Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, 68538-68540 [2020-23985]
Download as PDF
68538
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act;
and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the SIP is not approved
to apply on any Indian reservation land
or in any other area where EPA or an
Indian tribe has demonstrated that a
tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of
Indian country, the rule does not have
tribal implications and will not impose
substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because
redesignation is an action that affects
the status of a geographical area and
does not impose any new regulatory
requirements on tribes, impact any
existing sources of air pollution on
tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance
of ozone national ambient air quality
standards in tribal lands.
List of Subjects
40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides.
40 CFR Part 81
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, National parks,
Wilderness areas.
Dated: October 19, 2020.
Kurt Thiede,
Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 2020–23496 Filed 10–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Oct 28, 2020
Jkt 253001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0516; FRL–10015–
82—Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State
Plans for Designated Facilities and
Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of
Emissions From Existing Municipal
Solid Waste Landfills
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
Clean Air Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’)
section 111(d) state plan submitted by
the South Dakota Department of
Environment and Natural Resources
(DENR or the ‘‘Department’’) on January
3, 2020. This plan was submitted to
fulfill the requirements of the CAA and
is responsive to the EPA’s promulgation
of Emission Guidelines and Compliance
Times for existing municipal solid
waste (MSW) landfills. The South
Dakota state plan establishes
performance standards and other
operating requirements for existing
MSW landfills within the State of South
Dakota and provides for the
implementation and enforcement of
those standards and requirements by the
Department.
DATES: Written comments must be
received on or before November 30,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08–
OAR–2020–0516, to the Federal
Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
Once submitted, comments cannot be
edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may
publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit
electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Multimedia submissions (audio, video,
etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is
considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points
you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or
comment contents located outside of the
primary submission (i.e., on the web,
cloud, or other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, the full
EPA public comment policy,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Air and Radiation Division,
Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. The EPA
requests that if at all possible, you
contact the individual listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket
Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4
p.m., excluding federal holidays and
facility closures.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gregory Lohrke, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode
8ARD–TRM, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129, (303)
312–6396, lohrke.gregory@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
I. Background
On August 29, 2016, the EPA
finalized revised Standards of
Performance (NSPS) for new MSW
landfills and Emission Guidelines and
Compliance Times (EG) for existing
MSW landfills in 40 CFR part 60,
subparts XXX and Cf, respectively. See
81 FR 59331 and 59313. These
rulemaking actions were taken in
accordance with section 111 of the
CAA. Section 111(d) of the Act requires
the EPA establish procedures for a state
to submit a plan to the Agency that
establishes standards of performance for
any ‘existing’ source for any air
pollutant, (1) for which air quality
criteria have not been issued or which
is not included on a list published
under CAA section 108, or emitted from
a source category which is regulated
under CAA section 112, but (2) to which
a new source performance standard
under section 111(b) would apply if
such existing source were a ‘new’
source. The EPA established general
provisions for submittal of state plans
for 111(d) sources in 40 CFR part 60,
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
subpart B and has recently promulgated
revised general provisions for CAA
111(d) state plans in Subpart Ba of that
same Part and Title of the CFR. See 84
FR 32575. State plan submittals for CAA
section 111(d) sources must be
consistent with the requirements of
these general provisions and also
establish performance standards and
other requirements at least as stringent
as those established by the relevant EG
as published in 40 CFR part 60. Upon
state plan submittal, the EPA reviews a
state’s plan for consistency with the
requirements of the general provisions
and specific EG. If the state plan is
complete and approvable with reference
to these requirements, the Agency
notifies the public, promulgates the plan
in 40 CFR part 62 and delegates
implementation and enforcement of the
standards and requirements of the EG to
the state under the terms of the state
plan as published in the CFR. Today’s
action concerns the completeness and
approvability of South Dakota’s CAA
section 111(d) state plan for existing
MSW landfills.
Under the new Ba implementing
regulations and Section 111(d), state
plan submittal must meet the
completeness requirements of 40 CFR
part 60, subpart Ba, sections 60.23a and
60.27a(g). Section 60.27a(g) states that:
‘‘Any plan or plan revision that a State
submits to the EPA, and that has not
been determined by the EPA by the date
6 months after receipt of the submission
to have failed to meet the minimum
criteria, shall on that date be deemed by
operation of law to meet such minimum
criteria.’’ 40 CFR 60.27a(g)(1).
The Secretary of the South Dakota
DENR submitted a final CAA section
111(d) state plan for existing MSW
landfills on January 3, 2020 in response
to the August 29, 2016 promulgation,
mentioned above in this preamble, of
the EG for such designated facilities at
40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. Six months
have passed since the date of the plan
submission. Therefore, the plan is
deemed to have met the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR 60.27a(g).
II. Summary and Analysis of the Plan
Submittal
The EPA has reviewed the South
Dakota 111(d) plan submittal in the
context of the plan completeness and
approvability requirements found in 40
CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and
part 62, subpart A. The EPA is
proposing with this action to determine
that the submitted section 111(d) plan
meets the above cited requirements. The
South Dakota state plan submittal
package includes all materials necessary
to be deemed administratively and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Oct 28, 2020
Jkt 253001
technically complete according to the
criteria of 40 CFR 60.27a(g). South
Dakota has chosen to author a state plan
document and provide all
implementation and enforcement
authority for all state plan requirements
through revisions to the Administrative
Rules of South Dakota (ARSD).
Specifically, the State has appropriately
incorporated all EG performance
standards and other source
requirements in ARSD article 74:36,
section 01:19 and sections 07:94–145.
Both the State plan document, the
relevant ARSD sections, and all other
relevant plan submittal materials may
be found in the docket for this action.
Necessary State legal and enforcement
authorities required for plan approval
are located elsewhere in South Dakota
statute, rules and regulations and have
been reviewed and approved of by the
EPA in the course of prior CAA section
111(d) or 111(d)/129 state plan
approvals. See 40 CFR 62.10350–10362.
Following the EPA’s review of the
submittal materials, the Agency finds
the State plan package to be approvable
according to all plan requirements.
In this action, EPA is proposing to
incorporate by reference (IBR) Article
74:36, Chapter 1, section 19 and Chapter
7, sections 94–145 of the ARSD, which
became effective in the State of South
Dakota on November 25, 2019. Analysis
of the submitted plan’s completeness
and approvability, with reference to the
relevant general and source category
specific plan requirements of 40 CFR
part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and a
detailed explanation of the rationale
supporting this proposed approval is
available in the Technical Support
Document (TSD) in the docket of this
proposed rule.
III. Proposed Action
The EPA is proposing to approve the
South Dakota section 111(d) state plan
for MSW landfills pursuant to 40 CFR
part 60, subparts B, Ba, and Cf.
Therefore, the EPA is proposing to
amend 40 CFR part 62, subpart QQ to
reflect this approval action. This
approval is based on the rationale
provided in section II of this preamble
and discussed in detail in the TSD
associated with this rulemaking action.
The scope of the proposed approval is
limited to the provisions of 40 CFR parts
60 and 62. The EPA’s proposed
approval of the South Dakota plan is
limited to those landfills that meet the
criteria established in 40 CFR part 60,
subpart Cf.
The EPA Administrator continues to
retain authority for approval of
alternative methods to determine the
nonmethane organic compound
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
68539
concentration or a site-specific methane
generation rate constant (k), as
stipulated in 40 CFR 60.30f(c).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is
proposing to incorporate by reference
DENR rules regarding MSW landfills
discussed in section II of this preamble
in accordance with the requirements of
1 CFR 51.5. The EPA has made, and will
continue to make, these materials
available through the docket for this
action, EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0516, at
https://www.regulations.gov, and at the
EPA Region VIII Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
In reviewing state plan submissions,
the EPA’s role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the
criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves state law as
meeting federal requirements and does
not impose additional requirements
beyond those imposed by state law. For
that reason, this proposed action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget under
Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821,
January 21, 2011);
• Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82
FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory
action because 111(d) plan approvals
are exempted under Executive Order
12866;
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
section 12(d) of the National
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
68540
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the South Dakota state
plan for existing MSW landfills is not
approved to apply on any Indian
reservation land or in any other area
where EPA or an Indian tribe has
demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian
country, the proposed rule does not
have tribal implications and will not
impose substantial direct costs on tribal
governments or preempt tribal law as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Landfills,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Methane,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: October 23, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020–23985 Filed 10–28–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
42 CFR Part 100
RIN 0906–AB24
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program: Revisions to the Vaccine
Injury Table
Health Resources and Services
Administration (HRSA), U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services (HHS).
ACTION: Notification.
AGENCY:
This document announces a
public hearing to receive information
and views on the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ‘‘National
Vaccine Injury Compensation Program:
Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table.’’
DATES: November 9, 2020, 10:00 a.m.–
2:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET).
The ending time of this public hearing
may change based on public interest.
The most up-to-date information about
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:26 Oct 28, 2020
Jkt 253001
the public hearing will be available on
the National Vaccine Injury
Compensation (VICP) website, https://
www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/
index.html.
This meeting will be held
by Adobe Connect webinar and
teleconference.
The public can join the meeting by:
1. (Audio Portion) Calling the
conference phone number 800–988–
0218 and providing the following
information:
Leader: Tamara Overby
Password: 46525
2. (Visual Portion) Connecting to the
Public Hearing Adobe Connect Pro
Meeting using the following URL:
https://hrsa.connectsolutions.com/
VICPPublicHearing (copy and paste the
link into your browser if it does not
work directly, and enter as a guest).
Participants should call and connect 15
minutes prior to the meeting in order for
logistics to be set up. If you have never
attended an Adobe Connect meeting,
please test your connection using the
following URL: https://
hrsa.connectsolutions.com/common/
help/en/support/meeting_test.htm and
get a quick overview by following URL:
https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_
overview. Call (301) 443–6634 or send
an email to aherzog@hrsa.gov if you are
having trouble connecting to the
meeting site.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tamara Overby, Acting Director,
Division of Injury Compensation
Programs (DICP), Healthcare Systems
Bureau (HSB), HRSA, 5600 Fishers
Lane, 08N–142, Rockville, Maryland
20857; 855–266–2427 or by email
TOverby@hrsa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Secretary proposes to amend the
Vaccine Injury Table (Table) by
regulation. The proposed regulation will
have effect only for petitions for
compensation under the VICP filed after
the final regulation become effective.
The Secretary is seeking public
comment on the proposed revisions to
the Table.
The NPRM went on public display on
July 16, 2020. The public comment
period closes on January 12, 2021. 85 FR
43794 (July 20, 2020) https://
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-202007-20/pdf/2020-15673.pdf.
The public hearing will be held
within the 180-day public comment
period. This hearing is to provide an
open forum for the presentation of
information and views concerning all
aspects of the NPRM by interested
persons.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00054
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
In preparing a final regulation, the
Secretary will consider the
administrative record of this hearing
along with all other written comments
received during the comment period
specified in the NPRM. Individuals or
representatives of interested
organizations are invited to participate
in the public hearing in accordance with
the schedule and procedures set forth
below.
The presiding officer representing the
Secretary of HHS will be Tamara
Overby, Acting Director, DICP, HSB,
HRSA.
Persons who wish to participate are
requested to file a notice of participation
with HHS on or before October 26, 2020.
The notice should be mailed to the
National Vaccine Injury Compensation
Program, DICP, HSB, 08N146B, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland
20857 or emailed to aherzog@hrsa.gov.
To ensure timely handling, any outer
envelope or the subject line of an email
should be clearly marked ‘‘VICP NPRM
Hearing.’’ The notice of participation
should contain the interested person’s
name, address, email address, telephone
number, any business or organizational
affiliation of the person desiring to make
a presentation, a brief summary of the
presentation, and the approximate time
requested for the presentation. Groups
that have similar interests should
consolidate their comments as part of
one presentation. Time available for the
hearing will be allocated among the
persons who properly file notices of
participation. If time permits, interested
parties attending the hearing who did
not submit notice of participation in
advance will be allowed to make an oral
presentation at the conclusion of the
hearing.
Persons who find that there is
insufficient time to submit the required
information in writing may give oral
notice of participation by calling Annie
Herzog, DICP, at (301) 443–6634, no
later than October 26, 2020.
After reviewing the notices of
participation and accompanying
information, HHS will schedule each
appearance and notify each participant
by mail, email, or telephone of the time
allotted to the person(s) and the
approximate time the person’s oral
presentation is scheduled to begin.
A summary of comments and a
recording of the hearing will be made
available for public inspection at the
VICP website, https://www.hrsa.gov/
vaccine-compensation/, as
soon as they have been prepared.
E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM
29OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 210 (Thursday, October 29, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68538-68540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 62
[EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0516; FRL-10015-82--Region 8]
Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated
Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of Emissions From
Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to
approve a Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act'') section 111(d) state plan
submitted by the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural
Resources (DENR or the ``Department'') on January 3, 2020. This plan
was submitted to fulfill the requirements of the CAA and is responsive
to the EPA's promulgation of Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times
for existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The South Dakota
state plan establishes performance standards and other operating
requirements for existing MSW landfills within the State of South
Dakota and provides for the implementation and enforcement of those
standards and requirements by the Department.
DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 30,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2020-0516, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation
Division, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. The EPA requests that if at all
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m.
to 4 p.m., excluding federal holidays and facility closures.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Lohrke, Air and Radiation
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-TRM, 1595 Wynkoop Street,
Denver, Colorado, 80202-1129, (303) 312-6396, [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
I. Background
On August 29, 2016, the EPA finalized revised Standards of
Performance (NSPS) for new MSW landfills and Emission Guidelines and
Compliance Times (EG) for existing MSW landfills in 40 CFR part 60,
subparts XXX and Cf, respectively. See 81 FR 59331 and 59313. These
rulemaking actions were taken in accordance with section 111 of the
CAA. Section 111(d) of the Act requires the EPA establish procedures
for a state to submit a plan to the Agency that establishes standards
of performance for any `existing' source for any air pollutant, (1) for
which air quality criteria have not been issued or which is not
included on a list published under CAA section 108, or emitted from a
source category which is regulated under CAA section 112, but (2) to
which a new source performance standard under section 111(b) would
apply if such existing source were a `new' source. The EPA established
general provisions for submittal of state plans for 111(d) sources in
40 CFR part 60,
[[Page 68539]]
subpart B and has recently promulgated revised general provisions for
CAA 111(d) state plans in Subpart Ba of that same Part and Title of the
CFR. See 84 FR 32575. State plan submittals for CAA section 111(d)
sources must be consistent with the requirements of these general
provisions and also establish performance standards and other
requirements at least as stringent as those established by the relevant
EG as published in 40 CFR part 60. Upon state plan submittal, the EPA
reviews a state's plan for consistency with the requirements of the
general provisions and specific EG. If the state plan is complete and
approvable with reference to these requirements, the Agency notifies
the public, promulgates the plan in 40 CFR part 62 and delegates
implementation and enforcement of the standards and requirements of the
EG to the state under the terms of the state plan as published in the
CFR. Today's action concerns the completeness and approvability of
South Dakota's CAA section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW
landfills.
Under the new Ba implementing regulations and Section 111(d), state
plan submittal must meet the completeness requirements of 40 CFR part
60, subpart Ba, sections 60.23a and 60.27a(g). Section 60.27a(g) states
that: ``Any plan or plan revision that a State submits to the EPA, and
that has not been determined by the EPA by the date 6 months after
receipt of the submission to have failed to meet the minimum criteria,
shall on that date be deemed by operation of law to meet such minimum
criteria.'' 40 CFR 60.27a(g)(1).
The Secretary of the South Dakota DENR submitted a final CAA
section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW landfills on January 3, 2020
in response to the August 29, 2016 promulgation, mentioned above in
this preamble, of the EG for such designated facilities at 40 CFR part
60, subpart Cf. Six months have passed since the date of the plan
submission. Therefore, the plan is deemed to have met the completeness
criteria in 40 CFR 60.27a(g).
II. Summary and Analysis of the Plan Submittal
The EPA has reviewed the South Dakota 111(d) plan submittal in the
context of the plan completeness and approvability requirements found
in 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and part 62, subpart A. The
EPA is proposing with this action to determine that the submitted
section 111(d) plan meets the above cited requirements. The South
Dakota state plan submittal package includes all materials necessary to
be deemed administratively and technically complete according to the
criteria of 40 CFR 60.27a(g). South Dakota has chosen to author a state
plan document and provide all implementation and enforcement authority
for all state plan requirements through revisions to the Administrative
Rules of South Dakota (ARSD). Specifically, the State has appropriately
incorporated all EG performance standards and other source requirements
in ARSD article 74:36, section 01:19 and sections 07:94-145. Both the
State plan document, the relevant ARSD sections, and all other relevant
plan submittal materials may be found in the docket for this action.
Necessary State legal and enforcement authorities required for plan
approval are located elsewhere in South Dakota statute, rules and
regulations and have been reviewed and approved of by the EPA in the
course of prior CAA section 111(d) or 111(d)/129 state plan approvals.
See 40 CFR 62.10350-10362. Following the EPA's review of the submittal
materials, the Agency finds the State plan package to be approvable
according to all plan requirements.
In this action, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference (IBR)
Article 74:36, Chapter 1, section 19 and Chapter 7, sections 94-145 of
the ARSD, which became effective in the State of South Dakota on
November 25, 2019. Analysis of the submitted plan's completeness and
approvability, with reference to the relevant general and source
category specific plan requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba
and Cf, and a detailed explanation of the rationale supporting this
proposed approval is available in the Technical Support Document (TSD)
in the docket of this proposed rule.
III. Proposed Action
The EPA is proposing to approve the South Dakota section 111(d)
state plan for MSW landfills pursuant to 40 CFR part 60, subparts B,
Ba, and Cf. Therefore, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62,
subpart QQ to reflect this approval action. This approval is based on
the rationale provided in section II of this preamble and discussed in
detail in the TSD associated with this rulemaking action. The scope of
the proposed approval is limited to the provisions of 40 CFR parts 60
and 62. The EPA's proposed approval of the South Dakota plan is limited
to those landfills that meet the criteria established in 40 CFR part
60, subpart Cf.
The EPA Administrator continues to retain authority for approval of
alternative methods to determine the nonmethane organic compound
concentration or a site-specific methane generation rate constant (k),
as stipulated in 40 CFR 60.30f(c).
IV. Incorporation by Reference
In this document, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference
DENR rules regarding MSW landfills discussed in section II of this
preamble in accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5. The EPA has
made, and will continue to make, these materials available through the
docket for this action, EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0516, at https://www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region VIII Office (please contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble for more information).
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
In reviewing state plan submissions, the EPA's role is to approve
state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA.
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21,
2011);
Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2,
2017) regulatory action because 111(d) plan approvals are exempted
under Executive Order 12866;
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the
National
[[Page 68540]]
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note)
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with
the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, the South Dakota state plan for existing MSW landfills
is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other
area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Landfills,
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Methane,
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides,
Volatile organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: October 23, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020-23985 Filed 10-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P