Procedures for Issuing Guidance Documents, 67666-67670 [2020-22238]
Download as PDF
67666
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
United States Court of Appeals for the
District of Columbia Circuit by
December 28, 2020.
III. Description of Action
On February 4, 2020, the EPA
promulgated a final rule addressing a
petition for reconsideration that was
filed in response to a rule issued in
December 2015,1 which amended the
Petroleum Refinery Sector NESHAP
based on the RTR conducted for the
Petroleum Refinery source category. 85
FR 6064. Following promulgation of the
final rule, on April 6, 2020, the
Administrator received a petition for
reconsideration of certain provisions of
the final rule pursuant to CAA section
307(d)(7)(B). The petition for
reconsideration was filed by
Earthjustice on behalf of Air Alliance
Houston, California Communities
Against Toxics, Clean Air Council,
Coalition for a Safe Environment,
Community In-Power and Development
Association, Del Amo Action
Committee, Environmental Integrity
Project, Louisiana Bucket Brigade,
Sierra Club, Texas Environmental
Justice Advocacy Services, and Utah
Physicians for a Healthy Environment.
The petition for reconsideration
requests that the EPA reconsider five
issues in the February 4, 2020, final
rule: (1) The EPA’s rationale that the
pressure relief device (PRD) standards
and emergency flaring standards are
continuous; (2) the EPA’s rationale for
the PRD standards under CAA sections
112(d)(2) and (3); (3) the EPA’s rationale
for separate work practice standards for
flares operating above the smokeless
capacity; (4) the EPA’s rationale for risk
acceptability and risk determination;
and (5) the EPA’s analysis and rationale
in its assessment of acute risk.
CAA section 307(d)(7)(B) requires the
EPA to convene a proceeding for
reconsideration of a rule if a party
raising an objection to the rule ‘‘can
demonstrate to the Administrator that it
was impracticable to raise such
objection within [the public comment
period] or if the grounds for such
objection arose after the period for
public comment (but within the time
specified for judicial review) and if such
objection is of central relevance to the
outcome of the rule.’’ The requirement
to convene a proceeding to reconsider a
rule is, thus, based on the petitioner
demonstrating to the EPA both: (1) That
it was impracticable to raise the
objection during the comment period, or
that the grounds for such objection arose
after the comment period, but within
1 The December 1, 2015, rule can be found in the
Federal Register at 80 FR 75178.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Oct 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
the time specified for judicial review
(i.e., within 60 days after publication of
the final rulemaking notice in the
Federal Register, see CAA section
307(b)(1)); and (2) that the objection is
of central relevance to the outcome of
the rule.
The EPA carefully reviewed the
petition for reconsideration and
evaluated all five issues raised to
determine if they meet the CAA section
307(d)(7)(B) criteria for reconsideration.
In a separate letter to the petitioner, the
EPA Administrator denied the petition
for reconsideration. The letter
articulates in detail the rationale for the
EPA’s final responses and is available in
the docket for this action.
Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2020–23491 Filed 10–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
43 CFR Part 51
[Docket No. DOI–2020–0001; 201D0102DM,
DS6CS00000, DLSN00000.000000,
DX6CS25]
RIN 1093–AA27
Procedures for Issuing Guidance
Documents
Office of the Secretary, Interior.
Interim final rule; request for
comments.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
We, the Department of the
Interior (Department), through this
interim final rule (IFR), revise our
rulemaking procedures to implement an
Executive order (E.O.) entitled
‘‘Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance
Documents.’’ The E.O. requires Federal
Agencies to finalize regulations or
amend existing regulations to establish
processes and procedures for issuing
guidance documents and to establish
exceptions for categories of guidance
documents.
SUMMARY:
This rule is effective October 26,
2020. Comments will be accepted until
December 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
Docket No. DOI–2020–0001. Please note
that if you are using the Federal
eRulemaking Portal, the deadline for
submitting electronic comments is 11:59
Eastern Standard Time on the comment
due date.
DATES:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
• Mail: Address comment to Public
Comments Processing, Attn: Docket No.
DOI–2020–0001; Department of the
Interior; MS: 7328; 1849 C Street NW,
Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bivan Patnaik, Deputy Director of
Regulatory Affairs, Office of the
Executive Secretariat and Regulatory
Affairs, by phone at 202–208–3181 or
via the Federal Relay Service at 800–
877–8339, or via email account
guidance_document@ios.doi.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
E.O. 13891, entitled ‘‘Promoting the
Rule of Law Through Improved Agency
Guidance Documents,’’ which
published in the Federal Register on
October 15, 2019 (84 FR 55235), is
intended to improve the guidance
document development process while
maintaining an open and fair regulatory
process for the public. On October 31,
2019, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) issued a ‘‘Memorandum
for Regulatory Policy Officers at
Executive Departments and Agencies
and Managing and Executive Directors
of Certain Agencies and Commissions’’
(M–20–02).1 One of E.O. 13891’s
requirements is that Federal Agencies
promulgate final regulations or amend
existing regulations that set forth
processes and procedures for issuing
guidance documents.2 The purpose of
this IFR is to codify these processes and
procedures for issuing guidance
documents as well as to allow the
public to comment on the rule. The
Department is amending its regulations
under an IFR and will forgo issuing a
proposed rule. The IFR will take effect
on the date specified above in DATES,
with public comment to conclude as set
forth in DATES. Based on public
comments received, the interim rule
may be revised. The final rule will
contain responses to comments received
on the IFR, state the final decision, and
provide the justification for that
decision.
Discussion of the Interim Final Rule
This IFR creates a new part 51 in title
43 of the Code of Federal Regulations
(CFR), which concerns Public Lands
and the Department of the Interior. This
rule promulgates the Department’s
procedural requirements governing the
development, review, and clearance of
guidance documents; the processes for
1 See Memorandum for Regulatory Policy Officers
at Executive Departments and Agencies and
Managing and Executive Directors of Certain
Agencies and Commissions.
2 See section 4(a) of Executive Order 13891.
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
the public to petition for withdrawal or
modification of a particular guidance
document, including designating the
officials to whom petitions should be
directed; and the procedures for review
and approval of significant guidance
documents.
The procedures contained in this IFR
apply to all guidance documents, which
E.O. 13891 defines as any statement of
agency that is of general applicability
and intended to have future effect on
the behavior of regulated parties, that
sets forth a policy on a statutory,
regulatory, or technical issues or an
interpretation of a statute or regulation,
with certain exceptions. OMB’s M–20–
02 further clarifies and provides
information for Agencies to consider in
determining when a document is indeed
a guidance document, including a
functional test for rules of agency
organization, procedure, or practice.
This IFR codifies the Department’s
existing procedures and implements
new procedures regarding the
development, review, and clearance of
guidance documents. These procedures
ensure that all guidance documents
receive legal review and, when
appropriate, Office of the Secretary
review. Before guidance documents are
issued, they must be reviewed to ensure
they are written in plain language and
do not impose any substantive legal
requirements above and beyond those
imposed by statute, regulation, or
contract. If a guidance document
purports to describe, approve, or
recommend specific conduct that
extends beyond what is required by
existing law, regulation, or contract,
then it must include clear and
prominent language effectively stating
that the contents of the guidance
document do not have the force and
effect of law and are not meant to bind
the public in any way, and the guidance
document is intended only to provide
clarity to the public regarding existing
requirements under the law, regulation,
contract or agency policies.
In recognition of the fact that although
guidance documents are not legally
binding, they could nevertheless have a
substantial economic impact on
regulated entities that alter their
conduct to conform to the guidance, this
IFR directs Bureaus and Offices within
the Department to undertake a benefits
and cost assessment of the impact of the
guidance document when appropriate.
Further information that describes
identifying and measuring benefits and
costs are found in OMB’s Circular A–4
(add footnote). Further Bureaus/Offices
of the Department are to be in
compliance with E.O. 13891, Section
4(a)(iii)(C) and (D). The procedures for
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Oct 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
the development, review, and clearance
of guidance documents can be found at
43 CFR part 51.
Required Determinations
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5
U.S.C. 551 et seq.)
Under section 553(b)(3)(B) of the
APA, a proposed rule is not required
‘‘when the agency for good cause finds
(and incorporates the finding and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the
rules issued) that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.’’ There is good cause to forgo
notice and public comment on a
proposed rule in this instance and
instead take immediate action because
this IFR codifies the Department’s
existing procedures and implements
new procedures regarding the
development, review, and clearance of
guidance documents as directed by E.O
13891. Additionally, it does not reach
any right or benefit, substantive, or
procedural, as an enforceable action
against the United States or the
Department. The Department finds good
cause in accordance with 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3) to make the IFR effective less
than 30 days after the date of
publication to allow for swift
implementation of this program.
Although this IFR is effective
immediately, comments are solicited
from the public on all aspects of the
interim final rule. The Department will
consider all public comments received
in the development of a subsequent
final rule.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of
Management and Budget’s (OMB’s)
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs will review all significant rules.
The Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has determined that
this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of
E.O. 12866, calling for improvements in
the nation’s regulatory system to
promote predictability, to reduce
uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools
for achieving regulatory objectives. E.O.
13563 directs agencies to consider
regulatory approaches that reduce
burdens and maintain flexibility and
freedom of choice for the public, where
these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory
objectives. This IFR is in compliance
with E.O. 13563 and is intended to
promote predictability, to reduce
uncertainty, and to use the best, most
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67667
innovative, and least burdensome tools
for achieving regulatory objectives.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This IFR will not have a significant
economic effect on a substantial number
of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) as
it will not directly impact small entities
or impose any regulatory burdens on
them.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
In accordance with section 213(a) of
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, the
Department will assist small entities in
understanding this rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects. If the IFR rule
will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction, and you have questions
concerning its provisions, please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section of this
rule. Small businesses may send
comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce or otherwise
determine compliance with Federal
regulations to the Small Business
Administration’s Small Business and
Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement
Ombudsman and the Regional Small
Business Regulatory Fairness Boards.
The Ombudsman evaluates these
actions annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
A statement containing the
information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et
seq.) is not required.
This rule:
(a) Will not impose an unfunded
mandate on state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector of
more than $100 million per year.
(b) Will not have a significant or
unique effect on State, local, or tribal
governments, or the private sector.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling
Regulatory Costs (E.O. 13771)
This rule is not an E.O. 13771
regulatory action because this rule is not
significant under E.O. 12866.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630. This rule is not
a Government action capable of
interfering with constitutionally
protected property rights. It does not
impose any obligations on the public
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
67668
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
that would result in a taking. A takings
implication assessment is not required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O.
13132, this IFR will not have sufficient
federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a federalism summary
impact statement because it will not
substantially and directly affect the
relationship between the Federal and
State governments. Accordingly, a
federalism summary impact statement is
not required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O.12988)
This IFR complies with the
requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) of
this E.O. which requires that all
regulations be reviewed to eliminate
errors and ambiguity and be written to
minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2)
of this E.O. which requires that all
regulations be written in clear language
and contain clear legal standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O.
13175)
The Department strives to strengthen
its government-to-government
relationship with federally recognized
Indian tribes through a commitment to
consultation and recognition of their
right to self-governance and tribal
sovereignty. Under the criteria in E.O.
13175 and Departmental Manual Part
512 Chapters 4 and 5, this IFR will have
no substantial direct effects on federally
recognized Indian tribes or Alaska
Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA)
Corporations, and consultation under
the Department’s consultation policies
is not required.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C.
3501, et seq.
This IFR does not constitute a major
Federal action significantly affecting the
quality of the human environment.
Pursuant to Departmental Manual 516
DM 2.3A (2), section 1.10 of 516 DM 2,
Appendix 1 categorically excludes from
the requirement to document an
environmental assessment or impact
statement policies, directives,
regulations and guidelines of an
Jkt 253001
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O.
13211)
Authority: 5 U.S.C. Chapter 5, Subchapter
II; Chapter 7, E.O. 13891, 84 FR 55235, 3
CFR, 2019 Comp., p. 371.
This IFR is not a significant energy
action under the definition in E.O.
13211; therefore, a Statement of Energy
Effects is not required.
Plain Language
The Department is required by section
1(b)(12) of E.O. 12866 and Section
3(b)(1)(B) of E.O. 12988 and by the
Presidential Memorandum of June 1,
1998, to write all rules in plain
language. This means that this rule
must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address
readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and
clear language rather than jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and
sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever
possible.
If you feel that we have not met these
requirements, please contact the person
listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section of this preamble.
The Department publishes this IFR in
accordance with the APA as codified in
the text of chapters 5 and 7 of Title 5,
United States Code, that govern
procedures for agency rulemaking and
adjudication and provides for judicial
review of final agency actions and E.O.
13891.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 51
National Environmental Policy Act
16:27 Oct 23, 2020
51.3
Authority
This IFR does not contain any new
collections of information that require
approval by OMB under the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This IFR will not impose
recordkeeping or reporting requirements
on State, local, or Tribal governments,
individuals, businesses, or
organizations.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
administrative, financial, legal,
technical or procedural nature; or the
environmental effects of which are too
broad, speculative or conjectural to lend
themselves to meaningful analysis and
will be subject to the NEPA process,
either collectively or case-by-case. See
also 43 CFR 46.210(i). The Department
has reviewed this rule and determined
that this categorical exclusion applies,
and that none of the extraordinary
circumstances that would preclude use
of the categorical exclusion are
applicable. See 43 CFR 46.215.
Therefore, a detailed statement under
the National Environmental Policy Act
of 1969 (NEPA) is not required.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Executive orders.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, 43 CFR part 51 is added to
read as follows:
PART 51—GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS
PROCEDURES
Sec.
51.1
PO 00000
General.
Frm 00032
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Review and clearance by the Office of
the Solicitor.
51.5 Requirements for clearance.
51.7 Public access to effective guidance
documents.
51.9 Cost and benefit estimates.
51.11 Approval procedures for guidance
documents identified as ‘‘significant.’’
51.13 Definition of ‘‘significant guidance
document.’’
51.15 Designation procedures.
51.17 Notice-and-comment procedures.
51.19 Petitions for guidance.
51.21 Rescinded guidance.
51.23 Exigent circumstances.
51.25 Reports to Congress and the
Comptroller General.
51.27 No judicial review or enforceable
rights.
§ 51.1
General.
(a) This part governs the issuance of
Departmental guidance documents.
(b) Subject to the qualifications and
exemptions contained in this part, the
procedures in this part apply to all
guidance documents issued by all
Bureaus/Offices of the Department of
the Interior (the Department) after
October 26, 2020.
(c) For purposes of this part, the term
‘‘guidance document’’ is any statement
of agency policy or interpretation of a
statute, regulation, or technical matter
within the jurisdiction of the agency
that is of general applicability and
intended to have future effect on the
behavior of regulated parties, that sets
forth a policy on a statutory, regulatory,
or technical issues or an interpretation
of a statute or regulation, with certain
exceptions. The term is not confined to
formal written documents; guidance
may come in a variety of forms,
including (but not limited to) letters,
memoranda, circulars, bulletins,
advisories, and may include video,
audio, and Web-based formats. See
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Bulletin 07–02, ‘‘Agency Good
Guidance Practices,’’ (January 25, 2007)
(‘‘OMB Good Guidance Bulletin’’).
(d) This part does not apply to the
following documents, which are not
included in the definition of ‘‘guidance
document’’ for purposes of this part:
(1) Rules promulgated pursuant to
notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. 553,
or similar statutory provisions;
(2) Rules exempt from rulemaking
requirements under 5 U.S.C. 553(a);
(3) Rules of agency organization,
procedure, or practice;
(4) Decisions of agency adjudications
under 5 U.S.C. 554 or similar statutory
provisions;
(5) Internal guidance directed to the
issuing agency or other agencies that is
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
not intended to have substantial future
effect on the behavior of regulated
parties; or
(6) Internal executive branch legal
advice or legal advisory opinions
addressed to executive branch officials
that are not intended to have substantial
future effect on the behavior of
regulated parties.
§ 51.3 Review and clearance by the Office
of the Solicitor.
All Departmental guidance
documents, as defined in § 51.1(c),
require review and clearance in
accordance with this part.
(a) Guidance proposed to be issued by
a Bureau/Office of the Department must
be reviewed and cleared by the relevant
Division of the Office of the Solicitor. In
addition, as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, some Bureau/Office
guidance documents will require review
and clearance by the Immediate Office
of the Solicitor.
(b) Guidance proposed to be issued by
the Office of the Secretary must be
reviewed and cleared by the Immediate
Office of the Solicitor.
§ 51.5
Requirements for clearance.
The Department’s review and
clearance of guidance documents must
ensure that each guidance document
proposed to be issued by a Bureau/
Office of the Department satisfies the
following requirements:
(a) The guidance document complies
with and cites all relevant statutes and
regulations (including any statutory
deadlines for agency action);
(b) The guidance document identifies
or includes:
(1) The term ‘‘guidance’’ or its
functional equivalent;
(2) The issuing Bureau/Office and the
date of issuance;
(3) A unique identifier, including, at
a minimum, the date of issuance and
title of the guidance document and its
Z-Regulatory Identification Number (Z–
RIN), if applicable;
(4) The activity or entities to which
the guidance applies;
(5) Citations to applicable statutes and
regulations;
(6) A statement noting whether the
guidance document intends to revise or
replace any previously issued guidance
document and, if so, sufficient
information to identify the previously
issued guidance document; and
(7) A short summary of the subject
matter covered in the guidance
document at the top of the document;
(c) The guidance document should
not use mandatory language, such as
‘‘shall,’’ ‘‘must,’’ ‘‘required,’’ or
‘‘requirement,’’ unless the language is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Oct 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
describing an established statutory,
regulatory, or contractual requirement
or is addressed to Department staff and
will not foreclose the Department’s
consideration of positions advanced by
affected private parties;
(d) The guidance document is written
in plain and understandable English;
and
(e) The guidance document must
include a clear and prominent statement
declaring that the contents of the
document do not have the force and
effect of law, except as authorized by
law or as incorporated into a contract,
and are not meant to bind the public in
any way, except as authorized by law or
as incorporated into a contract, and that
the document is intended only to
provide clarity to the public regarding
existing requirements under the law or
agency policies.
§ 51.7 Public access to effective guidance
documents.
Each Bureau/Office that is responsible
for issuing guidance documents must:
(a) Ensure all effective guidance
documents, identified by a unique
identifier which includes, at a
minimum, the document’s title and date
of issuance or revision and its Z–RIN, if
applicable, are on the Department’s
website in a single, searchable, indexed
database, and available to the public in
accordance with the notice titled
‘‘Implementation of Executive Order
13891: Guidance Documents’’;
(b) Note on its website that guidance
documents lack the force and effect of
law, except as authorized by law or as
incorporated into a contract;
(c) Maintain and advertise on its
website a means for the public to
comment electronically on any guidance
documents that are subject to the noticeand-comment procedures described in
§ 51.17 and to submit requests
electronically for issuance,
reconsideration, modification, or
rescission of guidance documents in
accordance with § 51.21; and
(d) Designate an office or official(s) to
receive petitions for withdrawal or
modification of guidance documents
and address complaints from the public
that the Bureau/Office is not following
the requirements of OMB’s Good
Guidance Bulletin or is improperly
treating a guidance document as a
binding requirement.
§ 51.9
Cost and benefit estimates.
(a) The Bureau/Office must evaluate
whether, although not legally binding,
an agency guidance document may
result in a substantial economic impact
(e.g., by inducing private parties to alter
their conduct to conform to
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
67669
recommended standards or practices)
where ‘‘significant’’ as defined by E.O.
12866. E.O. 12866 requires agencies to
estimate the net benefits of regulations.
Net benefits are defined as total benefits
minus total costs. When it is determined
that a guidance document will be
economically significant, the Bureau/
Office must prepare a Regulatory Impact
Analysis and make it publicly available
in the same manner it what would
accompany an economically significant
rulemaking.
(b) While it may be difficult to predict
with precision the economic impact of
voluntary guidance, the issuing Bureau/
Office must, to the extent practicable,
make a estimate the likely economic
cost impact of the guidance document
in order to determine whether the
guidance document is economically
significant. When a Bureau/Office is
explaining to OMB’s Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs
(OIRA) whether it believes a guidance
document is economically significant, it
should, at a minimum, provide the same
level of analysis that would be required
for a major determination under the
Congressional Review Act.1
§ 51.11 Approval procedures for guidance
documents identified as ‘‘significant.’’
(a) Guidance documents proposed to
be issued by a Bureau/Office must be
submitted (or a summary of it) to the
Office of the Executive Secretariat and
Regulatory Affairs (OES). OES will
submit these documents or summaries
of them to OIRA for significance
determinations. If OIRA determines that
a proposed guidance document is
significant, then the Bureau/Office must
obtain a Z–RIN and clearance through
the Data Tracking System (DTS) or
successor data management system.
Each proposed guidance document
determined to be significant must be
approved by the Secretary before
issuance.
(b) As with regulations or rules,
including significant regulatory actions,
OES will submit significant guidance
documents to OIRA consistent with the
requirements set forth in § 51.13(c). In
addition, OES may determine that it is
appropriate to coordinate with the
Office of the Secretary and OIRA in the
review of guidance documents.
(c) Significant guidance documents
must be reviewed by OIRA under E.O.
12866 before issuance and must
demonstrate compliance with the
applicable requirements for regulations
or rules, including significant regulatory
actions.
1 See OMB Memorandum M–19–14, Guidance on
Compliance with the Congressional Review Act
(April 11, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
67670
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 207 / Monday, October 26, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(d) If the guidance document is
determined not to be significant as
defined by § 51.13, OES will advise the
proposing Bureau/Office to proceed
with issuance of the guidance through
its standard clearance process.
§ 51.13 Definition of ‘‘significant guidance
document.’’
(a) The term ‘‘significant guidance
document’’ means a guidance document
that may reasonably be anticipated to:
(1) Lead to an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more or
adversely affect in a material way the
U.S. economy, a sector of the U.S.
economy, productivity, competition,
jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or tribal
governments or communities;
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another Federal agency;
(3) Alter materially the budgetary
impact of entitlements, grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
set forth in E.O. 12866, as further
amended.
(b) The term ‘‘significant guidance
document’’ does not include the
categories of documents excluded by
§ 51.1(d) or any other category of
guidance documents exempted in
writing by OIRA in consultation with
OES.
(c) Significant guidance documents
must:
(1) Be reviewed by OIRA under E.O.
12866 before issuance;
(2) Be approved on a non-delegable
basis by the Bureau/Office head or by an
agency component head appointed by
the President, before issuance; and
(3) Demonstrate compliance with the
applicable requirements for regulations
or rules, including significant regulatory
actions, set forth in Executive Orders
12866, 13563, 13609, 13771, 13777, and
13893.
§ 51.15
Designation procedures.
(a) The OES may request a Bureau/
Office to prepare a designation request
for certain guidance documents.
Designation requests must include the
following information:
(1) A summary description of the
guidance document; and
(2) The Bureau/Office recommended
designation of ‘‘not significant,’’
‘‘significant,’’ or ‘‘economically
significant,’’ as well as a justification for
that designation.
(b) OES must seek significance
determinations from OIRA for guidance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:27 Oct 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
documents in the same manner as for
regulatory actions. Prior to publishing
such guidance documents, and with
sufficient time to allow OIRA to review
the document in the event that a
significance determination is made, OES
will provide OIRA with an opportunity
to review the designation request or the
guidance document, if requested, to
determine if it meets the definition of
‘‘significant’’ under Executive Order
13891.
§ 51.17
Notice-and-comment procedures.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph
(b) of this section, all proposed
Department guidance documents
determined to be a ‘‘significant guidance
document’’ within the meaning of
§ 51.13 will be subject to the following
informal notice-and-comment
procedures prior to issuance. The
issuing Bureau/Office must:
(1) Publish a notice in the Federal
Register announcing that a draft of the
proposed guidance document is
publicly available;
(2) Post the draft guidance document
on its website;
(3) Invite public comment on the draft
document for a minimum of 30 days
through a Federal Register notice;
(4) All public comments received
must be posted and made publicly
available; and
(5) Prepare and post public responses
to major concerns raised in the
comments, as appropriate, on its
website, and through a Federal Register
notice either before or when the
guidance document is finalized and
issued.
(b) The requirements of paragraph (a)
of this section will not apply to any
significant guidance document or
categories of significant guidance
documents for which OES finds, in
consultation with OIRA, the proposing
Bureau/Office, Solicitor, Assistant
Secretary, and the Secretary, that good
cause exists such that notice and public
procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest (and incorporates the finding of
good cause and a brief statement of
reasons therefor in the guidance issued).
Unless OES advises otherwise in
writing, the categories of guidance will
be exempt from the requirements of
paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Where appropriate, OES or the
proposing Bureau/Office may
recommend to the Secretary that a
particular guidance document that is
not a significant guidance document
should be subject to the informal noticeand-comment procedures described in
paragraph (a) of this section.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
§ 51.19
Petitions for guidance.
Any person may petition the
Secretary, through an electronic
submission, to issue new, or withdraw
or modify, a particular guidance
document by using the procedures
found in 43 CFR part 14 (§§ 14.1
through 14.4). The Secretary will
delegate the petition to the appropriate
Bureau/Office, which should respond to
all requests in a timely manner but must
respond no later than 90 days after
receipt of the request.
§ 51.21
Rescinded guidance.
A Bureau/Office may not cite, use, or
rely on guidance documents that are
rescinded, except to establish historical
facts.
§ 51.23
Exigent circumstances.
In emergency situations or when the
issuing Bureau/Office is required by
statutory deadline or court order to act
more quickly than normal review
procedures allow, the issuing Bureau/
Office must coordinate with OES to
notify OIRA as soon as possible and, to
the extent practicable, must comply
with the requirements of this part at the
earliest opportunity. Wherever
practicable, the issuing Bureau/Office
should schedule its proceedings to
permit sufficient time to comply with
the procedures set forth in this part.
§ 51.25 Reports to Congress and the
Comptroller General.
Unless otherwise determined in
writing by OES, it is the policy of the
Department that upon issuing a
guidance document determined to be
‘‘significant’’ within the meaning of
§ 51.13, the issuing Bureau/Office will
submit a report to Congress and the
Comptroller General in accordance with
the procedures described in 5 U.S.C.
801 (the ‘‘Congressional Review Act’’).
§ 51.27
rights.
No judicial review or enforceable
This part is intended to improve the
internal management of the Department.
As such, it is for the use of Department
personnel only and is not intended to,
and does not, create, any right or
benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any
party against the United States, its
agencies or other entities, its officers or
employees, or any other person.
Dated: September 28, 2020.
Katharine Sinclair MacGregor,
Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the
Interior.
[FR Doc. 2020–22238 Filed 10–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334–63–P
E:\FR\FM\26OCR1.SGM
26OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 207 (Monday, October 26, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 67666-67670]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22238]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
43 CFR Part 51
[Docket No. DOI-2020-0001; 201D0102DM, DS6CS00000, DLSN00000.000000,
DX6CS25]
RIN 1093-AA27
Procedures for Issuing Guidance Documents
AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Interior.
ACTION: Interim final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the Department of the Interior (Department), through this
interim final rule (IFR), revise our rulemaking procedures to implement
an Executive order (E.O.) entitled ``Promoting the Rule of Law Through
Improved Agency Guidance Documents.'' The E.O. requires Federal
Agencies to finalize regulations or amend existing regulations to
establish processes and procedures for issuing guidance documents and
to establish exceptions for categories of guidance documents.
DATES: This rule is effective October 26, 2020. Comments will be
accepted until December 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to Docket No. DOI-2020-0001.
Please note that if you are using the Federal eRulemaking Portal, the
deadline for submitting electronic comments is 11:59 Eastern Standard
Time on the comment due date.
Mail: Address comment to Public Comments Processing, Attn:
Docket No. DOI-2020-0001; Department of the Interior; MS: 7328; 1849 C
Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bivan Patnaik, Deputy Director of
Regulatory Affairs, Office of the Executive Secretariat and Regulatory
Affairs, by phone at 202-208-3181 or via the Federal Relay Service at
800-877-8339, or via email account [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background Information
E.O. 13891, entitled ``Promoting the Rule of Law Through Improved
Agency Guidance Documents,'' which published in the Federal Register on
October 15, 2019 (84 FR 55235), is intended to improve the guidance
document development process while maintaining an open and fair
regulatory process for the public. On October 31, 2019, the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) issued a ``Memorandum for Regulatory Policy
Officers at Executive Departments and Agencies and Managing and
Executive Directors of Certain Agencies and Commissions'' (M-20-02).\1\
One of E.O. 13891's requirements is that Federal Agencies promulgate
final regulations or amend existing regulations that set forth
processes and procedures for issuing guidance documents.\2\ The purpose
of this IFR is to codify these processes and procedures for issuing
guidance documents as well as to allow the public to comment on the
rule. The Department is amending its regulations under an IFR and will
forgo issuing a proposed rule. The IFR will take effect on the date
specified above in DATES, with public comment to conclude as set forth
in DATES. Based on public comments received, the interim rule may be
revised. The final rule will contain responses to comments received on
the IFR, state the final decision, and provide the justification for
that decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Memorandum for Regulatory Policy Officers at Executive
Departments and Agencies and Managing and Executive Directors of
Certain Agencies and Commissions.
\2\ See section 4(a) of Executive Order 13891.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Discussion of the Interim Final Rule
This IFR creates a new part 51 in title 43 of the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR), which concerns Public Lands and the Department of
the Interior. This rule promulgates the Department's procedural
requirements governing the development, review, and clearance of
guidance documents; the processes for
[[Page 67667]]
the public to petition for withdrawal or modification of a particular
guidance document, including designating the officials to whom
petitions should be directed; and the procedures for review and
approval of significant guidance documents.
The procedures contained in this IFR apply to all guidance
documents, which E.O. 13891 defines as any statement of agency that is
of general applicability and intended to have future effect on the
behavior of regulated parties, that sets forth a policy on a statutory,
regulatory, or technical issues or an interpretation of a statute or
regulation, with certain exceptions. OMB's M-20-02 further clarifies
and provides information for Agencies to consider in determining when a
document is indeed a guidance document, including a functional test for
rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice. This IFR codifies
the Department's existing procedures and implements new procedures
regarding the development, review, and clearance of guidance documents.
These procedures ensure that all guidance documents receive legal
review and, when appropriate, Office of the Secretary review. Before
guidance documents are issued, they must be reviewed to ensure they are
written in plain language and do not impose any substantive legal
requirements above and beyond those imposed by statute, regulation, or
contract. If a guidance document purports to describe, approve, or
recommend specific conduct that extends beyond what is required by
existing law, regulation, or contract, then it must include clear and
prominent language effectively stating that the contents of the
guidance document do not have the force and effect of law and are not
meant to bind the public in any way, and the guidance document is
intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing
requirements under the law, regulation, contract or agency policies.
In recognition of the fact that although guidance documents are not
legally binding, they could nevertheless have a substantial economic
impact on regulated entities that alter their conduct to conform to the
guidance, this IFR directs Bureaus and Offices within the Department to
undertake a benefits and cost assessment of the impact of the guidance
document when appropriate. Further information that describes
identifying and measuring benefits and costs are found in OMB's
Circular A-4 (add footnote). Further Bureaus/Offices of the Department
are to be in compliance with E.O. 13891, Section 4(a)(iii)(C) and (D).
The procedures for the development, review, and clearance of guidance
documents can be found at 43 CFR part 51.
Required Determinations
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 551 et seq.)
Under section 553(b)(3)(B) of the APA, a proposed rule is not
required ``when the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the
finding and a brief statement of reasons therefor in the rules issued)
that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable,
unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.'' There is good cause
to forgo notice and public comment on a proposed rule in this instance
and instead take immediate action because this IFR codifies the
Department's existing procedures and implements new procedures
regarding the development, review, and clearance of guidance documents
as directed by E.O 13891. Additionally, it does not reach any right or
benefit, substantive, or procedural, as an enforceable action against
the United States or the Department. The Department finds good cause in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) to make the IFR effective less than
30 days after the date of publication to allow for swift implementation
of this program. Although this IFR is effective immediately, comments
are solicited from the public on all aspects of the interim final rule.
The Department will consider all public comments received in the
development of a subsequent final rule.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Orders 12866 and 13563)
E.O. 12866 provides that the Office of Management and Budget's
(OMB's) Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs will review all
significant rules. The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has
determined that this rule is not significant.
E.O. 13563 reaffirms the principles of E.O. 12866, calling for
improvements in the nation's regulatory system to promote
predictability, to reduce uncertainty, and to use the best, most
innovative, and least burdensome tools for achieving regulatory
objectives. E.O. 13563 directs agencies to consider regulatory
approaches that reduce burdens and maintain flexibility and freedom of
choice for the public, where these approaches are relevant, feasible,
and consistent with regulatory objectives. This IFR is in compliance
with E.O. 13563 and is intended to promote predictability, to reduce
uncertainty, and to use the best, most innovative, and least burdensome
tools for achieving regulatory objectives.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This IFR will not have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) as it will not directly impact small
entities or impose any regulatory burdens on them.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
In accordance with section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, the Department will assist small
entities in understanding this rule so that they can better evaluate
its effects. If the IFR rule will affect your small business,
organization, or governmental jurisdiction, and you have questions
concerning its provisions, please contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of this rule. Small businesses may
send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce or
otherwise determine compliance with Federal regulations to the Small
Business Administration's Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
A statement containing the information required by the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act (2 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) is not required.
This rule:
(a) Will not impose an unfunded mandate on state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector of more than $100 million per year.
(b) Will not have a significant or unique effect on State, local,
or tribal governments, or the private sector.
Reducing Regulation and Controlling Regulatory Costs (E.O. 13771)
This rule is not an E.O. 13771 regulatory action because this rule
is not significant under E.O. 12866.
Takings (E.O. 12630)
This proposed rule does not affect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630. This
rule is not a Government action capable of interfering with
constitutionally protected property rights. It does not impose any
obligations on the public
[[Page 67668]]
that would result in a taking. A takings implication assessment is not
required.
Federalism (E.O. 13132)
Under the criteria in section 1 of E.O. 13132, this IFR will not
have sufficient federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
federalism summary impact statement because it will not substantially
and directly affect the relationship between the Federal and State
governments. Accordingly, a federalism summary impact statement is not
required.
Civil Justice Reform (E.O.12988)
This IFR complies with the requirements of E.O. 12988.
Specifically, this rule:
(a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) of this E.O. which requires
that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and
be written to minimize litigation; and
(b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) of this E.O. which
requires that all regulations be written in clear language and contain
clear legal standards.
Consultation With Indian Tribes (E.O. 13175)
The Department strives to strengthen its government-to-government
relationship with federally recognized Indian tribes through a
commitment to consultation and recognition of their right to self-
governance and tribal sovereignty. Under the criteria in E.O. 13175 and
Departmental Manual Part 512 Chapters 4 and 5, this IFR will have no
substantial direct effects on federally recognized Indian tribes or
Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (ANCSA) Corporations, and
consultation under the Department's consultation policies is not
required.
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq.
This IFR does not contain any new collections of information that
require approval by OMB under the Paperwork Reduction Act. This IFR
will not impose recordkeeping or reporting requirements on State,
local, or Tribal governments, individuals, businesses, or
organizations.
National Environmental Policy Act
This IFR does not constitute a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. Pursuant to
Departmental Manual 516 DM 2.3A (2), section 1.10 of 516 DM 2, Appendix
1 categorically excludes from the requirement to document an
environmental assessment or impact statement policies, directives,
regulations and guidelines of an administrative, financial, legal,
technical or procedural nature; or the environmental effects of which
are too broad, speculative or conjectural to lend themselves to
meaningful analysis and will be subject to the NEPA process, either
collectively or case-by-case. See also 43 CFR 46.210(i). The Department
has reviewed this rule and determined that this categorical exclusion
applies, and that none of the extraordinary circumstances that would
preclude use of the categorical exclusion are applicable. See 43 CFR
46.215. Therefore, a detailed statement under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required.
Effects on the Energy Supply (E.O. 13211)
This IFR is not a significant energy action under the definition in
E.O. 13211; therefore, a Statement of Energy Effects is not required.
Plain Language
The Department is required by section 1(b)(12) of E.O. 12866 and
Section 3(b)(1)(B) of E.O. 12988 and by the Presidential Memorandum of
June 1, 1998, to write all rules in plain language. This means that
this rule must:
(a) Be logically organized;
(b) Use the active voice to address readers directly;
(c) Use common, everyday words and clear language rather than
jargon;
(d) Be divided into short sections and sentences; and
(e) Use lists and tables wherever possible.
If you feel that we have not met these requirements, please contact
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section of
this preamble.
Authority
The Department publishes this IFR in accordance with the APA as
codified in the text of chapters 5 and 7 of Title 5, United States
Code, that govern procedures for agency rulemaking and adjudication and
provides for judicial review of final agency actions and E.O. 13891.
List of Subjects in 43 CFR Part 51
Administrative practice and procedure, Executive orders.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, 43 CFR part 51 is added
to read as follows:
PART 51--GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS PROCEDURES
Sec.
51.1 General.
51.3 Review and clearance by the Office of the Solicitor.
51.5 Requirements for clearance.
51.7 Public access to effective guidance documents.
51.9 Cost and benefit estimates.
51.11 Approval procedures for guidance documents identified as
``significant.''
51.13 Definition of ``significant guidance document.''
51.15 Designation procedures.
51.17 Notice-and-comment procedures.
51.19 Petitions for guidance.
51.21 Rescinded guidance.
51.23 Exigent circumstances.
51.25 Reports to Congress and the Comptroller General.
51.27 No judicial review or enforceable rights.
Authority: 5 U.S.C. Chapter 5, Subchapter II; Chapter 7, E.O.
13891, 84 FR 55235, 3 CFR, 2019 Comp., p. 371.
Sec. 51.1 General.
(a) This part governs the issuance of Departmental guidance
documents.
(b) Subject to the qualifications and exemptions contained in this
part, the procedures in this part apply to all guidance documents
issued by all Bureaus/Offices of the Department of the Interior (the
Department) after October 26, 2020.
(c) For purposes of this part, the term ``guidance document'' is
any statement of agency policy or interpretation of a statute,
regulation, or technical matter within the jurisdiction of the agency
that is of general applicability and intended to have future effect on
the behavior of regulated parties, that sets forth a policy on a
statutory, regulatory, or technical issues or an interpretation of a
statute or regulation, with certain exceptions. The term is not
confined to formal written documents; guidance may come in a variety of
forms, including (but not limited to) letters, memoranda, circulars,
bulletins, advisories, and may include video, audio, and Web-based
formats. See Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Bulletin 07-02,
``Agency Good Guidance Practices,'' (January 25, 2007) (``OMB Good
Guidance Bulletin'').
(d) This part does not apply to the following documents, which are
not included in the definition of ``guidance document'' for purposes of
this part:
(1) Rules promulgated pursuant to notice and comment under 5 U.S.C.
553, or similar statutory provisions;
(2) Rules exempt from rulemaking requirements under 5 U.S.C.
553(a);
(3) Rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice;
(4) Decisions of agency adjudications under 5 U.S.C. 554 or similar
statutory provisions;
(5) Internal guidance directed to the issuing agency or other
agencies that is
[[Page 67669]]
not intended to have substantial future effect on the behavior of
regulated parties; or
(6) Internal executive branch legal advice or legal advisory
opinions addressed to executive branch officials that are not intended
to have substantial future effect on the behavior of regulated parties.
Sec. 51.3 Review and clearance by the Office of the Solicitor.
All Departmental guidance documents, as defined in Sec. 51.1(c),
require review and clearance in accordance with this part.
(a) Guidance proposed to be issued by a Bureau/Office of the
Department must be reviewed and cleared by the relevant Division of the
Office of the Solicitor. In addition, as provided in paragraph (b) of
this section, some Bureau/Office guidance documents will require review
and clearance by the Immediate Office of the Solicitor.
(b) Guidance proposed to be issued by the Office of the Secretary
must be reviewed and cleared by the Immediate Office of the Solicitor.
Sec. 51.5 Requirements for clearance.
The Department's review and clearance of guidance documents must
ensure that each guidance document proposed to be issued by a Bureau/
Office of the Department satisfies the following requirements:
(a) The guidance document complies with and cites all relevant
statutes and regulations (including any statutory deadlines for agency
action);
(b) The guidance document identifies or includes:
(1) The term ``guidance'' or its functional equivalent;
(2) The issuing Bureau/Office and the date of issuance;
(3) A unique identifier, including, at a minimum, the date of
issuance and title of the guidance document and its Z-Regulatory
Identification Number (Z-RIN), if applicable;
(4) The activity or entities to which the guidance applies;
(5) Citations to applicable statutes and regulations;
(6) A statement noting whether the guidance document intends to
revise or replace any previously issued guidance document and, if so,
sufficient information to identify the previously issued guidance
document; and
(7) A short summary of the subject matter covered in the guidance
document at the top of the document;
(c) The guidance document should not use mandatory language, such
as ``shall,'' ``must,'' ``required,'' or ``requirement,'' unless the
language is describing an established statutory, regulatory, or
contractual requirement or is addressed to Department staff and will
not foreclose the Department's consideration of positions advanced by
affected private parties;
(d) The guidance document is written in plain and understandable
English; and
(e) The guidance document must include a clear and prominent
statement declaring that the contents of the document do not have the
force and effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated
into a contract, and are not meant to bind the public in any way,
except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a contract, and
that the document is intended only to provide clarity to the public
regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.
Sec. 51.7 Public access to effective guidance documents.
Each Bureau/Office that is responsible for issuing guidance
documents must:
(a) Ensure all effective guidance documents, identified by a unique
identifier which includes, at a minimum, the document's title and date
of issuance or revision and its Z-RIN, if applicable, are on the
Department's website in a single, searchable, indexed database, and
available to the public in accordance with the notice titled
``Implementation of Executive Order 13891: Guidance Documents'';
(b) Note on its website that guidance documents lack the force and
effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a
contract;
(c) Maintain and advertise on its website a means for the public to
comment electronically on any guidance documents that are subject to
the notice-and-comment procedures described in Sec. 51.17 and to
submit requests electronically for issuance, reconsideration,
modification, or rescission of guidance documents in accordance with
Sec. 51.21; and
(d) Designate an office or official(s) to receive petitions for
withdrawal or modification of guidance documents and address complaints
from the public that the Bureau/Office is not following the
requirements of OMB's Good Guidance Bulletin or is improperly treating
a guidance document as a binding requirement.
Sec. 51.9 Cost and benefit estimates.
(a) The Bureau/Office must evaluate whether, although not legally
binding, an agency guidance document may result in a substantial
economic impact (e.g., by inducing private parties to alter their
conduct to conform to recommended standards or practices) where
``significant'' as defined by E.O. 12866. E.O. 12866 requires agencies
to estimate the net benefits of regulations. Net benefits are defined
as total benefits minus total costs. When it is determined that a
guidance document will be economically significant, the Bureau/Office
must prepare a Regulatory Impact Analysis and make it publicly
available in the same manner it what would accompany an economically
significant rulemaking.
(b) While it may be difficult to predict with precision the
economic impact of voluntary guidance, the issuing Bureau/Office must,
to the extent practicable, make a estimate the likely economic cost
impact of the guidance document in order to determine whether the
guidance document is economically significant. When a Bureau/Office is
explaining to OMB's Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA)
whether it believes a guidance document is economically significant, it
should, at a minimum, provide the same level of analysis that would be
required for a major determination under the Congressional Review
Act.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See OMB Memorandum M-19-14, Guidance on Compliance with the
Congressional Review Act (April 11, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sec. 51.11 Approval procedures for guidance documents identified as
``significant.''
(a) Guidance documents proposed to be issued by a Bureau/Office
must be submitted (or a summary of it) to the Office of the Executive
Secretariat and Regulatory Affairs (OES). OES will submit these
documents or summaries of them to OIRA for significance determinations.
If OIRA determines that a proposed guidance document is significant,
then the Bureau/Office must obtain a Z-RIN and clearance through the
Data Tracking System (DTS) or successor data management system. Each
proposed guidance document determined to be significant must be
approved by the Secretary before issuance.
(b) As with regulations or rules, including significant regulatory
actions, OES will submit significant guidance documents to OIRA
consistent with the requirements set forth in Sec. 51.13(c). In
addition, OES may determine that it is appropriate to coordinate with
the Office of the Secretary and OIRA in the review of guidance
documents.
(c) Significant guidance documents must be reviewed by OIRA under
E.O. 12866 before issuance and must demonstrate compliance with the
applicable requirements for regulations or rules, including significant
regulatory actions.
[[Page 67670]]
(d) If the guidance document is determined not to be significant as
defined by Sec. 51.13, OES will advise the proposing Bureau/Office to
proceed with issuance of the guidance through its standard clearance
process.
Sec. 51.13 Definition of ``significant guidance document.''
(a) The term ``significant guidance document'' means a guidance
document that may reasonably be anticipated to:
(1) Lead to an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more
or adversely affect in a material way the U.S. economy, a sector of the
U.S. economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities;
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another Federal agency;
(3) Alter materially the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
E.O. 12866, as further amended.
(b) The term ``significant guidance document'' does not include the
categories of documents excluded by Sec. 51.1(d) or any other category
of guidance documents exempted in writing by OIRA in consultation with
OES.
(c) Significant guidance documents must:
(1) Be reviewed by OIRA under E.O. 12866 before issuance;
(2) Be approved on a non-delegable basis by the Bureau/Office head
or by an agency component head appointed by the President, before
issuance; and
(3) Demonstrate compliance with the applicable requirements for
regulations or rules, including significant regulatory actions, set
forth in Executive Orders 12866, 13563, 13609, 13771, 13777, and 13893.
Sec. 51.15 Designation procedures.
(a) The OES may request a Bureau/Office to prepare a designation
request for certain guidance documents. Designation requests must
include the following information:
(1) A summary description of the guidance document; and
(2) The Bureau/Office recommended designation of ``not
significant,'' ``significant,'' or ``economically significant,'' as
well as a justification for that designation.
(b) OES must seek significance determinations from OIRA for
guidance documents in the same manner as for regulatory actions. Prior
to publishing such guidance documents, and with sufficient time to
allow OIRA to review the document in the event that a significance
determination is made, OES will provide OIRA with an opportunity to
review the designation request or the guidance document, if requested,
to determine if it meets the definition of ``significant'' under
Executive Order 13891.
Sec. 51.17 Notice-and-comment procedures.
(a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, all
proposed Department guidance documents determined to be a ``significant
guidance document'' within the meaning of Sec. 51.13 will be subject
to the following informal notice-and-comment procedures prior to
issuance. The issuing Bureau/Office must:
(1) Publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing that a
draft of the proposed guidance document is publicly available;
(2) Post the draft guidance document on its website;
(3) Invite public comment on the draft document for a minimum of 30
days through a Federal Register notice;
(4) All public comments received must be posted and made publicly
available; and
(5) Prepare and post public responses to major concerns raised in
the comments, as appropriate, on its website, and through a Federal
Register notice either before or when the guidance document is
finalized and issued.
(b) The requirements of paragraph (a) of this section will not
apply to any significant guidance document or categories of significant
guidance documents for which OES finds, in consultation with OIRA, the
proposing Bureau/Office, Solicitor, Assistant Secretary, and the
Secretary, that good cause exists such that notice and public procedure
thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest (and incorporates the finding of good cause and a brief
statement of reasons therefor in the guidance issued). Unless OES
advises otherwise in writing, the categories of guidance will be exempt
from the requirements of paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Where appropriate, OES or the proposing Bureau/Office may
recommend to the Secretary that a particular guidance document that is
not a significant guidance document should be subject to the informal
notice-and-comment procedures described in paragraph (a) of this
section.
Sec. 51.19 Petitions for guidance.
Any person may petition the Secretary, through an electronic
submission, to issue new, or withdraw or modify, a particular guidance
document by using the procedures found in 43 CFR part 14 (Sec. Sec.
14.1 through 14.4). The Secretary will delegate the petition to the
appropriate Bureau/Office, which should respond to all requests in a
timely manner but must respond no later than 90 days after receipt of
the request.
Sec. 51.21 Rescinded guidance.
A Bureau/Office may not cite, use, or rely on guidance documents
that are rescinded, except to establish historical facts.
Sec. 51.23 Exigent circumstances.
In emergency situations or when the issuing Bureau/Office is
required by statutory deadline or court order to act more quickly than
normal review procedures allow, the issuing Bureau/Office must
coordinate with OES to notify OIRA as soon as possible and, to the
extent practicable, must comply with the requirements of this part at
the earliest opportunity. Wherever practicable, the issuing Bureau/
Office should schedule its proceedings to permit sufficient time to
comply with the procedures set forth in this part.
Sec. 51.25 Reports to Congress and the Comptroller General.
Unless otherwise determined in writing by OES, it is the policy of
the Department that upon issuing a guidance document determined to be
``significant'' within the meaning of Sec. 51.13, the issuing Bureau/
Office will submit a report to Congress and the Comptroller General in
accordance with the procedures described in 5 U.S.C. 801 (the
``Congressional Review Act'').
Sec. 51.27 No judicial review or enforceable rights.
This part is intended to improve the internal management of the
Department. As such, it is for the use of Department personnel only and
is not intended to, and does not, create, any right or benefit,
substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party
against the United States, its agencies or other entities, its officers
or employees, or any other person.
Dated: September 28, 2020.
Katharine Sinclair MacGregor,
Deputy Secretary, U.S. Department of the Interior.
[FR Doc. 2020-22238 Filed 10-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4334-63-P