial
User. For Industrial Users for which EPA or the authorized state,
tribe, or territory is the Control Authority, as of December 21, 2025
or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the industrial user to the Control Authority or
initial recipient, as defined in 40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with
this section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to
part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not
intended to undo existing requirements for electronic reporting. Prior
to this date, and independent of 40 CFR part 127, the Industrial Users
for which EPA or the authorized state, tribe, or territory is the
Control Authority may be required to report electronically if specified
by a particular control mechanism or if required to do so by state law.
(i) Annual POTW reports. POTWs with approved Pretreatment Programs
shall provide the Approval Authority with a report that briefly
describes the POTW's program activities, including activities of all
participating agencies, if more than one jurisdiction is involved in
the local program. The report required by this section shall be
submitted no later than one year after approval of the POTW's
Pretreatment Program, and at least annually thereafter, and must
include, at a minimum, the applicable required data in appendix A to 40
CFR part 127. The report required by this section must also include a
summary of changes to the POTW's pretreatment program that have not
been previously reported to the Approval Authority and any other
relevant information requested by the Approval Authority. As of
December 21, 2025 or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR
127.24(e) or (f)), all annual reports submitted in compliance with this
section must be submitted electronically by the POTW Pretreatment
Program to the Approval Authority or initial recipient, as defined in
40 CFR 127.2(b), in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to this date, and
independent of 40 CFR part 127, the Approval Authority may also require
POTW Pretreatment Programs to electronically submit annual reports
under this section if specified by a particular permit or if required
to do so by state law.
* * * * *
PART 503--STANDARDS FOR THE USE OR DISPOSAL OF SEWAGE SLUDGE
0
19. The authority citation for part 503 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Sections 405 (d) and (e) of the Clean Water Act, as
amended by Pub. L. 95-217, sec. 54(d), 91 Stat. 1591 (33 U.S.C. 1345
(d) and (e)); and Pub. L. 100-4, title IV, sec. 406 (a), (b), 101
Stat., 71, 72 (33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq.).
0
20. Revise Sec. 503.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 503.18 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in Sec.
501.2 of this chapter) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than
one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more
shall submit a report on February 19 of each year. As of December 21,
2016, all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically by the operator to EPA when the Regional
Administrator is the Director in compliance with this section and 40
CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR
122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. Otherwise, as of December 21, 2025, or an
EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all
reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the
Director may also require operators to electronically submit annual
reports under this section if required to do so by State law.
(a) The information in Sec. 503.17(a), except the information in
Sec. 503.17(a)(3)(ii), (a)(4)(ii) and in (a)(5)(ii), for the
appropriate requirements on February 19 of each year.
(b) The information in Sec. 503.17(a)(5)(ii)(A) through (G) on
February 19th of each year when 90 percent or more of any of the
cumulative pollutant loading rates in Table 2 of Sec. 503.13 is
reached at a land application site.
0
21. Revise Sec. 503.28 to read as follows:
Sec. 503.28 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in 40 CFR
501.2) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than one million
gallons per day, and POTWs that serve 10,000 people or more shall
submit a report on February 19 of each year. As of December 21, 2016,
all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically by the operator to EPA when the Regional Administrator
is the Director in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. Otherwise, as of December 21, 2025, or an EPA-
approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or (f)), all reports
submitted in compliance with this section must be submitted
electronically in compliance with this section and 40 CFR part 3
(including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the
Director may also require operators to electronically submit annual
reports under this section if required to do so by state law.
0
22. Revise Sec. 503.48 to read as follows:
[[Page 69206]]
Sec. 503.48 Reporting.
Class I sludge management facilities, POTWs (as defined in Sec.
501.2 of this chapter) with a design flow rate equal to or greater than
one million gallons per day, and POTWs that serve a population of
10,000 people or greater shall submit a report on February 19 of each
year. As of December 21, 2016, all reports submitted in compliance with
this section must be submitted electronically by the operator to EPA
when the Regional Administrator is the Director in compliance with this
section and 40 CFR part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to 40 CFR
part 3), 40 CFR 122.22, and 40 CFR part 127. Otherwise, as of December
21, 2025, or an EPA-approved alternative date (see 40 CFR 127.24(e) or
(f)), all reports submitted in compliance with this section must be
submitted electronically in compliance with this section and 40 CFR
part 3 (including, in all cases, subpart D to part 3), 40 CFR 122.22,
and 40 CFR part 127. 40 CFR part 127 is not intended to undo existing
requirements for electronic reporting. Prior to the compliance
deadlines for electronic reporting (see Table 1 in 40 CFR 127.16), the
Director may also require operators to electronically submit annual
reports under this section if required to do so by state law.
[FR Doc. 2020-21446 Filed 10-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P