Consolidated Net Operating Losses, 67966-67988 [2020-22974]
Download as PDF
67966
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(b) Affected ADs
None.
(c) Applicability
This AD applies to all the Airbus SAS
airplanes identified in paragraphs (c)(1)
through (4) of this AD, certificated in any
category.
(1) Model A318–111, –112, –121, and –122
airplanes.
(2) Model A319–111, –112, –113, –114,
–115, –131, –132, –133, –151N, –153N, and
–171N airplanes.
(3) Model A320–211, –212, –214, –216,
–231, –232, –233, –251N, –252N, –253N,
–271N, –272N, and –273N airplanes.
(4) Airbus SAS Model A321–111, –112,
–131, –211, –212, –213, –231, –232, –251N,
–252N, –253N, –271N, –272N, –251NX,
–252NX, –253NX, –271NX, and –272NX
airplanes.
(d) Subject
Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 32, Landing gear.
(e) Reason
This AD was prompted by reports of cracks
on the main landing gear (MLG) sliding
tubes. The FAA is issuing this AD to address
cracks on the MLG sliding tubes, which
could cause MLG sliding tube fracture, and
could possibly result in the MLG collapsing,
damaging the airplane, and injuring
occupants.
(f) Compliance
Comply with this AD within the
compliance times specified, unless already
done.
(g) Requirements
Except as specified in paragraph (h) of this
AD: Comply with all required actions and
compliance times specified in, and in
accordance with, EASA AD 2020–0193,
dated September 7, 2020 (EASA AD 2020–
0193).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
(h) Exceptions to EASA AD 2020–0193
(1) Where EASA AD 2020–0193 refers to its
effective date, this AD requires using the
effective date of this AD.
(2) The ‘‘Remarks’’ section of EASA AD
2020–0193 does not apply to this AD.
(3) Paragraph (3) of EASA AD 2020–0193
specifies to report inspection results to
Airbus within a certain compliance time. For
this AD, report inspection results at the
applicable time specified in paragraph
(h)(3)(i) or (ii) of this AD.
(i) If the inspection was done on or after
the effective date of this AD: Submit the
report within 15 days after the inspection.
(ii) If the inspection was done before the
effective date of this AD: Submit the report
within 15 days after the effective date of this
AD.
(i) Other FAA AD Provisions
The following provisions also apply to this
AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
FAA, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
found in 14 CFR 39.19. In accordance with
14 CFR 39.19, send your request to your
principal inspector or responsible Flight
Standards Office, as appropriate. If sending
information directly to the Large Aircraft
Section, International Validation Branch,
send it to the attention of the person
identified in paragraph (j) of this AD.
Information may be emailed to: 9-AVS-AIR730-AMOC@faa.gov. Before using any
approved AMOC, notify your appropriate
principal inspector, or lacking a principal
inspector, the manager of the responsible
Flight Standards Office.
(2) Contacting the Manufacturer: For any
requirement in this AD to obtain instructions
from a manufacturer, the instructions must
be accomplished using a method approved
by the Manager, Large Aircraft Section,
International Validation Branch, FAA; or
EASA; or Airbus SAS’s EASA Design
Organization Approval (DOA). If approved by
the DOA, the approval must include the
DOA-authorized signature.
(3) Required for Compliance (RC): Except
as required by paragraphs (h)(3) and (i)(2) of
this AD, if any service information referenced
in EASA AD 2020–0193 contains paragraphs
that are labeled as RC, the instructions in RC
paragraphs, including subparagraphs under
an RC paragraph, must be done to comply
with this AD; any paragraphs, including
subparagraphs under those paragraphs, that
are not identified as RC are recommended.
The instructions in paragraphs, including
subparagraphs under those paragraphs, not
identified as RC may be deviated from using
accepted methods in accordance with the
operator’s maintenance or inspection
program without obtaining approval of an
AMOC, provided the instructions identified
as RC can be done and the airplane can be
put back in an airworthy condition. Any
substitutions or changes to instructions
identified as RC require approval of an
AMOC.
(4) Paperwork Reduction Act Burden
Statement: A federal agency may not conduct
or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, nor shall a person be subject to
a penalty for failure to comply with a
collection of information subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork Reduction
Act unless that collection of information
displays a current valid OMB Control
Number. The OMB Control Number for this
information collection is 2120–0056. Public
reporting for this collection of information is
estimated to be approximately 1 hour per
response, including the time for reviewing
instructions, searching existing data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed,
and completing and reviewing the collection
of information. All responses to this
collection of information are mandatory as
required by this AD. Send comments
regarding this burden estimate or any other
aspect of this collection of information,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to Information Collection Clearance
Officer, Federal Aviation Administration,
10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX
76177–1524.
(j) Related Information
For more information about this AD,
contact Sanjay Ralhan, Aerospace Engineer,
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Large Aircraft Section, International
Validation Branch, FAA, 2200 South 216th
St., Des Moines, WA 98198; phone and fax:
206–231–3223; email: sanjay.ralhan@faa.gov.
(k) Material Incorporated by Reference
(1) The Director of the Federal Register
approved the incorporation by reference
(IBR) of the service information listed in this
paragraph under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR
part 51.
(2) You must use this service information
as applicable to do the actions required by
this AD, unless this AD specifies otherwise.
(3) The following service information was
approved for IBR on October 30, 2020 (85 FR
65200, October 15, 2020).
(i) European Union Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD 2020–0193, dated September 7,
2020.
(ii) [Reserved]
(4) For EASA AD 2020–0193, contact the
EASA, Konrad-Adenauer-Ufer 3, 50668
Cologne, Germany; telephone +49 221 8999
000; email ADs@easa.europa.eu; internet
www.easa.europa.eu. You may find this
EASA AD on the EASA website at https://
ad.easa.europa.eu.
(5) You may view this material at the FAA,
Airworthiness Products Section, Operational
Safety Branch, 2200 South 216th St., Des
Moines, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA, call
206–231–3195. This material may be found
in the AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for and
locating Docket No. FAA–2020–0908.
(6) You may view this material that is
incorporated by reference at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the availability
of this material at NARA, email fedreg.legal@
nara.gov, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/
federal-register/cfr/ibr-locations.html.
Issued on October 21, 2020.
Lance T. Gant,
Director, Compliance & Airworthiness
Division, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–23658 Filed 10–26–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9927]
RIN 1545–BP27
Consolidated Net Operating Losses
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
AGENCY:
This document contains final
regulations under sections 1502 and
1503 of the Internal Revenue Code
(Code). These regulations provide
guidance implementing recent statutory
amendments to section 172 of the Code
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
relating to the absorption of
consolidated net operating loss (CNOL)
carryovers and carrybacks. These
regulations also update regulations
applicable to consolidated groups that
include both life insurance companies
and other companies to reflect statutory
changes. These regulations affect
corporations that file consolidated
returns.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are
effective on December 28, 2020.
Applicability Date: For dates of
applicability, see §§ 1.1502–1(l),
1.1502–21(h)(10), 1.1502–47(n), and
1.1503(d)–8(b)(8).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin O. Kellar at (202) 317–6720,
Gregory J. Galvin at (202) 317–3598, or
William W. Burhop at (202) 317–5363.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Background
This Treasury decision amends the
Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1)
under section 1502 of the Code. Section
1502 authorizes the Secretary of the
Treasury or his delegate (Secretary) to
prescribe regulations for an affiliated
group of corporations that join in filing
(or that are required to join in filing) a
consolidated return (consolidated
group) to reflect clearly the Federal
income tax liability of the consolidated
group and to prevent avoidance of such
tax liability. See § 1.1502–1(h) (defining
the term ‘‘consolidated group’’). For
purposes of carrying out those
objectives, section 1502 also permits the
Secretary to prescribe rules that may be
different from the provisions of chapter
1 of the Code that would apply if the
corporations composing the
consolidated group filed separate
returns. Terms used in the consolidated
return regulations generally are defined
in § 1.1502–1.
On July 8, 2020, the IRS published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (REG–
125716–18) in the Federal Register (85
FR 40927) under section 1502 of the
Code (proposed regulations). The
proposed regulations provided guidance
implementing recent statutory
amendments to section 172, relating to
net operating loss (NOL) deductions,
and withdrew and re-proposed certain
sections of proposed guidance issued in
prior notices of proposed rulemaking
relating to the absorption of CNOL
carryovers and carrybacks. In addition,
the proposed regulations updated
regulations applicable to consolidated
groups that include both life insurance
companies and other companies to
reflect statutory changes.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
In connection with the proposed
regulations, the IRS published on the
same date temporary regulations under
section 1502 (TD 9900) in the Federal
Register (85 FR 40892) (temporary
regulations). The temporary regulations
permit consolidated groups that acquire
new members that were members of
another consolidated group to elect to
waive all or part of the pre-acquisition
portion of an extended carryback period
under section 172 for certain losses
attributable to the acquired members.
The text of the temporary regulations
also serves as the text of § 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of the proposed
regulations.
The IRS received seven comments in
response to the proposed regulations.
Copies of the comments received are
available for public inspection at https://
www.regulations.gov or upon request.
No public hearing was requested or
held. This Treasury decision adopts the
proposed regulations, other than
proposed § 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and
(D), as final regulations with the
changes described in the following
Summary of Comments and Explanation
of Revisions. The Treasury Department
and the IRS expect to finalize proposed
§ 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) at a later
date and welcome further comments on
these provisions.
Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions
I. Comments On and Changes To
Proposed § 1.1502–21
A. Overview of Section 172
These final revisions implement
certain statutory amendments to section
172 made by Public Law 115–97, 131
Stat. 2054 (December 22, 2017),
commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts
and Jobs Act (TCJA), and by the
Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act (CARES Act), Public Law
116–136, 134 Stat. 281 (March 27,
2020). See generally the Background
section of the preamble to the proposed
regulations. As amended, section
172(a)(2) allows an NOL deduction for
a taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020, in an amount equal to the sum
of (A) the aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs that are carried to such taxable
year, and (B) the lesser of (i) the
aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs
that are carried to such taxable year, or
(ii) the ‘‘80-percent limitation.’’ The 80percent limitation is equal to 80 percent
of the excess (if any) of (I) taxable
income computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250 of the Code, over (II) the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to the taxable year. See section
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67967
172(a)(2)(B)(ii). For purposes of the
foregoing computation, the term ‘‘pre2018 NOLs’’ refers to NOLs arising in
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018, and the term ‘‘post-2017 NOLs’’
refers to NOLs arising in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017.
The 80-percent limitation does not
apply to the offset of income by NOLs
in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2021. Section 172(a)(1). The
80-percent limitation also does not
apply to limit the use of pre-2018 NOLs.
Section 172(a)(2)(A).
Moreover, the 80-percent limitation
does not apply to insurance companies
other than life insurance companies
(nonlife insurance companies). Section
172(f). Therefore, the taxable income of
nonlife insurance companies may be
fully offset by NOL deductions. In
addition, under section 172(b)(1)(C) and
(b)(1)(D)(i), losses of nonlife insurance
companies arising in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2020, may
be carried back two years and carried
over 20 years. In contrast, losses (aside
from farming losses) of other taxpayers
arising in such taxable years may not be
carried back but may be carried forward
indefinitely. Section 172(b)(1). Thus,
nonlife insurance companies are subject
to special rules under section 172 both
with respect to the amount of taxable
income that may be offset by NOL
deductions and with respect to the
taxable years to which NOLs may be
carried.
B. Overview of the Proposed Approach
and the Alternative Approach
To implement the special rules under
section 172 for nonlife insurance
companies for a consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
the proposed regulations provided that
the application of the 80-percent
limitation within a consolidated group
to post-2017 NOLs depends on the
status of the member that generated the
income being offset. The proposed
regulations further provided that the
amount of post-2017 CNOLs that may be
absorbed by one or more members of the
group in such a consolidated return year
(post-2017 CNOL deduction limit) is
determined by applying the 80-percent
limitation, section 172(f) (that is, the
special rule for nonlife insurance
companies), or both, to the group’s
consolidated taxable income (CTI) for
that year. See proposed § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(ii)(A) and (B).
For consolidated groups comprised of
both nonlife insurance companies and
other members for a consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
the proposed regulations adopted a twofactor computation (proposed
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
67968
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
approach). In general, under the
proposed approach, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for such a group
equals the sum of two amounts. The
first amount, which relates to the
income of those members that are not
nonlife insurance companies (residual
income pool), is subject to the 80percent limitation. The second amount,
which relates to the income of those
members that are nonlife insurance
companies (nonlife income pool), is not
subject to the 80-percent limitation. See
proposed § 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C). Thus,
the proposed approach divides a
consolidated group’s nonlife insurance
companies and its other members into
two separate ‘‘pools’’ for purposes of
determining the amount of CTI that is
available to be offset by post-2017
CNOLs after applying the 80-percent
limitation.
In formulating the proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS considered another
approach (alternative approach). This
alternative approach would have
required a group to first offset income
and loss items within a pool of nonlife
insurance companies and a pool of other
members for all purposes of section 172
applicable to taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020. In other words,
the alternative approach would have
applied a pooling concept beyond
merely determining the group’s post2017 CNOL deduction limit, but would
have required a group’s CTI to be
allocated between the operations of its
nonlife insurance company members,
which can be offset fully by CNOL
deductions, and the operations of its
other members subject to the 80-percent
limitation. This alternative approach
would also have applied similar rules to
allocate CNOLs within groups including
both nonlife insurance companies and
other members to consistently identify
the portions of CNOLs allocable to
nonlife insurance company members,
which are subject to different carryover
rules than those of other members.
The alternative approach would have
contrasted with the historical
application of § 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(B),
under which a CNOL for a taxable year
is attributed pro rata to all members of
a group that produce net loss, without
first netting among entities of the same
type. In the preamble to the proposed
regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS requested comments
regarding both the proposed approach
and the alternative approach.
C. Comments on the Proposed
Approach and the Alternative Approach
In response to the request for
comments, the Treasury Department
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
and the IRS received comments that
uniformly approved the proposed
approach. For example, two
commenters commended the proposed
regulations as implementing the
statutory amendments to section 172 in
a reasonable manner that is consistent
with both the statute and consolidated
return principles. Specifically, both
commenters supported the proposed
regulations’ approach to computing a
group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit as well as the proposed
regulations’ retention of the historical
pro rata approach under § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(iv)(B) to determine the amount
of nonlife insurance company losses
that can be carried to other taxable
years.
In support of the proposed
regulations, one commenter asserted
that the proposed approach is more
consistent with the treatment of CNOLs
as consolidated items and with the
current CNOL use and absorption rules
in § 1.1502–21 than the alternative
approach. The commenter further
asserted that, because the alternative
approach would depart from the general
pro rata rules of § 1.1502–21 by first
netting income and loss among entities
of the same type within a consolidated
group, the alternative approach could
result in computational and compliance
complications in circumstances that
may be difficult to anticipate.
In response to the comments received,
these final regulations retain the
proposed approach to computing a
consolidated group’s post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit.
D. Application of the Proposed
Approach to Life-Nonlife Groups
One commenter recommended that,
for consolidated groups with both
nonlife insurance companies and life
insurance companies, the amounts of
the residual income pool and the
nonlife income pool in proposed
§ 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) be
clarified to refer only to the items of
income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members of the nonlife subgroup (as
defined in § 1.1502–47(b)(9) of these
final regulations). The commenter
further recommended that, in making
this clarification, the Treasury
Department and the IRS should not
prevent nonlife CNOLs from offsetting
life subgroup income where permitted
by the Code and § 1.1502–47. The
commenter noted that this outcome
appears to be the intent of the crossreference to § 1.1502–47 in proposed
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(E), but the
commenter indicated that clarification
would be useful. The Treasury
Department and the IRS agree with the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
commenter regarding the purpose of the
cross-reference to § 1.1502–47 in
proposed § 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv)(E) and
have revised the regulations to more
clearly confirm this outcome.
E. Consolidated Capital Gain Net
Income
Section 1.1502–11(a)(3) provides that
the CTI for a consolidated return year is
determined by taking into account,
among other enumerated items, any
consolidated capital gain net income.
See generally § 1.1502–22(a) (providing
rules for determining consolidated
capital gain net income). Under
§ 1.1502–22(a), the determinations for a
consolidated group under section 1222,
including capital gain net income, are
not made separately. Instead, such
consolidated amounts are determined
for the group as a whole.
Section 1.1502–11 does not provide
explicit rules for allocating consolidated
capital gain net income among
members. Thus, one commenter
requested that the final regulations
clarify that, for groups that include
nonlife insurance companies,
consolidated capital gain net income
under § 1.1502–11(a)(3) is allocated to
the residual income pool and the
nonlife income pool using a pro rata
method based on the principles of
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv), as reflected in the
general rule in § 1.1502–21(b)(1), for the
use and absorption of CNOLs.
Section 1.1502–11 also does not
provide explicit rules for determining
the amount of each member’s income
that is offset by losses (whether incurred
in the current year or carried over or
back as a part of a CNOL or consolidated
net capital loss). However, the Treasury
Department and the IRS understand
that, in the absence of express rules,
consolidated return practitioners
generally apply the principles of
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(iv) to make such
determinations. The methodology for
computing a consolidated group’s post2017 CNOL deduction limit is intended
to implement the changes made to
section 172(a) by the TCJA and the
CARES Act in a manner that is flexible
for taxpayers to apply and administrable
for the IRS. The Treasury Department
and the IRS have determined that
specific rules regarding the allocation of
consolidated capital gain net income to
the residual income pool and the
nonlife income pool under § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) would exceed
the scope of these final regulations.
Accordingly, the Treasury Department
and the IRS continue to reflect on the
commenter’s recommendation but have
not incorporated that recommendation
into the final regulations.
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
F. Example 6 in Proposed § 1.1502–
21(b)(2)(v)(F)
Proposed § 1.1502–21(b)(2)(v)(F)
(Example 6) contains an example that
illustrates the application of section 172
to a CNOL incurred by a consolidated
group (P group) that includes P, an
includible corporation under section
1504(b) of a type other than a nonlife
insurance company, and PC1, a nonlife
insurance company. Both P and PC1
were incorporated in Year 1, a year
beginning after December 31, 2020. In
Year 1, the P group has $45 of CTI, $20
of which is attributable to P and $25 of
which is attributable to PC1. In Year 2,
the P group incurs a $16 CNOL that is
attributable to PC1 and that is carried
back to Year 1 under section
172(b)(1)(C)(i).
The example illustrates that, under
proposed § 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C), the P
group’s post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for Year 1 is $41, which is the sum
of the residual income pool ($16) and
the nonlife income pool ($25), as
described in proposed § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3), respectively.
More specifically, the amount of the
residual income pool equaled the lesser
of the aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to Year 1 ($16), or 80
percent of the excess of P’s taxable
income for that year ($20) over the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
allocable to P ($0), which also was $16
(80 percent × ($20¥$0)). See proposed
§ 1.1502–21(b)(2)(v)(F)(3). The amount
of the nonlife income pool equaled the
excess of PC1’s taxable income for Year
1 ($25) over the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs allocable to PC1 ($0). Id.
Two commenters requested
clarification as to how much taxable
income in each pool is offset by a CNOL
carryover or carryback if each pool has
positive taxable income, as in Example
6. Specifically, commenters contended
that a specific absorption rule is needed
to determine how much taxable income
in the residual income pool (which is
subject to the 80-percent limitation) can
be offset by subsequent CNOL
carryovers or carrybacks to the same
year. For example, assume the same
facts as in Example 6, but that the P
group also incurs a $30 CNOL in Year
3 that is entirely attributable to PC1 and
that is eligible to be carried back to Year
1. Absent a rule specifying how much
taxable income in each pool was offset
in Year 1 by the $16 Year 2 CNOL
carryback, the commenters questioned
how to compute the residual income
pool for purposes of determining how
much of the P group’s Year 3 CNOL
carryback could be absorbed by the P
group in Year 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
As noted in part I.A of this Summary
of Comments and Explanation of
Revisions, the computation in section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii) is made ‘‘without regard
to the deductions under [section 172]
and sections 199A and 250.’’ Consistent
with the statute, the amount of income
in the residual income pool that is
subject to the 80-percent limitation for
a particular consolidated return year is
not recomputed to reflect the amount of
CNOLs carried over to and absorbed in
that year. See § 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2)
of these final regulations. Rather, the
only component of the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit that is subject to change
upon the carryover or carryback of
additional CNOLs to the same
consolidated return year is the aggregate
amount of post-2017 CNOLs carried to
that year. See § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(i) of these final
regulations. Determining this amount
does not require an absorption rule.
With regard to Example 6, if the P
group were to incur a $30 CNOL in Year
3 that was eligible to be carried back to
Year 1, the P group would redetermine
the aggregate amount of the P group’s
post-2017 CNOLs that are carried to
Year 1, but the P group would not
recompute the amount of Year 1 income
subject to the 80-percent limitation.
Thus, an absorption rule is not needed
to determine how much of the P group’s
Year 1 CTI can be offset by subsequent
CNOL carrybacks. However, these final
regulations provide additional facts in
Example 6 to illustrate the computation
of the amount of additional CNOL
carryovers or carrybacks to the same
consolidated return year that can be
deducted to offset income in that year.
G. Split-Waiver Elections
If a member of one consolidated group
becomes a member of another
consolidated group, § 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(B) permits the acquiring
group to make an irrevocable election to
relinquish, with respect to all CNOLs
attributable to the acquired corporation,
the portion of the carryback period for
which the acquired corporation was a
member of another group (so long as any
other corporation joining the acquiring
group that was affiliated with the
acquired corporation immediately
before it joined the acquiring group also
is included in the waiver).
A commenter noted that, pursuant to
§ 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(B), an acquiring
group may make a split-waiver election
only with respect to acquired
corporations that were members of a
different consolidated group in a
carryback year. The commenter
recommended that § 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)
be expanded to allow a split-waiver
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67969
election if the acquired corporation was
not a member of a consolidated group in
the carryback year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
appreciate the commenter’s suggestion
and will continue to consider it in
connection with the future finalization
of the temporary regulations. However,
this comment exceeds the scope of these
final regulations, which adopt the
provisions of the proposed regulations
other than those for which the text was
contained in the temporary regulations
(specifically, § 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(C)
and (D)). Therefore, the Treasury
Department and the IRS decline to
adopt this recommendation in this
Treasury decision.
H. Modification to SRLY Rules
The proposed regulations modify the
separate return limitation year (SRLY)
rules in § 1.1502–21(c) to take into
account the limitations on NOL
deductions under section 172, as
amended by the TCJA and the CARES
Act. See proposed § 1.1502–
21(c)(1)(i)(E). A commenter
recommended that this modification not
apply for purposes of section 1503(d)
(the dual consolidated loss (DCL) rules).
In certain cases, the extent to which
section 1503(d) restricts the use of a
DCL, or requires the recapture of a DCL
(or a related interest charge), depends
on the application of the SRLY rules in
§ 1.1502–21(c), subject to certain
adjustments. See §§ 1.1503(d)–4(c)(3)
and 1.1503(d)–6(h)(2). In these cases,
the adjusted SRLY rules are generally
intended to ensure that a DCL may be
used only to offset income of the dual
resident corporation or separate unit
that incurred the DCL, such that the use
does not result in a ‘‘double dip’’ of the
DCL.
The commenter recommended that
the modification reflected in proposed
§ 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(E) not apply for
purposes of the DCL rules because the
modification addresses policies specific
to the SRLY rules in § 1.1502–21(c)
(replicating, to the extent possible,
separate-entity usage of SRLY
attributes), which differ from the
policies underlying the DCL rules
(preventing double dipping of losses). In
addition, the commenter asserted that
applying the rule in proposed § 1.1502–
21(c)(1)(i)(E) for DCL purposes could
distort the determination of whether
double dipping could occur.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree with the commenter. The final
regulations therefore provide that
§ 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(E) does not apply
for purposes of the DCL rules. See
§ 1.1503(d)–4(c)(3)(v).
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
67970
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
I. Clarifying Changes to Proposed
§ 1.1502–21
In addition to the foregoing
comments, a commenter recommended
clarifying changes to proposed § 1.1502–
21. The Treasury Department and the
IRS appreciate these suggested
clarifications and have incorporated
many of them into the final regulations.
However, the commenter also
recommended deleting the reference to
section 199A in proposed §§ 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(A)(2)(ii) and 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2)(ii) on the grounds that
the deduction under section 199A is
available to only noncorporate
taxpayers. Because section 199A(g)
provides a deduction for specified
agricultural or horticultural
cooperatives, which (as C corporations)
can be members of a consolidated
group, these references to section 199A
have been retained in the final
regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
also have made additional clarifying
revisions based on further review of the
proposed regulations. In particular, the
final regulations contain corrections to
scrivener’s errors in the two-factor
computation in proposed § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii). Specifically, the ‘‘lesser of’’
language in proposed § 1.1502–
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2), which was intended
to reflect the application of section
172(a)(2)(B) to groups that include both
nonlife insurance companies and other
corporations, was mislocated. To
accurately reflect the comparison
required under section 172(a)(2)(B), the
language at issue has been moved to
§ 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(1) of the final
regulations.
Additional edits have been made to
enhance the consistency and clarity of
the rules in proposed § 1.1502–21(a)(2).
For example, language reflecting the
‘‘lesser of’’ comparison described in the
preceding paragraph has been explicitly
integrated into §§ 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(B)
and 1.1502–21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(ii)
(concerning CNOL deductions that
offset income of nonlife insurance
company members) of these final
regulations. As discussed in part II.B of
this Summary of Comments and
Explanation of Revisions, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit equals the
maximum amount of post-2017 CNOLs
that can be deducted against taxable
income in a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020. This
amount could never exceed the total
amount of post-2017 CNOLs carried to
that year. See section 172(f) (providing
that, in the case of a nonlife insurance
company, the amount of the NOL
deduction allowed under section 172(a)
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
in any taxable year equals the aggregate
of NOL carrybacks and carryovers to
that year).
Likewise, in the absence of any other
limitation, the taxable income of a
taxpayer always constitutes a limit on
the deductibility of NOLs. See generally
section 172(b)(2). Without such limit,
the deduction of NOLs in excess of
taxable income would create an
additional NOL. The Treasury
Department and IRS have determined
that explicitly providing the respective
post-2017 CNOL and taxable income
limitations on the deduction of NOLs to
offset taxable income of nonlife
insurance companies will enhance the
clarity of the final regulations and the
consistency of their application.
II. Comments On and Changes To
Proposed § 1.1502–47
The proposed regulations updated the
rules in § 1.1502–47 to reflect statutory
changes enacted since these rules were
promulgated. Commenters commended
the Treasury Department and the IRS for
updating these regulations.
Additionally, several commenters
expressed their understanding that
another guidance project has been
initiated to propose substantive changes
to § 1.1502–47 and urged the Treasury
Department and the IRS to give priority
to this effort. These commenters argued
that the objective of that guidance
project should be the elimination of any
provisions that depart from general
consolidated return principles in lifenonlife consolidation, except to the
extent non-conforming provisions are
necessary to implement specific
provisions of the Code. In particular,
these commenters expressed concern
about the treatment of consolidated
capital gains and losses under § 1.1502–
47 and requested simplification of the
eligibility and tacking rules.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
appreciate the commenters’ input and
welcome further comments regarding
substantive changes to § 1.1502–47 for
purposes of potential future guidance.
However, such changes are beyond the
scope of these final regulations.
Additionally, commenters
recommended several clarifying changes
to proposed § 1.1502–47. Many of these
suggested clarifications have been
incorporated into the final regulations.
For example, these final regulations
have added a cross-reference to the
definition of ‘‘nonlife insurance
company’’ in § 1.1502–1(k). However,
one commenter recommended that
§ 1.1502–47(g)(3) of these final
regulations be modified to more closely
parallel § 1.1502–47(f)(3) of these final
regulations. The commenter further
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
requested that paragraph (d)(5) of these
final regulations be modified to
explicitly set forth the various rules
(both statutory and regulatory) that
apply to certain dividends received by
an includible member from another
member of the consolidated group.
These comments exceed the scope of
these final regulations, but the Treasury
Department and the IRS will continue to
consider these comments for purposes
of potential future guidance regarding
§ 1.1502–47.
Effective/Applicability Dates
The final regulations in §§ 1.1502–
1(k), 1.1502–21(a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(iv), and
(c)(1)(i)(E), 1.1502–47, and 1.1503(d)–
8(b)(8) apply to taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2020. However, a
taxpayer may choose to apply the rules
in §§ 1.1502–1(k) and 1.1502–47 of
these final regulations to taxable years
beginning on or before December 31,
2020. If a taxpayer makes the choice
described in the previous sentence with
regard to the rules in § 1.1502–47, the
corporation must apply those rules in
their entirety and consistently with the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code
applicable to the years at issue.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review—
Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563, 13771, and
12866 direct agencies to assess costs and
benefits of available regulatory
alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and
equity). Executive Order 13563
emphasizes the importance of
quantifying both costs and benefits, of
reducing costs, of harmonizing rules,
and of promoting flexibility.
These final regulations have been
designated as subject to review under
Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the
Memorandum of Agreement (April 11,
2018) between the Treasury Department
and the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax
regulations. The Office of Information
and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has
designated the final regulations as
economically significant under section
1(c) of the Memorandum of Agreement.
Accordingly, OMB has reviewed the
final regulations.
A. Background and Need for
Regulations
In general, taxpayers whose
deductions exceed their income
generate a net operating loss (NOL),
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
calculated under the rules of section
172. Section 172 also governs the use of
NOLs generated in other years to offset
taxable income in the current year.
Regulations issued under the authority
of section 1502 may be used to govern
how section 172 applies to consolidated
groups of C corporations. In general, a
consolidated group generates a
combined NOL at an aggregate level
(CNOL), with the CNOL generally equal
to the loss generated from treating the
consolidated group as a single entity.
Under regulations promulgated prior to
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the
allowed CNOL deduction was equal to
the lesser of the CNOL carryover or the
combined taxable income of the group
(before the CNOL deduction).
The TCJA and the Coronavirus Aid,
Relief, and Economic Security (CARES)
Act made several changes to section
172. First, the TCJA and the CARES Act
disallowed the carry back of NOLs
generated in taxable years beginning
after 2020, except for farming losses and
losses incurred by corporations that are
insurance companies other than life
insurance companies (nonlife insurance
companies). Second, the TCJA and the
CARES Act limited the NOL deduction
in taxable years beginning after 2020 for
NOLs generated in 2018 or later (post2017 NOLs) to 80 percent of taxable
income determined after the deduction
for pre-2018 NOLs but before the
deduction for post-2017 NOLs. This 80percent limitation does not apply to
nonlife insurance companies.
These final regulations implement the
changes to section 172 in the context of
consolidated groups. In particular,
regulations are needed to address three
issues related to consolidated groups
that were not expressly addressed in the
TCJA or the CARES Act. First, the final
regulations describe how to determine
the 80-percent limitation in the case of
a ‘‘mixed’’ group—that is, a
consolidated group containing nonlife
insurance companies and other
members. Second, the final regulations
address the calculation and allocation of
farming losses. Third, the final
regulations implement the 80-percent
limitation into existing regulations to
determine the CNOL deduction
attributable to losses from a member
arising during periods in which that
member was not part of that group. Part
I.B of this Special Analyses describes
the manner by which the final
regulations addresses each of these
issues.
Part I.B also describes an alternative
approach that was contemplated by the
Treasury Department and the IRS
regarding the allocation of currently
generated losses to nonlife insurance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
companies and other members. The
Treasury Department and the IRS
elected not to implement this approach.
B. Overview of the Final Regulations
In this part I.B the following terms are
used. The term ‘‘P group’’ means a
consolidated group of which P is the
common parent. The term ‘‘P&C
member’’ means a member of the P
group that is a nonlife insurance
company. The term ‘‘C member’’ means
a member of the P group that is a C
corporation other than a nonlife
insurance company.
1. Application of 80-Percent Limitation
in Mixed Groups
Under the statute, the general rule for
determining the NOL deduction (for a
taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020) effectively proceeds in two
steps. First, the taxpayer deducts pre2018 NOLs without limit. Second, the
taxpayer deducts post-2017 NOLs up to
80 percent of the taxpayer’s taxable
income (computed without regard to the
deductions under sections 199A and
250) determined after the deduction of
pre-2018 NOLs (but, naturally, before
the deduction for post-2017 NOLs).
However, this 80-percent limitation
does not apply for corporations that are
nonlife insurance companies.
The application of the 80-percent
limitation to the P group is
straightforward if (i) there are no pre2018 NOLs and (ii) both classes of P&C
members and C members have positive
income before the CNOL deduction. In
that case, these final regulations
provide, quite naturally, that the CNOL
limitation is determined by adding (i)
the pre-CNOL income generated by the
class of C members (C member income
pool), determined by applying the 80percent limitation, plus (ii) 100 percent
of the pre-CNOL income generated by
the class of P&C members (P&C member
income pool). This latter treatment
reflects the rule in section 172(f) that
nonlife insurance companies are not
subject to the 80-percent limitation.
One complication arises when the
pre-CNOL C member income pool is
positive and the pre-CNOL P&C income
pool is negative, and the P group has
positive combined pre-CNOL taxable
income. In this case (where the preCNOL income is generated by C
members, rather than P&C members),
these final regulations provide that the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit is
determined by applying the 80-percent
limitation to the income of the P group.
If the situation were reversed, such that
the P group had positive combined
taxable income but the pre-CNOL
income is generated by P&C members,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67971
rather than the C members, the post2017 CNOL deduction limit is equal to
the income of the P group (that is,
determined without regard to the 80percent limitation). In essence, in these
situations, the amount of the P group’s
income able to absorb a post-2017 CNOL
carryover is defined by the member pool
(that is, the C member income pool or
the P&C member income pool) that is
generating the income.
The other complication occurs when
there is a pre-2018 NOL. In this
situation, it matters whether the pre2018 NOL is treated as reducing the
amount of the C member income pool or
reducing the amount of P&C member
income pool. Consider the following
example (Example 1). In Example 1, the
P group carries $50 in pre-2018 NOLs
and $1000 in post-2017 NOLs to 2021.
In 2021, the P&C members and the C
members, respectively, earn (pre-CNOL)
income of $100. If the pre-2018 NOL
were treated as solely reducing the
amount of C member income pool, then
the limitation for the post-2017 CNOL
deduction would be $100 plus 80
percent of $50 ($100 minus $50), equal
to $140. If the pre-2018 NOL were
treated as solely reducing the amount of
the P&C member income pool, then the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
P group would be $50 ($100 minus $50)
plus 80 percent of $100, or $130.
These final regulations allocate the
pre-2018 NOL pro-rata to the C member
income pool and the P&C member
income pool in proportion to their
current-year income. In Example 1, $25
of the pre-2018 NOL would be allocated
to the C member income pool and $25
to the P&C member income pool.
Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the P group would
be $75 ($100 minus $25) plus 80 percent
of $75 ($100 minus $25), or $135.
2. Farming Losses
Section 172 provides that NOLs
arising in a taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2020, may not be carried
back to prior years, with two exceptions:
(1) Farming losses and (2) nonlife
insurance company losses. Section
172(b)(1)(B) defines a ‘‘farming loss’’ as
the smaller of the actual loss from
farming activities in a given year (that
is, the excess of the deductions in
farming activities over income in
farming activities) and the total NOL
generated in that year. This statutory
provision means that if a taxpayer
incurs a loss in farming activities but
has overall income in other activities,
the farming loss will be smaller than the
loss in farming activities (and can
possibly be zero).
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
67972
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Regulations were needed to clarify
two issues that arise in the context of
consolidated groups. First, these
regulations clarify that the maximum
amount of farming loss is the CNOL of
the group rather than the NOL of the
specific member generating the loss in
farming activities. This approach
follows closely regulations issued by the
Treasury Department and the IRS in
2012 in an analogous setting.
Second, given the overlapping
categories of carryback-eligible NOLs
(farming losses and nonlife insurance
companies), regulations are needed to
allocate the farming loss to the various
members to determine the total amount
of CNOL that can be carried back.
Consider the following example
(Example 2). In Example 2, the P group
consists of one C member and one P&C
member. In 2021, the C member’s only
activity is farming and the C member
incurs a loss of $30, while the P&C
member incurs a loss of $10. The total
farming loss is $30, since $30 is less
than the P group CNOL of $40. If this
farming loss were allocated entirely to
the C member, then the total amount
eligible for carryback would be $40 (that
is, $30 for the farming loss and $10 for
the loss incurred by the P&C member).
By contrast, if the farming loss were
allocated entirely to the P&C member,
only $30 would be eligible to be carried
back.
Again, following a similar rule as the
2012 regulations, these final regulations
allocate the farming loss to each
member of the group in proportion with
their share of total losses, without
regard to whether each member actually
engaged in farming. In Example 2, this
would allocate $7.50 (that is, one-fourth
of $30) of the farming loss to the P&C
member and the remaining $22.50 (that
is, three-fourths of $30) to the C
member. Therefore, the P group would
be allowed to carry back $32.50 total
(that is, the $10 of loss generated by the
P&C member and the $22.50 of farming
losses allocated to the C member).
3. Separate Return Limitation Year
To reduce ‘‘loss trafficking,’’ existing
regulations under section 1502 limit the
extent to which a consolidated group
(that is, the P group) can claim a CNOL
attributable to losses generated by some
member (M) in years in which M was
not a member. In particular, existing
rules limit this amount of loss to the
amount of the loss that would have been
deductible had M remained a separate
entity; that is, the rules are designed to
preserve neutrality in loss use between
being a separate entity or a member of
a group. Existing rules operationalize
this principle using the mechanic of a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
‘‘cumulative register.’’ The cumulative
register is equal to the (cumulative)
amount of M’s income that is taken into
account in the P group’s income.
Income earned by M while a member of
the P group increases the cumulative
register, while losses (carried over or
otherwise) taken into account by the
group reduce the cumulative register. In
general, the existing rules provide that
M’s pre-group NOLs cannot offset the P
group’s income when the cumulative
register is less than or equal to zero.
The introduction of the 80-percent
limitation in the TCJA and CARES Act
necessitates an adjustment to this
mechanism in order to retain this
neutrality-in-loss-use property. In
particular, these final regulations
provide that any losses by M that are
absorbed by the P group and subject to
the 80-percent limitation cause a
reduction to the register equal to the full
amount of income needed to support
that deduction. The following example
(Example 3) demonstrates why this
adjustment is necessary. In Example 3,
P and S are each corporations other than
nonlife insurance companies (that is,
they are subject to the 80-percent
limitation). Suppose in 2021, S incurs a
loss of $800, which is the only loss ever
incurred by S. In 2022, S incurs income
of $400. If S were not a member of a
consolidated group, its 2022 NOL
deduction would be limited to $320 (80
percent of $400). Suppose instead that
P acquires S in 2022 and that P has
separate income of $600 in 2022, so the
consolidated group has $1000 in preCNOL income in 2022. Before claiming
any CNOLs, S’s cumulative register
would increase to $400 in 2022.
Without any additional rules, the $400
cumulative register would allow P to
claim a CNOL of $400 (bringing the
register down to zero), greater than what
would have been allowed had S
remained a separate entity. By contrast,
requiring the register to be reduced by
125 percent of the NOL (as under the
final regulations) allows P to claim only
a $320 CNOL, replicating the result if S
were a separate entity.
4. Allocation of Current Losses to
Nonlife Insurance Companies
In general, under the TCJA and
CARES Act, taxpayers may not carry
back any losses generated in tax years
beginning after 2020, with the exception
of losses generated by nonlife insurance
companies and farming losses. Existing
regulations clarify that CNOLs are
allocated to each member in proportion
to the total loss. This allocation rule can
be illustrated by example (Example 4).
In Example 4, the C member has a
current loss of $10 (in a tax year
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
beginning in 2021 or later). The P&C
members are corporations PC1 and PC2.
PC1 has a gain of $40 and PC2 has a loss
of $40. Assume that the P group does
not engage in any farming activities. The
CNOL for the P group is $10. The $10
of CNOL is allocated to the C member
and PC2 in proportion to their total
losses. The C member has one-fifth of
the total loss ($10 divided by $50) and
PC2 has four-fifths. Therefore, under the
existing regulations, the C member is
allocated $2 ($10 times one-fifth) and
PC2 is allocated $8 ($10 times fourfifths). In the end, $8 of the CNOL may
be carried back in Example 4. The final
regulations do not alter these existing
regulations.
In formulating these final regulations,
the Treasury Department and the IRS
contemplated an alternative approach.
Under this alternative, consolidated
groups would be required to compute
gain and loss by grouping P&C members
and C members separately prior to
allocating CNOL to members. The
application of this approach can be seen
by revisiting Example 4. Under this
alternative approach, because the P&C
members as a whole do not have a loss,
no CNOL would be allocated to any P&C
member regardless of the gain or loss of
any of the individual P&C members.
Thus, under the alternative approach,
none of the $10 CNOL would be eligible
for carryback in Example 4.
C. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
In this analysis, the Treasury
Department and the IRS assess the
benefits and costs of the final
regulations relative to a no-action
baseline reflecting anticipated Federal
income tax-related behavior in the
absence of these regulations.
2. Summary of Economic Effects
The final regulations provide
certainty and clarity to taxpayers
regarding the treatment of NOLs under
section 172 and the regulations under
section 1502. In the absence of such
guidance, the chance that different
taxpayers would interpret the statute
and the regulations differently would be
exacerbated. Similarly situated
taxpayers might interpret those rules
differently, with one taxpayer pursuing
an economic opportunity that another
taxpayer might decline to make because
of different interpretations of the ability
of losses to offset taxable income. If this
second taxpayer’s activity were more
profitable, the resulting economic
decisions are inefficient. Such situations
are more likely to arise in the absence
of guidance. While no guidance can
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
curtail all differential or inaccurate
interpretations of the statute, the
regulations significantly mitigate the
chance for differential or inaccurate
interpretations and thereby increase
economic efficiency.
To the extent that the specific
provisions of the final regulations result
in the acceleration or delay of the tax
year in which taxpayers deduct an NOL
relative to the baseline, those taxpayers
may face a change in the present value
of the after-tax return to new
investment, particularly investment that
may result in losses. The resulting
changes in the incentives facing the
taxpayer are complex and may lead the
taxpayer either to increase, decrease, or
leave unchanged the volume and risk
level of its investment portfolio, relative
to the baseline, in ways that depend on
the taxpayer’s stock of NOLs and the
depreciation schedules and income
patterns of investments they would
typically consider, including whether
the investment is subject to bonus
depreciation. Because these elements
are complex and taxpayer-specific and
because the sign of the effect on
investment is generally ambiguous, the
Treasury Department and the IRS have
not projected the specific effects on
economic activity arising from the final
regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that these regulations will have
annual effects below $100 million
($2020) relative to the baseline. The
effects are small because the regulations
apply only to consolidated groups; in
addition, several provisions of the final
regulations apply only to the extent that
a consolidated group contains a mix of
member types. Moreover, the effects are
small because: (i) For provisions of the
final regulations that affect the
deduction for pre-2018 NOLs, the effects
are limited to the stock of the pre-2018
NOLs; and (ii) for provisions that affect
the allowable rate of loss usage of post2017 NOLs, the effect arises only from
the 20 percentage point differential in
the deduction for these NOLs. This
latter effect in particular, to which the
bulk of the provisions apply, is too
small to substantially affect taxpayers’
use of NOLs and thus too small to lead
to meaningful changes in economic
decisions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
did not estimate more precisely the
economic effects of these regulations
because (i) the effects are expected to be
small and (ii) data or models that would
address the effects of these regulations
are not readily available. In the absence
of quantitative estimates, the subsequent
discussion provides qualitative analysis
of these economic effects.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
67973
The proposed regulations solicited
comments on the economic effects of
the proposed regulations. No such
comments were received.
the final regulations or the alternative
approach, is not high.
No additional substantive alternatives
were raised by the comments.
3. Allocation of CNOLs to Specific
Members of Consolidated Groups
4. Affected Taxpayers
The final regulations do not amend
existing rules for the allocation of the
CNOL within consolidated groups. The
final regulations follow existing rules
and allocate the CNOLs to each member
of the group in proportion to the total
loss.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
considered an alternative approach that
would have required groups to compute
gain and loss at the subgroup level prior
to allocating CNOL to members. Recall
Example 4 in which the P&C subgroup
had no gain or loss but the C subgroup
had a loss of $10. Under this alternative
approach, because the P&C subgroup as
a whole does not have a loss, no CNOL
would be allocated to any member in
the P&C group regardless of the gain or
loss of any of the individual members of
PC. Thus, in Example 4, none of the $10
CNOL would be eligible for carryback.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
recognize that as a result of the TCJA
and the CARES Act, the final
regulations may provide groups with an
incentive to split their C members into
several corporations—some with loss
and some with gain; this potential
incentive would not exist under the
alternative regulatory approach. In
certain circumstances, such a strategy
would effectively enable some share of
the losses generated by the other C
members to be carried back. This change
in the business structure of consolidated
groups may entail economic costs
because, to the extent this strategy is
pursued, it would result from tax-driven
rather than market-driven
considerations. The Treasury
Department and the IRS project,
however, that the adopted approach will
have lower compliance costs for
taxpayers, relative to the alternative
regulatory approach, because it
generally follows existing regulatory
practice for allocating losses within a
consolidated group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS
have not attempted to estimate the
economic consequences of either of
these effects but project them to be
small. The effects are projected to be
small because (i) only a small number
of taxpayers are likely to be affected; (ii)
any reorganization that occurs due to
the final regulations will primarily be
‘‘on paper’’ and entail little or no
economic loss; and (iii) the compliance
burden of loss allocation, under either
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Treasury Department and the IRS
project that these regulations will
primarily affect consolidated groups
that contain at least one nonlife
insurance member and at least one
member that is not a nonlife insurance
company. Based on data from 2015, the
Treasury Department and the IRS
calculate that there were 1,130 such
consolidated groups. Approximately
460 of these groups were of ‘‘mixed
loss’’ status, meaning that at least one
nonlife insurance member had a gain
and one other member had a loss, or
vice versa.
D. Summary
In sum, these regulations clarify the
recent statutory changes to section 172
as they apply to consolidated corporate
groups. The Treasury Department and
IRS project the economic effect of these
regulations to be small given that (1) the
effect of NOL usage on investment
incentives is of ambiguous sign, (2)
these regulations are projected to have
only a small effect on NOL usage, and
(3) it is expected that most taxpayers
would have come to a similar
interpretation of the statute in the
absence of these regulations.
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it is hereby
certified that these final regulations will
not have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small
entities. This certification is based on
the fact that these final regulations
apply only to corporations that file
consolidated Federal income tax
returns, and that such corporations
almost exclusively consist of larger
businesses. Specifically, based on data
available to the IRS, corporations that
file consolidated Federal income tax
returns represent only approximately
two percent of all filers of Forms 1120
(U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return).
However, these consolidated Federal
income tax returns account for
approximately 95 percent of the
aggregate amount of receipts provided
on all Forms 1120. Therefore, these final
regulations would not create additional
obligations for, or impose an economic
impact on, small entities. Accordingly,
the Secretary certifies that the final
regulations will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
67974
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the
Internal Revenue Code, the notice of
proposed rulemaking that preceded
these final regulations was submitted to
the Chief Counsel for the Office of
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration for comment on its
impact on small business. No comments
on the notice were received from the
Chief Counsel for the Office of
Advocacy of the Small Business
Administration.
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs
and benefits and take certain other
actions before issuing a final rule that
includes any Federal mandate that may
result in expenditures in any one year
by a state, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$100 million in 1995 dollars, updated
annually for inflation. In 2020, that
threshold is approximately $156
million. This rule does not include any
Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal
governments, or by the private sector in
excess of that threshold.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled
‘‘Federalism’’) prohibits an agency from
publishing any rule that has federalism
implications if the rule either imposes
substantial, direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and is not
required by statute, or preempts state
law, unless the agency meets the
consultation and funding requirements
of section 6 of the Executive Order. This
rule does not have federalism
implications, does not impose
substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and does
not preempt state law within the
meaning of the Executive Order.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Administrator of OIRA has
determined that this is a major rule for
purposes of the Congressional Review
Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.) (CRA). Under
section 801(3) of the CRA, a major rule
takes effect 60 days after the rule is
published in the Federal Register.
Consistent with this requirement, the
effective date of this Treasury decision
is December 28, 2020, whereas the rules
in this Treasury decision apply for
taxable years beginning after December
31, 2020.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these
regulations are Justin O. Kellar, Gregory
J. Galvin, and William W. Burhop of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
Office of Associate Chief Counsel
(Corporate). However, other personnel
from the Treasury Department and the
IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the
Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is
amended as follows:
PART 1—INCOME TAX
Paragraph 1. The authority citation
for part 1 continues to read in part as
follows:
■
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
Par. 2. Section 1.1502–1 is amended
by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to read
as follows:
■
§ 1.1502–1
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(k) Nonlife insurance company. The
term nonlife insurance company means
a member that is an insurance company
other than a life insurance company,
each as defined in section 816(a).
(l) Applicability date. Paragraph (k) of
this section applies to taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2020.
However, a taxpayer may choose to
apply paragraph (k) of this section to
taxable years beginning on or before
December 31, 2020.
■ Par. 3. Section 1.1502–21 is amended:
■ 1. By revising paragraph (a).
■ 2. By revising paragraph (b)(1).
■ 3. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(iv).
■ 4. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(v)
introductory text.
■ 5. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), by
designating Examples 1 through 3 as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A) through (C),
respectively, and removing the period
after each example number in the
paragraph headings and replacing them
with a colon.
■ 6. In newly designated paragraphs
(b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), by
redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(i)
and (ii) as paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(1) and
(2), paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(1) and (2), and
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(1) and (2).
■ 7. By adding paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(D)
through (G).
■ 8. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B), by
removing the text ‘‘§ 1.1502–
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)(2)’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘§ 1.1502–21(b)(3)(ii)(B)’’.
■ 9. By revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C).
■ 10. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(D).
■ 11. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(i)
introductory text.
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
12. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C)(2), by
removing the word ‘‘and’’.
■ 13. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D), by
removing the word ‘‘account.’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘account; and’’.
■ 14. By adding paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E).
■ 15. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(iii)
introductory text.
■ 16. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), by
designating Examples 1 through 5 as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E),
respectively, and removing the period
after each example number in the
paragraph headings and replacing them
with a colon.
■ 17. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), by
redesignating paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(i)
through (iii) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3), paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(B)(i) through (vi) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(B)(1) through (6), paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(i) through (iii) as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(C)(1) through (3),
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(i) through (iv)
as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) through
(4), and paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(i)
through (v) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(1)
through (5).
■ 18. By revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(2) and
(c)(1)(iii)(B)(2) through (6).
■ 19. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(2), by adding the words ‘‘,
a taxable year that begins on January 1,
2021’’ after the words ‘‘at the beginning
of Year 4’’.
■ 20. By revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(2) through (4).
■ 21. By adding paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(D)(5).
■ 22. By revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(2) through (5).
■ 23. By adding paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(E)(6) and (c)(1)(iii)(F).
■ 24. By revising paragraph (c)(2)(v).
■ 25. By revising paragraph (c)(2)(viii)
introductory text,.
■ 26. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii), by
designating Examples 1 through 4 as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D),
respectively, and removing the period
after each example number in the
paragraph headings and replacing them
with a colon.
■ 27. In newly designated paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D), by
redesignating paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A)(i) through (vii) as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(1) through (7),
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(i) through (iv)
as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1) through
(4), paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(C)(i) through
(iii) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(C)(1)
through (3), and paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(D)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(D)(1) and (2).
■ 28. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A)(3) through (7), the first
■
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
sentence of each, by adding the words
‘‘, including the limitation under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section’’
after the words ‘‘under paragraph (c) of
this section’’.
■ 29. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the first sentence, by
adding the words ‘‘, none of which is a
nonlife insurance company’’ after the
text ‘‘S, T, P and M’’.
■ 30. In newly redesignated paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the fourth sentence, by
adding the text ‘‘(a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020)’’
after the language ‘‘Year 3’’.
■ 31. By revising newly designated
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(3).
■ 32. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4)
as paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
■ 33. By adding a new paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(4).
■ 34. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
■ 35. By adding paragraph
(c)(2)(viii)(B)(6).
■ 36. In paragraph (g)(5), by designating
Examples 1 through 9 as paragraphs
(g)(5)(i) through (ix), respectively, and
removing the period after each example
number in the paragraph headings and
replacing them with a colon.
■ 37. In newly redesignated paragraphs
(g)(5)(i) through (ix), by redesignating
paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(i) through (iii) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(A) through (C),
paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(i) through (vi) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(A) through (F),
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(i) through (v) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(A) through (E),
and paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(i) through (vii)
as paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(A) through (G).
■ 38. By revising paragraph (h)(9).
■ 39. By adding paragraph (h)(10).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 1.1502–21
Net operating losses.
(a) Consolidated net operating loss
deduction—(1) In general. Subject to
any limitations under the Internal
Revenue Code or this chapter (for
example, the limitations under section
172(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2) of this
section), the consolidated net operating
loss deduction (or CNOL deduction) for
any consolidated return year is the
aggregate of the net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to the year.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
The net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks consist of—
(i) Any CNOLs (as defined in
paragraph (e) of this section) of the
consolidated group; and
(ii) Any net operating losses (or NOLs)
of the members arising in separate
return years.
(2) Application of section 172 for
computing net operating loss
deductions—(i) Overview. For purposes
of § 1.1502–11(a)(2) (regarding a CNOL
deduction), the rules of section 172
regarding the use of net operating losses
are taken into account as provided by
this paragraph (a)(2) in calculating the
consolidated taxable income of a group
for a particular consolidated return year.
More specifically, in computing taxable
income for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020, section 172(a)
generally limits the deductibility of net
operating losses arising in taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017
(post-2017 NOLs). However, these
limitations do not apply to net operating
losses arising in taxable years beginning
before January 1, 2018 (pre-2018 NOLs).
Therefore, in any particular
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, the group’s CNOL
deduction includes CNOLs arising in
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (pre-2018 CNOLs), without
limitation under section 172(a).
Following the deduction of pre-2018
CNOLs, this paragraph (a)(2) applies to
compute the maximum amount of
CNOLs from taxable years beginning
after December 31, 2017 (post-2017
CNOLs), that can be deducted against
taxable income in a consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020
(post-2017 CNOL deduction limit). See
section 172(a)(2)(A) and (B).
(ii) Computation of the 80-percent
limitation and special rule for nonlife
insurance companies—(A)
Determinations based on status of group
members. If a portion of a post-2017
CNOL is carried back or carried over to
a consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020, whether the
members of the group include nonlife
insurance companies, other types of
corporations, or both determines
whether section 172(a) (including the
limitation described in section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (80-percent limitation)),
section 172(f) (providing special rules
for nonlife insurance companies), or
both, apply to the group for the
consolidated return year.
(B) Determination of post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit. The post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit is determined under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this section by
applying section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is,
the 80-percent limitation), section 172(f)
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67975
(that is, the special rule for nonlife
insurance companies), or both, to the
group’s consolidated taxable income for
that year.
(C) Inapplicability of 80-percent
limitation. The 80-percent limitation
does not apply to CNOL deductions
taken in taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2021, or to CNOLs arising in
taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (that is, pre-2018 CNOLs). See
section 172(a).
(iii) Computations under sections
172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f). This paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) provides rules for applying
sections 172(f) and 172(a)(2)(B) to
consolidated return years beginning
after December 31, 2020 (that is, for
computing the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit). Section 172(f) applies
to income of nonlife insurance company
members, whereas section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii) applies to income of
members that are not nonlife insurance
companies. Thus, this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii) provides specific rules for
groups with no nonlife insurance
company members, only nonlife
insurance company members, or a
combination of nonlife insurance
company members and other members.
For groups with both nonlife insurance
company members and life insurance
company members, see paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(E) of this section.
(A) Groups without nonlife insurance
company members. If no member of a
group is a nonlife insurance company
during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, the 80percent limitation) applies to all income
of the group for that year. Therefore, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for that year is the lesser of—
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to that year; or
(2) The amount determined by
multiplying—
(i) 80 percent, by
(ii) Consolidated taxable income for
the group for that year (determined
without regard to any deductions under
sections 172, 199A, and 250) less the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year.
(B) Groups comprised solely of nonlife
insurance companies. If a group is
comprised solely of nonlife insurance
companies during a particular
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, section 172(f)
applies to all income of the group for
that year. Therefore, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for the group for
that year equals the lesser of—
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to that year, or
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
67976
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(2) Consolidated taxable income less
the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year.
(C) Groups that include both nonlife
insurance companies and other
corporations—(1) General rule. Except
as provided in paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)
of this section, if a group has at least one
member that is a nonlife insurance
company and at least one member that
is not a nonlife insurance company
during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020,
the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for
the group for that year equals the lesser
of—
(i) The aggregate amount of post-2017
NOLs carried to that year, or
(ii) The sum of the amounts in the
income pools determined under
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this
section.
(2) Residual income pool. The amount
determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) (residual income pool) is
eighty percent of the excess of—
(i) The consolidated taxable income of
the group for a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020,
determined without regard to any
income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members that are nonlife insurance
companies and without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250, over
(ii) The aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs carried to that year that are
allocated to this income pool under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section
(that is, by applying the 80-percent
limitation). See section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii).
(3) Nonlife income pool. The amount
determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) (nonlife income pool) is
the consolidated taxable income of the
group for a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020,
determined without regard to any
income, gain, deduction, or loss of
members included in the computation
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this
section, less the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year that
are allocated to this income pool under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section.
See section 172(f).
(4) Pro rata allocation of pre-2018
NOLs between pools of income. For
purposes of paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2)
and (3) of this section, the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to any
particular consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020, is
prorated between the residual income
pool and the nonlife income pool based
on the relative amounts of positive
income of those two pools. For example,
if $30 of pre-2018 NOLs is carried over
to a consolidated return year in which
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
the residual income pool contains $75
and the nonlife income pool contains
$150, the residual income pool is
allocated $10 of the pre-2018 NOLs ($30
× $75/($75 + $150), or $30 × 1⁄3), and the
nonlife income pool is allocated the
remaining $20 of pre-2018 NOLs ($30 ×
$150/($75 + $150), or $30 × 2⁄3).
(5) Exception. The post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the group for a
consolidated return year is determined
under this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) if
the amounts computed under
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this
section for that year are not both
positive.
(i) Positive residual income pool and
negative nonlife income pool. This
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies if
the amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the
residual income pool is positive and the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the
nonlife income pool is negative. If this
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year
equals the lesser of the aggregate
amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year, or 80 percent of the
consolidated taxable income of the
entire group (determined without regard
to any deductions under sections 172,
199A, and 250) after subtracting the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year (that is, by applying
the 80-percent limitation). See section
172(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Positive nonlife income pool and
negative residual income pool. If the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the
nonlife income pool is positive and the
amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the
residual income pool is negative, the
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year
equals the lesser of the aggregate
amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year, or the consolidated taxable
income of the entire group less the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
carried to that year. See section 172(f).
(b) * * *
(1) Carryovers and carrybacks
generally. The net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to a taxable
year are determined under the
principles of, and are subject to any
limitations under, section 172 and this
section. Thus, losses permitted to be
absorbed in a consolidated return year
generally are absorbed in the order of
the taxable years in which they arose,
and losses carried from taxable years
ending on the same date, and which are
available to offset consolidated taxable
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
income for the year, generally are
absorbed on a pro rata basis. In addition,
except as otherwise provided in this
section, the amount of any CNOL
absorbed by the group in any year is
apportioned among members based on
the percentage of the CNOL eligible for
carryback or carryover that is
attributable to each member as of the
beginning of the year. The percentage of
the CNOL attributable to a member is
determined pursuant to paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. Additional
rules provided under the Internal
Revenue Code or regulations also apply.
See, for example, section 382(l)(2)(B) (if
losses are carried from the same taxable
year, losses subject to limitation under
section 382 are absorbed before losses
that are not subject to limitation under
section 382). See paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B)
of this section, (Example 2), for an
illustration of pro rata absorption of
losses subject to a SRLY limitation.
(2) * * *
(iv) Operating rules. (A) Amount of
CNOL attributable to a member. The
amount of a CNOL that is attributable to
a member equals the product obtained
by multiplying the CNOL and the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
the member.
(B) Percentage of CNOL attributable to
a member—(1) In general. Except as
provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of
this section, the percentage of the CNOL
for the consolidated return year
attributable to a member equals the
separate net operating loss of the
member for the consolidated return year
divided by the sum of the separate net
operating losses for that year of all
members having such losses for that
year. For this purpose, the separate net
operating loss of a member is
determined by computing the CNOL by
reference to only the member’s items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss,
including the member’s losses and
deductions actually absorbed by the
group in the consolidated return year
(whether or not absorbed by the
member).
(2) Recomputed percentage. If, for any
reason, a member’s portion of a CNOL
is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata
basis (for example, under § 1.1502–11(b)
or (c), paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C) of this
section, § 1.1502–28, or 1.1502–36(d), or
as the result of a carryback to a separate
return year), the percentage of the CNOL
attributable to each member is
recomputed. In addition, if a member
with a separate net operating loss ceases
to be a member, the percentage of the
CNOL attributable to each remaining
member is recomputed. The recomputed
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
each member equals the remaining
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
CNOL attributable to the member at the
time of the recomputation divided by
the sum of the remaining CNOL
attributable to all of the remaining
members at the time of the
recomputation. For purposes of this
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2), a CNOL that
is permanently disallowed or eliminated
is treated as absorbed.
(C) Net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks—(1) General rules. Subject
to the rules regarding allocation of
special status losses under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) of this section—
(i) Nonlife insurance companies. The
portion of a CNOL attributable to any
members of the group that are nonlife
insurance companies is carried back or
carried over under the rules in section
172(b) applicable to nonlife insurance
companies.
(ii) Corporations other than nonlife
insurance companies. The portion of a
CNOL attributable to any other members
of the group is carried back or carried
over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to corporations other than
nonlife insurance companies.
(2) Recomputed percentage. For rules
governing the recomputation of the
percentage of a CNOL attributable to
each remaining member if any portion
of the CNOL attributable to a member is
carried back under section 172(b)(1)(B)
or (C) and absorbed on a non-pro rata
basis, see paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of
this section.
(D) Allocation of special status losses.
The amount of the group’s CNOL that is
determined to constitute a farming loss
(as defined in section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)) or
any other net operating loss that is
subject to special carryback or carryover
rules (special status loss) is allocated to
each member separately from the
remainder of the CNOL based on the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to
the member, as determined under
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section.
This allocation is made without regard
to whether a particular member actually
incurred specific expenses or engaged in
specific activities required by the
special status loss provisions. This
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) applies only with
regard to losses for which the special
carryback or carryover rules are
dependent on the type of expense
generating the loss, rather than on the
special status of the entity to which the
loss is allocable. See section 172(b)(1)(C)
and paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C)(1)(i) of this
section (applicable to losses of nonlife
insurance companies). This paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) does not apply to farming
losses incurred by a consolidated group
in any taxable year beginning after
December 31, 2017, and before January
1, 2021.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
(E) Coordination with rules for lifenonlife groups under § 1.1502–47. For
groups that include at least one member
that is a life insurance company and for
which an election is in effect under
section 1504(c)(2), any computation of
the 80-percent limitation under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section is
computed only with respect to items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss of the
members of the nonlife subgroup (as
defined in § 1.1502–47(b)(9)). For rules
regarding the use of CNOLs of the
nonlife subgroup to offset life insurance
company taxable income of the life
subgroup (each as defined in § 1.1502–
47(b)), or the use of CNOLs of the life
subgroup to offset consolidated taxable
income of the nonlife subgroup, see
generally section 1503(c)(1) and
§ 1.1502–47.
(v) Examples. For purposes of the
examples in this paragraph (b)(2)(v),
unless otherwise stated, all groups file
consolidated returns, all corporations
have calendar taxable years, all losses
are farming losses within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii), all taxable years
begin after December 31, 2020, the facts
set forth the only corporate activity,
value means fair market value and the
adjusted basis of each asset equals its
value, all transactions are with
unrelated persons, and the application
of any limitation or threshold under
section 382 is disregarded. The
principles of this paragraph (b) are
illustrated by the following examples:
*
*
*
*
*
(D) Example 4: Allocation of a CNOL
arising in a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020. (1)
P is the common parent of a
consolidated group that includes S.
Neither P nor S is a nonlife insurance
company. The P group also includes
nonlife insurance companies PC1, PC2,
and PC3. In the P group’s 2021
consolidated return year, all members
except S have separate net operating
losses, and the P group’s CNOL in that
year is $40. No member of the P group
engages in farming activities. See
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraphs (b)(1) and
(b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) of this section, for
purposes of carrying losses to other
taxable years, the P group’s $40 CNOL
is allocated pro rata among the group
members that have separate net
operating losses. Under paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(C) of this section, those
respective portions of the CNOL
attributable to PC1, PC2, and PC3 (that
is, members that are nonlife insurance
companies) are carried back to each of
the two preceding taxable years and
then carried over to each of the 20
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67977
subsequent taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(C). The portion attributable to
P (which is not a nonlife insurance
company) may not be carried back but
is carried over to future years. See
section 172(b)(1)(A).
(E) Example 5: Allocation of a CNOL
arising in a consolidated return year
beginning before January 1, 2021. The
facts are the same as in paragraph
(b)(2)(v)(D)(1) of this section, except that
the P group incurred the CNOL during
the P group’s 2020 consolidated return
year. The allocation among the P group
members of the CNOL described in
paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(2) of this section
would be the same. However, those
respective portions of the CNOL
attributable to PC1, PC2, and PC3 (that
is, members that are nonlife insurance
companies) will be carried back to each
of the five preceding taxable years and
then carried over to each of the 20
subsequent taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(C) and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
The portion attributable to P (which is
not a nonlife insurance company) will
be carried back to each of the five
preceding taxable years and then carried
over to future years. See section
172(b)(1)(A) and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
(F) Example 6: CNOL deduction and
application of section 172. (1) P (a type
of corporation other than a nonlife
insurance company) is the common
parent of a consolidated group that
includes PC1 (a nonlife insurance
company). P and PC1 were both
incorporated in Year 1 (a year beginning
after December 31, 2020). In Year 1, P
and PC1 have separate taxable income
of $20 and $25, respectively. As a result,
the P group has Year 1 consolidated
taxable income of $45. In Year 2, P has
separate taxable income of $24, and PC1
has a separate taxable loss of $40,
resulting in a P group CNOL of $16.
Additionally, in Year 3, P has separate
taxable income of $15, and PC1 has a
separate taxable loss of $45, resulting in
a P group CNOL of $30. No member of
the P group engages in farming
activities. See section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of
this section, the P group’s Year 2 CNOL
and Year 3 CNOL are entirely
attributable to PC1, a nonlife insurance
company. Therefore, under section
172(b)(1)(C)(i), the entire amount of
each of these CNOLs is eligible to be
carried back to Year 1.
(3) Under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this
section, the amount of the Year 2 CNOL
that may be used by the P group in Year
1 is determined by taking into account
the status (nonlife insurance company
or other type of corporation) of the
member that has separate taxable
income composing in whole or in part
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
67978
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the P group’s consolidated taxable
income. Because the P group includes
both a nonlife insurance company
member and a member that is not a
nonlife insurance company, paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section applies to
determine the computation of the post2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for Year 1. Therefore, the 80percent limitation is applied to the
residual income pool, which consists of
the taxable income of P, a type of
corporation other than a nonlife
insurance company. Under the 80percent limitation, the maximum
amount of P’s Year 1 income that may
be offset by the P group’s post-2017
CNOLs is $16, which equals 80 percent
of the excess of P’s taxable income for
Year 1 ($20) over the aggregate amount
of pre-2018 NOLs allocable to P ($0) (80
percent × ($20¥$0)). See paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this
section. PC1 is a nonlife insurance
company to which section 172(f), rather
than the 80-percent limitation in section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii), applies. Therefore, the
maximum amount of PC1’s Year 1
income that may be offset by the P
group’s post-2017 CNOLs is $25, which
equals the excess of PC1’s taxable
income for Year 1 ($25) over the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
allocable to PC1 ($0). See paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) and (4) of this section.
(4) Based on paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of
this section and the analysis set forth in
paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3) of this section,
at the end of Year 2, the P group’s post2017 CNOL deduction limit for Year 1
is the lesser of the aggregate amount of
post-2017 NOLs carried to Year 1 ($16),
or $41 ($16 + $25). Therefore, the P
group can offset $16 of its Year 1
income with its CNOL carryback from
Year 2.
(5) When the Year 3 CNOL is carried
back to Year 1, the P group’s post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for Year 1 is the
lesser of $46 (the aggregate amount of
post-2017 NOLs carried to Year 1) or
$41 ($16 + $25; see the computation in
paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3) of this section).
Thus, the total amount of the P group’s
Year 1 income that may be offset by the
P group’s Year 2 and Year 3 CNOLs is
$41 ($16 from Year 2 + $25 from Year
3). As a result, the P group reports $4
of income ($45¥$41) in Year 1 that is
ineligible for offset by any other NOLs.
The P group carries over its remaining
$5 CNOL ($46¥$41) to future years.
(G) Example 7: Pre-2018 and post2017 CNOLs. (1) P is the common parent
of a consolidated group. No member of
the P group is a nonlife insurance
company or is engaged in a farming
business, and no member of the P group
has a loss that is subject to a SRLY
limitation. The P group had the
following consolidated taxable income
or CNOL for the following taxable years:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (b)(2)(v)(G)(1)
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
$60
$0
$0
($90)
$30
($40)
($100)
$120
(2) Under section 172(a)(1), all $30 of
the P group’s 2018 consolidated taxable
income is offset by the 2017 CNOL
carryover without limitation. The
remaining $60 of the P group’s 2017
CNOL is carried over to 2021 under
section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(I).
(3) Under section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I),
the P group’s $40 2019 CNOL is carried
back to the five taxable years preceding
the year of the loss. Thus, the P group’s
$40 2019 CNOL is carried back to offset
$40 of its 2014 consolidated taxable
income.
(4) Under section 172(a)(2) and
paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section, the P
group’s CNOL deduction for 2021
equals the aggregate amount of pre-2018
NOLs carried to 2021 plus the group’s
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit. The P
group has $60 of pre-2018 NOLs carried
to 2021 ($90¥$30). Because no member
of the P group is a nonlife insurance
company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this
section applies to determine the
computation of the group’s post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for 2021. See also
section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, the post2017 CNOL deduction limit of the P
group for 2021 is $48, which equals the
lesser of the aggregate amount of post2017 NOLs carried to 2021 ($100), or 80
percent of the excess of the P group’s
consolidated taxable income for that
year computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
and 250 ($120) over the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to
2021 ($60) (that is, 80 percent × $60).
Thus, the P group’s CNOL deduction for
2021 equals $108 ($60 pre-2018 NOLs
carried to 2021 + $48 post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit). See section 172(a)(2)
and paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this section.
The P group offsets $108 of its $120 of
2021 consolidated taxable income,
resulting in $12 of consolidated taxable
income in 2021. The remaining $52 of
the P group’s 2020 CNOL ($100¥$48) is
carried over to future taxable years. See
section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II).
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Waiver of carryback period for
losses in taxable years to which
statutorily amended carryback rules
apply. For further information, see
§ 1.1502–21T(b)(3)(ii)(C).
(D) Examples. For further
information, see § 1.1502–
21T(b)(3)(ii)(D).
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. Except as provided in
paragraph (g) of this section (relating to
an overlap with section 382), the
aggregate of the net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks of a member
(SRLY member) arising (or treated as
arising) in SRLYs (SRLY NOLs) that are
included in the CNOL deductions for all
consolidated return years of the group
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
under paragraph (a) of this section may
not exceed the aggregate consolidated
taxable income for all consolidated
return years of the group determined by
reference to only the member’s items of
income, gain, deduction, and loss
(cumulative register). For this purpose—
*
*
*
*
*
(E) If a limitation on the amount of
taxable income that may be offset under
section 172(a) (see paragraph (a)(2) of
this section) applies in a taxable year to
a member whose carryovers or
carrybacks are subject to a SRLY
limitation (SRLY member), the amount
of net operating loss subject to a SRLY
limitation that is available for use by the
group in that year is limited to the
percentage of the balance in the
cumulative register that would be
available for offset under section 172(a)
if the SRLY member filed a separate
return and reported as taxable income in
that year the amount contained in the
cumulative register. For example,
assume that a consolidated group has a
SRLY member that is a corporation
other than a nonlife insurance company,
and that the SRLY member has a SRLY
NOL that arose in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017
(post-2017 NOL). The group’s
consolidated taxable income for a
consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020 is $200, but the
cumulative register has a positive
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
balance of only $120 (and no other net
operating loss carryovers or carrybacks
are available for the year). Because the
SRLY limitation would be $96 ($120 ×
80 percent), only $96 of SRLY loss may
be used, rather than $160 ($200 × 80
percent). In addition, to the extent that
this paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) applies, the
cumulative register is decreased by the
full amount of income required under
section 172(a) to support the amount of
SRLY NOL absorption. See, for example,
paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) of this
section for examples illustrating the
application of this rule.
*
*
*
*
*
(iii) Examples. For purposes of the
examples in this paragraph (c)(1)(iii), no
corporation is a nonlife insurance
company and, unless otherwise
specified, all taxable years begin after
December 31, 2020, and all CNOLs arise
in taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020. The principles of
this paragraph (c)(1) are illustrated by
the following examples:
(A) * * *
(2) T’s $100 net operating loss
carryover from Year 1 arose in a SRLY.
See § 1.1502–1(f)(2)(iii). P’s acquisition
of T was not an ownership change as
defined by section 382(g). Thus, the
$100 net operating loss carryover is
subject to the SRLY limitation in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The
positive balance of the cumulative
register of T for Year 2 equals the
consolidated taxable income of the P
group determined by reference to only
T’s items, or $70. However, due to the
80-percent limitation and the
application of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of
this section, the SRLY limitation is $56
($70 × 80 percent). No losses from
equivalent years are available, and the P
group otherwise has sufficient
consolidated taxable income to support
the CNOL deduction ($300 × 80 percent
= $240). Therefore, $56 of the SRLY net
operating loss is included under
paragraph (a) of this section in the P
group’s CNOL deduction for Year 2.
Although only $56 is absorbed, the
cumulative register of T is reduced by
$70, the full amount of income
necessary to support the $56 deduction
after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation ($70 × 80 percent = $56).
*
*
*
*
*
(B) * * *
(2) P’s Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 are
not SRLYs with respect to the P group.
See § 1.1502–1(f)(2)(i). Thus, P’s $40 net
operating loss arising in Year 1 and
$120 net operating loss arising in Year
3 are not subject to the SRLY limitation
under paragraph (c) of this section.
Although the P group has $160 of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
taxable income in Year 4, the 80-percent
limitation reduces the P group’s net
operating loss deduction in that year to
$128 ($160 × 80 percent). Under the
principles of section 172, paragraph (b)
of this section requires that P’s $40 loss
arising in Year 1 be the first loss
absorbed by the P group in Year 4.
Absorption of this loss leaves $88
($128¥$40) of the P group’s Year 4
consolidated taxable income available
for offset by loss carryovers.
(3) T’s Year 2 and Year 3 are SRLYs
with respect to the P group. See
§ 1.1502–1(f)(2)(ii). P’s acquisition of T
was not an ownership change as defined
by section 382(g). Thus, T’s $50 net
operating loss arising in Year 2 and $60
net operating loss arising in Year 3 are
subject to the SRLY limitation. The
positive balance of the cumulative
register of T for Year 4 equals the P
group’s consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s
items, or $70. Under paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking
into account the 80-percent limitation,
T’s SRLY limitation is $56 ($70 × 80
percent). Therefore, the P group can
absorb up to $56 of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 4. Under the
principles of section 172, T’s $50 SRLY
net operating loss from Year 2 is
included under paragraph (a) of this
section in the P group’s CNOL
deduction for Year 4. After absorption of
this loss, under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section, $6 of SRLY limit remains
in Year 4 ($56¥$50). Further, the total
amount of Year 4 consolidated taxable
income available for offset by other loss
carryovers under section 172(a) is $38
($88¥$50).
(4) P and T each carry over net
operating losses to Year 4 from a taxable
year ending on the same date (that is,
Year 3). The losses carried over from
Year 3 total $180. However, the
remaining Year 4 SRLY limit is $6.
Therefore, the total amount of loss
available for absorption is $126 ($120
allocable to P and $6 allocable to T).
Under paragraph (b) of this section, the
losses available for absorption that are
carried over from Year 3 are absorbed on
a pro rata basis, even though one loss
arises in a SRLY and the other loss does
not. Thus, $36.19 of P’s Year 3 loss is
absorbed ($120/($120 + $6)) × $38 =
$36.19. In addition, $1.81 of T’s Year 3
loss is absorbed ($6/($120 + $6)) × $38
= $1.81.
(5) After deduction of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 4, the
cumulative register of T is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. A total of $51.81 of SRLY net
operating losses were absorbed in Year
4 ($50 + $1.81). After taking into
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67979
account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of income necessary to support
this deduction is $64.76 ($64.76 × 80
percent = $51.81). Therefore, the
cumulative register of T is decreased by
$64.76, and $5.24 remains in the
cumulative register ($70¥$64.76).
(6) P carries its remaining $83.81
($120¥$36.19) Year 3 net operating loss
and T carries its remaining $58.19
($60¥$1.81) Year 3 net operating loss
over to Year 5. Assume that, in Year 5,
the P group has $90 of consolidated
taxable income (computed without
regard to the CNOL deduction). The P
group’s consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s
items is a CNOL of $4. Therefore, the
positive balance of the cumulative
register of T in Year 5 equals $1.24
($5.24¥$4). Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E)
of this section, after taking into account
the 80-percent limitation, T’s SRLY
limitation is $0.99 ($1.24 × 80 percent).
For Year 5, the total amount of Year 5
consolidated taxable income available
for offset by loss carryovers as a result
of the 80-percent limitation is $72 ($90
× 80 percent). Under paragraph (b) of
this section, the losses carried over from
Year 3 are absorbed on a pro rata basis,
even though one loss arises in a SRLY
and the other loss does not. Therefore,
$71.16 of P’s Year 3 loss is absorbed
(($83.81/($83.81 + $0.99)) × $72 =
$71.16). In addition, $0.84 of T’s Year 3
losses is absorbed (($0.99/($83.81 +
$0.99)) × $72 = $0.84).
*
*
*
*
*
(D) * * *
(2) Under § 1.1502–15(a), T’s $100 of
ordinary loss in Year 3 constitutes a
built-in loss that is subject to the SRLY
limitation under paragraph (c) of this
section. The amount of the limitation is
determined by treating the deduction as
a net operating loss carryover from a
SRLY. The built-in loss is therefore
subject to both a SRLY limitation and
the 80-percent limitation for Year 3. The
built-in loss is treated as a net operating
loss carryover solely for purposes of
determining the extent to which the loss
is not allowed by reason of the SRLY
limitation, and for all other purposes the
loss remains a loss arising in Year 3. See
§ 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(D). Consequently,
under paragraph (b) of this section, the
built-in loss is absorbed by the P group
before the net operating loss carryover
from Year 1 is absorbed. The positive
balance of the cumulative register of T
for Year 3 equals the P group’s
consolidated taxable income determined
by reference to only T’s items, or $60.
Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, after taking into account the 80percent limitation, the SRLY limitation
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
67980
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
for Year 3 is $48 ($60 × 80 percent).
Therefore, $48 of the built-in loss is
absorbed by the P group. None of T’s
$100 SRLY net operating loss carryover
from Year 1 is allowed.
(3) After deduction of T’s $48 SRLY
built-in loss in Year 4, the cumulative
register of T is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section.
After taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is
$60 ($60 × 80 percent = $48). Therefore,
the cumulative register of T is decreased
by $60, and zero remains in the
cumulative register ($60¥$60).
(4) Under § 1.1502–15(a), the $52
balance of the built-in loss that is not
allowed in Year 3 because of the SRLY
limitation and the 80-percent limitation
is treated as a $52 net operating loss
arising in Year 3 that is subject to the
SRLY limitation because, under
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section, Year
3 is treated as a SRLY. The built-in loss
is carried to other years in accordance
with the rules of paragraph (b) of this
section. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T for Year 4
equals $40 (zero from Year 3 + $40).
Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section, after taking into account the 80percent limitation, the SRLY limitation
for Year 4 is $32 ($40 × 80 percent).
Therefore, under paragraph (c) of this
section, $32 of T’s $100 net operating
loss carryover from Year 1 is included
in the CNOL deduction under paragraph
(a) of this section in Year 4.
(5) After deduction of T’s $32 SRLY
net operating loss in Year 4, the
cumulative register of T is adjusted
pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. After taking into account the
80-percent limitation, the amount of
income necessary to support this
deduction is $40 ($40 × 80 percent =
$32). Therefore, the cumulative register
is decreased by $40, and zero remains
in the cumulative register ($40¥$40).
(E) * * *
(2) For Year 2, the P group computes
separate SRLY limits for each of T’s
SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The group
determines its ability to use its capital
loss carryover before it determines its
ability to use its ordinary loss carryover.
Under section 1212, because the P group
has no Year 2 capital gain, it cannot
absorb any capital losses in Year 2. T’s
Year 1 net capital loss and the P group’s
Year 2 consolidated net capital loss (all
of which is attributable to T) are carried
over to Year 3.
(3) The P group’s ability to deduct net
operating losses in Year 2 is subject to
the 80-percent limitation, based on the
P group’s consolidated taxable income
for the year. Thus, the group’s limitation
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
for Year 2 is $72 ($90 × 80 percent).
However, use of the Year 1 net operating
loss also is subject to the SRLY
limitation. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T applicable to
SRLY net operating losses for Year 2
equals the P group’s consolidated
taxable income determined by reference
to only T’s items, or $60. Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year
2 is $48 ($60 × 80 percent). Therefore,
only $48 of T’s Year 1 SRLY net
operating loss is absorbed by the P
group in Year 2. T carries over its
remaining $52 of its Year 1 loss to
Year 3.
(4) After deduction of T’s SRLY net
operating losses in Year 2, the net
operating loss cumulative register is
adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. The P group
deducted $48 of T’s SRLY net operating
losses in Year 2. After taking into
account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of taxable income necessary to
support this deduction is $60 ($60 × 80
percent = $48). Therefore, the net
operating loss cumulative register of T
is decreased by $60, and zero remains
in the net operating loss cumulative
register ($60¥$60).
(5) For Year 3, the P group again
computes separate SRLY limits for each
of T’s SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The
group has consolidated net capital gain
(without taking into account a net
capital loss carryover deduction) of $30.
Under § 1.1502–22(c), the aggregate
amount of T’s $50 capital loss carryover
from Year 1 that is included in
computing the P group’s consolidated
net capital gain for all years of the group
(in this case, Years 2 and 3) may not
exceed $30 (the aggregate consolidated
net capital gain computed by reference
only to T’s items, including losses and
deductions actually absorbed (that is,
$30 of capital gain in Year 3)). Thus, the
P group may include $30 of T’s Year 1
capital loss carryover in its computation
of consolidated net capital gain for Year
3, which offsets the group’s capital gains
for Year 3. T carries over its remaining
$20 of its Year 1 capital loss to Year 4.
Therefore, the capital loss cumulative
register of T is decreased by $30, and
zero remains in the capital loss
cumulative register ($30¥$30). Further,
because the net operating loss
cumulative register includes all taxable
income of T included in the P group, as
well as all absorbed losses of T
(including capital items), a zero net
increase occurs in the net operating loss
cumulative register. The P group carries
over the Year 2 consolidated net capital
loss to Year 4.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(6) The P group’s ability to deduct net
operating losses in Year 3 is subject to
the 80-percent limitation, based on the
P group’s consolidated taxable income
for the year. Thus, the P group’s taxable
income for Year 3 that can be offset,
before use of net operating losses, is $40
(80 percent × the sum of zero capital
gain, after use of the capital loss
carryover, plus $50 of ordinary income).
However, use of the Year 1 net operating
loss also is subject to the SRLY
limitation. The positive balance of the
cumulative register of T applicable to
SRLY net operating losses for Year 3
equals the P group’s consolidated
taxable income determined by reference
only to T’s items, or $40. This amount
equals the sum obtained by adding the
zero carryover from Year 2, a net
inclusion of zero from capital items
implicated in Year 3 ($30¥$30), and
$40 of taxable income in Year 3. Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year
3 is $32 ($40 × 80 percent). Therefore,
only $32 of the Year 1 net operating loss
is absorbed by the P group in Year 3. T
carries over its remaining $20 of its Year
1 loss to Year 4.
(F) Example 6: Pre-2018 NOLs and
post-2017 NOLs. (1) Individual A owns
P. On January 1, 2017, A forms T. P and
T are calendar-year taxpayers. In 2017,
T sustains a $100 net operating loss that
is carried over. During 2018, 2019, and
2020, T deducts a total of $90 of its 2017
net operating loss against its taxable
income, and T carries over the
remaining $10 of its 2017 net operating
loss. In 2021, T sustains a net operating
loss of $50. On December 31, 2021, P
acquires all the stock of T, and T
becomes a member of the P group. The
P group has $300 of consolidated
taxable income in 2022 (computed
without regard to the CNOL deduction).
Such consolidated taxable income
would be $70 if determined by reference
to only T’s items. The P group has no
other SRLY net operating loss
carryovers or CNOL carryovers.
(2) T’s remaining $10 of net operating
loss carryover from 2017 and its $50 net
operating loss carryover from 2021 are
both SRLY losses in the P group. See
§ 1.1502–1(f)(2)(iii). P’s acquisition of T
was not an ownership change as defined
by section 382(g). Thus, T’s net
operating loss carryovers are subject to
the SRLY limitation in paragraph (c)(1)
of this section. The SRLY limitation for
the P group’s 2022 consolidated return
year is consolidated taxable income
determined by reference to only T’s $70
of items.
(3) Because T’s oldest (2017)
carryover was sustained in a year
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
beginning before January 1, 2018, its use
is not subject to limitation under section
172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, all $10 of T’s
2017 SRLY net operating loss (that is, a
pre-2018 NOL) is included under
paragraph (a) of this section in the P
group’s CNOL deduction for 2022. After
deduction of T’s $10 SRLY net operating
loss from 2017, the cumulative register
of T is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar
basis, pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i) of
this section. Therefore, the cumulative
register of T is decreased by $10, and
$60 remains in the cumulative register
($70¥$10).
(4) The P group’s deduction of T’s
2021 net operating loss is subject to both
a SRLY limitation and the 80-percent
limitation under section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii).
Therefore, the total limitation on the use
of T’s 2021 net operating loss in the P
group is $48 (the remaining cumulative
register of $60 × 80 percent). No losses
from equivalent years are available, and
the P group otherwise has sufficient
consolidated taxable income to support
the CNOL deduction ($290 × 80 percent
= $232). Therefore, $48 of T’s 2021
SRLY net operating loss is included
under paragraph (a) of this section in
the P group’s CNOL deduction for 2022.
The remaining $2 of T’s 2021 SRLY net
operating loss ($50¥$48) is carried over
to the P group’s 2023 consolidated
return year.
(5) After deduction of T’s $48 SRLY
NOL in 2022, the cumulative register of
T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking
into account the 80-percent limitation,
the amount of income necessary to
support this deduction is $60 ($60 × 80
percent = $48). Therefore, the
cumulative register of T is decreased by
$60, and zero remains in the cumulative
register ($60¥$60).
(2) * * *
(v) Coordination with other
limitations. This paragraph (c)(2) does
not allow a net operating loss to offset
income to the extent inconsistent with
other limitations or restrictions on the
use of losses, such as a limitation based
on the nature or activities of members.
For example, a net operating loss may
not offset income in excess of any
limitations under section 172(a) and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section.
Additionally, any dual consolidated loss
may not reduce the taxable income to an
extent greater than that allowed under
section 1503(d) and §§ 1.1503(d)–1
through 1.1503(d)–8. See also § 1.1502–
47(k) (relating to preemption of rules for
life-nonlife groups).
*
*
*
*
*
(viii) Examples. For purposes of the
examples in this paragraph (c)(2)(viii),
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
no corporation is a nonlife insurance
company or has any farming losses. The
principles of this paragraph (c)(2) are
illustrated by the following examples:
*
*
*
*
*
(B) * * *
(3) In Year 4, the M group has $10 of
consolidated taxable income (computed
without regard to the CNOL deduction
for Year 4). That consolidated taxable
income would be $45 if determined by
reference only to the items of P, S, and
T, the members included in the SRLY
subgroup with respect to P’s loss
carryover. Therefore, the positive
balance of the cumulative register of the
P SRLY subgroup for Year 4 equals $45
and, due to the application of the 80percent limitation under paragraph
(c)(2)(v) of this section, the SRLY
subgroup limitation under this
paragraph (c)(2) is $36 ($45 × 80
percent). However, the M group has
only $10 of consolidated taxable income
in Year 4. Thus, due to the 80-percent
limitation and the application of
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the M
group’s deduction of all net operating
losses in Year 4 is limited to $8 ($10 ×
80 percent). As a result, the M group
deducts $8 of P’s SRLY net operating
loss carryover, and the remaining $37 is
carried over to Year 5.
(4) After deduction of $8 of P’s SRLY
net operating loss in Year 4, the
cumulative register of the P SRLY
subgroup is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section.
After taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is
$10 ($10 × 80 percent = $8). Therefore,
the cumulative register of the P SRLY
subgroup is decreased by $10, and $35
remains in the cumulative register
($45¥$10).
(5) In Year 5, the M group has $100
of consolidated taxable income
(computed without regard to the CNOL
deduction for Year 5). None of P, S, or
T has any items of income, gain,
deduction, or loss in Year 5. Although
the members of the P SRLY subgroup do
not contribute to the $100 of
consolidated taxable income in Year 5,
the positive balance of the cumulative
register of the P SRLY subgroup for Year
5 is $35 and, due to the application of
the 80-percent limitation under
paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section, the
SRLY subgroup limitation under this
paragraph (c)(2) is $28 ($35 × 80
percent). Because of the 80-percent
limitation and the application of
paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the M
group’s deduction of net operating
losses in Year 5 is limited to $80 ($100
× 80 percent). Because the $28 of net
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67981
operating loss available to be absorbed
is less than 80 percent of the M group’s
consolidated taxable income, $28 of P’s
SRLY net operating loss is absorbed in
Year 5, and the remaining $9 ($37¥$28)
is carried over to Year 6.
(6) After deduction of $28 of P’s SRLY
net operating loss in Year 5, the
cumulative register of the P SRLY
subgroup is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section.
After taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the amount of income
necessary to support this deduction is
$35 ($35 × 80 percent = $28). Therefore,
the cumulative register of the P SRLY
subgroup is decreased by $35, and zero
remains in the cumulative register
($35¥$35).
*
*
*
*
*
(h) * * *
(9) For the applicability dates of
paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(C) and (b)(3)(ii)(D)
of this section, see § 1.1502–21T(h)(9).
(10) The rules of paragraphs (a), (b)(1),
(b)(2)(iv), and (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section
apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020.
■ Par. 4. Section 1.1502–47 is amended:
■ 1. By revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and
(ii).
■ 2. By removing paragraph (a)(3).
■ 3. By redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as
paragraph (a)(3).
■ 4. By removing paragraphs (b) and (c).
■ 5. By redesignating paragraph (d) as
paragraph (b).
■ 6. By revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (b)(1), (2), (3), (4), (5), (10),
(11), and (13).
■ 7. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(14), by designating Examples 1
through 14 as paragraphs (b)(14)(i)
through (xiv), respectively.
■ 8. In newly redesignated paragraph
(b)(14)(i), by adding a sentence at the
end of the paragraph.
■ 9. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(14)(ii).
■ 10. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (b)(14)(xiv).
■ 11. By redesignating paragraph (e) as
paragraph (c).
■ 12. By removing newly redesignated
paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
■ 13. By redesignating paragraph (c)(6)
as paragraph (c)(4).
■ 14. By redesignating paragraph (f) as
paragraph (d).
■ 15. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(5).
■ 16. By removing the last sentence of
newly redesignated paragraph (d)(6).
■ 17. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
■ 18. By redesignating paragraph
(d)(7)(iii) as paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
■ 19. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
67982
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
20. By redesignating paragraph (g) as
paragraph (e).
■ 21. In newly redesignated paragraph
(e)(2), by removing the language
‘‘partial’’ everywhere it appears.
■ 22. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (e)(3).
■ 23. By redesignating paragraph (h) as
paragraph (f).
■ 24. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(2)(iii).
■ 25. In newly designated paragraph
(f)(2)(v), by removing the word ‘‘partial’’
everywhere it appears.
■ 26. In newly redesignated paragraph
(f)(2)(v), by adding a sentence at the end
of the paragraph.
■ 27. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) and (vii).
■ 28. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(3).
■ 29. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (f)(4) as
paragraph (f)(3).
■ 30. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (f)(3)(ii).
■ 31. By adding a new paragraph (g).
■ 32. By removing paragraphs (j), (k),
and (l).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
■
33. By redesignating paragraph (m) as
paragraph (h), and redesignating
paragraph (n) as paragraph (j).
■ 34. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h), by removing the language ‘‘partial’’
everywhere it appears.
■ 35. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(2)(ii), by adding a sentence at the
end of the paragraph.
■ 36. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(3)(iv), by adding a sentence at the
end of the paragraph.
■ 37. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(3)(viii), by removing the language
‘‘common parent’s election’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘election by the agent for the
group (within the meaning of § 1.1502–
77)’’.
■ 38. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(3)(ix), by removing the last two
sentences.
■ 39. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(4).
■ 40. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (h)(5) as
paragraph (h)(4).
■ 41. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (h)(4) introductory text.
■ 42. In newly redesignated paragraph
(h)(4), by redesignating Examples 1
■
Paragraph
Redesignations
Remove
1.1502–47(a)(1) ..............
N/A ................................
1.1502–47(a)(1) ..............
N/A ................................
1.1502–47(a)(1) ..............
N/A ................................
section 802 or 821 (relating respectively
to life insurance companies and to
certain mutual insurance companies).
life insurance companies and mutual insurance companies may.
composition and its consolidated tax ......
1.1502–47(a)(4) ..............
1.1502–47(a)(4) ..............
1.1502–47(d)(12)(i)(A),
(d)(12)(i)(C),
(d)(12)(i)(D), (d)(12)(iii),
(d)(12)(iv), (d)(12)(v),
(d)(12)(v)(B),
(d)(12)(v)(C),
(d)(12)(v)(D),
(d)(12)(vi), (d)(12)(vii),
and (d)(12)(viii)(F).
1.1502–47(d)(12)(iii) .......
1.1502–47(d)(12)(iv) .......
1.1502–47(d)(12)(v)(B) ...
1.1502–47(a)(3) ............
1.1502–47(a)(3) ............
1.1502–47(b)(12)(i)(A),
(b)(12)(i)(C),
(b)(12)(i)(D),
(b)(12)(iii), (b)(12)(iv),
(b)(12)(v),
(b)(12)(v)(B),
(b)(12)(v)(C),
(b)(12)(v)(D),
(b)(12)(vi), (b)(12)(vii),
and (b)(12)(viii)(F), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(12)(iii) .....
1.1502–47(b)(12)(iv) .....
1.1502–47(b)(12)(v)(B)
subdivision (iii) .........................................
subdivision (iv) ........................................
(i.e., sections 11, 802, 821, or 831) ........
1.1502–47(d)(12)(vi) .......
1.1502–47(d)(12)(vii) ......
1.1502–47(d)(12)(viii)(A)
1.1502–47(b)(12)(vi) .....
1.1502–47(b)(12)(vii) ....
1.1502–47(b)(12)(viii)(A)
subdivision (vi) ........................................
return year and even ...............................
(i.e., total reserves in section 801(c)) .....
1.1502–47(d)(12)(viii)(D)
and (F).
1.1502–47(d)(14) ............
1.1502–47(d)(14) ............
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 1.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 2 through 4, 8, 10,
and 12.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 1 through 3.
1.1502–47(b)(12)(viii)(D)
and (F), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14) ..........
1.1502–47(b)(14) ..........
1.1502–47(b)(14)(i) .......
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 1 through 5 and 8
through 13.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
1.1502–47(b)(14)(ii)
through (iv), (viii), (x),
and (xii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(i)
through (iii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(i)
through (v) and (viii)
through (xiii), respectively.
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
through 6 as paragraphs (h)(4)(i) through
(vi).
■ 43. By revising newly redesignated
paragraphs (h)(4)(ii) and (iii).
■ 44. By removing newly redesignated
paragraphs (h)(4)(v) and (vi).
■ 45. By revising redesignated
paragraph (j)(2)(iii).
■ 46. By removing newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(2)(v).
■ 47. By redesignating newly
redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(vi) as
paragraph (j)(2)(v).
■ 48. By revising newly redesignated
paragraph (j)(3).
■ 49. By redesignating paragraphs (q),
(r), and (s) as paragraphs (k), (l), and
(m), respectively.
■ 50. By adding a new paragraph (n).
■ 51. By removing paragraphs (o), (p),
and (t).
■ 52. In the following table, for each
section designated or redesignated
under these regulations (as indicated in
the second column), removing the
language in the third column and
adding the language in the fourth
column with the frequency indicated in
the fifth column:
Add
§§ 1.1502–1 through 1.1502–80 .............
844 ..........................................................
(d)(12) ......................................................
Frequency
section 801 (relating to life insurance
companies).
Once.
life insurance companies may ................
Once.
composition, its consolidated taxable income (or loss), and its consolidated
tax.
§§ 1.1502–0 through 1.1502–100 ...........
848 ..........................................................
(b)(12) ......................................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Each place it appears.
Once.
Once.
Once.
subdivision (viii) .......................................
paragraph (b)(12)(iii) ...............................
paragraph (b)(12)(iv) ...............................
(for example, section 11, section 801, or
section 831).
paragraph (b)(12)(vi) ...............................
return year even ......................................
(that is, total reserves in section 816(c),
as modified by section 816(h)).
paragraph (b)(12)(viii) .............................
Illustrations ..............................................
paragraph (d) ..........................................
1913 ........................................................
Examples .................................................
paragraph (b) ..........................................
2012 ........................................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
1974 ........................................................
2012 ........................................................
Each place it appears.
1980 ........................................................
2018 ........................................................
Each place it appears.
1982 ........................................................
2020 ........................................................
Each place it appears.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
67983
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph
Redesignations
Remove
Add
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 5 through 7 and 9.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(v)
through (vii) and (ix),
respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(ii)
through (v) and (viii)
through (xii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(ii),
(iii), and (xii), respectively.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(iii) .....
1983 ........................................................
2021 ........................................................
Each place it appears.
(d)(12) ......................................................
(b)(12) ......................................................
Each place it appears.
stock casualty ..........................................
nonlife insurance .....................................
Each place it appears.
subparagraph (d)(12)(v)(B) and (E) ........
paragraph (b)(12)(v)(B) and (D) ..............
Once.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(iii) .....
e.g. ..........................................................
for example .............................................
Once.
1.1502–47(b)(14)(v) ......
i.e. ............................................................
in other words .........................................
Once.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 2 through 5 and 8
through 12.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
1.1502–47(d)(14), Examples 2, 3, and 12.
Frequency
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 3.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 3.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 5.
1.1502–47(d)(14), Example 12.
1.1502–47(e)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(b)(14)(xii) ....
casualty ...................................................
nonlife insurance .....................................
Once.
1.1502–47(c)(1) ............
life company ............................................
Once.
1.1502–47(e)(3) ..............
1.1502–47(c)(3) ............
§ 1.1502–75(c) .........................................
Once.
1.1502–47(f)(3) ...............
1.1502–47(f)(3) ...............
1.1502–47(f)(3) ...............
1.1502–47(d)(3) ............
1.1502–47(d)(3) ............
1.1502–47(d)(3) ............
2019 ........................................................
2020 ........................................................
applying §§ 1.1502–13 and 1.1502–19 ...
Each place it appears.
Each place it appears.
Once.
1.1502–47(f)(7)(i) ............
1.1502–47(f)(7)(i) ............
1.1502–47(g) ..................
1.1502–47(g)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(g)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(g)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(g)(2) ..............
1.1502–47(g)(2) ..............
1.1502–47(g)(2) ..............
1.1502–47(h)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(h)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(d)(7)(i) .........
1.1502–47(d)(7)(i) .........
1.1502–47(e) .................
1.1502–47(e)(1) ............
1.1502–47(e)(1) ............
1.1502–47(e)(1) ............
1.1502–47(e)(2) ............
1.1502–47(e)(2) ............
1.1502–47(e)(2) ............
1.1502–47(f)(1) .............
1.1502–47(f)(1) .............
paragraph (e) ..........................................
sections 801(a) and 831(a) .....................
two ...........................................................
paragraph (f) ...........................................
paragraph (j) ............................................
paragraph (e)(1) ......................................
paragraph (g)(1) ......................................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
paragraph (e)(2) ......................................
paragraph (f) ...........................................
includes insurance company taxable income.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(2)(i) ...........
1.1502–47(f)(2)(i) ..........
§ 1.1502–21, the rules in this paragraph
(f)(2).
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) ..........
1.1502–47(f)(2)(ii) .........
§ 1.1502–21(e) ........................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(2)(iv) .........
1.1502–47(f)(2)(iv) ........
year, § 1.1502–21 ....................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(2)(iv) .........
1.1502–47(h)(2)(v) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ...........
1.1502–47(f)(2)(iv) ........
1.1502–47(f)(2)(v) .........
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ..........
nonlife subgroup loss ..............................
paragraph (f)(2) .......................................
§ 1.1502–22 .............................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ...........
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) ...........
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ..........
1.1502–47(f)(3)(i) ..........
paragraph (f)(3) .......................................
§ 1.1502–22 .............................................
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iii) .........
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iii)(A) ....
1.1502–47(f)(3)(iii) ........
1.1502–47(f)(3)(iii)(A) ....
§ 1.1502–22(b) ........................................
allowed under section 832(c)(5) .............
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(m) .................
1.1502–47(m) .................
1.1502–47(m) .................
1.1502–47(m) .................
1.1502–47(m)(2)(ii) .........
1.1502–47(h) .................
1.1502–47(h) .................
1.1502–47(h) .................
1.1502–47(h) .................
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) ........
paragraph (e) ..........................................
paragraph (f) ...........................................
paragraph (g) ..........................................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
§ 1.1502–21 .............................................
Each place
Each place
Each place
Each place
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(2)(ii) .........
1.1502–47(h)(2)(ii) ........
§ 1.1502–22 .............................................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) .........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) .........
But see paragraph (h)(3)(ix) of this section.
arising in separate return years ..............
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) ..........
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(i) ..........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(i) .........
and 1.1502–22 ........................................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(iii) ........
1.1502–47(m)(3)(v) .........
1.1502–47(m)(3)(v) .........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(iii) .......
1.1502–47(h)(3)(v) ........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(v) ........
life consolidated net operating loss ........
taxable income ........................................
LICTI for any ...........................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vi)(A) ...
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(A) ..
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vi)(A) ..
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(A) ..
paragraph (h)(3) ......................................
notwithstanding § 1.1502–21(b) ..............
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(A) ..
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(A) ..
life company or an ineligible mutual
company.
§ 1.1502–75(c) and paragraph (e)(4) of
this section.
1981 ........................................................
1982 ........................................................
applying §§ 1.1502–13, 1.1502–18, and
1.1502–19.
paragraph (g) ..........................................
sections 802(a), 821(a), and 831(a) .......
three ........................................................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
paragraph (n) ..........................................
paragraph (g)(1) ......................................
paragraph (j) ............................................
paragraph (m) .........................................
paragraph (g)(2) ......................................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
includes separate mutual insurance
company taxable income (as defined
in section 821(b)) and insurance company taxable income.
§§ 1.1502–21 or 1.1502–21A (as appropriate), the rules in this subparagraph
(2).
§§ 1.1502–21(A)(f) or 1.1502–21(e) (as
appropriate).
year beginning after December 31,
1981, §§ 1.1502–21A or 1.1502–21
(as appropriate).
nonlife loss ..............................................
subparagraph (2) .....................................
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A (as appropriate).
subparagraph (4) .....................................
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A(a) (as appropriate).
§§ 1.1502–22A(b)(1) or 1.1502–22(b) .....
allowed under section 822(c)(6) or section 832(c)(5).
paragraph (g) ..........................................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
paragraph (l) ............................................
paragraph (m) .........................................
§§ 1502–21 or 1.1502–21A (as appropriate).
§§ 1.1502–22 or 1.1502–22A (as appropriate).
But see subdivision (ix) of this paragraph (m)(3).
arising in separate return years ending
after December 31, 1980.
and 1.1502–22 (or §§ 1.1502–21A and
1.1502–22A, as appropriate).
consolidated LO ......................................
GO or TII .................................................
LICTI (as determined under paragraph
(j) of this section) for any.
subparagraph (3) .....................................
notwithstanding § 1.1502–21A(b)(3)(ii) or
1.1502–21(b).
taxable income for that year ...................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(vii)(B) ..
1.1502–47(m)(3)(viii) ......
1.1502–47(h)(3)(vii)(B) ..
1.1502–47(h)(3)(viii) ......
(A) of this subdivision (vii) .......................
section 172(b)(3)(C) ................................
taxable income for that year, subject to
the limitation in section 172(a).
paragraph (h)(3)(vii)(A) of this section ....
section 172(b)(3) .....................................
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Once.
Once.
it
it
it
it
appears.
appears.
appears.
appears.
67984
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Paragraph
Redesignations
Remove
Add
1.1502–47(m)(3)(ix) ........
1.1502–47(m)(3)(ix) ........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(ix) .......
1.1502–47(h)(3)(ix) .......
243(b)(3) ..................................................
return year ...............................................
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(x) .........
1.1502–47(h)(3)(x) ........
LICTI in the particular .............................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(xii) .......
1.1502–47(h)(3)(xii) ......
243(b)(2) ..................................................
return year ending after December 31,
1980.
LICTI (as defined in paragraph (j) of this
section) in the particular.
carryback of a consolidated LO ..............
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(3)(xii) .......
1.1502–47(m)(5), Examples 1 through 4.
1.1502–47(h)(3)(xii) ......
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i)
through (iv), respectively.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i)
through (iv), respectively.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) .........
(2) or (4) ..................................................
1982 ........................................................
carryback of a life consolidated net operating loss.
(2) or (3) ..................................................
2021 ........................................................
Once.
Each place it appears.
i.e. ............................................................
that is .......................................................
Each place it appears.
paragraph (d)(13) ....................................
paragraph (b)(13) ....................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) .........
attributable to I (an ineligible member) ...
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(i) .........
of this section. The result would be ........
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
of this section or under § 1.1502–15A ....
attributable to I (an ineligible member
that is not a nonlife insurance company).
of this section and section 172(a). The
result would be.
of this section ..........................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
taxable income is $35 .............................
taxable income is $32.5 ..........................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
30% .........................................................
35% .........................................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
(15) ..........................................................
(17.5) .......................................................
Once.
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
(65) ..........................................................
(67.5) .......................................................
Once.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Examples 1 through 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 1.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(m)(5), Example 4.
1.1502–47(n) ..................
1.1502–47(h)(4)(iv) .......
(85) ..........................................................
(82.5) .......................................................
Once.
1.1502–47(j) ..................
consolidated LO ......................................
Each place it appears.
1.1502–47(n)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(n)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(j)(1) .............
1.1502–47(j)(1) .............
paragraph (g)(1) ......................................
paragraph (n)(2) of this section ..............
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(n)(1) ..............
1.1502–47(j)(1) .............
1.1502–47(n)(2) ..............
1.1502–47(n)(2) ..............
1.1502–47(n)(2)(ii) ..........
1.1502–47(n)(2)(iv) .........
1.1502–47(q) ..................
1.1502–47(q) ..................
1.1502–47(q) ..................
1.1502–47(j)(2) .............
1.1502–47(j)(2) .............
1.1502–47(j)(2)(ii) .........
1.1502–47(j)(2)(iv) ........
1.1502–47(k) .................
1.1502–47(k) .................
1.1502–47(k) .................
paragraph (f) ...........................................
paragraphs (h)(2) and (3) .......................
consolidated LICTI ..................................
Paragraphs (h)(3)(vi), (vii), (x), and (xi) ..
§§ 1.1502–0 through 1.1502–100 ...........
paragraph (h)(3)(vi) .................................
§ 1.1502–21 .............................................
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
1.1502–47(r) ...................
1.1502–47(l) ..................
consolidated net capital loss (as determined under paragraph (l)(4) of this
section).
paragraph (h) ..........................................
paragraphs (m)(2) and (3) ......................
consolidated partial LICTI .......................
Paragraphs (m)(3)(vi), (vii), (x), and (xi)
§ 1.1502–1 through 1.1502–80 ...............
paragraph (m)(3)(vi) ................................
§§ 1.1502–21A(b)(3) and 1.1502–
79A(a)(3) (or § 1.1502–21, as appropriate).
partial LICTI (or LO) ................................
life consolidated net operating loss and
consolidated operations loss
carryovers.
paragraph (e)(1) ......................................
paragraph (j)(2) of this section, subject
to the rules and limitations in paragraph (j)(3) of this section.
consolidated net capital loss ...................
Once.
1.1502–47(r) ...................
1.1502–47(s)(1)(iii) .........
1.1502–47(s)(1)(iv) .........
1.1502–47(s)(1)(v) ..........
1.1502–47(s)(1)(v) ..........
1.1502–47(l) ..................
1.1502–47(m)(1)(iii) ......
1.1502–47(m)(1)(iv) ......
1.1502–47(m)(1)(v) .......
1.1502–47(m)(1)(v) .......
LICTI (or life consolidated net operating
loss).
§§ 1.1502–0 through 1.1502–100 ...........
paragraphs (e), (h), and (j) .....................
paragraph (f) ...........................................
consolidated Life .....................................
or life consolidated net operating loss ....
The additions and revisions read as
follows:
§ 1.1502–47 Consolidated returns by lifenonlife groups.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Frequency
(a) * * *
(2) General method of consolidation—
(i) Subgroup method. The regulations
adopt a subgroup method to determine
consolidated taxable income. One
subgroup is the group’s nonlife
companies. The other subgroup is the
group’s life insurance companies.
Initially, the nonlife subgroup computes
nonlife consolidated taxable income and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
§§ 1.1502–0—1.1502–80 ........................
paragraphs (g), (m), and (n) ...................
paragraph (h) ..........................................
consolidated partial Life ..........................
(as defined by paragraph (d)(3) of this
section), determined under paragraph
(j) of this section
the life subgroup computes consolidated
LICTI. A subgroup’s income may in
effect be reduced by a loss of the other
subgroup, subject to the limitations in
sections 172 and 1503(c). The life
subgroup losses consist of life
consolidated net operating loss,
consolidated operations loss carryovers
from taxable years beginning before
January 1, 2018 (consolidated
operations loss carryovers), and life
consolidated net capital loss. The
nonlife subgroup losses consist of
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
and nonlife consolidated net capital
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
Once.
loss. Consolidated taxable income is
therefore defined in pertinent part as the
sum of nonlife consolidated taxable
income and consolidated LICTI,
reduced by life subgroup losses and/or
nonlife subgroup losses.
(ii) Subgroup loss. A subgroup loss
does not actually affect the computation
of nonlife consolidated taxable income
or consolidated LICTI. It merely
constitutes a bottom-line adjustment in
reaching consolidated taxable income.
Furthermore, the amount of a
subgroup’s loss, if any, that is eligible to
be carried back to a prior taxable year
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
first must be carried back against
income of the same subgroup before it
may be used as a setoff against the other
subgroup’s income in the taxable year
the loss arose. (See sections 172(b)(1)
and 1503(c)(1); see also § 1.1502–21(b).)
The carryback of losses from one
subgroup may not be used to offset
income of the other subgroup in the year
to which the loss is to be carried. This
carryback of one subgroup’s loss may
‘‘bump’’ the other subgroup’s loss that,
in effect, previously reduced the income
of the first subgroup. The subgroup’s
loss that is bumped in appropriate cases
may, in effect, reduce a succeeding
year’s income of either subgroup. This
approach gives the group the tax savings
of the use of losses, but the bumping
rule assures that, insofar as possible, life
deductions will be matched against life
income and nonlife deductions against
nonlife income.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(1) Life company. The term life
company means a life insurance
company as defined in section 816 and
subject to tax under section 801. Section
816 applies to each company separately.
(2) Nonlife insurance company. The
term nonlife insurance company has the
meaning provided in § 1.1502–1(k).
(3) Life insurance company taxable
income. The term life insurance
company taxable income or LICTI has
the meaning provided in section 801(b).
(4) Group. The term group has the
meaning provided in § 1.1502–1(a).
Unless otherwise indicated in this
section, a group’s composition is
determined without regard to section
1504(b)(2).
(5) Member. The term member has the
meaning provided in § 1.1502–1(b). A
life company is tentatively treated as a
member for any taxable year for
purposes of determining if it is an
eligible corporation under paragraph
(b)(12) of this section and, therefore, if
it is an includible corporation under
section 1504(c)(2). If such a company is
eligible and includible (under section
1504(c)(2)), it will actually be treated as
a member of the group.
*
*
*
*
*
(10) Separate return year. The term
separate return year has the meaning
provided in § 1.1502–1(e). For purposes
of this paragraph (b)(10), the term group
is defined with regard to section
1504(b)(2) for years in which an election
under section 1504(c)(2) is not in effect.
Thus, a separate return year includes a
taxable year for which that election is
not in effect.
(11) Separate return limitation year.
Section 1.1502–1(f)(2) provides
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
exceptions to the definition of the term
separate return limitation year. For
purposes of applying those exceptions
to this section, the term group is defined
without regard to section 1504(b)(2),
and the definition in this paragraph
(b)(11) applies separately to the nonlife
subgroup in determining nonlife
consolidated taxable income under
paragraph (f) of this section and to the
life subgroup in determining
consolidated LICTI under paragraph (g)
of this section. Paragraph (h)(3)(ix) of
this section defines the term separate
return limitation year for purposes of
determining whether the losses of one
subgroup may be used against the
income of the other subgroup.
*
*
*
*
*
(13) Ineligible corporation. A
corporation that is not an eligible
corporation is ineligible. If a life
company is ineligible, it is not treated
under section 1504(c)(2) as an
includible corporation. Losses of a
nonlife member arising in years when it
is ineligible may not be used under
section 1503(c)(2) and paragraph (g) of
this section to set off the income of a life
member. If a life company is ineligible
and is the common parent of the group
(without regard to section 1504(b)(2)),
the election under section 1504(c)(2)
may not be made.
(14) * * *
(i) * * * S2 must file its own separate
return for 2020.
(ii) Example 2. Since 2012, L1 has
been a life company owning all the
stock of L2. In 2018, L1 transfers assets
to S1, a new nonlife insurance company
subject to taxation under section 831(a).
For 2020, only L1 and L2 are eligible
corporations. The tacking rule in
paragraph (b)(12)(v) of this section does
not apply in 2020 because the old
corporation (L1) and the new
corporation (S1) do not have the same
tax character.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(5) Dividends received deduction—(i)
Dividends received by an includible
insurance company. Dividends received
by an includible member insurance
company, taxed under either section
801 or section 831, from another
includible member of the group are
treated for Federal income tax purposes
as if the group did not file a
consolidated return. See sections
818(e)(2) and 805(a)(4) for rules
regarding a member taxed under section
801, and see sections 832(g) and
832(b)(5)(B) through (E) for rules
regarding a member taxed under section
831.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67985
(ii) Other dividends. Dividends
received from a life company member of
the group that are not subject to
paragraph (d)(5)(i) of this section are not
included in gross income of the
distributee member. See section
1504(c)(2)(B)(i). If the distributee
corporation is a nonlife insurance
company subject to tax under section
831, the rules of section 832(b)(5)(B)
through (E) apply.
*
*
*
*
*
(7) * * *
(ii) Any taxes described in § 1.1502–
2 (other than in § 1.1502–2(a)(1), (a)(6),
and (a)(7)).
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Carrybacks. The portion of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
for the nonlife subgroup described in
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section, if
any, that is eligible to be carried back to
prior taxable years under § 1.1502–21 is
carried back to the appropriate years
(whether consolidated or separate)
before the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss may be used as a nonlife
subgroup loss under paragraphs (e)(2)
and (h) of this section to set off
consolidated LICTI in the year the loss
arose. The election under section
172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire
carryback period for the net operating
loss of the nonlife subgroup may be
made by the agent for the group within
the meaning of § 1.1502–77.
*
*
*
*
*
(v) * * * For limitations on the use
of nonlife carryovers to offset nonlife
consolidated taxable income or
consolidated LICTI, see § 1.1502–21.
(vi) Portion of nonlife consolidated
net operating loss that is carried back to
prior taxable years. The portion of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
that (absent an election to waive
carrybacks) is carried back to the two
preceding taxable years is the sum of the
nonlife subgroup’s farming loss (within
the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii))
and the amount of the subgroup’s net
operating loss that is attributable to
nonlife insurance companies (as
determined under § 1.1502–21). For
rules governing the absorption of net
operating loss carrybacks, including
limitations on the amount of net
operating loss carrybacks that may be
absorbed in prior taxable years, see
§ 1.1502–21(b).
(vii) Example. P, a holding company
that is not an insurance company, owns
all of the stock of S, a nonlife insurance
company, and L1, a life insurance
company. L1 owns all of the stock of L2,
a life insurance company. Both L1 and
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
67986
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
L2 satisfy the eligibility requirements of
§ 1.1502–47(b)(12). Each corporation
uses the calendar year as its taxable
year, and no corporation has incurred
farming losses (within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)). For 2021, the
group first files a consolidated return for
which the election under section
1504(c)(2) is effective. P and S filed
consolidated returns for 2019 and 2020.
In 2021, the P–S group sustains a
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
that is attributable entirely to S (see
§ 1.1502–21(b)). The election in 2021
under section 1504(c)(2) does not result
under paragraph (d)(1) of this section in
the creation of a new group or the
termination of the P–S group. The loss
is carried back to the consolidated
return years 2019 and 2020 of P and S.
Pursuant to § 1.1502–21(b), the loss may
be used to offset S’s income in 2019 and
2020 without limitation, and the loss
may be used to offset P’s income in
those years, subject to the limitation in
section 172(a) (see § 1.1502–21(b)). The
portion of the loss not absorbed in 2019
and 2020 may serve as a nonlife
subgroup loss in 2021 that may set off
the consolidated LICTI of L1 and L2
under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this
section.
(3) * * *
(ii) Additional principles. In applying
§ 1.1502–22 to nonlife consolidated net
capital loss carryovers and carrybacks,
the principles set forth in paragraph
(f)(2)(iii) through (v) of this section for
applying § 1.1502–21 to nonlife
consolidated net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks also apply,
without regard to the limitation in
paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) Consolidated LICTI—(1) General
rule. Consolidated LICTI is the
consolidated taxable income of the life
subgroup, computed under § 1.1502–11
as modified by this paragraph (g).
(2) Life consolidated net operating
loss deduction—(i) In general. In
applying § 1.1502–21, the rules in this
paragraph (g)(2) apply in determining
for the life subgroup the life net
operating loss and the portion of the life
net operating loss carryovers and
carrybacks to the taxable year.
(ii) Life CNOL. The life consolidated
net operating loss is determined under
§ 1.1502–21(e) by treating the life
subgroup as the group.
(iii) Carrybacks—(A) General rule.
The portion of the life consolidated net
operating loss for the life subgroup, if
any, that is eligible to be carried back
under § 1.1502–21 is carried back to the
appropriate years (whether consolidated
or separate) before the life consolidated
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
net operating loss may be used as a life
subgroup loss under paragraphs (e)(1)
and (j) of this section to set off nonlife
consolidated taxable income in the year
the loss arose. The election under
section 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire
carryback period for the consolidated
net operating loss of the life subgroup
may be made by the agent for the group
within the meaning of § 1.1502–77.
(B) Special rule for life consolidated
net operating losses arising in 2018,
2019, or 2020. If a life consolidated net
operating loss arising in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017, and
before January 1, 2021, is carried back
to a life insurance company taxable year
beginning before January 1, 2018, then
such life consolidated net operating loss
is treated as an operations loss
carryback (within the meaning of
section 810, as in effect prior to its
repeal) of such company to such taxable
year.
(iv) Subgroup rule. In determining the
portion of the life consolidated net
operating loss that is absorbed when the
loss is carried back to a consolidated
return year, § 1.1502–21 is applied by
treating the life subgroup as the group.
Therefore, the absorption is determined
without taking into account any nonlife
subgroup losses that were previously
reported on a consolidated return as
setting off life consolidated taxable
income for the year to which the life
subgroup loss is carried back.
(v) Carryovers. The portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss that is
not absorbed in a prior year as a
carryback, or as a life subgroup loss that
set off nonlife consolidated taxable
income for the year the loss arose,
constitutes a life carryover under this
paragraph (g)(2) to reduce consolidated
LICTI before that portion may constitute
a life subgroup loss that sets off nonlife
consolidated taxable income for that
particular year. For limitations on the
use of life carryovers to offset nonlife
consolidated taxable income or
consolidated LICTI, see § 1.1502–21(b).
(3) Life consolidated capital gain net
income or loss—(i) [Reserved].
(ii) Life consolidated net capital loss
carryovers and carrybacks. The life
consolidated net capital loss carryovers
and carrybacks for the life subgroup are
determined by applying the principles
of § 1.1502–22 as modified by the
following rules in this paragraph
(g)(3)(ii):
(A) Life consolidated net capital loss
is first carried back (or apportioned to
the life members for separate return
years) to be absorbed by life
consolidated capital gain net income
without regard to any nonlife subgroup
capital losses and before the life
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
consolidated net capital loss may serve
as a life subgroup capital loss that sets
off nonlife consolidated capital gain net
income in the year the life consolidated
net capital loss arose.
(B) If a life consolidated net capital
loss is not carried back or is not a life
subgroup loss that sets off nonlife
consolidated capital gain net income in
the year the life consolidated net capital
loss arose, then it is carried over to the
particular year under this paragraph
(g)(3)(ii) first against life consolidated
capital gain net income before it may
serve as a life subgroup capital loss that
sets off nonlife consolidated capital gain
net income in that particular year.
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Additionally, the amount of
consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
carryovers may be subject to limitation
(see section 172 and § 1.1502–21).
*
*
*
*
*
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The amount of
consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
carryovers may be subject to limitation
(see section 172 and § 1.1502–21).
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (h). In the examples, L
indicates a life company, S is a nonlife
insurance company, another letter
indicates a nonlife company that is not
an insurance company, no company has
farming losses (within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)), and each
corporation uses the calendar year as its
taxable year.
*
*
*
*
*
(ii) Example 2. (A) The facts are the
same as in paragraph (h)(4)(i) of this
section, except that, for 2021, S’s
separate net operating loss is $200.
Assume further that L’s consolidated
LICTI is $200. Under paragraph
(h)(3)(vi) of this section, the offsettable
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
is $100 (the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss computed under
paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of this section ($200),
reduced by the separate net operating
loss of I ($100)). The offsettable nonlife
consolidated net operating loss that may
be set off against consolidated LICTI in
2021 is $35 (35 percent of the lesser of
the offsettable $100 or consolidated
LICTI of $200). See section 1503(c)(1)
and paragraph (h)(3)(x) of this section.
S carries over a loss of $65, and I carries
over a loss of $100, to 2022 under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section to be
used against nonlife consolidated
taxable income (consolidated net
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
operating loss ($200) less amount used
in 2021 ($35)). Under paragraph
(h)(2)(ii) of this section, the offsettable
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
that may be carried to 2022 is $65 ($100
67987
minus $35). The facts and results are
summarized in the following table.
TABLE 1 TO PARAGRAPH (h)(4)(ii)(A)
[Dollars omitted]
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
P ..................................................................................................................
S ..................................................................................................................
I ....................................................................................................................
Nonlife Subgroup .........................................................................................
L ...................................................................................................................
35% of lower of line 4(c) or 5(c) ..................................................................
Unused offsettable loss ...............................................................................
(B) Accordingly, under paragraph (e)
of this section, consolidated taxable
income is $165 (line 5(a) minus line
6(c)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (h)(4)(ii) of this section,
with the following additions for 2022.
The nonlife subgroup has nonlife
consolidated taxable income of $50 (all
of which is attributable to I) before the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss
deduction under paragraph (f)(2) of this
section. Consolidated LICTI is $100.
Under paragraph (f)(2) of this section,
$50 of the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss carryover ($165) is used
in 2022 and, under paragraph (h)(3)(vi)
and (vii) of this section, the portion
used in 2022 is attributable to I, the
ineligible nonlife member. Accordingly,
the offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss from 2021 under
paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of this section is
$65, the unused loss from 2021. The
offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss in 2022 is $22.75 (35
percent of the lesser of the offsettable
loss of $65 or consolidated LICTI of
$100). Accordingly, under paragraph (e)
of this section, consolidated taxable
income is $77.25 (consolidated LICTI of
$100 minus the offsettable loss of
$22.75).
*
*
*
*
*
(j) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Substitute the term ‘‘life
consolidated net operating loss and
consolidated operations loss carryovers’’
for ‘‘nonlife consolidated net operating
loss’’, and ‘‘paragraph (g)’’ for
‘‘paragraph (f)’’.
(3) Examples. The following examples
illustrate the principles of this
paragraph (j). In the examples, L
indicates a life company, S is a nonlife
insurance company, another letter
indicates a nonlife company that is not
an insurance company, no company has
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
Facts
Offsettable
Limit
Unused Loss
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
100
(200)
(100)
(200)
200
........................
........................
........................
(100)
........................
(100)
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
........................
(100)
200
35
........................
........................
(65)
(100)
(165)
........................
........................
(65)
farming losses (within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)), and each
corporation uses the calendar year as its
taxable year.
(i) Example 1. P, S, L1 and L2
constitute a group that elects under
section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated
return for 2021. In 2021, the nonlife
subgroup consolidated taxable income
is $100 and there is $20 of nonlife
consolidated net capital loss that cannot
be carried back under paragraph (f) of
this section to taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) preceding
2021. The nonlife subgroup has no
carryover from years prior to 2021. The
life consolidated net operating loss is
$150, which under paragraph (g) of this
section includes life consolidated
capital gain net income of $25. Since
life consolidated capital gain net income
is zero for 2021 (see paragraph (h)(3)(iii)
of this section), the nonlife capital loss
offset is zero (see paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of
this section). However, $100 of life
consolidated net operating loss sets off
the $100 nonlife consolidated taxable
income in 2021. The life subgroup
carries under paragraph (g)(2) of this
section to 2022 $50 of the life
consolidated net operating loss ($150
minus $100). The $50 carryover will be
used in 2022 (subject to the limitation
in section 172(a)) against life subgroup
income before it may be used in 2022
to setoff nonlife consolidated taxable
income.
(ii) Example 2. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of this section,
except that, for 2021, the nonlife
consolidated taxable income is $150
(this amount is entirely attributable to S
and includes nonlife consolidated
capital gain net income of $50),
consolidated LICTI is $200, and a life
consolidated net capital loss is $50. The
$50 life consolidated net capital loss
sets off the $50 nonlife consolidated
capital gain net income. Consolidated
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
taxable income under paragraph (e) of
this section is $300 (nonlife
consolidated taxable income ($150)
minus the setoff of the life consolidated
net capital loss ($50), plus consolidated
LICTI ($200)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(ii) of this section,
except that, for 2022, the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss is $150.
This entire amount is attributable to S;
thus, it is eligible to be carried back to
2021 against nonlife consolidated
taxable income under paragraph (f)(2) of
this section and § 1.1502–21(b). If P, the
agent for the group within the meaning
of § 1.1502–77, does not elect to
relinquish the carryback under section
172(b)(3), the entire $150 will be carried
back, reducing 2021 nonlife
consolidated taxable income to zero and
nonlife consolidated capital gain net
income to zero. Under paragraph
(h)(3)(xii) of this section, the setoff in
2021 of the nonlife consolidated capital
gain net income ($50) by the life
consolidated net capital loss ($50) is
restored. Accordingly, the 2021 life
consolidated net capital loss may be
carried over by the life subgroup to
2022. Under paragraph (e) of this
section, after the carryback,
consolidated taxable income for 2021 is
$200 (nonlife consolidated taxable
income ($0) plus consolidated LICTI
($200)).
(iv) Example 4. The facts are the same
as in paragraph (j)(3)(iii) of this section,
except that P elects under section
172(b)(3) to relinquish the carryback of
$150 arising in 2022. The setoff in
Example 2 is not restored. However, the
offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for 2022 (or that may be
carried over from 2022) is zero. See
paragraph (h)(3)(viii) of this section.
Nevertheless, the $150 nonlife
consolidated net operating loss may be
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
67988
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 208 / Tuesday, October 27, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
carried over to be used by the nonlife
group.
(v) Example 5. P owns all of the stock
of S1 and of L1. On January 1, 2017, L1
purchases all of the stock of L2. For
2021, the group elects under section
1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return.
For 2021, L1 is an eligible corporation
under paragraph (b)(12) of this section
but L2 is ineligible. Thus, L1 but not L2
is a member for 2021. For 2021, L2
sustains a net operating loss, which
cannot be carried back (see section
172(b)). For 2021, L2 is treated under
paragraph (d)(6) of this section as a
member of a controlled group of
corporations under section 1563 with P,
S, and L1. For 2022, L2 is eligible and
is included on the group’s consolidated
return. L2’s net operating loss for 2021
that may be carried to 2022 is not
treated under paragraph (b)(11) of this
section as having been sustained in a
separate return limitation year for
purposes of computing consolidated
LICTI of the L1–L2 life subgroup for
2022. Furthermore, the portion of L2’s
net operating loss not used under
paragraph (g)(2) of this section against
life subgroup income in 2022 may be
included in offsettable life consolidated
net operating loss under paragraph (j)(2)
and (h)(3)(i) of this section that reduces
in 2022 nonlife consolidated taxable
income (subject to the limitation in
section 172(a)) because L2’s loss in 2021
was not sustained in a separate return
limitation year under paragraph (j)(2)
and (h)(3)(ix)(A) of this section or in a
separate return year (2021) when an
election was in effect under neither
section 1504(c)(2) nor section 243(b)(3).
*
*
*
*
*
(n) Effective/applicability dates. The
rules of this section apply to taxable
years beginning after December 31,
2020. However, a taxpayer may choose
to apply the rules of this section to
taxable years beginning on or before
December 31, 2020. If a taxpayer makes
the choice described in the previous
sentence, the taxpayer must apply those
rules in their entirety and consistently
with the provisions of subchapter L of
the Internal Revenue Code applicable to
the years at issue.
Par. 5. Section 1.1503(d)–4 is
amended by:
■ 1. In paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(B), removing
the period and adding in its place a
semi-colon.
■ 2. In paragraph (c)(3)(iv), removing
the period and adding in its place ‘‘;
and’’.
■ 3. Adding paragraph (c)(3)(v).
The addition reads as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
■
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:51 Oct 26, 2020
Jkt 253001
§ 1.1503(d)–4 Domestic use limitation and
related operating rules.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) The SRLY limitation is applied
without regard to § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(E)
(section 172(a) limitation applicable to a
SRLY member).
*
*
*
*
*
■ Par. 6. Section 1.1503(d)–8 is
amended by adding paragraph (b)(8) to
read as follows:
§ 1.1503(d)–8
Effective dates.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) Rule providing that SRLY
limitation applies without regard to
§ 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(E). Section
1.1503(d)–4(c)(3)(v) applies to any
period to which § 1.1502–21(c)(1)(i)(E)
applies.
Sunita Lough,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and
Enforcement.
Approved: September 29, 2020.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax
Policy).
[FR Doc. 2020–22974 Filed 10–23–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4830–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Office of Foreign Assets Control
31 CFR Part 515
Cuban Assets Control Regulations
Office of Foreign Assets
Control, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
The Department of the
Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets
Control (OFAC) is amending the Cuban
Assets Control Regulations to further
implement portions of the President’s
foreign policy toward Cuba to deny the
Cuban government access to funds in
connection with remittances to Cuba.
DATES: This rule is effective November
26, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
OFAC: Assistant Director for Licensing,
202–622–2480, Assistant Director for
Regulatory Affairs, 202–622–4855, or
Assistant Director for Sanctions
Compliance & Evaluation, 202–622–
2490.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Electronic Availability
This document and additional
information concerning OFAC are
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
available on OFAC’s website
(www.treasury.gov/ofac).
Background
The Department of the Treasury
issued the Cuban Assets Control
Regulations, 31 CFR part 515 (the
‘‘Regulations’’), on July 8, 1963, under
various authorities, including the
Trading With the Enemy Act (50 U.S.C.
4301–41). OFAC has amended the
Regulations on numerous occasions,
including to implement the President’s
foreign policy toward Cuba as set forth
in National Security Presidential
Memorandum-5, ‘‘Strengthening the
Policy of the United States Toward
Cuba,’’ signed by the President on June
16, 2017.
Today, OFAC, in consultation with
the State Department, is taking
additional action to implement the
Administration’s foreign policy toward
Cuba, as set forth in more detail below.
This rule provides for a 30-day
implementation period before it is
effective in order to allow for technical
implementation of these additional
restrictions.
Restrictions on Certain RemittanceRelated Transactions To and From Cuba
OFAC is amending the Regulations to
remove from the scope of certain
remittance-related general
authorizations any transactions
involving entities or subentities
identified on the Cuba Restricted List, as
maintained by the State Department and
published in the Federal Register. This
action is intended to restrict such
entities’ and subentities’ access to funds
obtained in connection with remittancerelated activities, including in their role
as intermediaries or in their receipt of
fees or commissions from processing
remittance transactions. Specifically,
OFAC is amending three general
licenses in Subpart E of the Regulations
to exclude from the scope of such
authorizations any transaction involving
any entity or subentity identified on the
Cuba Restricted List: (i) § 515.570,
which relates to remittances from
persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction or
from blocked accounts; (ii)
§ 515.572(a)(3), which relates to the
provision of remittance forwarding
services; and (iii) § 515.587, which
relates to remittances from Cuban
nationals to persons subject to U.S.
jurisdiction. OFAC is also amending
§ 515.421, which provides interpretative
guidance with respect to transactions
ordinarily incident to a licensed
transaction, to make clear that a
transaction relating to the collection,
forwarding, or receipt of remittances
involving any entity or subentity
E:\FR\FM\27OCR1.SGM
27OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 208 (Tuesday, October 27, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67966-67988]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22974]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
26 CFR Part 1
[TD 9927]
RIN 1545-BP27
Consolidated Net Operating Losses
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.
ACTION: Final regulations.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document contains final regulations under sections 1502
and 1503 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). These regulations provide
guidance implementing recent statutory amendments to section 172 of the
Code
[[Page 67967]]
relating to the absorption of consolidated net operating loss (CNOL)
carryovers and carrybacks. These regulations also update regulations
applicable to consolidated groups that include both life insurance
companies and other companies to reflect statutory changes. These
regulations affect corporations that file consolidated returns.
DATES:
Effective Date: These regulations are effective on December 28,
2020.
Applicability Date: For dates of applicability, see Sec. Sec.
1.1502-1(l), 1.1502-21(h)(10), 1.1502-47(n), and 1.1503(d)-8(b)(8).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin O. Kellar at (202) 317-6720,
Gregory J. Galvin at (202) 317-3598, or William W. Burhop at (202) 317-
5363.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
This Treasury decision amends the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR
part 1) under section 1502 of the Code. Section 1502 authorizes the
Secretary of the Treasury or his delegate (Secretary) to prescribe
regulations for an affiliated group of corporations that join in filing
(or that are required to join in filing) a consolidated return
(consolidated group) to reflect clearly the Federal income tax
liability of the consolidated group and to prevent avoidance of such
tax liability. See Sec. 1.1502-1(h) (defining the term ``consolidated
group''). For purposes of carrying out those objectives, section 1502
also permits the Secretary to prescribe rules that may be different
from the provisions of chapter 1 of the Code that would apply if the
corporations composing the consolidated group filed separate returns.
Terms used in the consolidated return regulations generally are defined
in Sec. 1.1502-1.
On July 8, 2020, the IRS published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(REG-125716-18) in the Federal Register (85 FR 40927) under section
1502 of the Code (proposed regulations). The proposed regulations
provided guidance implementing recent statutory amendments to section
172, relating to net operating loss (NOL) deductions, and withdrew and
re-proposed certain sections of proposed guidance issued in prior
notices of proposed rulemaking relating to the absorption of CNOL
carryovers and carrybacks. In addition, the proposed regulations
updated regulations applicable to consolidated groups that include both
life insurance companies and other companies to reflect statutory
changes.
In connection with the proposed regulations, the IRS published on
the same date temporary regulations under section 1502 (TD 9900) in the
Federal Register (85 FR 40892) (temporary regulations). The temporary
regulations permit consolidated groups that acquire new members that
were members of another consolidated group to elect to waive all or
part of the pre-acquisition portion of an extended carryback period
under section 172 for certain losses attributable to the acquired
members. The text of the temporary regulations also serves as the text
of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) of the proposed regulations.
The IRS received seven comments in response to the proposed
regulations. Copies of the comments received are available for public
inspection at https://www.regulations.gov or upon request. No public
hearing was requested or held. This Treasury decision adopts the
proposed regulations, other than proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C)
and (D), as final regulations with the changes described in the
following Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions. The
Treasury Department and the IRS expect to finalize proposed Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D) at a later date and welcome further
comments on these provisions.
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions
I. Comments On and Changes To Proposed Sec. 1.1502-21
A. Overview of Section 172
These final revisions implement certain statutory amendments to
section 172 made by Public Law 115-97, 131 Stat. 2054 (December 22,
2017), commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), and by
the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act),
Public Law 116-136, 134 Stat. 281 (March 27, 2020). See generally the
Background section of the preamble to the proposed regulations. As
amended, section 172(a)(2) allows an NOL deduction for a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2020, in an amount equal to the sum of (A)
the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs that are carried to such taxable
year, and (B) the lesser of (i) the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs
that are carried to such taxable year, or (ii) the ``80-percent
limitation.'' The 80-percent limitation is equal to 80 percent of the
excess (if any) of (I) taxable income computed without regard to any
deductions under sections 172, 199A, and 250 of the Code, over (II) the
aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to the taxable year. See
section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii). For purposes of the foregoing computation,
the term ``pre-2018 NOLs'' refers to NOLs arising in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2018, and the term ``post-2017 NOLs''
refers to NOLs arising in taxable years beginning after December 31,
2017.
The 80-percent limitation does not apply to the offset of income by
NOLs in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2021. Section
172(a)(1). The 80-percent limitation also does not apply to limit the
use of pre-2018 NOLs. Section 172(a)(2)(A).
Moreover, the 80-percent limitation does not apply to insurance
companies other than life insurance companies (nonlife insurance
companies). Section 172(f). Therefore, the taxable income of nonlife
insurance companies may be fully offset by NOL deductions. In addition,
under section 172(b)(1)(C) and (b)(1)(D)(i), losses of nonlife
insurance companies arising in taxable years beginning after December
31, 2020, may be carried back two years and carried over 20 years. In
contrast, losses (aside from farming losses) of other taxpayers arising
in such taxable years may not be carried back but may be carried
forward indefinitely. Section 172(b)(1). Thus, nonlife insurance
companies are subject to special rules under section 172 both with
respect to the amount of taxable income that may be offset by NOL
deductions and with respect to the taxable years to which NOLs may be
carried.
B. Overview of the Proposed Approach and the Alternative Approach
To implement the special rules under section 172 for nonlife
insurance companies for a consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, the proposed regulations provided that the
application of the 80-percent limitation within a consolidated group to
post-2017 NOLs depends on the status of the member that generated the
income being offset. The proposed regulations further provided that the
amount of post-2017 CNOLs that may be absorbed by one or more members
of the group in such a consolidated return year (post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit) is determined by applying the 80-percent limitation,
section 172(f) (that is, the special rule for nonlife insurance
companies), or both, to the group's consolidated taxable income (CTI)
for that year. See proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2)(ii)(A) and (B).
For consolidated groups comprised of both nonlife insurance
companies and other members for a consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020, the proposed regulations adopted a two-factor
computation (proposed
[[Page 67968]]
approach). In general, under the proposed approach, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for such a group equals the sum of two amounts. The
first amount, which relates to the income of those members that are not
nonlife insurance companies (residual income pool), is subject to the
80-percent limitation. The second amount, which relates to the income
of those members that are nonlife insurance companies (nonlife income
pool), is not subject to the 80-percent limitation. See proposed Sec.
1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(C). Thus, the proposed approach divides a
consolidated group's nonlife insurance companies and its other members
into two separate ``pools'' for purposes of determining the amount of
CTI that is available to be offset by post-2017 CNOLs after applying
the 80-percent limitation.
In formulating the proposed regulations, the Treasury Department
and the IRS considered another approach (alternative approach). This
alternative approach would have required a group to first offset income
and loss items within a pool of nonlife insurance companies and a pool
of other members for all purposes of section 172 applicable to taxable
years beginning after December 31, 2020. In other words, the
alternative approach would have applied a pooling concept beyond merely
determining the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit, but would have
required a group's CTI to be allocated between the operations of its
nonlife insurance company members, which can be offset fully by CNOL
deductions, and the operations of its other members subject to the 80-
percent limitation. This alternative approach would also have applied
similar rules to allocate CNOLs within groups including both nonlife
insurance companies and other members to consistently identify the
portions of CNOLs allocable to nonlife insurance company members, which
are subject to different carryover rules than those of other members.
The alternative approach would have contrasted with the historical
application of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B), under which a CNOL for a
taxable year is attributed pro rata to all members of a group that
produce net loss, without first netting among entities of the same
type. In the preamble to the proposed regulations, the Treasury
Department and the IRS requested comments regarding both the proposed
approach and the alternative approach.
C. Comments on the Proposed Approach and the Alternative Approach
In response to the request for comments, the Treasury Department
and the IRS received comments that uniformly approved the proposed
approach. For example, two commenters commended the proposed
regulations as implementing the statutory amendments to section 172 in
a reasonable manner that is consistent with both the statute and
consolidated return principles. Specifically, both commenters supported
the proposed regulations' approach to computing a group's post-2017
CNOL deduction limit as well as the proposed regulations' retention of
the historical pro rata approach under Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(B) to
determine the amount of nonlife insurance company losses that can be
carried to other taxable years.
In support of the proposed regulations, one commenter asserted that
the proposed approach is more consistent with the treatment of CNOLs as
consolidated items and with the current CNOL use and absorption rules
in Sec. 1.1502-21 than the alternative approach. The commenter further
asserted that, because the alternative approach would depart from the
general pro rata rules of Sec. 1.1502-21 by first netting income and
loss among entities of the same type within a consolidated group, the
alternative approach could result in computational and compliance
complications in circumstances that may be difficult to anticipate.
In response to the comments received, these final regulations
retain the proposed approach to computing a consolidated group's post-
2017 CNOL deduction limit.
D. Application of the Proposed Approach to Life-Nonlife Groups
One commenter recommended that, for consolidated groups with both
nonlife insurance companies and life insurance companies, the amounts
of the residual income pool and the nonlife income pool in proposed
Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) be clarified to refer only to
the items of income, gain, deduction, or loss of members of the nonlife
subgroup (as defined in Sec. 1.1502-47(b)(9) of these final
regulations). The commenter further recommended that, in making this
clarification, the Treasury Department and the IRS should not prevent
nonlife CNOLs from offsetting life subgroup income where permitted by
the Code and Sec. 1.1502-47. The commenter noted that this outcome
appears to be the intent of the cross-reference to Sec. 1.1502-47 in
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(E), but the commenter indicated that
clarification would be useful. The Treasury Department and the IRS
agree with the commenter regarding the purpose of the cross-reference
to Sec. 1.1502-47 in proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv)(E) and have
revised the regulations to more clearly confirm this outcome.
E. Consolidated Capital Gain Net Income
Section 1.1502-11(a)(3) provides that the CTI for a consolidated
return year is determined by taking into account, among other
enumerated items, any consolidated capital gain net income. See
generally Sec. 1.1502-22(a) (providing rules for determining
consolidated capital gain net income). Under Sec. 1.1502-22(a), the
determinations for a consolidated group under section 1222, including
capital gain net income, are not made separately. Instead, such
consolidated amounts are determined for the group as a whole.
Section 1.1502-11 does not provide explicit rules for allocating
consolidated capital gain net income among members. Thus, one commenter
requested that the final regulations clarify that, for groups that
include nonlife insurance companies, consolidated capital gain net
income under Sec. 1.1502-11(a)(3) is allocated to the residual income
pool and the nonlife income pool using a pro rata method based on the
principles of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv), as reflected in the general
rule in Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(1), for the use and absorption of CNOLs.
Section 1.1502-11 also does not provide explicit rules for
determining the amount of each member's income that is offset by losses
(whether incurred in the current year or carried over or back as a part
of a CNOL or consolidated net capital loss). However, the Treasury
Department and the IRS understand that, in the absence of express
rules, consolidated return practitioners generally apply the principles
of Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(iv) to make such determinations. The
methodology for computing a consolidated group's post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit is intended to implement the changes made to section
172(a) by the TCJA and the CARES Act in a manner that is flexible for
taxpayers to apply and administrable for the IRS. The Treasury
Department and the IRS have determined that specific rules regarding
the allocation of consolidated capital gain net income to the residual
income pool and the nonlife income pool under Sec. 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) would exceed the scope of these final
regulations. Accordingly, the Treasury Department and the IRS continue
to reflect on the commenter's recommendation but have not incorporated
that recommendation into the final regulations.
[[Page 67969]]
F. Example 6 in Proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(v)(F)
Proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(v)(F) (Example 6) contains an
example that illustrates the application of section 172 to a CNOL
incurred by a consolidated group (P group) that includes P, an
includible corporation under section 1504(b) of a type other than a
nonlife insurance company, and PC1, a nonlife insurance company. Both P
and PC1 were incorporated in Year 1, a year beginning after December
31, 2020. In Year 1, the P group has $45 of CTI, $20 of which is
attributable to P and $25 of which is attributable to PC1. In Year 2,
the P group incurs a $16 CNOL that is attributable to PC1 and that is
carried back to Year 1 under section 172(b)(1)(C)(i).
The example illustrates that, under proposed Sec. 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C), the P group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for Year
1 is $41, which is the sum of the residual income pool ($16) and the
nonlife income pool ($25), as described in proposed Sec. 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3), respectively. More specifically, the
amount of the residual income pool equaled the lesser of the aggregate
amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to Year 1 ($16), or 80 percent of the
excess of P's taxable income for that year ($20) over the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocable to P ($0), which also was $16 (80
percent x ($20-$0)). See proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(2)(v)(F)(3). The
amount of the nonlife income pool equaled the excess of PC1's taxable
income for Year 1 ($25) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs
allocable to PC1 ($0). Id.
Two commenters requested clarification as to how much taxable
income in each pool is offset by a CNOL carryover or carryback if each
pool has positive taxable income, as in Example 6. Specifically,
commenters contended that a specific absorption rule is needed to
determine how much taxable income in the residual income pool (which is
subject to the 80-percent limitation) can be offset by subsequent CNOL
carryovers or carrybacks to the same year. For example, assume the same
facts as in Example 6, but that the P group also incurs a $30 CNOL in
Year 3 that is entirely attributable to PC1 and that is eligible to be
carried back to Year 1. Absent a rule specifying how much taxable
income in each pool was offset in Year 1 by the $16 Year 2 CNOL
carryback, the commenters questioned how to compute the residual income
pool for purposes of determining how much of the P group's Year 3 CNOL
carryback could be absorbed by the P group in Year 1.
As noted in part I.A of this Summary of Comments and Explanation of
Revisions, the computation in section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii) is made
``without regard to the deductions under [section 172] and sections
199A and 250.'' Consistent with the statute, the amount of income in
the residual income pool that is subject to the 80-percent limitation
for a particular consolidated return year is not recomputed to reflect
the amount of CNOLs carried over to and absorbed in that year. See
Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of these final regulations. Rather,
the only component of the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit that is
subject to change upon the carryover or carryback of additional CNOLs
to the same consolidated return year is the aggregate amount of post-
2017 CNOLs carried to that year. See Sec. 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(1)(i) of these final regulations. Determining this
amount does not require an absorption rule.
With regard to Example 6, if the P group were to incur a $30 CNOL
in Year 3 that was eligible to be carried back to Year 1, the P group
would redetermine the aggregate amount of the P group's post-2017 CNOLs
that are carried to Year 1, but the P group would not recompute the
amount of Year 1 income subject to the 80-percent limitation. Thus, an
absorption rule is not needed to determine how much of the P group's
Year 1 CTI can be offset by subsequent CNOL carrybacks. However, these
final regulations provide additional facts in Example 6 to illustrate
the computation of the amount of additional CNOL carryovers or
carrybacks to the same consolidated return year that can be deducted to
offset income in that year.
G. Split-Waiver Elections
If a member of one consolidated group becomes a member of another
consolidated group, Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(B) permits the acquiring
group to make an irrevocable election to relinquish, with respect to
all CNOLs attributable to the acquired corporation, the portion of the
carryback period for which the acquired corporation was a member of
another group (so long as any other corporation joining the acquiring
group that was affiliated with the acquired corporation immediately
before it joined the acquiring group also is included in the waiver).
A commenter noted that, pursuant to Sec. 1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(B),
an acquiring group may make a split-waiver election only with respect
to acquired corporations that were members of a different consolidated
group in a carryback year. The commenter recommended that Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(ii) be expanded to allow a split-waiver election if the
acquired corporation was not a member of a consolidated group in the
carryback year.
The Treasury Department and the IRS appreciate the commenter's
suggestion and will continue to consider it in connection with the
future finalization of the temporary regulations. However, this comment
exceeds the scope of these final regulations, which adopt the
provisions of the proposed regulations other than those for which the
text was contained in the temporary regulations (specifically, Sec.
1.1502-21(b)(3)(ii)(C) and (D)). Therefore, the Treasury Department and
the IRS decline to adopt this recommendation in this Treasury decision.
H. Modification to SRLY Rules
The proposed regulations modify the separate return limitation year
(SRLY) rules in Sec. 1.1502-21(c) to take into account the limitations
on NOL deductions under section 172, as amended by the TCJA and the
CARES Act. See proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E). A commenter
recommended that this modification not apply for purposes of section
1503(d) (the dual consolidated loss (DCL) rules). In certain cases, the
extent to which section 1503(d) restricts the use of a DCL, or requires
the recapture of a DCL (or a related interest charge), depends on the
application of the SRLY rules in Sec. 1.1502-21(c), subject to certain
adjustments. See Sec. Sec. 1.1503(d)-4(c)(3) and 1.1503(d)-6(h)(2). In
these cases, the adjusted SRLY rules are generally intended to ensure
that a DCL may be used only to offset income of the dual resident
corporation or separate unit that incurred the DCL, such that the use
does not result in a ``double dip'' of the DCL.
The commenter recommended that the modification reflected in
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E) not apply for purposes of the DCL
rules because the modification addresses policies specific to the SRLY
rules in Sec. 1.1502-21(c) (replicating, to the extent possible,
separate-entity usage of SRLY attributes), which differ from the
policies underlying the DCL rules (preventing double dipping of
losses). In addition, the commenter asserted that applying the rule in
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E) for DCL purposes could distort the
determination of whether double dipping could occur.
The Treasury Department and the IRS agree with the commenter. The
final regulations therefore provide that Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E)
does not apply for purposes of the DCL rules. See Sec. 1.1503(d)-
4(c)(3)(v).
[[Page 67970]]
I. Clarifying Changes to Proposed Sec. 1.1502-21
In addition to the foregoing comments, a commenter recommended
clarifying changes to proposed Sec. 1.1502-21. The Treasury Department
and the IRS appreciate these suggested clarifications and have
incorporated many of them into the final regulations. However, the
commenter also recommended deleting the reference to section 199A in
proposed Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(A)(2)(ii) and 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2)(ii) on the grounds that the deduction under section
199A is available to only noncorporate taxpayers. Because section
199A(g) provides a deduction for specified agricultural or
horticultural cooperatives, which (as C corporations) can be members of
a consolidated group, these references to section 199A have been
retained in the final regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS also have made additional
clarifying revisions based on further review of the proposed
regulations. In particular, the final regulations contain corrections
to scrivener's errors in the two-factor computation in proposed Sec.
1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii). Specifically, the ``lesser of'' language in
proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2), which was intended to
reflect the application of section 172(a)(2)(B) to groups that include
both nonlife insurance companies and other corporations, was
mislocated. To accurately reflect the comparison required under section
172(a)(2)(B), the language at issue has been moved to Sec. 1.1502-
21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(1) of the final regulations.
Additional edits have been made to enhance the consistency and
clarity of the rules in proposed Sec. 1.1502-21(a)(2). For example,
language reflecting the ``lesser of'' comparison described in the
preceding paragraph has been explicitly integrated into Sec. Sec.
1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(B) and 1.1502-21(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(ii) (concerning
CNOL deductions that offset income of nonlife insurance company
members) of these final regulations. As discussed in part II.B of this
Summary of Comments and Explanation of Revisions, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit equals the maximum amount of post-2017 CNOLs that can
be deducted against taxable income in a consolidated return year
beginning after December 31, 2020. This amount could never exceed the
total amount of post-2017 CNOLs carried to that year. See section
172(f) (providing that, in the case of a nonlife insurance company, the
amount of the NOL deduction allowed under section 172(a) in any taxable
year equals the aggregate of NOL carrybacks and carryovers to that
year).
Likewise, in the absence of any other limitation, the taxable
income of a taxpayer always constitutes a limit on the deductibility of
NOLs. See generally section 172(b)(2). Without such limit, the
deduction of NOLs in excess of taxable income would create an
additional NOL. The Treasury Department and IRS have determined that
explicitly providing the respective post-2017 CNOL and taxable income
limitations on the deduction of NOLs to offset taxable income of
nonlife insurance companies will enhance the clarity of the final
regulations and the consistency of their application.
II. Comments On and Changes To Proposed Sec. 1.1502-47
The proposed regulations updated the rules in Sec. 1.1502-47 to
reflect statutory changes enacted since these rules were promulgated.
Commenters commended the Treasury Department and the IRS for updating
these regulations. Additionally, several commenters expressed their
understanding that another guidance project has been initiated to
propose substantive changes to Sec. 1.1502-47 and urged the Treasury
Department and the IRS to give priority to this effort. These
commenters argued that the objective of that guidance project should be
the elimination of any provisions that depart from general consolidated
return principles in life-nonlife consolidation, except to the extent
non-conforming provisions are necessary to implement specific
provisions of the Code. In particular, these commenters expressed
concern about the treatment of consolidated capital gains and losses
under Sec. 1.1502-47 and requested simplification of the eligibility
and tacking rules.
The Treasury Department and the IRS appreciate the commenters'
input and welcome further comments regarding substantive changes to
Sec. 1.1502-47 for purposes of potential future guidance. However,
such changes are beyond the scope of these final regulations.
Additionally, commenters recommended several clarifying changes to
proposed Sec. 1.1502-47. Many of these suggested clarifications have
been incorporated into the final regulations. For example, these final
regulations have added a cross-reference to the definition of ``nonlife
insurance company'' in Sec. 1.1502-1(k). However, one commenter
recommended that Sec. 1.1502-47(g)(3) of these final regulations be
modified to more closely parallel Sec. 1.1502-47(f)(3) of these final
regulations. The commenter further requested that paragraph (d)(5) of
these final regulations be modified to explicitly set forth the various
rules (both statutory and regulatory) that apply to certain dividends
received by an includible member from another member of the
consolidated group. These comments exceed the scope of these final
regulations, but the Treasury Department and the IRS will continue to
consider these comments for purposes of potential future guidance
regarding Sec. 1.1502-47.
Effective/Applicability Dates
The final regulations in Sec. Sec. 1.1502-1(k), 1.1502-21(a),
(b)(1), (b)(2)(iv), and (c)(1)(i)(E), 1.1502-47, and 1.1503(d)-8(b)(8)
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020. However, a
taxpayer may choose to apply the rules in Sec. Sec. 1.1502-1(k) and
1.1502-47 of these final regulations to taxable years beginning on or
before December 31, 2020. If a taxpayer makes the choice described in
the previous sentence with regard to the rules in Sec. 1.1502-47, the
corporation must apply those rules in their entirety and consistently
with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to the
years at issue.
Special Analyses
I. Regulatory Planning and Review--Economic Analysis
Executive Orders 13563, 13771, and 12866 direct agencies to assess
costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if
regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public
health and safety effects, distributive impacts, and equity). Executive
Order 13563 emphasizes the importance of quantifying both costs and
benefits, of reducing costs, of harmonizing rules, and of promoting
flexibility.
These final regulations have been designated as subject to review
under Executive Order 12866 pursuant to the Memorandum of Agreement
(April 11, 2018) between the Treasury Department and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) regarding review of tax regulations. The
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) has designated the
final regulations as economically significant under section 1(c) of the
Memorandum of Agreement. Accordingly, OMB has reviewed the final
regulations.
A. Background and Need for Regulations
In general, taxpayers whose deductions exceed their income generate
a net operating loss (NOL),
[[Page 67971]]
calculated under the rules of section 172. Section 172 also governs the
use of NOLs generated in other years to offset taxable income in the
current year. Regulations issued under the authority of section 1502
may be used to govern how section 172 applies to consolidated groups of
C corporations. In general, a consolidated group generates a combined
NOL at an aggregate level (CNOL), with the CNOL generally equal to the
loss generated from treating the consolidated group as a single entity.
Under regulations promulgated prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(TCJA), the allowed CNOL deduction was equal to the lesser of the CNOL
carryover or the combined taxable income of the group (before the CNOL
deduction).
The TCJA and the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security
(CARES) Act made several changes to section 172. First, the TCJA and
the CARES Act disallowed the carry back of NOLs generated in taxable
years beginning after 2020, except for farming losses and losses
incurred by corporations that are insurance companies other than life
insurance companies (nonlife insurance companies). Second, the TCJA and
the CARES Act limited the NOL deduction in taxable years beginning
after 2020 for NOLs generated in 2018 or later (post-2017 NOLs) to 80
percent of taxable income determined after the deduction for pre-2018
NOLs but before the deduction for post-2017 NOLs. This 80-percent
limitation does not apply to nonlife insurance companies.
These final regulations implement the changes to section 172 in the
context of consolidated groups. In particular, regulations are needed
to address three issues related to consolidated groups that were not
expressly addressed in the TCJA or the CARES Act. First, the final
regulations describe how to determine the 80-percent limitation in the
case of a ``mixed'' group--that is, a consolidated group containing
nonlife insurance companies and other members. Second, the final
regulations address the calculation and allocation of farming losses.
Third, the final regulations implement the 80-percent limitation into
existing regulations to determine the CNOL deduction attributable to
losses from a member arising during periods in which that member was
not part of that group. Part I.B of this Special Analyses describes the
manner by which the final regulations addresses each of these issues.
Part I.B also describes an alternative approach that was
contemplated by the Treasury Department and the IRS regarding the
allocation of currently generated losses to nonlife insurance companies
and other members. The Treasury Department and the IRS elected not to
implement this approach.
B. Overview of the Final Regulations
In this part I.B the following terms are used. The term ``P group''
means a consolidated group of which P is the common parent. The term
``P&C member'' means a member of the P group that is a nonlife
insurance company. The term ``C member'' means a member of the P group
that is a C corporation other than a nonlife insurance company.
1. Application of 80-Percent Limitation in Mixed Groups
Under the statute, the general rule for determining the NOL
deduction (for a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2020)
effectively proceeds in two steps. First, the taxpayer deducts pre-2018
NOLs without limit. Second, the taxpayer deducts post-2017 NOLs up to
80 percent of the taxpayer's taxable income (computed without regard to
the deductions under sections 199A and 250) determined after the
deduction of pre-2018 NOLs (but, naturally, before the deduction for
post-2017 NOLs). However, this 80-percent limitation does not apply for
corporations that are nonlife insurance companies.
The application of the 80-percent limitation to the P group is
straightforward if (i) there are no pre-2018 NOLs and (ii) both classes
of P&C members and C members have positive income before the CNOL
deduction. In that case, these final regulations provide, quite
naturally, that the CNOL limitation is determined by adding (i) the
pre-CNOL income generated by the class of C members (C member income
pool), determined by applying the 80-percent limitation, plus (ii) 100
percent of the pre-CNOL income generated by the class of P&C members
(P&C member income pool). This latter treatment reflects the rule in
section 172(f) that nonlife insurance companies are not subject to the
80-percent limitation.
One complication arises when the pre-CNOL C member income pool is
positive and the pre-CNOL P&C income pool is negative, and the P group
has positive combined pre-CNOL taxable income. In this case (where the
pre-CNOL income is generated by C members, rather than P&C members),
these final regulations provide that the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit
is determined by applying the 80-percent limitation to the income of
the P group. If the situation were reversed, such that the P group had
positive combined taxable income but the pre-CNOL income is generated
by P&C members, rather than the C members, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit is equal to the income of the P group (that is, determined
without regard to the 80-percent limitation). In essence, in these
situations, the amount of the P group's income able to absorb a post-
2017 CNOL carryover is defined by the member pool (that is, the C
member income pool or the P&C member income pool) that is generating
the income.
The other complication occurs when there is a pre-2018 NOL. In this
situation, it matters whether the pre-2018 NOL is treated as reducing
the amount of the C member income pool or reducing the amount of P&C
member income pool. Consider the following example (Example 1). In
Example 1, the P group carries $50 in pre-2018 NOLs and $1000 in post-
2017 NOLs to 2021. In 2021, the P&C members and the C members,
respectively, earn (pre-CNOL) income of $100. If the pre-2018 NOL were
treated as solely reducing the amount of C member income pool, then the
limitation for the post-2017 CNOL deduction would be $100 plus 80
percent of $50 ($100 minus $50), equal to $140. If the pre-2018 NOL
were treated as solely reducing the amount of the P&C member income
pool, then the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the P group would be
$50 ($100 minus $50) plus 80 percent of $100, or $130.
These final regulations allocate the pre-2018 NOL pro-rata to the C
member income pool and the P&C member income pool in proportion to
their current-year income. In Example 1, $25 of the pre-2018 NOL would
be allocated to the C member income pool and $25 to the P&C member
income pool. Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the P
group would be $75 ($100 minus $25) plus 80 percent of $75 ($100 minus
$25), or $135.
2. Farming Losses
Section 172 provides that NOLs arising in a taxable year beginning
after December 31, 2020, may not be carried back to prior years, with
two exceptions: (1) Farming losses and (2) nonlife insurance company
losses. Section 172(b)(1)(B) defines a ``farming loss'' as the smaller
of the actual loss from farming activities in a given year (that is,
the excess of the deductions in farming activities over income in
farming activities) and the total NOL generated in that year. This
statutory provision means that if a taxpayer incurs a loss in farming
activities but has overall income in other activities, the farming loss
will be smaller than the loss in farming activities (and can possibly
be zero).
[[Page 67972]]
Regulations were needed to clarify two issues that arise in the
context of consolidated groups. First, these regulations clarify that
the maximum amount of farming loss is the CNOL of the group rather than
the NOL of the specific member generating the loss in farming
activities. This approach follows closely regulations issued by the
Treasury Department and the IRS in 2012 in an analogous setting.
Second, given the overlapping categories of carryback-eligible NOLs
(farming losses and nonlife insurance companies), regulations are
needed to allocate the farming loss to the various members to determine
the total amount of CNOL that can be carried back. Consider the
following example (Example 2). In Example 2, the P group consists of
one C member and one P&C member. In 2021, the C member's only activity
is farming and the C member incurs a loss of $30, while the P&C member
incurs a loss of $10. The total farming loss is $30, since $30 is less
than the P group CNOL of $40. If this farming loss were allocated
entirely to the C member, then the total amount eligible for carryback
would be $40 (that is, $30 for the farming loss and $10 for the loss
incurred by the P&C member). By contrast, if the farming loss were
allocated entirely to the P&C member, only $30 would be eligible to be
carried back.
Again, following a similar rule as the 2012 regulations, these
final regulations allocate the farming loss to each member of the group
in proportion with their share of total losses, without regard to
whether each member actually engaged in farming. In Example 2, this
would allocate $7.50 (that is, one-fourth of $30) of the farming loss
to the P&C member and the remaining $22.50 (that is, three-fourths of
$30) to the C member. Therefore, the P group would be allowed to carry
back $32.50 total (that is, the $10 of loss generated by the P&C member
and the $22.50 of farming losses allocated to the C member).
3. Separate Return Limitation Year
To reduce ``loss trafficking,'' existing regulations under section
1502 limit the extent to which a consolidated group (that is, the P
group) can claim a CNOL attributable to losses generated by some member
(M) in years in which M was not a member. In particular, existing rules
limit this amount of loss to the amount of the loss that would have
been deductible had M remained a separate entity; that is, the rules
are designed to preserve neutrality in loss use between being a
separate entity or a member of a group. Existing rules operationalize
this principle using the mechanic of a ``cumulative register.'' The
cumulative register is equal to the (cumulative) amount of M's income
that is taken into account in the P group's income. Income earned by M
while a member of the P group increases the cumulative register, while
losses (carried over or otherwise) taken into account by the group
reduce the cumulative register. In general, the existing rules provide
that M's pre-group NOLs cannot offset the P group's income when the
cumulative register is less than or equal to zero.
The introduction of the 80-percent limitation in the TCJA and CARES
Act necessitates an adjustment to this mechanism in order to retain
this neutrality-in-loss-use property. In particular, these final
regulations provide that any losses by M that are absorbed by the P
group and subject to the 80-percent limitation cause a reduction to the
register equal to the full amount of income needed to support that
deduction. The following example (Example 3) demonstrates why this
adjustment is necessary. In Example 3, P and S are each corporations
other than nonlife insurance companies (that is, they are subject to
the 80-percent limitation). Suppose in 2021, S incurs a loss of $800,
which is the only loss ever incurred by S. In 2022, S incurs income of
$400. If S were not a member of a consolidated group, its 2022 NOL
deduction would be limited to $320 (80 percent of $400). Suppose
instead that P acquires S in 2022 and that P has separate income of
$600 in 2022, so the consolidated group has $1000 in pre-CNOL income in
2022. Before claiming any CNOLs, S's cumulative register would increase
to $400 in 2022. Without any additional rules, the $400 cumulative
register would allow P to claim a CNOL of $400 (bringing the register
down to zero), greater than what would have been allowed had S remained
a separate entity. By contrast, requiring the register to be reduced by
125 percent of the NOL (as under the final regulations) allows P to
claim only a $320 CNOL, replicating the result if S were a separate
entity.
4. Allocation of Current Losses to Nonlife Insurance Companies
In general, under the TCJA and CARES Act, taxpayers may not carry
back any losses generated in tax years beginning after 2020, with the
exception of losses generated by nonlife insurance companies and
farming losses. Existing regulations clarify that CNOLs are allocated
to each member in proportion to the total loss. This allocation rule
can be illustrated by example (Example 4). In Example 4, the C member
has a current loss of $10 (in a tax year beginning in 2021 or later).
The P&C members are corporations PC1 and PC2. PC1 has a gain of $40 and
PC2 has a loss of $40. Assume that the P group does not engage in any
farming activities. The CNOL for the P group is $10. The $10 of CNOL is
allocated to the C member and PC2 in proportion to their total losses.
The C member has one-fifth of the total loss ($10 divided by $50) and
PC2 has four-fifths. Therefore, under the existing regulations, the C
member is allocated $2 ($10 times one-fifth) and PC2 is allocated $8
($10 times four-fifths). In the end, $8 of the CNOL may be carried back
in Example 4. The final regulations do not alter these existing
regulations.
In formulating these final regulations, the Treasury Department and
the IRS contemplated an alternative approach. Under this alternative,
consolidated groups would be required to compute gain and loss by
grouping P&C members and C members separately prior to allocating CNOL
to members. The application of this approach can be seen by revisiting
Example 4. Under this alternative approach, because the P&C members as
a whole do not have a loss, no CNOL would be allocated to any P&C
member regardless of the gain or loss of any of the individual P&C
members. Thus, under the alternative approach, none of the $10 CNOL
would be eligible for carryback in Example 4.
C. Economic Analysis
1. Baseline
In this analysis, the Treasury Department and the IRS assess the
benefits and costs of the final regulations relative to a no-action
baseline reflecting anticipated Federal income tax-related behavior in
the absence of these regulations.
2. Summary of Economic Effects
The final regulations provide certainty and clarity to taxpayers
regarding the treatment of NOLs under section 172 and the regulations
under section 1502. In the absence of such guidance, the chance that
different taxpayers would interpret the statute and the regulations
differently would be exacerbated. Similarly situated taxpayers might
interpret those rules differently, with one taxpayer pursuing an
economic opportunity that another taxpayer might decline to make
because of different interpretations of the ability of losses to offset
taxable income. If this second taxpayer's activity were more
profitable, the resulting economic decisions are inefficient. Such
situations are more likely to arise in the absence of guidance. While
no guidance can
[[Page 67973]]
curtail all differential or inaccurate interpretations of the statute,
the regulations significantly mitigate the chance for differential or
inaccurate interpretations and thereby increase economic efficiency.
To the extent that the specific provisions of the final regulations
result in the acceleration or delay of the tax year in which taxpayers
deduct an NOL relative to the baseline, those taxpayers may face a
change in the present value of the after-tax return to new investment,
particularly investment that may result in losses. The resulting
changes in the incentives facing the taxpayer are complex and may lead
the taxpayer either to increase, decrease, or leave unchanged the
volume and risk level of its investment portfolio, relative to the
baseline, in ways that depend on the taxpayer's stock of NOLs and the
depreciation schedules and income patterns of investments they would
typically consider, including whether the investment is subject to
bonus depreciation. Because these elements are complex and taxpayer-
specific and because the sign of the effect on investment is generally
ambiguous, the Treasury Department and the IRS have not projected the
specific effects on economic activity arising from the final
regulations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that these regulations
will have annual effects below $100 million ($2020) relative to the
baseline. The effects are small because the regulations apply only to
consolidated groups; in addition, several provisions of the final
regulations apply only to the extent that a consolidated group contains
a mix of member types. Moreover, the effects are small because: (i) For
provisions of the final regulations that affect the deduction for pre-
2018 NOLs, the effects are limited to the stock of the pre-2018 NOLs;
and (ii) for provisions that affect the allowable rate of loss usage of
post-2017 NOLs, the effect arises only from the 20 percentage point
differential in the deduction for these NOLs. This latter effect in
particular, to which the bulk of the provisions apply, is too small to
substantially affect taxpayers' use of NOLs and thus too small to lead
to meaningful changes in economic decisions.
The Treasury Department and the IRS did not estimate more precisely
the economic effects of these regulations because (i) the effects are
expected to be small and (ii) data or models that would address the
effects of these regulations are not readily available. In the absence
of quantitative estimates, the subsequent discussion provides
qualitative analysis of these economic effects.
The proposed regulations solicited comments on the economic effects
of the proposed regulations. No such comments were received.
3. Allocation of CNOLs to Specific Members of Consolidated Groups
The final regulations do not amend existing rules for the
allocation of the CNOL within consolidated groups. The final
regulations follow existing rules and allocate the CNOLs to each member
of the group in proportion to the total loss.
The Treasury Department and the IRS considered an alternative
approach that would have required groups to compute gain and loss at
the subgroup level prior to allocating CNOL to members. Recall Example
4 in which the P&C subgroup had no gain or loss but the C subgroup had
a loss of $10. Under this alternative approach, because the P&C
subgroup as a whole does not have a loss, no CNOL would be allocated to
any member in the P&C group regardless of the gain or loss of any of
the individual members of PC. Thus, in Example 4, none of the $10 CNOL
would be eligible for carryback.
The Treasury Department and the IRS recognize that as a result of
the TCJA and the CARES Act, the final regulations may provide groups
with an incentive to split their C members into several corporations--
some with loss and some with gain; this potential incentive would not
exist under the alternative regulatory approach. In certain
circumstances, such a strategy would effectively enable some share of
the losses generated by the other C members to be carried back. This
change in the business structure of consolidated groups may entail
economic costs because, to the extent this strategy is pursued, it
would result from tax-driven rather than market-driven considerations.
The Treasury Department and the IRS project, however, that the adopted
approach will have lower compliance costs for taxpayers, relative to
the alternative regulatory approach, because it generally follows
existing regulatory practice for allocating losses within a
consolidated group.
The Treasury Department and the IRS have not attempted to estimate
the economic consequences of either of these effects but project them
to be small. The effects are projected to be small because (i) only a
small number of taxpayers are likely to be affected; (ii) any
reorganization that occurs due to the final regulations will primarily
be ``on paper'' and entail little or no economic loss; and (iii) the
compliance burden of loss allocation, under either the final
regulations or the alternative approach, is not high.
No additional substantive alternatives were raised by the comments.
4. Affected Taxpayers
The Treasury Department and the IRS project that these regulations
will primarily affect consolidated groups that contain at least one
nonlife insurance member and at least one member that is not a nonlife
insurance company. Based on data from 2015, the Treasury Department and
the IRS calculate that there were 1,130 such consolidated groups.
Approximately 460 of these groups were of ``mixed loss'' status,
meaning that at least one nonlife insurance member had a gain and one
other member had a loss, or vice versa.
D. Summary
In sum, these regulations clarify the recent statutory changes to
section 172 as they apply to consolidated corporate groups. The
Treasury Department and IRS project the economic effect of these
regulations to be small given that (1) the effect of NOL usage on
investment incentives is of ambiguous sign, (2) these regulations are
projected to have only a small effect on NOL usage, and (3) it is
expected that most taxpayers would have come to a similar
interpretation of the statute in the absence of these regulations.
II. Regulatory Flexibility Act
Pursuant to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6), it
is hereby certified that these final regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
This certification is based on the fact that these final regulations
apply only to corporations that file consolidated Federal income tax
returns, and that such corporations almost exclusively consist of
larger businesses. Specifically, based on data available to the IRS,
corporations that file consolidated Federal income tax returns
represent only approximately two percent of all filers of Forms 1120
(U.S. Corporation Income Tax Return). However, these consolidated
Federal income tax returns account for approximately 95 percent of the
aggregate amount of receipts provided on all Forms 1120. Therefore,
these final regulations would not create additional obligations for, or
impose an economic impact on, small entities. Accordingly, the
Secretary certifies that the final regulations will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
[[Page 67974]]
Pursuant to section 7805(f) of the Internal Revenue Code, the
notice of proposed rulemaking that preceded these final regulations was
submitted to the Chief Counsel for the Office of Advocacy of the Small
Business Administration for comment on its impact on small business. No
comments on the notice were received from the Chief Counsel for the
Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.
III. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
Section 202 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires
that agencies assess anticipated costs and benefits and take certain
other actions before issuing a final rule that includes any Federal
mandate that may result in expenditures in any one year by a state,
local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private
sector, of $100 million in 1995 dollars, updated annually for
inflation. In 2020, that threshold is approximately $156 million. This
rule does not include any Federal mandate that may result in
expenditures by state, local, or tribal governments, or by the private
sector in excess of that threshold.
IV. Executive Order 13132: Federalism
Executive Order 13132 (entitled ``Federalism'') prohibits an agency
from publishing any rule that has federalism implications if the rule
either imposes substantial, direct compliance costs on state and local
governments, and is not required by statute, or preempts state law,
unless the agency meets the consultation and funding requirements of
section 6 of the Executive Order. This rule does not have federalism
implications, does not impose substantial direct compliance costs on
state and local governments, and does not preempt state law within the
meaning of the Executive Order.
V. Congressional Review Act
The Administrator of OIRA has determined that this is a major rule
for purposes of the Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.)
(CRA). Under section 801(3) of the CRA, a major rule takes effect 60
days after the rule is published in the Federal Register. Consistent
with this requirement, the effective date of this Treasury decision is
December 28, 2020, whereas the rules in this Treasury decision apply
for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
Drafting Information
The principal authors of these regulations are Justin O. Kellar,
Gregory J. Galvin, and William W. Burhop of the Office of Associate
Chief Counsel (Corporate). However, other personnel from the Treasury
Department and the IRS participated in their development.
List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 1
Income taxes, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
Adoption of Amendments to the Regulations
Accordingly, 26 CFR part 1 is amended as follows:
PART 1--INCOME TAX
0
Paragraph 1. The authority citation for part 1 continues to read in
part as follows:
Authority: 26 U.S.C. 7805 * * *
0
Par. 2. Section 1.1502-1 is amended by adding paragraphs (k) and (l) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-1 Definitions.
* * * * *
(k) Nonlife insurance company. The term nonlife insurance company
means a member that is an insurance company other than a life insurance
company, each as defined in section 816(a).
(l) Applicability date. Paragraph (k) of this section applies to
taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020. However, a taxpayer
may choose to apply paragraph (k) of this section to taxable years
beginning on or before December 31, 2020.
0
Par. 3. Section 1.1502-21 is amended:
0
1. By revising paragraph (a).
0
2. By revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
3. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(iv).
0
4. By revising paragraph (b)(2)(v) introductory text.
0
5. In paragraph (b)(2)(v), by designating Examples 1 through 3 as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), respectively, and removing the
period after each example number in the paragraph headings and
replacing them with a colon.
0
6. In newly designated paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A) through (C), by
redesignating paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(A)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(b)(2)(v)(A)(1) and (2), paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(i) and (ii) as
paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(B)(1) and (2), and paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(i) and
(ii) as paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(C)(1) and (2).
0
7. By adding paragraphs (b)(2)(v)(D) through (G).
0
8. In paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B), by removing the text ``Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)(2)'' and adding in its place ``Sec. 1.1502-
21(b)(3)(ii)(B)''.
0
9. By revising paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(C).
0
10. By adding paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(D).
0
11. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(i) introductory text.
0
12. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(C)(2), by removing the word ``and''.
0
13. In paragraph (c)(1)(i)(D), by removing the word ``account.'' and
adding in its place ``account; and''.
0
14. By adding paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E).
0
15. By revising paragraph (c)(1)(iii) introductory text.
0
16. In paragraph (c)(1)(iii), by designating Examples 1 through 5 as
paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), respectively, and removing the
period after each example number in the paragraph headings and
replacing them with a colon.
0
17. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A) through (E), by
redesignating paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(A)(1) through (3), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(i) through
(vi) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(B)(1) through (6), paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(C)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(C)(1) through
(3), paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs
(c)(1)(iii)(D)(1) through (4), and paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(i) through
(v) as paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(1) through (5).
0
18. By revising newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(A)(2) and
(c)(1)(iii)(B)(2) through (6).
0
19. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(C)(2), by adding the
words ``, a taxable year that begins on January 1, 2021'' after the
words ``at the beginning of Year 4''.
0
20. By revising newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(D)(2) through
(4).
0
21. By adding paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(D)(5).
0
22. By revising newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(2) through
(5).
0
23. By adding paragraphs (c)(1)(iii)(E)(6) and (c)(1)(iii)(F).
0
24. By revising paragraph (c)(2)(v).
0
25. By revising paragraph (c)(2)(viii) introductory text,.
0
26. In paragraph (c)(2)(viii), by designating Examples 1 through 4 as
paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D), respectively, and removing the
period after each example number in the paragraph headings and
replacing them with a colon.
0
27. In newly designated paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A) through (D), by
redesignating paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(i) through (vii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(A)(1) through (7), paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(i) through
(iv) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1) through (4), paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(C)(i) through (iii) as paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(C)(1)
through (3), and paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(D)(i) and (ii) as paragraphs
(c)(2)(viii)(D)(1) and (2).
0
28. In newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(2)(viii)(A)(3) through (7),
the first
[[Page 67975]]
sentence of each, by adding the words ``, including the limitation
under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section'' after the words ``under
paragraph (c) of this section''.
0
29. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the first
sentence, by adding the words ``, none of which is a nonlife insurance
company'' after the text ``S, T, P and M''.
0
30. In newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(1), the fourth
sentence, by adding the text ``(a taxable year beginning after December
31, 2020)'' after the language ``Year 3''.
0
31. By revising newly designated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(3).
0
32. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4) as
paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
0
33. By adding a new paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(4).
0
34. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(5).
0
35. By adding paragraph (c)(2)(viii)(B)(6).
0
36. In paragraph (g)(5), by designating Examples 1 through 9 as
paragraphs (g)(5)(i) through (ix), respectively, and removing the
period after each example number in the paragraph headings and
replacing them with a colon.
0
37. In newly redesignated paragraphs (g)(5)(i) through (ix), by
redesignating paragraphs (g)(5)(i)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs
(g)(5)(i)(A) through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(i) through (iv) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(ii)(A) through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(i) through
(iii) as paragraphs (g)(5)(iii)(A) through (C), paragraphs
(g)(5)(iv)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(iv)(A) through (D),
paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(v)(A) through
(D), paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(i) through (iv) as paragraphs (g)(5)(vi)(A)
through (D), paragraphs (g)(5)(vii)(i) through (vi) as paragraphs
(g)(5)(vii)(A) through (F), paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(i) through (v) as
paragraphs (g)(5)(viii)(A) through (E), and paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(i)
through (vii) as paragraphs (g)(5)(ix)(A) through (G).
0
38. By revising paragraph (h)(9).
0
39. By adding paragraph (h)(10).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-21 Net operating losses.
(a) Consolidated net operating loss deduction--(1) In general.
Subject to any limitations under the Internal Revenue Code or this
chapter (for example, the limitations under section 172(a)(2) and
paragraph (a)(2) of this section), the consolidated net operating loss
deduction (or CNOL deduction) for any consolidated return year is the
aggregate of the net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to the
year. The net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks consist of--
(i) Any CNOLs (as defined in paragraph (e) of this section) of the
consolidated group; and
(ii) Any net operating losses (or NOLs) of the members arising in
separate return years.
(2) Application of section 172 for computing net operating loss
deductions--(i) Overview. For purposes of Sec. 1.1502-11(a)(2)
(regarding a CNOL deduction), the rules of section 172 regarding the
use of net operating losses are taken into account as provided by this
paragraph (a)(2) in calculating the consolidated taxable income of a
group for a particular consolidated return year. More specifically, in
computing taxable income for taxable years beginning after December 31,
2020, section 172(a) generally limits the deductibility of net
operating losses arising in taxable years beginning after December 31,
2017 (post-2017 NOLs). However, these limitations do not apply to net
operating losses arising in taxable years beginning before January 1,
2018 (pre-2018 NOLs). Therefore, in any particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020, the group's CNOL deduction
includes CNOLs arising in taxable years beginning before January 1,
2018 (pre-2018 CNOLs), without limitation under section 172(a).
Following the deduction of pre-2018 CNOLs, this paragraph (a)(2)
applies to compute the maximum amount of CNOLs from taxable years
beginning after December 31, 2017 (post-2017 CNOLs), that can be
deducted against taxable income in a consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020 (post-2017 CNOL deduction limit). See section
172(a)(2)(A) and (B).
(ii) Computation of the 80-percent limitation and special rule for
nonlife insurance companies--(A) Determinations based on status of
group members. If a portion of a post-2017 CNOL is carried back or
carried over to a consolidated return year beginning after December 31,
2020, whether the members of the group include nonlife insurance
companies, other types of corporations, or both determines whether
section 172(a) (including the limitation described in section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (80-percent limitation)), section 172(f) (providing
special rules for nonlife insurance companies), or both, apply to the
group for the consolidated return year.
(B) Determination of post-2017 CNOL deduction limit. The post-2017
CNOL deduction limit is determined under paragraph (a)(2)(iii) of this
section by applying section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, the 80-percent
limitation), section 172(f) (that is, the special rule for nonlife
insurance companies), or both, to the group's consolidated taxable
income for that year.
(C) Inapplicability of 80-percent limitation. The 80-percent
limitation does not apply to CNOL deductions taken in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2021, or to CNOLs arising in taxable years
beginning before January 1, 2018 (that is, pre-2018 CNOLs). See section
172(a).
(iii) Computations under sections 172(a)(2)(B) and 172(f). This
paragraph (a)(2)(iii) provides rules for applying sections 172(f) and
172(a)(2)(B) to consolidated return years beginning after December 31,
2020 (that is, for computing the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit).
Section 172(f) applies to income of nonlife insurance company members,
whereas section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii) applies to income of members that are
not nonlife insurance companies. Thus, this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)
provides specific rules for groups with no nonlife insurance company
members, only nonlife insurance company members, or a combination of
nonlife insurance company members and other members. For groups with
both nonlife insurance company members and life insurance company
members, see paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(E) of this section.
(A) Groups without nonlife insurance company members. If no member
of a group is a nonlife insurance company during a particular
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020, section
172(a)(2)(B)(ii) (that is, the 80-percent limitation) applies to all
income of the group for that year. Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit for the group for that year is the lesser of--
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to that year; or
(2) The amount determined by multiplying--
(i) 80 percent, by
(ii) Consolidated taxable income for the group for that year
(determined without regard to any deductions under sections 172, 199A,
and 250) less the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that
year.
(B) Groups comprised solely of nonlife insurance companies. If a
group is comprised solely of nonlife insurance companies during a
particular consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020,
section 172(f) applies to all income of the group for that year.
Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the group for that
year equals the lesser of--
(1) The aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to that year, or
[[Page 67976]]
(2) Consolidated taxable income less the aggregate amount of pre-
2018 NOLs carried to that year.
(C) Groups that include both nonlife insurance companies and other
corporations--(1) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) of this section, if a group has at least one member
that is a nonlife insurance company and at least one member that is not
a nonlife insurance company during a particular consolidated return
year beginning after December 31, 2020, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for the group for that year equals the lesser of--
(i) The aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to that year, or
(ii) The sum of the amounts in the income pools determined under
paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section.
(2) Residual income pool. The amount determined under this
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) (residual income pool) is eighty percent of
the excess of--
(i) The consolidated taxable income of the group for a consolidated
return year beginning after December 31, 2020, determined without
regard to any income, gain, deduction, or loss of members that are
nonlife insurance companies and without regard to any deductions under
sections 172, 199A, and 250, over
(ii) The aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year
that are allocated to this income pool under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section (that is, by applying the 80-percent
limitation). See section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii).
(3) Nonlife income pool. The amount determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) (nonlife income pool) is the consolidated taxable
income of the group for a consolidated return year beginning after
December 31, 2020, determined without regard to any income, gain,
deduction, or loss of members included in the computation under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section, less the aggregate amount
of pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year that are allocated to this income
pool under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section. See section
172(f).
(4) Pro rata allocation of pre-2018 NOLs between pools of income.
For purposes of paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section,
the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to any particular
consolidated return year beginning after December 31, 2020, is prorated
between the residual income pool and the nonlife income pool based on
the relative amounts of positive income of those two pools. For
example, if $30 of pre-2018 NOLs is carried over to a consolidated
return year in which the residual income pool contains $75 and the
nonlife income pool contains $150, the residual income pool is
allocated $10 of the pre-2018 NOLs ($30 x $75/($75 + $150), or $30 x
\1/3\), and the nonlife income pool is allocated the remaining $20 of
pre-2018 NOLs ($30 x $150/($75 + $150), or $30 x \2/3\).
(5) Exception. The post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the group for
a consolidated return year is determined under this paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(5) if the amounts computed under paragraphs
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and (3) of this section for that year are not both
positive.
(i) Positive residual income pool and negative nonlife income pool.
This paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies if the amount computed
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the residual
income pool is positive and the amount computed under paragraph
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this section for the nonlife income pool is
negative. If this paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(5)(i) applies, the post-2017
CNOL deduction limit for the group for a consolidated return year
equals the lesser of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to
that year, or 80 percent of the consolidated taxable income of the
entire group (determined without regard to any deductions under
sections 172, 199A, and 250) after subtracting the aggregate amount of
pre-2018 NOLs carried to that year (that is, by applying the 80-percent
limitation). See section 172(a)(2)(B).
(ii) Positive nonlife income pool and negative residual income
pool. If the amount computed under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) of this
section for the nonlife income pool is positive and the amount computed
under paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) of this section for the residual
income pool is negative, the post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for the
group for a consolidated return year equals the lesser of the aggregate
amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to that year, or the consolidated
taxable income of the entire group less the aggregate amount of pre-
2018 NOLs carried to that year. See section 172(f).
(b) * * *
(1) Carryovers and carrybacks generally. The net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks to a taxable year are determined under the
principles of, and are subject to any limitations under, section 172
and this section. Thus, losses permitted to be absorbed in a
consolidated return year generally are absorbed in the order of the
taxable years in which they arose, and losses carried from taxable
years ending on the same date, and which are available to offset
consolidated taxable income for the year, generally are absorbed on a
pro rata basis. In addition, except as otherwise provided in this
section, the amount of any CNOL absorbed by the group in any year is
apportioned among members based on the percentage of the CNOL eligible
for carryback or carryover that is attributable to each member as of
the beginning of the year. The percentage of the CNOL attributable to a
member is determined pursuant to paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this
section. Additional rules provided under the Internal Revenue Code or
regulations also apply. See, for example, section 382(l)(2)(B) (if
losses are carried from the same taxable year, losses subject to
limitation under section 382 are absorbed before losses that are not
subject to limitation under section 382). See paragraph (c)(1)(iii)(B)
of this section, (Example 2), for an illustration of pro rata
absorption of losses subject to a SRLY limitation.
(2) * * *
(iv) Operating rules. (A) Amount of CNOL attributable to a member.
The amount of a CNOL that is attributable to a member equals the
product obtained by multiplying the CNOL and the percentage of the CNOL
attributable to the member.
(B) Percentage of CNOL attributable to a member--(1) In general.
Except as provided in paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of this section, the
percentage of the CNOL for the consolidated return year attributable to
a member equals the separate net operating loss of the member for the
consolidated return year divided by the sum of the separate net
operating losses for that year of all members having such losses for
that year. For this purpose, the separate net operating loss of a
member is determined by computing the CNOL by reference to only the
member's items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, including the
member's losses and deductions actually absorbed by the group in the
consolidated return year (whether or not absorbed by the member).
(2) Recomputed percentage. If, for any reason, a member's portion
of a CNOL is absorbed or reduced on a non-pro rata basis (for example,
under Sec. 1.1502-11(b) or (c), paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C) of this
section, Sec. 1.1502-28, or 1.1502-36(d), or as the result of a
carryback to a separate return year), the percentage of the CNOL
attributable to each member is recomputed. In addition, if a member
with a separate net operating loss ceases to be a member, the
percentage of the CNOL attributable to each remaining member is
recomputed. The recomputed percentage of the CNOL attributable to each
member equals the remaining
[[Page 67977]]
CNOL attributable to the member at the time of the recomputation
divided by the sum of the remaining CNOL attributable to all of the
remaining members at the time of the recomputation. For purposes of
this paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2), a CNOL that is permanently disallowed
or eliminated is treated as absorbed.
(C) Net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks--(1) General
rules. Subject to the rules regarding allocation of special status
losses under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) of this section--
(i) Nonlife insurance companies. The portion of a CNOL attributable
to any members of the group that are nonlife insurance companies is
carried back or carried over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to nonlife insurance companies.
(ii) Corporations other than nonlife insurance companies. The
portion of a CNOL attributable to any other members of the group is
carried back or carried over under the rules in section 172(b)
applicable to corporations other than nonlife insurance companies.
(2) Recomputed percentage. For rules governing the recomputation of
the percentage of a CNOL attributable to each remaining member if any
portion of the CNOL attributable to a member is carried back under
section 172(b)(1)(B) or (C) and absorbed on a non-pro rata basis, see
paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B)(2) of this section.
(D) Allocation of special status losses. The amount of the group's
CNOL that is determined to constitute a farming loss (as defined in
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)) or any other net operating loss that is
subject to special carryback or carryover rules (special status loss)
is allocated to each member separately from the remainder of the CNOL
based on the percentage of the CNOL attributable to the member, as
determined under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section. This
allocation is made without regard to whether a particular member
actually incurred specific expenses or engaged in specific activities
required by the special status loss provisions. This paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(D) applies only with regard to losses for which the special
carryback or carryover rules are dependent on the type of expense
generating the loss, rather than on the special status of the entity to
which the loss is allocable. See section 172(b)(1)(C) and paragraph
(b)(2)(iv)(C)(1)(i) of this section (applicable to losses of nonlife
insurance companies). This paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(D) does not apply to
farming losses incurred by a consolidated group in any taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2021.
(E) Coordination with rules for life-nonlife groups under Sec.
1.1502-47. For groups that include at least one member that is a life
insurance company and for which an election is in effect under section
1504(c)(2), any computation of the 80-percent limitation under
paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section is computed only with respect
to items of income, gain, deduction, and loss of the members of the
nonlife subgroup (as defined in Sec. 1.1502-47(b)(9)). For rules
regarding the use of CNOLs of the nonlife subgroup to offset life
insurance company taxable income of the life subgroup (each as defined
in Sec. 1.1502-47(b)), or the use of CNOLs of the life subgroup to
offset consolidated taxable income of the nonlife subgroup, see
generally section 1503(c)(1) and Sec. 1.1502-47.
(v) Examples. For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(b)(2)(v), unless otherwise stated, all groups file consolidated
returns, all corporations have calendar taxable years, all losses are
farming losses within the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii), all
taxable years begin after December 31, 2020, the facts set forth the
only corporate activity, value means fair market value and the adjusted
basis of each asset equals its value, all transactions are with
unrelated persons, and the application of any limitation or threshold
under section 382 is disregarded. The principles of this paragraph (b)
are illustrated by the following examples:
* * * * *
(D) Example 4: Allocation of a CNOL arising in a consolidated
return year beginning after December 31, 2020. (1) P is the common
parent of a consolidated group that includes S. Neither P nor S is a
nonlife insurance company. The P group also includes nonlife insurance
companies PC1, PC2, and PC3. In the P group's 2021 consolidated return
year, all members except S have separate net operating losses, and the
P group's CNOL in that year is $40. No member of the P group engages in
farming activities. See section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraphs (b)(1) and (b)(2)(iv)(B)(1) of this section,
for purposes of carrying losses to other taxable years, the P group's
$40 CNOL is allocated pro rata among the group members that have
separate net operating losses. Under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(C) of this
section, those respective portions of the CNOL attributable to PC1,
PC2, and PC3 (that is, members that are nonlife insurance companies)
are carried back to each of the two preceding taxable years and then
carried over to each of the 20 subsequent taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(C). The portion attributable to P (which is not a nonlife
insurance company) may not be carried back but is carried over to
future years. See section 172(b)(1)(A).
(E) Example 5: Allocation of a CNOL arising in a consolidated
return year beginning before January 1, 2021. The facts are the same as
in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(1) of this section, except that the P group
incurred the CNOL during the P group's 2020 consolidated return year.
The allocation among the P group members of the CNOL described in
paragraph (b)(2)(v)(D)(2) of this section would be the same. However,
those respective portions of the CNOL attributable to PC1, PC2, and PC3
(that is, members that are nonlife insurance companies) will be carried
back to each of the five preceding taxable years and then carried over
to each of the 20 subsequent taxable years. See section 172(b)(1)(C)
and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i). The portion attributable to P (which is
not a nonlife insurance company) will be carried back to each of the
five preceding taxable years and then carried over to future years. See
section 172(b)(1)(A) and section 172(b)(1)(D)(i).
(F) Example 6: CNOL deduction and application of section 172. (1) P
(a type of corporation other than a nonlife insurance company) is the
common parent of a consolidated group that includes PC1 (a nonlife
insurance company). P and PC1 were both incorporated in Year 1 (a year
beginning after December 31, 2020). In Year 1, P and PC1 have separate
taxable income of $20 and $25, respectively. As a result, the P group
has Year 1 consolidated taxable income of $45. In Year 2, P has
separate taxable income of $24, and PC1 has a separate taxable loss of
$40, resulting in a P group CNOL of $16. Additionally, in Year 3, P has
separate taxable income of $15, and PC1 has a separate taxable loss of
$45, resulting in a P group CNOL of $30. No member of the P group
engages in farming activities. See section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii).
(2) Under paragraph (b)(2)(iv)(B) of this section, the P group's
Year 2 CNOL and Year 3 CNOL are entirely attributable to PC1, a nonlife
insurance company. Therefore, under section 172(b)(1)(C)(i), the entire
amount of each of these CNOLs is eligible to be carried back to Year 1.
(3) Under paragraph (a)(2)(ii) of this section, the amount of the
Year 2 CNOL that may be used by the P group in Year 1 is determined by
taking into account the status (nonlife insurance company or other type
of corporation) of the member that has separate taxable income
composing in whole or in part
[[Page 67978]]
the P group's consolidated taxable income. Because the P group includes
both a nonlife insurance company member and a member that is not a
nonlife insurance company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section
applies to determine the computation of the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit for the group for Year 1. Therefore, the 80-percent limitation is
applied to the residual income pool, which consists of the taxable
income of P, a type of corporation other than a nonlife insurance
company. Under the 80-percent limitation, the maximum amount of P's
Year 1 income that may be offset by the P group's post-2017 CNOLs is
$16, which equals 80 percent of the excess of P's taxable income for
Year 1 ($20) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocable to P
($0) (80 percent x ($20-$0)). See paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(2) and
(a)(2)(iii)(C)(4) of this section. PC1 is a nonlife insurance company
to which section 172(f), rather than the 80-percent limitation in
section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii), applies. Therefore, the maximum amount of
PC1's Year 1 income that may be offset by the P group's post-2017 CNOLs
is $25, which equals the excess of PC1's taxable income for Year 1
($25) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs allocable to PC1 ($0).
See paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C)(3) and (4) of this section.
(4) Based on paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section and the
analysis set forth in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3) of this section, at the
end of Year 2, the P group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for Year 1
is the lesser of the aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to Year
1 ($16), or $41 ($16 + $25). Therefore, the P group can offset $16 of
its Year 1 income with its CNOL carryback from Year 2.
(5) When the Year 3 CNOL is carried back to Year 1, the P group's
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for Year 1 is the lesser of $46 (the
aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to Year 1) or $41 ($16 +
$25; see the computation in paragraph (b)(2)(v)(F)(3) of this section).
Thus, the total amount of the P group's Year 1 income that may be
offset by the P group's Year 2 and Year 3 CNOLs is $41 ($16 from Year 2
+ $25 from Year 3). As a result, the P group reports $4 of income ($45-
$41) in Year 1 that is ineligible for offset by any other NOLs. The P
group carries over its remaining $5 CNOL ($46-$41) to future years.
(G) Example 7: Pre-2018 and post-2017 CNOLs. (1) P is the common
parent of a consolidated group. No member of the P group is a nonlife
insurance company or is engaged in a farming business, and no member of
the P group has a loss that is subject to a SRLY limitation. The P
group had the following consolidated taxable income or CNOL for the
following taxable years:
Table 1 to Paragraph (b)(2)(v)(G)(1)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
------------------------------------------------------------------------
$60 $0 $0 ($90) $30 ($40) ($100) $120
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(2) Under section 172(a)(1), all $30 of the P group's 2018
consolidated taxable income is offset by the 2017 CNOL carryover
without limitation. The remaining $60 of the P group's 2017 CNOL is
carried over to 2021 under section 172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(I).
(3) Under section 172(b)(1)(D)(i)(I), the P group's $40 2019 CNOL
is carried back to the five taxable years preceding the year of the
loss. Thus, the P group's $40 2019 CNOL is carried back to offset $40
of its 2014 consolidated taxable income.
(4) Under section 172(a)(2) and paragraph (a)(2)(i) of this
section, the P group's CNOL deduction for 2021 equals the aggregate
amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 plus the group's post-2017 CNOL
deduction limit. The P group has $60 of pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021
($90-$30). Because no member of the P group is a nonlife insurance
company, paragraph (a)(2)(iii)(A) of this section applies to determine
the computation of the group's post-2017 CNOL deduction limit for 2021.
See also section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, the post-2017 CNOL deduction
limit of the P group for 2021 is $48, which equals the lesser of the
aggregate amount of post-2017 NOLs carried to 2021 ($100), or 80
percent of the excess of the P group's consolidated taxable income for
that year computed without regard to any deductions under sections 172,
199A, and 250 ($120) over the aggregate amount of pre-2018 NOLs carried
to 2021 ($60) (that is, 80 percent x $60). Thus, the P group's CNOL
deduction for 2021 equals $108 ($60 pre-2018 NOLs carried to 2021 + $48
post-2017 CNOL deduction limit). See section 172(a)(2) and paragraph
(a)(2)(i) of this section. The P group offsets $108 of its $120 of 2021
consolidated taxable income, resulting in $12 of consolidated taxable
income in 2021. The remaining $52 of the P group's 2020 CNOL ($100-$48)
is carried over to future taxable years. See section
172(b)(1)(A)(ii)(II).
(3) * * *
(ii) * * *
(C) Waiver of carryback period for losses in taxable years to which
statutorily amended carryback rules apply. For further information, see
Sec. 1.1502-21T(b)(3)(ii)(C).
(D) Examples. For further information, see Sec. 1.1502-
21T(b)(3)(ii)(D).
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) * * *
(i) General rule. Except as provided in paragraph (g) of this
section (relating to an overlap with section 382), the aggregate of the
net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks of a member (SRLY member)
arising (or treated as arising) in SRLYs (SRLY NOLs) that are included
in the CNOL deductions for all consolidated return years of the group
under paragraph (a) of this section may not exceed the aggregate
consolidated taxable income for all consolidated return years of the
group determined by reference to only the member's items of income,
gain, deduction, and loss (cumulative register). For this purpose--
* * * * *
(E) If a limitation on the amount of taxable income that may be
offset under section 172(a) (see paragraph (a)(2) of this section)
applies in a taxable year to a member whose carryovers or carrybacks
are subject to a SRLY limitation (SRLY member), the amount of net
operating loss subject to a SRLY limitation that is available for use
by the group in that year is limited to the percentage of the balance
in the cumulative register that would be available for offset under
section 172(a) if the SRLY member filed a separate return and reported
as taxable income in that year the amount contained in the cumulative
register. For example, assume that a consolidated group has a SRLY
member that is a corporation other than a nonlife insurance company,
and that the SRLY member has a SRLY NOL that arose in a taxable year
beginning after December 31, 2017 (post-2017 NOL). The group's
consolidated taxable income for a consolidated return year beginning
after December 31, 2020 is $200, but the cumulative register has a
positive
[[Page 67979]]
balance of only $120 (and no other net operating loss carryovers or
carrybacks are available for the year). Because the SRLY limitation
would be $96 ($120 x 80 percent), only $96 of SRLY loss may be used,
rather than $160 ($200 x 80 percent). In addition, to the extent that
this paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) applies, the cumulative register is
decreased by the full amount of income required under section 172(a) to
support the amount of SRLY NOL absorption. See, for example, paragraph
(c)(1)(iii)(A) and (B) of this section for examples illustrating the
application of this rule.
* * * * *
(iii) Examples. For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(c)(1)(iii), no corporation is a nonlife insurance company and, unless
otherwise specified, all taxable years begin after December 31, 2020,
and all CNOLs arise in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020.
The principles of this paragraph (c)(1) are illustrated by the
following examples:
(A) * * *
(2) T's $100 net operating loss carryover from Year 1 arose in a
SRLY. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(iii). P's acquisition of T was not an
ownership change as defined by section 382(g). Thus, the $100 net
operating loss carryover is subject to the SRLY limitation in paragraph
(c)(1) of this section. The positive balance of the cumulative register
of T for Year 2 equals the consolidated taxable income of the P group
determined by reference to only T's items, or $70. However, due to the
80-percent limitation and the application of paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of
this section, the SRLY limitation is $56 ($70 x 80 percent). No losses
from equivalent years are available, and the P group otherwise has
sufficient consolidated taxable income to support the CNOL deduction
($300 x 80 percent = $240). Therefore, $56 of the SRLY net operating
loss is included under paragraph (a) of this section in the P group's
CNOL deduction for Year 2. Although only $56 is absorbed, the
cumulative register of T is reduced by $70, the full amount of income
necessary to support the $56 deduction after taking into account the
80-percent limitation ($70 x 80 percent = $56).
* * * * *
(B) * * *
(2) P's Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 are not SRLYs with respect to
the P group. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(i). Thus, P's $40 net operating
loss arising in Year 1 and $120 net operating loss arising in Year 3
are not subject to the SRLY limitation under paragraph (c) of this
section. Although the P group has $160 of taxable income in Year 4, the
80-percent limitation reduces the P group's net operating loss
deduction in that year to $128 ($160 x 80 percent). Under the
principles of section 172, paragraph (b) of this section requires that
P's $40 loss arising in Year 1 be the first loss absorbed by the P
group in Year 4. Absorption of this loss leaves $88 ($128-$40) of the P
group's Year 4 consolidated taxable income available for offset by loss
carryovers.
(3) T's Year 2 and Year 3 are SRLYs with respect to the P group.
See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(ii). P's acquisition of T was not an ownership
change as defined by section 382(g). Thus, T's $50 net operating loss
arising in Year 2 and $60 net operating loss arising in Year 3 are
subject to the SRLY limitation. The positive balance of the cumulative
register of T for Year 4 equals the P group's consolidated taxable
income determined by reference to only T's items, or $70. Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into account the
80-percent limitation, T's SRLY limitation is $56 ($70 x 80 percent).
Therefore, the P group can absorb up to $56 of T's SRLY net operating
losses in Year 4. Under the principles of section 172, T's $50 SRLY net
operating loss from Year 2 is included under paragraph (a) of this
section in the P group's CNOL deduction for Year 4. After absorption of
this loss, under paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section, $6 of SRLY limit
remains in Year 4 ($56-$50). Further, the total amount of Year 4
consolidated taxable income available for offset by other loss
carryovers under section 172(a) is $38 ($88-$50).
(4) P and T each carry over net operating losses to Year 4 from a
taxable year ending on the same date (that is, Year 3). The losses
carried over from Year 3 total $180. However, the remaining Year 4 SRLY
limit is $6. Therefore, the total amount of loss available for
absorption is $126 ($120 allocable to P and $6 allocable to T). Under
paragraph (b) of this section, the losses available for absorption that
are carried over from Year 3 are absorbed on a pro rata basis, even
though one loss arises in a SRLY and the other loss does not. Thus,
$36.19 of P's Year 3 loss is absorbed ($120/($120 + $6)) x $38 =
$36.19. In addition, $1.81 of T's Year 3 loss is absorbed ($6/($120 +
$6)) x $38 = $1.81.
(5) After deduction of T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 4, the
cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E)
of this section. A total of $51.81 of SRLY net operating losses were
absorbed in Year 4 ($50 + $1.81). After taking into account the 80-
percent limitation, the amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $64.76 ($64.76 x 80 percent = $51.81). Therefore, the
cumulative register of T is decreased by $64.76, and $5.24 remains in
the cumulative register ($70-$64.76).
(6) P carries its remaining $83.81 ($120-$36.19) Year 3 net
operating loss and T carries its remaining $58.19 ($60-$1.81) Year 3
net operating loss over to Year 5. Assume that, in Year 5, the P group
has $90 of consolidated taxable income (computed without regard to the
CNOL deduction). The P group's consolidated taxable income determined
by reference to only T's items is a CNOL of $4. Therefore, the positive
balance of the cumulative register of T in Year 5 equals $1.24 ($5.24-
$4). Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into
account the 80-percent limitation, T's SRLY limitation is $0.99 ($1.24
x 80 percent). For Year 5, the total amount of Year 5 consolidated
taxable income available for offset by loss carryovers as a result of
the 80-percent limitation is $72 ($90 x 80 percent). Under paragraph
(b) of this section, the losses carried over from Year 3 are absorbed
on a pro rata basis, even though one loss arises in a SRLY and the
other loss does not. Therefore, $71.16 of P's Year 3 loss is absorbed
(($83.81/($83.81 + $0.99)) x $72 = $71.16). In addition, $0.84 of T's
Year 3 losses is absorbed (($0.99/($83.81 + $0.99)) x $72 = $0.84).
* * * * *
(D) * * *
(2) Under Sec. 1.1502-15(a), T's $100 of ordinary loss in Year 3
constitutes a built-in loss that is subject to the SRLY limitation
under paragraph (c) of this section. The amount of the limitation is
determined by treating the deduction as a net operating loss carryover
from a SRLY. The built-in loss is therefore subject to both a SRLY
limitation and the 80-percent limitation for Year 3. The built-in loss
is treated as a net operating loss carryover solely for purposes of
determining the extent to which the loss is not allowed by reason of
the SRLY limitation, and for all other purposes the loss remains a loss
arising in Year 3. See Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(D). Consequently, under
paragraph (b) of this section, the built-in loss is absorbed by the P
group before the net operating loss carryover from Year 1 is absorbed.
The positive balance of the cumulative register of T for Year 3 equals
the P group's consolidated taxable income determined by reference to
only T's items, or $60. Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section,
after taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the SRLY
limitation
[[Page 67980]]
for Year 3 is $48 ($60 x 80 percent). Therefore, $48 of the built-in
loss is absorbed by the P group. None of T's $100 SRLY net operating
loss carryover from Year 1 is allowed.
(3) After deduction of T's $48 SRLY built-in loss in Year 4, the
cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E)
of this section. After taking into account the 80-percent limitation,
the amount of income necessary to support this deduction is $60 ($60 x
80 percent = $48). Therefore, the cumulative register of T is decreased
by $60, and zero remains in the cumulative register ($60-$60).
(4) Under Sec. 1.1502-15(a), the $52 balance of the built-in loss
that is not allowed in Year 3 because of the SRLY limitation and the
80-percent limitation is treated as a $52 net operating loss arising in
Year 3 that is subject to the SRLY limitation because, under paragraph
(c)(1)(ii) of this section, Year 3 is treated as a SRLY. The built-in
loss is carried to other years in accordance with the rules of
paragraph (b) of this section. The positive balance of the cumulative
register of T for Year 4 equals $40 (zero from Year 3 + $40). Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into account the
80-percent limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year 4 is $32 ($40 x 80
percent). Therefore, under paragraph (c) of this section, $32 of T's
$100 net operating loss carryover from Year 1 is included in the CNOL
deduction under paragraph (a) of this section in Year 4.
(5) After deduction of T's $32 SRLY net operating loss in Year 4,
the cumulative register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into account the 80-percent
limitation, the amount of income necessary to support this deduction is
$40 ($40 x 80 percent = $32). Therefore, the cumulative register is
decreased by $40, and zero remains in the cumulative register ($40-
$40).
(E) * * *
(2) For Year 2, the P group computes separate SRLY limits for each
of T's SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The group determines its ability to
use its capital loss carryover before it determines its ability to use
its ordinary loss carryover. Under section 1212, because the P group
has no Year 2 capital gain, it cannot absorb any capital losses in Year
2. T's Year 1 net capital loss and the P group's Year 2 consolidated
net capital loss (all of which is attributable to T) are carried over
to Year 3.
(3) The P group's ability to deduct net operating losses in Year 2
is subject to the 80-percent limitation, based on the P group's
consolidated taxable income for the year. Thus, the group's limitation
for Year 2 is $72 ($90 x 80 percent). However, use of the Year 1 net
operating loss also is subject to the SRLY limitation. The positive
balance of the cumulative register of T applicable to SRLY net
operating losses for Year 2 equals the P group's consolidated taxable
income determined by reference to only T's items, or $60. Under
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into account the
80-percent limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year 2 is $48 ($60 x 80
percent). Therefore, only $48 of T's Year 1 SRLY net operating loss is
absorbed by the P group in Year 2. T carries over its remaining $52 of
its Year 1 loss to Year 3.
(4) After deduction of T's SRLY net operating losses in Year 2, the
net operating loss cumulative register is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. The P group deducted $48 of T's
SRLY net operating losses in Year 2. After taking into account the 80-
percent limitation, the amount of taxable income necessary to support
this deduction is $60 ($60 x 80 percent = $48). Therefore, the net
operating loss cumulative register of T is decreased by $60, and zero
remains in the net operating loss cumulative register ($60-$60).
(5) For Year 3, the P group again computes separate SRLY limits for
each of T's SRLY carryovers from Year 1. The group has consolidated net
capital gain (without taking into account a net capital loss carryover
deduction) of $30. Under Sec. 1.1502-22(c), the aggregate amount of
T's $50 capital loss carryover from Year 1 that is included in
computing the P group's consolidated net capital gain for all years of
the group (in this case, Years 2 and 3) may not exceed $30 (the
aggregate consolidated net capital gain computed by reference only to
T's items, including losses and deductions actually absorbed (that is,
$30 of capital gain in Year 3)). Thus, the P group may include $30 of
T's Year 1 capital loss carryover in its computation of consolidated
net capital gain for Year 3, which offsets the group's capital gains
for Year 3. T carries over its remaining $20 of its Year 1 capital loss
to Year 4. Therefore, the capital loss cumulative register of T is
decreased by $30, and zero remains in the capital loss cumulative
register ($30-$30). Further, because the net operating loss cumulative
register includes all taxable income of T included in the P group, as
well as all absorbed losses of T (including capital items), a zero net
increase occurs in the net operating loss cumulative register. The P
group carries over the Year 2 consolidated net capital loss to Year 4.
(6) The P group's ability to deduct net operating losses in Year 3
is subject to the 80-percent limitation, based on the P group's
consolidated taxable income for the year. Thus, the P group's taxable
income for Year 3 that can be offset, before use of net operating
losses, is $40 (80 percent x the sum of zero capital gain, after use of
the capital loss carryover, plus $50 of ordinary income). However, use
of the Year 1 net operating loss also is subject to the SRLY
limitation. The positive balance of the cumulative register of T
applicable to SRLY net operating losses for Year 3 equals the P group's
consolidated taxable income determined by reference only to T's items,
or $40. This amount equals the sum obtained by adding the zero
carryover from Year 2, a net inclusion of zero from capital items
implicated in Year 3 ($30-$30), and $40 of taxable income in Year 3.
Under paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section, after taking into account
the 80-percent limitation, the SRLY limitation for Year 3 is $32 ($40 x
80 percent). Therefore, only $32 of the Year 1 net operating loss is
absorbed by the P group in Year 3. T carries over its remaining $20 of
its Year 1 loss to Year 4.
(F) Example 6: Pre-2018 NOLs and post-2017 NOLs. (1) Individual A
owns P. On January 1, 2017, A forms T. P and T are calendar-year
taxpayers. In 2017, T sustains a $100 net operating loss that is
carried over. During 2018, 2019, and 2020, T deducts a total of $90 of
its 2017 net operating loss against its taxable income, and T carries
over the remaining $10 of its 2017 net operating loss. In 2021, T
sustains a net operating loss of $50. On December 31, 2021, P acquires
all the stock of T, and T becomes a member of the P group. The P group
has $300 of consolidated taxable income in 2022 (computed without
regard to the CNOL deduction). Such consolidated taxable income would
be $70 if determined by reference to only T's items. The P group has no
other SRLY net operating loss carryovers or CNOL carryovers.
(2) T's remaining $10 of net operating loss carryover from 2017 and
its $50 net operating loss carryover from 2021 are both SRLY losses in
the P group. See Sec. 1.1502-1(f)(2)(iii). P's acquisition of T was
not an ownership change as defined by section 382(g). Thus, T's net
operating loss carryovers are subject to the SRLY limitation in
paragraph (c)(1) of this section. The SRLY limitation for the P group's
2022 consolidated return year is consolidated taxable income determined
by reference to only T's $70 of items.
(3) Because T's oldest (2017) carryover was sustained in a year
[[Page 67981]]
beginning before January 1, 2018, its use is not subject to limitation
under section 172(a)(2)(B). Therefore, all $10 of T's 2017 SRLY net
operating loss (that is, a pre-2018 NOL) is included under paragraph
(a) of this section in the P group's CNOL deduction for 2022. After
deduction of T's $10 SRLY net operating loss from 2017, the cumulative
register of T is reduced on a dollar-for-dollar basis, pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i) of this section. Therefore, the cumulative register
of T is decreased by $10, and $60 remains in the cumulative register
($70-$10).
(4) The P group's deduction of T's 2021 net operating loss is
subject to both a SRLY limitation and the 80-percent limitation under
section 172(a)(2)(B)(ii). Therefore, the total limitation on the use of
T's 2021 net operating loss in the P group is $48 (the remaining
cumulative register of $60 x 80 percent). No losses from equivalent
years are available, and the P group otherwise has sufficient
consolidated taxable income to support the CNOL deduction ($290 x 80
percent = $232). Therefore, $48 of T's 2021 SRLY net operating loss is
included under paragraph (a) of this section in the P group's CNOL
deduction for 2022. The remaining $2 of T's 2021 SRLY net operating
loss ($50-$48) is carried over to the P group's 2023 consolidated
return year.
(5) After deduction of T's $48 SRLY NOL in 2022, the cumulative
register of T is adjusted pursuant to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this
section. After taking into account the 80-percent limitation, the
amount of income necessary to support this deduction is $60 ($60 x 80
percent = $48). Therefore, the cumulative register of T is decreased by
$60, and zero remains in the cumulative register ($60-$60).
(2) * * *
(v) Coordination with other limitations. This paragraph (c)(2) does
not allow a net operating loss to offset income to the extent
inconsistent with other limitations or restrictions on the use of
losses, such as a limitation based on the nature or activities of
members. For example, a net operating loss may not offset income in
excess of any limitations under section 172(a) and paragraph (a)(2) of
this section. Additionally, any dual consolidated loss may not reduce
the taxable income to an extent greater than that allowed under section
1503(d) and Sec. Sec. 1.1503(d)-1 through 1.1503(d)-8. See also Sec.
1.1502-47(k) (relating to preemption of rules for life-nonlife groups).
* * * * *
(viii) Examples. For purposes of the examples in this paragraph
(c)(2)(viii), no corporation is a nonlife insurance company or has any
farming losses. The principles of this paragraph (c)(2) are illustrated
by the following examples:
* * * * *
(B) * * *
(3) In Year 4, the M group has $10 of consolidated taxable income
(computed without regard to the CNOL deduction for Year 4). That
consolidated taxable income would be $45 if determined by reference
only to the items of P, S, and T, the members included in the SRLY
subgroup with respect to P's loss carryover. Therefore, the positive
balance of the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup for Year 4
equals $45 and, due to the application of the 80-percent limitation
under paragraph (c)(2)(v) of this section, the SRLY subgroup limitation
under this paragraph (c)(2) is $36 ($45 x 80 percent). However, the M
group has only $10 of consolidated taxable income in Year 4. Thus, due
to the 80-percent limitation and the application of paragraph (b)(1) of
this section, the M group's deduction of all net operating losses in
Year 4 is limited to $8 ($10 x 80 percent). As a result, the M group
deducts $8 of P's SRLY net operating loss carryover, and the remaining
$37 is carried over to Year 5.
(4) After deduction of $8 of P's SRLY net operating loss in Year 4,
the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted pursuant to
paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into account the
80-percent limitation, the amount of income necessary to support this
deduction is $10 ($10 x 80 percent = $8). Therefore, the cumulative
register of the P SRLY subgroup is decreased by $10, and $35 remains in
the cumulative register ($45-$10).
(5) In Year 5, the M group has $100 of consolidated taxable income
(computed without regard to the CNOL deduction for Year 5). None of P,
S, or T has any items of income, gain, deduction, or loss in Year 5.
Although the members of the P SRLY subgroup do not contribute to the
$100 of consolidated taxable income in Year 5, the positive balance of
the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup for Year 5 is $35 and,
due to the application of the 80-percent limitation under paragraph
(c)(2)(v) of this section, the SRLY subgroup limitation under this
paragraph (c)(2) is $28 ($35 x 80 percent). Because of the 80-percent
limitation and the application of paragraph (b)(1) of this section, the
M group's deduction of net operating losses in Year 5 is limited to $80
($100 x 80 percent). Because the $28 of net operating loss available to
be absorbed is less than 80 percent of the M group's consolidated
taxable income, $28 of P's SRLY net operating loss is absorbed in Year
5, and the remaining $9 ($37-$28) is carried over to Year 6.
(6) After deduction of $28 of P's SRLY net operating loss in Year
5, the cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is adjusted pursuant
to paragraph (c)(1)(i)(E) of this section. After taking into account
the 80-percent limitation, the amount of income necessary to support
this deduction is $35 ($35 x 80 percent = $28). Therefore, the
cumulative register of the P SRLY subgroup is decreased by $35, and
zero remains in the cumulative register ($35-$35).
* * * * *
(h) * * *
(9) For the applicability dates of paragraphs (b)(3)(ii)(C) and
(b)(3)(ii)(D) of this section, see Sec. 1.1502-21T(h)(9).
(10) The rules of paragraphs (a), (b)(1), (b)(2)(iv), and
(c)(1)(i)(E) of this section apply to taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2020.
0
Par. 4. Section 1.1502-47 is amended:
0
1. By revising paragraphs (a)(2)(i) and (ii).
0
2. By removing paragraph (a)(3).
0
3. By redesignating paragraph (a)(4) as paragraph (a)(3).
0
4. By removing paragraphs (b) and (c).
0
5. By redesignating paragraph (d) as paragraph (b).
0
6. By revising newly redesignated paragraphs (b)(1), (2), (3), (4),
(5), (10), (11), and (13).
0
7. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(14), by designating Examples 1
through 14 as paragraphs (b)(14)(i) through (xiv), respectively.
0
8. In newly redesignated paragraph (b)(14)(i), by adding a sentence at
the end of the paragraph.
0
9. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (b)(14)(ii).
0
10. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (b)(14)(xiv).
0
11. By redesignating paragraph (e) as paragraph (c).
0
12. By removing newly redesignated paragraphs (c)(4) and (5).
0
13. By redesignating paragraph (c)(6) as paragraph (c)(4).
0
14. By redesignating paragraph (f) as paragraph (d).
0
15. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (d)(5).
0
16. By removing the last sentence of newly redesignated paragraph
(d)(6).
0
17. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
0
18. By redesignating paragraph (d)(7)(iii) as paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
0
19. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (d)(7)(ii).
[[Page 67982]]
0
20. By redesignating paragraph (g) as paragraph (e).
0
21. In newly redesignated paragraph (e)(2), by removing the language
``partial'' everywhere it appears.
0
22. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (e)(3).
0
23. By redesignating paragraph (h) as paragraph (f).
0
24. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(iii).
0
25. In newly designated paragraph (f)(2)(v), by removing the word
``partial'' everywhere it appears.
0
26. In newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(v), by adding a sentence at
the end of the paragraph.
0
27. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (f)(2)(vi) and (vii).
0
28. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (f)(3).
0
29. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (f)(4) as paragraph
(f)(3).
0
30. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (f)(3)(ii).
0
31. By adding a new paragraph (g).
0
32. By removing paragraphs (j), (k), and (l).
0
33. By redesignating paragraph (m) as paragraph (h), and redesignating
paragraph (n) as paragraph (j).
0
34. In newly redesignated paragraph (h), by removing the language
``partial'' everywhere it appears.
0
35. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(2)(ii), by adding a sentence at
the end of the paragraph.
0
36. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3)(iv), by adding a sentence at
the end of the paragraph.
0
37. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3)(viii), by removing the
language ``common parent's election'' and adding in its place
``election by the agent for the group (within the meaning of Sec.
1.1502-77)''.
0
38. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(3)(ix), by removing the last
two sentences.
0
39. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4).
0
40. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (h)(5) as paragraph
(h)(4).
0
41. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4) introductory text.
0
42. In newly redesignated paragraph (h)(4), by redesignating Examples 1
through 6 as paragraphs (h)(4)(i) through (vi).
0
43. By revising newly redesignated paragraphs (h)(4)(ii) and (iii).
0
44. By removing newly redesignated paragraphs (h)(4)(v) and (vi).
0
45. By revising redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(iii).
0
46. By removing newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(v).
0
47. By redesignating newly redesignated paragraph (j)(2)(vi) as
paragraph (j)(2)(v).
0
48. By revising newly redesignated paragraph (j)(3).
0
49. By redesignating paragraphs (q), (r), and (s) as paragraphs (k),
(l), and (m), respectively.
0
50. By adding a new paragraph (n).
0
51. By removing paragraphs (o), (p), and (t).
0
52. In the following table, for each section designated or redesignated
under these regulations (as indicated in the second column), removing
the language in the third column and adding the language in the fourth
column with the frequency indicated in the fifth column:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paragraph Redesignations Remove Add Frequency
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... section 802 or 821 section 801 Once.
(relating (relating to life
respectively to insurance
life insurance companies).
companies and to
certain mutual
insurance
companies).
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... life insurance life insurance Once.
companies and companies may.
mutual insurance
companies may.
1.1502-47(a)(1)................. N/A............... composition and composition, its Once.
its consolidated consolidated
tax. taxable income
(or loss), and
its consolidated
tax.
1.1502-47(a)(4)................. 1.1502-47(a)(3)... Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Once.
1.1502-1 through 1.1502-0 through
1.1502-80. 1.1502-100.
1.1502-47(a)(4)................. 1.1502-47(a)(3)... 844............... 848............... Once.
1.1502-47(d)(12)(i)(A), 1.1502-47(b)(12)(i (d)(12)........... (b)(12)........... Each place it
(d)(12)(i)(C), (d)(12)(i)(D), )(A), appears.
(d)(12)(iii), (d)(12)(iv), (b)(12)(i)(C),
(d)(12)(v), (d)(12)(v)(B), (b)(12)(i)(D),
(d)(12)(v)(C), (d)(12)(v)(D), (b)(12)(iii),
(d)(12)(vi), (d)(12)(vii), and (b)(12)(iv),
(d)(12)(viii)(F). (b)(12)(v),
(b)(12)(v)(B),
(b)(12)(v)(C),
(b)(12)(v)(D),
(b)(12)(vi),
(b)(12)(vii), and
(b)(12)(viii)(F),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(12)(iii)........... 1.1502-47(b)(12)(i subdivision (iii). paragraph Once.
ii). (b)(12)(iii).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(iv)............ 1.1502-47(b)(12)(i subdivision (iv).. paragraph Once.
v). (b)(12)(iv).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(v)(B).......... 1.1502-47(b)(12)(v (i.e., sections (for example, Once.
)(B). 11, 802, 821, or section 11,
831). section 801, or
section 831).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(vi)............ 1.1502-47(b)(12)(v subdivision (vi).. paragraph Once.
i). (b)(12)(vi).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(vii)........... 1.1502-47(b)(12)(v return year and return year even.. Once.
ii). even.
1.1502-47(d)(12)(viii)(A)....... 1.1502-47(b)(12)(v (i.e., total (that is, total Once.
iii)(A). reserves in reserves in
section 801(c)). section 816(c),
as modified by
section 816(h)).
1.1502-47(d)(12)(viii)(D) and 1.1502-47(b)(12)(v subdivision (viii) paragraph Once.
(F). iii)(D) and (F), (b)(12)(viii).
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14)................ 1.1502-47(b)(14).. Illustrations..... Examples.......... Once.
1.1502-47(d)(14)................ 1.1502-47(b)(14).. paragraph (d)..... paragraph (b)..... Once.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 1..... 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i 1913.............. 2012.............. Once.
).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i 1974.............. 2012.............. Each place it
through 4, 8, 10, and 12. i) through (iv), appears.
(viii), (x), and
(xii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 1 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i 1980.............. 2018.............. Each place it
through 3. ) through (iii), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 1 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i 1982.............. 2020.............. Each place it
through 5 and 8 through 13. ) through (v) and appears.
(viii) through
(xiii),
respectively.
[[Page 67983]]
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 5 1.1502-47(b)(14)(v 1983.............. 2021.............. Each place it
through 7 and 9. ) through (vii) appears.
and (ix),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i (d)(12)........... (b)(12)........... Each place it
through 5 and 8 through 12. i) through (v) appears.
and (viii)
through (xii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Examples 2, 3, 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i stock casualty.... nonlife insurance. Each place it
and 12. i), (iii), and appears.
(xii),
respectively.
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 3..... 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i subparagraph paragraph Once.
ii). (d)(12)(v)(B) and (b)(12)(v)(B) and
(E). (D).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 3..... 1.1502-47(b)(14)(i e.g............... for example....... Once.
ii).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 5..... 1.1502-47(b)(14)(v i.e............... in other words.... Once.
).
1.1502-47(d)(14), Example 12.... 1.1502-47(b)(14)(x casualty.......... nonlife insurance. Once.
ii).
1.1502-47(e)(1)................. 1.1502-47(c)(1)... life company or an life company...... Once.
ineligible mutual
company.
1.1502-47(e)(3)................. 1.1502-47(c)(3)... Sec. 1.1502- Sec. 1.1502- Once.
75(c) and 75(c).
paragraph (e)(4)
of this section.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... 1981.............. 2019.............. Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... 1982.............. 2020.............. Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(f)(3)................. 1.1502-47(d)(3)... applying Sec. applying Sec. Once.
Sec. 1.1502-13, Sec. 1.1502-13
1.1502-18, and and 1.1502-19.
1.1502-19.
1.1502-47(f)(7)(i).............. 1.1502-47(d)(7)(i) paragraph (g)..... paragraph (e)..... Once.
1.1502-47(f)(7)(i).............. 1.1502-47(d)(7)(i) sections 802(a), sections 801(a) Once.
821(a), and and 831(a).
831(a).
1.1502-47(g).................... 1.1502-47(e)...... three............. two............... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (n)..... paragraph (j)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(1)................. 1.1502-47(e)(1)... paragraph (g)(1).. paragraph (e)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (j)..... paragraph (g)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (m)..... paragraph (h)..... Once.
1.1502-47(g)(2)................. 1.1502-47(e)(2)... paragraph (g)(2).. paragraph (e)(2).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(1)................. 1.1502-47(f)(1)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(h)(1)................. 1.1502-47(f)(1)... includes separate includes insurance Once.
mutual insurance company taxable
company taxable income.
income (as
defined in
section 821(b))
and insurance
company taxable
income.
1.1502-47(h)(2)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21, Once.
1.1502-21 or the rules in this
1.1502-21A (as paragraph (f)(2).
appropriate), the
rules in this
subparagraph (2).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502- Once.
). 1.1502-21(A)(f) 21(e).
or 1.1502-21(e)
(as appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(iv year beginning year, Sec. Once.
). after December 1.1502-21.
31, 1981, Sec.
Sec. 1.1502-21A
or 1.1502-21 (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(iv nonlife loss...... nonlife subgroup Once.
). loss.
1.1502-47(h)(2)(v).............. 1.1502-47(f)(2)(v) subparagraph (2).. paragraph (f)(2).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) subparagraph (4).. paragraph (f)(3).. Once.
1.1502-47(h)(4)(i).............. 1.1502-47(f)(3)(i) Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A(a) (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(f)(3)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502- Once.
i). 1.1502-22A(b)(1) 22(b).
or 1.1502-22(b).
1.1502-47(h)(4)(iii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(f)(3)(ii allowed under allowed under Once.
i)(A). section 822(c)(6) section 832(c)(5).
or section
832(c)(5).
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (g)..... paragraph (e)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (l)..... paragraph (g)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m).................... 1.1502-47(h)...... paragraph (m)..... paragraph (h)..... Each place it
appears.
1.1502-47(m)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. 1502- Sec. 1.1502-21.. Once.
). 21 or 1.1502-21A
(as appropriate).
1.1502-47(m)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(h)(2)(ii Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-22.. Once.
). 1.1502-22 or
1.1502-22A (as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) But see But see paragraph Once.
subdivision (ix) (h)(3)(ix) of
of this paragraph this section.
(m)(3).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) arising in arising in Once.
separate return separate return
years ending years.
after December
31, 1980.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(i).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(i) and 1.1502-22 (or and 1.1502-22..... Once.
Sec. Sec.
1.1502-21A and
1.1502-22A, as
appropriate).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ii consolidated LO... life consolidated Once.
i). net operating
loss.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(v).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(v) GO or TII......... taxable income.... Once.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(v).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(v) LICTI (as LICTI for any..... Once.
determined under
paragraph (j) of
this section) for
any.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vi)(A).......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi subparagraph (3).. paragraph (h)(3).. Once.
)(A).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi notwithstanding notwithstanding Once.
i)(A). Sec. 1.1502- Sec. 1.1502-
21A(b)(3)(ii) or 21(b).
1.1502-21(b).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(A)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi taxable income for taxable income for Once.
i)(A). that year. that year,
subject to the
limitation in
section 172(a).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(vii)(B)......... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi (A) of this paragraph Once.
i)(B). subdivision (vii). (h)(3)(vii)(A) of
this section.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(viii)........... 1.1502-47(h)(3)(vi section section 172(b)(3). Once.
ii). 172(b)(3)(C).
[[Page 67984]]
1.1502-47(m)(3)(ix)............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ix 243(b)(2)......... 243(b)(3)......... Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(3)(ix)............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(ix return year ending return year....... Once.
). after December
31, 1980.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(x).............. 1.1502-47(h)(3)(x) LICTI (as defined LICTI in the Once.
in paragraph (j) particular.
of this section)
in the particular.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(xii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(xi carryback of a carryback of a Once.
i). consolidated LO. life consolidated
net operating
loss.
1.1502-47(m)(3)(xii)............ 1.1502-47(h)(3)(xi (2) or (4)........ (2) or (3)........ Once.
i).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Examples 1 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) 1982.............. 2021.............. Each place it
through 4. through (iv), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Examples 1 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) i.e............... that is........... Each place it
through 4. through (iv), appears.
respectively.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) paragraph (d)(13). paragraph (b)(13). Once.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) attributable to I attributable to I Once.
(an ineligible (an ineligible
member). member that is
not a nonlife
insurance
company).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 1...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(i) of this section. of this section Once.
The result would and section
be. 172(a). The
result would be.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv of this section or of this section... Once.
). under Sec.
1.1502-15A.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv taxable income is taxable income is Once.
). $35. $32.5.
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv 30%............... 35%............... Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (15).............. (17.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (65).............. (67.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(m)(5), Example 4...... 1.1502-47(h)(4)(iv (85).............. (82.5)............ Once.
).
1.1502-47(n).................... 1.1502-47(j)...... consolidated LO... life consolidated Each place it
net operating appears.
loss and
consolidated
operations loss
carryovers.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... paragraph (g)(1).. paragraph (e)(1).. Once.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... paragraph (n)(2) paragraph (j)(2) Once.
of this section. of this section,
subject to the
rules and
limitations in
paragraph (j)(3)
of this section.
1.1502-47(n)(1)................. 1.1502-47(j)(1)... consolidated net consolidated net Once.
capital loss (as capital loss.
determined under
paragraph (l)(4)
of this section).
1.1502-47(n)(2)................. 1.1502-47(j)(2)... paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
1.1502-47(n)(2)................. 1.1502-47(j)(2)... paragraphs (m)(2) paragraphs (h)(2) Once.
and (3). and (3).
1.1502-47(n)(2)(ii)............. 1.1502-47(j)(2)(ii consolidated consolidated LICTI Once.
). partial LICTI.
1.1502-47(n)(2)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(j)(2)(iv Paragraphs Paragraphs Once.
). (m)(3)(vi), (h)(3)(vi),
(vii), (x), and (vii), (x), and
(xi). (xi).
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... Sec. 1.1502-1 Sec. Sec. Once.
through 1.1502-80. 1.1502-0 through
1.1502-100.
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... paragraph paragraph Once.
(m)(3)(vi). (h)(3)(vi).
1.1502-47(q).................... 1.1502-47(k)...... Sec. Sec. Sec. 1.1502-21.. Once.
1.1502-21A(b)(3)
and 1.1502-
79A(a)(3) (or
Sec. 1.1502-21,
as appropriate).
1.1502-47(r).................... 1.1502-47(l)...... partial LICTI (or LICTI (or life Once.
LO). consolidated net
operating loss).
1.1502-47(r).................... 1.1502-47(l)...... Sec. Sec. Sec. Sec. Once.
1.1502-0--1.1502- 1.1502-0 through
80. 1.1502-100.
1.1502-47(s)(1)(iii)............ 1.1502-47(m)(1)(ii paragraphs (g), paragraphs (e), Once.
i). (m), and (n). (h), and (j).
1.1502-47(s)(1)(iv)............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(iv paragraph (h)..... paragraph (f)..... Once.
).
1.1502-47(s)(1)(v).............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(v) consolidated consolidated Life. Once.
partial Life.
1.1502-47(s)(1)(v).............. 1.1502-47(m)(1)(v) (as defined by or life Once.
paragraph (d)(3) consolidated net
of this section), operating loss.
determined under
paragraph (j) of
this section
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The additions and revisions read as follows:
Sec. 1.1502-47 Consolidated returns by life-nonlife groups.
(a) * * *
(2) General method of consolidation--(i) Subgroup method. The
regulations adopt a subgroup method to determine consolidated taxable
income. One subgroup is the group's nonlife companies. The other
subgroup is the group's life insurance companies. Initially, the
nonlife subgroup computes nonlife consolidated taxable income and the
life subgroup computes consolidated LICTI. A subgroup's income may in
effect be reduced by a loss of the other subgroup, subject to the
limitations in sections 172 and 1503(c). The life subgroup losses
consist of life consolidated net operating loss, consolidated
operations loss carryovers from taxable years beginning before January
1, 2018 (consolidated operations loss carryovers), and life
consolidated net capital loss. The nonlife subgroup losses consist of
nonlife consolidated net operating loss and nonlife consolidated net
capital loss. Consolidated taxable income is therefore defined in
pertinent part as the sum of nonlife consolidated taxable income and
consolidated LICTI, reduced by life subgroup losses and/or nonlife
subgroup losses.
(ii) Subgroup loss. A subgroup loss does not actually affect the
computation of nonlife consolidated taxable income or consolidated
LICTI. It merely constitutes a bottom-line adjustment in reaching
consolidated taxable income. Furthermore, the amount of a subgroup's
loss, if any, that is eligible to be carried back to a prior taxable
year
[[Page 67985]]
first must be carried back against income of the same subgroup before
it may be used as a setoff against the other subgroup's income in the
taxable year the loss arose. (See sections 172(b)(1) and 1503(c)(1);
see also Sec. 1.1502-21(b).) The carryback of losses from one subgroup
may not be used to offset income of the other subgroup in the year to
which the loss is to be carried. This carryback of one subgroup's loss
may ``bump'' the other subgroup's loss that, in effect, previously
reduced the income of the first subgroup. The subgroup's loss that is
bumped in appropriate cases may, in effect, reduce a succeeding year's
income of either subgroup. This approach gives the group the tax
savings of the use of losses, but the bumping rule assures that,
insofar as possible, life deductions will be matched against life
income and nonlife deductions against nonlife income.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(1) Life company. The term life company means a life insurance
company as defined in section 816 and subject to tax under section 801.
Section 816 applies to each company separately.
(2) Nonlife insurance company. The term nonlife insurance company
has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.1502-1(k).
(3) Life insurance company taxable income. The term life insurance
company taxable income or LICTI has the meaning provided in section
801(b).
(4) Group. The term group has the meaning provided in Sec. 1.1502-
1(a). Unless otherwise indicated in this section, a group's composition
is determined without regard to section 1504(b)(2).
(5) Member. The term member has the meaning provided in Sec.
1.1502-1(b). A life company is tentatively treated as a member for any
taxable year for purposes of determining if it is an eligible
corporation under paragraph (b)(12) of this section and, therefore, if
it is an includible corporation under section 1504(c)(2). If such a
company is eligible and includible (under section 1504(c)(2)), it will
actually be treated as a member of the group.
* * * * *
(10) Separate return year. The term separate return year has the
meaning provided in Sec. 1.1502-1(e). For purposes of this paragraph
(b)(10), the term group is defined with regard to section 1504(b)(2)
for years in which an election under section 1504(c)(2) is not in
effect. Thus, a separate return year includes a taxable year for which
that election is not in effect.
(11) Separate return limitation year. Section 1.1502-1(f)(2)
provides exceptions to the definition of the term separate return
limitation year. For purposes of applying those exceptions to this
section, the term group is defined without regard to section
1504(b)(2), and the definition in this paragraph (b)(11) applies
separately to the nonlife subgroup in determining nonlife consolidated
taxable income under paragraph (f) of this section and to the life
subgroup in determining consolidated LICTI under paragraph (g) of this
section. Paragraph (h)(3)(ix) of this section defines the term separate
return limitation year for purposes of determining whether the losses
of one subgroup may be used against the income of the other subgroup.
* * * * *
(13) Ineligible corporation. A corporation that is not an eligible
corporation is ineligible. If a life company is ineligible, it is not
treated under section 1504(c)(2) as an includible corporation. Losses
of a nonlife member arising in years when it is ineligible may not be
used under section 1503(c)(2) and paragraph (g) of this section to set
off the income of a life member. If a life company is ineligible and is
the common parent of the group (without regard to section 1504(b)(2)),
the election under section 1504(c)(2) may not be made.
(14) * * *
(i) * * * S2 must file its own separate return for 2020.
(ii) Example 2. Since 2012, L1 has been a life company owning all
the stock of L2. In 2018, L1 transfers assets to S1, a new nonlife
insurance company subject to taxation under section 831(a). For 2020,
only L1 and L2 are eligible corporations. The tacking rule in paragraph
(b)(12)(v) of this section does not apply in 2020 because the old
corporation (L1) and the new corporation (S1) do not have the same tax
character.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(5) Dividends received deduction--(i) Dividends received by an
includible insurance company. Dividends received by an includible
member insurance company, taxed under either section 801 or section
831, from another includible member of the group are treated for
Federal income tax purposes as if the group did not file a consolidated
return. See sections 818(e)(2) and 805(a)(4) for rules regarding a
member taxed under section 801, and see sections 832(g) and
832(b)(5)(B) through (E) for rules regarding a member taxed under
section 831.
(ii) Other dividends. Dividends received from a life company member
of the group that are not subject to paragraph (d)(5)(i) of this
section are not included in gross income of the distributee member. See
section 1504(c)(2)(B)(i). If the distributee corporation is a nonlife
insurance company subject to tax under section 831, the rules of
section 832(b)(5)(B) through (E) apply.
* * * * *
(7) * * *
(ii) Any taxes described in Sec. 1.1502-2 (other than in Sec.
1.1502-2(a)(1), (a)(6), and (a)(7)).
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Carrybacks. The portion of the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for the nonlife subgroup described in paragraph
(f)(2)(vi) of this section, if any, that is eligible to be carried back
to prior taxable years under Sec. 1.1502-21 is carried back to the
appropriate years (whether consolidated or separate) before the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss may be used as a nonlife subgroup loss
under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this section to set off consolidated
LICTI in the year the loss arose. The election under section 172(b)(3)
to relinquish the entire carryback period for the net operating loss of
the nonlife subgroup may be made by the agent for the group within the
meaning of Sec. 1.1502-77.
* * * * *
(v) * * * For limitations on the use of nonlife carryovers to
offset nonlife consolidated taxable income or consolidated LICTI, see
Sec. 1.1502-21.
(vi) Portion of nonlife consolidated net operating loss that is
carried back to prior taxable years. The portion of the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss that (absent an election to waive
carrybacks) is carried back to the two preceding taxable years is the
sum of the nonlife subgroup's farming loss (within the meaning of
section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)) and the amount of the subgroup's net
operating loss that is attributable to nonlife insurance companies (as
determined under Sec. 1.1502-21). For rules governing the absorption
of net operating loss carrybacks, including limitations on the amount
of net operating loss carrybacks that may be absorbed in prior taxable
years, see Sec. 1.1502-21(b).
(vii) Example. P, a holding company that is not an insurance
company, owns all of the stock of S, a nonlife insurance company, and
L1, a life insurance company. L1 owns all of the stock of L2, a life
insurance company. Both L1 and
[[Page 67986]]
L2 satisfy the eligibility requirements of Sec. 1.1502-47(b)(12). Each
corporation uses the calendar year as its taxable year, and no
corporation has incurred farming losses (within the meaning of section
172(b)(1)(B)(ii)). For 2021, the group first files a consolidated
return for which the election under section 1504(c)(2) is effective. P
and S filed consolidated returns for 2019 and 2020. In 2021, the P-S
group sustains a nonlife consolidated net operating loss that is
attributable entirely to S (see Sec. 1.1502-21(b)). The election in
2021 under section 1504(c)(2) does not result under paragraph (d)(1) of
this section in the creation of a new group or the termination of the
P-S group. The loss is carried back to the consolidated return years
2019 and 2020 of P and S. Pursuant to Sec. 1.1502-21(b), the loss may
be used to offset S's income in 2019 and 2020 without limitation, and
the loss may be used to offset P's income in those years, subject to
the limitation in section 172(a) (see Sec. 1.1502-21(b)). The portion
of the loss not absorbed in 2019 and 2020 may serve as a nonlife
subgroup loss in 2021 that may set off the consolidated LICTI of L1 and
L2 under paragraphs (e)(2) and (h) of this section.
(3) * * *
(ii) Additional principles. In applying Sec. 1.1502-22 to nonlife
consolidated net capital loss carryovers and carrybacks, the principles
set forth in paragraph (f)(2)(iii) through (v) of this section for
applying Sec. 1.1502-21 to nonlife consolidated net operating loss
carryovers and carrybacks also apply, without regard to the limitation
in paragraph (f)(2)(vi) of this section.
* * * * *
(g) Consolidated LICTI--(1) General rule. Consolidated LICTI is the
consolidated taxable income of the life subgroup, computed under Sec.
1.1502-11 as modified by this paragraph (g).
(2) Life consolidated net operating loss deduction--(i) In general.
In applying Sec. 1.1502-21, the rules in this paragraph (g)(2) apply
in determining for the life subgroup the life net operating loss and
the portion of the life net operating loss carryovers and carrybacks to
the taxable year.
(ii) Life CNOL. The life consolidated net operating loss is
determined under Sec. 1.1502-21(e) by treating the life subgroup as
the group.
(iii) Carrybacks--(A) General rule. The portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss for the life subgroup, if any, that is
eligible to be carried back under Sec. 1.1502-21 is carried back to
the appropriate years (whether consolidated or separate) before the
life consolidated net operating loss may be used as a life subgroup
loss under paragraphs (e)(1) and (j) of this section to set off nonlife
consolidated taxable income in the year the loss arose. The election
under section 172(b)(3) to relinquish the entire carryback period for
the consolidated net operating loss of the life subgroup may be made by
the agent for the group within the meaning of Sec. 1.1502-77.
(B) Special rule for life consolidated net operating losses arising
in 2018, 2019, or 2020. If a life consolidated net operating loss
arising in a taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017, and before
January 1, 2021, is carried back to a life insurance company taxable
year beginning before January 1, 2018, then such life consolidated net
operating loss is treated as an operations loss carryback (within the
meaning of section 810, as in effect prior to its repeal) of such
company to such taxable year.
(iv) Subgroup rule. In determining the portion of the life
consolidated net operating loss that is absorbed when the loss is
carried back to a consolidated return year, Sec. 1.1502-21 is applied
by treating the life subgroup as the group. Therefore, the absorption
is determined without taking into account any nonlife subgroup losses
that were previously reported on a consolidated return as setting off
life consolidated taxable income for the year to which the life
subgroup loss is carried back.
(v) Carryovers. The portion of the life consolidated net operating
loss that is not absorbed in a prior year as a carryback, or as a life
subgroup loss that set off nonlife consolidated taxable income for the
year the loss arose, constitutes a life carryover under this paragraph
(g)(2) to reduce consolidated LICTI before that portion may constitute
a life subgroup loss that sets off nonlife consolidated taxable income
for that particular year. For limitations on the use of life carryovers
to offset nonlife consolidated taxable income or consolidated LICTI,
see Sec. 1.1502-21(b).
(3) Life consolidated capital gain net income or loss--(i)
[Reserved].
(ii) Life consolidated net capital loss carryovers and carrybacks.
The life consolidated net capital loss carryovers and carrybacks for
the life subgroup are determined by applying the principles of Sec.
1.1502-22 as modified by the following rules in this paragraph
(g)(3)(ii):
(A) Life consolidated net capital loss is first carried back (or
apportioned to the life members for separate return years) to be
absorbed by life consolidated capital gain net income without regard to
any nonlife subgroup capital losses and before the life consolidated
net capital loss may serve as a life subgroup capital loss that sets
off nonlife consolidated capital gain net income in the year the life
consolidated net capital loss arose.
(B) If a life consolidated net capital loss is not carried back or
is not a life subgroup loss that sets off nonlife consolidated capital
gain net income in the year the life consolidated net capital loss
arose, then it is carried over to the particular year under this
paragraph (g)(3)(ii) first against life consolidated capital gain net
income before it may serve as a life subgroup capital loss that sets
off nonlife consolidated capital gain net income in that particular
year.
(h) * * *
(2) * * *
(ii) * * * Additionally, the amount of consolidated LICTI that may
be offset by nonlife consolidated net operating loss carryovers may be
subject to limitation (see section 172 and Sec. 1.1502-21).
* * * * *
(3) * * *
(iv) * * * The amount of consolidated LICTI that may be offset by
nonlife consolidated net operating loss carryovers may be subject to
limitation (see section 172 and Sec. 1.1502-21).
* * * * *
(4) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (h). In the examples, L indicates a life company, S is a
nonlife insurance company, another letter indicates a nonlife company
that is not an insurance company, no company has farming losses (within
the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)), and each corporation uses the
calendar year as its taxable year.
* * * * *
(ii) Example 2. (A) The facts are the same as in paragraph
(h)(4)(i) of this section, except that, for 2021, S's separate net
operating loss is $200. Assume further that L's consolidated LICTI is
$200. Under paragraph (h)(3)(vi) of this section, the offsettable
nonlife consolidated net operating loss is $100 (the nonlife
consolidated net operating loss computed under paragraph (f)(2)(ii) of
this section ($200), reduced by the separate net operating loss of I
($100)). The offsettable nonlife consolidated net operating loss that
may be set off against consolidated LICTI in 2021 is $35 (35 percent of
the lesser of the offsettable $100 or consolidated LICTI of $200). See
section 1503(c)(1) and paragraph (h)(3)(x) of this section. S carries
over a loss of $65, and I carries over a loss of $100, to 2022 under
paragraph (f)(2) of this section to be used against nonlife
consolidated taxable income (consolidated net
[[Page 67987]]
operating loss ($200) less amount used in 2021 ($35)). Under paragraph
(h)(2)(ii) of this section, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss that may be carried to 2022 is $65 ($100 minus $35). The
facts and results are summarized in the following table.
Table 1 to Paragraph (h)(4)(ii)(A)
[Dollars omitted]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Offsettable Limit Unused Loss
(a) (b) (c) (d)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. P............................................ 100 .............. .............. ..............
2. S............................................ (200) (100) .............. (65)
3. I............................................ (100) .............. .............. (100)
4. Nonlife Subgroup............................. (200) (100) (100) (165)
5. L............................................ 200 .............. 200 ..............
6. 35% of lower of line 4(c) or 5(c)............ .............. .............. 35 ..............
7. Unused offsettable loss...................... .............. .............. .............. (65)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(B) Accordingly, under paragraph (e) of this section, consolidated
taxable income is $165 (line 5(a) minus line 6(c)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same as in paragraph (h)(4)(ii)
of this section, with the following additions for 2022. The nonlife
subgroup has nonlife consolidated taxable income of $50 (all of which
is attributable to I) before the nonlife consolidated net operating
loss deduction under paragraph (f)(2) of this section. Consolidated
LICTI is $100. Under paragraph (f)(2) of this section, $50 of the
nonlife consolidated net operating loss carryover ($165) is used in
2022 and, under paragraph (h)(3)(vi) and (vii) of this section, the
portion used in 2022 is attributable to I, the ineligible nonlife
member. Accordingly, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net operating
loss from 2021 under paragraph (h)(3)(ii) of this section is $65, the
unused loss from 2021. The offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss in 2022 is $22.75 (35 percent of the lesser of the
offsettable loss of $65 or consolidated LICTI of $100). Accordingly,
under paragraph (e) of this section, consolidated taxable income is
$77.25 (consolidated LICTI of $100 minus the offsettable loss of
$22.75).
* * * * *
(j) * * *
(2) * * *
(iii) Substitute the term ``life consolidated net operating loss
and consolidated operations loss carryovers'' for ``nonlife
consolidated net operating loss'', and ``paragraph (g)'' for
``paragraph (f)''.
(3) Examples. The following examples illustrate the principles of
this paragraph (j). In the examples, L indicates a life company, S is a
nonlife insurance company, another letter indicates a nonlife company
that is not an insurance company, no company has farming losses (within
the meaning of section 172(b)(1)(B)(ii)), and each corporation uses the
calendar year as its taxable year.
(i) Example 1. P, S, L1 and L2 constitute a group that elects under
section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return for 2021. In 2021, the
nonlife subgroup consolidated taxable income is $100 and there is $20
of nonlife consolidated net capital loss that cannot be carried back
under paragraph (f) of this section to taxable years (whether
consolidated or separate) preceding 2021. The nonlife subgroup has no
carryover from years prior to 2021. The life consolidated net operating
loss is $150, which under paragraph (g) of this section includes life
consolidated capital gain net income of $25. Since life consolidated
capital gain net income is zero for 2021 (see paragraph (h)(3)(iii) of
this section), the nonlife capital loss offset is zero (see paragraph
(h)(3)(ii) of this section). However, $100 of life consolidated net
operating loss sets off the $100 nonlife consolidated taxable income in
2021. The life subgroup carries under paragraph (g)(2) of this section
to 2022 $50 of the life consolidated net operating loss ($150 minus
$100). The $50 carryover will be used in 2022 (subject to the
limitation in section 172(a)) against life subgroup income before it
may be used in 2022 to setoff nonlife consolidated taxable income.
(ii) Example 2. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(i) of
this section, except that, for 2021, the nonlife consolidated taxable
income is $150 (this amount is entirely attributable to S and includes
nonlife consolidated capital gain net income of $50), consolidated
LICTI is $200, and a life consolidated net capital loss is $50. The $50
life consolidated net capital loss sets off the $50 nonlife
consolidated capital gain net income. Consolidated taxable income under
paragraph (e) of this section is $300 (nonlife consolidated taxable
income ($150) minus the setoff of the life consolidated net capital
loss ($50), plus consolidated LICTI ($200)).
(iii) Example 3. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(ii)
of this section, except that, for 2022, the nonlife consolidated net
operating loss is $150. This entire amount is attributable to S; thus,
it is eligible to be carried back to 2021 against nonlife consolidated
taxable income under paragraph (f)(2) of this section and Sec. 1.1502-
21(b). If P, the agent for the group within the meaning of Sec.
1.1502-77, does not elect to relinquish the carryback under section
172(b)(3), the entire $150 will be carried back, reducing 2021 nonlife
consolidated taxable income to zero and nonlife consolidated capital
gain net income to zero. Under paragraph (h)(3)(xii) of this section,
the setoff in 2021 of the nonlife consolidated capital gain net income
($50) by the life consolidated net capital loss ($50) is restored.
Accordingly, the 2021 life consolidated net capital loss may be carried
over by the life subgroup to 2022. Under paragraph (e) of this section,
after the carryback, consolidated taxable income for 2021 is $200
(nonlife consolidated taxable income ($0) plus consolidated LICTI
($200)).
(iv) Example 4. The facts are the same as in paragraph (j)(3)(iii)
of this section, except that P elects under section 172(b)(3) to
relinquish the carryback of $150 arising in 2022. The setoff in Example
2 is not restored. However, the offsettable nonlife consolidated net
operating loss for 2022 (or that may be carried over from 2022) is
zero. See paragraph (h)(3)(viii) of this section. Nevertheless, the
$150 nonlife consolidated net operating loss may be
[[Page 67988]]
carried over to be used by the nonlife group.
(v) Example 5. P owns all of the stock of S1 and of L1. On January
1, 2017, L1 purchases all of the stock of L2. For 2021, the group
elects under section 1504(c)(2) to file a consolidated return. For
2021, L1 is an eligible corporation under paragraph (b)(12) of this
section but L2 is ineligible. Thus, L1 but not L2 is a member for 2021.
For 2021, L2 sustains a net operating loss, which cannot be carried
back (see section 172(b)). For 2021, L2 is treated under paragraph
(d)(6) of this section as a member of a controlled group of
corporations under section 1563 with P, S, and L1. For 2022, L2 is
eligible and is included on the group's consolidated return. L2's net
operating loss for 2021 that may be carried to 2022 is not treated
under paragraph (b)(11) of this section as having been sustained in a
separate return limitation year for purposes of computing consolidated
LICTI of the L1-L2 life subgroup for 2022. Furthermore, the portion of
L2's net operating loss not used under paragraph (g)(2) of this section
against life subgroup income in 2022 may be included in offsettable
life consolidated net operating loss under paragraph (j)(2) and
(h)(3)(i) of this section that reduces in 2022 nonlife consolidated
taxable income (subject to the limitation in section 172(a)) because
L2's loss in 2021 was not sustained in a separate return limitation
year under paragraph (j)(2) and (h)(3)(ix)(A) of this section or in a
separate return year (2021) when an election was in effect under
neither section 1504(c)(2) nor section 243(b)(3).
* * * * *
(n) Effective/applicability dates. The rules of this section apply
to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2020. However, a taxpayer
may choose to apply the rules of this section to taxable years
beginning on or before December 31, 2020. If a taxpayer makes the
choice described in the previous sentence, the taxpayer must apply
those rules in their entirety and consistently with the provisions of
subchapter L of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to the years at
issue.
0
Par. 5. Section 1.1503(d)-4 is amended by:
0
1. In paragraph (c)(3)(iii)(B), removing the period and adding in its
place a semi-colon.
0
2. In paragraph (c)(3)(iv), removing the period and adding in its place
``; and''.
0
3. Adding paragraph (c)(3)(v).
The addition reads as follows:
Sec. 1.1503(d)-4 Domestic use limitation and related operating rules.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(3) * * *
(v) The SRLY limitation is applied without regard to Sec. 1.1502-
21(c)(1)(i)(E) (section 172(a) limitation applicable to a SRLY member).
* * * * *
0
Par. 6. Section 1.1503(d)-8 is amended by adding paragraph (b)(8) to
read as follows:
Sec. 1.1503(d)-8 Effective dates.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Rule providing that SRLY limitation applies without regard to
Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E). Section 1.1503(d)-4(c)(3)(v) applies to
any period to which Sec. 1.1502-21(c)(1)(i)(E) applies.
Sunita Lough,
Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement.
Approved: September 29, 2020.
David J. Kautter,
Assistant Secretary of the Treasury (Tax Policy).
[FR Doc. 2020-22974 Filed 10-23-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P