Examination and Copying of PBGC Records, 64425-64434 [2020-20018]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Availability of NPRMs
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Recently published rulemaking
documents can also be accessed through
the FAA’s web page at https://
www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/
airspace_amendments/.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office (see the
ADDRESSES section for the address and
phone number) between 9:00 a.m. and
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except federal holidays. An informal
docket may also be examined during
normal business hours at the Northwest
Mountain Regional Office of the Federal
Aviation Administration, Air Traffic
Organization, Western Service Center,
Operations Support Group, 2200 S
216th Street, Des Moines, WA 98198.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Availability and Summary of
Documents for Incorporation by
Reference
listed in this document will be
published subsequently in the Order.
Regulatory Notices and Analyses
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore: (1) Is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
This document proposes to amend
FAA Order 7400.11E, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated July 21, 2020, and effective
September 15, 2020. FAA Order
7400.11E is publicly available as listed
in the ADDRESSES section of this
document. FAA Order 7400.11E lists
Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas,
air traffic service routes, and reporting
points.
Environmental Review
This proposal will be subject to an
environmental analysis in accordance
with FAA Order 1050.1F,
‘‘Environmental Impacts: Policies and
Procedures’’ prior to any FAA final
regulatory action.
The Proposal
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me, the Federal
Aviation Administration proposes to
amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows:
The FAA is proposing an amendment
to Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations
(14 CFR) part 71 by removing the Fresno
Yosemite International Airport Class E3
airspace extending upward from the
surface of the earth. The Clovis
VORTAC was decommissioned and
requires the legal descriptions in FAA
Order 7400.11E be rewritten to
eliminate reference to this navigational
aid. In addition, during review of the
Class E airspace extending upward from
the surface as an extension to the Class
C surface area, it was identified that the
airspace is no longer needed to support
approaches into the airport. This action
would support the operation of
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) under
standard instrument approach and
departure procedures in the National
Airspace System.
Class E airspace designations are
published in paragraph 6003 of FAA
Order 7400.11E, dated July 21, 2020,
and effective September 15, 2020, which
is incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designations
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
1. The authority citation for 14 CFR
part 71 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g), 40103,
40113, 40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR,
1959–1963 Comp., p. 389.
§ 71.1
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of FAA Order 7400.11E,
Airspace Designations and Reporting
Points, dated July 21, 2020, and
effective September 15, 2020, is
amended as follows:
■
6003. Class E Airspace Areas Designated as
an Extension.
The Class E airspace areas listed below
consist of airspace extending upward from
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64425
the surface designated as an extension to a
Class C surface area.
*
*
*
*
*
AWP CA E3 Fresno, CA [Remove]
Fresno Air Terminal, CA
(Lat. 36°46′34″ N, long. 119°43′06″ W)
Clovis VORTAC
(Lat. 36°53′04″ N, long. 119°48′55″ W)
Issued in Seattle, Washington, on October
6, 2020.
Byron Chew,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Western Service Center.
[FR Doc. 2020–22566 Filed 10–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY
CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4001 and 4901
RIN 1212–AB44
Examination and Copying of PBGC
Records
Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The proposed rule would
update and clarify guidance on
examining records kept by the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The
proposed amendments reflect statutory
changes to the Freedom of Information
Act and recent updates to PBGC’s
procedures for record examination.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before December 14, 2020 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Email: reg.comments@pbgc.gov.
Include RIN 1212–AB44 in the subject
line.
• Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory
Affairs Division, Office of the General
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, 1200 K Street NW,
Washington, DC 20005–4026.
All submissions must include the
agency’s name (Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation or PBGC) and the
Regulation Identifier Number for this
rulemaking (RIN 1212–AB44).
Comments received will be posted
without change to PBGC’s website,
https://www.pbgc.gov, including any
personal information provided. Copies
of comments may also be obtained by
writing to Disclosure Division, Office of
the General Counsel, Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
64426
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
NW, Washington, DC 20005–4026, or
calling 202–326–4040 during normal
business hours. (TTY users may call the
Federal Relay Service toll-free at 800–
877–8339 and ask to be connected to
202–326–4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Melissa Rifkin (rifkin.melissa@
pbgc.gov), Attorney, Regulatory Affairs
Division, Office of the General Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street NW, Washington, DC
20005–4026; 202–326–4400, extension
6563. (TTY users may call the Federal
Relay Service toll-free at 800–877–8339
and ask to be connected to 202–326–
4400, extension 6563.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose and Authority
The purpose of this regulatory action
is to update the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation’s (PBGC’s)
regulation on requesting, obtaining, and
examining records to reflect statutory
changes and current agency practice.
Authority for this rule is provided by
section 4002(b)(3) of the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974
and by the Freedom of Information Act,
as amended.
Major Provisions
This proposed rule would:
• Clarify that PBGC’s disclosable
records are generally available in an
electronic, rather than paper, format.
• Describe the procedure to seek
expedited treatment for record requests.
• Clarify the acceptable methods for
submitting record requests.
• Update the time limit to respond to
record requests.
• Clarify the procedures available to a
requester when PBGC extends the time
to respond to a disclosure request or an
appeal.
• Clarify the procedure for
responding to requests that are of
concern to a Federal agency other than
PBGC.
• Update the fees for search and
review time.
• Modify the definitions of certain
categories of requesters.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
Background
The Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation (PBGC) proposes to amend
its regulation on Examination and
Copying of PBGC Records (29 CFR part
4901) (‘‘FOIA regulation’’) to: (1)
Incorporate statutory changes to the
Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C.
552) (‘‘FOIA’’) made by the FOIA
Improvement Act of 2016 (‘‘the 2016
Act’’) and prior statutory amendments;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
(2) reflect PBGC’s current procedures for
processing and responding to FOIA
requests; and (3) update the fees charged
to certain requesters to more accurately
reflect PBGC’s costs in performing the
search and review work that is
necessary to respond to their FOIA
requests. The proposed rule would also
make clarifications and other editorial
changes to 29 CFR part 4901.
PBGC is committed to maintaining
excellent customer service in
responding to FOIA requests. Since
2015, PBGC has received the
Department of Justice’s Office of
Information Policy’s highest score in
each key area for which it recognizes
agencies: (1) Applying a presumption of
openness, (2) having an efficient system
in place for responding to requests, (3)
increasing proactive disclosures, (4)
utilizing technology, and (5) reducing
any backlogs and improving timeliness.1
A 2015 audit by the National Security
Archive, a non-governmental
organization, gave PBGC its highest
rating and found it to be among ‘‘the
best overall [for] . . . proactively
meeting the 21st Century Standard of
posting all or nearly all FOIA releases
online.’’ 2 The proposed changes would
further improve PBGC’s FOIA process
and increase the transparency of its
procedures.
Proposed Amendments
Records Available in an Electronic
Format
Section 2 of the 2016 Act replaced
references to ‘‘public inspection and
copying’’ in the FOIA with ‘‘public
inspection in an electronic format.’’ A
stated goal of the 2016 Act was to
‘‘require federal agencies to make their
disclosable records and documents
available for public inspection in an
electronic format.’’ 3 PBGC’s Disclosure
Division follows this directive and
produces disclosable records in an
electronic format, but in several places
PBGC’s FOIA regulation refers to the
practice of offering paper copies of
documents. PBGC proposes to replace
1 See Department of Justice, Summary of Agency
Chief FOIA Officer Reports for 2015, 2016, 2017,
and 2018. See for 2018, www.justice.gov/OIP/
Reports/2018Summary%26Assessment/
download#2018; for 2017, www.justice.gov/oip/
reports/2017_cfo_summary_and_assessment.pdf/
download; for 2016, www.justice.gov/oip/reports/
2016_cfo_summary_and_assessment/download;
and for 2015, www.justice.gov/oip/2015_cfo_
summary_and_assessment.pdf/download.
2 See Most Agencies Falling Short on Mandate for
Online Records, The National Security Archive
2015 E–FOIA Audit, nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/
NSAEBB505/.
3 Congressional Research Services, Summary of
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016, Public Law 114–
185, June 30, 2016.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the term ‘‘copy’’ in its FOIA regulation
with language conveying that, where
practicable, records covered under the
FOIA are available or will be made
available in an electronic, rather than
paper, format. Also, PBGC proposes to
add in § 4901.2 a definition of the term
‘‘record’’ with a reference to the
statutory definition, which includes
information in an electronic format.
Electronic Reading Room
PBGC used to maintain a reference
room on site where members of the
public could inspect and copy certain
PBGC records without formally
requesting them. Following the directive
of the 2016 Act to make records and
documents available for public
inspection in an electronic format,
PBGC modified its FOIA regulation and
replaced instances of the term
‘‘reference room’’ with ‘‘electronic
reading room,’’ meaning an online and
publicly accessible database of certain
PBGC records.4
PBGC proposes to update § 4901.4(c)
of the FOIA regulation to remove the
requirement that PBGC keep a register
for the purpose of collecting the names
of people who inspect rulemaking
proceedings in the electronic reading
room and the times at which they do so.
This requirement was possible with
PBGC’s on site reference room but is
impractical with its electronic reading
room. It would be unnecessarily
burdensome to require individuals who
inspect rulemaking proceedings in the
electronic reading room to provide their
names.
Submitting a Record Request
PBGC proposes to amend § 4901.11 of
the FOIA regulation to clarify the
procedures for submitting a request for
records. First, PBGC’s Disclosure
Division requires FOIA requests to be in
writing, and the proposed amendment
would codify this requirement. Second,
the proposed amendment would codify
that electronic telecommunication (i.e.,
email, online portal) is an approved
method to submit a FOIA request.
Third, the proposed amendment would
add a statement that a requester may
seek the assistance of a PBGC FOIA
Public Liaison and a description of this
position. PBGC’s Disclosure Division
has designated FOIA Public Liaisons, as
required by FOIA, who will assist
requesters with describing records they
are seeking, understanding the status of
requests, and resolving disputes. PBGC
proposes this addition to § 4901.11 to
highlight the availability of this help.
4 See
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
82 FR 26990 (June 13, 2017).
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
In addition, PBGC proposes to clarify
its procedures applied when a FOIA
request does not sufficiently describe
the records being sought. Section
4901.12(b) of the FOIA regulation states
that PBGC will offer assistance to a
requester who has submitted a deficient
request. The proposed amendment
would add that the requester will be
informed of the availability of assistance
from the FOIA Public Liaison, that
failure to reasonably describe the
records being sought could cause a
delay in responding to the request or a
denial of the request, and that an
amended request must provide
sufficient detail to meet the
requirements of an original request.
Action on Request
Section 552(a)(6)(A)(i) of the FOIA
provides that a Federal agency has 20
working days to make a determination
on a FOIA request. A Senate Report to
the Electronic Freedom of Information
Act Amendments of 1996,5 the law that
increased the required response period
from 10 to 20 days, said, ‘‘Compliance
with the 10-day rule is a practical
impossibility for the majority of
agencies.’’ 6 Therefore, PBGC proposes
to update the time limit for responding
to FOIA requests in § 4901.14(a) of the
FOIA regulation from 10 working days
to 20 working days, not including
extensions. In practice, PBGC already
follows the time limit permitted under
the statute to allow for thorough and
appropriate searches and reviews of
agency records.
Section 552(a)(6) of the FOIA
provides that Federal agencies have a
single opportunity to ask the requester
for additional information and toll the
20-working day response period while
awaiting the requester’s response. This
provision is intended to ‘‘ensure
accuracy in FOIA responses.’’ 7 PBGC’s
Disclosure Division follows the statute
with respect to tolling the response
period, and PBGC proposes to codify
this practice in § 4901.14(a).
Also, PBGC proposes to add to
§ 4901.14(b) a provision that PBGC will
provide records in the format specified
in the request if practicable.
Finally, PBGC proposes to clarify its
procedures for when a requested record
cannot be located. Section 4901.14(d) of
the FOIA regulation states that a request
may be denied if a record is not located
in time to determine whether it may be
disclosed. PBGC proposes to clarify that
when records cannot be located despite
5 Public
Law 104–231.
Rep. 104–272, May 15, 1996.
7 153 Cong. Rec. S15701–04, on the OPEN
Government Act on 2007, Public Law 110–175.
6 S.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
a reasonably calculated search to
uncover all relevant documents, PBGC
will let the requester know there are no
records to provide, rather than deny the
request.
Appeals
Under PBGC’s procedures, a requester
may appeal any adverse determination
by the Disclosure Division. However,
§ 4901.15(a) states only that a requester
may appeal a denial of a request for
disclosure of information. The proposed
amendment to § 4901.15(a) would
clarify that a requester may appeal any
adverse decision by the Disclosure
Division under FOIA, including a denial
of: access to records, expedited
processing, or waiver of fees. It also
would clarify the instructions for
submitting an appeal.
Extensions of Time
As provided for in section 552(a)(6)(B)
of the FOIA and § 4901.16 of the FOIA
regulation, PBGC may extend its time to
respond to a disclosure request or an
appeal when it must collect records
stored offsite, examine a voluminous
amount of records, or consult with
another agency to respond to a FOIA
request. PBGC proposes to add to
§ 4901.16 that when that extension of
time exceeds 10 working days, the
requester will be provided with an
opportunity to seek assistance, modify
the request, or arrange an alternative
time period (with new response due
dates) for processing the original or
modified request. This change is
intended to improve customer service.
Expedited Action on Requests and
Appeals
Section 552(a)(6)(E)(i) of the FOIA
states that Federal agencies must
promulgate regulations to provide
expedited processing of FOIA requests
and appeals where the requester
demonstrates a compelling need and for
other reasons determined by the agency.
PBGC’s Disclosure Division has a
process to request and receive expedited
processing. The proposed regulation
would codify this process. Proposed
new § 4901.17 would allow a requester
to submit a request for expedited action
on a disclosure request or appeal. PBGC
would act on the disclosure request or
appeal as soon as practicable if the
requester demonstrates that: (1) A lack
of expedited action could reasonably be
expected to pose an imminent threat to
the life or physical safety of an
individual or the loss of an individual’s
substantial due process rights, or (2) the
requester is primarily engaged in
disseminating information and the
disclosure request or appeal is urgently
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64427
needed to inform the public about an
actual or alleged Federal Government
activity.
The proposed rule would move the
current § 4901.17 on exhaustion of
administrative remedies to new
§ 4901.18.
Record of Concern to More Than One
Agency
PBGC proposes to modify § 4901.23,
which covers the procedures for a
requested record that is of interest to a
Federal agency other than PBGC.
Currently, PBGC may release such a
record only if it determines that PBGC’s
interest in the record is greater than that
of the other agency. Under the proposed
amendment, PBGC would have greater
discretion over whether to transfer the
request to another agency. If PBGC
receives a request for records that is of
concern to another agency, PBGC would
either consult with the interested
Federal agency about the requested
records before determining whether the
record is disclosable or refer the request
to the interested Federal agency to make
that determination. This change is
intended to eliminate referrals where
the requested record is of concern to the
other agency, but PBGC is nonetheless
able to determine whether it may be
disclosed. Allowing a consultation in
these situations will help to ensure that
certain requests for records are not
unnecessarily delayed.
Charges for Services
PBGC proposes to simplify the
categories of requesters used to
determine if a requester will be charged
fees. Under § 4901.31(b), (1) noncommercial scientific or educational
institutions and (2) the news media are
considered as two separate categories.
Under the proposed amendment, they
would be combined into a single
category, as all requesters that fall
within these parameters are not assessed
fees for responses to their FOIA
requests.
In addition, PBGC proposes to update
the definitions in § 4901.31(b). The
definition of ‘‘commercial use’’ would
state in proposed § 4901.31(b)(1)(ii) that
such use may include litigation work
and that PBGC will determine if a
requester should be in the ‘‘commercial
use’’ category on a case-by-case basis
and inform the requester of its decision.
The definition of ‘‘educational
institution’’ would be modified in
proposed § 4901.31(b)(2)(iii) to allow
PBGC to verify that a request is in
furtherance of scholarly research and
state that PBGC will inform the
requester of its decision. Also, the
definition of ‘‘representative of the news
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
64428
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
media’’ would be updated and clarified
in proposed § 4901.31(b)(2)(iv).
Finally, the proposed rule would
clarify in proposed § 4901.31(e) the
circumstances in which PBGC may fail
to comply with a time limit under
section 552(a)(6) of the FOIA but still
assess fees.
Fee Schedule
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
PBGC proposes to update the fees
charged for search and review time on
its FOIA fee schedule. Under section
552(a)(4)(A)(i) of the FOIA,8 Federal
agencies must conform their FOIA fee
schedules with OMB’s Uniform
Freedom of Information Act Fee
Schedule and Guidelines 9 (OMB
Guidelines). This guidance states,
‘‘Agencies should charge fees that
recoup the full allowable direct costs
they incur.’’ Direct costs, per OMB
Guidelines, include the salary rate,
meaning basic rate of pay plus 16
percent, intended to cover benefits,10 of
the employee making the search.
Agencies may establish an average rate
for the range of grades typically
involved if ‘‘a homogeneous class of
personnel is used exclusively (e.g., all
administrative/clerical, or all
professional/executive).’’
PBGC’s fees are too low to comport
with the requirement to fully recoup
direct costs, per OMB Guidelines and 5
U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i). PBGC currently
charges $1.75 per quarter hour ($7.00
per hour) for search and review work
performed by custodial or clerical
personnel and $4.00 per quarter hour
($16.00 per hour) for search and review
work performed by supervisory and
professional personnel. These rates were
set in 1987 11 and have not been raised
since. PBGC’s current fees are well
below the salary rates of the PBGC
employees working on FOIA requests.
PBGC personnel who typically
conduct search and review work are a
homogeneous class of professional
employees. These employees generally
are at the grade level of GS–12 or higher.
Accordingly, PBGC proposes to set a
single fee for search and review work
performed by professional personnel at
$54.00 per hour (approximately basic
8 ‘‘[E]ach agency shall promulgate regulations
. . . specifying the schedule of fees applicable to
the processing of requests . . . Such schedule shall
conform to the guidelines which shall be
promulgated, pursuant to notice and receipt of
public comment, by the Director of the Office of
Management and Budget and which shall provide
for a uniform schedule of fees for all agencies.’’
9 52 FR 10012 (March 27, 1987).
10 See id; see also Department of Justice, Office
of Information Policy’s Template for Agency FOIA
Regulations.
11 See 52 FR 30662 (August 17, 1987).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
pay plus 16 percent 12 for a GS–12, step
5 employee in Washington, DC). The
rate is within the range of fees charged
by other agencies for search and review
work by professional personnel.
The proposed change to PBGC’s fee
schedule is unlikely to increase fees to
individual plan participants or
beneficiaries requesting their own
records. PBGC considers most such
requests to be covered wholly under the
Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a,
which allows fees only for duplication.
Any components of these requests that
are not covered under the Privacy Act
likely require no more than two hours
of search time, which, as ‘‘other
requesters,’’ individual plan
participants requesting their own
records are granted at no charge. Also,
PBGC will not earn any additional funds
from this change, as FOIA fees are paid
to the U.S. Treasury, rather than to the
agency responding to the request.
In addition, PBGC proposes to
streamline and simplify its methods of
calculating certain fees under FOIA.
Section 4901.32(a)(2) of the FOIA
regulation states that PBGC’s
transportation costs necessary for
retrieving offsite records will be charged
to a requester. Under the proposed
amendment, PBGC would charge these
costs in accordance with the
Transactional Billing Rate Schedule
established by the National Archives
and Records Administration.
Finally, § 4901.32(a)(3), which
establishes a different system of charges
for searches of computerized records,
would be deleted, and the outmoded
limits on copied documents in
§ 4901.32(b)(3) and references to PBGC’s
provision of a manual copying machine
in § 4901.32(b)(4) would be deleted.
Payment of Fees
PBGC proposes changing the list in
§ 4901.33 of approved methods to
submit payment of FOIA fees to check,
money order or other PBGC permitted
means. This change will allow PBGC to
employ new technologies for submitting
FOIA fee payments as they are
developed.
Waiver or Reduction of Charges
Section 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) of the FOIA
describes the conditions necessary to
waive FOIA fees.13 Because inability to
pay is not described in this provision of
12 The 16 percent accounts for benefits, per OMB
Guidelines.
13 The conditions under 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) of the
FOIA are, ‘‘if disclosure of the information is in the
public interest because it is likely to contribute
significantly to public understanding of the
operations or activities of the government and is not
primarily in the commercial interest of the
requester.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the statute, PBGC proposes to delete the
language in § 4901.34(b) of the FOIA
regulation, which provides that the
Disclosure Officer may waive or reduce
fees based on the requester’s inability to
pay. The proposed rule would instead
adhere to the statutory language about
when fees may be waived. The proposed
rule would also provide that PBGC will
inform the requester in writing that a fee
waiver request was denied and why.
This proposed amendment is intended
to increase accuracy and transparency
about when fees may be waived.
Compliance With Rulemaking
Guidelines
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771
The Office of Management and Budget
has determined that this rulemaking is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866. This rule
updates PBGC’s FOIA regulation to
comport with amendments to 5 U.S.C.
552 and PBGC’s procedures.
Accordingly, this proposed rule is
exempt from Executive Order 13771,
and OMB has not reviewed the
proposed rule under Executive Order
12866.
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
if regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety effects, distributive impacts,
and equity).
Although this is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866, PBGC has examined the
economic implications of this proposed
rule and has concluded that there will
be no significant economic impact as a
result of the proposed amendments to
PBGC’s regulation. Most of the proposed
amendments merely clarify existing
PBGC practices or modify the regulation
to meet statutory requirements. The
only additional costs to the public come
from the update to the fees for search
and review time under § 4901.32 to
bring the fee schedule in line with
current costs. Under the FOIA
regulation, PBGC collects annually less
than $3,000 in fees for responding to
FOIA requests. Under the proposed rule,
PBGC anticipates that it will collect
between $6,500 and $10,000 in fees
annually. As such, the increased fees
under § 4901.32 will not have a
significant economic impact on the
public.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563
requires agencies to rethink existing
regulations by periodically reviewing
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
their regulatory program for rules that
‘‘may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively
burdensome.’’ These rules should be
modified, streamlined, expanded, or
repealed as appropriate. PBGC has
identified clarifications, updates, and
improvements to this regulation
consistent with the principles for review
under Executive Order 13563. PBGC
believes that the proposed changes will
provide clearer guidance to the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act 14
imposes certain requirements with
respect to rules that are subject to the
notice-and-comment requirements of
section 553(b) of the Administrative
Procedure Act and that are likely to
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Unless an agency determines that a
proposed rule is not likely to have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities,
section 603 of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act requires that the agency present an
initial regulatory flexibility analysis at
the time of the publication of the
proposed rule describing the impact of
the rule on small entities and seek
public comment on such impact. Small
entities include small businesses,
organizations, and governmental
jurisdictions.
Small Entities
For purposes of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this proposed rule, PBGC
considers a small entity to be a plan
with fewer than 100 participants. This
is substantially the same criterion PBGC
uses in other regulations 15 and is
consistent with certain requirements in
title I of ERISA 16 and the Internal
Revenue Code (Code),17 as well as the
definition of a small entity that the
Department of Labor has used for
purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.18
Thus, PBGC believes that assessing
the impact of the final rule on small
plans is an appropriate substitute for
evaluating the effect on small entities.
14 5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.
e.g., special rules for small plans under
part 4007 (Payment of premiums).
16 See, e.g., ERISA section 104(a)(2), which
permits the Secretary of Labor to prescribe
simplified annual reports for pension plans that
cover few than 100 participants.
17 See, e.g., Code section 430(g)(2)(B), which
permits plans with 100 or fewer participants to use
valuation dates other than the first day of the plan
year.
18 See, e.g., DOL’s final rule on Prohibited
Transaction Exemption Procedures, 76 FR 66,644
(Oct. 27, 2011).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
15 See,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
The definition of small entity
considered appropriate for this purpose
differs, however, from a definition of
small business based on size standards
promulgated by the Small Business
Administration 19 under the Small
Business Act. Therefore, PBGC requests
comments on the appropriateness of the
size standard used in evaluating the
impact of the amendments in this
proposed rule on small entities.
Based on its definition of small entity,
PBGC certifies under section 605(b) of
the Regulatory Flexibility Act that the
amendments in this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. Most of the amendments clarify
existing PBGC practices and will have a
neutral cost impact. The amendment to
PBGC’s search and review fees is
consistent with OMB Guidelines.
Accordingly, as provided in section 605
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act,
sections 603 and 604 do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain a
collection-of-information requirement
subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA).
64429
PART 4901—DISCLOSURE AND
PUBLIC INSPECTION OF PENSION
BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
RECORDS
3. The authority citation for part 4901
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 29 U.S.C.
1302(b)(3), E.O. 12600, 52 FR 23781, 3 CFR,
1987 Comp., p. 235.
4. Revise the heading of part 4901 to
read as set forth above.
■ 5. Revise § 4901.1 to read as follows:
■
§ 4901.1
Purpose and scope.
This part contains PBGC’s general
rules implementing the Freedom of
Information Act. This part sets forth
generally the categories of records
accessible to the public, types of records
subject to prohibitions or restrictions on
disclosure, and procedures whereby
members of the public may access and
inspect PBGC records.
■ 6. Amend § 4901.2 by removing
‘‘party,’’ from the first sentence, and
adding in alphabetical order a definition
for ‘‘Record’’ to read as follows:
§ 4901.2
Definitions.
*
List of Subjects
*
*
*
*
Record has the meaning attributed to
it by section 552(f)(2) of FOIA.
*
*
*
*
*
29 CFR Part 4001
§ 4901.3
[Amended]
7. Amend § 4901.3 by removing ‘‘The
PBGC’’ and adding in its place ‘‘PBGC’’,
and removing ‘‘website’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘website’’.
■ 8. Amend § 4901.4 by:
■ a. Removing ‘‘The PBGC shall’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘PBGC will’’ in the
introductory text;
■ b. Removing ‘‘Copies of Federal
Register documents published by the
PBGC, and copies of Federal’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Federal Register
documents published by PBGC, and
Federal’’ in paragraph (a);
■ c. Removing ‘‘Copies of
informational’’ and adding in its place
‘‘Informational’’ in paragraph (b);
■ d. Revising paragraphs (c) and (d); and
■ e. Removing ‘‘paragraph (a)(2)’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘section 552(a)(2)’’
in paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
■
Business and industry, Organization
and functions (Government agencies),
Pension insurance, Pensions, Small
businesses.
29 CFR Part 4901
Freedom of information.
In consideration of the foregoing,
PBGC proposes to amend 29 CFR parts
4001 and 4901 as follows.
PART 4001—TERMINOLOGY
1. The authority citation for part 4001
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301, 1302(b)(3).
2. Amend § 4001.2 by revising the
definition of ‘‘Disclosure officer’’ to read
as follows:
■
§ 4001.2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
Disclosure Officer means the official
designated as Disclosure Officer in the
Office of the General Counsel, PBGC.
*
*
*
*
*
19 See,
PO 00000
13 CFR 121.201.
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 4901.4 Information maintained in
electronic reading room.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Rulemaking proceedings. All
papers and documents made a part of
the official record in administrative
proceedings conducted by PBGC in
connection with the issuance,
amendment, or revocation of rules and
regulations or determinations having
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
64430
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
general applicability or legal effect with
respect to members of the public or a
class thereof;
(d) Other agency proceedings,
policies, staff manuals and instructions,
and records. Except to the extent that
deletion of identifying details is
required to prevent a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy (in which case PBGC will
explain in writing the justification for
the deletion)—
(1) Adjudication proceedings. Final
opinions, orders, and (except to the
extent that an exemption provided by
FOIA must be asserted in the public
interest to prevent a clearly
unwarranted invasion of personal
privacy or violation of law or to ensure
the proper discharge of the functions of
PBGC) other papers and documents
made a part of the official record in
adjudication proceedings conducted by
PBGC;
(2) Policy statements and
interpretations. Statements of policy
and interpretations affecting a member
of the public which have been adopted
by PBGC and which have not been
published in the Federal Register;
(3) Staff manuals and instructions.
Administrative staff manuals and
instructions to staff issued by PBGC that
affect any member of the public;
(4) Frequently requested records.
Records that have been released under
section 552(a)(3) of FOIA and have been
the subject of three or more disclosure
requests; and
(5) Other records. Records that have
been released under section 552(a)(3) of
FOIA and that PBGC determines,
because of the nature of the records’
subject matter, have become or are
likely to become the subject of
subsequent disclosure requests for
substantially the same records; and
*
*
*
*
*
■ 9. Revise § 4901.5 to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4901.5
Disclosure of other information.
(a) In general. Upon the request of any
person submitted in accordance with
subpart B of this part, the Disclosure
Officer will make any document (or
portion thereof) from the records of
PBGC in the custody of any official of
PBGC available for inspection unless
PBGC reasonably foresees that
disclosure would harm an interest
protected by an exemption under the
provisions of section 552(b) of FOIA and
subpart C of this part or disclosure is
otherwise prohibited by law. The
procedures in subpart B of this part
must be used for records that are not
made available in PBGC’s electronic
reading room under § 4901.4 and may
be used for records that are available in
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
the electronic reading room. Records are
not records of PBGC and are not
required to be furnished under FOIA, if
they could only be produced by
manipulation of existing information
(such as computer analyses of existing
data), thus creating information not
previously in existence.
(b) Discretionary disclosure. Unless
prohibited from disclosure by
§ 4901.21(a), the Disclosure Officer may
make any document (or portion thereof)
from the records of PBGC available for
inspection if the Disclosure Officer
determines that disclosure furthers the
public interest and does not impede the
discharge of any of the functions of
PBGC.
■ 10. Revise § 4901.6 to read as follows:
c. Removing ‘‘Requests calling’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Disclosure requests
calling’’; removing ‘‘paragraph (a)(3)’’
and adding in its place ‘‘section
552(a)(3)’’; removing ‘‘the PBGC’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘PBGC’’; and
removing ‘‘disclosure officer shall’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Disclosure Officer
will’’ in paragraph (c).
The revision reads as follows:
■
§ 4901.12 Description of information
requested.
*
*
*
*
(b) Deficient descriptions. (1) If the
description is insufficient to enable a
professional employee familiar with the
subject area of the disclosure request to
locate the record with a reasonable
amount of effort, the Disclosure Officer
§ 4901.6 Filing rules; computation of time.
will notify the requester and, to the
extent possible, indicate the additional
(a) Place, method, and date of filing.
information required. PBGC will make
(1) For rules about where to file a
every reasonable effort to assist a
submission under this part with PBGC,
requester in the identification and
see § 4000.4 of this chapter.
location of the record or records sought.
(2) For rules about permissible
PBGC will not withhold records merely
methods of filing with PBGC under this
because of difficulty in finding them.
part, see § 4000.3 of this chapter.
(2) A requester who is attempting to
(3) For rules about the date that a
modify or reformulate a disclosure
submission under this part was filed
request may discuss the request with a
with PBGC, see subpart C of part 4000
FOIA Public Liaison, who is available to
of this chapter.
assist the requester in reasonably
(b) Computation of time. For rules
describing the records sought. If the
about any time period under this part,
requester fails to reasonably describe the
see subpart D of part 4000 of this
records sought, PBGC’s response to the
chapter.
request may be delayed or denied.
■ 11. Revise § 4901.11 to read as
(3) Any amended disclosure request
follows:
must meet the requirements for a
§ 4901.11 Submission of requests for
request under paragraph (a) of this
access to records.
section.
(a) In general. A request to inspect any *
*
*
*
*
record subject to this subpart must be
■ 13. Revise § 4901.13 to read as
submitted in writing to the Disclosure
follows:
Officer, Pension Benefit Guaranty
§ 4901.13 Receipt by agency of request.
Corporation, by mail, in-person
delivery, or electronic
The Disclosure Officer will note the
telecommunication in accordance with
date and time of receipt on each
the FOIA instructions on PBGC’s
disclosure request for access to records.
website, www.pbgc.gov. To facilitate
A disclosure request is deemed received
processing, ‘‘FOIA request’’ should
and the period within which PBGC acts
appear prominently on the request.
on the request, as set forth in § 4901.14,
(b) Assistance with requests. A person begins on the next working day
who intends to submit or has submitted following receipt, except that a
a request to inspect any record subject
disclosure request is deemed received
to this subpart may at any time seek
only if and when PBGC receives all of
assistance from a FOIA Public Liaison
the following:
listed on PBGC’s website,
(a) A sufficient description under
www.pbgc.gov. PBGC’s FOIA Public
§ 4901.12;
(b) Payment or assurance of payment
Liaisons are responsible for assisting in
if required under § 4901.33(b); and
reducing delays, increasing
(c) The requester’s consent to pay
transparency and understanding of the
substantial search, review, and/or
status of requests, and assisting in the
duplication charges under subpart D of
resolution of disputes.
this part if PBGC determines that such
■ 12. Amend § 4901.12 by:
charges may be substantial and so
■ a. Removing ‘‘Each request’’ and
notifies the requester. Consent must be
adding in its place ‘‘Each disclosure
in the form of a statement that charges
request’’ in paragraph (a);
under subpart D of this part will be
■ b. Revising paragraph (b); and
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
*
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
acceptable either in any amount or up
to a specified amount. To avoid possible
delay, a requester may include such a
statement in an initial disclosure
request.
■ 14. Revise § 4901.14 to read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4901.14
Action on request.
(a) Time for action. Promptly and in
any event within 20 working days after
receipt of a disclosure request (subject
to extension under § 4901.16), the
Disclosure Officer will take action with
respect to each requested item (or
portion of an item) under either
paragraph (b), (c), or (d) of this section.
Following receipt, PBGC may ask the
requester for information once and toll
the 20-day period until PBGC receives
such information.
(b) Request granted. If the Disclosure
Officer determines that the disclosure
request will be granted, PBGC will so
advise the requester and will promptly
make the records available to the
requester. PBGC will accommodate any
specification of the preferred form or
format for the sought record as stated in
the request, if the record is readily
reproducible in the preferred form or
format.
(c) Request denied. If the Disclosure
Officer determines that the disclosure
request will be denied, PBGC will so
advise the requester in writing with a
brief statement of the reasons for the
denial, including, if applicable, a
reference to the specific exemption(s)
authorizing the denial and an
explanation of how each such
exemption applies to the matter
withheld.
(d) Records not located. If the
Disclosure Officer determines that,
despite a reasonably calculated search
to uncover all relevant documents, the
requested records could not be located,
PBGC will issue a ‘‘no-records’’
response, and so advise the requester in
writing.
(e) Information for requester. Written
responses issued under paragraph (c) or
(d) of this section will include the name
and title of the person(s) responsible for
the denial, outline the appeal procedure
available, and notify the requester of the
right to seek dispute resolution services
from a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the
Office of Government Information
Services.
■ 15. Amend § 4901.15 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a) through (c);
and
■ b. Removing ‘‘shall’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘will’’; and removing ‘‘the PBGC’s
public reference’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘PBGC’s electronic reading’’ in
paragraph (d).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
The revisions read as follows:
§ 4901.15
Appeals from denial of requests.
(a) Submittal of appeals. A requester
may appeal any adverse determination
by the Disclosure Officer of a request
under FOIA, including a denial of a
request for access to records, expedited
action, or fee waiver. The requester may
file a written appeal within 90 days
from the date of the denial or, in the
case of a partial denial, 90 days from the
date the requester receives the disclosed
material. The appeal must include the
grounds for appeal and any supporting
statements or arguments. The requester
must address the appeal to the General
Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation, and must submit the
appeal by mail, in-person delivery, or
electronic telecommunication in
accordance with the FOIA instructions
on PBGC’s website, www.pbgc.gov. To
facilitate processing, the words ‘‘FOIA
appeal’’ should appear prominently on
the appeal.
(b) Receipt and consideration of
appeal. The General Counsel will note
the date and time of receipt on each
appeal and notify the requester thereof.
Within 20 working days after receipt of
an appeal (subject to extension under
§ 4901.16), the General Counsel will
issue a decision on the appeal.
(1) The General Counsel will
determine de novo whether the denial
of disclosure was in accordance with
FOIA and this part.
(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the
court, the General Counsel may act on
an appeal notwithstanding the
pendency of an action for judicial relief
in the same matter and, if no appeal has
been filed, may treat the pending action
as the filing of an appeal.
(c) Decision on appeal. As to each
item (or portion of an item) whose
nondisclosure is appealed, the General
Counsel will either—
(1) Grant the appeal and so advise the
requester in writing, in which case the
records with respect to which the
appeal is granted will promptly be made
available to the requester; or
(2) Deny the appeal and so advise the
requester in writing with a brief
statement of the reasons for the denial,
including a reference to the specific
exemption(s) authorizing the denial, an
explanation of how each such
exemption applies to the matter
withheld, and notice of the provisions
for judicial review in section 552(a)(4)
of FOIA. The General Counsel’s
decision will be the final action of PBGC
with respect to the request.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 16. Revise § 4901.16 to read as
follows:
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
§ 4901.16
64431
Extensions of time.
In unusual circumstances (as
described in section 552(a)(6)(B) of
FOIA), the time to respond to a
disclosure request under § 4901.14(a) or
an appeal under § 4901.15(b) may be
extended as reasonably necessary to
process the request or appeal. The
Disclosure Officer will notify the
requester in writing within the original
time period of the unusual
circumstances and the date when a
response is expected to be sent. When
the extension for a disclosure request
exceeds 10 working days, the notice will
provide the requester with an
opportunity to modify the disclosure
request or arrange an alternative time
period for processing the original or
modified request. This notice will also
alert the requester of the availability of
a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison for
assistance and the Office of Government
Information Services for dispute
resolution services. The maximum
extension for responding to an appeal is
10 working days minus the amount of
any extension on the request to which
the appeal relates.
■ 17. Revise § 4901.17 to read as
follows:
§ 4901.17 Expedited action on requests
and appeals.
(a) In general. Upon a request
submitted in accordance with paragraph
(b) of this section, PBGC will expedite
a disclosure request under § 4901.11 or
an appeal under § 4901.15 if PBGC
determines that the requester has
demonstrated one of the following:
(1) The disclosure request or appeal
involves circumstances in which the
lack of expedited action could
reasonably be expected to pose an
imminent threat to the life or physical
safety of an individual or the loss of an
individual’s substantial due process
rights.
(2) The requester is primarily engaged
in disseminating information and the
disclosure request or appeal is urgently
needed to inform the public about an
actual or alleged Federal Government
activity.
(b) Timing and method of request. A
request for PBGC to expedite a
disclosure request or an appeal may be
made at any time and must be made by
mail, in-person delivery, or electronic
telecommunication in accordance with
the FOIA instructions on PBGC’s
website, www.pbgc.gov.
(c) Action on request. (1) PBGC will
notify the requester within 10 calendar
days of receipt of a request for expedited
action whether PBGC will expedite a
disclosure request or an appeal.
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
64432
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
(2) Request granted. If PBGC
determines that the request for
expedited action will be granted, PBGC
will take action on the disclosure
request or the appeal as soon as
practicable.
(3) Request denied. If PBGC
determines that the request for
expedited action will be denied, PBGC
will so advise the requester in writing
with a brief statement of the reasons for
the denial. The writing will also include
the name and title or position of the
person(s) responsible for the denial,
outline the appeal procedure available,
and notify the requester of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from a
PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office
of Government Information Services.
PBGC will act on any appeal of that
decision expeditiously.
■ 18. Add § 4901.18 to read as follows:
§ 4901.18 Exhaustion of administrative
remedies.
If the Disclosure Officer fails to make
a determination to grant or deny access
to requested records, or the General
Counsel does not make a decision on
appeal from a denial of access to PBGC
records, within the time prescribed
(including any extension) for making
such determination or decision, the
requester’s administrative remedies will
be deemed exhausted and the requester
may apply for judicial relief under
FOIA. However, since a court may allow
PBGC additional time to act as provided
in FOIA, processing of the disclosure
request or appeal will continue and
PBGC will so advise the requester.
■ 19. Revise § 4901.21 to read as
follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4901.21
Restrictions in general.
(a) Records not disclosable. PBGC will
not disclose records to the extent
prohibited by section 552(b)(1) or (3) of
FOIA, sections 4010 and 4043 of ERISA,
or other statutes.
(b) Records disclosure of which may
be refused. Unless prohibited from
disclosure by paragraph (a) of this
section, PBGC need not but may, as
provided in § 4901.5(b), disclose records
exempted from FOIA, which include as
of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL
RULE] records under:
(1) Section 552(b)(2) of FOIA, dealing
in general with internal agency
personnel rules and practices;
(2) Section 552(b)(4) of FOIA, dealing
in general with trade secrets and
commercial and financial information;
(3) Section 552(b)(5) of FOIA, dealing
in general with inter-agency and intraagency memoranda and letters;
(4) Section 552(b)(6) of FOIA, dealing
in general with personnel, medical, and
similar files;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
(5) Section 552(b)(7) of FOIA, dealing
in general with records or information
compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(6) Section 552(b)(8) of FOIA, dealing
in general with reports on financial
institutions; or
(7) Section 552(b)(9) of FOIA, dealing
in general with information about wells.
§ 4901.22
[Amended]
20. Amend § 4901.22 by removing
‘‘shall not’’ and adding in its place ‘‘will
not’’ in the first sentence, and removing
‘‘shall be’’ and adding in its place ‘‘will
be’’ in the second sentence.
■ 21. Revise § 4901.23 to read as
follows:
■
§ 4901.23 Record of concern to agency
other than PBGC.
When reviewing a record in response
to a disclosure request, PBGC will
determine whether another agency is
better able to determine whether the
record is exempt from disclosure under
FOIA. As to any such record, PBGC will
proceed in one of the following ways:
(a) Consultation with another agency.
When the record contains information
of interest to another agency, PBGC will
make a release determination only if its
interest in the record is the primary
interest and only after PBGC consults
with that agency.
(b) Referral to another agency. (1)
When an agency other than PBGC has
primary interest in the record, then
PBGC will refer the responsibility for
responding to the disclosure request
regarding that record to that agency.
(2) Whenever PBGC refers any part of
the responsibility for responding to a
disclosure request to another agency,
PBGC will document the referral,
maintain a copy of the record that it
refers, and notify the requester of the
referral, informing the requester of the
name(s) of the agency to which the
record was referred, including that
agency’s FOIA office.
■ 22. Amend § 4901.24 by:
■ a. Revising the section heading and
paragraph (a);
■ b. Removing ‘‘submitter shall’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘submitter must’’;
removing ‘‘paragraph shall’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘paragraph will’’; and
removing ‘‘therefor’’ in paragraph (b);
■ c. Removing ‘‘disclosure officer’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Disclosure Officer’’;
removing ‘‘Counsel shall’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘Counsel will’’; and removing
‘‘requester shall’’ and adding in its place
‘‘requester will’’ in paragraph (c);
■ d. Removing ‘‘disclosure should’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘disclosure must’’;
removing ‘‘subsection (b)’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘section 552(b)’’; removing
‘‘paragraph (b)(4) of FOIA’’ and adding
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
in its place ‘‘section 552(b)(4)’’;
removing ‘‘asserted should’’ and adding
in its place ‘‘asserted must’’; and
removing ‘‘shall’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘will’’ in paragraph (d);
■ e. Revising paragraph (e); and
■ f. Removing ‘‘disclosure officer’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Disclosure Officer’’;
and removing ‘‘Counsel shall’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Counsel will’’ in
paragraph (f).
The revisions read as follows:
§ 4901.24 Special rules for trade secrets
and confidential commercial or financial
information submitted to PBGC.
(a) Application. To the extent
permitted by law, this section applies to
a request for disclosure of a record that
contains information that has been
designated by the submitter in good
faith in accordance with paragraph (b)
of this section or a record that PBGC has
reason to believe contains such
information, unless one of the following
applies:
(1) Access to the information is
denied.
(2) The information has been
published or officially made available to
the public.
(3) Disclosure of the information is
required by law other than FOIA.
(4) The designation under paragraph
(b) of this section appears obviously
frivolous, except that in such a case
PBGC will notify the submitter in
writing of a determination to disclose
the information within a reasonable
time before the disclosure date (which
shall be specified in the notice).
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Notification to submitter of
decision to disclose. If the Disclosure
Officer or (where disclosure is in
response to an appeal) the General
Counsel decides to disclose information
subject to this section despite the
submitter’s objections, the Disclosure
Officer (or General Counsel) will give
the submitter written notice, explaining
briefly why the information is to be
disclosed despite those objections,
describing the information to be
disclosed, and specifying the date when
the information will be disclosed to the
requester. The notification will, to the
extent permitted by law, be provided a
reasonable number of days before the
disclosure date so specified, and a copy
will be provided to the requester.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 23. Amend § 4901.31 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
■ b. Removing ‘‘the PBGC reasonably’’
and adding in its place ‘‘PBGC
reasonably’’; removing ‘‘the PBGC will’’
and adding in its place ‘‘PBGC will’’;
and removing ‘‘will the PBGC’’ and
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
adding in its place ‘‘will PBGC’’ in
paragraph (c); and
■ c. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4901.31
Charges for services.
(a) In general. Pursuant to the
provisions of section 552 of FOIA, as
amended, PBGC will assess charges to
cover the direct costs of searching for,
reviewing, and/or duplicating records
requested under FOIA, except where the
charges are limited or waived under
paragraph (b) or (d) of this section,
according to the fee schedule in
§ 4901.32. No charge will be assessed if
the costs of routine collection and
processing of the fee would be equal to
or greater than the fee itself. Except as
provided in paragraph (e) of this
section, no charge for searching (or in
the case of a requester described under
section 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II) of FOIA, for
duplication) will be assessed if PBGC
has failed to comply with any time limit
under section 552(a)(6) of FOIA.
(1) Direct costs means those
expenditures which PBGC actually
incurs in searching for and duplicating
(and in the case of commercial
requesters, reviewing) documents to
respond to a disclosure request under
FOIA and this part. Not included in
direct costs are overhead expenses such
as costs of space, and heating or lighting
the facility in which the records are
stored.
(2) Search means all time spent
looking for material that is responsive to
a disclosure request under FOIA and
this part, including page-by-page or
line-by-line identification of materials
within a document, if required.
Searches may be done manually or by
computer using existing programming.
Search is distinguishable from ‘‘review’’
which is defined in paragraph (a)(3) of
this section.
(3) Review means the process of
examining documents located in
response to a disclosure request under
FOIA and this part to determine
whether any portion of any document
located is permitted or required to be
withheld. It also includes processing
any documents for disclosure, e.g.,
doing all that is necessary to redact
them and otherwise prepare them for
release. Review does not include time
spent resolving general legal or policy
issues regarding the application of
exemptions.
(4) Duplication means the process of
making a copy of a document necessary
to respond to a disclosure request under
FOIA and this part, in a form that is
reasonably usable by the requester.
Copies can take the form of paper copy,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
audio-visual materials, or electronic
records, among others.
(b) Categories of requesters. For
purposes of assessing fees, requesters
who seek access to records under FOIA
and this part are divided into three
categories: Commercial use requesters,
non-commercial scientific or
educational institutions or news media
requesters, and all other requesters.
PBGC will determine the category of a
requester and charge fees according to
the following rules.
(1) Commercial use requesters. (i)
When records are requested for
commercial use, PBGC will assess
charges, as provided in this subpart, for
the full direct costs of searching for,
reviewing for release, and duplicating
the records sought. Fees for search and
review may be charged even if the
record searched for is not found or if,
after it is found, it is determined that the
request to inspect it may be denied
under section 552(b) of FOIA and this
part.
(ii) A ‘‘commercial use’’ request is a
request that asks for information for a
use or a purpose that furthers a
commercial, trade, or profit interest,
which can include furthering those
interests through litigation. PBGC’s
decision to place a requester in the
commercial use category will be made
on a case-by-case basis dependent upon
on the requester’s intended use of the
information. PBGC will notify
requesters of their placement in this
category.
(2) Non-commercial scientific or
educational institutions, or news media
requesters. (i) When records are
requested by a non-commercial
scientific or educational institution or a
news media requestor, PBGC will assess
charges, as provided in this subpart, for
the full direct cost of duplication only,
excluding charges for the first 100
pages.
(ii) A non-commercial scientific
institution is an institution that is not
operated for a ‘‘commercial use’’ as that
term is defined in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of
this section, and which is operated
solely for the purpose of conducting
scientific research the results of which
are not intended to promote any
particular product or industry.
(iii) An educational institution is any
school that operates a program of
scholarly research. A requester in this
fee category must show that the request
is made in connection with his or her
role at the educational institution. PBGC
may seek verification from the requester
that the request is in furtherance of
scholarly research and PBGC will advise
requesters of their placement in this
category.
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64433
(iv)(A) A representative of the news
media is any person or entity that
gathers information of potential interest
to a segment of the public, uses editorial
skills to turn the raw materials into a
distinct work, and distributes that work
to an audience. The term news means
information that is about current events
or that would be of current interest to
the public. Examples of news media
entities include television or radio
stations broadcasting to the public at
large, and publishers of periodicals that
disseminate ‘‘news’’ and make their
products available through a variety of
means to the general public, including
news organizations that disseminate
solely on the internet. These examples
are not intended to be all-inclusive. A
‘‘freelance’’ journalist who demonstrates
a solid basis for expecting publication
through a news media entity will be
considered as a representative of the
news media.
(B) To be eligible for inclusion in this
category, the request must not be made
for a commercial use. A request for
records supporting the news
dissemination function of the requester
who is a representative of the news
media will not be considered to be a
request that is for a commercial use.
(3) All other requesters. When records
are requested by requesters who do not
fit into any of the categories in
paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of this section,
PBGC will assess charges, as provided
in this subpart, for the full direct cost of
searching for and duplicating the
records sought, with the exceptions that
there will be no charge for the first 100
pages of duplication and the first two
hours of search time. Notwithstanding
the preceding sentence, there will be no
charge for search time in the event of
requests under the Privacy Act of 1974
from subjects of records filed in PBGC’s
systems of records for the disclosure of
records about themselves. Search fees,
where applicable, may be charged even
if the record sought is not found.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Waiver or reduction of charges.
Circumstances under which any fee
listed in § 4901.32 may be waived or
reduced are set forth in § 4901.34.
(e) Unusual or exceptional
circumstances. Notwithstanding
paragraph (a) of this section, if PBGC
fails to comply with a time limit under
section 552(a)(6) of FOIA, PBGC may
nevertheless assess a charge for search
and review services (or in the case of a
requester described under section
552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II), for duplication) if
one of the following circumstances
applies:
(1) PBGC has determined that unusual
circumstances (as defined in section
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
64434
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 198 / Tuesday, October 13, 2020 / Proposed Rules
552(a)(6)(B) of FOIA) apply, PBGC
needs more than 10 additional days to
process the disclosure request, and more
than 5,000 pages are necessary to
respond to the request, provided that:
(i) PBGC has provided timely written
notice of this determination to the
requester; and
(ii) PBGC has discussed with the
requester, or made three or more goodfaith attempts to do so, via written mail,
electronic mail, or telephone how the
requester could effectively limit the
scope of the request.
(2) PBGC has determined that unusual
circumstances (as defined in section
552(a)(6)(B) of FOIA) apply, PBGC has
provided timely written notice to the
requester of the unusual circumstances
extending the time limit by 10
additional days, and PBGC processes
the disclosure request within that time.
(3) A court has determined that
exceptional circumstances exist (as
defined in section 552(a)(6)(C) of FOIA)
and has issued an order excusing
PBGC’s failure to comply with the time
limit.
■ 24. Amend § 4901.32 by revising
paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as follows:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS
§ 4901.32
Fee schedule.
(a) Charges for searching and review
of records. Charges applicable under
this subpart to the search for and review
of records will be made according to the
following fee schedule:
(1) Search time and review time. For
ordinary search services and review
services, PBGC charges $54.00 per hour.
PBGC charges fees in quarter hour
increments.
(2) Retrieving records stored by
NARA. For disclosure requests that
require the retrieval of records stored at
a Federal records center operated by the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA), PBGC charges
additional costs in accordance with the
Transactional Billing Rate Schedule
established by NARA.
(b) Charges for duplication of records.
Charges applicable under this subpart
for obtaining requested copies of records
made available for inspection will be
made according to the following fee
schedule and subject to the following
conditions.
(1) Standard copying fee. $0.15 for
each page of record copies furnished.
(2) Voluminous material. If the
volume of page copy desired by the
requester is such that the reproduction
charge at the standard page rate would
be in excess of $50, the person desiring
reproduction may request a special rate
quotation from PBGC.
(3) Indexes. Pursuant to section
552(a)(2) of FOIA copies of indexes or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:17 Oct 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
supplements thereto which are
maintained as therein provided but
which have not been published will be
provided on request at a cost not to
exceed the direct cost of duplication.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 25. Amend § 4901.33 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a), (b)
introductory text, and (b)(1);
■ b. Removing ‘‘the PBGC may’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘PBGC may’’ in
paragraph (b)(2); and
■ c. Removing ‘‘The PBGC may’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘PBGC may’’ in
paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Issued in Washington, DC, by:
Gordon Hartogensis,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty
Corporation.
§ 4901.33
Department of the Army, Corps of
Engineers
Payment of fees.
(a) Medium of payment. Payment of
the applicable fees as provided in this
section must be made by check, money,
or other PBGC permitted method, and in
accordance with the FOIA instructions
on PBGC’s website, www.pbgc.gov.
(b) Advance payment or assurance of
payment. Payment or assurance of
payment before work is begun or
continued on a disclosure request may
be required as follows:
(1) Where PBGC estimates or
determines that charges allowable under
the rules in this subpart, are likely to
exceed $250, PBGC may require
advance payment of the entire fee or
assurance of payment, as follows:
(i) Where the requester has a history
of prompt payment of fees under this
part, PBGC will notify the requester of
the likely cost and obtain satisfactory
assurance of full payment; or
(ii) Where the requester has no history
of payment for requests made pursuant
to FOIA and this part, PBGC may
require the requester to make an
advance payment of an amount up to
the full estimated charges.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 26. Amend § 4901.34 by:
■ a. Removing ‘‘disclosure officer’’ and
adding in its place ‘‘Disclosure Officer’’;
removing ‘‘government’’ and adding in
its place ‘‘Government’’; removing
‘‘waiver request shall’’ and adding in its
place ‘‘waiver or reduction request
must’’; and removing ‘‘request for
waiver’’ and adding in its place
‘‘request’’ in paragraph (a); and
■ b. Revising paragraph (b).
The revision reads as follows:
§ 4901.34
Waiver or reduction of charges.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) If the Disclosure Officer
determines that the request for fee
waiver or reduction will be denied, the
requester will be so advised in writing
with a brief statement of the reasons for
the denial. The writing will include the
name and title or position of the
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
person(s) responsible for the denial,
outline the appeal procedure available,
and notify the requester of the right to
seek dispute resolution services from a
PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office
of Government Information Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–20018 Filed 10–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
33 CFR Part 334
[COE–2019–0010]
Washington Channel, Fort McNair,
Washington, DC; Restricted Area
AGENCY:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers,
DoD.
Notice of proposed rulemaking
and request for comments.
ACTION:
The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers (Corps) is proposing to
establish a restricted area in the
Washington Channel adjacent to Fort
McNair. Fort McNair is the headquarters
of the Army’s Military District of
Washington and home of the National
Defense University as well as the official
residence of the U.S. Army’s Vice Chief
of Staff. Fort McNair requested a
restricted area to fulfill Joint Base MyerHenderson Hall (JBM–HH) security
needs including Marine Helicopter
Squadron (HMX) missions and
protection of VIP quarters at Fort
McNair. On August 8, 2019, the Corps
published a proposed rule for the
establishment of a restricted area in the
Washington Channel adjacent to Fort
McNair. After evaluating the comments
received in response to that proposed
rule, the proposal has been revised and
the Corps is inviting public comment on
the revised proposed rule text.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before November 12,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number COE–
2019–0010, by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments to
docket number COE–2019–0010.
Email: david.b.olson@usace.army.mil.
Include the docket number, COE–2019–
0010, in the subject line of the message.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\13OCP1.SGM
13OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 198 (Tuesday, October 13, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64425-64434]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-20018]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
PENSION BENEFIT GUARANTY CORPORATION
29 CFR Parts 4001 and 4901
RIN 1212-AB44
Examination and Copying of PBGC Records
AGENCY: Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The proposed rule would update and clarify guidance on
examining records kept by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation. The
proposed amendments reflect statutory changes to the Freedom of
Information Act and recent updates to PBGC's procedures for record
examination.
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before December 14, 2020 to be
assured of consideration.
ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Email: [email protected]. Include RIN 1212-AB44 in the
subject line.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Regulatory Affairs Division, Office
of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K
Street NW, Washington, DC 20005-4026.
All submissions must include the agency's name (Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation or PBGC) and the Regulation Identifier Number for
this rulemaking (RIN 1212-AB44). Comments received will be posted
without change to PBGC's website, https://www.pbgc.gov, including any
personal information provided. Copies of comments may also be obtained
by writing to Disclosure Division, Office of the General Counsel,
Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, 1200 K Street
[[Page 64426]]
NW, Washington, DC 20005-4026, or calling 202-326-4040 during normal
business hours. (TTY users may call the Federal Relay Service toll-free
at 800-877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4040.)
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Melissa Rifkin
([email protected]), Attorney, Regulatory Affairs Division,
Office of the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
1200 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20005-4026; 202-326-4400, extension
6563. (TTY users may call the Federal Relay Service toll-free at 800-
877-8339 and ask to be connected to 202-326-4400, extension 6563.)
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Executive Summary
Purpose and Authority
The purpose of this regulatory action is to update the Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation's (PBGC's) regulation on requesting,
obtaining, and examining records to reflect statutory changes and
current agency practice. Authority for this rule is provided by section
4002(b)(3) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and
by the Freedom of Information Act, as amended.
Major Provisions
This proposed rule would:
Clarify that PBGC's disclosable records are generally
available in an electronic, rather than paper, format.
Describe the procedure to seek expedited treatment for
record requests.
Clarify the acceptable methods for submitting record
requests.
Update the time limit to respond to record requests.
Clarify the procedures available to a requester when PBGC
extends the time to respond to a disclosure request or an appeal.
Clarify the procedure for responding to requests that are
of concern to a Federal agency other than PBGC.
Update the fees for search and review time.
Modify the definitions of certain categories of
requesters.
Background
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) proposes to amend
its regulation on Examination and Copying of PBGC Records (29 CFR part
4901) (``FOIA regulation'') to: (1) Incorporate statutory changes to
the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552) (``FOIA'') made by the
FOIA Improvement Act of 2016 (``the 2016 Act'') and prior statutory
amendments; (2) reflect PBGC's current procedures for processing and
responding to FOIA requests; and (3) update the fees charged to certain
requesters to more accurately reflect PBGC's costs in performing the
search and review work that is necessary to respond to their FOIA
requests. The proposed rule would also make clarifications and other
editorial changes to 29 CFR part 4901.
PBGC is committed to maintaining excellent customer service in
responding to FOIA requests. Since 2015, PBGC has received the
Department of Justice's Office of Information Policy's highest score in
each key area for which it recognizes agencies: (1) Applying a
presumption of openness, (2) having an efficient system in place for
responding to requests, (3) increasing proactive disclosures, (4)
utilizing technology, and (5) reducing any backlogs and improving
timeliness.\1\ A 2015 audit by the National Security Archive, a non-
governmental organization, gave PBGC its highest rating and found it to
be among ``the best overall [for] . . . proactively meeting the 21st
Century Standard of posting all or nearly all FOIA releases online.''
\2\ The proposed changes would further improve PBGC's FOIA process and
increase the transparency of its procedures.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Department of Justice, Summary of Agency Chief FOIA
Officer Reports for 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. See for 2018,
www.justice.gov/OIP/Reports/2018Summary%26Assessment/download#2018;
for 2017, www.justice.gov/oip/reports/2017_cfo_summary_and_assessment.pdf/download; for 2016,
www.justice.gov/oip/reports/2016_cfo_summary_and_assessment/download; and for 2015, www.justice.gov/oip/2015_cfo_summary_and_assessment.pdf/download.
\2\ See Most Agencies Falling Short on Mandate for Online
Records, The National Security Archive 2015 E-FOIA Audit,
nsarchive2.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB505/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Amendments
Records Available in an Electronic Format
Section 2 of the 2016 Act replaced references to ``public
inspection and copying'' in the FOIA with ``public inspection in an
electronic format.'' A stated goal of the 2016 Act was to ``require
federal agencies to make their disclosable records and documents
available for public inspection in an electronic format.'' \3\ PBGC's
Disclosure Division follows this directive and produces disclosable
records in an electronic format, but in several places PBGC's FOIA
regulation refers to the practice of offering paper copies of
documents. PBGC proposes to replace the term ``copy'' in its FOIA
regulation with language conveying that, where practicable, records
covered under the FOIA are available or will be made available in an
electronic, rather than paper, format. Also, PBGC proposes to add in
Sec. 4901.2 a definition of the term ``record'' with a reference to
the statutory definition, which includes information in an electronic
format.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Congressional Research Services, Summary of FOIA Improvement
Act of 2016, Public Law 114-185, June 30, 2016.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Electronic Reading Room
PBGC used to maintain a reference room on site where members of the
public could inspect and copy certain PBGC records without formally
requesting them. Following the directive of the 2016 Act to make
records and documents available for public inspection in an electronic
format, PBGC modified its FOIA regulation and replaced instances of the
term ``reference room'' with ``electronic reading room,'' meaning an
online and publicly accessible database of certain PBGC records.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 82 FR 26990 (June 13, 2017).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PBGC proposes to update Sec. 4901.4(c) of the FOIA regulation to
remove the requirement that PBGC keep a register for the purpose of
collecting the names of people who inspect rulemaking proceedings in
the electronic reading room and the times at which they do so. This
requirement was possible with PBGC's on site reference room but is
impractical with its electronic reading room. It would be unnecessarily
burdensome to require individuals who inspect rulemaking proceedings in
the electronic reading room to provide their names.
Submitting a Record Request
PBGC proposes to amend Sec. 4901.11 of the FOIA regulation to
clarify the procedures for submitting a request for records. First,
PBGC's Disclosure Division requires FOIA requests to be in writing, and
the proposed amendment would codify this requirement. Second, the
proposed amendment would codify that electronic telecommunication
(i.e., email, online portal) is an approved method to submit a FOIA
request. Third, the proposed amendment would add a statement that a
requester may seek the assistance of a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison and a
description of this position. PBGC's Disclosure Division has designated
FOIA Public Liaisons, as required by FOIA, who will assist requesters
with describing records they are seeking, understanding the status of
requests, and resolving disputes. PBGC proposes this addition to Sec.
4901.11 to highlight the availability of this help.
[[Page 64427]]
In addition, PBGC proposes to clarify its procedures applied when a
FOIA request does not sufficiently describe the records being sought.
Section 4901.12(b) of the FOIA regulation states that PBGC will offer
assistance to a requester who has submitted a deficient request. The
proposed amendment would add that the requester will be informed of the
availability of assistance from the FOIA Public Liaison, that failure
to reasonably describe the records being sought could cause a delay in
responding to the request or a denial of the request, and that an
amended request must provide sufficient detail to meet the requirements
of an original request.
Action on Request
Section 552(a)(6)(A)(i) of the FOIA provides that a Federal agency
has 20 working days to make a determination on a FOIA request. A Senate
Report to the Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments of
1996,\5\ the law that increased the required response period from 10 to
20 days, said, ``Compliance with the 10-day rule is a practical
impossibility for the majority of agencies.'' \6\ Therefore, PBGC
proposes to update the time limit for responding to FOIA requests in
Sec. 4901.14(a) of the FOIA regulation from 10 working days to 20
working days, not including extensions. In practice, PBGC already
follows the time limit permitted under the statute to allow for
thorough and appropriate searches and reviews of agency records.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Public Law 104-231.
\6\ S. Rep. 104-272, May 15, 1996.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 552(a)(6) of the FOIA provides that Federal agencies have a
single opportunity to ask the requester for additional information and
toll the 20-working day response period while awaiting the requester's
response. This provision is intended to ``ensure accuracy in FOIA
responses.'' \7\ PBGC's Disclosure Division follows the statute with
respect to tolling the response period, and PBGC proposes to codify
this practice in Sec. 4901.14(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 153 Cong. Rec. S15701-04, on the OPEN Government Act on
2007, Public Law 110-175.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Also, PBGC proposes to add to Sec. 4901.14(b) a provision that
PBGC will provide records in the format specified in the request if
practicable.
Finally, PBGC proposes to clarify its procedures for when a
requested record cannot be located. Section 4901.14(d) of the FOIA
regulation states that a request may be denied if a record is not
located in time to determine whether it may be disclosed. PBGC proposes
to clarify that when records cannot be located despite a reasonably
calculated search to uncover all relevant documents, PBGC will let the
requester know there are no records to provide, rather than deny the
request.
Appeals
Under PBGC's procedures, a requester may appeal any adverse
determination by the Disclosure Division. However, Sec. 4901.15(a)
states only that a requester may appeal a denial of a request for
disclosure of information. The proposed amendment to Sec. 4901.15(a)
would clarify that a requester may appeal any adverse decision by the
Disclosure Division under FOIA, including a denial of: access to
records, expedited processing, or waiver of fees. It also would clarify
the instructions for submitting an appeal.
Extensions of Time
As provided for in section 552(a)(6)(B) of the FOIA and Sec.
4901.16 of the FOIA regulation, PBGC may extend its time to respond to
a disclosure request or an appeal when it must collect records stored
offsite, examine a voluminous amount of records, or consult with
another agency to respond to a FOIA request. PBGC proposes to add to
Sec. 4901.16 that when that extension of time exceeds 10 working days,
the requester will be provided with an opportunity to seek assistance,
modify the request, or arrange an alternative time period (with new
response due dates) for processing the original or modified request.
This change is intended to improve customer service.
Expedited Action on Requests and Appeals
Section 552(a)(6)(E)(i) of the FOIA states that Federal agencies
must promulgate regulations to provide expedited processing of FOIA
requests and appeals where the requester demonstrates a compelling need
and for other reasons determined by the agency. PBGC's Disclosure
Division has a process to request and receive expedited processing. The
proposed regulation would codify this process. Proposed new Sec.
4901.17 would allow a requester to submit a request for expedited
action on a disclosure request or appeal. PBGC would act on the
disclosure request or appeal as soon as practicable if the requester
demonstrates that: (1) A lack of expedited action could reasonably be
expected to pose an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of
an individual or the loss of an individual's substantial due process
rights, or (2) the requester is primarily engaged in disseminating
information and the disclosure request or appeal is urgently needed to
inform the public about an actual or alleged Federal Government
activity.
The proposed rule would move the current Sec. 4901.17 on
exhaustion of administrative remedies to new Sec. 4901.18.
Record of Concern to More Than One Agency
PBGC proposes to modify Sec. 4901.23, which covers the procedures
for a requested record that is of interest to a Federal agency other
than PBGC. Currently, PBGC may release such a record only if it
determines that PBGC's interest in the record is greater than that of
the other agency. Under the proposed amendment, PBGC would have greater
discretion over whether to transfer the request to another agency. If
PBGC receives a request for records that is of concern to another
agency, PBGC would either consult with the interested Federal agency
about the requested records before determining whether the record is
disclosable or refer the request to the interested Federal agency to
make that determination. This change is intended to eliminate referrals
where the requested record is of concern to the other agency, but PBGC
is nonetheless able to determine whether it may be disclosed. Allowing
a consultation in these situations will help to ensure that certain
requests for records are not unnecessarily delayed.
Charges for Services
PBGC proposes to simplify the categories of requesters used to
determine if a requester will be charged fees. Under Sec. 4901.31(b),
(1) non-commercial scientific or educational institutions and (2) the
news media are considered as two separate categories. Under the
proposed amendment, they would be combined into a single category, as
all requesters that fall within these parameters are not assessed fees
for responses to their FOIA requests.
In addition, PBGC proposes to update the definitions in Sec.
4901.31(b). The definition of ``commercial use'' would state in
proposed Sec. 4901.31(b)(1)(ii) that such use may include litigation
work and that PBGC will determine if a requester should be in the
``commercial use'' category on a case-by-case basis and inform the
requester of its decision. The definition of ``educational
institution'' would be modified in proposed Sec. 4901.31(b)(2)(iii) to
allow PBGC to verify that a request is in furtherance of scholarly
research and state that PBGC will inform the requester of its decision.
Also, the definition of ``representative of the news
[[Page 64428]]
media'' would be updated and clarified in proposed Sec.
4901.31(b)(2)(iv).
Finally, the proposed rule would clarify in proposed Sec.
4901.31(e) the circumstances in which PBGC may fail to comply with a
time limit under section 552(a)(6) of the FOIA but still assess fees.
Fee Schedule
PBGC proposes to update the fees charged for search and review time
on its FOIA fee schedule. Under section 552(a)(4)(A)(i) of the FOIA,\8\
Federal agencies must conform their FOIA fee schedules with OMB's
Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and Guidelines \9\ (OMB
Guidelines). This guidance states, ``Agencies should charge fees that
recoup the full allowable direct costs they incur.'' Direct costs, per
OMB Guidelines, include the salary rate, meaning basic rate of pay plus
16 percent, intended to cover benefits,\10\ of the employee making the
search. Agencies may establish an average rate for the range of grades
typically involved if ``a homogeneous class of personnel is used
exclusively (e.g., all administrative/clerical, or all professional/
executive).''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ ``[E]ach agency shall promulgate regulations . . .
specifying the schedule of fees applicable to the processing of
requests . . . Such schedule shall conform to the guidelines which
shall be promulgated, pursuant to notice and receipt of public
comment, by the Director of the Office of Management and Budget and
which shall provide for a uniform schedule of fees for all
agencies.''
\9\ 52 FR 10012 (March 27, 1987).
\10\ See id; see also Department of Justice, Office of
Information Policy's Template for Agency FOIA Regulations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PBGC's fees are too low to comport with the requirement to fully
recoup direct costs, per OMB Guidelines and 5 U.S.C. 552(a)(4)(A)(i).
PBGC currently charges $1.75 per quarter hour ($7.00 per hour) for
search and review work performed by custodial or clerical personnel and
$4.00 per quarter hour ($16.00 per hour) for search and review work
performed by supervisory and professional personnel. These rates were
set in 1987 \11\ and have not been raised since. PBGC's current fees
are well below the salary rates of the PBGC employees working on FOIA
requests.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See 52 FR 30662 (August 17, 1987).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PBGC personnel who typically conduct search and review work are a
homogeneous class of professional employees. These employees generally
are at the grade level of GS-12 or higher. Accordingly, PBGC proposes
to set a single fee for search and review work performed by
professional personnel at $54.00 per hour (approximately basic pay plus
16 percent \12\ for a GS-12, step 5 employee in Washington, DC). The
rate is within the range of fees charged by other agencies for search
and review work by professional personnel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The 16 percent accounts for benefits, per OMB Guidelines.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change to PBGC's fee schedule is unlikely to increase
fees to individual plan participants or beneficiaries requesting their
own records. PBGC considers most such requests to be covered wholly
under the Privacy Act of 1974, 5 U.S.C. 552a, which allows fees only
for duplication. Any components of these requests that are not covered
under the Privacy Act likely require no more than two hours of search
time, which, as ``other requesters,'' individual plan participants
requesting their own records are granted at no charge. Also, PBGC will
not earn any additional funds from this change, as FOIA fees are paid
to the U.S. Treasury, rather than to the agency responding to the
request.
In addition, PBGC proposes to streamline and simplify its methods
of calculating certain fees under FOIA. Section 4901.32(a)(2) of the
FOIA regulation states that PBGC's transportation costs necessary for
retrieving offsite records will be charged to a requester. Under the
proposed amendment, PBGC would charge these costs in accordance with
the Transactional Billing Rate Schedule established by the National
Archives and Records Administration.
Finally, Sec. 4901.32(a)(3), which establishes a different system
of charges for searches of computerized records, would be deleted, and
the outmoded limits on copied documents in Sec. 4901.32(b)(3) and
references to PBGC's provision of a manual copying machine in Sec.
4901.32(b)(4) would be deleted.
Payment of Fees
PBGC proposes changing the list in Sec. 4901.33 of approved
methods to submit payment of FOIA fees to check, money order or other
PBGC permitted means. This change will allow PBGC to employ new
technologies for submitting FOIA fee payments as they are developed.
Waiver or Reduction of Charges
Section 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) of the FOIA describes the conditions
necessary to waive FOIA fees.\13\ Because inability to pay is not
described in this provision of the statute, PBGC proposes to delete the
language in Sec. 4901.34(b) of the FOIA regulation, which provides
that the Disclosure Officer may waive or reduce fees based on the
requester's inability to pay. The proposed rule would instead adhere to
the statutory language about when fees may be waived. The proposed rule
would also provide that PBGC will inform the requester in writing that
a fee waiver request was denied and why. This proposed amendment is
intended to increase accuracy and transparency about when fees may be
waived.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ The conditions under 552(a)(4)(A)(iii) of the FOIA are,
``if disclosure of the information is in the public interest because
it is likely to contribute significantly to public understanding of
the operations or activities of the government and is not primarily
in the commercial interest of the requester.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compliance With Rulemaking Guidelines
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771
The Office of Management and Budget has determined that this
rulemaking is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive
Order 12866. This rule updates PBGC's FOIA regulation to comport with
amendments to 5 U.S.C. 552 and PBGC's procedures. Accordingly, this
proposed rule is exempt from Executive Order 13771, and OMB has not
reviewed the proposed rule under Executive Order 12866.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, if regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety
effects, distributive impacts, and equity).
Although this is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, PBGC has examined the economic implications of
this proposed rule and has concluded that there will be no significant
economic impact as a result of the proposed amendments to PBGC's
regulation. Most of the proposed amendments merely clarify existing
PBGC practices or modify the regulation to meet statutory requirements.
The only additional costs to the public come from the update to the
fees for search and review time under Sec. 4901.32 to bring the fee
schedule in line with current costs. Under the FOIA regulation, PBGC
collects annually less than $3,000 in fees for responding to FOIA
requests. Under the proposed rule, PBGC anticipates that it will
collect between $6,500 and $10,000 in fees annually. As such, the
increased fees under Sec. 4901.32 will not have a significant economic
impact on the public.
Section 6 of Executive Order 13563 requires agencies to rethink
existing regulations by periodically reviewing
[[Page 64429]]
their regulatory program for rules that ``may be outmoded, ineffective,
insufficient, or excessively burdensome.'' These rules should be
modified, streamlined, expanded, or repealed as appropriate. PBGC has
identified clarifications, updates, and improvements to this regulation
consistent with the principles for review under Executive Order 13563.
PBGC believes that the proposed changes will provide clearer guidance
to the public.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act \14\ imposes certain requirements
with respect to rules that are subject to the notice-and-comment
requirements of section 553(b) of the Administrative Procedure Act and
that are likely to have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Unless an agency determines that a proposed
rule is not likely to have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities, section 603 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act requires that the agency present an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis at the time of the publication of the proposed
rule describing the impact of the rule on small entities and seek
public comment on such impact. Small entities include small businesses,
organizations, and governmental jurisdictions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Small Entities
For purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility Act requirements with
respect to this proposed rule, PBGC considers a small entity to be a
plan with fewer than 100 participants. This is substantially the same
criterion PBGC uses in other regulations \15\ and is consistent with
certain requirements in title I of ERISA \16\ and the Internal Revenue
Code (Code),\17\ as well as the definition of a small entity that the
Department of Labor has used for purposes of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See, e.g., special rules for small plans under part 4007
(Payment of premiums).
\16\ See, e.g., ERISA section 104(a)(2), which permits the
Secretary of Labor to prescribe simplified annual reports for
pension plans that cover few than 100 participants.
\17\ See, e.g., Code section 430(g)(2)(B), which permits plans
with 100 or fewer participants to use valuation dates other than the
first day of the plan year.
\18\ See, e.g., DOL's final rule on Prohibited Transaction
Exemption Procedures, 76 FR 66,644 (Oct. 27, 2011).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thus, PBGC believes that assessing the impact of the final rule on
small plans is an appropriate substitute for evaluating the effect on
small entities. The definition of small entity considered appropriate
for this purpose differs, however, from a definition of small business
based on size standards promulgated by the Small Business
Administration \19\ under the Small Business Act. Therefore, PBGC
requests comments on the appropriateness of the size standard used in
evaluating the impact of the amendments in this proposed rule on small
entities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See, 13 CFR 121.201.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on its definition of small entity, PBGC certifies under
section 605(b) of the Regulatory Flexibility Act that the amendments in
this proposed rule would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities. Most of the amendments clarify
existing PBGC practices and will have a neutral cost impact. The
amendment to PBGC's search and review fees is consistent with OMB
Guidelines. Accordingly, as provided in section 605 of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, sections 603 and 604 do not apply.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document does not contain a collection-of-information
requirement subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
List of Subjects
29 CFR Part 4001
Business and industry, Organization and functions (Government
agencies), Pension insurance, Pensions, Small businesses.
29 CFR Part 4901
Freedom of information.
In consideration of the foregoing, PBGC proposes to amend 29 CFR
parts 4001 and 4901 as follows.
PART 4001--TERMINOLOGY
0
1. The authority citation for part 4001 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 29 U.S.C. 1301, 1302(b)(3).
0
2. Amend Sec. 4001.2 by revising the definition of ``Disclosure
officer'' to read as follows:
Sec. 4001.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Disclosure Officer means the official designated as Disclosure
Officer in the Office of the General Counsel, PBGC.
* * * * *
PART 4901--DISCLOSURE AND PUBLIC INSPECTION OF PENSION BENEFIT
GUARANTY CORPORATION RECORDS
0
3. The authority citation for part 4901 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552, 29 U.S.C. 1302(b)(3), E.O. 12600, 52 FR
23781, 3 CFR, 1987 Comp., p. 235.
0
4. Revise the heading of part 4901 to read as set forth above.
0
5. Revise Sec. 4901.1 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.1 Purpose and scope.
This part contains PBGC's general rules implementing the Freedom of
Information Act. This part sets forth generally the categories of
records accessible to the public, types of records subject to
prohibitions or restrictions on disclosure, and procedures whereby
members of the public may access and inspect PBGC records.
0
6. Amend Sec. 4901.2 by removing ``party,'' from the first sentence,
and adding in alphabetical order a definition for ``Record'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 4901.2 Definitions.
* * * * *
Record has the meaning attributed to it by section 552(f)(2) of
FOIA.
* * * * *
Sec. 4901.3 [Amended]
0
7. Amend Sec. 4901.3 by removing ``The PBGC'' and adding in its place
``PBGC'', and removing ``website'' and adding in its place ``website''.
0
8. Amend Sec. 4901.4 by:
0
a. Removing ``The PBGC shall'' and adding in its place ``PBGC will'' in
the introductory text;
0
b. Removing ``Copies of Federal Register documents published by the
PBGC, and copies of Federal'' and adding in its place ``Federal
Register documents published by PBGC, and Federal'' in paragraph (a);
0
c. Removing ``Copies of informational'' and adding in its place
``Informational'' in paragraph (b);
0
d. Revising paragraphs (c) and (d); and
0
e. Removing ``paragraph (a)(2)'' and adding in its place ``section
552(a)(2)'' in paragraph (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4901.4 Information maintained in electronic reading room.
* * * * *
(c) Rulemaking proceedings. All papers and documents made a part of
the official record in administrative proceedings conducted by PBGC in
connection with the issuance, amendment, or revocation of rules and
regulations or determinations having
[[Page 64430]]
general applicability or legal effect with respect to members of the
public or a class thereof;
(d) Other agency proceedings, policies, staff manuals and
instructions, and records. Except to the extent that deletion of
identifying details is required to prevent a clearly unwarranted
invasion of personal privacy (in which case PBGC will explain in
writing the justification for the deletion)--
(1) Adjudication proceedings. Final opinions, orders, and (except
to the extent that an exemption provided by FOIA must be asserted in
the public interest to prevent a clearly unwarranted invasion of
personal privacy or violation of law or to ensure the proper discharge
of the functions of PBGC) other papers and documents made a part of the
official record in adjudication proceedings conducted by PBGC;
(2) Policy statements and interpretations. Statements of policy and
interpretations affecting a member of the public which have been
adopted by PBGC and which have not been published in the Federal
Register;
(3) Staff manuals and instructions. Administrative staff manuals
and instructions to staff issued by PBGC that affect any member of the
public;
(4) Frequently requested records. Records that have been released
under section 552(a)(3) of FOIA and have been the subject of three or
more disclosure requests; and
(5) Other records. Records that have been released under section
552(a)(3) of FOIA and that PBGC determines, because of the nature of
the records' subject matter, have become or are likely to become the
subject of subsequent disclosure requests for substantially the same
records; and
* * * * *
0
9. Revise Sec. 4901.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.5 Disclosure of other information.
(a) In general. Upon the request of any person submitted in
accordance with subpart B of this part, the Disclosure Officer will
make any document (or portion thereof) from the records of PBGC in the
custody of any official of PBGC available for inspection unless PBGC
reasonably foresees that disclosure would harm an interest protected by
an exemption under the provisions of section 552(b) of FOIA and subpart
C of this part or disclosure is otherwise prohibited by law. The
procedures in subpart B of this part must be used for records that are
not made available in PBGC's electronic reading room under Sec. 4901.4
and may be used for records that are available in the electronic
reading room. Records are not records of PBGC and are not required to
be furnished under FOIA, if they could only be produced by manipulation
of existing information (such as computer analyses of existing data),
thus creating information not previously in existence.
(b) Discretionary disclosure. Unless prohibited from disclosure by
Sec. 4901.21(a), the Disclosure Officer may make any document (or
portion thereof) from the records of PBGC available for inspection if
the Disclosure Officer determines that disclosure furthers the public
interest and does not impede the discharge of any of the functions of
PBGC.
0
10. Revise Sec. 4901.6 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.6 Filing rules; computation of time.
(a) Place, method, and date of filing. (1) For rules about where to
file a submission under this part with PBGC, see Sec. 4000.4 of this
chapter.
(2) For rules about permissible methods of filing with PBGC under
this part, see Sec. 4000.3 of this chapter.
(3) For rules about the date that a submission under this part was
filed with PBGC, see subpart C of part 4000 of this chapter.
(b) Computation of time. For rules about any time period under this
part, see subpart D of part 4000 of this chapter.
0
11. Revise Sec. 4901.11 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.11 Submission of requests for access to records.
(a) In general. A request to inspect any record subject to this
subpart must be submitted in writing to the Disclosure Officer, Pension
Benefit Guaranty Corporation, by mail, in-person delivery, or
electronic telecommunication in accordance with the FOIA instructions
on PBGC's website, www.pbgc.gov. To facilitate processing, ``FOIA
request'' should appear prominently on the request.
(b) Assistance with requests. A person who intends to submit or has
submitted a request to inspect any record subject to this subpart may
at any time seek assistance from a FOIA Public Liaison listed on PBGC's
website, www.pbgc.gov. PBGC's FOIA Public Liaisons are responsible for
assisting in reducing delays, increasing transparency and understanding
of the status of requests, and assisting in the resolution of disputes.
0
12. Amend Sec. 4901.12 by:
0
a. Removing ``Each request'' and adding in its place ``Each disclosure
request'' in paragraph (a);
0
b. Revising paragraph (b); and
0
c. Removing ``Requests calling'' and adding in its place ``Disclosure
requests calling''; removing ``paragraph (a)(3)'' and adding in its
place ``section 552(a)(3)''; removing ``the PBGC'' and adding in its
place ``PBGC''; and removing ``disclosure officer shall'' and adding in
its place ``Disclosure Officer will'' in paragraph (c).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 4901.12 Description of information requested.
* * * * *
(b) Deficient descriptions. (1) If the description is insufficient
to enable a professional employee familiar with the subject area of the
disclosure request to locate the record with a reasonable amount of
effort, the Disclosure Officer will notify the requester and, to the
extent possible, indicate the additional information required. PBGC
will make every reasonable effort to assist a requester in the
identification and location of the record or records sought. PBGC will
not withhold records merely because of difficulty in finding them.
(2) A requester who is attempting to modify or reformulate a
disclosure request may discuss the request with a FOIA Public Liaison,
who is available to assist the requester in reasonably describing the
records sought. If the requester fails to reasonably describe the
records sought, PBGC's response to the request may be delayed or
denied.
(3) Any amended disclosure request must meet the requirements for a
request under paragraph (a) of this section.
* * * * *
0
13. Revise Sec. 4901.13 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.13 Receipt by agency of request.
The Disclosure Officer will note the date and time of receipt on
each disclosure request for access to records. A disclosure request is
deemed received and the period within which PBGC acts on the request,
as set forth in Sec. 4901.14, begins on the next working day following
receipt, except that a disclosure request is deemed received only if
and when PBGC receives all of the following:
(a) A sufficient description under Sec. 4901.12;
(b) Payment or assurance of payment if required under Sec.
4901.33(b); and
(c) The requester's consent to pay substantial search, review, and/
or duplication charges under subpart D of this part if PBGC determines
that such charges may be substantial and so notifies the requester.
Consent must be in the form of a statement that charges under subpart D
of this part will be
[[Page 64431]]
acceptable either in any amount or up to a specified amount. To avoid
possible delay, a requester may include such a statement in an initial
disclosure request.
0
14. Revise Sec. 4901.14 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.14 Action on request.
(a) Time for action. Promptly and in any event within 20 working
days after receipt of a disclosure request (subject to extension under
Sec. 4901.16), the Disclosure Officer will take action with respect to
each requested item (or portion of an item) under either paragraph (b),
(c), or (d) of this section. Following receipt, PBGC may ask the
requester for information once and toll the 20-day period until PBGC
receives such information.
(b) Request granted. If the Disclosure Officer determines that the
disclosure request will be granted, PBGC will so advise the requester
and will promptly make the records available to the requester. PBGC
will accommodate any specification of the preferred form or format for
the sought record as stated in the request, if the record is readily
reproducible in the preferred form or format.
(c) Request denied. If the Disclosure Officer determines that the
disclosure request will be denied, PBGC will so advise the requester in
writing with a brief statement of the reasons for the denial,
including, if applicable, a reference to the specific exemption(s)
authorizing the denial and an explanation of how each such exemption
applies to the matter withheld.
(d) Records not located. If the Disclosure Officer determines that,
despite a reasonably calculated search to uncover all relevant
documents, the requested records could not be located, PBGC will issue
a ``no-records'' response, and so advise the requester in writing.
(e) Information for requester. Written responses issued under
paragraph (c) or (d) of this section will include the name and title of
the person(s) responsible for the denial, outline the appeal procedure
available, and notify the requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services.
0
15. Amend Sec. 4901.15 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) through (c); and
0
b. Removing ``shall'' and adding in its place ``will''; and removing
``the PBGC's public reference'' and adding in its place ``PBGC's
electronic reading'' in paragraph (d).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4901.15 Appeals from denial of requests.
(a) Submittal of appeals. A requester may appeal any adverse
determination by the Disclosure Officer of a request under FOIA,
including a denial of a request for access to records, expedited
action, or fee waiver. The requester may file a written appeal within
90 days from the date of the denial or, in the case of a partial
denial, 90 days from the date the requester receives the disclosed
material. The appeal must include the grounds for appeal and any
supporting statements or arguments. The requester must address the
appeal to the General Counsel, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation,
and must submit the appeal by mail, in-person delivery, or electronic
telecommunication in accordance with the FOIA instructions on PBGC's
website, www.pbgc.gov. To facilitate processing, the words ``FOIA
appeal'' should appear prominently on the appeal.
(b) Receipt and consideration of appeal. The General Counsel will
note the date and time of receipt on each appeal and notify the
requester thereof. Within 20 working days after receipt of an appeal
(subject to extension under Sec. 4901.16), the General Counsel will
issue a decision on the appeal.
(1) The General Counsel will determine de novo whether the denial
of disclosure was in accordance with FOIA and this part.
(2) Unless otherwise ordered by the court, the General Counsel may
act on an appeal notwithstanding the pendency of an action for judicial
relief in the same matter and, if no appeal has been filed, may treat
the pending action as the filing of an appeal.
(c) Decision on appeal. As to each item (or portion of an item)
whose nondisclosure is appealed, the General Counsel will either--
(1) Grant the appeal and so advise the requester in writing, in
which case the records with respect to which the appeal is granted will
promptly be made available to the requester; or
(2) Deny the appeal and so advise the requester in writing with a
brief statement of the reasons for the denial, including a reference to
the specific exemption(s) authorizing the denial, an explanation of how
each such exemption applies to the matter withheld, and notice of the
provisions for judicial review in section 552(a)(4) of FOIA. The
General Counsel's decision will be the final action of PBGC with
respect to the request.
* * * * *
0
16. Revise Sec. 4901.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.16 Extensions of time.
In unusual circumstances (as described in section 552(a)(6)(B) of
FOIA), the time to respond to a disclosure request under Sec.
4901.14(a) or an appeal under Sec. 4901.15(b) may be extended as
reasonably necessary to process the request or appeal. The Disclosure
Officer will notify the requester in writing within the original time
period of the unusual circumstances and the date when a response is
expected to be sent. When the extension for a disclosure request
exceeds 10 working days, the notice will provide the requester with an
opportunity to modify the disclosure request or arrange an alternative
time period for processing the original or modified request. This
notice will also alert the requester of the availability of a PBGC FOIA
Public Liaison for assistance and the Office of Government Information
Services for dispute resolution services. The maximum extension for
responding to an appeal is 10 working days minus the amount of any
extension on the request to which the appeal relates.
0
17. Revise Sec. 4901.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.17 Expedited action on requests and appeals.
(a) In general. Upon a request submitted in accordance with
paragraph (b) of this section, PBGC will expedite a disclosure request
under Sec. 4901.11 or an appeal under Sec. 4901.15 if PBGC determines
that the requester has demonstrated one of the following:
(1) The disclosure request or appeal involves circumstances in
which the lack of expedited action could reasonably be expected to pose
an imminent threat to the life or physical safety of an individual or
the loss of an individual's substantial due process rights.
(2) The requester is primarily engaged in disseminating information
and the disclosure request or appeal is urgently needed to inform the
public about an actual or alleged Federal Government activity.
(b) Timing and method of request. A request for PBGC to expedite a
disclosure request or an appeal may be made at any time and must be
made by mail, in-person delivery, or electronic telecommunication in
accordance with the FOIA instructions on PBGC's website, www.pbgc.gov.
(c) Action on request. (1) PBGC will notify the requester within 10
calendar days of receipt of a request for expedited action whether PBGC
will expedite a disclosure request or an appeal.
[[Page 64432]]
(2) Request granted. If PBGC determines that the request for
expedited action will be granted, PBGC will take action on the
disclosure request or the appeal as soon as practicable.
(3) Request denied. If PBGC determines that the request for
expedited action will be denied, PBGC will so advise the requester in
writing with a brief statement of the reasons for the denial. The
writing will also include the name and title or position of the
person(s) responsible for the denial, outline the appeal procedure
available, and notify the requester of the right to seek dispute
resolution services from a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of
Government Information Services. PBGC will act on any appeal of that
decision expeditiously.
0
18. Add Sec. 4901.18 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.18 Exhaustion of administrative remedies.
If the Disclosure Officer fails to make a determination to grant or
deny access to requested records, or the General Counsel does not make
a decision on appeal from a denial of access to PBGC records, within
the time prescribed (including any extension) for making such
determination or decision, the requester's administrative remedies will
be deemed exhausted and the requester may apply for judicial relief
under FOIA. However, since a court may allow PBGC additional time to
act as provided in FOIA, processing of the disclosure request or appeal
will continue and PBGC will so advise the requester.
0
19. Revise Sec. 4901.21 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.21 Restrictions in general.
(a) Records not disclosable. PBGC will not disclose records to the
extent prohibited by section 552(b)(1) or (3) of FOIA, sections 4010
and 4043 of ERISA, or other statutes.
(b) Records disclosure of which may be refused. Unless prohibited
from disclosure by paragraph (a) of this section, PBGC need not but
may, as provided in Sec. 4901.5(b), disclose records exempted from
FOIA, which include as of [EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE FINAL RULE] records
under:
(1) Section 552(b)(2) of FOIA, dealing in general with internal
agency personnel rules and practices;
(2) Section 552(b)(4) of FOIA, dealing in general with trade
secrets and commercial and financial information;
(3) Section 552(b)(5) of FOIA, dealing in general with inter-agency
and intra-agency memoranda and letters;
(4) Section 552(b)(6) of FOIA, dealing in general with personnel,
medical, and similar files;
(5) Section 552(b)(7) of FOIA, dealing in general with records or
information compiled for law enforcement purposes;
(6) Section 552(b)(8) of FOIA, dealing in general with reports on
financial institutions; or
(7) Section 552(b)(9) of FOIA, dealing in general with information
about wells.
Sec. 4901.22 [Amended]
0
20. Amend Sec. 4901.22 by removing ``shall not'' and adding in its
place ``will not'' in the first sentence, and removing ``shall be'' and
adding in its place ``will be'' in the second sentence.
0
21. Revise Sec. 4901.23 to read as follows:
Sec. 4901.23 Record of concern to agency other than PBGC.
When reviewing a record in response to a disclosure request, PBGC
will determine whether another agency is better able to determine
whether the record is exempt from disclosure under FOIA. As to any such
record, PBGC will proceed in one of the following ways:
(a) Consultation with another agency. When the record contains
information of interest to another agency, PBGC will make a release
determination only if its interest in the record is the primary
interest and only after PBGC consults with that agency.
(b) Referral to another agency. (1) When an agency other than PBGC
has primary interest in the record, then PBGC will refer the
responsibility for responding to the disclosure request regarding that
record to that agency.
(2) Whenever PBGC refers any part of the responsibility for
responding to a disclosure request to another agency, PBGC will
document the referral, maintain a copy of the record that it refers,
and notify the requester of the referral, informing the requester of
the name(s) of the agency to which the record was referred, including
that agency's FOIA office.
0
22. Amend Sec. 4901.24 by:
0
a. Revising the section heading and paragraph (a);
0
b. Removing ``submitter shall'' and adding in its place ``submitter
must''; removing ``paragraph shall'' and adding in its place
``paragraph will''; and removing ``therefor'' in paragraph (b);
0
c. Removing ``disclosure officer'' and adding in its place ``Disclosure
Officer''; removing ``Counsel shall'' and adding in its place ``Counsel
will''; and removing ``requester shall'' and adding in its place
``requester will'' in paragraph (c);
0
d. Removing ``disclosure should'' and adding in its place ``disclosure
must''; removing ``subsection (b)'' and adding in its place ``section
552(b)''; removing ``paragraph (b)(4) of FOIA'' and adding in its place
``section 552(b)(4)''; removing ``asserted should'' and adding in its
place ``asserted must''; and removing ``shall'' and adding in its place
``will'' in paragraph (d);
0
e. Revising paragraph (e); and
0
f. Removing ``disclosure officer'' and adding in its place ``Disclosure
Officer''; and removing ``Counsel shall'' and adding in its place
``Counsel will'' in paragraph (f).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4901.24 Special rules for trade secrets and confidential
commercial or financial information submitted to PBGC.
(a) Application. To the extent permitted by law, this section
applies to a request for disclosure of a record that contains
information that has been designated by the submitter in good faith in
accordance with paragraph (b) of this section or a record that PBGC has
reason to believe contains such information, unless one of the
following applies:
(1) Access to the information is denied.
(2) The information has been published or officially made available
to the public.
(3) Disclosure of the information is required by law other than
FOIA.
(4) The designation under paragraph (b) of this section appears
obviously frivolous, except that in such a case PBGC will notify the
submitter in writing of a determination to disclose the information
within a reasonable time before the disclosure date (which shall be
specified in the notice).
* * * * *
(e) Notification to submitter of decision to disclose. If the
Disclosure Officer or (where disclosure is in response to an appeal)
the General Counsel decides to disclose information subject to this
section despite the submitter's objections, the Disclosure Officer (or
General Counsel) will give the submitter written notice, explaining
briefly why the information is to be disclosed despite those
objections, describing the information to be disclosed, and specifying
the date when the information will be disclosed to the requester. The
notification will, to the extent permitted by law, be provided a
reasonable number of days before the disclosure date so specified, and
a copy will be provided to the requester.
* * * * *
0
23. Amend Sec. 4901.31 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) and (b);
0
b. Removing ``the PBGC reasonably'' and adding in its place ``PBGC
reasonably''; removing ``the PBGC will'' and adding in its place ``PBGC
will''; and removing ``will the PBGC'' and
[[Page 64433]]
adding in its place ``will PBGC'' in paragraph (c); and
0
c. Revising paragraphs (d) and (e).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4901.31 Charges for services.
(a) In general. Pursuant to the provisions of section 552 of FOIA,
as amended, PBGC will assess charges to cover the direct costs of
searching for, reviewing, and/or duplicating records requested under
FOIA, except where the charges are limited or waived under paragraph
(b) or (d) of this section, according to the fee schedule in Sec.
4901.32. No charge will be assessed if the costs of routine collection
and processing of the fee would be equal to or greater than the fee
itself. Except as provided in paragraph (e) of this section, no charge
for searching (or in the case of a requester described under section
552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II) of FOIA, for duplication) will be assessed if PBGC
has failed to comply with any time limit under section 552(a)(6) of
FOIA.
(1) Direct costs means those expenditures which PBGC actually
incurs in searching for and duplicating (and in the case of commercial
requesters, reviewing) documents to respond to a disclosure request
under FOIA and this part. Not included in direct costs are overhead
expenses such as costs of space, and heating or lighting the facility
in which the records are stored.
(2) Search means all time spent looking for material that is
responsive to a disclosure request under FOIA and this part, including
page-by-page or line-by-line identification of materials within a
document, if required. Searches may be done manually or by computer
using existing programming. Search is distinguishable from ``review''
which is defined in paragraph (a)(3) of this section.
(3) Review means the process of examining documents located in
response to a disclosure request under FOIA and this part to determine
whether any portion of any document located is permitted or required to
be withheld. It also includes processing any documents for disclosure,
e.g., doing all that is necessary to redact them and otherwise prepare
them for release. Review does not include time spent resolving general
legal or policy issues regarding the application of exemptions.
(4) Duplication means the process of making a copy of a document
necessary to respond to a disclosure request under FOIA and this part,
in a form that is reasonably usable by the requester. Copies can take
the form of paper copy, audio-visual materials, or electronic records,
among others.
(b) Categories of requesters. For purposes of assessing fees,
requesters who seek access to records under FOIA and this part are
divided into three categories: Commercial use requesters, non-
commercial scientific or educational institutions or news media
requesters, and all other requesters. PBGC will determine the category
of a requester and charge fees according to the following rules.
(1) Commercial use requesters. (i) When records are requested for
commercial use, PBGC will assess charges, as provided in this subpart,
for the full direct costs of searching for, reviewing for release, and
duplicating the records sought. Fees for search and review may be
charged even if the record searched for is not found or if, after it is
found, it is determined that the request to inspect it may be denied
under section 552(b) of FOIA and this part.
(ii) A ``commercial use'' request is a request that asks for
information for a use or a purpose that furthers a commercial, trade,
or profit interest, which can include furthering those interests
through litigation. PBGC's decision to place a requester in the
commercial use category will be made on a case-by-case basis dependent
upon on the requester's intended use of the information. PBGC will
notify requesters of their placement in this category.
(2) Non-commercial scientific or educational institutions, or news
media requesters. (i) When records are requested by a non-commercial
scientific or educational institution or a news media requestor, PBGC
will assess charges, as provided in this subpart, for the full direct
cost of duplication only, excluding charges for the first 100 pages.
(ii) A non-commercial scientific institution is an institution that
is not operated for a ``commercial use'' as that term is defined in
paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this section, and which is operated solely for
the purpose of conducting scientific research the results of which are
not intended to promote any particular product or industry.
(iii) An educational institution is any school that operates a
program of scholarly research. A requester in this fee category must
show that the request is made in connection with his or her role at the
educational institution. PBGC may seek verification from the requester
that the request is in furtherance of scholarly research and PBGC will
advise requesters of their placement in this category.
(iv)(A) A representative of the news media is any person or entity
that gathers information of potential interest to a segment of the
public, uses editorial skills to turn the raw materials into a distinct
work, and distributes that work to an audience. The term news means
information that is about current events or that would be of current
interest to the public. Examples of news media entities include
television or radio stations broadcasting to the public at large, and
publishers of periodicals that disseminate ``news'' and make their
products available through a variety of means to the general public,
including news organizations that disseminate solely on the internet.
These examples are not intended to be all-inclusive. A ``freelance''
journalist who demonstrates a solid basis for expecting publication
through a news media entity will be considered as a representative of
the news media.
(B) To be eligible for inclusion in this category, the request must
not be made for a commercial use. A request for records supporting the
news dissemination function of the requester who is a representative of
the news media will not be considered to be a request that is for a
commercial use.
(3) All other requesters. When records are requested by requesters
who do not fit into any of the categories in paragraph (b)(1) or (2) of
this section, PBGC will assess charges, as provided in this subpart,
for the full direct cost of searching for and duplicating the records
sought, with the exceptions that there will be no charge for the first
100 pages of duplication and the first two hours of search time.
Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, there will be no charge for
search time in the event of requests under the Privacy Act of 1974 from
subjects of records filed in PBGC's systems of records for the
disclosure of records about themselves. Search fees, where applicable,
may be charged even if the record sought is not found.
* * * * *
(d) Waiver or reduction of charges. Circumstances under which any
fee listed in Sec. 4901.32 may be waived or reduced are set forth in
Sec. 4901.34.
(e) Unusual or exceptional circumstances. Notwithstanding paragraph
(a) of this section, if PBGC fails to comply with a time limit under
section 552(a)(6) of FOIA, PBGC may nevertheless assess a charge for
search and review services (or in the case of a requester described
under section 552(a)(4)(A)(ii)(II), for duplication) if one of the
following circumstances applies:
(1) PBGC has determined that unusual circumstances (as defined in
section
[[Page 64434]]
552(a)(6)(B) of FOIA) apply, PBGC needs more than 10 additional days to
process the disclosure request, and more than 5,000 pages are necessary
to respond to the request, provided that:
(i) PBGC has provided timely written notice of this determination
to the requester; and
(ii) PBGC has discussed with the requester, or made three or more
good-faith attempts to do so, via written mail, electronic mail, or
telephone how the requester could effectively limit the scope of the
request.
(2) PBGC has determined that unusual circumstances (as defined in
section 552(a)(6)(B) of FOIA) apply, PBGC has provided timely written
notice to the requester of the unusual circumstances extending the time
limit by 10 additional days, and PBGC processes the disclosure request
within that time.
(3) A court has determined that exceptional circumstances exist (as
defined in section 552(a)(6)(C) of FOIA) and has issued an order
excusing PBGC's failure to comply with the time limit.
0
24. Amend Sec. 4901.32 by revising paragraphs (a) and (b) to read as
follows:
Sec. 4901.32 Fee schedule.
(a) Charges for searching and review of records. Charges applicable
under this subpart to the search for and review of records will be made
according to the following fee schedule:
(1) Search time and review time. For ordinary search services and
review services, PBGC charges $54.00 per hour. PBGC charges fees in
quarter hour increments.
(2) Retrieving records stored by NARA. For disclosure requests that
require the retrieval of records stored at a Federal records center
operated by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA),
PBGC charges additional costs in accordance with the Transactional
Billing Rate Schedule established by NARA.
(b) Charges for duplication of records. Charges applicable under
this subpart for obtaining requested copies of records made available
for inspection will be made according to the following fee schedule and
subject to the following conditions.
(1) Standard copying fee. $0.15 for each page of record copies
furnished.
(2) Voluminous material. If the volume of page copy desired by the
requester is such that the reproduction charge at the standard page
rate would be in excess of $50, the person desiring reproduction may
request a special rate quotation from PBGC.
(3) Indexes. Pursuant to section 552(a)(2) of FOIA copies of
indexes or supplements thereto which are maintained as therein provided
but which have not been published will be provided on request at a cost
not to exceed the direct cost of duplication.
* * * * *
0
25. Amend Sec. 4901.33 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a), (b) introductory text, and (b)(1);
0
b. Removing ``the PBGC may'' and adding in its place ``PBGC may'' in
paragraph (b)(2); and
0
c. Removing ``The PBGC may'' and adding in its place ``PBGC may'' in
paragraph (c).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 4901.33 Payment of fees.
(a) Medium of payment. Payment of the applicable fees as provided
in this section must be made by check, money, or other PBGC permitted
method, and in accordance with the FOIA instructions on PBGC's website,
www.pbgc.gov.
(b) Advance payment or assurance of payment. Payment or assurance
of payment before work is begun or continued on a disclosure request
may be required as follows:
(1) Where PBGC estimates or determines that charges allowable under
the rules in this subpart, are likely to exceed $250, PBGC may require
advance payment of the entire fee or assurance of payment, as follows:
(i) Where the requester has a history of prompt payment of fees
under this part, PBGC will notify the requester of the likely cost and
obtain satisfactory assurance of full payment; or
(ii) Where the requester has no history of payment for requests
made pursuant to FOIA and this part, PBGC may require the requester to
make an advance payment of an amount up to the full estimated charges.
* * * * *
0
26. Amend Sec. 4901.34 by:
0
a. Removing ``disclosure officer'' and adding in its place ``Disclosure
Officer''; removing ``government'' and adding in its place
``Government''; removing ``waiver request shall'' and adding in its
place ``waiver or reduction request must''; and removing ``request for
waiver'' and adding in its place ``request'' in paragraph (a); and
0
b. Revising paragraph (b).
The revision reads as follows:
Sec. 4901.34 Waiver or reduction of charges.
* * * * *
(b) If the Disclosure Officer determines that the request for fee
waiver or reduction will be denied, the requester will be so advised in
writing with a brief statement of the reasons for the denial. The
writing will include the name and title or position of the person(s)
responsible for the denial, outline the appeal procedure available, and
notify the requester of the right to seek dispute resolution services
from a PBGC FOIA Public Liaison or the Office of Government Information
Services.
Issued in Washington, DC, by:
Gordon Hartogensis,
Director, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation.
[FR Doc. 2020-20018 Filed 10-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7709-02-P