Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for NASA's Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California, 62328-62330 [2020-21787]
Download as PDF
62328
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 192 / Friday, October 2, 2020 / Notices
e.g., permitting electronic submission of
responses.
Agency: DOL-Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs
Type of Review: New Collection.
Title of Collection: DEEOIC
Authorization Forms
Agency Form Number: EE–22, EE–24,
EE–26, EE–28, EE–30, EE–32
OMB Control Number: 1240–0NEW.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households; businesses or other forprofit.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
12,890.
Frequency: Varies by form.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
66,770.
Estimated Average Time per
Response: 10 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 11,129.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for Office of
Management and Budget approval of the
information collection request; they will
also become a matter of public record.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A).
Anjanette Suggs,
Agency Clearance Officer, Office of Workers’
Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of
Labor.
[FR Doc. 2020–21790 Filed 10–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–CR–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 20–080]
Name of Information Collection: Term
and Condition Notification of
Harassment Form
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of information collection
AGENCY:
The National Aeronautics and
Space Administration, as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, invites the
general public and other Federal
agencies to take this opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing information collections.
DATES: Comments are due by 10/31/
2020.
SUMMARY:
All comments should be
addressed to Roger Kantz, National
Aeronautics and Space Administration,
300 E Street SW, Washington, DC
20546–0001 or call 281.792.7885.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:11 Oct 01, 2020
Jkt 253001
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Roger Kantz, NASA
Clearance Officer, NASA Headquarters,
300 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20546
or email Travis.Kantz@nasa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract:
This collection of information
supports NASA’s term and condition
regarding sexual harassment, other
forms of harassment, and sexual assault.
This term and condition requires
recipient organizations to report to
NASA any findings/determinations of
sexual harassment, other forms of
harassment, or sexual assault regarding
a NASA funded PI or Co-I. The new
term and condition will also require the
recipient to report to NASA if the PI or
Co-I is placed on administrative leave or
if the recipient has imposed any
administrative action on the PI or Co-I,
or any determination or an investigation
of an alleged violation of the recipient’s
policies or codes of conduct, statutes,
regulations, or executive orders relating
to sexual harassment, other forms of
harassment, or sexual assault.
In reviewing harassment notifications
pursuant to the term and condition, it
will be necessary for the Agency to have
complete information provided in a
consistent manner. The information
provided will be used by the Agency to
assess the matters reported and to
consult with the Authorized
Organizational Representative (AOR), or
designee of the reporting institution.
Based on the results of this review and
consultation, NASA may, if necessary,
assert its programmatic stewardship
responsibilities and oversight authority
to initiate the substitution or removal of
the PI or any co-PI, reduce the award
funding amount, or where neither of
those previous options is available or
adequate, to suspend or terminate the
award.
II. Methods of Collection:
Electronic.
III. Data
Title: NASA Term and Condition
Notification of Harassment Form.
OMB Number:
Type of review: New.
Affected Public: NASA grant recipient
institution reporting officials.
Estimated Annual Number of
Activities: 20.
Estimated Number of Respondents
per Activity: 1.
Annual Responses: 20.
Estimated Time per Response: 1 hour.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 20.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: $2,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00055
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (1) The
accuracy of NASA’s estimate of the
burden (including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (2)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (3) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including automated
collection techniques or the use of other
forms of information technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection.
They will also become a matter of
public record.
Roger Kantz,
NASA PRA Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–21810 Filed 10–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 20–079]
Notice of Availability of the Record of
Decision for NASA’s Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
Soil Cleanup Activities at Santa
Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura
County, California
National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the
Record of Decision (ROD).
AGENCY:
NASA announces its decision
concerning agency actions related to soil
cleanup activities at the Santa Susana
Field Laboratory, Ventura County,
California. NASA’s decision is
supported by the detailed analysis
found in the Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Statement for
Soil Cleanup Activities (SEIS), as
summarized in the agency’s Record of
Decision (ROD).
ADDRESSES: The Santa Susana Field
Laboratory (SSFL) SEIS ROD and related
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) documents are available at
NASA’s SSFL project website (https://
www.nasa.gov/feature/environmentalimpact-statement-eis-for-demolitionand-environmental-cleanup-activities).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Peter Zorba, SSFL Project Director,
email at msfc-ssfl-information@
mail.nasa.gov, or phone (202) 714–0496.
Additional information about NASA’s
SSFL site, the soil and cleanup
activities, and the associated planning
process and documentation (as
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 192 / Friday, October 2, 2020 / Notices
available) may be found on the internet
at https://www.nasa.gov/feature/
environmental-impact-statement-eis-fordemolition-and-environmental-cleanupactivities or on the California
Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) website at https://
www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Santa_
Susana_Field_Lab/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
approximately 1,200 comments and
hosted two public meetings in Ventura
County and Los Angeles County
respectively. Oral and written
comments were received at each public
meeting. After considering the
comments received on the Draft SEIS,
NASA prepared and published the Final
SEIS on July 24, 2020 (85 FR 44930).
Background
SSFL is located on 2,850 acres of
open, rocky terrain above California’s
Simi Valley in southeastern Ventura
County, approximately 30 miles
northwest of Los Angeles. SSFL is
divided into four Administrative Areas
(Areas I through IV) and two
undeveloped areas. Area II and a small
portion of Area I (the Former Liquid
Oxygen (LOX) Plant Area) are owned by
the U.S. Government and administered
by NASA. The remainder of the
property is owned by The Boeing
Company (Boeing). In Area IV, the U.S.
Department of Energy (DOE) has
prepared an environmental impact
statement for building demolition and
the cleanup of soil and groundwater and
remediation activities related to its
previous activities at SSFL (see e.g.,
NOA, 83 FR 67282).
Since the mid-1950s, when SSFL was
administered by the U.S. Air Force, this
site has been used for developing and
testing rocket engines. Four test stand
complexes were constructed in Area II
between 1954 and 1957 named Alfa,
Bravo, Coca, and Delta. These test areas
along with the LOX Plant portion of
Area I were acquired by NASA from the
U.S. Air Force in the 1970s. NASA
conducted rocket engine testing in
support of the nation’s space
exploration programs (e.g., Apollo
program, Space Shuttle program) at
SSFL and concluded its activities
related to rocket engine and component
testing in 2006.
Environmental sampling at SSFL
indicates that contaminants are present
in soil within the NASA-administered
portion of SSFL. In 2018, the California
Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) approved NASA’s Soil
Treatability Study and in 2019 DTSC
approved NASA’s Soil Data Summary
Report. The scientific data from these
reports showed the soil quantity that
may need to be removed from the SSFL
site under DTSC’s Look Up Table (LUT)
framework (i.e., Alternative A in the
Final SEIS) far exceeded the estimate
NASA used in its 2014 Final EIS. NASA
subsequently determined this
constituted significant new information
relevant to environmental concerns and
bearing on the Proposed Action.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
NASA prepared the SSFL SEIS in
accordance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.), CEQ NEPA implementing
regulations (40 CFR parts 1500—1508),
NASA’s NEPA Implementing
regulations (14 CFR 1216.3), and NASA
NEPA policy (NASA Procedural
Requirements 8580.1—Implementing
the National Environmental Policy Act
and Executive Order 12114). NASA
announced its intent to prepare a SEIS
on April 5, 2018 (84 FR 13725). The
SEIS was limited in scope to the
proposed soil cleanup activities at
SSFL.1 Preparation of the SEIS was
required because NASA determined that
significant new circumstances exist
relevant to environmental concerns
bearing on the cleanup of the SSFL site
and the potential environmental
impacts of those activities exist.
Specifically, the estimated quantity of
soil required to be removed during site
cleanup under the California DTSC’s
proposed framework had increased
substantially since the publication of
NASA’s 2014 Final EIS. This increase
had the potential to significantly alter
the environmental impacts that were
evaluated in the 2014 Final EIS. For this
reason, pursuant to NEPA, NASA
determined it was required to prepare a
supplement to the 2014 Final EIS. On
October 25, 2019, NASA published a
Notice of Availability (NOA) (84 FR
57490) for the SSFL Draft SEIS, which
initiated a 45-day public comment
period. On December 9, 2019, NASA
published a notice in the FR which
advised the public that the comment
period would be extended by 30 days to
January 8, 2020 (84 FR 67296). During
the comment period, NASA received
1 NASA published a Final Environmental Impact
Statement for demolition of site infrastructure, soil
cleanup and groundwater remediation within
NASA administered ‘‘Area II’’ and a portion of
‘‘Area I’’ (former LOX Plant) of SSFL on March 14,
2014 (79 FR 14545). NASA subsequently issued a
ROD for building demolition on April 23, 2014. At
that time, a decision was made to defer issuing
RODs for the cleanup of soil and groundwater until
further investigations, analysis, and planning could
be completed. Upon completion of the SSFL Draft
Groundwater Corrective Measure Study, a ROD
allowing groundwater cleanup at SSFL was signed
on October 4, 2018 and published in the Federal
Register on October 17, 2018 (83 FR 52570).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Oct 01, 2020
Jkt 253001
SSFL Site Background
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62329
In 2009, NASA completed a review of
its property holdings at SSFL and
determined SSFL was no longer needed
by NASA to meet its then current needs
or future mission requirements. On
September 14, 2009, NASA requested
the General Services Administration
(GSA) take action for disposition of its
portion of SSFL. On September 17,
2009, the GSA conditionally accepted
NASA’s request to undertake action to
dispose of the property subject to the
following conditions: (1) The receipt of
NASA’s certification that all remedial
action necessary to protect human
health and the environment with
respect to any hazardous substance
remaining on the property has been
taken, or receipt of EPA’s
[Environmental Protection Agency’s]
written concurrence that an approved
and installed remedial design is
operating properly and successfully, or;
(2) the receipt of the Governor’s
concurrence in the suitability of the
property for transfer as provided in
CERCLA [Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act] Section 120(h)(3)(C).
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
The purpose and need of NASA’s
proposed action is to use the best
available science and technology to
achieve a soil cleanup at SSFL in a
timely manner that minimizes impacts
to the community, and which is fully
protective of the public health and
welfare. As set forth in the ROD, NASA
has decided that, based on its
comparison of alternatives in the Final
SEIS, selection of Alternative C—
Suburban Residential Cleanup (based on
the DTSC-approved Standardized Risk
Assessment) most fully supports the
purpose and need and is NASA’s
preferred and environmentally preferred
alternative for soil cleanup at SSFL.
Selection of Alternative C applies an
accepted risk methodology to soil
cleanup activities which accounts for
the reasonably foreseeable future use of
the land, the health and safety of
surrounding communities, the
protection and preservation of
significant cultural and natural
resources, and the implementability of
each alternative.
Alternatives
In the Draft and Final SEIS, NASA
evaluated the No Action Alternative and
four other action alternatives. In the
Final SEIS, the impacts of soil
remediation activities at the NASAadministered Area I Former LOX Plant
and Area II are comprehensively
evaluated. The alternatives considered
for cleaning up the soil are as follows:
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
62330
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 192 / Friday, October 2, 2020 / Notices
Alternative A: Administrative Order on
Consent (AOC) Cleanup; Alternative B:
Revised LUT Levels Cleanup;
Alternative C: Suburban Residential
Cleanup; Alternative D: Recreational
Cleanup; and the No Action Alternative
These alternatives are described in
detail in the Alternatives Selection
section of the ROD (see section B.4) and
Chapters 2 and 3 of the Final SEIS. The
following specifics apply to the cleanup
alternatives considered in this SEIS:
• All risk-based alternatives are
protective of public health and the
environment and follow nationwide
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) guidelines and the DTSCapproved standardized risk-based
methodology specific to SSFL.
• The implementation of the ‘‘AOC’’
cleanup alternative would have the
most significant adverse impacts to the
surrounding community and the
protected cultural, natural, and
biological resources.
• The beneficial impacts for biology,
water resources, and health and safety
are the same for all the cleanup
alternatives.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Comments Received on the Final SEIS
The Notice of Availability for the
SSFL Final SEIS published in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2020
commencing a 30-day pre-decisional
waiting period that concluded on
August 24, 2020. During this predecisional period, NASA received
comments from the United States
Environmental Protection Agency
Region IX, the City of Los Angeles, and
a joint letter from the Committee to
Bridge the Gap (CBG), Physicians for
Social Responsibility—Los Angeles
(PSR–LA), and the Natural Resources
Defense Council (NRDC). The CBG also
submitted supplemental comments in
support of the joint comments described
above. Prior to making its final decision,
NASA considered the matters raised by
each commenter, evaluated the analysis,
scientific basis, and methodology used
to validate the conclusions set forth in
the Final SEIS, and determined the
received comments do not affect the
findings of the Final SEIS. Specific
responses to the received comments are
found in Section C.2 of the ROD.
Decision
NASA has decided to adopt
Alternative C—Suburban Residential
Cleanup as its Preferred Alternative for
implementation of soil cleanup
activities at the NASA administered
areas of SSFL. Selection of Alternative
C applies an accepted risk assessment
methodology to soil cleanup activities
which accounts for the reasonably
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:38 Oct 01, 2020
Jkt 253001
foreseeable future use of the land, is
fully protective of the health and safety
of surrounding communities, preserves
significant existing cultural and natural
resources, reduces the time horizon for
project completion, reduces the
environmental impact of the overall
project, provides greater flexibility to
the U.S. government in the event the
property is transferred at a later date,
and considers the long term
implementability of each alternative.
The Associate Administrator for
Mission Support Directorate signed the
Soil Cleanup ROD, which constitutes
the final decision by NASA for soil
cleanup at SSFL. A copy of this
document can be found at https://
www.nasa.gov/feature/environmentalimpact-statement-eis-for-demolitionand-environmental-cleanup-activities.
Cheryl Parker,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–21787 Filed 10–1–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510–13–P
THE NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR
THE ARTS AND THE HUMANITIES
Institute of Museum and Library
Services
Notice of Proposed Information
Collection Requests: Maker/STEM
Education Support for 21st Century
Community Learning Centers Program
Evaluation
Institute of Museum and
Library Services, National Foundation
for the Arts and the Humanities.
ACTION: Notice, request for comments,
collection of information.
AGENCY:
The Institute of Museum and
Library Services (IMLS), as part of its
continuing effort to reduce paperwork
and respondent burden, conducts a
preclearance consultation program to
provide the general public and Federal
agencies with an opportunity to
comment on proposed and/or
continuing collections of information in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act. This pre-clearance
consultation program helps to ensure
that requested data can be provided in
the desired format, reporting burden
(time and financial resources) is
minimized, collection instruments are
clearly understood, and the impact of
collection requirements on respondents
can be properly assessed. The purpose
of this notice is to solicit comments
concerning a proposed survey and
interviews to document the
implementation of the Maker/STEM
Education Support for 21st Century
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Community Learning Centers (21st
CCLC) program and investigate
outcomes for museum staff, 21st CCLC
staff, and youth participants. A copy of
the proposed information collection
request can be obtained by contacting
the individual listed below in the
ADDRESSES section of this notice.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted to the office listed in the
addressee section below on or before
November 30, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to Connie
Bodner, Ph.D., Director of Grants Policy
and Management, Office of Grants
Policy and Management, Institute of
Museum and Library Services, 955
L’Enfant Plaza North SW, Suite 4000,
Washington, DC 20024–2135. Dr.
Bodner can be reached by Telephone:
202–653–4636 or by email at cbodner@
imls.gov, or by teletype (TTY/TDD) for
persons with hearing difficulty at 202–
653–4614. Office hours are from 8:30
a.m. to 5 p.m., E.T., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Reagan Moore, Senior Program Officer,
Office of Museum Services, Institute of
Museum and Library Services, 955
L’Enfant Plaza North SW, Suite 4000,
Washington, DC 20024–2135. Ms.
Moore can be reached by Telephone:
202–653–4637, or by email at rmoore@
imls.gov, or by teletype (TTY/TDD) for
persons with hearing difficulty at 202–
653–4614.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: IMLS is
particularly interested in public
comment that help the agency to:
• Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
• Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
• Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
• Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques, or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submissions of responses.
I. Background
The Institute of Museum and Library
Services is the primary source of
Federal support for the Nation’s
libraries and museums. We advance,
E:\FR\FM\02OCN1.SGM
02OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 192 (Friday, October 2, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62328-62330]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[Notice: 20-079]
Notice of Availability of the Record of Decision for NASA's
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities
at Santa Susana Field Laboratory, Ventura County, California
AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of availability of the Record of Decision (ROD).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NASA announces its decision concerning agency actions related
to soil cleanup activities at the Santa Susana Field Laboratory,
Ventura County, California. NASA's decision is supported by the
detailed analysis found in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact
Statement for Soil Cleanup Activities (SEIS), as summarized in the
agency's Record of Decision (ROD).
ADDRESSES: The Santa Susana Field Laboratory (SSFL) SEIS ROD and
related National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents are
available at NASA's SSFL project website (https://www.nasa.gov/feature/environmental-impact-statement-eis-for-demolition-and-environmental-cleanup-activities).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peter Zorba, SSFL Project Director,
email at [email protected], or phone (202) 714-0496.
Additional information about NASA's SSFL site, the soil and cleanup
activities, and the associated planning process and documentation (as
[[Page 62329]]
available) may be found on the internet at https://www.nasa.gov/feature/environmental-impact-statement-eis-for-demolition-and-environmental-cleanup-activities or on the California Department of
Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) website at https://www.dtsc.ca.gov/SiteCleanup/Santa_Susana_Field_Lab/.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NASA prepared the SSFL SEIS in accordance with NEPA (42 U.S.C. 4321
et seq.), CEQ NEPA implementing regulations (40 CFR parts 1500--1508),
NASA's NEPA Implementing regulations (14 CFR 1216.3), and NASA NEPA
policy (NASA Procedural Requirements 8580.1--Implementing the National
Environmental Policy Act and Executive Order 12114). NASA announced its
intent to prepare a SEIS on April 5, 2018 (84 FR 13725). The SEIS was
limited in scope to the proposed soil cleanup activities at SSFL.\1\
Preparation of the SEIS was required because NASA determined that
significant new circumstances exist relevant to environmental concerns
bearing on the cleanup of the SSFL site and the potential environmental
impacts of those activities exist. Specifically, the estimated quantity
of soil required to be removed during site cleanup under the California
DTSC's proposed framework had increased substantially since the
publication of NASA's 2014 Final EIS. This increase had the potential
to significantly alter the environmental impacts that were evaluated in
the 2014 Final EIS. For this reason, pursuant to NEPA, NASA determined
it was required to prepare a supplement to the 2014 Final EIS. On
October 25, 2019, NASA published a Notice of Availability (NOA) (84 FR
57490) for the SSFL Draft SEIS, which initiated a 45-day public comment
period. On December 9, 2019, NASA published a notice in the FR which
advised the public that the comment period would be extended by 30 days
to January 8, 2020 (84 FR 67296). During the comment period, NASA
received approximately 1,200 comments and hosted two public meetings in
Ventura County and Los Angeles County respectively. Oral and written
comments were received at each public meeting. After considering the
comments received on the Draft SEIS, NASA prepared and published the
Final SEIS on July 24, 2020 (85 FR 44930).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ NASA published a Final Environmental Impact Statement for
demolition of site infrastructure, soil cleanup and groundwater
remediation within NASA administered ``Area II'' and a portion of
``Area I'' (former LOX Plant) of SSFL on March 14, 2014 (79 FR
14545). NASA subsequently issued a ROD for building demolition on
April 23, 2014. At that time, a decision was made to defer issuing
RODs for the cleanup of soil and groundwater until further
investigations, analysis, and planning could be completed. Upon
completion of the SSFL Draft Groundwater Corrective Measure Study, a
ROD allowing groundwater cleanup at SSFL was signed on October 4,
2018 and published in the Federal Register on October 17, 2018 (83
FR 52570).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
SSFL Site Background
SSFL is located on 2,850 acres of open, rocky terrain above
California's Simi Valley in southeastern Ventura County, approximately
30 miles northwest of Los Angeles. SSFL is divided into four
Administrative Areas (Areas I through IV) and two undeveloped areas.
Area II and a small portion of Area I (the Former Liquid Oxygen (LOX)
Plant Area) are owned by the U.S. Government and administered by NASA.
The remainder of the property is owned by The Boeing Company (Boeing).
In Area IV, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has prepared an
environmental impact statement for building demolition and the cleanup
of soil and groundwater and remediation activities related to its
previous activities at SSFL (see e.g., NOA, 83 FR 67282).
Since the mid-1950s, when SSFL was administered by the U.S. Air
Force, this site has been used for developing and testing rocket
engines. Four test stand complexes were constructed in Area II between
1954 and 1957 named Alfa, Bravo, Coca, and Delta. These test areas
along with the LOX Plant portion of Area I were acquired by NASA from
the U.S. Air Force in the 1970s. NASA conducted rocket engine testing
in support of the nation's space exploration programs (e.g., Apollo
program, Space Shuttle program) at SSFL and concluded its activities
related to rocket engine and component testing in 2006.
Environmental sampling at SSFL indicates that contaminants are
present in soil within the NASA-administered portion of SSFL. In 2018,
the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) approved
NASA's Soil Treatability Study and in 2019 DTSC approved NASA's Soil
Data Summary Report. The scientific data from these reports showed the
soil quantity that may need to be removed from the SSFL site under
DTSC's Look Up Table (LUT) framework (i.e., Alternative A in the Final
SEIS) far exceeded the estimate NASA used in its 2014 Final EIS. NASA
subsequently determined this constituted significant new information
relevant to environmental concerns and bearing on the Proposed Action.
In 2009, NASA completed a review of its property holdings at SSFL
and determined SSFL was no longer needed by NASA to meet its then
current needs or future mission requirements. On September 14, 2009,
NASA requested the General Services Administration (GSA) take action
for disposition of its portion of SSFL. On September 17, 2009, the GSA
conditionally accepted NASA's request to undertake action to dispose of
the property subject to the following conditions: (1) The receipt of
NASA's certification that all remedial action necessary to protect
human health and the environment with respect to any hazardous
substance remaining on the property has been taken, or receipt of EPA's
[Environmental Protection Agency's] written concurrence that an
approved and installed remedial design is operating properly and
successfully, or; (2) the receipt of the Governor's concurrence in the
suitability of the property for transfer as provided in CERCLA
[Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act]
Section 120(h)(3)(C).
Purpose and Need for Agency Action
The purpose and need of NASA's proposed action is to use the best
available science and technology to achieve a soil cleanup at SSFL in a
timely manner that minimizes impacts to the community, and which is
fully protective of the public health and welfare. As set forth in the
ROD, NASA has decided that, based on its comparison of alternatives in
the Final SEIS, selection of Alternative C--Suburban Residential
Cleanup (based on the DTSC-approved Standardized Risk Assessment) most
fully supports the purpose and need and is NASA's preferred and
environmentally preferred alternative for soil cleanup at SSFL.
Selection of Alternative C applies an accepted risk methodology to soil
cleanup activities which accounts for the reasonably foreseeable future
use of the land, the health and safety of surrounding communities, the
protection and preservation of significant cultural and natural
resources, and the implementability of each alternative.
Alternatives
In the Draft and Final SEIS, NASA evaluated the No Action
Alternative and four other action alternatives. In the Final SEIS, the
impacts of soil remediation activities at the NASA-administered Area I
Former LOX Plant and Area II are comprehensively evaluated. The
alternatives considered for cleaning up the soil are as follows:
[[Page 62330]]
Alternative A: Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) Cleanup;
Alternative B: Revised LUT Levels Cleanup; Alternative C: Suburban
Residential Cleanup; Alternative D: Recreational Cleanup; and the No
Action Alternative
These alternatives are described in detail in the Alternatives
Selection section of the ROD (see section B.4) and Chapters 2 and 3 of
the Final SEIS. The following specifics apply to the cleanup
alternatives considered in this SEIS:
All risk-based alternatives are protective of public
health and the environment and follow nationwide U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) guidelines and the DTSC-approved standardized
risk-based methodology specific to SSFL.
The implementation of the ``AOC'' cleanup alternative
would have the most significant adverse impacts to the surrounding
community and the protected cultural, natural, and biological
resources.
The beneficial impacts for biology, water resources, and
health and safety are the same for all the cleanup alternatives.
Comments Received on the Final SEIS
The Notice of Availability for the SSFL Final SEIS published in the
Federal Register on July 24, 2020 commencing a 30-day pre-decisional
waiting period that concluded on August 24, 2020. During this pre-
decisional period, NASA received comments from the United States
Environmental Protection Agency Region IX, the City of Los Angeles, and
a joint letter from the Committee to Bridge the Gap (CBG), Physicians
for Social Responsibility--Los Angeles (PSR-LA), and the Natural
Resources Defense Council (NRDC). The CBG also submitted supplemental
comments in support of the joint comments described above. Prior to
making its final decision, NASA considered the matters raised by each
commenter, evaluated the analysis, scientific basis, and methodology
used to validate the conclusions set forth in the Final SEIS, and
determined the received comments do not affect the findings of the
Final SEIS. Specific responses to the received comments are found in
Section C.2 of the ROD.
Decision
NASA has decided to adopt Alternative C--Suburban Residential
Cleanup as its Preferred Alternative for implementation of soil cleanup
activities at the NASA administered areas of SSFL. Selection of
Alternative C applies an accepted risk assessment methodology to soil
cleanup activities which accounts for the reasonably foreseeable future
use of the land, is fully protective of the health and safety of
surrounding communities, preserves significant existing cultural and
natural resources, reduces the time horizon for project completion,
reduces the environmental impact of the overall project, provides
greater flexibility to the U.S. government in the event the property is
transferred at a later date, and considers the long term
implementability of each alternative.
The Associate Administrator for Mission Support Directorate signed
the Soil Cleanup ROD, which constitutes the final decision by NASA for
soil cleanup at SSFL. A copy of this document can be found at https://www.nasa.gov/feature/environmental-impact-statement-eis-for-demolition-and-environmental-cleanup-activities.
Cheryl Parker,
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-21787 Filed 10-1-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P