Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards, 61571-61575 [2020-16894]
Download as PDF
61571
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 190
Wednesday, September 30, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
2 CFR Part 1500
[EPA–HQ OMS–2020–0018; 10010–32–OMS]
Uniform Administrative Requirements,
Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request
for comment.
AGENCY:
This regulatory action revises
certain provisions of Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) financial
assistance regulations to provide more
flexibility to recipients of
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
financial assistance and streamline
dispute procedures for applicants and
recipients of EPA financial assistance.
The revisions to this rule are exempt
from the notice and comment
requirements of the Administrative
Procedure Act (APA) because it is a
matter relating to agency management
concerning grants.
DATES: Effective date: This interim final
rule is effective November 12, 2020.
Applicability date: This interim final
rule applies to EPA financial assistance
agreements awarded or amended to add
funds on or after or disputes arising
from agency decisions issued on or after
November 12, 2020. Disputes arising
from agency decisions issued prior to
the effective date of this rule will
remain subject to the procedures in the
prior regulations.
Comment date: Comments must be
received on or before November 30,
2020.
SUMMARY:
Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. OMS–2020–
0018 by one of the following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• Email: Docket_OMS@epa.gov.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Sep 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
• Mail: OMS Docket, Environmental
Protection Agency, Mailcode: 28221T,
1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW,
Washington, DC 20460.
• Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center,
WJC West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC
20004. The telephone number for the
Docket Center is 202–566–1744. For
additional information about EPA’s
public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/
dockets. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket’s normal
hours of operation: 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., and special arrangements should
be made for deliveries of boxed
information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Docket ID No. OMS–2020–0018.
EPA’s policy is that all comments
received will be included in the public
docket without change and may be
made available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
claimed to be Confidential Business
Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise
protected through www.regulations.gov
or email. The www.regulations.gov
website is an ‘‘anonymous access’’
system, which means EPA will not
know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send an
email comment directly to EPA without
going through www.regulations.gov your
email address will be automatically
captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public
docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic
comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact
information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM
you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties
and cannot contact you for clarification,
EPA may not be able to consider your
comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form
of encryption, and be free of any defects
or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket
are listed in the www.regulations.gov
index. Although listed in the index,
some information is not publicly
available, e.g., CBI or other information
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
whose disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, will be publicly
available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available
either electronically in
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
Docket ID No. OMS–2020–0018, OMS
Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading
Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays. The telephone number
for the Public Reading Room is (202)
566–1744, and the telephone number for
the OMS Docket is (202) 566–1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alexandra Raver at raver.alexandra@
epa.gov or (202) 564–5296.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA’s
revisions to 2 CFR part 1500 are
summarized below.
1. EPA will add a provision at 2 CFR
1500.1(a) clarifying that allowable
participant support costs under 2 CFR
200.1, Participant support costs, may
include rebates or other subsidies
provided to program participants or
program beneficiaries when authorized
by the statutory authority for the
financial assistance program. The
provision applies to subsidies used for
purchase and installation of
commercially available, standard (‘‘off
the shelf’’) pollution control equipment
or low emission vehicles under the
Diesel Emission Reduction Act program
or other programs when the program
participant rather than the recipient
owns the equipment. Other examples of
these other EPA funded programs
specified in EPA’s Interim Guidance on
Participant Support Costs include
subsidies or rebates provided to
program beneficiaries to encourage
participation in statutorily authorized
programs to encourage environmental
stewardship such as Best Management
Practices under Clean Water Act 319
nonpoint source management programs,
subsidies to promote adoption of source
reduction practices by businesses under
section 6605 of the Pollution Prevention
Act, and rebates or subsides for wood
stove replacement under financial
assistance programs authorized by the
Clean Air Act or EPA’s annual
appropriation acts.
2. EPA has added a new provision at
2 CFR 1500.3(b) stating that
subrecipient monitoring and
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
61572
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 190 / Wednesday, September 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
management requirements at 2 CFR
200.331 through 200.333 do not apply to
transactions entered into with borrowers
by recipients of Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization
grants and Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund (DWSRF) capitalization
grants. This revision is consistent with
the Administration’s emphasis, as
described in the President’s
Management Agenda, Cross-Agency
Priority Goal on Results Oriented
Accountability for Grants, on risk-based
approaches to streamlining
requirements for recipients whose
performance record warrants burden
reduction and the importance of
deference to states. CWSRF and DWSRF
programs are mature Federal grant
programs with comprehensive program
specific regulations and capitalization
grants are administered by state
agencies with well-established
processes for managing loans and
monitoring borrower compliance with
loan agreements. This regulatory change
will allow states to follow their own
procedures rather than those mandated
by 2 CFR 200.331 through 200.333.
Requirements for reporting subaward
and executive compensation in 2 CFR
part 170 and internal controls described
at 2 CFR 200.303 will continue to apply
to CWSRF and DWSRF program grant
recipients and borrowers. Recipients of
Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund
capitalization grants and their borrowers
as well other EPA revolving loan fund
(RLF) capitalization grant programs
remain subject to 2 CFR 200.331
through 200.333 and other applicable
regulations. Eligibility for these grants is
not necessarily limited to states.
3. EPA has revised 2 CFR 1500.7 to
provide that recipients may add all
program income to their EPA funds for
use under the purposes and conditions
of the assistance agreement even if
program income exceeds the amount
anticipated at time of award. The
revision will allow recipients to deduct
the cost of generating program income
from gross program income to determine
net program income provided these
costs have not been charged to any
Federal award or the terms of the
agreement do not preclude deducting
the cost of generating program income.
EPA has extended the policy of allowing
recipients of RLF capitalization grants to
draw down funds from EPA prior to
using program income to all RLF
programs except the CWSRF and
DWSRF programs, which have their
own regulations.
4. EPA has revised 2 CFR 1500.9 to
clarify the scope of the limitation on the
allowability of costs for individual
consultant fees on EPA assistance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Sep 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
agreements to be consistent with the
policy EPA announced in 69 FR 18380
(April 7, 2004). Additionally, the
regulation specifies that borrowers
under EPA assistance programs for
capitalization of revolving loan funds
are not subject to the limitation on
consultant fee costs.
5. EPA has revised the 2 CFR part
1500, subpart E, disputes procedures to
exempt the following decisions from the
procedures.
a. Decisions to decline to fund noncompetitive applications and not to award
incremental or supplemental funding based
on the availability of funds or agency
priorities.
b. Decisions on requests for
reconsideration of Specific conditions under
2 CFR 200.208.
c. Decisions to deny requests for no-cost
extensions under 2 CFR 200.308(e)(2), 40
CFR 35.114(b), and 40 CFR 35.514(b).
d. Denials of requests for EPA approval of
procurement through noncompetitive
proposals under 2 CFR 200.320(c)(4).
EPA has also eliminated reviews of
Dispute Decision Official (DDO)
decisions by the Director of the Office
of Grants and Debarment or Regional
Administrators as currently provided for
in 2 CFR 1500.17 through 1500.19.
These reviews will be replaced by a
procedure that allows applicants and
recipients to petition the DDO to
reconsider adverse dispute decisions on
an expedited basis. Regional
Administrators may act as DDOs or
designate another official to be the DDO.
In addition to the above described
substantive revisions, EPA will
renumber the sections in 2 CFR part
1500 to reflect the addition of a new
§ 1500.1.
I. General Information
A. Affected Entities
Entities affected by this action are
those that apply for and/or receive
Federal financial assistance (grants,
cooperative agreements or fellowships)
from EPA including but not limited to:
State and local governments, Indian
Tribes, Intertribal Consortia, Institutions
of Higher Education, Hospitals, and
other Non-profit Organizations, and
Individuals.
II. Background
On December 19, 2014 (79 FR 76050–
76054) EPA promulgated 2 CFR part
1500, Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.
These regulations supplement OMB’s 2
CFR part 200 regulations covering the
same subjects which were promulgated
that same day (79 FR 75871). EPA’s
experience in administering these
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
regulations indicates that applicants and
recipients would benefit from clarity
regarding EPA’s interpretation of these
regulations as well as additional
flexibility. Further, EPA believes the
process for disputing adverse actions
the EPA takes against applicants or
recipients could be streamlined without
compromising fairness. The revisions to
2 CFR part 1500 that EPA is making on
an interim final basis achieve these
objectives. The rule will become final
without further revision if no changes
are warranted based on comments EPA
receives.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory
Planning and Review
This action is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ and was therefore not
submitted to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing
Regulations and Controlling Regulatory
Costs
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13771 because it is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as
defined in section 3(f) of Executive
Order 12886.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new
information collection burden.
However, the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) has previously approved
the information collection requirements
contained in the existing regulations 2
CFR parts 200 and 1500 under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction
Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has
assigned OMB control number 2030–
0020. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed
in 40 CFR part 9.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This interim final rule is not subject
to the Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA),
which generally requires an agency to
prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis
for any rule that will have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The RFA
applies only to rules subject to notice
and comment rulemaking requirements
under the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) or any other statute. This rule is
not subject to notice and comment
requirements under the APA or any
other statute because this rule pertains
to grants, which the APA expressly
exempts from notice and comment
rulemaking requirements. 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2).
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 190 / Wednesday, September 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal
mandates under the provisions of Title
II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531–
1538 for State, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. The
action imposes no enforceable duty on
any State, local or tribal governments or
the private sector. Therefore, this action
is not subject to the requirements of
sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA
because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or
uniquely affect small governments. This
action affects all applicants and
recipients of EPA financial Federal
assistance and therefore no one entity
type will be impacted disproportionally
or significantly.
2001), because it is not a significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866.
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism
implications. It will not have substantial
direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the National
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132. This action
affects all applicants and recipients of
EPA financial Federal assistance and
therefore no one entity type will be
impacted disproportionally. Thus,
Executive Order 13132 does not apply
to this action.
L. Congressional Review Act
G. Executive Order 13175
This action does not have tribal
implications, as specified in Executive
Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9,
2000). This action affects all applicants
and recipients of EPA financial Federal
assistance and therefore no one entity
type will be impacted disproportionally.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not
apply to this action. Consistent with the
EPA Policy on Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribes, the
EPA consulted with tribal officials on
these changes.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to E.O.
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
because it is not economically
significant as defined in E.O. 12866.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive
Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Sep 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
J. National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act
This action does not involve technical
standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal
Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and
Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that it is not
practicable to determine whether this
action has disproportionately high and
adverse effects on minority populations,
low-income populations, and/or
indigenous peoples, as specified in
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629,
February 16, 1994).
The Congressional Review Act (CRA),
5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This action is not
a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 1500
Accounting, Grant programs, Grants
administration, Loan programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Water pollution control,
Water supply.
Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
PART 1500—UNIFORM
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS,
COST PRINCIPLES, AND AUDIT
REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL
AWARDS
1. The authority citation for part 1500
is revised to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 136 et
seq., 15 U.S.C. 2601 et seq., 20 U.S.C. 4011
et seq., 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., and 1401 et
seq., 42 U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f et
seq., 1857 et seq., 6901 et seq., 7401 et seq.,
and 9601 et seq.; 2 CFR part 200.
§§ 1500.17 through 1500.19
Sfmt 4700
[Removed]
2. Remove §§ 1500.17 through
1500.19.
■
§ § 1500.1 through 1500.16 [Redesignated
as §§ 1500.2 through 1500.17]
3. Redesignate §§ 1500.1 through
1500.16 as §§ 1500.2 through 1500.17.
■ 4. Add subpart A to read as follows:
■
Subpart A—Acronyms and Definitions
§ 1500.1
Definitions.
(a) Participant support costs. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
has supplemented 2 CFR 200.1,
Participant support costs, to provide
that allowable participant support costs
under EPA assistance agreements
include:
(1) Rebates or other subsidies
provided to program participants for
purchases and installations of
commercially available, standard (‘‘off
the shelf’’) pollution control equipment
or low emission vehicles under the
Diesel Emission Reduction Act program
or programs authorized by EPA
appropriation acts and permitted by
terms specified in EPA assistance
agreements or guidance, when the
program participant rather than the
recipient owns the equipment.
(2) Subsidies, rebates, and other
payments provided to program
beneficiaries to encourage participation
in statutorily authorized programs to
encourage environmental stewardship
and enable the public to participate in
EPA funded research, pollution
abatement, and other projects or
programs to the extent permitted by
statutes and terms specified in EPA
assistance agreements or guidance.
(b) [Reserved]
■ 5. Revise newly redesignated § 1500.3
to read as follows:
§ 1500.3
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Environmental Protection
Agency amends 2 CFR part 1500 as
follows:
61573
Applicability.
(a) Uniform administrative
requirements and cost principles
(subparts A through E of 2 CFR part 200
as supplemented by this part) apply to
foreign public entities or foreign
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
61574
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 190 / Wednesday, September 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
organizations, except where EPA
determines that the application of this
part would be inconsistent with the
international obligations of the United
States or the statutes or regulations of a
foreign government.
(b) Requirements for subrecipient
monitoring and management at 2 CFR
200.331 through 200.333 do not apply to
loan, loan guarantees, interest subsidies
and principal forgiveness, purchases of
insurance or local government debt or
similar transactions with borrowers by
recipients of Clean Water State
Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization
grants and Drinking Water State
Revolving Fund (DWSRF) capitalization
grants. Requirements for reporting
subaward and executive compensation
in 2 CFR part 170 and internal controls
described at 2 CFR 200.303 continue to
apply to CWSRF and DWSRF grant
recipients and borrowers.
■ 6. Revise newly redesignated § 1500.8
to read as follows:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
§ 1500.8
Program income.
(a) Governmental revenues. Permit
fees are governmental revenue and not
program income. (See 2 CFR
200.307(c)).
(b) Use of program income. The
default use of program income for EPA
awards is addition even if the amount
of program income the non-Federal
entity generates exceeds the anticipated
amount at time of the award of the
assistance agreement. Unless the terms
of the agreement provide otherwise,
recipients may deduct costs incidental
to the generation of program income
from gross income to determine program
income, provided these costs have not
been charged to any Federal award. (See
2 CFR 200.307(b)). The program income
shall be used for the purposes and
under the conditions of the assistance
agreement. (See 2 CFR 200.307(e)(2)).
(c) Brownfields Revolving Loan. To
continue the mission of the Brownfields
Revolving Loan fund, recipients may
use EPA grant funding prior to using
program income funds generated by the
revolving loan fund. Recipients may
also keep program income at the end of
the assistance agreement as long as they
use these funds to continue to operate
the revolving loan fund or some other
brownfield purpose as outlined in their
respective closeout agreements.
(d) Other revolving loan programs.
Recipients of EPA funding for other
revolving loan fund programs may use
EPA grant funding prior to using
program income funds generated by the
revolving loan fund. Recipients may
also keep program income at the end of
the assistance agreement as long as they
use these funds to continue to operate
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Sep 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
the revolving loan fund or some other
authorized purpose as outlined in their
closeout agreement. This paragraph (d)
does not apply to EPA’s Clean Water
State Revolving Fund and Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund programs
which are subject to their own
regulations.
■ 7. Revise newly redesignated
§ 1500.10 to read as follows:
§ 1500.10
General procurement standards.
(a) EPA will limit its participation in
the salary rate (excluding overhead)
paid to individual consultants retained
by recipients, and their contractors or
subcontractors to the maximum daily
rate for level 4 of the Executive
Schedule unless a greater amount is
authorized by law. (These non-Federal
entities may, however, pay consultants
more than this amount with non-EPA
funds.) The limitation in this paragraph
(a) applies to consultation services of
designated individuals with specialized
skills who are paid at a daily or hourly
rate. This rate does not include
transportation and subsistence costs for
travel performed; recipients will pay
these in accordance with their normal
travel reimbursement practices.
(b) All contracts between recipients
and subrecipients and individual
consultants are subject to the
procurement standards in subpart D of
2 CFR part 200. Contracts or
subcontracts with multi-employee firms
for consulting services are not affected
by the limitation in paragraph (a) of this
section provided the contractor or
subcontractor rather than the recipient
or subrecipient selects, directs and
controls individual employees
providing consulting services.
(c) Borrowers under EPA revolving
loan fund capitalization grant programs
are not subject to paragraphs (a) and (b)
of this section.
■ 8. Amend newly redesignated
§ 1500.13 by:
■ a. Revising paragraphs (a)
introductory text, (a)(1), (c) introductory
text, and (c)(1);
■ b. Adding a semicolon at the end of
paragraph (c)(2);
■ c. Removing the word ‘‘and’’ at the
end of paragraph (c)(4);
■ d. Removing the period at the end of
paragraph (c)(5) and adding a semicolon
in its place; and
■ e. Adding paragraphs (c)(6) through
(9).
The revisions and additions read as
follows:
§ 1500.13
subpart.
Purpose and scope of this
(a) This section provides the process
for the resolution of pre-award and post-
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
award assistance agreement disputes as
described in § 1500.14, except for:
(1) Assistance agreement competitionrelated disputes which are covered by
EPA’s Grant Competition Dispute
Resolution Procedures; and,
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Determinations affecting assistance
agreements made under certain Agency
decision-making processes are not
subject to review under the procedures
in this subpart or the Agency’s
procedures for resolving assistance
agreement competition-related disputes.
These determinations include, but are
not limited to:
(1) Decisions on requests for
exceptions under § 1500.4;
*
*
*
*
*
(6) Decisions to decline to fund noncompetitive applications or not to award
incremental or supplemental funding
based on the availability of funds or
agency priorities;
(7) Decisions on requests for
reconsideration of specific award
conditions under 2 CFR 200.208;
(8) Decisions to deny requests for nocost extensions under 2 CFR
200.308(e)(2), 40 CFR 35.114(b), and 40
CFR 35.514(b); and
(9) Denials of requests for EPA
approval of procurement through
noncompetitive proposals under 2 CFR
200.320(c)(4).
■ 9. Amend newly redesignated
§ 1500.14 by revising paragraphs (c)
through (e) to read as follows:
§ 1500.14
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Agency Decision is the agency’s
initial pre-award or post-award
assistance agreement determination that
may be disputed in accordance with this
subpart. The Agency Decision is sent by
the Action Official (AO) to the Affected
Entity electronically and informs them
of their dispute rights and identifies the
Dispute Decision Official (DDO). An
Agency Decision based on audit
findings serves as EPA’s Management
decision as defined in 2 CFR part 200.1.
(d) Dispute is a disagreement by an
Affected Entity with a specific Agency
Decision submitted to the DDO in
accordance with this subpart.
(e) Dispute Decision Official (DDO) is
the designated agency official
responsible for issuing a decision
resolving a Dispute.
(1) The DDO for a Headquarters
Dispute is the Director of the Grants and
Interagency Agreement Management
Division in the Office of Grants and
Debarment or designee. To provide for
a fair and impartial review, the AO for
the challenged Agency Decision may
not serve as the Headquarters DDO.
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 190 / Wednesday, September 30, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
(2) The DDO for a Regional Assistance
Agreement Dispute is the Regional
Administrator or the official designated
by the Regional Administrator to issue
the written decision resolving the
Dispute. To provide for a fair and
impartial review, the AO for the
challenged Agency Decision may not
serve as the Regional DDO.
*
*
*
*
*
■ 10. Revise newly redesignated
§ 1500.15 to read as follows:
§ 1500.15
Submission of Dispute.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
An Affected Entity or its authorized
representative may dispute an Agency
Decision by electronically submitting a
Dispute to the DDO identified in the
Agency Decision. In order for the DDO
to consider the Dispute, it must satisfy
the following requirements:
(a) Timeliness. The DDO must receive
the Dispute no later than 30 calendar
days from the date the Agency Decision
is electronically sent to the Affected
Entity. The DDO will dismiss any
Dispute received after the 30-day period
unless the DDO grants an extension of
time to submit the Dispute. The
Affected Entity must submit a written
request for extension to the DDO before
the expiration of the 30-day period. The
DDO may grant a one-time extension of
up to 30 calendar days when justified by
the situation, which may include the
unusual complexity of the Dispute or
because of exigent circumstances.
(b) Method of submission. The
Affected Entity must submit the Dispute
electronically via email to the DDO,
with a copy to the AO, using the email
addresses specified in the Agency
Decision within the 30-day period
stated in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Contents of Dispute. The Dispute
submitted to the DDO must include:
(1) A copy of the disputed Agency
Decision;
(2) A detailed statement of the
specific legal and factual grounds for the
Dispute, including copies of any
supporting documents;
(3) The specific remedy or relief the
Affected Entity seeks under the Dispute;
and
(4) The name and contact information,
including email address, of the Affected
Entity’s designated point of contact for
the Dispute.
■ 11. Revise newly redesignated
§ 1500.16 to read as follows:
§ 1500.16 Notice of receipt of Dispute to
Affected Entity.
Within 15 calendar days of receiving
the Dispute, the DDO will provide the
Affected Entity a written notice, sent
electronically, acknowledging receipt of
the Dispute.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:10 Sep 29, 2020
Jkt 250001
(a) Timely Disputes. If the Dispute
was timely submitted, the notice of
acknowledgement may identify any
additional information or
documentation that is required for a
thorough consideration of the Dispute.
The notice should provide no more than
30 calendar days for the Affected Entity
to provide the requested information. If
it is not feasible to identify such
information or documentation in the
notice the DDO may request it at a later
point in time prior to issuance of the
Dispute decision.
(b) Untimely Disputes. If the DDO did
not receive the Dispute within the
required 30-day period, or any
extension of it, the DDO will notify the
Affected Entity that the Dispute is being
dismissed as untimely and the Agency
Decision of the AO becomes final. The
dismissal of an untimely Dispute
constitutes the final agency action. In
appropriate circumstances, the DDO
may, as a matter of discretion, consider
an untimely Dispute if doing so would
be in the interests of fairness and equity.
■ 12. Revise newly redesignated
§ 1500.17 to read as follows:
§ 1500.17
Determination of Dispute.
(a) In determining the merits of the
Dispute, the DDO will consider the
record related to the Agency Decision,
any documentation that the Affected
Entity submits with its Dispute, any
additional documentation submitted by
the Affected Entity in response to the
DDO’s request under § 1500.16(a), and
any other information the DDO
determines is relevant to the Dispute
provided the DDO gives notice of that
information to the Affected Entity. The
Affected Entity may not on its own
initiative submit any additional
documents except in the support of a
request for reconsideration under
paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) The DDO will issue the Dispute
decision within 180 calendar days from
the date the Dispute is received by the
DDO unless a longer period is necessary
based on the complexity of the legal,
technical, and factual issues presented.
The DDO will notify the Affected Entity
if the expected decision will not be
issued within the 180-day period and if
feasible will indicate when the decision
is expected to be issued. The DDO will
issue the Dispute decision electronically
and advise the Affected Entity of
procedures for requesting
reconsideration. The DDO’s decision
will constitute the final agency action
unless the Affected Entity electronically
petitions the DDO for reconsideration
within 15 calendar days of issuance of
the DDO Decision. The Affected Entity
must include a detailed statement of the
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 9990
61575
factual and legal grounds warranting
reversal or modification of the DDO
decision. In addition, the Affected
Entity may submit additional
documents that were not previously
provided to the DDO.
(c) If a petition for reconsideration is
submitted, the DDO’s will advise the
Affected Entity within 15 calendar days
of receipt of the petition whether the
DDO Decision will be reconsidered. The
DDO will issue this determination
electronically. DDO’s will only grant a
reconsideration petition if the Affected
Entity provides relevant and material
evidence that was not available to the
Affected Entity at the time the Dispute
was submitted or to correct a clear and
prejudicial error of fact or law. Denial of
a petition for reconsideration constitutes
final agency action and the DDO will
advise the Affected Entity of the reasons
for denying the reconsideration in
writing.
(d) If the DDO grants a
reconsideration petition, the DDO will
issue a revised DDO Decision within 30
calendar days of acceptance of the
reconsideration petition unless a longer
period is necessary based on the
complexity of the legal, technical, and
factual issues presented. The DDO will
issue the revised DDO Decision
electronically. The revised DDO
Decision and any new material
considered by the DDO in making the
revised DDO Decision will become part
of the record of the Dispute. The revised
DDO Decision will constitute final
agency action.
(e) The DDO may consider untimely
filed reconsideration petitions only if
necessary, to correct a DDO Decision
that is manifestly unfair and inequitable
in light of relevant and material
evidence that the Affected Entity could
not have discovered during the 30-day
period for petitioning for
reconsideration. This evidence must be
submitted within six months of the date
of the DDO Decision. The DDO will
advise the Affected Entity within 30
days of receipt of an untimely filed
reconsideration petition whether the
DDO will accept the petition. Denial of
an untimely filed reconsideration
petition constitutes final agency action.
[FR Doc. 2020–16894 Filed 9–29–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
E:\FR\FM\30SER1.SGM
30SER1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 190 (Wednesday, September 30, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 61571-61575]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16894]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 190 / Wednesday, September 30, 2020 /
Rules and Regulations
[[Page 61571]]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
2 CFR Part 1500
[EPA-HQ OMS-2020-0018; 10010-32-OMS]
Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Interim final rule with request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This regulatory action revises certain provisions of
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) financial assistance regulations
to provide more flexibility to recipients of Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) financial assistance and streamline dispute procedures for
applicants and recipients of EPA financial assistance. The revisions to
this rule are exempt from the notice and comment requirements of the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) because it is a matter relating to
agency management concerning grants.
DATES: Effective date: This interim final rule is effective November
12, 2020.
Applicability date: This interim final rule applies to EPA
financial assistance agreements awarded or amended to add funds on or
after or disputes arising from agency decisions issued on or after
November 12, 2020. Disputes arising from agency decisions issued prior
to the effective date of this rule will remain subject to the
procedures in the prior regulations.
Comment date: Comments must be received on or before November 30,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. OMS-2020-
0018 by one of the following methods:
www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line instructions for
submitting comments.
Email: [email protected].
Mail: OMS Docket, Environmental Protection Agency,
Mailcode: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20460.
Hand Delivery: EPA Docket Center, WJC West, Room 3334,
1301 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20004. The telephone number
for the Docket Center is 202-566-1744. For additional information about
EPA's public docket, visit https://www.epa.gov/dockets. Such deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation: 8:30
a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and special arrangements should be made for
deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. OMS-2020-0018.
EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included in the
public docket without change and may be made available online at https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided,
unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to
be CBI or otherwise protected through www.regulations.gov or email. The
www.regulations.gov website is an ``anonymous access'' system, which
means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you
provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an email comment
directly to EPA without going through www.regulations.gov your email
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the
internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you
include your name and other contact information in the body of your
comment and with any disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your
comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for
clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic
files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of
encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses.
Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in the
www.regulations.gov index. Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, will be publicly available only in hard copy.
Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically
in www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at Docket ID No. OMS-2020-0018,
OMS Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave. NW,
Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone
number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the telephone
number for the OMS Docket is (202) 566-1752.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alexandra Raver at
[email protected] or (202) 564-5296.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA's revisions to 2 CFR part 1500 are
summarized below.
1. EPA will add a provision at 2 CFR 1500.1(a) clarifying that
allowable participant support costs under 2 CFR 200.1, Participant
support costs, may include rebates or other subsidies provided to
program participants or program beneficiaries when authorized by the
statutory authority for the financial assistance program. The provision
applies to subsidies used for purchase and installation of commercially
available, standard (``off the shelf'') pollution control equipment or
low emission vehicles under the Diesel Emission Reduction Act program
or other programs when the program participant rather than the
recipient owns the equipment. Other examples of these other EPA funded
programs specified in EPA's Interim Guidance on Participant Support
Costs include subsidies or rebates provided to program beneficiaries to
encourage participation in statutorily authorized programs to encourage
environmental stewardship such as Best Management Practices under Clean
Water Act 319 nonpoint source management programs, subsidies to promote
adoption of source reduction practices by businesses under section 6605
of the Pollution Prevention Act, and rebates or subsides for wood stove
replacement under financial assistance programs authorized by the Clean
Air Act or EPA's annual appropriation acts.
2. EPA has added a new provision at 2 CFR 1500.3(b) stating that
subrecipient monitoring and
[[Page 61572]]
management requirements at 2 CFR 200.331 through 200.333 do not apply
to transactions entered into with borrowers by recipients of Clean
Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization grants and Drinking
Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) capitalization grants. This revision
is consistent with the Administration's emphasis, as described in the
President's Management Agenda, Cross-Agency Priority Goal on Results
Oriented Accountability for Grants, on risk-based approaches to
streamlining requirements for recipients whose performance record
warrants burden reduction and the importance of deference to states.
CWSRF and DWSRF programs are mature Federal grant programs with
comprehensive program specific regulations and capitalization grants
are administered by state agencies with well-established processes for
managing loans and monitoring borrower compliance with loan agreements.
This regulatory change will allow states to follow their own procedures
rather than those mandated by 2 CFR 200.331 through 200.333.
Requirements for reporting subaward and executive compensation in 2 CFR
part 170 and internal controls described at 2 CFR 200.303 will continue
to apply to CWSRF and DWSRF program grant recipients and borrowers.
Recipients of Brownfields Revolving Loan Fund capitalization grants and
their borrowers as well other EPA revolving loan fund (RLF)
capitalization grant programs remain subject to 2 CFR 200.331 through
200.333 and other applicable regulations. Eligibility for these grants
is not necessarily limited to states.
3. EPA has revised 2 CFR 1500.7 to provide that recipients may add
all program income to their EPA funds for use under the purposes and
conditions of the assistance agreement even if program income exceeds
the amount anticipated at time of award. The revision will allow
recipients to deduct the cost of generating program income from gross
program income to determine net program income provided these costs
have not been charged to any Federal award or the terms of the
agreement do not preclude deducting the cost of generating program
income. EPA has extended the policy of allowing recipients of RLF
capitalization grants to draw down funds from EPA prior to using
program income to all RLF programs except the CWSRF and DWSRF programs,
which have their own regulations.
4. EPA has revised 2 CFR 1500.9 to clarify the scope of the
limitation on the allowability of costs for individual consultant fees
on EPA assistance agreements to be consistent with the policy EPA
announced in 69 FR 18380 (April 7, 2004). Additionally, the regulation
specifies that borrowers under EPA assistance programs for
capitalization of revolving loan funds are not subject to the
limitation on consultant fee costs.
5. EPA has revised the 2 CFR part 1500, subpart E, disputes
procedures to exempt the following decisions from the procedures.
a. Decisions to decline to fund non-competitive applications and
not to award incremental or supplemental funding based on the
availability of funds or agency priorities.
b. Decisions on requests for reconsideration of Specific
conditions under 2 CFR 200.208.
c. Decisions to deny requests for no-cost extensions under 2 CFR
200.308(e)(2), 40 CFR 35.114(b), and 40 CFR 35.514(b).
d. Denials of requests for EPA approval of procurement through
noncompetitive proposals under 2 CFR 200.320(c)(4).
EPA has also eliminated reviews of Dispute Decision Official (DDO)
decisions by the Director of the Office of Grants and Debarment or
Regional Administrators as currently provided for in 2 CFR 1500.17
through 1500.19. These reviews will be replaced by a procedure that
allows applicants and recipients to petition the DDO to reconsider
adverse dispute decisions on an expedited basis. Regional
Administrators may act as DDOs or designate another official to be the
DDO.
In addition to the above described substantive revisions, EPA will
renumber the sections in 2 CFR part 1500 to reflect the addition of a
new Sec. 1500.1.
I. General Information
A. Affected Entities
Entities affected by this action are those that apply for and/or
receive Federal financial assistance (grants, cooperative agreements or
fellowships) from EPA including but not limited to: State and local
governments, Indian Tribes, Intertribal Consortia, Institutions of
Higher Education, Hospitals, and other Non-profit Organizations, and
Individuals.
II. Background
On December 19, 2014 (79 FR 76050-76054) EPA promulgated 2 CFR part
1500, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards. These regulations supplement OMB's 2
CFR part 200 regulations covering the same subjects which were
promulgated that same day (79 FR 75871). EPA's experience in
administering these regulations indicates that applicants and
recipients would benefit from clarity regarding EPA's interpretation of
these regulations as well as additional flexibility. Further, EPA
believes the process for disputing adverse actions the EPA takes
against applicants or recipients could be streamlined without
compromising fairness. The revisions to 2 CFR part 1500 that EPA is
making on an interim final basis achieve these objectives. The rule
will become final without further revision if no changes are warranted
based on comments EPA receives.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review
This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and was
therefore not submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
for review.
B. Executive Order 13771: Reducing Regulations and Controlling
Regulatory Costs
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13771 because it is
not a ``significant regulatory action'' as defined in section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12886.
C. Paperwork Reduction Act
This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
However, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously
approved the information collection requirements contained in the
existing regulations 2 CFR parts 200 and 1500 under the provisions of
the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned
OMB control number 2030-0020. The OMB control numbers for EPA's
regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.
D. Regulatory Flexibility Act
This interim final rule is not subject to the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (RFA), which generally requires an agency to prepare a
regulatory flexibility analysis for any rule that will have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.
The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking
requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or any other
statute. This rule is not subject to notice and comment requirements
under the APA or any other statute because this rule pertains to
grants, which the APA expressly exempts from notice and comment
rulemaking requirements. 5 U.S.C. 553(a)(2).
[[Page 61573]]
E. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C.
1531-1538 for State, local, or tribal governments or the private
sector. The action imposes no enforceable duty on any State, local or
tribal governments or the private sector. Therefore, this action is not
subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of the UMRA.
This action is also not subject to the requirements of section 203
of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. This action affects
all applicants and recipients of EPA financial Federal assistance and
therefore no one entity type will be impacted disproportionally or
significantly.
F. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)
This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between
the National Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This action affects all applicants
and recipients of EPA financial Federal assistance and therefore no one
entity type will be impacted disproportionally. Thus, Executive Order
13132 does not apply to this action.
G. Executive Order 13175
This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action
affects all applicants and recipients of EPA financial Federal
assistance and therefore no one entity type will be impacted
disproportionally. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this
action. Consistent with the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribes, the EPA consulted with tribal officials on these
changes.
H. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks
This action is not subject to E.O. 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) because it is not economically significant as defined in E.O.
12866.
I. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use
This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355,
May 22, 2001), because it is not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866.
J. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act
This action does not involve technical standards.
K. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations
The EPA believes that it is not practicable to determine whether
this action has disproportionately high and adverse effects on minority
populations, low-income populations, and/or indigenous peoples, as
specified in Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
L. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act (CRA), 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added
by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 2 CFR Part 1500
Accounting, Grant programs, Grants administration, Loan programs,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Water pollution control,
Water supply.
Andrew Wheeler,
Administrator.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Environmental
Protection Agency amends 2 CFR part 1500 as follows:
PART 1500--UNIFORM ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS, COST PRINCIPLES,
AND AUDIT REQUIREMENTS FOR FEDERAL AWARDS
0
1. The authority citation for part 1500 is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301, 7 U.S.C. 136 et seq., 15 U.S.C. 2601
et seq., 20 U.S.C. 4011 et seq., 33 U.S.C. 1251 et seq., and 1401 et
seq., 42 U.S.C. 241, 242b, 243, 246, 300f et seq., 1857 et seq.,
6901 et seq., 7401 et seq., and 9601 et seq.; 2 CFR part 200.
Sec. Sec. 1500.17 through 1500.19 [Removed]
0
2. Remove Sec. Sec. 1500.17 through 1500.19.
Sec. Sec. 1500.1 through 1500.16 [Redesignated as Sec. Sec. 1500.2
through 1500.17]
0
3. Redesignate Sec. Sec. 1500.1 through 1500.16 as Sec. Sec. 1500.2
through 1500.17.
0
4. Add subpart A to read as follows:
Subpart A--Acronyms and Definitions
Sec. 1500.1 Definitions.
(a) Participant support costs. The Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has supplemented 2 CFR 200.1, Participant support costs, to
provide that allowable participant support costs under EPA assistance
agreements include:
(1) Rebates or other subsidies provided to program participants for
purchases and installations of commercially available, standard (``off
the shelf'') pollution control equipment or low emission vehicles under
the Diesel Emission Reduction Act program or programs authorized by EPA
appropriation acts and permitted by terms specified in EPA assistance
agreements or guidance, when the program participant rather than the
recipient owns the equipment.
(2) Subsidies, rebates, and other payments provided to program
beneficiaries to encourage participation in statutorily authorized
programs to encourage environmental stewardship and enable the public
to participate in EPA funded research, pollution abatement, and other
projects or programs to the extent permitted by statutes and terms
specified in EPA assistance agreements or guidance.
(b) [Reserved]
0
5. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.3 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.3 Applicability.
(a) Uniform administrative requirements and cost principles
(subparts A through E of 2 CFR part 200 as supplemented by this part)
apply to foreign public entities or foreign
[[Page 61574]]
organizations, except where EPA determines that the application of this
part would be inconsistent with the international obligations of the
United States or the statutes or regulations of a foreign government.
(b) Requirements for subrecipient monitoring and management at 2
CFR 200.331 through 200.333 do not apply to loan, loan guarantees,
interest subsidies and principal forgiveness, purchases of insurance or
local government debt or similar transactions with borrowers by
recipients of Clean Water State Revolving Fund (CWSRF) capitalization
grants and Drinking Water State Revolving Fund (DWSRF) capitalization
grants. Requirements for reporting subaward and executive compensation
in 2 CFR part 170 and internal controls described at 2 CFR 200.303
continue to apply to CWSRF and DWSRF grant recipients and borrowers.
0
6. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.8 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.8 Program income.
(a) Governmental revenues. Permit fees are governmental revenue and
not program income. (See 2 CFR 200.307(c)).
(b) Use of program income. The default use of program income for
EPA awards is addition even if the amount of program income the non-
Federal entity generates exceeds the anticipated amount at time of the
award of the assistance agreement. Unless the terms of the agreement
provide otherwise, recipients may deduct costs incidental to the
generation of program income from gross income to determine program
income, provided these costs have not been charged to any Federal
award. (See 2 CFR 200.307(b)). The program income shall be used for the
purposes and under the conditions of the assistance agreement. (See 2
CFR 200.307(e)(2)).
(c) Brownfields Revolving Loan. To continue the mission of the
Brownfields Revolving Loan fund, recipients may use EPA grant funding
prior to using program income funds generated by the revolving loan
fund. Recipients may also keep program income at the end of the
assistance agreement as long as they use these funds to continue to
operate the revolving loan fund or some other brownfield purpose as
outlined in their respective closeout agreements.
(d) Other revolving loan programs. Recipients of EPA funding for
other revolving loan fund programs may use EPA grant funding prior to
using program income funds generated by the revolving loan fund.
Recipients may also keep program income at the end of the assistance
agreement as long as they use these funds to continue to operate the
revolving loan fund or some other authorized purpose as outlined in
their closeout agreement. This paragraph (d) does not apply to EPA's
Clean Water State Revolving Fund and Drinking Water State Revolving
Fund programs which are subject to their own regulations.
0
7. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.10 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.10 General procurement standards.
(a) EPA will limit its participation in the salary rate (excluding
overhead) paid to individual consultants retained by recipients, and
their contractors or subcontractors to the maximum daily rate for level
4 of the Executive Schedule unless a greater amount is authorized by
law. (These non-Federal entities may, however, pay consultants more
than this amount with non-EPA funds.) The limitation in this paragraph
(a) applies to consultation services of designated individuals with
specialized skills who are paid at a daily or hourly rate. This rate
does not include transportation and subsistence costs for travel
performed; recipients will pay these in accordance with their normal
travel reimbursement practices.
(b) All contracts between recipients and subrecipients and
individual consultants are subject to the procurement standards in
subpart D of 2 CFR part 200. Contracts or subcontracts with multi-
employee firms for consulting services are not affected by the
limitation in paragraph (a) of this section provided the contractor or
subcontractor rather than the recipient or subrecipient selects,
directs and controls individual employees providing consulting
services.
(c) Borrowers under EPA revolving loan fund capitalization grant
programs are not subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
0
8. Amend newly redesignated Sec. 1500.13 by:
0
a. Revising paragraphs (a) introductory text, (a)(1), (c) introductory
text, and (c)(1);
0
b. Adding a semicolon at the end of paragraph (c)(2);
0
c. Removing the word ``and'' at the end of paragraph (c)(4);
0
d. Removing the period at the end of paragraph (c)(5) and adding a
semicolon in its place; and
0
e. Adding paragraphs (c)(6) through (9).
The revisions and additions read as follows:
Sec. 1500.13 Purpose and scope of this subpart.
(a) This section provides the process for the resolution of pre-
award and post-award assistance agreement disputes as described in
Sec. 1500.14, except for:
(1) Assistance agreement competition-related disputes which are
covered by EPA's Grant Competition Dispute Resolution Procedures; and,
* * * * *
(c) Determinations affecting assistance agreements made under
certain Agency decision-making processes are not subject to review
under the procedures in this subpart or the Agency's procedures for
resolving assistance agreement competition-related disputes. These
determinations include, but are not limited to:
(1) Decisions on requests for exceptions under Sec. 1500.4;
* * * * *
(6) Decisions to decline to fund non-competitive applications or
not to award incremental or supplemental funding based on the
availability of funds or agency priorities;
(7) Decisions on requests for reconsideration of specific award
conditions under 2 CFR 200.208;
(8) Decisions to deny requests for no-cost extensions under 2 CFR
200.308(e)(2), 40 CFR 35.114(b), and 40 CFR 35.514(b); and
(9) Denials of requests for EPA approval of procurement through
noncompetitive proposals under 2 CFR 200.320(c)(4).
0
9. Amend newly redesignated Sec. 1500.14 by revising paragraphs (c)
through (e) to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.14 Definitions.
* * * * *
(c) Agency Decision is the agency's initial pre-award or post-award
assistance agreement determination that may be disputed in accordance
with this subpart. The Agency Decision is sent by the Action Official
(AO) to the Affected Entity electronically and informs them of their
dispute rights and identifies the Dispute Decision Official (DDO). An
Agency Decision based on audit findings serves as EPA's Management
decision as defined in 2 CFR part 200.1.
(d) Dispute is a disagreement by an Affected Entity with a specific
Agency Decision submitted to the DDO in accordance with this subpart.
(e) Dispute Decision Official (DDO) is the designated agency
official responsible for issuing a decision resolving a Dispute.
(1) The DDO for a Headquarters Dispute is the Director of the
Grants and Interagency Agreement Management Division in the Office of
Grants and Debarment or designee. To provide for a fair and impartial
review, the AO for the challenged Agency Decision may not serve as the
Headquarters DDO.
[[Page 61575]]
(2) The DDO for a Regional Assistance Agreement Dispute is the
Regional Administrator or the official designated by the Regional
Administrator to issue the written decision resolving the Dispute. To
provide for a fair and impartial review, the AO for the challenged
Agency Decision may not serve as the Regional DDO.
* * * * *
0
10. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.15 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.15 Submission of Dispute.
An Affected Entity or its authorized representative may dispute an
Agency Decision by electronically submitting a Dispute to the DDO
identified in the Agency Decision. In order for the DDO to consider the
Dispute, it must satisfy the following requirements:
(a) Timeliness. The DDO must receive the Dispute no later than 30
calendar days from the date the Agency Decision is electronically sent
to the Affected Entity. The DDO will dismiss any Dispute received after
the 30-day period unless the DDO grants an extension of time to submit
the Dispute. The Affected Entity must submit a written request for
extension to the DDO before the expiration of the 30-day period. The
DDO may grant a one-time extension of up to 30 calendar days when
justified by the situation, which may include the unusual complexity of
the Dispute or because of exigent circumstances.
(b) Method of submission. The Affected Entity must submit the
Dispute electronically via email to the DDO, with a copy to the AO,
using the email addresses specified in the Agency Decision within the
30-day period stated in paragraph (a) of this section.
(c) Contents of Dispute. The Dispute submitted to the DDO must
include:
(1) A copy of the disputed Agency Decision;
(2) A detailed statement of the specific legal and factual grounds
for the Dispute, including copies of any supporting documents;
(3) The specific remedy or relief the Affected Entity seeks under
the Dispute; and
(4) The name and contact information, including email address, of
the Affected Entity's designated point of contact for the Dispute.
0
11. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.16 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.16 Notice of receipt of Dispute to Affected Entity.
Within 15 calendar days of receiving the Dispute, the DDO will
provide the Affected Entity a written notice, sent electronically,
acknowledging receipt of the Dispute.
(a) Timely Disputes. If the Dispute was timely submitted, the
notice of acknowledgement may identify any additional information or
documentation that is required for a thorough consideration of the
Dispute. The notice should provide no more than 30 calendar days for
the Affected Entity to provide the requested information. If it is not
feasible to identify such information or documentation in the notice
the DDO may request it at a later point in time prior to issuance of
the Dispute decision.
(b) Untimely Disputes. If the DDO did not receive the Dispute
within the required 30-day period, or any extension of it, the DDO will
notify the Affected Entity that the Dispute is being dismissed as
untimely and the Agency Decision of the AO becomes final. The dismissal
of an untimely Dispute constitutes the final agency action. In
appropriate circumstances, the DDO may, as a matter of discretion,
consider an untimely Dispute if doing so would be in the interests of
fairness and equity.
0
12. Revise newly redesignated Sec. 1500.17 to read as follows:
Sec. 1500.17 Determination of Dispute.
(a) In determining the merits of the Dispute, the DDO will consider
the record related to the Agency Decision, any documentation that the
Affected Entity submits with its Dispute, any additional documentation
submitted by the Affected Entity in response to the DDO's request under
Sec. 1500.16(a), and any other information the DDO determines is
relevant to the Dispute provided the DDO gives notice of that
information to the Affected Entity. The Affected Entity may not on its
own initiative submit any additional documents except in the support of
a request for reconsideration under paragraph (c) of this section.
(b) The DDO will issue the Dispute decision within 180 calendar
days from the date the Dispute is received by the DDO unless a longer
period is necessary based on the complexity of the legal, technical,
and factual issues presented. The DDO will notify the Affected Entity
if the expected decision will not be issued within the 180-day period
and if feasible will indicate when the decision is expected to be
issued. The DDO will issue the Dispute decision electronically and
advise the Affected Entity of procedures for requesting
reconsideration. The DDO's decision will constitute the final agency
action unless the Affected Entity electronically petitions the DDO for
reconsideration within 15 calendar days of issuance of the DDO
Decision. The Affected Entity must include a detailed statement of the
factual and legal grounds warranting reversal or modification of the
DDO decision. In addition, the Affected Entity may submit additional
documents that were not previously provided to the DDO.
(c) If a petition for reconsideration is submitted, the DDO's will
advise the Affected Entity within 15 calendar days of receipt of the
petition whether the DDO Decision will be reconsidered. The DDO will
issue this determination electronically. DDO's will only grant a
reconsideration petition if the Affected Entity provides relevant and
material evidence that was not available to the Affected Entity at the
time the Dispute was submitted or to correct a clear and prejudicial
error of fact or law. Denial of a petition for reconsideration
constitutes final agency action and the DDO will advise the Affected
Entity of the reasons for denying the reconsideration in writing.
(d) If the DDO grants a reconsideration petition, the DDO will
issue a revised DDO Decision within 30 calendar days of acceptance of
the reconsideration petition unless a longer period is necessary based
on the complexity of the legal, technical, and factual issues
presented. The DDO will issue the revised DDO Decision electronically.
The revised DDO Decision and any new material considered by the DDO in
making the revised DDO Decision will become part of the record of the
Dispute. The revised DDO Decision will constitute final agency action.
(e) The DDO may consider untimely filed reconsideration petitions
only if necessary, to correct a DDO Decision that is manifestly unfair
and inequitable in light of relevant and material evidence that the
Affected Entity could not have discovered during the 30-day period for
petitioning for reconsideration. This evidence must be submitted within
six months of the date of the DDO Decision. The DDO will advise the
Affected Entity within 30 days of receipt of an untimely filed
reconsideration petition whether the DDO will accept the petition.
Denial of an untimely filed reconsideration petition constitutes final
agency action.
[FR Doc. 2020-16894 Filed 9-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P