Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills, 68538-68540 [2020-23985]

Download as PDF 68538 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), because redesignation is an action that affects the status of a geographical area and does not impose any new regulatory requirements on tribes, impact any existing sources of air pollution on tribal lands, nor impair the maintenance of ozone national ambient air quality standards in tribal lands. List of Subjects 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides. 40 CFR Part 81 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Environmental protection, Air pollution control, National parks, Wilderness areas. Dated: October 19, 2020. Kurt Thiede, Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 2020–23496 Filed 10–28–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Oct 28, 2020 Jkt 253001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 62 [EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0516; FRL–10015– 82—Region 8] Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of Emissions From Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a Clean Air Act (CAA or the ‘‘Act’’) section 111(d) state plan submitted by the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR or the ‘‘Department’’) on January 3, 2020. This plan was submitted to fulfill the requirements of the CAA and is responsive to the EPA’s promulgation of Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times for existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The South Dakota state plan establishes performance standards and other operating requirements for existing MSW landfills within the State of South Dakota and provides for the implementation and enforcement of those standards and requirements by the Department. DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 30, 2020. SUMMARY: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R08– OAR–2020–0516, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment policy, ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00052 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Division, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. The EPA requests that if at all possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4 p.m., excluding federal holidays and facility closures. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Lohrke, Air and Radiation Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD–TRM, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, Colorado, 80202–1129, (303) 312–6396, lohrke.gregory@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background On August 29, 2016, the EPA finalized revised Standards of Performance (NSPS) for new MSW landfills and Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times (EG) for existing MSW landfills in 40 CFR part 60, subparts XXX and Cf, respectively. See 81 FR 59331 and 59313. These rulemaking actions were taken in accordance with section 111 of the CAA. Section 111(d) of the Act requires the EPA establish procedures for a state to submit a plan to the Agency that establishes standards of performance for any ‘existing’ source for any air pollutant, (1) for which air quality criteria have not been issued or which is not included on a list published under CAA section 108, or emitted from a source category which is regulated under CAA section 112, but (2) to which a new source performance standard under section 111(b) would apply if such existing source were a ‘new’ source. The EPA established general provisions for submittal of state plans for 111(d) sources in 40 CFR part 60, E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM 29OCP1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS subpart B and has recently promulgated revised general provisions for CAA 111(d) state plans in Subpart Ba of that same Part and Title of the CFR. See 84 FR 32575. State plan submittals for CAA section 111(d) sources must be consistent with the requirements of these general provisions and also establish performance standards and other requirements at least as stringent as those established by the relevant EG as published in 40 CFR part 60. Upon state plan submittal, the EPA reviews a state’s plan for consistency with the requirements of the general provisions and specific EG. If the state plan is complete and approvable with reference to these requirements, the Agency notifies the public, promulgates the plan in 40 CFR part 62 and delegates implementation and enforcement of the standards and requirements of the EG to the state under the terms of the state plan as published in the CFR. Today’s action concerns the completeness and approvability of South Dakota’s CAA section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW landfills. Under the new Ba implementing regulations and Section 111(d), state plan submittal must meet the completeness requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subpart Ba, sections 60.23a and 60.27a(g). Section 60.27a(g) states that: ‘‘Any plan or plan revision that a State submits to the EPA, and that has not been determined by the EPA by the date 6 months after receipt of the submission to have failed to meet the minimum criteria, shall on that date be deemed by operation of law to meet such minimum criteria.’’ 40 CFR 60.27a(g)(1). The Secretary of the South Dakota DENR submitted a final CAA section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW landfills on January 3, 2020 in response to the August 29, 2016 promulgation, mentioned above in this preamble, of the EG for such designated facilities at 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. Six months have passed since the date of the plan submission. Therefore, the plan is deemed to have met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR 60.27a(g). II. Summary and Analysis of the Plan Submittal The EPA has reviewed the South Dakota 111(d) plan submittal in the context of the plan completeness and approvability requirements found in 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and part 62, subpart A. The EPA is proposing with this action to determine that the submitted section 111(d) plan meets the above cited requirements. The South Dakota state plan submittal package includes all materials necessary to be deemed administratively and VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Oct 28, 2020 Jkt 253001 technically complete according to the criteria of 40 CFR 60.27a(g). South Dakota has chosen to author a state plan document and provide all implementation and enforcement authority for all state plan requirements through revisions to the Administrative Rules of South Dakota (ARSD). Specifically, the State has appropriately incorporated all EG performance standards and other source requirements in ARSD article 74:36, section 01:19 and sections 07:94–145. Both the State plan document, the relevant ARSD sections, and all other relevant plan submittal materials may be found in the docket for this action. Necessary State legal and enforcement authorities required for plan approval are located elsewhere in South Dakota statute, rules and regulations and have been reviewed and approved of by the EPA in the course of prior CAA section 111(d) or 111(d)/129 state plan approvals. See 40 CFR 62.10350–10362. Following the EPA’s review of the submittal materials, the Agency finds the State plan package to be approvable according to all plan requirements. In this action, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference (IBR) Article 74:36, Chapter 1, section 19 and Chapter 7, sections 94–145 of the ARSD, which became effective in the State of South Dakota on November 25, 2019. Analysis of the submitted plan’s completeness and approvability, with reference to the relevant general and source category specific plan requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and a detailed explanation of the rationale supporting this proposed approval is available in the Technical Support Document (TSD) in the docket of this proposed rule. III. Proposed Action The EPA is proposing to approve the South Dakota section 111(d) state plan for MSW landfills pursuant to 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba, and Cf. Therefore, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62, subpart QQ to reflect this approval action. This approval is based on the rationale provided in section II of this preamble and discussed in detail in the TSD associated with this rulemaking action. The scope of the proposed approval is limited to the provisions of 40 CFR parts 60 and 62. The EPA’s proposed approval of the South Dakota plan is limited to those landfills that meet the criteria established in 40 CFR part 60, subpart Cf. The EPA Administrator continues to retain authority for approval of alternative methods to determine the nonmethane organic compound PO 00000 Frm 00053 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 68539 concentration or a site-specific methane generation rate constant (k), as stipulated in 40 CFR 60.30f(c). IV. Incorporation by Reference In this document, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference DENR rules regarding MSW landfills discussed in section II of this preamble in accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5. The EPA has made, and will continue to make, these materials available through the docket for this action, EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0516, at https://www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region VIII Office (please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this preamble for more information). V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews In reviewing state plan submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 2017) regulatory action because 111(d) plan approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); • Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM 29OCP1 68540 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 210 / Thursday, October 29, 2020 / Proposed Rules Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the CAA; and • Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the South Dakota state plan for existing MSW landfills is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Landfills, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Methane, Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: October 23, 2020. Gregory Sopkin, Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8. [FR Doc. 2020–23985 Filed 10–28–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 42 CFR Part 100 RIN 0906–AB24 National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). ACTION: Notification. AGENCY: This document announces a public hearing to receive information and views on the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) entitled ‘‘National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program: Revisions to the Vaccine Injury Table.’’ DATES: November 9, 2020, 10:00 a.m.– 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET). The ending time of this public hearing may change based on public interest. The most up-to-date information about jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with PROPOSALS SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:26 Oct 28, 2020 Jkt 253001 the public hearing will be available on the National Vaccine Injury Compensation (VICP) website, https:// www.hrsa.gov/vaccine-compensation/ index.html. This meeting will be held by Adobe Connect webinar and teleconference. The public can join the meeting by: 1. (Audio Portion) Calling the conference phone number 800–988– 0218 and providing the following information: Leader: Tamara Overby Password: 46525 2. (Visual Portion) Connecting to the Public Hearing Adobe Connect Pro Meeting using the following URL: https://hrsa.connectsolutions.com/ VICPPublicHearing (copy and paste the link into your browser if it does not work directly, and enter as a guest). Participants should call and connect 15 minutes prior to the meeting in order for logistics to be set up. If you have never attended an Adobe Connect meeting, please test your connection using the following URL: https:// hrsa.connectsolutions.com/common/ help/en/support/meeting_test.htm and get a quick overview by following URL: https://www.adobe.com/go/connectpro_ overview. Call (301) 443–6634 or send an email to aherzog@hrsa.gov if you are having trouble connecting to the meeting site. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tamara Overby, Acting Director, Division of Injury Compensation Programs (DICP), Healthcare Systems Bureau (HSB), HRSA, 5600 Fishers Lane, 08N–142, Rockville, Maryland 20857; 855–266–2427 or by email TOverby@hrsa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Secretary proposes to amend the Vaccine Injury Table (Table) by regulation. The proposed regulation will have effect only for petitions for compensation under the VICP filed after the final regulation become effective. The Secretary is seeking public comment on the proposed revisions to the Table. The NPRM went on public display on July 16, 2020. The public comment period closes on January 12, 2021. 85 FR 43794 (July 20, 2020) https:// www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-202007-20/pdf/2020-15673.pdf. The public hearing will be held within the 180-day public comment period. This hearing is to provide an open forum for the presentation of information and views concerning all aspects of the NPRM by interested persons. ADDRESSES: PO 00000 Frm 00054 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 In preparing a final regulation, the Secretary will consider the administrative record of this hearing along with all other written comments received during the comment period specified in the NPRM. Individuals or representatives of interested organizations are invited to participate in the public hearing in accordance with the schedule and procedures set forth below. The presiding officer representing the Secretary of HHS will be Tamara Overby, Acting Director, DICP, HSB, HRSA. Persons who wish to participate are requested to file a notice of participation with HHS on or before October 26, 2020. The notice should be mailed to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, DICP, HSB, 08N146B, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, Maryland 20857 or emailed to aherzog@hrsa.gov. To ensure timely handling, any outer envelope or the subject line of an email should be clearly marked ‘‘VICP NPRM Hearing.’’ The notice of participation should contain the interested person’s name, address, email address, telephone number, any business or organizational affiliation of the person desiring to make a presentation, a brief summary of the presentation, and the approximate time requested for the presentation. Groups that have similar interests should consolidate their comments as part of one presentation. Time available for the hearing will be allocated among the persons who properly file notices of participation. If time permits, interested parties attending the hearing who did not submit notice of participation in advance will be allowed to make an oral presentation at the conclusion of the hearing. Persons who find that there is insufficient time to submit the required information in writing may give oral notice of participation by calling Annie Herzog, DICP, at (301) 443–6634, no later than October 26, 2020. After reviewing the notices of participation and accompanying information, HHS will schedule each appearance and notify each participant by mail, email, or telephone of the time allotted to the person(s) and the approximate time the person’s oral presentation is scheduled to begin. A summary of comments and a recording of the hearing will be made available for public inspection at the VICP website, https://www.hrsa.gov/ vaccine-compensation/, as soon as they have been prepared. E:\FR\FM\29OCP1.SGM 29OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 210 (Thursday, October 29, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 68538-68540]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23985]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 62

[EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0516; FRL-10015-82--Region 8]


Approval and Promulgation of State Plans for Designated 
Facilities and Pollutants; South Dakota; Control of Emissions From 
Existing Municipal Solid Waste Landfills

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve a Clean Air Act (CAA or the ``Act'') section 111(d) state plan 
submitted by the South Dakota Department of Environment and Natural 
Resources (DENR or the ``Department'') on January 3, 2020. This plan 
was submitted to fulfill the requirements of the CAA and is responsive 
to the EPA's promulgation of Emission Guidelines and Compliance Times 
for existing municipal solid waste (MSW) landfills. The South Dakota 
state plan establishes performance standards and other operating 
requirements for existing MSW landfills within the State of South 
Dakota and provides for the implementation and enforcement of those 
standards and requirements by the Department.

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before November 30, 
2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R08-
OAR-2020-0516, to the Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
www.regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its 
public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you 
consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other 
information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia 
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written 
comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and 
should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will 
generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of 
the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing 
system). For additional submission methods, the full EPA public comment 
policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general 
guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the 
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. 
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically 
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation 
Division, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop 
Street, Denver, Colorado 80202-1129. The EPA requests that if at all 
possible, you contact the individual listed in the FOR FURTHER 
INFORMATION CONTACT section to view the hard copy of the docket. You 
may view the hard copy of the docket Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. 
to 4 p.m., excluding federal holidays and facility closures.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gregory Lohrke, Air and Radiation 
Division, EPA, Region 8, Mailcode 8ARD-TRM, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 
Denver, Colorado, 80202-1129, (303) 312-6396, [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,'' 
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.

I. Background

    On August 29, 2016, the EPA finalized revised Standards of 
Performance (NSPS) for new MSW landfills and Emission Guidelines and 
Compliance Times (EG) for existing MSW landfills in 40 CFR part 60, 
subparts XXX and Cf, respectively. See 81 FR 59331 and 59313. These 
rulemaking actions were taken in accordance with section 111 of the 
CAA. Section 111(d) of the Act requires the EPA establish procedures 
for a state to submit a plan to the Agency that establishes standards 
of performance for any `existing' source for any air pollutant, (1) for 
which air quality criteria have not been issued or which is not 
included on a list published under CAA section 108, or emitted from a 
source category which is regulated under CAA section 112, but (2) to 
which a new source performance standard under section 111(b) would 
apply if such existing source were a `new' source. The EPA established 
general provisions for submittal of state plans for 111(d) sources in 
40 CFR part 60,

[[Page 68539]]

subpart B and has recently promulgated revised general provisions for 
CAA 111(d) state plans in Subpart Ba of that same Part and Title of the 
CFR. See 84 FR 32575. State plan submittals for CAA section 111(d) 
sources must be consistent with the requirements of these general 
provisions and also establish performance standards and other 
requirements at least as stringent as those established by the relevant 
EG as published in 40 CFR part 60. Upon state plan submittal, the EPA 
reviews a state's plan for consistency with the requirements of the 
general provisions and specific EG. If the state plan is complete and 
approvable with reference to these requirements, the Agency notifies 
the public, promulgates the plan in 40 CFR part 62 and delegates 
implementation and enforcement of the standards and requirements of the 
EG to the state under the terms of the state plan as published in the 
CFR. Today's action concerns the completeness and approvability of 
South Dakota's CAA section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW 
landfills.
    Under the new Ba implementing regulations and Section 111(d), state 
plan submittal must meet the completeness requirements of 40 CFR part 
60, subpart Ba, sections 60.23a and 60.27a(g). Section 60.27a(g) states 
that: ``Any plan or plan revision that a State submits to the EPA, and 
that has not been determined by the EPA by the date 6 months after 
receipt of the submission to have failed to meet the minimum criteria, 
shall on that date be deemed by operation of law to meet such minimum 
criteria.'' 40 CFR 60.27a(g)(1).
    The Secretary of the South Dakota DENR submitted a final CAA 
section 111(d) state plan for existing MSW landfills on January 3, 2020 
in response to the August 29, 2016 promulgation, mentioned above in 
this preamble, of the EG for such designated facilities at 40 CFR part 
60, subpart Cf. Six months have passed since the date of the plan 
submission. Therefore, the plan is deemed to have met the completeness 
criteria in 40 CFR 60.27a(g).

II. Summary and Analysis of the Plan Submittal

    The EPA has reviewed the South Dakota 111(d) plan submittal in the 
context of the plan completeness and approvability requirements found 
in 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba and Cf, and part 62, subpart A. The 
EPA is proposing with this action to determine that the submitted 
section 111(d) plan meets the above cited requirements. The South 
Dakota state plan submittal package includes all materials necessary to 
be deemed administratively and technically complete according to the 
criteria of 40 CFR 60.27a(g). South Dakota has chosen to author a state 
plan document and provide all implementation and enforcement authority 
for all state plan requirements through revisions to the Administrative 
Rules of South Dakota (ARSD). Specifically, the State has appropriately 
incorporated all EG performance standards and other source requirements 
in ARSD article 74:36, section 01:19 and sections 07:94-145. Both the 
State plan document, the relevant ARSD sections, and all other relevant 
plan submittal materials may be found in the docket for this action. 
Necessary State legal and enforcement authorities required for plan 
approval are located elsewhere in South Dakota statute, rules and 
regulations and have been reviewed and approved of by the EPA in the 
course of prior CAA section 111(d) or 111(d)/129 state plan approvals. 
See 40 CFR 62.10350-10362. Following the EPA's review of the submittal 
materials, the Agency finds the State plan package to be approvable 
according to all plan requirements.
    In this action, EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference (IBR) 
Article 74:36, Chapter 1, section 19 and Chapter 7, sections 94-145 of 
the ARSD, which became effective in the State of South Dakota on 
November 25, 2019. Analysis of the submitted plan's completeness and 
approvability, with reference to the relevant general and source 
category specific plan requirements of 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, Ba 
and Cf, and a detailed explanation of the rationale supporting this 
proposed approval is available in the Technical Support Document (TSD) 
in the docket of this proposed rule.

III. Proposed Action

    The EPA is proposing to approve the South Dakota section 111(d) 
state plan for MSW landfills pursuant to 40 CFR part 60, subparts B, 
Ba, and Cf. Therefore, the EPA is proposing to amend 40 CFR part 62, 
subpart QQ to reflect this approval action. This approval is based on 
the rationale provided in section II of this preamble and discussed in 
detail in the TSD associated with this rulemaking action. The scope of 
the proposed approval is limited to the provisions of 40 CFR parts 60 
and 62. The EPA's proposed approval of the South Dakota plan is limited 
to those landfills that meet the criteria established in 40 CFR part 
60, subpart Cf.
    The EPA Administrator continues to retain authority for approval of 
alternative methods to determine the nonmethane organic compound 
concentration or a site-specific methane generation rate constant (k), 
as stipulated in 40 CFR 60.30f(c).

IV. Incorporation by Reference

    In this document, the EPA is proposing to incorporate by reference 
DENR rules regarding MSW landfills discussed in section II of this 
preamble in accordance with the requirements of 1 CFR 51.5. The EPA has 
made, and will continue to make, these materials available through the 
docket for this action, EPA-R08-OAR-2020-0516, at https://www.regulations.gov, and at the EPA Region VIII Office (please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of 
this preamble for more information).

V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    In reviewing state plan submissions, the EPA's role is to approve 
state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. 
Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 2, 
2017) regulatory action because 111(d) plan approvals are exempted 
under Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have Federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997);
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the 
National

[[Page 68540]]

Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 
because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with 
the CAA; and
     Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to 
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental 
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under 
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the South Dakota state plan for existing MSW landfills 
is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other 
area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has 
jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the proposed rule does 
not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct 
costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 62

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Landfills, 
Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Methane, 
Ozone, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Sulfur oxides, 
Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: October 23, 2020.
Gregory Sopkin,
Regional Administrator, EPA Region 8.
[FR Doc. 2020-23985 Filed 10-28-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.