2020 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy: Comment Request, 62006-62008 [2020-21723]
Download as PDF
62006
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 191 / Thursday, October 1, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
the OCE finding that women-owned
businesses are less likely to win
contracts. As a result, SBA found that it
possessed sufficient data to determine
that WOSBs are underrepresented in
these 21 industries. SBA also believed
that this decision fulfills the intent of
the Small Business Act, which
demonstrates the intent that the
designations of eligible industries be
based on at least five years of data. The
full OCE study is available on SBA’s
website at www.sba.gov/wosb.
D. Solicitation of Public Comments
As both the RAND and OCE studies
indicate, there is no single solution to
determine underrepresentation, with
each study methodology choice having
its own benefits and shortcomings. As
discussed above, the previous studies
made choices regarding certain
measures. Through this request, SBA
seeks input from stakeholders on the
areas below.
1. For the past two studies SBA has
looked at the value of contracts as part
of determining the utilization ratio. One
issue raised by this approach is that this
may be reflecting very few contracts
awards (meaning awards to a few
companies) which may not be
representative of the actual competitive
balance in the industry. SBA is seeking
input on whether a hybrid approach
should be used accounting for both
value of contracts and number of
contracts in a given industry. SBA is
also considering using higher level
NAICS (meaning fewer digits) for low
volume industries.
2. SBA is also seeking input on how
best to define women-owned businesses
that are ready, willing, and able. Past
studies have used SAM registration as a
measure for ready, willing, and able.
However, it may be that there are
women-owned firms that are ready,
willing, and able to perform government
contracts that are not registered in SAM.
Another option would be to look at
women-owned small businesses in the
US generally rather than limiting it to
sam.gov registered businesses. SBA
would like public comment input if it
should continue to use the ready,
willing, and able that was used in the
previous studies, use general womenowned businesses in the US, or is there
another method that SBA should
consider.
Another issue with the ready, willing,
and able determination is the possible
overestimate of the number of WOSBs
in a given NAICS because of the ability
of firms to self-select NAICS in sam.gov
without regard for capability. It may be
possible to perform a sensitivity
analysis to try to identify if there is a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Sep 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
problem with overestimates and to
correct the analysis accordingly. SBA
would like public input on whether this
possible overestimate is a problem, and,
if so, is SBA’s proposed solution useful.
3. SBA is seeking comments on the
appropriate thresholds for
underrepresented versus substantially
underrepresented. Currently, the
threshold for underrepresented is <1
and the threshold for substantially
underrepresented is <.5. Another factor
SBA would like the public to consider
is what should the thresholds be if they
are changed? In addition, SBA is also
considering utilizing different
thresholds for low-volume NAICS.
Should it be the same for all industries?
4. The past two studies have each had
issues with low-volume industries. This
occurs when there are either low-dollar
value or low volume of contracts in a
given industry. The result is that minor
changes in in either category can have
extreme effects on the outcome. SBA is
considering the use of power analysis
calculations to determine which
industries have a sufficient number of
firms to detect a small effect size for the
difference between the use of WOSBs
and that of other businesses. SBA is also
considering determining the level of
industry concentration using a
Normalized Herfindahl Index. In
addition, SBA may also consider
measuring disparity metrics
independently by fiscal year and using
pooled data over multiple years. This
could reduce the number of low-volume
NAICS, but could be considered less
reliable if there is significant variance in
disparity metrics over time. SBA would
like public input on whether it should
make changes to the treatment of lowvolume NAICS and whether or not the
proposed methods are a good way to
taking into account low-volume NAICS.
Barbara Carson,
Deputy Associate Administrator, Office of
Government Contracting and Business
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–21678 Filed 9–30–20; 8:45 am]
The meeting will be held on
Wednesday, October 14, 2020, from 9:30
a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EDT, followed by a
1 hour lunch break and reconvene at
12:55 p.m. EDT. The afternoon session
will end no later than 3:30 p.m. EDT.
ADDRESSES: The meeting is virtual and
open to the public. Public members
must preregister at the following link:
https://bit.ly/RercOct14. Anyone
needing special accommodations should
let the contact below know at least a
week in advance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cathy Coffey, ccoffey@tva.gov or 865/
632–4494.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The RERC
was established to advise TVA on its
energy resource activities and the
priorities among competing objectives
and values. Notice of this meeting is
given under the Federal Advisory
Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. App.2.
The meeting agenda includes the
following:
1. Welcome and Introductions
2. TVA Updates
3. Presentations Regarding TVA Electric
Vehicle Strategy
4. Public Comments
5. Council Discussion
The RERC will hear views of citizens
by providing a public comment session
running from 1:00 p.m.–1:30 p.m. EDT,
that day. Persons wishing to speak must
register at ccoffey@tva.gov by 5:00 p.m.
EDT, on Tuesday, October 13, 2020, and
will be called on during the public
comment period for up to two minutes
to share their views. Written comments
are also invited and may be mailed to
the Regional Energy Resource Council,
Tennessee Valley Authority, 400 West
Summit Hill Drive, WT 9D, Knoxville,
Tennessee 37902.
DATES:
Dated: September 25, 2020.
Joseph J. Hoagland,
Vice President, Innovation and Research,
Tennessee Valley Authority.
[FR Doc. 2020–21747 Filed 9–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8120–08–P
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Meeting of the Regional Energy
Resource Council
AGENCY:
Tennessee Valley Authority
(TVA).
ACTION:
Notice of meeting.
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket Number USTR–2020–0035]
2020 Review of Notorious Markets for
Counterfeiting and Piracy: Comment
Request
Office of the United States
Trade Representative.
ACTION: Request for comments.
AGENCY:
The TVA Regional Energy
Resource Council (RERC) will hold a
virtual meeting on Wednesday, October
14, 2020, regarding regional energy
related issues in the Tennessee Valley.
SUMMARY:
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
The Office of the United
States Trade Representative (USTR)
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 191 / Thursday, October 1, 2020 / Notices
requests comments that identify online
and physical markets to be considered
for inclusion in the 2020 Review of
Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting
and Piracy (Notorious Markets List). The
Notorious Markets List identifies
examples of online and physical
markets that reportedly engage in and
facilitate substantial copyright piracy or
trademark counterfeiting. The issue
focus for the 2020 Notorious Markets
List will examine the use of e-commerce
platforms and other third-party
intermediaries to facilitate the
importation of counterfeit and pirated
goods into the United States.
DATES: November 8, 2020 at 11:59 p.m.
ET: Deadline for submission of written
comments. November 22, 2020 at 11:59
p.m. ET: Deadline for submission of
rebuttal comments and other
information USTR should consider
during the review.
ADDRESSES: You should submit written
comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov (Regulations.gov).
Follow the instructions for submitting
comments in section III below. For
alternatives to online submissions,
please contact Jacob Ewerdt at
Notorious Markets@ustr.eop.gov or (202)
395–4510 before transmitting a
comment and in advance of the relevant
deadline.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacob Ewerdt, Director for Innovation
and Intellectual Property, at Notorious
Markets@ustr.eop.gov or (202) 395–
4510. You can find information about
the Special 301 Review, including the
Notorious Markets List, at www.ustr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Background
The United States is concerned with
trademark counterfeiting and copyright
piracy on a commercial scale because
these illicit activities cause significant
financial losses for right holders,
legitimate businesses, and governments.
In addition, they undermine critical
U.S. comparative advantages in
innovation and creativity to the
detriment of American workers, and can
pose significant risks to consumer
health and safety and privacy and
security. Conducted under the auspices
of the Special 301 program and the
authority of the U.S. Trade
Representative to address practices that
have significant adverse impact on the
value of U.S. innovation, the Notorious
Markets List identifies examples of
online and physical markets that
reportedly engage in and facilitate
substantial copyright piracy or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Sep 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
trademark counterfeiting that infringe
on U.S. intellectual property (IP).
Beginning in 2006, USTR identified
notorious markets in the annual Special
301 Report. In 2010, USTR announced
that it would publish the Notorious
Markets List as an Out-of-Cycle Review,
separate from the annual Special 301
Report. USTR published the first
Notorious Markets List in February
2011. USTR develops the annual
Notorious Markets List based upon
public comments solicited through the
Federal Register and in consultation
with Federal agencies that serve on the
Special 301 Subcommittee of the Trade
Policy Staff Committee.
The United States encourages owners
and operators of markets reportedly
involved in piracy or counterfeiting to
adopt business models that rely on the
licensed distribution of legitimate
content and products and to work with
right holders and enforcement officials
to address infringement. USTR also
encourages foreign government
authorities to intensify their efforts to
investigate reports of piracy and
counterfeiting in such markets, and to
pursue appropriate enforcement actions.
The Notorious Markets List does not
purport to reflect findings of legal
violations, nor does it reflect the U.S.
Government’s analysis of the general IP
protection and enforcement climate in
the country or countries concerned. For
an analysis of the IP climate in
particular countries, please refer to the
annual Special 301 Report, published
each spring no later than 30 days after
USTR submits the National Trade
Estimate to Congress.
II. Public Comments
USTR invites written comments
concerning examples of online and
physical markets that reportedly engage
in and facilitate substantial copyright
piracy or trademark counterfeiting that
infringe on U.S. intellectual property.
USTR also invites written comments for
the Notorious Markets List ‘issue focus’
that highlights an issue related to the
facilitation of substantial trademark
counterfeiting or copyright piracy. The
issue focus for the 2020 Notorious
Markets List will examine the use of ecommerce platforms and other thirdparty intermediaries to facilitate the
importation of counterfeit and pirated
goods into the United States. The rapid
growth of e-commerce platforms has
helped fuel the growth of counterfeit
and pirated goods into a half trilliondollar industry. This illicit trade has an
enormous impact on the American
economy by eroding the
competitiveness of American workers,
manufacturers and innovation.
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62007
To facilitate the review, written
comments should be as detailed as
possible. Comments must clearly
identify the market and the reasons why
the commenter believes that the market
should be included in the Notorious
Markets List. Commenters should
include the following information, as
applicable:
For physical markets:
• The market’s name and location,
e.g., common name, street address,
neighborhood, shopping district, city,
etc., and the identity of the principal
owners/operators.
For online markets:
• The domain name(s) past and
present, available registration
information, and name(s) and
location(s) of the hosting provider(s)
and operator(s).
• Information on the volume of
internet traffic associated with the
website, including number of visitors
and page views, average time spent on
the site, estimate of the number of
infringing goods offered, sold, or traded
and number of infringing files streamed,
shared, seeded, leeched, downloaded,
uploaded, or otherwise distributed or
reproduced, and global or country
popularity rating (e.g., Alexa rank).
• Revenue sources such as sales,
subscriptions, donations, upload
incentives, or advertising and the
methods by which that revenue is
collected.
For physical and online markets:
• Whether the market is owned,
operated, or otherwise affiliated with a
government entity.
• Types of counterfeit or pirated
products or services sold, traded,
distributed, or otherwise made available
at that market.
• Volume of counterfeit or pirated
goods or services or other indicia of a
market’s scale, reach, or relative
significance in a given geographic area
or with respect to a category of goods or
services.
• Estimates of economic harm to right
holders resulting from the piracy or
counterfeiting and a description of the
methodology used to calculate the harm.
• Whether the volume of counterfeit
or pirated goods or estimates of harm
has increased or decreased from
previous years, and an approximate
calculation of that increase or decrease
for each year.
• Whether the infringing goods or
services sold, traded, distributed, or
made available pose a risk to public
health or safety.
• Any known contractual, civil,
administrative, or criminal enforcement
activity against the market and the
outcome of that enforcement activity.
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
62008
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 191 / Thursday, October 1, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
• Additional actions taken by right
holders against the market such as
takedown notices, requests to sites to
remove URLs or infringing content,
cease and desist letters, warning letters
to landlords and requests to enforce the
terms of their leases, requests to
providers to enforce their terms of
service or terms of use, and the outcome
of these actions.
• Additional actions taken by the
market owners or operators to remove,
limit, or discourage the availability of
counterfeit or pirated goods or services,
including policies to prevent or remove
access to such goods or services, or to
disable seller or user accounts, the
effectiveness of market policies and
guidelines in addressing counterfeiting
and piracy, and the level of cooperation
with right holders and law enforcement.
• Any other additional information
relevant to the review.
III. Submission Instructions
All submissions must be in English
and sent electronically via
Regulations.gov. To submit comments,
locate the docket (folder) by entering the
docket number USTR–2020–0035 in the
‘Enter Keyword or IP’ window at the
Regulations.gov homepage and click
‘search.’ The site will provide a searchresults page listing all documents
associated with this docket. Locate the
reference to this notice by selecting
‘notice under ‘document type’ on the
left side of the search-results page, and
click on the link entitled ‘comment
now!’ You should provide comments in
an attached document, and name the
file according to the following protocol,
as appropriate: Commenter Name or
Organization_2020 Notorious Markets.
Please include the following
information in the ‘type comment’ field:
2020 Review of Notorious Markets for
Counterfeiting and Piracy. USTR prefers
submissions in Microsoft Word (.docx)
or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format. If the
submission is in another file format,
please indicate the name of the software
application in the ‘type comment’ field.
For further information on using
Regulations.gov, please select ‘how to
use Regulations.gov’ on the bottom of
any page.
Please do not attach separate cover
letters to electronic submissions.
Instead, include any information that
might appear in a cover letter in the
comments themselves. Similarly, to the
extent possible, please include any
exhibits, annexes, or other attachments
in the same file as the comment itself,
rather than submitting them as separate
files.
For any comment submitted
electronically that contains business
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:13 Sep 30, 2020
Jkt 253001
confidential information (BCI), the file
name of the business confidential
version should begin with the characters
‘BCI’. Any page containing BCI must be
clearly marked ‘‘BUSINESS
CONFIDENTIAL’’ on the top of that
page and the submission should clearly
indicate, via brackets, highlighting, or
other means, the specific information
that is business confidential. A filer
requesting business confidential
treatment must certify that the
information is business confidential and
that they would not customarily release
it to the public. Additionally, the
submitter should type ‘Business
Confidential 2020 Review of Notorious
Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy’
in the ‘comment’ field.
Filers of comments containing BCI
also must submit a public version of
their comments. The file name of the
public version should begin with the
character ‘P’. The non-business
confidential version will be placed in
the docket at Regulations.gov and be
available for public inspection.
As noted, USTR strongly urges
submitters to file comments through
Regulations.gov. You must make any
alternative arrangements in advance of
the relevant deadline and before
transmitting a comment by contacting
Jacob Ewerdt at Notorious Markets@
ustr.eop.gov or (202) 395–4510 before
transmitting a comment and in advance
of the relevant deadline.
USTR will post comments in the
docket for public inspection, except
properly designated BCI. You can view
comments on Regulations.gov by
entering docket number USTR–2020–
0035 in the search field on the home
page.
Daniel Lee,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for
Innovation and Intellectual Property (Acting),
Office of the United States Trade
Representative.
[FR Doc. 2020–21723 Filed 9–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290–F0–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
Burlington International Airport, South
Burlington VT; FAA Approval of Noise
Compatibility Program
Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) announces its
findings on the noise compatibility
program submitted by the City of
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Burlington, Vermont under the
provisions of Title I of the Aviation
Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979
and FAA regulations. These findings are
made in recognition of the description
of federal and non-federal
responsibilities in Senate Report No.
96–52 (1980). On August 27, 2020, the
Airports Division Manager approved the
Burlington International Airport noise
compatibility program. All of the
proposed program elements were
approved.
The date of the FAA’s approval
of the Burlington International Airport
noise compatibility program is August
27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Richard Doucette, Federal Aviation
Administration, New England Region,
Airports Division, 1200 District Avenue,
Burlington, Massachusetts 01803,
Telephone (781) 238–7613, Email:
richard.doucette@faa.gov.
Documents reflecting this FAA action
may be obtained from the same
individual. The Noise Compatibility
Plan and supporting information can
also be found at www.btvsound.com.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice announces that the FAA has
given its overall approval to the
Burlington International Airport noise
compatibility program, effective August
27, 2020.
Under Section 104 (a) of the Aviation
Safety and Noise Abatement Act of 1979
(hereinafter the Act), an airport operator
who has previously submitted a noise
exposure map may submit to the FAA
a noise compatibility program which
sets forth the measures taken or
proposed by the airport operator for the
reduction of existing non-compatible
land uses and prevention of additional
non-compatible land uses within the
area covered by the noise exposure
maps.
The Act requires such programs to be
developed in consultation with
interested and affected parties including
local communities, government
agencies, airport users, and FAA
personnel.
Each airport noise compatibility
program developed in accordance with
14 CFR part 150 is a local program, not
a federal program. The FAA does not
substitute its judgment for that of the
airport proprietor with respect to which
measures should be recommended for
action. The FAA’s approval or
disapproval of the Part 150 program
recommendations is measured
according to the standards expressed in
Part 150 and the Act, and is limited to
the following determinations:
DATES:
E:\FR\FM\01OCN1.SGM
01OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 191 (Thursday, October 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62006-62008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21723]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
[Docket Number USTR-2020-0035]
2020 Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy:
Comment Request
AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.
ACTION: Request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR)
[[Page 62007]]
requests comments that identify online and physical markets to be
considered for inclusion in the 2020 Review of Notorious Markets for
Counterfeiting and Piracy (Notorious Markets List). The Notorious
Markets List identifies examples of online and physical markets that
reportedly engage in and facilitate substantial copyright piracy or
trademark counterfeiting. The issue focus for the 2020 Notorious
Markets List will examine the use of e-commerce platforms and other
third-party intermediaries to facilitate the importation of counterfeit
and pirated goods into the United States.
DATES: November 8, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. ET: Deadline for submission of
written comments. November 22, 2020 at 11:59 p.m. ET: Deadline for
submission of rebuttal comments and other information USTR should
consider during the review.
ADDRESSES: You should submit written comments through the Federal
eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov (Regulations.gov).
Follow the instructions for submitting comments in section III below.
For alternatives to online submissions, please contact Jacob Ewerdt at
Notorious [email protected] or (202) 395-4510 before transmitting a
comment and in advance of the relevant deadline.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacob Ewerdt, Director for Innovation
and Intellectual Property, at Notorious [email protected] or (202)
395-4510. You can find information about the Special 301 Review,
including the Notorious Markets List, at www.ustr.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The United States is concerned with trademark counterfeiting and
copyright piracy on a commercial scale because these illicit activities
cause significant financial losses for right holders, legitimate
businesses, and governments. In addition, they undermine critical U.S.
comparative advantages in innovation and creativity to the detriment of
American workers, and can pose significant risks to consumer health and
safety and privacy and security. Conducted under the auspices of the
Special 301 program and the authority of the U.S. Trade Representative
to address practices that have significant adverse impact on the value
of U.S. innovation, the Notorious Markets List identifies examples of
online and physical markets that reportedly engage in and facilitate
substantial copyright piracy or trademark counterfeiting that infringe
on U.S. intellectual property (IP).
Beginning in 2006, USTR identified notorious markets in the annual
Special 301 Report. In 2010, USTR announced that it would publish the
Notorious Markets List as an Out-of-Cycle Review, separate from the
annual Special 301 Report. USTR published the first Notorious Markets
List in February 2011. USTR develops the annual Notorious Markets List
based upon public comments solicited through the Federal Register and
in consultation with Federal agencies that serve on the Special 301
Subcommittee of the Trade Policy Staff Committee.
The United States encourages owners and operators of markets
reportedly involved in piracy or counterfeiting to adopt business
models that rely on the licensed distribution of legitimate content and
products and to work with right holders and enforcement officials to
address infringement. USTR also encourages foreign government
authorities to intensify their efforts to investigate reports of piracy
and counterfeiting in such markets, and to pursue appropriate
enforcement actions. The Notorious Markets List does not purport to
reflect findings of legal violations, nor does it reflect the U.S.
Government's analysis of the general IP protection and enforcement
climate in the country or countries concerned. For an analysis of the
IP climate in particular countries, please refer to the annual Special
301 Report, published each spring no later than 30 days after USTR
submits the National Trade Estimate to Congress.
II. Public Comments
USTR invites written comments concerning examples of online and
physical markets that reportedly engage in and facilitate substantial
copyright piracy or trademark counterfeiting that infringe on U.S.
intellectual property. USTR also invites written comments for the
Notorious Markets List `issue focus' that highlights an issue related
to the facilitation of substantial trademark counterfeiting or
copyright piracy. The issue focus for the 2020 Notorious Markets List
will examine the use of e-commerce platforms and other third-party
intermediaries to facilitate the importation of counterfeit and pirated
goods into the United States. The rapid growth of e-commerce platforms
has helped fuel the growth of counterfeit and pirated goods into a half
trillion-dollar industry. This illicit trade has an enormous impact on
the American economy by eroding the competitiveness of American
workers, manufacturers and innovation.
To facilitate the review, written comments should be as detailed as
possible. Comments must clearly identify the market and the reasons why
the commenter believes that the market should be included in the
Notorious Markets List. Commenters should include the following
information, as applicable:
For physical markets:
The market's name and location, e.g., common name, street
address, neighborhood, shopping district, city, etc., and the identity
of the principal owners/operators.
For online markets:
The domain name(s) past and present, available
registration information, and name(s) and location(s) of the hosting
provider(s) and operator(s).
Information on the volume of internet traffic associated
with the website, including number of visitors and page views, average
time spent on the site, estimate of the number of infringing goods
offered, sold, or traded and number of infringing files streamed,
shared, seeded, leeched, downloaded, uploaded, or otherwise distributed
or reproduced, and global or country popularity rating (e.g., Alexa
rank).
Revenue sources such as sales, subscriptions, donations,
upload incentives, or advertising and the methods by which that revenue
is collected.
For physical and online markets:
Whether the market is owned, operated, or otherwise
affiliated with a government entity.
Types of counterfeit or pirated products or services sold,
traded, distributed, or otherwise made available at that market.
Volume of counterfeit or pirated goods or services or
other indicia of a market's scale, reach, or relative significance in a
given geographic area or with respect to a category of goods or
services.
Estimates of economic harm to right holders resulting from
the piracy or counterfeiting and a description of the methodology used
to calculate the harm.
Whether the volume of counterfeit or pirated goods or
estimates of harm has increased or decreased from previous years, and
an approximate calculation of that increase or decrease for each year.
Whether the infringing goods or services sold, traded,
distributed, or made available pose a risk to public health or safety.
Any known contractual, civil, administrative, or criminal
enforcement activity against the market and the outcome of that
enforcement activity.
[[Page 62008]]
Additional actions taken by right holders against the
market such as takedown notices, requests to sites to remove URLs or
infringing content, cease and desist letters, warning letters to
landlords and requests to enforce the terms of their leases, requests
to providers to enforce their terms of service or terms of use, and the
outcome of these actions.
Additional actions taken by the market owners or operators
to remove, limit, or discourage the availability of counterfeit or
pirated goods or services, including policies to prevent or remove
access to such goods or services, or to disable seller or user
accounts, the effectiveness of market policies and guidelines in
addressing counterfeiting and piracy, and the level of cooperation with
right holders and law enforcement.
Any other additional information relevant to the review.
III. Submission Instructions
All submissions must be in English and sent electronically via
Regulations.gov. To submit comments, locate the docket (folder) by
entering the docket number USTR-2020-0035 in the `Enter Keyword or IP'
window at the Regulations.gov homepage and click `search.' The site
will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated
with this docket. Locate the reference to this notice by selecting
`notice under `document type' on the left side of the search-results
page, and click on the link entitled `comment now!' You should provide
comments in an attached document, and name the file according to the
following protocol, as appropriate: Commenter Name or Organization_2020
Notorious Markets. Please include the following information in the
`type comment' field: 2020 Review of Notorious Markets for
Counterfeiting and Piracy. USTR prefers submissions in Microsoft Word
(.docx) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format. If the submission is in another
file format, please indicate the name of the software application in
the `type comment' field. For further information on using
Regulations.gov, please select `how to use Regulations.gov' on the
bottom of any page.
Please do not attach separate cover letters to electronic
submissions. Instead, include any information that might appear in a
cover letter in the comments themselves. Similarly, to the extent
possible, please include any exhibits, annexes, or other attachments in
the same file as the comment itself, rather than submitting them as
separate files.
For any comment submitted electronically that contains business
confidential information (BCI), the file name of the business
confidential version should begin with the characters `BCI'. Any page
containing BCI must be clearly marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' on the
top of that page and the submission should clearly indicate, via
brackets, highlighting, or other means, the specific information that
is business confidential. A filer requesting business confidential
treatment must certify that the information is business confidential
and that they would not customarily release it to the public.
Additionally, the submitter should type `Business Confidential 2020
Review of Notorious Markets for Counterfeiting and Piracy' in the
`comment' field.
Filers of comments containing BCI also must submit a public version
of their comments. The file name of the public version should begin
with the character `P'. The non-business confidential version will be
placed in the docket at Regulations.gov and be available for public
inspection.
As noted, USTR strongly urges submitters to file comments through
Regulations.gov. You must make any alternative arrangements in advance
of the relevant deadline and before transmitting a comment by
contacting Jacob Ewerdt at Notorious [email protected] or (202) 395-
4510 before transmitting a comment and in advance of the relevant
deadline.
USTR will post comments in the docket for public inspection, except
properly designated BCI. You can view comments on Regulations.gov by
entering docket number USTR-2020-0035 in the search field on the home
page.
Daniel Lee,
Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Innovation and Intellectual
Property (Acting), Office of the United States Trade Representative.
[FR Doc. 2020-21723 Filed 9-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3290-F0-P