Exemptions Implemented Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, 64091-64096 [2020-22331]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
at 43 CFR 17.501–17.570 (Subpart E).
NPM–EDUC–33 explains how
BIE-operated schools will implement
the Subpart E regulations and outlines
ways in which BIE will be able to
identify, assess, and provide eligible
students with disabilities appropriate
educational services within the meaning
of Section 504.
The Department will use comments
received during consultation to inform
its development of a final Section 504
policy for BIE-operated elementary and
secondary schools and dormitories. The
proposed consultation topics are: (1)
Qualifying for Section 504 protections,
(2) Program Accessibility, (3)
Identification of Students with
Disabilities, (4) Development and
contents of a Section 504 Individualized
Accommodation Plan (IAP), (5) Section
504 and Discipline: Manifestation
Determination, (6) and Compliance
Procedures: Filing a complaint.
64091
BIE will conduct two consultation
sessions through telephonic webinar
with a Tribal representative or their
designee, and school boards, parents,
teachers, and other public stakeholders.
The following table lists dates and
consultation teleconference webinar
registration information. After
registering, you will receive a
confirmation email containing
information about joining the meeting.
For
Dates
Time (EDT)
To register for webinar
Tribes ................
November 9 and 10, 2020 ............
4 p.m.–5 p.m .....
Public ................
November 9 and 10, 2020 ............
5 p.m.–6 p.m .....
Register in advance for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcvc-6vrjwpHdOA4NqtOhjmn4Wrcp9L8swF.
Register in advance for this meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcvc-6vrjwpHdOA4NqtOhjmn4Wrcp9L8swF.
The Tribal consultation presentation
and a copy of NPM–EDUC 33 can be
found at https://www.bia.gov/sites/
bia.gov/files/assets/public/raca/
national_policy_memoranda/pdf/NPMEDUC-33_Section-504_FINAL_Signed_
IssueDate_508.pdf.
The BIE strongly recommends
reviewing the NPM prior to attending a
consultation session or submitting
written comments in order to provide
meaningful feedback.
Public Comment Availability
Comments, including names, street
addresses, and other contact
information of respondents, will be
available for public review at the
address listed under the ADDRESSES
section during regular business hours (8
a.m. to 4:30 p.m. EST), Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
Individual respondents may request
confidentiality. If you wish us to
withhold your name, street address, and
other contact information (such as fax or
phone number) from public review or
from disclosure under the Freedom of
Information Act, you must state this
prominently at the beginning of your
comment. We will honor your request to
the extent allowable by law. We will
make available for public inspection in
their entirety all submissions from
organizations or businesses, and from
individuals identifying themselves as
representatives or officials of
organizations or businesses.
Authority
This document is published in
accordance with the authority delegated
by the Secretary of the Interior to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs by
209 DM 8.1.
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020–21972 Filed 10–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket No. 02–278; FCC 20–140; FRS
17118]
Exemptions Implemented Under the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991
Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
In this document, the
Commission proposes measures to
implement section 8 of the PalloneThune Telephone Robocall Abuse
Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence
Act (TRACED Act) and seeks comment
on how to best implement it. As
directed by the TRACED Act, the
Commission seeks to ensure that any
exemption the Commission has granted
under the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act (TCPA) for calls to
residential lines or for calls to wireless
numbers includes requirements with
respect to the classes of parties that may
make such calls; the classes of parties
that may be called; and the number of
such calls that may be made to a
particular called party. The Commission
also seeks comment on any conditions
that are necessary to ensure that the
existing exemptions for calls made to
residential telephone lines satisfy
section 8 of the TRACED Act and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
proposes to allow residential consumers
to opt out of any calls made pursuant to
an exemption.
DATES: Comments are due on or before
October 26, 2020, and reply comments
are due on or before November 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by CG Docket No. 02–278, by
any of the following methods:
• Electronic Filers: Comments may be
filed electronically using the internet by
accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/
ecfs/.
• Paper Filers: Parties who choose to
file by paper must file an original and
one copy of each filing. If more than one
docket or rulemaking number appears in
the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for
each additional docket or rulemaking
number.
Filings can be sent by hand or
messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or
overnight U.S. Postal Service mail. All
filings must be addressed to the
Commission’s Secretary, Office of the
Secretary, Federal Communications
Commission.
• Commercial overnight mail (other
than U.S. Postal Service Express Mail
and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050
Junction Drive, Annapolis Junction, MD
20701.
• U.S. Postal Service first-class,
Express, and Priority mail must be
addressed to 445 12th Street SW,
Washington, DC 20554.
• Effective March 19, 2020, and until
further notice, the Commission no
longer accepts any hand or messenger
delivered filings. This is a temporary
measure taken to help protect the health
and safety of individuals, and to
mitigate the transmission of COVID–19.
See FCC Announces Closure of FCC
Headquarters Open Window and
Change in Hand-Delivery Policy, Public
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
64092
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
Notice, DA 20–304 (March 19, 2020),
https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcccloses-headquarters-open-window-andchanges-hand-delivery-policy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard D. Smith of the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (717)
338–2797 or Richard.Smith@fcc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a
summary of the Commission’s notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM), in CG
Docket No. 02–278, FCC 20–140,
adopted and released on October 1,
2020. The full text of document is
available for public inspection and
copying via the Commission’s
Electronic Comment Filing System
(ECFS). To request materials in
accessible formats for people with
disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an
email to fcc504@fcc.gov or call the
Consumer and Governmental Affairs
Bureau at 202–418–0530 (voice).
This matter shall be treated as a
‘‘permit-but-disclose’’ proceeding in
accordance with the Commission’s ex
parte rules. 47 CFR 1.1200 through
1.1216. Persons making oral ex parte
presentations are reminded that
memoranda summarizing the
presentations must contain summaries
of the substances of the presentations
and not merely a listing of the subjects
discussed. More than a one or two
sentence description of the views and
arguments presented is generally
required. See 47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other
rules pertaining to oral and written ex
parte presentations in permit-butdisclose proceedings are set forth in
§ 1.1206(b) of the Commission’s rules,
47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 Analysis
The NPRM seeks comment on
proposed rule amendments that may
result in modified information
collection requirements. If the
Commission adopts any modified
information collection requirements, the
Commission will publish a notice in the
Federal Register inviting the public to
comment on the requirements, as
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. Public Law 104–13; 44 U.S.C.
3501–3520. In addition, pursuant to the
Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of
2002, the Commission seeks comment
on how it might further reduce the
information collection burden for small
business concerns with fewer than 25
employees. Public Law 107–198; 44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
1. In this notice of proposed
rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission, to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
comply with the TRACED Act, seeks
comment on the need to amend
exemptions the Commission has
previously carved out. Those
exemptions are: (1) Non-commercial
calls to a residence; (2) commercial calls
to a residence that do not constitute
telemarketing; (3) tax-exempt nonprofit
organization calls to a residence; (4)
Health Insurance Portability and
Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)related calls to a residence; (5) package
delivery-related calls to a wireless
number; (6) financial institution calls to
a wireless number; (7) healthcarerelated calls to a wireless number; (8)
inmate calling service calls to a wireless
number; and (9) cellular carrier calls to
their own subscribers. The Commission
seeks comment on these and any other
issues that may allow it to implement
section 8 of the TRACED Act. The
Commission proposes to codify in the
Commission’s rules all existing
exemptions under 47 U.S.C.
227(b)(2)(C).
A. Non-Commercial Calls to a
Residential Line
2. The Commission has exempted
calls ‘‘not made for a commercial
purpose’’ from the prohibition on
artificial or prerecorded-voice messages
to residential telephone lines. See 47
CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(ii). The Commission
seeks comment on how to amend this
rule as needed. Because this exemption
is predicated on calls not being made for
a commercial purpose, the Commission
proposes to deem these classes of
parties as ‘‘informational callers’’ that
do not have a commercial purpose. Is
this limitation sufficient to protect both
callers availing themselves of the
exemption as well as consumers
receiving calls from such organizations?
To implement section 8’s directive to
adopt requirements with respect to the
number of calls that may be made to a
particular party, the Commission seeks
comment on whether to adopt a
numerical limit on the number of calls
that may be made to a called party
under this exemption or whether to
specify in the rules that a calling party
shall not be limited in terms of the
number of calls it makes under the
exemption. If the Commission adopts a
limit, should it be an overall limit or a
limit on the number of calls that may be
made to a called party each week or
month? Additionally, the Commission
proposes to prohibit additional calls
under this exemption after a called
party has made an opt-out request to the
calling party.
3. The Commission seeks comment on
the potential burdens that these opt-out
requirements could impose on those
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities that make calls under this
exemption, including ways to minimize
any such burdens. How long would it
take to implement the requirements in
§ 64.1200(d) of the Commission’s rules
for those calls made pursuant to an
exemption under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(B)?
Would the time necessary for entities to
honor opt-out requests vary according to
the size of the calling entity? Are there
ways to mitigate any such burdens on
smaller entities? The Commission also
seeks comment on the extent to which
entities that make such artificial or
prerecorded-voice calls for a noncommercial purpose may already offer,
on a voluntary basis, an opt-out
mechanism for those subscribers who
request that they no longer be called.
B. Commercial Calls to a Residential
Line That Do Not Constitute
Telemarketing
4. The Commission has exempted
calls made for a commercial purpose but
that do not include or introduce an
advertisement or constitute
telemarketing from the prohibition on
using an artificial or prerecorded-voice
message to residential telephone lines.
See 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(iii). The
Commission seeks comment on how to
amend this rule as needed. Because this
exemption is predicated on calls not
including an advertisement or
constituting telemarketing, the
Commission proposes to deem these
classes of parties as ‘‘informational
callers’’ to the extent they are only
providing information or ‘‘transactional
callers’’ that are calling to complete or
confirm a commercial transaction with
the called party. Is this limitation
sufficient to protect both callers availing
themselves of the exemption as well as
consumers receiving calls from such
organizations? To implement section 8’s
directive to adopt requirements with
respect to the number of such calls that
may be made to a particular called
party, the Commission seeks comment
on whether to adopt a numerical limit
on the number of calls that may be made
to a called party under this exemption,
or whether to specify in the rules that
a calling party shall not be limited in
terms of the number of calls it makes
under the exemption. If the Commission
adopts a limit, should it be an overall
limit or instead a limit on the number
of calls that may be made to a called
party each week or month?
Additionally, the Commission proposes
to prohibit additional calls under this
exemption after a called party has made
an opt-out request to the calling party.
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
C. Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Organization
Calls to a Residential Line
5. The Commission has exempted
calls made by or on behalf of a taxexempt nonprofit organization from the
prohibition on using an artificial or
prerecorded voice to deliver a message
to a residential telephone line. See 47
CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(iv). The Commission
seeks comment on how to amend this
rule as needed. To implement section
8’s directive to adopt requirements with
respect to the number of such calls that
may be made to a particular called
party, the Commission seeks comment
on whether to adopt a numerical limit
on the number of calls that may be made
to a called party under this exemption,
or whether to specify in the rules that
a calling party shall not be limited in
terms of the number of calls it makes
under the exemption. If the Commission
adopts a limit, should it be an overall
limit or instead a limit on the number
of calls that may be made to a called
party each week or month?
Additionally, the Commission proposes
to prohibit additional calls under this
exemption after a called party has made
an opt-out request to the calling party.
D. HIPAA Calls to a Residential Line
6. The Commission has exempted
HIPAA-related calls that deliver a
healthcare message from the prohibition
on using an artificial or prerecorded
voice to deliver a message to residential
telephone lines. See 47 CFR
64.1200(a)(3)(v). The Commission seeks
comment on how to amend this rule as
needed. To implement section 8’s
directive to adopt requirements with
respect to the number of such calls that
may be made to a particular called
party, the Commission seeks comment
on whether to adopt a numerical limit
on the number of calls that may be made
to a called party under this exemption,
or whether to specify in the rules that
a calling party shall not be limited in
terms of the number of calls it makes
under the exemption. If the Commission
adopts a limit, should it be an overall
limit or instead a limit on the number
of calls that may be made to a called
party each week or month?
Additionally, the Commission proposes
to prohibit additional calls under this
exemption after a called party has made
an opt-out request to the calling party.
E. Package Delivery Calls to a Wireless
Number
7. The Commission has exempted
package delivery calls to wireless
consumers subject to several conditions.
See Cargo Airline Association Petition
for Expedited Declaratory Ruling, CG
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
Docket No. 02–278, Order, published at
80 FR 15688, March 25, 2015. These
conditions appear to satisfy section 8 of
the TRACED Act. Among other things,
these conditions limit the class of
calling parties (package delivery
companies), the class of called parties
(package recipients), and the number of
calls (one notification for each package,
with one additional notification for up
to two follow-up attempts to obtain a
recipient’s signature if a signature is
needed for delivery). The Commission
seeks comment on these views and
whether the exemption remains in the
public interest. The Commission also
seeks comment on how to amend this
exemption to the extent needed to
comply with section 8 of the TRACED
Act.
F. Financial Institution Calls to a
Wireless Number
8. The Commission has exempted
calls made by financial institutions
subject to certain conditions. See Rules
and Regulations Implementing the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991, CG Docket No. 02–278, WC
Docket No. 07–135, Declaratory Ruling
and Order, published at 80 FR 61129,
October 9, 2015. These conditions
appear to satisfy section 8 of the
TRACED Act. The exemption’s
conditions include limitations on the
class of calling parties (financial
institutions), the class of called parties
(customers of the financial institution),
and the number of calls (no more than
three calls per event over a three-day
period for each affected account). The
Commission seeks comment on these
views and whether the exemption
remains in the public interest. The
Commission also seeks comment on
how to amend this exemption to the
extent needed to comply with section 8
of the TRACED Act.
G. Healthcare Provider Calls to a
Wireless Number
9. The Commission has exempted
healthcare provider calls subject to
several conditions. See Rules and
Regulations Implementing the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of
1991, CG Docket No. 02–278, WC
Docket No. 07–135, Declaratory Ruling
and Order, published at 80 FR 61129,
October 9, 2015. These conditions
appear to satisfy section 8 of the
TRACED Act. They limit the class of
calling parties (by or on behalf of a
‘‘covered entity’’ or its ‘‘business
associate’’ as defined by HIPAA), the
class of called parties (patients), and the
number of calls (one message/call per
day, up to a maximum of three voice
calls or text messages combined per
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64093
week). The Commission seeks comment
on these views and whether the
exemption remains in the public
interest. The Commission also seeks
comment on how to amend this
exemption to the extent needed to
comply with section 8 of the TRACED
Act.
H. Inmate Calling Service Calls to a
Wireless Number
10. The Commission has exempted
calls from inmate phone service
providers subject to several conditions.
See Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer
Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket No.
02–278, WC Docket No. 07–135,
Declaratory Ruling and Order,
published at 80 FR 61129, October 9,
2015. These conditions appear to satisfy
section 8 of the TRACED Act. They limit
the class of calling parties (inmate
collect call service providers), the class
of called parties (wireless subscribers
with whom the service provider needs
to establish a billing arrangement for
future inmate collect calls), and the
number of calls (no more than three
notifications following an unsuccessful
collect call). The Commission seeks
comment on these views and whether
the exemption remains in the public
interest. The Commission also seeks
comment on how to amend this
exemption to the extent needed to
comply with section 8 of the TRACED
Act.
I. Cellular Carrier Calls to Subscribers
11. In 1992, the Commission
concluded that cellular carriers need not
obtain additional consent from their
subscribers prior to initiating autodialed
or artificial or prerecorded-voice calls
for which the cellular subscriber is not
charged because such calls are not
prohibited by 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A)(iii).
This ruling limited the class of calling
parties (cellular carrier) and the class of
called parties (the cellular carrier’s own
subscriber), but it does not appear to
limit the number of calls a calling party
may make to a called party beyond not
charging the subscriber for the call. The
Commission seeks comment on how to
amend this exemption as needed. To
implement section 8’s directive to adopt
requirements with respect to the
number of such calls that may be made
to a particular called party, the
Commission seeks comment on whether
to adopt a numerical limit on the
number of calls that may be made to a
called party under this exemption, or
whether to specify in the rules that a
calling party shall not be limited in
terms of the number of calls it makes
under the exemption. If the Commission
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
64094
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
adopts a limit, should it be an overall
limit or instead a limit on the number
of calls that may be made to a called
party each week or month?
Additionally, the Commission proposes
to prohibit additional calls under this
exemption after a called party has made
an opt-out request to the calling party.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory
Flexibility Act of 1980, as amended, the
Commission has prepared the Initial
Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA)
of the possible significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities by the policies and rules
proposed in the NPRM. Written public
comments are requested on the IRFA.
Comments must be identified as
responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments on the
NPRM provided.
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the
Proposed Rules
13. The TRACED Act directs the
Commission, no later than December 30,
2020, to ‘‘prescribe such regulations or
amend such existing regulations, as
necessary to ensure that [any] such
exemption [issued under 47 U.S.C.
227(b)(2)(B) or (C) of the TCPA] contains
each requirement [listed in section 8(a)
of the TRACED Act].’’ Section 8(b) of
the TRACED Act provides that ‘‘[t]o the
extent such an exemption contains such
a requirement before such date of
enactment, nothing in this section or the
amendments made by this section shall
be construed to require the Commission
to prescribe or amend regulations
relating to such requirement.’’
14. The NPRM seeks comment on
whether to amend the exemptions the
Commission has previously carved out
to comply with the TRACED Act. Those
exemptions are: (1) Non-commercial
calls to a residence; (2) commercial calls
to a residence that do not constitute
telemarketing; (3) tax-exempt nonprofit
organization calls to a residence; (4)
HIPAA-related calls to a residence; (5)
package delivery-related calls to a
wireless number; (6) financial
institution calls to a wireless number;
(7) healthcare-related calls to a wireless
number; (8) inmate calling service calls
to a wireless number; and (9) cellular
carrier calls to their own subscribers.
The NPRM seeks comment on these and
any other issues that may allow the
Commission to implement section 8 of
the TRACED Act and the TCPA’s
objective in balancing individual
privacy rights with legitimate
communications and on ways to
minimize any compliance burdens for
both small and large entities that make
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
calls pursuant to one of the exemptions
in the law. The NPRM proposes to
codify all existing exemptions granted
under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(C).
B. Legal Basis
15. The proposed rules are authorized
under sections 4(i), 4(j), and 227 of the
Communications Act of 1934, as
amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), 154(j), 227,
and section 8 of the Pallone-Thune
Telephone Robocall Abuse Criminal
Enforcement and Deterrence Act, Public
Law 116–105, 133 Stat. 3274.
C. Description of Projected Reporting,
Recordkeeping, and Other Compliance
Requirements
16. The NPRM generally does not
propose specific limits on any existing
exemptions in the rules and thus
contains no specific reporting or
recordkeeping requirements. The NPRM
does, however, seek comment on
requiring entities making artificial or
prerecorded-voice calls to residential
numbers pursuant to any of the
exemptions adopted under 47 U.S.C.
227(b)(2)(B) to allow consumers to opt
out of any future calls. In such cases, a
caller may need to record and track such
opt-out requests in order to avoid
making any additional calls to certain
consumers. In such cases, a caller may
need to record and track such opt-out
requests in order to avoid making any
additional calls to certain consumers.
D. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant
Economic Impact on Small Entities, and
Significant Alternatives Considered
17. The RFA requires an agency to
describe any significant alternatives that
it has considered in reaching its
proposed approach, which may include
the following four alternatives (among
others): (1) The establishment of
differing compliance or reporting
requirements or timetables that take into
account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification,
consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements
under the rule for small entities; (3) the
use of performance, rather than design,
standards; and (4) an exemption from
coverage of the rule, or any part thereof,
for small entities.
18. The NPRM specifically seeks
comment on the timing necessary for
entities that currently take advantage of
exemptions from the TCPA to
implement any new limitations the
Commission might adopt on such
exemptions. The NPRM considers, for
example, different timing schedules for
small and large entities subject to the
TCPA rules. Specifically, the NPRM
asks about the time necessary for
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
entities to honor opt-out requests and
whether that will vary according to the
size of the entity. Finally, the NPRM
seeks comment on different options
available to entities to ensure they are
complying with consumers’ desire not
to be contacted. It asks whether a caller
should simply be permitted to provide
a telephone number for opting out or
whether the caller should provide an
automated voice-response mechanism
during the call for doing so. The NPRM
considers any compliance costs for
small businesses if the proposed rules
are adopted.
19. The Commission expects to
consider the economic impact on small
entities, as identified in comments filed
in response to the NPRM and this IRFA,
in reaching its final conclusions and
taking action in this proceeding.
E. Federal Rules That May Duplicate,
Overlap, or Conflict With the Proposed
Rules
20. None.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Communications common carriers,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Telecommunications,
Telephone.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Federal Communications
Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR
part 64 as follows:
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES
RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
1. The authority citation for part 64
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 217,
218, 220, 222, 225, 226, 227, 227b, 228,
251(a), 251(e), 254(k), 262, 403(b)(2)(B), (c),
616, 620, 1401–1473, unless otherwise noted;
Pub. L. 115–141, Div. P, sec. 503, 132 Stat.
348, 1091.
2. Amend § 64.1200 by revising
paragraph (a)(1)(iv), adding paragraph
(a)(9), and revising paragraphs (b)(2) and
(3) and (d) to read as follows:
■
§ 64.1200
Delivery restrictions.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) A person will not be liable for
violating the prohibition in paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) of this section when the call is
placed to a wireless number that has
been ported from wireline service and
such call is a voice call; not knowingly
made to a wireless number; and made
within 15 days of the porting of the
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
number from wireline to wireless
service, provided the number is not
already on the national do-not-call
registry or caller’s company-specific donot-call list. A person will not be liable
for violating the prohibition in
paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section when
making calls exempted by paragraph
(a)(9) of this section.
*
*
*
*
*
(9) A person will not be liable for
violating the prohibition in paragraph
(a)(1)(iii) of this section for making any
call exempted in this paragraph (a)(9),
provided that the call is not charged to
the called person or counted against the
called person’s plan limits on minutes
or texts. As used in this paragraph (a)(9),
the term ‘‘call’’ includes a text message,
including a short message service (SMS)
call.
(i) Calls made by a package delivery
company to notify a consumer about a
package delivery, provided that all of
the following conditions are met:
(A) The notification must be sent only
to the telephone number for the package
recipient;
(B) The notification must identify the
name of the package delivery company
and include contact information for the
package delivery company;
(C) The notification must not include
any telemarketing, solicitation, or
advertising content;
(D) The voice call or text message
notification must be concise, generally
one minute or less in length for voice
calls or 160 characters or less in length
for text messages;
(E) The package delivery company
shall send only one notification
(whether by voice call or text message)
per package, except that one additional
notification may be sent for each
attempt to deliver the package, up to
two attempts, if the recipient’s signature
is required for the package and the
recipient was not available to sign for
the package on the previous delivery
attempt;
(F) The package delivery company
must offer package recipients the ability
to opt out of receiving future delivery
notification calls and messages and
must honor an opt-out request within a
reasonable time from the date such
request is made, not to exceed thirty
days; and,
(G) Each notification must include
information on how to opt out of future
delivery notifications; voice call
notifications that could be answered by
a live person must include an
automated, interactive voice- and/or key
press-activated opt-out mechanism that
enables the called person to make an
opt-out request prior to terminating the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
call; voice call notifications that could
be answered by an answering machine
or voice mail service must include a
toll-free number that the consumer can
call to opt out of future package delivery
notifications; text notifications must
include the ability for the recipient to
opt out by replying ‘‘STOP.’’
(ii) Calls made by an inmate collect
call service provider following an
unsuccessful collect call to establish a
billing arrangement with the called
party to enable future collect calls,
provided that all of the following
conditions are met:
(A) Notifications must identify the
name of the inmate collect call service
provider and include contact
information;
(B) Notifications must not include any
telemarketing, solicitation, debt
collection, or advertising content;
(C) Notifications must be clear and
concise, generally one minute or less;
(D) Inmate collect call service
providers shall send no more than three
notifications following each inmate
collect call that is unsuccessful due to
the lack of an established billing
arrangement, and shall not retain the
called party’s number after call
completion or, in the alternative, after
the third notification attempt; and
(E) Each notification call must include
information on how to opt out of future
calls; voice calls that could be answered
by a live person must include an
automated, interactive voice- and/or key
press-activated opt-out mechanism that
enables the called person to make an
opt-out request prior to terminating the
call; voice calls that could be answered
by an answering machine or voice mail
service must include a toll-free number
that the consumer can call to opt out of
future notification calls; and,
(F) The inmate collect call service
provider must honor opt-out requests
immediately.
(iii) Calls made by any financial
institution as defined in section 4(k) of
the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,
15 U.S.C. 6809(3)(A), provided that all
of the following conditions are met:
(A) Voice calls and text messages
must be sent only to the wireless
telephone number provided by the
customer of the financial institution;
(B) Voice calls and text messages must
state the name and contact information
of the financial institution (for voice
calls, these disclosures must be made at
the beginning of the call);
(C) Voice calls and text messages are
strictly limited to those for the following
purposes: Transactions and events that
suggest a risk of fraud or identity theft;
possible breaches of the security of
customers’ personal information; steps
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
64095
consumers can take to prevent or
remedy harm caused by data security
breaches; and actions needed to arrange
for receipt of pending money transfers;
(D) Voice calls and text messages
must not include any telemarketing,
cross-marketing, solicitation, debt
collection, or advertising content;
(E) Voice calls and text messages must
be concise, generally one minute or less
in length for voice calls (unless more
time is needed to obtain customer
responses or answer customer
questions) or 160 characters or less in
length for text messages;
(F) A financial institution may initiate
no more than three messages (whether
by voice call or text message) per event
over a three-day period for an affected
account;
(G) A financial institution must offer
recipients within each message an easy
means to opt out of future such
messages; voice calls that could be
answered by a live person must include
an automated, interactive voice- and/or
key press-activated opt-out mechanism
that enables the call recipient to make
an opt-out request prior to terminating
the call; voice calls that could be
answered by an answering machine or
voice mail service must include a tollfree number that the consumer can call
to opt out of future calls; text messages
must inform recipients of the ability to
opt out by replying ‘‘STOP,’’ which will
be the exclusive means by which
consumers may opt out of such
messages; and,
(H) A financial institution must honor
opt-out requests immediately.
(iv) Calls made by healthcare
providers, which include hospitals,
emergency care centers, medical
physician or service offices, poison
control centers, and other healthcare
professionals, provided that all of the
following conditions are met:
(A) Voice calls and text messages
must be sent only to the wireless
telephone number provided by the
patient;
(B) Voice calls and text messages must
state the name and contact information
of the healthcare provider (for voice
calls, these disclosures would need to
be made at the beginning of the call);
(C) Voice calls and text messages are
strictly limited to those for the following
purposes: Appointment and exam
confirmations and reminders, wellness
checkups, hospital pre-registration
instructions, pre-operative instructions,
lab results, post-discharge follow-up
intended to prevent readmission,
prescription notifications, and home
healthcare instructions;
(D) Voice calls and text messages
must not include any telemarketing,
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
64096
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Proposed Rules
solicitation, or advertising; may not
include accounting, billing, debtcollection, or other financial content;
and must comply with HIPAA privacy
rules, 45 CFR 160.103;
(E) Voice calls and text messages must
be concise, generally one minute or less
in length for voice calls or 160
characters or less in length for text
messages;
(F) A healthcare provider may initiate
only one message (whether by voice call
or text message) per day to each patient,
up to a maximum of three voice calls or
text messages combined per week to
each patient;
(G) A healthcare provider must offer
recipients within each message an easy
means to opt out of future such
messages; voice calls that could be
answered by a live person must include
an automated, interactive voice- and/or
key press-activated opt-out mechanism
that enables the call recipient to make
an opt-out request prior to terminating
the call; voice calls that could be
answered by an answering machine or
voice mail service must include a tollfree number that the consumer can call
to opt out of future healthcare calls; text
messages must inform recipients of the
ability to opt out by replying ‘‘STOP,’’
which will be the exclusive means by
which consumers may opt out of such
messages; and,
(H) A healthcare provider must honor
opt-out requests immediately.
(b) * * *
(2) During or after the message, state
clearly the telephone number (other
than that of the autodialer or
prerecorded message player that placed
the call) of such business, other entity,
or individual. The telephone number
provided may not be a 900 number or
any other number for which charges
exceed local or long distance
transmission charges. For telemarketing
messages and messages made pursuant
to an exemption under paragraphs
(a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section to
residential telephone subscribers, such
telephone number must permit any
individual to make a do-not-call request
during regular business hours; and
(3) In every case where the artificial
or prerecorded-voice telephone message
is made pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this
section or includes or introduces an
advertisement or constitutes
telemarketing and is delivered to a
residential telephone line or any of the
lines or telephone numbers described in
paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this
section, provide an automated,
interactive voice- and/or key pressactivated opt-out mechanism for the
called person to make a do-not-call
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:53 Oct 08, 2020
Jkt 253001
request, including brief explanatory
instructions on how to use such
mechanism, within two (2) seconds of
providing the identification information
required in paragraph (b)(1) of this
section. When the called person elects
to opt out using such mechanism, the
mechanism must automatically record
the called person’s number to the
caller’s do-not-call list and immediately
terminate the call. When the artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone message is
left on an answering machine or a voice
mail service, such message must also
provide a toll free number that enables
the called person to call back at a later
time and connect directly to the
automated, interactive voice- and/or key
press-activated opt-out mechanism and
automatically record the called person’s
number to the caller’s do-not-call list.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) No person or entity shall initiate
any artificial or prerecorded-voice
telephone call pursuant to an exemption
under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of
this section or any call for telemarketing
purposes to a residential telephone
subscriber unless such person or entity
has instituted procedures for
maintaining a list of persons who
request not to receive such calls made
by or on behalf of that person or entity.
The procedures instituted must meet the
following minimum standards:
(1) Written policy. Persons or entities
making artificial or prerecorded-voice
telephone calls pursuant to an
exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii)
through (v) of this section or calls for
telemarketing purposes must have a
written policy, available upon demand,
for maintaining a do-not-call list.
(2) Training of personnel. Personnel
engaged in making artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone calls
pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this
section or who are engaged in any
aspect of telemarketing must be
informed and trained in the existence
and use of the do-not-call list.
(3) Recording, disclosure of do-notcall requests. If a person or entity
making an artificial or prerecordedvoice telephone call pursuant to an
exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii)
through (v) of this section or any call for
telemarketing purposes (or on whose
behalf such a call is made) receives a
request from a residential telephone
subscriber not to receive calls from that
person or entity, the person or entity
must record the request and place the
subscriber’s name, if provided, and
telephone number on the do-not-call list
at the time the request is made. Persons
or entities making such calls (or on
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 9990
whose behalf such calls are made) must
honor a residential subscriber’s do-notcall request within a reasonable time
from the date such request is made. This
period may not exceed thirty days from
the date of such request. If such requests
are recorded or maintained by a party
other than the person or entity on whose
behalf the call is made, the person or
entity on whose behalf the call is made
will be liable for any failures to honor
the do-not-call request. A person or
entity making an artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone call
pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this
section or any call for telemarketing
purposes must obtain a consumer’s
prior express permission to share or
forward the consumer’s request not to
be called to a party other than the
person or entity on whose behalf a call
is made or an affiliated entity.
(4) Identification of callers and
telemarketers. A person or entity
making an artificial or prerecordedvoice telephone call pursuant to an
exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii)
through (v) of this section or any call for
telemarketing purposes must provide
the called party with the name of the
individual caller, the name of the
person or entity on whose behalf the
call is being made, and a telephone
number or address at which the person
or entity may be contacted. The
telephone number provided may not be
a 900 number or any other number for
which charges exceed local or long
distance transmission charges.
(5) Affiliated persons or entities. In
the absence of a specific request by the
subscriber to the contrary, a residential
subscriber’s do-not-call request shall
apply to the particular entity making the
call (or on whose behalf a call is made),
and will not apply to affiliated entities
unless the consumer reasonably would
expect them to be included given the
identification of the caller and (for
telemarketing calls) the product being
advertised.
(6) Maintenance of do-not-call lists. A
person or entity making artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone calls
pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this
section or any call for telemarketing
purposes must maintain a record of a
consumer’s request not to receive
further calls. A do-not-call request must
be honored for 5 years from the time the
request is made.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 2020–22331 Filed 10–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712–01–P
E:\FR\FM\09OCP1.SGM
09OCP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 197 (Friday, October 9, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 64091-64096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22331]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 64
[CG Docket No. 02-278; FCC 20-140; FRS 17118]
Exemptions Implemented Under the Telephone Consumer Protection
Act of 1991
AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission proposes measures to
implement section 8 of the Pallone-Thune Telephone Robocall Abuse
Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act (TRACED Act) and seeks comment
on how to best implement it. As directed by the TRACED Act, the
Commission seeks to ensure that any exemption the Commission has
granted under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) for calls to
residential lines or for calls to wireless numbers includes
requirements with respect to the classes of parties that may make such
calls; the classes of parties that may be called; and the number of
such calls that may be made to a particular called party. The
Commission also seeks comment on any conditions that are necessary to
ensure that the existing exemptions for calls made to residential
telephone lines satisfy section 8 of the TRACED Act and proposes to
allow residential consumers to opt out of any calls made pursuant to an
exemption.
DATES: Comments are due on or before October 26, 2020, and reply
comments are due on or before November 3, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by CG Docket No. 02-278,
by any of the following methods:
Electronic Filers: Comments may be filed electronically
using the internet by accessing the ECFS: https://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/.
Paper Filers: Parties who choose to file by paper must
file an original and one copy of each filing. If more than one docket
or rulemaking number appears in the caption of this proceeding, filers
must submit two additional copies for each additional docket or
rulemaking number.
Filings can be sent by hand or messenger delivery, by commercial
overnight courier, or by first-class or overnight U.S. Postal Service
mail. All filings must be addressed to the Commission's Secretary,
Office of the Secretary, Federal Communications Commission.
Commercial overnight mail (other than U.S. Postal Service
Express Mail and Priority Mail) must be sent to 9050 Junction Drive,
Annapolis Junction, MD 20701.
U.S. Postal Service first-class, Express, and Priority
mail must be addressed to 445 12th Street SW, Washington, DC 20554.
Effective March 19, 2020, and until further notice, the
Commission no longer accepts any hand or messenger delivered filings.
This is a temporary measure taken to help protect the health and safety
of individuals, and to mitigate the transmission of COVID-19. See FCC
Announces Closure of FCC Headquarters Open Window and Change in Hand-
Delivery Policy, Public
[[Page 64092]]
Notice, DA 20-304 (March 19, 2020), https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-closes-headquarters-open-window-and-changes-hand-delivery-policy.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Richard D. Smith of the Consumer and
Governmental Affairs Bureau at (717) 338-2797 or [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This is a summary of the Commission's notice
of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), in CG Docket No. 02-278, FCC 20-140,
adopted and released on October 1, 2020. The full text of document is
available for public inspection and copying via the Commission's
Electronic Comment Filing System (ECFS). To request materials in
accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print,
electronic files, audio format), send an email to [email protected] or
call the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau at 202-418-0530
(voice).
This matter shall be treated as a ``permit-but-disclose''
proceeding in accordance with the Commission's ex parte rules. 47 CFR
1.1200 through 1.1216. Persons making oral ex parte presentations are
reminded that memoranda summarizing the presentations must contain
summaries of the substances of the presentations and not merely a
listing of the subjects discussed. More than a one or two sentence
description of the views and arguments presented is generally required.
See 47 CFR 1.1206(b). Other rules pertaining to oral and written ex
parte presentations in permit-but-disclose proceedings are set forth in
Sec. 1.1206(b) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.1206(b).
Initial Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
The NPRM seeks comment on proposed rule amendments that may result
in modified information collection requirements. If the Commission
adopts any modified information collection requirements, the Commission
will publish a notice in the Federal Register inviting the public to
comment on the requirements, as required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act. Public Law 104-13; 44 U.S.C. 3501-3520. In addition, pursuant to
the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, the Commission seeks
comment on how it might further reduce the information collection
burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees. Public
Law 107-198; 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Synopsis
1. In this notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), the Commission, to
comply with the TRACED Act, seeks comment on the need to amend
exemptions the Commission has previously carved out. Those exemptions
are: (1) Non-commercial calls to a residence; (2) commercial calls to a
residence that do not constitute telemarketing; (3) tax-exempt
nonprofit organization calls to a residence; (4) Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA)-related calls to a
residence; (5) package delivery-related calls to a wireless number; (6)
financial institution calls to a wireless number; (7) healthcare-
related calls to a wireless number; (8) inmate calling service calls to
a wireless number; and (9) cellular carrier calls to their own
subscribers. The Commission seeks comment on these and any other issues
that may allow it to implement section 8 of the TRACED Act. The
Commission proposes to codify in the Commission's rules all existing
exemptions under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(C).
A. Non-Commercial Calls to a Residential Line
2. The Commission has exempted calls ``not made for a commercial
purpose'' from the prohibition on artificial or prerecorded-voice
messages to residential telephone lines. See 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(ii).
The Commission seeks comment on how to amend this rule as needed.
Because this exemption is predicated on calls not being made for a
commercial purpose, the Commission proposes to deem these classes of
parties as ``informational callers'' that do not have a commercial
purpose. Is this limitation sufficient to protect both callers availing
themselves of the exemption as well as consumers receiving calls from
such organizations? To implement section 8's directive to adopt
requirements with respect to the number of calls that may be made to a
particular party, the Commission seeks comment on whether to adopt a
numerical limit on the number of calls that may be made to a called
party under this exemption or whether to specify in the rules that a
calling party shall not be limited in terms of the number of calls it
makes under the exemption. If the Commission adopts a limit, should it
be an overall limit or a limit on the number of calls that may be made
to a called party each week or month? Additionally, the Commission
proposes to prohibit additional calls under this exemption after a
called party has made an opt-out request to the calling party.
3. The Commission seeks comment on the potential burdens that these
opt-out requirements could impose on those entities that make calls
under this exemption, including ways to minimize any such burdens. How
long would it take to implement the requirements in Sec. 64.1200(d) of
the Commission's rules for those calls made pursuant to an exemption
under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(B)? Would the time necessary for entities to
honor opt-out requests vary according to the size of the calling
entity? Are there ways to mitigate any such burdens on smaller
entities? The Commission also seeks comment on the extent to which
entities that make such artificial or prerecorded-voice calls for a
non-commercial purpose may already offer, on a voluntary basis, an opt-
out mechanism for those subscribers who request that they no longer be
called.
B. Commercial Calls to a Residential Line That Do Not Constitute
Telemarketing
4. The Commission has exempted calls made for a commercial purpose
but that do not include or introduce an advertisement or constitute
telemarketing from the prohibition on using an artificial or
prerecorded-voice message to residential telephone lines. See 47 CFR
64.1200(a)(3)(iii). The Commission seeks comment on how to amend this
rule as needed. Because this exemption is predicated on calls not
including an advertisement or constituting telemarketing, the
Commission proposes to deem these classes of parties as ``informational
callers'' to the extent they are only providing information or
``transactional callers'' that are calling to complete or confirm a
commercial transaction with the called party. Is this limitation
sufficient to protect both callers availing themselves of the exemption
as well as consumers receiving calls from such organizations? To
implement section 8's directive to adopt requirements with respect to
the number of such calls that may be made to a particular called party,
the Commission seeks comment on whether to adopt a numerical limit on
the number of calls that may be made to a called party under this
exemption, or whether to specify in the rules that a calling party
shall not be limited in terms of the number of calls it makes under the
exemption. If the Commission adopts a limit, should it be an overall
limit or instead a limit on the number of calls that may be made to a
called party each week or month? Additionally, the Commission proposes
to prohibit additional calls under this exemption after a called party
has made an opt-out request to the calling party.
[[Page 64093]]
C. Tax-Exempt Nonprofit Organization Calls to a Residential Line
5. The Commission has exempted calls made by or on behalf of a tax-
exempt nonprofit organization from the prohibition on using an
artificial or prerecorded voice to deliver a message to a residential
telephone line. See 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(iv). The Commission seeks
comment on how to amend this rule as needed. To implement section 8's
directive to adopt requirements with respect to the number of such
calls that may be made to a particular called party, the Commission
seeks comment on whether to adopt a numerical limit on the number of
calls that may be made to a called party under this exemption, or
whether to specify in the rules that a calling party shall not be
limited in terms of the number of calls it makes under the exemption.
If the Commission adopts a limit, should it be an overall limit or
instead a limit on the number of calls that may be made to a called
party each week or month? Additionally, the Commission proposes to
prohibit additional calls under this exemption after a called party has
made an opt-out request to the calling party.
D. HIPAA Calls to a Residential Line
6. The Commission has exempted HIPAA-related calls that deliver a
healthcare message from the prohibition on using an artificial or
prerecorded voice to deliver a message to residential telephone lines.
See 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(3)(v). The Commission seeks comment on how to
amend this rule as needed. To implement section 8's directive to adopt
requirements with respect to the number of such calls that may be made
to a particular called party, the Commission seeks comment on whether
to adopt a numerical limit on the number of calls that may be made to a
called party under this exemption, or whether to specify in the rules
that a calling party shall not be limited in terms of the number of
calls it makes under the exemption. If the Commission adopts a limit,
should it be an overall limit or instead a limit on the number of calls
that may be made to a called party each week or month? Additionally,
the Commission proposes to prohibit additional calls under this
exemption after a called party has made an opt-out request to the
calling party.
E. Package Delivery Calls to a Wireless Number
7. The Commission has exempted package delivery calls to wireless
consumers subject to several conditions. See Cargo Airline Association
Petition for Expedited Declaratory Ruling, CG Docket No. 02-278, Order,
published at 80 FR 15688, March 25, 2015. These conditions appear to
satisfy section 8 of the TRACED Act. Among other things, these
conditions limit the class of calling parties (package delivery
companies), the class of called parties (package recipients), and the
number of calls (one notification for each package, with one additional
notification for up to two follow-up attempts to obtain a recipient's
signature if a signature is needed for delivery). The Commission seeks
comment on these views and whether the exemption remains in the public
interest. The Commission also seeks comment on how to amend this
exemption to the extent needed to comply with section 8 of the TRACED
Act.
F. Financial Institution Calls to a Wireless Number
8. The Commission has exempted calls made by financial institutions
subject to certain conditions. See Rules and Regulations Implementing
the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket No. 02-278, WC
Docket No. 07-135, Declaratory Ruling and Order, published at 80 FR
61129, October 9, 2015. These conditions appear to satisfy section 8 of
the TRACED Act. The exemption's conditions include limitations on the
class of calling parties (financial institutions), the class of called
parties (customers of the financial institution), and the number of
calls (no more than three calls per event over a three-day period for
each affected account). The Commission seeks comment on these views and
whether the exemption remains in the public interest. The Commission
also seeks comment on how to amend this exemption to the extent needed
to comply with section 8 of the TRACED Act.
G. Healthcare Provider Calls to a Wireless Number
9. The Commission has exempted healthcare provider calls subject to
several conditions. See Rules and Regulations Implementing the
Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket No. 02-278, WC
Docket No. 07-135, Declaratory Ruling and Order, published at 80 FR
61129, October 9, 2015. These conditions appear to satisfy section 8 of
the TRACED Act. They limit the class of calling parties (by or on
behalf of a ``covered entity'' or its ``business associate'' as defined
by HIPAA), the class of called parties (patients), and the number of
calls (one message/call per day, up to a maximum of three voice calls
or text messages combined per week). The Commission seeks comment on
these views and whether the exemption remains in the public interest.
The Commission also seeks comment on how to amend this exemption to the
extent needed to comply with section 8 of the TRACED Act.
H. Inmate Calling Service Calls to a Wireless Number
10. The Commission has exempted calls from inmate phone service
providers subject to several conditions. See Rules and Regulations
Implementing the Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991, CG Docket
No. 02-278, WC Docket No. 07-135, Declaratory Ruling and Order,
published at 80 FR 61129, October 9, 2015. These conditions appear to
satisfy section 8 of the TRACED Act. They limit the class of calling
parties (inmate collect call service providers), the class of called
parties (wireless subscribers with whom the service provider needs to
establish a billing arrangement for future inmate collect calls), and
the number of calls (no more than three notifications following an
unsuccessful collect call). The Commission seeks comment on these views
and whether the exemption remains in the public interest. The
Commission also seeks comment on how to amend this exemption to the
extent needed to comply with section 8 of the TRACED Act.
I. Cellular Carrier Calls to Subscribers
11. In 1992, the Commission concluded that cellular carriers need
not obtain additional consent from their subscribers prior to
initiating autodialed or artificial or prerecorded-voice calls for
which the cellular subscriber is not charged because such calls are not
prohibited by 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(1)(A)(iii). This ruling limited the
class of calling parties (cellular carrier) and the class of called
parties (the cellular carrier's own subscriber), but it does not appear
to limit the number of calls a calling party may make to a called party
beyond not charging the subscriber for the call. The Commission seeks
comment on how to amend this exemption as needed. To implement section
8's directive to adopt requirements with respect to the number of such
calls that may be made to a particular called party, the Commission
seeks comment on whether to adopt a numerical limit on the number of
calls that may be made to a called party under this exemption, or
whether to specify in the rules that a calling party shall not be
limited in terms of the number of calls it makes under the exemption.
If the Commission
[[Page 64094]]
adopts a limit, should it be an overall limit or instead a limit on the
number of calls that may be made to a called party each week or month?
Additionally, the Commission proposes to prohibit additional calls
under this exemption after a called party has made an opt-out request
to the calling party.
Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis
12. As required by the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980, as
amended, the Commission has prepared the Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (IRFA) of the possible significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities by the policies and rules proposed
in the NPRM. Written public comments are requested on the IRFA.
Comments must be identified as responses to the IRFA and must be filed
by the deadlines for comments on the NPRM provided.
A. Need for, and Objectives of, the Proposed Rules
13. The TRACED Act directs the Commission, no later than December
30, 2020, to ``prescribe such regulations or amend such existing
regulations, as necessary to ensure that [any] such exemption [issued
under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(B) or (C) of the TCPA] contains each
requirement [listed in section 8(a) of the TRACED Act].'' Section 8(b)
of the TRACED Act provides that ``[t]o the extent such an exemption
contains such a requirement before such date of enactment, nothing in
this section or the amendments made by this section shall be construed
to require the Commission to prescribe or amend regulations relating to
such requirement.''
14. The NPRM seeks comment on whether to amend the exemptions the
Commission has previously carved out to comply with the TRACED Act.
Those exemptions are: (1) Non-commercial calls to a residence; (2)
commercial calls to a residence that do not constitute telemarketing;
(3) tax-exempt nonprofit organization calls to a residence; (4) HIPAA-
related calls to a residence; (5) package delivery-related calls to a
wireless number; (6) financial institution calls to a wireless number;
(7) healthcare-related calls to a wireless number; (8) inmate calling
service calls to a wireless number; and (9) cellular carrier calls to
their own subscribers. The NPRM seeks comment on these and any other
issues that may allow the Commission to implement section 8 of the
TRACED Act and the TCPA's objective in balancing individual privacy
rights with legitimate communications and on ways to minimize any
compliance burdens for both small and large entities that make calls
pursuant to one of the exemptions in the law. The NPRM proposes to
codify all existing exemptions granted under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(C).
B. Legal Basis
15. The proposed rules are authorized under sections 4(i), 4(j),
and 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.
154(i), 154(j), 227, and section 8 of the Pallone-Thune Telephone
Robocall Abuse Criminal Enforcement and Deterrence Act, Public Law 116-
105, 133 Stat. 3274.
C. Description of Projected Reporting, Recordkeeping, and Other
Compliance Requirements
16. The NPRM generally does not propose specific limits on any
existing exemptions in the rules and thus contains no specific
reporting or recordkeeping requirements. The NPRM does, however, seek
comment on requiring entities making artificial or prerecorded-voice
calls to residential numbers pursuant to any of the exemptions adopted
under 47 U.S.C. 227(b)(2)(B) to allow consumers to opt out of any
future calls. In such cases, a caller may need to record and track such
opt-out requests in order to avoid making any additional calls to
certain consumers. In such cases, a caller may need to record and track
such opt-out requests in order to avoid making any additional calls to
certain consumers.
D. Steps Taken To Minimize Significant Economic Impact on Small
Entities, and Significant Alternatives Considered
17. The RFA requires an agency to describe any significant
alternatives that it has considered in reaching its proposed approach,
which may include the following four alternatives (among others): (1)
The establishment of differing compliance or reporting requirements or
timetables that take into account the resources available to small
entities; (2) the clarification, consolidation, or simplification of
compliance or reporting requirements under the rule for small entities;
(3) the use of performance, rather than design, standards; and (4) an
exemption from coverage of the rule, or any part thereof, for small
entities.
18. The NPRM specifically seeks comment on the timing necessary for
entities that currently take advantage of exemptions from the TCPA to
implement any new limitations the Commission might adopt on such
exemptions. The NPRM considers, for example, different timing schedules
for small and large entities subject to the TCPA rules. Specifically,
the NPRM asks about the time necessary for entities to honor opt-out
requests and whether that will vary according to the size of the
entity. Finally, the NPRM seeks comment on different options available
to entities to ensure they are complying with consumers' desire not to
be contacted. It asks whether a caller should simply be permitted to
provide a telephone number for opting out or whether the caller should
provide an automated voice-response mechanism during the call for doing
so. The NPRM considers any compliance costs for small businesses if the
proposed rules are adopted.
19. The Commission expects to consider the economic impact on small
entities, as identified in comments filed in response to the NPRM and
this IRFA, in reaching its final conclusions and taking action in this
proceeding.
E. Federal Rules That May Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict With the
Proposed Rules
20. None.
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Communications common carriers, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Telecommunications, Telephone.
Federal Communications Commission.
Marlene Dortch,
Secretary, Office of the Secretary.
Proposed Rules
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal
Communications Commission proposes to amend 47 CFR part 64 as follows:
PART 64--MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERS
0
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 47 U.S.C. 154, 201, 202, 217, 218, 220, 222, 225,
226, 227, 227b, 228, 251(a), 251(e), 254(k), 262, 403(b)(2)(B), (c),
616, 620, 1401-1473, unless otherwise noted; Pub. L. 115-141, Div.
P, sec. 503, 132 Stat. 348, 1091.
0
2. Amend Sec. 64.1200 by revising paragraph (a)(1)(iv), adding
paragraph (a)(9), and revising paragraphs (b)(2) and (3) and (d) to
read as follows:
Sec. 64.1200 Delivery restrictions.
(a) * * *
(1) * * *
(iv) A person will not be liable for violating the prohibition in
paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section when the call is placed to a
wireless number that has been ported from wireline service and such
call is a voice call; not knowingly made to a wireless number; and made
within 15 days of the porting of the
[[Page 64095]]
number from wireline to wireless service, provided the number is not
already on the national do-not-call registry or caller's company-
specific do-not-call list. A person will not be liable for violating
the prohibition in paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section when making
calls exempted by paragraph (a)(9) of this section.
* * * * *
(9) A person will not be liable for violating the prohibition in
paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section for making any call exempted in
this paragraph (a)(9), provided that the call is not charged to the
called person or counted against the called person's plan limits on
minutes or texts. As used in this paragraph (a)(9), the term ``call''
includes a text message, including a short message service (SMS) call.
(i) Calls made by a package delivery company to notify a consumer
about a package delivery, provided that all of the following conditions
are met:
(A) The notification must be sent only to the telephone number for
the package recipient;
(B) The notification must identify the name of the package delivery
company and include contact information for the package delivery
company;
(C) The notification must not include any telemarketing,
solicitation, or advertising content;
(D) The voice call or text message notification must be concise,
generally one minute or less in length for voice calls or 160
characters or less in length for text messages;
(E) The package delivery company shall send only one notification
(whether by voice call or text message) per package, except that one
additional notification may be sent for each attempt to deliver the
package, up to two attempts, if the recipient's signature is required
for the package and the recipient was not available to sign for the
package on the previous delivery attempt;
(F) The package delivery company must offer package recipients the
ability to opt out of receiving future delivery notification calls and
messages and must honor an opt-out request within a reasonable time
from the date such request is made, not to exceed thirty days; and,
(G) Each notification must include information on how to opt out of
future delivery notifications; voice call notifications that could be
answered by a live person must include an automated, interactive voice-
and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism that enables the called
person to make an opt-out request prior to terminating the call; voice
call notifications that could be answered by an answering machine or
voice mail service must include a toll-free number that the consumer
can call to opt out of future package delivery notifications; text
notifications must include the ability for the recipient to opt out by
replying ``STOP.''
(ii) Calls made by an inmate collect call service provider
following an unsuccessful collect call to establish a billing
arrangement with the called party to enable future collect calls,
provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(A) Notifications must identify the name of the inmate collect call
service provider and include contact information;
(B) Notifications must not include any telemarketing, solicitation,
debt collection, or advertising content;
(C) Notifications must be clear and concise, generally one minute
or less;
(D) Inmate collect call service providers shall send no more than
three notifications following each inmate collect call that is
unsuccessful due to the lack of an established billing arrangement, and
shall not retain the called party's number after call completion or, in
the alternative, after the third notification attempt; and
(E) Each notification call must include information on how to opt
out of future calls; voice calls that could be answered by a live
person must include an automated, interactive voice- and/or key press-
activated opt-out mechanism that enables the called person to make an
opt-out request prior to terminating the call; voice calls that could
be answered by an answering machine or voice mail service must include
a toll-free number that the consumer can call to opt out of future
notification calls; and,
(F) The inmate collect call service provider must honor opt-out
requests immediately.
(iii) Calls made by any financial institution as defined in section
4(k) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, 15 U.S.C. 6809(3)(A),
provided that all of the following conditions are met:
(A) Voice calls and text messages must be sent only to the wireless
telephone number provided by the customer of the financial institution;
(B) Voice calls and text messages must state the name and contact
information of the financial institution (for voice calls, these
disclosures must be made at the beginning of the call);
(C) Voice calls and text messages are strictly limited to those for
the following purposes: Transactions and events that suggest a risk of
fraud or identity theft; possible breaches of the security of
customers' personal information; steps consumers can take to prevent or
remedy harm caused by data security breaches; and actions needed to
arrange for receipt of pending money transfers;
(D) Voice calls and text messages must not include any
telemarketing, cross-marketing, solicitation, debt collection, or
advertising content;
(E) Voice calls and text messages must be concise, generally one
minute or less in length for voice calls (unless more time is needed to
obtain customer responses or answer customer questions) or 160
characters or less in length for text messages;
(F) A financial institution may initiate no more than three
messages (whether by voice call or text message) per event over a
three-day period for an affected account;
(G) A financial institution must offer recipients within each
message an easy means to opt out of future such messages; voice calls
that could be answered by a live person must include an automated,
interactive voice- and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism that
enables the call recipient to make an opt-out request prior to
terminating the call; voice calls that could be answered by an
answering machine or voice mail service must include a toll-free number
that the consumer can call to opt out of future calls; text messages
must inform recipients of the ability to opt out by replying ``STOP,''
which will be the exclusive means by which consumers may opt out of
such messages; and,
(H) A financial institution must honor opt-out requests
immediately.
(iv) Calls made by healthcare providers, which include hospitals,
emergency care centers, medical physician or service offices, poison
control centers, and other healthcare professionals, provided that all
of the following conditions are met:
(A) Voice calls and text messages must be sent only to the wireless
telephone number provided by the patient;
(B) Voice calls and text messages must state the name and contact
information of the healthcare provider (for voice calls, these
disclosures would need to be made at the beginning of the call);
(C) Voice calls and text messages are strictly limited to those for
the following purposes: Appointment and exam confirmations and
reminders, wellness checkups, hospital pre-registration instructions,
pre-operative instructions, lab results, post-discharge follow-up
intended to prevent readmission, prescription notifications, and home
healthcare instructions;
(D) Voice calls and text messages must not include any
telemarketing,
[[Page 64096]]
solicitation, or advertising; may not include accounting, billing,
debt-collection, or other financial content; and must comply with HIPAA
privacy rules, 45 CFR 160.103;
(E) Voice calls and text messages must be concise, generally one
minute or less in length for voice calls or 160 characters or less in
length for text messages;
(F) A healthcare provider may initiate only one message (whether by
voice call or text message) per day to each patient, up to a maximum of
three voice calls or text messages combined per week to each patient;
(G) A healthcare provider must offer recipients within each message
an easy means to opt out of future such messages; voice calls that
could be answered by a live person must include an automated,
interactive voice- and/or key press-activated opt-out mechanism that
enables the call recipient to make an opt-out request prior to
terminating the call; voice calls that could be answered by an
answering machine or voice mail service must include a toll-free number
that the consumer can call to opt out of future healthcare calls; text
messages must inform recipients of the ability to opt out by replying
``STOP,'' which will be the exclusive means by which consumers may opt
out of such messages; and,
(H) A healthcare provider must honor opt-out requests immediately.
(b) * * *
(2) During or after the message, state clearly the telephone number
(other than that of the autodialer or prerecorded message player that
placed the call) of such business, other entity, or individual. The
telephone number provided may not be a 900 number or any other number
for which charges exceed local or long distance transmission charges.
For telemarketing messages and messages made pursuant to an exemption
under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section to residential
telephone subscribers, such telephone number must permit any individual
to make a do-not-call request during regular business hours; and
(3) In every case where the artificial or prerecorded-voice
telephone message is made pursuant to an exemption under paragraphs
(a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or includes or introduces an
advertisement or constitutes telemarketing and is delivered to a
residential telephone line or any of the lines or telephone numbers
described in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (iii) of this section,
provide an automated, interactive voice- and/or key press-activated
opt-out mechanism for the called person to make a do-not-call request,
including brief explanatory instructions on how to use such mechanism,
within two (2) seconds of providing the identification information
required in paragraph (b)(1) of this section. When the called person
elects to opt out using such mechanism, the mechanism must
automatically record the called person's number to the caller's do-not-
call list and immediately terminate the call. When the artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone message is left on an answering machine or
a voice mail service, such message must also provide a toll free number
that enables the called person to call back at a later time and connect
directly to the automated, interactive voice- and/or key press-
activated opt-out mechanism and automatically record the called
person's number to the caller's do-not-call list.
* * * * *
(d) No person or entity shall initiate any artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone call pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or any call for
telemarketing purposes to a residential telephone subscriber unless
such person or entity has instituted procedures for maintaining a list
of persons who request not to receive such calls made by or on behalf
of that person or entity. The procedures instituted must meet the
following minimum standards:
(1) Written policy. Persons or entities making artificial or
prerecorded-voice telephone calls pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or calls for
telemarketing purposes must have a written policy, available upon
demand, for maintaining a do-not-call list.
(2) Training of personnel. Personnel engaged in making artificial
or prerecorded-voice telephone calls pursuant to an exemption under
paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or who are engaged in
any aspect of telemarketing must be informed and trained in the
existence and use of the do-not-call list.
(3) Recording, disclosure of do-not-call requests. If a person or
entity making an artificial or prerecorded-voice telephone call
pursuant to an exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of
this section or any call for telemarketing purposes (or on whose behalf
such a call is made) receives a request from a residential telephone
subscriber not to receive calls from that person or entity, the person
or entity must record the request and place the subscriber's name, if
provided, and telephone number on the do-not-call list at the time the
request is made. Persons or entities making such calls (or on whose
behalf such calls are made) must honor a residential subscriber's do-
not-call request within a reasonable time from the date such request is
made. This period may not exceed thirty days from the date of such
request. If such requests are recorded or maintained by a party other
than the person or entity on whose behalf the call is made, the person
or entity on whose behalf the call is made will be liable for any
failures to honor the do-not-call request. A person or entity making an
artificial or prerecorded-voice telephone call pursuant to an exemption
under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or any call for
telemarketing purposes must obtain a consumer's prior express
permission to share or forward the consumer's request not to be called
to a party other than the person or entity on whose behalf a call is
made or an affiliated entity.
(4) Identification of callers and telemarketers. A person or entity
making an artificial or prerecorded-voice telephone call pursuant to an
exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or
any call for telemarketing purposes must provide the called party with
the name of the individual caller, the name of the person or entity on
whose behalf the call is being made, and a telephone number or address
at which the person or entity may be contacted. The telephone number
provided may not be a 900 number or any other number for which charges
exceed local or long distance transmission charges.
(5) Affiliated persons or entities. In the absence of a specific
request by the subscriber to the contrary, a residential subscriber's
do-not-call request shall apply to the particular entity making the
call (or on whose behalf a call is made), and will not apply to
affiliated entities unless the consumer reasonably would expect them to
be included given the identification of the caller and (for
telemarketing calls) the product being advertised.
(6) Maintenance of do-not-call lists. A person or entity making
artificial or prerecorded-voice telephone calls pursuant to an
exemption under paragraphs (a)(3)(ii) through (v) of this section or
any call for telemarketing purposes must maintain a record of a
consumer's request not to receive further calls. A do-not-call request
must be honored for 5 years from the time the request is made.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. 2020-22331 Filed 10-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P