Revisions to Publication Requirements for Community Eligibility Status Information Under the National Flood Insurance Program, 68782-68790 [2020-23970]
Download as PDF
68782
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
§ 170.505 Requirements during
applications to protect handlers, workers,
and other persons.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
*
*
*
*
*
(b) Suspending applications. (1) Any
handler performing a pesticide
application must immediately suspend
the pesticide application if any worker
or other person is in an application
exclusion zone described in
§ 170.405(a)(1) that is within the
boundaries of the agricultural
establishment or the area specified in
column B of the Table in
§ 170.405(b)(4), except for:
(i) Appropriately trained and
equipped handlers involved in the
application,
(ii) Persons not employed by the
establishment in an area subject to an
easement that prevents the agricultural
employer from temporarily excluding
those persons from that area, and
(iii) The owner(s) of the agricultural
establishment and members of their
immediate families who remain inside
closed buildings, housing, or shelters on
the establishment, provided that the
handlers have been expressly instructed
by the owner(s) of the agricultural
establishment that only immediate
family members remain inside those
closed buildings, housing, or shelters
and that the application should proceed
despite the presence of the owner(s) or
their immediate family members inside
those closed buildings, housing, or
shelters.
(2) A handler must not resume a
suspended pesticide application while
any workers or other persons remain in
an application exclusion zone described
in § 170.405(a)(1) that is within the
boundaries of the agricultural
establishment or the area specified in
column B of the Table in
§ 170.405(b)(4), except for:
(i) Appropriately trained and
equipped handlers involved in the
application,
(ii) Persons not employed by the
establishment in an area subject to an
easement that prevents the agricultural
employer from temporarily excluding
those persons from that area, and
(iii) The owner(s) of the agricultural
establishment and members of their
immediate families who remain inside
closed buildings, housing, or shelters on
the establishment, provided that the
handlers have been expressly instructed
by the owner(s) of the agricultural
establishment that only immediate
family members remain inside those
closed buildings, housing, or shelters
and that the application should proceed
despite the presence of the owner(s) or
their immediate family members inside
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
those closed buildings, housing, or
shelters.
*
*
*
*
*
6. Amend § 170.601 by revising
paragraph (a)(1) to read as follows:
■
§ 170.601
(a) * * *
(1) On any agricultural establishment
where a majority of the establishment is
owned by one or more members of the
same immediate family, the owner(s) of
the establishment (and, where specified
below, certain handlers) are not
required to provide the protections of
the following provisions to themselves
or members of their immediate family
when they are performing handling
activities or tasks related to the
production of agricultural plants that
would otherwise be covered by this part
on their own agricultural establishment.
(i) Section 170.309(c).
(ii) Section 170.309(f) through (j).
(iii) Section 170.311.
(iv) Section 170.401.
(v) Section 170.403.
(vi) Sections 170.405(a)(2) and
170.505(b), but only in regard to
owner(s) of the establishment and their
immediate family members who remain
inside closed buildings, housing, or
shelters on the establishment. This
exception also applies to handlers
(regardless of whether they are
immediate family members) who have
been expressly instructed by the
owner(s) of the establishment that:
(A) Only the owner(s) or their
immediate family members remain
inside the closed building, housing, or
shelter on the establishment, and
(B) The application should proceed
despite the presence of the owner(s) or
their immediate family members
remaining inside the closed buildings,
housing, or shelters on the
establishment.
(vii) Section 170.409.
(viii) Sections 170.411 and 170.509.
(ix) Section 170.501.
(x) Section 170.503.
(xi) Section 170.505(c) and (d).
(xii) Section 170.507(c) through (e).
(xiii) Section 170.605(a) through (c),
and (e) through (j).
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–23411 Filed 10–29–20; 8:45 am]
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Federal Emergency Management
Agency
44 CFR Parts 59 and 64
Exemptions.
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
[Docket ID FEMA–2019–0016]
RIN 1660–AA92
Revisions to Publication Requirements
for Community Eligibility Status
Information Under the National Flood
Insurance Program
Federal Emergency
Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
This final rule modernizes
regulations regarding publication
requirements of community eligibility
status information under the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). FEMA
is replacing outdated regulations that
require publication of community loss
of eligibility notices in the Federal
Register with a requirement that FEMA
publish this information on the internet
or by another comparable method.
FEMA is also replacing its requirement
that the agency maintain a list of
communities eligible for flood insurance
in the Code of Federal Regulations with
a requirement that FEMA publish this
list on the internet or by another
comparable method.
DATES: This rule is effective December 2,
2020.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this
rulemaking is available for inspection
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at
https://www.regulations.gov and can be
viewed by following that website’s
instructions.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Adrienne Sheldon, Supervisory
Emergency Management Specialist,
Floodplain Management Division,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation
Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 400 C Street SW,
Washington, DC 20472,
adriennel.sheldon@fema.dhs.gov, (202)
674–1087.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Discussion of the
Rule
The National Flood Insurance Act of
1968, as amended (NFIA), Title 42 of the
United States Code (U.S.C.) 4001 et seq.,
authorizes the Administrator of FEMA
to establish and carry out the National
Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) to
enable interested persons to purchase
insurance against loss resulting from
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
physical damage to or loss of property
arising from floods in the United
States.1 Under the NFIA, FEMA may
only grant flood insurance to properties
within communities that have adopted
and that enforce adequate land use and
control measures that regulate
floodplains.2 The statute authorizes
FEMA to develop land use criteria
consistent with requirements laid out in
the NFIA and to encourage the adoption
and enforcement of State and local
measures implementing those criteria.3
FEMA floodplain management
regulations governing community
eligibility for participation in the NFIP
are located at 44 CFR parts 59, 60, and
64.
FEMA regulations at 44 CFR 60.3,
60.4, and 60.5 contain land use
measures for floodplain management. If
a community fails to demonstrate to
FEMA that it meets these requirements,
or decided to withdraw from the NFIP,
FEMA may initiate probation,
suspension, or withdrawal procedures
as described in 44 CFR 59.24. In the
case of a loss of eligibility, for instance
if a community is suspended for failing
to enforce its floodplain regulations,
FEMA notifies the community of the
upcoming loss directly and gives the
community an opportunity to correct
the deficiency that triggered the
procedures. In cases of loss of eligibility,
FEMA publishes a notice of the
upcoming loss of eligibility in the
Federal Register as required by 44 CFR
59.24.
NFIP regulations at 44 CFR 64.6
provide a list of communities where the
sale of flood insurance under the NFIP
is authorized as set forth in Subpart B,
‘‘Eligibility Requirements,’’ to part 59 of
the regulations. Due to the large number
of communities eligible for flood
insurance and the relative frequency to
changes to community eligibility,
maintaining a list of communities in
FEMA’s regulations is not feasible;
however, FEMA meets this requirement
by publishing the updated list of
communities through periodic final
rules in the Federal Register. FEMA last
published an updated list in the Federal
Register in August 2006.
On February 12, 2020, FEMA
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (85 FR 7902)
proposing to make two changes to its
regulations regarding publication
requirements of community eligibility
status information under the NFIP. The
NPRM proposed to replace outdated
regulations that require publication of
1 See
42 U.S.C. 4011(a).
42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1).
3 See 42 U.S.C. 4102(c).
2 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
community loss of eligibility notices in
the Federal Register with a requirement
that FEMA publish the information on
the internet or other comparable
method. The NPRM also proposed to
replace the requirement that the agency
maintain a list of communities eligible
for flood insurance in the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) with a
requirement that FEMA publish this list
on the internet or other comparable
method. The NPRM explained FEMA
would transition to the new form of
publication by first publishing brief
notices monthly in the Federal Register
for six months after the effective date of
the final rule.
The NPRM solicited public comment
on these proposed changes. FEMA
received six comments related to the
rulemaking. In this final rule, FEMA
adopts the changes it proposed in the
NPRM, with clarifications in
consideration of the related comments.
FEMA describes these changes below.
II. Summary and Discussion of Public
Comments
Of the six comments FEMA received
related to this rulemaking, five were
generally in support of the proposed
changes in the NPRM and one was
neutral. Three members of the public
[FEMA–2019–0016–0003, FEMA–2019–
1660–0007, and FEMA–2019–0016–
0002] expressed their support for the
rule generally. One member of the
public [FEMA–2019–0016–0003] stated
she was supportive of the move to an
online notification process and also of
the proposed transition period in the
NPRM while another member of the
public [FEMA–2019–1660–0007]
expressed support for the changes and
noted that the NRPM aligned with OMB
M–19–21 regarding a transition to
electronic records and other such
Federal Government initiatives. A third
member of the public [FEMA–2019–
0016–0002] expressed general support
for the changes. The Association of State
Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) [FEMA–
2016–0016–0006] expressed support for
the changes, as did the Massachusetts
Department of Conservation and
Recreation [FEMA–2019–1600–0004].
A. The Community Status Book (CSB)
Three commenters provided feedback
on the use of the CSB. One anonymous
commenter [FEMA–2019–0016–0005]
stated a need to include communities
that are not mapped in a Special Flood
Hazard Area (SFHA) and not
participating in the NFIP in the CSB.
The commenter opined that the absence
of these communities from the list of
communities not participating in the
NFIP created confusion for everyday
PO 00000
Frm 00067
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68783
users and required them to reach out to
additional resources which undermines
the cost savings proposed in the rule.
FEMA respectfully disagrees with the
commenter. The statute requires FEMA
to develop minimum floodplain
management criteria to ‘‘(1) constrict the
development of land which is exposed
to flood damage where appropriate, (2)
guide the development of proposed
construction away from locations which
are threatened by flood hazards, (3)
assist in reducing damage caused by
floods, and (4) otherwise improve the
long-range land management and use of
flood-prone areas.’’ 4 FEMA is required
to focus NFIP floodplain management
efforts on communities with flood-prone
or special flood hazard areas. Consistent
with the statutory requirement, the CSB
provides a list of those communities
participating in the NFIP and those
communities not participating in the
NFIP when those communities are in a
currently mapped flood risk area. Some
communities that do not have special
flood hazard areas may still participate
in the NFIP. The statutory language
allows any state or area (or subdivision
thereof) to participate if they have
expressed an interest in participating
and have adopted the required land use
and control measures ‘‘consistent with
the comprehensive criteria for land
management and use’’ required by the
statute and regulatory framework.5 Such
participation is voluntary and those
communities are captured in the CSB as
participating communities. It would be
impractical and inappropriate for FEMA
to include communities that are not in
special flood hazard areas that are not
participating in the NFIP program in the
CSB. Including those communities in
the CSB would not be consistent with
its purpose—to provide the status of
those communities participating in the
NFIP. ASFPM [FEMA–2019–0016–0006]
requested that FEMA develop a second
tool to compare to the CSB to determine
which communities are eligible,
providing a mechanism for users to find
communities not otherwise found in the
CSB. As explained above, if a
community is eligible and participating,
the community is listed as a
participating community in the CSB. If
the community is suspended from
participating in the NFIP, that
community is also listed in the CSB as
a community not participating in the
NFIP along with other communities that
contain identified flood hazard areas
that have either withdrawn from or have
not yet participated in the NFIP. The
NFIP is a voluntary program. FEMA
4 42
5 42
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
U.S.C. 4102.
U.S.C. 4012.
30OCR1
68784
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
would not have knowledge of those
communities that do not contain special
flood hazard areas and would otherwise
be eligible for the program, which
requires that they have land use
authority, unless those communities
apply for the NFIP. Finally, a member
of the public [FEMA–2019–0016–0002]
suggested that FEMA make the CSB easy
to search and access if the rule is to be
finalized. FEMA appreciates the
comment and will add instructions to
the main CSB page on www.fema.gov on
how to search the CSB.
B. Outreach
ASFPM also requested that FEMA
develop and implement an outreach
plan to message changes to the
publication process and improve
awareness of the CSB. The commenter
recommended FEMA coordinate with
state and local partners on this outreach
effort, to update printed and online
materials regarding process, and to
provide accommodations for those that
cannot access information online. As
explained in the NPRM, FEMA will
continue to publish notices in the
Federal Register for six months after the
effective date of this rule to notify
communities of their NFIP status to
allow communities to adjust to the
changed process as part of the ongoing
outreach efforts. The notices will
contain information on how to access
community status information so that
the public will become familiar with the
new process. Additionally, FEMA will
utilize www.fema.gov to provide
notifications to communities of their
status with information on how
individuals can check their community
status during and after the transition
period. In the required notification
letters FEMA sends to impacted
communities notifying them of potential
suspensions 90 days and 30 days prior
to final suspension, FEMA will provide
information on how the notification
process will transition to the CSB and
www.fema.gov respectively. The agency
will also ensure outreach to notify other
stakeholders of these changes through
webinars, printed materials, and other
information posted on www.fema.gov
for flood insurance agents and the
public. Individuals without internet
access will be able to contact their local
floodplain management official and/or
State NFIP Coordinating Office directly
for assistance.
Additionally, the Massachusetts
Department of Conservation and
Recreation [FEMA–2019–1600–0004]
commented that FEMA must continue
to notify state NFIP coordinating offices
in a timely manner of communities
which have become ineligible to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
participate in the program. FEMA
intends to continue the current practice
of notifying state coordinators of
community suspensions and this final
rule will not impact that practice.
C. Other Methods of Notice
One member of the public [FEMA–
2019–1660–0003] suggested
broadcasting community status
information through TV commercials,
social media, and/or billboards in the
impacted community to raise
awareness. FEMA appreciates the
commenter’s desire to ensure
stakeholders are notified of community
status changes and the agency’s goal is
to ensure the public continues to have
the most current community status
information available. Some of the
suggestions would result in additional
costs and would not necessarily result
in sufficient or immediate access to the
information that the final rule changes
provide. Additionally, the commenter’s
suggestion to utilize social media
strategies to educate the public on the
new process and of suspensions, such as
using Twitter and other social media
platforms is not an appropriate use of
FEMA’s social media tools. Notices of
NFIP community status are routine and
not suited to social media platforms that
are more focused on communicating
materials regarding the Agency’s
mission, including disaster
preparedness, mitigation, and response
and recovery to stakeholders. FEMA
will provide this notice to the public by
publishing links to www.fema.gov
information on community suspensions
as proposed.
Finally, another member of the public
[FEMA–2019–1660–0007]
recommended a major revision to the
agency’s website. The comment noted
that the current www.fema.gov had far
too many topics in the navigation bar,
which were not in any logical order and
were overwhelming to the user. The
commenter requested a more userfriendly experience when using FEMA’s
website and more search function
versatility. FEMA appreciates the
comment. FEMA recently completed
updates to its website pursuant to the
passage of the 21st Century Integrated
Digital Experience Act.6 The revamped
website provides more user
functionality, including a section of the
website dedicated to floodplain
management.
III. Summary of Changes
The final rule removes the
requirements contained in 44 CFR
59.24(a), (c), (d), and (e) that community
loss of eligibility notices be published in
the Federal Register and adds a
requirement that FEMA publish the
notices on the internet or by another
comparable method. FEMA will store
these notices on its website for a
minimum of one year after the notices
are issued, so that they are easily
available to all interested parties. These
notices will be available in the CSB area
of the website and the CSB will also be
updated regularly to reflect current
community status information. The
standard URL link for the CSB is https://
www.fema.gov/national-floodinsurance-program-community-status.
After removal from FEMA’s publicfacing website, the agency will retain
copies of the notices in accordance with
all statutory and regulatory
requirements. Note that changes to the
community’s status will be reflected in
the updated CSB so that individuals can
always find the current status of their
community.
Second, 44 CFR 64.6 is revised to
remove the requirement that FEMA
maintain a list of communities eligible
for flood insurance under the NFIA in
the CFR. Instead, the final rule requires
publication and maintenance of the list
on the internet or through another
comparable method. As explained in the
NPRM, FEMA will continue to maintain
an online CSB, providing a list of
communities that are, and are not,
eligible for flood insurance under the
NFIP. These changes do not impact the
other notification requirements found at
44 CFR 59.24. To aid in the transition
to the new form of publication, FEMA
will publish brief notices monthly in the
Federal Register for six months, after
the effective date of this rule, alerting
stakeholders to the change, and letting
them know where to go to access
community status information. The
agency will also complete various
outreach activities, including
notifications to impacted communities
as part of the 90-day and 30-day letters
they receive during the suspension
process, updated process information to
state and local partners, and webinars
and other materials for flood insurance
agents and the public.
6 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act
(21st Century IDEA), Public Law 115–336, 132 Stat.
5025 (2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00068
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Regulatory Analysis
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
A. Executive Orders 12866, ‘‘Regulatory
Planning and Review’’, 13563,
‘‘Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review’’, and 13771, ‘‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’’
Executive Orders 13563 (‘‘Improving
Regulation and Regulatory Review’’)
and 12866 (‘‘Regulatory Planning and
Review’’) direct agencies to assess the
costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility. Executive
Order 13771 (‘‘Reducing Regulation and
Controlling Regulatory Costs’’) directs
agencies to reduce regulation and
control regulatory costs and provides
that ‘‘for every one new regulation
issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the
cost of planned regulations be prudently
managed and controlled through a
budgeting process.’’
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has not designated this rule a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it.
As this rule is not a significant
regulatory action, this rule is exempt
from the requirements of Executive
Order 13771. See OMB’s Memorandum
‘‘Guidance Implementing Executive
Order 13771, Titled ‘Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory
Costs’ ’’ (April 5, 2017).
1. Need for Regulatory Action
Under the NFIA, FEMA may only
grant flood insurance to properties
within communities that have adopted
adequate land use and control
measures.7 Pursuant to this statutory
direction, FEMA has adopted
regulations governing community
eligibility for participation in the NFIP
at 44 CFR parts 59, 60, and 64. These
regulations include requirements that a
community follow certain steps to retain
eligibility for the NFIP. If a community
fails to follow these requirements or
decides to withdraw from the NFIP,
FEMA initiates loss of eligibility
procedures as described in 44 CFR 59.24
and publishes a notice of the upcoming
loss of eligibility in the Federal
7 See
42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
Register. In addition, 44 CFR 64.6 states
that flood insurance under the NFIP is
authorized for communities set forth
under Section 64.6 of the regulations,
requiring FEMA to maintain a list of
eligible communities in the CFR.
FEMA is making two changes to the
current regulations.
First, FEMA will remove the
requirement pursuant to § 59.24(a), (c),
(d), and (e) to publish community loss
of eligibility notices in the Federal
Register. In lieu of publication in the
Federal Register, the rule requires that
these notices be published on the
internet or by another comparable
method. To aid in the transition, FEMA
will publish brief notices in the Federal
Register for 6 months after the effective
date of the final rule, alerting
stakeholders to the change.
Second, FEMA is removing the
requirement pursuant to § 64.6 that
FEMA maintain a list of eligible
communities in the CFR. In lieu of this
requirement, the final rule will require
FEMA to publish and maintain a list of
eligible communities on the internet or
through another comparable method.
These two changes will result in
reduced FEMA expenditures, largely by
reducing costs associated with Federal
Register publication. The changes to
§ 59.24 will also provide faster and more
user-friendly access to community loss
of eligibility information by requiring
publication of the notices online instead
of in the Federal Register. In addition,
these changes direct FEMA to
consolidate community status
information into one location, allowing
stakeholders to have more streamlined
access to community status-related
information.
2. Baseline
Requirement To Publish Community
Loss of Eligibility Notices in the Federal
Register
Community loss of eligibility notices
were published a total of 246 times in
the Federal Register from 2010 to 2019.
Based on data from these notices, FEMA
calculates that on average, from 2007 to
2016, the notices were published about
25 times per year, rounded to the
nearest whole number (246 ÷ 10 = 24.6.
24.6 rounded to the nearest whole
number = 25).
Requirement To Publish the List of
Eligible Communities in the CFR
With respect to the requirement for
FEMA to maintain a list of eligible
communities in the CFR, FEMA notes
that it currently maintains this list
online in the Community Status Book
PO 00000
Frm 00069
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68785
rather than in the CFR.8 In addition,
FEMA prepares quarterly reports in an
attempt to comply with the publication
requirement contained in § 64.6. The
quarterly preparation burden is
approximately 15 hours per quarter at a
cost of $80 per hour, for a total of $4,800
each year (15 hours per quarter × $80
per hour × 4 quarters a year).9 FEMA has
not published the quarterly reports in
the CFR since 2006 due to the recurring
costs involved, and the ability to
maintain a more up-to-date list, since
the CFR is only updated annually.
3. Costs
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices:
Internet Publication Costs
As a substitute for publishing the
required community loss of eligibility
notices in the Federal Register, this
final rule requires FEMA to publish
community loss of eligibility notices
online. FEMA currently maintains a
public website (www.fema.gov) where
similar notices, bulletins, and updates
from across the agency are published for
public consumption. While there is no
direct cost to adding individual web
pages or sections to the site, publishing
community loss of eligibility notices
online creates labor costs for staff that
need to develop a template to format
and process the notices for web
publication.
FEMA recently completed a website
re-design that included more versatile
search functionality for the user, a more
standardized look and feel, increased
search engine optimization, and better
capture of meta-data. FEMA anticipated
the use of this re-design in the analysis
of this final rule. Development of this
publication process for online notices
will be labor intensive at the beginning.
Once a template is created, each update
will be less labor intensive than the
current practice.
FEMA staff expect it will take
approximately 3 days of labor (24 hours)
of a General Schedule (GS) Federal
employee in the National Capital
Region, at the GS–14 Step 5 level
($63.64 hourly wage),10 to establish the
publication process under the redesign.
After the publication process is
established, FEMA anticipates that it
8 The Community Status Book is available for
public viewing at https://www.fema.gov/nationalflood-insurance-program-community-status-book.
9 Hourly rates derived from FEMA estimates
based on prior contracting benchmarks for this
service.
10 Office of Personnel Management, 2019,
Washington-Baltimore-Arlington-DC–MD–VA–WV–
PA, Hourly Rate, GS–14, Step 5. Available at
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/payleave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2019/DCB_
h.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
68786
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
will take a GS–14 employee
approximately thirty minutes per future
publication.
The average 25 notices per year result
in a burden to FEMA of $3,392 the first
year (($63.64 for GS 14 Step 5 wage ×
1.46) 11 × (24 hours of work + (0.5 hour
of work × 25 notices per year))) and
$1,162 each subsequent year (($63.64 for
GS 14 Step 5 wage × 1.46) × (0.5 hour
of work × 25 notices per year)) for a 10year total of $13,850.
TABLE 1—INTERNET PUBLICATION COSTS
Year
Initial internet
publication burden
(hours)
Recurrent internet
publication burden
(hours)
Internet
publication
cost
(a)
(b) = (0.25 × 25)
(c) = (a × b) × ($63.64 × 1.46)
1 .......................................................................................................
2 .......................................................................................................
3 .......................................................................................................
4 .......................................................................................................
5 .......................................................................................................
6 .......................................................................................................
7 .......................................................................................................
8 .......................................................................................................
9 .......................................................................................................
10 .....................................................................................................
24
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
12.5
$3,392
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
Total ..........................................................................................
24
12.5
13,850
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices:
Transition/Phase-Out Costs
Upon publication of this final rule,
FEMA will aid in the transition from the
publication of community loss of
eligibility notices in the Federal
Register to their posting on FEMA’s
website by publication of transitional
announcements in the Federal Register.
These announcements will alert
stakeholders of the new location of
these notices and they would be concise
and tailored to notify stakeholders of the
FEMA web address where the
community loss of eligibility notices can
be found. FEMA expects these
transitional announcements to publish
once a month for a 6-month phase-out
period following the effective date of the
rule.
Community Status Report: Cost Savings
FEMA is removing the requirement
pursuant to § 64.6 that FEMA maintain
an updated list of eligible communities
in the CFR. FEMA does not currently
publish updates to the list of
communities eligible for flood insurance
in the CFR and already maintains an
online Community Status Book
containing this information.12 FEMA
prepares quarterly reports on the current
lists of communities in order to comply
with the regulation. These reports are
available upon stakeholder request,
although they are not published.
Modifying the regulations to eliminate
the requirement to publish the list in the
CFR in favor of publishing the notices
in the same location as the community
status list that is already maintained on
FEMA’s website (the Community Status
Book) eliminates the preparation of
these lists and saves the quarterly
preparation burden of approximately 15
hours per quarter at $80 per hour,13
yielding a cost savings of $4,800 ($80
per hour × 15 hours per quarter × 4
quarters a year) annually. This revision
will save FEMA costs without affecting
policyholders or other stakeholders.
TABLE 2—NET COST SAVINGS
Internet
publication
cost
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Year
Community
status report
cost savings
Net cost
savings
NPV at 3%
NPV at 7%
1 ...........................................................................................
2 ...........................................................................................
3 ...........................................................................................
4 ...........................................................................................
5 ...........................................................................................
6 ...........................................................................................
7 ...........................................................................................
8 ...........................................................................................
9 ...........................................................................................
10 .........................................................................................
$3,392
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
1,162
¥$4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥4,800
¥$1,408
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥3,638
¥$1,367
¥3,429
¥3,329
¥3,232
¥3,138
¥3,047
¥2,958
¥2,872
¥2,788
¥2,707
¥$1,315
¥3,178
¥2,970
¥2,775
¥2,594
¥2,424
¥2,266
¥2,117
¥1,979
¥1,849
Total ..............................................................................
13,850
¥48,000
¥34,150
¥28,868
¥23,468
Annualized ....................................................................
........................
........................
........................
¥3,384
¥3,341
11 Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for
Employee Compensation, Table 1. ‘‘Employer costs
per hour worked for employee compensation and
costs as a percent of total compensation: Civilian
workers, by major occupational and industry group,
March 2019.’’ Available at https://www.bls.gov/
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
news.release/archives/ecec_06182019.pdf.
Accessed June 24, 2020. The wage multiplier is
calculated by dividing total compensation for all
workers of $36.77 by wages and salaries for all
workers of $25.22 per hour yielding a benefits
multiplier of approximately 1.46.
PO 00000
Frm 00070
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12 The Community Status Book is available for
public viewing at https://www.fema.gov/nationalflood-insurance-program-community-status-book.
13 Hourly rates derived from FEMA estimates
based on prior contracting benchmarks for this
service.
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
The net cost savings expected from
this rulemaking are presented in Table
2. The up-front transition costs are only
expected to take place in Year 1, thus
the cost savings expected over the
subsequent years are not impacted. For
the 10-year period analyzed, the
estimated quantified discounted total
cost savings at 7 and 3 percent are
$23,468 (annualized at $3,341) and
$28,868 (annualized at $3,384),
respectively.
4. Benefits
Revising 59.24 to eliminate the
Federal Register publication
requirements allows FEMA to be more
agile and timely in updating community
status information. In contrast,
continued updates through the Federal
Register would be slower, more
expensive to FEMA, and present the
information in a format that is less
accessible to stakeholders.
In addition, making this change to
59.24, and updating FEMA’s regulations
in § 64.6, will locate all information
related to community status and
eligibility for flood insurance in one
place that is well-known by
stakeholders. This consolidation would
improve the ease and efficiency of
locating community status and
eligibility information for stakeholders
and for FEMA.
5. Transfers
Transfer payments are monetary
payments from one group to another
that do not affect total resources
available to society. There are no
anticipated transfer payments resulting
from this final rule.
6. Alternatives Considered
FEMA considered continuing with
their current method to publish the
community loss of eligibility notices in
the Federal Register. This would have
taken more time to publish changes and
updates. However, stakeholders would
know where to access the information
68787
since the location of information would
not change.
FEMA also considered the suggestion
of one of the commenters about
broadcasting the community status
information through TV commercials,
social media, or billboards in the
impacted community to raise
awareness. Some of these suggestions
would result in additional costs and
would not necessarily result in
sufficient or immediate access to the
information that the final rule changes
provide. Additionally, notices of NFIP
community status are routine and not
suited to social media platforms that are
more focused on communicating
materials regarding the Agency’s
mission, including disaster
preparedness, mitigation, and response
and recovery to stakeholders.
7. Summary
Table 3 provides the A–4 accounting
summary.
TABLE 3—A–4 ACCOUNTING STATEMENT
[2019$]
Source citation
(RIA, preamble,
etc.)
7 Percent discount
rate
3 Percent discount
rate
Annualized Monetized .........................................................................................
Annualized Quantified ..........................................................................................
$0
N/A
$0
N/A
................................
................................
Qualitative ............................................................................................................
• Allows FEMA to
timely in updating
formation
• Improve the ease
cating community
information
be more agile and
community status in-
RIA
¥$3,341
N/A
¥$3,384
N/A
Category
Benefits
and efficiency of lostatus and eligibility
Costs
Annualized Monetized .........................................................................................
Annualized quantified ..........................................................................................
Qualitative ............................................................................................................
N/A
RIA
................................
................................
Transfers
Annualized Monetized $millions/year ..................................................................
N/A
From/To ...............................................................................................................
N/A
................................
N/A
................................
None
None
None
None
................................
................................
................................
................................
Effects
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
State, Local, and/or Tribal Government ..............................................................
Small business .....................................................................................................
Wages ..................................................................................................................
Growth .................................................................................................................
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of
1980, 5 U.S.C. 601–612, as amended,
requires Federal agencies to consider
the potential impact of regulations on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’
comprises small businesses, not-forprofit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and
are not dominant in their fields, and
PO 00000
Frm 00071
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000. This
rule does not directly impact any small
entities. This rule only changes how
FEMA shares loss of community
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
68788
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
eligibility notices and community status
information.
FEMA used the U.S. Census Bureau’s
2017 Census of Government 14 to
estimate the number of small
government jurisdictions in the United
States. According to the U.S. Census,
there are 38,779 jurisdictions consisting
of counties, municipalities, and
townships within the United States.
Among these, 35,748 would qualify as
small government jurisdictions, which
would equate to 92.2 percent of all U.S.
governmental jurisdictions. Applying
this percentage to the 22,490
communities currently participating in
the National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP) 15 results in an estimated 20,736
small governmental jurisdictions.
Individual policyholders are not
considered small entities.
FEMA believes this rule would not
impose any direct costs on small entities
and would allow easier access to
information about flood insurance
eligibility. Accordingly, FEMA certifies
that this rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. FEMA
requested comments as to the impact
that the NPRM would have on small
governmental jurisdictions; no
comments were received.
1. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of
1995
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 658, 1501–1504, 1531–
1536, 1571, pertains to any rulemaking
which is likely to result in the
promulgation of any rule that includes
a Federal mandate that may result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million (adjusted
annually for inflation) or more in any
one year. If the rulemaking includes a
Federal mandate, the Act requires an
agency to prepare an assessment of the
anticipated costs and benefits of the
Federal mandate. The Act also pertains
to any regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect
small governments. Before establishing
any such requirements, an agency must
develop a plan allowing for input from
the affected governments regarding the
requirements.
14 See U.S. Census Bureau, ‘‘2017 Census of
Governments, Local Governments by Type and
State 2017,’’ Table 2, April 25, 2019, available at:
https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/gus/
tables/2017/cog2017_cg1700org02.zip?#. Accessed
June 25, 2020.
15 The number of NFIP communities is derived
from ‘‘The National Flood Insurance Program
Community Status Book,’’ Page 478, located at
https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-withnfip/community-status-book.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
FEMA has determined that this
rulemaking will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, nor by
the private sector, of $100,000,000 or
more in any one year as a result of a
Federal mandate, and it will not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. Therefore, no actions are
deemed necessary under the provisions
of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995.
2. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (PRA), as amended, 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520, an agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of
information unless the agency obtains
approval from the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for the collection and
the collection displays a valid OMB
control number. See 44 U.S.C. 3506,
3507. FEMA collects community
information for the purposes of
application to the NFIP under OMB
Control Number 1660–0004,
Application for Participation in the
National Flood Insurance Program
(NFIP).16 However, FEMA has
determined that this rulemaking does
not impact this information collection
or any other collection of information
under the PRA.
3. Privacy Act/E-Government Act
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5
U.S.C. 552a, an agency must determine
whether implementation of a proposed
regulation will result in a system of
records. A ‘‘record’’ is any item,
collection, or grouping of information
about an individual that is maintained
by an agency, including, but not limited
to, his/her education, financial
transactions, medical history, and
criminal or employment history and
that contains his/her name, or the
identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the
individual, such as a finger or voice
print or a photograph. See 5 U.S.C.
552a(a)(4). A ‘‘system of records’’ is a
group of records under the control of an
agency from which information is
retrieved by the name of the individual
or by some identifying number, symbol,
or other identifying particular assigned
to the individual. See id. section
552a(a)(5). An agency cannot disclose
any record which is contained in a
system of records except by following
specific procedures.
The E-Government Act of 2002, 44
U.S.C. 3501 note also requires specific
16 See 44 CFR 59.22 for a description of the
information collected.
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
procedures when an agency takes action
to develop or procure information
technology that collects, maintains, or
disseminates information that is in an
identifiable form. This Act also applies
when an agency initiates a new
collection of information that will be
collected, maintained, or disseminated
using information technology if it
includes any information in an
identifiable form permitting the
physical or online contacting of a
specific individual.
In accordance with DHS policy,
FEMA has completed a Privacy
Threshold Analysis (PTA) for this rule.
DHS determined that this rulemaking is
not privacy sensitive, as it does not
affect the information collected about an
individual. FEMA’s original collection
and maintenance of NFIP related
personally identifiable information has
coverage under the DHS/FEMA–003National Flood Insurance Program Files,
79 FR 28747 (May 19, 2014) System of
Records Notice and the DHS/FEMA/
PIA—011 National Flood Insurance
Program Information Technology
System Privacy Impact Assessment.
Therefore, this rulemaking does not
require coverage under an existing or
new Privacy Impact Assessment or
System of Records Notice.
4. Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination With Indian Tribal
Governments’’
Executive Order 13175, ‘‘Consultation
and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments,’’ 65 FR 67249, (Nov. 9,
2000), applies to agency regulations that
have Tribal implications, that is,
regulations that have substantial direct
effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal
government and Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. Under
this Executive Order, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, no
agency shall promulgate any regulation
that has Tribal implications, that
imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on Indian Tribal governments, and
that is not required by statute, unless
funds necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the Indian Tribal
government or the Tribe in complying
with the regulation are provided by the
Federal government, or the agency
consults with Tribal officials.
Nor, to the extent practicable by law,
may an agency promulgate a regulation
that has Tribal implications and
preempts Tribal law, unless the agency
consults with Tribal officials. Although
Tribes that meet the NFIP eligibility
criteria can participate in the NFIP in
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
the same manner as communities,17
FEMA has reviewed this final rule
under Executive Order 13175 and has
determined that the rule does not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian Tribes, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. This
final rule modernizes notice
requirements for community loss of
eligibility information and community
status information: therefore, the
changes in this rule do not substantially
or disproportionately affect Indian
Tribal governments acting as
communities under the NFIP.
5. Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism’’
Executive Order 13132, ‘‘Federalism,’’
64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999), sets forth
principles and criteria that agencies
must adhere to in formulating and
implementing policies that have
federalism implications, that is,
regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship
between the national government and
the States, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government.’’ For the
purposes of this Executive Order, the
term States also includes local
governments or other subdivisions
established by the States. Under this
Executive Order, Federal agencies must
closely examine the statutory authority
supporting any action that would limit
the policymaking discretion of the
States. Further, to the extent practicable
and permitted by law, no agency shall
promulgate any regulation that has
federalism implications, that imposes
substantial direct compliance costs on
State and local governments, and that is
not required by statute, unless the
Federal Government provides funds
necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the State and local
governments in complying with the
regulation, or the agency consults with
State and local officials. Nor, to the
extent practicable by law, may an
agency promulgate a regulation that has
federalism implications and preempts
State law, unless the agency consults
with State and local officials.
FEMA has reviewed this rule under
Executive Order 13132 and has
determined that it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
17 Although the NFIP does not explicitly reference
Tribal Governments, FEMA includes Tribal nations
in its definition of a community. See 44 CFR 59.1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
levels of government, and therefore does
not have federalism implications as
defined by the Executive Order. This
rule modernizes notice requirements for
community status information under the
NFIP; therefore, this rule does not
impact the substantive rights, roles, or
responsibilities of States, and does not
limit State policymaking discretion.
6. National Environmental Policy Act of
1969 (NEPA)
Section 102 of the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 83 Stat. 852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42
U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires agencies to
consider the impacts of their proposed
actions on the quality of the human
environment. The Council on
Environmental Quality’s procedures for
implementing NEPA, 40 CFR 1500 et
seq., require Federal agencies to prepare
Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
for major Federal actions significantly
affecting the quality of the human
environment. Each agency can develop
categorical exclusions to cover actions
that have been demonstrated to not
typically trigger significant impacts to
the human environment individually or
cumulatively. Agencies develop
environmental assessments (EA) to
evaluate those actions that do not fit an
agency’s categorical exclusion and for
which the need for an EIS is not readily
apparent. At the end of the EA process,
the agency will determine whether to
make a Finding of No Significant Impact
(FONSI) or whether to initiate the EIS
process.
Rulemaking is a major Federal action
subject to NEPA. Categorical exclusions
A3 included in the list of exclusion
categories at Department of Homeland
Security Manual 023–01–001–01,
Revision 01, Implementation of the
National Environmental Policy Act,
Appendix A, issued November 6, 2014,
covers the promulgation of rules,
issuance of rulings or interpretations,
and the development and publication of
policies, orders, directives, notices,
procedures, manuals, and advisory
circulars if they meet certain criteria
provided in A3(a–f). This final rule
meets Categorical Exclusion A3(d),
‘‘Those that interpret or amend an
existing regulation without changing its
environmental effect.’’
7. Congressional Review of Agency
Rulemaking
Under the Congressional Review of
Agency Rulemaking Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C.
801–808, before a rule can take effect,
the Federal agency promulgating the
rule must submit to Congress and to the
Government Accountability Office
(GAO) a copy of the rule; a concise
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
68789
general statement relating to the rule,
including whether it is a major rule; the
proposed effective date of the rule; a
copy of any cost-benefit analysis;
descriptions of the agency’s actions
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and
the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act;
and any other information or statements
required by relevant executive orders.
FEMA has sent this final rule to the
Congress and to GAO pursuant to the
CRA. The rule is not a ‘‘major rule’’
within the meaning of the CRA. It will
not have an annual effect on the
economy of $100,000,000 or more; it
will not result in a major increase in
costs or prices for consumers,
individual industries, Federal, State, or
local government agencies, or
geographic regions; and it will not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
enterprises to compete with foreignbased enterprises in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects
44 CFR Parts 59
Flood insurance, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, FEMA amends 44 CFR parts
59 and 64 as follows:
PART 59—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 59
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.,
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 43 FR
41943, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O.
12127 of Mar. 31, 1979, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.
2. Amend § 59.24 by:
a. Revising the fourth sentence of
paragraph (a);
■ b. Revising the fourth sentence of
paragraph (c);
■ c. Revising the second sentence of
paragraph (d);
■ d. Revising the second sentence of
paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
■
■
§ 59.24 Suspension of community
eligibility.
(a) * * * If, subsequently, copies of
adequate flood plain management
regulations are not received by the
Administrator, no later than 30 days
before the expiration of the original six
month period the Federal Insurance
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
68790
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 211 / Friday, October 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Administrator shall provide written
notice to the community and to the state
and assure publication of the
community’s loss of eligibility for the
sale of flood insurance on the internet
or by another comparable method, such
suspension to become effective upon the
expiration of the six month period.
* * *
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * * If a community is to be
suspended, the Federal Insurance
Administrator shall inform it upon 30
days prior written notice and upon
publication of its loss of eligibility for
the sale of flood insurance on the
internet or by another comparable
method. * * *
(d) * * * If a community is to be
suspended, the Federal Insurance
Administrator shall inform it upon 30
days prior written notice and upon
publication of its loss of eligibly for the
sale of flood insurance on the internet
or by another comparable method.
* * *
(e) * * * Upon receipt of a certified
copy of a final legislative action, the
Federal Insurance Administrator shall
withdraw the community from the
Program and publish its loss of
eligibility for the sale of flood insurance
on the internet or by another
comparable method. * * *
*
*
*
*
*
PART 64—COMMUNITIES ELIGIBLE
FOR THE SALE OF INSURANCE
3. The authority citation for part 61
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.;
Reorganization Plan No. 3 of 1978, 3 CFR,
1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367,
3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
■
List of eligible communities.
FEMA will maintain a list of
communities eligible for the sale of
flood insurance pursuant to the National
Flood Insurance Program (42 U.S.C.
4001–4128). This list will be published
and maintained on the internet or
through another comparable method.
Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency
Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020–23970 Filed 10–29–20; 8:45 am]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
BILLING CODE 9111–52–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:11 Oct 29, 2020
Jkt 253001
RIN 2137–AF30
I. Overview
Pipeline and Hazardous Materials
Safety Administration
49 CFR Part 180
Hazardous Materials: Response to an
Industry Petition To Reduce
Regulatory Burden for Cylinder
Requalification Requirements
Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration,
Department of Transportation.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Pipeline and Hazardous
Materials Safety Administration
(PHMSA) is amending the requirements
of the requalification periods for certain
Department of Transportation (DOT) 4series specification cylinders in noncorrosive gas service in response to a
petition for rulemaking submitted by the
National Propane Gas Association
(NPGA).
DATES:
Effective date: This rule is effective
November 30, 2020.
Voluntary compliance date:
Voluntary compliance with all
amendments is authorized October 30,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lily
Ballengee, Standards and Rulemaking
Division, (202) 366–8553, Pipeline and
Hazardous Materials Safety
Administration, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Table of Contents
4. Revise § 61.6 to read as follows:
§ 64.6
[Docket No. PHMSA–2017–0083 (HM–219B)]
C. Subsequent Requalification via Proof
Pressure Testing
D. Comments Related to the Requalifier
Identification Number
E. Miscellaneous Comments
IV. Changes Being Adopted
V. Regulatory Analyses and Notices
List of Subjects
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
I. Overview
II. Background
A. Summary of Historical Changes to the
Regulatory Text
B. HM–233F Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Final Rule
C. Petition P–1696
D. Statement of Enforcement Discretion
E. HM–219B Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking; Executive Order 13924
III. NPRM Comment Discussion
A. Comments Related to the
Requalification Periods
B. Initial Requalification Periods;
Subsequent Requalification Periods via
Volumetric Expansion Testing
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
PHMSA is amending the Hazardous
Materials Regulations (HMR; 49 CFR
parts 171–180) for certain commonly
used DOT 4-series specification
cylinders in non-corrosive gas service.
This final rule authorizes 12-year initial
and subsequent requalification periods
for volumetric expansion testing and a
12-year initial requalification period for
proof pressure testing. This final rule
does not modify the existing 10-year
subsequent requalification periods for
proof pressure testing. In addition, it
makes clarifying and conforming edits
to the requalification table in
§ 180.209(a) and the text in paragraph
(e). This final rule provides regulatory
relief by reducing requalification-related
costs for propane marketers,
distributors, and others in non-corrosive
gas service without reducing safety.
PHMSA also withdraws its Statement of
Enforcement Discretion issued on
March 17, 2017, as of the effective date
of this final rule.
II. Background
A. Summary of Historical Changes to
the Regulatory Text
As further discussed throughout this
section, the requalification periods for
volumetric expansion and proof
pressure testing—to include the first
requalification after manufacture
(‘‘initial requalification’’) and the
recurring requalifications required after
the initial requalification (‘‘subsequent
requalification(s)’’)—have evolved
through various regulatory actions.
Table 1 summarizes the history of
changes to the timelines for
requalification by volumetric expansion
and proof pressure testing that are the
subject of this rulemaking. The
requalification time periods
memorialized in Table 1 as having been
in place ‘‘Prior to HM–233F’’ date from
1964.1
1 See Interstate Commerce Commission,
Explosives and Other Dangerous Articles, 29 FR
18651 (Dec. 29, 1964) (introducing requalification
period requirements at Note 2 to § 173.34(e)(9)).
E:\FR\FM\30OCR1.SGM
30OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 211 (Friday, October 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 68782-68790]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23970]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Federal Emergency Management Agency
44 CFR Parts 59 and 64
[Docket ID FEMA-2019-0016]
RIN 1660-AA92
Revisions to Publication Requirements for Community Eligibility
Status Information Under the National Flood Insurance Program
AGENCY: Federal Emergency Management Agency, DHS.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This final rule modernizes regulations regarding publication
requirements of community eligibility status information under the
National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). FEMA is replacing outdated
regulations that require publication of community loss of eligibility
notices in the Federal Register with a requirement that FEMA publish
this information on the internet or by another comparable method. FEMA
is also replacing its requirement that the agency maintain a list of
communities eligible for flood insurance in the Code of Federal
Regulations with a requirement that FEMA publish this list on the
internet or by another comparable method.
DATES: This rule is effective December 2, 2020.
ADDRESSES: The docket for this rulemaking is available for inspection
using the Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://www.regulations.gov and
can be viewed by following that website's instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Adrienne Sheldon, Supervisory
Emergency Management Specialist, Floodplain Management Division,
Federal Insurance and Mitigation Administration, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 400 C Street SW, Washington, DC 20472,
[email protected], (202) 674-1087.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background and Discussion of the Rule
The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended (NFIA), Title
42 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) 4001 et seq., authorizes the
Administrator of FEMA to establish and carry out the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP) to enable interested persons to purchase
insurance against loss resulting from
[[Page 68783]]
physical damage to or loss of property arising from floods in the
United States.\1\ Under the NFIA, FEMA may only grant flood insurance
to properties within communities that have adopted and that enforce
adequate land use and control measures that regulate floodplains.\2\
The statute authorizes FEMA to develop land use criteria consistent
with requirements laid out in the NFIA and to encourage the adoption
and enforcement of State and local measures implementing those
criteria.\3\ FEMA floodplain management regulations governing community
eligibility for participation in the NFIP are located at 44 CFR parts
59, 60, and 64.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 42 U.S.C. 4011(a).
\2\ See 42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1).
\3\ See 42 U.S.C. 4102(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEMA regulations at 44 CFR 60.3, 60.4, and 60.5 contain land use
measures for floodplain management. If a community fails to demonstrate
to FEMA that it meets these requirements, or decided to withdraw from
the NFIP, FEMA may initiate probation, suspension, or withdrawal
procedures as described in 44 CFR 59.24. In the case of a loss of
eligibility, for instance if a community is suspended for failing to
enforce its floodplain regulations, FEMA notifies the community of the
upcoming loss directly and gives the community an opportunity to
correct the deficiency that triggered the procedures. In cases of loss
of eligibility, FEMA publishes a notice of the upcoming loss of
eligibility in the Federal Register as required by 44 CFR 59.24.
NFIP regulations at 44 CFR 64.6 provide a list of communities where
the sale of flood insurance under the NFIP is authorized as set forth
in Subpart B, ``Eligibility Requirements,'' to part 59 of the
regulations. Due to the large number of communities eligible for flood
insurance and the relative frequency to changes to community
eligibility, maintaining a list of communities in FEMA's regulations is
not feasible; however, FEMA meets this requirement by publishing the
updated list of communities through periodic final rules in the Federal
Register. FEMA last published an updated list in the Federal Register
in August 2006.
On February 12, 2020, FEMA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) (85 FR 7902) proposing to make two changes to its
regulations regarding publication requirements of community eligibility
status information under the NFIP. The NPRM proposed to replace
outdated regulations that require publication of community loss of
eligibility notices in the Federal Register with a requirement that
FEMA publish the information on the internet or other comparable
method. The NPRM also proposed to replace the requirement that the
agency maintain a list of communities eligible for flood insurance in
the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) with a requirement that FEMA
publish this list on the internet or other comparable method. The NPRM
explained FEMA would transition to the new form of publication by first
publishing brief notices monthly in the Federal Register for six months
after the effective date of the final rule.
The NPRM solicited public comment on these proposed changes. FEMA
received six comments related to the rulemaking. In this final rule,
FEMA adopts the changes it proposed in the NPRM, with clarifications in
consideration of the related comments. FEMA describes these changes
below.
II. Summary and Discussion of Public Comments
Of the six comments FEMA received related to this rulemaking, five
were generally in support of the proposed changes in the NPRM and one
was neutral. Three members of the public [FEMA-2019-0016-0003, FEMA-
2019-1660-0007, and FEMA-2019-0016-0002] expressed their support for
the rule generally. One member of the public [FEMA-2019-0016-0003]
stated she was supportive of the move to an online notification process
and also of the proposed transition period in the NPRM while another
member of the public [FEMA-2019-1660-0007] expressed support for the
changes and noted that the NRPM aligned with OMB M-19-21 regarding a
transition to electronic records and other such Federal Government
initiatives. A third member of the public [FEMA-2019-0016-0002]
expressed general support for the changes. The Association of State
Floodplain Managers (ASFPM) [FEMA-2016-0016-0006] expressed support for
the changes, as did the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and
Recreation [FEMA-2019-1600-0004].
A. The Community Status Book (CSB)
Three commenters provided feedback on the use of the CSB. One
anonymous commenter [FEMA-2019-0016-0005] stated a need to include
communities that are not mapped in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA)
and not participating in the NFIP in the CSB. The commenter opined that
the absence of these communities from the list of communities not
participating in the NFIP created confusion for everyday users and
required them to reach out to additional resources which undermines the
cost savings proposed in the rule. FEMA respectfully disagrees with the
commenter. The statute requires FEMA to develop minimum floodplain
management criteria to ``(1) constrict the development of land which is
exposed to flood damage where appropriate, (2) guide the development of
proposed construction away from locations which are threatened by flood
hazards, (3) assist in reducing damage caused by floods, and (4)
otherwise improve the long-range land management and use of flood-prone
areas.'' \4\ FEMA is required to focus NFIP floodplain management
efforts on communities with flood-prone or special flood hazard areas.
Consistent with the statutory requirement, the CSB provides a list of
those communities participating in the NFIP and those communities not
participating in the NFIP when those communities are in a currently
mapped flood risk area. Some communities that do not have special flood
hazard areas may still participate in the NFIP. The statutory language
allows any state or area (or subdivision thereof) to participate if
they have expressed an interest in participating and have adopted the
required land use and control measures ``consistent with the
comprehensive criteria for land management and use'' required by the
statute and regulatory framework.\5\ Such participation is voluntary
and those communities are captured in the CSB as participating
communities. It would be impractical and inappropriate for FEMA to
include communities that are not in special flood hazard areas that are
not participating in the NFIP program in the CSB. Including those
communities in the CSB would not be consistent with its purpose--to
provide the status of those communities participating in the NFIP.
ASFPM [FEMA-2019-0016-0006] requested that FEMA develop a second tool
to compare to the CSB to determine which communities are eligible,
providing a mechanism for users to find communities not otherwise found
in the CSB. As explained above, if a community is eligible and
participating, the community is listed as a participating community in
the CSB. If the community is suspended from participating in the NFIP,
that community is also listed in the CSB as a community not
participating in the NFIP along with other communities that contain
identified flood hazard areas that have either withdrawn from or have
not yet participated in the NFIP. The NFIP is a voluntary program. FEMA
[[Page 68784]]
would not have knowledge of those communities that do not contain
special flood hazard areas and would otherwise be eligible for the
program, which requires that they have land use authority, unless those
communities apply for the NFIP. Finally, a member of the public [FEMA-
2019-0016-0002] suggested that FEMA make the CSB easy to search and
access if the rule is to be finalized. FEMA appreciates the comment and
will add instructions to the main CSB page on www.fema.gov on how to
search the CSB.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ 42 U.S.C. 4102.
\5\ 42 U.S.C. 4012.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Outreach
ASFPM also requested that FEMA develop and implement an outreach
plan to message changes to the publication process and improve
awareness of the CSB. The commenter recommended FEMA coordinate with
state and local partners on this outreach effort, to update printed and
online materials regarding process, and to provide accommodations for
those that cannot access information online. As explained in the NPRM,
FEMA will continue to publish notices in the Federal Register for six
months after the effective date of this rule to notify communities of
their NFIP status to allow communities to adjust to the changed process
as part of the ongoing outreach efforts. The notices will contain
information on how to access community status information so that the
public will become familiar with the new process. Additionally, FEMA
will utilize www.fema.gov to provide notifications to communities of
their status with information on how individuals can check their
community status during and after the transition period. In the
required notification letters FEMA sends to impacted communities
notifying them of potential suspensions 90 days and 30 days prior to
final suspension, FEMA will provide information on how the notification
process will transition to the CSB and www.fema.gov respectively. The
agency will also ensure outreach to notify other stakeholders of these
changes through webinars, printed materials, and other information
posted on www.fema.gov for flood insurance agents and the public.
Individuals without internet access will be able to contact their local
floodplain management official and/or State NFIP Coordinating Office
directly for assistance.
Additionally, the Massachusetts Department of Conservation and
Recreation [FEMA-2019-1600-0004] commented that FEMA must continue to
notify state NFIP coordinating offices in a timely manner of
communities which have become ineligible to participate in the program.
FEMA intends to continue the current practice of notifying state
coordinators of community suspensions and this final rule will not
impact that practice.
C. Other Methods of Notice
One member of the public [FEMA-2019-1660-0003] suggested
broadcasting community status information through TV commercials,
social media, and/or billboards in the impacted community to raise
awareness. FEMA appreciates the commenter's desire to ensure
stakeholders are notified of community status changes and the agency's
goal is to ensure the public continues to have the most current
community status information available. Some of the suggestions would
result in additional costs and would not necessarily result in
sufficient or immediate access to the information that the final rule
changes provide. Additionally, the commenter's suggestion to utilize
social media strategies to educate the public on the new process and of
suspensions, such as using Twitter and other social media platforms is
not an appropriate use of FEMA's social media tools. Notices of NFIP
community status are routine and not suited to social media platforms
that are more focused on communicating materials regarding the Agency's
mission, including disaster preparedness, mitigation, and response and
recovery to stakeholders. FEMA will provide this notice to the public
by publishing links to www.fema.gov information on community
suspensions as proposed.
Finally, another member of the public [FEMA-2019-1660-0007]
recommended a major revision to the agency's website. The comment noted
that the current www.fema.gov had far too many topics in the navigation
bar, which were not in any logical order and were overwhelming to the
user. The commenter requested a more user-friendly experience when
using FEMA's website and more search function versatility. FEMA
appreciates the comment. FEMA recently completed updates to its website
pursuant to the passage of the 21st Century Integrated Digital
Experience Act.\6\ The revamped website provides more user
functionality, including a section of the website dedicated to
floodplain management.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 21st Century Integrated Digital Experience Act (21st Century
IDEA), Public Law 115-336, 132 Stat. 5025 (2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Summary of Changes
The final rule removes the requirements contained in 44 CFR
59.24(a), (c), (d), and (e) that community loss of eligibility notices
be published in the Federal Register and adds a requirement that FEMA
publish the notices on the internet or by another comparable method.
FEMA will store these notices on its website for a minimum of one year
after the notices are issued, so that they are easily available to all
interested parties. These notices will be available in the CSB area of
the website and the CSB will also be updated regularly to reflect
current community status information. The standard URL link for the CSB
is https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status. After removal from FEMA's public-facing website, the agency
will retain copies of the notices in accordance with all statutory and
regulatory requirements. Note that changes to the community's status
will be reflected in the updated CSB so that individuals can always
find the current status of their community.
Second, 44 CFR 64.6 is revised to remove the requirement that FEMA
maintain a list of communities eligible for flood insurance under the
NFIA in the CFR. Instead, the final rule requires publication and
maintenance of the list on the internet or through another comparable
method. As explained in the NPRM, FEMA will continue to maintain an
online CSB, providing a list of communities that are, and are not,
eligible for flood insurance under the NFIP. These changes do not
impact the other notification requirements found at 44 CFR 59.24. To
aid in the transition to the new form of publication, FEMA will publish
brief notices monthly in the Federal Register for six months, after the
effective date of this rule, alerting stakeholders to the change, and
letting them know where to go to access community status information.
The agency will also complete various outreach activities, including
notifications to impacted communities as part of the 90-day and 30-day
letters they receive during the suspension process, updated process
information to state and local partners, and webinars and other
materials for flood insurance agents and the public.
[[Page 68785]]
IV. Regulatory Analysis
A. Executive Orders 12866, ``Regulatory Planning and Review'', 13563,
``Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review'', and 13771, ``Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs''
Executive Orders 13563 (``Improving Regulation and Regulatory
Review'') and 12866 (``Regulatory Planning and Review'') direct
agencies to assess the costs and benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity). Executive Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing
rules, and of promoting flexibility. Executive Order 13771 (``Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs'') directs agencies to
reduce regulation and control regulatory costs and provides that ``for
every one new regulation issued, at least two prior regulations be
identified for elimination, and that the cost of planned regulations be
prudently managed and controlled through a budgeting process.''
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has not designated this
rule a ``significant regulatory action'' under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866. Accordingly, OMB has not reviewed it. As this
rule is not a significant regulatory action, this rule is exempt from
the requirements of Executive Order 13771. See OMB's Memorandum
``Guidance Implementing Executive Order 13771, Titled `Reducing
Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs' '' (April 5, 2017).
1. Need for Regulatory Action
Under the NFIA, FEMA may only grant flood insurance to properties
within communities that have adopted adequate land use and control
measures.\7\ Pursuant to this statutory direction, FEMA has adopted
regulations governing community eligibility for participation in the
NFIP at 44 CFR parts 59, 60, and 64. These regulations include
requirements that a community follow certain steps to retain
eligibility for the NFIP. If a community fails to follow these
requirements or decides to withdraw from the NFIP, FEMA initiates loss
of eligibility procedures as described in 44 CFR 59.24 and publishes a
notice of the upcoming loss of eligibility in the Federal Register. In
addition, 44 CFR 64.6 states that flood insurance under the NFIP is
authorized for communities set forth under Section 64.6 of the
regulations, requiring FEMA to maintain a list of eligible communities
in the CFR.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 42 U.S.C. 4022(a)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEMA is making two changes to the current regulations.
First, FEMA will remove the requirement pursuant to Sec. 59.24(a),
(c), (d), and (e) to publish community loss of eligibility notices in
the Federal Register. In lieu of publication in the Federal Register,
the rule requires that these notices be published on the internet or by
another comparable method. To aid in the transition, FEMA will publish
brief notices in the Federal Register for 6 months after the effective
date of the final rule, alerting stakeholders to the change.
Second, FEMA is removing the requirement pursuant to Sec. 64.6
that FEMA maintain a list of eligible communities in the CFR. In lieu
of this requirement, the final rule will require FEMA to publish and
maintain a list of eligible communities on the internet or through
another comparable method.
These two changes will result in reduced FEMA expenditures, largely
by reducing costs associated with Federal Register publication. The
changes to Sec. 59.24 will also provide faster and more user-friendly
access to community loss of eligibility information by requiring
publication of the notices online instead of in the Federal Register.
In addition, these changes direct FEMA to consolidate community status
information into one location, allowing stakeholders to have more
streamlined access to community status-related information.
2. Baseline
Requirement To Publish Community Loss of Eligibility Notices in the
Federal Register
Community loss of eligibility notices were published a total of 246
times in the Federal Register from 2010 to 2019. Based on data from
these notices, FEMA calculates that on average, from 2007 to 2016, the
notices were published about 25 times per year, rounded to the nearest
whole number (246 / 10 = 24.6. 24.6 rounded to the nearest whole number
= 25).
Requirement To Publish the List of Eligible Communities in the CFR
With respect to the requirement for FEMA to maintain a list of
eligible communities in the CFR, FEMA notes that it currently maintains
this list online in the Community Status Book rather than in the
CFR.\8\ In addition, FEMA prepares quarterly reports in an attempt to
comply with the publication requirement contained in Sec. 64.6. The
quarterly preparation burden is approximately 15 hours per quarter at a
cost of $80 per hour, for a total of $4,800 each year (15 hours per
quarter x $80 per hour x 4 quarters a year).\9\ FEMA has not published
the quarterly reports in the CFR since 2006 due to the recurring costs
involved, and the ability to maintain a more up-to-date list, since the
CFR is only updated annually.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Community Status Book is available for public viewing at
https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book.
\9\ Hourly rates derived from FEMA estimates based on prior
contracting benchmarks for this service.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Costs
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices: Internet Publication Costs
As a substitute for publishing the required community loss of
eligibility notices in the Federal Register, this final rule requires
FEMA to publish community loss of eligibility notices online. FEMA
currently maintains a public website (www.fema.gov) where similar
notices, bulletins, and updates from across the agency are published
for public consumption. While there is no direct cost to adding
individual web pages or sections to the site, publishing community loss
of eligibility notices online creates labor costs for staff that need
to develop a template to format and process the notices for web
publication.
FEMA recently completed a website re-design that included more
versatile search functionality for the user, a more standardized look
and feel, increased search engine optimization, and better capture of
meta-data. FEMA anticipated the use of this re-design in the analysis
of this final rule. Development of this publication process for online
notices will be labor intensive at the beginning. Once a template is
created, each update will be less labor intensive than the current
practice.
FEMA staff expect it will take approximately 3 days of labor (24
hours) of a General Schedule (GS) Federal employee in the National
Capital Region, at the GS-14 Step 5 level ($63.64 hourly wage),\10\ to
establish the publication process under the redesign. After the
publication process is established, FEMA anticipates that it
[[Page 68786]]
will take a GS-14 employee approximately thirty minutes per future
publication.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ Office of Personnel Management, 2019, Washington-Baltimore-
Arlington-DC-MD-VA-WV-PA, Hourly Rate, GS-14, Step 5. Available at
https://www.opm.gov/policy-data-oversight/pay-leave/salaries-wages/salary-tables/pdf/2019/DCB_h.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The average 25 notices per year result in a burden to FEMA of
$3,392 the first year (($63.64 for GS 14 Step 5 wage x 1.46) \11\ x (24
hours of work + (0.5 hour of work x 25 notices per year))) and $1,162
each subsequent year (($63.64 for GS 14 Step 5 wage x 1.46) x (0.5 hour
of work x 25 notices per year)) for a 10-year total of $13,850.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Bureau of Labor Statistics, Employer Costs for Employee
Compensation, Table 1. ``Employer costs per hour worked for employee
compensation and costs as a percent of total compensation: Civilian
workers, by major occupational and industry group, March 2019.''
Available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/ecec_06182019.pdf. Accessed June 24, 2020. The wage multiplier is
calculated by dividing total compensation for all workers of $36.77
by wages and salaries for all workers of $25.22 per hour yielding a
benefits multiplier of approximately 1.46.
Table 1--Internet Publication Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initial internet Recurrent internet
Year publication burden publication Internet publication cost
(hours) burden (hours)
(a) (b) = (0.25 x 25) (c) = (a x b) x ($63.64 x
1.46)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1........................................ 24 12.5 $3,392
2........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
3........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
4........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
5........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
6........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
7........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
8........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
9........................................ .................. 12.5 1,162
10....................................... .................. 12.5 1,162
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Total................................ 24 12.5 13,850
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Community Loss of Eligibility Notices: Transition/Phase-Out Costs
Upon publication of this final rule, FEMA will aid in the
transition from the publication of community loss of eligibility
notices in the Federal Register to their posting on FEMA's website by
publication of transitional announcements in the Federal Register.
These announcements will alert stakeholders of the new location of
these notices and they would be concise and tailored to notify
stakeholders of the FEMA web address where the community loss of
eligibility notices can be found. FEMA expects these transitional
announcements to publish once a month for a 6-month phase-out period
following the effective date of the rule.
Community Status Report: Cost Savings
FEMA is removing the requirement pursuant to Sec. 64.6 that FEMA
maintain an updated list of eligible communities in the CFR. FEMA does
not currently publish updates to the list of communities eligible for
flood insurance in the CFR and already maintains an online Community
Status Book containing this information.\12\ FEMA prepares quarterly
reports on the current lists of communities in order to comply with the
regulation. These reports are available upon stakeholder request,
although they are not published. Modifying the regulations to eliminate
the requirement to publish the list in the CFR in favor of publishing
the notices in the same location as the community status list that is
already maintained on FEMA's website (the Community Status Book)
eliminates the preparation of these lists and saves the quarterly
preparation burden of approximately 15 hours per quarter at $80 per
hour,\13\ yielding a cost savings of $4,800 ($80 per hour x 15 hours
per quarter x 4 quarters a year) annually. This revision will save FEMA
costs without affecting policyholders or other stakeholders.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Community Status Book is available for public viewing
at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-status-book.
\13\ Hourly rates derived from FEMA estimates based on prior
contracting benchmarks for this service.
Table 2--Net Cost Savings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Internet Community
Year publication status report Net cost NPV at 3% NPV at 7%
cost cost savings savings
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1............................... $3,392 -$4,800 -$1,408 -$1,367 -$1,315
2............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -3,429 -3,178
3............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -3,329 -2,970
4............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -3,232 -2,775
5............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -3,138 -2,594
6............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -3,047 -2,424
7............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -2,958 -2,266
8............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -2,872 -2,117
9............................... 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -2,788 -1,979
10.............................. 1,162 -4,800 -3,638 -2,707 -1,849
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total....................... 13,850 -48,000 -34,150 -28,868 -23,468
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized.................. .............. .............. .............. -3,384 -3,341
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 68787]]
The net cost savings expected from this rulemaking are presented in
Table 2. The up-front transition costs are only expected to take place
in Year 1, thus the cost savings expected over the subsequent years are
not impacted. For the 10-year period analyzed, the estimated quantified
discounted total cost savings at 7 and 3 percent are $23,468
(annualized at $3,341) and $28,868 (annualized at $3,384),
respectively.
4. Benefits
Revising 59.24 to eliminate the Federal Register publication
requirements allows FEMA to be more agile and timely in updating
community status information. In contrast, continued updates through
the Federal Register would be slower, more expensive to FEMA, and
present the information in a format that is less accessible to
stakeholders.
In addition, making this change to 59.24, and updating FEMA's
regulations in Sec. 64.6, will locate all information related to
community status and eligibility for flood insurance in one place that
is well-known by stakeholders. This consolidation would improve the
ease and efficiency of locating community status and eligibility
information for stakeholders and for FEMA.
5. Transfers
Transfer payments are monetary payments from one group to another
that do not affect total resources available to society. There are no
anticipated transfer payments resulting from this final rule.
6. Alternatives Considered
FEMA considered continuing with their current method to publish the
community loss of eligibility notices in the Federal Register. This
would have taken more time to publish changes and updates. However,
stakeholders would know where to access the information since the
location of information would not change.
FEMA also considered the suggestion of one of the commenters about
broadcasting the community status information through TV commercials,
social media, or billboards in the impacted community to raise
awareness. Some of these suggestions would result in additional costs
and would not necessarily result in sufficient or immediate access to
the information that the final rule changes provide. Additionally,
notices of NFIP community status are routine and not suited to social
media platforms that are more focused on communicating materials
regarding the Agency's mission, including disaster preparedness,
mitigation, and response and recovery to stakeholders.
7. Summary
Table 3 provides the A-4 accounting summary.
Table 3--A-4 Accounting Statement
[2019$]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Source citation
Category 7 Percent discount 3 Percent discount (RIA, preamble,
rate rate etc.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benefits
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized Monetized................................ $0 $0 ..................
Annualized Quantified............................... N/A N/A ..................
-----------------------------------------------------------
Qualitative......................................... Allows FEMA to be more agile RIA
and timely in updating community
status information
Improve the ease and
efficiency of locating community
status and eligibility information
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Costs
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized Monetized................................ -$3,341 -$3,384 RIA
Annualized quantified............................... N/A N/A ..................
-----------------------------------------------------------
Qualitative......................................... N/A ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transfers
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annualized Monetized $millions/year................. N/A N/A ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
From/To............................................. N/A ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effects
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State, Local, and/or Tribal Government.............. None ..................
Small business...................................... None ..................
Wages............................................... None ..................
Growth.............................................. None ..................
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, 5 U.S.C. 601-612, as
amended, requires Federal agencies to consider the potential impact of
regulations on small entities. The term ``small entities'' comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. This
rule does not directly impact any small entities. This rule only
changes how FEMA shares loss of community
[[Page 68788]]
eligibility notices and community status information.
FEMA used the U.S. Census Bureau's 2017 Census of Government \14\
to estimate the number of small government jurisdictions in the United
States. According to the U.S. Census, there are 38,779 jurisdictions
consisting of counties, municipalities, and townships within the United
States. Among these, 35,748 would qualify as small government
jurisdictions, which would equate to 92.2 percent of all U.S.
governmental jurisdictions. Applying this percentage to the 22,490
communities currently participating in the National Flood Insurance
Program (NFIP) \15\ results in an estimated 20,736 small governmental
jurisdictions. Individual policyholders are not considered small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See U.S. Census Bureau, ``2017 Census of Governments, Local
Governments by Type and State 2017,'' Table 2, April 25, 2019,
available at: https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/gus/tables/2017/cog2017_cg1700org02.zip?#. Accessed June 25, 2020.
\15\ The number of NFIP communities is derived from ``The
National Flood Insurance Program Community Status Book,'' Page 478,
located at https://www.fema.gov/flood-insurance/work-with-nfip/community-status-book.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FEMA believes this rule would not impose any direct costs on small
entities and would allow easier access to information about flood
insurance eligibility. Accordingly, FEMA certifies that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. FEMA requested comments as to the impact that the NPRM would
have on small governmental jurisdictions; no comments were received.
1. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995, 2 U.S.C. 658, 1501-1504,
1531-1536, 1571, pertains to any rulemaking which is likely to result
in the promulgation of any rule that includes a Federal mandate that
may result in the expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million (adjusted
annually for inflation) or more in any one year. If the rulemaking
includes a Federal mandate, the Act requires an agency to prepare an
assessment of the anticipated costs and benefits of the Federal
mandate. The Act also pertains to any regulatory requirements that
might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Before
establishing any such requirements, an agency must develop a plan
allowing for input from the affected governments regarding the
requirements.
FEMA has determined that this rulemaking will not result in the
expenditure by State, local, and Tribal governments, in the aggregate,
nor by the private sector, of $100,000,000 or more in any one year as a
result of a Federal mandate, and it will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no actions are deemed necessary
under the provisions of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995.
2. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), as amended, 44
U.S.C. 3501-3520, an agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection of information unless the
agency obtains approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for the collection and the collection displays a valid OMB control
number. See 44 U.S.C. 3506, 3507. FEMA collects community information
for the purposes of application to the NFIP under OMB Control Number
1660-0004, Application for Participation in the National Flood
Insurance Program (NFIP).\16\ However, FEMA has determined that this
rulemaking does not impact this information collection or any other
collection of information under the PRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See 44 CFR 59.22 for a description of the information
collected.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Privacy Act/E-Government Act
Under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, an agency must
determine whether implementation of a proposed regulation will result
in a system of records. A ``record'' is any item, collection, or
grouping of information about an individual that is maintained by an
agency, including, but not limited to, his/her education, financial
transactions, medical history, and criminal or employment history and
that contains his/her name, or the identifying number, symbol, or other
identifying particular assigned to the individual, such as a finger or
voice print or a photograph. See 5 U.S.C. 552a(a)(4). A ``system of
records'' is a group of records under the control of an agency from
which information is retrieved by the name of the individual or by some
identifying number, symbol, or other identifying particular assigned to
the individual. See id. section 552a(a)(5). An agency cannot disclose
any record which is contained in a system of records except by
following specific procedures.
The E-Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. 3501 note also requires
specific procedures when an agency takes action to develop or procure
information technology that collects, maintains, or disseminates
information that is in an identifiable form. This Act also applies when
an agency initiates a new collection of information that will be
collected, maintained, or disseminated using information technology if
it includes any information in an identifiable form permitting the
physical or online contacting of a specific individual.
In accordance with DHS policy, FEMA has completed a Privacy
Threshold Analysis (PTA) for this rule. DHS determined that this
rulemaking is not privacy sensitive, as it does not affect the
information collected about an individual. FEMA's original collection
and maintenance of NFIP related personally identifiable information has
coverage under the DHS/FEMA-003-National Flood Insurance Program Files,
79 FR 28747 (May 19, 2014) System of Records Notice and the DHS/FEMA/
PIA--011 National Flood Insurance Program Information Technology System
Privacy Impact Assessment. Therefore, this rulemaking does not require
coverage under an existing or new Privacy Impact Assessment or System
of Records Notice.
4. Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments''
Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and Coordination with Indian
Tribal Governments,'' 65 FR 67249, (Nov. 9, 2000), applies to agency
regulations that have Tribal implications, that is, regulations that
have substantial direct effects on one or more Indian Tribes, on the
relationship between the Federal government and Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. Under this Executive Order, to the extent
practicable and permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any
regulation that has Tribal implications, that imposes substantial
direct compliance costs on Indian Tribal governments, and that is not
required by statute, unless funds necessary to pay the direct costs
incurred by the Indian Tribal government or the Tribe in complying with
the regulation are provided by the Federal government, or the agency
consults with Tribal officials.
Nor, to the extent practicable by law, may an agency promulgate a
regulation that has Tribal implications and preempts Tribal law, unless
the agency consults with Tribal officials. Although Tribes that meet
the NFIP eligibility criteria can participate in the NFIP in
[[Page 68789]]
the same manner as communities,\17\ FEMA has reviewed this final rule
under Executive Order 13175 and has determined that the rule does not
have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian Tribes, or on
the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian Tribes. This final rule modernizes notice
requirements for community loss of eligibility information and
community status information: therefore, the changes in this rule do
not substantially or disproportionately affect Indian Tribal
governments acting as communities under the NFIP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Although the NFIP does not explicitly reference Tribal
Governments, FEMA includes Tribal nations in its definition of a
community. See 44 CFR 59.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
5. Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism''
Executive Order 13132, ``Federalism,'' 64 FR 43255 (Aug. 10, 1999),
sets forth principles and criteria that agencies must adhere to in
formulating and implementing policies that have federalism
implications, that is, regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.'' For the
purposes of this Executive Order, the term States also includes local
governments or other subdivisions established by the States. Under this
Executive Order, Federal agencies must closely examine the statutory
authority supporting any action that would limit the policymaking
discretion of the States. Further, to the extent practicable and
permitted by law, no agency shall promulgate any regulation that has
federalism implications, that imposes substantial direct compliance
costs on State and local governments, and that is not required by
statute, unless the Federal Government provides funds necessary to pay
the direct costs incurred by the State and local governments in
complying with the regulation, or the agency consults with State and
local officials. Nor, to the extent practicable by law, may an agency
promulgate a regulation that has federalism implications and preempts
State law, unless the agency consults with State and local officials.
FEMA has reviewed this rule under Executive Order 13132 and has
determined that it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, and therefore does not have federalism
implications as defined by the Executive Order. This rule modernizes
notice requirements for community status information under the NFIP;
therefore, this rule does not impact the substantive rights, roles, or
responsibilities of States, and does not limit State policymaking
discretion.
6. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA)
Section 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA), 83 Stat. 852 (Jan. 1, 1970) (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) requires
agencies to consider the impacts of their proposed actions on the
quality of the human environment. The Council on Environmental
Quality's procedures for implementing NEPA, 40 CFR 1500 et seq.,
require Federal agencies to prepare Environmental Impact Statements
(EIS) for major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of
the human environment. Each agency can develop categorical exclusions
to cover actions that have been demonstrated to not typically trigger
significant impacts to the human environment individually or
cumulatively. Agencies develop environmental assessments (EA) to
evaluate those actions that do not fit an agency's categorical
exclusion and for which the need for an EIS is not readily apparent. At
the end of the EA process, the agency will determine whether to make a
Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) or whether to initiate the EIS
process.
Rulemaking is a major Federal action subject to NEPA. Categorical
exclusions A3 included in the list of exclusion categories at
Department of Homeland Security Manual 023-01-001-01, Revision 01,
Implementation of the National Environmental Policy Act, Appendix A,
issued November 6, 2014, covers the promulgation of rules, issuance of
rulings or interpretations, and the development and publication of
policies, orders, directives, notices, procedures, manuals, and
advisory circulars if they meet certain criteria provided in A3(a-f).
This final rule meets Categorical Exclusion A3(d), ``Those that
interpret or amend an existing regulation without changing its
environmental effect.''
7. Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking
Under the Congressional Review of Agency Rulemaking Act (CRA), 5
U.S.C. 801-808, before a rule can take effect, the Federal agency
promulgating the rule must submit to Congress and to the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) a copy of the rule; a concise general
statement relating to the rule, including whether it is a major rule;
the proposed effective date of the rule; a copy of any cost-benefit
analysis; descriptions of the agency's actions under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act and the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act; and any other
information or statements required by relevant executive orders.
FEMA has sent this final rule to the Congress and to GAO pursuant
to the CRA. The rule is not a ``major rule'' within the meaning of the
CRA. It will not have an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000
or more; it will not result in a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government
agencies, or geographic regions; and it will not have significant
adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity,
innovation, or on the ability of United States-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects
44 CFR Parts 59
Flood insurance, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
44 CFR Part 64
Flood insurance, Floodplains, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, FEMA amends 44 CFR parts 59
and 64 as follows:
PART 59--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 59 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq., Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 43 FR 41943, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127 of Mar. 31,
1979, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR, 1979 Comp., p. 376.
0
2. Amend Sec. 59.24 by:
0
a. Revising the fourth sentence of paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising the fourth sentence of paragraph (c);
0
c. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (d);
0
d. Revising the second sentence of paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 59.24 Suspension of community eligibility.
(a) * * * If, subsequently, copies of adequate flood plain
management regulations are not received by the Administrator, no later
than 30 days before the expiration of the original six month period the
Federal Insurance
[[Page 68790]]
Administrator shall provide written notice to the community and to the
state and assure publication of the community's loss of eligibility for
the sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable
method, such suspension to become effective upon the expiration of the
six month period. * * *
* * * * *
(c) * * * If a community is to be suspended, the Federal Insurance
Administrator shall inform it upon 30 days prior written notice and
upon publication of its loss of eligibility for the sale of flood
insurance on the internet or by another comparable method. * * *
(d) * * * If a community is to be suspended, the Federal Insurance
Administrator shall inform it upon 30 days prior written notice and
upon publication of its loss of eligibly for the sale of flood
insurance on the internet or by another comparable method. * * *
(e) * * * Upon receipt of a certified copy of a final legislative
action, the Federal Insurance Administrator shall withdraw the
community from the Program and publish its loss of eligibility for the
sale of flood insurance on the internet or by another comparable
method. * * *
* * * * *
PART 64--COMMUNITIES ELIGIBLE FOR THE SALE OF INSURANCE
0
3. The authority citation for part 61 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 4001 et seq.; Reorganization Plan No. 3 of
1978, 3 CFR, 1978 Comp., p. 329; E.O. 12127, 44 FR 19367, 3 CFR,
1979 Comp., p. 376.
0
4. Revise Sec. 61.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 64.6 List of eligible communities.
FEMA will maintain a list of communities eligible for the sale of
flood insurance pursuant to the National Flood Insurance Program (42
U.S.C. 4001-4128). This list will be published and maintained on the
internet or through another comparable method.
Pete Gaynor,
Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
[FR Doc. 2020-23970 Filed 10-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-52-P