Air Plan Approval; California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District, and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District, 63064-63066 [2020-21322]

Download as PDF 63064 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules Civil Justice Reform (Executive Order 12988) This rulemaking complies with the requirements of Executive Order 12988. This rulemaking: (a) Meets the criteria of section 3(a) requiring that all regulations be reviewed to eliminate errors and ambiguity and be written to minimize litigation; and (b) Meets the criteria of section 3(b)(2) requiring that all regulations be written in clear language and contain clear legal standards. of the proposal to remove 36 CFR 7.1(b) is administrative, financial and legal. The NPS has determined the rulemaking does not involve any of the extraordinary circumstances listed in 43 CFR 46.215 that would require further analysis under NEPA. Consultation With Indian Tribes (Executive Order 13175 and Department Policy) The Department of the Interior strives to strengthen its government-togovernment relationship with Indian Tribes through a commitment to consultation with Indian tribes and recognition of their right to selfgovernance and tribal sovereignty. The NPS has evaluated this rulemaking under the criteria in Executive Order 13175 and under the Department’s tribal consultation policy and have determined that tribal consultation is not required because the proposed rule will have no substantial direct effect on federally recognized Indian tribes. The NPS will consult with federally recognized tribes if and when launching and landing sites for vessels are designated. List of Subjects in 36 CFR Part 7 District of Columbia, National parks, Reporting and Recordkeeping requirements. In consideration of the foregoing, the National Park Service proposes to amend 36 CFR part 7 as set forth below: khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS Paperwork Reduction Act This rulemaking does not contain information collection requirements, and a submission to the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act is not required. The NPS may not conduct or sponsor and you are not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. National Environmental Policy Act This rulemaking does not constitute a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment. A detailed statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required because the rulemaking is covered by a categorical exclusion. The NPS has determined the rule is categorically excluded under 43 CFR 46.210(i). The environmental effects of removing 36 CFR 7.1(a) are too broad, speculative, or conjectural to lend themselves to meaningful analysis. Decisions to construct and designate launching and landing sites will later be subject to the NEPA process, either collectively or case-by-case. The nature VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Oct 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 Effects on the Energy Supply (Executive Order 13211) This rulemaking is not a significant energy action under the definition in Executive Order 13211. A Statement of Energy Effects in not required. PART 7—SPECIAL REGULATIONS, AREAS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SYSTEM 1. The authority citation for part 7 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 54 U.S.C. 100101, 100751, 320102; Sec. 7.96 also issued under DC Code 10–137 and DC Code 50–2201.07. § 7.1 ■ [Removed and Reserved] 2. Remove and reserve § 7.1. George Wallace, Assistant Secretary for Fish and Wildlife and Parks. [FR Doc. 2020–21756 Filed 10–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R09–OAR–2020–0435; FRL–10014– 95–Region 9] Air Plan Approval; California; Placer County Air Pollution Control District, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District, and Eastern Kern Air Pollution Control District Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve revisions to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District (PCAPCD), Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD), Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District (MCAPCD), and Eastern Kern SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00026 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) portions of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern negative declarations for the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry (Oil and Natural Gas CTG). We are taking comments on this proposal to approve the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative declarations into the California SIP. We plan to follow with a final action. Comments must be received on or before November 5, 2020. DATES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09– OAR–2020–0435 at https:// www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written comment is considered the official comment and should include discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/ commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a language other than English, or if you are a person with disabilities who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. ADDRESSES: Sina Schwenk-Mueller, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105 by phone: (415) 947–4100 or email at SchwenkMueller.Sina@epa.gov or Rebecca Newhouse, EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105 by phone: (415) 972–3004 or email at newhouse.rebecca@epa.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’ and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA. E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1 63065 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules Table of Contents I. The State’s Submittal A. What documents did the State submit? B. Are there other versions of these documents? C. What is the purpose of the submitted negative declarations? II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the negative declarations? B. Do the negative declarations meet the evaluation criteria? C. Public Comment and Proposed Action III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews I. The State’s Submittal A. What documents did the State submit? Table 1 lists the documents addressed by this proposal with the dates that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). TABLE 1—SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS Local agency Document title PCAPCD ........................... Negative Declaration for the Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry Source Category. Federal Negative Declaration for Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry Source Category. Negative Declaration for the Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry Source Category. Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) State Implementation Plan (SIP) Revision for the 2008 Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standards— Negative Declaration for Oil and Natural Gas CTG 4. AVAQMD ........................... MCAPCD ........................... EKAPCD ........................... Adopted Submitted 12/12/19 1 01/23/20 01/21/20 2 05/01/20 03/10/20 3 05/01/20 05/11/17 08/09/17 1 This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated January 21, 2020. submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated April 30, 2020. 3 This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated April 30, 2020. 4 The EPA is only acting on the negative declaration for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG in Table 6—CTG Categories with No Applicable Source (Negative Declarations) of the EKAPCD RACT SIP Submittal. At this time, the EPA is not proposing any action on the remainder of the EKAPCD RACT SIP that was submitted on August 9, 2017. The EPA will propose a separate action on the remainder of the EKAPCD RACT SIP at a future date. 2 This On June 9, 2020, the EPA determined that the submittals for AVAQMD and MCAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG met the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be met before formal EPA review. The submittals for the EKAPCD and PCAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG were deemed by operation of law to meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V on February 9, 2018, and July 23, 2020, respectively. B. Are there other versions of these documents? There are no previous versions of the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, or EKAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG in the California SIP. khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS C. What is the purpose of the submitted negative declarations? Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) contribute to the production of ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter (PM), which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations that control VOC emissions. CAA section 182(b)(2) requires states to submit SIP revisions to implement RACT for each category of VOC sources in the nonattainment area covered by a CTG. On October 27, 2016, (81 FR 74798), the EPA announced the VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Oct 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 availability of the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. In lieu of adopting local regulations to implement the CTG, air agencies may adopt a negative declaration if the nonattainment area has no sources covered by the 2016 Oil and Natural Gas CTG.1 The PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD’s negative declaration submittals are the districts’ certifications that there are no sources covered by the 2016 Oil and Natural Gas CTG in their respective ozone nonattainment areas.2 The EPA’s technical support documents (TSDs) for this action have more information about the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD 1 Memorandum dated October 20, 2016, from Anna Marie Wood, Director, Air Quality Policy Division, U.S. EPA, to Regional Air Division Directors 1—10, Subject: ‘‘Implementing Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for Sources Covered by the 2016 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry,’’ Question #8. 2 The Placer County APCD, Antelope Valley AQMD, Mariposa County APCD and Eastern Kern APCD are subject to CAA section 182(b)(2) RACT. PCAPCD has jurisdiction over all of Placer County and is classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). AVAQMD’s jurisdiction includes the portion of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) that is not within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB) and is classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. MCAPCD has jurisdiction over all of Mariposa County, which is classified as Moderate nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. EKAPCD’s jurisdiction includes the eastern portion of Kern County, which is classified as Serious nonattainment for the 2008 ozone NAAQS. PO 00000 Frm 00027 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 negative declarations, and the EPA’s evaluation thereof. II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action A. How is the EPA evaluating the negative declarations? Generally, CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) requires SIPs to ‘‘include enforceable emission limitations and other control measures, means, or techniques . . . as may be necessary or appropriate to meet the applicable requirements of [the CAA],’’ and SIPs must be consistent with the requirements of CAA sections 110(l) and 193. SIPs must also require RACT for each category of sources covered by a CTG document as well as each major source in ozone nonattainment areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA sections 182(b)(2) and (f)). States relying on negative declarations for CTG source categories for which the states have not adopted CTG-based regulations because they have no sources above the CTGrecommended applicability threshold must submit them for SIP approval, regardless of whether such negative declarations were made for an earlier SIP.3 To do so, the submittal should provide reasonable assurance that no sources subject to the CTG’s requirements currently exist in the relevant ozone nonattainment area. Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate enforceability, 3 This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated April 30, 2020. E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1 63066 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 194 / Tuesday, October 6, 2020 / Proposed Rules revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable criteria pollutants include the following: 1. ‘‘State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,’’ 57 FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992). 2. EPA 453/B–16–001, Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas Industry. B. Do the negative declarations meet the evaluation criteria? khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with PROPOSALS With respect to the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG, the submittals contain the air districts’ certifications that there are no sources within the ozone nonattainment areas under the air districts’ jurisdiction that are subject to the Oil and Natural Gas CTG for the 2008 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD based their certifications on reviews of their permit files and emission inventories. We accessed California’s Department of Conservation Geologic Energy Management Division’s (CalGEM) Well Finder website, CARB’s pollution mapping tool, and a 2017 archived map of the California Natural Gas Pipelines 4 and did not find indications of operations that would be subject to the Oil and Natural Gas CTG in the ozone nonattainment areas. For EKAPCD, we additionally used a geographic information system (GIS) mapping tool to ensure that there were no oil and gas operations within EKAPCD’s jurisdiction covered by the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. Based on our review, we agree with the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. Our TSDs for each of the air districts’ negative declarations have more information on our evaluation. 4 The California Energy Commission (CEC) map of natural gas pipelines and compressor stations in California we accessed and reviewed is an archived version from 2017 and can be found here: https:// web.archive.org/web/20200217015846/https:/ ww2.energy.ca.gov/maps/infrastructure/Natural_ Gas_Pipelines.pdf. More current and/or nonarchived versions of this information from CEC are not available, because CEC has discontinued maintenance on the natural gas pipeline and station GIS datasets and related maps and removed them from their website. Email dated August 7, 2020, from Travis David (CEC) to Sina Schwenk-Mueller (EPA), Subject: ‘‘RE: California Natural Gas Pipelines.’’ VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:51 Oct 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 C. Public Comment and Proposed Action As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to fully approve the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG because they fulfill the relevant requirements in CAA sections 110(a), 110(l), 182(b)(2), and 193. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until November 5, 2020. If we take final action to approve the submitted documents, our final action will incorporate these documents into the federally enforceable SIP. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action: • Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011); • Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under Executive Order 12866; • Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); • Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.); • Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); • Does not have federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999); • Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) • Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001); PO 00000 Frm 00028 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 • Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and • Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: September 22, 2020. John Busterud, Regional Administrator, Region IX. [FR Doc. 2020–21322 Filed 10–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [EPA–R08–OAR–2020–0114; FRL–10014– 26–Region 8] Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Colorado; Revisions to Regulation Number 7 and RACT Requirements for 2008 8-Hour Ozone Standard for the Denver Metro/ North Front Range Nonattainment Area Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing approval and conditional approval of State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Colorado on May 31, 2017, May 14, 2018, and May 10, 2019. The revisions are to Colorado Air Quality Control Commission (Commission or AQCC) Regulation Number 7 (Reg. 7). The revisions to Reg. 7 address Colorado’s reasonably SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06OCP1.SGM 06OCP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 194 (Tuesday, October 6, 2020)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 63064-63066]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21322]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R09-OAR-2020-0435; FRL-10014-95-Region 9]


Air Plan Approval; California; Placer County Air Pollution 
Control District, Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, 
Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District, and Eastern Kern Air 
Pollution Control District

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to 
approve revisions to the Placer County Air Pollution Control District 
(PCAPCD), Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District (AVAQMD), 
Mariposa County Air Pollution Control District (MCAPCD), and Eastern 
Kern Air Pollution Control District (EKAPCD) portions of the California 
State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions concern negative 
declarations for the Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for the Oil 
and Natural Gas Industry (Oil and Natural Gas CTG). We are taking 
comments on this proposal to approve the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and 
EKAPCD negative declarations into the California SIP. We plan to follow 
with a final action.

DATES: Comments must be received on or before November 5, 2020.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-R09-
OAR-2020-0435 at https://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted at 
Regulations.gov, follow the online instructions for submitting 
comments. Once submitted, comments cannot be edited or removed from 
Regulations.gov. The EPA may publish any comment received to its public 
docket. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Multimedia submissions (audio, 
video, etc.) must be accompanied by a written comment. The written 
comment is considered the official comment and should include 
discussion of all points you wish to make. The EPA will generally not 
consider comments or comment contents located outside of the primary 
submission (i.e., on the web, cloud, or other file sharing system). For 
additional submission methods, please contact the person identified in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. For the full EPA public 
comment policy, information about CBI or multimedia submissions, and 
general guidance on making effective comments, please visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets/commenting-epa-dockets. If you need assistance in a 
language other than English, or if you are a person with disabilities 
who needs a reasonable accommodation at no cost to you, please contact 
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sina Schwenk-Mueller, EPA Region IX, 
75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105 by phone: (415) 947-4100 or 
email at [email protected] or Rebecca Newhouse, EPA Region 
IX, 75 Hawthorne St., San Francisco, CA 94105 by phone: (415) 972-3004 
or email at [email protected].

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and 
``our'' refer to the EPA.

[[Page 63065]]

Table of Contents

I. The State's Submittal
    A. What documents did the State submit?
    B. Are there other versions of these documents?
    C. What is the purpose of the submitted negative declarations?
II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action
    A. How is the EPA evaluating the negative declarations?
    B. Do the negative declarations meet the evaluation criteria?
    C. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

I. The State's Submittal

A. What documents did the State submit?

    Table 1 lists the documents addressed by this proposal with the 
dates that they were adopted by the local air agencies and submitted by 
the California Air Resources Board (CARB).

                                          Table 1--Submitted Documents
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 Local agency                            Document title               Adopted        Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PCAPCD........................................  Negative Declaration for the            12/12/19    \1\ 01/23/20
                                                 Control Techniques Guidelines
                                                 for the Oil and Natural Gas
                                                 Industry Source Category.
AVAQMD........................................  Federal Negative Declaration for        01/21/20    \2\ 05/01/20
                                                 Control Techniques Guidelines
                                                 (CTG) for the Oil and Natural
                                                 Gas Industry Source Category.
MCAPCD........................................  Negative Declaration for the            03/10/20    \3\ 05/01/20
                                                 Control Techniques Guidelines
                                                 for the Oil and Natural Gas
                                                 Industry Source Category.
EKAPCD........................................  Reasonably Available Control            05/11/17        08/09/17
                                                 Technology (RACT) State
                                                 Implementation Plan (SIP)
                                                 Revision for the 2008 Ozone
                                                 National Ambient Air Quality
                                                 Standards--Negative Declaration
                                                 for Oil and Natural Gas CTG \4\.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated January 21, 2020.
\2\ This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated April 30, 2020.
\3\ This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from CARB dated April 30, 2020.
\4\ The EPA is only acting on the negative declaration for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG in Table 6--CTG
  Categories with No Applicable Source (Negative Declarations) of the EKAPCD RACT SIP Submittal. At this time,
  the EPA is not proposing any action on the remainder of the EKAPCD RACT SIP that was submitted on August 9,
  2017. The EPA will propose a separate action on the remainder of the EKAPCD RACT SIP at a future date.

    On June 9, 2020, the EPA determined that the submittals for AVAQMD 
and MCAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG met 
the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V, which must be 
met before formal EPA review.
    The submittals for the EKAPCD and PCAPCD negative declarations for 
the Oil and Natural Gas CTG were deemed by operation of law to meet the 
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51 Appendix V on February 9, 2018, 
and July 23, 2020, respectively.

B. Are there other versions of these documents?

    There are no previous versions of the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, or 
EKAPCD negative declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG in the 
California SIP.

C. What is the purpose of the submitted negative declarations?

    Emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) contribute to the 
production of ground-level ozone, smog and particulate matter (PM), 
which harm human health and the environment. Section 110(a) of the CAA 
requires states to submit regulations that control VOC emissions.
    CAA section 182(b)(2) requires states to submit SIP revisions to 
implement RACT for each category of VOC sources in the nonattainment 
area covered by a CTG. On October 27, 2016, (81 FR 74798), the EPA 
announced the availability of the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. In lieu of 
adopting local regulations to implement the CTG, air agencies may adopt 
a negative declaration if the nonattainment area has no sources covered 
by the 2016 Oil and Natural Gas CTG.\1\ The PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and 
EKAPCD's negative declaration submittals are the districts' 
certifications that there are no sources covered by the 2016 Oil and 
Natural Gas CTG in their respective ozone nonattainment areas.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ Memorandum dated October 20, 2016, from Anna Marie Wood, 
Director, Air Quality Policy Division, U.S. EPA, to Regional Air 
Division Directors 1--10, Subject: ``Implementing Reasonably 
Available Control Technology Requirements for Sources Covered by the 
2016 Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and Natural Gas 
Industry,'' Question #8.
    \2\ The Placer County APCD, Antelope Valley AQMD, Mariposa 
County APCD and Eastern Kern APCD are subject to CAA section 
182(b)(2) RACT. PCAPCD has jurisdiction over all of Placer County 
and is classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 ozone 
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). AVAQMD's 
jurisdiction includes the portion of the South Coast Air Quality 
Management District (SCAQMD) that is not within the South Coast Air 
Basin (SCAB) and is classified as Severe nonattainment for the 2008 
ozone NAAQS. MCAPCD has jurisdiction over all of Mariposa County, 
which is classified as Moderate nonattainment for the 2008 ozone 
NAAQS. EKAPCD's jurisdiction includes the eastern portion of Kern 
County, which is classified as Serious nonattainment for the 2008 
ozone NAAQS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The EPA's technical support documents (TSDs) for this action have 
more information about the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative 
declarations, and the EPA's evaluation thereof.

II. The EPA's Evaluation and Action

A. How is the EPA evaluating the negative declarations?

    Generally, CAA section 110(a)(2)(A) requires SIPs to ``include 
enforceable emission limitations and other control measures, means, or 
techniques . . . as may be necessary or appropriate to meet the 
applicable requirements of [the CAA],'' and SIPs must be consistent 
with the requirements of CAA sections 110(l) and 193.
    SIPs must also require RACT for each category of sources covered by 
a CTG document as well as each major source in ozone nonattainment 
areas classified as Moderate or above (see CAA sections 182(b)(2) and 
(f)). States relying on negative declarations for CTG source categories 
for which the states have not adopted CTG-based regulations because 
they have no sources above the CTG-recommended applicability threshold 
must submit them for SIP approval, regardless of whether such negative 
declarations were made for an earlier SIP.\3\ To do so, the submittal 
should provide reasonable assurance that no sources subject to the 
CTG's requirements currently exist in the relevant ozone nonattainment 
area.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ This submittal was transmitted to the EPA by a letter from 
CARB dated April 30, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Guidance and policy documents that we used to evaluate 
enforceability,

[[Page 63066]]

revision/relaxation and rule stringency requirements for the applicable 
criteria pollutants include the following:
    1. ``State Implementation Plans; General Preamble for the 
Implementation of Title I of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990,'' 57 
FR 13498 (April 16, 1992); 57 FR 18070 (April 28, 1992).
    2. EPA 453/B-16-001, Control Techniques Guidelines for the Oil and 
Natural Gas Industry.

B. Do the negative declarations meet the evaluation criteria?

    With respect to the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative 
declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG, the submittals contain 
the air districts' certifications that there are no sources within the 
ozone nonattainment areas under the air districts' jurisdiction that 
are subject to the Oil and Natural Gas CTG for the 2008 8-hour ozone 
national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The PCAPCD, AVAQMD, 
MCAPCD, and EKAPCD based their certifications on reviews of their 
permit files and emission inventories. We accessed California's 
Department of Conservation Geologic Energy Management Division's 
(CalGEM) Well Finder website, CARB's pollution mapping tool, and a 2017 
archived map of the California Natural Gas Pipelines \4\ and did not 
find indications of operations that would be subject to the Oil and 
Natural Gas CTG in the ozone nonattainment areas. For EKAPCD, we 
additionally used a geographic information system (GIS) mapping tool to 
ensure that there were no oil and gas operations within EKAPCD's 
jurisdiction covered by the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. Based on our 
review, we agree with the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative 
declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG. Our TSDs for each of the 
air districts' negative declarations have more information on our 
evaluation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ The California Energy Commission (CEC) map of natural gas 
pipelines and compressor stations in California we accessed and 
reviewed is an archived version from 2017 and can be found here: 
https://web.archive.org/web/20200217015846/https:/ww2.energy.ca.gov/maps/infrastructure/Natural_Gas_Pipelines.pdf. More current and/or 
non-archived versions of this information from CEC are not 
available, because CEC has discontinued maintenance on the natural 
gas pipeline and station GIS datasets and related maps and removed 
them from their website. Email dated August 7, 2020, from Travis 
David (CEC) to Sina Schwenk-Mueller (EPA), Subject: ``RE: California 
Natural Gas Pipelines.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

C. Public Comment and Proposed Action

    As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the Act, the EPA proposes to 
fully approve the PCAPCD, AVAQMD, MCAPCD, and EKAPCD negative 
declarations for the Oil and Natural Gas CTG because they fulfill the 
relevant requirements in CAA sections 110(a), 110(l), 182(b)(2), and 
193. We will accept comments from the public on this proposal until 
November 5, 2020. If we take final action to approve the submitted 
documents, our final action will incorporate these documents into the 
federally enforceable SIP.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

    Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP 
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable 
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in 
reviewing SIP submissions, the EPA's role is to approve state choices, 
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this 
proposed action merely proposes to approve state law as meeting Federal 
requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those 
imposed by state law. For that reason, this proposed action:
     Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to 
review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 
12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 
2011);
     Is not an Executive Order 13771 (82 FR 9339, February 3, 
2017) regulatory action because SIP approvals are exempted under 
Executive Order 12866;
     Does not impose an information collection burden under the 
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
     Is certified as not having a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory 
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
     Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or 
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded 
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
     Does not have federalism implications as specified in 
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
     Is not an economically significant regulatory action based 
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 
19885, April 23, 1997)
     Is not a significant regulatory action subject to 
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
     Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the 
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent 
with the Clean Air Act; and
     Does not provide the EPA with the discretionary authority 
to address disproportionate human health or environmental effects with 
practical, appropriate, and legally permissible methods under Executive 
Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
    In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian 
reservation land or in any other area where the EPA or an Indian tribe 
has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 
Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not 
impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal 
law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 
2000).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by 
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Volatile organic compounds.

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: September 22, 2020.
John Busterud,
Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. 2020-21322 Filed 10-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.